Abstract
Hepatic expression of A20, including in hepatocytes, increases in response to injury, inflammation and resection. This increase likely serves a hepatoprotective purpose. The characteristic unfettered liver inflammation and necrosis in A20 knockout mice established physiologic upregulation of A20 as integral to the anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic armamentarium of hepatocytes. However, the implication of physiologic upregulation of A20 in modulating hepatocytes' proliferative responses following liver resection remains controversial. To resolve the impact of A20 on hepatocyte proliferation and the liver's regenerative capacity, we examined whether decreased A20 expression, as in A20 heterozygous knockout mice, affects outcome following two-third partial hepatectomy. A20 heterozygous mice do not demonstrate a striking liver phenotype, indicating that their A20 expression levels are still sufficient to contain inflammation and cell death at baseline. However, usually benign partial hepatectomy provoked a staggering lethality (>40%) in these mice, uncovering an unsuspected phenotype. Heightened lethality in A20 heterozygous mice following partial hepatectomy resulted from impaired hepatocyte proliferation due to heightened levels of cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p21, and deficient upregulation of cyclins D1, E and A, in the context of worsened liver steatosis. A20 heterozygous knockout minimally affected baseline liver transcriptome, mostly circadian rhythm genes. Nevertheless, this caused differential expression of >1000 genes post hepatectomy, hindering lipid metabolism, bile acid biosynthesis, insulin signaling and cell cycle, all critical cellular processes for liver regeneration. These results demonstrate that mere reduction of A20 levels causes worse outcome post hepatectomy than full knockout of bona fide liver pro-regenerative players such as IL-6, clearly ascertaining A20's primordial role in enabling liver regeneration. Clinical implications of these data are of utmost importance as they caution safety of extensive hepatectomy for donation or tumor in carriers of A20/TNFAIP3 single nucleotide polymorphisms alleles that decrease A20 expression or function, and prompt the development of A20-based liver pro-regenerative therapies.
Humans and mice restore their liver mass within 2 weeks of surgical, viral or toxic parenchymal loss via compensatory re-growth, referred to as liver regeneration (LR).1, 2 Adequate LR is contingent upon maintaining a minimum healthy residual liver mass without which hepatocyte proliferation is stunned, resulting in hepatic failure. In liver transplantation (mainly living donor liver transplantation), 'small-for-size' syndrome illustrates this outcome.3 Incremental 78% and 87% hepatectomy in mice reproduces this syndrome, causing 50% and 100% lethality, respectively.4 Despite considerable knowledge characterizing the molecular basis of LR, better understanding of this process's shortcomings in the face of extensive resection and/or damage is required for uncovering therapies to overcome defective regeneration. These discoveries would revolutionize clinical management of large liver tumors and of liver transplantation.5, 6
Our laboratory contributed novel leads to such therapies by exposing the dramatic survival advantage afforded by hepatic overexpression of NF-κB-inhibitory and ubiquitin-editing protein, A20,7, 8 in mouse models of severe toxic or ischemic liver injuries,9, 10 and of extended (78%) and radical (87%) hepatectomy.4 A20 confers this advantage by (i) limiting inflammation through inhibition of NF-κB activation, (ii) protecting hepatocytes from apoptosis,9 (iii) reducing oxidative stress by increasing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha (PPARα) expression,10 (iv) promoting hepatocyte proliferation by decreasing cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor (CDKI) p21, enhancing interleukin-6/signal transducer and activator of transcription-3 (IL-6/STAT3) regenerative signals, and (v) optimizing energy production by improving fatty acid (FA) metabolism.4, 11, 12 A20 homozygous KO mice are born cachectic, and die within 3–6 weeks of birth from systemic inflammation, predominantly in the liver.13 This highlights A20's prominence in the liver's physiologic anti-inflammatory and anti-apoptotic defense mechanisms. Significant upregulation of A20 in humans and mice livers following hepatectomy suggests that A20 is also an active player in the liver's physiologic regenerative response.1, 4, 9, 12 We explored this hypothesis by evaluating LR following two-third partial hepatectomy (PH) in female A20 heterozygous knockout (HET) mice that show no pathological phenotype at baseline, including in the liver. This procedure is impossible in short-lived cachectic A20 KO mice.13
Results
A20 knockdown provokes lethality by increasing liver damage and impairing hepatocyte proliferation following PH
Two-third PH, a non-lethal procedure in wild-type (WT) mice, resulted in a staggering 42% lethality in HET mice within 7 days (d) of surgery (Figure 1a). Lethality in HET mice associated with greater liver damage, as evidenced by significantly higher plasma levels of alanine transaminase, aspartate transaminase and total bilirubin 1–2 d post PH (Figures 1b–d), and on morphometry by increased liver steatosis (2 d), necrosis (4 d) and hemorrhage (7 d) in HET versus WT livers (Figure 1e). Lethality in HET mice also correlated with decreased hepatocyte proliferation, as evidenced by nearly absent Ki67+ hepatocytes/high power field in HET livers 2 d post PH. Hepatocyte proliferation occurred in HET mice that survived the procedure, but was delayed (4 d) and never as robust as in WT (Figure 1f). By western blot analysis, we also checked for hepatic expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), an auxiliary protein to DNA polymerase delta that is required for cell proliferation. PCNA levels in WT livers increased 1 d, peaked 2 d and tapered down 4 d after PH, as expected.14 PCNA levels also increased in livers of HET mice 1 d post PH, but became undetectable by 2 d post PH, marking aborted LR. PCNA expression increased again in HET mice that survived PH but was delayed (4 and 7 d post PH; Figure 1g).
A20 is part of the liver regenerative response.1, 4 Upregulation of A20 mRNA and protein in HET livers following PH was insufficient, that is, transient (limited to 1 d post PH) and significantly lower than in WT livers (Figures 1h and i). These results link inadequate upregulation of A20 in HET livers post PH (both temporal and quantitative) to their defective LR. A20 protein levels were moderately higher in livers of A20 HET mice at baseline, agreeing with increased activation in these livers of the transcriptional regulator of A20, NF-κB.9, 15, 16
A20 HET livers demonstrate heightened intra-hepatic levels of TNF and IL-6 but no increase in hepatocyte apoptosis following PH
PH increases circulating and intra-hepatic TNF and IL-6 levels to prime entry of hepatocytes into cell cycle.2 Exaggerated production of these priming, yet pro-inflammatory, cytokines stalls hepatocyte proliferation, hampering LR.17 A20 heterozygocity did not affect basal circulating levels of TNF and IL-6 nor early (first 24 h) TNF upregulation post PH, and only caused moderately higher circulating IL-6 levels 6 h post PH in HET versus WT mice (Figures 2a and b). This result is in keeping with the absence of an overt hyperactivation of the innate and adaptive immune system in A20 HET mice, which contrasts with what observed in A20 KO mice.13 However, we noted significantly higher intrahepatic TNF (10–20-fold) and IL-6 (10–15-fold) mRNA levels in HET versus WT livers 2 d post PH (Figures 2c and d). This correlated with significantly higher intra-hepatic inflammation, as gauged by nuclear expression of the NF-κB subunit p65 in the liver, mostly in hepatocytes as evidenced by their larger nuclei size (Figure 2e), and also likely in Kupffer cells. There was also a trend (>twofold, albeit non-significant) for higher basal intrahepatic TNF and IL-6 mRNA levels that correlated with significantly more p65+ nuclei/high power field (mostly hepatocytes) in HET versus WT livers (Figure 2e). These results suggest that HET livers suffer subtle baseline inflammation and NF-κB activation, predominating in hepatocytes, that amplifies following PH. However, A20 heterozygocity did not increase basal nor early post-PH apoptosis of hepatocytes (Figure 2f), indicating that lower A20 levels in these mice were still sufficient to prevent excessive hepatocyte apoptosis following PH.
A20 HET alters expression levels of the cell cycle regulators p21 and cyclins D1, E and A to negatively impact hepatocyte proliferation
Following priming, hepatocyte progression through cell cycle requires intrahepatic production of growth factors, that is, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF) and transforming growth factor alpha (TGFα).18 We noted comparable peak of HGF and TGFα mRNA levels in HET and WT livers 1 d post PH. However, HET livers neither demonstrated the 4 d HGF mRNA peak, nor the prolonged increase in TGFα mRNA (80–120-fold up to 4 d) noted in WT livers post PH (Figures 3a and b).
We recently showed that A20 overexpression in mouse livers promotes hepatocyte proliferation by decreasing p21 mRNA and protein levels.4, 11 We expected the reverse in HET livers, yet baseline and PH-induced upregulation of p21 mRNA was comparable in HET and WT livers (Figure 3c). However, by immunohistochemistry, the number of p21+ hepatocytes/high power field was significantly higher in HET versus WT livers 2 d post PH (Figure 3d), with a trend towards higher number at baseline. We noted a similar pattern by western blot that showed that intra-hepatic p21 protein levels were higher in HET versus WT livers both before and 2 d post PH (Figure 3e). To ensure that heightened p21 protein levels in HET livers simply relate to a shift in its circadian cycling, we evaluated p21 protein levels at 8 am, 12 pm and 4 pm. HET livers showed drastically higher p21 protein levels than WT livers, at all time points tested (Figure 3f), which indicated that increased p21 protein levels in HET livers was constant, at least in the daytime when PH were performed. In a time-course analysis following PH, we showed, as expected, that intra-hepatic levels of p21 do decrease 1d post-PH in HET livers, albeit not to the extent observed in WT livers, and quickly return to their high baseline values within 2 d post PH to remain elevated thereafter (Figure 3g).
Prolonged upregulation of cyclin D1, a rate-limiting cell cycle protein, after PH is required for adequate LR.19 We noted transient increase of the cyclin D1 protein 1 d post PH in HET livers contrasting with higher (2 d peak) and prolonged (up to 7 d) induction in WT livers (Figure 3f). Similarly, upregulation of cyclin E and phosphorylation of retinoblastoma protein (Rb) post PH were transient (only 1 d) in HET, while prolonged (up to 4 d) in WT livers (Figure 3f). Cyclin A protein levels failed to increase 2 and 4 d following PH in HET livers, as they did in WT livers (Supplementary Figure 1), but did increase in a delayed fashion (7 d) in HET mice that survived PH. Altogether these data indicate that hepatocyte proliferation post PH is aborted and/or delayed in A20 HET livers.
Minimal baseline differences in HET liver transcriptome transform into significant changes following PH
To decipher the molecular basis for defective LR in HET mice, we compared HET versus WT liver transcriptomes by microarray analysis. We identified 90 and 1081 significantly differentially expressed transcripts pre- and post PH, respectively (Supplementary Tables I and II), and established a hierarchy of the top 25 and top 50 pre- and post-PH genes (Supplementary Figures 2a and b). By gene ontology (GO) and interactive network enrichment analyses using DAVID, we identified circadian rhythm (CR) as the only significantly affected GO category in HET livers at baseline (Figure 4a). Differentially expressed CR genes included the key transcription regulator of cyclic genes D site of albumin promoter-binding protein (DBP)20 that was higher in HET versus WT livers. Other differentially expressed cyclic genes pre-PH included the regulators of lipid and glucose metabolism regulator of G-coupled receptor signaling 16 (RGS16), pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase isozyme 4 (PDK4) and insulin-induced regulator of SREBP1c (INSIG2). GO categories significantly affected in HET versus WT livers post PH largely related to lipid metabolism (Figure 4a). Differentially expressed genes post PH mostly affected lipid metabolism, cell cycle and inflammation (Supplementary Table III). These results agree with lipid metabolism being the most affected GO category in A20 gain-of-function studies.11
We validated differential expression of key pre-PH genes by qPCR and demonstrated significantly higher DBP and RGS16 and lower PDK4 mRNA levels in HET versus WT livers (Figure 4b). However, there was only a trend towards lower INSIG2 mRNA in HET versus WT livers pre-PH, which became statistically significant post PH (Figure 4c). Upstream of DBP, basal intra-hepatic protein (but not mRNA, data not shown) levels of its transcriptional regulator aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator like (ARNTL), also referred to as brain and muscle ARNTL (BMAL1),21 were substantially higher in HET versus WT livers (Figure 4d), suggesting that increased DBP mRNA in HET livers was due to its increased transcription.
Impaired lipid metabolism following PH in HET livers results in maladaptive hepatic macrosteatosis
There is ample evidence that PH prompts the release of FA from adipose tissue and their uptake by the liver, promoting the accumulation of triglycerides (TG) to provide the energy required to fuel LR.22, 23 Suppression of fat accumulation in the liver after PH impairs LR in mice.24 On the other hand, excessive liver steatosis, such as in leptin- and leptin-receptor-deficient mice25, 26, 27 or high fat diet-fed mice,28 also derails LR post PH. At the molecular level, ob/ob and high fat diet-fed mice show decreased expression of cyclin D1, and heightened p21 protein levels,29 which recapitulates the molecular signature we identified in HET mice. Because limited and rather subtle differences in pre-PH HET liver transcriptome significantly impact genes involved in lipid metabolism post PH, we questioned whether defective LR in these mice correlated with inadequate fat redistribution and accumulation in the liver. We confirmed that HET livers suffer severe macrosteatosis, as evidenced by oil red-O staining (Figure 5a), and accumulate higher levels of intrahepatic TG than WT livers following PH (Figure 5b). The maladaptive hepatic macrosteatosis and TG accumulation that develop post PH in HET livers evoke similar pathologic features of diabetic and obese mice, strongly suggesting that they are central to the pathogenesis of impaired LR in these mice.
Discussion
Through loss-of-function studies, we demonstrate that adequate upregulation of A20 following PH is essential for appropriate LR. Mere A20 heterozygous knockdown transformed PH from a well-tolerated procedure to one with more than 40% lethality, uncovering an otherwise unsuspected phenotype in HET mice. Remarkably, lethality in HET mice topped that of IL-6 KO,30 TNF-receptor-1 KO31 and conditional hepatocyte-specific STAT3 KO,32 qualifying A20 among the most potent key physiologic regulators of LR.
HET mice that survived PH showed heightened liver damage, macrosteatosis and delayed hepatocyte proliferation, predicting worse results in mice that died. Exploring causes of this drastic outcome, we showed that baseline and first day post-PH surge in circulating and intrahepatic ‘priming' yet pro-inflammatory cytokines, TNF and IL-6, were comparable in HET and WT mice. This suggests that A20 HET does not result in hyperactivation of the innate or adaptive immune system as homozygous KO does.13, 33 However, intrahepatic levels of TNF and IL-6 following PH were excessively higher and prolonged in HET versus WT livers 4d post PH, likely contributing to derailed LR.17 This indicates that maladaptive inflammatory responses in HET mice only unveil following injury (in this case PH), and remain contained to the site of injury (here the liver) as systemic inflammation did not worsen. Our results convincingly show that subtle basal inflammation, as indicated by increased number of p65+ nuclei in HET livers, mostly corresponding with large nucleolated nuclei of hepatocytes,34 significantly aggravates following PH. These results agree with our published data showing that hepatocytes retrieved from A20 HET mice produce higher levels of TNF and IL-6 in response to LPS, than WT hepatocytes.12 Excessive and extended production of TNF and IL-6 in HET livers likely relates to their inability to mount an adequate post-PH surge of NF-κB inhibitory A20, a pre-requisite for secondary containment of these largely NF-κB-dependent cytokines.13 However, even if reduced, levels of the anti-apoptotic A209 in HET livers following PH were still sufficient to preclude higher rate of hepatocyte apoptosis. This suggests that other anti-apoptotic mechanisms must compensate for lower A20 levels in protecting hepatocytes post PH.
It is well established that IL-6, produced by Kupffer cells and hepatocytes,35 is the central trigger of LR via phosphorylation/activation of STAT3.36 However, excessive levels of IL-6 following PH halt hepatocyte proliferation17 by increasing p21 transcription to block Cyclin/CDK complexes37 and by binding STAT3 to inhibit its pro-regenerative signals.38 Having reported that A20 overexpression decreases p21 mRNA and protein levels,4, 11, 12 we were intrigued by the comparable levels of p21 mRNA in HET and WT livers post PH. This suggested that A20 was either not a physiologic regulator of p21 mRNA, or that homozygous (not heterozygous) KO of A20 (paralleled by even higher IL-6 levels) was required to increase p21 mRNA levels. Our data showing significantly higher p21 mRNA levels in A20 KO versus WT livers at baseline support the latter, even though it does not indicate whether this regulation is direct or indirect, and whether it is transcriptional or results from changes in mRNA half-life and stability (Supplementary Figure 3). Despite similar mRNA levels, HET mice still demonstrated significantly heightened p21 protein levels at baseline. Also, compared with wipeout of the p21 protein in WT livers, p21 protein levels only moderately and transiently decreased (i.e., in a way that was not conducive for LR) in HET livers. The mechanism(s) supporting heightened p21 levels in A20-deficient mice remain unknown but could relate to the regulation of its ubiquitination and degradation in the proteasome. This would be consistent with our data showing (i) that lower p21 protein levels in A20overexpressing HepG2 hepatoma cells are restored upon treatment of the cells with the proteasome inhibitor MG132, and (ii) that p21 is enriched in MG132-treated HEPG2 protein extracts immunoprecipitated with an anti-ubiquitin antibody (Supplementary Figure 4). Regardless of mechanism(s), our loss-of-function studies suggest that A20 is either directly or indirectly a physiologic transcriptional and posttranscriptional/posttranslational regulator of p21. They also expose p21 as a key culprit in defective LR of HET mice. Transient p21-mediated blockade of cell cycle was also suggested as 'the' pathogenic effector of defective LR after extended hepatectomy (86%)39 and in fatty livers.29 This infers that heterozygous A20 KO transforms the molecular signature of a benign PH to that of either an extended hepatectomy or of a PH on a marginal fatty liver, plaguing it with equally as high lethality.
Hepatocyte proliferation following PH also requires upregulation of HGF and TGFα to induce phase 1 cyclins.18 Although A20 HET did not affect early upregulation of HGF and TGFα and consequently that of cyclins D1 and E following PH, it blunted their second peak and extended production, precluding prolonged expression of cyclins D1 and E. This pattern of aborted growth factors/cyclins upregulation after an adequate post-PH start in HET mice differs from IL-6 hyperstimulation where their induction post PH is delayed and their levels lower.17
To explore the molecular basis for aborted LR in HET mice, we probed the liver transcriptome and discovered that A20 HET subtly, but consistently, increased mRNA levels of the CR transcription factor (CRTF) DBP.20 Though subtle, this could be quite significant as 5–9% of the liver transcriptome and >20% of its secreted proteome are under CR control.40, 41 We traced back higher DBP mRNA levels to higher protein (not mRNA) levels of its transcriptional regulator ARNTL in HET livers. This latter result suggests that hepatic ARNTL is directly or indirectly regulated at the posttranslational level by ubiquitin-editing A20, which would agree with ARNTL incurring posttranslational sumoylation and ubiquitination,42 and its protein levels being modulated by proteasomal activity.43 Increased ARNTL levels in HET livers correlated with a significant increase in mRNA levels of its other target gene Wee1 (Supplementary Figure 5), a cyclic kinase that inactivates cdc2 to preclude mitosis.44 Because ARNTL/BMAL1 KO mice experience defective hepatocyte proliferation due to increased p21 transcription,45 we anticipated that higher ARNTL/BMAL1 levels in HET livers might cause the opposite, that is, decrease p21 transcription. However, p21 mRNA levels remained unchanged with p21 protein levels being significantly higher in HET versus WT livers. This indicates that increased ARNTL levels were not sufficient to impact p21 transcription, and that increased p21 protein levels in HET livers likely relates to ARNTL-independent posttranslational modifications.
Dysregulation of CR also disrupts lipid homeostasis,46, 47 that is, LR fuel. Specifically, DBP is the dominant regulator of bile acid synthesis rate-limiting enzyme, cholesterol 7 alpha hydroxylase (Cyp7a1). Cyp7a1 levels must rapidly decrease post PH, otherwise bile acids accumulate and cause hepatocyte apoptosis.48 Paralleling DPB, Cyp7a1 mRNA levels were higher in HET livers pre- and post PH (Supplementary Figure 6), confirming higher levels of a functional DBP protein in HET livers. DBP also influences lipid metabolism by inducing insulin-like growth factor binding protein 1 (IGFBP1), which downregulates INSIG2, an inhibitor of de novo lipogenesis.49 Higher DBP levels in HET livers coincided with lower pre- and post-PH INSIG2 mRNA levels. As in INSIG2a KO mice,50 lower INSIG2 in HET livers associated with deleterious macrosteatosis following PH, hampering LR.27
Metabolic genes PDK4 and RGS16 were two other differentially expressed cyclic genes in HET versus WT livers at baseline. PDK4, required for blood glucose homeostasis and ATP production,51 was lower in HET versus WT livers. Although lower PDK4 improves diabetes,51 it impairs FA oxidation and decreases ATP production, which would hinder LR. RGS16, a regulator of G-protein coupled receptor pathways was higher in HET versus WT livers. Akin A20 HET, hepatocyte-specific overexpression of RGS16 also increases intrahepatic TG levels and provokes regeneration-defective fatty livers.52
Altogether, our results establish A20 as an integral physiologic regulator of LR by exposing that mere A20 haploinsufficiency causes defective LR through the additive/amplifying contribution of heightened p21 protein levels and deregulated lipid metabolism. Recently discovered single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the A20/TNFAIP3 locus that correspond with numerous autoimmune and inflammatory diseases highlight the clinical implication of these data.53 Indeed, at least five of the A20 SNPs associate with lower A20 expression or activity in homozygous or heterozygous carriers of minor alleles, and hence could recap A20 HET. 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, 59 On the basis of HapMap (Haplotype mapping) data, minor allele frequency of some of these SNPs is far from being negligible, especially in certain populations. For instance, the percentage of homozygous carriers of rs610604 minor allele (prevalent in patients with psoriasis and predicting higher coronary artery disease in diabetic patients) reaches 18% in Europeans and 32–50% in Africans, while the percentage of homozygous carriers of rs661561minor allele (associated with Grave's disease) reaches 37% in Europeans and up to 50% in Asians. 60, 61 However, and beyond the use of A20 SNPs as predictive marker of LR, our results mostly reinforce our pursuit of A20-based therapies to promote LR and improve safety of extensive LR for donation or tumor.
Materials and Methods
Mice and PH model
We conducted two-third (67%) PH in 8–10-week-old female A20 HET and WT littermate mice. All PH were performed between 0900–1200 hours. This model is a classic model for the study of LR. Resected (pre-PH) and remnant (post-PH) liver tissue was recovered and either embedded in OCT/snap-frozen for immunohistochemistry, fixed in formalin for morphological analysis or snap-frozen for RNA and protein extraction. Mice received humane care according to criteria of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. All procedures were approved by the institutional committee for use and care of laboratory animals (IACUC).
Serum collection and measurements of transaminases, bilirubin and cytokines
We drew blood by puncturing the submandibular vein, or catheterizing the vena cava at the time of killing. Serum was recovered and assayed for total bilirubin, aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase using commercially available kits (JAS Diagnostics, Inc., Miami Lakes, FL, USA). TNF and IL-6 serum concentration were measured using ELISA Ready-SET-Go! from eBioscience (San Diego, CA, USA).
Histology and immunohistochemistry
For morphological studies, we stained 5-μm sections of formalin-fixed liver tissue with hematoxylin and eosin. For immunohistochemistry, frozen sections were incubated with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to mouse p21 (LifeSpan Biosciences Inc., Seattle, WA, USA), cell proliferation marker Ki67 (Dako, Glostrup, Denmark), and NF-κB p65 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology Inc., Santa Cruz, CA, USA), followed by appropriate biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector, Burlingame, CA, USA). Two investigators blindly evaluated hematoxylin and eosin-stained sections and counted the number of p21, Ki67 and p65-positive hepatocytes per high power field using either automated or manual counting on Image J1.41 (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA).
Western blot analysis
Whole proteins extracted from liver lysates were analyzed by western blots. Membranes were immunoblotted with mouse monoclonal anti-p21 (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA), anti-Cyclin-D1 and anti-β-actin (Santa Cruz); rabbit polyclonal anti-Cyclin E (Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA), anti-Ser780 phospho-Rb (Cell Signaling Technology, Inc., Danvers, MA USA,); goat polyclonal anti-p53 (Santa Cruz); and anti-ARNTL/BMAL1 (Novus Biologicals LLC, Littleton, CO, USA), chicken anti-TNFAIP3 (A20) (Abcam Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA), and GAPDH (Calbiochem/EMD Biosciences, Gibston, NJ, USA), followed by appropriate secondary HRP-conjugated antibodies (Thermo Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA). Immunoblots were scanned and band intensity quantified by densitometry using ImageJ 1.41.
Quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
Whole-liver RNA was extracted using TRIzol (Sigma-Aldrich CO., Saint Louis, MO, USA). Complementary DNA was synthesized using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). Gene expression was quantified using iTaq Fast SYBR Green Supermix with ROX (Bio-Rad) and gene specific primers (Invitrogen, Coralville, IA, USA) (Supplementary Table IV), or TaqMan Mm00627280_m1 (TNFAIP3), Mm00607939_s1 (βactin). Expression of target genes was normalized to that of housekeeping genes βactin, or TATA box-binding protein (TBP), and quantified using Livak's relative quantification method.
Microarray data analysis
For transcriptional profiling, we analyzed livers from three mice per group, using mouse Affymetrix genome HT 430 2.0 PM GeneChip array plate. Quality of scanned arrays images was determined using arrayQualityMetrics package from Bioconductor (http://www.bioconductor.org). Scanned high quality array images were normalized using multichip average algorithm. Genes with 90% lower confidence bound of the fold change >1.5 were considered differentially expressed. To reduce false-positive rate, we preprocessed data by removing the transcripts with lower expression, that is, absolute expression of <20 in 90% of arrays.
GO enrichment analysis
To identify overrepresented GO categories among differentially expressed genes, we used the Biological Processes and Molecular functions Enrichment Analysis available from the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). A P-value gets assigned on the basis of enrichment. GO categories with multiple test corrected P-values of <0.05 (Holm–Bonferroni method) were considered significant.
Interactive network analysis
We used Ingenuity Pathway Analysis to identify key interaction networks significantly affected in genes differentially expressed in HET versus WT livers pre- and post PH (http//www.ingenuity.com). Ingenuity Pathway Analysis displays the results as score (-log p) indicating the likelihood of a gene to randomly be in a network or pathway. Ranking networks based on their relevance to the queried data set allows for prioritization of networks with highest impact on the disease process.
Intrahepatic TG content analysis
Total lipid content of liver samples was extracted using the Folch method.62 TGs were then isolated by aminopropryl columns (Sigma), and their profiles determined by gas chromatography with a Hewlett Packard 5890 II (Hewlett-Packard, Wilmington, DE, USA), using supercowax-10, 0.25 mm ID column (Sigma) and a three-stage (150–260 °C) temperature program. FA methyl ester peaks were identified by comparison of retention times of a standard mixture, quantified using internal standards, and FA profiles of samples were calculated. Liver's TG content was calculated (μmol/mg) based on TG profiles.
Statistical analysis
We analyzed survival rate by the Kaplan–Meier curve. P-values were determined with a log-rank Mantel-Cox test. We used t-test for unpaired two-group comparisons and one- or two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's and Bonferroni's post hoc test for multiple comparisons. All statistical analyses were done using Prism Mac version 5 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA). Differences between groups were rated significant at a probability error (P)<0.05.
Acknowledgments
This study was supported NIH grants R01 DK063275, R01 HL080130 and R21 DK091822 to CF. AlM, JJS, CRP and SMD were supported by NIH T32 HL07734. PS was supported by a grant from the National Swiss Foundation. We also wish to thank Dr. Vishva Dixit and Robert Gerard for providing the A20 plasmid and the recombinant β-galactosidase adenovirus.
Author Contributions
Study design: PS, CGS, CF. Data acquisition and revision: PS, CGS, JRC, EC, JJS, SMS, CRP, MB, Al. M. Material Support: Av. M. Manuscript drafting: PS, CGS, CF. Important intellectual content: DC, DMS.
Glossary
- ARNTL
aryl hydrocarbon receptor nuclear translocator like
- BMAL1
brain and muscle ARNTL
- Cyp7a1
cholesterol 7 alpha hydroxylase
- CLOCK
circadian locomotor output cycles kaput
- CR
circadian rhythm
- CRTF
circadian rhythm transcription factors
- CCND1
cyclin D1
- CDKI
cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor
- DBP
D site of albumin promoter binding protein
- FA
fatty acids
- GO
gene ontology
- HGF
hepatocyte growth factor
- HET
heterozygous
- INSIG2
insulin induced regulator of SREBP1c
- KO
knockout
- LR
liver regeneration
- NPAS2
neuronal PAS domain-containing protein 2
- PCNA
proliferating cell nuclear antigen
- PH
partial hepatectomy
- PPARα
peroxisome proliferator activated receptor-alpha
- PDK4
pyrruvate dehydrogenase kinase isozyme 4
- RGS16
regulator of G-coupled receptor signaling 16
- STAT3
signal transducer and activator of transcription-3
- SNPs
single nucleotide polymorphisms
- TGFα
transforming growth factor alpha
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper on Cell Death and Differentiation website (http://www.nature.com/cdd)
Edited by P Salomoni
Supplementary Material
References
- de Jonge J, Kurian S, Shaked A, Reddy KR, Hancock W, Salomon DR et al. Unique early gene expression patterns in human adult-to-adult living donor liver grafts compared to deceased donor grafts. Am J Transplant 2009; 9: 758–772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fausto N, Campbell JS, Riehle KJ. Liver regeneration. Hepatology 2006; 43: S45–S53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dahm F, Georgiev P, Clavien PA. Small-for-size syndrome after partial liver transplantation: definition, mechanisms of disease and clinical implications. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 2605–2610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Longo CR, Patel VI, Shrikhande GV, Scali ST, Csizmadia E, Daniel S et al. A20 protects mice from lethal radical hepatectomy by promoting hepatocyte proliferation via a p21waf1-dependent mechanism. Hepatology 2005; 42: 156–164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van den Eynde M, Hendlisz A. Treatment of colorectal liver metastases: a review. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2009; 4: 56–62. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wertheim JA, Petrowsky H, Saab S, Kupiec-Weglinski JW, Busuttil RW. Major challenges limiting liver transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant 2011; 11: 1773–1784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cooper JT, Stroka DM, Brostjan C, Palmetshofer A, Bach FH, Ferran C. A20 blocks endothelial cell activation through a NF-kappaB-dependent mechanism. J Biol Chem 1996; 271: 18068–18073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wertz IE, O'Rourke KM, Zhou H, Eby M, Aravind L, Seshagiri S et al. De-ubiquitination and ubiquitin ligase domains of A20 downregulate NF-kappaB signalling. Nature 2004; 430: 694–699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arvelo MB, Cooper JT, Longo C, Daniel S, Grey ST, Mahiou J et al. A20 protects mice from D-galactosamine/lipopolysaccharide acute toxic lethal hepatitis. Hepatology 2002; 35: 535–543. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ramsey HE, Da Silva CG, Longo CR, Csizmadia E, Studer P, Patel VI et al. A20 protects mice from lethal liver ischemia/reperfusion injury by increasing peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-alpha expression. Liver Transpl 2009; 15: 1613–1621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Damrauer SM, Studer P, da Silva CG, Longo CR, Ramsey HE, Csizmadia E et al. A20 modulates lipid metabolism and energy production to promote liver regeneration. PLoS One 2011; 6: e17715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- da Silva CG, Studer P, Skroch M, Mahiou J, Minussi DC, Peterson CR et al. A20 promotes liver regeneration by decreasing SOCS3 expression to enhance IL-6/STAT3 proliferative signals. Hepatology 2013; 57: 2014–2025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee EG, Boone DL, Chai S, Libby SL, Chein J, Lodolce JP et al. Failure to regulate TNF-induced NF-kB and cell death responses in A20-deficient mice. Science 2000; 289: 2350–2354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zou Y, Bao Q, Kumar S, Hu M, Wang GY, Dai G. Four waves of hepatocyte proliferation linked with three waves of hepatic fat accumulation during partial hepatectomy-induced liver regeneration. PloS One 2012; 7: e30675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Krikos A, Laherty CD, Dixit VM. Transcriptional activation of the tumor necrosis factor alpha-inducible zinc finger protein, A20, is mediated by kappa B elements. J Biol Chem 1992; 267: 17971–17976. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Bach FH, Hancock WW, Ferran C. Protective genes expressed in endothelial cells: a regulatory response to injury. Immunol Today 1997; 18: 483–486. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wustefeld T, Rakemann T, Kubicka S, Manns MP, Trautwein C. Hyperstimulation with interleukin 6 inhibits cell cycle progression after hepatectomy in mice. Hepatology 2000; 32: 514–522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fausto N, Laird AD, Webber EM. Liver regeneration. 2. Role of growth factors and cytokines in hepatic regeneration. FASEB J 1995; 9: 1527–1536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Fu M, Wang C, Li Z, Sakamaki T, Pestell RG. Minireview: Cyclin D1: normal and abnormal functions. Endocrinology 2004; 145: 5439–5447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schrem H, Klempnauer J, Borlak J. Liver-enriched transcription factors in liver function and development. Part II: the C/EBPs and D site-binding protein in cell cycle control, carcinogenesis, circadian gene regulation, liver regeneration, apoptosis, and liver-specific gene regulation. Pharmacol Rev 2004; 56: 291–330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schibler U. Circadian rhythms. Liver regeneration clocks on. Science 2003; 302: 234–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tijburg LB, Nyathi CB, Meijer GW, Geelen MJ. Biosynthesis and secretion of triacylglycerol in rat liver after partial hepatectomy. Biochem J 1991; 277: 723–728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Farrell GC. Probing Prometheus: fat fueling the fire? Hepatology 2004; 40: 1252–1255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shteyer E, Liao Y, Muglia LJ, Hruz PW, Rudnick DA. Disruption of hepatic adipogenesis is associated with impaired liver regeneration in mice. Hepatology 2004; 40: 1322–1332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yang SQ, Lin HZ, Mandal AK, Huang J, Diehl AM. Disrupted signaling and inhibited regeneration in obese mice with fatty livers: implications for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease pathophysiology. Hepatology 2001; 34: 694–706. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamauchi H, Uetsuka K, Okada T, Nakayama H, Doi K. Impaired liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in db/db mice. Exp Toxicol Pathol 2003; 54: 281–286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Murata H, Yagi T, Iwagaki H, Ogino T, Sadamori H, Matsukawa H et al. Mechanism of impaired regeneration of fatty liver in mouse partial hepatectomy model. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 22: 2173–2180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DeAngelis RA, Markiewski MM, Taub R, Lambris JD. A high-fat diet impairs liver regeneration in C57BL/6 mice through overexpression of the NF-kappaB inhibitor, IkappaBalpha. Hepatology 2005; 42: 1148–1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Torbenson M, Yang SQ, Liu HZ, Huang J, Gage W, Diehl AM. STAT-3 overexpression and p21 up-regulation accompany impaired regeneration of fatty livers. Am J Pathol 2002; 161: 155–161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cressman DE, Greenbaum LE, DeAngelis RA, Ciliberto G, Furth EE, Poli V et al. Liver failure and defective hepatocyte regeneration in interleukin-6-deficient mice. Science 1996; 274: 1379–1383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamada Y, Webber EM, Kirillova I, Peschon JJ, Fausto N. Analysis of liver regeneration in mice lacking type 1 or type 2 tumor necrosis factor receptor: requirement for type 1 but not type 2 receptor. Hepatology 1998; 28: 959–970. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W, Liang X, Kellendonk C, Poli V, Taub R. STAT3 contributes to the mitogenic response of hepatocytes during liver regeneration. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 28411–28417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boone DL, Turer EE, Lee EG, Ahmad RC, Wheeler MT, Tsui C et al. The ubiquitin-modifying enzyme A20 is required for termination of Toll-like receptor responses. Nat Immunol 2004; 5: 1052–1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baratta JL, Ngo A, Lopez B, Kasabwalla N, Longmuir KJ, Robertson RT. Cellular organization of normal mouse liver: a histological, quantitative immunocytochemical, and fine structural analysis. Histochem Cell Biol 2009; 131: 713–726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Panesar N, Tolman K, Mazuski JE. Endotoxin stimulates hepatocyte interleukin-6 production. J Surg Res 1999; 85: 251–258. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Li W, Liang X, Kellendonk C, Poli V, Taub R. STAT3 contributes to the mitogenic response of hepatocytes during liver regeneration. J Biol Chem 2002; 277: 28411–28417. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Giraud S, Hurlstone A, Avril S, Coqueret O. Implication of BRG1 and cdk9 in the STAT3-mediated activation of the p21waf1 gene. Oncogene 2004; 23: 7391–7398. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Coqueret O, Gascan H. Functional interaction of STAT3 transcription factor with the cell cycle inhibitor p21WAF1/CIP1/SDI1. J Biol Chem 2000; 275: 18794–18800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lehmann K, Tschuor C, Rickenbacher A, Jang JH, Oberkofler CE, Tschopp O et al. Liver failure after extended hepatectomy in mice is mediated by a p21-dependent barrier to liver regeneration. Gastroenterology 2012; 143: 1609–1619 e4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Storch KF, Lipan O, Leykin I, Viswanathan N, Davis FC, Wong WH et al. Extensive and divergent circadian gene expression in liver and heart. Nature 2002; 417: 78–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller BH, McDearmon EL, Panda S, Hayes KR, Zhang J, Andrews JL et al. Circadian and CLOCK-controlled regulation of the mouse transcriptome and cell proliferation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104: 3342–3347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lee J, Lee Y, Lee MJ, Park E, Kang SH, Chung CH et al. Dual modification of BMAL1 by SUMO2/3 and ubiquitin promotes circadian activation of the CLOCK/BMAL1 complex. Mol Cell Biol 2008; 28: 6056–6065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stratmann M, Suter DM, Molina N, Naef F, Schibler U. Circadian Dbp transcription relies on highly dynamic BMAL1-CLOCK interaction with E boxes and requires the proteasome. Mol Cell 2012; 48: 277–278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Matsuo T, Yamaguchi S, Mitsui S, Emi A, Shimoda F, Okamura H. Control mechanism of the circadian clock for timing of cell division in vivo. Science 2003; 302: 255–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grechez-Cassiau A, Rayet B, Guillaumond F, Teboul M, Delaunay F. The circadian clock component BMAL1 is a critical regulator of p21WAF1/CIP1 expression and hepatocyte proliferation. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 4535–4542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tong X, Yin L. Circadian rhythms in liver physiology and liver diseases. Compr Physiol 2013; 3: 917–940. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shi SQ, Ansari TS, McGuinness OP, Wasserman DH, Johnson CH. Circadian disruption leads to insulin resistance and obesity. Curr Biol 2013; 23: 372–381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang L, Huang X, Meng Z, Dong B, Shiah S, Moore DD et al. Significance and mechanism of CYP7a1 gene regulation during the acute phase of liver regeneration. Mol Endocrinol 2009; 23: 137–145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yabe D, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Insig-2, a second endoplasmic reticulum protein that binds SCAP and blocks export of sterol regulatory element-binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 12753–12758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yabe D, Komuro R, Liang G, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. Liver-specific mRNA for Insig-2 down-regulated by insulin: implications for fatty acid synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003; 100: 3155–3160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jeoung NH, Harris RA. Pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase-4 deficiency lowers blood glucose and improves glucose tolerance in diet-induced obese mice. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2008; 295: E46–E54. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pashkov V, Huang J, Parameswara VK, Kedzierski W, Kurrasch DM, Tall GG et al. Regulator of G protein signaling (RGS16) inhibits hepatic fatty acid oxidation in a carbohydrate response element-binding protein (ChREBP)-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 2011; 286: 15116–15125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vereecke L, Beyaert R, van Loo G. Genetic relationships between A20/TNFAIP3, chronic inflammation and autoimmune disease. Biochem Soc Trans 2011; 39: 1086–1091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lodolce JP, Kolodziej LE, Rhee L, Kariuki SN, Franek BS, McGreal NM et al. African-derived genetic polymorphisms in TNFAIP3 mediate risk for autoimmunity. J Immunol 2010; 184: 7001–7009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang S, Wen F, Wiley GB, Kinter MT, Gaffney PM. An enhancer element harboring variants associated with systemic lupus erythematosus engages the TNFAIP3 promoter to influence A20 expression. PLoS Genet 2013; 9: e1003750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boonyasrisawat W, Eberle D, Bacci S, Zhang YY, Nolan D, Gervino EV et al. Tag polymorphisms at the A20 (TNFAIP3) locus are associated with lower gene expression and increased risk of coronary artery disease in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2007; 56: 499–505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Thomson W, Barton A, Ke X, Eyre S, Hinks A, Bowes J et al. Rheumatoid arthritis association at 6q23. Nat Genet 2007; 39: 1431–1433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhu L, Zhang F, Shen Q, Chen S, Wang X, Wang L et al. Characteristics of A20 gene polymorphisms in T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia. Hematology 2014; 19: 448–454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Song RH, Yu ZY, Wang Q, Muhali FS, Jiang WJ, Xiao L et al. Polymorphisms of the TNFAIP3 region and Graves' disease. Autoimmunity 2014; 47: 459–465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frazer KA, Ballinger DG, Cox DR, Hinds DA, Stuve LL, Gibbs RA et al. A second generation human haplotype map of over 3.1 million SNPs. Nature 2007; 449: 851–861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Altshuler DM, Gibbs RA, Peltonen L, Dermitzakis E, Schaffner SF, Yu F et al. Integrating common and rare genetic variation in diverse human populations. Nature 2010; 467: 52–58. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Folch J, Lees M, Sloane Stanley GH. A simple method for the isolation and purification of total lipides from animal tissues. J Biol Chem 1957; 226: 497–509. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.