Abstract
Antimicrobial susceptibility to cefamandole versus cephalothin and cefazolin versus cephalothin was compared by the broth microdilution method against 3,000 and 5,895 clinical bacterial isolates, respectively. Cefamandole and, to a lesser degree, cefazolin showed greater activity than cephalothin against Enterobacteriaceae, but the three drugs were comparable against gram-positive cocci.
Full text
PDFSelected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
- Motley M., Shadomy S. In vitro studies with cefazolin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Dec;6(6):856–861. doi: 10.1128/aac.6.6.856. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Neu H. C. Cefamandole, a cephalosporin antibiotic with an unusually wide spectrum of activity. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Aug;6(2):177–182. doi: 10.1128/aac.6.2.177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Phair J. P., Carleton J., Tan J. S. Comparison of cefazolin, a new cephalosporin antibiotic, with cephalothin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Oct;2(4):329–330. doi: 10.1128/aac.2.4.329. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Reller L. B., Karney W. W., Beaty H. N., Holmes K. K., Turck M. Evaluation of cefazolin, a new cephalosporin antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Apr;3(4):488–497. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.4.488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ries K., Levison M. E., Kaye D. Clinical and in vitro evaluation of cefazolin, a new cephalosporin antibiotic. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1973 Feb;3(2):168–174. doi: 10.1128/aac.3.2.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sabath L. D., Wilcox C., Garner C., Finland M. In vitro activity of cefazolin against recent clinical bacterial isolates. J Infect Dis. 1973 Oct;128(Suppl):S320–S326. doi: 10.1093/infdis/128.supplement_2.s320. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wick W. E., Preston D. A. Biological properties of three 3-heterocyclic-thiomethyl cephalosporin antibiotics. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1972 Mar;1(3):221–234. doi: 10.1128/aac.1.3.221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]