Abstract
The thioredoxin-dependent system is an essential regulator of cellular redox balance. Since oxidative stress has been linked with neurodegenerative disease, we studied the roles of thioredoxin reductases in brain using mice with nervous system (NS)-specific deletion of cytosolic (Txnrd1) and mitochondrial (Txnrd2) thioredoxin reductase. While NS-specific Txnrd2 null mice develop normally, mice lacking Txnrd1 in the NS were significantly smaller and displayed ataxia and tremor. A striking patterned cerebellar hypoplasia was observed. Proliferation of the external granular layer (EGL) was strongly reduced and fissure formation and laminar organisation of the cerebellar cortex was impaired in the rostral portion of the cerebellum. Purkinje cells were ectopically located and their dendrites stunted. The Bergmann glial network was disorganized and showed a pronounced reduction in fiber strength. Cerebellar hypoplasia did not result from increased apoptosis, but from decreased proliferation of granule cell precursors within the EGL. Of note, neuron-specific inactivation of Txnrd1 did not result in cerebellar hypoplasia, suggesting a vital role for Txnrd1 in Bergmann glia or neuronal precursor cells.
Introduction
The thioredoxin (Txn) dependent system is one of the key systems controlling cellular redox balance, and thus cell fate. Impaired cellular redox balance has been linked with age-related diseases, and neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer and Parkinson's disease [1]. Beyond its protective role, the Txn system is involved in various cellular processes, such as cell-cell communication, transcriptional regulation, cell signalling, and DNA synthesis [2].
The importance of the Txn system during embryo development and adult physiology has been corroborated by loss-of function approaches of individual members of this system in the mouse. Targeted inactivation of cytosolic thioredoxin (Txn1) was associated with severe defects of inner cell mass proliferation and embryonic death at the blastocysts stage [3]. Mice deficient for mitochondrial thioredoxin (Txn2) displayed marked apoptosis, anterior neural tube defects and embryonic lethality at E10.5 [4]. By contrast, overexpression of members of the thioredoxin family promoted neuronal survival after various stresses. For instance, Txn1 overexpression in mice had a neuroprotective effect on neuronal cells when challenged with either focal brain ischemia [5] or with the excitotoxin kainate [6]. Systemic administration of recombinant human Txn1 decreased the extent of damage induced by focal brain ischemia [7].
Txn activities are governed by the selenoenzyme family of thioredoxin reductases [8]. There are three distinct genes in mammals encoding cytosolic thioredoxin reductase (Txnrd1)[9], mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase (Txnrd2)[10], and thioredoxin-glutaredoxin reductase (TGR or Txnrd3)[11]. While Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 are ubiquitously expressed in cells and tissues, expression of Txrnd3 is mainly confined to testis. Thioredoxin reductases are flavoproteins, form homodimers in a head to tail alignment and possess two catalytically interacting reactive centres. The C-terminally located redox active site contains an essential selenocysteine residue; hence thioredoxin reductase activity relies on the availability of dietary selenium (Se). While some organs apparently exhibit a decreased demand for selenium, it is strongly retained in the brain during experimental selenium deficiency, arguing for essential roles exerted by one or several selenoproteins in this organ [12]. Accordingly, impaired expression of selenoproteins in transgenic mice caused developmental and degenerative damage in the brain [13]–[15].
Starting to dissect their contribution in embryonic development, adult physiology and pathophysiology, we created mice with conditional alleles of both Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 [16], [17]. Ubiquitous inactivation revealed that both genes are indispensable for embryogenesis albeit in different ways. Txnrd1 knockouts exhibited remarkable developmental, growth and neural tube closure retardation and embryonic death between E8.5 and E10.5. Txnrd2-deficient embryos died shortly thereafter (E13.5) due to severe anemia and growth retardation, resulting from perturbed cardiac development and augmented apoptosis of hematopoietic cells.
Expression profiling of Txnrd1 in embryos revealed highest expression levels in neuronal tissues such as the developing forebrain, rhombomeres and neural tube [17]. To ask whether thioredoxin reductases are essential in brain development and function, we inactivated both Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 individually in the nervous system (NS) by using the Nestin-Cre transgenic mouse [18], which expresses Cre in neuronal and glial precursor cells. NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice were born at the expected frequencies, but displayed growth retardation and striking a movement disorder, suggestive of cerebellar dysfunction. By contrast, NS-specific ablation of Txnrd2 or neuron-specific deletion of Txnrd1 did not cause any obvious pathophysiological abnormalities.
Results
NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice are smaller and display severe movement disorders
To decipher the individual contribution of cytosolic and mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in brain development and maintenance, Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 expression in the central nervous system (CNS) was disrupted in a tissue-specific manner. To bypass embryonic lethality of Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 null embryos [16], [17], we used the Nestin-Cre (NesCre) transgenic mouse line, which targets precursor cells of the neuronal and glial lineage, thus achieving efficient gene deletion in both cell types [18], [19]. Txnrd1-NS null mice were born at the expected Mendelian ratio. Out of 197 offspring from NesCre;Txnrd1+/fl and Txnrd1fl/fl matings, 24% were Txnrd1+/fl , 24% were Txnrd1fl/fl , 22% were NesCre;Txnrd1+/fl and 28% were NesCre;Txnrd1fl/fl.(Txnrd1-NS null). Likewise, mice lacking Txnrd2 specifically in the NS were born at the Mendelian ratio (data not shown).
The efficiency of Cre-mediated gene deletion of Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 was monitored by immunoblotting, enzyme activity and qRT-PCR as shown in figure 1 and figure S1 A, respectively. While Txnrd1 protein levels in brain were only slightly reduced in NesCre;Txnrd1+/fl mice compared to Txnrd1fl/fl control mice, the 55-kDa immunoreactive band, representing Txnrd1 protein, was virtually absent in the brains of Txnrd1-NS null mice (Fig. 1 A). In accordance with the immunoblotting analysis, determination of cytosolic Txnrd activity in brain and liver tissue revealed significantly decreased cytosolic Txnrd activity in the brain of Txnrd1-NS null mice compared to control littermates (Fig. 1 B). qRT-PCR analysis of total RNA revealed very low levels of Txnrd2 transcripts in brain of Txnrd2-NS null mice (Fig. S1 A).
At birth, Txnrd1-NS null pups and Txnrd2-NS null pups were indistinguishable from their littermates, but within the first days of life, a deficiency in growth became apparent in Txnrd1-NS null mice, whereas Txnrd2-NS null mice developed normally and did not show any overt phenotype. NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice slowly gained weight, reaching only about half the body mass compared to their littermates at the age of 4 weeks (Fig. 2 A and B). Already at P7, Txnrd1-NS null mice showed ataxic gait, impaired balance, and tremor. After weaning, NS-specific Txnrd1 null mice were incapable of reaching food pellets in the wire bar of the cage. Only when supplied with food pellets on the bottom of the cage for the first couple of weeks, the knockout mice were able to grow to adulthood. Male and female knockout mice were fertile, and females could also foster their offspring normally (data not shown). In order to quantify the movement defect, Txnrd1-NS null and control mice were subjected to a modified pole test [20], an assay for coordinated movement (Fig. 2 C). While control animals were able to climb down the pole in approximately 30 seconds, Txnrd1-NS null mice mostly failed in doing so. 11 out of 14 tested mutants slid or dropped down.
Cerebellar hypoplasia, abnormal foliation and perturbed lamination in the cerebellum of NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice
While most brain regions, including the olfactory bulb, subventricular zone and the cerebral cortex, did not reveal any histological abnormalities in Txnrd1-NS null mice, the cerebellar cortex displayed striking morphological alterations. In contrast, no morphological abnormalities could be detected in Txnrd2-NS null mice, indicating that Txnrd1, rather than Txnrd2, plays a vital role for brain development. Further histological analyses were performed in Txnrd1-NS null mice to define the developmental abnormalities in the cerebellum. For a thorough spatiotemporal analysis of the cerebellar phenotype, serial sagittal sections of brains from control and Txnrd1-NS null mice at different embryonic stages (E11.5, E15.5 and E18.5) and various postnatal stages were prepared (Fig. 3). Cerebellar dimensions were determined morphometrically (Fig. 4). At developmental stages E11.5 (data not shown) and E15.5, no differences between knockout and control animals were evident. Overall cerebellar size and external granular layer (EGL) thickness were indistinguishable among mice of the different genotypes. From as early as E18.5 until the end of cerebellar development at postnatal stage P21, cerebellar morphology of the mutants substantially differed from that of control animals, particularly in its size, cerebellar cortical folding and lamination. Cerebellar size differences became evident from P7 onwards (Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 C). At weaning, the area of the knockout cerebellum was only one fourth of that of the controls. Massive proliferation within the EGL, producing granule neurons, is mainly responsible for the postnatal expansion of the cerebellum [21]. In normal development, it comprises 7–10 cell layers at P7, decreasing thereafter, and eventually disappears by P21 [22]. However, from P1, the EGL in the anterior cerebellum of the mutants was thinner than in control animals (Fig. 3), resulting in strongly diminished expansion of the tissue in this area.
In order to delineate the mechanism, underlying cerebellar hypoplasia in Txnrd1-NS null mice, proliferation of granule cell precursors was quantified by immunostaining for mitotic cells using the mitosis marker phosphorylated histone H3 (PH3) [23] (Fig. 4 A and B). In control mice, EGL proliferation was highest at postnatal day 7, whereas in Txnrd1-NS null mice the number of proliferating cells was approximately three times lower at P7, and around two times lower at P14 compared to control mice. The strongly impaired proliferation eventually resulted in a strongly reduced cell density of the granular layer particularly in the anterior part of the knockout cerebellum (Fig. 4 D). This effect was limited to granular cells, as the number of Purkinje Cells was unaffected (Fig. 4 D). To examine whether increased programmed cell death may contribute to the dramatically reduced size of the cerebellum during development, sagittal sections of P7 cerebella from Txnrd1-NS null mice and controls were stained for apoptotic cells [24]. However, no difference in the ratio of TUNEL-positive cells was apparent between control and mutant mice, indicating that increased cell death does not substantially contribute to impaired cerebellar size (Fig. S2).
Owing to the massive proliferation of granule cell precursor cells, the cerebellar cortex expands, finally developing into a folded structure with 10 main vermal lobules (designated I to X). Cerebellar development is completed by P21. In Txnrd1-deficient brain, the absence of major proliferation in the anterior region of the cerebellum leaves this folding unnecessary, and thus only lobules VII to X are formed (Fig. 3).
Besides the differences in size and foliation, there was a striking lamination defect in the anterior part of the Txnrd1-deficient cerebellum. The definitive cerebellar cortex consists of a molecular layer, a Purkinje cell (PC) layer and an internal granular layer. PCs, originating from the ventricular zone, migrate along the Bergmann glial fibers to settle in a dense zone beneath the forming EGL. Terminal differentiation of PCs occurs postnatally when they become arranged in a monolayer and make contact with the parallel fibers of the granule cells [25]. The granular neurons forming the internal granular layer descend from the EGL after exiting the cell cycle and move radially from the outer cerebellar surface beneath the PC layer along the guiding Bergmann glia, thereby making their connections with the PC dendrites. These developmental events were severely disturbed in the cerebellum of the mutants and the anterior part became progressively more distorted throughout postnatal development (Fig. 3). The anterior cerebellum showed an ectopic PC localisation (Fig. 3, P7), no formation of distinctive molecular-, PC- and granular layer and fusion of the lobules. In the posterior part, however, lamination did not grossly deviate from the normal cerebellar development. To determine the roles of different cell types in the lamination phenotype, we performed immunohistochemical stainings (Fig. 5) [26]–[28]. By P1, staining for Nestin (Fig. 5) and GFAP (data not shown) revealed a clew-like alignment and shortening of Bergman glia in the anterior cerebellum of the mutant. By P14, a significant change in the distribution the GFAP-protein in the anterior mutant cerebellum, loss of radial alignment and reduction of thickness were detectable (Fig. 5). This was not observed in the posterior area of Txnrd1-NS null mice.
Immunostaining with the PC marker Calbindin (Fig. 5) clearly supports the ectopic localisation of PCs in the fused anterior cerebellar area, confirming the data already obtained by HE staining (Fig. 3, P7). In addition, architecture of the dendritic trees in the mutants was less elaborated (Fig. 5, inlays). PC dendritic trees along with the parallel fibers of granular neurons as well as basket- and stellate cells predominantly form the molecular layer, which does not separate in the anterior part of the mutants (Fig. 3 and Fig. 5). Immunostaining for parvalbumin, another marker for Purkinje cells, corroborated these findings (data not shown). Postmitotic neurons of the granular layer were detected by NeuN expression (data not shown) [29]. This staining supported the disrupted formation of the granular layer in the mature anterior cerebellum of Txnrd1-NS null mice as also revealed by the H&E staining (Fig. 3). In summary, the development of cerebellar lobules was defective in Txnrd1-NS null mice, showing fusion of lobule I–VI. In this anterior part, the principal laminae, molecular layer, PC layer, and granule layer, did not form. The lobules in the posterior cerebellar area (lobules VI–X) of Txnrd1-NS null mice were smaller but the laminar organisation was normal.
In order to further dissect the roles of neurons and glial cells in Txnrd1-dependent developmental processes, we additionally generated neuron-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice (Tα1-Cre;Txnrd1fl/fl) [30], [31]. Interestingly, cerebellar foliation was completely normal in these mice (Fig. 6 A, B). Accordingly, there were no behavioural abnormalities or growth defects in these mice (not shown). Cytosolic thioredoxin reductase activity measurements were performed to demonstrate targeted inactivation of Txnrd1 in neuronal cells (Fig. 6 C). Thioredoxin reductase activity was reduced by half, consistent with remaining Txnrd1 expression in glial cells. Thus, since Nestin-Cre causes excision of loxP flanked genes in neuronal and glial precursor cells, but Tα1-Cre mice are specific for postnatal neurons, it is tempting to assume that the cerebellar phenotype in Txnrd1-NS null mice is caused by disruption of Bergmann glia function and/or diminished proliferative capacity of granule cell precursors.
Discussion
The thioredoxin (Txn) dependent system, comprising of cytosolic (Txn1) and mitochondrial (Txn2) thioredoxins, various Txn dependent peroxidases (peroxiredoxins) and the selenoenzymes thioredoxin reductases 1–3, is one of the major redox systems in cells involved in the control of cellular redox balance [2], [8]. While the Txn dependent system has been suspected to play a significant role in brain tissue, only very little information on its physiological role in brain development and function has been available to date.
To address the individual roles of members of the thioredoxin reductase family in brain development and function, we conditionally disrupted Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 expression in brain using neural-specific and neuron-specific Cre transgenic mice. Thus, expression of Txnrd1 and Txnrd2 is abrogated as early as in neuronal progenitor cells [18] or early postnatal neurons [30]. Cre-mediated inactivation was highly efficient in Txnrd1- and Txnrd2-NS null mice. While expression levels of Txnrd1 were very low in the brain of Txnrd1-NS null mice, residual cytosolic thioredoxin reductase activity could be detected in these mice, which may be attributed to cytosolic Txnrd2. Several recent reports indicated that Txnrd2 is also expressed in the cytosolic compartment [11], [32], though its subcellular localisation in tissues and organs remains to be elucidated. Surprisingly, mice specifically lacking Txnrd2 in the NS develop normally, do not show any histopathological deterioration and have a similar life span as control littermates (data not shown). By contrast, NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice exhibit reduced weight gain from P7 onwards and developed severe ataxia, suggestive of major cerebellar defects. Nonetheless, NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice survived and could even generate and foster viable offspring. Our data imply that it is Txnrd1 and not Txnrd2 that plays a critical role in brain development, however this does not rule out any contribution of Txnrd2, for instance under pathological conditions such as stroke and trauma. Interestingly, in our two previous studies we could clearly assign a crucial role for Txnrd2 in heart development and function [16], while Txnrd1 function turned out to be negligible for cardiac development and function [17]. Thus, both enzymes do not emerge as mere housekeeping genes, but fulfil tissue and organ-specific functions.
We observed a clear compartment boundary between the widely normally developed posterior cerebellum (lobules VII–X) and the strongly disorganized anterior part (lobules I–VI) in Txnrd1-NS null mice. This phenomenon has been previously found in a number of other cerebellar aberrations [33]–[35], and has been interpreted as a general developmental principle in cerebellar development [34]. Most interestingly, loss-of genetic loci causes a phenotype either in the anterior or the posterior part of the cerebellum. Meander tail (Mea) for example has an appearance that very closely resembles the Txnrd1-NS null phenotype, whereas BETA2/NeuroD1-knockout has a posterior defect [36]. In contrast to our findings, the cell types primarily affected by the Mea mutation are the granular neurons. The molecular and cellular mechanisms leading to the Mea phenotype, however, have not been described yet.
Histopathological analysis of Txnrd1 null brain revealed striking cerebellar hypoplasia, in particular of lobules I–VI. Proper foliation requires a complex, well-coordinated series of developmental steps, including proliferation or death of granule cells [37], migration along Bergmann glial fibers [38] and outgrowth of PC dendrites [22]. All these processes are intricately connected [39], e.g. granule cell precursor proliferation depends on sonic hedgehog released by PC [40], and induction of a radial glial phenotype of Bergmann glia requires the release of Neuregulin by granule cells. Since increased cell death is not observed, but reduced numbers of mitotic granule cell precursors, the major defect underlying cerebellar hypoplasia might result from diminished proliferation of granule cells, the driving force of cerebellar growth and foliation. In fact, it has been demonstrated recently that increasing sonic hedgehog signalling in the mouse cerebellum (by modulating patched expression) can induce the formation of an additional lobe at the same position where it exists in rats [40]. A major role for Txnrd1 in postnatal proliferation of granule cells is also suggested by the normal embryonic development of the cerebellum. The use of two different Cre-transgenic mice to disrupt Txnrd1 allowed us to rule out a major role of neuronal Txnrd1 for cerebellar morphogenesis. Thus, either radial glial (Bergmann) cells and/or granule cell precursors are the cell type likely affected by Txnrd1-deficiency.
Interestingly, neither the cerebellar anlage nor any other part of the brain seems to be affected by loss-of Txnrd1 using NesCre. This is a remarkable finding, since virtually all neurons show Nestin expression during their development. This finding is underscored by the complete absence of Txnrd1 protein observed in brain homogenates from Txnrd1-NS null mice. So why is the cerebellum apparently more affected than other brain regions that also descend from proliferation of neuroepithelial cells? If we assume the granule cell precursors as the primarily affected cell type, they are distinguished from most other proliferative epithelia in being a secondary neuroepithelium. There is, however, no indication why a secondary neuroepithelium should specifically rely on Txnrd1. Another difference is the massive proliferation, occurring during postnatal cerebellar expansion. In fact, granule cells are the single most abundant cell type in the brain. Thus, if Txnrd1 is absent, insufficient provision of electrons for ribonucleotide reductase [41], [42] (the commited step in DNA synthesis) during massive expansion might become the limiting step in tissue development.
Of interest, neuronal progenitor cell-specific ablation of N-myc using the Nestin-Cre, resulted in a similar cerebellar phenotype as in the like NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice [43]. NS-specific N-myc null mice show ataxia and behavioural abnormalities, associated with a strong reduction in cerebellar size. Drops in mitotic cells and cells in S-phase along with reduced expression of the N-myc target gene cyclin D2 were considered being responsible for cerebellar hypoplasia in N-myc null brain. Txnrd1 has been identified as direct c-Myc target gene in a human B cell line [44]. Since members of the Myc transcription factor family are largely interchangeable [45], and n-Myc constitutes the major isoform of the Myc family in brain, one may propose that Txnrd1 is one of the most significant target genes of n-Myc in brain. Also, the Txn1/Txnrd1 system has been frequently linked with proliferation of many tumors and tumor cell lines [46]–[48]. Thus, our present finding along with our previous studies, in which we observed a pronounced overall proliferation defect in Txnrd1 null embryos except in the heart [17], corroborate the importance of Txnrd1 for cell proliferation and tissue development. It is, however, somewhat surprising that other regions of the brain apparently do not require functional Txnrd1 or Txnrd2. It thus remains open, whether thioredoxin reductase 3 (also called thioredoxin-glutaredoxin reductase) may replace Txnrd1 or Txnrd2 [11], or alternatively that Txnrd2 may functionally compensate for dysfunctional Txnrd1 at least for normal proliferation. This possibility might be answered by generating compound mutant mice in which both isoforms are simultaneously inactivated in the brain. Of note, knockout mouse models for enzymes of the cell cycle progression machinery, including cyclin D2 [49] or compound mutant mice lacking cyclins D1 and D2 [50] also develop similar phenotypes in the cerebellum, albeit to a different degree. Hence, Txnrd1 might be viewed as an additional major player of the cell proliferation machinery.
Recent data implied that truncated forms of Txnrd1, lacking the C-terminally located catalytically important selenocysteine might exert pro-apoptotic functions [51], [52]. Since our targeting strategies aimed at inactivating the C-terminal catalytic centers of Txnrd1 and Txnrd2, we cannot rule out that minute amounts of Txnrd1 or Txnrd2 are still made in knockout brains, possibly causing unwanted side effects. But in our NS-specific knockout models, we could never detect any changes in the number of apoptotic cells, even in aged brain (data not shown).
Selenium depletion experiments in rodents demonstrated that selenium is strongly retained in brain, suggesting vital functions for one or several selenium dependent enzymes for neuronal and non-neuronal cells. Accordingly, mice with targeted disruption of selenoprotein P, a selenoprotein of the selenium delivery pathway to organs, show seizures and ataxic gait [13]. Neuron-specific ablation of selenoprotein expression, achieved by neuron-specific removal of the tRNA for selenocysteine, leads, among other phenotypes, to cerebellar hypoplasia. However, the defect is histologically distinct from that observed in NS-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice (E. Wirth U.S., unpublished).
The Txn1-Txnrd1 system has been implicated in Alzheimer's disease. Altered expression levels have been observed in patients suffering from Alzheimer's disease, and pre-treatment of primary hippocampal cultures with either Txn or Txnrd appear to ameliorate the effects of amyloid β [53]. Likewise, oxidation of glutaredoxin 1 and thioredoxin 1 in response to amyloid β treatment has been shown to activate apoptosis signal-regulating kinase (ASK1), suggesting that a deregulated antioxidant system including thioredoxin 1 might be critical in the sequelae leading to Alzheimer [54]. In future experiments, our models might prove most suitable to investigate the role of the Txn1/Txnrd1 system in animal models of Alzheimer's Diseases or other neurodegenerative diseases.
Materials and Methods
Generation and maintenance of tissue-specific knockout mice
To generate neuronal progenitor cell-specific or neuron specific thioredoxin reductase-deficient mice, mice with conditional alleles for either Txnrd1 (Txnrd1 tm1Marc) [17] or Txnrd2 (Txnrd2 tm1Marc)[16] were crossed with Nestin-Cre transgenic mice [18] or Tα1-Cre mice, respectively [30]. Two consecutive breeding steps were required. First, loxP-flanked (floxed; fl) Txnrd1 tm1Marc (designated as Txnrd1 +/fl) and Txnrd2tm1Marc (designated as Txnrd2 +/fl) knockout mice were bred with Nestin-Cre or Tα1-Cre transgenic mice to obtain NesCre;Txnrd1 +/fl, Tα1-Cre;Txnrd1 +/fl, and NesCre;Txnrd2 +/fl mice, respectively. Subsequently, these mice were mated with Txnrd1 fl/fl or Txnrd2 fl/fl mice to obtain NesCre;Txnrd1 fl/fl (designated as Txnrd1-NS null mice in the text), Tα1-Cre;Txnrd1 fl/fl (designated as neuron-specific Txnrd1 knockout mice), and NesCre;Txnrd2 fl/fl mice (designated as Txnrd2-NS null mice in the text), respectively. Heterozygous knockout mice behaved like wild-type in all assays, and thus NesCre;Txnrd1 +/fl, Txnrd1 fl/fl, Txnrd1 +/fl and NesCre;Txnrd2 +/fl, Txnrd2 +/fl, Txnrd2 +/fl littermates served as controls. Mice were kept under standard housing conditions with food (type 1314, Altromin GmbH, Lage, Germany) and water ad libitum. All animal experiments were performed in compliance with the German animal welfare law and have been approved by the institutional committee on animal experimentation and the district governments of Upper Bavaria and Berlin. Genotyping of mice was performed by PCR of tail DNA as described previously [16], [17].
Immunoblotting
Preparation of total and cytosolic protein fractions from tissue was carried out as described [17]. Protein concentrations were determined by the Bradford assay (Bio-Rad Labs GmbH, Munich, Germany). 20 µg of cytosolic proteins were separated on a 10% SDS-PAGE and blotted onto a nitrocellulose membrane (Hybond ECL, Amersham Biosciences, RPN 303D). For detection, a rabbit anti-Txnrd1 (1∶2000 dilution, Lab Frontier, LF-PA0023, Seoul, Korea), and a goat anti-rabbit horseradish peroxidase conjugated secondary antibody (1∶2000 dilution, Bio-Rad Labs GmbH, Munich, Germany) were used. Signals were visualized by an enhanced chemoluminescence kit (Amersham Biosciences, RPN 2106).
RNA isolation, cDNA synthesis and quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR)
Isolation of total RNA, DNAse treatment of RNA and reverse transcription was carried out as described [16]. qRT-PCR was carried out using a Roche LightCycler ® 2.0 Real-Time PCR System according to the manufacturer's recommendations (Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany). Txnrd2 levels were normalized against 18S ribosomal RNA. Primers used for Txnrd2 quantification were: E6/E10forw.: 5′-CAGCTTTGTGGATGAGCACACAGTTCG-3′, E6/E10rev.:5′-GATCCTCCCAAGTGACCTGCAGCTGG-3′, E15/E18forw.:5′-TTCACGGTGGCGGATAGGGATGCTC-3′, E15/E18rev 5′-TGCCCAGGCCATCATCATCTGACG-3′, S18forw.:5′-GGA CAG GAT TGA CAG ATT GAT AG-3′, S18rev.: 5′-CTC GTT CGT TAT CGG AAT TAA C-3′.
Determination of thioredoxin reductase activity
Thioredoxin reductase activity was determined by the NADPH-dependent DTNB reduction assay (Holmgren and Bjornstedt, 1995). 100 µg of the cytosolic fraction was added to the reaction mixture, containing 0.1 M potassium phosphate, pH 7.0, 1 mM EDTA, 2 mg/ml DTNB (Sigma-Aldrich GmbH, Seelze, Germany), 0.2 mg/ml NADPH (10107824001, Roche Diagnostics, Mannheim, Germany), and 0.2 mg/ml bovine serum albumin. Absorption at 412 nm was measured in a spectrophotometer (SmartSpec ™ Plus, BioRad GmbH, Munich, Germany). Txnrd1 activity is expressed as nmol oxidized NADPH/(min * mg of protein).
Pole test
The pole test was performed according to Fernagut et al. [20], with minor modifications. 14 Txnrd1-NS null and 14 control littermates were placed head downwards on top of a vertical rough-surfaced pole (diameter 1 cm, 50 cm height). Nesting material was placed at the bottom of the pole to avoid injury. Each mouse was habituated to the pole on the day prior to testing (five trials). The total time until the mouse reached the floor with its four paws was recorded (T-total). Animals received five trials with an inter-trial interval of 30 s. If the mouse was unable to climb down, fell or slipped, a default value of 120 s was taken into account.
Histological analysis
Embryos dissected at various developmental stages (E11.5, E15.5, E18.5) as well as brains from animals at postnatal stages P1, P7, P14, P21 and two years old were analyzed. Freshly dissected embryos and tissue samples were fixed overnight in 4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (4% PFA) in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) or in Bouin's fixative, stored in 70% ethanol, embedded in paraffin, and cut in sections of 7 µm (embryos) and 8 µm (brains). For hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining, sections were deparaffinized in xylol, rehydrated in graded ethanol series, stained with Mayer's haemalaun (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany) for 5 min, washed again, and stained with 1% eosin (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany for 2 minutes). The sections were washed in water, dehydrated in graded ethanol series, treated with xylol, and mounted. Nissl staining was carried out as described [55].
Immunohistochemical stainings
Immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded sections was carried out as described previously [16], [17]. Following primary antibodies were used: anti-phosphorylated histone H3 (PH3) (9701, Cell Signaling NEB GmbH, Frankfurt, Germany), anti-GFAP (MAB360), anti-calbindin (AB1778), anti-Nestin (MAB353), anti-Parvalbumin (MAB 1572) and anti-NeuN (MAB377, all Chemicon GmbH, Schwalbach, Germany). Biotinylated secondary antibodies were purchased from Vector labs, Ohio, USA. To visualize bound secondary antibodies, staining was performed according to the manufacturer's protocol (Vectastatin Elite ABC kit PK-6100 and DAB kit SK-4100, Vector Labs. Ohio, USA). Sections were counterstained with Mayer's haemalaun (Carl Roth, Karlsruhe, Germany). To avoid non-specific binding 5% BSA/PBS-solution (MP Biomedicals) was used for blocking.
In situ end labelling
For monitoring apoptotic cells in Txnrd1-NS null and control animals, PFA-fixed (4% (w/v) paraformaldehyde in PBS) and paraffin-embedded sections were stained with the ApopTag kit (S7100, Serologicals Corporation, Norcross, GA, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Digoxigenin-deoxynucleoside triphosphate-labelled cells were incubated with an anti-digoxigenin peroxidase conjugate and visualized with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine (DAB, Vector Labs, Ohio, USA). Sections of testis from C57Bl/6 animals served as positive control.
Morphometrical and quantitative analyses
Documentation of the sections was performed using an Axioplan 2 microscope and Axiovision 3.1 software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). Mitotic cells (PH3-positive cells): The number of PH3-positive cells in the cerebellum per section were counted on sections from two Txnrd1-NS null and two control animals at developmental and neonatal stages E11.5, E15.5, E18.5, P1, P7, P14, and P21. Cerebellar area: Measurement of the cerebellar area in midsaggital sections of two Txnrd1-NS null and control animals was performed by using the Axiovision LE 4.1 software (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) at stages E15.5, E18.5, P1, P7, P14, and P21. Relative cell counts in the cerebellar granular layer and number of Purkinje cells1: Quantification of cells in the anterior and posterior part of the cerebellum (three knockouts and three controls, adult animals) was calculated as described previously (Leung et al., 2004), using the ImageJ program (http://www.uhnresearch.ca/facilities/wcif/imagej/) for granular cells. Purkinje cells were counted directly on the microscope.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
We thank Lino Tessarollo, NCI, Frederick, USA, for providing the Tα1-Cre mice. We are grateful to Nadja Mayr, Silke Kappler, Vartitér Seher, and Anne Schänzer for excellent technical assistance, Rob Chapman for critically reading the manuscript, Manuela Schneider for fruitful discussions, and the animal care takers for their work and dedication.
Footnotes
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: This work was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Priority Programme 1087 “Selenoproteins” to MC, MB and US. The supporting foundation had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Andersen JK. Oxidative stress in neurodegeneration: cause or consequence? Nat Med. 2004;10(Suppl):S18–25. doi: 10.1038/nrn1434. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lillig CH, Holmgren A. Thioredoxin and related molecules–from biology to health and disease. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2007;9:25–47. doi: 10.1089/ars.2007.9.25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Matsui M, Oshima M, Oshima H, Takaku K, Maruyama T, et al. Early embryonic lethality caused by targeted disruption of the mouse thioredoxin gene. Dev Biol. 1996;178:179–185. doi: 10.1006/dbio.1996.0208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nonn L, Williams RR, Erickson RP, Powis G. The absence of mitochondrial thioredoxin 2 causes massive apoptosis, exencephaly, and early embryonic lethality in homozygous mice. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:916–922. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.3.916-922.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Takagi Y, Mitsui A, Nishiyama A, Nozaki K, Sono H, et al. Overexpression of thioredoxin in transgenic mice attenuates focal ischemic brain damage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96:4131–4136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.4131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Takagi Y, Hattori I, Nozaki K, Mitsui A, Ishikawa M, et al. Excitotoxic hippocampal injury is attenuated in thioredoxin transgenic mice. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2000;20:829–833. doi: 10.1097/00004647-200005000-00009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hattori I, Takagi Y, Nakamura H, Nozaki K, Bai J, et al. Intravenous administration of thioredoxin decreases brain damage following transient focal cerebral ischemia in mice. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2004;6:81–87. doi: 10.1089/152308604771978372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Arner ES, Holmgren A. Physiological functions of thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase. Eur J Biochem. 2000;267:6102–6109. doi: 10.1046/j.1432-1327.2000.01701.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Gladyshev VN, Jeang KT, Stadtman TC. Selenocysteine, identified as the penultimate C-terminal residue in human T-cell thioredoxin reductase, corresponds to TGA in the human placental gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:6146–6151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.93.12.6146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gasdaska JR, Harney JW, Gasdaska PY, Powis G, Berry MJ. Regulation of human thioredoxin reductase expression and activity by 3′-untranslated region selenocysteine insertion sequence and mRNA instability elements. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:25379–25385. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.36.25379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Sun QA, Zappacosta F, Factor VM, Wirth PJ, Hatfield DL, et al. Heterogeneity within animal thioredoxin reductases. Evidence for alternative first exon splicing. J Biol Chem. 2001;276:3106–3114. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M004750200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Behne D, Hilmert H, Scheid S, Gessner H, Elger W. Evidence for specific selenium target tissues and new biologically important selenoproteins. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1988;966:12–21. doi: 10.1016/0304-4165(88)90123-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schomburg L, Schweizer U, Holtmann B, Flohe L, Sendtner M, et al. Gene disruption discloses role of selenoprotein P in selenium delivery to target tissues. Biochem J. 2003;370:397–402. doi: 10.1042/BJ20021853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Schweizer U, Schomburg L. Chapter 23. Selenium, Selenoproteins, and Brain Function. In: Hatfield G, Berry, editors. Selenium: It's molecular biology and role in human health. New York: Springer; 2006. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Burk RF, Hill KE, Olson GE, Weeber EJ, Motley AK, et al. Deletion of apolipoprotein E receptor-2 in mice lowers brain selenium and causes severe neurological dysfunction and death when a low-selenium diet is fed. J Neurosci. 2007;27:6207–6211. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1153-07.2007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Conrad M, Jakupoglu C, Moreno SG, Lippl S, Banjac A, et al. Essential role for mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in hematopoiesis, heart development, and heart function. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24:9414–9423. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.21.9414-9423.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Jakupoglu C, Przemeck GK, Schneider M, Moreno SG, Mayr N, et al. Cytoplasmic thioredoxin reductase is essential for embryogenesis but dispensable for cardiac development. Mol Cell Biol. 2005;25:1980–1988. doi: 10.1128/MCB.25.5.1980-1988.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Tronche F, Kellendonk C, Kretz O, Gass P, Anlag K, et al. Disruption of the glucocorticoid receptor gene in the nervous system results in reduced anxiety. Nat Genet. 1999;23:99–103. doi: 10.1038/12703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Graus-Porta D, Blaess S, Senften M, Littlewood-Evans A, Damsky C, et al. Beta1-class integrins regulate the development of laminae and folia in the cerebral and cerebellar cortex. Neuron. 2001;31:367–379. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(01)00374-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Fernagut PO, Chalon S, Diguet E, Guilloteau D, Tison F, et al. Motor behaviour deficits and their histopathological and functional correlates in the nigrostriatal system of dopamine transporter knockout mice. Neuroscience. 2003;116:1123–1130. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4522(02)00778-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Mares V, Lodin Z. The cellular kinetics of the developing mouse cerebellum. II. The function of the external granular layer in the process of gyrification. Brain Res. 1970;23:343–352. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(70)90061-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Altman J, Bayer SA. New York: CRC Press; 1997. Development of the cerebellar system. In relation to its evolution, structure and functions. [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hendzel MJ, Wei Y, Mancini MA, Van Hooser A, Ranalli T, et al. Mitosis-specific phosphorylation of histone H3 initiates primarily within pericentromeric heterochromatin during G2 and spreads in an ordered fashion coincident with mitotic chromosome condensation. Chromosoma. 1997;106:348–360. doi: 10.1007/s004120050256. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gavrieli Y, Sherman Y, Ben-Sasson SA. Identification of programmed cell death in situ via specific labeling of nuclear DNA fragmentation. J Cell Biol. 1992;119:493–501. doi: 10.1083/jcb.119.3.493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Hatten ME, Heintz N. Mechanisms of neural patterning and specification in the developing cerebellum. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:385–408. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.002125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hatten ME, Liem RK. Astroglial cells provide a template for the positioning of developing cerebellar neurons in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1981;90:622–630. doi: 10.1083/jcb.90.3.622. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tohyama T, Lee VM, Rorke LB, Marvin M, McKay RD, et al. Nestin expression in embryonic human neuroepithelium and in human neuroepithelial tumor cells. Lab Invest. 1992;66:303–313. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.de Talamoni N, Smith CA, Wasserman RH, Beltramino C, Fullmer CS, et al. Immunocytochemical localization of the plasma membrane calcium pump, calbindin-D28k, and parvalbumin in Purkinje cells of avian and mammalian cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:11949–11953. doi: 10.1073/pnas.90.24.11949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lind D, Franken S, Kappler J, Jankowski J, Schilling K. Characterization of the neuronal marker NeuN as a multiply phosphorylated antigen with discrete subcellular localization. J Neurosci Res. 2005;79:295–302. doi: 10.1002/jnr.20354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Coppola V, Barrick CA, Southon EA, Celeste A, Wang K, et al. Ablation of TrkA function in the immune system causes B cell abnormalities. Development. 2004;131:5185–5195. doi: 10.1242/dev.01383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Gloster A, Wu W, Speelman A, Weiss S, Causing C, et al. The T alpha 1 alpha-tubulin promoter specifies gene expression as a function of neuronal growth and regeneration in transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 1994;14:7319–7330. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.14-12-07319.1994. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Turanov AA, Su D, Gladyshev VN. Characterization of alternative cytosolic forms and cellular targets of mouse mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:22953–22963. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604326200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fletcher CF, Lutz CM, O'Sullivan TN, Shaughnessy JD, Jr, Hawkes R, et al. Absence epilepsy in tottering mutant mice is associated with calcium channel defects. Cell. 1996;87:607–617. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81381-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ross ME, Fletcher C, Mason CA, Hatten ME, Heintz N. Meander tail reveals a discrete developmental unit in the mouse cerebellum. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:4189–4192. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.11.4189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Thomas KR, Musci TS, Neumann PE, Capecchi MR. Swaying is a mutant allele of the proto-oncogene Wnt-1. Cell. 1991;67:969–976. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(91)90369-a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Cho JH, Tsai MJ. Preferential posterior cerebellum defect in BETA2/NeuroD1 knockout mice is the result of differential expression of BETA2/NeuroD1 along anterior-posterior axis. Dev Biol. 2006;290:125–138. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.11.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Wahlsten D, Andison M. Patterns of cerebellar foliation in recombinant inbred mice. Brain Res. 1991;557:184–189. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(91)90133-g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ackerman SL, Kozak LP, Przyborski SA, Rund LA, Boyer BB, et al. The mouse rostral cerebellar malformation gene encodes an UNC-5-like protein. Nature. 1997;386:838–842. doi: 10.1038/386838a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Sotelo C. Cellular and genetic regulation of the development of the cerebellar system. Prog Neurobiol. 2004;72:295–339. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2004.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Corrales JD, Blaess S, Mahoney EM, Joyner AL. The level of sonic hedgehog signaling regulates the complexity of cerebellar foliation. Development. 2006;133:1811–1821. doi: 10.1242/dev.02351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Laurent TC, Moore EC, Reichard P. Enzymatic Synthesis of Deoxyribonucleotides. Iv. Isolation and Characterization of Thioredoxin, the Hydrogen Donor from Escherichia Coli B. J Biol Chem. 1964;239:3436–3444. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Moore EC, Reichard P, Thelander L. Enzymatic Synthesis of Deoxyribonucleotides.V. Purification and Properties of Thioredoxin Reductase from Escherichia Coli B. J Biol Chem. 1964;239:3445–3452. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Knoepfler PS, Cheng PF, Eisenman RN. N-myc is essential during neurogenesis for the rapid expansion of progenitor cell populations and the inhibition of neuronal differentiation. Genes Dev. 2002;16:2699–2712. doi: 10.1101/gad.1021202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Schuhmacher M, Kohlhuber F, Holzel M, Kaiser C, Burtscher H, et al. The transcriptional program of a human B cell line in response to Myc. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29:397–406. doi: 10.1093/nar/29.2.397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Malynn BA, de Alboran IM, O'Hagan RC, Bronson R, Davidson L, et al. N-myc can functionally replace c-myc in murine development, cellular growth, and differentiation. Genes Dev. 2000;14:1390–1399. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Berggren M, Gallegos A, Gasdaska JR, Gasdaska PY, Warneke J, et al. Thioredoxin and thioredoxin reductase gene expression in human tumors and cell lines, and the effects of serum stimulation and hypoxia. Anticancer Res. 1996;16:3459–3466. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lincoln DT, Ali Emadi EM, Tonissen KF, Clarke FM. The thioredoxin-thioredoxin reductase system: over-expression in human cancer. Anticancer Res. 2003;23:2425–2433. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wakasugi N, Tagaya Y, Wakasugi H, Mitsui A, Maeda M, et al. Adult T-cell leukemia-derived factor/thioredoxin, produced by both human T-lymphotropic virus type I- and Epstein-Barr virus-transformed lymphocytes, acts as an autocrine growth factor and synergizes with interleukin 1 and interleukin 2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1990;87:8282–8286. doi: 10.1073/pnas.87.21.8282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Huard JM, Forster CC, Carter ML, Sicinski P, Ross ME. Cerebellar histogenesis is disturbed in mice lacking cyclin D2. Development. 1999;126:1927–1935. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.9.1927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Ciemerych MA, Kenney AM, Sicinska E, Kalaszczynska I, Bronson RT, et al. Development of mice expressing a single D-type cyclin. Genes Dev. 2002;16:3277–3289. doi: 10.1101/gad.1023602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Anestal K, Arner ES. Rapid induction of cell death by selenium-compromised thioredoxin reductase 1 but not by the fully active enzyme containing selenocysteine. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:15966–15972. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M210733200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Nalvarte I, Damdimopoulos AE, Nystom C, Nordman T, Miranda-Vizuete A, et al. Overexpression of enzymatically active human cytosolic and mitochondrial thioredoxin reductase in HEK-293 cells. Effect on cell growth and differentiation. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:54510–54517. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M408494200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Lovell MA, Xie C, Gabbita SP, Markesbery WR. Decreased thioredoxin and increased thioredoxin reductase levels in Alzheimer's disease brain. Free Radic Biol Med. 2000;28:418–427. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5849(99)00258-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Akterin S, Cowburn RF, Miranda-Vizuete A, Jimenez A, Bogdanovic N, et al. Involvement of glutaredoxin-1 and thioredoxin-1 in beta-amyloid toxicity and Alzheimer's disease. Cell Death Differ. 2006;13:1454–1465. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Schomburg L, Riese C, Michaelis M, Griebert E, Klein MO, et al. Synthesis and metabolism of thyroid hormones is preferentially maintained in selenium-deficient transgenic mice. Endocrinology. 2006;147:1306–1313. doi: 10.1210/en.2005-1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.