Abstract
In an effort to safeguard against false inference of a major gene in segregation analysis, it has become common practice to require nonrejection of the Mendelian-transmission hypothesis (Mendelian tau's) and rejection of the no-transmission hypothesis (equal tau's). However, it is not known how often one would actually infer a major gene, when one exists, by using these criteria. A simulation study was undertaken to investigate this issue. Segregation of a Mendelian gene under a variety of models was simulated in families with both parents and three children. The data were analyzed by using POINTER; the assumptions under the generating and analysis models were identical. By design, the power to reject the no-major-effect hypothesis (q = 0) was > 60% for all models considered; tests on the transmission probabilities were carried out only when q = 0 was rejected, using alpha = 0.05 for all tests. The rates of Mendelian inference were mostly in the range of 22%-50% under recessive inheritance, versus 60%-99% under dominant inheritance. Notably, it was not possible to resolve the transmission (from among Mendelian tau's, equal tau's, and general unconstrained tau's) in approximately 20%-70% of the cases under recessive models, versus 3%-15% under dominant models. Therefore, while tests on transmission probabilities can serve to reduce rates of false inference of a major gene, it is also possible to fail to infer a major gene when one indeed exists, especially under recessive inheritance.
Full text
PDF
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Bonaïti-Pellié C., Poisson N., Bechtel Y., Bechtel P. Sensitivity of transmission probabilities to paternity exclusion in segregation analysis. Genet Epidemiol. 1992;9(1):67–71. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370090108. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borecki I. B., Bonney G. E., Rice T., Bouchard C., Rao D. C. Influence of genotype-dependent effects of covariates on the outcome of segregation analysis of the body mass index. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Sep;53(3):676–687. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Borecki I. B., Province M. A., Rao D. C. Power of segregation analysis for detection of major gene effects on quantitative traits. Genet Epidemiol. 1994;11(5):409–418. doi: 10.1002/gepi.1370110503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demenais F., Lathrop M., Lalouel J. M. Robustness and power of the unified model in the analysis of quantitative measurements. Am J Hum Genet. 1986 Feb;38(2):228–234. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Demenais F., Martinez M., Andrieu N. The transmission probability model is useful to prevent false inference. Am J Hum Genet. 1993 Feb;52(2):441–442. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Elston R. C., Stewart J. A general model for the genetic analysis of pedigree data. Hum Hered. 1971;21(6):523–542. doi: 10.1159/000152448. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Go R. C., Elston R. C., Kaplan E. B. Efficiency and robustness of pedigree segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1978 Jan;30(1):28–37. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Greenberg D. A. There is more than one way to collect data for linkage analysis. What a study of epilepsy can tell us about linkage strategy for psychiatric disease. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1992 Sep;49(9):745–750. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1992.01820090073012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalouel J. M., Morton N. E. Complex segregation analysis with pointers. Hum Hered. 1981;31(5):312–321. doi: 10.1159/000153231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lalouel J. M., Rao D. C., Morton N. E., Elston R. C. A unified model for complex segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1983 Sep;35(5):816–826. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacLean C. J., Morton N. E., Lew R. Analysis of family resemblance. IV. Operational characteristics of segregation analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1975 May;27(3):365–384. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Morton N. E., MacLean C. J. Analysis of family resemblance. 3. Complex segregation of quantitative traits. Am J Hum Genet. 1974 Jul;26(4):489–503. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]