Abstract
By utilizing a bioassay-guided separation (P388 lymphocytic leukemia and a panel of human cancer cell lines) of fermentation broths from a Kitasatospora sp. collected from a tundra soil sample taken at the shore of the Beaufort Sea, we have isolated three powerful (GI50 to 0.0006 μg/mL) cancer cell growth inhibitors (1-3) and determined their structures to be closely related cyclodepsipeptides. From 380-L fermentations of Kitasatospora sp. were obtained 2.6 mg of a new cyclodepsipeptide designated kitastatin 1 (3), accompanied by the previously known respirantin (1, 10.8 mg) and its valeryl homologue (2, 4.8 mg). The structures were determined by employment of a series of high-resolution mass and 2D-NMR spectroscopic analyses. The stereochemical assignments and overall structures were confirmed by subsequent total synthesis of depsipeptide 1, as reported in the accompanying contribution.
The actinomycete genus Kitasatospora has a developing history of producing biologically active metabolites, especially those with cancer cell growth inhibitory properties. An early example of the latter was the isolation of the anticancer antibiotic terpentecin from a soil Kitasatospora sp. (strain MF730-N6) by Umezawa and colleagues in 1985.2 That advance was quickly followed by the isolation of anticancer carbolines from Kitasatospora setae3a,b cultured from a Spitsbergen soil sample.4 In 1993, the stereochemically undefined cyclodepsipeptide respirantin (1) was isolated from a Kitasatospora sp. during an examination of its constituents for insecticidal activity.5 Interestingly, in an investigation of endophytic actinomycetes on Taxus baccata plants, a Kitasatospora sp. (strain P & U 22869) was isolated and found to produce Taxol™ and related taxanes.6 More recently, Kitasatospora spp. have been found to produce yeast-like pleiotropic drug-resistant pump constituents,7 proteasome inhibitors designated tyropeptins A and B,8 and bafilomycin-like antifungal compounds9; more recently, K. cheerisanensis was found to contain the cytotoxic bafilomycin C1-amide.10 The bafilomycins represent a group of 16-membered macrocyclic lactones isolated from K. setae and several streptomyces species and are very strong cancer-cell-growth inhibitors.11a-h
In 1997, during an exploration in arctic Alaska for terrestrial and marine microorganisms that might contain anticancer constituents, a tundra specimen on the shore of the Beaufort Sea near Prudhoe Bay was collected and subsequently found to contain a Gram-positive bacterium identified as Kitasatospora sp. After this actinomycete was identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity, it was scaled up in a quarter-strength potato dextrose broth over a seven-day fermentation period. A dichloromethane extract of 4 L of broth was concentrated to a residue that inhibited growth of the P388 lymphocytic leukemia and a minipanel of human cancer cell lines. For isolation of the cancer cell growth inhibitor constituents, the fermentation was scaled up to 380 L, and separation was guided by a bioassay using both the P388 and human cancer cell line systems. The resulting extract (3.4g) was partitioned between 9:1 CH3OH-water and hexane followed by dilution of the aqueous phase to 3:2 CH3OH-water and extraction with CH2Cl2. Concentration of the latter phase provided the active fraction (0.50g, P388 ED50 0.15 μg/mL). Separation of this fraction was guided by the P388 lymphocytic leukemia cell line bioassay and was conducted using a series of gel permeation column separations on Sephadex LH-20 followed by partition chromatographic separations, again on LH-20, and finally by reversed-phase high-performance liquid chromatographic separations that led to cyclodepsipeptides 1 (10.8 mg), 2 (4.8 mg) and 3 (2.6 mg).
Results and Discussions
In a high-resolution APCI (positive ion mode) mass spectrum, cyclodepsipeptide 1 showed a molecular ion peak at m/z 748.3660 [M+H]+ that suggested molecular formula C37H53N3O13. The comprehensive analyses of 1H-, 13C- and 2D-NMR spectra allowed assignment of the following units: lactyl, 2-hydroxy-3-methylvaleryl, 4-amino-2,2,6-trimethyl-3-oxoheptanoyl, 2-hydroxy-4-methylvaleryl, 2-hydroxy-3-formylaminobenzoyl, and a threonine unit. The connection of the fragments by HMBC-NMR analyses led to assignment of depsipeptide 1 with unknown stereochemistry, as reported for the Streptomyces sp. constituent 1 by Urushibata5 in 1993.
