Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the usefulness of endocervical Gram stain smears in the diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in a female population attending a STD clinic.
Methods: 494 females attending a STD clinic and undergoing a speculum examination had endocervical specimens submitted for C trachomatis culture, direct fluorescent antibody testing (DFA), and N gonorrhoeae culture. Endocervical smears were also collected for Gram stain. The number of polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) per high power field (HPF), presence of bacteria, yeast, red blood cells, and clue cells were recorded. Clinical signs of cervicitis were also documented.
Results: N gonorrhoeae was isolated from one subject who was co-infected with C trachomatis and no further analysis was done regarding N gonorrhoeae. Analysis was performed on 220 participants. The prevalence of C trachomatis infection was 13%. Of the Gram smears collected, 55% were inadequate owing to the presence of vaginal contamination. There were an equal number of C trachomatis isolates in patients with ≤10 PMN/HPF (48%) and >10 PMN/HPF (52%). Endocervical mucopus and erythema were statistically significant for the presence of C trachomatis (p<0.001 and 0.02 respectively). The presence of any signs of cervicitis—that is, mucopus, friability, erythema, and ectropion together with >10 PMN/HPF was statistically significant for the presence of C trachomatis.
Conclusion: The use of endocervical Gram smear results together with clinical information can be used to identify high risk women for C trachomatis infection.
Key Words: endocervical Gram stain; polymorphonuclear leucocytes; Chlamydia trachomatis
Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (81.9 KB).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Brunham R. C., Paavonen J., Stevens C. E., Kiviat N., Kuo C. C., Critchlow C. W., Holmes K. K. Mucopurulent cervicitis--the ignored counterpart in women of urethritis in men. N Engl J Med. 1984 Jul 5;311(1):1–6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198407053110101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ferris D. G., Lawler F. H., Horner R. D., Jernigan J. C., Crout F. V. Test of cure for genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in women. J Fam Pract. 1990 Jul;31(1):36–41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gram L. F., Henrichsen J. Septicaemia meningococcica chronica. Ugeskr Laeger. 1969 Jan 16;131(3):104–106. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Katz B. P., Caine V. A., Jones R. B. Diagnosis of mucopurulent cervicitis among women at risk for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Sex Transm Dis. 1989 Apr-Jun;16(2):103–106. doi: 10.1097/00007435-198904000-00012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moscicki B., Shafer M. A., Millstein S. G., Irwin C. E., Jr, Schachter J. The use and limitations of endocervical Gram stains and mucopurulent cervicitis as predictors for Chlamydia trachomatis in female adolescents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Jul;157(1):65–71. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80347-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Parsons W. L., Godwin M., Robbins C., Butler R. Prevalence of cervical pathogens in women with and without inflammatory changes on smear testing. BMJ. 1993 May 1;306(6886):1173–1174. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6886.1173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ryan C. A., Courtois B. N., Hawes S. E., Stevens C. E., Eschenbach D. A., Holmes K. K. Risk assessment, symptoms, and signs as predictors of vulvovaginal and cervical infections in an urban US STD clinic: implications for use of STD algorithms. Sex Transm Infect. 1998 Jun;74 (Suppl 1):S59–S76. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sellors J., Howard M., Pickard L., Jang D., Mahony J., Chernesky M. Chlamydial cervicitis: testing the practice guidelines for presumptive diagnosis. CMAJ. 1998 Jan 13;158(1):41–46. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thejls H., Rahm V. A., Rosen G., Gnarpe H. Correlation between chlamydia infection and clinical evaluation, vaginal wet smear, and cervical swab test in female adolescents. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1987 Oct;157(4 Pt 1):974–976. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(87)80098-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]