Skip to main content
The BMJ logoLink to The BMJ
. 1995 Aug 26;311(7004):546–550. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7004.546

Change in general practice and its effects on service provision in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics.

B Leese 1, N Bosanquet 1
PMCID: PMC2550608  PMID: 7663212

Abstract

OBJECTIVE--To investigate the changes in the structure and service provision of general practice in areas with different socioeconomic characteristics. DESIGN--Interview survey; postal questionnaire. SETTING--260 group and 80 singlehanded general practices in six family health services authorities in England. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES--Changes in computerisation, premises, staffing, incomes, and service provision since the introduction of the 1990 contract, including comparison with data from a study in 1987. RESULTS--In 1993, 94% (245) of group practices were computerised compared with 38% in 1987, and 35% (90) of practices had used the cost rent scheme since 1987. Practice managers were employed in 88% (228) of group practices, and practice nurses in 96% (249) (61% and 60% respectively in 1987). Diabetes and asthma programmes were generally more common in the more affluent areas than elsewhere. A minority of practices (27% (9/33)) in the London inner city area achieved the higher target level for cervical smear testing, compared with 88% (230) overall. A similar trend was apparent for childhood immunisation. Perceived workload increased sharply between 1987 and 1993. Differences in the mean net incomes of general practitioners between areas were much lower than in 1987. Singlehanded practices generally had more problems than group practices in improving service provision. CONCLUSIONS--Practices in all areas have shown a strong response to the new incentives. The evidence suggests, however, that generally the urban and inner city practices still lag behind practices in rural and suburban areas in terms of practice structure and service provision.

Full text

PDF
548

Selected References

These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.

  1. Baker D., Klein R., Carter R. Impact of the 1990 contract for general practitioners on night visiting. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Feb;44(379):68–71. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Bosanquet N., Leese B. Family doctors and innovation in general practice. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1988 Jun 4;296(6636):1576–1580. doi: 10.1136/bmj.296.6636.1576. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bosanquet N., Leese B. Family doctors: their choice of practice strategy. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986 Sep 13;293(6548):667–670. doi: 10.1136/bmj.293.6548.667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Chambers R., Belcher J. Work patterns of general practitioners before and after the introduction of the 1990 contract. Br J Gen Pract. 1993 Oct;43(375):410–412. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jarman B. Identification of underprivileged areas. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1983 May 28;286(6379):1705–1709. doi: 10.1136/bmj.286.6379.1705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klein R. On the Oregon trail: rationing health care. BMJ. 1991 Jan 5;302(6767):1–2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.302.6767.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Leese B., Bosanquet N. Family doctors and change in practice strategy since 1986. BMJ. 1995 Mar 18;310(6981):705–708. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6981.705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Leese B., Bosanquet N. High and low incomes in general practice. BMJ. 1989 Apr 8;298(6678):932–934. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6678.932. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Leese B. The costs of diabetes and its complications. Soc Sci Med. 1992 Nov;35(10):1303–1310. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(92)90183-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Lowy A., Brazier J., Fall M., Thomas K., Jones N., Williams B. T. Quality of minor surgery by general practitioners in 1990 and 1991. Br J Gen Pract. 1994 Aug;44(385):364–365. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Morrell D. The new general practitioner contract: is there an alternative? BMJ. 1989 Apr 15;298(6679):1005–1007. doi: 10.1136/bmj.298.6679.1005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Sutherland V. J., Cooper C. L. Job stress, satisfaction, and mental health among general practitioners before and after introduction of new contract. BMJ. 1992 Jun 13;304(6841):1545–1548. doi: 10.1136/bmj.304.6841.1545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from BMJ : British Medical Journal are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES