Abstract
The mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) is characterized by the presence of the T-E-Y, T-D-Y, and T-G-Y motifs in its activation loop region and plays a significant role in regulating diverse cellular responses in eukaryotic organisms. Availability of large-scale genome data in the fungal kingdom encouraged us to identify and analyse the fungal MAPK gene family consisting of 173 fungal species. The analysis of the MAPK gene family resulted in the discovery of several novel activation loop motifs (T-T-Y, T-I-Y, T-N-Y, T-H-Y, T-S-Y, K-G-Y, T-Q-Y, S-E-Y and S-D-Y) in fungal MAPKs. The phylogenetic analysis suggests that fungal MAPKs are non-polymorphic, had evolved from their common ancestors around 1500 million years ago, and are distantly related to plant MAPKs. We are the first to report the presence of nine novel activation loop motifs in fungal MAPKs. The specificity of the activation loop motif plays a significant role in controlling different growth and stress related pathways in fungi. Hence, the presences of these nine novel activation loop motifs in fungi are of special interest.
Introduction
Among the several signal transduction pathways present in an eukaryotic system, the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway is one of the most important signaling pathways [1–4]. It is considered as one of the evolutionary conserved signal transduction pathways that transduces an extracellular signal to the nucleus and maintains proper adjustment of cellular responses [2]. The signaling pathways consist of myriads of cascades that are induced in response to environmental cues. A recent development in the study of MAPK shows that, this pathway is involved in diverse cellular responses [5–7]. The MAPK cascade consists of a three-kinase signaling module; MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAP3Ks), MAP kinase kinase (MAP2Ks), and MAP kinases (MAPKs) [1,2,8] which are connected to each other by a process of sequential phosphorylation events [1,5]. Upon extra-cellular responses, the signalling molecules activate upstream MAP kinase kinase kinase kinase (MAP4Ks) or MAP kinase kinase kinase (MAP3Ks) making them as adaptor-signaling molecules [8] which phosphorylates downstream MAP2Ks at S/T-X3-5-S/T motif of the activation loop region [9]. Subsequently, MAP2Ks phosphorylates MAPKs at conserved T-x-Y (T-E-Y/T-D-Y) motifs in the activation loop region [1,10]. Upon activation, the MAPKs are able to phosphorylate a large number of downstream targets, including other kinases and transcription factors that regulate growth, development and stress responses. The MAPK pathway module present in fungi is activated by a member of the p21-activated protein kinase (PAK) that activates Ste20. Protein p21 is a monomeric Ras-related GTPase Cdc42 that activates Ste20 [11]. Upon activation by Cdc42, Ste20 modulates phosphorylation of Ste11 [11]. The Ste20 acts as an upstream MAPKKK kinase in MAPK module [12]. Later Ste20 phosphorylates downstream protein Ste7 (MAPKK) and Fus3 (MAPK). A scaffold protein Ste5, binds all three kinase module cascade together [11,12].
The MAPKs contain characteristic T-E-Y/T-D-Y/T-P-Y and the T-G-Y motif in the activation loop region [4,13–16]. Reports suggest that, activation loop motif T-E-Y and T-D-Y are common to plants and animals, whereas presence of T-E-Y, and T-G-Y motifs are unique to animals and fungi only [13]. The MAPK motif specificity in fungi plays distinct roles in maintaining different pathways. The Fus3 (T-E-Y) mediates cellular response to peptide pheromone, Kss1 (T-E-Y) helps in adjustment to nutrient limiting conditions, and Hog1 (T-G-Y) controls hyperosmotic condition in fungi [11]. The phosphorylation at both threonine and tyrosine residues in the T-x-Y motif of MAPK is important for locking the kinase domain in a catalytic competent conformation. The phosphorylation of tyrosine is usually followed by phosphorylation of threonine, although phosphorylation of any one of the two residues can occur in the absence of the other [17]. This sequential activation of the MAPK cascade controls different aspects of cellular activities and regulates proper growth and development of the organisms [18,19]. The fungi are very important microorganisms with a diverse genomic organization [20]. The MAPK gene family plays significant roles in fungal growth, development as well as different signaling and stress responses [20]. The MAPK research in fungal biology is in its infantile stage and required in-depth investigations. Therefore, to know more detail about fungal MAPKs, we conducted genome-wide identification of the MAPK gene family of 173 fungal species, and analysed their diversity and evolutionary aspects.
Materials and Methods
Identification of fungal MAPKs
To identify the MAPK sequences of fungal species, the MAPK protein sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae [P16892 (Fus3), P14681 (Kss1), P32485 (Hog1), P41808 (Smk1), and Q00772 (Slt2)], Oryza sativa [LOC_Os03g17700 (OsMPK3), LOC_Os10g38950 (OsMPK4-1), LOC_Os05g05160 (OsMPK4-2), LOC_Os06g06090 (OsMPK6), LOC_Os06g48590 (OsMPK7), LOC_Os02g05480 (OsMPK14), LOC_Os11g17080 (OsMPK16-1), LOC_Os08g06060 (OsMPK16-2), LOC_Os06g49430 (OsMPK17-1), LOC_Os02g04230 (OsMPK17-2), LOC_Os01g43910 (OsMPK20-1), LOC_Os05g50560 (OsMPK20-2), LOC_Os06g26340 (OsMPK20-3), LOC_Os01g47530 (OsMPK20-4), LOC_Os05g49140 (OsMPK20-5), LOC_Os05g50120 (OsMPK21-1), and LOC_Os01g45620 (OsMPK21-2)] and Arabidopsis thaliana [At1g10210 (AtMPK1), At1g59580 (AtMPK2), At3g45640 (AtMPK3), At4g01370 (AtMPK4), At4g11330 (AtMPK5), At2g43790 (AtMPK6), At2g18170 (AtMPK7), At1g18150 (AtMPK8), At3g18040 (AtMPK9), At3g59790 (AtMPK10), At1g01560 (AtMPK11), At2g46070 (AtMPK12), At1g07880 (AtMPK13), At4g36450 (AtMPK14), At1g73670 (AtMPK15), At5g19010 (AtMPK16), At2g01450 (AtMPK17), At1g53510 (AtMPK18), At3g14720 (AtMPK19), and At2g42880 (AtMPK20)] were used as the search query. The MAPK sequences of Saccharomyces cerevisiae were downloaded from Uniprot (http://www.uniprot.org/) database. The MAPK sequences of O. sativa and A. thaliana were downloaded from “Rice Genome Annotation Project (http://rice.plantbiology.msu.edu/)” and “The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) (http://www.arabidopsis.org/),” respectively [21,22]. The MAPK sequences from all the studied fungal species were downloaded from the Mycocosm database [23,24]. The MAPK sequences of plants were included in this study to broaden the diversity of search of fungal MAPK. Fungi has closer evolutionary role with plants which helped the photosynthetic plant lineage to acquire the land habitat. Therefore, their inclusion in this study was important. In total, 173 fungal species were taken during this study, and the names of all these species are listed in Table 1. The BLASTP program was used to identify the MAPK sequences of fungal species. Different statistical parameters used during BLASTP searches were: E- value: 1.0E-5, and scoring matrix: BLOSUM62. All the identified sequences were subjected to scanprosite software in FASTA format to check for the presence of serine/threonine protein kinase domain and activation loop motifs within it using the default parameters [25]. Scanprosite analysis of sequences which gave hit to prosite accession of serine/threonine protein kinase or mitogen activated protein kinase such as PS01351, PS00107, PS00108, PS50011 were considered as positive prediction for MAP kinase. The details of all the fungal MAPKs and their JGI accessions are provided in S1 appendix. The resulting protein sequences were again subjected to a BLASTP search against the TAIR and rice genome annotation database using default BLASTP parameters. The sequences that resulted in MAPK hits in the TAIR and rice genome annotation databases were considered as the fungal MAPK sequences.
Table 1. MAPK gene family of fungi.
Sl. No | Name of Fungal Species | Division | No. of Identified MAPKs | Activation Loop Motifs |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Acidomyces richmondensis | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
2 | Acremonium alcalophilum | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
3 | Amorphotheca resinae | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY, TGY |
4 | Anthostoma avocetta | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
5 | Apiospora montagnei | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
6 | Aplosporella prunicola | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
7 | Ascobolus immerses | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
8 | Ascoidea rubescens | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TNY |
9 | Aspergillus acidus | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
10 | Aspergillus niger | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
11 | Aulographum hederae | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
12 | Aureobasidium pullulans | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
13 | Babjeviella inositovora | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY, TNY |
14 | Baudoinia compniacensis | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
15 | Candida caseinolytica | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY, TGY |
16 | Cenococcum geophilum | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
17 | Cercospora zeae-maydis | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
18 | Chalara longipes | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
19 | Choiromyces venosus | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
20 | Cochliobolus sativus | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
21 | Cryphonectria parasitica | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
22 | Cucurbitaria berberidis | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
23 | Cyberlindnera jadinii | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY, TNY |
24 | Daldinia eschscholzii | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
25 | Dekkera bruxellensis | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY, THY |
26 | Didymella exigua | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
27 | Dissoconium aciculare | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
28 | Dothidotthia symphoricarpi | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
29 | Eurotium rubrum | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
30 | Glomerella acutata | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY |
31 | Glomerella cingulata | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
32 | Gymnascella aurantiaca | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
33 | Gymnascella citrina | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
34 | Hanseniaspora valbyensis | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY, TSY |
35 | Hansenula polymorpha | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TNY |
36 | Hyphopichia burtonii | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY, TNY |
37 | Hypoxylon sp. | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
38 | Lipomyces starkeyi | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
39 | Lophiostoma macrostomum | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
40 | Melanconium sp. | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
41 | Melanomma pulvis-pyrius | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY |
42 | Metschnikowia bicuspidata | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY, TNY |
43 | Monascus purpureus | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
44 | Monascus ruber | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
45 | Myceliophthora thermophila | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY, TGY |
46 | Mycosphaerella graminicola | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY, TGY |
47 | Myriangium duriaei | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
48 | Nadsonia fulvescens | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY, THY |
49 | Neurospora discreta | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY |
50 | Neurospora tetrasperma | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
51 | Oidiodendron maius | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
52 | Pachysolen tannophilus | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY, TNY |
53 | Patellaria atrata | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
54 | Penicillium brevicompactum | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
55 | Penicillium canescens | Ascomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
56 | Penicillium janthinellum | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
57 | Penicillium raistrickii | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
58 | Pichia stipitis | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY, TNY |
59 | Piedraia hortae | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
60 | Pleomassaria siparia | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
61 | Polychaeton citri | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
62 | Saccharata proteae | Ascomycota | 2 | TEY, TGY |
63 | Saccharomyces cerevisiae | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY, TNY, KGY |
64 | Saitoella complicata | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
65 | Septoria musiva | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY, TGY |
66 | Sodiomyces alkalinus | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
67 | Spathaspora passalidarum | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
68 | Sporormia fimetaria | Ascomycota | 9 | TEY, TGY |
69 | Talaromyces aculeatus | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
70 | Terfezia boudieri | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
71 | Thermoascus aurantiacus | Ascomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
72 | Thielavia appendiculata | Ascomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
73 | Thielavia arenaria | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
74 | Thielavia hyrcaniae | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
75 | Trichoderma citrinoviride | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY, TGY |
76 | Trypethelium eluteriae | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
77 | Wickerhamomyces anomalus | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY, TNY |
78 | Wilcoxina mikolae | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
79 | Xanthoria parietina | Ascomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY, TNY, KGY |
80 | Xylona heveae | Ascomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
81 | Zasmidium cellare | Ascomycota | 3 | TEY, TGY |
82 | Zopfia rhizophila | Ascomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
83 | Agaricus bisporus | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY |
84 | Amanita muscaria | Basidiomycota | 15 | TEY, TGY |
85 | Antrodia sinuosa | Basidiomycota | 14 | TEY |
86 | Atractiellales sp. | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
87 | Auricularia subglabra | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
88 | Bjerkandera adusta | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY, TGY |
89 | Boletus edulis | Basidiomycota | 13 | TEY, TGY |
90 | Botryobasidium botryosum | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
91 | Calocera cornea | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
92 | Calocera viscose | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY, TGY |
93 | Coniophora puteana | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
94 | Coprinopsis cinerea | Basidiomycota | 12 | TEY, TGY |
95 | Cortinarius glaucopus | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY |
96 | Cronartium quercuum | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
97 | Cryptococcus vishniacii | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
98 | Cylindrobasidium torrendii | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
99 | Dacryopinax sp. | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
100 | Daedalea quercina | Basidiomycota | 15 | TEY |
101 | Dendrothele bispora | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY |
102 | Dichomitus squalens | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY |
103 | Dioszegia cryoxerica | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
104 | Exidia glandulosa | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY |
105 | Exobasidium vaccinii | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
106 | Fibulorhizoctonia sp. | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
107 | Fomitiporia mediterranea | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
108 | Fomitopsis pinicola | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
109 | Galerina marginata | Basidiomycota | 5 | TEY |
110 | Ganoderma sp. | Basidiomycota | 5 | TEY |
111 | Gloeophyllum trabeum | Basidiomycota | 11 | TEY |
112 | Gyrodon lividus | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY |
113 | Hebeloma cylindrosporum | Basidiomycota | 13 | TEY, TGY |
114 | Heterobasidion annosum | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY |
115 | Hydnomerulius pinastri | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY |
116 | Hypholoma sublateritium | Basidiomycota | 11 | TEY, TGY |
117 | Jaapia argillacea | Basidiomycota | 11 | TEY, TGY |
118 | Laccaria amethystina | Basidiomycota | 20 | TEY, TGY |
119 | Laccaria bicolour | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
120 | Laetiporus sulphureus | Basidiomycota | 12 | TEY, TGY |
121 | Lentinus tigrinus | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY |
122 | Leucogyrophana mollusca | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY |
123 | Macrolepiota fuliginosa | Basidiomycota | 14 | TEY, TGY |
124 | Melampsora laricis-populina | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
125 | Meliniomyces bicolour | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY, SDY |
126 | Mixia osmundae | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
127 | Neolentinus lepideus | Basidiomycota | 13 | TEY |
128 | Paxillus rubicundulus | Basidiomycota | 18 | TEY, TGY |
129 | Phlebia brevispora | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
130 | Phlebiopsis gigantean | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
131 | Piloderma croceum | Basidiomycota | 11 | TEY, TGY |
132 | Pisolithus microcarpus | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
133 | Pleurotus ostreatus | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
134 | Polyporus arcularius | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY |
135 | Punctularia strigosozonata | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
136 | Pycnoporus sanguineus | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY, TGY |
137 | Ramaria rubella | Basidiomycota | 11 | TEY |
138 | Rhodotorula graminis | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
139 | Rickenella mellea | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY |
140 | Schizophyllum commune Loenen | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY |
141 | Schizophyllum commune Tattone | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY |
142 | Schizopora paradoxa | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
143 | Scleroderma citrinum | Basidiomycota | 11 | TEY, TGY |
144 | Sebacina vermifera | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
145 | Serpula lacrymans | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
146 | Sistotrema brinkmannii | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY, TGY |
147 | Sistotremastrum niveocremeum | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
148 | Sporobolomyces roseus | Basidiomycota | 5 | TEY, TGY |
149 | Stereum hirsutum | Basidiomycota | 7 | TEY, TGY |
150 | Suillus brevipes | Basidiomycota | 9 | TEY |
151 | Trametes versicolor | Basidiomycota | 4 | TEY |
152 | Trichaptum abietinum | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
153 | Tulasnella calospora | Basidiomycota | 10 | TEY, TGY |
154 | Wallemia sebi | Basidiomycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
155 | Wolfiporia cocos | Basidiomycota | 8 | TEY, TGY |
156 | Catenaria anguillulae | Blastocladiomycota | 4 | TEY, TGY |
157 | Conidiobolus coronatus | Entomophthoromycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
158 | Rhizophagus irregularis | Glomeromycota | 6 | TEY, TGY |
159 | Coemansia reversa | Kickellomycotina | 4 | TEY, TGY |
160 | Gonapodya prolifera | Monoblepharidomycetes | 8 | TEY, TGY |
161 | Backusella circina | Mucoromycotina | 5 | TEY, TGY |
162 | Lichtheimia hyalospora | Mucoromycotina | 9 | TEY, TGY, THY |
163 | Mortierella elongate | Mucoromycotina | 5 | TEY, TGY |
164 | Mucor circinelloides | Mucoromycotina | 8 | TEY, TGY, THY |
165 | Phycomyces blakesleeanus | Mucoromycotina | 6 | TEY, TGY, THY |
166 | Rhizopus microsporus | Mucoromycotina | 8 | TEY, TGY, THY |
167 | Umbelopsis ramanniana | Mucoromycotina | 5 | TEY, TGY, TQY |
168 | Piromyces sp. | Neocallimastigomycota | 2 | TEY |
169 | Phytophthora capsici | Oomycota | 12 | TEY, TGY |
170 | Phytophthora cinnamomi | Oomycota | 6 | TEY |
171 | Phytophthora sojae | Oomycota | 8 | TEY |
172 | Aplanochytrium kerguelense | Stramenopiles | 4 | TEY, TTY |
173 | Aurantiochytrium limacinum | Stramenopiles | 7 | TEY, TIY, SEY |
Nomenclature of fungal MAPKs
Nomenclature of a gene is very important to know its exact identity. But, it was a very difficult task to name all the identified fungal MAPKs. Therefore we named the fungal MAPKs which contained only novel activation loop motif. Name was provided by taking first letter of genus name in upper case and first letter of specie name in lower case followed by MPK. Functional characterizations of all the novel activation loop motifs are yet to be done; therefore the naming of fungal MAPKs which contains novel activation loop motifs were not done according to gene HOG, SLT2, KSS1, FUS3 and SMK1 as found in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
Molecular modeling of fungal MAPKs
During the identification of fungal MAPKs, we identified several MAPKs that contains novel activation loop motif. Therefore, representative molecular structures for all the MAPKs were modelled which contained the novel activation loop motif. The fungal MAPK sequences that contained novel activation loop motif was used to build the molecular structure with the help of Swiss-model workspace [26]. After building the models, the models were analysed for the presence of novel motifs using Pymol software.
Multiple sequence alignment
Multiple sequence alignments of all the identified MAPKs of fungi were conducted using Multalin software (http://multalin.toulouse.inra.fr/multalin/) [S1 Fig]. Owing to large data files of multiple sequence alignments, it was difficult to incorporate them all in the manuscript for a conceptual figure. Therefore, we again conducted another multiple sequence alignment of few selected fungal MAPK sequences those that contained the novel activation loop motif. Different statistical parameters used to run the Multalin program were as follows. Protein weight matrix: Blosum62-12-12; gap penalty at the opening: default; gap penalty at extension: default; gap penalty at the extremities: none; one iteration only: no; high consensus level: 90%; and low consensus level: 50%.
Phylogenetic analysis
Different phylogenetic trees were constructed to infer the phylogenetic relationship of fungal MAPKs. In the first case, all the MAPK sequences of the fungal species were taken to construct a phylogenetic tree. In the second case, a phylogenetic tree was constructed by taking fungal MAPK sequences that contained only novel activation loop motifs and AtMPK4, AtMPK16, OsMPK6, and OsMPK14 from A. thaliana and O. sativa as the representative of the T-E-Y and T-D-Y motifs. In the third case, a phylogenetic tree was constructed using all representative MAPKs of A. thaliana, and O. sativa with the fungal MAPKs that contained the novel activation loop motifs. In all the three cases, first of all, a clustal file was generated using clustalw or clustal omega program using the default parameters [27,28]. The resulting clustal files were downloaded and converted to MEGA file format using MEGA5 software [29]. Resulting MEGA files of MAPKs were subjected to construct the phylogenetic tree. Different statistical parameters used to construct the phylogenetic trees were as follows. Analysis: phylogeny reconstruction; scope: all selected taxa; statistical parameters: maximum likelihood; test of phylogeny: bootstrap method; number of bootstrap replications: 1000; substitution type: amino acids; model/methods: Jones-Taylor-Thornton (JTT); rates among sites: uniform rates; pattern among lineage: homogenous; gaps/missing data treatment: pair wise deletion/use all sites; and swap filter: very strong.
Statistical analysis
Tajima’s neutrality test and Tajima’s relative rate test were conducted in order to understand the statistical significance and the rate of evolution of fungal MAPKs [30]. Different statistical parameters used for Tajima’s neutrality test were; analysis, Tajima’s test of neutrality; scope, all selected taxas; substitution type, amino acids; gaps/missing data treatment, pairwise deletion and different statistical parameters that were used to carry out Tajima’s relative rate tests were; analysis, Tajima’s relative rate test; scope, for three chosen sequences; substitution type, amino acids; and gaps/missing data treatment, complete deletion.
Gene duplication analysis
The duplication event of all the Saccharomyces cerevisiae MAPKs were studied using Notung 2.6 software [31,32]. Due to lack of species tree of 173 species, study of gene duplication/loss of all the fungal MAPKs was not feasible. Therefore, we conducted the duplication analysis of fungal MAPKs that contained the novel activation loop motifs, by using the online server Pinda (http://orion.mbg.duth.gr/Pinda) [33]. The fungal MAPKs sequences that resulted in z-score below four were considered as non-duplicated while those resulted in a z-score above four were considered to be duplicated MAPKs [33].
Results
Identification of novel activation loop motifs
Commonly, the fungal MAPKs contain either a T-E-Y or a T-G-Y motif in the activation loop region [19, 20]. Besides the presence of the activation loop T-E-Y or T-G-Y motif in fungal MAPKs, they were also found to contain several new activation loop motifs (Tables 1 and 2). These newly identified activation loop motifs of fungal MAPKs are T-T-Y, T-I-Y, T-N-Y, T-H-Y, T-S-Y, K-G-Y, T-Q-Y, S-E-Y and S-D-Y (Fig 1) which were never reported before. The newly identified activation loop motifs found among different species are; T-T-Y (Aplanochytrium kerguelense), T-I-Y (Aurantiochytrium limacinum), T-N-Y (Ascoidea rubescens, Babjeviella inositovora, Cyberlindnera jadinii, Hansenula polymorpha, Hyphopichia burtonii, Metschnikowia bicuspidata, Pachysolen tannophilus, Pichia stipitis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Wickerhamomyces anomalus, Xanthoria parietina), T-H-Y (Dekkera bruxellensis, Lichtheimia hyalospora, Mucor circinelloides, Nadsonia fulvescens, Phycomyces blakesleeanus, Rhizopus microsporus), T-S-Y (Hanseniaspora valbyensis), K-G-Y (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Xanthoria parietina), T-Q-Y (Umbelopsis ramanniana), S-E-Y (Aurantiochytrium limacinum), and S-D-Y (Meliniomyces bicolor). The novel activation loop motif T-N-Y, K-G-Y, and T-S-Y is only present in the species belonged to the Ascomycota group while the novel activation loop motif T-Q-Y was only found in the Mucoromycotina group. The novel activation loop motif T-H-Y is present in the Ascomycota and Mucoromycotina and absent in all other groups (Table 1). The novel activation loop motif S-D-Y is only present in Basidiomycota group. Earlier, it was thought that the “x” in T-x-Y motif is restricted to G (glycine), P (proline), D (aspartate), and E (glutamate) which are belonged to polar, non-polar and negatively charged amino acids respectively. In our study we found that, the “x” amino acid in T-x-Y motif is very dynamic and can be either polar (T-T-Y), non-polar (T-I-Y), positively charged (T-H-Y) and negatively charged (T-E-Y/T-D-Y) amino acid. From the studied 82 species of Ascomycota group, 66 species have MAPKs that contains only two types of motifs i.e. T-E-Y and T-G-Y while seven species (Babjeviella inositovora, Cyberlindnera jadinii, Hyphopichia burtonii, Metschnikowia bicuspidate, Pachysolen tannophilus, Pichia stipitis, and Wickerhamomyces anomalus) have MAPKs contains three types of motifs i.e. T-E-Y, T-G-Y and T-N-Y. Along with T-E-Y, T-G-Y, and T-N-Y motifs, K-G-Y motif is present in MAPKs of only two species (Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and Xanthoria parietina). MAPKs of only one species (Hanseniaspora valbyensis) encodes T-E-Y, T-G-Y and T-S-Y motifs while another two species (Ascoidea rubescens, Hansenula polymorpha) encodes T-E-Y and T-N-Y motif. The activation loop motif T-E-Y, T-G-Y and T-H-Y is encoded by only two species (Dekkera bruxellensis, Nadsonia fulvescens). The fungal species Glomerella acutata, Melanomma pulvis-pyrius, and Neurospora discrete encodes only T-E-Y motif. Unlike Ascomycota species, from a total of 73 species studied from Basidiomycota group, 23 species encodes only T-E-Y motif in their MAPKs and 49 species encodes T-E-Y and T-G-Y motifs (Table 1). Only one species (Meliniomyces bicolour) of Basidiomycota group contains T-E-Y, T-G-Y, and S-D-Y motifs. From the studied 7 species of Mucoromycotina, four species encodes T-E-Y, T-G-Y, T-H-Y motifs, two species encodes T-E-Y and T-G-Y motifs while only one species encodes T-E-Y, T-G-Y, and T-Q-Y motifs. The presence of T-Q-Y motif is unique to Mucoromycotina only. From this analysis, it is clear that, the variability’s of activation loop motifs are much more in Ascomycota and Mucoromycotina.
Table 2. Distribution of the different MAPK activation loop motifs in different groups of fungal MAPKs.
Fungal MAPK Groups | Activation loop motifs |
---|---|
Group A (red) | TEY, TGY, TNY, KGY, THY, TSY |
Group B (lime) | TEY, TGY, TQY, THY, |
Group C (magenta) | TEY, TGY, TNY, KGY |
Group D (blue) | TEY, TGY, TIY, TTY, SEY, SDY |
The numbers of MAPK gene members in fungi are diverse and varies from species to species (Table 1). The species Laccaria amethystine encodes for a maximum of 20 MAPKs in its genome. From the studied 173 species, 31 species encode for 10 or more than 10 MAPKs in their genome (Table 1). A majority of the fungal species putatively encodes six (40 species), seven (23 species) or eight (20 species) MAPKs in their genomes (Table 1). From 73 species of Basidiomycota, 29 species encodes 10 or more than 10 MAPKs in their genome. Similarly, from 82 species of Ascomycota, only one species (Thielavia appendiculata) encodes 10 MAPKs in its genome. The MAPK gene family size of Basidiomycota is bigger than Ascomycota.
Conserved domains and motifs of MAPKs
In the multiple sequence alignment studies, we found that, the newly identified T-T-Y, T-I-Y, T-N-Y, T-H-Y, T-S-Y, K-G-Y, T-Q-Y, S-E-Y and S-D-Y activation loop motifs of MAPKs are aligned with the commonly found T-E-Y and T-D-Y motifs of A. thaliana, and O. sativa (Fig 2). This reflects that the newly identified activation loop motifs are true activation loop motifs of fungal MAPKs. Besides the presence of a conserved activation loop motif, fungal MAPKs also show the presence of N-terminal-and C-terminal-conserved domains. The N-terminal conserved domain of MAPK is H-R-D-L-K-P-N whereas the C-terminal conserved domain is T-R-W-Y-R-A-P [Fig 2, S1 Fig]. The N-terminal-conserved domain is present before the activation loop motif, and the C-terminal-conserved domain is present after the activation loop motif. The ScMPK-A (S. cerevisiae-A, JGI sequence ID: 151941649 (M3837 strain) and XpMPK (X. parietina-A, JGI sequence ID: 767958) contains lysine amino acid in K-G-Y motif instead of the threonine amino acid. This shows that, threonine amino acid is replaced by lysine amino acid in the activation loop motif. Lysine amino acid is a positively charged amino acid and a suitable target phosphorylation site of different kinases [34–38]. Presence of lysine amino acid in the activation loop motif in MAPK shows the activation loop motifs are expanding to increase their diversity to get phosphorylated by diverse kinases.
Phylogeny
The grouping and classification of different genes in a gene family is very important in order to understand the functional aspects of a gene family. So, grouping of fungal MAPKs was conducted by constructing a phylogenetic tree. The phylogenetic analysis shows that fungal MAPKs are grouped into four major groups and two minor groups. The major groups are named as group A (red), B (lime), C (magenta), and D (deep blue) (Fig 3). The minor groups are named as group E (black) and F (light blue). Group E is present in between groups A and B, and group F is present in between groups B and C. The phylogenetic tree shows that, the fungal MAPK groups are originated polyphyletically. This could have happened due to the fact that the study was conducted with 173 species, which included diverse species, including slime molds. Slime molds are not considered as true fungi, and hence, their common ancestor could be different from other fungi. The classification of the fungi kingdom is changing very rapidly and is yet to acquire a specified classification. Therefore, this may be the reason for the presence of polyphyletic groups in fungal MAPKs.
During the study, we found several fungal MAPKs that contain the novel activation loop motifs. Therefore, it was very important to understand their grouping system and phylogenetic relationship with other common activation loop motifs (T-E-Y and T-D-Y) as well to understand their evolution and subsequent divergence. Therefore, we constructed a phylogenetic tree by including fungal MAPKs with novel activation loop motifs (K-G-Y, T-Q-Y, S-D-Y, T-S-Y, T-T-Y, T-I-Y, S-E-Y, T-H-Y, and T-N-Y), and plant MAPK with common activation loop motifs T-E-Y and T-D-Y. Plant MAPKs were taken from A. thaliana (AtMPK4, AtMPK16) and O. sativa (OsMPK6, OsMPK14). The phylogenetic tree resulted in four distinct groups (Fig 4, Table 2). We named them as groups A (red), B (lime), C (magenta), and D (blue). The activation loop motifs T-E-Y, T-G-Y, T-N-Y, K-G-Y, T-H-Y, and T-S-Y, were found to be present in group A; T-E-Y, T-G-Y, T-Q-Y, and T-H-Y in group B; T-E-Y, T-G-Y, T-N-Y, and K-G-Y in group C; and T-E-Y,T-G-Y,T-I-Y, T-T-Y, S-E-Y, T-D-Y and S-D-Y in group D (Table 2). The fungi and plants have close evolutionary relationship. During evolution, fungi have helped the photosynthetic plant lineage to move to terrestrial ecosystem to green the earth in the early Palaeozoic era and played a significant role in assisting colonization of terrestrial environments [39]. Besides, the mutualistic relationships of fungi are much closer to the plants [39]. Therefore, we used the MAPK sequences of plant lineage to construct the phylogenetic tree to understand their evolutionary linkage. Later, we constructed another phylogenetic tree by taking all the representative MAPKs of A. thaliana and O. sativa to understand the evolutionary relationship of fungal MAPKs that contain the novel activation loop motifs. The phylogenetic tree resulted into four groups (Fig 5). From the resulting four groups, two groups were shared by fungal MAPKs (magenta and blue), and the other two groups were shared by plant MAPKs (red and lime). Phylogenetic result shows, fungal MAPKs are evolutionarily older than plant MAPKs and are derived from their common ancestors during the process of evolution.
Statistical analysis
Tajima’s relative rate test explains the test of the molecular evolutionary hypothesis (i.e. a constant rate of molecular evolution) between two samples using an out-group. It applied to nucleotide and protein sequences. Therefore, we conducted Tajima’s relative rate test of fungal MAPKs that contained novel activation loop motif combining with AtMAPKs and OsMAPKs that contained common activation loop motifs. During the analysis, sequences A (OsMPK6) and B (ScMPK-A), with sequence C (CjMPK) were used as random selection by the MEGA program. Results of the analysis show a p-value of 0.01004 (p = 0.01004), and X2 value of 6.63 (X2 = 6.63) (Table 3). Tajima’s relative rate test with fungal MAPKs that contained a representative of a novel activation loop motif combined with the representative AtMAPKs and OsMAPKs, resulted in a p value of 0.0522 (p = 0.0522), and X2 test result of 3.77 (X2 = 3.77) (Table 3). The sequences A (DeMPK) and B (AtMPK1), with sequence C (CjMPK) were used during this analysis. When all the MAPKs that contained the novel activation loop motifs were analysed for Tajima’s relative rate test, the resulting p- value was 0.0000 (p = 0.0000), and X2 value was 97.92 (X2 = 97.92) (Table 3). The sequences A (JGI sequence ID: 687684) and B (JGI sequence ID: 91669), with sequence C (JGI sequence ID: 5240) were used during this analysis as random selections by MEGA software. The p value less than 0.05 is often used to reject the null hypothesis of equal rates between the lineages (p ≤ 0.01: very strong presumption against the null hypothesis, 0.01< p ≤ 0.05: strong presumption against the null hypothesis, 0.05 < p ≤ 0.1 low presumption against the null hypothesis).
Table 3. Tajima’s relative rate test.
Configuration | Fungal MAPKs having novel activation loop motifs with few AtMAPKs and OsMAPKs | Fungal MAPKs having novel activation loop motifs with all AtMAPKs and OsMAPKs | All Fungal MAPKs of that contain novel activation loop motif |
---|---|---|---|
Identical sites in all three sequences | 130 | 117 | 193 |
Divergent sites in all three sequences | 83 | 93 | 4 |
Unique differences in Sequence A | 64 | 52 | 137 |
Unique differences in Sequence B | 38 | 34 | 15 |
Unique differences in Sequence C | 20 | 38 | 1 |
P-value | 0.01004 | 0.0522 | 0.0000 |
X2 test | 6.63 | 3.77 | 97.92 |
Degree of freedom | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Tajima’s neutrality test distinguishes between the DNA sequences that evolve randomly (neutrally), and one evolving under a non-random process like a balancing selection. This explains the evolution of a particular gene, or group of genes or a genome, and explains whether they evolved neutrally, or by directional selection, or by balancing selection. Therefore, we conducted Tajima’s neutrality test of fungal MAPKs. When fungal MAPKs that contained novel activation loop motifs were analysed in combination with a few AtMAPKs and OsMAPKs (two AtMPKs and two OsMAPKs) as the representative of T-E-Y and T-D-Y motif, the Tajima’s D test result was 5.189926 (Table 4). When fungal MAPKs that contained novel activation loop motifs were analysed in combination with all AtMAPKs and OsMAPKs of A. thaliana and O. sativa, the Tajima’s D result was 5.233833 (Table 4). When all the fungal MAPKs of 173 species were analysed for Tajima’s neutrality test, the resulting D value was -3.500934. When fungal MAPKs that contained only novel activation loop motifs were analysed, the resulting D value was 4.7514 (D = 4.751476). As per thumb rule presumption, D value greater than +2 (plus two) or less than -2 (minus two) is considered as highly significant. Therefore, all the results of Tajima’s neutrality test were significant.
Table 4. Tajima’s test for neutrality.
Category | m | S | ps | Θ | π | D |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
All fungal MAPKs | 1226 | 130 | 0.992366 | 0.129075 | 0.290760 | 3.500934 |
Only novel activation loop motif fungal MAPKs | 24 | 265 | 0.880399 | 0.235761 | 0.514011 | 4.751476 |
Novel motif with two MAPKs of rice and Arabidopsis | 30 | 280 | 0.906149 | 0.228730 | 0.534338 | 5.189926 |
Novel activation loop motif fungal MAPKs with all AtMAPKs and OsMAPKs | 63 | 290 | 0.929487 | 0.197243 | 0.489426 | 5.233833 |
Gene duplication analysis
Gene duplication is a major mechanism which helps in generating new genetic material during molecular evolution, and this creates the genetic novelty. To understand this phenomena, we analysed the duplication event of the model fungi S. cerevisiae. From the six MAPKs of S. cerevisiae, five were found to be duplicated and no MAPK was found to be lost during the evolution (Fig 6). Due to certain limitation and lack of species tree of all the studied (173) fungal species, it was difficult to study the duplication event of all the fungal MAPKs, and hence we restricted out study to S. cerevisiae only. Still, it was very peculiar to understand the duplication event of the MAPKs that contained the novel activation loop motif. Therefore, we studied the duplication event of MAPKs that contained the novel activation loop by using Pinda server. We found that the MAPKs that contain the most common activation loop motifs T-E-Y, T-G-Y, K-G-Y, T-Q-Y, S-D-Y, and T-S-Y are highly duplicated and contain a z-score of more than four (Table 5). This shows that the most common form of activation loop motif MAPKs is highly duplicated. This result is due to presence of large numbers of evolutionarily conserved orthologous genes (Fig 6). From, six MAPKs of S. cerevisiae, five were found to be orthologous gene and only one (Smk1) was found to be paralogous (Fig 6). The MAPKs that contain the activation loop motifs T-T-Y, T-I-Y, S-E-Y, T-H-Y and T-N-Y show a z-score of less than four and are found to be non-duplicated.
Table 5. Duplication analysis of novel activation loop motif of fungal MAPKs.
MAPK Genes with Activation loop Motif | Z-score | Level of confidence(%) |
---|---|---|
T-E-Y | 10.86 | 100 |
T-G-Y | 10.86 | 100 |
K-G-Y | 10.86 | 100 |
T-Q-Y | 8.64 | 100 |
S-D-Y | 7.40 | 100 |
T-S-Y | 5.99 | 100 |
T-T-Y | 2.03 | 95.7 |
T-I-Y | 1.99 | 95.3 |
S-E-Y | 1.67 | 90.6 |
T-H-Y | 1.49 | 86.4 |
T-N-Y | 1.15 | 75 |
Discussion
The origin and evolution of fungi dates back to 1500 million years, when fungi were diverged from other forms of life (Fig 7) [40,41]. Various groups of fungi colonized the land more than 500 million years ago during the Cambrian period [42]. We found that, the presence of T-E-Y motif in MAPK is very common to almost all fungi and presence of the fungal kingdom before 1500 million years directly reflects that, T-E-Y motif of MAPK is the ancient most motif compared to others and might present since 1500 million years ago.
The number of MAPK sequences identified from different fungal species ranges from 2 to 20 (Table 1). The presence of diverse numbers of MAPK sequences and the presence of diverse activation loop motifs in fungal species reflects wide diversity of MAPKs in fungi. The presence of the activation loop T-E-Y motif is common to the plants, animals, and fungi, whereas the presence of the T-G-Y motif is common to the animals and fungi only [2]. Similarly, the activation loop T-D-Y motif is only present in plants and animals. No fungal MAPKs were found to contain any T-D-Y motif in their activation loop region, which is common to plants and animals. The presence of the activation loop T-P-Y motif is unique to animals and fungi [13]. In addition to T-E-Y and T-D-Y motifs in plants, a recent study shows presence of M-E-Y, T-E-M, T-Q-M, T-R-M, T-V-Y, T-S-Y, T-E-C and T-Q-Y motifs in plant MAPKs [16]. The newly identified activation loop motifs of fungal MAPKs are T-T-Y, T-I-Y, T-N-Y, T-H-Y, T-S-Y, K-G-Y, T-Q-Y, S-E-Y and S-D-Y (Figs 1 and 2). The activation loop T-Q-Y motif is present in fungi and animals. The T-S-Y and T-Q-Y motifs are present in plants and fungi. Excluding the T-S-Y and T-Q-Y motifs, all the other seven new activation loop motifs are unique to fungi only. These diverse activation loop MAPK motifs are may be responsible for the diverse kind of functionalities and phosphorylation related signaling events in fungi. The T-I-Y, S-E-Y and T-T-Y motifs found in A. limacinum and A. kerguelense, respectively, are specific to the phylum Labyrinthulomycota. The T-H-Y motif is found in both Ascomycota and Zygomycota. The T-N-Y, T-S-Y, and K-G-Y motifs are specific to Ascomycota only. The S-D-Y motif is found in M. bicolour, which is specific to Basidiomycota, and the T-Q-Y motif found in U. ramanniana is specific to Zygomycota only. As fungi have also been in existence since the past 1500 million years, it can be possible that fungal MAPKs have also been in existence since the past 1500 million years. The absence of T-D-Y motifs in fungi reflects that, this motif might have evolved recently, and is present only in the plant and animal kingdoms.
In fungi, MAPK signaling cascades are regulated through cell integrity (CWI pathway) [43], the high osmolarity glycerol (HOG) pathway, Kss/Fus3 cascade, Mpk1 and SmK1 (sporulation and meiosis) pathways (Fig 8) [18,44–50]. The HOG pathway is crucial for adaptation to osmotic stress and is regulated by accumulation of glycerol in intracellular spaces [51]. During starvation, fungi activate the Kss1 pathway [52–54]. In the Kss1 pathway, the upstream MAPKKK Ste11 activates Ste7 that followed by activation of MAPK Kss1 [55,56]. The Fus3 pathway is involved in mating and cell cycle arrest [48,52,57]. The mating is induced by the presence of specialized pheromones which is sensed by the Ste2 and Ste3 G-protein coupled receptor which, in turn, leads to the activation of MAPK signaling module. The Fus3 and Kss1 MAPK contain T-E-Y motif in the activation loop region. Therefore, the presence of T-E-Y motif in the activation loop region of MAPK that regulates the Fus3 and Kss1 pathways is supposed to be responsible for mating and filamentous growth, respectively. The HOG1 MAPK, which is responsible for hyperosmosis-mediated glycerol synthesis contains T-G-Y motif. This indicates that the presence of the T-G-Y motif in the activation loop motif might mediate critical role for HOG pathway. The Mpk1 pathway is responsible for cell wall remodeling in fungi and it contains T-E-Y motif. The Smk1 protein that mediates Smk1 pathway contains T-N-Y motif. Hence, the presence of the T-N-Y motif in the activation loop might be responsible for regulating Smk1 pathway. The activation loop motif K-G-Y was found in MAPK of S. cerevisiae and X. parietina, which are not reported before. Therefore, the presence of mitogen activated protein kinase that contain K-G-Y motif is new to S. cerevisiae. The presence of K-G-Y motif corroborates to the K-D-X motif of KDX1 protein in Saccharomyces genome database. This KDX1 protein is considered as catalytically dead and the presence of the K-G-Y motif in this MAPK is of particular interest. As the tyrosine residue is a potential phosphorylation site of upstream MAP2Ks, the presence of K-G-Y motif in ScMPK-A might be functionally active. Motif specific MAPKs in fungi regulate a different pathway in S. cerevisiae and presence of K-G-Y motif might regulate some important pathway as well, which is yet to be elucidated. In this context, the presence of several new activation loop motifs in fungal MAPKs seems very interesting, and they might be regulating some novel pathways in fungi. A detailed experimental study with fungal MAPKs that contain a different activation loop motifs may elucidate a new MAPK pathway in fungi.
The mutualistic relationships of fungi are closer to plants, and fungi has helped the plants to colonize the terrestrial environment due to their ecological dominance [39,58]. Beside this, during the evolutionary process of life, the evolutions of plants were followed by evolution of fungi and evolutionary relationships of fungi are much closer to the plants. Therefore, to better understand the evolutionary event of fungal MAPKs, it was highly necessary to conduct the comparative analysis of fungal MAPKs with plant MAPKs. Therefore, MAPKs of A. thaliana and O. sativa were included in this study to construct the phylogenetic tree. The resulting phylogenetic tree shows the presence of four distinct groups (Fig 5). The two upper groups belong to MAPKs of O. sativa and A. thaliana (except fungal AkMPK and AlMPK that contain the T-T-Y and T-I-Y motifs), and the two lower groups belong to the MAPKs of fungi. Two fungal MAPKs (AkMPK and AlMPK) that contain T-T-Y and T-I-Y motifs, respectively, were found to be grouped with the MAPKs of A. thaliana and O. sativa (Fig 5). This shows that the T-T-Y and T-I-Y motifs might be plant-specific as well, which are yet to be reported. The two lower clades of the phylogenetic tree are distinctly separated from the MAPKs of higher plants. This suggests that fungal MAPKs were evolved independently and polyphyletically from their common ancestor and diverged during the evolution, which led to the presence of the diverse activation loop motifs. Earlier it was widely reported that, motif specificity plays important role in grouping of MAPKs [2]. The group D MAPKs of plants and animals always contains T-D-Y motif. But here, we can see that the plant MAPKs of A. thaliana and O. sativa with T-D-Y motif don’t grouped together (Fig 5). This clearly explains, T-D-Y motif has no role in grouping of MAPKs and might be applicable to plants and animals only. When MAPKs sequences from all the fungal species were subjected to construct the phylogenetic tree, it resulted in six distinct groups, similar to the MAPK of plant systems (Fig 2) [16]. This explains, although MAPKs of plants and fungal systems were evolved independently from their polyphyletic common ancestors, their basic sequence and group architecture remain conserved. This indicates the conserved and lineage-specific evolution of MAPKs. When the phylogenetic tree was constructed by taking the sequence of MAPKs with the novel activation loop motif group, it resulted in four groups (groups A, B, C and D) (Fig 4, Table 2). The activation loop motifs T-E-Y and T-G-Y were found to be distributed in all four groups while activation loop motif T-N-Y distributed in groups A and C (Table 2). Similarly MAPKs having the activation loop motif T-H-Y were distributed in groups A and B only. The activation loop motifs S-D-Y, S-E-Y, T-T-Y, and T-I-Y are unique to group D; the T-S-Y and T-Q-Y motifs are unique to groups A and B, respectively (Table 2). The K-G-Y activation loop motif is unique to groups A and C.
In the statistical analysis of Tajima’s relative rate test, the p value of all the three groups lies between 0.0000 and 0.05, which are considered as significant [30]. The X2 values for all the three groups were also very significant (Table 3). This indicates a high level of significance to Tajima’s test for neutrality (D test). The D values of all the fungal MAPKs studied were found to be -3.500934. In the case of fungal MAPKs that contained only novel activation loop motifs combined with selected AtMAPKs and OsMAPK, the resulting D value was found to be 5.189926 [30,59,60]. Similarly, the D value of fungal MAPKs that contained only novel activation loop motifs was found to be 4.751476 (Table 4). When fungal MAPKs that contained novel activation loop motifs were combined with all representative MAPKs of A. thaliana and O. sativa, the resulting D value was 5.233833 (Table 4). A negative Tajima’s D value represents very low frequencies of genetic polymorphism relative to expectation [30,59,60]. This represents an expansion in the population size after the selective and purifying process of selection. A positive Tajima’s D value represents a high level of frequencies of polymorphism [30]. This indicates a decrease in population size by balancing selection. The D value of all fungal MAPKs was found to be positive. This confirms that, overall, fungal MAPKs underwent very high frequencies of genetic polymorphism. The novel activation loop motifs of MAPKs were recently evolved and had undergone a significant genetic polymorphism. When Tajima’s D = 0, theta-Pi is equivalent to theta-k (observed = expected). This implies that the average heterozygosity is equal to the number of segregating sites, or otherwise, it can be explained as an observed variation being similar to expected variation [30,59,60]. This signifies that the population is evolving as per mutation-drift equilibrium and there is no evidence of selection. When Tajima’s D < 0, it indicates a lower average heterozygosity than the number of segregating sites, and rare alleles are present at low frequencies [30,59,60]. This signifies a recent selective sweep and population expansion after a recent bottleneck and linkage to a swept gene. When Tajima’s D > 0, it indicates a more average heterozygosity than the number of segregating sites, and can be present in multiple alleles, some at low and others at high frequencies. This signifies a balancing in selection and sudden contraction of the population [30,59,60]. In the cases of novel activation loop motif fungal MAPKs, and a comparative study with selected A. thaliana and O. sativa MAPKs, the D value is greater than zero (D > 0) (Table 4). This confirms that, novel activation loop motif fungal MAPKs and plant MAPKs have multiple alleles present at high frequencies that were responsible for the sudden decrease in population by balancing selection. The D value of all fungal MAPKs together was found to be -3.500934, which is less than zero (D < 0). This explains why rare MAPK alleles are present at very low frequencies and the population expansion after a recent bottleneck. As per thumb rule, the D values greater than +2 or less than -2 are supposed to be significant [30]. In all the cases, the D value was found to be more than +2, and hence; the analyses were highly significant. In the cases of fungal MAPKs that contain the novel activation loop motifs analysed with all representatives of AtMAPKs and OsMAPK, the resulting D value was found to be of 5.233833 (D = 5.233833). This denotes that the novel activation loop containing fungal MAPKs and plant MAPKs are highly polymorphic and evolutionarily conserved, and that they have evolved only recently. In the gene duplication study, the MAPKs that contain the new activation loop motifs T-T-Y, T-I-Y, S-E-Y, T-H-Y and T-N-Y are those that contain a Z-score below four (Table 5). The presence of Z-score of a gene above four is considered as highly significant to be duplicated [33]. Thus, fungal MAPKs that contain these novel activation loop motifs are highly nonduplicated, and most probably evolved only recently, and are yet to undergo any duplication events. The abundance and numbers of MAPK sequences that contain T-T-Y, T-I-Y, S-E-Y, T-H-Y and T-N-Y motifs are very low. This signifies the nonduplication aspects of these MAPKs.
Conclusion
Genome-wide identification of the MAPK gene family in fungi revealed the presence of several novel activation loop motifs. Evolutionary study shows that fungal MAPKs that contain the T-E-Y motif in the activation loop region are older than other activation loop motifs and MAPKs that contains the T-D-Y motifs are supposed to be evolved recently. The Mpk1, Fus3 and Kss1 pathway is mediated by MAPKs that contains T-E-Y motifs. The HOG1 pathway mediated by MAPK that contains T-G-Y motif and the Smk1 pathway is mediated by MAPK that contains T-N-Y motif. This reflects that, activation loop motif in fungal MAPK decides the fate of different pathways. From this point, we can speculate that, presence of novel activation loop motif MAPKs of fungi might regulate some other novel pathways in different species, which are yet to be elucidated.
Supporting Information
Acknowledgments
This study was carried out with the support of the “Forest Science and Technology” project (Project No. S121414L030110) provided by Korea forest service. The funder has no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This study was carried out with the support of the “Forest Science and Technology” project (Project No. S121414L030110) provided by Korea forest service. The funder has no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Sinha AK, Jaggi M, Raghuram B, Tuteja N (2011) Mitogen-activated protein kinase signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal Behav 6: 196–203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hamel L-P, Nicole M-C, Sritubtim S, Morency M-J, Ellis M, Ehlting J, et al. (2006) Ancient signals: comparative genomics of plant MAPK and MAPKK gene families. Trends Plant Sci 11: 192–198. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Johnson GL, Lapadat R (2002) Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 protein kinases. Science 298: 1911–1912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Singh P, Mohanta TK, Sinha AK (2015) Unraveling the intricate nexus of molecular mechanisms governing rice root development: OsMPK3/6 and Auxin-Cytokinin Interplay. PLoS One 10: e0123620 10.1371/journal.pone.0123620 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhao X, Mehrabi R, Xu J-R (2007) Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways and fungal pathogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 6: 1701–1714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Popescu SC, Popescu G V, Bachan S, Zhang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M, et al. (2009) Functional protein microarrays MAPK target networks in Arabidopsis thaliana revealed using functional protein microarrays. Genes Dev 23: 80–92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Xu JR, Hamer JE (1996) MAP kinase and cAMP signaling regulate infection structure formation and pathogenic growth in the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe grisea. Genes Dev 10: 2696–2706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Widmann C, Gibson S (1999) Mitogen-activated protein kinase: conservation of a three-kinase module from yeast to human. Physiol Rev 79: 143–180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Kumar K, Sinha AK (2014) Genome-wide transcriptome modulation in rice transgenic lines expressing engineered mitogen activated protein kinase kinase 6. Plant Signal Behav 9: e28502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Colcombet J, Hirt H (2008) Arabidopsis MAPKs: a complex signalling network involved in multiple biological processes. Biochem J 413: 217–226. 10.1042/BJ20080625 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chen RE, Thorner J (2007) Function and regulation in MAPK signaling pathways: lessons learned from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta 1773: 1311–1340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wu C, Whiteway M, Thomas DY, Leberer E (1995) Molecular characterization of Ste20p, a potential mitogen-activated protein or extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase (MEK) kinase kinase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem 270: 15984–15992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Morrison DK (2012) MAP kinase pathways. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 4: a011254 10.1101/cshperspect.a011254 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shen Y, Luche R, Wei B, Gordon ML, Diltz CD, Tonks NK (2001) Activation of the Jnk signaling pathway by a dual-specificity phosphatase, JSP-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98: 13613–13618. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Moriwaki A, Kubo E, Arase S, Kihara J (2006) Disruption of SRM1, a mitogen-activated protein kinase gene, affects sensitivity to osmotic and ultraviolet stressors in the phytopathogenic fungus Bipolaris oryzae. FEMS Microbiol Lett 257: 253–261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mohanta TK, Arora PK, Mohanta N, Parida P, Bae H (2015) Identification of new members of the MAPK gene family in plants shows diverse conserved domains and novel activation loop variants. BMC Genomics 16: 58 10.1186/s12864-015-1244-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ray LB, Sturgill TW (1988) Insulin-stimulated microtubule-associated protein kinase is phosphorylated on tyrosine and threonine in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85: 3753–3757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Román E, Arana DM, Nombela C, Alonso-Monge R, Pla J (2007) MAP kinase pathways as regulators of fungal virulence. Trends Microbiol 15: 181–190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Ren D, Liu Y, Yang K-Y, Han L, Mao G, Glazebrook J, et al. (2008) A fungal-responsive MAPK cascade regulates phytoalexin biosynthesis in Arabidopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105: 5638–5643. 10.1073/pnas.0711301105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mohanta TK, Bae H (2015) Functional genomics and signaling events in mycorrhizal symbiosis. J Plant Interact 10: 21–40. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Ouyang S, Zhu W, Hamilton J, Lin H, Campbell M, Childs K, et al. (2007) The TIGR rice genome annotation resource: improvements and new features. Nucleic Acids Res 35: D883–D887. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Lamesch P, Berardini TZ, Li D, Swarbreck D, Wilks C, Sasidharan R, et al. (2012) The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR): improved gene annotation and new tools. Nucleic Acids Res 40: D1202–D1210. 10.1093/nar/gkr1090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nordberg H, Cantor M, Dusheyko S, Hua S, Poliakov A, Shabalov I, et al. (2014) The genome portal of the Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute: 2014 updates. Nucleic Acids Res 42: D26–D31. 10.1093/nar/gkt1069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Grigoriev IV, Nikitin R, Haridas S, Kuo A, Ohm R, Otillar R, et al. (2014) MycoCosm portal: gearing up for 1000 fungal genomes. Nucleic Acids Res 42: D699–D704. 10.1093/nar/gkt1183 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.de Castro E, Sigrist CJA, Gattiker A, Bulliard V, Langendijk-Genevaux PS, Gasteiger E, et al. (2006) ScanProsite: detection of PROSITE signature matches and ProRule-associated functional and structural residues in proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 34: W362–W365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, Schmidt T, et al. (2014) SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res 42: 252–258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Larkin M, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, et al. (2007) Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23: 2947–2948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Sievers F, Wilm A, Dineen D, Gibson TJ, Karplus K, Li W, et al. (2011) Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol Syst Biol 7: 539 10.1038/msb.2011.75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28: 2731–2739. 10.1093/molbev/msr121 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tajima F (1989) Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 595: 585–595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Vernot B, Stolzer M, Goldman A, Durand D (2008) Reconciliation with non-binary species trees. J Comput Biol 15: 981–1006. 10.1089/cmb.2008.0092 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Durand D, Halldórsson BV, Vernot B (2006) A hybrid micro-macroevolutionary approach to gene tree reconstruction. J Comput Biol 13: 320–335. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Kontopoulos D-G, Glykos NM (2013) Pinda: a web service for detection and analysis of intraspecies gene duplication events. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 111: 711–714. 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.05.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Cargnello M, Roux PP (2011) Activation and function of the MAPKs and their substrates, the MAPK-activated protein kinases. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 75: 50–83. 10.1128/MMBR.00031-10 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cozzone AJ (1988) Protein phosphorylation in prokaryotes. Annu Rev Microbiol 42: 97–125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Stock JB, Ninfa AJ, Stock AM (1989) Protein phosphorylation and regulation of adaptive responses in bacteria. Microbiol Rev 53:450–490 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Deutscher J, Saier MH Jr (2005) Ser/Thr/Tyr protein phosphorylation in bacteria—for long time neglected, now well established. J Mol Microbiol Biotechnol 9: 125–131. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cieśla J, Fraczyk T, Rode W (2011) Phosphorylation of basic amino acid residues in proteins: Important but easily missed. Acta Biochim Pol 58: 137–148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Humphreys CP, Franks PJ, Rees M, Bidartondo MI, Leake JR, Beerling DJ (2010) Mutualistic mycorrhiza-like symbiosis in the most ancient group of land plants. Nat Commun 1: 103 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wang D (1999) Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi. Proc Biol Sci 266: 163–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Brundrett M (2002) Coevolution of roots and mycorrhizas of land plants. New Phytol 154: 275–304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Taylor TN, Osborn JM (1996) The importance of fungi in shaping the paleoecosystem. Rev Palaeobot Palynol 90: 249–262. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Verna J, Lodder A, Lee K (1997) A family of genes required for maintenance of cell wall integrity and for the stress response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94: 13804–13809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cheetham J, Smith DA, Dantas S, Doris KS, Patterson MJ, Bruce CR, et al. (2007) A single MAPKKK regulates the Hog1 MAPK pathway in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Mol Biol Cell 18: 4603–4614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kojima K, Bahn Y-S, Heitman J (2006) Calcineurin, Mpk1 and Hog1 MAPK pathways independently control fludioxonil antifungal sensitivity in Cryptococcus neoformans. Microbiology 152: 591–604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Levin DE (2011) Regulation of cell wall biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: the cell wall integrity signaling pathway. Genetics 189: 1145–1175. 10.1534/genetics.111.128264 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Lin C-H, Yang SL, Wang N-Y, Chung K-R (2010) The FUS3 MAPK signaling pathway of the citrus pathogen Alternaria alternata functions independently or cooperatively with the fungal redox-responsive AP1 regulator for diverse developmental, physiological and pathogenic processes. Fungal Genet Biol 47: 381–391. 10.1016/j.fgb.2009.12.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Román E, Pla J (2013) The CEK1-mediated mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway in the fungal pathogen Candida albicans. MAP Kinase 2: e5. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Xu JR (2000) Map kinases in fungal pathogens. Fungal Genet Biol 31: 137–152. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhao X, Mehrabi R, Xu J-R (2007) Mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways and fungal pathogenesis. Eukaryot Cell 6: 1701–1714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Saito H, Tatebayashi K (2004) Regulation of the osmoregulatory HOG MAPK cascade in yeast. J Biochem 136: 267–272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cherkasova V, Lyons DM, Elion EA (1999) Fus3p and Kss1p control G1 arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae through a balance of distinct arrest and proliferative functions that operate in parallel with Far1p. Genetics 151: 989–1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gimeno CJ, Ljungdahl PO, Styles CA, Fink GR (1992) Unipolar cell divisions in the yeast S. cerevisiae lead to filamentous growth: regulation by starvation and RAS. Cell 68: 1077–1090. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Palecek SP, Parikh AS, Kron SJ (2002) Sensing, signalling and integrating physical processes during Saccharomyces cerevisiae invasive and filamentous growth. Microbiology 148: 893–907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Lee BN, Elion EA (1999) The MAPKKK Ste11 regulates vegetative growth through a kinase cascade of shared signaling components. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 96: 12679–12684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Liberer E, Harcus D, Broadbent ID, Clark KL, Dignard D, Zeigelbauer K, et al. (1996) Signal transduction through homologs of the Ste20p and Ste7p protein kinases can trigger hyphal formation in the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 93: 13217–13222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Elion E (2000) Pheromone response, mating and cell biology. Curr OpinMicrobiol 3: 573–581. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Mohanta T, Bae H (2015) The diversity of fungal genome. Biological Procedures Online 17: 8 10.1186/s12575-015-0020-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Fu Y, Li W (1993) Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics 133: 693–709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Simonsen KL, Churchill GA, Aquadro CF (1995) Properties of statistical tests of neutrality for DNA polymorphism data. Genetics 141: 413–429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.