Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Apr;166(4):1963–1979. doi: 10.1534/genetics.166.4.1963

Sibship reconstruction from genetic data with typing errors.

Jinliang Wang 1
PMCID: PMC1470831  PMID: 15126412

Abstract

Likelihood methods have been developed to partition individuals in a sample into full-sib and half-sib families using genetic marker data without parental information. They invariably make the critical assumption that marker data are free of genotyping errors and mutations and are thus completely reliable in inferring sibships. Unfortunately, however, this assumption is rarely tenable for virtually all kinds of genetic markers in practical use and, if violated, can severely bias sibship estimates as shown by simulations in this article. I propose a new likelihood method with simple and robust models of typing error incorporated into it. Simulations show that the new method can be used to infer full- and half-sibships accurately from marker data with a high error rate and to identify typing errors at each locus in each reconstructed sib family. The new method also improves previous ones by adopting a fresh iterative procedure for updating allele frequencies with reconstructed sibships taken into account, by allowing for the use of parental information, and by using efficient algorithms for calculating the likelihood function and searching for the maximum-likelihood configuration. It is tested extensively on simulated data with a varying number of marker loci, different rates of typing errors, and various sample sizes and family structures and applied to two empirical data sets to demonstrate its usefulness.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (179.4 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Blouin M. S., Parsons M., Lacaille V., Lotz S. Use of microsatellite loci to classify individuals by relatedness. Mol Ecol. 1996 Jun;5(3):393–401. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1996.tb00329.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Boehnke M., Cox N. J. Accurate inference of relationships in sib-pair linkage studies. Am J Hum Genet. 1997 Aug;61(2):423–429. doi: 10.1086/514862. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Chapman R. E., Wang J., Bourke A. F. G. Genetic analysis of spatial foraging patterns and resource sharing in bumble bee pollinators. Mol Ecol. 2003 Oct;12(10):2801–2808. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01957.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Douglas J. A., Boehnke M., Lange K. A multipoint method for detecting genotyping errors and mutations in sibling-pair linkage data. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Mar 28;66(4):1287–1297. doi: 10.1086/302861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Epstein M. P., Duren W. L., Boehnke M. Improved inference of relationship for pairs of individuals. Am J Hum Genet. 2000 Oct 13;67(5):1219–1231. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9297(07)62952-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Frankham R. Conservation genetics. Annu Rev Genet. 1995;29:305–327. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.29.120195.001513. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Gagneux P., Boesch C., Woodruff D. S. Microsatellite scoring errors associated with noninvasive genotyping based on nuclear DNA amplified from shed hair. Mol Ecol. 1997 Sep;6(9):861–868. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294x.1997.tb00140.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gerber S., Mariette S., Streiff R., Bodénès C., Kremer A. Comparison of microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers for parentage analysis. Mol Ecol. 2000 Aug;9(8):1037–1048. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.00961.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hammond R. L., Bourke A. F., Bruford M. W. Mating frequency and mating system of the polygynous ant, Leptothorax acervorum. Mol Ecol. 2001 Nov;10(11):2719–2728. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01394.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Jones Adam G., Ardren William R. Methods of parentage analysis in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 2003 Oct;12(10):2511–2523. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.2003.01928.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jones Beatrix, Clark Andrew G. Bayesian sperm competition estimates. Genetics. 2003 Mar;163(3):1193–1199. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.3.1193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kirkpatrick S., Gelatt C. D., Jr, Vecchi M. P. Optimization by simulated annealing. Science. 1983 May 13;220(4598):671–680. doi: 10.1126/science.220.4598.671. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Marshall T. C., Slate J., Kruuk L. E., Pemberton J. M. Statistical confidence for likelihood-based paternity inference in natural populations. Mol Ecol. 1998 May;7(5):639–655. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294x.1998.00374.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Sieberts Solveig K., Wijsman Ellen M., Thompson Elizabeth A. Relationship inference from trios of individuals, in the presence of typing error. Am J Hum Genet. 2001 Nov 28;70(1):170–180. doi: 10.1086/338444. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith B. R., Herbinger C. M., Merry H. R. Accurate partition of individuals into full-sib families from genetic data without parental information. Genetics. 2001 Jul;158(3):1329–1338. doi: 10.1093/genetics/158.3.1329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Taberlet P., Griffin S., Goossens B., Questiau S., Manceau V., Escaravage N., Waits L. P., Bouvet J. Reliable genotyping of samples with very low DNA quantities using PCR. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996 Aug 15;24(16):3189–3194. doi: 10.1093/nar/24.16.3189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Talbot C. C., Jr, Avramopoulos D., Gerken S., Chakravarti A., Armour J. A., Matsunami N., White R., Antonarakis S. E. The tetranucleotide repeat polymorphism D21S1245 demonstrates hypermutability in germline and somatic cells. Hum Mol Genet. 1995 Jul;4(7):1193–1199. doi: 10.1093/hmg/4.7.1193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Thomas S. C., Hill W. G. Estimating quantitative genetic parameters using sibships reconstructed from marker data. Genetics. 2000 Aug;155(4):1961–1972. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.4.1961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Thomas Stuart C., Hill William G. Sibship reconstruction in hierarchical population structures using Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques. Genet Res. 2002 Jun;79(3):227–234. doi: 10.1017/s0016672302005669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Thompson E. A. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet. 1975 Oct;39(2):173–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-1809.1975.tb00120.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Wang Jinliang, Whitlock Michael C. Estimating effective population size and migration rates from genetic samples over space and time. Genetics. 2003 Jan;163(1):429–446. doi: 10.1093/genetics/163.1.429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES