Abstract
Intracellular single-celled parasites belonging to the large phylum Apicomplexa are amongst the most prevalent and morbidity-causing pathogens worldwide. In this review, we highlight a few of the many recent advances in the field that helped to clarify some important aspects of their fascinating biology and interaction with their hosts. Plasmodium falciparum causes malaria, and thus the recent emergence of resistance against the currently used drug combinations based on artemisinin has been of major interest for the scientific community. It resulted in great advances in understanding the resistance mechanisms that can hopefully be translated into altered future drug regimens. Apicomplexa are also experts in host cell manipulation and immune evasion. Toxoplasma gondii and Theileria sp., besides Plasmodium sp., are species that secrete effector molecules into the host cell to reach this aim. The underlying molecular mechanisms for how these proteins are trafficked to the host cytosol ( T. gondii and Plasmodium) and how a secreted protein can immortalize the host cell ( Theileria sp.) have been illuminated recently. Moreover, how such secreted proteins affect the host innate immune responses against T. gondii and the liver stages of Plasmodium has also been unraveled at the genetic and molecular level, leading to unexpected insights.
Methodological advances in metabolomics and molecular biology have been instrumental to solving some fundamental puzzles of mitochondrial carbon metabolism in Apicomplexa. Also, for the first time, the generation of stably transfected Cryptosporidium parasites was achieved, which opens up a wide variety of experimental possibilities for this understudied, important apicomplexan pathogen.
Keywords: Apicomplexa, parasites, Plasmodium, T. gondii, CRISPR/Cas9
Introduction
Apicomplexa comprise a large phylum of single-celled, obligate intracellular protozoan organisms that all have a parasitic lifestyle. Among the more than 6000 named and probably more than one million unnamed species 1 are some of great public health and economic relevance, since they cause severe diseases in humans and livestock, affecting millions each year 2– 6. Therefore, increased knowledge about their biology in general, e.g. to exploit vulnerabilities, and their interaction with the host organism, e.g. to stimulate the immune system, is of great importance and promises major benefits in understanding and combating the diseases they cause. In addition, they possess a fascinating biology as intracellular eukaryotes thriving within another eukaryotic cell ( Figure 1), which clearly sets them apart from other pathogens like bacteria and viruses. Taken together, these are all good reasons to pay attention to these fascinating organisms. This review will focus on four important genera.
Plasmodium falciparum and four other Plasmodium species that affect humans cause malaria, a mosquito-transmitted, potentially deadly disease. According to the latest data from the World Health Organization (WHO), the number of deaths due to malaria has declined by 48% between 2000 and 2015 but the disease still causes the loss of ca. 438,000 lives each year of the 218 million people infected, mostly children under 5 years of age 5.
An estimated one-third of the human population is chronically infected with Toxoplasma gondii leading to toxoplasmosis. It can cause severe symptoms in newborns (e.g. encephalitis and ocular disease) when a previously non-infected mother contracts the infection during pregnancy by ingesting infectious stages of T. gondii via contaminated food, water, or dust 7. The latest numbers from WHO rank toxoplasmosis highest with respect to the overall lifelong disease burden among those foodborne diseases caused by protozoan parasites 8.
The same study identified cryptosporidiosis (caused by two Cryptosporidium species, Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum) as the second most important disease in this class. Worldwide, each of these species infects 8–10 million people per year, but in addition they also cause considerable disease in livestock.
Lastly, Theileria parva, a tick-transmitted apicomplexan of ruminants, leads to the death of more than 1 million cattle per year in sub-Saharan Africa, causing costs of >300 million US$. This has severe socio-economic consequences for those regions 4.
T. gondii, and to a lesser extent Plasmodium sp., has also gained increased attention from cell biologists owing to a number of unique mechanisms of host cell entry, division, motility, etc., thereby becoming model organisms for such aspects 9. Both medical importance and model character are reflected by the overall citations in PubMed (several thousands from January 2013–December 2015 for the four taxa), making it impossible to cover even the most interesting discoveries of the last 2–3 years in all areas of apicomplexan research in reasonable depth. Consequently, only a few, admittedly subjective highlights in the fields of cell and molecular biology, biochemistry, and immunology as well as aspects concerning drugs will be mentioned here. These were selected because they are expected to make a major impact in the following years or offer explanations for puzzling unexplained observations in apicomplexan biology.
Methodological advances as game-changers
Many new findings require new technologies at first, and with the advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) techniques 10, the number and quality of apicomplexan genome sequences and respective transcriptomes have been growing considerably, allowing insights and discoveries that would have been hard or impossible to gain a few years ago 11– 13. The genetic tools are most advanced for T. gondii and Plasmodium, and further specifics can be found in recent articles 14– 17. Moreover, the Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR-associated protein 9 (Cas9) genome editing system 18 and related techniques started a wave in 2012 19, 20 that swept over the life sciences and since then has also reached the Apicomplexa. It has allowed targeted deletions, mutations, or gene additions so far in Plasmodium, T. gondii, and Cryptosporidium with unprecedented ease 21– 25, as will be illustrated here for the latter.
Cryptosporidium sp. have some unique biological aspects within the phylum, which are of great evolutionary interest, like the presence of only a rudimentary mitochondrion (mitosome) or the absence of the secondary plastid called apicoplast 26, 27. However, the lack of protocols for efficient long-term propagation in cell culture, reverse genetics, and thus methods to mark the parasites with fluorescent proteins has long precluded a broader analysis of many of those aspects. Application of CRISPR/Cas9, together with a number of smart optimizations of established techniques, plus the transfer of transfected parasites directly into the intestine of immune-deficient mice and their subsequent selection therein, changed the game 22. This allowed for the first time the establishment of stably transfected C. parvum parasites and opens up a whole variety of options. For example, parasites expressing a reporter enzyme like luciferase will enable comprehensive drug screening efforts, allowing the tackling of an urgent need. Likewise, generation of genetically attenuated parasites by multi-gene deletions can be envisaged as a means to develop oral vaccines for livestock (or even humans). Effective vaccines for the former would minimize the contamination of the environment with excreted infectious oocysts. Finally, many fascinating cell biological aspects can now be followed and analyzed using fluorescent sporozoites.
All about artemisinin in a nutshell: biotechnological production, mode of action, and the emergence and nature of Plasmodium drug resistance
In 2015, the Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine was in part awarded to Chinese scientist Youyou Tu for her major contributions to the discovery of artemisinin in the 1970s 28, 29. It is the ingredient of a traditional Chinese herbal anti-malarial treatment that, when metabolized in situ to dihydroartemisinin, very efficiently kills Plasmodium sp.. Artemisinin combination therapies (ACTs) are currently the drugs of choice and recommended by WHO for treating P. falciparum infections worldwide, largely because drug resistance against other available compounds precludes their further use in many areas of Africa and South-East Asia (SEA) 30. ACTs consist of fast-acting artemisinin (or its derivatives) and less-potent, long-acting partner drugs. Artemisinin’s mode of action is unique in the sense that not a single protein or cell component but a multitude of parasite molecules are targeted by the compound via the generation of highly reactive endoperoxide-derived radicals 31. These affect at least 124 parasites but few, if any, host proteins (at the level of currently applied experimental resolution), as a recent study reported 32. This probably leads to the observed cellular stress response and increased molecular tagging of the affected proteins for disposal by the “cellular garbage can”, the proteasome 33. Many of these proteins are known or suspected to be essential for parasite growth, and their concerted damage by an unselective mechanism like oxidative damage could be expected to make it fairly difficult for the parasite to develop resistance (see below).
Only one plant is known to produce artemisinin, Artemisia annua L., and extraction yields do not exceed 0.5%. Therefore, the molecular deciphering of its biosynthesis 34 and the subsequent biotechnological production of artemisinic acid, the key precursor from which artemisinin and other derivatives can be derived by straightforward chemical synthesis, was a major breakthrough 35, 36. The genes required for this pathway were engineered into a yeast strain that can now produce artemisinic acid with a yield of 25 g/L of fermentation broth 36. Notably, although developed by a company, all intellectual property rights have been provided free of charge.
Unfortunately, this success story has recently been dampened by the emergence (again!) of resistance phenotypes in SEA 37, 38. Resistance is defined as a parasite clearance half-life of at least 5 hours following ACT treatment, whereas non-resistant Plasmodium parasites are all killed earlier. The problem lies in the fact that delayed clearance (parasites are still killed, but slower) exposes the surviving organisms to the second drug in ACT, increasing the chance that resistance to this partner compound develops. Clearly, understanding the mechanism of artemisinin resistance is of utmost importance to be able to counteract and change drug regimens or composition.
Here, NGS and related techniques come into play. Sequencing resistant P. falciparum isolates directly from patients, a number of recent studies provided solid evidence for multiple mutations in a gene called kelch13 ( K13), which are associated with increased resistance 39– 42. Transcriptomics identified an additional protein presumably involved, phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase (PI3K) 43 (for details, see Figure 2).
Another transcriptomics study of 1000 (!) clinical P. falciparum isolates provided evidence that a population of parasites exists that is slowed down in growth and shows an upregulated so-called “unfolded protein response” pathway 44. This might allow parasites to repair proteins that were oxidatively damaged by artemisinin’s mode of action (see above) and progress through the rest of their lifecycle in red blood cells. The reduced growth would give them more time to do so. Puzzlingly, this report found no association between PI3K transcript levels and either parasite clearance half-life or K13 mutations. Evidently, more efforts are required to reconcile all the observations and to fully understand resistance development. Nevertheless, in a very short time, from the initial observation of delayed clearance times of ACT in SEA to the current studies, immense progress has been made in understanding the obviously very complex artemisinin resistance mechanism(s). Technological breakthroughs were just there at the right time to face this challenge.
Mitochondrial metabolism – similar but still significantly different
Condensing parasitism to the meaning of the Greek word παράσιτος (parásitos; person who eats at someone else's table), and regarding biochemistry as the underlying science to reveal this eating behavior, there is an obvious and long-standing interest in understanding apicomplexan metabolism, not least because enzymes can make good drug targets 45. Again, technological advances in the field of metabolomics, together with gene knockouts, have greatly helped finding some answers to who eats what, when, and how.
Mitochondrial carbon metabolism in Apicomplexa is central to the generation of energy and several precursors of other pathways that occur outside the organelle, like pyrimidine and heme biosynthesis 46– 49. One fundamental energy-generating system in most eukaryotes is the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle in this organelle. It leads to complete oxidation of carbohydrates, lipids, and amino acids, thus allowing much greater ATP generation through the electron transport chain (ETC) than e.g. breakdown of glucose via glycolysis. T. gondii and Plasmodium sp. can get along with an energy supply derived only from glycolysis as long as they are living in glucose-rich environments. In fact, most (but not all) TCA cycle enzymes in P. falciparum could be knocked out with only little influence on the blood stage forms 50. Nevertheless, for a number of reasons, it seemed that a TCA cycle and ETC were operating in both organisms. For instance, several recent studies 50– 55 have shown that the development of Plasmodium berghei (a rodent model for P. falciparum) in the mosquito is not possible without a functional TCA cycle or ETC (summarized in 47). These studies have highlighted the great flexibility of both Plasmodium sp. and T. gondii with regard to substrate utilization and adaptation of carbon metabolism to different host environments.
However, an unresolved mystery was the experimentally well-proven absence of a key enzyme complex, pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH), in the mitochondrion of Apicomplexa that would allow these organisms to feed glucose-derived pyruvate into the TCA cycle 47, 48 ( Figure 3a). This longstanding conundrum has now been solved, and it could be shown that a structurally related mitochondrial enzyme complex, branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase (BCKDH) usually involved in the degradation of branched-chain amino acids (BCAAs), has evolved to also take over the PDH task, generating acetyl-CoA from pyruvate 51 ( Figure 3a). Since pyruvate and the usual substrates for BCKDH are structurally quite similar ( Figure 3b), it is likely that only few (so far unknown) mutations were necessary to acquire the required substrate specificity. It is an illuminating example that holes in metabolic pathways predicted from genome data are not necessarily an annotation problem but can reflect evolutionary processes of reductive evolution 46, 48.
Reductive evolution aims to reduce the considerable metabolic burden of gene and protein synthesis when the function of lost genes can be fulfilled otherwise 56, 57. Importantly, in this case, parasitism wasn’t the driving force, since free-living dinoflagellates that share a common ancestor with Apicomplexa are also devoid of a mitochondrial PDH but possess BCKDH 46. Interestingly, while Plasmodium sp. have lost the entire BCAA degradation pathway of enzymes operating before and after BCKDH 46, 48, thus saving even more on gene and protein synthesis, T. gondii as well as non-parasitic photosynthetic algae related to Apicomplexa have kept it 58.
Understanding apicomplexan host cell manipulation – it all depends on protein export
One of the most fascinating aspects of the biology of Apicomplexa in general is their remarkable capacity to manipulate their respective host cells to suit their own demands. This causes changes in host cell signaling, nutrient delivery to the parasite, and evasion of host immunity 59– 62. Amongst the many strategies leading to this outcome, unique examples are provided by T. parva and Theileria annulata.
Both species have the ability to immortalize (transform) their host cells, which resembles in many aspects cancerous cell transformation. T. parva transforms bovine B and T lymphocytes, whereas T. annulata, besides B cells, also transforms macrophages and dendritic cells 63. Activation of the c-Jun pathway, a signaling cascade involved in controlling many cellular processes including proliferation 64, has been shown previously to be required for Theileria-induced transformation 65, 66. However, how this is accomplished at the molecular level has long been elusive.
Now, Marsolier et al. 67 have reported the identification of a parasite-encoded enzyme called peptidyl-prolyl isomerase (PPIase), a homologue of human parvulin (hPIN1), as the transforming agent. Upon export into the host cell, the Theileria PPIase, like the human homolog, binds to a host protein (an ubiquitin ligase that controls the levels of c-Jun), leading to its destabilization and subsequent degradation. This in turn results in higher levels of c-Jun and eventually leads to cell transformation. These surprising findings go beyond parasite biology, as they also define prolyl-isomerization as a conserved mechanism that is important in cancer development.
T. gondii, amongst other Apicomplexa, is also a known expert in manipulation of the host cell at various levels via the secretion upon host cell entry of effector proteins 68, 69, the number of which (currently around 80 58) is still increasing 70– 72. The so-called rhoptry proteins (ROPs) are injected into the host cell cytosol during the actual invasion process via special organelles called rhoptries 73. A number of so-called GRA proteins derive from other organelles, the dense granules, and are delivered into the host cytosol after the parasite has formed its vacuole wherein it resides 74. Consequently, and in contrast to the ROPs, their mechanism of trafficking must include a way to pass this membrane structure. This aspect recently gained increased attention 75.
Precedence for this transport pathway came from the one that had been described for erythrocytic stages of Plasmodium. There, one molecular entity in the vacuolar membrane named “Plasmodium translocon of exported proteins” (PTEX) was recently described, which transports many parasite proteins into the cytosol of the red blood cell 76– 79. Delivery to PTEX depends in turn on prior export of proteins out of the parasite cell into the vacuolar space, which requires cleavage by a specific protease (plasmepsin 5) at a particular sequence motif called “Plasmodium export element” (PEXEL) 79. This PEXEL motif allows the identification of many but not all proteins that are to be exported into the host cytosol 80.
It made sense to also look for such a motif in T. gondii – and it was found for numerous known GRA proteins 75. Now, several groups recently reported the importance of export of T. gondii aspartyl protease ASP5 (the homolog to plasmepsin 5 in Plasmodium), which resides in the parasite’s Golgi and processes those GRA proteins containing the PEXEL-like motif 70, 72, 81. However, not all GRAs that depend on ASP5 for export contain a PEXEL-like motif. In Plasmodium, plasmepsin 5 is an essential gene already under in vitro growth conditions. This fact allowed the development of a very potent inhibitor of this crucial enzyme and that was subsequently used for structural studies 82. In contrast, T. gondii parasites with a deleted ASP5 grow fine in cell culture but are much less virulent in a mouse model than the highly virulent parental strain. The very same phenotype has been described for a knockout strain of the ASP5-processed GRA14 83. Together, this indicates the crucial importance of a repertoire of exported proteins during a natural infection. One reason for this might be the observed reduced migration of infected dendritic cells (which are known to be misused by T. gondii as Trojan horses to reach the brain 84), thereby lowering the dissemination within the host 72. Interestingly, this disparate phenotype upon gene deletion of in vitro and in vivo growth, together with a severe impact on protein export into the host, is shared with another recently reported T. gondii parasitophorous vacuolar membrane (PVM)-resident protein, Myc regulation 1 (MYR1) 85. Whether MYR1 is part of the T. gondii “translocon of exported proteins” needs to be determined, since e.g. Plasmodium sp. lack a homolog of MYR1. In addition, a T. gondii homolog of the putative PTEX pore protein EXP2 86, GRA17, is involved in the translocation of only small molecules through the PVM but apparently not of proteins 87. This indicates that both species use very different molecular complexes for protein export into the host cell.
Another distinctive difference to Plasmodium sp. is that in the absence of ASP5, certain GRA proteins fail to be exported into the host’s cytosol and then further on into its nucleus. Here, they cause large disturbances in the transcriptome of the infected cell 70, 72. Plasmodium sporozoites, the stage that infects hepatocytes, apparently do not possess dense granules 61. Nevertheless, large transcriptomic changes in liver cells occur upon infection 88. Apparently, in both parasite species different effectors accomplish similar things, i.e. they modify their host cells to optimize their own survival therein.
The T. gondii studies further indicate that many more exported effector proteins besides the known ROPs and GRAs need to be identified to fully understand the ways this parasite manipulates its host cell. The ASP5 mutants will be a valuable source in this respect. More studies will be required to understand the details and evolution of this crucial mechanism in the Apicomplexa 89.
Innate immune defense always starts at the host-parasite interface
Innate immune responses are the immediate answer to an infection. They are triggered by the recognition of pathogen-derived molecules via evolutionarily conserved host receptors 90. In the last two decades, numerous studies found that innate sensing of apicomplexan infection is mediated by membrane-bound and cytoplasmic so-called pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) such as Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and Nod-like receptors (NLRs) 91, 92. Early sensing of infection by these pathways in antigen-presenting cells bridges the innate and adaptive immune responses by licensing them to interact with naïve, antigen-specific CD4 + and CD8 + T cells to stimulate them to become effector cells capable of producing cytokines and/or cytotoxic molecules. Efficient control of T. gondii and Plasmodium sp. infections is mediated by T and NK cell-derived interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) 93, 94. This cytokine triggers the activation of very diverse effector pathways, e.g. NO production in infected host cells 95 or induction of immunity-related GTPase (IRG) proteins (a family of rodent IFN-γ-induced GTPases) or GBP proteins (IFNγ-inducible guanylate-binding proteins) that damage the PVM ( Figure 1), thereby mediating parasite death 96– 101. Recent studies emphasized the importance of GBP1 100, GBP2 101, and the cooperation of IRGs with GBPs 99 in cell-autonomous immunity and anti-parasitic resistance.
While the effects of IRGs on T. gondii in infected mice were known for some time, it became only recently apparent that laboratory mice and wild Mus musculus show enormous sequence diversity in particular genes of this family, with great and unexpected consequences for infection 102. For decades, T. gondii strains were defined as being highly virulent in various strains of common laboratory mice because even a single parasite could kill them within days. Unexpectedly, those strains totally failed to reproduce this phenotype in wild mice. This is largely due to a highly polymorphic IRG allele that confers resistance against virulent parasites by interfering with their virulence factors of the ROP family of protein kinases 102. The study is a striking example that lab mice and their wild counterparts can show very different responses to identical immunological challenges.
Protective immunity against T. gondii is governed by an IL-12-triggered Th1-type immune response, which involves NK cells, CD4 + effector cells, and CD8 + cytotoxic T cells as sources of IFN-γ 93. In order to induce its production by these cells, the innate arm of the immune system needs to sense the infection and relay this information into IL-12 production as an igniting factor for the ensuing Th1 response. Control of the infection is dependent on MYD88 103, an adaptor molecule common to several TLRs, and the parasite-derived TLR-ligand T. gondii profilin ( TgPRF). The latter binds TLR11, which triggers a signaling cascade that stimulates IL-12 production by dendritic cells 59, 104. However, TLR11 deficiency only modestly affects the survival of T. gondii-infected mice. Only recently was TLR12 shown to be involved in host resistance to T. gondii by recognizing TgPRF 105 and cooperating with TLR11 to induce IL-12 in macrophages and dendritic cells 106.
Other studies demonstrate the involvement of additional pathogen-derived molecules and PRRs in starting an immune response by contributing to the stimulation of IL-12 production. A recent study employed mice carrying a mutation in UNC93B1, a molecule involved in subcellular trafficking of endosomal TLRs 107. These mice are highly susceptible to experimental toxoplasmosis and their phenotype is not recapitulated by mice deficient in nucleic acid sensing (TLR3-/TLR7-/TLR9-deficient) but rather by mice deficient in TLR7/TLR9 and TLR11, highlighting the redundancy of pathogen recognition in those animals 108 ( Figure 4a). Humans lack TLR12 and harbor TLR11 as a pseudogene but produce high levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines in response to live phagocytosed parasites and parasite RNA and DNA. Thus, nucleic-acid-sensing TLRs seem to be the PRR operating in both hosts 108, 109, while recognition of TgPRF by the TLR11/12 pathway is most likely an adaptation of rodents being a major intermediate host for T. gondii 109.
In contrast to T. gondii, which can infect virtually any nucleated cell, Plasmodium sp. are restricted to infecting hepatocytes and erythrocytes. Upon injection of Plasmodium sporozoites by the mosquito vector into the skin of the host, they first migrate to the liver and invade hepatocytes where they massively replicate. Early work on innate sensing of Plasmodium revealed that hemozoin-containing parasite DNA is recognized by TLR9 and mediates proinflammatory cytokine production by dendritic cells 110, but little was known about the hepatic immune response. Strikingly, and in stark contrast to the erythrocytic cycle, which causes the well-known malaria symptoms like recurrent fever, this initial contact between the parasite and its host cell is without clinical signs. This could be taken as evidence for an immunologically silent hepatic stage of the infection. However, recently it was shown that hepatocytes do respond to P. berghei sporozoite invasion with induction of a type I IFN response. Parasitemia in liver and red blood cells was increased and leucocyte recruitment was decreased in type I IFN receptor-deficient ( Ifnar -/-) mice, highlighting the important role of type I IFN at this early phase of infection 111. The authors proposed a mechanism involving sensing of Plasmodium RNA by the cytoplasmic RNA receptor Mda5 and signaling via the mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein (Mavs) and the transcription factors Irf3 and Irf7, finally leading to transcription of IFN-α and IFN-β ( Figure 4b). A potential link among IFN-α, cell recruitment, and parasite elimination could be IFN-γ-secreting NK T cells, suggested by a recent study using the related species Plasmodium yoelii 112. However, a successful immune response often comes at a price, since a type I IFN response also causes malaria-associated immunopathology, such as liver damage and brain pathology 113, 114.
Outlook
Obviously, we could give only a subjective glimpse of the recent exciting developments in understanding apicomplexan biology. What will come next?
One can probably barely overestimate the impact that CRISPR/Cas9 technology will have on Apicomplexa research. It is expected that genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 gene knockouts, similar to what has been described for mammals 115, will also be published soon for Apicomplexa (preliminary data have been reported already for T. gondii 116). This will allow researchers to qualify genes as being either essential or not under different in situ conditions and to discover so far unknown phenotypes. For instance, parasites deficient in molecules known to target the innate immune system (but also knockdown of host PRRs, especially in primary human cells) will reveal pathways that are necessary for innate sensing and hence parasite control in rodents and humans and help to answer the question of whether actual infection, phagocytosis, or mere contact (“kiss and spit”) is required for CD4 + and CD8 + T cell responses.
Moreover, microscopy-based genome-wide screens on CRISPR/Cas9-generated knockouts or fluorescently tagged proteins can be envisaged to follow 117. It would allow testing for function and localization of proteins that could not be achieved with this precision, speed, and coverage so far.
In particular, the less-studied stages (e.g. sexual stages within the mosquito [ Plasmodium] or the cat [ T. gondii]) will be of scientific interest. For the latter, establishing feline organoid cultures that would allow in vitro culture of the sexual stages will be crucial 118. One of the most eminent questions in this respect is why does sex only take place in cats when this parasite is otherwise so extremely promiscuous in its host range? Together with the advent of modern metabolomics and gene knockouts, the answer to this and other questions might be within reach in the next few years.
Since Apicomplexa are pathogens, the development of new drugs and drug target candidates will of course remain a major driver for studying these parasites, and it is inevitable that there will be a big gain in understanding of the underlying molecular processes. Recent studies on crucial metabolic pathways for lipids 119, 120, sugars 121, and isoprenoids 122 have shown more potential metabolic vulnerabilities of apicomplexan parasites. Moreover, a new class of highly active anti-malarial compounds has already been described 123, 124, and one of them, the spiroindolone KAE609, has shown very promising results in recent phase II clinical trials against uncomplicated malaria 125– 127. Although drug resistance in the laboratory has already been described for spiroindolones, knowledge about its reported mechanism 123, 128, 129 will hopefully help in designing strategies to pre-emptively delay the spread of resistance in nature once KAE609 has been brought onto the market. However, the race is bound to start all over again – winner currently unknown.
Abbreviations
ACTs, artemisinin combination therapies; BCAA, branched-chain amino acid; ASP5, aspartyl protease 5; BCAT, branched-chain amino acid transferase; BCKDH, branched-chain alpha-ketoacid dehydrogenase; CRISPR, Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats; Cas, CRISPR associated; ETC, electron transport chain; hPINI, human parvulin; IFN-γ, interferon-gamma γ; IFNα/β, interferon α/β; IRG, immunity related GTPases; K13, kelch13; Mavs, mitochondrial antiviral signaling protein; MC, 2-methylcitrate; MYR1, Myc regulation 1; NGS, next-generation sequencing; NOD, Nod-like receptor; PDH, pyruvate dehydrogenase; PEXEL, Plasmodium export element; PI3K, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase; PI3P, phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate; PPIase, peptidyl-prolyl isomerase; PRR, pathogen recognition receptor; PTEX, Plasmodium translocon of exported proteins; PVM, parasitophorous vacuolar membrane; ROPs, rhoptry proteins; SEA, South-East Asia; TCA, tricarboxylic acid; TgPFR, Toxoplasma gondii-derived protein profilin; TLR, Toll-like receptor.
Dedicated to the memory of Klaus Lingelbach, a devoted Plasmodium scientist and a mentor of Frank Seeber.
Acknowledgements
We apologize to all whose studies were not mentioned owing to space constraints or were missed owing to our ignorance. We thank Michael Laue and Florian Müller for providing the image for Figure 1 and Toni Aebischer and Totta Kasemo for comments on the manuscript.
Dedicated to the memory of Klaus Lingelbach, a devoted Plasmodium scientist and a mentor of Frank Seeber.
Editorial Note on the Review Process
F1000 Faculty Reviews are commissioned from members of the prestigious F1000 Faculty and are edited as a service to readers. In order to make these reviews as comprehensive and accessible as possible, the referees provide input before publication and only the final, revised version is published. The referees who approved the final version are listed with their names and affiliations but without their reports on earlier versions (any comments will already have been addressed in the published version).
The referees who approved this article are:
Julius Lukes, Institute of Parasitology, Biology Centre, Czech Academy of Sciences and Faculty of Science, České Budějovice, Czech Republic
Jeroen Saeij, Department of Pathology, Microbiology &Immunology, University of California, Davis, Ca, USA
Daniel Gold, Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology, University of California, Davis, USA
Funding Statement
The authors are senior members of the Research Training Group 2046 (GRK 2046) "Parasite Infections: From Experimental Models to Natural Systems" funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
[version 1; referees: 2 approved]
References
- 1. Adl SM, Leander BS, Simpson AG, et al. : Diversity, nomenclature, and taxonomy of protists. Syst Biol. 2007;56(4):684–9. 10.1080/10635150701494127 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Battle KE, Gething PW, Elyazar IR, et al. : The global public health significance of Plasmodium vivax. Adv Parasitol. 2012;80:1–111. 10.1016/B978-0-12-397900-1.00001-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Checkley W, White AC, Jr, Jaganath D, et al. : A review of the global burden, novel diagnostics, therapeutics, and vaccine targets for cryptosporidium. Lancet Infect Dis. 2015;15(1):85–94. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70772-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Morrison WI: The aetiology, pathogenesis and control of theileriosis in domestic animals. Rev Sci Tech. 2015;34(2):599–611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. World Health Organization: World malaria report 2015. World Health Organization;2015;1–280. Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 6. Torgerson PR, Mastroiacovo P: The global burden of congenital toxoplasmosis: a systematic review. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(7):501–8. 10.2471/BLT.12.111732 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Schlüter D, Däubener W, Schares G, et al. : Animals are key to human toxoplasmosis. Int J Med Microbiol. 2014;304(7):917–29. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2014.09.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Havelaar AH, Kirk MD, Torgerson PR, et al. : World health organization global estimates and regional comparisons of the burden of foodborne disease in 2010. PLoS Med. 2015;12(12):e1001923. 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001923 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Kim K, Weiss LM: Toxoplasma gondii: the model apicomplexan. Int J Parasitol. 2004;34(3):423–32. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2003.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Reuter JA, Spacek DV, Snyder MP: High-throughput sequencing technologies. Mol Cell. 2015;58(4):586–97. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Foth BJ, Otto TD: Genomics illuminates parasite biology. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(11):727. 10.1038/nrmicro3368 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Wasmuth JD: Realizing the promise of parasite genomics. Trends Parasitol. 2014;30(7):321–3. 10.1016/j.pt.2014.04.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Forrester SJ, Hall N: The revolution of whole genome sequencing to study parasites. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 2014;195(2):77–81. 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2014.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Andenmatten N, Egarter S, Jackson AJ, et al. : Conditional genome engineering in Toxoplasma gondii uncovers alternative invasion mechanisms. Nat Methods. 2013;10(2):125–7. 10.1038/nmeth.2301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Jiménez-Ruiz E, Wong EH, Pall GS, et al. : Advantages and disadvantages of conditional systems for characterization of essential genes in Toxoplasma gondii. Parasitology. 2014;141(11):1390–8. 10.1017/S0031182014000559 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. de Koning-Ward TF, Gilson PR, Crabb BS: Advances in molecular genetic systems in malaria. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2015;13(6):373–87. 10.1038/nrmicro3450 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Limenitakis J, Soldati-Favre D: Functional genetics in apicomplexa: potentials and limits. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(11):1579–88. 10.1016/j.febslet.2011.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. Sternberg SH, Doudna JA: Expanding the biologist's toolkit with CRISPR-Cas9. Mol Cell. 2015;58(4):568–74. 10.1016/j.molcel.2015.02.032 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Jinek M, Chylinski K, Fonfara I, et al. : A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science. 2012;337(6096):816–21. 10.1126/science.1225829 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Ledford H: CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature. 2015;522(7554):20–4. 10.1038/522020a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Shen B, Brown KM, Lee TD, et al. : Efficient gene disruption in diverse strains of Toxoplasma gondii using CRISPR/CAS9. MBio. 2014;5(3):e01114–14. 10.1128/mBio.01114-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Vinayak S, Pawlowic MC, Sateriale A, et al. : Genetic modification of the diarrhoeal pathogen Cryptosporidium parvum. Nature. 2015;523(7561):477–80. 10.1038/nature14651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Ghorbal M, Gorman M, Macpherson CR, et al. : Genome editing in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Nat Biotechnol. 2014;32(8):819–21. 10.1038/nbt.2925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Wagner JC, Platt RJ, Goldfless SJ, et al. : Efficient CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genome editing in Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Methods. 2014;11(9):915–8. 10.1038/nmeth.3063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Sidik SM, Hackett CG, Tran F, et al. : Efficient genome engineering of Toxoplasma gondii using CRISPR/Cas9. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100450. 10.1371/journal.pone.0100450 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Clode PL, Koh WH, Thompson RC: Life without a host cell: what is Cryptosporidium? Trends Parasitol. 2015;31(12):614–24. 10.1016/j.pt.2015.08.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Ryan U, Hijjawi N: New developments in Cryptosporidium research. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45(6):367–73. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2015.01.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Su XZ, Miller LH: The discovery of artemisinin and the nobel prize in physiology or medicine. Sci China Life Sci. 2015;58(11):1175–9. 10.1007/s11427-015-4948-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Tu Y: The discovery of artemisinin (qinghaosu) and gifts from Chinese medicine. Nat Med. 2011;17(10):1217–20. 10.1038/nm.2471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Cui L, Mharakurwa S, Ndiaye D, et al. : Antimalarial drug resistance: literature review and activities and findings of the ICEMR network. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2015;93(3 Suppl):57–68. 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. O'Neill PM, Barton VE, Ward SA: The molecular mechanism of action of artemisinin--the debate continues. Molecules. 2010;15(3):1705–21. 10.3390/molecules15031705 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Wang J, Zhang CJ, Chia WN, et al. : Haem-activated promiscuous targeting of artemisinin in Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Commun. 2015;6:10111. 10.1038/ncomms10111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Dogovski C, Xie SC, Burgio G, et al. : Targeting the cell stress response of Plasmodium falciparum to overcome artemisinin resistance. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(4):e1002132. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Brown GD: The biosynthesis of artemisinin (Qinghaosu) and the phytochemistry of Artemisia annua L. (Qinghao). Molecules. 2010;15(11):7603–98. 10.3390/molecules15117603 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Paddon CJ, Keasling JD: Semi-synthetic artemisinin: a model for the use of synthetic biology in pharmaceutical development. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12(5):355–67. 10.1038/nrmicro3240 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Paddon CJ, Westfall PJ, Pitera DJ, et al. : High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature. 2013;496(7446):528–32. 10.1038/nature12051 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Fairhurst RM: Understanding artemisinin-resistant malaria: what a difference a year makes. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2015;28(5):417–25. 10.1097/QCO.0000000000000199 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Ashley EA, Dhorda M, Fairhurst RM, et al. : Spread of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(5):411–23. 10.1056/NEJMoa1314981 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Takala-Harrison S, Jacob CG, Arze C, et al. : Independent emergence of artemisinin resistance mutations among Plasmodium falciparum in Southeast Asia. J Infect Dis. 2015;211(5):670–9. 10.1093/infdis/jiu491 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Straimer J, Gnädig NF, Witkowski B, et al. : Drug resistance. K13-propeller mutations confer artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparum clinical isolates. Science. 2015;347(6220):428–31. 10.1126/science.1260867 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Nair S, Nkhoma SC, Serre D, et al. : Single-cell genomics for dissection of complex malaria infections. Genome Res. 2014;24(6):1028–38. 10.1101/gr.168286.113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Lin JT, Hathaway NJ, Saunders DL, et al. : Using amplicon deep sequencing to detect genetic signatures of Plasmodium vivax relapse. J Infect Dis. 2015;212(6):999–1008. 10.1093/infdis/jiv142 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Mbengue A, Bhattacharjee S, Pandharkar T, et al. : A molecular mechanism of artemisinin resistance in Plasmodium falciparummalaria. Nature. 2015;520(7549):683–7. 10.1038/nature14412 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Mok S, Ashley EA, Ferreira PE, et al. : Drug resistance. Population transcriptomics of human malaria parasites reveals the mechanism of artemisinin resistance. Science. 2015;347(6220):431–5. 10.1126/science.1260403 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Kafsack BF, Llinás M: Eating at the table of another: metabolomics of host-parasite interactions. Cell Host Microbe. 2010;7(2):90–9. 10.1016/j.chom.2010.01.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Danne JC, Gornik SG, Macrae JI, et al. : Alveolate mitochondrial metabolic evolution: dinoflagellates force reassessment of the role of parasitism as a driver of change in apicomplexans. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(1):123–39. 10.1093/molbev/mss205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Jacot D, Waller RF, Soldati-Favre D, et al. : Apicomplexan energy metabolism: carbon source promiscuity and the quiescence hyperbole. Trends Parasitol. 2016;32(1):56–70. 10.1016/j.pt.2015.09.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Seeber F, Limenitakis J, Soldati-Favre D: Apicomplexan mitochondrial metabolism: a story of gains, losses and retentions. Trends Parasitol. 2008;24(10):468–78. 10.1016/j.pt.2008.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Vaidya AB, Mather MW: Mitochondrial evolution and functions in malaria parasites. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2009;63:249–67. 10.1146/annurev.micro.091208.073424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Ke H, Lewis IA, Morrisey JM, et al. : Genetic investigation of tricarboxylic acid metabolism during the Plasmodium falciparum life cycle. Cell Rep. 2015;11(1):164–74. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.03.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Oppenheim RD, Creek DJ, Macrae JI, et al. : BCKDH: the missing link in apicomplexan mitochondrial metabolism is required for full virulence of Toxoplasma gondii and Plasmodium berghei. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(7):e1004263. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sturm A, Mollard V, Cozijnsen A, et al. : Mitochondrial ATP synthase is dispensable in blood-stage Plasmodium berghei rodent malaria but essential in the mosquito phase. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(33):10216–23. 10.1073/pnas.1423959112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Hino A, Hirai M, Tanaka TQ, et al. : Critical roles of the mitochondrial complex II in oocyst formation of rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium berghei. J Biochem. 2012;152(3):259–68. 10.1093/jb/mvs058 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Srivastava A, Creek DJ, Evans KJ, et al. : Host reticulocytes provide metabolic reservoirs that can be exploited by malaria parasites. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(6):e1004882. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004882 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Storm J, Sethia S, Blackburn GJ, et al. : Phospho enolpyruvate carboxylase identified as a key enzyme in erythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum carbon metabolism. PLoS Pathog. 2014;10(1):e1003876. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003876 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Lynch M, Marinov GK: The bioenergetic costs of a gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(51):15690–5. 10.1073/pnas.1514974112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Morris JJ: Black queen evolution: the role of leakiness in structuring microbial communities. Trends Genet. 2015;31(8):475–82. 10.1016/j.tig.2015.05.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Woo YH, Ansari H, Otto TD, et al. : Chromerid genomes reveal the evolutionary path from photosynthetic algae to obligate intracellular parasites. eLife. 2015;4:e06974. 10.7554/eLife.06974 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Plattner F, Soldati-Favre D: Hijacking of host cellular functions by the Apicomplexa. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2008;62:471–87. 10.1146/annurev.micro.62.081307.162802 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Maier AG, Cooke BM, Cowman AF, et al. : Malaria parasite proteins that remodel the host erythrocyte. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2009;7(5):341–54. 10.1038/nrmicro2110 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Ingmundson A, Alano P, Matuschewski K, et al. : Feeling at home from arrival to departure: protein export and host cell remodelling during Plasmodium liver stage and gametocyte maturation. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(3):324–33. 10.1111/cmi.12251 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Lüder CG, Stanway RR, Chaussepied M, et al. : Intracellular survival of apicomplexan parasites and host cell modification. Int J Parasitol. 2009;39(2):163–73. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2008.09.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Tretina K, Gotia HT, Mann DJ, et al. : Theileria-transformed bovine leukocytes have cancer hallmarks. Trends Parasitol. 2015;31(7):306–14. 10.1016/j.pt.2015.04.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Johnson GL, Nakamura K: The c-jun kinase/stress-activated pathway: regulation, function and role in human disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007;1773(8):1341–8. 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.12.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Dobbelaere D, Heussler V: Transformation of leukocytes by Theileria parva and T. annulata. Annu Rev Microbiol. 1999;53:1–42. 10.1146/annurev.micro.53.1.1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Heussler VT, Rottenberg S, Schwab R, et al. : Hijacking of host cell IKK signalosomes by the transforming parasite Theileria. Science. 2002;298(5595):1033–6. 10.1126/science.1075462 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Marsolier J, Perichon M, DeBarry JD, et al. : Theileria parasites secrete a prolyl isomerase to maintain host leukocyte transformation. Nature. 2015;520(7547):378–82. 10.1038/nature14044 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Blader IJ, Koshy AA: Toxoplasma gondii development of its replicative niche: in its host cell and beyond. Eukaryotic Cell. 2014;13(8):965–76. 10.1128/EC.00081-14 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. English ED, Adomako-Ankomah Y, Boyle JP: Secreted effectors in Toxoplasma gondii and related species: determinants of host range and pathogenesis? Parasite Immunol. 2015;37(3):127–40. 10.1111/pim.12166 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Coffey MJ, Sleebs BE, Uboldi AD, et al. : An aspartyl protease defines a novel pathway for export of Toxoplasma proteins into the host cell. eLife. 2015;4: pii: e10809. 10.7554/eLife.10809 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Etheridge RD, Alaganan A, Tang K, et al. : The Toxoplasma pseudokinase ROP5 forms complexes with ROP18 and ROP17 kinases that synergize to control acute virulence in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(5):537–50. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.04.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Hammoudi PM, Jacot D, Mueller C, et al. : Fundamental roles of the golgi-associated Toxoplasma aspartyl protease, ASP5, at the host-parasite interface. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(10):e1005211. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005211 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Lim DC, Cooke BM, Doerig C, et al. : Toxoplasma and Plasmodium protein kinases: roles in invasion and host cell remodelling. Int J Parasitol. 2012;42(1):21–32. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2011.11.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Bougdour A, Tardieux I, Hakimi MA: Toxoplasma exports dense granule proteins beyond the vacuole to the host cell nucleus and rewires the host genome expression. Cell Microbiol. 2014;16(3):334–43. 10.1111/cmi.12255 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Hsiao CH, Luisa Hiller N, Haldar K, et al. : A HT/PEXEL motif in Toxoplasma dense granule proteins is a signal for protein cleavage but not export into the host cell. Traffic. 2013;14(5):519–31. 10.1111/tra.12049 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Beck JR, Muralidharan V, Oksman A, et al. : PTEX component HSP101 mediates export of diverse malaria effectors into host erythrocytes. Nature. 2014;511(7511):592–5. 10.1038/nature13574 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77. de Koning-Ward TF, Gilson PR, Boddey JA, et al. : A newly discovered protein export machine in malaria parasites. Nature. 2009;459(7249):945–9. 10.1038/nature08104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78. Elsworth B, Matthews K, Nie CQ, et al. : PTEX is an essential nexus for protein export in malaria parasites. Nature. 2014;511(7511):587–91. 10.1038/nature13555 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79. Spillman NJ, Beck JR, Goldberg DE: Protein export into malaria parasite-infected erythrocytes: mechanisms and functional consequences. Annu Rev Biochem. 2015;84:813–41. 10.1146/annurev-biochem-060614-034157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80. Schulze J, Kwiatkowski M, Borner J, et al. : The Plasmodium falciparum exportome contains non-canonical PEXEL/HT proteins. Mol Microbiol. 2015;97(2):301–14. 10.1111/mmi.13024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81. Curt-Varesano A, Braun L, Ranquet C, et al. : The aspartyl protease TgASP5 mediates the export of the Toxoplasma GRA16 and GRA24 effectors into host cells. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18(2):151–67. 10.1111/cmi.12498 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82. Hodder AN, Sleebs BE, Czabotar PE, et al. : Structural basis for plasmepsin V inhibition that blocks export of malaria proteins to human erythrocytes. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(8):590–6. 10.1038/nsmb.3061 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83. Bougdour A, Durandau E, Brenier-Pinchart MP, et al. : Host cell subversion by Toxoplasma GRA16, an exported dense granule protein that targets the host cell nucleus and alters gene expression. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13(4):489–500. 10.1016/j.chom.2013.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84. Weidner JM, Barragan A: Tightly regulated migratory subversion of immune cells promotes the dissemination of Toxoplasma gondii. Int J Parasitol. 2014;44(2):85–90. 10.1016/j.ijpara.2013.09.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85. Franco M, Panas MW, Marino ND, et al. : A novel secreted protein, MYR1, is central to Toxoplasma's manipulation of host cells. MBio. 2016;7(1):e02231–15. 10.1128/mBio.02231-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86. Fischer K, Marti T, Rick B, et al. : Characterization and cloning of the gene encoding the vacuolar membrane protein EXP-2 from Plasmodium falciparum. Mol Biochem Parasitol. 1998;92(1):47–57. 10.1016/S0166-6851(97)00224-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87. Gold DA, Kaplan AD, Lis A, et al. : The Toxoplasma dense granule proteins GRA17 and GRA23 mediate the movement of small molecules between the host and the parasitophorous vacuole. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;17(5):642–52. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.04.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88. Albuquerque SS, Carret C, Grosso AR, et al. : Host cell transcriptional profiling during malaria liver stage infection reveals a coordinated and sequential set of biological events. BMC Genomics. 2009;10:270. 10.1186/1471-2164-10-270 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89. Pellé KG, Jiang RH, Mantel PY, et al. : Shared elements of host-targeting pathways among apicomplexan parasites of differing lifestyles. Cell Microbiol. 2015;17(11):1618–39. 10.1111/cmi.12460 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90. Thaiss CA, Levy M, Itav S, et al. : Integration of innate immune signaling. Trends Immunol. 2016;37(2):84–101. 10.1016/j.it.2015.12.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91. Gazzinelli RT, Mendonça-Neto R, Lilue J, et al. : Innate resistance against Toxoplasma gondii: an evolutionary tale of mice, cats, and men. Cell Host Microbe. 2014;15(2):132–8. 10.1016/j.chom.2014.01.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92. Clay GM, Sutterwala FS, Wilson ME: NLR proteins and parasitic disease. Immunol Res. 2014;59(1-3):142–52. 10.1007/s12026-014-8544-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93. Dupont CD, Christian DA, Hunter CA: Immune response and immunopathology during toxoplasmosis. Semin Immunopathol. 2012;34(6):793–813. 10.1007/s00281-012-0339-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94. McCall MB, Sauerwein RW: Interferon-γ--central mediator of protective immune responses against the pre-erythrocytic and blood stage of malaria. J Leukoc Biol. 2010;88(6):1131–43. 10.1189/jlb.0310137 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95. Takács AC, Swierzy IJ, Lüder CG: Interferon-γ restricts Toxoplasma gondii development in murine skeletal muscle cells via nitric oxide production and immunity-related GTPases. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45440. 10.1371/journal.pone.0045440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96. Meunier E, Broz P: Interferon-inducible GTPases in cell autonomous and innate immunity. Cell Microbiol. 2016;18(2):168–80. 10.1111/cmi.12546 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97. Yamamoto M, Okuyama M, Ma JS, et al. : A cluster of interferon-γ-inducible p65 GTPases plays a critical role in host defense against Toxoplasma gondii. Immunity. 2012;37(2):302–13. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98. Howard JC, Hunn JP, Steinfeldt T: The IRG protein-based resistance mechanism in mice and its relation to virulence in Toxoplasma gondii. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14(4):414–21. 10.1016/j.mib.2011.07.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99. Haldar AK, Foltz C, Finethy R, et al. : Ubiquitin systems mark pathogen-containing vacuoles as targets for host defense by guanylate binding proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(41):E5628–37. 10.1073/pnas.1515966112 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100. Selleck EM, Fentress SJ, Beatty WL, et al. : Guanylate-binding protein 1 (Gbp1) contributes to cell-autonomous immunity against Toxoplasma gondii. PLoS Pathog. 2013;9(4):e1003320. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003320 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101. Degrandi D, Kravets E, Konermann C, et al. : Murine guanylate binding protein 2 (mGBP2) controls Toxoplasma gondii replication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(1):294–9. 10.1073/pnas.1205635110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102. Lilue J, Müller UB, Steinfeldt T, et al. : Reciprocal virulence and resistance polymorphism in the relationship between Toxoplasma gondii and the house mouse. eLife. 2013;2:e01298. 10.7554/eLife.01298 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 103. Scanga CA, Aliberti J, Jankovic D, et al. : Cutting edge: MyD88 is required for resistance to Toxoplasma gondii infection and regulates parasite-induced IL-12 production by dendritic cells. J Immunol. 2002;168(12):5997–6001. 10.4049/jimmunol.168.12.5997 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 104. Yarovinsky F, Zhang D, Andersen JF, et al. : TLR11 activation of dendritic cells by a protozoan profilin-like protein. Science. 2005;308(5728):1626–9. 10.1126/science.1109893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 105. Koblansky AA, Jankovic D, Oh H, et al. : Recognition of profilin by Toll-like receptor 12 is critical for host resistance to Toxoplasma gondii. Immunity. 2013;38(1):119–30. 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.09.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 106. Raetz M, Kibardin A, Sturge CR, et al. : Cooperation of TLR12 and TLR11 in the IRF8-dependent IL-12 response to Toxoplasma gondii profilin. J Immunol. 2013;191(9):4818–27. 10.4049/jimmunol.1301301 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 107. Lee BL, Barton GM: Trafficking of endosomal Toll-like receptors. Trends Cell Biol. 2014;24(6):360–9. 10.1016/j.tcb.2013.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 108. Andrade WA, Souza Mdo C, Ramos-Martinez E, et al. : Combined action of nucleic acid-sensing Toll-like receptors and TLR11/TLR12 heterodimers imparts resistance to Toxoplasma gondii in mice. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13(1):42–53. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.12.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 109. Tosh KW, Mittereder L, Bonne-Annee S, et al. : The IL-12 response of primary human dendritic cells and monocytes to Toxoplasma gondii is stimulated by phagocytosis of live parasites rather than host cell invasion. J Immunol. 2016;196(1):345–56. 10.4049/jimmunol.1501558 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 110. Parroche P, Lauw FN, Goutagny N, et al. : Malaria hemozoin is immunologically inert but radically enhances innate responses by presenting malaria DNA to Toll-like receptor 9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(6):1919–24. 10.1073/pnas.0608745104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 111. Liehl P, Zuzarte-Luís V, Chan J, et al. : Host-cell sensors for Plasmodium activate innate immunity against liver-stage infection. Nat Med. 2014;20(1):47–53. 10.1038/nm.3424 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 112. Miller JL, Sack BK, Baldwin M, et al. : Interferon-mediated innate immune responses against malaria parasite liver stages. Cell Rep. 2014;7(2):436–47. 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 113. Rocha BC, Marques PE, Leoratti FM, et al. : Type I interferon transcriptional signature in neutrophils and low-density granulocytes are associated with tissue damage in malaria. Cell Rep. 2015;13(12):2829–41. 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 114. Edwards CL, Best SE, Gun SY, et al. : Spatiotemporal requirements for IRF7 in mediating type I IFN-dependent susceptibility to blood-stage Plasmodium infection. Eur J Immunol. 2015;45(1):130–41. 10.1002/eji.201444824 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 115. Shalem O, Sanjana NE, Zhang F: High-throughput functional genomics using CRISPR-Cas9. Nat Rev Genet. 2015;16(5):299–311. 10.1038/nrg3899 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 116. Sidik SM, Huet D, Lourido S: Genome-scale screens for Toxoplasma gene function using CRISPR/Cas9. In: Toxo13 - 13th international congress on Toxoplasmosis and Toxoplasma gondii research: 17-21 June 2015; Gettysburg, PA, USA.2015;49 Reference Source [Google Scholar]
- 117. Boutros M, Heigwer F, Laufer C: Microscopy-based high-content screening. Cell. 2015;163(6):1314–25. 10.1016/j.cell.2015.11.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 118. Klotz C, Aebischer T, Seeber F: Stem cell-derived cell cultures and organoids for protozoan parasite propagation and studying host-parasite interaction. Int J Med Microbiol. 2012;302(4–5):203–9. 10.1016/j.ijmm.2012.07.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 119. Gulati S, Ekland EH, Ruggles KV, et al. : Profiling the essential nature of lipid metabolism in asexual blood and gametocyte stages of Plasmodium falciparum. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18(3):371–81. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.08.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 120. Arroyo-Olarte RD, Brouwers JF, Kuchipudi A, et al. : Phosphatidylthreonine and lipid-mediated control of parasite virulence. PLoS Biol. 2015;13(11):e1002288. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 121. Blume M, Nitzsche R, Sternberg U, et al. : A Toxoplasma gondii gluconeogenic enzyme contributes to robust central carbon metabolism and is essential for replication and virulence. Cell Host Microbe. 2015;18(2):210–20. 10.1016/j.chom.2015.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 122. Guggisberg AM, Park J, Edwards RL, et al. : A sugar phosphatase regulates the methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway in malaria parasites. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4467. 10.1038/ncomms5467 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 123. Vaidya AB, Morrisey JM, Zhang Z, et al. : Pyrazoleamide compounds are potent antimalarials that target Na + homeostasis in intraerythrocytic Plasmodium falciparum. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5521. 10.1038/ncomms6521 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 124. Rottmann M, McNamara C, Yeung BK, et al. : Spiroindolones, a potent compound class for the treatment of malaria. Science. 2010;329(5996):1175–80. 10.1126/science.1193225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 125. Diagana TT: Supporting malaria elimination with 21st century antimalarial agent drug discovery. Drug Discov Today. 2015;20(10):1265–70. 10.1016/j.drudis.2015.06.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 126. Lehane AM, Ridgway MC, Baker E, et al. : Diverse chemotypes disrupt ion homeostasis in the Malaria parasite. Mol Microbiol. 2014;94(2):327–39. 10.1111/mmi.12765 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 127. White NJ, Pukrittayakamee S, Phyo AP, et al. : Spiroindolone KAE609 for falciparum and vivax malaria. N Engl J Med. 2014;371(5):403–10. 10.1056/NEJMoa1315860 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 128. Spillman NJ, Allen RJ, McNamara CW, et al. : Na + regulation in the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum involves the cation ATPase PfATP4 and is a target of the spiroindolone antimalarials. Cell Host Microbe. 2013;13(2):227–37. 10.1016/j.chom.2012.12.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 129. Spillman NJ, Kirk K: The malaria parasite cation ATPase PfATP4 and its role in the mechanism of action of a new arsenal of antimalarial drugs. Int J Parasitol Drugs Drug Resist. 2015;5(3):149–62. 10.1016/j.ijpddr.2015.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 130. Sharma P, Chitnis CE: Key molecular events during host cell invasion by Apicomplexan pathogens. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2013;16(4):432–7. 10.1016/j.mib.2013.07.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 131. Limenitakis J, Oppenheim RD, Creek DJ, et al. : The 2-methylcitrate cycle is implicated in the detoxification of propionate in Toxoplasma gondii. Mol Microbiol. 2013;87(4):894–908. 10.1111/mmi.12139 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 132. Yarovinsky F: Innate immunity to Toxoplasma gondii infection. Nat Rev Immunol. 2014;14(2):109–21. 10.1038/nri3598 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]