Abstract
The spectrum of somatic mutation of the most aggressive forms of neuroblastoma is not completely determined. We sought to identify potential cancer drivers in clinically aggressive neuroblastoma.
Whole exome sequencing was conducted on 17 germline and tumor DNA samples from high-risk patients with adverse events within 36 months from diagnosis (HR-Event3) to identify somatic mutations and deep targeted sequencing of 134 genes selected from the initial screening in additional 48 germline and tumor pairs (62.5% HR-Event3 and high-risk patients), 17 HR-Event3 tumors and 17 human-derived neuroblastoma cell lines.
We revealed 22 significantly mutated genes, many of which implicated in cancer progression. Fifteen genes (68.2%) were highly expressed in neuroblastoma supporting their involvement in the disease. CHD9, a cancer driver gene, was the most significantly altered (4.0% of cases) after ALK.
Other genes (PTK2, NAV3, NAV1, FZD1 and ATRX), expressed in neuroblastoma and involved in cell invasion and migration were mutated at frequency ranged from 4% to 2%.
Focal adhesion and regulation of actin cytoskeleton pathways, were frequently disrupted (14.1% of cases) thus suggesting potential novel therapeutic strategies to prevent disease progression.
Notably BARD1, CHEK2 and AXIN2 were enriched in rare, potentially pathogenic, germline variants.
In summary, whole exome and deep targeted sequencing identified novel cancer genes of clinically aggressive neuroblastoma. Our analyses show pathway-level implications of infrequently mutated genes in leading neuroblastoma progression.
Keywords: NGS, neuroblastoma, high risk, somatic mutation, cancer driver genes
INTRODUCTION
Neuroblastoma is a pediatric tumor resulting from malignant transformation of neural crest-derived precursors of the peripheral sympathetic nervous system. Although many low and intermediate-risk patients are amenable to no or little therapy, overall survival rates of patients diagnosed as high-risk tumors remain below 50% despite receiving complex and intensive treatments [1]. Among high-risk patients, gene signatures can identify children with higher risk disease who would benefit from new and more aggressive therapeutic approaches [2]. Genome-wide association studies have identified multiple DNA polymorphisms influencing neuroblastoma susceptibility and clinical phenotype [3-7]. High-throughput sequencing-based studies have highlighted that recurrent mutations of single genes are infrequent in primary neuroblastoma with activating mutations in ALK and inactivating mutations in ATRX, and TERT rearrangements being the most frequent [8-11]. Two recent studies have shown a higher mutational load in relapsed neuroblastoma than in primary tumors with a relevant proportion of mutations in genes of the RAS-MAPK and YAP pathways [12, 13]. Nevertheless, genes infrequently mutated but acting in molecular mechanisms underlying the oncogenesis and progression of neuroblastoma remain unknown, and targeted therapies identified to date, such as ALK inhibitors, might benefit a reduced number of patients [14]. It is thought that rarely mutated genes may also contribute to tumor development, thus accounting for inter-tumor variability. Recent studies have painted a portrait of the mutation landscape for multiple cancers including pancreatic, lung, breast, brain and ovarian. In each case, the distribution of somatic point mutations across the samples typically includes a few altered genes at frequencies higher than 10% and a long “tail” of many genes mutated at frequencies of 5% or lower [15]. Driver genes are detected mostly from positive-selection signals found in the mutation patterns of individual genes across tumors [15]. However, this approach will miss less-frequently mutated but functionally important genes that a typical cohort with hundreds of tumor samples is not statistically powered to detect.
Here we used a strategy to identify somatic mutations that are rare at the gene level, but frequently affect specific processes of biological relevance in aggressive neuroblastoma. Moreover, we sought to identify potential variants predisposing to aggressive neuroblastoma.
RESULTS
Whole exome (WES) and deep targeted (DT-seq) sequencing
We performed WES of 17 matched germline and HR-Event3 neuroblastoma tissue pairs (Supplementary Figure 1, Supplementary Table 1 and 2a). The low rate of somatic mutations was in substantial agreement with previous studies [8-10] (Supplementary Table 2c). After stringent filtering steps we obtained a total of 444 non-silent somatic changes (median per sample: 17) (Figure 1A and 1B and Supplementary Table 3a). Neuroblastoma mutation spectrum (Figure 1C and 1D) was enriched in C > A transversions (28.07%) and C > T transitions (36.84%), a process attributed to the normal cellular event of deamination of 5-methylcytosine. Our results were consistent with that reported in Alexandrov et al. [16] for neuroblastoma that is characterized by two signatures: C > T changes (signature 1b, common and widespread among diverse cancer types) that contribute to the 53.2%, and C > A variations (signature 18, a finding considered to be unique for neuroblastoma) that contribute to the 46.8% of the overall pattern. We also compared our data to those published in previous reports [8-10] (Supplementary Figure 2) and confirmed the overall concordance of the mutational spectrum except for the C > A transversions percentage that was lower than that of C > T transitions. This could be due to the high inter-sample variability observed among datasets for the C > A mutation respect to the C > T mutation. However, the specific percentage of C > A mutations in TCT contexts and C > T in GCG triplets resulted to be consistent among the four datasets. Indeed, these were the most frequent changes observed in 3 out of 4 datasets.
Mutated genes prioritization
To determine mutational events contributing to HR-Event3 neuroblastoma (driver events), we first selected candidate drivers from the discovery cohort obtaining 134 genes (see Supplementary information and Supplementary Table 3a). Next, we deep sequenced all exons of the 134 selected genes in an independent validation set of 48 matched tumor-control pairs (17 HR-Event3, 13 high-risk, 10 intermediate-risk, 8 low-risk), 17 HR-Event3 tumors and 17 cell lines with a mean depth of 733x (Supplementary Table 1 and 2b). Ninety-one non-silent somatic changes were identified in 55 genes (Supplementary Table 3b).
We discovered 22 significantly mutated genes in 33 tumors through combining putative driver mutations from both cohorts and reapplying the cancer driver analysis (Figure 2A, Supplementary Table 3c). These genes were mutated in 20/33 (60%) HR-Event3, 12/33 (36%) high-risk and 1/33 (0.03%) intermediate-risk neuroblastomas. In keeping with literature, point mutations of ALK and ATRX were found in 8.1% and 1.1% of cases, respectively. Expression microarrays revealed that 15 genes (68.2%) were highly expressed in neuroblastoma supporting the biological rationale for their neuroblastoma involvement (Supplementary Figure 3A and 3B). Furthermore, an analysis encompassing 491 cancer types identified ALK and CHD9 as highly expressed in neuroblastoma (Supplementary Figure 3C and 3D). The gene expression of 20 out of 22 genes was significantly different among low-risk, high-risk and HR-Event3 tumors (Supplementary Figure 4).
Four driver mutations were found in CHD9 gene encoding for an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling protein that induces osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal cells [17]. We speculate that CHD9 inactivation may increase metastatic spread to the bone, which is the second most common site of metastasis in neuroblastoma. Indeed, the osteogenesis inhibition favours bone invasion by neuroblastoma cells [18] and here we show that the downregulation of CHD9 is correlated with metastasization and low survival rates (Figure 3A and 3D and Supplementary Figure 5A and 5D). Moreover, 3 out of 4 mutations are localized close to phosphorylation sites and thus could inhibit CHD9 protein activation (Figure 4A). Together, these data suggest that CHD9 mutations are relevant for neuroblastoma progression. Interestingly, we found two driver mutations in PTK2, which encodes a focal adhesion kinase (FAK) protein, important for neuroblastoma tumor cell viability [19]. Both mutations were close to the codons for the Tyr576 and Tyr861 phosphorylation sites that are required for FAK activation (Figure 4B). Combined and concurrent inhibition of the FAK-Src-Paxillin system has been proposed as a therapy to inhibit neuroblastoma tumor growth and metastases [20]. We also focused on the serine-protease HTRA1 since its low expression levels strongly correlate with neuroblastoma progression [21]. We found four non-silent variants, three of them predicted to be driver mutations. Two mutations occurred in exon 2 (A180T and F171Fs). Interestingly, mutation A180T has been described in other cancers (The Cancer Genome Atlas database). Since all mutations are predicted to affect HTRA1 protein stability (Figure 5), we suggest that the observed variants may act as loss-of-function mutations that enhance invasion or metastasis of tumor cells. Four mutations were found in two functionally similar genes NAV1 and NAV3 involved in neuronal development and cell migration [22]. Of note NAV3 deletions have been associated with poor prognosis in nervous system tumors including neuroblastoma [22]. Accordingly, we found that downregulation of both genes is correlated with metastatic neuroblastoma and low survival rates (Figure 3B, 3C, 3D and 3F and Supplementary Figure 5B, 5C, 5D and 5F). Other five genes (LRRC17, PXDN, FZD1, ARHGEF10L, ATRX) resulted to be expressed in neuroblastoma and involved in cell migration and invasion (Figure 2A). Except for ALK, each gene was mutated at frequency ranged 4% to 2%.
Mutational pathway enrichment analysis
We searched for enrichment of somatically mutated genes in the curated KEGG pathways through GSEA algorithm combined with mutational analysis. Focal adhesions (FA) and regulation of actin cytoskeleton (RAC) pathways were identified as the most significantly altered (FDR≤0.05; Supplementary Table 4a). Analysis of mutations from three previous reports [8-10] using our methods also identified FA and RAC among the most significantly mutated pathways (Supplementary Table 4b,c,d). Furthermore, analysis of microarray data of 498 neuroblastomas showed that FA and other pathways, implicated in cancer progression, were over-represented among over-expressed genes in low-risk tumors when compared to HR-Event3 neuroblastoma (Supplementary Table 5). Combining data from WES and DT-seq, encompassing a total of 99 samples, we found that 14.1% (14/99) of neuroblastomas (12 HR-Event3 and 2 high-risk) harbored mutations in FA and RAC pathways. In total, we detected 20 non-silent somatic mutations in 13 genes of these two pathways (Figure 2B and 2C). Most mutations in the pathways were mutually exclusive. Among cancer driver genes (Figure 2A), 13 have been reported to contribute to cell invasion and migration (Supplementary Table 6). Therefore, the number of cases carrying mutated genes implicated in cancer progression reaches a frequency of 39.4% (26 HR-Event3, 12 high-risk, 1 intermediate risk). The genes ALK, COL1A1, FGFR1, GABRB2, HTRA1, MYLK2, PTEN and PTK2 showed drug-gene interactions (the Drug Gene Interaction database, DGIdb).
Germline mutations
Given the low mutation rate and very early onset of neuroblastoma, we sought to identify germline mutations predisposing to aggressive neuroblastoma. Therefore, we screened germline sequence data for cancer predisposition genes [23] enriched in functional variants in 52 neuroblastoma patients (32 HR-Event3, 16 high-risk and 4 intermediate risk) compared to control populations (Table 1, Supplementary Figure 6, Supplementary Table 1 and 7). The top three genes most enriched in rare functional germline variants were BARD1, CHEK2, and AXIN2 with 9 out of 11 mutations occurred in HR-Event3 patients (Supplementary Table 7).
Table 1. Results from the analysis of the enriched germline variants in 52 neuroblastoma patients.
Neuroblastoma | 1000g-Control-Ita | 1000g-Control-Eur | House-Control-Ita | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gene | Patients with variants | Patients without variants | Controls with variants | Controls without variants | P-value | Controls with variants | Controls without variants | P-value | Controls with variants | Controls without variants | P-value | P-value combined population | Fold enrichment |
BARD1* | 4 | 100 | 0 | 107 | 0.057 | 0 | 396 | 0.002 | 0 | 106 | 0.058 | 0.0004 | 25.0 |
AXIN2 | 4 | 48 | 0 | 107 | 0.011 | 3 | 393 | 0.004 | 1 | 105 | 0.041 | 0.0019 | 12.6 |
MC1R | 5 | 47 | 5 | 102 | 0.298 | 3 | 393 | 0.001 | 3 | 103 | 0.116 | 0.0056 | 5.8 |
CHEK2 | 3 | 49 | 0 | 107 | 0.034 | 3 | 393 | 0.023 | 0 | 106 | 0.034 | 0.0078 | 12.5 |
SLC25A13 | 2 | 50 | 0 | 107 | 0.106 | 2 | 394 | 0.068 | 0 | 106 | 0.107 | 0.0329 | 12.5 |
CD96 | 1 | 51 | 0 | 107 | 0.327 | 1 | 395 | 0.219 | 0 | 106 | 0.329 | 0.1513 | 12.3 |
FH | 1 | 51 | 0 | 107 | 0.327 | 0 | 396 | 0.116 | 1 | 105 | 0.551 | 0.1513 | 12.3 |
XRRC3 | 1 | 51 | 0 | 107 | 0.327 | 1 | 395 | 0.219 | 0 | 106 | 0.329 | 0.1513 | 12.3 |
APC | 2 | 50 | 2 | 105 | 0.597 | 7 | 389 | 0.281 | 1 | 105 | 0.252 | 0.2421 | 2.4 |
RAD50 | 1 | 51 | 0 | 107 | 0.327 | 2 | 394 | 0.310 | 2 | 104 | 1.000 | 0.337 | 3.0 |
BRCA2 | 1 | 51 | 1 | 106 | 0.549 | 3 | 393 | 0.391 | 1 | 105 | 0.551 | 0.3896 | 2.4 |
SLX4 | 1 | 51 | 0 | 107 | 0.327 | 5 | 391 | 0.525 | 0 | 106 | 0.329 | 0.3896 | 2.4 |
FANCM | 1 | 51 | 1 | 106 | 0.549 | 3 | 393 | 0.391 | 3 | 103 | 1.000 | 0.4827 | 1.7 |
PALB2 | 1 | 51 | 5 | 102 | 0.665 | 2 | 394 | 0.310 | 2 | 104 | 1.000 | 0.5619 | 1.3 |
In bold germline variants significantly enriched in the neuroblastoma patients.
Enrichment of germline MC1R and SLC25A13 variants is considered not to be significant in neuroblastoma as no associaiton was found when using Italian controls.
Data from 52 whole exome sequencing and 52 deep targeted sequencing of germilne DNA from neuroblastoma patients.
P-values calculated using 2-tailed Fisher's exact test.
DISCUSSION
In attempt to better understand the neuroblastoma patho-biology at genomic level, 99 tumors were profiled by means of WES and DT-seq. Our study identifies novel candidate driver genes associated with clinically aggressive neuroblastoma (including HR-Event3 and high-risk phenotypes). As expected, most of these genes are infrequently mutated (from 4%-2%) but in silico analyses strongly support their functional involvement in neuroblastoma biology. This is in according to the recent literature suggesting that cancer genomes are composed of a few frequently mutated genes across patients but are dominated by a much larger number of infrequently mutated genes that contribute to disease initiation and progression [15].
Mutations in CHD9 emerged as relatively recurrent in neuroblastoma (4%). CHD9 (also known as CReMM, Chromatin Related Mesenchymal Modulator) is a chromatin remodeling protein. It is expressed during the differentiation of osteoprogenitors in vivo and in vitro and interacts with A/T-rich sites within promoters of key genes in osteoblast maturation [24]. Recent works dealing with the mechanisms of osteolytic metastasis in Stage IV neuroblastoma have highlighted that, similar to breast cancer and multiple myeloma, bone invasion by neuroblastoma cells is predominantly osteolytic and involves the activation of osteoclasts [25]. Here we report that a decreased gene expression of CHD9 is associated with worst prognosis. In this scenario, loss of CHD9 would lead to progression of neuroblastoma. Moreover, mouse insertional mutagenesis experiments support CHD9 as a cancer driver gene (Candidate Cancer Gene Database). Indeed, clusters of insertional events of CHD9 driving cancer progression have been reported in diverse tumors [26, 27] including malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors [27] in which CHD9 is deleted in 6.7% of cases. Intriguingly, the loss of the similar functional gene CHD5 has been also linked to the progression of neuroblastoma tumors [28]. So far, CHD9 mutations have not been reported in previous Next Generation Sequencing studies probably because in our study we used a restricted and homogeneous sub-set of aggressive neuroblastoma and because we profiled most of the tumors by DT-seq reaching coverage higher than 700x. In fact, the use of deep sequencing of a restricted panel of genes increases the sensitivity to detect mutations in known and potentially actionable genes.
Somatic mutations localized close to the well-known functional phosphorylation (Tyr576 and Tyr861) [11] sites were identified in PTK2 (also known as FAK) in 2 cases. During development and in various tumours including neuroblastoma, FAK promotes cell motility, survival and proliferation through kinase-dependent and kinase-independent mechanisms [19, 20]. The anticancer compounds targeting FAK are currently in preclinical and clinical trials. Moreover, current literature suggests FAK inhibition for tumor suppression and prevention or delay of metastasis in neuroblastoma [11]. We think that the found somatic mutations could activate the FAK protein, which thus could be a promising therapeutic target for clinically aggressive neuroblastoma. Of note, non-silent somatic mutations were previously identified in PTK2 in one primary and one relapsed neuroblastoma [9, 12].
Of particular interest was the identification of mutations in HTRA1 encoding a member of the trypsin family of serine proteases, involved in the degradation of extracellular matrix proteins, important in cancer progression and invasion [21]. Several studies have indicated that the down regulation of HTRA1 plays an important role in malignant progression of ovarian cancers [29] and melanoma [30]. A recent study has reported that the expression of HtrA1 protein is lower in advanced neuroblastomas [21]. In concordance with previous observations, we found variants that can act as loss-of-function mutations and thus can contribute to enhance invasion or metastasis of tumor cells. The mutation A180T in the exon 2 found in our study has been also identified in hepatocarcinoma and skin cutaneous melanoma whereas three missense mutations in exon 2 at 168, 166 and 167 position have been reported in hepatocarcinoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma and lung adenocarcinoma, respectively. Therefore, the presence of a possible mutational hot spot in exon 2 can be hypothesized.
Two genes (NAV1 and NAV3) belonging to the neuron navigator family were found mutated in 4 cases. NAV3 is essential for the longitudinal growth of neurons involved in mechanosensation and mutant alleles can affect whole neuronal process bundles [31]. Accumulating evidence suggests that disruption of NAV3 contributes progression of breast cancer [32], colorectal cancer [33], T-cell lymphoma [34] and nervous system tumors including neuroblastoma [22]. Based on current literature, we speculate that mutations in NAV1 and NAV3 could act as loss-of-function. This hypothesis is supported from the low gene expression levels of both genes found in advanced neuroblastomas.
Additional five mutated genes (LRRC17, PXDN, FZD1, ARHGEF10L, ATRX) were highly expressed in neuroblastoma and involved in cancer progression (Supplementary Table 6). Of particular interest is the gene FZD1 because it promotes chemoresistance in neuroblastoma through activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway [35].
There is growing interest in identifying disrupted pathways rather than single mutated genes in order to uncover biological systems perturbed in tumor cells [36]. Here we show that mutations in FA and RAC pathways (promoting metastasis and cancer progression) occur frequently in a subset of unfavourable neuroblastoma and confirm this finding in three independent sets of neuroblastoma samples. A recent study has suggested that dysfunction of FA pathway promotes bone marrow infiltration of stage 4 neuroblastoma [2]. Importantly, anticancer compounds targeting FA and RAC pathways can reduce growth, motility and viability of tumor cells in neuroblastoma [37]. In our study, combined results from single gene and pathway analysis indicated that 39.4% of patients (of which 66% were HR-Event3) carried mutations in genes involved in metastatic processes. We found 8 genes with potential druggability. We thus propose that inhibition of multiple steps of these processes could be of therapeutic interest and could yield better results in patients with aggressive neuroblastoma.
Neuroblastoma is an embryonal tumor, which arises in the fetus or very early in life and is likely to be less influenced by environmental factors than adult malignancies. We have already demonstrated by using genome-wide association studies that common variants are associated with risk of neuroblastoma [4-7]. We thus speculated that also rare germline variants could have a role in the etiology of this pediatric malignancy. We identified significant enrichment of rare germline variants in BARD1, CHEK2 and AXIN2. Neuroblastoma-predisposing mutations in BARD1 and CHEK2 have been recently reported [9]. BARD1 is a known neuroblastoma susceptibility locus [4] but little is known about the frequencies of rare variants. Here, we found the same, rare, loss-of-function mutation (BARD1 p.Arg641*) that has been identified by Pugh et al. [9]. AXIN2 is involved in the regulation of Wnt/β-catenin and neural crest differentiation pathways, and its mutations have been reported in association with gastrointestinal cancers [38]. Interestingly, we already demonstrated that Wnt/β-catenin signaling is activated in high-risk neuroblastoma without MYCN amplification [39]. Our data suggest that rare germline genetic variants might cooperate to determine the rapidly progressive nature of clinically aggressive neuroblastomas.
In this study we identified diverse genes mutated at relatively low frequency in high-risk and HR-event3 neuroblastoma. It is intriguing that chromatin modeler CHD9 is the most promising cancer driver. In according to metastatic propensity of studied tumors, most of the genes have been reported to play key roles in cell migration and motility suggesting that the functional impact, or the role in suppressing or promoting a tumor, of a single mutation is not static but depends on cell state and the presence of other mutations and could have effects on multiple cellular processes. Indeed, we also demonstrated FA and RAC pathways as frequently mutated in this sub-set of aggressive neuroblastoma. Our finding raises a new challenge in the treatment of cancer that involves the use of a selection of therapies based on different genetic alterations in individual tumors. We believe that our understanding of cancer biology through the lens of pathway-level implication is nascent, but it holds the potential to transform our thinking on disease etiology and treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Somatic mutation identification
Samples collection
Neuroblastoma tumor DNA (primary tumors) and matched germline DNA (from peripheral blood) were obtained from the IRCCS AOU San Martino-IST and Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues de Llobregat. Primary tumor samples were verified to have > 75% viable tumor cell content by histopathology assessment. The human-derived neuroblastoma cell lines were purchased from commercial sources and the nucleic acids (mRNA and DNA) were extracted from each of the original purchased cryotube after keeping the cells in culture for only 5-7 passages from thawing. All cell lines were screened for the presence of mycoplasma. The patients were classified in low, intermediate and high risk groups based on International Neuroblastoma Risk Groups criteria [40]. We selected a subgroup of patients with rapid progression disease and named “HR-Event3” which included high-risk individuals with any adverse event (tumor progression, relapse or death) within 36 months from diagnosis. Our discovery set of 17 HR-Event3 neuroblastomas was composed of 15 (88%) high-risk individuals with an adverse event within 18 months from diagnosis. Therefore the tumors subjected to whole exome sequencing were highly aggressive. The human-derived neuroblastoma cell lines were classified as high-risk. Informed consent for research use was obtained from all subjects and/or parents and study approval was obtained from Ethics Committee of the Medical University of Naples. Detailed clinical information of neuroblastoma patients and biological information of tumor samples are provided in Supplementary Table 1.
High throughput sequencing
Exome regions were captured and enriched with the Agilent SureSelect Target Enrichment System 50Mb (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) according to the manufacturers' protocol. Whole Exome Sequencing was performed on an Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA) yielding 100bp paired-end reads with a mean depth of 110x (Supplementary Table 2a). Deep Targeted sequencing (DT-seq) was designed considering the coding regions (plus 10bp at 5′ and 3′ ends) of the 134 candidate cancer driver genes. The DNA was captured using the SeqCap EZ Library SR (Roche NimbleGen, Madison, WI). Captured DNAs were subjected to massively parallel sequencing using an Illumina HiSeq 1000 obtaining 100bp paired-end reads with a mean depth of 733x (Supplementary Table 2b).
Sequencing data processing and mutation calling
Burrows-Wheeler Aligner [41] was used to map sequencing reads versus the human reference genome, assembly GRCh37/hg19. Alignment files for tumor and control tissue pairs, were piled up with Samtools [42] and variants (Single Nucleotide Variations and Short Insertions/Deletions) were called using VarScan2 [43] and annotated with Annovar [44]. As explained in detail in Supplementary information, raw variant calls were strongly filtered to get a high confidence set of functionally relevant somatic changes that were manually curated and visually inspected with the IGV - Integrated Genome Viewer.
Somatic signature profiling
Somatic single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), divided into 96 groups defined by substitution class and sequence context (adjacent bases at 3′ and 5′), were used to draw a somatic signature profile. To compare and validate our results, we drew somatic signatures for the lists of somatic mutations from recent next generation sequencing-based screenings on primary neuroblastomas: Molenaar et al. [8], Pugh et al. [9] and Sausen et al. [10].
Prioritization of driver mutations
We used the Cancer-specific High-throughput Annotation of Somatic Mutations (CHASM) [45] tool to distinguish passenger variation events from driver ones without considering the mutation recurrence across our cohort of tumors. The program predictions are based on the probability that a somatic missense variant can increase the fitness of cancer cells. The Variant Effect Scoring Tool (VEST) [46] was used to identify variants that affect the molecular function of the protein and prioritize them on the basis of the likelihood of their involvement in human disease. Details on filtering steps and candidate cancer drivers inclusion criteria are provided in Supplementary information.
Gene expression analysis
Normalized gene expression array data of two independent sets of neuroblastoma patients were downloaded from the website “R2: Genomics Analysis and Visualization Platform” and named “Affymetrix data” (GEO ID: GSE16476) and “Agilent data” (GEO ID: GSE49710); see Supplementary information. The comparison of gene expression profiles (Log2 transformed) among low-risk, high-risk and HR-Event3 patients was performed with “R2” using the following parameters: 1) T-test to assess the statistical significance; 2) FDR to correct for multiple tests. Enriched gene sets were supported by significance statistical analysis with hypergeometric test.
Identification of significantly altered pathways
We ranked the list of mutated genes found by whole exome sequencing (WES) and DT-seq methods according to the score of pathogenicity assigned by CHASM algorithm. Then we applied Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) that assesses if a pre-defined set of genes has more high-ranking genes than would be expected by chance. The same analysis was also conducted on the list of mutated genes showed in supplementary data of the previously mentioned works [8-10]. We used the canonical pathways defined by the KEGG database.
Sanger sequencing validation of somatic mutations
A total of 70 somatic SNVs and indels identified by next-generation sequencing (WES and DT-seq) were verified by Sanger sequencing. All somatic variants, except for 2 SNVs, were successfully validated. Primers sequences are available upon request.
Germline mutation identification
Samples collection and data analysis
We used WES data from blood-derived DNA samples of the 17 neuroblastoma patients used for the somatic mutation identification, 28 additional neuroblastoma patients (obtained from the National Cancer Research Institute of Genoa), and 7 neuroblastoma patients (Supplementary Table 1) reported in the paper of Sausen et al. [10] downloaded from European Genome-Phenome Archive (EGAC00001000085).
Filtering of germline mutations
Germline variants were filtered step by step to identify the potentially interesting candidates applying a similar approach successfully used by Wang L et al. [47]. The detailed workflow is described in Supplementary information. The subset of functionally relevant variants in known cancer predisposition genes [23] was filtered from common polymorphisms (reported in dbSNP135 given that common SNPs are unlikely to be disease causative), then mutation calls with a VEST 3.2 p-value < 0.10 (predicted to be pathogenic) were kept for further analysis. For each gene in the above list, we calculated the fold of enrichment in germline variants in neuroblastoma patients and compared to that of control cohorts (106 controls from in-house exome data, 107 Italian controls from 1000 Genome Project, 396 European controls from 1000 Genome Project). The potentially interesting and candidate neuroblastoma-predisposing genes were then selected on the basis of the significant P values calculated with the Fisher's exact test.
Sanger sequencing validation of germline mutations
A total of 15 germline SNVs identified by next-generation sequencing were verified by Sanger sequencing. All variants were successfully confirmed. Primers sequences are available upon request.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL FIGURES AND TABLES
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the Prof. Orsetta Zuffardi from University of Pavia (Italy) for providing the exome data of Italian subjects.
Footnotes
CONFLICTS OF INTERESTS
None.
GRANT SUPPORT
The work was supported in part by Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro (10537) (MC), Ministero della Salute (GR-2011-02348722) (MC), Fondazione Italiana per la Lotta al Neuroblastoma (MC, GPT and LL) and Associazione Oncologia Pediatrica e Neuroblastoma (MC). Spanish Ministry of Health (FIS PI14/00040), Fundació Cellex (CdT). Associazione Culturale DiSciMuS RFC (PP) and Fondazione Umberto Veronesi Fellowship (FC).
Author contributions
MC and VAL designed the experiments and drafted the manuscript. MC, VAL, CZ, FMC and DF analyzed data. GPT and MDH generated and provided part of exome data. GPT, CdT MDH, AI and LL contributed to overall study design. LL, CdT and JM provided part of DNA samples. FC, DF, PP, MDM, MRE performed research. All authors commented on or contributed to the current manuscript.
REFERENCES
- 1.Maris JM. Recent advances in neuroblastoma. The New England journal of medicine. 2010;362:2202–2211. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0804577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Viprey VF, Gregory WM, Corrias MV, Tchirkov A, Swerts K, Vicha A, Dallorso S, Brock P, Luksch R, Valteau-Couanet D, Papadakis V, Laureys G, Pearson AD, Ladenstein R, Burchill SA. Neuroblastoma mRNAs predict outcome in children with stage 4 neuroblastoma: a European HR-NBL1/SIOPEN study. Journal of clinical oncology. 2014;32:1074–1083. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.3604. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Capasso M, Diskin SJ. Genetics and genomics of neuroblastoma. Cancer treatment and research. 2010;155:65–84. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6033-7_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Capasso M, Devoto M, Hou C, Asgharzadeh S, Glessner JT, Attiyeh EF, Mosse YP, Kim C, Diskin SJ, Cole KA, Bosse K, Diamond M, Laudenslager M, Winter C, Bradfield JP, Scott RH, et al. Common variations in BARD1 influence susceptibility to high-risk neuroblastoma. Nature genetics. 2009;41:718–723. doi: 10.1038/ng.374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Capasso M, Diskin S, Cimmino F, Acierno G, Totaro F, Petrosino G, Pezone L, Diamond M, McDaniel L, Hakonarson H, Iolascon A, Devoto M, Maris JM. Common genetic variants in NEFL influence gene expression and neuroblastoma risk. Cancer research. 2014;74:6913–6924. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Capasso M, Diskin SJ, Totaro F, Longo L, De Mariano M, Russo R, Cimmino F, Hakonarson H, Tonini GP, Devoto M, Maris JM, Iolascon A. Replication of GWAS-identified neuroblastoma risk loci strengthens the role of BARD1 and affirms the cumulative effect of genetic variations on disease susceptibility. Carcinogenesis. 2013;34:605–611. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgs380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Diskin SJ, Capasso M, Diamond M, Oldridge DA, Conkrite K, Bosse KR, Russell MR, Iolascon A, Hakonarson H, Devoto M, Maris JM. Rare variants in TP53 and susceptibility to neuroblastoma. Journal of the National Cancer Institute. 2014;106:dju047. doi: 10.1093/jnci/dju047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Molenaar JJ, Koster J, Zwijnenburg DA, van Sluis P, Valentijn LJ, van der Ploeg I, Hamdi M, van Nes J, Westerman BA, van Arkel J, Ebus ME, Haneveld F, Lakeman A, Schild L, Molenaar P, Stroeken P, et al. Sequencing of neuroblastoma identifies chromothripsis and defects in neuritogenesis genes. Nature. 2012;483:589–593. doi: 10.1038/nature10910. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pugh TJ, Morozova O, Attiyeh EF, Asgharzadeh S, Wei JS, Auclair D, Carter SL, Cibulskis K, Hanna M, Kiezun A, Kim J, Lawrence MS, Lichenstein L, McKenna A, Pedamallu CS, Ramos AH, et al. The genetic landscape of high-risk neuroblastoma. Nature genetics. 2013;45:279–284. doi: 10.1038/ng.2529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sausen M, Leary RJ, Jones S, Wu J, Reynolds CP, Liu X, Blackford A, Parmigiani G, Diaz LA, Jr, Papadopoulos N, Vogelstein B, Kinzler KW, Velculescu VE, Hogarty MD. Integrated genomic analyses identify ARID1A and ARID1B alterations in the childhood cancer neuroblastoma. Nature genetics. 2013;45:12–17. doi: 10.1038/ng.2493. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Saarinen-Pihkala UM, Jahnukainen K, Wikstrom S, Koivusalo A, Karikoski R, Sariola H, Hovi L. Ultrahigh-risk group within the high-risk neuroblastoma category. Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. 2013;35:e254–259. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e318287326b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eleveld TF, Oldridge DA, Bernard V, Koster J, Daage LC, Diskin SJ, Schild L, Bentahar NB, Bellini A, Chicard M, Lapouble E, Combaret V, Legoix-Ne P, Michon J, Pugh TJ, Hart LS, et al. Relapsed neuroblastomas show frequent RAS-MAPK pathway mutations. Nature genetics. 2015;47:864–871. doi: 10.1038/ng.3333. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Schramm A, Koster J, Assenov Y, Althoff K, Peifer M, Mahlow E, Odersky A, Beisser D, Ernst C, Henssen AG, Stephan H, Schroder C, Heukamp L, Engesser A, Kahlert Y, Theissen J, et al. Mutational dynamics between primary and relapse neuroblastomas. Nature genetics. 2015;47:872–877. doi: 10.1038/ng.3349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Bresler SC, Weiser DA, Huwe PJ, Park JH, Krytska K, Ryles H, Laudenslager M, Rappaport EF, Wood AC, McGrady PW, Hogarty MD, London WB, Radhakrishnan R, Lemmon MA, Mosse YP. ALK mutations confer differential oncogenic activation and sensitivity to ALK inhibition therapy in neuroblastoma. Cancer cell. 2014;26:682–694. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2014.09.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Garraway LA, Lander ES. Lessons from the cancer genome. Cell. 2013;153:17–37. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Alexandrov LB, Nik-Zainal S, Wedge DC, Aparicio SA, Behjati S, Biankin AV, Bignell GR, Bolli N, Borg A, Borresen-Dale AL, Boyault S, Burkhardt B, Butler AP, Caldas C, Davies HR, Desmedt C, et al. Signatures of mutational processes in human cancer. Nature. 2013;500:415–421. doi: 10.1038/nature12477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Shur I, Socher R, Benayahu D. In vivo association of CReMM/CHD9 with promoters in osteogenic cells. Journal of cellular physiology. 2006;207:374–378. doi: 10.1002/jcp.20586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Granchi D, Baglio SR, Amato I, Giunti A, Baldini N. Paracrine inhibition of osteoblast differentiation induced by neuroblastoma cells. International journal of cancer. 2008;123:1526–1535. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee S, Qiao J, Paul P, O'Connor KL, Evers MB, Chung DH. FAK is a critical regulator of neuroblastoma liver metastasis. Oncotarget. 2012;3:1576–1587. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kratimenos P, Koutroulis I, Marconi D, Syriopoulou V, Delivoria-Papadopoulos M, Chrousos GP, Theocharis S. Multi-targeted molecular therapeutic approach in aggressive neuroblastoma: the effect of Focal Adhesion Kinase-Src-Paxillin system. Expert opinion on therapeutic targets. 2014;18:1395–1406. doi: 10.1517/14728222.2014.952280. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.D'Angelo V, Pecoraro G, Indolfi P, Iannotta A, Donofrio V, Errico ME, Indolfi C, Ramaglia M, Lombardi A, Di Martino M, Gigantino V, Baldi A, Caraglia M, De Luca A, Casale F. Expression and localization of serine protease Htra1 in neuroblastoma: correlation with cellular differentiation grade. Journal of neuro-oncology. 2014;117:287–294. doi: 10.1007/s11060-014-1387-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Carlsson E, Krohn K, Ovaska K, Lindberg P, Hayry V, Maliniemi P, Lintulahti A, Korja M, Kivisaari R, Hussein S, Sarna S, Niiranen K, Hautaniemi S, Haapasalo H, Ranki A. Neuron navigator 3 alterations in nervous system tumors associate with tumor malignancy grade and prognosis. Genes, chromosomes & cancer. 2013;52:191–201. doi: 10.1002/gcc.22019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rahman N. Realizing the promise of cancer predisposition genes. Nature. 2014;505:302–308. doi: 10.1038/nature12981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Shur I, Solomon R, Benayahu D. Dynamic interactions of chromatin-related mesenchymal modulator, a chromodomain helicase-DNA-binding protein, with promoters in osteoprogenitors. Stem cells. 2006;24:1288–1293. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.2005-0300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sohara Y, Shimada H, DeClerck YA. Mechanisms of bone invasion and metastasis in human neuroblastoma. Cancer letters. 2005;228:203–209. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2005.01.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Berquam-Vrieze KE, Nannapaneni K, Brett BT, Holmfeldt L, Ma J, Zagorodna O, Jenkins NA, Copeland NG, Meyerholz DK, Knudson CM, Mullighan CG, Scheetz TE, Dupuy AJ. Cell of origin strongly influences genetic selection in a mouse model of T-ALL. Blood. 2011;118:4646–4656. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-03-343947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Rahrmann EP, Watson AL, Keng VW, Choi K, Moriarity BS, Beckmann DA, Wolf NK, Sarver A, Collins MH, Moertel CL, Wallace MR, Gel B, Serra E, Ratner N, Largaespada DA. Forward genetic screen for malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor formation identifies new genes and pathways driving tumorigenesis. Nature genetics. 2013;45:756–766. doi: 10.1038/ng.2641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Koyama H, Zhuang T, Light JE, Kolla V, Higashi M, McGrady PW, London WB, Brodeur GM. Mechanisms of CHD5 Inactivation in neuroblastomas. Clinical cancer research. 2012;18:1588–1597. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.He X, Ota T, Liu P, Su C, Chien J, Shridhar V. Downregulation of HtrA1 promotes resistance to anoikis and peritoneal dissemination of ovarian cancer cells. Cancer research. 2010;70:3109–3118. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Baldi A, De Luca A, Morini M, Battista T, Felsani A, Baldi F, Catricala C, Amantea A, Noonan DM, Albini A, Natali PG, Lombardi D, Paggi MG. The HtrA1 serine protease is down-regulated during human melanoma progression and represses growth of metastatic melanoma cells. Oncogene. 2002;21:6684–6688. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Harismendy O, Schwab RB, Alakus H, Yost SE, Matsui H, Hasteh F, Wallace AM, Park HL, Madlensky L, Parker B, Carpenter PM, Jepsen K, Anton-Culver H, Frazer KA. Evaluation of ultra-deep targeted sequencing for personalized breast cancer care. Breast cancer research. 2013;15:R115. doi: 10.1186/bcr3584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cohen-Dvashi H, Ben-Chetrit N, Russell R, Carvalho S, Lauriola M, Nisani S, Mancini M, Nataraj N, Kedmi M, Roth L, Kostler W, Zeisel A, Yitzhaky A, Zylberg J, Tarcic G, Eilam R, et al. Navigator-3, a modulator of cell migration, may act as a suppressor of breast cancer progression. EMBO molecular medicine. 2015;7:299–314. doi: 10.15252/emmm.201404134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Carlsson E, Ranki A, Sipila L, Karenko L, Abdel-Rahman WM, Ovaska K, Siggberg L, Aapola U, Assamaki R, Hayry V, Niiranen K, Helle M, Knuutila S, Hautaniemi S, Peltomaki P, Krohn K. Potential role of a navigator gene NAV3 in colorectal cancer. British journal of cancer. 2012;106:517–524. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2011.553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Karenko L, Hahtola S, Paivinen S, Karhu R, Syrja S, Kahkonen M, Nedoszytko B, Kytola S, Zhou Y, Blazevic V, Pesonen M, Nevala H, Nupponen N, Sihto H, Krebs I, Poustka A, et al. Primary cutaneous T-cell lymphomas show a deletion or translocation affecting NAV3, the human UNC-53 homologue. Cancer research. 2005;65:8101–8110. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Flahaut M, Meier R, Coulon A, Nardou KA, Niggli FK, Martinet D, Beckmann JS, Joseph JM, Muhlethaler-Mottet A, Gross N. The Wnt receptor FZD1 mediates chemoresistance in neuroblastoma through activation of the Wnt/beta-catenin pathway. Oncogene. 2009;28:2245–2256. doi: 10.1038/onc.2009.80. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mutation C, Pathway Analysis working group of the International Cancer Genome C Pathway and network analysis of cancer genomes. Nature methods. 2015;12:615–621. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Stehn JR, Haass NK, Bonello T, Desouza M, Kottyan G, Treutlein H, Zeng J, Nascimento PR, Sequeira VB, Butler TL, Allanson M, Fath T, Hill TA, McCluskey A, Schevzov G, Palmer SJ, et al. A novel class of anticancer compounds targets the actin cytoskeleton in tumor cells. Cancer research. 2013;73:5169–5182. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-4501. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Mazzoni SM, Fearon ER. AXIN1 and AXIN2 variants in gastrointestinal cancers. Cancer letters. 2014;355:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.09.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Liu X, Mazanek P, Dam V, Wang Q, Zhao H, Guo R, Jagannathan J, Cnaan A, Maris JM, Hogarty MD. Deregulated Wnt/beta-catenin program in high-risk neuroblastomas without MYCN amplification. Oncogene. 2008;27:1478–1488. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Cohn SL, Pearson AD, London WB, Monclair T, Ambros PF, Brodeur GM, Faldum A, Hero B, Iehara T, Machin D, Mosseri V, Simon T, Garaventa A, Castel V, Matthay KK, Force IT. The International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system: an INRG Task Force report. Journal of clinical oncology. 2009;27:289–297. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.16.6785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Li H, Handsaker B, Wysoker A, Fennell T, Ruan J, Homer N, Marth G, Abecasis G, Durbin R, Genome Project Data Processing S The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2078–2079. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Koboldt DC, Zhang Q, Larson DE, Shen D, McLellan MD, Lin L, Miller CA, Mardis ER, Ding L, Wilson RK. VarScan 2: somatic mutation and copy number alteration discovery in cancer by exome sequencing. Genome research. 2012;22:568–576. doi: 10.1101/gr.129684.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang K, Li M, Hakonarson H. ANNOVAR: functional annotation of genetic variants from high-throughput sequencing data. Nucleic acids research. 2010;38:e164. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Carter H, Chen S, Isik L, Tyekucheva S, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Vogelstein B, Karchin R. Cancer-specific high-throughput annotation of somatic mutations: computational prediction of driver missense mutations. Cancer research. 2009;69:6660–6667. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-1133. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Carter H, Douville C, Stenson PD, Cooper DN, Karchin R. Identifying Mendelian disease genes with the variant effect scoring tool. BMC genomics. 2013;14(Suppl 3):S3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-S3-S3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang L, Yamaguchi S, Burstein MD, Terashima K, Chang K, Ng HK, Nakamura H, He Z, Doddapaneni H, Lewis L, Wang M, Suzuki T, Nishikawa R, Natsume A, Terasaka S, Dauser R, et al. Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours. Nature. 2014;511:241–245. doi: 10.1038/nature13296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.