Abstract
Two key biological features distinguish Trypanosoma evansi from the T. brucei group: independence from the tsetse fly as obligatory vector, and independence from the need for functional mitochondrial DNA (kinetoplast or kDNA). In an effort to better understand the molecular causes and consequences of these differences, we sequenced the genome of an akinetoplastic T. evansi strain from China and compared it to the T. b. brucei reference strain. The annotated T. evansi genome shows extensive similarity to the reference, with 94.9% of the predicted T. b. brucei coding sequences (CDS) having an ortholog in T. evansi, and 94.6% of the non-repetitive orthologs having a nucleotide identity of 95% or greater. Interestingly, several procyclin-associated genes (PAGs) were disrupted or not found in this T. evansi strain, suggesting a selective loss of function in the absence of the insect life-cycle stage. Surprisingly, orthologous sequences were found in T. evansi for all 978 nuclear CDS predicted to represent the mitochondrial proteome in T. brucei, although a small number of these may have lost functionality. Consistent with previous results, the F1FO-ATP synthase γ subunit was found to have an A281 deletion, which is involved in generation of a mitochondrial membrane potential in the absence of kDNA. Candidates for CDS that are absent from the reference genome were identified in supplementary de novo assemblies of T. evansi reads. Phylogenetic analyses show that the sequenced strain belongs to a dominant group of clonal T. evansi strains with worldwide distribution that also includes isolates classified as T. equiperdum. At least three other types of T. evansi or T. equiperdum have emerged independently. Overall, the elucidation of the T. evansi genome sequence reveals extensive similarity of T. brucei and supports the contention that T. evansi should be classified as a subspecies of T. brucei.
Author Summary
The single-cell parasite Trypanosoma evansi is the disease-causing trypanosome with the widest geographical distribution. The disease, called surra, has significant economic impact primarily due to infections of cattle, horses, and camels. Morphologically the parasite is indistinguishable from bloodstream stage T. brucei, a parasite causing sleeping sickness in humans and the disease nagana in animals. T. brucei, however, is strictly bound to sub-Saharan Africa where its obligate vector, the tsetse fly, resides. The lack of a complete mitochondrial genome in T. evansi further distinguishes this parasite from T. brucei. Important questions regarding the biology of T. evansi include how it escaped from Africa, whether this has happened more than once, and how exactly it is related to T. brucei. To help answer these questions we have sequenced the T. evansi nuclear genome. Our phylogenetic analysis demonstrates that T. evansi, and the closely related horse parasite T. equiperdum, evolved more than once from T. brucei. We also demonstrate extensive similarity to T. brucei, including the maintenance of numerous genes that T. evansi no longer requires. Therefore, despite the significant functional and pathological differences between T. evansi and T. brucei, our analysis supports the notion that T. evansi is not an independent species.
Introduction
Trypanosomatid parasites Trypanosoma evansi and T. equiperdum are responsible for animal diseases with extensive pathological and economic impact and closely related to the T. brucei group [1], [2]. The latter includes three subspecies: the human parasite T. b. rhodesiense, the zoonotic parasite T. b. gambiense, and the animal parasite T. b. brucei. Together T. brucei, T. evansi, and T. equiperdum comprise the subgenus Trypanozoon. The exact nature of the phylogenetic relationship between these three species has been the subject of ongoing debate, with some evidence suggesting that T. evansi and T. equiperdum are monophyletic and other evidence suggesting that they are polyphyletic and have emerged multiple times from T. b. brucei [3]–[6]. Trypanosomatids are a family within the protist group Kinetoplastida, the eponymous feature of which is a large and complex network of circular DNAs (kinetoplast or kDNA) inside their single mitochondrion. Two key biological features distinguish T. evansi and T. equiperdum from the T. brucei group. Firstly, their transmission is independent from the tsetse fly as obligatory vector. T. evansi is predominantly transmitted by biting flies and causes surra in a wide variety of mammalian species (the name of the disease varies with geographical area), while T. equiperdum causes a sexually transmitted disease called dourine in horses [1], [3], [7]. The altered mode of transmission has enabled both parasites to escape from the sub-Saharan tsetse belt and become the pathogenic trypanosomes with the widest geographical distribution. Secondly, all strains of T. evansi and T. equiperdum investigated so far are dyskinetoplastic, i.e., lacking all (akinetoplastic) or critical parts of their kDNA [8]. The loss of kDNA is thought to lock T. evansi and T. equiperdum in the bloodstream life cycle stage, presumably because the absence of kDNA-encoded components of the oxidative phosphorylation system prevents ATP generation in the tsetse midgut [9]. Nonetheless, whether dyskinetoplasty preceded the switch to tsetse-independent transmission or vice versa is unresolved [8], [10], [11].
The kDNA that comprises the mitochondrial genome in T. brucei consists of numerous concatenated circles of two kinds: maxicircles that encode genes primarily involved in oxidative phosphorylation and minicircles that encode guide RNAs (gRNAs) [12]. The majority of maxicircle mRNAs undergo RNA editing to insert or delete uridine residues as specified by template gRNAs in a process catalyzed by multiprotein complexes called editosomes [13]–[15]. One kDNA-encoded transcript that requires editing is the F1FO-ATPase subunit 6, which is essential in both bloodstream and insect stage T. brucei [16]–[19]. However, it has recently been shown that mutations found in the nuclear-encoded ATPase subunit γ of some T. evansi and T. equiperdum strains can compensate for the loss of kDNA, explaining their viability [20].
In an effort to better understand the causes and consequences of tsetse-independent transmission and kDNA-independent viability, we sequenced the genome of T. evansi strain STIB805. This strain was isolated in 1985 from an infected water buffalo in the Jiangsu province of China, shown to completely lack kDNA (i.e. to be akinetoplastic), and suggested to belong to a possibly clonal group of T. evansi with worldwide distribution [4], [21], which is why it was chosen for this study. The comparative genome analysis between this strain and the T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 strain reference genome [22] revealed extensive similarities. While the sizes of the chromosomes differ between T. evansi and T. brucei, the gene content within their respective genomes are largely similar, as 92.7% of T. evansi CDS have an identifiable ortholog in T. brucei. Analysis of T. evansi variant surface glycoprotein (VSG) sequences shows broad conservation of N-terminal sub-types, with extensive phylogenetic similarity and no evidence of any species-specific expansion of clades. An analysis of T. evansi CDS corresponding to the identified T. brucei mitochondrial proteome revealed that virtually all are retained, despite the lack of requirement in an akinetoplastic trypanosome for respiratory complexes I-IV or any proteins involved in maintenance or expression of the mitochondrial genome. Phylogenetic analyses with several genetic markers conclusively show that extant strains of T. evansi or T. equiperdum are not monophyletic and evolved on at least four independent occasions. Together, the results presented here show few critical differences between T. evansi and T brucei, indicating that dyskinetoplasty and concomitant tsetse-independent transmission are significant phenotypic changes underpinned by relatively subtle genomic alterations.
Materials and Methods
Ethics statement
The rearing of animals was regulated by Czech legislation (Act No 246/1992 Coll.). All housing, feeding and experimental procedures were conducted under protocol 90/2013 approved by Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences and Central Commission for Animal Welfare of the Czech Republic.
Whole genome sequencing
Trypanosomes (T. evansi strain STIB805) were purified from mice by DEAE (DE52) cellulose [23]. Total DNA was extracted as described elsewhere [24]. Briefly, the cells were lysed using SDS, and incubated with proteinase K and RNase. DNA was harvested after phenol extraction and ethanol precipitation. Four runs of single-end 454 sequencing plus 2 runs of paired-end 454 sequencing were obtained using GS FLX(+) System following the manufacturer's instruction (Roche) and generated 1,904,327 reads (225,826 paired end, 1,678,501 single end) [25]. Approximately 10 µg of genomic DNA was sheared by nebulization into desired fragments sizes (∼400 bp for single-end 454, ∼3 kb for paired-end) and adaptor oligos ligated to create the library for sequencing. Additional sequence data was obtained by shearing genomic DNA to ∼200–300 bp fragments sizes for sequencing on an Illumina GAIIx producing 19,701,740 tags with an ordered read length of 76mers. Illumina reads for T. b. brucei strains TREU 927/4 and Lister 427 (provided by the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute, Hinxton, UK) were downloaded from the European Nucleotide Archive (accession nos. ERX009953 and ERX008998).
Sequence assembly and SNP calling
Genome assemblies and identification of sequence polymorphisms (SNPs and indels) were carried out with CLC Genomics Workbench (CLC bio). Reads for T. evansi STIB805, T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 and T. b. brucei Lister 427 were mapped against the T. brucei TREU 927/4 version 4 reference (Tb927) using the following mapping parameters: global alignment, similarity fraction = 0.9, length fraction = 0.5, insertion cost = 3, deletion cost = 3, mismatch cost = 2. De novo assemblies for each strain were created using either all reads or those binned during the reference-based assemblies, using the following parameters: automatic word size = yes, bubble size = 50, similarity fraction = 0.9, length fraction = 0.5, deletion cost = 3, insertion cost = 3, mismatch cost = 2. De novo contigs were aligned to Tb927 using standalone NCBI BLAST version 2.2.25 and Artemis Comparison Tool release 12.0 [26]. For RPKM (reads per kilo base per million) analysis, aligned STIB805 and TREU 927/4 reads were assigned to sequential 1-kb bins along the length of the Tb927 reference. For each chromosome, the log2 ratio of binned reads from the two read-sets was calculated for each bin, and normalized to a median log2 ratio of 0 by offsetting all values by the median log2 ratio. SNPs and indels were called with CLC bio using the following parameters: minimum coverage = 10, maximum coverage = 100, minimum variant frequency = 30%, minimum central quality = 20, minimum average quality = 15.
Gene prediction and annotation
Coding sequence prediction of T. evansi genome was done using a combination of de novo gene prediction approach and reference based gene transfers. The Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool (RATT) was used to transfer the gene boundaries and functional annotations from Tb927 onto T. evansi chromosomes (target hereafter) [27]. To prevent the transfer of paralogs to the same target region, thus resulting in multiple overlapping/duplicate gene calls, the annotation transfer was performed pairwise between one chromosome from Tb927 and the corresponding chromosome from the target. This resulted in the transfer of more than 96.4% (9427/9776) of genes from Tb927_v4 onto TevSTIB805ra. Though we observed extensive conservation of synteny between Tb927 and target genomes, this approach would likely have missed genes in targets that were shuffled by chromosomal fission and fusion that occurred during evolution. We performed another RATT transfer considering all Tb927 chromosomes and one target chromosome at a time. We then parsed out genes that were predicted uniquely by this approach (i.e. from regions where the initial RATT transfer failed to predict any genes). Combining these two approaches allowed us to predict genes that were shuffled across the chromosomes while avoiding predictions that overlap each other. We then used an in-house consensual de novo gene prediction suite called 'AutoMagi' to predict protein coding genes from T. evansi [28]. AutoMagi internally uses three gene prediction algorithms (genescan, testcode, codonusage) and predicts a consensus gene model out of individual gene predictions. The codon usage table required by AutoMagi was generated by ‘cusp’ using the RATT output of T. evansi STIB805 assembly [29]. We then used an in-house built prolog system to combine the de novo gene predictions and reference-based gene predictions. The genes that are unique to RATT predictions were automatically included in the final set. Genes that are unique to AutoMagi were compared with the NCBI non-redundant (NR) database (accessed 23 February 2011) using 'BLASTp' (default criteria: EXPECT = −10, WORD SIZE = −3, MATRIX_NAME = BLOSUM62, GAP COST = Existence:11 Extension:1) algorithm. All of the 'BLASTp' results were reviewed manually, and genes meeting the following two criteria were retained: (a) an E-value of 5e-6 or lower to the matched NR sequence; (b) coding strand identical to nearest neighbors on either side (i.e. on same poly-cistronic unit). This manual curation removed 165 putative CDS from making into the finalized TevSTIB8805ra.
The gene calls that overlapped between RATT and AutoMagi were subdivided into the following 4 groups. 1) Identical: overlapping exactly, 2) AM_subsetof_RATT: AutoMagi prediction is entirely contained within RATT prediction, 3) RATT_subsetof_AM: RATT prediction is entirely contained within AutoMagi prediction 4) StaggeredOverlap: both predictions overlap in a staggered fashion. In the first two cases (Identical & AM_subsetof_RATT), AutoMagi gene calls were ignored and RATT models were retained. In the third case (RATT_subsetof_AM) coordinates from AutoMagi were combined with annotation information from the RATT model. Genes in the fourth category (Staggered) were subjected to a thorough manual review process. The review process involved (i) 'BLASTp' search against NCBI's NR database to identify coordinates for queries and subject; (ii) a ClustalW multiple sequence alignment of both candidate genes with their potential homolog(s) from T. brucei. Manual review of BLAST and ClustalW was performed in each case to decide either to split/merge/choose one of the AutoMagi/RATT predictions. These newly derived coordinates were then combined with the annotation information from the RATT model. GeneIDs of the final set of protein coding genes were unified and ordered from left to right end of the chromosome.
Genome publication
Entire genome and all the predicted genes are publicly available at TriTrypDB (http://tritrypdb.org/tritrypdb/). The fastq files containing the Illumina read data for T. evansi STIB805 are available at: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERA000101.
Pulse-field gel electrophoresis
Bloodstream parasites at 2×108 cells/ml were purified using DEAE cellulose (DE52) chromatography, and subsequently used to prepare chromosome blocks as previous described [30]. DNA from T. b. evansi and T. b. brucei cells was embedded in low-melt agarose blocks (final concentration of 5×107 cells/ml) according to [31], and was resolved using a 1% Megabase agarose (Bio-Rad) gel with 0.5X TBE buffer in the CHEF-DRIII system (Bio-Rad). S. cerevisiae DNA was used as a size marker. Pulse field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) was run at 14°C under the following conditions: switch time A increased from 28.6 s to 228 s for 24 hrs, followed by switch time B, with increase from 28.6 s to 1,000 s for another 24 hrs. The angle was set to 120° and voltage gradient to 3 V/cm. The PFGE gel was stained with ethidium bromide after the run.
VSG sequence retrieval and alignment
VSG sequences were extracted from the genome assembly using hidden markov models (HMM) and HMMER 3.0 [32]. HMMs were constructed for a- and b-type VSG respectively using multiple sequence alignments of T. brucei TREU 927/4 and T. b. gambiense DAL972 sequences [33]. All open reading frames>100 bp were marked up and the predicted amino acid sequences were searched for matches to either HMM using HMMER 3.0. Significant matches were checked manually to ensure that each VSG was complete and gene boundaries were correct. Intact VSG were extracted and aligned approximately using Clustal X [34]. The aligned sequences were combined with existing alignments of T. brucei TREU 927/4 a- and b-type VSG [35] and modified by eye.
VSG phylogenetic analysis
C-terminal domains were trimmed (due to recombination these present an inconsistent phylogenetic signal), resulting in a- and b-VSG alignments of 470 and 492 characters, respectively. Neighbour-joining trees were estimated for each amino acid sequence alignment using PHYLIP v3.6, with a JTT rate matrix and 100 non-parametric bootstrap replicates. A frequency distribution of species-specific clade sizes, (i.e. three T. evansi VSG clustered together with a T. brucei TREU 927/4 sequence as the sister lineage has a clade size of 3) was calculated to express the degree of intercalation of sequences from the two strains.
VSG ortholog divergence
Putative VSG orthologs were extracted from the phylogenies. In situations where single VSG from T. evansi STIB805 and T. brucei TREU 927/4 were sister taxa, supported by a bootstrap value>95, these genes were interpreted as orthologs. The rates of synonymous and non-synonymous nucleotide substitutions per site were estimated for these orthologous pairs. The ratio of these rates (ω) was estimated using Ka/Ks Calculator v1.2 [36] using GY and MS methods. For comparison, this was repeated for 151 pairs of non-VSG orthologs chosen at random.
Phylogenetic analyses
The dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (LipDH) CDS (Tb927.11.16730) was PCR-amplified from total parasite DNA using primers 5′-ATA AAG CTT ATG TTC CGT CGC TGC-3′ (forward) and 5′-ATA AGA TCT TTA GAA GTT GAT TGT TTT GG-3′ (reverse) and Phusion polymerase (New England Biolabs, NEB). In cases where direct sequencing of the amplicon revealed heterozygosity, sequence information for individual alleles was obtained after cloning. After removal of the primer sequences, LipDH CDSs were aligned using ClustalX [37]. Phylogenies were reconstructed using the program MrBayes [38] via the Topali platform [39], implementing the GTR substitution model and a discrete gamma rate distribution model with four rate categories (to account for rate heterogeneity among sites) as the most appropriate nucleotide substitution model. Four independent MCMC chains of 1×106 generations were sampled every 100th generation. A 50% majority rule consensus tree was derived after the first 25% of trees were discarded as burn-in. The ATP synthase γ subunit sequence (Tb927.10.180) was PCR-amplified from total parasite DNA with primers 5′-GCG GAA TTC GAA GCA GAT GAC ACC TAA-3′ (forward) and 5′-GCG GAA GAC CTT GCT GCG GAG CCA CTC T-3′ or 5′-GGC GAC ATT CAA CTT CAT-3′ (reverse) and Phusion polymerase (NEB). The sequence was determined by direct amplicon sequencing or, in cases of heterozygosity, after cloning. A partial 812-bp sequence of cytochrome oxidase 1 (COX1) was obtained by PCR and used for phylogenetic analysis as previously described [40]. Briefly, we assessed phylogenetic relationships among T. equiperdum and T. brucei isolates using a haplotype network constructed using the statistical parsimony approach implemented in TCS v. 1.21 [41]. Subnetworks were created with 95% confidence limit and then unconnected subnetworks>10 mutations apart were connected by relaxing the confidence limit. To verify that the haplotypes containing T. equiperdum isolates were on phylogenetically distinct branches, we estimated a phylogenetic tree using the Bayesian approach implemented in MrBayes v. 3.2 [42]. PartitionFinder v. 1.0.1 [43] determined the Hasegawa, Kishino and Yano nucleotide substitution [44] with invariant sites (HKY+I) without partitioning by codon positions as the most appropriate model for the MrBayes analysis. Microsatellite genotyping was carried out exactly as described previously [40]. Briefly, isolates were typed for eight microsatellite markers [45]. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed in R using the package adegenet, as described [40].
Results
Pulse-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE)
PFGE was performed to visualize the pattern of chromosomes in the akinetoplastic T. evansi STIB805 strain. Multiple bands corresponding to megabase chromosomes ranging in size from ∼1 to ∼5 Mb could be visualized (Fig. 1). The most noticeable differences in the chromosomal pattern in comparison to T. brucei are the five intermediate chromosome bands that range from ∼300 kb to ∼800 kb. Additionally, two size groups of minichromosomes (∼100 kb and ∼200 kb) were observed in T. evansi STIB805. Such a degree of variability is within the range observed among strains of T. b. brucei [46].
T. evansi reference-based genome
Genomic DNA isolated from T. evansi STIB805 was subjected to both 454 and Illumina sequencing, generating a combined total of 21,445,221 reads. Using the T. brucei TREU 927/4 genome sequence [22] (version 4; from here onwards abbreviated Tb927 for convenience) as a scaffold, a reference-based assembly of these T. evansi reads was generated. This assembly, called TevSTIB805ra, incorporates 17,856,165 reads and has an average coverage of 57.2 reads per nucleotide across the entire assembly and of 48.4 reads per nucleotide for the ‘core regions’ [i.e. regions excluding telomeres, subtelomeres, and internal regions that consist of repetitive coding sequences such as VSGs, expression site-associated genes (ESAGs) or retroposon hot spot genes (RHS)].
An assembly approach based on the genome of a closely related reference strain allows the reliable identification of homologous gene pairs, of any differences that might exist between these sequences, and of genes that are missing or highly diverged in the genome of interest. This approach has limited power in identifying structural differences between genomes and, by definition, cannot identify sequences that are present in the genome of interest but not in the reference genome. For that reason we have supplemented the reference-based approach with the analysis of contigs that were assemble de novo. As detailed below, this allowed the confirmation of Tb927 genes that are absent in in T. evansi STIB805 and the identification of candidate genes that might be present in the latter but absent in the former. However, genome rearrangements that are not associated with differences in gene content will have been missed and the T. evansi STIB805 genome as published on TriTrypDB may indicate gene synteny where it does not exist.
Annotation of the TevSTIB805ra T. evansi genome was performed using a combination of RATT and AutoMagi, followed by manual curation. RATT (Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool; [27]) identified likely orthologs in the T. brucei reference genome and transferred their functional annotations to the T. evansi genome, while AutoMagi predicted genes de novo using the consensus of three gene prediction algorithms (genescan, testcode, codonusage) [28]. A total of 10,110 CDS were identified, with 9368 CDS annotated as T. brucei orthologs by RATT and subsequent manual inspection (Table 1, columns C, E and F; S1 Table), and 742 CDS uniquely predicted by AutoMagi (Table 1, column D; S2 Table). Thus, 92.7% of the identified T. evansi CDS have an identified ortholog in T. brucei, while 7.3% were uniquely detected by de novo gene prediction. Analysis of the 742 AutoMagi CDS by BLAST searching of the GenBank non-redundant database revealed at least one hit (E-value ≤5e-6) for each of these CDS to a gene from a Trypanosoma species (T. b. gambiense 568 CDS; T. b. brucei 168 CDS; T. equiperdum, T. vivax, or T. congolense 6 CDS). The most common annotations among these BLAST hits were for ‘hypothetical unlikely’ (415 CDS) or other hypothetical (150 CDS) sequences (S2 Table). Orthologous sequences had not been annotated in the Tb927 reference, presumably due to more stringent criteria for gene calling. Thus, most if not all of the de novo predicted genes in TevSTIB805ra are also present in T. brucei.
Table 1. Chromosomal breakdown of CDS found in TevSTIB805ra compared to Tb927 reference.
A | B | C | D | E | F | G | H | |
CDS found in TevSTIB805ra | CDS found in Tb927 | Orthologous CDS pairs (found in both TevSTIB805ra and Tb927) | CDS uniquely found in TevSTIB805ra by AutoMagi | CDS found in TevSTIB805ra chromosome with RATT homolog in a different Tb927 chromosome | Additional non-syntenic CDS in TevSTIB805ra with RATT homolog in the same Tb927 chromosome | CDS found in Tb927 but not found in TevSTIB805ra | CDS found in Tb927 chromosome with RATT homolog in a different TevSTIB805ra chromosome | |
Chr01 | 524 | 522 | 507 | 13 | 4 | 0 | 10 | 5 |
Chr02 | 364 | 326 | 318 | 28 | 18 | 0 | 8 | 0 |
Chr03 | 618 | 579 | 565 | 44 | 9 | 0 | 14 | 0 |
Chr04 | 602 | 573 | 558 | 36 | 8 | 0 | 15 | 0 |
Chr05 | 585 | 526 | 495 | 82 | 8 | 0 | 31 | 0 |
Chr06 | 590 | 574 | 543 | 40 | 7 | 0 | 31 | 0 |
Chr07 | 836 | 754 | 740 | 89 | 3 | 4 | 13 | 1 |
Chr08 | 878 | 828 | 807 | 64 | 6 | 1 | 20 | 1 |
Chr09 | 1299 | 1472 | 1208 | 82 | 5 | 4 | 258 | 6 |
Chr10 | 1743 | 1654 | 1624 | 114 | 5 | 0 | 29 | 1 |
Chr11_01 | 1907 | 1807 | 1762 | 127 | 14 | 4 | 42 | 3 |
Chr11_02 | 85 | 83 | 72 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 11 | 0 |
Chr11_03 | 79 | 78 | 57 | 13 | 9 | 0 | 21 | 0 |
total | 10110 | 9776 | 9256 | 742 | 99 | 13 | 503 | 17 |
Column A shows all CDS found in TevSTIB805ra, and is the sum of Columns C, D, E, and F. Column B shows all CDS found in Tb927, and is the sum of Columns C, G, and H. Column C shows the number of orthologous CDS pairs shared by TevSTIB805ra and Tb927 without additional counts for duplicated CDS. Column D lists numbers of CDS predicted by AutoMagi for which no annotated CDS was found in the same location in the Tb927 reference. Column E shows the numbers of TevSTIB805ra CDS that had annotation transferred from a Tb927 CDS on a different chromosome. Column F shows the number of additional CDS found in TevSTIB805ra that arise from multiple tandem T. evansi CDS matching a single CDS within a similar tandem array in Tb927, instead of the syntenic CDS. Since a reference–based assembly by definition identifies the read that is the best match for the reference sequence, genes listed in columns E and F most likely correspond to sequences that are unannotated pseudogenes in Tb927, but are related to annotated genes in other locations. Column G shows Tb927 CDS for which no TevSTIB805ra CDS was identified. Column H shows the numbers of Tb927 CDS that had annotation uniquely transferred to a TevSTIB805ra CDS on a different chromosome, i.e. no annotation transfer of these Tb927 CDS was made to the same TevSTIB805ra chromosome. See Tables in Supporting Information for additional information.
Of the 9368 T. evansi CDS identified as T. brucei orthologs, 8421 CDS were classified as non-repetitive genes; the remaining 947 CDS were VSG, ESAG, RHS, or duplicate sequences. A comparison of the 8421 non-repetitive CDS between T. brucei and T. evansi revealed 7970 (94.6%) had a nucleotide identity of 95% or greater, 320 (3.8%) had a nucleotide identity between 70–95%, and 131 (1.6%) had a nucleotide identity less than 70% (Fig. 2; S1 Fig.). After RATT annotation transfer, a total of 503 (5.1%) Tb927 GeneIDs did not have identified orthologs in the TevSTIB805ra annotated genome (Table 1, column G; S2 Table). The majority of these (406) represent repetitive genes (e.g. VSG, ESAG, and RHS) or ‘hypothetical unlikely’ genes, which were not analyzed further. Five CDS correspond to predicted pseudogenes. T. evansi STIB805 orthologs for 49 Tb927 CDS were shown to be wholly or partially missing in TevSTIB805 reads that mapped to these gene loci (see below). T. evansi homologs for the remaining 43 Tb927 GeneIDs were ‘missed’ by RATT and AutoMagi, but were subsequently identified by manual examination of the T. evansi sequence. Thus, the majority of T. brucei CDS have extremely similar T. evansi orthologs, and very few T. brucei CDS were not found in T. evansi. This result is consistent with a very close phylogenetic relationship between these parasites.
The initial RATT approach only identified T. evansi CDS with an annotated Tb927 homolog in the syntenic position. To identify potential CDS in TevSTIB805ra that are syntenic to unannotated sequences in Tb927, and are homologous to annotated CDS in other (non-syntenic) locations, RATT was performed a second time by comparing each TevSTIB805ra chromosome to the entire Tb927 genome. This approach complemented de novo gene calling by AutoMAGI and identified 112 CDS in TevSTIB805ra (Table 1, columns E and F; S2 Table). The majority of these CDS were annotated as hypothetical proteins (64 CDS) or repetitive sequences such as VSG, ESAG, and RHS (39 CDS). For almost all loci, manual inspection revealed that either (i) a syntenic CDS existed in Tb927 that was unannotated or (ii) a syntenic, annotated CDS did exist in Tb927 but the presence of a highly similar sequence elsewhere caused a RATT artefact. An exception was TevSTIB805.6.770, where the syntenic sequence in Tb927 was found to be disrupted by frame-shifts, but in T. b. gambiense DAL972 to be annotated as Tbg972.6.420 (hypothetical protein, unlikely)
Genes identified in T. evansi by de novo assembly
Two approaches were used to find genes in the T. evansi genome that may not be present in the T. brucei genome. Firstly, reads from T. evansi that did not match Tb927 were de novo assembled to make TevSTIB805dn and putative CDS called with AutoMagi (Table 2 and S2 Table). The 22 CDS with a homolog in Tb927 that was not a repetitive or hypothetical gene included multiple copies of pseudogenes for putative UDP-Gal/UDP-GlcNAc-dependent glycosyltransferase and lytic factor resistance-like protein, an adenosine transporter, calmodulin, a DNA topoisomerase, a leucine-rich repeat protein, ribulose-phosphate 3-epimerase, major surface protease B, and a galactokinase pseudogene. 36 of the 202 CDS that did not get a hit against Tb927 had a BLASTx hit in the NCBI non-redundant database: 23 CDS matched hypothetical Trypanosoma spp. and 9 appeared to be contaminants from other - mostly bacterial - organisms. The remaining 4 BLAST hits were for T. vivax RNA-dependent DNA polymerase and T. evansi VSGs (2 hits) and diminazene-resistance-associated protein.
Table 2. Genes identified in T. evansi de novo assemblies.
Assembly | Method | Number of CDS | Criteria | ||
TevSTIB805dn1 | AutoMAGI prediction | 2165 | total number | ||
BLASTp | 1963 | homolog in Tb9272 | |||
BLASTp | 1807 | repetitive, e.g. RHS, VSG, ESAG | |||
BLASTp | 134 | hypothetical proteins | |||
BLASTp | 22 | others (see text) | |||
BLASTp | 202 | no homolog in Tb9272 | |||
BLASTx | 36/54 | hit in NCBI3 | |||
BLASTx | 166/174 | no hit in NCBI3 | |||
TevSTIB805dn_sub5 | AutoMAGI prediction | 1409 | total number | ||
BLASTp | 1292 | homolog in Tb9272 | |||
BLASTp | 1208 | repetitive, e.g. RHS, VSG, ESAG | |||
BLASTp | 71 | hypothetical proteins | |||
BLASTp | 13 | others (see text) | |||
BLASTp | 117 | no homolog in Tb9272 | |||
BLASTx | 18/14 | hit in NCBI3 | |||
BLASTx | 99/54 | no hit in NCBI3 |
3,589,056 reads from T. evansi STIB805 did not match the Tb927 reference were used for a de novo assembly. 3,056,932 reads could be assembled into 2590 contigs ≥500 bp with a combined length of 4,927,577 bp; (N50 = 978). Data are in S2 Table.
cut-off: BLASTp E-value ≤0.001.
cut-off: BLASTx E-value ≤0.001 in NCBI non-redundant protein database.
filtered for contigs with ≥5x minimum coverage.
1,951,783 reads from T. evansi STIB805 that matched neither the Tb927 reference, nor a de novo assembly of T. brucei TREU 927/4 Illumina reads, were used for a de novo assembly. 1,416,068 reads could be assembled into 2390 contigs ≥500 bp with a combined length of 3,239,882 bp (N50 = 1174).
Because Tb927 was created using a traditional sequencing approach and only covers the 11 large chromosomes [22], sequences found in the de novo assembly of T. evansi deep sequencing reads might not be unique to this strain or species, but rather reflect a difference in sequencing methodology or stem from intermediate-sized or mini-chromosomes. To address this, Illumina reads from sequencing T. brucei TREU 927/4 that also did not match Tb927 were de novo assembled into Tb927dn. Comparison of Tb927dn to TevSTIB805dn showed that 45.6% of the binned T. evansi reads matched to Tb927dn. The remaining T. evansi reads were then assembled into TevSTIB805dn_sub and putative CDS called with AutoMagi (Table 2 and S2 Table). Of the 84 BLASTp matches to non-repetitive genes, 71 are annotated as hypothetical proteins, 2 are lytic factor resistance-like proteins, 1 is a putative transporter, and 10 are annotated as putative (or pseudogene) UDP-Gal or UDP-GlcNAc-dependent glycosyltransferase. Glycosyltransferases in T. brucei are frequently found in subtelomeric regions that are difficult to assemble due to repetitive sequences, and are known to be highly variable among trypanosome strains [33], [47]. Of the 117 TevSTIB805dn_sub CDS for which no match was identified in Tb927, 18 had a BLASTx hit in the NCBI non-redundant database: 9 CDS matched hypothetical genes from various Trypanosoma species and 1 matched a diminazene resistance-associated protein that was previously suggested to convey diminazene aceturate (Berenil) resistance to certain strains of T. evansi [48]. Thus, gene prediction found very few CDS in de novo T. evansi assemblies that are not present in T. brucei, and analysis of these CDS revealed differences reminiscent of those observed among strains of the same species.
When T. evansi STIB805 de novo contigs were filtered for minimum coverage of at least 5x, the number of genes without obvious homologs in Tb927 was reduced considerably (Table 2). To test the potential absence of these genes in T. b. brucei more rigorously, short read data sets for strains TREU 927/4 and Lister 427 were searched for matches to the 22 candidates from TevSTIB805dn and the 6 candidates from TevSTIB805dn_sub. Only seven CDS candidates remained where the sequence was either entirely absent from both T. b. brucei datasets, or did not contain an undisrupted ORF (S2 Table, highlighted). Whether these candidates are indeed functional CDS, and whether they are generally absent from T. brucei ssp. and present in T. evansi, and therefore are of potentially diagnostic value, requires further investigation. A non-redundant list of the ORFs that did not have a BLASTx hit in NCBI (200 ORFs in total) is provided as S1 Data File.
CDS identified in T. brucei that are absent in T. evansi
A total of 49 CDS found in Tb927 were not identified in TevSTIB805ra. These loci were analyzed individually by (i) specifically searching for matching T. evansi STIB805 reads (S2 Table); (ii) comparing reads per kilobase per million (RPKM) coverage plots of these regions for T. brucei and T. evansi; (iii) aligning contigs of a full T. evansi STIB805 de novo assembly to the respective regions in Tb927. These analyses confirmed the absence or disruption of several of these CDS in T. evansi STIB805 (including the iron/ascorbate oxidoreductase loci, the Tb927.9.7950/Tb927.9.7960 repeat, the Tb927.4.3200-.3270 region, both Tb927.8.490 and Tb927.8.500, and the Tb927.8.7300-.7330 region), as illustrated in S2–S9 Fig., with the procyclin loci described in detail below. These cases have in common that the loci in question show considerable variation among Trypanozoon strains and CDS appear to be absent in T. b. brucei Lister 427 and/or T. b. gambiense DAL972 as well [33]. The differences observed in T. evansi STIB805 compared to Tb927 therefore are unlikely to be relevant for kDNA loss or tsetse-independent transmission.
Procyclin loci
In T. evansi STIB805, the procyclin loci either lack or have disrupted versions of several CDS found in T. brucei. GPEET and EP procyclins and associated genes are encoded in loci on chromosomes 6 and 10, respectively, in various T. brucei strains [49]. Procyclin proteins are GPI-anchored coat glycoproteins that are expressed exclusively in the procyclic insect form of T. brucei, and they have been hypothesized to be involved in protection against tsetse fly midgut hydrolases [50]. Experiments in T. brucei have shown that knocking out all of the procyclin genes (Null mutants of GPEET and EP3 on chromosome 6; EP1 and EP2 on chromosome 10) causes no growth defect in vitro and permits completion of the entire life cycle, but causes a selective disadvantage during co-infection with wild type cells in the tsetse fly midgut [51]. These procyclin loci also contain procyclin-associated genes and a gene related to expression site associated gene 2 (PAG3 and GRESAG2 on chromosome 6; PAG1, 2, 2*, 4, and 5 on chromosome 10) [49]. The functions of the PAG proteins and GRESAG2 are unknown; although transcripts of PAG1–3 have been shown to increase during differentiation to procyclic forms, published experiments using cell lines with all PAG genes knocked out reported no obvious abnormal phenotypes in vitro or in vivo [49]. In multiple T. brucei strains, the chromosome 10 procyclin loci are heterozygous, with one chromosome containing EP1/EP2/PAG1/PAG5/PAG2*/PAG4 and the other chromosome containing EP1/EP2/PAG2/PAG4 (PAG2 being a fusion of the 5′ part of PAG1 and the 3′ part of PAG2*) [49], [52]–[56]. In T. evansi STIB805, chromosome 10 appears to be homozygous, with only the EP1/EP2/PAG2/PAG4 locus present, and the associated absence of the segment containing the 3′ part of PAG1, PAG5 and the 5′ part of PAG2* (Fig. 3). The full STIB805 de novo assembly contained a single 14.9 kb contig corresponding to the EP1/EP2/PAG2/PAG4 locus (S2 Fig.). Also on chromosome 10, the EP2 in T. evansi contains a stretch of 12 divergent amino acids in the domain N-terminal to the EP repeat; this region is highly conserved in T. brucei [57], [58]. Although the function of this domain is unknown, these 12 amino acids are found in all sequenced T. brucei genomes with very few variations. The chromosome 6 procyclin locus contains a triplication of three genes (EP3/PAG3/GRESAG2) in T. brucei TREU 927/4, with GPEET present only in front of the last unit (Fig. 3). Copy numbers of these genes may vary among T. brucei strains, as Southern analysis showed that these are single copy genes in the AnTat1.1 strain [49]. In TevSTIB805ra, coverage of this locus is much reduced (Fig. 3, S3 Fig.), indicating either divergence, reduced copy number, or both. The locus did not assemble into a single contig in the de novo approach and because of the repeat nature of this locus in Tb927, assigning sequence differences to particular gene copies was not possible. Nonetheless, several non-synonymous mutations in EP3 are evident, and the PAG3 and GRESAG2 genes have frameshifts and deletions. In contrast, analysis of a subset of other T. evansi orthologs to CDS shown to be upregulated in PF relative to BF T. brucei (Tb927.1.2310, Tb927.1.2350, Tb927.1.2560, Tb927.1.580, Tb927.10.10260, Tb927.10.10950, Tb927.10.4570, Tb927.11.16130, Tb927.11.8200, Tb927.4.1800, Tb927.4.1860, Tb927.4.4730, Tb927.5.1710, Tb927.5.2260, Tb927.6.510, Tb927.8.5260, Tb927.4.4730, Tb927.8.8300, Tb927.9.15110, and Tb927.9.8420) [59] detected no notable changes.
Analysis of T. brucei mitoproteome orthologs in T. evansi
Any Tb927 gene encoding a product that is exclusive involved in (i) maintenance or expression of kDNA, (ii) life cycle progression, or (iii) insect-stage specific energy metabolism, e.g. oxidative phosphorylation, is redundant in T. evansi. Although many of these genes encode mitochondrial proteins, numerous other mitochondrial activities are expected to remain essential even in an akinetoplastic bloodstream trypanosome (see Discussion). Extensive proteomic analyses have identified 978 mitochondrial proteins in T. brucei [60]–[63]. A search of TevSTIB805ra and TevSTIB805dn identified orthologous gene sequences for all of these proteins (S6 Table). A detailed examination of a subset of genes representing categories i-iii above (with the exception of the F1 subunits of respiratory complex V, which remain essential in T. evansi [19]) suggests that the vast majority, if not all of these genes remain functional (see S6 Table for details). To obtain further evidence for or against mutational decay in these genes, we calculated Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks for the following orthologous gene pairs in Tb927 and T. evansi: 208 CDS associated with kDNA expression or function; 942 unambiguous orthologous gene pairs for mitochondrial proteins; and 6331 unambiguous orthologous gene pairs corresponding to non-VSG and non-mitoproteome annotations (Table 3). These orthologous gene pairs were selected using greater stringency (reciprocal best matches in BLASTp searches with a minimum e-value threshold of 1×10−4) than the analysis shown in Fig. 2, to ensure that paralogous gene pairs were excluded (these would possibly increase Ka and Ks estimates and skew the distribution; S6 Table). We found no evidence of relaxed selection for T. evansi CDS associated with kDNA expression or function or the mitoproteome as a whole. Both Ka and Ks were lower for CDS associated with mitochondrial expression, and Ka/Ks was also lower relative to the genomic background, indicating that purifying selection is generally stronger among mitoproteome CDS, perhaps suggesting a higher proportion of essential genes compared to the control set. Furthermore, we made the same comparison between Tb927 and T. b. gambiense DAL972 (both of which retain functional kDNA) and the values for Ka, Ks and Ka/Ks show no significant differences (by t-test) with the values for T. evansi.
Table 3. Mean average Ka/Ks estimates for orthologous CDS pairs between Tb927 and either T. evansi STIB805 (Tev) or T. b. gambiense DAL972 (Tbg).
n | Ka | p | Ks | p | Ka/Ks | p | ||||
Tbg | Tev | Tbg | Tev | Tbg | Tev | |||||
non-mitochondrial, non-VSG | 6331 | 0.0068 | 0.0066 | 0.6106 | 0.0169 | 0.0172 | 0.7099 | 0.3853 | 0.4554 | 0.3582 |
kDNA expression or function | 208 | 0.0033 | 0.0032 | 0.9413 | 0.0135 | 0.0137 | 0.9007 | 0.2291 | 0.2264 | 0.9180 |
mitoproteome | 942 | 0.0037 | 0.0036 | 0.5203 | 0.0145 | 0.0141 | 0.4381 | 0.2602 | 0.2629 | 0.8586 |
Number of CDS pairs analyzed (n) for each category represents a subset of CDS that are unambiguous orthologs with reciprocal best match by BLASTp. Analysis by t-test of the values for Ka, Ks, and Ka/Ks for the T. evansi and T. b. gambiense isolates relative to Tb927 show no significant differences (p).
VSG repertoire
The predicted protein structures of VSGs in T. evansi STIB805 conform to the canonical structures in T. b. brucei and T. b. gambiense, and include all five recognized N-terminal sub-types (N1-5). In T. evansi STIB805 we identified 525 a-type VSGs (i.e. N-1-3 and 5; S2 Data File) and 505 b-type VSGs (i.e. N4; S3 Data File); of these 453 (86%) and 451 (89%), respectively, are full-length. Given that the assembly of subtelomeric and mini-chromosomal regions is fragmentary, these numbers may underestimate the real number of VSGs, although the total is comparable with both T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 [22] and T. b. gambiense DAL972 sequences [33]. The VSG repertoire is largely conserved between the T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 reference and T. evansi STIB805, as the VSGs are interspersed among each other in neighbour-joining molecular cladograms (S10 Fig.). Another indication of the similarity of the VSG repertoire is that very few clades of strain-specific VSG are larger than 2–3 (Fig. 4a and b). Large clades of VSG from a single genome would suggest divergence of VSG repertoire through gene duplication. Hence, 376 and 384 ( = 85.1%) T. evansi STIB805 and T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 a-VSGs, respectively, are most closely related to an ortholog in the other strain, or are paraphyletic to a clade of such sequences (i.e. strain-specific clade size = 1). Only 40 T. evansi STIB805 VSGs and 51 T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 VSGs form a clade with a paralog from the same genome (i.e. strain-specific clade size = 2), suggesting a single gene duplication since the strains separated. The same patterns occur with b-VSGs. Orthology between VSGs does not mean that they are unaffected by recombination, only that enough sequence homology persists for two orthologs to cluster together. Indeed, among 151 putative a-VSG orthologs 33 (21.8%) have dissimilar C-terminal types, while among 112 b-VSG orthologs 32 (28.6%) showed similar evidence for recombination having occurred since these two strains split from their common ancestor. Thus, analysis of the VSG repertoire reveals no evidence for the evolution of specific VSG gene clusters or subfamilies in T. evansi, similar to what had been observed for T. b. gambiense [33].
VSG sequence evolution
This comparison of orthologous VSGs from T. evansi STIB805 and T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 provides an overview of the molecular evolutionary forces incident on the VSG archive. Fig. 4c and d show that substitution rates among orthologous VSGs are typically higher than the background defined by comparison to the 6331 non-VSG orthologous gene pairs previously used in the mitoproteome analysis above. The mean average rate for VSG is significantly greater than other genes (p<0.05) and comparison of Ka/Ks (ω) explains this. The distribution of ω is left-skewed for non-VSG genes, which reflects the strong purifying selection on non-synonymous substitutions that typifies most genes that perform essential functions. The distribution for VSG is normal, indicating that purifying selection is much weaker on average, although still in effect. This difference in the distribution of ω is significant (p<0.005) and shows that VSGs evolve in a more neutral fashion than other genes, resulting in higher substitution rates. However, there is no more evidence for positive selection among VSGs than for 'normal' genes, which reflects our current understanding that VSG sequence evolution in T. brucei is driven predominantly by the diversifying effects of recombination [35], rather than directional selection driven by host immune responses.
RoTat 1.2
Consistent with earlier reports [64] that have suggested RoTat 1.2 (NCBI accession AF317914) as a predominant and diagnostic T. evansi VSG, we identified a closely related ORF in STIB805. The first 1250 bp of a 1431-bp ORF on a 3.9-kb de novo contig are nearly identical to the published RoTat1.2 sequence, while the 200 bp at the 3′ end are nearly identical to Tb927.8.240, annotated as ‘VSG, degenerate’ in TriTrypDB (S11 Fig.). Thus, the gene in STIB805 had most likely obtained a different C-terminal region through recombination, an important mechanism in VSG evolution [35]. We did not identify any close homologs to the 5′ region of RoTat1.2 in the publicly available T. b. brucei TREU 927/4, T. b. brucei Lister 427 or T. b. gambiense DAL972 datasets.
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) between T. evansi and T. brucei
A comparison of the TevSTIB805ra to the Tb927 reference genome revealed 354,809 single nucleotide polymorphisms, 68,938 of which were non-synonymous in identified CDS. 32,892 of these non-synonymous SNPs were found in 904 CDS classified as repetitive (e.g. RHS, VSG, ESAG), while 36,046 were found in 6630 CDS from non-repetitive genes (S3 Table). This number is slightly lower than the ∼45,000 non-synonymous SNPs reported for T. b. gambiense orthologs of non-repetitive T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 genes [33]. Additionally, there were 45,269 short indels (insertions/deletions of up to eight nucleotides), of which 5544 were in CDS regions. Of these, 4963 (89.5%) were not an indel of mod 3, and would therefore be expected to cause a frameshift. 3247 (58.6%) of the indels were found in 656 CDS classified as repetitive, while 2297 (41.4%) were found in 1091 CDS from non-repetitive genes (S4 Table). The latter consisted of 1154 insertions, 1000 deletions, and 143 that were complex (a combination of insertion, deletion and/or SNP). The Tb927 reference contains information for one allele only for any heterozygous locus. We therefore also identified SNPs and indels for TREU 927/4 using publicly available Illumina reads and the same criteria that were applied for STIB805. We identified 26,522 non-synonymous SNPs and 1630 indels. Of these, 814 and 58, respectively, were homozygous, thus reflecting discrepancies between the original Sanger sequencing data and the Illumina reads. The cause of these discrepancies, which could arise from a number of potential sources, including DNA isolation from different cultures of the same strain, is unknown. Only 1267 non-synonymous allele variations (SNP or indel) in CDSs (repetitive or non-repetitive) were shared by STIB805 and TREU 927/4, 8710 variations affected the same position, but were different, and 89,043 affected a different position. All non-synonymous SNPs and indels identified in STIB805 and TREU 927/4 are compared in S5 Table, listed by chromosome and gene. In summary, while numerous small sequence variations exist between T. evansi STIB805 and the T. b. brucei reference genome, these are comparable in number to differences between the T. b. brucei and T. b. gambiense subspecies.
Phylogenetic analysis with dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase (LipDH) and ATP synthase subunit γ as genetic markers
The phylogenetic relationship of various T. evansi and T. equiperdum isolates to each other and to isolates of T. brucei subspecies is controversial. We compared T. evansi STIB805 CDSs with their T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 orthologs as retrieved from Tb927 in order to identify a genetic marker that would likely be informative for the elucidation of the phylogenetic origins of T. evansi and T. equiperdum, and for determining their evolutionary relationships with established T. brucei sub-species. Selection criteria included (i) sufficient SNPs over a length of 1–3 kb (to minimize number of internal primers necessary for amplification and sequencing), (ii) lack of paralogs, and (iii) minimal alignment gaps. One promising candidate, the LipDH gene (Tb927.11.16730), a shared component of four mitochondrial multi-enzyme complexes [65], was selected for sequence analysis. Both LipDH CDS alleles were amplified and sequenced from a total of 40 isolates from various geographical locations (13 T. b. brucei, 3 T. b. gambiense group 1, 4 T. b. rhodesiense, 5 T. equiperdum, 15 T. evansi; S7 Table). Since mutations in subunit γ of the mitochondrial ATP synthase complex were recently identified as important factors in the viability of T. evansi and T. equiperdum, the sequence for both γ alleles was also determined for all isolates.
32 unique LipDH haplotypes were identified. The majority of strains (36/41) had two different alleles and four strains appeared to be homozygous at this locus, all of which were T. b. brucei (although it cannot be ruled out that the primers used were selective for one allele in these cases). Phylogenetic analysis (Fig. 5) showed all but three of the haplotype sequences fell into one of five major clusters with strong support (posterior probabilities ≥0.9), which we refer to as clades V, W, X, Y and Z. Importantly, 14 different haplotypes are derived from the T. evansi/T. equiperdum isolates, which are found in three different clades as well as outside of the clades. This feature is incompatible with monophyly of T. evansi or T. equiperdum. Some subspecies did have relatively restricted phylogenetic diversity, for example T. b. gambiense type 1 had only five closely related haplotypes and certain clades contained sequences from a restricted number of the subspecies; e.g. clade X only contained T. b. rhodesiense and T. b. brucei; clade Y included only T. b. gambiense type 1 and T. b. brucei. This may reflect relatively more recent origins of certain populations, bottleneck events and/or sampling bias, and is in line with most previous work ([40] and references therein).
Eight unique T. evansi/T. equiperdum genotypes (haplotype pairs) were found which, by disregarding minor sequence differences, were reduced to four major genotypes: W/Z, V/V, V/Z, or atypical (Fig. 5; S7 Table). These LipDH genotypes correlated very well with the four ATP synthase γ genotypes found in these strains (Fig. 5B; see also S7 Table).
The largest group (Group 1), consisting of 13 T. evansi isolates (including STIB805) and 2 T. equiperdum isolates, is characterized by LipDH genotype W/Z and γ genotype A281Δ/WT. The single exception, Tev48, had two Z haplotypes (Hap24+Hap29) distinguished by two SNPs, which may be a result of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) followed by two mutations, or it may represent a cloning artefact. Non-T. evansi/T. equiperdum strains that had sequences within these clades originated from both East and West Africa in the case of clade Z, and the T. b. gambiense samples from Ivory Coast in the case of clade W. The remaining T. evansi/T. equiperdum strains were split into three further groups according to the LipDH/ATP synthase γ genotypes as follows. Group 2 is characterized by LipDH V/Z and γ genotype A273P/A273P. The two T. equiperdum strains carrying this genotype (Teq21 and Teq22) were heterozygous for two alleles derived from well-separated clades: one ‘V’ allele (Hap17 or Hap18, 1 SNP difference) and one ‘Z’ allele (Hap14 or Hap15, 1 SNP difference). The divergence between the V and Z alleles (11 or 12 discriminating SNPs), suggests that these strains have evolved out of a T. b. brucei background that had relatively old and distinct LipDH alleles, possibly via a recombination event. Interestingly, the most closely related non-T. evansi/T. equiperdum alleles are found in current East African populations as well as in three T. b. brucei from Ivory Coast. Group 3 is characterized by LipDH V/V and γ genotype WT/WT. The one T. equiperdum strain with a WT γ genotype (Teq23 = STIB841; probably synonymous with the OVI strain [5]) was heterozygous with two similar ‘V’ clade alleles that are closely related to the V alleles in Teq21, Teq22, Tbr02 (Kenya) and Tbb08 (Zambia) (S7 Table). Group 4 is characterized by atypical LipDH and γ genotype M282L/WT. This genotype was found in a single T. evansi strain (Tev42 = KETRI 2479) with Hap27+Hap28 and could not be reliably grouped with any other strains.
An interesting aspect of the T. evansi/T. equiperdum genotypes is that most strains possess two divergent alleles that are more similar to those found in other, non-Tev/Teq strains than they are to each other. These non-Tev/Teq strains are themselves heterozygous, with second alleles that are clearly distinct from either of the Tev/Teq alleles. A clear example is the most common Teq/Tev LipDH genotype, W/Z, that is carried by 13 out of 15 T. evansi analyzed and 2 out of 5 T. equiperdum analyzed. This finding is incompatible with allelic divergence due to long-term clonal evolution, rather it shows that recombination between ancestral parasites occurred either at or immediately prior to the origin of this genotype which has subsequently undergone clonal expansion in the absence of the possibility of sexual exchange in the tsetse vector. Three of the four T. b. rhodesiense strains (Tbr01, 03, 04) also exhibit alleles split across different clades as does Tbb06. Interestingly, all Tbb except Tbb06 have alleles from the same clade, possibly indicative of inbreeding.
Cytochrome oxidase 1 (COX1)
The COX1 gene, encoded in the mitochondrial maxicircle DNA, was recently used as a highly informative marker to investigate the phylogeography of T. brucei subspecies [40]. Although most, if not all, T. evansi isolates lack a maxicircle, the presence of at least one T. equiperdum isolate with at least a partial maxicircle in three of the above groups prompted us to determine the COX1 haplotypes for these strains and to investigate their relationship with the Trypanozoon isolates from the earlier study (S7 Table). A maximum parsimony network analysis strongly supported the notion of three independent evolutionary origins for these three groups (Fig. 6). T. equiperdum STIB818 (Teq24; COX1 haplotype 23) links Group 1 with COX1 clade A, which is composed of isolates of all three T. brucei subspecies found across all of sub-Saharan Africa [40]. Although Groups 2 and 3, which share a related ‘V’ LipDH genotype, are both linked to COX1 clade C (composed of T. b. brucei and T. b. rhodesiense isolates from eastern and southern Africa), they are well separated within this clade, indicating independent evolutionary origins. T. equiperdum STIB841 (Teq23) shares both its COX1 haplotype 14 and its LipDH haplotype 19 with Tbr02 from Zambia and Tbb08 from Kenya, both members of the Kiboko group, suggesting relatively recent common ancestry. Note that Tev42 (KETRI2479), the lone representative of the ‘atypical’ LipDH genotype, is not represented in this network since this isolate lacks a maxicircle and therefore the COX1 gene.
Principal component analysis (PCA) of microsatellite markers
Incorporation of microsatellite data for a subset of T. evansi/T. equiperdum isolates into an established PCA network [40] also gave results that are inconsistent with monophyly of either species (Fig. 7). Most T. evansi isolates, together with Teq24 (STIB818), formed a cluster (grey circle) related to, but somewhat distinct from, non-Kiboko T. b. brucei (light blue circle) and T. b. rhodesiense (red circle). The single exception among T. evansi was again Tev42 (KETRI2479), which localized near the centre of the non-Kiboko cluster. Teq21 (BoTat1.1) was also more related to non-Kiboko T. b. brucei, but relatively distant from Tev42. The PCA analysis, consistent with the COX1 and LipDH data, suggested a relatively close evolutionary relationship of T. equiperdum STIB841/OVI (Teq23) with the Kiboko group of T. b. brucei (dark blue circle).
The results of the phylogenetic analyses are summarized in Table 4, along with the ATPase subunit γ genotypes and, where known, dominant minicircle class and RoTat 1.2 VSG genotype. Combined, these markers suggest that the T. evansi/T.equiperdum isolates investigated in our study can be arranged into four distinct groups of independent evolutionary origin (see Discussion)
Table 4. Proposed grouping of T. evansi/T. equiperdum isolates.
Group | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 |
Examples (code) | T. ev. STIB805 (27)T. ev. Kazakh (33)T. ev. AnTat3/3 (36)T. eq. STIB818 (24)T. eq. ATCC30023 (25) | T. eq. STIB842 (22)T. eq. BoTat1.1 (21) | T. eq. STIB8411 (23) | T. ev. KETRI2479 (42) |
ATPase γ C-term. | A281del | A273P | WT | M282L |
dominant minicircle class | A2 | C3 | n/a | B4 |
LipDH genotype | W/Z | V/Z | V/V | atypical |
COX1 haplotype | 23 | 22 | 14 | n/a5 |
microsatellite PCA | Tev | Tbb | Tbb Kiboko | Tbb |
RoTat1.2 | +6 | -7 | -7 | -8 |
Probably identical or highly similar to T. equiperdum OVI ([5] and subsequent communications in Trends in Parasitology: http://www.cell.com/trends/parasitology/abstract/S1471-4922(05)00334-X)
n/a = not available, as KETRI2479 lacks COX1
Discussion
We sequenced and analyzed the genome of T. evansi strain STIB805, a representative of a large, clonal group of close relatives of T. brucei that are transmitted independently of tsetse flies. Our examination revealed a number of insights into the biology and phylogenetic origin of this akinetoplastic trypanosome and provides further support for the proposed classification of T. evansi and T. equiperdum as subspecies of T. brucei [4]. A comparison with the T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 reference shows broad similarity, with 94.6% of non-repetitive CDS having a nucleotide identity of 95% or greater and 78.9% having ≥99% identity (Fig. 2). This high degree of identity mirrors similarities previously observed between T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 and T. b. gambiense DAL972 (86.4% of CDS had ≥99% identity) [33]. Phylogenetic analyses of T. evansi STIB805 VSG sequences also show extensive similarity to T. b. brucei. A cladistic representation of VSG sequences from T. evansi and T. b. brucei shows these sequences broadly interspersed with little evidence for subspecies-specific grouping, which underscores the close evolutionary relationship of the two strains (S10 Fig.). Despite the lack of kDNA and the absence of the life cycle stages in the insect vector, where the T. b. brucei mitochondrion is exclusively active in oxidative phosphorylation, T. evansi has maintained the coding capacity for nearly all of the mitochondrial proteome found in T. b. brucei. To some extent this reflects the fact that many mitochondrial activities are expected to remain essential even in an akinetoplastic bloodstream trypanosome. Such activities include the glycine cleavage complex [65], the alternative oxidase [66] and ubiquinone biosynthesis [67], fatty acid metabolism [68], [69], the F1-ATP synthase and ADP/ATP carrier [20], iron sulfur cluster biosynthesis [70], and all activities required to maintain and duplicate the mitochondrion itself. Nonetheless, a focused analysis of those genes known to be involved in kDNA maintenance or expression, or in oxidative phosphorylation, identified not a single case of gene loss and very few cases of mutations with predicted consequences for protein function. Of the 35 kDNA replication and transcription CDS examined, only the mitochondrial DNA polymerase beta-PAK appeared to be functionally compromised (S6 Table). Similarly, all 133 of the CDS identified as the mitochondrial ribosome in T. b. brucei [62], [71] are maintained in T. evansi, with the largest difference observed being a relatively small region of TevSTIB805.11_01.4800 (Tb927.11.4650) that alters 24 amino acids in the middle of the coding sequence. The paucity of disruptions among such a large protein complex strongly suggests that the mitochondrial ribosomes in T. evansi STIB805 are fully functional despite the lack of known substrates. Editosome function also appears essentially intact in T. evansi. Previous experiments have shown that dyskinetoplastic T. b. brucei and another strain of T. evansi contain functional editing complexes, which is consistent with retention of proteins no longer required [72].
Components of the mitochondrial electron transport chain are of particular interest in T. evansi, as the key compensatory change that permits survival in the absence of kDNA resides in complex V (mitochondrial FOF1-ATP synthase) [20]. The electron transport chain is composed of five complexes in the inner mitochondrial membrane, and in T. brucei these complexes are differentially expressed between life cycle stages [9]. In bloodstream forms, ATP is thought to be produced entirely by glycolysis. The classical respiratory chain is not functionally active, and the ATP synthase operates “in reverse” by hydrolyzing ATP to pump protons into the mitochondrial matrix in order to maintain the essential mitochondrial membrane potential, Δψm [19], [73], [74]. This activity requires the kDNA-encoded FO subunit 6. Maintenance of Δψm in the absence of a functional FO in T. evansi STIB805 involves an A281 deletion in the gamma subunit of the F1 subcomplex, but whether this mutation alone is sufficient to fully compensate for kDNA loss is presently unclear [20]. Our study has identified mutations in the α and β subunits of F1 that could function in concert with the A281 deletion to permit survival of T. evansi STIB805, and this can be tested experimentally. Nuclear genes encoding components of complexes I-IV of the oxidative phosphorylation system appear to be intact in T. evansi. Although complex I is expressed in bloodstream T. brucei, a recent study demonstrated that it is non-essential for bloodstream form metabolism, and no growth defects were observed in cell lines in which complex I components were eliminated [75]. Genes for subunits of complexes II-IV are not required in bloodstream form parasites, and eleven kDNA-encoded subunits are absent in T. evansi, yet the integrity of the nuclear-encoded genes for complexes I-IV has been maintained in T. evansi STIB805.
Ka/Ks analysis further highlights the conservation of the T. evansi mitoproteome in general and of a subset of proteins involved in kDNA maintenance, expression, and function in particular: we detected no significant difference between Ka, Ks, or Ka/Ks values for T. evansi STIB805 and T. b. gambiense DAL972 relative to T. b. brucei. A potential explanation is that selective pressure remains for a large number of the mitoproteome CDS, including those involved in kDNA maintenance and function, perhaps due to additional functions outside of the mitochondrion. For example, the mitochondrial topoisomerase II was recently shown to be important for normal growth even in the absence of kDNA [20]. Alternatively, retention of functional sequences could reflect a relatively short evolutionary separation between T. brucei and T. evansi STIB805, high stability of the gene maintenance and expression pathways in these organisms, or some unknown aspect of their biology. For example, robust mechanisms to maintain gene functionality would make sense in an organism with a complex life cycle like T. brucei that spends many generations in an environment where only a subset of genes are required.
The depth of similarity between T. evansi STIB805 and T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 creates a background that highlights some of the observed differences. The differences in chromosome pattern between the two T. evansi and T. b. brucei strains are comparable to strain variations observed within the T. b. brucei subspecies (Fig. 1) [46]. Previous studies investigating T. brucei chromosomes have indicated that gene content is more conserved than chromosome size [30], [76], similar to other kinetoplastid species [77], [78]. This size polymorphism is probably caused by genome-wide rearrangements over evolutionary time. The majority of the megabase chromosomes appeared largely similar between T. evansi STIB805 and T. b. brucei TREU 927/4, which is consistent with similarities subsequently observed in sequence. It remains to be shown whether the chromosomal differences observed among trypanosomatids reflect any functional consequences, which are more obvious at the gene level.
One clear example of such CDS differences that are found in the T. evansi STIB805 genome is the loss of a significant number of procyclin associated genes (PAGs). In multiple T. brucei strains, the chromosome 10 procyclin locus is heterozygous, with one chromosome containing EP1/EP2/PAG1/PAG5/PAG2*/PAG4 and the other chromosome containing EP1/EP2/PAG2/PAG4 [49], [52]–[56]. In T. evansi STIB805, chromosome 10 is homozygous for the EP1/EP2/PAG2/PAG4 locus, resulting in the associated absence of PAG5 and PAG2*. Also on chromosome 10, the EP2 gene in T. evansi contains a stretch of 12 divergent amino acids in the domain N-terminal to the EP repeat; this region is highly conserved among T. b. brucei strains [57], [58]. The PAG3 and GRESAG2 genes on chromosome 6 have frame-shifts and deletions. Although the function of procyclins and PAGs are not fully clear, the hypothesized role in protection within tsetse fly midgut is a logical extrapolation [50]. Because T. evansi has jettisoned this life-cycle stage, a life persisting as bloodstream parasites provides no selection to maintain these genes. Nonetheless, the fact that several procyclin genes and PAGs have been disrupted in T. evansi STIB805 stands in stark contrast to the integrity of other genes dispensable in an akinetoplastic bloodstream trypanosome, such as the genes specifically required for kDNA maintenance or expression, or for insect stage-specific energy metabolism (see above). Procyclin genes - in contrast to most other protein coding genes - are transcribed by RNA polymerase I, which might be associated with idiosyncratic features at these loci. Thus, either the loss of the genes gives a selective advantage to parasites locked in the bloodstream stage, or their genomic loci are intrinsically less stable.
Several other genes appear to be missing in T. evansi STIB805, but all cases we identified represent members of gene families that show considerable variation among T. brucei subspecies and strains. For example, presence of the complete IAO/AT2 array on T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 chromosome 2 and of the single IAO gene on chromosome 9 (Tb927.9.14600) is highly variable among T. b. brucei and T. b. gambiense strains [33]. Similarly, tandem duplications on T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 chromosomes 3 (Tb927.3.5690-.5730) and 6 (Tb927.6.1310-.1390) are absent from both STIB805 and T. b. gambiense DAL972 [33]. Hence, with the notable exception of procyclins and PAGs, most cases of genes that are present in Tb927 but absent from T. evansi STIB805 are probably more a reflection of frequent differences in gene content within the subgenus Trypanozoon, rather than events specific to T. evansi. It is unknown if this variability is of any biological significance.
A search for ORFs on contigs assembled de novo from T. evansi STIB805 Illumina reads identified 200 candidates for T. evansi-specific genes (S1 Data File). These candidates lacked close homologs in other trypanosome species based on the absence of BLASTp hits (E-value cut-off 0.001) in Tb927 or in the NCBI database (Table 2 and S2 Table). Seven of these candidates came from contigs with at least 5x minimal coverage and mapping of T. b. brucei TREU 927/4 or Lister 427 Illumina reads to these ORFs resulted in no or only incomplete coverage. The size of these ORFs is generally small (306–501 bp) and the surrounding contig regions either lack homology to Tb927 chromosomes entirely or match to repetitive regions such as VSG arrays. Further studies are needed to elucidate whether any of these candidates are functional CDS, and whether they are generally absent from T. brucei ssp. and present in T. evansi strains, and therefore are of potential diagnostic value. We confirmed the presence of the RoTat 1.2 gene in the STIB805 genome, which encodes a VSG used for serodiagnosis of surra [79]. Although the N-terminal domain is almost identical to the canonical RoTat 1.2 sequence (NCBI accession no. AF317914), the STIB805 protein has a different C-terminal domain. Based on our phylogenetic analysis we would caution that the RoTat 1.2 gene may not reliably distinguish surra from dourine (see below).
The relationship of T. evansi strains to each other as well as to strains classified as T. equiperdum and to the T. brucei group is controversial [5], [11], [80]. Hoare had suggested that T. evansi evolved from a T. brucei infection in camels that had temporarily entered the sub-Saharan tsetse belt. This strain subsequently became adapted to mechanical transmission by biting flies and disseminated by caravans to areas outside of sub-Saharan Africa. Hoare further speculated that the sexually transmitted T. equiperdum may have evolved from an equine strain of T. evansi by developing tropism for genital tissues [81]. Subsequent molecular analyses demonstrated that most strains of T. equiperdum, in contrast to T. evansi, possess at least a partial maxicircle (reviewed in [8]), which is inconsistent with a scenario in which the former evolved from the latter. Brun et al. proposed a reversed scenario in which T. evansi arose from a clone of T. equiperdum that had lost its maxicircle [3]. More extensive phylogenetic studies suggested that the T. evansi/T. equiperdum group is not monophyletic, leading to the hypothesis that some T. equiperdum isolates are misclassified T. evansi strains whereas others are a subspecies of T. brucei [5], [82]. A more recent phylogenetic analysis based on SL RNA repeats from various isolates of T. evansi, T. equiperdum, T. b. brucei and T. b. gambiense found no species-specific clusters, and the authors suggested that the various T. evansi and T. equiperdum strains may have evolved on numerous independent occasions and should be classified as subspecies of T. brucei [1], [4].
The phylogenetic analysis presented in the present study, which was based on four different genetic markers, strongly suggests that T. evansi/T. equiperdum evolved from within the T. brucei group on at least four independent occasions and from genetically distinct T. brucei strains (Table 4 and Fig. 5–7). Isolates within each group share not only the genotypes assessed in the present study, but also the dominant class of minicircle (if present) and the RoTat 1.2 genotype. The grouping presented in Table 4 is also consistent with a phylogeny based on random amplified polymorphic DNA and a multiple endonuclease typing approach [5], [82]. Not all markers listed in Table 4 have been assessed for all strains, but all the data available are consistent with this grouping, which provides a solid framework for further studies. The isolates we sampled cover a time period of 110 years and a vast geographical area (S7 Table), but it seems likely that other independent lineages of T. evansi/T. equiperdum have emerged earlier, and that independent extant lineages exist that were not sampled in the present study.
Another important observation from the phylogenetic data summarized in Table 4 is that Group 1 contains isolates representing both T. evansi and T. equiperdum. A similar intermingling of isolates classified as T. evansi and T. equiperdum was observed in other phylogenetic studies and led the authors to hypothesize that these T. equiperdum strains had been misclassified and are actually T. evansi [5]. Another possibility is that T. evansi can under certain circumstances evolve from T. equiperdum by converting from a tissue parasite back to a blood parasite, and from sexual transmission to mechanical transmission by biting flies, as suggested by Brun et al. [3]. It remains mysterious why sexual transmission in horses by and large appears to be correlated with the presence of a (sometimes partial) maxicircle, and mechanical transmission by biting flies with a lack thereof. Based on our current knowledge of kinetoplast function in trypanosomes the maxicircle becomes vestigial in the absence of minicircle heterogeneity, and apparent minicircle homogeneity is a hallmark of both T. evansi and T. equiperdum (reviewed in [8]). Finding answers to these important questions will require a more complete understanding of kinetoplast function, and a thorough molecular and epidemiological analysis of new T. evansi and T. equiperdum isolates.
Regardless of which of the above explanations for the simultaneous presence of T. evansi and T. equiperdum isolates in Group 1 is correct, it is evident that they both evolved independently on at least two distinct occasions, and neither is therefore monophyletic. This scenario is reminiscent of the situation with T. b. gambiense, which evolved from T. b. brucei on two independent occasions [40], [83]. An important difference is that T. b. gambiense, at least theoretically, can mate with T. b. brucei to form hybrids, and there is strong evidence that this occurs for group 2 T. b. gambiense [83]. In contrast, T. evansi and T. equiperdum can no longer develop in the tsetse vector, considered a requirement for mating, and are therefore now genetically isolated. A consistent solution to the species problem in trypanosomes, as in other organisms, has not been reached, and classification of species vs. (sub)species has often been subjective and utilitarian rather than logical [84],[85]. However, maintaining the rank of species for T. evansi and T. equiperdum, despite clear evidence for lack of monophyly in both cases, seems inconsistent even within the Trypanozoon group itself. We therefore recommend re-classification as subspecies, i. e. T. b. evansi and T. b. equiperdum.
The present study did not identify any obvious candidates for genetic changes that might underpin the switch from tsetse-dependent to mechanical transmission by biting flies in T. evansi. A mathematical model for mechanical transmission suggested a high level of parasitaemia in the blood as an important condition for its success [86]. T. brucei regulates its parasitaemia through a quorum sensing mechanism that results in density dependent differentiation into a non-proliferative ‘stumpy’ form that is pre-adapted to survival in the tsetse vector [87]. Adaptations in the signaling pathway responsible for this sensing could provide a mechanism for increased parasitaemia, and numerous components of this pathway have recently been identified [88]. Indeed, while stumpy forms were occasionally observed for T. evansi, they are usually absent [81]. However, an entirely uncontrolled proliferation in the blood would probably result in untimely death of the host, again detrimental to transmission. On the other hand, a multi-species parasite like T. evansi could have (i) an uncontrolled proliferation in some of its hosts, and thus be fatal, as in horses, and (ii) a more controlled proliferation in others, such as certain bovines, which may act as reservoir. It therefore seems plausible that successful adaptation to mechanical transmission requires striking a new balance between survival of parasite and host, resulting in a new equilibrium that involves a very large range of receptive hosts exhibiting variable susceptibility.
Conclusions
Taken together, the genome analysis and accompanying phylogenetic studies presented in this work revealed important insights into the biology and evolution of T. evansi STIB805 and dyskinetoplastic trypanosomes in general. Their re-classification as subspecies of T. brucei, i. e. T. b. evansi and T. b. equiperdum, seems clearly justified considering the vast similarities observed at the genome level and the lack of monophyly confirmed by phylogenetic analyses. Important questions that remain include the molecular basis of tsetse-independent transmission and the evolutionary timescale of the appearance of the T. evansi/T. equiperdum groups. The genome data presented here provide an important tool for future studies aimed at resolving these questions.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Wendy Gibson (University of Bristol, Bristol, UK) for sharing parasite DNA and helpful comments on the manuscript, Ana Jansen (FIOCRUZ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) for sharing parasite DNA, David Martin (University of Dundee, Dundee, UK) for helpful discussions, and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute (Hinxton, UK) and George Cross (Rockefeller University, New York, USA) for providing Illumina reads for T. b. brucei strains TREU 927/4 and Lister 427 to the research community.
Data Availability
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. Entire genome and all the predicted genes are publicly available at TriTrypDB (http://tritrypdb.org/tritrypdb/). The fastq files containing the Illumina read data for T. evansi STIB805 is available at: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERA000101.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by US National Institutes of Health (www.nih.gov) grants AI014102 (to KS) and AI69057 (to AS), UK Medical Research Council (www.mrc.ac.uk) grant G0600129 (to AS), EU grant (ec.europa.eu) FP7/2007-2013 (no. 316304), Bioglobe grant CZ.1.07/2.3.00/30.0032, and the Praemium Academiae award (to JL, who is a Fellow of the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research), and National Science Foundation of China (www.nsfc.gov.cn) grants #30670275 and #31272305 (to ZRL). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Desquesnes M, Holzmuller P, Lai DH, Dargantes A, Lun ZR, et al. (2013) Trypanosoma evansi and Surra: A Review and Perspectives on Origin, History, Distribution, Taxonomy, Morphology, Hosts, and Pathogenic Effects. Biomed Res Int 2013: 1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Joshi PP, Shegokar VR, Powar RM, Herder S, Katti R, et al. (2005) Human trypanosomiasis caused by Trypanosoma evansi in India: the first case report. Am J Trop Med Hyg 73: 491–495. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Brun R, Hecker H, Lun ZR (1998) Trypanosoma evansi and T. equiperdum: distribution, biology, treatment and phylogenetic relationship (a review). Vet Parasitol 79: 95–107. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Lai DH, Hashimi H, Lun ZR, Ayala FJ, Lukeš J (2008) Adaptations of Trypanosoma brucei to gradual loss of kinetoplast DNA: Trypanosoma equiperdum and Trypanosoma evansi are petite mutants of T. brucei. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 1999–2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Claes F, Buscher P, Touratier L, Goddeeris BM (2005) Trypanosoma equiperdum: master of disguise or historical mistake? Trends Parasitol 21: 316–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Ventura RM, Takeda GF, Silva RA, Nunes VL, Buck GA, et al. (2002) Genetic relatedness among Trypanosoma evansi stocks by random amplification of polymorphic DNA and evaluation of a synapomorphic DNA fragment for species-specific diagnosis. Int J Parasitol 32: 53–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Desquesnes M, Dargantes A, Lai DH, Lun ZR, Holzmuller P, et al. (2013) Trypanosoma evansi and surra: a review and perspectives on transmission, epidemiology and control, impact, and zoonotic aspects. Biomed Res Int 2013: 321237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Schnaufer A, Domingo GJ, Stuart KD (2002) Natural and induced dyskinetoplastid trypanosomatids: How to live without mitochondrial DNA. Int J Parasitol 32: 1071–1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Bringaud F, Riviere L, Coustou V (2006) Energy metabolism of trypanosomatids: adaptation to available carbon sources. Mol Biochem Parasitol 149: 1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Jensen RE, Simpson L, Englund PT (2008) What happens when Trypanosoma brucei leaves Africa. Trends Parasitol 24: 428–431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Lun ZR, Lai DH, Li FJ, Lukeš J, Ayala FJ (2010) Trypanosoma brucei: two steps to spread out from Africa. Trends Parasitol 26: 424–427. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Liu B, Liu Y, Motyka SA, Agbo EC, Englund PT (2005) Fellowship of the rings: the replication of kinetoplast DNA. Trends Parasitol 21: 363–369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Stuart KD, Schnaufer A, Ernst NL, Panigrahi AK (2005) Complex management: RNA editing in trypanosomes. Trends Biochem Sci 30: 97–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Aphasizhev R, Aphasizheva I (2011) Mitochondrial RNA processing in trypanosomes. Res Microbiol 162: 655–663. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Hajduk S, Ochsenreiter T (2010) RNA editing in kinetoplastids. RNA Biol 7: 229–236. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Bhat GJ, Koslowsky DJ, Feagin JE, Smiley BL, Stuart K (1990) An extensively edited mitochondrial transcript in kinetoplastids encodes a protein homologous to ATPase subunit 6. Cell 61: 885–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Hashimi H, Benkovicová V, Cermáková P, Lai DH, Horváth A, et al. (2010) The assembly of F(1)F(O)-ATP synthase is disrupted upon interference of RNA editing in Trypanosoma brucei. Int J Parasitol 40: 45–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Zíková A, Schnaufer A, Dalley RA, Panigrahi AK, Stuart KD (2009) The F0F1-ATP Synthase Complex Contains Novel Subunits and Is Essential for Procyclic Trypanosoma brucei. PLOS Pathogens 5: 1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Schnaufer A, Clark-Walker GD, Steinberg AG, Stuart K (2005) The F(1)-ATP synthase complex in bloodstream stage trypanosomes has an unusual and essential function. EMBO J 24: 4029–4040. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Dean S, Gould MK, Dewar CE, Schnaufer AC (2013) Single point mutations in ATP synthase compensate for mitochondrial genome loss in trypanosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 14741–14746. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Lun ZR, Brun R, Gibson W (1992) Kinetoplast DNA and molecular karyotypes of Trypanosoma evansi and Trypanosoma equiperdum from China. Mol Biochem Parasitol 50: 189–196. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Berriman M, Ghedin E, Hertz-Fowler C, Blandin G, Lennard NJ, et al. (2005) The genome of the African trypanosome, Trypanosoma brucei. Science 309: 416–422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lanham SM, Godfrey DG (1970) Isolation of salivarian trypanosomes from man and other mammals using DEAE-cellulose. Exp Parasitol 28: 521–534. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sambrook J. and Russell, D W. (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Third Edition. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.
- 25. Margulies M, Egholm M, Altman WE, Attiya S, Bader JS, et al. (2005) Genome sequencing in microfabricated high-density picolitre reactors. Nature 437: 376–380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Carver TJ, Rutherford KM, Berriman M, Rajandream MA, Barrell BG, et al. (2005) ACT: the Artemis Comparison Tool. Bioinformatics 21: 3422–3423. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Otto TD, Dillon GP, Degrave WS, Berriman M (2011) RATT: Rapid Annotation Transfer Tool. Nucleic Acids Res 39: e57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Aggarwal G, Worthey E, McDonagh P, Myler PJ (2003) Importing statistical measures in Artemis enhances gene identification in Leishmania Genome Project. BMC Bioinformatics 4: 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Blankenberg D, Taylor J, Schenck I, He J, Zhang Y, et al. (2007) A framework for collaborative analysis of ENCODE data: making large-scale analyses biologist-friendly. Genome Res 17: 960–964. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Melville SE, Leech V, Gerrard CS, Tait A, Blackwell JM (1998) The molecular karyotype of the megabase chromosomes of Trypanosoma brucei and the assignment of chromosome markers. Mol Biochem Parasitol 94: 155–173. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Rovai L, Tripp C, Stuart K, Simpson L (1992) Recurrent polymorphisms in small chromosomes of Leishmania tarentolae after nutrient stress or subcloning. Mol Biochem Parasitol 50: 115–126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR (2011) HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res 39: W29–W37. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Jackson AP, Sanders M, Berry A, McQuillan J, Aslett MA, et al. (2010) The genome sequence of Trypanosoma brucei gambiense, causative agent of chronic human african trypanosomiasis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 4: e658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Jackson AP, Berry A, Aslett M, Allison HC, Burton P, et al. (2012) Antigenic diversity is generated by distinct evolutionary mechanisms in African trypanosome species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 3416–3421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Zhang Z, Li J, Yu J (2006) Computing Ka and Ks with a consideration of unequal transitional substitutions. BMC Evol Biol 6: 44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Plewniak F, Jeanmougin F, Higgins DG (1997) The CLUSTAL_X windows interface: flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Res 25: 4876–4882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Milne I, Lindner D, Bayer M, Husmeier D, McGuire G, et al. (2009) TOPALi v2: a rich graphical interface for evolutionary analyses of multiple alignments on HPC clusters and multi-core desktops. Bioinformatics 25: 126–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Balmer O, Beadell JS, Gibson W, Caccone A (2011) Phylogeography and taxonomy of Trypanosoma brucei. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 5: e961. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Clement M, Posada D, Crandall KA (2000) TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol Ecol 9: 1657–1659. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, et al. (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol 61: 539–542. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Lanfear R, Calcott B, Ho SY, Guindon S (2012) Partitionfinder: combined selection of partitioning schemes and substitution models for phylogenetic analyses. Mol Biol Evol 29: 1695–1701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T (1985) Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22: 160–174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Balmer O, Palma C, MacLeod A, Caccone A (2006) Characterization of di-, tri-, and tetranucleotide microsatellite markers with perfect repeats for Trypanosoma brucei and related species. Mol Ecol Notes 6: 508–510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Melville SE, Leech V, Navarro M, Cross GA (2000) The molecular karyotype of the megabase chromosomes of Trypanosoma brucei stock 427. Mol Biochem Parasitol 111: 261–273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Callejas S, Leech V, Reitter C, Melville S (2006) Hemizygous subtelomeres of an African trypanosome chromosome may account for over 75% of chromosome length. Genome Res 16: 1109–1118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Witola WH, Tsuda A, Inoue N, Ohashi K, Onuma M (2005) Acquired resistance to berenil in a cloned isolate of Trypanosoma evansi is associated with upregulation of a novel gene, TeDR40. Parasitol 131: 635–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Haenni S, Renggli CK, Fragoso CM, Oberle M, Roditi I (2006) The procyclin-associated genes of Trypanosoma brucei are not essential for cyclical transmission by tsetse. Mol Biochem Parasitol 150: 144–156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Roditi I, Furger A, Ruepp S, Schurch N, Butikofer P (1998) Unravelling the procyclin coat of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol 91: 117–130. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Vassella E, Oberle M, Urwyler S, Renggli CK, Studer E, et al. (2009) Major surface glycoproteins of insect forms of Trypanosoma brucei are not essential for cyclical transmission by tsetse. PLoS ONE 4: e4493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Vassella E, Acosta-Serrano A, Studer E, Lee SH, Englund PT, et al. (2001) Multiple procyclin isoforms are expressed differentially during the development of insect forms of Trypanosoma brucei. J Mol Biol 312: 597–607. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Koenig-Martin E, Yamage M, Roditi I (1992) A procyclin-associated gene in Trypanosoma brucei encodes a polypeptide related to ESAG 6 and 7 proteins. Mol Biochem Parasitol 55: 135–146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Berberof M, Pays A, Lips S, Tebabi P, Pays E (1996) Characterization of a transcription terminator of the procyclin PARP A unit of Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Cell Biol 16: 914–924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Liniger M, Bodenmuller K, Pays E, Gallati S, Roditi I (2001) Overlapping sense and antisense transcription units in Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Microbiol 40: 869–878. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. König E, Delius H, Carrington M, Williams RO, Roditi I (1989) Duplication and transcription of procyclin genes in Trypanosoma brucei. Nucl Acids Res 17: 8727–8739. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Acosta-Serrano A, Cole RN, Mehlert A, Lee MG, Ferguson MA, et al. (1999) The procyclin repertoire of Trypanosoma brucei. Identification and structural characterization of the Glu-Pro-rich polypeptides. J Biol Chem 274: 29763–29771. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Liniger M, Urwyler S, Studer E, Oberle M, Renggli CK, et al. (2004) Role of the N-terminal domains of EP and GPEET procyclins in membrane targeting and the establishment of midgut infections by Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Biochem Parasitol 137: 247–251. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Jensen BC, Sivam D, Kifer CT, Myler PJ, Parsons M (2009) Widespread variation in transcript abundance within and across developmental stages of Trypanosoma brucei. BMC Genomics 10: 482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Panigrahi AK, Ogata Y, Zikova A, Anupama A, Dalley RA, et al. (2009) A comprehensive analysis of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial proteome. Proteomics 9: 434–450. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Acestor N, Panigrahi AK, Ogata Y, Anupama A, Stuart KD (2009) Protein composition of Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial membranes. Proteomics 9: 5497–5508. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Zíková A, Panigrahi AK, Dalley RA, Acestor N, Anupama A, et al. (2008) Trypanosoma brucei mitochondrial ribosomes: affinity purification and component identification by mass spectrometry. Mol Cell Proteomics 7: 1286–1296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Beck K, Acestor N, Schulfer A, Anupama A, Carnes J, et al. (2013) Trypanosoma brucei Tb927.2.6100 is an essential protein associated with kinetoplast DNA. Eukaryot Cell 12: 970–978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Lejon V, Claes F, Verloo D, Maina M, Urakawa T, et al. (2005) Recombinant RoTat 1.2 variable surface glycoprotein as antigen for diagnosis of Trypanosoma evansi in dromedary camels. Int J Parasitol 35: 455–460. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Roldan A, Comini MA, Crispo M, Krauth-Siegel RL (2011) Lipoamide dehydrogenase is essential for both bloodstream and procyclic Trypanosoma brucei. Mol Microbiol 81: 623–639. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Shiba T, Kido Y, Sakamoto K, Inaoka DK, Tsuge C, et al. (2013) Structure of the trypanosome cyanide-insensitive alternative oxidase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110: 4580–4585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Lai DH, Poropat E, Pravia C, Landoni M, Couto AS, et al. (2014) Solanesyl diphosphate synthase, an enzyme of the ubiquinone synthetic pathway, is required throughout the life cycle of Trypanosoma brucei. Eukaryot Cell 13: 320–328. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Stephens JL, Lee SH, Paul KS, Englund PT (2007) Mitochondrial fatty acid synthesis in Trypanosoma brucei. J Biol Chem 282: 4427–4436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Mazet M, Morand P, Biran M, Bouyssou G, Courtois P, et al. (2013) Revisiting the central metabolism of the bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei: production of acetate in the mitochondrion is essential for parasite viability. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 7: e2587. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Alfonzo JD, Lukeš J (2011) Assembling Fe/S-clusters and modifying tRNAs: ancient co-factors meet ancient adaptors. Trends Parasitol 27: 235–238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Pusnik M, Small I, Read LK, Fabbro T, Schneider A (2007) Pentatricopeptide Repeat Proteins in Trypanosoma brucei Function in Mitochondrial Ribosomes. Mol Cell Biol 27: 6876–6888. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Domingo GJ, Palazzo SS, Wang B, Panicucci B, Salavati R, et al. (2003) Dyskinetoplastic Trypanosoma brucei contain functional editing complexes. Eukaryot Cell 2: 569–577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Nolan DP, Voorheis HP (1992) The mitochondrion in bloodstream forms of Trypanosoma brucei is energized by the electrogenic pumping of protons catalysed by the F1F0-ATPase. Eur J Biochem 209: 207–216. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Vercesi AE, Docampo R, Moreno SNJ (1992) Energization-dependent Ca2+ accumulation in Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream and procyclic trypomastigotes mitochondria. Mol Biochem Parasitol 56: 251–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Surve S, Heestand M, Panicucci B, Schnaufer A, Parsons M (2012) Enigmatic presence of mitochondrial complex I in Trypanosoma brucei bloodstream forms. Eukaryot Cell 11: 183–193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Turner CM, Melville SE, Tait A (1997) A proposal for karyotype nomenclature in Trypanosoma brucei. Parasitol Today 13: 5–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. Wincker P, Ravel C, Blaineau C, Pages M, Jauffret Y, et al. (1996) The Leishmania genome comprises 36 chromosomes conserved across widely divergent human pathogenic species. Nucl Acids Res 24: 1688–1694. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Henriksson J, Porcel B, Rydaker M, Ruiz A, Sabaj V, et al. (1995) Chromosome specific markers reveal conserved linkage groups in spite of extensive chromosomal size variation in Trypanosoma cruzi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 73: 63–74. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Tran T, Claes F, Verloo D, De GH, Buscher P (2009) Towards a new reference test for surra in camels. Clin Vaccine Immunol 16: 999–1002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Li FJ, Lai DH, Lukeš J, Chen XG, Lun ZR (2006) Doubts about Trypanosoma equiperdum strains classed as Trypanosoma brucei or Trypanosoma evansi. Trends Parasitol 22: 55–56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Hoare, C A. (1972) The trypanosomes of mammals. A zoological monograph. Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Publications.
- 82. Claes F, Agbo EC, Radwanska M, Te Pas MF, Baltz T, et al. (2003) How does Trypanosoma equiperdum fit into the Trypanozoon group? A cluster analysis by RAPD and multiplex-endonuclease genotyping approach. Parasitol 126: 425–431. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Capewell P, Cooper A, Duffy CW, Tait A, Turner CM, et al. (2013) Human and animal Trypanosomes in Cote d'Ivoire form a single breeding population. PLoS ONE 8: e67852. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Gibson W (2007) Resolution of the species problem in African trypanosomes. Int J Parasitol 37: 829–838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Hey J (2001) The mind of the species problem. Trends Ecol Evol 16: 326–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Desquesnes M, Biteau-Coroller F, Bouyer J, Dia ML, Foil L (2009) Development of a mathematical model for mechanical transmission of trypanosomes and other pathogens of cattle transmitted by tabanids. Int J Parasitol 39: 333–346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. MacGregor P, Szoor B, Savill NJ, Matthews KR (2012) Trypanosomal immune evasion, chronicity and transmission: an elegant balancing act. Nat Rev Microbiol 10: 431–438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Mony BM, MacGregor P, Ivens A, Rojas F, Cowton A, et al. (2014) Genome-wide dissection of the quorum sensing signalling pathway in Trypanosoma brucei. Nature 505: 681–685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Alsford S, Turner DJ, Obado SO, Sanchez-Flores A, Glover L, et al. (2011) High-throughput phenotyping using parallel sequencing of RNA interference targets in the African trypanosome. Genome Res 21: 915–924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Borst P, Fase-Fowler F, Gibson WC (1987) Kinetoplast DNA of Trypanosoma evansi. Mol Biochem Parasitol 23: 31–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Njiru ZK, Constantine CC, Masiga DK, Reid SA, Thompson RC, et al. (2006) Characterization of Trypanosoma evansi type B. Infect Genet Evol. 6: 292–300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Bajyana Songa E, Hamers R (1988) A card agglutination test (CATT) for veterinary use based on an early VAT RoTat 1/2 of Trypanosoma evansi. Ann Soc Belg Med Trop 68: 233–240. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Claes F, Radwanska M, Urakawa T, Majiwa PA, Goddeeris B, et al. (2004) Variable Surface Glycoprotein RoTat 1.2 PCR as a specific diagnostic tool for the detection of Trypanosoma evansi infections. Kinetoplastid Biol Dis 3: 3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. Urakawa T, Verloo D, Moens L, Buscher P, Majiwa PA (2001) Trypanosoma evansi: cloning and expression in Spodoptera frugiperda [correction of fugiperda] insect cells of the diagnostic antigen RoTat1.2. Exp Parasitol 99: 181–189. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Verloo D, Holland W, My LN, Thanh NG, Tam PT, et al. (2000) Comparison of serological tests for Trypanosoma evansi natural infections in water buffaloes from north Vietnam. Vet Parasitol 92: 87–96. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Ngaira JM, Olembo NK, Njagi EN, Ngeranwa JJ (2005) The detection of non-RoTat 1.2 Trypanosoma evansi. Exp Parasitol 110: 30–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The authors confirm that all data underlying the findings are fully available without restriction. Entire genome and all the predicted genes are publicly available at TriTrypDB (http://tritrypdb.org/tritrypdb/). The fastq files containing the Illumina read data for T. evansi STIB805 is available at: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/ERA000101.