Abstract
Revisionary taxonomy is frequently dismissed as merely descriptive, which belies its strong intellectual content and hypothesis-driven nature. Funding for taxonomy is inadequate and largely diverted to studies of phylogeny that neither improve classifications nor nomenclature. Phylogenetic classifications are optimal for storing and predicting information, but phylogeny divorced from taxonomy is ephemeral and erodes the accuracy and information content of the language of biology. Taxonomic revisions and monographs are efficient, high-throughput species hypothesis-testing devices that are ideal for the World Wide Web. Taxonomic knowledge remains essential to credible biological research and is made urgent by the biodiversity crisis. Theoretical and technological advances and threats of mass species extinctions indicate that this is the time for a renaissance in taxonomy. Clarity of vision and courage of purpose are needed from individual taxonomists and natural history museums to bring about this evolution of taxonomy into the information age.
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (161.4 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Agosti Donat, Johnson Norman F. Taxonomists need better access to published data. Nature. 2002 May 16;417(6886):222–222. doi: 10.1038/417222b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benton M. J. Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2000 Nov;75(4):633–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185x.2000.tb00055.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bisby Frank A., Shimura Junko, Ruggiero Michael, Edwards James, Haeuser Christoph. Taxonomy, at the click of a mouse. Nature. 2002 Jul 25;418(6896):367–367. doi: 10.1038/418367a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blaxter Mark L. The promise of a DNA taxonomy. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):669–679. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blaxter Mark. Molecular systematics: Counting angels with DNA. Nature. 2003 Jan 9;421(6919):122–124. doi: 10.1038/421122a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dalton Rex. Natural history collections in crisis as funding is slashed. Nature. 2003 Jun 5;423(6940):575–575. doi: 10.1038/423575a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daly D. C., Cameron K. M., Stevenson D. W. Plant systematics in the age of genomics. Plant Physiol. 2001 Dec;127(4):1328–1333. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Godfray H. Charles J. Challenges for taxonomy. Nature. 2002 May 2;417(6884):17–19. doi: 10.1038/417017a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Graybeal A. Is it better to add taxa or characters to a difficult phylogenetic problem? Syst Biol. 1998 Mar;47(1):9–17. doi: 10.1080/106351598260996. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hebert Paul D. N., Cywinska Alina, Ball Shelley L., deWaard Jeremy R. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci. 2003 Feb 7;270(1512):313–321. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hillis D. M. Taxonomic sampling, phylogenetic accuracy, and investigator bias. Syst Biol. 1998 Mar;47(1):3–8. doi: 10.1080/106351598260987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hillis David M., Pollock David D., McGuire Jimmy A., Zwickl Derrick J. Is sparse taxon sampling a problem for phylogenetic inference? Syst Biol. 2003 Feb;52(1):124–126. doi: 10.1080/10635150390132911. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Knapp Sandra, Lamas Gerardo, Lughadha Eimear Nic, Novarino Gianfranco. Stability or stasis in the names of organisms: the evolving codes of nomenclature. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2004 Apr 29;359(1444):611–622. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2003.1445. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qiu Y. L., Lee J., Bernasconi-Quadroni F., Soltis D. E., Soltis P. S., Zanis M., Zimmer E. A., Chen Z., Savolainen V., Chase M. W. The earliest angiosperms: evidence from mitochondrial, plastid and nuclear genomes. Nature. 1999 Nov 25;402(6760):404–407. doi: 10.1038/46536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodman James E., Cody Jeannine H. The taxonomic impediment overcome: NSF's Partnerships for Enhancing Expertise in Taxonomy (PEET) as a model. Syst Biol. 2003 Jun;52(3):428–435. doi: 10.1080/10635150390197055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Smith Gideon F., Steenkamp Yolande, Klopper Ronell R., Siebert Stefan J., Arnold Trevor H. The price of collecting life. Nature. 2003 Mar 27;422(6930):375–376. doi: 10.1038/422375a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Whiting Michael F., Bradler Sven, Maxwell Taylor. Loss and recovery of wings in stick insects. Nature. 2003 Jan 16;421(6920):264–267. doi: 10.1038/nature01313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]