Abstract
Endocrinological studies have contributed considerably to the development of theory concerning the proximate aspects of the timing of reproduction. In non-domesticated, avian species, the relative importance of the photoperiodic and non-photoperiodic factors influencing later stages of the breeding cycle, such as the onset of egg laying, remains unclear because egg laying is difficult to obtain with captive populations and laboratory experiments of breeding are rarely carried out in the framework of long-term field studies. We set up a special experimental design such that captive Mediterranean blue tits (Parus caeruleus) can breed with success in large outdoor aviaries at similar latitudes and altitudes to their wild counterparts. Here we demonstrate experimentally that the non-photoperiodic factors responsible for large and consistent differences in the expression of natural breeding responses between three captive outdoor blue tit populations are ignored during long-day treatment. Based on these findings, an evolutionary explanation is provided for why the relative importance of the non-photoperiodic factors decreases with the progress of the season. The hypothesis can explain observed maladapted breeding dates in free-living populations and could possibly be used to increase the success of breeding programmes with some endangered, captive, non-domesticated, photoperiodic species.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (148.1 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Blondel J, Dias PC, Perret P, Maistre M, Lambrechts MM. Selection-Based Biodiversity at a Small Spatial Scale in a Low-Dispersing Insular Bird. Science. 1999 Aug 27;285(5432):1399–1402. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5432.1399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cohen D. Optimizing reproduction in a randomly varying environment when a correlation may exist between the conditions at the time a choice has to be made and the subsequent outcome. J Theor Biol. 1967 Jul;16(1):1–14. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(67)90050-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dawkins M. S. Evolution and animal welfare. Q Rev Biol. 1998 Sep;73(3):305–328. doi: 10.1086/420307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- FARNER D. S. Comparative physiology: photoperiodicity. Annu Rev Physiol. 1961;23:71–96. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ph.23.030161.000443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lambrechts M. M., Blondel J., Maistre M., Perret P. A single response mechanism is responsible for evolutionary adaptive variation in a bird's laying date. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997 May 13;94(10):5153–5155. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maney D. L., Hahn T. P., Schoech S. J., Sharp P. J., Morton M. L., Wingfield J. C. Effects of ambient temperature on photo-induced prolactin secretion in three subspecies of white-crowned sparrow, Zonotrichia leucophrys. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1999 Mar;113(3):445–456. doi: 10.1006/gcen.1998.7219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meijer T., Schwabl H. Hormonal patterns in breeding and nonbreeding kestrels, Falco tinnunculus: field and laboratory studies. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1989 Apr;74(1):148–160. doi: 10.1016/0016-6480(89)90123-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- doi: 10.1098/rspb.1999.0780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [Google Scholar]
- Silverin B., Massa R., Stokkan K. A. Photoperiodic adaptation to breeding at different latitudes in great tits. Gen Comp Endocrinol. 1993 Apr;90(1):14–22. doi: 10.1006/gcen.1993.1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Silverin B., Westin J. Influence of the opposite sex on photoperiodically induced LH and gonadal cycles in willow tit (Parus montanus). Horm Behav. 1995 Jun;29(2):207–215. doi: 10.1006/hbeh.1995.1015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]