Molecular formula C36H51N3O13 was assigned to cyclodepsipeptide 2 on the basis of APCI (positive ion mode) HRMS results, the molecular ion at m/z 734.3510 [M+H]+ being 14 units (CH2) less than 1. The NMR proton and carbon assignments of cyclodepsipeptide 2 were deduced by comparison with those exhibited in the NMR spectra of 1. Those comparisons revealed a 2-hydroxy-3-methylbutyryl unit in place of the 2-hydroxy-4-methylvaleryl unit of 1 and allowed assignment of cyclodepsipeptide 2, previously described in a 1994 Japanese patent.12
The 380-L scale fermentation of Kitasatospora sp. was repeated three times in order to obtain sufficient amounts of cyclodepsipeptides 1 and 2 for attempts at obtaining crystals for X-ray crystal structure determinations. Although suitable crystals were not obtained, one of the 380-L fermentations led to isolation of a new cyclodepsipeptide designated kitastatin 1 (3), albeit in very low yield (2.6 mg). Kitastatin 1 (3) was obtained as an amorphous powder that gave a high-resolution (APCI+) mass spectral molecular ion at m/z 720.3725 [M+1]+, which corresponds to a formula 28 mass units less than that of cyclodepsipeptide 1. The 1H-, 13C- and HMQC-NMR spectra of kitastatin 1 (Table 1) resembled that of respirantin (1). However, the high-field carbonyl signal corresponding to the aromatic formamide group of 1 was missing. That was further confirmed when 1H-, 1H-COSY, TOCSY-, and HMBC data were interpreted and pointed to a 3-amino-2-hydroxy-benzoyl segment in place of the aromatic formamide as the only structural difference with cyclodepsipeptide 1. Thus, kitastatin 1 was unequivocally assigned structure 3.13
Table 1.
1H and 13C Spectral Assignments for Kitastatin 1 (3, recorded in CD2Cl2, J in Hz)a
| Positions | δ 13C | δ 1H | 1H, 1H-COSY | HMBC (C to H) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1-CO | 168.0 | H-2, H-13 | ||
| 2-CH | 55.8 | 5.25 (dd, 8.5/2.5) | NH-2, H-3 | H-14 |
| 3-CH | 72.9 | 6.02 (dq, 7.0/2.5) | H-2, H-14 | H-14 |
| 4-CO | 172.3 | H-3 | ||
| 5-CH | 72.6 | 4.72 (m) | H-15a, H-15b | |
| 6-CO | 173.7 | H-19, H-20 | ||
| 7-C | 53.7 | H-19, H-20 | ||
| 8-CO | 208.5 | H-9, H-19, H-20 | ||
| 9-CH | 56.0 | 4.84 (dd, 11.0/5.5) | NH-9, H-21 | H-21 |
| 10-CO | 170.4 | H-9, H-11 | ||
| 11-CH | 81.4 | 4.74 (m) | H-25 | H-26 |
| 12-CO | 170.2 | H-11, H-13, H-29 | ||
| 13-CH | 71.6 | 5.80 (q, 6.5) | H-29 | H-29 |
| 14-CH3 | 16.6 | 1.36 (d, 6.5) | H-3 | |
| 15-CH2 | 39.8 | 1.52 (m) | H-5, H-15b | H-16, H-17 |
| 1.72 (m) | H-5, H-15a | |||
| 16-CH | 24.9 | 1.74 (m) | H-18 | |
| 17-CH3 | 21.6 | 0.89 (d, 6.5) | H-18 | |
| 18-CH3 | 22.9 | 0.94 (d, 7.0) | H-16 | H-17 |
| 19-CH3 | 20.0 | 1.10 (s) | H-20 | |
| 20-CH3 | 24.3 | 1.27 (s) | H-19 | |
| 21-CH2 | 43.3 | 1.80 (2H, t, 8.5) | H-9, H-22 | H-9, H-23, H-24 |
| 22-CH | 25.0 | 1.64 (m) | H-21, H-23, H24 | H-23, H-24 |
| 23-CH3 | 21.1 | 0.92 (d, 7.0) | H-22 | H-21 |
| 24-CH3 | 23.6 | 0.93 (d, 7.0) | H-22 | H-21 |
| 25-CH | 36.9 | 2.11 (m) | H-11, H-26, H27 | H-11, H-27 |
| 26-CH3 | 14.7 | 0.98 (d, 7.0) | H-25 | H-27a |
| 27-CH2 | 25.7 | 1.37 (m) | H-25, H-27b, H-28 | H-27 |
| 1.77 (m) | H-27a, H-28 | |||
| 28-CH3 | 10.6 | 0.97 (t, 7.5) | H-27a, H-27b | H-27a |
| 29-CH3 | 18.3 | 1.54 (d, 7.0) | H-13 | H-13 |
| 1′-C | 113.3 | H-5′ | ||
| 2′-C | 150.9 | H-4′, H-6′ | ||
| 3′-C | 137.0 | H-5′ | ||
| 4′-CH | 118.5 | 6.89 (d, 6.5) | H-5′ | H-6′ |
| 5′-CH | 119.3 | 6.78 (t, 7.5) | H-4′, H-6′ | |
| 6′-CH | 114.6 | 7.01 (d, 8.0) | H-5′ | H-4′ |
| 7′-CO | 171.3 | NH-2, H-6′ | ||
| NH-2 | 7.08 (d, 8.5) | H-2 | ||
| NH-9 | 7.53 (d, 9.5) | H-9 | ||
| NH-3′ | 4.00 (s, br) |
500 MHz for 1H NMR, 100 MHz for 13C NMR.
Because suitable crystallization of cyclodepsipeptides 1-3 was not successful and prevented investigation of the stereochemistry by X-ray crystal structure determinations, we initially focused on high-field 2-D NMR approaches to define the stereochemistry. In ROESY-NMR experiments, kitastatin 1 (3) showed cross-peaks related to the ring system at H-2/H-3 (δH 5.25/6.02), H-9/H-19 (δH 4.84/1.10) and H-25/NH-9 (δH 2.11/7.53), which suggested a 2S, 3R (or 2R, 3S), 9S and 11S (or 9R and 11R) relationship. Similarly, three-cross peaks at H-2/H-3 (δH 5.24/6.03), H-9/H-19 (δH 4.83/1.09) and H-25/NH-9 (δH 2.09/7.50) were located in the ROESY spectrum of cyclodepsipeptide respirantin (1). While these NMR experiments were in progress, we were able to unequivocally assign the stereostructure of 1 and kitastatin 1 (3) as 2S, 3R, 5S, 9S, 11S and 13S by our completion of total syntheses.13 Since we were unable to make a direct comparison of our cyclodepsipeptides 1 and 2 with authentic samples previously reported,5,12 there still remains some minor uncertainty.
To investigate whether minor variations in the fermentation conditions could lead to a series of new cyclodepsipeptide antineoplastic agents, culture media were modified by adding presumed biochemical precursors, DL-serine, 2-hydroxyvaleric acid, DL-tyrosine, or shikimic acid. Fermentation conditions as well as bioassay guided isolation techniques were otherwise identical. As summarized in Table 2, only cyclodepsipeptides 1 and 2 were isolated following addition of the various presumed precursors to the fermentation broth.
Table 2.
Results of Fermentation Experiments (Runs A-D)a
| Cyclodepsipeptide and CH2Cl2 Fraction | A (mg) | B (mg) | C (mg) | D (mg) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CH2Cl2 Fractionb | 60.0 | 92.0 | 185.0 | 140.0 |
| Cyclodepsipeptide 1 | 7.0 | 5.3 | 3.7 | 9.0 |
| Cyclodepsipeptide 2 | 1.7 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 2.3 |
Run A: culture media with addition of DL-serine. Run B: culture media with addition of 2-hydroxyvaleric acid. Run C: culture media with addition of DL-tyrosine. Run D: culture media with addition of shikimic acid.
CH2Cl2 extract fraction (from each 380-L fermentation) obtained from the CH2Cl2/CH3CHOH-H2O (3:2) solvent partition isolation step.
The bioassay-directed separation clearly indicated that cyclodepsipeptides 1-3 are the most important cancer cell growth inhibitor constituents of Kitasatospora sp. When evaluated against the murine P388 lymphocytic leukemia and six human cancer cell lines, they exhibited extraordinary cancer cell growth inhibitory properties (Table 3). Since the minor structural differences between compounds 1, 2 and 3 did not greatly affect the cancer cell growth inhibitory activities, it appears that the overall stereochemistry of the macrocyclic lactone and side-chain are of greater importance. Structural modifications of kitastatin 113 are in progress as well as preclinical development. Interestingly, no previous cancer cell growth inhibitory activity has been reported for cyclodepsipeptides 1 and 2.5,12
Table 3.
Inhibition of the Murine P388 Lymphocytic Leukemia (ED50 μg/mL) and Human Cancer Cell Line (GI50 μg/mL) by Cyclodepsipeptides 1, 2 and 3.
| Cyclodepsipeptides | P388 Murine leukemia | BXPC-3 Pancreas | MCF-7 Breast | SF268 CNS | NCI-H460 Lung | KM20L2 Colon | DU-145 Prostate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0.0037 | 0.47 | 0.0006 | 0.0016 | 0.0006 | 0.0006 | 0.00018 |
| 2 | 0.033 | 1.2 | 0.00064 | 0.016 | 0.00063 | 0.00058 | <0.0001 |
| 3 | 0.045 | 0.0066 | 0.004 | 0.0035 | <0.001 | 0.0024 | 0.0026 |
In addition to the human cancer cell line activity, cyclodepsipeptide 1 had activity against the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans (minimum inhibitory concentration [MIC] = 2 μg/mL), and cyclodepsipeptide 2 had marginal activity against the opportunistic bacterium Micrococcus luteus (MIC = 64 μg/mL). Kitastatin 1 (3) had marginal activity against C. neoformans and Enterococcus faecalis (MIC = 64 μg/mL).
Experimental
General Experimental Procedures
Solvents used for the chromatographic procedure were redistilled. Sephadex LH-20 employed for gel permeation and partition chromatography was obtained from Pharmacia Fine Chemicals AB, Upsala, Sweden. The silica gel GHLF Uniplates for thin layer chromatography were supplied by Analtech, Inc., USA. The TLC results were viewed under UV light and developed with ceric sulfate/sulfuric acid (heating for 3 minutes). Analytical HPLC was conducted using a Hewlett-Packard model 1100 HPLC coupled with a diode-array detector and an Evaporative Light Scattering Detector. Reverse-phase HPLC was performed on a ZORBAX SB C18 column attached to a Waters 600E instrument with a 2487 dualλ absorbance detector.
The melting points were recorded with a Kofler melting point instrument. Optical rotation data were determined with a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter. UV spectra were acquired using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 3β UV/VIS spectrophotometer equipped with a Hewlett-Packard Laser Jet 2000 plotter. IR spectra were recorded with an AVATAR 360 FT-IR instrument with the sample prepared in CHCl3 film. High-resolution mass spectra were obtained with a JEOL LCmate magnetic sector instrument by APCI in positive ion mode with a poly(ethylene glycol) reference. The NMR experiments were conducted using a Varian Unity INOVA-500 spectrometer operating at 500 MHz or 400 MHz for 1H NMR as well as 2D NMR referenced to tetramethylsilane and at 100 MHz for 13C NMR referenced to tetramethylsilane.
Specimen Collection and Fermentation
Soil samples were collected in clean plastic bags by one of us (GRP) on the shore tundra near Prudhoe Bay (Beaufort Sea), Alaska, and shipped by air to our laboratory. Soils were aseptically diluted and spread on quarter-strength potato dextrose agar (Difco) containing soil extract (1 kg/L commercial potting soil was heated, filtered, sterilized, and used at a final concentration of 133 mL/L in all preparations). Kitasatospora sp. was identified by 16S rRNA gene sequence similarity (Accugenix, Newark, DE). Results from the MicroSeq database based on the first 500 base pairs of the 16S rRNA gene placed the bacterium in the genus Kitasatospora sp. (% difference = 1.91, confidence level to genus). Isolated colonies were subcultured and fermented in potato dextrose broth/soil extract, and extracts were screened against the murine P388 lymphocytic leukemia cell line and a minipanel of human cancer cell lines. Prior to large-scale fermentation (6 L flasks containing 4 L media), the P388 and human cancer cell line activity of the actinomycete was determined to be optimum in quarter-strength potato dextrose broth for seven days. All activity peak experiments and large-scale fermentations were performed at room temperature with shaking. The voucher specimen is maintained at Arizona State University.
Extraction and Solvent Partition of Kitasatospora sp
The microbial broth (380 L; a series over the period Feb 2003-May 2003) was extracted (3×) with CH2Cl2 (1/2 volume). The CH2Cl2 extract was dried (3.4 g) and then redissolved in 2 L of 9:1 CH3OH-H2O and partitioned (4×) with CH2Cl2 (2 L per pass). The CH2Cl2 was quickly removed in vacuo, and the residue was redissolved in 9:1 CH3OH-H2O and partitioned (4×) with hexane. After dilution to 3:2 CH3OH-H2O, the aqueous phase was partitioned (4×) with CH2Cl2 to give 0.5 g of a CH2Cl2-soluble fraction (P388 ED50, 0.15 μg/ML).
Isolation of Cyclodepsipeptides 1, 2 and 3
The cancer cell inhibitory CH2Cl2 fraction (0.5 g), obtained as described in the preceding experiment, was passed in CH3OH through a column of Sephadex LH-20. Two resulting bioactive (cancer cell line bioassay) fractions were combined and chromatographed on a Sephadex LH-20 column using hexane-toluene-CH3OH (3:1:1) as eluent, which led to the concentration into one fraction of the inhibitory activity (57 mg, P388 ED50 0.02 μg/mL). Further separation of the active fraction was performed using reverse-phase HPLC. Initially, analytical HPLC of the fraction was conducted on a HP1100 series instrument with both ELSD and UV detectors to locate the target peaks. The fraction was then separated by semi-preparative HPLC on a Waters instrument with a ZORBAX SB C18 column (9.6 × 250 mm) in acetonitrile-H2O (40% to 90% in 45 minutes) at 4 mL/minute flow rate. Cyclodepsipeptides 1, 2 and 3 were obtained by concentration of the eluting fractions with peaks at retention times of 42.5, 40 and 45 min, respectively.
The experimental results summarized in Table 2 were obtained by employment of the preceding procedure.
Cyclodepsipeptide 1
colorless amorphous powder (10.8 mg): mp 118-120 °C; 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 500 MHz) δ 12.61 (1H, s, 2′-OH), 8.54 (1H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-4′), 8.47 (1H, s, H-8′), 7.92 (1H, s, 3′-NH), 7.50 (1H, d, J = 7.5 Hz, 9-NH), 7.40 (1H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-6′), 7.16 (1H, d, J = 7.0 Hz, 2-NH), 6.97 (1H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, H-5′), 6.03 (1H, m, H-3), 5.80 (1H, q, J = 6.0 Hz, H-13), 5.24 (1H, dd, J = 1.6,7.0 Hz, H-2), 4.83 (1H, m, H-9), 4.73 (1H, m, H-11), 4.71 (1H, m, H-5), 2.09 (1H, m, H-25), 1.80 (2H, m, H-21), 1.76 (1H, m, H-27b), 1.70 (1H, m, H-16), 1.68 (1H, m, H-15b), 1.62 (1H, m, H-22), 1.54 (1H, m, H-15a), 1.54 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-29), 1.36 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-14), 1.33 (1H, m, H-27a), 1.27 (3H, s, H-20), 1.09 (3H, s, H-19), 0.96 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-26), 0.95 (3H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, H-28), 0.93 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-18), 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-23), 0.91 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-24), 0.89 (3H, d, J = 6.0 Hz, H-17), 13C NMR (CD2Cl2, 100 MHz) δ 208.0(C-8), 173.7(C-6), 172.3(C-4), 170.7(C-7′), 170.4(C-10), 170.1(C-12), 167.8(C-1), 159.3(C-8′), 150.9(C-2′), 127.9(C-3′), 125.0(C-4′), 120.7(C-6′), 119.2(C-5′), 113.3(C-1′), 81.4(C-11), 72.7(C-3), 72.6(C-5), 71.7(C-13), 56.8(C-9), 56.0(C-2), 54.2(C-7), 43.3(C-21), 39.7(C-15), 36.8(C-25), 25.7(C-27), 24.9(C-16), 24.8(C-22), 24.3(C-20), 23.6(C-23), 23.0(C-18), 21.5(C-17), 21.0(C-24), 20.0(C-19), 18.3(C-29), 16.6(C-14), 14.5(C-26), 10.6(C-28); Selected HBMC (C to H) C-1 to H-2, H-13; C-2 to H-14; C-3 to H-14; C-4 to H-3, H-5; C-6 to H-19, H-20; C-7 to H-19, H-20; C-8 to H-9, H-19, H-20; C-9 to H-21; C-10 to H-9, 10-NH, H-11; C-11 to H-26; C-12 to H-11, H-13, H-29; C-13 to H-29; HRMS (APCI positive ion mode) m/z 748.3660 [M+H]+ (calcd for C37H54N3O13, 748.3657).
Cyclodepsipeptide 2
colorless amorphous powder (4.8 mg): mp 117-120 °C; 1H NMR (CD2Cl2, 400 MHz) δ 12.62 (1H, s, 4′-OH), 8.53 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-4′), 8.50 (1H, s, H-8′), 8.02 (1H, s, 3′-NH), 7.52 (1H, d, J = 10.0 Hz, 9-NH), 7.43 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, H-6′), 7.18 (1H, d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2-NH), 6.99 (1H, t, J = 7.6 Hz, H-5′), 6.02 (1H, m, H-3), 5.82 (1H, q, J = 7.2 Hz, H-13), 5.26 (1H, d, J = 8.8 Hz, H-2), 4.85 (1H, m, H-9), 4.77 (1H, m, H-11), 4.54 (1H, m, H-5), 2.12 (1H, m, H-15), 2.10 (1H, m, H-24), 1.83 (2H, t, J = 6.0 Hz, H-20), 1.75 (1H, m, H-26b), 1.62 (1H, m, H-21), 1.56 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-28), 1.39 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-14), 1.37 (1H, m, H-26a), 1.29 (3H, s, H-19), 1.11 (3H, s, H-18), 0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-17), 0.98 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-25), 0.97 (3H, t, J = 6.4 Hz, H-27), 0.95 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-16), 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-23), 0.92 (3H, d, J = 6.4 Hz, H-24); 13C NMR (CD2Cl2, 100 MHz) δ 207.5(C-8), 173.6(C-6), 170.9(C-4), 170.9(C-7′), 170.6(C-10), 170.0(C-12), 167.7(C-1), 159.5(C-8′), 150.8(C-2′), 127.9(C-3′), 125.0(C-4′), 120.7(C-6′), 119.1(C-5′), 113.5(C-1′), 81.0(C-11), 78.3(C-5), 72.7(C-3), 71.6(C-13), 56.7(C-9), 55.9(C-2), 53.8(C-7), 42.8(C-20), 36.8(C-24), 30.3 (C-15), 25.4(C-26), 24.8(C-19), 24.1(C-21), 23.6(C-23), 20.0(C-22), 19.8(C-18), 18.4(C-17), 18.1(C-28), 17.7(C-16), 16.6(C-14), 14.4(C-25), 10.4(C-27); HRMS (APCI positive ion mode) m/z 734.351 [M-H]+ (calcd for C36H52N3O13, 734.3500).
Cyclodepispeptide 3
colorless amorphous powder: mp 126-129 °C; [α]24 D-10 (c 0.07, CH3OH); UV (CH3OH) λmax 231, 328 mm; IR (CHCl3), νmax 1745, 1712, 1665, 1644, 1502 and 1525 cm-1; HRMS (APCI positive ion mode) m/z 720.3725[M+H]+ (calcd for C36H54N3O12, 720.3708); 1H and 13C NMR data see Table 1.
Cancer Cell Line Bioassay Procedures
The inhibition of cancer cell growth was evaluated using the National cancer Institute’s standard sulforhodamine B assay as previously described.14 Cells in a 5% fetal bovine serum/RPMI1640 mdium solution were inoculated in 96-well plates and incubated for 24 h. Serial dilutions of the compounds were next added. After 48 h, the plates were fixed with trichloroacetic acid, stained with rhodamine B, and read with an automatic microplate reader. Growth inhibition of 50% (ED50 or the drug concentration causing a 50% reduction in the net protein increase) was calculated from optical density data with Immunosoft software. Murine leukemia P388 cells were incubated in a 10% horse serum/Fisher medium solution for 24 h followed by a 48 h incubation with serial dilutions of the compounds. Cell growth inhibition (ED50) was then calculated using a Z1 Beckman/Coulter particle counter.
Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing
Cyclodepsipeptides 1 and 2 were screened against the bacteria Stenotrophomonas maltophilia ATCC 13637, Micrococcus luteus Presque Isle 456, Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213, Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Enterobacter cloacae ATCC 13047, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212, Streptococcus pneumoniae ATCC 6303, Neisseria gonorrhoeae ATCC 49226, and the fungi Candida albicans ATCC 90028 and Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC 90112, according to established broth microdilution susceptibility assays.15,16 Owing to a paucity of material, compound 2 was tested against S. maltophilia, M. luteus, S. aureus, E. coli and C. albicans only. Compounds were reconstituted in a small volume of sterile DMSO and diluted in the appropriate media immediately prior to susceptibility experiments. The minimum inhibitory concentration was defined as the lowest concentration of compound that inhibited all visible growth of the test organism (optically clear). Assays were repeated a minimum of two times on separate days.
Figure 1.

Cyclodepsipeptides 1-3.
Acknowledgement
We are pleased to acknowledge financial support provided by Outstanding Investigator Grant CA44344-01-12 and RO1 CA90441 -01-05 awarded by the Division of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, DHHS; the Arizona Disease Control Research Commission; the Robert B. Dalton Endowment Fund; Dr. Alec D. Keith; Dr. William Crisp; Mrs. Anita Crisp; Gary L. and Diane R. Tooker; John C. Budzinski; the Eagles Art Ehrmann Cancer Fund; and the Ladies Auxiliary to the Veterans of Foreign Wars. Other helpful assistance was provided by Drs. F. Hogan, J. C. Knight, V. J. R. V. Mukku, and J. M. Schmidt; L. Williams; and Linda K. Butts, United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Northern District Office, Dalton Management Unit, 1150 University Avenue, Fairbanks, Alaska 99709-3899.
References and Notes
- 1.Contribution 560 of the series Antineoplastic Agents. For part 559, seeSmith AB, III, Razler TM, Pettit GR, Chapuis J-C. Organic Lett. 2005;7:4403–4406. doi: 10.1021/ol051585a.
- 2.Tamamura T, Sawa T, Isshiki K, Masuda T, Homma Y, Iinuma H, Naganawa H, Hamada M, Takeuchi T, Umezawa H. J. Antibiot. 1985;38:1664–1669. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.38.1664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3(a).Peczynska-Czoch W. Inst. Immunol. Exp. Ther. 1987;35:129–137. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Peczynska-Czoch W, Mordarski M, Kaczmarek L, Nantka-Namirski P. Inst. Immunol. Exp. Ther. 1987;35:109–15. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mordarska H, Wieczorek J, Zakrzewska-Czerwinska J, Zwiefka A, Mordarski M. Inst. Immunol. Exp. Ther. 1987;35:237–247. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Urushibata I, Isogai A, Matsumoto S, Suzuki A. J. Antibiot. 1993;46:701–703. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.46.701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Caruso M, Colombo AL, Crespi-Perellino N, Fedeli L, Malyszko J, Pavesi A, Quaroni S, Saracchi M, Ventrella G. Annals of Microbiology. 2000;50:89–102. [Google Scholar]
- 7.Wanigasekera a., Hiraga K, Hamanaka N, Oka K. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry. 2001;65:2353–2357. doi: 10.1271/bbb.65.2353. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Momose I, Sekizawa R, Hirosawa S, Ikeda D, Naganawa H, Linuma H, Takeuchi T. J. Antibiotics. 2001;54:1004–1012. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.54.1004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Chung YR, Sung KC, Mo HK, Son D, Nam JS, Chun J, Bae KS. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1999;49:753–758. doi: 10.1099/00207713-49-2-753. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Moon S-S, Hwang W-H, Chung YR, Shin J. J. Antibiot. 2003;56:856–861. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.56.856. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11(a).Werner G, Hagenmaier G, Albert K, Kohlshorn H. Tetrahedron Lett. 1983;24:5193–5196. [Google Scholar]; (b) Kretschmer A, Dorgerloh M, Deeg M, Hagenmaier H. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1985;49:2509–2511. [Google Scholar]; (c) Werner G, Hagenmaier G, Drautz H, Baumgartner A, Zahner H. J. Antibiot. 1984;37:110–117. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.37.110. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Meyer M, Keller-Schierlein W, Drautz H, Blank W, Zahner H. Helv. Chim. Acta. 1985;68:83–94. [Google Scholar]; (e) Baker GH, Brown PJ, Dorgan RJ, Everett JR, Ley SV, Slawin AMZ, Williams DJ. Tetrahedron Lett. 1987;28:5565–5568. [Google Scholar]; (f) O’Shea MG, Richards RW, Rothschild JM, Lacey E. J. Antibiot. 1997;50:1073–1077. doi: 10.7164/antibiotics.50.1073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (g) Toshima K, Yamaguchi H, Jyojima T, Noguchi Y, Nakata M, Matsumura S. Tetrahedron Lett. 1996;37:1073–1076. [Google Scholar]; (h) Scheidt KA, Bannister TD, Tasaka A, Wendt MD, Savall BM, Fegley GJ, Roush WR. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:6981–6990. doi: 10.1021/ja017885e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Suzuki A, Nagayama K. Jpn. Kokai Tokkyo Koho. 1994:15. CODEN: JKXXAF JP 06239844 A2 19940830 Heisei. Application: JP 93-51415 19930217.
- 13.Pettit GR, Smith TH, Feng S, Knight JC, Tan R, Pettit RK, Hinrichs PA. J. Nat. Prod. 2007;70:1073–1083. doi: 10.1021/np0680735. PubMed. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Monks A, Scudiero D, Skehan P, Shoemaker R, Paull K, Vestica D, Hose C, Langley J, Cronise P, Vaigro-Wolff A, Gray-Goodrich M, Campbell H, Mayo J, Boyd M. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 1991;83:757–766. doi: 10.1093/jnci/83.11.757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.NCCLS . Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically; Approved Standard - Fifth Edition. NCCLS; 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA: 2000. NCCLS document M7-A5 [ISBN 1-56238-394-9] [Google Scholar]
- 16.NCCLS . Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard—Second Edition. NCCLS; 940 West Valley Road, Suite 1400, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087-1898 USA: 2002. NCCLS document M27-A2 [ISBN 1-56238-469-4] [Google Scholar]
