Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Jun;158(2):657–665. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.657

Regions of lower crossing over harbor more rare variants in African populations of Drosophila melanogaster.

P Andolfatto 1, M Przeworski 1
PMCID: PMC1461661  PMID: 11404330

Abstract

A correlation between diversity levels and rates of recombination is predicted both by models of positive selection, such as hitchhiking associated with the rapid fixation of advantageous mutations, and by models of purifying selection against strongly deleterious mutations (commonly referred to as "background selection"). With parameter values appropriate for Drosophila populations, only the first class of models predicts a marked skew in the frequency spectrum of linked neutral variants, relative to a neutral model. Here, we consider 29 loci scattered throughout the Drosophila melanogaster genome. We show that, in African populations, a summary of the frequency spectrum of polymorphic mutations is positively correlated with the meiotic rate of crossing over. This pattern is demonstrated to be unlikely under a model of background selection. Models of weakly deleterious selection are not expected to produce both the observed correlation and the extent to which nucleotide diversity is reduced in regions of low (but nonzero) recombination. Thus, of existing models, hitchhiking due to the recurrent fixation of advantageous variants is the most plausible explanation for the data.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (202.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Aguade M., Miyashita N., Langley C. H. Reduced variation in the yellow-achaete-scute region in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1989 Jul;122(3):607–615. doi: 10.1093/genetics/122.3.607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Akashi H. Within- and between-species DNA sequence variation and the 'footprint' of natural selection. Gene. 1999 Sep 30;238(1):39–51. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(99)00294-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Andolfatto P. Contrasting patterns of X-linked and autosomal nucleotide variation in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):279–290. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Andolfatto P., Przeworski M. A genome-wide departure from the standard neutral model in natural populations of Drosophila. Genetics. 2000 Sep;156(1):257–268. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.1.257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. African and North American populations of Drosophila melanogaster are very different at the DNA level. Nature. 1993 Oct 7;365(6446):548–550. doi: 10.1038/365548a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Levels of naturally occurring DNA polymorphism correlate with recombination rates in D. melanogaster. Nature. 1992 Apr 9;356(6369):519–520. doi: 10.1038/356519a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Begun D. J., Aquadro C. F. Molecular variation at the vermilion locus in geographically diverse populations of Drosophila melanogaster and D. simulans. Genetics. 1995 Jul;140(3):1019–1032. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.3.1019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Berry A. J., Ajioka J. W., Kreitman M. Lack of polymorphism on the Drosophila fourth chromosome resulting from selection. Genetics. 1991 Dec;129(4):1111–1117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.4.1111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Braverman J. M., Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L., Langley C. H., Stephan W. The hitchhiking effect on the site frequency spectrum of DNA polymorphisms. Genetics. 1995 Jun;140(2):783–796. doi: 10.1093/genetics/140.2.783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Caballero A. On the effective size of populations with separate sexes, with particular reference to sex-linked genes. Genetics. 1995 Feb;139(2):1007–1011. doi: 10.1093/genetics/139.2.1007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Cann R. L., Stoneking M., Wilson A. C. Mitochondrial DNA and human evolution. Nature. 1987 Jan 1;325(6099):31–36. doi: 10.1038/325031a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Charlesworth B. Background selection and patterns of genetic diversity in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1996 Oct;68(2):131–149. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300034029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T., Charlesworth D. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics. 1993 Aug;134(4):1289–1303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/134.4.1289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Charlesworth D., Charlesworth B., Morgan M. T. The pattern of neutral molecular variation under the background selection model. Genetics. 1995 Dec;141(4):1619–1632. doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.4.1619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen Y., Marsh B. J., Stephan W. Joint effects of natural selection and recombination on gene flow between Drosophila ananassae populations. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1185–1194. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Clark A. G., Wang L. Molecular population genetics of Drosophila immune system genes. Genetics. 1997 Oct;147(2):713–724. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.2.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Comeron J. M., Kreitman M., Aguadé M. Natural selection on synonymous sites is correlated with gene length and recombination in Drosophila. Genetics. 1999 Jan;151(1):239–249. doi: 10.1093/genetics/151.1.239. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. David J. R., Capy P. Genetic variation of Drosophila melanogaster natural populations. Trends Genet. 1988 Apr;4(4):106–111. doi: 10.1016/0168-9525(88)90098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Davies E. K., Peters A. D., Keightley P. D. High frequency of cryptic deleterious mutations in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1999 Sep 10;285(5434):1748–1751. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5434.1748. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Depaulis F., Brazier L., Mousset S., Turbe A., Veuille M. Selective sweep near the In(2L)t inversion breakpoint in an African population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 2000 Oct;76(2):149–158. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300004626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Felsenstein J. The evolutionary advantage of recombination. Genetics. 1974 Oct;78(2):737–756. doi: 10.1093/genetics/78.2.737. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Fry J. D., Keightley P. D., Heinsohn S. L., Nuzhdin S. V. New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):574–579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fu Y. X., Li W. H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 1993 Mar;133(3):693–709. doi: 10.1093/genetics/133.3.693. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gasperini R., Gibson G. Absence of protein polymorphism in the Ras genes of Drosophila melanogaster. J Mol Evol. 1999 Nov;49(5):583–590. doi: 10.1007/pl00006579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Gillespie J. H. Junk ain't what junk does: neutral alleles in a selected context. Gene. 1997 Dec 31;205(1-2):291–299. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(97)00470-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Hale L. R., Singh R. S. A comprehensive study of genic variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. IV. Mitochondrial DNA variation and the role of history vs. selection in the genetic structure of geographic populations. Genetics. 1991 Sep;129(1):103–117. doi: 10.1093/genetics/129.1.103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hamblin M. T., Aquadro C. F. Contrasting patterns of nucleotide sequence variation at the glucose dehydrogenase (Gld) locus in different populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1997 Apr;145(4):1053–1062. doi: 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hudson R. R. How can the low levels of DNA sequence variation in regions of the drosophila genome with low recombination rates be explained? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994 Jul 19;91(15):6815–6818. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.15.6815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hudson R. R., Kaplan N. L. The coalescent process and background selection. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1995 Jul 29;349(1327):19–23. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1995.0086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hudson R. R. Properties of a neutral allele model with intragenic recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1983 Apr;23(2):183–201. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(83)90013-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Irvin S. D., Wetterstrand K. A., Hutter C. M., Aquadro C. F. Genetic variation and differentiation at microsatellite loci in Drosophila simulans. Evidence for founder effects in new world populations. Genetics. 1998 Oct;150(2):777–790. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.2.777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Kaplan N. L., Hudson R. R., Langley C. H. The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. Genetics. 1989 Dec;123(4):887–899. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.4.887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Keightley P. D., Eyre-Walker A. Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):515–523. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kim Y., Stephan W. Joint effects of genetic hitchhiking and background selection on neutral variation. Genetics. 2000 Jul;155(3):1415–1427. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.3.1415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Langley C. H., Lazzaro B. P., Phillips W., Heikkinen E., Braverman J. M. Linkage disequilibria and the site frequency spectra in the su(s) and su(w(a)) regions of the Drosophila melanogaster X chromosome. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1837–1852. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Marjoram P., Donnelly P. Pairwise comparisons of mitochondrial DNA sequences in subdivided populations and implications for early human evolution. Genetics. 1994 Feb;136(2):673–683. doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.2.673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. McVean G. A., Charlesworth B. The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Genetics. 2000 Jun;155(2):929–944. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.2.929. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. McVean G. A., Vieira J. Inferring parameters of mutation, selection and demography from patterns of synonymous site evolution in Drosophila. Genetics. 2001 Jan;157(1):245–257. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.1.245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Nachman M. W., Bauer V. L., Crowell S. L., Aquadro C. F. DNA variability and recombination rates at X-linked loci in humans. Genetics. 1998 Nov;150(3):1133–1141. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Nachman M. W., Crowell S. L. Contrasting evolutionary histories of two introns of the duchenne muscular dystrophy gene, Dmd, in humans. Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):1855–1864. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1855. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Nachman M. W. Patterns of DNA variability at X-linked loci in Mus domesticus. Genetics. 1997 Nov;147(3):1303–1316. doi: 10.1093/genetics/147.3.1303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Nordborg M., Charlesworth B., Charlesworth D. The effect of recombination on background selection. Genet Res. 1996 Apr;67(2):159–174. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300033619. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Nordborg M. Structured coalescent processes on different time scales. Genetics. 1997 Aug;146(4):1501–1514. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.4.1501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Przeworski M., Hudson R. R., Di Rienzo A. Adjusting the focus on human variation. Trends Genet. 2000 Jul;16(7):296–302. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02030-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Przeworski M., Wall J. D., Andolfatto P. Recombination and the frequency spectrum in Drosophila melanogaster and Drosophila simulans. Mol Biol Evol. 2001 Mar;18(3):291–298. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a003805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Rozas J., Rozas R. DnaSP version 3: an integrated program for molecular population genetics and molecular evolution analysis. Bioinformatics. 1999 Feb;15(2):174–175. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/15.2.174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. SCHULTZ J., REDFIELD H. Interchromosomal effects on crossing over in Drosophila. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 1951;16:175–197. doi: 10.1101/sqb.1951.016.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Schlötterer C., Vogl C., Tautz D. Polymorphism and locus-specific effects on polymorphism at microsatellite loci in natural Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genetics. 1997 May;146(1):309–320. doi: 10.1093/genetics/146.1.309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Slatkin M., Wiehe T. Genetic hitch-hiking in a subdivided population. Genet Res. 1998 Apr;71(2):155–160. doi: 10.1017/s001667239800319x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Smith J. M., Haigh J. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 1974 Feb;23(1):23–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Sniegowski P. D., Pringle A., Hughes K. A. Effects of autosomal inversions on meiotic exchange in distal and proximal regions of the X chromosome in a natural population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 1994 Feb;63(1):57–62. doi: 10.1017/s0016672300032080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Stephan W., Langley C. H. DNA polymorphism in lycopersicon and crossing-over per physical length. Genetics. 1998 Dec;150(4):1585–1593. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Tachida H. Molecular evolution in a multisite nearly neutral mutation model. J Mol Evol. 2000 Jan;50(1):69–81. doi: 10.1007/s002399910008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Tajima F. DNA polymorphism in a subdivided population: the expected number of segregating sites in the two-subpopulation model. Genetics. 1989 Sep;123(1):229–240. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.1.229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):585–595. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Tajima F. The effect of change in population size on DNA polymorphism. Genetics. 1989 Nov;123(3):597–601. doi: 10.1093/genetics/123.3.597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Watterson G. A. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theor Popul Biol. 1975 Apr;7(2):256–276. doi: 10.1016/0040-5809(75)90020-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Yi S., Charlesworth B. A selective sweep associated with a recent gene transposition in Drosophila miranda. Genetics. 2000 Dec;156(4):1753–1763. doi: 10.1093/genetics/156.4.1753. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES