Skip to main content
Applied and Environmental Microbiology logoLink to Applied and Environmental Microbiology
. 2017 May 31;83(12):e00502-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00502-17

Nitrous Oxide Reduction by an Obligate Aerobic Bacterium, Gemmatimonas aurantiaca Strain T-27

Doyoung Park 1, Hayeon Kim 1, Sukhwan Yoon 1,
Editor: Maia Kivisaar2
PMCID: PMC5452805  PMID: 28389533

ABSTRACT

N2O-reducing organisms with nitrous oxide reductases (NosZ) are known as the only biological sink of N2O in the environment. Among the most abundant nosZ genes found in the environment are nosZ genes affiliated with the understudied Gemmatimonadetes phylum. In this study, a unique regulatory mechanism of N2O reduction in Gemmatimonas aurantiaca strain T-27, an isolate affiliated with the Gemmatimonadetes phylum, was examined. Strain T-27 was incubated with N2O and/or O2 as the electron acceptor. Significant N2O reduction was observed only when O2 was initially present. When batch cultures of strain T-27 were amended with O2 and N2O, N2O reduction commenced after O2 was depleted. In a long-term incubation with the addition of N2O upon depletion, the N2O reduction rate decreased over time and came to an eventual stop. Spiking of the culture with O2 resulted in the resuscitation of N2O reduction activity, supporting the hypothesis that N2O reduction by strain T-27 required the transient presence of O2. The highest level of nosZ transcription (8.97 nosZ transcripts/recA transcript) was observed immediately after O2 depletion, and transcription decreased ∼25-fold within 85 h, supporting the observed phenotype. The observed difference between responses of strain T-27 cultures amended with and without N2O to O2 starvation suggested that N2O helped sustain the viability of strain T-27 during temporary anoxia, although N2O reduction was not coupled to growth. The findings in this study suggest that obligate aerobic microorganisms with nosZ genes may utilize N2O as a temporary surrogate for O2 to survive periodic anoxia.

IMPORTANCE Emission of N2O, a potent greenhouse gas and ozone depletion agent, from the soil environment is largely determined by microbial sources and sinks. N2O reduction by organisms with N2O reductases (NosZ) is the only known biological sink of N2O at environmentally relevant concentrations (up to ∼1,000 parts per million by volume [ppmv]). Although a large fraction of nosZ genes recovered from soil is affiliated with nosZ found in the genomes of the obligate aerobic phylum Gemmatimonadetes, N2O reduction has not yet been confirmed in any of these organisms. This study demonstrates that N2O is reduced by an obligate aerobic bacterium, Gemmatimonas aurantiaca strain T-27, and suggests a novel regulation mechanism for N2O reduction in this organism, which may also be applicable to other obligate aerobic organisms possessing nosZ genes. We expect that these findings will significantly advance the understanding of N2O dynamics in environments with frequent transitions between oxic and anoxic conditions.

KEYWORDS: Gemmatimonadetes, nitrous oxide, nitrous oxide reduction, RT-qPCR

INTRODUCTION

The recent meteorological data from the first half of the year 2016 witnessed the highest worldwide average temperature ever recorded for the same period of the year, supporting the concern of the scientific world about ongoing climate change (GISS Surface Temperature Analysis [http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sotc/global/201606]). The increase in greenhouse gas emission due to various anthropogenic activities has been regarded as the major culprit of the general upward trend in the global temperature and climate anomalies occurring with alarming frequency across the globe (1). Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas with a global warming potential ∼300 times that of CO2 and is the third most important contributor to global warming (6.2%) after CO2 (78%) and CH4 (16%) (14). Further, the abolition of chlorofluorocarbons has left N2O as the largest contributor to the destruction of the ozone layer in the stratosphere (5, 6). Therefore, control of N2O emissions is indispensable in the efforts to curb global warming and climate change.

Both natural and anthropogenic sources of N2O have a predominantly biological origin, with biological transformation of N fertilizer applied to agricultural soils being the single largest source (1, 7, 8). Nitrification produces N2O as a by-product of ammonia oxidation, and denitrification emits N2O as a stable intermediate or an end product (811). Other relatively minor sources of N2O include dissimilatory reduction to ammonium (DNRA) and chemodenitrification (8, 1214). In contrast to the diverse pathways leading to the production of N2O, the sole biological sink process of N2O in the environment is its reduction by the organisms expressing nitrous oxide reductases (NosZ) (8, 1517). N2O reduction was originally regarded merely as a part of the denitrification cascade. N2O reduction as an independent respiratory reaction had not garnered the deserved interest until recent discoveries unveiled the unexpectedly broad diversity of nosZ (15, 18). nosZ genes of the novel clade II are often found in organisms lacking the genes encoding the key denitrification enzymes, namely nirK or nirS, indicating that these organisms utilize N2O reduction as a respiratory reaction independent from denitrification (19). Thus, these nondenitrifying N2O reducers function as de facto sinks of N2O, as confirmed by physiological observations in experiments with isolates possessing NosZ (20, 21). Indeed, a recent study on the kinetics of N2O reductions revealed that the clade II nosZ-containing organisms have significantly higher affinity to N2O than the clade I nosZ-containing organisms, supporting the hypothesis that the organisms with clade II nosZ may contribute to the mitigation of N2O emissions from nonpoint sources (17).

Metagenomic analyses of environmental DNA have revealed that clade II nosZ genes are, in fact, abundant in diverse environments, ranging from tropical forest and hot desert to Arctic tundra and polar desert (18, 22). Among the most abundant phylogenetic groups of nosZ in the environment are clade II nosZ genes affiliated with the Gemmatimonadetes phylum (16, 18). Gemmatimonadetes have been identified as one of the most abundant phyla of bacteria in soil environments and often constitute >2% of the total bacterial population (23, 24); however, only three representative strains of this phylum (Gemmatimonas aurantiaca strain T-27, Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis strain KBS708, and Gemmatimonas phototrophica strain AP64) have been isolated to date, and the physiological characteristics of these organisms are virtually unknown (2528). Although clade II nosZ genes were found in the genomes of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 and G. kalamazoonesis strain KBS708, these strains were both characterized as obligate aerobes, and respiration on any other electron acceptors, e.g., N2O, has yet to be explored (2527). Therefore, questions remain unanswered regarding the functionality of this Gemmatimonadetes NosZ and its potential physiological role as a respiratory enzyme. As this particular group of nosZ genes constituted up to 33% of the entire nosZ gene pools identified in soil metagenomes, an understanding of the N2O reduction phenotype of the Gemmatimonadetes phylum is crucial for predicting N2O sink capabilities of subsurface soil environments. In this study, N2O reduction by G. aurantiaca strain T-27 was observed in both the absence and presence of oxygen. The inability of this organism to consume N2O in the complete absence of oxygen and the unexpected transcription pattern of nosZ, i.e., upregulation in the presence of oxygen and downregulation in the absence of oxygen, suggest a novel regulatory mechanism for N2O respiration by obligate aerobic microorganisms.

RESULTS

Aerobic growth of G. aurantiaca strain T-27.

Gemmatimonas aurantiaca strain T-27 was incubated with 66.6 ± 1.1 μmol O2 as the electron acceptor to obtain its growth curve under aerobic conditions (Fig. 1). The cell number, quantified by determining the nosZ gene copy number, increased from 5.5 × 107 ± 0.5 × 107 cells · ml−1 to 3.6 × 108 ± 0.5 × 108 cells · ml−1 at an exponential-growth rate of 0.068 ± 0.004 · h−1 (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The exponential-growth phase lasted until O2 was depleted. Cell decay began immediately after O2 depletion; there was no stationary phase. The cell number decreased by more than 3-fold, from 3.6 × 108 ± 0.5 × 108 cells · ml−1 to 1.1 × 108 ± 0.4 × 108 cells · ml−1, over 299 h of anoxic incubation following O2 depletion. As 66.6 ± 1.1 μmol O2 was consumed, the cellular yield on O2 respiration was calculated to be 1.14 × 108 ± 0.03 × 108 cells (μmol e eq)−1. The addition of O2 at t = 338 h failed to revitalize the inactivated G. aurantiaca strain T-27 cells, as three consecutive measurements at 12 h-intervals confirmed no significant increase in cell number or decrease in the amount of O2. Unexpectedly, no significant decrease in glucose concentration was observed throughout the experiment (data not shown), indicating that other organic compounds in the complex medium NM-1 (polypeptone, monosodium glutamate, and/or yeast extract) also served as electron donors and sources of carbon for G. aurantiaca strain T-27.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Aerobic growth of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 cultures in partially oxic conditions. The changes in amounts of O2 (○) and nosZ copy numbers (▲) in the reaction bottles were monitored. Additional O2 was added at t = 339 h. The data points are averages of duplicate experiments, with the error bars representing the standard deviations.

N2O consumption under anoxic and partially oxic conditions.

Initially, G. aurantiaca strain T-27 was examined for N2O reduction activity under completely anoxic conditions (Fig. 2A). The amount of N2O in the culture bottle after 312 h of incubation (105.1 ± 6.4 μmol/bottle) was not significantly different (P > 0.05) from the initial amount of N2O (103.5 ± 1.7 μmol/bottle). When G. aurantiaca strain T-27 cells were incubated with O2 added to the headspace (55.8 ± 3.9 μmol/bottle) along with N2O (125.8 ± 9.9 μmol/bottle), active N2O reduction was observed, but only after O2 was depleted (Fig. 2B). The O2 concentration dropped below the detection limit of the oxygen meter (0.02% in the headspace) within 25 h of inoculation, and the consumption of N2O started upon the depletion of O2. N2O was depleted after 138.5 h of anoxic incubation. The observations from these anoxic and partially oxic incubations of strain T-27 with N2O suggested that N2O reduction activity in strain T-27 is dependent on O2. No decrease in N2O concentration was observed in killed-cell controls over 336 h of incubation (Fig. S2), confirming that the N2O consumption was entirely biological.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

N2O (●) and O2 (○) consumption by G. aurantiaca strain T-27 cultures in the absence of O2 (A) and initially amended with 55.8 ± 3.9 μmol O2 (B). The data points are averages of triplicate experiments, with the error bars representing the standard deviations of the triplicate measurements.

Long-term N2O consumption in the absence of oxygen.

In a subsequent experiment under identical experimental conditions, N2O consumption by G. aurantiaca strain T-27 was monitored over the long term (392 h) to investigate whether N2O reduction activity is sustained in the absence of O2 (Fig. 3A). Neither the cell yield (1.27 × 108 ± 0.18 × 108 cells [μmol e eq]−1) nor the exponential-growth rate (0.081 ± 0.009 h−1) during the initial aerobic growth was significantly different from the value determined from the aerobic incubation without N2O (Fig. S1). The initial batch of N2O (125.8 ± 0.9 μmol) was rapidly consumed within 81.5 h after O2 depletion. After an injection of an additional 133.1 ± 2.7 μmol N2O, strain T-27 continued to consume N2O until the reaction slowed down significantly after t = 237.5 h and came to a near-complete stop at t = 338 h, after a total of 159.9 μmol N2O was consumed. N2O respiration did not appear to be coupled to growth in strain T-27, as no significant increase in cell number (P > 0.05) was observed after the depletion of O2. Unlike when strain T-27 was incubated without N2O, O2 depletion did not lead to an immediate decrease in cell number. The cell number was sustained for 144.5 h after the depletion of O2, although a statistically insignificant (P > 0.05) drop from 3.6 × 108 ± 0.3 × 108 copies · ml−1 to 3.1 × 108 ± 0.8 × 108 copies · ml−1 was observed after that time point. The addition of O2 at t = 338 h resulted in immediate consumption of O2 accompanied by an immediate increase in the nosZ gene copy number to 5.0 × 108 ± 0.7 × 108 copies · ml−1, followed by resuscitation of N2O consumption. Residual N2O (99.0 ± 2.3 mol) at the time of O2 injection was rapidly reduced within 42.5 h of O2 depletion. The different responses of the cultures amended with and without N2O to O2 depletion suggested that N2O reduction helped sustain cell integrity and, in part, metabolic activities during transient anoxia.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

Long-term incubation of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 with N2O after initial growth on O2. The amounts of N2O (□) and O2 (○) in the reaction bottles were monitored, and the copy numbers of nosZ genes (▲) were measured at selected time points using qPCR for cell counts. N2O was added upon N2O depletion at t = 144 h, and O2 was added at t = 338 h. The data points are averages of triplicate experiments, with the error bars representing the standard deviations of the triplicate measurements.

In another set of experiments, the rates of N2O consumption were measured at different time points during anoxic incubation following initial growth on O2 (Fig. 4). The N2O consumption rate peaked with 7.6 × 10−11 ± 1.0 × 10−11 μmol · h−1 · cell−1 at t = 169 h (132 h after O2 depletion) and decreased to zero at t = 217 h. N2O reduction resumed after consumption of added O2, and the maximum N2O consumption rate, 5.3 × 10−11 ± 0.6 × 10−11 μmol · h−1 · cell−1, was measured immediately after O2 depletion. The maximum N2O consumption rate was 69.7% of the highest value measured before resuscitation; however, N2O consumption was sustained for a longer period of time after (144 h) than before (95 h) resuscitation. These kinetics measurements confirmed that N2O consumption is not sustainable in the prolonged absence of O2.

FIG 4.

FIG 4

Monitoring of the change in rates of N2O consumption by G. aurantiaca strain T-27. Each data point represents the N2O consumption rate determined from linear regression of time versus N2O amount (the average of triplicate samples) data. The error bars represent the standard errors of linear regression analyses. The arrow mark indicates the time of O2 addition.

nosZ transcription analyses.

The transcription of nosZ was monitored with the samples withdrawn from a replicate of the batch culture used for monitoring of N2O consumption and cell growth (Fig. 5, Fig. S3). The transcription of nosZ increased significantly, from 0.21 ± 0.21 nosZ transcripts/recA transcript upon inoculation to 8.97 ± 0.90 nosZ transcripts/recA transcript, immediately after the consumption of 63.1 μmol O2 (P < 0.05). The transcription of nosZ decreased to 0.15 ± 0.23 nosZ transcripts/rec transcript 419 h after O2 depletion, and the downregulation of nosZ transcription explained the disappearance of N2O reductase activity. As expected from the resumption of N2O reduction activity after injection of O2, O2 addition resuscitated nosZ transcription, and the maximum transcription level (1.86 ± 0.16 nosZ transcripts/rec transcript) was observed 91 h after O2 depletion. This elevated transcription activity was sustained for >300 h after the oxygen depletion, even though a notable decreasing trend was observed after the peak, suggesting a less stringent regulation of nosZ transcription than that observed after the first O2 depletion event. This observation was consistent with a less precipitous decrease in N2O reduction rate after resuscitation than before O2 addition. The highest peaks in nosZ transcription were observed immediately after O2 was depleted, indicating that nosZ transcription occurred in the presence of O2. These observations suggested that G. aurantiaca strain T-27 may require N2O reductases expressed in the presence of O2 to utilize N2O as a surrogate electron acceptor in the anoxia that follows.

FIG 5.

FIG 5

nosZ transcription in the G. aurantiaca strain T-27 culture during the long-term anoxic incubation with N2O following initial partial-oxic incubation. The samples for the RT-qPCR analysis were collected at 9 crucial time points from the same culture vessel examined in Fig. S3. nosZ transcription level (□) was presented as the nosZ transcript copy numbers normalized with recA transcript copy numbers. O2 (●) concentration is shown to indicate the time points of O2 addition and depletion. The nosZ transcription data points are averages of triplicate samples treated independently through RNA extraction, purification, and reverse transcription procedures, and the error bars represent their standard deviations.

DISCUSSION

The Gemmatimonadetes phylum is one of the most abundant phylogenetic groups of microorganisms that constitute the soil bacterial communities (29, 30). Apart from the synthesis of a novel carotenoid by G. aurantiaca strain T-27 (31), not much has been reported regarding their physiology until recently, mainly due to the paucity of available isolates. The recent discovery of a full operon encoding type 2 photosynthetic reaction centers in the G. phototrophica strain AP-64 genome suggested that the Gemmatimonadetes phylum of bacteria may have adopted an oxygen-independent energy-generating metabolism to supplement an oxygen-dependent heterotrophic lifestyle in cases of transient hypoxia or anoxia (32). The utilization of N2O by G. aurantiaca strain T-27 observed in this study may be interpreted in a similar context. Strain T-27 was previously characterized as an obligate aerobic bacteria unable to grow with any nonoxygen electron acceptors (26), and our experiments have confirmed that the presence of N2O alone could not initiate N2O reduction under conditions of complete anoxia or support growth; however, in the short term, N2O utilization as the surrogate electron acceptor helped sustain cell viability in the absence of O2. Similar transient enhancement of reduction of nonoxygen electron acceptors, i.e., NO2 and NO, was previously observed in obligate aerobic nitrifiers under hypoxic or semioxic conditions (33, 34). Geets et al. (34) proposed the hypothesis that one of the possible physiological roles of this nitrifier denitrification may be related to survival during anoxic periods, but this hypothesis has not yet been supported by experimental evidence. In recent research with Nitrosomonas eutropha strain C91, NO2 gas was found to have a similar role of sustaining cell viability in oxygen-depleted cultures (35). The transcriptomics and proteomics data in the study suggested that N. eutropha strain C91 tuned down the assimilatory metabolism while retaining or stimulating dissimilatory metabolism upon anoxic incubation with NO2 as the surrogate oxidant. A Gram-positive obligate aerobic bacterium, Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2), was also found to utilize its Nar-type respiratory nitrate reductase to survive extended periods of anoxia, although no growth was observed in the absence of O2 (36, 37). The utilization of N2O as a temporary substitute for O2 in G. aurantiaca strain T-27 may be another such lifestyle that strictly aerobic microorganisms have adopted to generate cell maintenance energy to survive through periods of anoxia. In fact, in support of this hypothesis, several other organisms that have been characterized as obligate aerobes harbor clade II nosZ genes, including Leptospira spp., Runella slithyformis, Haliscomenobacter hydrossis, and Marivirga tractuosa (3841).

The physiology of N2O reduction by G. aurantiaca strain T-27 observed in this study was distinguishable from that of previously studied denitrifiers or nondenitrifying N2O reducers in that (i) N2O reduction was decoupled from cell growth and (ii) N2O reduction activity was dependent on the transient presence of O2 and dissipated under prolonged anoxia. Although N2O reductase is a soluble periplasmic enzyme, earlier studies have demonstrated that the electron transfer chain to N2O reductase involves cytochromes and thus is coupled to proton translocation across the membrane and energy conservation (42, 43). In fact, diverse groups of denitrifiers and nondenitrifying N2O reducers were able to grow with N2O as the sole electron acceptor (17, 43, 44). Albeit with different efficiencies and concentration thresholds, organisms with active clade I and clade II N2O reductases examined in a recent kinetics study invariably coupled N2O reduction to growth, and N2O reduction entirely decoupled from cell growth has not been previously observed.

A plausible explanation for nongrowth in the absence of O2 may be that O2 is required for synthesis of metabolites necessary for strain T-27 to reproduce while N2O can be used only as a temporary substitute for oxygen, as it can provide energy but not these necessary metabolites. A similar phenomenon was previously observed with Campylobacter jejuni strain 11168, a gastrointestinal pathogen capable of utilizing NO3, NO2, fumarate, and trimethylamine-N-oxide as electron acceptors for energy conservation under microaerophilic conditions, but not in the complete absence of oxygen (45). The oxygen dependence of C. jejuni strain 11168 was attributed to the requirement for oxygen-dependent ribonucleotide reductase (RNR). Another plausible explanation for the oxygen requirement of strictly aerobic bacteria is the use of HemF, the oxygen-dependent coproporphyrinogen III oxidase, for coproporphyrinogen III decarboxylation in heme synthesis (46). Neither case applies to G. aurantiaca strain T-27, as it possesses the genes encoding class II RNR and HemN, the oxygen-independent counterparts for class I RNR and HemF, respectively, in its genome; however, it is still possible that other essential metabolic functions for biosynthesis in G. aurantiaca strain T-27 may be carried out by oxygen-dependent enzymes.

Nitrous oxide reductase, like other enzymes in the denitrification cascade, has long been known to be sensitive to O2 concentration (47, 48). That G. aurantiaca required the transient presence of O2 for expression and activation of nitrous oxide reductases is nothing new. Ensifer meliloti strain 1021 was found to require partial oxygenation before activation of anaerobic denitrification and N2O reduction, and Paracoccus denitrificans exhibited the highest level of nosZ expression immediately following O2 depletion (49, 50). Nevertheless, the eventual termination of N2O reduction in prolonged anoxia has not been observed in these organisms. In E. meliloti strain 1021, the expression levels of denitrification-related genes napA, nirS, nosC, and nosZ were sustained at an order-of-magnitude-higher level under completely anoxic conditions than under partially oxic conditions, suggesting continued expression and activity of denitrification and N2O reduction (51). In P. denitrificans, the high level of nosZ transcription was sustained in the anoxic phase until all nitrogen oxides were depleted, indicating that NosZ enzymes synthesized during anoxic incubation were utilized for N2O reduction (52). Further, in four strains of bacteria examined for kinetic properties, N2O served as the sole source of electron acceptor for exponential growth in the complete absence of O2 (17). As nitrous oxide reductase is active only in the absence of O2 and thus is supposedly more beneficial for its owners under anoxic conditions (52), the disappearance of nosZ transcription activity in oxygen-depleted cultures of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 is rather unexpected and is unprecedented in any studies on denitrifiers or nondenitrifying N2O reducers alike. These novel findings substantially expand the knowledge of microbial processes that contribute to N2O emission mitigation, as this study demonstrated a novel regulatory mechanism that may be more generally applicable to nosZ-harboring obligate aerobic bacteria, which constitute an appreciable portion of the nosZ-harboring population in the environment (15, 18).

Subsurface soil environments alternate between oxic and anoxic conditions due to both natural and anthropogenic events. Precipitation events often lead to flooding of the vadose zone, hindering mass transfer of atmospheric O2 into the subsurface soil environment (53). In fertilized grassland, soil compaction from frequent mowing may also result in temporarily diminished O2 availability (54). Elevated N2O emissions have been observed during such transitions from oxic to anoxic conditions (5557). The obligate aerobic organisms harboring nosZ genes, including G. aurantiaca strain T-27, may benefit from the elevated local N2O concentrations, as they are capable of utilizing N2O as a temporary surrogate for O2 to survive temporary anoxia. These aerobic N2O reducers may be undertaking an unexpectedly important role in reducing the amounts of N2O emitted to the atmosphere in events of oxic-to-anoxic transitions. Future research is warranted for the development of novel experimental methods for an investigation of the true contribution of these obligate aerobic organisms to N2O emission reduction, as enrichment-based investigations would not be able to capture these important N2O sinks.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial culture and growth conditions.

Gemmatimonas aurantiaca strain T-27 was acquired from the Japan Collection of Microorganisms (JCM 11422). The culture medium used in this study was developed from NM-1 medium, a semidefined medium previously developed for isolation and culturing of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 (26). The medium contained, per liter, 0.5 g of glucose, 0.5 g of polypeptone, 0.5 g of monosodium glutamate, 0.5 g of yeast extract, 0.44 g of K2HPO4, 0.1 g of (NH4)2SO4, and 0.1 g of MgSO4. As nitrous oxide reductase is a copper-dependent enzyme and a lack of copper may hinder the activity of the enzyme (58), CuCl2 was added to a concentration of 5 μM. The pH was adjusted to 7.0 with 5 N NaOH solution. For preparation of anoxic or partially oxic cultures, 100-ml aliquots of the medium were distributed into 160-ml serum bottles (Wheaton, Millville, NJ) and flushed with >99.999% N2 for ∼20 min to remove O2. This degassing step was omitted for oxic precultures, prepared with 50 ml of medium in 160-ml serum bottles. The serum bottles were then sealed with butyl rubber stoppers (Geo-Microbial Technologies, Ochelata, OK). After autoclaving, 10% of headspace (6 ml of 60-ml headspaces) was aseptically replaced with air to prepare partially oxic cultures (∼2.1% O2 concentration in the headspace). No air was added to anoxic controls. Half a milliliter of 200× Wolin's vitamin solution (59) was added, and 2.0 ml of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 preculture was inoculated. Three milliliters of >99.999% N2O (Deokyang Co., Ulsan, South Korea) was aseptically added using a disposable syringe connected to 0.2-μm-pore-size syringe filters (Advantec, Inc., Tokyo, Japan) after the same volume of headspace gas was removed. All culture vessels were incubated at 30°C with shaking at 140 rpm. Glucose was added in excess (0.5 g/liter), as a theoretical stoichiometric calculation estimated that only 15.0% (42.5 μmol) of added glucose would be consumed to reduce 125.8 μmol O2 and 258.9 μmol N2O (the maximum amounts of electron acceptors used in this research), even if glucose is used as the sole electron donor. Glucose concentrations were measured after the reactions were completed to confirm that the amount of electron donor added was not a limiting factor for the growth of G. aurantiaca strain T-27.

Analytical procedure.

The amounts of N2O in the serum bottles were quantified using an HP6890 series gas chromatograph equipped with an HP-PLOT/Q column and an electron capture detector (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). The injector, oven, and detector temperatures were set to 200, 85, and 250°C, respectively (17). For each measurement, 200 μl of headspace gas was removed using a 1700 series gas-tight syringe (Hamilton Company, Reno, NV), and 100 μl of the withdrawn sample was manually injected into the gas chromatograph. The syringe was flushed at least three times with pressurized N2 gas to remove O2 before use, and 200 μl of N2 was added upon each sampling event to prevent a pressure drop in the culture bottles. The change in the amounts of N2O due to gas sampling was accounted for in the subsequent calculations (60). Oxygen concentrations were monitored with fiber-optic oxygen sensor spots and a FireStingO2 oxygen meter (Pyroscience, Aachen, Germany). The total amounts of N2O and O2 in the reaction vessels were calculated from the headspace concentrations as described previously (17). The dimensionless Henry's constants (calculated as moles in the headspace/moles in the aqueous phase) of N2O and O2 at 30°C were calculated to be 1.92 and 33.3, respectively (61). These dimensionless Henry's constants were used to calculate the aqueous concentrations of N2O and O2. The amounts of the gases in the headspace and the aqueous phase were summed to determine the total amounts of N2O and O2 in the vessels. Glucose concentrations were measured colorimetrically using a glucose (HK) assay kit (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Monitoring of N2O consumption.

A series of incubation experiments was performed to investigate the consumption of N2O by G. aurantiaca strain T-27. Oxic precultures for the experiments were prepared from glycerol stocks of strain T-27. For anoxic control experiments, 50 ml of the oxic precultures was harvested at the late-exponential phase (optical density at 600 nm [OD600], ∼0.043) and centrifuged at 4,800 × g for 10 min at 4°C. In an anaerobic chamber (Coy Laboratory Products, Inc., Grass Lake, MI) filled with 95% N2 and 5% H2, the pellets were equilibrated for 1 h and resuspended into 2 ml of medium taken from the anoxic culture bottles prepared as described above. The concentrated precultures were reinjected into the anoxic serum bottle, and the N2O concentration was monitored for 312 h. After confirmation of the absence of N2O consumption activity in the anoxic cultures, the N2O consumption experiments were performed in partially oxic culture bottles prepared with a low concentration (2.1%) of O2 in the headspace. One milliliter of frozen stock of strain T-27 was grown in 50 ml of oxic medium in a 160-ml serum bottle until the late-exponential phase. Each partially oxic culture bottle (with 100 ml of medium) was inoculated with 2 ml of these late-exponential-phase cultures. O2 concentrations were monitored until the concentrations dropped below the detection limit of the oxygen meter, and N2O concentrations were measured at 5- to 26.5-h intervals until no remaining N2O was detected. The killed-cell negative controls were inoculated with autoclaved aerobic precultures harvested at the late-exponential phase and concentrated by centrifugation. The concentrations of O2 and N2O were monitored for 336 h at 30°C.

Long-term incubation of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 on N2O.

In order to examine whether O2 is required for sustenance of N2O reduction activity, G. aurantiaca strain T-27 culture was initiated with 51.5 μmol O2 and 122.6 μmol N2O. Each time N2O was depleted, 3 ml (nominally 121.6 μmol) of N2O was aseptically injected into the culture bottle. After N2O consumption came close to a halt, 6 ml of headspace was aseptically replaced with air, providing an additional 51.5 μmol O2, to examine whether O2 addition resuscitates N2O reduction activity. O2 and N2O concentrations were monitored throughout the experiment at appropriate time intervals (3.5 to 100.5 h), and aqueous-phase samples were collected for quantification of nosZ genes and/or transcripts. As strain T-27 contains a single nosZ copy in its published genome (accession no. NC_012489.1), the copy number of the nosZ gene was used as a surrogate for cell counts. In the no-N2O controls amended only with 51.5 μmol O2, O2 concentrations and cell numbers were monitored until 323 h after O2 depletion. After O2 replenishment, three measurements of O2 concentrations and nosZ copy numbers were made at 12-h intervals.

In an independent set of experiments, the decrease in N2O consumption rate was monitored in anoxia following initial O2 consumption (51.5 μmol). Three independent cultures of G. aurantiaca strain T-27 were prepared identically to the above-described experiments. After O2 depletion and onset of N2O consumption, N2O consumption rates were measured by taking at least three consecutive measurements of N2O concentrations at a constant time interval (intervals were varied depending on the rates of N2O consumption) and performing linear regression to calculate the slope of the time-versus-amount curves for the N2O consumption rates. The average of the time points was taken as the representative time for each rate measurement. After each rate determination, N2O in the culture bottles was replenished to the initial amount (∼121.6 μmol N2O/bottle) by adding >99.999% N2O aseptically through 0.2-μm-pore-size filters. One milliliter of the aqueous phase was extracted immediately after N2O replenishment for cell counting by quantitative PCR (qPCR), and the volumetric loss was replaced with fresh anoxic NM-1 medium. The N2O consumption data were normalized, with the numbers of nosZ genes measured by qPCR. Upon cessation of N2O reduction, 51.5 μmol O2 was added, and N2O reduction rates were monitored using the same protocol.

Cell culture sampling for DNA/RNA extraction.

A qPCR technique was used for quantification of cell numbers, and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (RT-qPCR) analyses were performed to examine the effect of O2 on transcription of nosZ. A cell suspension was sampled at the time points determined to be crucial for observation of N2O reduction by G. aurantiaca strain T-27. Each sampling was performed by withdrawing 1.0 ml (samples subjected to either qPCR or RT-qPCR) or 1.6 ml (samples subjected to both qPCR and RT-qPCR) of the aqueous phase using a sterile disposable syringe flushed with N2 gas. To avoid pressure loss in the vessel, the same volume of N2 gas was added upon each sampling event. Triplicate 0.2-ml aliquots were transferred to 1.5-ml DNase- and RNase-free tubes (Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany) for DNA extraction. After centrifugation at 15,000 × g for 1 min, the supernatant was removed. The cell pellet was stored in a −20°C freezer until DNA extraction. For RNA extraction, triplicate 0.3-ml aliquots were transferred to 1.5-ml DNase- and RNase-free tubes, and each aliquot was mixed vigorously with 0.6 ml of RNAprotect Bacteria reagent (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). After centrifugation at 5,000 × g for 10 min, the supernatant was carefully removed and the pellet was stored at −80°C until further treatment.

DNA/RNA extraction and purification procedure.

DNA extraction from the pelleted cell culture samples were performed with the DNeasy blood and tissue kit (Qiagen) according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The DNA samples were stored at −20°C until qPCR analyses. A two-step RT-qPCR approach was taken for analyses of nosZ transcription according to the established protocol (62). Before extraction, 1 μl of luciferase control mRNA (Promega, Madison, WI) diluted to 1010 copies · μl−1 was added to each sample as an internal standard to account for RNA loss during extraction, purification, and reverse transcription processes (63). The recovery of the control RNA was used to check for the validity of transcription analyses. A mixture of 350 μl of RLT buffer from an RNeasy minikit (Qiagen) and 7 μl of β-mercaptoethanol was added to the tubes containing cell pellets, and the tubes were vortexed for 10 s. Each suspension was transferred to a 2.0-ml reinforced tube containing 0.1-mm-diameter glass beads (Omni International, Kennesaw, GA). Cells were disrupted for 5 min at 5 m/s in a Bead Ruptor 12 homogenizer (Omni International). Total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy minikit according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. The eluents were then treated with RNase-free DNase I (Qiagen) to remove residual DNA (64). The DNase-treated samples were purified using the RNeasy MinElute cleanup kit (Qiagen), and 20-μl eluent volumes were collected after purification. To 10 μl of the eluents, 1 μl of a 10 mM dinucleoside triphosphate (dNTP) mixture (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA) and 2 μl of random hexamers (Invitrogen) were added. The remaining eluents were stored at −20°C and later employed to check for DNA contamination by using qPCR assays targeting the nosZ gene. The mixture was incubated at 65°C for 5 min. After cooling in ice for 1 min, 4 μl of 5× First-Strand buffer, 1 μl of 0.1 M dithiothreitol (DTT; Invitrogen), and 1 μl of RNaseOUT solution (Invitrogen) were added, and the reaction mixture was incubated at room temperature for 2 min. After 1 μl of SuperScript III reverse transcriptase (Invitrogen) was added, the reaction mixture was incubated with the following temperature cycle: 10 min at room temperature, 3 h at 42°C, and 15 min at 70°C. The resulting cDNA was chilled on ice before 1 μl of RNase H (Invitrogen) was added to digest RNA strands of RNA-cDNA hybrids and residual RNA in the solution. The reaction mixture was incubated at 37°C for 20 min, and the resulting cDNA solution was diluted 5-fold with the addition of 84 μl of nuclease-free water to reduce inhibitory effects of the reagents on qPCR. The triplicate samples collected at each time point were treated independently through extraction, purification, and reverse transcription procedures and yielded three separate cDNA samples later subjected to qPCR.

Quantitative PCR/RT-qPCR assays for cell number determination and analyses of nosZ transcription.

Quantification of nosZ genes in the genomic DNA and the cDNA samples were performed with quantitative PCR using established protocols, with modifications (62) (Fig. 5). recA, the housekeeping gene encoding recombinase A, was quantified in the cDNA samples for normalization of the RT-qPCR data, and the nosZ gene expression levels were presented as the nosZ transcript copy number per recA transcript. The new primers used in this study were designed using the Primer3 software, and amplicon sizes were limited to <200 bp for accurate quantification (Table 1) (65). SYBR green detection chemistry was used for qPCR assays performed with the QuantStudio 3 real-time PCR instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA). The reaction mixture was prepared with 2× Power SYBR green PCR master mix solution (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA). The calibration curves were constructed with a serial dilution series of the target fragments inserted into PCR2.1 vectors using the TOPO TA cloning kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific). The qPCR assay for all three target genes yielded consistent results for DNA copy numbers as low as 101 copies/μl. Amplification of the no-template controls and DNase-treated RNA samples yielded negative results. Consistent melting curves indicated the target specificity of the qPCRs. The RNA recovery rates, as determined from the recovery of the luc control, ranged from 19.61% to 41.28%. For each DNA or cDNA sample analyzed, qPCRs were performed in triplicate, and the average threshold cycle (CT) values of these technical replicates were obtained for calculation of the copy number.

TABLE 1.

Primers used for qPCR and RT-qPCR analyses and their qPCR calibration curve parameters

Primer Primer sequence (5′ to 3′) Target gene (locus tag) Amplicon length (bp) Slope y intercept Amplification efficiency R2 Reference or source
GenosZf1000 TCGATCTACTTCCTGCCGAC nosZ (GAU_1385) 151 −3.523 36.21 92.2 0.993 This study
GenosZr1150 CGAACGCCTGATCCTTGATG
GerecAf780 CGACATCATGTACGCGGAAG recA (GAU_1917) 183 −3.449 35.99 95.0 0.999 This study
GerecAr972 CTTCACCTTGTCCTCGACCT
lucf TACAACACCCCAACATCTTCGA Luciferase control mRNA 67 −3.32 34.69 100.3 1 62
lucr GGAAGTTCACCGGCGTCAT

Statistical analyses.

Statistical analyses (t tests) were performed with SPSS 24 software (IBM Corp., NY, USA). Unless otherwise mentioned, the presented data are the averages and standard deviations of the results from triplicate experiments. P values of <0.05 were considered significant.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental material

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was supported by National Research Foundation of Korea, awards 2014R1A1A2058543 and 2015M3D3A1A01064881.

Footnotes

Supplemental material for this article may be found at https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00502-17.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Montzka SA, Dlugokencky EJ, Butler JH. 2011. Non-CO2 greenhouse gases and climate change. Nature 476:43–50. doi: 10.1038/nature10322. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Lashof DA, Ahuja DR. 1990. Relative contributions of greenhouse gas emissions to global warming. Nature 344:529–531. doi: 10.1038/344529a0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Forster P, Ramaswamy V, Artaxo P, Berntsen T, Betts R, Fahey DW, Haywood J, Lean J, Lowe DC, Myhre G, Nganga J, Prinn R, Raga G, Schultz M, van Dorland R. 2007. Changes in atmospheric constituents and in radiative forcing, p 129–234. In Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Chen Z, Marquis M, Averyt KB, Tingor M, Miller HL (ed), Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2014. Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, and New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ravishankara AR, Daniel JS, Portmann RW. 2009. Nitrous oxide (N2O): the dominant ozone-depleting substance emitted in the 21st century. Science 326:123–125. doi: 10.1126/science.1176985. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Portmann RW, Daniel JS, Ravishankara AR. 2012. Stratospheric ozone depletion due to nitrous oxide: influences of other gases. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:1256–1264. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0377. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Butterbach-Bahl K, Baggs EM, Dannenmann M, Kiese R, Zechmeister-Boltenstern S. 2013. Nitrous oxide emissions from soils: how well do we understand the processes and their controls? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 368:20130122. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Thomson AJ, Giannopoulos G, Pretty J, Baggs EM, Richardson DJ. 2012. Biological sources and sinks of nitrous oxide and strategies to mitigate emissions. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 367:1157–1168. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Zhu X, Burger M, Doane TA, Horwath WR. 2013. Ammonia oxidation pathways and nitrifier denitrification are significant sources of N2O and NO under low oxygen availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:6328–6333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219993110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Bateman EJ, Baggs EM. 2005. Contributions of nitrification and denitrification to N2O emissions from soils at different water-filled pore space. Biol Fertil Soils 41:379–388. doi: 10.1007/s00374-005-0858-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Philippot L, Andert J, Jones CM, Bru D, Hallin S. 2011. Importance of denitrifiers lacking the genes encoding the nitrous oxide reductase for N2O emissions from soil. Glob Chang Biol 17:1497–1504. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02334.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Cruz-García C, Murray AE, Klappenbach JA, Stewart V, Tiedje JM. 2007. Respiratory nitrate ammonification by Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. J Bacteriol 189:656–662. doi: 10.1128/JB.01194-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Jones LC, Peters B, Lezama Pacheco JS, Casciotti KL, Fendorf S. 2015. Stable isotopes and iron oxide mineral products as markers of chemodenitrification. Environ Sci Technol 49:3444–3452. doi: 10.1021/es504862x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mania D, Heylen K, van Spanning RJ, Frostegard A. 2014. The nitrate-ammonifying and nosZ carrying bacterium Bacillus vireti is a potent source and sink for nitric and nitrous oxides under high nitrate conditions. Environ Microbiol 16:3196–3210. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12478. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Sanford RA, Wagner DD, Wu Q, Chee-Sanford JC, Thomas SH, Cruz-García C, Rodríguez G, Massol-Deyá A, Krishnani KK, Ritalahti KM, Nissen S, Konstantinidis KT, Löffler FE. 2012. Unexpected nondenitrifier nitrous oxide reductase gene diversity and abundance in soils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:19709–19714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211238109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Jones CM, Spor A, Brennan FP, Breuil M-C, Bru D, Lemanceau P, Griffiths B, Hallin S, Philippot L. 2014. Recently identified microbial guild mediates soil N2O sink capacity. Nat Clim Chang 4:801–805. doi: 10.1038/nclimate2301. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Yoon S, Nissen S, Park D, Sanford RA, Löffler FE. 2016. Nitrous oxide reduction kinetics distinguish bacteria harboring clade I versus clade II NosZ. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3793–3800. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00409-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Jones CM, Graf DRH, Bru D, Philippot L, Hallin S. 2013. The unaccounted yet abundant nitrous oxide-reducing microbial community: a potential nitrous oxide sink. ISME J 7:417–426. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Graf DR, Jones CM, Hallin S. 2014. Intergenomic comparisons highlight modularity of the denitrification pathway and underpin the importance of community structure for N2O emissions. PLoS One 9:e114118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Domeignoz-Horta L, Spor A, Bru D, Breuil M-C, Bizouard F, Leonard J, Philippot L. 2015. The diversity of the N2O reducers matters for the N2O:N2 denitrification end-product ratio across an annual and a perennial cropping system. Front Microbiol 6:971. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00971. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Domeignoz-Horta LA, Putz M, Spor A, Bru D, Breuil MC, Hallin S, Philippot L. 2016. Non-denitrifying nitrous oxide-reducing bacteria—an effective N2O sink in soil. Soil Biol Biochem 103:376–379. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2016.09.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Orellana LH, Rodriguez-R LM, Higgins S, Chee-Sanford JC, Sanford RA, Ritalahti KM, Löffler FE, Konstantinidis KT. 2014. Detecting nitrous oxide reductase (nosZ) genes in soil metagenomes: method development and implications for the nitrogen cycle. mBio 5(3):e01193-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01193-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.de Bruin WP, Kotterman MJ, Posthumus MA, Schraa G, Zehnder AJ. 1992. Complete biological reductive transformation of tetrachloroethene to ethane. Appl Environ Microbiol 58:1996–2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Shen Z, Wang D, Ruan Y, Xue C, Zhang J, Li R, Shen Q. 2014. Deep 16S rRNA pyrosequencing reveals a bacterial community associated with banana fusarium wilt disease suppression induced by bio-organic fertilizer application. PLoS One 9:e98420. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0098420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Zeng Y, Selyanin V, Lukeš M, Dean J, Kaftan D, Feng F, Koblížek M. 2015. Characterization of the microaerophilic, bacteriochlorophyll a-containing bacterium Gemmatimonas phototrophica sp. nov., and emended descriptions of the genus Gemmatimonas and Gemmatimonas aurantiaca. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 65:2410–2419. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.000272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Zhang H, Sekiguchi Y, Hanada S, Hugenholtz P, Kim H, Kamagata Y, Nakamura K. 2003. Gemmatimonas aurantiaca gen. nov., sp. nov., a Gram-negative, aerobic, polyphosphate-accumulating micro-organism, the first cultured representative of the new bacterial phylum Gemmatimonadetes phyl. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1155–1163. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.02520-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.DeBruyn JM, Fawaz MN, Peacock AD, Dunlap JR, Nixon LT, Cooper KE, Radosevich M. 2013. Gemmatirosa kalamazoonesis gen. nov., sp. nov., a member of the rarely-cultivated bacterial phylum Gemmatimonadetes. J Gen Appl Microbiol 59:305–312. doi: 10.2323/jgam.59.305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Davis KER, Joseph SJ, Janssen PH. 2005. Effects of growth medium, inoculum size, and incubation time on culturability and isolation of soil bacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:826–834. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.2.826-834.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Janssen P. 2006. Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72:1719–1728. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.3.1719-1728.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.DeBruyn JM, Nixon LT, Fawaz MN, Johnson AM, Radosevich M. 2011. Global biogeography and quantitative seasonal dynamics of Gemmatimonadetes in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:6295–6300. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05005-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Takaichi S, Maoka T, Takasaki K, Hanada S. 2010. Carotenoids of Gemmatimonas aurantiaca (Gemmatimonadetes): identification of a novel carotenoid, deoxyoscillol 2-rhamnoside, and proposed biosynthetic pathway of oscillol 2,2′-dirhamnoside. Microbiology 156:757–763. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.034249-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Zeng Y, Feng F, Medová H, Dean J, Koblížek M. 2014. Functional type 2 photosynthetic reaction centers found in the rare bacterial phylum Gemmatimonadetes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111:7795–7800. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400295111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Hu H-W, Chen D, He J-Z. 2015. Microbial regulation of terrestrial nitrous oxide formation: understanding the biological pathways for prediction of emission rates. FEMS Microbiol Rev 39:729–749. doi: 10.1093/femsre/fuv021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Geets J, Boon N, Verstraete W. 2006. Strategies of aerobic ammonia-oxidizing bacteria for coping with nutrient and oxygen fluctuations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 58:1–13. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00170.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Kartal B, Wessels HJCT, van der Biezen E, Francoijs K-J, Jetten MSM, Klotz MG, Stein LY. 2012. Effects of nitrogen dioxide and anoxia on global gene and protein expression in long-term continuous cultures of Nitrosomonas eutropha C91. Appl Environ Microbiol 78:4788–4794. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00668-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Fischer M, Falke D, Pawlik T, Sawers RG. 2014. Oxygen-dependent control of respiratory nitrate reduction in mycelium of Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Bacteriol 196:4152–4162. doi: 10.1128/JB.02202-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.van Keulen G, Alderson J, White J, Sawers RG. 2007. The obligate aerobic actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2) survives extended periods of anaerobic stress. Environ Microbiol 9:3143–3149. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01433.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Larkin JM, Williams PM. 1978. Runella slithyformis gen. nov., sp. nov., a curved, nonflexible, pink bacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 28:32–36. [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Daligault H, Lapidus A, Zeytun A, Nolan M, Lucas S, Del Rio TG, Tice H, Cheng J-F, Tapia R, Han C, Goodwin L, Pitluck S, Liolios K, Pagani I, Ivanova N, Huntemann M, Mavromatis K, Mikhailova N, Pati A, Chen A, Palaniappan K, Land M, Hauser L, Brambilla E-M, Rohde M, Verbarg S, Göker M, Bristow J, Eisen JA, Markowitz V, Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC, Klenk H-P, Woyke T. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Haliscomenobacter hydrossis type strain (OT). Stand Genomic Sci 4:352–360. doi: 10.4056/sigs.1964579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Pagani I, Chertkov O, Lapidus A, Lucas S, Glavina Del Rio T, Tice H, Copeland A, Cheng J-F, Nolan M, Saunders E, Pitluck S, Held B, Goodwin L, Liolios K, Ovchinikova G, Ivanova N, Mavromatis K, Pati A, Chen A, Palaniappan K, Land M, Hauser L, Jeffries CD, Detter JC, Han C, Tapia R, Ngatchou-Djao OD, Rohde M, Göker M, Spring S, Sikorski J, Woyke T, Bristow J, Eisen JA, Markowitz V, Hugenholtz P, Klenk H-P, Kyrpides NC. 2011. Complete genome sequence of Marivirga tractuosa type strain (H-43T). Stand Genomic Sci 4:154–162. doi: 10.4056/sigs.1623941. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Perolat P, Chappel RJ, Adler B, Baranton G, Bulach DM, Billinghurst ML, Letocart M, Merien F, Serrano MS. 1998. Leptospira fainei sp. nov., isolated from pigs in Australia. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 48:851–858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zumft WG. 1997. Cell biology and molecular basis of denitrification. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 61:533–616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Zumft WG, Kroneck PM. 2006. Respiratory transformation of nitrous oxide (N2O) to dinitrogen by bacteria and archaea, p 107–227. In Robert KP. (ed), Advances in microbiology physiology, vol 52 Academic Press, Cambridge MA. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Payne WJ, Grant MA, Shapleigh J, Hoffman P. 1982. Nitrogen oxide reduction in Wolinella succinogenes and Campylobacter species. J Bacteriol 152:915–918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Sellers MJ, Hall SJ, Kelly DJ. 2002. Growth of Campylobacter jejuni supported by respiration of fumarate, nitrate, nitrite, trimethylamine-N-oxide, or dimethyl sulfoxide requires oxygen. J Bacteriol 184:4187–4196. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.15.4187-4196.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Layer G, Pierik AJ, Trost M, Rigby SE, Leech HK, Grage K, Breckau D, Astner I, Jänsch L, Heathcote P, Warren MJ, Heinz DW, Jahn D. 2006. The substrate radical of Escherichia coli oxygen-independent coproporphyrinogen III oxidase HemN. J Biol Chem 281:15727–15734. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M512628200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Betlach MR, Tiedje JM. 1981. Kinetic explanation for accumulation of nitrite, nitric oxide, and nitrous oxide during bacterial denitrification. Appl Environ Microbiol 42:1074–1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Morley N, Baggs EM, Dörsch P, Bakken L. 2008. Production of NO, N2O and N2 by extracted soil bacteria, regulation by NO2 and O2 concentrations. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65:102–112. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2008.00495.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Torres MJ, Rubia MI, Bedmar EJ, Delgado MJ. 2011. Denitrification in Sinorhizobium meliloti. Biochem Soc Trans 39:1886–1889. doi: 10.1042/BST20110733. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Bergaust L, Mao Y, Bakken L, Frostegard A. 2010. Denitrification response patterns during the transition to anoxic respiration and posttranscriptional effects of suboptimal pH on nitrous oxide reductase in Paracoccus denitrificans. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:6387–6396. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00608-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Torres M, Rubia M, de la Pena T, Pueyo J, Bedmar E, Delgado M. 2014. Genetic basis for denitrification in Ensifer meliloti. BMC Microbiol 14:142. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-14-142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Qu Z, Bakken LR, Molstad L, Frostegård Å, Bergaust LL. 2016. Transcriptional and metabolic regulation of denitrification in Paracoccus denitrificans allows low but significant activity of nitrous oxide reductase under oxic conditions. Environ Microbiol 18:2951–2963. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13128. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Davidson EA, Verchot LV, Cattânio JH, Ackerman IL, Carvalho J. 2000. Effects of soil water content on soil respiration in forests and cattle pastures of eastern Amazonia. Biogeochemistry 48:53–69. doi: 10.1023/A:1006204113917. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Glatzel S, Stahr K. 2001. Methane and nitrous oxide exchange in differently fertilised grassland in southern Germany. Plant Soil 231:21–35. doi: 10.1023/A:1010315416866. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Law Y, Ye L, Pan Y, Yuan Z. 2012. Nitrous oxide emissions from wastewater treatment processes. Philos Trans R Soc B 367:1265–1277. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Bollmann A, Conrad R. 1998. Influence of O2 availability on NO and N2O release by nitrification and denitrification in soils. Glob Chang Biol 4:387–396. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00161.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Qu Z, Wang J, Almøy T, Bakken LR. 2014. Excessive use of nitrogen in Chinese agriculture results in high N2O/(N2O + N2) product ratio of denitrification, primarily due to acidification of the soils. Glob Chang Biol 20:1685–1698. doi: 10.1111/gcb.12461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Granger J, Ward BB. 2003. Accumulation of nitrogen oxides in copper-limited cultures of denitrifying bacteria. Limnol Oceanogr 48:313–318. doi: 10.4319/lo.2003.48.1.0313. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Wolin E, Wolin MJ, Wolfe R. 1963. Formation of methane by bacterial extracts. J Biol Chem 238:2882–2886. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Yoon S, Sanford RA, Löffler FE. 2013. Shewanella spp. use acetate as an electron donor for denitrification but not ferric iron or fumarate reduction. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:2818–2822. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03872-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sander R. 2015. Compilation of Henry's law constants (version 4.0) for water as solvent. Atmos Chem Phys 15:4399–4981. doi: 10.5194/acp-15-4399-2015. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Yoon S, Cruz-García C, Sanford R, Ritalahti KM, Löffler FE. 2015. Denitrification versus respiratory ammonification: environmental controls of two competing dissimilatory NO3/NO2 reduction pathways in Shewanella loihica strain PV-4. ISME J 9:1093–1104. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2014.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Amos BK, Ritalahti KM, Cruz-Garcia C, Padilla-Crespo E, Löffler FE. 2008. Oxygen effect on Dehalococcoides viability and biomarker quantification. Environ Sci Technol 42:5718–5726. doi: 10.1021/es703227g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Johnson DR, Lee PK, Holmes VF, Alvarez-Cohen L. 2005. An internal reference technique for accurately quantifying specific mRNAs by real-time PCR with application to the tceA reductive dehalogenase gene. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:3866–3871. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.7.3866-3871.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Untergasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG. 2012. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Res 40:e115. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplemental material

Articles from Applied and Environmental Microbiology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES