Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 1976 Oct;32(4):547–552. doi: 10.1128/aem.32.4.547-552.1976

Membrane filter method for recovery of fecal coliforms in chlorinated sewage effluents.

S D Lin
PMCID: PMC170303  PMID: 791122

Abstract

The standard one-step M-FC broth-membrane-filter procedure for recovery of fecal coliforms from chlorinated sewage effluents is much less effective than the multiple-tube (most-probable-number) technique. A two-step membrane-filter method, using a pre-enrichment technique with phenol red lactose broth and incubation at 35 degrees C for 4 h, followether 18+/-2 h, enhanced fecal coliform recovery from chlorinated effluents. The results of 126 comparisons using chlorinated effluents from five wastewater plants showed that fecal coliform recovery by using the two-step membrane-filter method is comparable to that using the multiple-tube procedure.

Full text

PDF
552

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Braswell J. R., Hoadley A. W. Recovery of Escherichia coli from chlorinated secondary sewage. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Aug;28(2):328–329. doi: 10.1128/am.28.2.328-329.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dutka B. J., Jackson M. J., Bell J. B. Comparison of autoclave and ethylene oxide-sterilized membrane filters used in water quality studies. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Sep;28(3):474–480. doi: 10.1128/am.28.3.474-480.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Green B. L., Clausen E., Litsky W. Comparison of the new millipore HC with conventional membrane filters for the enumeration of fecal coliform bacteria. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):697–699. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.697-699.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hufham J. B. Evaluating the membrane fecal coliform test by using Escherichia coli as the indicator organism. Appl Microbiol. 1974 Apr;27(4):771–776. doi: 10.1128/am.27.4.771-776.1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lin S. Evaluation of coliform tests for chlorinated secondary effluents. J Water Pollut Control Fed. 1973 Mar;45(1):498–506. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rose R. E., Geldreich E. E., Litsky W. Improved membrane filter method for fecal coliform analysis. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Apr;29(4):532–536. doi: 10.1128/am.29.4.532-536.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Scheusner D. L., Busta F. F., Speck M. L. Injury of bacteria by sanitizers. Appl Microbiol. 1971 Jan;21(1):41–45. doi: 10.1128/am.21.1.41-45.1971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Sladek K. J., Suslavich R. V., Sohn B. I., Dawson F. W. Optimum membrane structures for growth of coliform and fecal coliform organisms. Appl Microbiol. 1975 Oct;30(4):685–691. doi: 10.1128/am.30.4.685-691.1975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. THOMAS H. A., Jr, WOODWARD R. L. Estimation of coliform density by the membrane filter and the fermentation tube methods. Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1955 Nov;45(11):1431–1437. doi: 10.2105/ajph.45.11.1431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES