Skip to main content
Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP logoLink to Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP
. 2013 Sep 12;12(12):3744–3758. doi: 10.1074/mcp.M113.027441

Quantitative Proteomic and Functional Analysis of Liver Mitochondria from High Fat Diet (HFD) Diabetic Mice*

Yurong Guo ‡,§, Manjula Darshi , Yuliang Ma §, Guy A Perkins , Zhouxin Shen **, Kristofer J Haushalter §, Rintaro Saito ‡‡, Ai Chen §§, Yun Sok Lee §§, Hemal H Patel ¶¶,‖‖, Steven P Briggs **, Mark H Ellisman ‖,a, Jerrold M Olefsky ‡‡, Susan S Taylor ‡,§,¶,b
PMCID: PMC3861721  PMID: 24030101

Abstract

Insulin resistance plays a major role in the development of type 2 diabetes and obesity and affects a number of biological processes such as mitochondrial biogenesis. Though mitochondrial dysfunction has been linked to the development of insulin resistance and pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes, the precise mechanism linking the two is not well understood. We used high fat diet (HFD)-induced obesity dependent diabetes mouse models to gain insight into the potential pathways altered with metabolic disease, and carried out quantitative proteomic analysis of liver mitochondria. As previously reported, proteins involved in fatty acid oxidation, branched chain amino acid degradation, tricarboxylic acid cycle, and oxidative phosphorylation were uniformly up-regulated in the liver of HFD fed mice compared with that of normal diet. Further, our studies revealed that retinol metabolism is distinctly down-regulated and the mitochondrial structural proteins—components of mitochondrial inter-membrane space bridging (MIB) complex (Mitofilin, Sam50, and ChChd3), and Tim proteins—essential for protein import, are significantly up-regulated in HFD fed mice. Structural and functional studies on HFD and normal diet liver mitochondria revealed remodeling of HFD mitochondria to a more condensed form with increased respiratory capacity and higher ATP levels compared with normal diet mitochondria. Thus, it is likely that the structural remodeling is essential to accommodate the increased protein content in presence of HFD: the mechanism could be through the MIB complex promoting contact site and crista junction formation and in turn facilitating the lipid and protein uptake.


Obesity has become a global epidemic and in the United States alone more than one third of adults (34%) are obese and over 11% of the population over the age of 20 are diabetic (1, 2). Even though the precise mechanisms causing obesity are still being determined, it is well established that obesity induces insulin resistance leading to the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes (T2D)1 (3, 4). Insulin resistance has been implicated in multiple organ damage such as liver, skeletal muscle, and adipose tissues (5). This is in view of the fact that cellular glucose homeostasis is tightly regulated by insulin secretion from the pancreatic β-cells and glucose uptake by muscle and output by liver. Thus, failure of insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells to compensate for insulin resistance results in hyperglycemia (6, 7) and uncontrolled hyperglycemia has the potential to negatively impact a number of organ systems.

Mitochondrial dysfunction has been thought to play a critical role in insulin resistance and T2D (811), and the role of mitochondria in insulin resistance is highly tissue specific. Despite this the mechanisms of action is controversial: in skeletal muscle, oxidative metabolism of lipids is reduced in T2D patients (11, 12). However, it has been reported that carnitine palmitoyl transferase (CPT) activity is decreased or long-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LACD) is deficient, and these lead to an accumulation of intracellular lipids and insulin resistance in insulin-targeting cells (13). These excess metabolites eventually cause the decrease in glucose transport and other events downstream of insulin receptor signaling (14). In adipose tissue, it has been shown that adiponectin expression and mitochondrial content in obese db/db mice were reduced (15). One of the favorable effects of adiponectin is the improvement of insulin action (16) and it has been reported that mitochondrial dysfunction in adipose tissue explains decreased adiponectin synthesis in obesity (15). In contrast to muscle, coordinated up-regulation of oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) subunits in obese liver has been previously reported at mRNA (17) and protein (18) levels. Liver mitochondria also showed significant up-regulation of beta-oxidation, branched chain amino acid degradation, pyruvate metabolism, TCA cycle, and apoptotic pathways (18, 19).

In the fasting state, blood glucose levels are maintained by liver regulated gluconeogenesis. T2D is characterized by defects in insulin's ability to inhibit gluconeogenesis. Hepatic insulin resistance and impaired fatty acid oxidation have been the major contributors for the development of hepatic steatosis and the progression of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) (20). Mitochondrial abnormalities have also been associated with NAFLD, and hence liver insulin sensitivity and the potential relationship with mitochondria appear to be crucial.

In this study, we used a proteomic approach to investigate the biological pathways leading to insulin resistance in T2D in the liver and analyzed the protein expression profiles from mitochondria of mice fed on a high fat diet (HFD) for 30 weeks. Increased insulin resistance, elevated plasma insulin and impaired glucose tolerance were observed in mice after 16 weeks of HFD (21). Consistent with previous studies, liver mitochondria showed significant up-regulation of oxidation-phosphorylation (OXPHOS), beta-oxidation, branched chain amino acid degradation, pyruvate metabolism, TCA cycle, and apoptotic pathways (18, 19). Additionally, in our study we show that retinol metabolism was consistently down-regulated, and the proteins involved in the protein import into mitochondria, mitochondrial biogenesis and regulation of crista morphology are up-regulated in HFD versus normal diet (ND) liver mitochondria. We further examined the ultrastructure of the mitochondria from the liver and show that under HFD conditions the mitochondria are often condensed with a remodeling of crista and increased number of cristae. We suggest that the structural change in cristae is likely to be a necessary event to accommodate the increased OXPHOS gene expression and other proteins that are residents of the inner membrane. The remodeling of cristae is also accompanied by increased mitofilin expression and its interacting proteins, which include ChChd3 and OPA1, that are critical for cristae organization. Finally our oxygen consumption experiment showed increased activities of complex I and complex II in liver mitochondria of HFD versus ND mice and our ATP assay confirmed increased ATP production in HFD versus ND mice.

EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURES

Animals and Animal Care

Male C57BL/6J mice aged 12 weeks were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory and were fed with HFD (60% kcal from fat; D12492, Research Diets) or ND (12% kcal from fat; Purina 5001, LabDiet) for 30 weeks. Animals were maintained on a 12-h/12-h light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. All animal protocols were in accordance with the University of California, San Diego research guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.

Mitochondria Isolation

Mitochondria from mouse liver were isolated as described previously (22). In brief, livers were quickly excised and homogenized with a Potter-Elvehjem tissue homogenizer in ice-cold MSHE buffer (220 mm mannitol, 70 mm sucrose, 5 mm HEPES-KOH, pH 7.4, and 1 mm EGTA, pH 7.4) containing EDTA-free protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma) and PhoSTOP phosphatase inhibitor mixture (Roche). Nuclear material and unbroken cells were discarded by centrifugation for 10 min at 600 × g. Crude mitochondrial fractions were collected by centrifugation for 10 min at 15,000 × g and resuspended in 2% Rapigest, 50 mm HEPES, pH 7.3 with 2.5 mm sodium fluoride, 0.25 mm sodium pervanadate, 0.25 mm sodium pyrophosphate, and 0.25 mm β-glycerolphosphate. Mitochondria from each mouse (3HFD, 3ND) were isolated separately.

Mitochondria Digestion

Mitochondria samples were reduced with tris (2-carboxyethyl) phosphine (final concentration, 4 mm), alkylated with iodoacetamide (final concentration, 10 mm), and diluted 10× using 50 mm HEPES. Protein concentration was measured by using a bicinchoninic acid assay (BCA assay, Pierce) and samples were digested with sequence-grade modified trypsin (Promega, Madison, WI) at 1:100 enzyme to protein ratio overnight at 37 °C. Aliquots of the samples were analyzed on a 4–12% SDS-PAGE gel and stained by using the SilverQuest SilverStain kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) to confirm complete digestion. Toward the complete digestion, the BCA assay was again used to measure peptide concentration.

Desalting and iTRAQ Labeling of Peptides

An aliquot of each sample (100 μg) was treated with 50% trifluoroacetic acid to a final pH of 1.4, incubated at 4 °C for 1 h and centrifuged at 18,000 × g for 10 min. The supernatant was centrifuged through a 0.22 μm filter. The flow through was desalted on Sep-Pak Plus C18 cartridges, and reconstituted in 0.5 m HEPES, pH 7.2. For iTRAQ labeling, each desalted sample was treated with one tube of different 4-plex iTRAQ reagents (ND: 114; HFD: 115) in 70% isopropanol at pH 7.2 for 2 h at room temperature (22). The samples were dried under speed vacuum to about 25 μl, combined and used for mass spectrometric analysis. Three pairs of HFD and ND samples were treated as three biological replicates.

RP1/SCX/RP2-HPLC Separation of Peptides

The peptides were separated on a three-phase column assembly adapted from Andreyev et al. (23) using an Agilent 1100 HPLC system (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Briefly, half of the iTRAQ-labeled peptide mixture was loaded to an RP1 column (RP1, 360 μm O.D. × 200 μm I.D., 5 μm Zorbax SB-C18 (Agilent Technologies), 20 cm packing) using a pressure chamber, rinsed with 0.1% formic acid and eluted to a SCX column (SCX, 360 μm O.D. × 200 μm I.D., 5 μm Poly-SULPHOETHYL A (PolyLC, Inc., 5 cm packing) online using a reverse phase gradient 0–80%B in 150 min (solvent A: 0.1% formic acid; solvent B: 90% acetonitrile in 0.1% formic acid). The peptides on the strong cation exchange (SCX) column were step eluted to a C18 analytical column with integrated tip (RP2, 360 μm O.D. X 200 μm I.D., 5 μm Zorbax SB-C18 (Agilent Technologies), 20 cm packing) with a series of salt gradients (38 steps). Following each salt elution, the peptides on the C18 analytical column were eluted with increased acetonitrile (0–40% in 120 min) to an LTQ-Orbitrap (Thermo Fisher Scientific, San Jose, CA). The flow rate out of the RP2 column was ∼500 nl/min.

Tandem Mass Spectrometry Analysis

The LTQ-Orbitrap was operated under data-dependent mode with gas phase fractionation. Briefly, the full MS scan range was divided into three smaller scan ranges (400–805, 800–1055, 1050–2000). Each MS scan (Orbitrap, 7500R) was followed by four pairs of pulsed Q dissociation-collision activated dissociation (PQD-CAD) scans on the top four most abundant parent ions in LTQ (24). A dynamic exclusion of 1 min was used. The capillary temperature was 150 °C.

Data Analysis

The raw data were extracted and searched using Spectrum Mill v3.03 (Agilent Technologies). The PQD and CAD spectra were merged together and searched against the International Protein Index mouse database (v3.31; 56,555 protein sequences). Trypsin was used as an enzyme, and the peptides were limited to fully tryptic with a maximum missed cleavage of two. Other parameters include: carbamidomethylation of cysteines, static; iTRAQ modification on N-term and lysine, differential; ± 20 ppm for precursor ions; ± 0.7 Da for fragment ions, and a minimum matched percent scored peak intensity (SPI%) of 50%. In situ, the false discovery rate (FDR) was calculated by searching the data against a concatenated forward-reverse database. Cutoff scores were dynamically assigned to each data set to maintain a FDR of 0.1% at the protein level. Only proteins with two or more unique peptides were selected for quantitative analysis. Proteins that share common peptides were grouped to address the database redundancy issue and the presence of parsimonious proteins. The proteins within the same group shared the same set of peptides and were represented by “protein group leader.” In the remaining text, the term “protein” refers to “protein group leader.”

For protein quantitation, protein iTRAQ reporter ion intensities were calculated by summing the iTRAQ reporter ion intensities of all peptide spectral matches (PSMs) for peptides for that protein and only unique peptides were considered. In our summing method, a peptide with high-intensity signal contributes more to the final calculation of the protein ratio than does a peptide with a low-intensity signal. This is a reasonable approach based on the fact that a high-intensity signal reflects a more reliable quantification than does a low-intensity ion signal (24). Isotope impurities of iTRAQ reagents were corrected using correction factors provided by the manufacturer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). A minimal total iTRAQ reporter ion intensity (sum of two channels, HFD and ND) of 50 was used to filter out low intensity spectra. The reporter ion ratios were calculated and normalized to the median ratio. We carried out protein quantitation in three biological replicates. For statistical analysis, we performed Student's t test (tailed 2, type 1) assuming a log normal distribution. To state that a protein has significant abundance changes (unless specified otherwise), the following criteria have to be fulfilled: The protein has to be quantified in all three biological replicates, and that all the abundance ratios (HFD/ND) have to be either ≤ 0.67 or ≥ 1.5; 2. p value for student's t test has to be less than 0.05.

Gene Ontology Annotation

The DAVID 6.7 Bioinformatics tool (http://david.abcc.ncifcrf.gov/) (25, 26) was used for gene functional categorization and pathway analysis. This tool mainly provides batch gene annotation and gene-gene ontology (GO) term enrichment analysis to highlight the most relevant GO terms associated with a given gene list.

Cytoscape Analysis

We mapped our protein p values into publicly available protein–protein interaction network using Cytoscape (27). This network provides global view of potentially relevant interacting partners of proteins whose abundances change in high-fat diet mice. We also searched for possible functional links among some significant proteins using computational prediction based on several criteria including co-expression of genes and colocalization of proteins. Protein–protein interaction (PPI) data were obtained from BioGRID database (http://thebiogrid.org). Because number of publicly available PPIs of mouse (∼15,000) is far less than that of human (∼130,000), we converted human PPIs into mouse PPIs using orthologous relationship (“interologs,”) (28) obtained from Imparanoid database (http://inparanoid.sbc.su.se/).

Immunoblot Analysis

To verify iTRAQ data, HFD/ND liver mitochondria samples (15 μg each) were subjected to immunoblot analysis. For this purpose, samples were lysed with ice-cold lysis buffer (50 mm tris, 150 mm NaCl and 1% triton X-100) containing protease inhibitor mixture (Sigma) and separated on SDS-PAGE. Proteins were transferred onto PVDF membranes and probed with the corresponding antibodies. The following monoclonal (mAb) and polyclonal (pAb) antibodies were used: the mouse mAb Cyp1a2 (Abcam, Cambridge, MA), rabbit pAb ChChd3 (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA), mouse mAb mitofilin (Life Technologies), rabbit pAb Opa1 (Affinity BioReagents, Golden, CO), mouse mAb cytochrome C (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), and rabbit pAb Tom40 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). Protein expression was quantitated by densitometry using ImageJ 1.41o software (29). Student's t test (tailed 2, type 1) was carried out using Prism 6 software and graph was then generated using Prism 6 software with outlier excluded.

Electron Microscopy (EM) of Liver Mitochondria, Isolated and In Situ

Isolated mitochondria prepared as above were pelleted and then fixed with 2% paraformaldehyde plus 2.5% glutaral. Anesthetized mice were whole-body perfusion fixed with Ringer's solution followed by this same fixative. The liver was extracted and immersed in the fixative on ice for 2 h. The tissue was chopped into smaller pieces about 2 mm × 2 mm × 2 mm cube. The following applies to both isolated mitochondria and tissue pieces The samples were washed three times with buffer of 0.1 m sodium cacodylate plus 3 mm calcium chloride (pH 7.4) on ice and then post-fixed with 1% osmium tetroxide, 0.8% potassium ferrocyanide, 3 mm calcium chloride in 0.1 m sodium cacodylate (pH 7.4) overnight, washed three times with ice-cold distilled water, en bloc stained with 2% uranyl acetate at 4 °C for 1 h, dehydrated through graded ethanol solutions, and embedded in Durcupan ACM resin (Fluka, St. Louis, MO). Ultrathin (80 nm) sections were post-stained with uranyl acetate and lead salts before imaging using a JEOL 1200FX transmission EM operated at 80 kV. Images were taken on film at 6000× magnification. The negatives were digitized at 1800 dpi using a Nikon CoolScan system, giving an image size of 4033 × 6010 pixels and a pixel resolution of 2.35 nm. Mitochondrial volume fractions were measured on the tissue images using stereology as follows. A 9 × 13 rectangular grid (chosen for ease of use with Photoshop) was overlaid on each image and mitochondria and cytoplasm lying under intercepts were counted. The relative volume (volume fraction) of mitochondria was expressed as the ratio of intercepts coinciding with this organelle relative to the intercepts coinciding with cytoplasm and reported as a percentage. Mitochondrial lengths were measured on these same images using ImageJ (NIH). The cristae membrane surface area was also measured using ImageJ by tracing each crista in a mitochondrion and calculating its surface area. To normalize the measurement, the sum of cristae surface area was divided by the outer membrane surface area per mitochondrion. Mean and standard error of the mean (S.E.) were used throughout.

“Electron Flow” Respiration Analysis Using the XF24 Flux Analyzer

Methods for respiration analysis of isolated liver mitochondria were adapted from previously described methods (30). All steps were conducted on ice (4 °C) unless otherwise stated. On quantitation of protein concentration by Bradford assay, crude liver mitochondria from each subject group were diluted in 1× Mitochondrial Assay Solution (“MAS”: 70 mm sucrose, 220 mm mannitol, 10 mm KH2PO4, 5 mm MgCl2, 2 mm HEPES, 1 mm EGTA, and 0.2% (w/v) fatty acid-free BSA, pH 7.4; supplemented with 10 mm pyruvate, 2 mm malate, and 4 μm FCCP) to reach a normalized concentration of 0.1 μg/μl. Diluted mitochondria suspension (50 μl) was loaded via pipette into individual wells of a 24-well XF culture plate (coated with Cell-Tak ® cell/tissue adhesive reagent, as per vendor specifications). To immobilize mitochondria, the plate was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 20 min (at 4 °C). After centrifugation, 450 μl of 1x MAS prewarmed to 37 °C was carefully added to each well, and then the plate was equilibrated to room temperature for 5 min before beginning the assay. Subsequent oxygen consumption rate (OCR) analysis of functionally active liver mitochondria was conducted according to the “Electron Flow” assay, with given mix/measure time-course and drug injections, as described previously (30).

ATP Assay

Mitochondria ATP production was measured by the CellTiter-Glo® Cell Viability Kit (Promega, Madison, WI) as described by the manufacturer. Functional mitochondria were normalized by diluting 2 μg total protein into 10 μl of 1× MAS, then added to 90 μl of the reaction mix. Samples were loaded into a Tecan Infinite M200 plate reader, and luminescence was quantified after 10 min.

RESULTS

Proteomic Profiling of HFD/ND Mice Liver Mitochondria

To gain insights into mitochondrial dysfunction in liver under insulin resistance and T2D conditions, we analyzed the proteins and pathways altered by HFD in mouse liver mitochondria. We carried out a quantitative proteomic analysis of HFD and ND mice of liver mitochondria. Fig. 1A shows the schematic of our work flow. We isolated mitochondria independently from each mouse (3 HFD and 3 ND) in three biological replicates and analyzed them using iTRAQ labeling technique (23). We identified and quantified the proteins using Spectrum Mill and used DAVID Bioinformatics to extract pathways that were over- or under-represented (25, 26) in HFD compared with that of ND samples.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

A, Schematic diagram of experimental procedure. Liver mitochondria were isolated separately from each mouse (ND and HFD) and the mitochondria proteins were digested. The resulting peptides were desalted and labeled with different iTRAQ reagents. The labeled mitochondria peptides from each pair were then pooled and separated with online 2D LC with PQD-CAD acquisition on LTQ-Orbitrap. Spectrum Mill was used to search the raw data for protein identification and quantitation. The proteins that were up- or down-regulated were then analyzed using the DAVID bioinformatics tool for over- or under-represented pathways. B, Enrichment of mitochondria proteins. The list of proteins identified from proteomic analysis was analyzed using the DAVID bioinformatics tool. The enrichment factors (-log10p-value) were shown for proteins from different organelles. C, Reproducibility. This Venn diagram shows the proteins identified from each biological replicate and the overlap between the replicates.

We identified a total of 1508 proteins with a FDR of 0.1% at the protein level and with at least two unique peptides. To get the relative enrichment of mitochondria, we analyzed the full list of proteins using DAVID Bioinformatics and extracted the “cellular component” annotation information. Fig. 1B shows the enrichment of total proteins from different organelles. It is clear that even though we used crude mitochondria, mitochondrial proteins were greatly enriched. We compared our list of proteins with some existing studies including Deng et al. (18), the Mitoproteome database (http://www.mitoproteome.org/database/index.cgi), and mitochondria proteins from GO terms (25, 26) and found at least 649 identical mitochondrial proteins. The full list of proteins identified and their ratios for each biological replicate are displayed in supplemental Table S1.

We also evaluated the reproducibility of our approach. Fig. 1C illustrates the number of proteins in each biological replicate and the overlap between these replicates. A total of 1345, 1080, and 1299 proteins were obtained for set 1, set 2, and set 3 respectively, and combining all three data sets, a total of 1508 proteins were identified. Among the 1508 total proteins, 913 (60.5%) were common between all the three data sets. The protein overlap between set 1 and 2, set 2 and 3, and set 3 and 1 were 1169, 988, 972 respectively. The percentage of identifications by only one replicate totaled 13.6% ((101 + 33 + 71)/1508). Thus, these numbers confirm the reproducibility of our approach.

iTRAQ Quantitation Reveal Changes of Conserved Proteins Identified in Type 2 Diabetic Model

To identify proteins that have significant changes in HFD mitochondria, we first tried a fold change cutoff of >1.50 or <0.67 for all three biological replicates and a two-tailed paired Student's t test with a p value cutoff of 0.05 (see Experimental Procedures). The results are summarized in supplemental Table S2A. Only 92 proteins were found to have significant changes with 72 proteins up-regulated and 20 proteins down-regulated in the liver mitochondria of HFD versus ND. Regarding the use of DAVID Bioinformatics for pathways that were up- or down-regulated, we found that retinol metabolism were significantly down-regulated, branched chain amino acid (BCAA) degradation and oxidative phosphorylation were significantly up-regulated. However this list excludes a large number of proteins that have been previously shown to change in HFD mitochondria such as Dci and Acadm which are involved in fatty acid oxidation, and Atp5o, Atp5a1, Cox5a, Ndufs1, Ndufb6, and Sdhb involved in oxidative phosphorylation (18). Our studies failed to show fatty acid metabolism, pyruvate metabolism and TCA cycle that have been shown to be up-regulated in previous studies (18, 19). Our experience is consistent with the findings from O'Brien et al. (31) that the t test was not an adequate statistical measure of the reproducibility of protein changes using iTRAQ. The reason might be that isobaric tags in general suffer to some extent from compression of ratios in complex samples although the trends of up- or down-regulation are correct (32). Recently developed methods can be used to get around this issue and should help with future studies (33). In our final analysis, we considered the protein changes significant when a fold change cutoff of >1.50 or <0.67 is met for all three biological replicates. The q-values are also listed (supplemental Table S2A and S2B) (http://genomics.princeton.edu/storeylab/qvalue/) to give an understanding of the false discovery rate for reported changes.

Pathways Over- or Under-represented in HFD Mitochondria

The relative abundance of mitochondrial proteins was quantified by using the iTRAQ method. A total of 181 proteins showed abundance changes, of which 37 proteins were down-regulated and 145 proteins were up-regulated in HFD (supplemental Table S2B). We then analyzed these proteins using DAVID Bioinformatics for pathways that were up- or down-regulated.

With respect to molecular function, oxidoreductase activity (acting on NADH, NADPH, aldehyde, or oxo group of donors, NAD or NADP acceptors), cofactor binding, 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase activity, hydrogen ion trans membrane transporter activity, protein transport, and membrane biogenesis were significantly enriched in HFD mice. In regards to biological processes, the fatty acid metabolic process, the generation of precursor metabolites and energy, the cellular respiration, the carboxylic acid catabolic process, the monosaccharide metabolic process, and the carboxylic acid biosynthetic process were all significantly enhanced in HFD mice. Within the KEGG pathway, our results clearly showed that several processes were highly coordinated in HFD induced T2D. Because from the KEGG pathways, we can distinctly see the role of each protein, we used it as a start point to delve further into details on the key processes that were disturbed in HFD induced T2D mice.

From the KEGG pathways, our data indicated that 14 proteins involved in fatty acid oxidation are differentially expressed (Table I), and all these proteins are consistently up-regulated in HFD versus ND liver mitochondria. This is consistent with up-regulation of fatty acid beta-oxidation protein level in liver with obesity (34). supplemental Fig. S1 shows where these proteins are and the role of these proteins in fatty acid oxidation. The enzymes in fatty acid oxidation break fatty acids into small pieces and shuttle each piece through the TCA cycle. The proteins that are up-regulated in this pathway include two kinds of acyl-CoA dehydrogenases, the very long chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (Acadvl) and the medium chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase (Acadm), four kinds of hydroxyacyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenases (Ehhadh, Hadh, Hadha, and Hadhb), three kinds of aldehyde dehydrogenases (Aldh1b1, Aldh2, and Aldh7a1), two kinds of carnitine palmitoyltransferases (Cpt1a and Cpt2), acetyl-Coenzyme A acyltransferase 2 (Acaa2), acyl-CoA synthetase long-chain family member 6 (Acsl6), and dodecenoyl-Coenzyme A delta isomerase (Dci).

Table I. Functional categorization of proteins differentially expressed in liver mitochondria of HFD vs. ND mice. +, fold changes (HFD/ND) of 1.5–2; ++, fold changes (HFD/ND) of 2–3; +++, fold changes (HFD/ND) > 3; −, down-regulated in HFD.
Gene symbol IPI number Protein name Changes p values
Fatty acid metabolism
    Aldh7a1 IPI00230084 Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 7, member A1 ++ 0.01
    Aldh1b1 IPI00113073 Aldehyde dehydrogenase X +++ 0.03
    Cpt1a IPI00330094 Cpt1a Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase I, liver isoform ++ 0.04
    Hadh IPI00121105 Hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase +++ 0.04
    Cpt2 IPI00131424 Carnitine O-palmitoyltransferase 2 +++ 0.06
    Hadha IPI00223092 Hydroxyacyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase, alpha subunit +++ 0.07
    Dci IPI00331692 Dci Dodecenoyl-Coenzyme A delta isomerase +++ 0.08
    Ehhadh IPI00554834 Ehhadh Peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme + 0.09
    Acadvl IPI00119203 Very-long-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase ++ 0.09
    Acaa2 IPI00653158 Acetyl-Coenzyme A acyltransferase 2 ++ 0.09
    Aldh2 IPI00111218 Aldehyde dehydrogenase +++ 0.10
    Hadhb IPI00115607 Trifunctional enzyme subunit beta +++ 0.17
    Acsl6 IPI00625955 Acsl6 Long-chain-fatty-acid–CoA ligase 6 +++ 0.18
    Acadm IPI00134961 Medium-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase +++ 0.20
Branched chain amino acid degradation
    Aldh7a1 IPI00230084 Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 7, member A1 ++ 0.01
    Auh IPI00124900 Isoform 1 of Methylglutaconyl-CoA hydratase ++ 0.01
    Ivd IPI00471246 Isovaleryl-CoA dehydrogenase + 0.02
    Aldh1b1 IPI00113073 Aldehyde dehydrogenase X +++ 0.03
    Hmgcs2 IPI00420718 Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA synthase +++ 0.03
    Hadh IPI00121105 Hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase +++ 0.04
    Hadha IPI00223092 Hydroxyacyl-Coenzyme A dehydrogenase alpha subunit +++ 0.07
    Ehhadh IPI00554834 Peroxisomal bifunctional enzyme + 0.09
    Acaa2 IPI00653158 Acetyl-Coenzyme A acyltransferase 2 ++ 0.09
    Aldh2 IPI00111218 Aldehyde dehydrogenase +++ 0.10
    Pcca IPI00330523 Propionyl-CoA carboxylase alpha chain ++ 0.11
    Aldh6a1 IPI00461964 Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 6, subfamily A1 ++ 0.12
    Hadhb IPI00115607 Trifunctional enzyme subunit beta +++ 0.17
    Acadm IPI00134961 Medium-chain specific acyl-CoA dehydrogenase +++ 0.20
Pyruvate metabolism
    Aldh7a1 IPI00230084 Aldehyde dehydrogenase family 7, member A1 ++ 0.01
    Aldh1b1 IPI00113073 Aldehyde dehydrogenase X +++ 0.03
    Grhpr IPI00130530 Glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase ++ 0.04
    Dlat IPI00153660 Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase +++ 0.04
    Pdha1 IPI00337893 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component alpha subunit, somatic form +++ 0.05
    Mdh2 IPI00323592 Malate dehydrogenase, mitochondrial precursor ++ 0.06
    Pdhb IPI00132042 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta ++ 0.06
    Pcx IPI00114710 Pyruvate carboxylase +++ 0.09
    Aldh2 IPI00111218 Aldehyde dehydrogenase +++ 0.10
TCA cycle
    Dlst IPI00134809 Isoform 1 of Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue succinyltransferase +++ 0.01
    Dlat IPI00153660 Dihydrolipoyllysine-residue acetyltransferase component +++ 0.04
    Pdha1 IPI00337893 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component alpha subunit, somatic form +++ 0.05
    Mdh2 IPI00323592 Malate dehydrogenase ++ 0.06
    Pdhb IPI00132042 Pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 component subunit beta ++ 0.06
    Suclg1 IPI00406442 Succinyl-CoA ligase [GDP-forming] subunit alpha ++ 0.07
    Sdhb IPI00338536 Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur subunit ++ 0.07
    Idh3a IPI00459725 Isoform 1 of Isocitrate dehydrogenase [NAD] subunit alpha + 0.09
    Pcx IPI00114710 Pyruvate carboxylase +++ 0.09
    Aco2 IPI00116074 Aco2 Aconitate hydratase, mitochondrial precursor +++ 0.10
    Suclg2 IPI00459487 Isoform 1 of Succinyl-CoA ligase [GDP-forming] beta-chain ++ 0.13
Component of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase complex
Oxidative phosphorylation
    Cox6b1 IPI00225390 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIb isoform 1 ++ 0.00
    Atp5j IPI00125460 ATP synthase-coupling factor 6 ++ 0.00
    Uqcrc2 IPI00119138 Ubiquinol-cytochrome-c reductase complex core protein 2 ++ 0.01
    Cox7a2 IPI00114377 Cytochrome c oxidase polypeptide VIIa-liver/heart ++ 0.01
    Ndufs8 IPI00170093 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 8 ++ 0.01
    Ndufv2 IPI00169925 Isoform 1 of NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] flavoprotein 2 ++ 0.02
    Ndufb7 IPI00133215 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] 1 beta subcomplex subunit 7 ++ 0.03
    Cox4i1 IPI00117978 Cytochrome c oxidase subunit 4 isoform 1 + 0.03
    Uqcrb IPI00132347 Ubiquinol-cytochrome-c reductase binding protein homolog +++ 0.04
    Atp5b IPI00468481 ATP synthase subunit beta ++ 0.04
    Atp5o IPI00118986 ATP synthase O subunit ++ 0.06
    Cyc1 IPI00845772 Isoform 2 of Cytochrome c1 heme protein ++ 0.06
    Sdhb IPI00338536 Succinate dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur subunit ++ 0.07
    Ndufs1 IPI00308882 NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase 75 kDa subunit ++ 0.09
    Ndufs3 IPI00121309 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 3 ++ 0.09
    Ndufb6 IPI00648743 NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 beta subcomplex, 6 ++ 0.11
    Atp5a1 IPI00130280 ATP synthase subunit alpha ++ 0.12
    Cox5a IPI00776087 Cytochrome c oxidase, subunit Va ++ 0.15
    Ndufs7 IPI00120232 NADH dehydrogenase [ubiquinone] iron-sulfur protein 7 +++ 0.29
Protein QP-C
Retinol metabolism
    Cyp3a11 IPI00134504 Cytochrome P450 3A11 0.00
    Cyp2c29 IPI00134503 Cytochrome P450 2C29 0.02
    Cyp2c54 IPI00409800 Cytochrome P450 2C54 0.02
    Cyp4a12b IPI00828590 Cytochrome P450, family 4, subfamily a, polypeptide 12 0.03
    Cyp2c70 IPI00269265 Cytochrome P450 2C70 0.04
    Cyp1a2 IPI00128287 Cytochrome P450 1A2 0.05
    Cyp2a5 IPI00751041 Similar to cytochrome P450, family 2, subfamily a, polypeptide 5 0.05
    Retsat IPI00471380 All-trans-retinol 13,14-reductase precursor 0.09
    Ugt2b1 IPI00153143 UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B1 0.17

Branched chain amino acid (BCAA) degradation is significantly enhanced in HFD versus ND liver mitochondria. The degradation of BCAA has two steps: reversible transamination to yield branched chain keto-acid and irreversible oxidative decarboxylation of branched chain keto-acid, the product of which is the acyl-CoA derivative with one less carbon that can enter the TCA cycle. We have 14 significantly changed proteins involved in this pathway and all these proteins are coordinately increased (Table I and Fig. 2A). These proteins include four aldehyde dehydrogenases (Aldh1b1, Aldh2, Aldh6a1, and Aldh7a1), six Coenzyme A dehydrogenases (Acadm, Ehhadh, Hadh, Hadha, Ivd, and Hadhb), 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-Coenzyme A synthase 2 (Hmgcs2), AU RNA binding protein/enoyl-coenzyme A hydratase (Auh), Acaa2, and propionyl-Coenzyme A carboxylase (Pcca).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

KEGG pathways for branched chain amino acid degradation and retinol metabolism. A, Branched chain amino acid pathway; The list of proteins that were up- or down-regulated in HFD from proteomic analysis was analyzed using the DAVID bioinformatics software. The proteins in green were consistently increased. B, Retinol metabolism pathway: The list of proteins that were up- or down-regulated in HFD from proteomic analysis was analyzed using the DAVID bioinformatics software. The proteins in yellow were consistently decreased.

Pyruvate metabolism is over-represented in the liver mitochondria of HFD versus ND. We have 9 proteins involved in this pathway that are consistently increased (Table I and supplemental Fig. S2) in HFD samples. These proteins include pyruvate dedydrogenase E1 alpha 1 (Pdha1), pyruvate dehydrogenase beta (Pdhb), and dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase (Dlat), which convert pyruvate to Acetyl-CoA; pyruvate carboxylase (Pcx), which converts pyruvate to oxaloacetate; malate dehydrogenase 2 (Mdh2), which converts l-malate to oxaloacetate; glyoxylate reductase/hydroxypyruvate reductase, which converts methylglyoxal to d-Lactaldehyde; and three different aldehyde dehydrogenases (Aldh1b1, Aldh2, and Aldh7a1).

The citrate cycle [tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle] is distinctively over-represented in HFD liver mitochondria compared with ND. The TCA cycle serves to degrade the 2-carbon unit of acetyl-CoA into CO2, while transforming the energy of the acetyl group into GTP (the equivalent of ATP) and reducing power in the form of NADH and FADH2. From our iTRAQ analysis, we detected 11 proteins involved in this pathway that are significantly up-regulated and none that were down-regulated (Table I and supplemental Fig. S3). These proteins include pyruvate dedydrogenase E1 alpha 1 (Pdha1), pyruvate dehydrogenase beta (Pdhb), and dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase (Dlat), which convert pyruvate to Acetyl-CoA; pyruvate carboxylase (Pcx), which converts pyruvate to oxaloacetate; pyruvate carboxylase (Pcx), which converts pyruvate to oxaloacetate; malate dehydrogenase 2 (Mdh2), which converts oxaloacetate to S-malate reversibly; aconitase 2 (Aco2), which converts citrate to cis-aconitate reversibly; isocitrate dehydrogenase 3 alpha (Idh3a), which converts isocitrate to 2-oxoglutarate reversibly; succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit b (Sdhb), which converts fumarate to succinate reversibly; and dihydrolipoamide S-succinyltransferase (Dlst), which converts S-succinyl-dihydrolipoamide-E to succinyl-CoA reversibly; and succinate-CoA ligase, GDP forming, alpha subunit (Suclg1) and succinate-CoA ligase, GDP forming, beta subunit (Suclg2), which convert succinyl-CoA to succinate reversibly.

The OXPHOS pathway is significantly over-represented in HFD mitochondria. We have one or more subunits in each of the five complexes that are coordinately up-regulated, and not a single protein that is down-regulated (Table I and supplemental Fig. 4). These proteins include 7 NADH dehydrogenases from complex I (Ndufs1, Ndufs3, Ndufs7, Ndufs8, Ndufv2, Ndufb6, and Ndufb7), succinate dehydrogenase complex, subunit B (Sdhb) from complex II, three proteins from complex III (Cyc1, Uqcrc2, and Uqcrb), four kinds of cytochrome c oxidases from complex IV (Cox4i1, Cox7a2, Cox6b1, and Cox5a), four kinds of ATP synthases (Atp5b, Atp5j, Atp5a1, and Atp5o) from Complex V.

Liver is the main source for gluconeogenesis. When we analyzed this pathway, we noticed an increase in several key enzymes in the liver mitochondria of HFD versus ND. These include pyruvate carboxylase (Pcx), mitochondrial phosphoenolpyruvate carboxykinase 2 (Pck2), and fructose-1, 6-biophosphatase 1 (Fbp1). Gluconeogenic enzymes require ATP for their catalytic actions and because we noticed an increase in OXPHOS pathway under HFD conditions, it is likely that the ATP generated from OXPHOS contribute to up-regulation of gluconeogenesis and increased glucose levels in liver.

Down-regulation of Retinol Metabolism

Our analysis showed compelling changes of proteins involved in retinol metabolism. Although many of the changes listed above are consistent with previous studies (18, 19), in our analysis we found that the retinol metabolism pathway is significantly under-represented in HFD liver mitochondria. Retinol (Vitamin A) (all-trans retinol) and its metabolites, all-trans- and cis-Retinoic acid and 11-cis-Retinal, are involved in processes such as vision, reproduction, growth, development and immune function. In addition, retinoids have been shown to play important roles in obesity and insulin resistance (35, 36). We have nine significantly changed proteins involved in retinol metabolism and they are all consistently down-regulated (Table I and Fig. 2B). These proteins include retinol saturase (all-trans retinol 13, 14 reductase) (Retsat), UDP glucuronosyltransferase 2 family, polypeptide B1 (Ugt2b1), and 7 proteins from the cytochrome P450 family (Cyp1a2, Cyp2a5, Cyp2c29, Cyp2c70, Cyp3a11, Cyp4a12b, and Cyp2c54).

Increased Protein Expression of Mitochondrial Intermembrane Space Bridging (MIB) complex and Translocases of the Inner Membrane Proteins (TIMs)

Recent studies from our lab and other groups have established that mitofilin together with ChChd3 (on the inner membrane) and Sam50 (on the outer membrane) exists in a complex at the crista junction as well as at the contact sites. Other proteins including OPA1and metaxins have also been shown to be part of this complex- termed the mitochondrial intermembrane space bridging (MIB) complex or mitochondrial contact site (MICOS) complex. The MIB/MICOS integrity is required for maintaining cristae architecture, crista junction formation, membrane organization and mitochondrial function (3742). In our analysis, the majority of the components of this complex are significantly elevated in the liver mitochondria of HFD versus ND. The levels of mitofilin/IMMT (inner mitochondrial membrane protein), ChChd3, Sam50, OPA1, and metaxin1 are consistently increased in the liver mitochondria of HFD mice versus ND mice (Table II). Additionally we found a significant increase in the TIM proteins: Tim17, Tim44, Tim8, and Tim13 in the liver mitochondria of HFD mice compared with that of the ND mice (Table II). All these proteins have roles in translocation of matrix targeted proteins with a cleavable presequence. Specifically, Tim17 and Tim44 are part of the Tim23 and PAM complex on the inner membrane and matrix respectively (43). Tim8 and Tim13, on the other hand, are intermembrane space proteins involved in the import of Tim23 under low membrane potential conditions (44). Heat shock proteins 60 (HSP60/Hspd1) and 70 (HSP70/Hspa9, associated with translocation and processing of the precursor proteins in the mitochondrial matrix, also increased in HFD liver mitochondria (Table II).

Table II. List of proteins involved in mitochondrial protein transport, biogenesis and regulation of crista morphology. The data shown are the average ratios (HFD vs. ND) from three biological replicates. Also shown are the number of unique peptides identified for each protein (unique_Pep) and number of PQD spectrum (Spectrum_num) used for protein quantitation. The protein coverage is shown as Protein_Coverage. ND: not detected.
Gene Symbol Accession set1_HFD/ND set2_HFD/ND set3_HFD/ND Average HFD/ND p value Unique_Peptide Spectrum_num Protein_Coverage Protein
Chchd3 IPI00754739 2.10 1.10 3.68 2.29 0.18 6 18 0.38 Coiled-coil-helix coiled-coil-helix domain- containing protein 3
Samm50 IPI00221608 0.96 3.08 3.90 2.64 0.20 6 24 0.10 Sorting and assembly machinery component 50 homolog
Immt IPI00554845 1.39 4.75 2.96 3.03 0.11 26 149 0.38 Mitofilin Isoform 5 of Mitochondrial inner membrane protein
Mtx1 IPI00112327 4.26 ND 8.21 6.24 0.20 4 7 0.14 Metaxin-1
Opa1 IPI00403336 2.15 1.76 2.61 2.17 0.02 12 22 0.13 Optic atrophy 1
Timm44 IPI00135068 1.22 2.67 7.03 3.64 0.18 9 21 0.18 Import inner membrane translocase subunit TIM44
Timm17b IPI00129504 2.59 ND 2.48 2.54 0.18 2 5 0.17 Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim17-B
Hspd1 IPI00308885 1.19 1.54 2.98 1.90 0.18 43 1003 0.55 Hsp60 Isoform 1 of 60 kDa heat shock protein
Hspa9 IPI00133903 1.62 1.60 3.96 2.39 0.12 34 947 0.49 Hspa9 Stress-70 protein
Timm8a1 IPI00125776 0.88 1.62 4.57 2.36 0.32 2 33 0.23 Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim8 A
Timm13 IPI00134484 2.38 2.06 2.55 2.33 0.01 4 123 0.37 Mitochondrial import inner membrane translocase subunit Tim13
Cytoscape Analysis

The cytoscape analysis (Fig. 3A) provides global view of potentially relevant interacting partners of proteins whose levels change in high-fat diet mouse. We also searched for possible functional links among eleven significant proteins in Table II using computational prediction based on several criteria including co-expression of genes and colocalization of proteins (Fig. 3B). We observed functional links among these 11 proteins.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Cytoscape analysis. A, Quantitative proteomic data were mapped on protein-protein interaction network. Blue edges represent mouse PPIs whereas sky blue edges represent PPIs transferred from human (interologs). Nodes with lower p values are colored in dark red. Nodes associated with no proteome value are colored in green. B, Possible functional connections among some significant proteins predicted by Cytoscape plugin GeneMania. Square nodes represent eleven significant proteins and circle nodes represent those predicted to be functionally associated. Color of node is closer to dark red if the average HFD/ND is higher. Circle size represents functional relevance.

Immunoblot Analysis

To further confirm our iTRAQ results, we performed immunoblot analysis on some of the significantly changed proteins (Fig. 4). Cyp1a2, the protein involved in retinol metabolism is clearly down-regulated in HFD mitochondria samples compared with that of ND. Mitofilin, ChChd3, and OPA1 were tested for the components of MIB/MICOS, and they were all clearly up-regulated in HFD samples. Consistent with the mass spectrometry results, cytochrome C is up-regulated and Tom40 has no change in expression level and hence was used as a loading control. Thus, the immunoblot results further validated our iTRAQ data. We also noticed that three out of the five proteins (ChChd3, mitofilin, and cytochrome C) were validated with immunoblot analysis, yet these proteins had p values ≥ 0.05 from our mass spectrometry analysis. If we limit our analysis to changes with a p value cutoff of 0.05, we would have missed these proteins. Therefore, there are certainly additional relevant changes beyond this significance threshold, but users should note the FDR rates at each p value cutoff.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4.

Immunoblot analysis of mouse liver mitochondria. Proteins from isolated liver mitochondria (ND and HFD, 15 μg) were separated by SDS-PAGE (4–12%) and transferred to PVDF membranes. The membranes were incubated for 1 h at room temperature with blocking buffer (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5, 100 mM NaCl, 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS/Tween 20), and 5% nonfat milk powder), and then overnight at 4 °C with appropriate antibodies. Tom40 was used as a loading control. A, Immunoblot images from four biological replicates (4ND and 4HFD). B, Immunoblot bar graph. Protein expression was quantitated by densitometry using ImageJ 1.41o software, and statistical analysis was done using Prism 6 software. The ratios calculated from immunoblot were shown on the top, and the ratios calculated from iTRAQ data were shown on the bottom along with standard deviation. Note: ND immunoblot data from the second lane was omitted because of the high variation. (mean ± S.E.; *p < 0.05).

Liver Mitochondria of HFD are More Condensed

We next analyzed the HFD -induced structural changes in liver mitochondria by using electron microscopy. The most significant structural difference between the mitochondria from HFD liver and their counterparts from ND liver was a conformational change to a more condensed state in the HFD mitochondria (Fig. 5). This change was found in both isolated mitochondria (Figs. 5A, 5B, 5C) and mitochondria in situ (Figs. 5D, 5E). The condensed mitochondria under HFD conditions were smaller, with a darker matrix, indicative of more densely packed proteins, and a preponderance of dilated cristae. In the isolated HFD samples, ultracondensed mitochondria were common and represent an extreme of the condensed configuration (Fig. 5C). Ultracondensation involves cristae remodeling with a reversal of the membrane curvature thus forming tubes that enclose the matrix instead of the intracristal space. More than half the HFD mitochondria (57%) in tissue showed a classically condensed conformation, whereas no ND mitochondria were condensed. Consistent with the condensed configuration, the mitochondrial volume fraction (density) was lower (Fig. 5F) and length was shorter (Fig. 5G) in the HFD liver tissue. The lowered mitochondrial density and smaller mitochondria are likely attributed to compacting of the matrix occurring during condensation. There was also an increase in the cristae abundance (Fig. 5H) in the HFD mitochondria.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5.

EM analysis of liver mitochondria. Mitochondria in HFD liver are more condensed and have more cristae membrane than in ND liver, indicating increased respiration. A–C, EM images of isolated mitochondria. A, typical mitochondrion from ND. Scale bar is 200 nm. B, condensed mitochondrion that is the most common form seen from HFD. The structure is classically condensed showing a darker matrix and enlarged cristae. C, ultracondensed mitochondrion, less commonly seen from HFD. D, typical mitochondrion in ND liver tissue. Scale bar is 200 nm. E, typical mitochondrion in HFD liver tissue. F, Mitochondrial volume fraction was significantly less in HFD liver (mean ± S.E.; n = 9; **p < 0.01). G, Mitochondrial lengths were also shorter in HFD liver (mean ± S.E.; n = 100. *p < 0.05). H, There was more cristae membrane surface area in the HFD mitochondria (mean ± S.E.; n = 28, *p < 0.05).

Oxygen Consumption Rate (OCR) and ATP Generation in Liver Mitochondria are Elevated with HFD Treatment

To determine whether or not HFD treatment induces a significant difference in metabolic capacity, we have performed functional analyses of isolated liver mitochondria from both 30-week HFD treated groups as well as age-matched wild-type mice. First, we conducted oxygen consumption measurements using the XF24 metabolic flux analyzer to assess respiratory capacity among the two groups. As shown in one independent experiment with 10 technical replicates for each group (Fig. 6A), we observed a significant increase in respiratory capacity in HFD mice compared with wild-type on both malate/pyruvate stimulus (i.e. complex I activation) as well as with succinate stimulus (i.e. complex II activation). After performing the experiment in two separate biological replicates, we see that the relative change in OCR % as compared with baseline complex I activity is also markedly increased in HFD mice as compared with ND mice (Fig. 6B). As a corroboration of these results, we also performed relative quantitation of ATP production in both groups using the CellTiter-Glo® cell viability kit (Promega). As seen in Fig. 6C, we observed that ATP production is also similarly increased in HFD mice as relative to ND mice given malate/pyruvate stimulus for activation of complex I driven respiration. In combination, these findings indicate that diet with high fat content induces a change in metabolic phenotype, as manifested by overactive respiratory function in HFD mice as compared with ND mice.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6.

Oxygen consumption and ATP production are increased in HFD mice. Comparison of mitochondrial function between ND and HFD mice. A, Oxygen consumption analysis in isolated liver mitochondria using the XF24 analyzer (representative of one experiment with 10 technical replicates; *p < 0.05). B, Relative oxygen consumption rate percentage (OCR %) is compared with baseline malate/pyruvate stimulus (n = 15 technical replicates from 2 biological replicates. *p < 0.05). C, ATP production assay in isolated mitochondria stimulated with 2 mm malate/10 mm pyruvate (n = 3 technical replicates. *p < 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Mitochondrial dysfunction is considered as one of the major underlying defects linking obesity to diabetes, through insulin resistance and β-cell dysfunction. Focusing on the changes in proteins and pathways can serve as a reference to better understand and ultimately provide therapeutic targets for the disease. With this purpose in mind, we used a quantitative proteomic approach to identify the protein expression changes in mouse liver mitochondria from an HFD induced obesity model. Our results illustrate that, in liver mitochondria, HFD triggers a coordinated increase in various metabolic pathways including OXPHOS, fatty-acid oxidation, gluconeogenesis, pyruvate metabolism, branched chain amino acid degradation and TCA cycle. In addition to this, the retinol metabolism pathway is distinctly down-regulated, and the proteins that are associated with crista morphology and biogenesis, and mitochondrial protein import are up-regulated under HFD conditions. Electron microscopic analysis of the mitochondria revealed that HFD promotes remodeling to a condensed state with increased matrix density and cristae membrane. Furthermore, functional analysis of liver mitochondria demonstrated increased activities of complex I and complex II, and increased ATP production in HFD versus ND mice. We propose that in HFD fed mice the liver mitochondria is able to up-regulate OXPHOS to synthesize ATP, and it is further used in gluconeogenesis causing hyperglycemia, consistent with previous findings (19, 45). Condensed mitochondria with higher cristae content and dense matrix in HFD may be a necessary structural remodeling event to accommodate the higher protein levels.

We first evaluated the criteria for defining protein changes and found that using fold change cutoff and p value cutoff of 0.05, we would miss some proteins and important pathways that have been shown to be changed previously. Some of these proteins which had p values > 0.05 were validated with immunoblot. We then continued with fold changes only with the p values listed to give a sense of the false discovery rate. Among 1508 identified proteins 182 are differentially expressed in our analysis. We compared our data to a closely related recent study on mitochondria from T2D livers of GK rats (18). We noticed many similarities in our system including up-regulation of 15 proteins involved in OXPHOS, two proteins from the TCA pathway (Dlat, Sdhb), one protein involved in glucose metabolism (Gpd2), three proteins involved in fatty acid oxidation (Acadm, Dci, Hadh), and two proteins associated with ketone body metabolism (Bdh1 and Hmgcs2). With regards to KEGG pathways, OXPHOS, β-oxidation, pyruvate metabolism, TCA cycle, and gluconeogenesis are consistently up-regulated in HFD. Our data is consistent with a human diabetic patient liver study by Takamura and coworkers (19). These authors showed a clear up-regulation of genes involved in OXPHOS, and glucose and lipid metabolism. Increase in OXPHOS was also accompanied by an increase in enzyme expression in the gluconeogenesis pathway. It has been suggested that hepatic insulin resistance contributes to an increase in gluconeogenesis through the ATP generated from fatty acid oxidation resulting in hyperglycemia in liver. Accordingly, we also noticed up-regulation of the enzymes involved in the gluconeogenesis pathway in HFD mitochondria.

Thus, our data from the T2D mouse model support the earlier work from other labs using different mammalian systems, and establish a key finding that increased protein expression of OXPHOS and other metabolic pathways is a common phenomenon observed in liver mitochondria under HFD induced obesity and diabetes. This is in contrast to the skeletal muscle studies where reduced OXPHOS genes/proteins and mitochondrial activity were reported (12, 14, 46, 47). Electron microscopic analysis of muscle mitochondria in obese, T2D and HFD studies revealed smaller mitochondria along with reduced mitochondrial density (12, 48). The liver mitochondria on the other hand showed a remodeling to a condensed conformation (Fig. 5). The transition between the “orthodox” and “condensed” states is a reflection of the energy state of the mitochondria. In vitro and in situ studies have revealed that in state 4 (low respiratory activity), mitochondria are normally in the orthodox configuration, and in state 3 (high respiratory activity), they adopt a condensed configuration characterized by dense matrix and enlarged cristae (4952). Studies have shown that mitochondria in cancer cells switch from an orthodox to a condense conformation when the cells are shifted from glucose to galactose media (53). This conformational change was also accompanied by an increase in OXPHOS components. Thus, condensed mitochondria with increased cristae membrane and OXPHOS proteins in HFD liver, is a strong indicator that the mitochondria are energetically active. As we noticed this increase in proteins involved in fatty acid oxidation concomitant with increased cristae formation on OXPHOS protein expression, it can be predicted that the HFD liver mitochondria utilize fatty acids for synthesizing ATP.

There were contradictory findings in the literature regarding to mitochondria respiration. Several studies have reported increased respiration in the liver mitochondria of obesity models (17, 54), and other models of obesity have exhibited decreased respiration in liver (55). Therefore, we carried out oxygen consumption experiment in purified mitochondria from our HFD model. We see increased activities of complex I and complex II in liver mitochondria and this is consistent with more condensed mitochondria from our EM analysis and increased OXPHOS proteins from our proteomic analysis. Furthermore, our ATP assay confirmed increased ATP production in HFD versus ND mice.

One of the novel observations in the present study is the increased abundance of components from the MIB/MICOS complex in HFD mitochondria (Table II). We showed recently that ChChd3 is part of a complex that bridges the inner and outer mitochondrial membranes, and this was subsequently confirmed by several laboratories. This complex on the inner membrane is crucial for maintaining inner membrane architecture, crista integrity and contact site formation (3739, 42, 56). The inner membrane protein mitofilin is also a core component of this complex, and it interacts with several inner and outer membrane proteins at crista junctions and contact sites (41, 57). On the outer membrane, mitofilin associates with the SAM (sorting and assembly machinery) complex that is involved in biogenesis of outer membrane proteins (39, 58). On the inner membrane, ChChd3, ChChd6, and OPA1 have been shown to copurify with mitofilin (39, 59). Knockdown studies in cultured cells revealed similar phenotypes for many of these proteins including altered growth rates, impaired mitochondrial function and drastic alterations in cristae structure, along with fragmentation, rounding and loss of cristae (38, 39, 41, 59). In HFD mitochondria we noticed a significant increase in almost all the components of this complex including mitofilin, ChChd3, OPA1, Sam50, and metaxin1. Immunoblot analysis for mitofilin, ChChd3 and OPA1 confirmed the proteomic data and showed a clear increase in these proteins in all three liver mitochondria samples (Fig. 4). Mitochondrial contact sites are where the outer and inner membranes touch and function in maintaining structural integrity, coordinating fusion and fission events, and in transporting proteins, lipids, ions, and metabolites. As recent studies have shown that MIB/MICOS components are essential for contact site formation, the increase in the components of this complex likely facilitates the formation of these contacts under HFD conditions. Because lipid metabolism increased with HFD, it is likely that the MIB/MICOS complex can facilitate the transport of lipids through the contact sites into mitochondria and thus may have a role in fatty acid uptake and oxidation. We also observed an increased abundance of the contact site-specific proteins: voltage dependent anion channel (VDAC) and adenine nucleotide transporter (49). It is also likely that the MIB/MICOS complex is essential for the formation of condensed mitochondria where increased crista and crista junctions were observed.

In a proteomic analysis from human skeletal muscle, a significant reduction in ChChd3 protein levels was observed in obese and T2D subjects (60). This is interesting mainly because the expression change in ChChd3 seems to directly correlate with changes in OXPHOS. It is unclear whether ChChd3, which is part of the MIB/MICOS complex, or the components of MIB/MICOS have a direct role in regulating OXPHOS function or whether the function is regulated through the scaffolding aspect of the complex. Studies toward understanding the function of MIB/MICOS components in glucose and lipid metabolism can provide clues to the role of these proteins in insulin signaling. Another key finding in this study is that the retinol metabolism pathway is significantly affected under HFD conditions. We identified a total of nine proteins that have changes in this pathway and all are significantly down-regulated with HFD. Retinyl esters, retinol, retinal, retinoic acid, and oxidized and conjugated metabolites of both retinol and retinoic acid are different forms of retinoids, and they are critical for development of the nervous system and notochord and many other embryonic structures, as well as for cell proliferation and differentiation (61). Retinoids have also been known to play an important role in glucose and lipid metabolism by regulating gene expression (62, 63). All-trans-retinoid acid (at-RA) functions as a ligand for nuclear retinoid acid receptor and they heterodimerize with PPARs, the main players in lipid and glucose metabolism, and thus the effects of retinoids on insulin sensitivity is thought to be through dimerization with PPARγ. Cyp450 family enzymes regulate the cellular levels of at-RA by hydrolyzing to form polar metabolites (64). In our study, we found seven proteins that belong to this group, and all these are significantly reduced in HFD liver mitochondria. We also noticed down-regulation of retinol saturase (Ret Sat) an enzyme implicated in the formation of dihydroretinoid metabolites from retinol. Ret Sat has been shown to be essential for adipogenesis, and it is down-regulated with human and mouse obesity (65). In a recent study, retinol was shown to regulate mitochondrial metabolism (66). Acin-Perez et al., showed that retinol binds to and activates PKCδ in mitochondria and this PKCδ/retinol complex signals the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex to increase pyruvate flux in the TCA cycle. Reduced Ret Sat in HFD liver mitochondria can produce an increase in retinol and can affect OXPHOS in mitochondria. shRNA down-regulation of Ret Sat in NIH3T3 cells has been shown to produce resistance to oxidative stress (67). Based on this, we propose that the reduced expression of Ret Sat in HFD mitochondria can be one of the defensive mechanisms to protect from ROS mediated oxidative stress.

In summary, by using quantitative proteomic analysis, bioinformatic and biochemical approaches, we identified metabolic and biological pathways that are dysregulated in liver mitochondria of HFD-induced obesity and T2D mouse models. Although our results are consistent with the previous findings that with obesity and HFD conditions, fatty acid oxidation and OXPHOS pathways are significantly enhanced, our study also unveiled novel pathways including the up-regulation of the MIB/MICOS complex and the down-regulation of retinol metabolism under HFD conditions. Future studies are warranted to address the specific role of these proteins in the pathogenesis of obesity and T2D.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Data

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Mira Sastri for editing this manuscript. The authors also wish to acknowledge the Reviewer 1 for his/her detailed and helpful comments.

Footnotes

* This work was partially supported by National Institute of Health grants P01 DK54441 (SST), 5P41RR004050 and P41GM103412-24 (MHE), HL107200 (HHP), DK-033651, DK-074868, T32-DK-007494, and DK-063491 (JMO), by the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development/NIH through cooperative agreement of U54-HD-012303-25 as part of the specialized Cooperative Centers Program in Reproduction and Infertility Research, and by the National Resource for Network Biology (P41 GM103504), the San Diego Center for Systems Biology (P50 GM085764), and the Department of Veterans Affairs BX001963 (HHP).

1 The abbreviations used are:

T2D
type 2 diabetes
iTRAQ
isobaric tagging for relative and absolute quantification
HFD
high fat diet
ND
normal diet
ChChd3
coiled-coil helix coiled-coil helix domain containing protein 3
FDR
false discovery rate
GO
gene ontology
mAb
monoclonal antibody
pAb
polyclonal antibody
PQD
pulsed Q dissociation
CAD
collision activated dissociation
EM
electron microscopy
OXPHOS
oxidative phosphorylation
MIB
mitochondrial intermembrane space bridging
MICOS
mitochondrial contact site.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Wang Y. C., Colditz G. A., Kuntz K. M. (2007) Forecasting the obesity epidemic in the aging U.S. population. Obesity 15, 2855–2865 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Zimmet P., Alberti K. G., Shaw J. (2001) Global and societal implications of the diabetes epidemic. Nature 414, 782–787 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Kahn B. B., Flier J. S. (2000) Obesity and insulin resistance. J. Clin. Invest. 106, 473–481 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kahn S. E., Hull R. L., Utzschneider K. M. (2006) Mechanisms linking obesity to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. Nature 444, 840–846 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Reaven G. M. (1995) Pathophysiology of insulin resistance in human disease. Physiol. Rev. 75, 473–486 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Kahn S. E. (2003) The relative contributions of insulin resistance and beta-cell dysfunction to the pathophysiology of Type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia 46, 3–19 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. LeRoith D. (2002) Beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetes: role of metabolic and genetic abnormalities. Am J Med 113, 3S–11S [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Wang C. H., Wang C. C., Wei Y. H. (2010) Mitochondrial dysfunction in insulin insensitivity: implication of mitochondrial role in type 2 diabetes. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1201, 157–165 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Ma Z. A., Zhao Z., Turk J. (2012) Mitochondrial dysfunction and beta-cell failure in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Exp. Diabetes Res. 2012, 7035–7038 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lowell B. B., Shulman G. I. (2005) Mitochondrial dysfunction and type 2 diabetes. Science 307, 384–387 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Kim J. Y., Hickner R. C., Cortright R. L., Dohm G. L., Houmard J. A. (2000) Lipid oxidation is reduced in obese human skeletal muscle. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol. Metab. 279, E1039–E1044 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Kelley D. E., He J., Menshikova E. V., Ritov V. B. (2002) Dysfunction of mitochondria in human skeletal muscle in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 51, 2944–2950 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Morino K., Petersen K. F., Dufour S., Befroy D., Frattini J., Shatzkes N., Neschen S., White M. F., Bilz S., Sono S., Pypaert M., Shulman G. I. (2005) Reduced mitochondrial density and increased IRS-1 serine phosphorylation in muscle of insulin-resistant offspring of type 2 diabetic parents. J. Clin. Invest. 115, 3587–3593 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Mootha V. K., Lindgren C. M., Eriksson K. F., Subramanian A., Sihag S., Lehar J., Puigserver P., Carlsson E., Ridderstråle M., Laurila E., Houstis N., Daly M. J., Patterson N., Mesirov J. P., Golub T. R., Tamayo P., Spiegelman B., Lander E. S., Hirschhorn J. N., Altshuler D., Groop L. C. (2003) PGC-1alpha-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat. Genet. 34, 267–273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Koh E. H., Park J. Y., Park H. S., Jeon M. J., Ryu J. W., Kim M., Kim S. Y., Kim M. S., Kim S. W., Park I. S., Youn J. H., Lee K. U. (2007) Essential role of mitochondrial function in adiponectin synthesis in adipocytes. Diabetes 56, 2973–2981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Kadowaki T., Yamauchi T., Kubota N., Hara K., Ueki K., Tobe K. (2006) Adiponectin and adiponectin receptors in insulin resistance, diabetes, and the metabolic syndrome. J. Clin. Invest. 116, 1784–1792 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Buchner D. A., Yazbek S. N., Solinas P., Burrage L. C., Morgan M. G., Hoppel C. L., Nadeau J. H. (2011) Increased mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in the liver is associated with obesity and insulin resistance. Obesity 19, 917–924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Deng W. J., Nie S., Dai J., Wu J. R., Zeng R. (2010) Proteome, phosphoproteome, and hydroxyproteome of liver mitochondria in diabetic rats at early pathogenic stages. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 100–116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Takamura T., Misu H., Matsuzawa-Nagata N., Sakurai M., Ota T., Shimizu A., Kurita S., Takeshita Y., Ando H., Honda M., Kaneko S. (2008) Obesity upregulates genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation in livers of diabetic patients. Obesity 16, 2601–2609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Rector R.S., Thyfault J. P., Uptergrove G. M., Morris E. M., Naples S. P., Borengasser S. J., Mikus C. R., Laye M. J., Laughlin M. H., Booth F. W., Ibdah J. A. (2010) Mitochondrial dysfunction precedes insulin resistance and hepatic steatosis and contributes to the natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in an obese rodent model. J. Hepatol. 52, 727–736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Lee Y. S., Li P., Huh J. Y., Hwang I. J., Lu M., Kim J. I., Ham M., Talukdar S., Chen A., Lu W. J., Bandyopadhyay G. K., Schwendener R., Olefsky J., Kim J. B. (2011) Inflammation is necessary for long-term but not short-term high-fat diet-induced insulin resistance. Diabetes 60, 2474–2483 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Pagliarini D. J., Wiley S. E., Kimple M. E., Dixon J. R., Kelly P., Worby C. A., Casey P. J., Dixon J. E. (2005) Involvement of a mitochondrial phosphatase in the regulation of ATP production and insulin secretion in pancreatic beta cells. Mol. Cell 19, 197–207 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Andreyev A. Y., Shen Z., Guan Z., Ryan A., Fahy E., Subramaniam S., Raetz C. R., Briggs S., Dennis E. A. (2010) Application of proteomic marker ensembles to subcellular organelle identification. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 388–402 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Griffin T. J., Xie H., Bandhakavi S., Popko J., Mohan A., Carlis J. V., Higgins L. (2007) iTRAQ reagent-based quantitative proteomic analysis on a linear ion trap mass spectrometer. J. Proteome Res. 6, 4200–4209 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Huang da W., Sherman B. T., Lempicki R. A. (2009) Bioinformatics enrichment tools: paths toward the comprehensive functional analysis of large gene lists. Nucleic Acids Res. 37, 1–13 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Huang D. W., Sherman B. T., Lempicki R. A. (2009) Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nature Protoc. 4, 44–57 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Shannon P., Markiel A., Ozier O., Baliga N. S., Wang J. T., Ramage D., Amin N., Schwikowski B., Ideker T. (2003) Cytoscape: a software environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks. Genome Res. 13, 2498–2504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Matthews L. R., Vaglio P., Reboul J., Ge H., Davis B. P., Garrels J., Vincent S., Vidal M. (2001) Identification of potential interaction networks using sequence-based searches for conserved protein-protein interactions or “interologs”. Genome Res. 11, 2120–2126 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Rasband W. S., ImageJ, U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, U.S.A., http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2012 [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Tang T., Zheng B., Chen S. H., Murphy A. N., Kudlicka K., Zhou H., Farquhar M. G. (2009) hNOA1 Interacts with Complex I and DAP3 and Regulates Mitochondrial Respiration and Apoptosis. J. Biol. Chem. 284, 5414–5424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. O'Brien R. N., Shen Z., Tachikawa K., Lee P. A., Briggs S. P. (2010) Quantitative proteome analysis of pluripotent cells by iTRAQ mass tagging reveals post-transcriptional regulation of proteins required for ES cell self-renewal. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 9, 2238–2251 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Ow S. Y., Salim M., Noirel J., Evans C., Rehman I., Wright P. C. (2009) iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: “the good, the bad and the ugly”. J. Proteome Res. 8, 5347–5355 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Ting L., Rad R., Gygi S. P., Haas W. (2011) MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 8, 937–940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Grimsrud P. A., Carson J. J., Hebert A. S., Hubler S. L., Niemi N. M., Bailey D. J., Jochem A., Stapleton D. S., Keller M. P., Westphall M. S., Yandell B. S., Attie A. D., Coon J. J., Pagliarini D. J. (2012) A quantitative map of the liver mitochondrial phosphoproteome reveals posttranslational control of ketogenesis. Cell Metab. 16, 672–683 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Berry D. C., Noy N. (2009) All-trans-retinoic acid represses obesity and insulin resistance by activating both peroxisome proliferation-activated receptor beta/delta and retinoic acid receptor. Mol. Cell. Biol. 29, 3286–3296 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Berry D. C., Jin H., Majumdar A., Noy N. (2011) Signaling by vitamin A and retinol-binding protein regulates gene expression to inhibit insulin responses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 108, 4340–4345 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Harner M., Körner C., Walther D., Mokranjac D., Kaesmacher J., Welsch U., Griffith J., Mann M., Reggiori F., Neupert W. (2011) The mitochondrial contact site complex, a determinant of mitochondrial architecture. EMBO J. 30, 4356–4370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Ott C., Ross K., Straub S., Thiede B., Götz M., Goosmann C., Krischke M., Mueller M. J., Krohne G., Rudel T., Kozjak-Pavlovic V. (2012) Sam50 functions in mitochondrial intermembrane space bridging and biogenesis of respiratory complexes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 32, 1173–1188 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Darshi M., Mendiola V. L., Mackey M. R., Murphy A. N., Koller A., Perkins G. A., Ellisman M. H., Taylor S. S. (2011) ChChd3, an inner mitochondrial membrane protein, is essential for maintaining crista integrity and mitochondrial function. J. Biol. Chem. 286, 2918–2932 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Alkhaja A. K., Jans D. C., Nikolov M., Vukotic M., Lytovchenko O., Ludewig F., Schliebs W., Riedel D., Urlaub H., Jakobs S., Deckers M. (2012) MINOS1 is a conserved component of mitofilin complexes and required for mitochondrial function and cristae organization. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 247–257 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. John G. B., Shang Y., Li L., Renken C., Mannella C. A., Selker J. M., Rangell L., Bennett M. J., Zha J. (2005) The mitochondrial inner membrane protein mitofilin controls cristae morphology. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1543–1554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Zerbes R. M., van der Klei I. J., Veenhuis M., Pfanner N., van der Laan M., Bohnert M. (2012) Mitofilin complexes: conserved organizers of mitochondrial membrane architecture. Biol. Chem. 393, 1247–1261 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Chacinska A., Koehler C. M., Milenkovic D., Lithgow T., Pfanner N. (2009) Importing mitochondrial proteins: machineries and mechanisms. Cell 138, 628–644 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Paschen S. A., Rothbauer U., Káldi K., Bauer M. F., Neupert W., Brunner M. (2000) The role of the TIM8–13 complex in the import of Tim23 into mitochondria. EMBO J. 19, 6392–6400 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Buchner D. A., Yazbek S. N., Solinas P., Burrage L. C., Morgan M. G., Hoppel C. L., Nadeau J. H. (2011) Increased mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation in the liver is associated with obesity and insulin resistance. Obesity 19, 917–924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Mogensen M., Sahlin K., Fernström M., Glintborg D., Vind B. F., Beck-Nielsen H., Hojlund K. (2007) Mitochondrial respiration is decreased in skeletal muscle of patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 56, 1592–1599 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Patti M. E., Butte A. J., Crunkhorn S., Cusi K., Berria R., Kashyap S., Miyazaki Y., Kohane I., Costello M., Saccone R., Landaker E. J., Goldfine A. B., Mun E., DeFronzo R., Finlayson J., Kahn C. R., Mandarino L. J. (2003) Coordinated reduction of genes of oxidative metabolism in humans with insulin resistance and diabetes: Potential role of PGC1 and NRF1. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 8466–8471 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Bonnard C., Durand A., Peyrol S., Chanseaume E., Chauvin M. A., Morio B., Vidal H., Rieusset J. (2008) Mitochondrial dysfunction results from oxidative stress in the skeletal muscle of diet-induced insulin-resistant mice. J. Clin. Invest. 118, 789–800 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. De Martino C., Floridi A., Marcante M. L., Malorni W., Scorza Barcellona P., Bellocci M., Silvestrini B. (1979) Morphological, histochemical and biochemical studies on germ cell mitochondria of normal rats. Cell Tissue Res. 196, 1–22 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Hackenbrock C. R. (1968) Chemical and physical fixation of isolated mitochondria in low-energy and high-energy states. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 61, 598–605 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Hackenbrock C. R. (1968) Ultrastructural bases for metabolically linked mechanical activity in mitochondria. II. Electron transport-linked ultrastructural transformations in mitochondria. J. Cell Biol. 37, 345–369 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Benard G., Rossignol R. (2008) Ultrastructure of the mitochondrion and its bearing on function and bioenergetics. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 10, 1313–1342 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Rossignol R., Gilkerson R., Aggeler R., Yamagata K., Remington S. J., Capaldi R. A. (2004) Energy substrate modulates mitochondrial structure and oxidative capacity in cancer cells. Cancer Res. 64, 985–993 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Raffaella C., Francesca B., Italia F., Marina P., Giovanna L., Susanna I. (2008) Alterations in hepatic mitochondrial compartment in a model of obesity and insulin resistance. Obesity 16, 958–964 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Holmström M. H., Iglesias-Gutierrez E., Zierath J. R., Garcia-Roves P. M. (2012) Tissue-specific control of mitochondrial respiration in obesity-related insulin resistance and diabetes. Am. J. Physiol. Endocrinol Metab 302, E731–E739 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Herrmann J. M. (2011) MINOS is plus: a Mitofilin complex for mitochondrial membrane contacts. Dev Cell 21, 599–600 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Mun J. Y., Lee T. H., Kim J. H., Yoo B. H., Bahk Y. Y., Koo H. S., Han S. S. (2010) Caenorhabditis elegans mitofilin homologs control the morphology of mitochondrial cristae and influence reproduction and physiology. J. Cell. Physiol. 224, 748–756 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Xie J., Marusich M. F., Souda P., Whitelegge J., Capaldi R. A. (2007) The mitochondrial inner membrane protein mitofilin exists as a complex with SAM50, metaxins 1 and 2, coiled-coil-helix coiled-coil-helix domain-containing protein 3 and 6 and DnaJC11. FEBS Lett. 581, 3545–3549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. An J., Shi J., He Q., Lui K., Liu Y., Huang Y., Sheikh M. S. (2012) CHCM1/CHCHD6, novel mitochondrial protein linked to regulation of mitofilin and mitochondrial cristae morphology. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 7411–7426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Hwang H., Bowen B. P., Lefort N., Flynn C. R., De Filippis E. A., Roberts C., Smoke C. C., Meyer C., Højlund K., Yi Z., Mandarino L. J. (2010) Proteomics analysis of human skeletal muscle reveals novel abnormalities in obesity and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 59, 33–42 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Blomhoff R., Blomhoff H. K. (2006) Overview of retinoid metabolism and function. J. Neurobiol. 66, 606–630 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Rhee E. J., Plutzky J. (2012) Retinoid metabolism and diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab. J. 36, 167–180 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Zhao S., Li R., Li Y., Chen W., Zhang Y., Chen G. (2012) Roles of vitamin A status and retinoids in glucose and fatty acid metabolism. Biochem. Cell Biol. 90, 142–152 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Ross A. C., Zolfaghari R. (2011) Cytochrome P450s in the regulation of cellular retinoic acid metabolism. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 31, 65–87 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Schupp M., Lefterova M. I., Janke J., Leitner K., Cristancho A. G., Mullican S. E., Qatanani M., Szwergold N., Steger D. J., Curtin J. C., Kim R. J., Suh M. J., Suh M., Albert M. R., Engeli S., Gudas L. J., Lazar M. A. (2009) Retinol saturase promotes adipogenesis and is downregulated in obesity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 1105–1110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Acin-Perez R., Hoyos B., Zhao F., Vinogradov V., Fischman D. A., Harris R. A., Leitges M., Wongsiriroj N., Blaner W. S., Manfredi G., Hammerling U. (2010) Control of oxidative phosphorylation by vitamin A illuminates a fundamental role in mitochondrial energy homoeostasis. FASEB J. 24, 627–636 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Nagaoka-Yasuda R., Matsuo N., Perkins B., Limbaeck-Stokin K., Mayford M. (2007) An RNAi-based genetic screen for oxidative stress resistance reveals retinol saturase as a mediator of stress resistance. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 43, 781–788 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental Data

Articles from Molecular & Cellular Proteomics : MCP are provided here courtesy of American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology

RESOURCES