Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2001 Jun;158(2):681–693. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.2.681

The rate of mutation and the homozygous and heterozygous mutational effects for competitive viability: a long-term experiment with Drosophila melanogaster.

D Chavarrías 1, C López-Fanjul 1, A García-Dorado 1
PMCID: PMC1461667  PMID: 11404332

Abstract

The effect of 250 generations of mutation accumulation (MA) on the second chromosome competitive viability of Drosophila melanogaster was analyzed both in homozygous and heterozygous conditions. We used full-sib MA lines, where selection hampers the accumulation of severely deleterious mutations but is ineffective against mildly deleterious ones. A large control population was simultaneously evaluated. Competitive viability scores, unaffected by the expression of mutations in heterozygosis, were obtained relative to a Cy/L(2) genotype. The rate of decline in mean DeltaM approximately 0.1% was small. However, that of increase in variance DeltaV approximately 0.08 x 10(-3) was similar to the values obtained in previous experiments when severely deleterious mutations were excluded. The corresponding estimates of the mutation rate lambda > or = 0.01 and the average effect of mutations E(s) < or = 0.08 are in good agreement with Bateman-Mukai and minimum distance estimates for noncompetitive viability obtained from the same MA lines after 105 generations. Thus, competitive and noncompetitive viability show similar mutational properties. The regression estimate of the degree of dominance for mild-to-moderate deleterious mutations was approximately 0.3, suggesting that the pertinent value for new unselected mutations should be somewhat smaller.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (316.3 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Caballero A., Keightley P. D. A pleiotropic nonadditive model of variation in quantitative traits. Genetics. 1994 Nov;138(3):883–900. doi: 10.1093/genetics/138.3.883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Caballero A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The response to artificial selection from new mutations in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1991 May;128(1):89–102. doi: 10.1093/genetics/128.1.89. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Fernández J., López-Fanjul C. Spontaneous mutational variances and covariances for fitness-related traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1996 Jun;143(2):829–837. doi: 10.1093/genetics/143.2.829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fry J. D., Keightley P. D., Heinsohn S. L., Nuzhdin S. V. New estimates of the rates and effects of mildly deleterious mutation in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Jan 19;96(2):574–579. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.2.574. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. García-Dorado A., Caballero A. On the average coefficient of dominance of deleterious spontaneous mutations. Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):1991–2001. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. García-Dorado A., Fernández J., López-Fanjul C. Temporal uniformity of the spontaneous mutational variance of quantitative traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Genet Res. 2000 Feb;75(1):47–51. doi: 10.1017/s0016672399004267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. García-Dorado A., López-Fanjul C., Caballero A. Properties of spontaneous mutations affecting quantitative traits. Genet Res. 1999 Dec;74(3):341–350. doi: 10.1017/s0016672399004206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. García-Dorado A., Monedero J. L., López-Fanjul C. The mutation rate and the distribution of mutational effects of viability and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetica. 1998;102-103(1-6):255–265. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. KIMURA M. On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. Genetics. 1962 Jun;47:713–719. doi: 10.1093/genetics/47.6.713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Keightley P. D., Bataillon T. M. Multigeneration maximum-likelihood analysis applied to mutation-accumulation experiments in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 2000 Mar;154(3):1193–1201. doi: 10.1093/genetics/154.3.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Keightley P. D., Caballero A., García-Dorado A. Population genetics: surviving under mutation pressure. Curr Biol. 1998 Mar 26;8(7):R235–R237. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70148-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Keightley P. D., Eyre-Walker A. Terumi Mukai and the riddle of deleterious mutation rates. Genetics. 1999 Oct;153(2):515–523. doi: 10.1093/genetics/153.2.515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Keightley P. D. Nature of deleterious mutation load in Drosophila. Genetics. 1996 Dec;144(4):1993–1999. doi: 10.1093/genetics/144.4.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kondrashov A. S., Houle D. Genotype-environment interactions and the estimation of the genomic mutation rate in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc Biol Sci. 1994 Dec 22;258(1353):221–227. doi: 10.1098/rspb.1994.0166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. MUKAI T. THE GENETIC STRUCTURE OF NATURAL POPULATIONS OF DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER. I. SPONTANEOUS MUTATION RATE OF POLYGENES CONTROLLING VIABILITY. Genetics. 1964 Jul;50:1–19. doi: 10.1093/genetics/50.1.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mukai T., Chigusa S. I., Mettler L. E., Crow J. F. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1972 Oct;72(2):335–355. doi: 10.1093/genetics/72.2.335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ohnishi O. Spontaneous and ethyl methanesulfonate-induced mutations controlling viability in Drosophila melanogaster. II. Homozygous effect of polygenic mutations. Genetics. 1977 Nov;87(3):529–545. doi: 10.1093/genetics/87.3.529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Santiago E., Albornoz J., Domínguez A., Toro M. A., López-Fanjul C. The distribution of spontaneous mutations on quantitative traits and fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics. 1992 Nov;132(3):771–781. doi: 10.1093/genetics/132.3.771. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Schultz S. T., Lynch M., Willis J. H. Spontaneous deleterious mutation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 Sep 28;96(20):11393–11398. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.20.11393. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Shabalina S. A., Yampolsky LYu, Kondrashov A. S. Rapid decline of fitness in panmictic populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under relaxed natural selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Nov 25;94(24):13034–13039. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.24.13034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shaw R. G., Byers D. L., Darmo E. Spontaneous mutational effects on reproductive traits of arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):369–378. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.1.369. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES