Skip to main content
PMC home page
Genetics logoLink to Genetics
. 2004 Jun;167(2):879–888. doi: 10.1534/genetics.103.025072

Rapid evolution of mammalian X-linked testis-expressed homeobox genes.

Xiaoxia Wang 1, Jianzhi Zhang 1
PMCID: PMC1470886  PMID: 15238536

Abstract

Homeobox genes encode transcription factors that function in various developmental processes and are usually evolutionarily conserved in their sequences. However, two X-chromosome-linked testis-expressed homeobox genes, one from rodents and the other from fruit flies, are known to evolve rapidly under positive Darwinian selection. Here we report yet another case, from primates. TGIFLX is an X-linked homeobox gene that originated by retroposition of the autosomal gene TGIF2, most likely in a common ancestor of rodents and primates. While TGIF2 is ubiquitously expressed, TGIFLX is exclusively expressed in adult testis. A comparison of the TGIFLX sequences among 16 anthropoid primates revealed a significantly higher rate of nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution (d(N)) than synonymous substitution (d(S)), strongly suggesting the action of positive selection. Although the high d(N)/d(S) ratio is most evident outside the homeobox, the homeobox has a d(N)/d(S) of approximately 0.89 and includes two codons that are likely under selection. Furthermore, the rate of radical amino acid substitutions that alter amino acid charge is significantly greater than that of conservative substitutions, suggesting that the selection promotes diversity of the protein charge profile. More interestingly, an analysis of 64 orthologous homeobox genes from humans and mice shows substantially higher rates of amino acid substitution in X-linked testis-expressed genes than in other genes. These results suggest a general pattern of rapid evolution of mammalian X-linked testis-expressed homeobox genes. Although the physiological function of and the exact selective agent on TGIFLX and other rapidly evolving homeobox genes are unclear, the common expression pattern of these transcription factor genes led us to conjecture that the selection is related to one or more aspects of male reproduction and may contribute to speciation.

Full Text

The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (175.6 KB).

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Banerjee-Basu S., Baxevanis A. D. Molecular evolution of the homeodomain family of transcription factors. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001 Aug 1;29(15):3258–3269. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.15.3258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bertolino E., Reimund B., Wildt-Perinic D., Clerc R. G. A novel homeobox protein which recognizes a TGT core and functionally interferes with a retinoid-responsive motif. J Biol Chem. 1995 Dec 29;270(52):31178–31188. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.52.31178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bharathan G., Janssen B. J., Kellogg E. A., Sinha N. Did homeodomain proteins duplicate before the origin of angiosperms, fungi, and metazoa? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 Dec 9;94(25):13749–13753. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Blanco-Arias Patricia, Sargent Carole A., Affara Nabeel A. The human-specific Yp11.2/Xq21.3 homology block encodes a potentially functional testis-specific TGIF-like retroposon. Mamm Genome. 2002 Aug;13(8):463–468. doi: 10.1007/s00335-002-3010-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Bürglin T. R. Analysis of TALE superclass homeobox genes (MEIS, PBC, KNOX, Iroquois, TGIF) reveals a novel domain conserved between plants and animals. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997 Nov 1;25(21):4173–4180. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.21.4173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Coyne J. A. Genetics and speciation. Nature. 1992 Feb 6;355(6360):511–515. doi: 10.1038/355511a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Dagan Tal, Talmor Yael, Graur Dan. Ratios of radical to conservative amino acid replacement are affected by mutational and compositional factors and may not be indicative of positive Darwinian selection. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Jul;19(7):1022–1025. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gehring W. J., Affolter M., Bürglin T. Homeodomain proteins. Annu Rev Biochem. 1994;63:487–526. doi: 10.1146/annurev.bi.63.070194.002415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Gehring W. J., Qian Y. Q., Billeter M., Furukubo-Tokunaga K., Schier A. F., Resendez-Perez D., Affolter M., Otting G., Wüthrich K. Homeodomain-DNA recognition. Cell. 1994 Jul 29;78(2):211–223. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90292-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Goodman M., Porter C. A., Czelusniak J., Page S. L., Schneider H., Shoshani J., Gunnell G., Groves C. P. Toward a phylogenetic classification of Primates based on DNA evidence complemented by fossil evidence. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 1998 Jun;9(3):585–598. doi: 10.1006/mpev.1998.0495. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kappen C., Schughart K., Ruddle F. H. Early evolutionary origin of major homeodomain sequence classes. Genomics. 1993 Oct;18(1):54–70. doi: 10.1006/geno.1993.1426. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Kumar S., Tamura K., Jakobsen I. B., Nei M. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Bioinformatics. 2001 Dec;17(12):1244–1245. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Lai Yi-Lun, Li Hung, Chiang Han Sun, Hsieh-Li Hsiu Mei. Expression of a novel TGIF subclass homeobox gene, Tex1, in the spermatids of mouse testis during spermatogenesis. Mech Dev. 2002 May;113(2):185–187. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4773(02)00026-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lee Y. H., Ota T., Vacquier V. D. Positive selection is a general phenomenon in the evolution of abalone sperm lysin. Mol Biol Evol. 1995 Mar;12(2):231–238. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lifschytz E., Lindsley D. L. The role of X-chromosome inactivation during spermatogenesis (Drosophila-allocycly-chromosome evolution-male sterility-dosage compensation). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1972 Jan;69(1):182–186. doi: 10.1073/pnas.69.1.182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Makalowski W., Boguski M. S. Evolutionary parameters of the transcribed mammalian genome: an analysis of 2,820 orthologous rodent and human sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Aug 4;95(16):9407–9412. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.16.9407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. McGinnis W., Garber R. L., Wirz J., Kuroiwa A., Gehring W. J. A homologous protein-coding sequence in Drosophila homeotic genes and its conservation in other metazoans. Cell. 1984 Jun;37(2):403–408. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(84)90370-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Melhuish T. A., Gallo C. M., Wotton D. TGIF2 interacts with histone deacetylase 1 and represses transcription. J Biol Chem. 2001 Jun 26;276(34):32109–32114. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M103377200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Melhuish T. A., Wotton D. The interaction of the carboxyl terminus-binding protein with the Smad corepressor TGIF is disrupted by a holoprosencephaly mutation in TGIF. J Biol Chem. 2000 Dec 15;275(50):39762–39766. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000416200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Metz E. C., Palumbi S. R. Positive selection and sequence rearrangements generate extensive polymorphism in the gamete recognition protein bindin. Mol Biol Evol. 1996 Feb;13(2):397–406. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025598. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Nei M., Gojobori T. Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol. 1986 Sep;3(5):418–426. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Page S. L., Goodman M. Catarrhine phylogeny: noncoding DNA evidence for a diphyletic origin of the mangabeys and for a human-chimpanzee clade. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2001 Jan;18(1):14–25. doi: 10.1006/mpev.2000.0895. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Podlaha Ondrej, Zhang Jianzhi. Positive selection on protein-length in the evolution of a primate sperm ion channel. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 1;100(21):12241–12246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2033555100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Rooney A. P., Zhang J. Rapid evolution of a primate sperm protein: relaxation of functional constraint or positive Darwinian selection? Mol Biol Evol. 1999 May;16(5):706–710. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Scott M. P., Weiner A. J. Structural relationships among genes that control development: sequence homology between the Antennapedia, Ultrabithorax, and fushi tarazu loci of Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Jul;81(13):4115–4119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.13.4115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Shepherd J. C., McGinnis W., Carrasco A. E., De Robertis E. M., Gehring W. J. Fly and frog homoeo domains show homologies with yeast mating type regulatory proteins. Nature. 1984 Jul 5;310(5972):70–71. doi: 10.1038/310070a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Singer Silke S., Schmitz Jürgen, Schwiegk Claudia, Zischler Hans. Molecular cladistic markers in New World monkey phylogeny (Platyrrhini, Primates). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Mar;26(3):490–501. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00312-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Smith Nick G. C. Are radical and conservative substitution rates useful statistics in molecular evolution? J Mol Evol. 2003 Oct;57(4):467–478. doi: 10.1007/s00239-003-2500-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Steiper Michael E., Ruvolo Maryellen. New World monkey phylogeny based on X-linked G6PD DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2003 Apr;27(1):121–130. doi: 10.1016/s1055-7903(02)00375-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sutton K. A., Wilkinson M. F. Rapid evolution of a homeodomain: evidence for positive selection. J Mol Evol. 1997 Dec;45(6):579–588. doi: 10.1007/pl00006262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Suzuki Y., Gojobori T. A method for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol Biol Evol. 1999 Oct;16(10):1315–1328. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Suzuki Yoshiyuki, Nei Masatoshi. Simulation study of the reliability and robustness of the statistical methods for detecting positive selection at single amino acid sites. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Nov;19(11):1865–1869. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Swanson W. J., Vacquier V. D. Extraordinary divergence and positive Darwinian selection in a fusagenic protein coating the acrosomal process of abalone spermatozoa. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 May 23;92(11):4957–4961. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.11.4957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Ting C. T., Tsaur S. C., Wu M. L., Wu C. I. A rapidly evolving homeobox at the site of a hybrid sterility gene. Science. 1998 Nov 20;282(5393):1501–1504. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Torgerson Dara G., Singh Rama S. Sex-linked mammalian sperm proteins evolve faster than autosomal ones. Mol Biol Evol. 2003 Jun 27;20(10):1705–1709. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msg193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Wang P. J., McCarrey J. R., Yang F., Page D. C. An abundance of X-linked genes expressed in spermatogonia. Nat Genet. 2001 Apr;27(4):422–426. doi: 10.1038/86927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Wayne Chad M., MacLean James A., Cornwall Gail, Wilkinson Miles F. Two novel human X-linked homeobox genes, hPEPP1 and hPEPP2, selectively expressed in the testis. Gene. 2002 Nov 13;301(1-2):1–11. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(02)01087-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Xia X., Xie Z. DAMBE: software package for data analysis in molecular biology and evolution. J Hered. 2001 Jul-Aug;92(4):371–373. doi: 10.1093/jhered/92.4.371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Yang Z., Nielsen R., Goldman N., Pedersen A. M. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure at amino acid sites. Genetics. 2000 May;155(1):431–449. doi: 10.1093/genetics/155.1.431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Zhang J., Kumar S., Nei M. Small-sample tests of episodic adaptive evolution: a case study of primate lysozymes. Mol Biol Evol. 1997 Dec;14(12):1335–1338. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a025743. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Zhang J., Nei M. Accuracies of ancestral amino acid sequences inferred by the parsimony, likelihood, and distance methods. J Mol Evol. 1997;44 (Suppl 1):S139–S146. doi: 10.1007/pl00000067. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Zhang J., Nei M. Evolution of Antennapedia-class homeobox genes. Genetics. 1996 Jan;142(1):295–303. doi: 10.1093/genetics/142.1.295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhang J., Rosenberg H. F., Nei M. Positive Darwinian selection after gene duplication in primate ribonuclease genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Mar 31;95(7):3708–3713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.7.3708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhang Jianzhi, Rosenberg Helene F. Diversifying selection of the tumor-growth promoter angiogenin in primate evolution. Mol Biol Evol. 2002 Apr;19(4):438–445. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004099. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES