Skip to main content
NCBI home page
The Scientific World Journal logoLink to The Scientific World Journal
. 2014 Aug 13;2014:147963. doi: 10.1155/2014/147963

Characterization of the Intergenic Spacer rDNAs of Two Pig Nodule Worms, Oesophagostomum dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum

Rui-Qing Lin 1, Li Shu 1,2, Guang-Hui Zhao 3, Tian Cheng 1, Shang-Shu Zou 1, Yuan Zhang 1, Ya-Biao Weng 1,*
PMCID: PMC4147281  PMID: 25197691

Abstract

The characteristics of the intergenic spacer rDNAs (IGS rDNAs) of Oesophagostomum dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum isolated from pigs in different geographical locations in Mainland China were determined, and the phylogenetic relationships of the two species were reconstructed using the IGS rDNA sequences. The organization of the IGS rDNA sequences was similar to their organization in other eukaryotes. The 28S-18S IGS rDNA sequences of both O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum were found to have variable lengths, that is, 759–762 bp and 937–1128 bp, respectively. All of the sequences contained direct repeats and inverted repeats. The length polymorphisms were related to the different numbers and organization of repetitive elements. Different types and numbers of repeats were found between the two pig nodule species, and two IGS structures were found within O. quadrispinulatum. Phylogenetic analysis showed that all O. dentatum isolates were clustered into one clade, but O. quadrispinulatum isolates from different origins were grouped into two distinct clusters. These results suggested independent species and the existence of genotypes or subspecies within pig nodule worms. Different types and numbers of repeats and IGS rDNA structures could serve as potential markers for differentiating these two species of pig nodule worms.

1. Introduction

The ribosome has been identified as a central hub for sensing the nature of a nascent protein chain, recruiting protein folding and translocation components, and integrating mRNA and nascent chain quality control [1]. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) typically accounts for approximately 40% of all transcription within a cell, and ribosomal RNA comprises as much as 80% of the cellular RNA [2]. The rRNA transcripts, including 18S, 28S, and 5.8S rRNA, mature through the excision of their tandem spacer regions, for example, internal transcribed spacers (ITSs) and intergenic spacers (IGSs) [3]. The IGSs are biologically significant. Furthermore, the cell is capable of both regulating rRNA synthesis and sequestering large numbers of proteins to modulate essential molecular networks through the timely induction of various ribosomal IGS noncoding RNA (IGS RNA) transcripts [4].

IGS regions are composed of an extraordinary variety of repeats and RNA polymerase promoters and enhancers, which cause considerable inter- and intraspecific variations in parasites [5]. These variations make IGS rDNA a suitable marker for inferring evolutionary relationships among more closely related species and among strains within the same species [6] as well as for developing molecular detection approaches for infectious diseases [7–12]. The IGS rDNA regions of Trypanosoma [13], Giardia [8], Leishmania [6], Toxoplasma gondii and Neospora caninum [14], Schistosoma haematobium, S. intercalatum, and S. mansoni [15], and S. japonicum [5] have been studied and showed some organizational features common to the majority of eukaryotes.

Oesophagostomiasis, which is caused by nodular worms (Oesophagostomum spp.) and is commonly observed in pigs, ruminants, and primates (including humans), is often neglected by researchers and practitioners due to its mild symptoms [16]. However, severe infections can lead to significant socioeconomic problems and serious public health concerns [17–19]. Of the Oesophagostomum spp., O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum have been identified as the two main causative agents of oesophagostomiasis in pigs [20, 21]. Moreover, O. dentatum was proposed as a potential model for genomic studies of strongylid nematodes [22]. The objective of this study was to determine the characteristics of the IGS rDNA regions of O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum collected from pigs at different geographical locations in Mainland China.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Parasite Samples

Isolates of O. dentatum (14 isolates) and O. quadrispinulatum (12 isolates) were collected from pigs at six geographical origins in Mainland China. Their codes, geographical origins, and accession numbers are listed in Table 1. Each adult parasite was washed extensively in physiological saline and was preliminarily identified at the species level based on its morphological characteristics [23].

Table 1.

Geographical origins, sample codes, and GenBank accession numbers of Oesophagostomum dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum samples used in the present study.

Species Sample code Geographical origin Accession number
O. dentatum ODHN1 Hunan (Huihua) KC991159
ODHN2 Hunan (Huihua) KC991160
ODYJ1 Guangdong (Yangjiang) KC991161
ODYJ2 Guangdong (Yangjiang) KC991162
ODYJ3 Guangdong (Yangjiang) KC991163
ODYJ4 Guangdong (Yangjiang) KC991164
ODYJ5 Guangdong (Yangjiang) KC991165
ODYC1 Chongqing (Yongzhou) KC991166
ODYC2 Chongqing (Yongzhou) KC991167
ODYC3 Chongqing (Yongzhou) KC991168
ODYC4 Chongqing (Yongzhou) KC991169
ODYC5 Chongqing (Yongzhou) KC991170
ODHLJ1 Heilongjiang (Jiaxing) KC991171
ODYB1 Chongqing (Yubei) KC991172
O. quadrispinulatum OQHN1 Hunan (Huihua) KC991173
OQRC1 Chongqing (Rongchang) KC991174
OQYC1 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991175
OQYC2 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991176
OQYC3 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991177
OQYC4 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991178
OQYC5 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991179
OQYC6 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991180
OQYC7 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991181
OQYC8 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991182
OQYC9 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991183
OQYC10 Chongqing (Yongchuan) KC991184
Trichostrongylus colubriformis — Iran HQ389237
Marshallagia marshalli — Iran HQ389236
Haemonchus contortus — Iran HQ389234
Cylicostephanus minutus — — HM142941
Coronocyclus coronatus — — HM142939
Open in a new tab

2.2. DNA Isolation and PCR Amplification

Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted from individual adult worms through sodium dodecyl-sulfate/proteinase K treatment, column-purified using the Wizard SV Genomic DNA Purification System (Promega) and eluted with 40 μL of H2O according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The DNA samples were then identified at the species level based on their ITS rDNA sequences [20] and stored at −20°C until further analysis.

The 28S-18S IGS rDNA sequences of O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum were amplified using PCR with the O28 (5′-ACGACATGTATACTGGTCAAGG-3′, forward) and O18 (5′-GCTTTGGTGCATGTATTAGCTC-3′, reverse) primers. The PCR reactions included 3 mM MgCl2, 0.5 μM of each primer, 2.5 μL of Ex Taq buffer, 0.2 mM of each deoxyribonucleotide, 0.5 U of Ex Taq DNA polymerase (TAKARA), 1 μL of DNA sample, and double-distilled water to a total volume of 25 μL. The procedures were performed in a thermocycler (Biometra) under the following conditions: 94°C for 5 min (initial denaturation), followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s (denaturation), 55°C for 1 min (annealing), 72°C for 45 s (extension), and a final extension at 72°C for 5 min. An aliquot (5 μL) of each amplicon was examined on 1.0% agarose-TBE gels, stained with ethidium bromide (EB) and photographed upon transillumination. The DL2000 marker (TAKARA) was used to estimate the sizes of the IGS+ rDNA amplicons.

2.3. Purification, Cloning, and Sequencing of the IGS PCR Products

Representative PCR products were purified using spin columns (Wizard PCR-Prep DNA Purification System, Promega), and the purified PCR products were ligated into the pGEM-T easy plasmid vector (Promega) according to the manufacturer's recommendations. The recombinant plasmid was then transformed into Escherichia coli JM109 competent cells (Promega), and positive transformants containing recombinant plasmids were selected by PCR amplification. Cell cultures with confirmed recombinant plasmids were sent to Shanghai sangon Biological Engineering Biotechnology Company for sequencing using an ABI 377 automated DNA sequencer (BigDye Terminator Chemistry).

2.4. Sequence Analysis and Reconstruction of Phylogenetic Relationships

The characteristics of the 28S-18S IGS rDNA regions of O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum were determined by comparing these sequences with the previously published IGS rDNA sequences of Skrjabingylus chitwoodorum (AY295819), Cylicocyclus nassatus (AJ223348), and Cyathostomum catinatum (AJ223339); the 18S rDNA sequences of Chabertia ovina (AJ920341) and Labiostrongylus bipapillosus (AJ920337); and the 28S rDNA sequences of Chabertia ovina (AM039733) and Labiostrongylus bipapillosus (AJ512837).

The palindrome in EMBOSS 6.3.1 [24] (http://mobyle.pasteur.fr/cgi-bin/portal.py?#forms::palindrome) was used to identify inverted repeats in the Oesophagostomum species. Direct repeats were identified using REPFIND [25] at http://cagt.bu.edu/page/REPFIND_submit and Tandem Repeats Finder [26] at http://tandem.bu.edu/trf/trf.html. These repeats were identified with the criteria of nuclear match ≥10 bp and mismatch ≤1.

The phylogenetic relationships of the O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum isolates from the different geographical origins were reconstructed based on their IGS rDNA sequences using the neighbor-joining (NJ) method within the Mega 4.0 software and the Kimura 2-parameter model [27]. Phylograms were drawn using the TreeView program, version 1.65 [28].

3. Results and Discussion

The 28S-18S IGS rDNA sequences of O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum from Mainland China had dynamic and highly complex structures. The first indication of this finding became apparent upon amplification of the IGS rDNA, which presented variable lengths ranging from 1000 to 1400 bp (data not shown). After removal of the flanking 28S and 18S rDNA sequences, the lengths of the IGS rDNA sequences were 759–762 bp and 937–1128 bp for O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum, respectively. The IGS of O. dentatum only contained 2 copies of one 11-nt direct repeat (A1 and A2) and one 10-nt inverted repeat (B and B rev comp). The IGS rDNA sequences of O. quadrispinulatum could be grouped into two types based on their lengths and characteristics. The longest, the IGS of OQHN1, exhibited the following features: (1) three complete 49-nt copies of direct repeat C beginning 409 nt downstream of the 5′ end of the IGS rDNA; (2) two copies of direct repeat D beginning 89 nt downstream of the last copy of direct repeat C; (3) one complete inverted repeat I; and (4) six short, incomplete inverted repeats (inverted repeats F, G, H, J, K, and L). Compared with OQHN1, the shortest sequence, OQYC4, showed the following features: (1) a new, incomplete inverted repeat E and (2) no repeats including two copies of direct repeat C, repeat F, repeat G, or inverted repeat F (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

The alignment of the representative sequences of intergenic spacer rDNA (IGS rDNA) regions of Oesophagostomum dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum. Portions of the flanking 28S and 18S genes are shown. Dots (·) denote sequence identity to the first sequence. Dashes (-) represent nucleotide deletions. Motifs for two nematodes are boxed with a solid (or broken) line. See the text for additional details.

Eukaryotic ribosomes are very important for protein synthesis, cellular growth, and organismal development [2]. In most eukaryotes, rDNA is arranged in tandemly repeated units containing genes for the 18S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs, which are separated by spacers. The large intergenic spacer (IGS; formerly NTS) separating the 28S and 18S genes is internally repetitious: each repeat contains a tandem array of short subrepeat units [29, 30]. Alterations in these repeats mostly occur due to unequal crossing over during both sexual and asexual reproduction or in somatic cell lineages [31], and variations in the number of repeat units and, consequently, in the copy number of the regulatory elements can lead to the polymorphic lengths and structures observed in the IGS rDNA [2]. In this study, the IGS rDNA sequences of O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum were found to contain many short, direct, and inverted repeats, and different types and numbers of repeats were found both between the two pig nodule species and within O. quadrispinulatum. These differences suggested that these species are independent and that genotypes or subspecies exist within the known species of pig nodule worms.

Homologous chromosome pairing precedes meiotic recombination and may initiate without strand breakage by way of “kissing” interactions between the loops of extruded stem-loop structures [32]. Such recombination may be responsible for the existence of numerous repeats such as “cross-over hot-spot” (Chi) sequences [32]. The Chi site, which contains sequences of 5′-GCTGGTGG-3′ in the template strand and 5′-CCACCAGC-3′ in the complementary strand, has been found in the repetitive sequences within the first internal transcribed spacer of the rDNA of schistosomes [33]. Although these two sequences were not found in the IGS rDNA sequences of the two pig nodule worms examined in this study, two similar sites, with sequences of 5′-GCTGGTGT-3′ 93 bp upstream of the 5′ end of direct repeat B and of 5′-CCTGGCGG-3′ 9 bp downstream of the 3′ end of inverted repeat I, were found in the IGS rDNA sequences of O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum, respectively. These results indicated that the IGS rDNA might participate in homologous chromosome pairing.

Pairwise comparisons showed interspecific genetic variations of 54.6–56.8% between O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum isolates and intraspecific sequence differences of 0–1.3% and 0.2–15.1% for O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum, respectively. The phylogenetic relationships among O. dentatum, O. quadrispinulatum, and other known species were reconstructed using NJ analysis (Figure 2). From the NJ tree, two main clades were observed. All Oesophagostomum isolates were grouped in a sister clade, including Trichostrongylus colubriformis and Marshallagia marshalli, which suggested their close relationships with the two Oesophagostomum spp. Within the cluster of the two Oesophagostomum species, all O. dentatum isolates clustered together in one clade, whereas the O. quadrispinulatum isolates from different locations grouped into two distinct clusters. These results indicated the complicated genetic structure of O. quadrispinulatum.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Phylogenetic relationships of Oesophagostomum and O. quadrispinulatum isolates inferred by neighbor-joining (NJ) method with model of Kimura 2-parameter based on sequences of intergenic spacer rDNA (IGS rDNA). Bootstrap values (in %) above 50% from 1000 pseudoreplicates are shown for the NJ analyses. Scale bar indicates an evolutionary distance of Kimura 2-parameter methods.

The IGS is the most rapidly evolving region of rDNA, and the number and organization of the internal repeats are species-specific and often vary among populations, individuals, and even within a single cell [29]. These variations in the structures of repetitive regions are common in many taxa and have been widely used in phylogenetic analysis and to quantify gene flow between populations [29, 30]. Analyses of inter- and intragenetic variations in the IGS rDNA sequences of two species of pig nodule worms showed that the sequence differences between O. quadrispinulatum isolates were larger than those between O. dentatum isolates, and phylogenetic analysis revealed two subclusters within a clade of O. quadrispinulatum. These results suggested that different genotypes or subspecies might exist in O. quadrispinulatum.

4. Conclusions

This study is the first to report the 28S-18S IGS rDNA sequences of O. dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum from different geographical locations in China. Genetic analysis revealed the sequence annotations and organizations of these sequences and demonstrated that these regions were polymorphic and contained direct and inverted repeats. Different types and numbers of repeats and IGS rDNA structures could serve as potential markers for differentiating these two species of pig nodule worms.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Open Funds of the State Key Laboratory of Veterinary Etiological Biology, Lanzhou Veterinary Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Grant no. SKLVEB2012KFKT003), and the Scientific and Technological Programs of Guangdong Province (Grant no. 2012A020100001).

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  • 1.Pechmann S, Willmund F, Frydman J. The ribosome as a hub for protein quality control. Molecular Cell. 2013;49(3):411–421. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.01.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Moss T, Stefanovsky VY. Promotion and regulation of ribosomal transcription in eukaryotes by RNA polymerase I. Progress in Nucleic Acid Research and Molecular Biology. 1995;50:25–66. doi: 10.1016/s0079-6603(08)60810-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Capowski EE, Tracy JW. Ribosomal RNA processing and the role of SmMAK16 in ribosome biogenesis in Schistosoma mansoni . Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 2003;132(2):67–74. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2003.08.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Jacob MD, Audas TE, Mullineux S, Lee S. Where no RNA polymerase has gone before: novel functional transcripts derived from the ribosomal intergenic spacer. Nucleus. 2012;3(4):315–319. doi: 10.4161/nucl.20585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhao GH, Blair D, Li XY, et al. The ribosomal intergenic spacer (IGS) region in Schistosoma japonicum: structure and comparisons with related species. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2011;11(3):610–617. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2011.01.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Orlando TC, Rubio MAT, Sturm NR, Campbell DA, Floeter-Winter LM. Intergenic and external transcribed spacers of ribosomal RNA genes in lizard-infecting Leishmania: molecular structure and phylogenetic relationship to mammal-infecting Leishmania in the subgenus Leishmania (Leishmania) . Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz. 2002;97(5):695–701. doi: 10.1590/s0074-02762002000500020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hopkins RM, Constantine CC, Groth DA, Wetherall JD, Reynoldson JA, Thompson RCA. PCR-based DNA fingerprinting of Giardia duodenalis isolates using the intergenic rDNA spacer. Parasitology. 1999;118(6):531–539. doi: 10.1017/s003118209900428x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ghosh S, Debnath A, Sil A, De S, Chattopadhyay DJ, Das P. PCR detection of Giardia lamblia in stool: targeting intergenic spacer region of multicopy rRNA gene. Molecular and Cellular Probes. 2000;14(3):181–189. doi: 10.1006/mcpr.2000.0302. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Cunningham CO, Collins CM, Malmberg G, Mo TA. Analysis of ribosomal RNA intergenic spacer (IGS) sequences in species and populations of Gyrodactylus (Platyhelminthes: Monogenea) from salmonid fish in Northern Europe. Diseases of Aquatic Organisms. 2003;57(3):237–246. doi: 10.3354/dao057237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Danovaro R, Luna GM, Dell'Anno A, Pietrangeli B. Comparison of two fingerprinting techniques, terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis, for determination of bacterial diversity in aquatic environments. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2006;72(9):5982–5989. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01361-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kovacs A, Yacoby K, Gophna U. A systematic assessment of automated ribosomal intergenic spacer analysis (ARISA) as a tool for estimating bacterial richness. Research in Microbiology. 2010;161(3):192–197. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2010.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wehrhahn MC, Xiao M, Kong F, Xu YC, Chen SC. A PCR-based intergenic spacer region-capillary gel electrophoresis typing method for identification and subtyping of Nocardia species. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 2012;50(11):3478–3484. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01311-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Dietrich P, Soares MB, Affonso MHT, Floeter-Winter LM. The Trypanosoma cruzi ribosomal RNA-encoding gene: analysis of promoter and upstream intergenic spacer sequences. Gene. 1993;125(1):103–107. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90753-p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fazaeli A, Carter PE, Pennington TH. Intergenic spacer (IGS) polymorphism: a new genetic marker for differentiation of Toxoplasma gondii strains and Neospora caninum . The Journal of Parasitology. 2000;86(4):716–723. doi: 10.1645/0022-3395(2000)086[0716:ISIPAN]2.0.CO;2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kane RA, Rollinson D. Comparison of the intergenic spacers and 3′ end regions of the large subunit (28S) ribosomal RNA gene from three species of Schistosoma . Parasitology. 1998;117, part 3:235–242. doi: 10.1017/s0031182098003059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Krief S, Vermeulen B, Lafosse S, et al. Nodular worm infection in wild chimpanzees in Western Uganda: a risk for human health? PLoS Neglected Tropical Diseases. 2010;4(3) article e630 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0000630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lin RQ, Liu GH, Hu M, et al. Oesophagostomum dentatum and Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum: characterization of the complete mitochondrial genome sequences of the two pig nodule worms. Experimental Parasitology. 2012;131(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.02.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lin RQ, Liu GH, Song HQ, et al. Sequence variability in three mitochondrial genes between the two pig nodule worms Oesophagostomum dentatum and O. quadrispinulatum . Mitochondrial DNA. 2012;23(3):182–186. doi: 10.3109/19401736.2012.668892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lin R, Zhou D, Huang S, et al. Identification and characterization of new major sperm protein genes from Oesophagostomum dentatum and Oesophagostomum quadrispinulatum from pigs in China. Experimental Parasitology. 2013;133(2):187–192. doi: 10.1016/j.exppara.2012.11.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Lin RQ, Zhu XQ, Wei DX, et al. Characterization of Oesophagostomum spp. from pigs in China by PCR-based approaches using genetic markers in the internal transcribed spacers of ribosomal DNA. Parasitology Research. 2007;101(2):351–356. doi: 10.1007/s00436-007-0498-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Lin RQ, Ai L, Zou FC, et al. A multiplex PCR tool for the specific identification of Oesophagostomum spp. from pigs. Parasitology Research. 2008;103(4):993–997. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1070-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Gasser RB, Cottee P, Nisbet AJ, Ruttkowski B, Ranganathan S, Joachim A. Oesophagostomum dentatum: potential as a model for genomic studies of strongylid nematodes, with biotechnological prospects. Biotechnology Advances. 2007;25(3):281–293. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2007.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wang M. Veterinary Parasitology. 3rd edition. Beijing, China: China Agriculture Press; 2002. (Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Rice P, Longden L, Bleasby A. EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite. Trends in Genetics. 2000;16(6):276–277. doi: 10.1016/s0168-9525(00)02024-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Betley JN, Frith MC, Graber JH, Choo S, Deshler JO. A ubiquitous and conserved signal for RNA localization in chordates. Current Biology. 2002;12(20):1756–1761. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)01220-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 1999;27(2):573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M, Kumar S. MEGA4: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version 4.0. Molecular Biology and Evolution. 2007;24(8):1596–1599. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msm092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.page RD. TreeView: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences. 1996;12(4):357–358. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/12.4.357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Paule MR, Lofquist AK. Organization and expression of eukaryotic ribosomal RNA genes. In: Zimmerman RA, Dahlberg AE, editors. Ribosomal RNA: Structure, Evolution, Processing, and Function in Protein Biosynthesis. New York, NY, USA: CRC Press; 1996. pp. 395–420. [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Gorokhova E, Dowling TE, Weider LJ, Crease TJ, Elser JJ. Functional and ecological significance of rDNA intergenic spacer variation in a clonal organism under divergent selection for production rate. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2002;269(1507):2373–2379. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2002.2145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Ganley ARD, Scott B. Extraordinary ribosomal spacer length heterogeneity in a neotyphodium endophyte hybrid: Implications for concerted evolution. Genetics. 1998;150(4):1625–1637. doi: 10.1093/genetics/150.4.1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Bell SJ, Chow YC, Ho JYK, Forsdyke DR. Correlation of Chi orientation with transcription indicates a fundamental relationship between recombination and transcription. Gene. 1998;216(2):285–292. doi: 10.1016/s0378-1119(98)00333-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Kane RA, Ridgers IL, Johnston DA, Rollinson D. Repetitive sequences within the first internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA in schistosomes contain a Chi-like site. Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology. 1996;75(2):265–269. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(95)02525-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Scientific World Journal are provided here courtesy of Wiley

RESOURCES