Abstract
Gene expression alterations in response to cigarette smoke have been characterized in normal-appearing bronchial epithelium of healthy smokers and it has been suggested that adjacent histologically normal tissue display tumor-associated molecular abnormalities. We sought to delineate the spatial and temporal molecular lung field of injury in smoker early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (n=19) who were accrued into a surveillance clinical trial for annual follow-up and bronchoscopies within one year after definitive surgery. Bronchial brushings and biopsies were obtained from six different sites in the lung at the time of inclusion in the study and at 12, 24 and 36 months after the first time point. Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays were used for whole-transcript expression profiling of airways (n=391). Microarray analysis identified gene features (n=1165) that were non-uniform by site and differentially expressed between airways adjacent to tumors relative to more distant samples as well as those (n=1395) that were significantly altered with time up to three years. In addition, gene-interaction networks mediated by PI3K and ERK1/2 were modulated in adjacent compared to contralateral airways and the latter network with time. Furthermore, phosphorylated AKT and ERK1/2 immunohistochemical expression were significantly increased with time (nuclear pAKT, p=0.03; cytoplasmic pAKT, p<0.0001; pERK1/2, p=0.02) and elevated in adjacent compared to more distant airways (nuclear pAKT, p=0.04; pERK1/2, p=0.03). This study highlights spatial and temporal cancer-associated expression alterations in the molecular field of injury of early stage NSCLC patients after definitive surgery that warrant further validation in independent studies.
Keywords: Early stage NSCLC, gene expression profiling, lung airway epithelium, chemoprevention
Introduction
Lung cancer, of which non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) comprises the majority, is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the US and worldwide (1, 2). The high mortality of this disease is in part due to the late diagnosis of the majority of lung cancers after regional or distant spread of the malignancy (3). Recent data from the National Lung Screening Trial (4), indicating that screening increases early detection rates, are expected to augment the number of early stage NSCLC detected warranting the need for better clinical management of this growing subpopulation. Besides adjuvant therapy, there are no effective chemoprevention strategies for early stage NSCLC patients (5) who comprise approximately 50% of all diagnosed cases and have a relatively high rate of relapse (3). Improved clinical management of early stage NSCLC is tightly linked to the identification of new effective early biomarkers that can guide potential chemoprevention strategies.
Most diagnosed NSCLC cases (85%) are attributable to cigarette smoking (6–8). Auerbach et al found that cigarette smoke induces extensive histological changes in the bronchial epithelia in the lungs of smokers and that premalignant lesions are widespread and multifocal throughout the respiratory epithelium, suggestive of a field effect (9). Many molecular abnormalities, such as loss of heterozygosity (LOH) (10–12), mutations in TP53 (13), methylation of p16 tumor suppressor, death associated protein kinase (DAPK) and retinoic acid receptor 2 beta (RAR-β2) were detected in bronchial epithelia of cancer-free former smokers (14–18) some of which persisting for many years after smoking cessation (15). More recently, global mRNA and microRNA (miRNA) expression profiles have been described in the normal-appearing bronchial epithelium of healthy smokers (19, 20) that are different from those in non-smokers. Moreover, expression and pathway signatures have been derived from normal bronchial epithelium of smokers that exhibited diagnostic properties (21, 22). Molecular changes involving LOH of chromosomal regions 3p (DDUT and FHIT genes), 9p (CDKN2A), genomic instability (increased microsatellite repeats) and p16 methylation have been demonstrated in histologically normal epithelium in squamous cell carcinoma patients and in the sequence of pathogenesis of the disease (14, 23, 24). Moreover, Nelson et al demonstrated that KRAS is also mutated in histologically normal lung tissue adjacent to lung tumors (25). Furthermore, Tang and colleagues found higher rates of EGFR mutations in adjacent normal bronchial epithelia (26, 27) suggestive of a potential localized field effect.
It is plausible to assume that understanding early molecular aberrations in histologically normal smoke-damaged airway epithelium of early stage patients would serve as a critical first step towards identification of biomarkers that can guide lung cancer prevention strategies. However, the global molecular airway field of injury in early stage NSCLC patients, in particular after definitive surgery, is unknown. In this study, we used transcript-level expression profiling coupled with gene-interaction network analysis and immunohistochemical analysis to characterize, in-depth, site- and time-dependent global molecular alterations in airways of smoker early stage NSCLC patients.
Materials and Methods
Patient population and airway epithelial cell collection
Early stage (I/II), current or former smoker NSCLC patients with at least a 10-pack-year smoking history and without evidence of disease after definitive surgery were recruited into the Vanguard phase II surveillance clinical trial (clinical trial number NCT00352391) within one year from time of surgery. Patients were accrued between 2004–2008 and underwent frequent testing including chest x-rays, CT scans, laboratory work, serologies, flexible bronchoscopies and airway biopsy collections within one year from surgery (average, 6 months; range, 1–12) (first time point), and at months 12, 24, and 36 following the first time point. Bronchoscopies were performed using white light or both white light and autofluorescence modalities. Biopsies were obtained from all potential anatomical locations and time points per patient. In total there were 324 evaluable airway biopsies. Histological assessment was performed to determine whether malignant changes will occur during the time period. Once patients have completed 3 years of testing, they were followed until the study is completed. Patients were comprised of former (n=16) and current (n=3) smokers. One of the three current smoker patients quit smoking 6 months before the 24 month time point. The clinicopathological variables of patients in this study are summarized in Table 1. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards and all participants provided written informed consents.
Table 1.
Patient | Histology | Anatomical site |
Stage | Recurrence | Adjuvant chemotherapy |
Gender | Age | Smoking status |
Pack years |
Years quit smoking |
Months to inclusion from surgery |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | ADC | LUL | IIA | Yes | No | Male | 81 | Former | 100 | 12.0 | 1 |
2 | ADC | RLL | IB | No | No | Male | 64 | Former | 27 | 19.1 | 5 |
3 | ADC | RUL | IB | Yes | Yes | Male | 58 | Former | 12 | 25.5 | 7 |
4 | SCC | RLL | IB | Yes | Yes | Female | 62 | Former | 60 | 7.6 | 7 |
5 | ADC | RLL | IA | No | No | Female | 60 | Former | 31 | 11.8 | 6 |
6 | ADC | LLL | IA | Yes | Yes | Male | 62 | Former | 40 | 5.8 | 5 |
7 | ADC | RUL | IB | Yes | Yes | Male | 61 | Current | 70 | NA | 10 |
8 | SCC | LUL | IB | No | No | Male | 64 | Current | 100 | NA | 5 |
9 | ADC | RUL | IA | No | No | Male | 69 | Former | 12 | 36.5 | 8 |
10 | ADC | RUL | IB | No | No | Female | 63 | Former | 18 | 8.6 | 5 |
11 | ADC | RUL | IB | Yes | No | Female | 53 | Former | 42 | 5.8 | 3 |
12 | SCC | RUL | IA | No | No | Male | 62 | Former | 68 | 0.4 | 5 |
13 | SCC | LUL | IA | No | No | Male | 70 | Former | 96 | 1.4 | 7 |
14 | ADC | LUL | IA | Yes | Yes | Female | 45 | Former | 12.5 | 0.9 | 12 |
15 | ADC | RLL | IA | No | No | Female | 57 | Current | 80 | NA | 4 |
16 | ADC | LLL | IA | No | No | Male | 65 | Former | 48 | 21.0 | 7 |
17 | ADC | LLL | IA | No | No | Male | 64 | Former | 92 | 5.1 | 7 |
18 | ADC | RML | IB | No | No | Male | 71 | Former | 102 | 2.3 | 2 |
19 | ADC | LUL | IA | No | No | Female | 66 | Former | 50 | 18.5 | 5 |
Anatomical site: location of primary tumor in the lung (LUL, left upper lobe; LLL, left lower lobe; RUL, right upper lobe; RML, right middle lobe; RLL, right lower lobe
Smoking status: smoking status at time of inclusion into the study (patient 7 quit smoking during the course of the study).
Years quit smoking: Years from smoking cessation to time of inclusion into the study.
Months to inclusion from surgery: Months elapsed from surgery to time of inclusion into the study/first bronchoscopy time point.
ADC, adenocarcinoma; SCC, squamous cell carcinoma
Bronchial airway epithelial cells were obtained from five to six different sites (main carina, 4 airways from 4 lobes and the bronchial stump or main stem bronchus adjacent to the originally resected tumor and lobe, Figure 1) at each time point using an Olympus fiberoptic bronchoscope (Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, PA) and cytobrushes (Cellebrity Endoscopic Cytobrush, Boston Scientific, Boston, MA). Patients (n=19) with samples/specimens available for analysis that were obtained serially up to either 24 or 36 months and from at least from four different sites in the lung at each time point (n=391 airway samples) were selected for the study. Epithelial cell content was confirmed by cytokeratin staining which yielded a 90% epithelial cell content mainly comprised of ciliated cells. Brushes were immediately placed in serum-free RPMI medium on ice, vortexed gently to disperse epithelia into the media and then removed. Samples were then immediately centrifuged and cell pellets were resuspended in 1 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). 500µl of the sample was then again centrifuged and the pellet resuspended in 500µl β-mercaptoethanol-containing RLT buffer (Qiagen, Valencia, CA), homogenized and stored in −80°C until further processing. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Qiagen).
RNA processing for microarrays
Total RNA samples were preprocessed for subsequent hybridization to expression arrays using the WT-Ovation and Encore™ Biotin Module from NuGEN Technologies Inc. (San Carlos, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, the WT-Ovation Pico RNA amplification system was used to generate amplified cDNA using 5 ng of starting RNA material. After formation of double stranded cDNA, DNA was amplified using the SPIA™ amplification method, a linear isothermal DNA amplification process developed by the vendor (NuGEN Technologies). The WT-Ovation™ Exon Module (NuGEN Technologies) was then used for generation of amplified sense strand cDNA (ST-cDNA) that is suitable for subsequent array analysis with the Affymetrix Human Gene 1.0 ST array platform (Affymetrix, Santa Clara, CA). Fragmented and biotin-labeled cDNA was then generated using the Encore™ Biotin Module (NuGEN Technologies) using 5µg of amplified cDNA. Quality and size distribution of unfragmented SPIA-amplified cDNA and subsequent fragmented labeled cDNA were assessed by loading samples on an RNA 6000 Nano LabChip (Agilent) and analysis with Agilent bioanalyzer 2000 (Agilent). No differences in quality were noted based on duration of sample storage.
Generation of microarray raw data and analysis
Fragmented and labeled cDNA (2.5µg) were hybridized onto Human Gene 1.0 ST arrays according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Affymetrix). Hybridization cocktails containing samples, control oligonucleotide and eukaryotic hybridization controls in addition to hybridization mixes, DMSO and nuclease-free water were heat denatured at 99°C for 5 minutes, cooled to 45°C for 5 minutes, and finally centrifuged at maximum speed for 1 minute. After injecting 80µL of the hybridization cocktails, arrays were incubated for 17 hours in a hybridization oven set to a temperature of 45°C with 60 rpm rotation. Arrays were washed, stained and processed using Affymetrix GeneChip Fluidics Station 450 systems after which they were imaged using Affymetrix GeneChip Scanner 3000 7G for subsequent generation of raw data (*CEL files). Raw data were quantified using Robust Multichip Array (RMA) background correction, quantile normalization and RMA probe-level models (RmaPlm) summarization methods. MIAME compliant metadata, normalized expression values and 391 CEL files were submitted to the gene expression omnibus (GEO) (samples GSM992943-GSM993345, series GSE40407). After data preprocessing and normalization, a log base 2 transformation was applied. Pathways and gene-interaction network analyses were performed using the commercially available software Ingenuity Pathways analysis. All details of the microarray analysis including pairwise analysis of adjacent and contralateral airways for patient clustering are included in the Supplementary Information and in the four supplementary sweave reports accompanying the manuscript.
Immunohistochemical analysis of airway biopsies
Immunohistochemistry was done on histological sections of 4 micron formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples prepared by a tissue arrayer as described previously (28). Immunohistochemistry analysis was performed using purified rabbit polyclonal primary antibodies raised against phospho-AKT(Threonine308) (1:200 dilution, clone C31E5E, catalog number 2965) and phospho-ERK1/2(Thr202/Tyr204) (1:400 dilution, clone D13.14.4E, catalog number 4370) (Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA). Antigen retrieval was performed using the Dako target retrieval system at a PH of 6 (Dako, Carpinteria, CA). Intrinsic peroxidase activity was blocked by 3% methanol and hydrogen peroxide for 15 min and serum-free protein block (Dako) was used for 7 min for blocking non-specific antibody binding. Slides were then incubated with the antibodies against phospho-AKT and phospho-ERK1/2 at room temperature for 90 and 120 min, respectively. After three washes in Tris-buffered saline, slides were incubated for 30 min with Dako Envision+ Dual Link at room temperature. Following three additional washes, slides were incubated with Dako chromogen substrate for 5 min and were counterstained with hemotoxylin for another 5 min. Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded pellets from lung cancer cell lines displaying positive phospho-AKT and phospho-ERK1/2 expression by Western blot analysis were used as a positive control, whereas samples and whole-section tissue specimens processed similarly, except for the omission of the primary antibodies were used as negative controls. The intensity and extent of cytoplasmic and nuclear phospho-AKT and phospho-ERK1/2 immunostaining was evaluated using a light microscope (magnification, x20) independently by two pathologists (J.F. and I.I.W.) who were blinded to the identity of the samples. Cytoplasmic expression was quantified using a four-value intensity score (0, none; 1, weak; 2, moderate and 3, strong) and the percentage (0–100%) of the extent of reactivity). A final cytoplasmic expression score was obtained by multiplying the intensity and reactivity extension values (range, 0–300). Nuclear expression score was quantified using the percentage of extent of reactivity (range, 0–100).
