Skip to main content
Genes & Development logoLink to Genes & Development
. 2006 Aug 1;20(15):2018–2023. doi: 10.1101/gad.385606

Cytokines regulate postnatal hematopoietic stem cell expansion: opposing roles of thrombopoietin and LNK

Natalija Buza-Vidas 1,3, Jennifer Antonchuk 1,3, Hong Qian 1, Robert Månsson 1, Sidinh Luc 1, Sasan Zandi 1, Kristina Anderson 1, Satoshi Takaki 2, Jens M Nygren 1, Christina T Jensen 1, Sten Eirik W Jacobsen 1,4
PMCID: PMC1536053  PMID: 16882979

Abstract

The role of cytokines as regulators of hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) expansion remains elusive. Herein, we identify thrombopoietin (THPO) and the cytokine signaling inhibitor LNK, as opposing physiological regulators of HSC expansion. Lnk−/− HSCs continue to expand postnatally, up to 24-fold above normal by 6 mo of age. Within the stem cell compartment, this expansion is highly selective for self-renewing long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs), which show enhanced THPO responsiveness. Lnk−/− HSC expansion is dependent on THPO, and 12-wk-old Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice have 65-fold fewer LT-HSCs than Lnk−/− mice. Expansions of multiple myeloid, but not lymphoid, progenitors in Lnk−/− mice also proved THPO-dependent.

Keywords: LNK, stem cells, self-renewal, hematopoiesis, thrombopoietin


As self-renewing hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are not only a requisite for sustained normal blood cell production but also of critical importance for rapid and sustained reconstitution after bone marrow (BM) transplantation, identification and clinical exploitation of the stem cell self-renewal machinery have been a long-sought goal of HSC research (Sorrentino 2004). HSCs cycle and expand extensively during fetal development and following transplantation (Pawliuk et al. 1996; Iscove and Nawa 1997), providing compelling evidence for a positive and dynamic regulation of HSC self-renewal. However, from early postnatal life the HSC compartment is sustained at a relatively constant level (Morrison et al. 1996). This tight restriction on postnatal HSC expansion, potentially reflecting the enhanced propensity of HSCs to undergo leukemic transformation (Reya et al. 2001), implicates either the coexistence of important negative regulators of HSC self-renewal, or down-regulation of positive regulators in steady-state hematopoiesis.

Although HSCs represent the best characterized somatic stem cells, the physiological regulators of HSC self-renewal and expansion remain largely unknown. However, a few intrinsic cues—including the transcriptional repressor BMI-1 (Molofsky et al. 2003; Iwama et al. 2004), the proto-oncogene MYC (Wilson et al. 2004), and the transcription factor C/EBPα (Zhang et al. 2004)—have, through lack-of-function studies, been implicated as regulators of HSC self-renewal. Further, overexpression of HoxB4 (Antonchuk et al. 2002) promotes extensive HSC expansion ex vivo, although evidence for its physiological role in HSC regulation is lacking.

Whereas the important role of hematopoietic cytokines as extracellular regulators of blood lineage development is indisputably established (Ogawa 1993), efforts to identify their expected roles as positive regulators of HSC self-renewal and expansion have been disappointing (Sauvageau et al. 2004; Sorrentino 2004; Jacobsen 2005). Despite more than two decades of exhaustive attempts to promote ex vivo HSC expansion using HSC-stimulating cytokines, most efforts have rather resulted in HSC loss, and only in a few cases has limited HSC expansion been achieved (Miller and Eaves 1997; Zhang and Lodish 2005). Consequently, the enthusiasm to utilize cytokines for HSC ex vivo expansion has waned, and whether cytokines play any role in regulating HSC expansion under physiological conditions has increasingly been questioned (Sauvageau et al. 2004; Jacobsen 2005). In fact, of all cytokines investigated, only genetic deficiencies in Thrombopoietin (Thpo) or its receptor Mpl result in reduced levels of HSCs (Kimura et al. 1998; Solar et al. 1998). As THPO efficiently suppresses apoptosis (Pestina et al. 2001) and promotes survival of HSCs (Borge et al. 1996), it has been suggested that THPO may act primarily to counteract HSC apoptosis, rather than promoting HSC expansion.

Recently, mice deficient in expression of Lnk, a member of the APS family of adaptor proteins (Yokouchi et al. 1997), were demonstrated to have a variety of hematopoietic phenotypes, including an expansion of the HSC compartment (Takaki et al. 2000; Ema et al. 2005). However, the dynamics of this expansion and the mechanism of action by which LNK might restrict HSC expansion in steady-state hematopoiesis remain unclear, as LNK acts as a broad inhibitor of growth factor and cytokine signaling pathways, including those of THPO, Kit ligand (KITL), Erythropoietin (EPO), Interleukin (IL)-3, and IL-7 (Takaki et al. 2000, 2002; Velazquez et al. 2002; Tong and Lodish 2004; Tong et al. 2005).

The present studies were designed to identify whether LNK might act as a physiological negative regulator of cytokine-induced HSC expansion, and if so what specific cytokine signaling pathway it might directly target. Herein we provide compelling evidence for LNK being a physiological negative regulator of THPO-induced postnatal expansion of self-renewing HSCs and myeloid progenitors, identifying a unique balance between opposing regulators of cytokine receptor signaling in regulating the size of the HSC and progenitor compartments.

Results and Discussion

Selective and age-dependent expansion of long-term HSCs in Lnk−/− mice

Although previous studies had established that the HSC compartment is expanded in adult Lnk−/− mice (Takaki et al. 2002; Ema et al. 2005), the role of LNK in regulating recently identified phenotypically and functionally distinct subclasses of HSCs (Adolfsson et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2005) had not been investigated.

Notably, whereas previous studies had suggested that Lnk−/− HSCs, defined as LINSCA1+KIT+CD34 (LSKCD34), are not expanded relative to wild-type HSCs prior to the age of 8 wk (Ema et al. 2005), we observed a 1.9-fold (p < 0.01) increase in Lnk−/− LSKFLT3 (LSKFLT3) cells already in 14.5 d postcoitum (dpc) fetal liver (FL) (Fig. 1A,B). The seeming discrepancy between our finding of expanded LSKFLT3 cells and no expansion of LSKCD34 cells in early development reported by Ema et al. (2005) is most likely explained by HSCs not having a LSKCD34 but rather a LSKCD34+ phenotype in early development (Ito et al. 2000), whereas HSCs are LSKFLT3 throughout development (Adolfsson et al. 2001; Christensen and Weissman 2001; L. Yang and S.E.W. Jacobsen, unpubl.). Thus, in contrast to previously published findings, our data suggest that LNK is already a negative regulator of the extensive physiological HSC expansion that takes place during this stage of fetal development (Pawliuk et al. 1996). Importantly, the expansion of Lnk−/− LSKFLT3 cells gradually increased with age, so that the numbers of Lnk−/− LSKFLT3 cells were increased relative to wild-type mice by 3.2-fold, 4.8-fold, and 8.8-fold in 2-wk-old, 15-wk-old, and 25-wk-old mice, respectively (Fig. 1A,B). Whereas LSKFLT3 cells contain pluripotent HSCs, LSKFLT3+ cells are predominantly lymphoid-primed multipotent progenitors (LMPPs) (Adolfsson et al. 2005). In striking contrast to the large expansions of LSKFLT3 cells, the LSKFLT3+ compartment was only increased 1.3- to 2.7-fold in FL or adult BM (Fig. 1B).

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Extensive age-dependent expansion of LSKCD34FLT3 LT-HSCs in Lnk−/− mice. (A) Representative FACS profiles of SCA1- and KIT-expressing cells within the LIN population, showing LSK gating (left panels), and CD34 and FLT3 expression within the LSK population (right panels), from 14.5-dpc FL and 2- to 25-wk-old BM from wild-type (WT) and Lnk−/− mice. Numbers shown are mean percentages of total cells in four to 12 mice of each genotype. (B) Mean (±SD) numbers of LSKFLT3 and LSKFLT3+ subpopulations from day 14.5 FL (n = 7–8), and 2-wk-old (n = 4), 15-wk-old (n = 12), or 25-wk-old (n = 7) BM cells in Lnk−/− mice relative to age-matched wild-type (WT) controls. (C) Mean (±SD) numbers of LSKCD34FLT3, LSKCD34+FLT3, and LSKCD34+FLT3+ cells in BM of 15-wk-old (n = 12) and 25-wk-old (n = 7) Lnk−/− mice relative to age-matched wild-type (WT) controls. Cellularities were increased 1.2- to 1.4-fold in Lnk−/− mice. (D,E) Total PB reconstitution by donor-derived cells at 16 wk after transplantation of limiting doses of wild-type (WT) or Lnk−/− 14.5-dpc FL cells (D) and 16-wk-old BM cells (E). Each symbol represents an individual recipient and bars indicate mean reconstitution in positive mice. Fractions shown above are the numbers of mice positive for lympho–myeloid reconstitution, using the threshold level of 0.1% total cells (dashed line), and 0.02% of each of the B, T, and myeloid lineages. (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01.

In adult mice, costaining for CD34 and FLT3 expression allows further discrimination between LSKCD34FLT3 long-term HSCs (LT-HSCs) and LSKCD34+FLT3 short-term HSCs (ST-HSCs) (Ito et al. 2000; Yang et al. 2005). Our analyses demonstrated dramatic 16-fold and 24-fold increases in LSKCD34FLT3 cells in 15-wk-old and 25-wk-old Lnk−/− mice, respectively (Fig. 1C). Conversely, LSKCD34+FLT3 cells were increased much less (4.1-fold and 6.3-fold, p < 0.001 and 0.01, respectively, compared with wild type). As shown in wild-type mice (Yang et al. 2005), we also found that all long-term multilineage repopulating activity was restricted to the LSKCD34FLT3 compartment in adult Lnk−/− mice (N. Buza-Vidas and S.E.W. Jacobsen, unpubl.).

We next sought to verify the expansion of LT-HSCs by functional assessment. Thus, limiting dose long-term competitive transplantation assays were performed with wild-type and Lnk−/− FL cells or adult BM cells, along with a standard competitor dose of 2 × 105 BM cells (Yang et al. 2005). In recipients of FL cells, 17 of 26 (65%) recipients of 20,000 wild-type cells and 12 of 26 (46%) recipients of 7000 Lnk−/− cells showed sustained multilineage reconstitution (Fig. 1D). This translates into a 1.7-fold increase in the frequency of LT-HSCs in Lnk−/− FLs (see Supplemental Material), in agreement with the observed 1.9-fold increase in LSKFLT3 FL cells (Fig. 1B).

Similarly, based on the frequency of multilineage reconstituted mice transplanted with 20,000 wild-type or 1000 Lnk−/− adult BM cells (Fig. 1E), a nearly 17-fold increase in the frequency of LT-HSCs was calculated for 16-wk-old Lnk−/− mice, in agreement with the 16-fold increase in LSKCD34FLT3 cells at that age (Fig. 1C). The relative contribution of Lnk−/− HSCs toward B-cell reconstitution was slightly enhanced and T cells were reduced, whereas myeloid contribution was comparable with that from wild-type cells (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Secondary transplantation of BM cells from positively reconstituted primary recipients of limiting dose transplantations (FL or BM) demonstrated that postnatally expanded Lnk−/− HSCs sustain self-renewal ability, at least comparable with that of age-matched wild-type HSCs, as the frequency of multilineage reconstituted secondary recipients of Lnk−/− cells was slightly increased when compared with that of wild-type cells (Supplementary Fig. 1B,C), in agreement with previous studies (Ema et al. 2005). However, this enhanced potential for serial reconstitution appears rather limited when compared with the extensive HSC expansion in Lnk−/− mice observed postnatally, when expansion of HSCs is normally restricted. This, together with the rather limited increase in fetal expansion of HSCs in Lnk−/− mice, suggests that the role of LNK might primarily be to limit HSC expansion during steady-state hematopoiesis, and that other, LNK-independent, mechanisms might be primarily responsible for promoting the extensive HSC expansion observed during fetal development and post-transplantation (Pawliuk et al. 1996).

At variance with previous studies (Ema et al. 2005), BrdU incorporation experiments suggested that the cycling of adult LT-HSCs is not enhanced in Lnk−/− mice (Supplementary Fig. 2). Interestingly, this suggests that the ability of LNK to suppress postnatal expansion of HSCs is not coupled to regulation over the extent of HSC proliferation. Importantly, leukemia was never observed in Lnk−/− mice or in primary or secondary recipients of Lnk−/− BM cells (N. Buza-Vidas, J. Antonchuk, and S.E.W. Jacobsen, unpubl.).

Thus, Lnk−/− mice have a selective and age-progressive expansion of the minor LT-HSC compartment, identifying LNK as a unique negative regulator selectively targeting LT-HSCs.

Expansion of LT-HSCs in Lnk−/− mice is dependent on thrombopoietin signaling

LNK has been demonstrated to directly inhibit a number of signaling pathways (Takaki et al. 2002; Velazquez et al. 2002; Tong and Lodish 2004; Tong et al. 2005), and of these the KIT and THPO pathways have been implicated as potential regulators of HSC numbers and/or function (Miller et al. 1996; Kimura et al. 1998; Solar et al. 1998). As previous studies had failed to couple increased HSC numbers in Lnk−/− mice to enhanced KIT function (Takaki et al. 2002; Ema et al. 2005), we sought here to establish whether LNK-induced inhibition of HSC expansion might depend on THPO signaling.

Whereas the expression of Bmi-1 and HoxB4 as determined by Q-PCR analysis was virtually unaffected in Lnk−/− LSKCD34FLT3 cells, Mpl expression was slightly increased (1.6-fold) (Fig. 2A). Notably, the in vitro THPO proliferative responsiveness of single Lnk−/− LSKCD34FLT3 cells was enhanced both with regard to the number (2.5-fold) and size (6.3-fold) of the clones formed (Fig. 2B). Furthermore, LSKCD34+FLT3 (ST-HSCs) were less responsive to THPO overall, their THPO responsiveness was only marginally enhanced in the Lnk-deficient setting, and neither wild-type nor Lnk−/− LSKCD34+FLT3hi (LMPPs) responded to THPO (Fig. 2B). These results are in agreement with the selective expansion of LT-HSCs in Lnk−/− mice, potentially via its interaction with THPO signaling. In further support of this, Mpl and Lnk expression were highest in LSKCD34FLT3 cells, and much lower in LSKCD34+FLT3hi cells (Fig. 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Enhanced proliferative responsiveness of Lnk−/− HSCs to thrombopoietin. (A) Bmi-1, Hoxb4, and Mpl mRNA expression levels in LSKCD34FLT3 cells from 12-wk-old wild-type (WT) and Lnk−/− mice, as determined by Q-PCR. Mean (±SEM) expression levels, relative to HPRT, from two to three experiments. (B) Mean (±SD) number of proliferative clones per 60 single LSKCD34FLT3, LSKCD34+FLT3, or LSKCD34+FLT3+ cells seeded in 50 ng/mL THPO. Open bars indicate mean number of total clones, closed bars indicate number of clones >10 cells, from three experiments. (*) p < 0.05 total number of clones; (‸‸) p < 0.01 number of large clones. (C) Mpl and Lnk mRNA expression levels in 2000 wild-type LSKCD34FLT3, LSKCD34+FLT3, or LSKCD34+FLT3+ BM cells, as determined by Q-PCR. Mean (±SEM) expression levels, relative to HPRT, from three to five experiments. (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01.

The above findings, combined with the documented ability of LNK to directly inhibit THPO-induced signaling (Tong and Lodish 2004), suggested a model in which expansion of LT-HSCs in Lnk−/− mice involves THPO signaling. Thus, we next studied the requirement of THPO in expansion of Lnk−/− HSCs by examining the HSC compartment in mice lacking both Lnk and Tpo expression. Strikingly, the extensive expansion of LSKCD34FLT3 cells in Lnk−/− as compared with wild-type mice (17-fold) could not be observed when comparing 12-wk-old Thpo−/− and Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice (Fig. 3A,B). In fact, the number of LSKCD34FLT3 cells were reduced by 88% (p < 0.001) in Thpo−/− mice and by 82% in Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice, giving a 100-fold difference in LSKCD34FLT3 numbers between Lnk−/− and Lnk−/− Thpo−/− mice (Fig. 3A,B).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

HSC expansion in Lnk-deficient mice is dependent on THPO. (A) Representative FACS profiles of SCA1- and KIT-expressing cells within the LIN population, showing LSK gating (top panels), and CD34 and FLT3 expression within the LSK population (bottom panels), in BM from 12-wk-old wild-type (WT), Lnk−/−, Thpo−/−, or Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice (n = 5 each). Numbers shown are mean percentages of total cells in each subpopulation. (B) Mean (±SD) absolute numbers of LSKCD34FLT3, LSKCD34+FLT3, and LSKCD34+FLT3+ cells per two femurs and two tibias in 12-wk-old mice (n = 5 per genotype). (C) CRU numbers (±95% confidence intervals) in two femurs and two tibias of BM from wild-type (WT), Lnk−/−, Thpo−/−, and Lnk−/−Thpo−/− 12-wk-old mice, averaged from two replicate experiments. (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01; (***) p < 0.001; (ns) not significant.

Limiting dilution transplantation experiments—where positively reconstituted mice were defined as having at least 0.1% donor-derived total blood cells and 0.02% myeloid, B-, and T-lymphoid donor-derived cells at 4 mo post-transplant (Materials and Methods)—were in agreement with the LSKCD34FLT3 analysis, in that long-term competitive repopulating units (CRUs) were increased as much as 25-fold in Lnk−/− relative to wild-type mice (p < 0.001) and extensively decreased in Thpo−/− mice (18-fold, p < 0.001). Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice had CRU values sevenfold above that in Thpo−/− mice (p = 0.0038), but still significantly lower than wild-type mice (p = 0.0078), giving a 65-fold difference in CRUs between Lnk−/− and Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice. Similar differences were observed when setting the threshold values for total and lineage reconstitution at a higher level (1.0% and 0.05%, respectively) (Supplementary Fig. 3).

Thus, the phenotypic and functional evaluations of HSC numbers demonstrate that the expansion of HSCs in Lnk−/− mice is largely THPO-dependent, supporting that LNK restricts LT-HSC expansion at least in part through inhibiting THPO-stimulated HSC expansion.

The expansion of LSKCD34+FLT3 ST-HSCs due to Lnk deficiency was also reduced when comparing Thpo−/− and Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice (Fig. 3A,B). Conversely, the slight (twofold, p < 0.01) expansion of LSKCD34+FLT3+ cells in Lnk−/− mice did not appear to involve THPO signaling (Fig. 3A,B), in agreement with the inability of LMPPs to respond to THPO, and implicating LNK targeting of other pathways in LMPPs.

The expression of Lnk in HSCs, the enhanced THPO responsiveness of purified Lnk−/− HSCs, and the HSC phenotype in Lnk−/− mice reflecting the restricted pattern of MPL expression on HSCs all support a cell-autonomous increase in HSC numbers in Lnk−/− mice. To further investigate this, we compared reconstitution levels of wild-type BM cells transplanted into lethally irradiated wild-type and Lnk−/− recipients (Supplementary Fig. 4). As long-term multilineage reconstitution was in fact slightly lower in Lnk−/− than wild-type recipients, these findings support that the expansion of HSCs in Lnk−/− mice is due to an intrinsic loss of LNK function in LT-HSCs.

LNK inhibits THPO-dependent expansion of colony-forming unit-spleen (CFU-S) and myelo–erythroid progenitors

We next explored to what degree the reported increases of myeloid and B lymphoid progenitors in Lnk−/− mice (Velazquez et al. 2002) and corresponding decrease of myeloid progenitors in Thpo−/− mice (Carver-Moore et al. 1996) could also reflect LNK-mediated inhibition of THPO-dependent expansion of committed myeloid progenitors.

The CFU-S assay detects multipotent myelo–erythroid progenitors with limited self-renewal ability (Till and McCulloch 1961). Adult Lnk−/− mice had a 2.6-fold expansion of day 12 CFU-S, whereas these were decreased to 18% of wild type in Thpo−/− mice (Fig. 4A). As CFU-S numbers were comparable in Thpo−/− and Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice, the CFU-S expansion observed in Lnk−/− mice also proved to be strictly dependent on THPO signaling.

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

THPO-dependent expansion of CFU-S and myelo–erythroid progenitors in Lnk−/− mice. (A–D) Mean (±SD) numbers in 12-wk-old adult BM of wild-type (WT), Lnk−/−, Thpo−/−, and Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice of day 12 CFU-S per 100,000 BM cells (n = 3 per genotype, 4 recipients each) (A); CFU-GM per 10,000 cells plated (n = 6–7 each) (B); BFU-E per 100,000 cells plated (n = 4–5 each) (C); CFU-Mk per 100,000 cells plated (n = 4–5 each) (D). (E) Mean (± SD) percentage of BM B220+IgM cells (n = 5–6). (*) p < 0.05; (**) p < 0.01; (***) p < 0.001; (ns) not significant.

Committed granulocyte-macrophage (CFU-GM) (Fig. 4B), erythroid (BFU-E) (Fig. 4C), and megakaryocyte (CFU-Mk) (Fig. 4D) progenitors were all increased in Lnk−/− mice and reduced in Thpo−/− mice, and, similar to CFU-S, their increase in Lnk−/− mice was entirely THPO-dependent.

In agreement with previous studies (Takaki et al. 2000; Velazquez et al. 2002), we also found early B220+ IgM B cells to be expanded in the BM of Lnk−/− mice, but, in contrast to myeloid progenitors, this expansion was entirely THPO-independent (Fig. 4E), in agreement with B cells being unaffected in Thpo−/− mice (de Sauvage et al. 1996). The coupling of LNK and THPO as opposing regulators of myeloid but not lymphoid lineage development was also evident in peripheral blood (PB) (Table 1), as the increase in PB lymphocytes in Lnk−/− mice was THPO-independent, whereas the increases in neutrophils, monocytes, eosinophils, and platelets were all THPO-dependent.

Table 1.

THPO-dependent expansion of myeloid but not lymphoid lineages in Lnk-deficient mice

graphic file with name 2018tbl1.jpg

Data shown are mean (±SD) values from four to five mice (12 wk old) per genotype.

ap < 0.05, bp < 0.01, cp < 0.001 in Lnk−/− compared with wild type mice.

dp < 0.05, ep < 0.001 in Lnk−/−Thpo−/− compared with Thpo−/− mice.

In conclusion, these studies demonstrate that Lnk−/− mice have progressive and selective increases in LT-HSCs and myeloid progenitors that are dependent on THPO signaling. The idea that LNK and THPO might function as interacting but opposing physiological regulators of HSC expansion is strongly supported by several lines of evidence. First, signaling studies of Lnk−/− cells demonstrate that LNK is a direct inhibitor of THPO-induced signaling (Tong and Lodish 2004), and in agreement with this we demonstrate here that Lnk−/− LT-HSCs are hyperresponsive to THPO. Second, the HSC and myeloid phenotypes of Lnk−/− and Thpo−/− mice closely oppose each other, qualitatively as well as quantitatively. Third, when compared with ST-HSCs and LMPPs, LT-HSCs express higher levels of Mpl and Lnk, and in agreement with this, Lnk−/− LT-HSCs show the most enhanced responsiveness to THPO. Finally and most importantly, studies of Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice demonstrate that the LT-HSC as well as myeloid progenitor cell expansion in Lnk−/− mice are dependent on THPO. The fact that this THPO-dependence is restricted to HSCs and myeloid progenitors on which MPL has been shown to be expressed, but not on LMPPs or lymphoid progenitors that fail to respond to THPO, confirms the expected specificity of the opposing interaction of THPO and LNK.

These studies demonstrate, for the first time, the importance of interaction between positive and negative regulators of cytokine signaling in controlling HSC expansion. The findings demonstrate that THPO, under physiological conditions in steady-state adult hematopoiesis, not only promotes HSC survival as previously suggested, but also stimulates HSC expansion, the extent of which is tightly restricted through the ability of LNK to negatively regulate THPO signaling. The possibility of specifically targeting these potent stimulatory and inhibitory pathways for HSC expansion should trigger renewed interest and efforts toward exploitation of cytokine pathways to promote ex vivo HSC expansion for therapeutic purposes.

Materials and methods

Mice

The Lnk−/− mouse strain was generated as previously described (Takaki et al. 2000), and the Thpo−/− strain was generated by Dr. F. de Sauvage at Genentech, Inc. (San Francisco, CA) (de Sauvage et al. 1996). Both strains were backcrossed to C57Bl/6 mice for >10 generations. Lnk−/− mice were mated to Thpo−/− to generate Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice. C57Bl/6 wild-type mice were used as controls. All animal protocols were approved by the local ethics committee at Lund University.

Isolation of hematopoietic cells and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) analysis of LIN−/loSCA1+KIT+ (LSK) subpopulations

BM cells were collected from femurs and tibias by crushing in a mortar. FLs were obtained from time-matched pregnant wild-type and Lnk−/− mice at 14.5 dpc. Modifications of previously described procedures (Adolfsson et al. 2005; Yang et al. 2005) were used to evaluate the distribution of cells within the LSK compartment. For more detailed information, see the Supplemental Material.

Competitive repopulation assay

The competitive repopulation assay using the congenic CD45.1/CD45.2 mouse model has been described previously (Szilvassy et al. 1990; Yang et al. 2005). Briefly, CD45.2 donor FL or BM cells were injected intravenously along with 200,000 competitor CD45.1 BM cells into lethally irradiated (900–975 cGy) CD45.1 hosts. Transplant doses (ranging from 500 to 106 cells) were approximated to contain a limiting repopulating cell dose. PB was collected 16 wk after transplantation and analyzed for donor reconstitution by FACS. Positively reconstituted mice were defined as having a minimum of 0.1% CD45.2+ total cells and 0.02% CD45.2+ cells of each of the myeloid (Mac-1+), B (B220+), and T (CD4/CD8+) lineages, and CRU frequencies in the test BM sample were calculated using Limit Dilution Analysis software (StemCell Technologies, Inc.). For more detailed information, see the Supplemental Material.

In vitro clonogenic progenitor assays

Single wild-type or Lnk−/− LSKCD34FLT3, LSKCD34+FLT3, or LSKCD34+FLT3hi BM cells were seeded into individual wells of Terasaki plates in 20 μL serum-free medium (X-vivo15; BioWhittaker), supplemented with 1% bovine serum albumin (StemCell Technologies, Inc.) and 50 ng/mL human THPO for 10 d, at which time wells were scored for clonal growth as previously described (Adolfsson et al. 2005). CFU-GM, BFU-E, and CFU-Mk in unfractionated BM cells were evaluated in methylcellulose cultures as previously described (Adolfsson et al. 2005). For more detailed information, see the Supplemental Material.

Q-PCR

Two thousand LSKCD34FLT3, LSKCD34+FLT3, and LSKCD34+FLT3hi BM cells from 12-wk-old wild-type or Lnk−/− mice were subjected to Q-PCR analysis as recently described (Adolfsson et al. 2005). Assays-on-Demand probes (InVitrogen) used were HPRT Mm00446968_m1, Lnk Mm00493156_m1, Mpl Mm00440310_m1, Hoxb4 Mm00657964_m1, and Bmi-1 Mm00776122_gH. All experiments were performed in triplicate and differences in cDNA input were compensated by normalization against HPRT expression levels.

CFU-S

BM cells (range 50,000–150,000) from adult wild-type, Lnk−/−, Thpo−/−, or Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice were transplanted into lethally irradiated wild-type recipients, and 12 d after transplantation macroscopic colonies were evaluated after fixation of spleens in Tellesnicky’s fixative, as previously described (Yang et al. 2005).

Peripheral blood cell analysis

PB was collected from the retro-orbital sinus into EDTA-coated tubes (Sarstedt) and analyzed in an automated cell counter (Sysmex). Differential counts were also obtained by microscopic examination of May-Grünwald/Giemsa-stained PB smears.

Statistics

Unless otherwise stated, the statistical significance of differences between wild-type, Lnk−/−, Thpo−/−, and Lnk−/−Thpo−/− mice was determined using the two-tailed Mann-Whitney test.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. John Adamson for providing the Thpo−/− mice. The expert technical assistance of Anna Fossum, Zhi Ma, Lilian Wittman, Ingbritt Åstrand-Grundström, Marie Magnusson, Therese Blidberg, Jalal Taneera, Stuart Walsh, and Gunilla Gärdebring is highly appreciated. We also thank Dr. Warren Alexander for critical review of the manuscript. These studies were supported by grants from ALF (Government Public Health Grant), Alfred Österlund Foundation, the Swedish Research Council, the Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF), the Swedish Cancer Society, and the EU project LHSB-CT-2003-503005 (EuroStemCell). J.A. is supported by a fellowship from the Leukemia and Lymphoma Society. The Lund Stem Cell Center is supported by a Center of Excellence grant from SSF.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available at http://www.genesdev.org.

References

  1. Adolfsson J., Borge O.J., Bryder D., Theilgaard-Monch K., Astrand-Grundstrom I., Sitnicka E., Sasaki Y., Jacobsen S.E. Upregulation of Flt3 expression within the bone marrow Lin−Sca1+c-kit+ stem cell compartment is accompanied by loss of self-renewal capacity. Immunity. 2001;15:659–669. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(01)00220-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Adolfsson J., Mansson R., Buza-Vidas N., Hultquist A., Liuba K., Jensen C.T., Bryder D., Yang L., Borge O.J., Thoren L.A., et al. Identification of Flt3+ lympho–myeloid stem cells lacking erythro–megakaryocytic potential a revised road map for adult blood lineage commitment. Cell. 2005;121:295–306. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Antonchuk J., Sauvageau G., Humphries R.K. HOXB4-induced expansion of adult hematopoietic stem cells ex vivo. Cell. 2002;109:39–45. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00697-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Borge O.J., Ramsfjell V., Veiby O.P., Murphy M.J., Jr., Lok S., Jacobsen S.E. Thrombopoietin, but not erythropoietin promotes viability and inhibits apoptosis of multipotent murine hematopoietic progenitor cells in vitro. Blood. 1996;88:2859–2870. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Carver-Moore K., Broxmeyer H.E., Luoh S.M., Cooper S., Peng J., Burstein S.A., Moore M.W., de Sauvage F.J. Low levels of erythroid and myeloid progenitors in thrombopoietin-and c-mpl-deficient mice. Blood. 1996;88:803–808. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Christensen J.L., Weissman I.L. Flk-2 is a marker in hematopoietic stem cell differentiation: A simple method to isolate long-term stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2001;98:14541–14546. doi: 10.1073/pnas.261562798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. de Sauvage F.J., Carver-Moore K., Luoh S.M., Ryan A., Dowd M., Eaton D.L., Moore M.W. Physiological regulation of early and late stages of megakaryocytopoiesis by thrombopoietin. J. Exp. Med. 1996;183:651–656. doi: 10.1084/jem.183.2.651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ema H., Sudo K., Seita J., Matsubara A., Morita Y., Osawa M., Takatsu K., Takaki S., Nakauchi H. Quantification of self-renewal capacity in single hematopoietic stem cells from normal and Lnk-deficient mice. Dev. Cell. 2005;8:907–914. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2005.03.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Iscove N.N., Nawa K. Hematopoietic stem cells expand during serial transplantation in vivo without apparent exhaustion. Curr. Biol. 1997;7:805–808. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(06)00341-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Ito T., Tajima F., Ogawa M. Developmental changes of CD34 expression by murine hematopoietic stem cells. Exp. Hematol. 2000;28:1269–1273. doi: 10.1016/s0301-472x(00)00535-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Iwama A., Oguro H., Negishi M., Kato Y., Morita Y., Tsukui H., Ema H., Kamijo T., Katoh-Fukui Y., Koseki H., et al. Enhanced self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells mediated by the polycomb gene product Bmi-1. Immunity. 2004;21:843–851. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.11.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Jacobsen S.E. Defining ‘stemness’: Notch and Wnt join forces? Nat. Immunol. 2005;6:234–236. doi: 10.1038/ni0305-234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kimura S., Roberts A.W., Metcalf D., Alexander W.S. Hematopoietic stem cell deficiencies in mice lacking c-Mpl, the receptor for thrombopoietin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1998;95:1195–1200. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.3.1195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Miller C.L., Eaves C.J. Expansion in vitro of adult murine hematopoietic stem cells with transplantable lympho–myeloid reconstituting ability. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1997;94:13648–13653. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.25.13648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Miller C.L., Rebel V.I., Lemieux M.E., Helgason C.D., Lansdorp P.M., Eaves C.J. Studies of W mutant mice provide evidence for alternate mechanisms capable of activating hematopoietic stem cells. Exp. Hematol. 1996;24:185–194. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Molofsky A.V., Pardal R., Iwashita T., Park I.K., Clarke M.F., Morrison S.J. Bmi-1 dependence distinguishes neural stem cell self-renewal from progenitor proliferation. Nature. 2003;425:962–967. doi: 10.1038/nature02060. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Morrison S.J., Wandycz A.M., Akashi K., Globerson A., Weissman I.L. The aging of hematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Med. 1996;2:1011–1016. doi: 10.1038/nm0996-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Ogawa M. Differentiation and proliferation of hematopoietic stem cells. Blood. 1993;81:2844–2853. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Pawliuk R., Eaves C., Humphries R.K. Evidence of both ontogeny and transplant dose-regulated expansion of hematopoietic stem cells in vivo. Blood. 1996;88:2852–2858. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Pestina T.I., Cleveland J.L., Yang C., Zambetti G.P., Jackson C.W. Mpl ligand prevents lethal myelosuppression by inhibiting p53-dependent apoptosis. Blood. 2001;98:2084–2090. doi: 10.1182/blood.v98.7.2084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Reya T., Morrison S.J., Clarke M.F., Weissman I.L. Stem cells, cancer, and cancer stem cells. Nature. 2001;414:105–111. doi: 10.1038/35102167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Sauvageau G., Iscove N.N., Humphries R.K. In vitro and in vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:7223–7232. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207942. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Solar G.P., Kerr W.G., Zeigler F.C., Hess D., Donahue C., de Sauvage F.J., Eaton D.L. Role of c-mpl in early hematopoiesis. Blood. 1998;92:4–10. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sorrentino B.P. Clinical strategies for expansion of haematopoietic stem cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2004;4:878–888. doi: 10.1038/nri1487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Szilvassy S.J., Humphries R.K., Lansdorp P.M., Eaves A.C., Eaves C.J. Quantitative assay for totipotent reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells by a competitive repopulation strategy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 1990;87:8736–8740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.22.8736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Takaki S., Sauer K., Iritani B.M., Chien S., Ebihara Y., Tsuji K., Takatsu K., Perlmutter R.M. Control of B cell production by the adaptor protein lnk. Definition of a conserved family of signal-modulating proteins. Immunity. 2000;13:599–609. doi: 10.1016/s1074-7613(00)00060-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Takaki S., Morita H., Tezuka Y., Takatsu K. Enhanced hematopoiesis by hematopoietic progenitor cells lacking intracellular adaptor protein, Lnk. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:151–160. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Till J.E., McCulloch E.A. A direct measurement of the radiation sensitivity of normal mouse bone marrow cells. Radiat. Res. 1961;14:213–222. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Tong W., Lodish H.F. Lnk inhibits Tpo-mpl signaling and Tpo-mediated megakaryocytopoiesis. J. Exp. Med. 2004;200:569–580. doi: 10.1084/jem.20040762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Tong W., Zhang J., Lodish H.F. Lnk inhibits erythropoiesis and Epo-dependent JAK2 activation and downstream signaling pathways. Blood. 2005;105:4604–4612. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-10-4093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Velazquez L., Cheng A.M., Fleming H.E., Furlonger C., Vesely S., Bernstein A., Paige C.J., Pawson T. Cytokine signaling and hematopoietic homeostasis are disrupted in Lnk-deficient mice. J. Exp. Med. 2002;195:1599–1611. doi: 10.1084/jem.20011883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Wilson A., Murphy M.J., Oskarsson T., Kaloulis K., Bettess M.D., Oser G.M., Pasche A.C., Knabenhans C., Macdonald H.R., Trumpp A. c-Myc controls the balance between hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. Genes & Dev. 2004;18:2747–2763. doi: 10.1101/gad.313104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Yang L., Bryder D., Adolfsson J., Nygren J., Mansson R., Sigvardsson M., Jacobsen S.E. Identification of Lin−Sca1+kit+CD34+Flt3− short-term hematopoietic stem cells capable of rapidly reconstituting and rescuing myeloablated transplant recipients. Blood. 2005;105:2717–2723. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-06-2159. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Yokouchi M., Suzuki R., Masuhara M., Komiya S., Inoue A., Yoshimura A. Cloning and characterization of APS, an adaptor molecule containing PH and SH2 domains that is tyrosine phosphorylated upon B-cell receptor stimulation. Oncogene. 1997;15:7–15. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1201163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Zhang C.C., Lodish H.F. Murine hematopoietic stem cells change their surface phenotype during ex vivo expansion. Blood. 2005;105:4314–4320. doi: 10.1182/blood-2004-11-4418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Zhang P., Iwasaki-Arai J., Iwasaki H., Fenyus M.L., Dayaram T., Owens B.M., Shigematsu H., Levantini E., Huettner C.S., Lekstrom-Himes J.A., et al. Enhancement of hematopoietic stem cell repopulating capacity and self-renewal in the absence of the transcription factor C/EBP α. Immunity. 2004;21:853–863. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2004.11.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Genes & Development are provided here courtesy of Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press

RESOURCES