Summary statistics, including frequency tabulation, means, standard deviations, median and range were given to describe subject characteristics and immunohistochemical protein expression. Repeated measures analysis was performed to assess the differential effect of sites on phosphorylated AKT and ERK1/2 expression variation with time. Mixed effects models were generated to assess significance of site, time and the interaction of both factors to the expression of both proteins. All statistical tests were two-sided and p-values of 0.05 or less were considered to be statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with standard statistical software, including SAS Release 8.1 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) and S-Plus 2000 (Mathsoft Inc., Seattle, WA).
Results
Detailed site- and time-dependent airway sampling of the field of injury in early stage NSCLC patients after definitive surgery
Expression patterns molecularly exemplifying the impact of smoking on the airway epithelium of cancer-free individuals have been characterized (8, 19, 29). Moreover, molecular abnormalities typically found in lung tumors have been detected in normal resected margins suggestive of a field effect (15, 25–27, 30, 31). However, the biological nature and clinical relevance of the field of injury in particular after complete removal of the tumor in early stage NSCLC patients, who are increasing in number and for whom there are no chemoprevention strategies, is yet unknown. Smoker early stage NSCLC patients were recruited on a prospective phase II surveillance clinical trial that included frequent computed tomography (CT) scans, serologies and annual bronchoscopies in which airway brushings and biopsies were obtained within one year following tumor resection and at 12, 24 and 36 months following the first time point (Supplementary methods and Figure 1). The first time point bronchoscopies were all performed within one year of definitive surgery (average, 6 months; range, 1–12). Nineteen patients were selected for the study (Table 1) based on airway sampling of at least five different sites per time point and continuously up to 24 or 36 months giving rise to 391 airway samples for transcript-level expressing profiling. The patients were accrued between 2004 and 2008 and were comprised of former (n=16) and current (n=3) smokers. Brushings and biopsies were obtained from the main carina (MC), airways relatively adjacent (ADJ) to the previously resected tumor (ADJ) and from airways more distant from the tumor in the ipsilateral (NON-ADJ) and contralateral (CONTRA) lung (Figure 1).
Following normalization of the raw expression data, a mixed-effects model was applied to characterize the expression pattern of each gene that incorporated fixed effects such as the site from the tumor and time after surgery of the collected airway samples (Supplementary information). Histogram p-value distribution plots after fitting beta-uniform-mixture (BUM) models (32) for derived p-values based on the fixed effects suggested that both site and time of the airway samples influenced gene expression modulation (Supplementary Figure 1A and 1B).
Site-dependent differential expression patterns in airway epithelia of early stage NSCLC patients
We first sought to determine whether gene expression profiles are differentially expressed in airways by site from the tumor including those relatively adjacent to the resected tumors compared to more distant airways. Based on the generated BUM models and p-value distributions, genes differentially expressed by site were selected based on a 1% false discovery rate (FDR). We identified 1165 gene features that were statistically significantly differentially expressed by site (Supplementary Table 1). Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering demonstrated that the airway samples were divided into two main branches or clusters (Figure 2A) based on expression of the genes. Moreover, the left cluster in the indicated heat map’s dendogram contained a statistically significantly higher number of adjacent airway samples compared to the right branch which contained a significantly higher proportion of main carinas and contralateral to the tumor airways (p=0.0027 of the Fisher’s exact test for count data). In addition, the two-dimensional clustering revealed eight different gene expression patterns which are indicated by the color bar and code along the left side of the heat map (Figure 2A). Some of the different gene clusters or classes were associated with a specific group of airway samples. Notably, a cluster of 263 genes (cluster 1,Supplementary Table 1), indicated by the dark green color and asterix on the heat map, was found to have highest average expression in adjacent airways (Figure 2A and Supplementary Table 2). In contrast, another cluster of 348 genes (indicated by magenta color) appeared to be highest in expression in main carinas (Figure 2A).
We then determined to functionally analyze the cluster of genes (n=263), that was found to exhibit the highest average expression in adjacent airways, between adjacent and contralateral airways. Functional pathways analysis using Ingenuity Pathways Analysis (IPA) depicted several significantly modulated pathways and molecular functions in particular, T-cell (p=1.2 × 10−9), chemokine C-C motif receptor 5 (CCR5) (1.5 × 10−9) and phospholipase C signaling (p=3.6 × 10−9). In addition, topological gene-interaction network analysis highlighted functionally modulated and up-regulated gene networks mediated by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) and extracellular regulate kinase (ERK) in the adjacent airways (Figure 2B). It is worthwhile to note that we also observed increased modulation of ERK MAPK-mediated gene-interaction network using a different analytical method where we compared expression profiles between adjacent and contralateral between patients in a pairwise fashion (data not shown, Supplementary sweave report 3). These findings suggest that airway site-dependent differential gene expression profiles in early stage NSCLC patients exhibit increased molecular features and gene-interaction networks typically associated with cancers.
We then determined to analyze gene expression profiles while excluding main carinas since their epithelial anatomy is suggested to be different from that of other airways (33) and thus may confound site-dependent observations. Following exclusion of main carinas, we found a reduced number of genes (n=136) that were significantly modulated by site in the field of injury (Supplementary sweave report 4). Two-dimensional hierarchical clustering demonstrated that airway samples were divided into two main branches or clusters (Supplementary Figure 2) with significantly more adjacent airways in the right branch (p=0.0002 of the Fisher’s exact t-test). Moreover, the differentially expressed genes (Supplementary Table 4) were comprised of two main subgroups with one cluster (top cluster) of 113 genes exhibiting highest average expression in adjacent airways. It is important to note that when we cross-compared gene clusters that we had found to exhibit the highest average expression in adjacent airways when including (263 gene cluster) or excluding (113 gene cluster) main carinas, we found a highly significant overlap (p=2.46 × 10−191) in the number of genes (n=96). Moreover, the site-dependent genes identified after exclusion of main carinas were also topologically organized following functional pathways analysis into interaction networks involving PI3K and ERK.
Gene expression profiles in the lung airway epithelia of early stage NSCLC patients are modulated with time following definitive surgery
We then determined to identify genes that were differentially expressed with time. Based on the generated BUM models and p-value distributions, time-dependent differentially expressed genes were identified and selected based on a 5% FDR cut-off (n=1395, Supplementary Table 4 and Supplementary sweave report 2). Hierarchical clustering of samples indicated that the dendogram’s main branches were statistically significantly unbalanced with respect to time; the main left branch comprised a higher number of 24 and 36 month time points compared to the right cluster (p=4.15 × 10−7 of the Fisher’s exact test for count data). Two-dimensional clustering of both genes and samples revealed two main classes of genes, those that displayed increased (upper cluster) and decreased (lower cluster) expression with time (Figure 3A). Functional pathways and gene-interaction network analysis of genes differentially expressed genes between 36 months and the first time point revealed statistically significantly modulated pathways, in particular protein ubiquitination (5.3 × 10−5), glutathione metabolism (6.0 × 10−5), mitochondrial dysfunction (1.4 × 10−4) and oxidative phosphorylation (2.9 × 10−3) as well as eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2) signaling (2.6 × 10−3). In addition, network analysis highlighted functionally modulated and elevated gene-interaction networks with time in particular those mediated by Nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-κB), ERK, AKT and cyclin-B1 (CCNB1) (Figure 3B).
We then sought to determine the relationship of genes that were significantly modulated by site and time in the molecular field of injury. A smooth scatter plot of transformed p-values indicated that site- and time-dependent expression modulations were largely independent (Supplementary Figure 3 and Supplementary sweave report 2). We then cross-compared the site-dependent (n=1165) and time-dependent (n=1395) profiles that we had noted in the molecular field of injury. Using hypergeometric tests for overlapping probability, we found no significant overlap between genes we had determined to be differentially expressed by site and time in the molecular field of injury (p=0.865) (Supplementary sweave report 4).
Increased expression of phosphorylated AKT and ERK1/2 in airway epithelia by site from the tumor and with time following surgery
Our findings on the modulation of PI3K- and ERK1/2-mediated networks by site and time after surgery prompted us to examine the immunohistochemical (IHC) expression of surrogate markers of both signaling cascades in corresponding formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) airway biopsies. We sought to examine expression of AKT phosphorylated at Threonine308 since phosphorylation of this amino acid is well known to occur through phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (PDPK1) following PI3K activation (34). We assessed by IHC the immunohistochemical expression of phospho-AKT(Thr308) and phospho-ERK1/2(Thr202/Tyr204) in available and evaluable histologically normal bronchial epithelia biopsies (n=324) corresponding to the brushings analyzed by expression profiling. Immunoreactivity of phospho-AKT (min 0, max 300) was variable as depicted in the representative photomicrographs in Figure 4A and was detected in both the cytoplasm and nucleus of normal bronchial epithelia (NBE) (Figure 4A). IHC analysis demonstrated that cytoplasmic (p<0.0001) and nuclear (p=0.01) phospho-AKT statistically significantly increased with time up to three years in all NBE (Figure 4B) with highest expression at the 36 month time point. Nuclear phosphorylated AKT was also statistically significantly increased in adjacent NBE compared to relatively airways more distant from tumors in the mixed-effects model (p=0.04) (Figure 4B).
Immunoreactivity of phospho-ERK1/2 was also variable (min 0, max 209) and mainly cytoplasmic (Figure 4C). IHC analysis demonstrated that phosphorylated ERK1/2 was statistically significantly elevated in adjacent NBE (p=0.03) and significantly increased with time up to three years in all airways when averaged together (p=0.02) (Figure 4D) in the model. Notably, there was a significant interaction (p=0.019) between site of NBE and time of sampling as phospho-ERK1/2 expression was significantly increased in adjacent NBE but not in contralateral airways and main carinas in the model (Figure 4D) with highest expression in adjacent airways and non-adjacent (ipsilateral, green plot) airways in observed at the latest time point. Similar data were obtained when we excluded main carinas in the mixed-effects model (data not shown). Moreover, we noted similar findings when all airway samples were analyzed irrespective of the presence of preneoplastic lesions (e.g. dysplasias).
These data demonstrated that like differential gene expression profiles within the lung airway field of injury, canonical activated oncogenes are modulated by site from the resected tumor and time following definitive surgery in early stage NSCLC patients.
Discussion
In this report, we characterized differential expression profiles and protein expression within the lung airway field of injury of early stage NSCLC patients by site from the tumor and time in years following surgery. We demonstrated, and to our knowledge for the first time, that gene expression profiles in histologically normal airways of early stage NSCLC patients are non-uniform by site and are modulated with time up to three years following surgery. Moreover, functional analysis of the expression profiles demonstrated that canonical expression patterns and protein kinase activation, typical of tumors, are increased in airway sites adjacent to tumors as well as remain or are further modulated in the lung airway field of injury for three years after definitive surgery. In particular, phosphorylated ERK MAPK and AKT expression were up-regulated in normal bronchial epithelia with time and by site from tumors. In light of the growing sub-population of early stage NSCLC, our findings are, in part, proof of principle and raise the intriguing possibility of the importance of intense surveillance and molecular characterization of the remaining smoking-injured airway epithelia and its potential integration in the future into clinical practice and management of early stage disease. However, it is noteworthy that our study’s patient cohort, despite its uniqueness in which expression profiling was performed on airways from multiple sites collected during bronchoscopies serially performed for 36 months following surgery, is of limited size. Moreover, the reported findings warrant the need for validation or confirmation in independent larger sets.
There is a large body of evidence that patients who have survived an upper aerodigestive cancer comprise a high risk population that may be targeted for early detection and chemoprevention efforts (5, 31). Currently there are no established adjuvant treatments in the tertiary prevention setting of early stage NSCLC patients. It has been suggested that failures in advances of chemoprevention are in part due to lack of clear and specific molecular targets (5, 35). Our extensive profiling of the molecular field of injury in NSCLC patients identified cancer-associated pathways (PI3K and ERK) aberrantly regulated in normal bronchial epithelia of NSCLC patients after tumor removal. In this context, it is plausible to suggest that a thorough characterization of the molecular field of injury in early stage NSCLC patients can aid in identification of aberrantly expressed pathways, e.g. PI3K and ERK, which could potentially serve as suitable targets for chemoprevention. However, it cannot be neglected that the alternative hypothesis can counter argue that activation of PI3K and ERK MAPK pathways may be beneficial for chemoprevention since markers of both pathways (phosphorylated AKT and ERK) increased following surgical tumor resection. Our suggestion that such pathways may serve as chemoprevention targets should be interpreted cautiously and is presented owing to the known promalignant function of the pathways and gene networks highlighted in our analysis (36).
The first time point brushings in this study were obtained within one year of patient accrual and not at the time when the tumor was still in situ. The variable starting time point from surgery among patients is a limiting factor in our analysis since it is plausible to assume that the molecular field of injury may vary upon tumor removal. We were not able to avoid this caveat given the difficulty of accrual of patients following surgical tumor resection to obtain bronchial brushings at six different anatomical sites in the bronchial tree annually up to three years. However, it is important to mention that the time-dependent gene expression profiles we had identified, despite not incorporating the molecular field effect at the time the tumor was present, demonstrated gradual changes in expression with time. This effect was also evident when analyzing the immunohistochemical expression of phosphorylated AKT and ERK in corresponding bronchial biopsies with highest expression at three years. Our findings warrant future larger studies in which the molecular field of injury at the time the tumor is still in situ can also be serially monitored for several years.
The patient population we had studied was comprised of early stage NSCLC patients, which is in contrast to earlier transcriptomic studies of the molecular field of injury that focused on phenotypically normal smokers and non-smokers (19, 21, 22). It is still not clear whether the differences in expression described in this study reflect an already present gradient field of injury that may have contributed to tumor development in light of the differential cancer-associated pathways identified or one that arises due to the molecular impact of the tumor on the adjacent field. It is important to note that in this study, the spatial and temporal molecular field of injury in lung cancer patients was profiled prospectively starting within one year following definitive surgery. Thus, the above speculation may be addressed by a similar thorough spatial and temporal characterization of the molecular field of injury before and after surgery in early stage patients. In addition, we did not have access to similar type of brushings from cancer-free individuals such as high-risk smokers. Similar analysis of the molecular field of injury in cancer-free individuals will shed light on the nature of site- and time-dependent expression patterns in the field of injury and whether such changes in cancer patients reflect recovery from surgery (temporal profiles) or are a cause or consequence of tumor development in the adjacent field (spatial profiles).
In conclusion, our unique study identified gene expression profiles, functional gene-networks and activated levels of oncogenic protein kinases within the field of injury of early stage NSCLC patients that are modulated or increased in airways spatially from the tumor and temporally following surgery. Moreover, the herein previously uncharacterized airway cancer-associated expression and protein kinase alterations harbor potential valuable targets for chemoprevention and warrant confirmation and further studies in larger independent cohorts.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
Grant support
This study was funded in part by Department of Defense (DoD) grants W81XWH-04-1-0142 (to W.K.H. and I.I.W.) and W81XWH-10-1-1007 (to H.K. and I.I.W.) and by Cancer Center Support Grant CA16672 (MD Anderson Cancer Center microarray core facility).
Footnotes
Conflict of Interest:
No conflicts declared
References
- 1.Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. doi: 10.3322/caac.20107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62:10–29. doi: 10.3322/caac.20138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Herbst RS, Heymach JV, Lippman SM. Lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:1367–1380. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0802714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Aberle DR, Adams AM, Berg CD, Black WC, Clapp JD, Fagerstrom RM, et al. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med. 365:395–409. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1102873. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gold KA, Kim ES, Lee JJ, Wistuba II, Farhangfar CJ, Hong WK. The BATTLE to personalize lung cancer prevention through reverse migration. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 4:962–972. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Goldstraw P, Ball D, Jett JR, Le Chevalier T, Lim E, Nicholson AG, et al. Non-small-cell lung cancer. Lancet. 2011;378:1727–1740. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62101-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gazdar AF, Thun MJ. Lung cancer, smoke exposure, and sex. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:469–471. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.4623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Steiling K, Ryan J, Brody JS, Spira A. The field of tissue injury in the lung and airway. Cancer Prev Res (Phila Pa) 2008;1:396–403. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Auerbach O, Stout AP, Hammond EC, Garfinkel L. Changes in bronchial epithelium in relation to cigarette smoking and in relation to lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 1961;265:253–267. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196108102650601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mao L, Lee JS, Kurie JM, Fan YH, Lippman SM, Lee JJ, et al. Clonal genetic alterations in the lungs of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:857–62. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.12.857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Powell CA, Klares S, O’Connor G, Brody JS. Loss of heterozygosity in epithelial cells obtained by bronchial brushing: clinical utility in lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 1999;5:2025–2034. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wistuba II, Lam S, Behrens C, Virmani AK, Fong KM, LeRiche J, et al. Molecular damage in the bronchial epithelium of current and former smokers. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1997;89:1366–1373. doi: 10.1093/jnci/89.18.1366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Franklin WA, Gazdar AF, Haney J, Wistuba II, La Rosa FG, Kennedy T, et al. Widely dispersed p53 mutation in respiratory epithelium A novel mechanism for field carcinogenesis. J Clin Invest. 1997;100:2133–2137. doi: 10.1172/JCI119748. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Belinsky SA, Nikula KJ, Palmisano WA, Michels R, Saccomanno G, Gabrielson E, et al. Aberrant methylation of p16(INK4a) is an early event in lung cancer and a potential biomarker for early diagnosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95:11891–11896. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.20.11891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Belinsky SA, Palmisano WA, Gilliland FD, Crooks LA, Divine KK, Winters SA, et al. Aberrant promoter methylation in bronchial epithelium and sputum from current and former smokers. Cancer Res. 2002;62:2370–2377. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Heller G, Zielinski CC, Zochbauer-Muller S. Lung cancer: from single-gene methylation to methylome profiling. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 29:95–107. doi: 10.1007/s10555-010-9203-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Soria JC, Rodriguez M, Liu DD, Lee JJ, Hong WK, Mao L. Aberrant promoter methylation of multiple genes in bronchial brush samples from former cigarette smokers. Cancer Res. 2002;62:351–355. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zochbauer-Muller S, Lam S, Toyooka S, Virmani AK, Toyooka KO, Seidl S, et al. Aberrant methylation of multiple genes in the upper aerodigestive tract epithelium of heavy smokers. Int J Cancer. 2003;107:612–616. doi: 10.1002/ijc.11458. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Spira A, Beane J, Shah V, Liu G, Schembri F, Yang X, et al. Effects of cigarette smoke on the human airway epithelial cell transcriptome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:10143–10148. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0401422101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Schembri F, Sridhar S, Perdomo C, Gustafson AM, Zhang X, Ergun A, et al. MicroRNAs as modulators of smoking-induced gene expression changes in human airway epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:2319–2324. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806383106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Spira A, Beane JE, Shah V, Steiling K, Liu G, Schembri F, et al. Airway epithelial gene expression in the diagnostic evaluation of smokers with suspect lung cancer. Nat Med. 2007;13:361–366. doi: 10.1038/nm1556. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Gustafson AM, Soldi R, Anderlind C, Scholand MB, Qian J, Zhang X, et al. Airway PI3K pathway activation is an early and reversible event in lung cancer development. Sci Transl Med. 2:26ra5. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3000251. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wistuba II, Behrens C, Virmani AK, Mele G, Milchgrub S, Girard L, et al. High resolution chromosome 3p allelotyping of human lung cancer and preneoplastic/preinvasive bronchial epithelium reveals multiple, discontinuous sites of 3p allele loss and three regions of frequent breakpoints. Cancer Res. 2000;60:1949–1960. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wistuba II, Behrens C, Virmani AK, Milchgrub S, Syed S, Lam S, et al. Allelic losses at chromosome 8p21– are early and frequent events in the pathogenesis of lung cancer. Cancer Res. 1999;59:1973–1979. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nelson MA, Wymer J, Clements N., Jr Detection of K-ras gene mutations in non-neoplastic lung tissue and lung cancers. Cancer Lett. 1996;103:115–121. doi: 10.1016/0304-3835(96)04202-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tang X, Shigematsu H, Bekele BN, Roth JA, Minna JD, Hong WK, et al. EGFR tyrosine kinase domain mutations are detected in histologically normal respiratory epithelium in lung cancer patients. Cancer Res. 2005;65:7568–7572. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1705. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Tang X, Varella-Garcia M, Xavier AC, Massarelli E, Ozburn N, Moran C, et al. Epidermal growth factor receptor abnormalities in the pathogenesis and progression of lung adenocarcinomas. Cancer Prev Res (Phila Pa) 2008;1:192–200. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-08-0032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sun M, Behrens C, Feng L, Ozburn N, Tang X, Yin G, et al. HER family receptor abnormalities in lung cancer brain metastases and corresponding primary tumors. Clin Cancer Res. 2009;15:4829–4837. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2921. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Beane J, Sebastiani P, Liu G, Brody JS, Lenburg ME, Spira A. Reversible and permanent effects of tobacco smoke exposure on airway epithelial gene expression. Genome Biol. 2007;8:R201. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-9-r201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wistuba II, Behrens C, Milchgrub S, Bryant D, Hung J, Minna JD, et al. Sequential molecular abnormalities are involved in the multistage development of squamous cell lung carcinoma. Oncogene. 1999;18:643–650. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Wistuba II, Gazdar AF. Lung cancer preneoplasia. Annu Rev Pathol. 2006;1:331–348. doi: 10.1146/annurev.pathol.1.110304.100103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pounds S, Morris SW. Estimating the occurrence of false positives and false negatives in microarray studies by approximating and partitioning the empirical distribution of p-values. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:1236–1242. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg148. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lips KS, Volk C, Schmitt BM, Pfeil U, Arndt P, Miska D, et al. Polyspecific cation transporters mediate luminal release of acetylcholine from bronchial epithelium. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2005;33:79–88. doi: 10.1165/rcmb.2004-0363OC. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Engelman JA. Targeting PI3K signalling in cancer: opportunities, challenges and limitations. Nat Rev Cancer. 2009;9:550–562. doi: 10.1038/nrc2664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Khuri FR. The dawn of a revolution in personalized lung cancer prevention. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2011;4:949–953. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-11-0278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144:646–674. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.