ABSTRACT
The PhcA virulence regulator in the vascular wilt pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum responds to cell density via quorum sensing. To understand the timing of traits that enable R. solanacearum to establish itself inside host plants, we created a ΔphcA mutant that is genetically locked in a low-cell-density condition. Comparing levels of gene expression of wild-type R. solanacearum and the ΔphcA mutant during tomato colonization revealed that the PhcA transcriptome includes an impressive 620 genes (>2-fold differentially expressed; false-discovery rate [FDR], ≤0.005). Many core metabolic pathways and nutrient transporters were upregulated in the ΔphcA mutant, which grew faster than the wild-type strain in tomato xylem sap and on dozens of specific metabolites, including 36 found in xylem. This suggests that PhcA helps R. solanacearum to survive in nutrient-poor environmental habitats and to grow rapidly during early pathogenesis. However, after R. solanacearum reaches high cell densities in planta, PhcA mediates a trade-off from maximizing growth to producing costly virulence factors. R. solanacearum infects through roots, and low-cell-density-mode-mimicking ΔphcA cells attached to tomato roots better than the wild-type cells, consistent with their increased expression of several adhesins. Inside xylem vessels, ΔphcA cells formed aberrantly dense mats. Possibly as a result, the mutant could not spread up or down tomato stems as well as the wild type. This suggests that aggregating improves R. solanacearum survival in soil and facilitates infection and that it reduces pathogenic fitness later in disease. Thus, PhcA mediates a second strategic switch between initial pathogen attachment and subsequent dispersal inside the host. PhcA helps R. solanacearum optimally invest resources and correctly sequence multiple steps in the bacterial wilt disease cycle.
KEYWORDS: adhesins, bacterial wilt, dispersal, metabolomics, plant pathogen, quorum sensing, transcriptomics, xylem
IMPORTANCE
Ralstonia solanacearum is a destructive soilborne crop pathogen that wilts plants by colonizing their water-transporting xylem vessels. It produces its costly virulence factors only after it has grown to a high population density inside a host. To identify traits that this pathogen needs in other life stages, we studied a mutant that mimics the low-cell-density condition. This mutant (the ΔphcA mutant) cannot sense its own population density. It grew faster than and used many nutrients not available to the wild-type bacterium, including metabolites present in tomato xylem sap. The mutant also attached much better to tomato roots, and yet it failed to spread once it was inside plants because it was trapped in dense mats. Thus, PhcA helps R. solanacearum succeed over the course of its complex life cycle by ensuring avid attachment to plant surfaces and rapid growth early in disease, followed by high virulence and effective dispersal later in disease.
INTRODUCTION
Many microbes coordinate their behavior by means of a cell-to-cell signaling system called quorum sensing (QS) (1–4). Quorum sensing is mediated by small diffusible signal molecules that accumulate as microbial populations increase or persist in confined spaces. If the signal reaches a critical concentration inside cells, it changes gene expression. The resulting density-dependent collective behavior ensures that quantitative traits such as production of bioluminescence, antibiotics, and virulence factors are expressed only when enough microbes are present to have a biological effect (2–4). Diverse animal and plant pathogens use QS to upregulate virulence factor expression at high cell densities (2, 3), but less attention has been given to how bacteria use QS to modulate traits that are important for success at low cell densities. Identifying genes that are upregulated at low cell densities may reveal how microbes adapt and protect themselves under unfavorable conditions.
The soilborne plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum occupies diverse ecological niches. It can survive for years in soil or water as a saprophyte but can also live in plant vascular systems as an aggressive pathogen (5, 6). The bacterium enters host plant through wounds, root elongation zones, or sites of lateral root emergence and colonizes the root cortex to invade its preferred in planta habitat, the water-transporting xylem vessels. There R. solanacearum rapidly multiplies to high population densities, spreading systemically and producing large amounts of extracellular polysaccharide (EPS), which results in wilting symptoms and, eventually, plant death (7).
R. solanacearum uses a sophisticated sensory and regulatory network to transition between its saprophytic and parasitic modes. At the center of this network is the Phc QS system, composed of the LysR-type transcriptional regulator PhcA and the products of the phcBSR operon, which control the levels of functional PhcA in response to cell density (8–13).
As noted in the first description of R. solanacearum in 1896, this pathogen frequently becomes nonmucoid and avirulent in culture (14). In addition to lacking EPS, these spontaneous mutants have increased motility and aerotaxis (13, 15–17). In 1993, Denny and coworkers discovered that such spontaneous “phenotype converted” (PC) strains resulted from mutation of the phcA locus (13). Subsequent studies found that phcA mutants are hypermotile and overproduce the siderophore staphyloferrin B but that they make less EPS and plant cell wall-degrading endoglucanase and cellobiohydrolase than the wild type (12, 18, 19). The dysregulation of these multiple virulence factors explains why these mutants are nearly avirulent, although they can still colonize plant stems if introduced through a wound (12).
PhcA directly regulates expression of at least two genes, the endoglucanase structural gene egl and the EPS regulator gene xpsR, by binding to a conserved 14-bp PhcA box in their promoters (20). Many more traits are indirectly regulated by PhcA via other regulatory loci such as pehSR, vsrAD, vsrBC, flhDC, and solIR (5, 21). The full extent of the PhcA regulon is unknown, but the many differences between the extracellular protein profiles of wild-type and phcA mutant strains of R. solanacearum indicate that numerous additional genes are directly or indirectly controlled by this system (22).
Most traits putatively regulated by PhcA have been experimentally verified only in vitro, with the important exception of EPS. Immunofluorescence microscopy of R. solanacearum-infected tomato plants using anti-EPS antibodies demonstrated that EPS production is dependent on cell density in planta (23, 24). Accumulating evidence suggests that in vitro studies are not reliable for understanding R. solanacearum regulation during plant pathogenesis. For example, PhcA regulates two important bacterial wilt virulence factors differently in culture and in planta: swimming motility and the pathogen’s type III secretion system (T3SS). Direct microscopic observation revealed that the percentage of motile cells was density dependent in culture, increasing rapidly as bacteria passed the QS threshold concentration of 107 CFU/ml (9, 25). In contrast, bacteria sampled from xylem vessels were nearly all nonmotile, even when population sizes exceeded 109 CFU/ml xylem fluid (26). Similarly, PhcA repressed the T3SS 20- to 60-fold at high cell densities in culture (27). However, analyses performed with reporter genes, quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR), and microarray analyses all found that the T3SS is actually highly expressed during plant infections (28–30). These inconsistencies suggest that the roles of PhcA can be assessed only in the biologically relevant context of a plant host.
To define the full extent of the PhcA QS system and to identify novel virulence factors that are expressed only at low cell densities, we compared the transcriptome of wild-type R. solanacearum to that of a ΔphcA mutant during colonization of tomato plants. About 12% of the pathogen’s genes were differentially expressed in the ΔphcA mutant, with an overall profile suggesting that at low cell densities R. solanacearum is optimized to obtain nutrients and attach to plant surfaces. Functional validation experiments confirmed that the ΔphcA mutant grew better than the wild type on many specific nutrients and in infected tomato xylem sap. This low-cell-density-mode-mimicking mutant attached better to tomato roots but formed aberrantly dense mats inside xylem vessels and spread poorly in tomato stems.
RESULTS
Phenotypes of the low-cell-density-mimicking ΔphcA mutant.
We constructed an R. solanacearum strain GMI1000 mutant with a disrupted phcA coding sequence to study the behavior of R. solanacearum cells that are genetically locked in the low-cell-density mode. As expected, this mutant, here called the ΔphcA mutant, formed small round nonmucoid colonies surrounded by brown pigment due to lack of EPS and overproduction of melanin (7) (Fig. 1A). Complementation of the ΔphcA mutant by insertion of a copy of the wild-type phcA locus and its promoter into the selectively neutral att site restored the typical mucoid colony morphology and lack of pigment production (Fig. 1A). The ΔphcA strain initially grew faster than the wild type in minimal medium (MM) with glucose (P = 0.0081, Mann-Whitney test) (Fig. 1B). However, this high growth rate was not sustained and the wild-type strain ultimately showed a slightly higher maximum level of absorbance. The mutant also grew faster than the wild type in ex vivo xylem sap from infected tomato plants, where the ΔphcA mutant reached and sustained a higher growth rate than the wild type (Fig. 1C). Together, these data suggest that R. solanacearum grows faster in low-cell-density mode than in high-cell-density mode. Finally, we compared the growth kinetics of the two strains in tomato stems following direct inoculation through a cut leaf petiole. Shortly after inoculation, the ΔphcA mutant grew faster than the wild-type strain, but the two strains reached similar population levels 3 days postinoculation (dpi) and after day 4, ΔphcA growth lagged (Fig. 1D).
The ΔphcA mutant differentially expressed hundreds of genes during tomato colonization.
To comprehensively identify traits controlled by the PhcA QS system, and to better understand how this regulator affects pathogen behavior in its natural host environment, we compared the transcriptomes of wild-type and ΔphcA strains during colonization of tomato stems. Transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) of bacterial RNA harvested from colonized tomato stems 72 h after petiole inoculation, when the population sizes of the two strains were similar, revealed that the PhcA in planta regulon is very large. Overall, 620 genes were differentially expressed (DE) in the ΔphcA mutant; representing 12.4% of the annotated coding sequences in the GMI1000 genome. Of these, 365 genes were downregulated, and 255 genes were upregulated (Fig. 2). Table S1A in the supplemental material lists all DE genes, defined as those that showed at least a 2-fold change in expression relative to the wild-type strain and that also met the criterion of a stringent false-discovery rate (FDR) of ≤0.005.
The RNA-seq data were robust and reliable. As expected with RNA extracted from ground plant tissue, most sequence reads mapped to the tomato genome while ~1.2% of the ΔphcA reads and ~3.2% of the wild-type reads mapped to the R. solanacearum genome (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material). Results of both multidimensional and scatter plot analyses indicated that the wild-type strain and ΔphcA mutant gene expression profiles differed significantly, while those of the biological replicates grouped together (Fig. S1B and C). Hierarchical gene clustering clearly identified many genes that were regulated differently under the two biological conditions (Fig. S1D). Quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) validated the relative expression levels of selected genes of interest; they were consistent with the levels determined by RNA-seq (Fig. S2B).
The in planta transcriptomic data generally agreed with the previously described phenotypes of phcA mutants. As expected, DE genes in the low-cell-density-mimicking mutant included those encoding synthesis of known virulence factors: extracellular polysaccharide (epsB and epsE [101- and 112-fold downregulated, respectively]), motility and chemotaxis, some type III secretion system structural proteins and several effectors, and plant cell wall-degrading enzymes (endoglucanase egl [90-fold downregulated], cellobiohydroloase cbhA [228-fold downregulated], and exo-poly-alpha-d-galacturonosidase pehB [4.7-fold downregulated]). Expression of the endo-polygalaturonase pehA gene, the exo-polygalacturonase pehC gene, and the pectin methylesterase pme gene, which are downregulated in ΔphcA mutants growing in culture (31), trended down but did not meet our criteria for DE in planta (Table S1A; Fig. S2A). Along with these known virulence factors, PhcA upregulates the R. solanacearum type VI secretion system (T6SS), predicted to translocate factors into either prokaryotic or eukaryotic hosts in a contact-dependent manner (32, 33). This is consistent with the discovery that the cryptic R. solanacearum T6SS contributes to virulence (34–36).
The distinct transcriptome profile of the ΔphcA mutant suggests that R. solanacearum has a broader catabolic capacity and grows faster in low-cell-density mode.
Collectively, the annotated functions of the 255 genes upregulated in the ΔphcA strain suggested that the pathogen’s core metabolism rates are strikingly different when the bacterium is at low versus high cell densities (Fig. 3; Table S1A). We hypothesized that the low-cell-density-mimicking mutant could grow on sources of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, and phosphorus that are not available to the pathogen after it reaches high cell density. Around 15% of the upregulated genes in the ΔphcA mutant encode putative transporters (Table S1B). These 56 proteins are predicted to transport a wide array of nutrients, including diverse carbohydrates, amino acids, polyamines, iron, nitrate, phosphate, and sulfur. This suggests that R. solanacearum avidly scavenges environmental nutrients at low cell densities. Only nine transporter genes were downregulated in the low-cell-density-mimicking mutant.
To test the hypothesis that low-cell-density-mode R. solanacearum cells can access nutrients that are unavailable when the bacterium reaches high cell density, we measured the growth of the wild-type and ΔphcA strains on Biolog phenotype arrays and in minimal media supplemented with individual carbon or nitrogen sources. The ΔphcA mutant grew better than the wild-type strain on dozens of sugars, carboxylic acids, and amino acids; indeed, the wild-type strain did not grow at all on most of these nutrients (Fig. 4A; Table S2).
The ΔphcA mutant upregulated dozens of genes involved in central carbon metabolism (Fig. 3; Table S3). These encode catabolic enzymes such as glucosidase, glycogen synthase, galactaric acid dehydratase, and two glucarate dehydratases. The low-cell-density-mimicking strain also upregulated genes involved in fatty acid metabolism, such as the Swanson conversion of pyruvate to acetyl-coenzyme A (acetyl-CoA), acyl-CoA dehydrogenases and acetyltransferases, and the trifunctional enoyl-CoA hydratase/delta3-cis-delta2-trans-enoyl-CoA isomerase/3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase that catalyzes the β-oxidation of fatty acids (Fig. 3). Conversely, expression of genes encoding degradation of some carbon sources available in xylem sap was repressed in the low-cell-density-mimicking mutant. These include genes encoding endoglucanase, exoglucanase A, trehalase, glycoside hydrolase, and a sucrose-specific phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system.
Blast2Go node analysis identified nitrogen metabolism among the biological processes most affected by PhcA (Fig. S4A). Nitrate is relatively abundant in tomato xylem sap, and during pathogenesis R. solanacearum strongly expresses several pathways that metabolize inorganic nitrogen (29). Nitrogen assimilation and denitrifying respiration (which enables ATP production in the hypoxic xylem vessels) are both required for normal tomato colonization and bacterial wilt virulence (37, 38). At high cell density, PhcA represses genes encoding nitrate reductase (Table S3) and putative transporters of nitrate, glutamate (gltJKL), and glutathione (Table S1B). In contrast, PhcA upregulates nitrite reductase, and direct measurements confirmed that the ΔphcA mutant produces more nitrite than the wild type both in vitro and in planta (Fig. S4B and C). Interestingly, the downstream denitrification steps function whether the quorum sensing system is active or not, because similar levels of nitric oxide were detected in the ΔphcA strain, the wild-type strain, and the phcA-complemented strain growing under anoxic conditions in vitro (Fig. S4D). Several genes encoding the amino acid catabolic pathways that generate tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle intermediates (proline, valine, glycine, glutamic acid, or serine) were also DE (Fig. 3; Table S3).
The metabolic capacity of the ΔphcA mutant was even broader with respect to sources of phosphorus and sulfur than for carbon and nitrogen sources. The ΔphcA mutant grew faster than the wild type on 83% of tested sulfur sources, including sulfate and many other sulfur-containing organic compounds present in soil and xylem sap (39, 40) (Fig. S3B; Table S2). Four sulfur assimilation genes that lead to cysteine synthesis were upregulated in the ΔphcA mutant (Fig. 3; Table S3), as well as ABC transporters of sulfate and alkane sulfonate (Table S1B). The low-cell-density-mimicking mutant grew faster than the wild type on 81% of tested sources of phosphorus, which is key to many cellular processes, including signal transduction and energy storage and release. Organic phosphate sources more available to low-cell-density-mode R. solanacearum cells included glycolytic intermediates, sugar phosphates, nucleotides, and phospholipid precursors. Together, these results imply that R. solanacearum benefits from increased sulfur and phosphorus uptake at low cell densities.
Low-cell-density-mode-mimicking R. solanacearum grew better under low-iron conditions.
Consistent with previous in vitro findings (19), we found that genes encoding ferric iron uptake were upregulated in the ΔphcA mutant. These included predicted iron-specific transporters and half of the 20 genes related to siderophore synthesis or regulation (Fig. S2A; Table S1A), suggesting that R. solanacearum is better able to scavenge iron at low cell densities than at high cell densities. We tested this hypothesis by comparing the growth rates of ΔphcA and wild-type bacteria in minimal medium supplemented with different concentrations of ferric chloride. The ΔphcA mutant grew better than the wild type under both low-iron conditions and high-iron conditions, but iron concentrations of >1 µM provided no further growth advantage (Fig. 4B). These combined transcriptional and functional results indicate that R. solanacearum expends significant resources at low cell densities to obtain iron but that these systems are less active at higher cell densities, possibly because R. solanacearum can acquire sufficient iron by other means in the plant.
The ΔphcA mutant is better at using nutrients present in xylem sap than the wild type.
High-cell-density-mode R. solanacearum grew more slowly or not at all on many nutrients. Does PhcA repress catabolism of these nutrients because they are not present in xylem sap? To characterize the nutrients available to R. solanacearum during tomato pathogenesis, we compiled a list of compounds known to be present in tomato xylem sap, based on published analyses of sap from healthy plants and on our untargeted metabolomic analysis of sap from R. solanacearum-infected wilt-susceptible tomato cultivar “Bonny Best” (Table S3) (29, 38, 41–44). Transcriptomic data suggested that many of the metabolites present in tomato xylem sap (highlighted in blue in Fig. 3) are more accessible to the low-cell-density-mimicking ΔphcA mutant. We functionally validated the RNA-seq results by comparing the growth rates of the wild-type and ΔphcA strains on selected compounds from this list used either as the sole carbon source or, for N-containing compounds, as the sole nitrogen source (Table S3). The ΔphcA mutant was better able to use 36 of 76 tested xylem sap nutrients (Fig. 4A; Table S3). Nine metabolites were used similarly by the two strains, and only galactose and trehalose supported growth of the wild-type strain alone. The remaining 29 tested xylem sap compounds did not support growth of either strain under our conditions. Thus, R. solanacearum can grow faster on many nutrients present in tomato xylem sap at low cell densities than it can after reaching high cell density. This may facilitate rapid pathogen growth at the earliest stages of host colonization.
However, the ΔphcA mutant also grew better than the wild type on 18 carbon or nitrogen sources that are not known to be present in xylem sap, such as butyric acid, tartaric acid, and cysteine (Table S2). Upregulating the corresponding transporters and catabolic pathways at low cell densities could increase the fitness of R. solanacearum outside plants by enabling the bacterium to access diverse nutrients present in low concentrations in soil and water.
PhcA affects R. solanacearum attachment to abiotic surfaces.
R. solanacearum forms biofilm-like aggregates inside xylem vessels in wilting plants, and R. solanacearum mutants that make abnormally thick biofilms in vitro are reduced in virulence (45, 46). Interestingly, many genes potentially associated with bacterial attachment, including six that encode hemagglutinin-like adhesin proteins, were differentially expressed in the low-cell-density-mimicking ΔphcA mutant. Three hemagglutinin genes were strongly upregulated, while three others were downregulated, suggesting that the PhcA QS system modifies the ability of R. solanacearum cells to aggregate and/or to adhere to surfaces in complex ways (Fig. S2A; Table S1C). To better understand this trait, we measured bacterial attachment to abiotic surfaces in vitro. The ΔphcA mutant formed much less biofilm than the wild type on polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plates stained with crystal violet (Fig. 5A). Confocal imaging analysis of 24 h biofilms on glass plates revealed that the ΔphcA mutant did not form structured three-dimensional biofilms like wild-type R. solanacearum, possibly because it was arrested in a low-cell-density mode optimized for initial substrate attachment. The ΔphcA mutant attached to a 3-fold-larger area than the wild-type strain or complemented mutant strain (P < 0.01, t test) (Fig. 5B and C). The ΔphcA biofilms were 2-fold thinner and contained 7-fold less biomass than those of the wild type (P < 0.05, t test). After 48 h of static growth in rich medium, the wild-type cells formed a floating pellicle at the air-liquid interface, but the ΔphcA mutant did not (Fig. 5D). Although this distinctive phenotype suggested that low-cell-density-mode R. solanacearum cells do not self-aggregate as well as they do at high cell density, its biological significance in a natural context remains to be determined.
ΔphcA cells colonizing tomato xylem are morphologically different from wild-type cells.
We used scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to image colonized tomato stem tissue harvested at 72 h postinoculation, when the wild-type and ΔphcA R. solanacearum cells had reached comparable population sizes. This is the same time point at which their transcriptomes were profiled. The wild-type bacteria had colonized most of the xylem vessels examined, where they formed loose aggregates of cells connected by thin, smooth fibers (Fig. 6B). In contrast, ΔphcA cells were present in fewer xylem vessels. In the vessels that were colonized, the ΔphcA bacteria formed dense mats of cells embedded in fibers that were more numerous, more kinked, and rougher than the fibers in the wild-type aggregates (Fig. 6D, E, and F). These fibers were on average four times thicker than those in the wild-type cell aggregates. In planta, the ΔphcA cells were on average 25% shorter in their longest dimension than the wild-type cells (Fig. 6A and D). The ΔphcA cells were oval, in contrast to the rod-shaped wild-type cells (Fig. 6A and D). Finally, the surfaces of the ΔphcA and wild-type cells had different textures in the SEM images; the wild-type cells had a uniform, rugose surface whereas the ΔphcA cell surfaces appeared more irregular, possibly reflecting the absence of EPS (Fig. 6C and F). Overall, the wild-type and ΔphcA bacteria were qualitatively different during tomato plant colonization with respect to their distribution; aggregate matrix composition; and the size, shape, and surface texture of their cells.
The hyperattachment behavior of the ΔphcA mutant restricts dispersal in the host.
Because SEM analysis revealed that the ΔphcA mutant formed denser aggregates in xylem vessels than the wild type, we predicted that the ΔphcA mutant would adhere more avidly to plant surfaces. We compared the levels of attachment of wild-type and ΔphcA bacteria to tomato seedling roots. Nine times more ΔphcA cells than wild-type cells were attached to the roots after 2 h (Fig. 7A). This is consistent with the idea that at low cell density, R. solanacearum cells adhere better to plants, possibly as a result of higher expression of adhesins specific to biotic surfaces. Together, the increased root attachment and limited xylem colonization by the ΔphcA mutant suggested that low-cell-density-mimicking cells might not disperse well inside host plants. However, our metabolic analyses and the observation that ΔphcA cells grew faster than wild-type cells in artificial media (Fig. S3A) and in ex vivo xylem sap (Fig. 1C) suggested that cells mimicking the low-cell-density condition would grow faster in planta and outcompete the wild-type strain.
To test these opposing hypotheses, we compared the abilities of the ΔphcA mutant to colonize tomato plants alone and in the presence of wild-type cells. When tomato plants were infected with a 1:1 suspension of wild-type and ΔphcA cells using a naturalistic soil-soak inoculation, the wild-type strain consistently outcompeted the ΔphcA mutant in tomato mid-stems (Fig. 7B). Even at 7 days after inoculation, few ΔphcA cells were detected in stems of coinoculated plants, although most plants contained more than 108 CFU of the wild-type strain per g stem at that time point (Fig. 7B). Interestingly, this defect was even more pronounced when the ΔphcA mutant was inoculated alone, suggesting that wild-type cells partially complement the ΔphcA colonization defect in trans, possibly by producing EPS or other secreted virulence factors (Fig. 7B). Similar results were obtained following direct coinoculation into the stem through a cut leaf petiole (Fig. 7C). Kinetic analysis showed that in the first 2 days after coinoculation, the ΔphcA mutant grew better than the wild type at the site of inoculation, possibly due to its ability to better exploit the nutrients available in tomato xylem (Fig. S5). However, the wild-type cells quickly caught up, and by 5 dpi the wild-type bacteria outnumbered the ΔphcA cells (Fig. 7C and S5). Moreover, following coinoculation, ΔphcA cells were defective in moving up tomato stems, with a very poor competitive index (CI) of 8.4 × 10−4 at 4 cm above the site of inoculation (Fig. 7C).
To determine if the low-cell-density-mode-mimicking ΔphcA strain could spread as well as the wild-type strain in tomato stems, we measured the population sizes of each strain above and below the inoculated petiole 7 days after inoculation. The ΔphcA mutant was strikingly deficient in the ability to move both up and down tomato stems (Fig. 7D). At 4 cm above the inoculation point, the mean population size of the wild-type strain was 4 × 108 CFU/g stem compared to only 2 × 104 CFU/g stem for the ΔphcA mutant.
Overall, the behavior of the ΔphcA mutant in planta suggests that it is adaptive for R. solanacearum to adhere to plant surfaces and to form aggregates there at early stages of infection. However, as the bacterium grows to high population densities in xylem vessels, this hyperattachment trait must be repressed so that the pathogen can disperse in the host plant.
The ΔphcA mutant elicited lower tomato defense gene expression than the wild type.
Infection with R. solanacearum causes tomato plants to increase expression of genes in both the ethylene (ET) and salicylic acid (SA) defense pathways (47). To determine if low-cell-density-mode-mimicking cells triggered plant defense gene expression as well as the wild type, we performed quantitative RT-PCR analysis of total RNA harvested from tomato stems 72 h postinoculation (hpi) with either ΔphcA or wild-type bacteria. Plants infected with comparable populations of the ΔphcA mutant expressed about 3-fold less of the SA-responsive defense gene PR-1a (P = 0.007, t test) and about 4-fold less of the ET-responsive defense gene ACO5 (P = 0.033, t test) than plants infected with the wild-type strain. Expression of the jasmonic acid (JA) pathway marker Pin2 was not altered (P = 0.64, t test).
DISCUSSION
To understand how R. solanacearum makes the critical transition from living as scattered cells in water, soil, or on root surfaces to the very different conditions it experiences at high population densities in plant xylem vessels, we needed to profile the pathogen’s gene expression at low cell density. Harvesting quality RNA from sparse, scattered cells is technically challenging, so we constructed a QS-blind ΔphcA mutant that mimics the behavior of the pathogen at low population densities. The transcriptomes of the ΔphcA mutant and wild-type R. solanacearum indirectly defined the metabolic and behavioral traits that help R. solanacearum succeed at low cell densities.
The PhcA quorum sensing system enables R. solanacearum to use different nutrient sources at low and high cell densities. Combining transcriptomic data with functional assays and xylem sap metabolomics identified specific mechanisms that expand the carbon sources available to R. solanacearum under low-nutrient conditions. Many metabolic pathways and transporters were expressed only at low cell densities, and functional assays confirmed that high-density R. solanacearum could not grow on the corresponding carbon sources. Thus, the pathogen can access some nutrients only at low cell densities and can also grow faster on many nutrients that are accessible to both modes. This suggests that the PhcA QS system regulates R. solanacearum core metabolism in ways that maximize growth early in colonization but that slow growth once bacteria reach high cell densities.
Among 76 potential nutrient sources detected in tomato xylem, wild-type R. solanacearum (high-cell-density mode) grew better than the ΔphcA mutant only on trehalose and galactose, while the ΔphcA mutant grew better or exclusively on 47% of the tested xylem metabolites. Several compounds that feed directly into central carbon metabolism (glycolysis and the TCA cycle) are more available to low-cell-density-mode-mimicking R. solanacearum cells. These include pyruvic acid, galactaric acid, glucaric acid, malate, citrate, and several others. Malate and citrate are important for the success of other plant-pathogenic bacteria such as Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria (48, 49).
R. solanacearum colonizes dead and lignified xylem tissue, which contains diverse carbohydrates such as glycosides, glycans, and glycoconjugates (50). Glucosidases convert these complex sugars to glucose, which is a preferred carbon source for R. solanacearum at both high and low cell densities. Glucosidase expression is upregulated 7-fold in ΔphcA cells, suggesting that host cell wall fragments are important carbon sources early in plant colonization. Conversely, trehalose and galactose, which are accessible only to high-cell-density-mode R. solanacearum, are likely key nutrients during full-blown wilt disease. Strategic use of a preferred carbon source such as glucose when the bacterium is at low cell densities not only provides the fitness advantage of rapid growth early in xylem colonization but also allows R. solanacearum to exploit less-preferred nutrient sources when it has already reached the critical density required for virulence. Further, rapid uptake of glucose, a widely preferred microbial carbon source, may help R. solanacearum outcompete other rhizosphere and endophytic bacteria.
Genes encoding nitrogen metabolism were upregulated in the low-cell-density-mimicking mutant, and the ΔphcA mutant grew better than the wild type on many nitrogen sources, including nitrate, nitrite, ammonia, and 16 amino acids. Plants infected with the ΔphcA mutant contained higher levels of nitrite, which R. solanacearum can assimilate and convert into glutamine and glutamate via ammonia (51). These amino acids are present in tomato xylem sap, and the GltIJKL glutamate transporters and glutamate dehydrogenase GdhA were upregulated in the ΔphcA mutant, consistent with increased assimilation of these compounds at low cell densities. In addition to representing acquisition of nitrogen for growth, increased nitrite levels may improve R. solanacearum survival during initial infection in the hypoxic host environment (52). Nitrates protect Mycobacterium tuberculosis from hypoxic stress by replacing oxygen as the terminal electron acceptor in the respiratory chain (53). The M. tuberculosis nitrate importer NarK2 is highly induced during hypoxia to levels similar to those that R. solanacearum encounters in tomato xylem (38). The upregulation of NarK2 in the ΔphcA mutant, along with the finding that denitrifying respiration is critical for R. solanacearum success during pathogenesis (38), suggests that nitrate may play a similar protective role for R. solanacearum in planta.
A recent in silico model of R. solanacearum strain GMI1000 metabolism also suggested that a phcA mutant had a generally broader catabolic capacity than the wild type, with specific functional results mostly consistent with our data (54). However, in contrast to their report, but in agreement with our transcriptomic data, we found that the ΔphcA mutant did not grow on galactose either in the Biolog galactose or in minimal medium (MM) plus galactose. This difference may have been a consequence of the fact that Peyraud and coworkers starved R. solanacearum cells in water for 6 h before inoculating the Biolog plates, whereas we harvested metabolically active bacteria from mid-log phase. Minimal medium and Biolog growth assays gave inconsistent results for a few other key carbon sources, such as sucrose, trehalose, and glycerol.
Downregulation of genes encoding a trait did not always lead to loss of function. For example, despite the low expression levels of scrAB sucrose transport and catabolism genes in the ΔphcA mutant, the low-cell-density-mimicking mutant grew as well as the wild type in MM supplemented with 10 mM sucrose. Expression of the scrRAB locus is induced by sucrose; if the proprietary Biolog medium contains little sucrose, this could explain why the mutant did not grow in the Biolog assay (29, 55). This carbon source is important in bacterial wilt disease development; a scrA mutant of R. solanacearum strain UW551 is reduced in virulence in tomato (29).
Taken together, the results of our transcriptomic and functional assays demonstrate that R. solanacearum uses many sources of carbon, nitrogen, sulfur, phosphorus, and iron more efficiently at low cell densities than when it is in high-cell-density mode. Indeed, the pathogen can use many of these substrates only at low cell density. How does this broad metabolic shift increase pathogen fitness? Perhaps the low-cell-density-mode bacteria are optimized to use nutrients available outside the plant in more chemically diverse and nutrient-poor rhizospheres and surface water habitats (56). This environmental nutrition hypothesis is consistent with the ability of the ΔphcA mutant to use compounds that have not been reported to be present in tomato xylem sap, including sulfur sources such as cysteine and glutathione. These may contribute to bacterial success in nonnutritional ways. For example, R. solanacearum at low cell densities could protect itself from oxidative damage inside the host plant by accumulating glutathione via upregulation of the gsiABCD glutathione ABC transporter and the ggtI and gstH glutathione S-transferases (57, 58).
Surprisingly, quorum sensing does not optimize high-cell-density-mode R. solanacearum to use nutrients in tomato xylem sap, where the bacterium multiplies rapidly (59). Instead, PhcA represses many catabolic pathways so that, once it exceeds 107 CFU/ml, R. solanacearum uses only a few of the nutrients that it encounters during pathogenesis. We favor the hypothesis that low-cell-density-mode R. solanacearum more efficiently exploits compounds in xylem sap to fuel the pathogen’s explosive growth early in disease development, before the QS system is activated. But the pathogen no longer uses all available xylem nutrients once it reaches high cell density and begins to express virulence factors. These findings are consistent with an in silico metabolic model suggesting that the PhcA QS system mediates a trade-off between optimal growth early in plant colonization and resource-demanding production of virulence factors later in disease development (54).
Similar trade-offs have been identified in many other bacteria (60). Environmental constraints and finite resources force bacteria to choose between two demanding traits at different developmental or disease stages (89). Their broader catabolic capacity and more rapid growth explain why spontaneous phcA mutants grow faster than the wild type in culture (7). Peyraud et al. proposed that spontaneous phcA mutants, which occur frequently (6), should outcompete wild-type cells in plants (54). We tested this hypothesis and found that it is not the case: wild-type cells outcompeted the ΔphcA mutant in planta by more than 10,000-fold. Moreover, phcA-type cells are rarely or never isolated from infected plants in the field (7). This suggests that, inside the plant, the growth advantage of phcA-type cells is outweighed by other disadvantageous traits. What are these traits?
The bacterium’s ability to adhere to biotic and abiotic surfaces is dramatically modified by R. solanacearum cell density. While ΔphcA cells did not form biofilms on abiotic substrates, they attached to roots much better than wild-type cells. Avidly binding to roots of potential hosts would be adaptive for R. solanacearum at low cell densities in soil. However, SEM images revealed that once they were inside a plant, ΔphcA cells formed abnormally thick, matted aggregates. All these phenotypes may be the result of altered expression of hemagglutinin-related nonfimbrial adhesins in the ΔphcA mutant. Adhesins are surface proteins that help bacteria attach to eukaryotes, an essential step in host-microbe interactions (61). Nonfimbrial adhesins influence the attachment behavior of phytopathogenic bacteria such as Xylella fastidiosa and Xanthomonas fuscans, which are initially bound to a surface by nonfimbrial adhesins (62–65). Once bacteria attach to a surface, fimbrial adhesins (pili, fimbriae) help bacteria stick to each other and form aggregates on the host surface. In general, adhesins contribute to virulence by playing specific roles at different disease stages (early infection, seed transmission, attachment to insect vectors, etc.). Nutrient availability can also influence attachment behavior; under low-nutrient conditions, Acinetobacter cells attached with increased stability and formed less-dispersive biofilm structures (66).
The R. solanacearum genome encodes about 20 putative hemagglutinin-related proteins, of which 6 were regulated by PhcA; 3 of the 6 showed higher expression at low cell densities, and the other 3 showed higher expression at high cell densities. A systematic analysis of mutants lacking these differentially expressed adhesins would identify their roles in attachment to various substrates throughout the disease cycle.
The low-cell-density-mimicking mutant upregulated genes encoding degradation of hydroxycinnamic acids (HCAs). These plant-produced compounds inhibit R. solanacearum, and we previously found that HCA degradation protects R. solanacearum from HCA toxicity in tomato roots, where these compounds are abundant (67). This is consistent with the hypothesis that, at low cell densities, the PhcA QS system upregulates traits that the pathogen needs early in disease development.
Inside the plant, the morphology of ΔphcA cells was strikingly different from that of wild-type cells: the ΔphcA cells were smaller, rougher, and more oval. Similar morphological differentiation was seen in stationary-phase Escherichia coli and Arthrobacter cells undergoing a survival response (68, 69). Under low-nutrient conditions, Acinetobacter sp. strain GJ12 cells switch from bacillar to coccoid morphology (66), which increases their surface-to-volume ratio and accommodates more nutrient transporter complexes (70). The increased roughness of the ΔphcA cell surfaces may be due to lack of EPS (71). Adding exogenous EPS to a spontaneous EPS-deficient rough mutant of R. solanacearum facilitated escape from agglutination (71), consistent with a role for EPS in colonization.
The ΔphcA cells were defective in plant colonization, occupying fewer xylem vessels and spreading up and down stems more slowly than the wild-type cells, possibly because they could not escape their abnormally matted aggregates. QS mutants of Pantoea stewartii subsp. stewartii also remained localized at the site of infection (72). Conversely, an rpfF QS mutant of Xylella fastidiosa had reduced adhesiveness, spread better in grapevine vessels than the wild type, and was hypervirulent after mechanical inoculation (73). Nonetheless, that mutant had very low fitness overall because it did not form biofilms in its insect vector and was poorly transmitted (74). R. solanacearum biofilms contain fibers made of extracellular DNA, and endonuclease-deficient mutants produced thick biofilms and spread poorly in tomato (46). A putative nuclease-encoding gene, RSp1603, was downregulated 35-fold in the ΔphcA mutant. This may preserve the structural integrity of developing biofilms by protecting the DNA fibers. Further investigation is needed to explore the connection between extracellular DNA degradation and the structure of ΔphcA aggregates in planta.
The hyperattachment trait of the ΔphcA mutant, which is consistent with its reduced competitive fitness and poor dispersal in plant stems, suggests that despite having the advantage of broad metabolic capacity, spontaneous phcA mutants are at a strong selective disadvantage in planta. Their altered morphology, root attachment, and aggregation suggest that these behaviors are advantageous at low cell densities in soil and early in plant colonization but must be downregulated for the pathogen to successfully colonize and spread as disease develops.
In an interesting parallel, it is well established that plants also execute an evolutionary trade-off between maximizing growth and maximizing defenses (75). Plants responded differently to R. solanacearum cells in the low-cell-density and high-cell-density modes. Wild-type R. solanacearum infection triggers rapid induction of salicylic acid and ethylene-responsive defense pathway genes, but both of these host signaling pathways were significantly less induced by the ΔphcA mutant, even when comparable numbers of pathogen cells were present. Similarly, human bronchial epithelial cells produced much less of the defensive cytokine interleukin-8 in response to a QS mutant of Pseudomonas aeruginosa than in response to wild-type P. aeruginosa (76).
The R. solanacearum QS mutant is compromised in expression of multiple virulence factors, some of which may trigger plant recognition and defense. It would clearly be advantageous for R. solanacearum to avoid activating host defenses early in plant colonization. Thus, reduced expression of these virulence factors not only saves energy but may also make R. solanacearum less visible to plant defenses. The lack of EPS in the ΔphcA mutant cannot explain this reduced defense gene expression because an EPS-deficient R. solanacearum mutant still induces wild-type defenses in wilt-susceptible plants such as the cultivar used here (47). Some R. solanacearum T3-secreted effectors suppress host defenses, but many T3SS-encoding genes were downregulated in the ΔphcA mutant, including those encoding the system’s major transcriptional activators, HrpB and HrpG. Nonetheless, the low-cell-density-mimicking ΔphcA mutant ultimately failed to colonize plants. It is possible that the mutant’s inability to spread normally meant that, overall, fewer plant cells perceived the pathogen, leading to a muted defense response. This could be tested using laser-capture microdissection to measure defenses in single plant cells that are in contact with either wild-type or ΔphcA bacteria.
Along with identifying new QS-regulated phenotypes, this study also revealed some inconsistencies between the R. solanacearum gene expression levels measured in culture and the pathogen’s transcriptional behavior in the natural environment of the host plant (summarized in Table S5). Most notably, the expression of the major T3SS regulator HrpB in culture is repressed by PhcA at high cell densities; this generated a model proposing that T3 secreted effectors were important only early in plant colonization (27). However, we found that many T3SS-related genes, including hrpB, were actually more highly expressed at high cell densities in planta. This is consistent with previous in planta experiments showing that T3SS genes are highly expressed during disease (28–30). It will be interesting to identify the intervening regulatory players that reverse this regulatory pathway in the plant.
Importantly, the gene expression levels reported here reflect averages across biologically heterogeneous bacterial populations that occupy distinct microenvironments. We extracted R. solanacearum RNA from infected tomato stem tissue, which included both the planktonic bacteria and those in aggregates or attached to plant surfaces. It is very likely that early in disease, cells in biofilms are in a different QS mode than individual cells in flowing xylem sap. Follow-up experiments could distinguish between gene expression levels in planktonic versus attached cells in xylem by using reporter gene fusions to compare levels of transcription of PhcA-responsive genes across subpopulations (77).
In conclusion, the in planta PhcA transcriptome identified novel traits that help R. solanacearum survive at low cell densities. The PhcA QS system controls two transitions essential for successful bacterial wilt pathogenesis. First, R. solanacearum expresses diverse transporters and catabolic pathways to maximize survival in soil or water and growth during early infection, but once infection has been established, these traits are repressed by PhcA in favor of virulence factor expression. Second, PhcA modulates the switch between a highly adhesive form that forms aggregates and attaches avidly to host surfaces and a more dispersive form that spreads rapidly within plants during host colonization. Because these transitions clearly play critical roles in the pathogen’s complex disease cycle, they are attractive targets for disease control. Exogenously applied, microbiome-delivered, or host plant-produced QS inhibitors, quorum quenchers, or QS autoinducers (78, 79) could effectively reduce R. solanacearum success and, by extension, reduce crop losses due to bacterial wilt disease.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains and growth conditions.
Bacterial strains used in this study are listed in Table S4 in the supplemental material. Escherichia coli cells were grown at 37°C in LB medium. R. solanacearum was grown at 28°C in Boucher’s minimal medium (BMM) broth (pH 7.0), Casamino Acids-peptone-glucose (CPG) rich broth, or Van den Mooter (VDM) denitrification broth; in ex vivo tomato xylem sap; or on tetrazolium chloride (TZC) agar plates (80, 81). Media were supplemented with gentamicin (Gm) (15 µg/ml) or tetracycline (Tc) (5 µg/ml) as necessary. Bacterial growth was assessed in BMM broth supplemented with various concentrations of ferric chloride (FeCl3) or with 10 mM carbon or nitrogen sources, using a microplate reader (Bio-Tek, Winooski, VT) with shaking at 28°C under aerobic conditions. Biolog PM1-4 phenotype array plates were used according to the instructions of the manufacturer (Biolog Inc., Hayward, CA). Kinetic data were analyzed at 72 h using Omnilog software. Growth in ex vivo xylem sap was measured as described previously (67), using three biological replicates each with at least three technical replicates. To measure nitric oxide levels, cells were grown in VDM medium supplemented with 4-amino-5-methylamino-2′,7′-difluorofluorescein diacetate (DAF-FM-DA) and relative fluorescence was measured by the use of a plate reader. The ΔnorB strain of R. solanacearum, which accumulates nitric oxide (38), was used as a positive control.
Plant assays.
Plant assays were conducted on wilt-susceptible Bonny Best tomato plants inoculated through unwounded roots by soil drenching or directly into stems through a cut leaf petiole as previously described (67). To compare the levels of in planta spread of the wild-type and ΔphcA strains, bacteria were enumerated by dilution plating of ground stem slices harvested 0, 2, and 4 cm above and below the point of inoculation (46).
To assess the in planta competitive fitness of the wild-type and ΔphcA strains, plants were soil-soak inoculated with a 1:1 ratio of wild-type and ΔphcA cells totaling 108 CFU/ml and bacterial populations in mid-stems were enumerated as described above at 4, 5, 6, and 7 days after inoculation. Population sizes were normalized to the initial inoculum of each strain. The experiment included two biological replicates, each performed with 12 plants per condition (n = 24). To measure bacterial competitive fitness in tomato stems, a 2-μl drop of bacterial suspension containing 2,000 cells in a 1:1 mixture of marked wild-type and ΔphcA bacteria was placed on a freshly cut leaf petiole. After 72 h, strain population sizes were measured in stems 4 cm above the point of inoculation by serial dilution plating in duplicate on antibiotic-containing media specific for each strain. The experiment included two biological replicates, each performed with 10 plants per condition (n = 20). The competitive index (CI) of the ΔphcA mutant was calculated as previously described (67).
Attachment of R. solanacearum to tomato roots was measured as previously described (82). Briefly, axenic tomato seedling roots were incubated 2 h in a dilute bacterial suspension, rinsed, blotted to remove unattached cells, and then ground and dilution plated to quantify attached bacteria. Percent attachment was defined as the ratio of CFU attached per centimeter of root to the total CFU in the inoculum. The experiment was repeated three times, with 8 to 10 technical replicates of 4 pooled roots each per treatment each time.
Recombinant DNA techniques and mutagenesis.
To construct an R. solanacearum GMI1000 ΔphcA strain (phcA::Gmr), the regions flanking phcA were amplified with Phusion high-fidelity DNA polymerase (Finnzymes, Vantaa, Finland), and a gentamicin resistance cassette amplified from pUC18t miniTn7t-Gm (Novagen, Madison, WI) was inserted between the two fragments via splice by overlap extension (SOE) PCR. This construct replaced the wild-type locus. A complemented phcA mutant strain was constructed by inserting the complete phcA open reading frame plus 227 bp of 5′ predicted promoter sequence into the selectively neutral chromosomal att site of the ΔphcA mutant strain using pRCT-tet without the Gateway cassette (83). Total genomic DNA and plasmid DNA were isolated, and E. coli and R. solanacearum were transformed as previously described (38). Primer sequences are listed in Table S4.
RNA extraction for RNA-seq and library preparation.
Twenty-one-day-old tomato plants were inoculated with approximately 2,000 cells of either wild-type R. solanacearum strain GMI1000 or the ΔphcA mutant through a cut petiole as described above. After 72 h, 0.1 g of stem tissue spanning the inoculated petiole was placed in a tube containing 900 µl of prechilled transcription stop solution (5% [vol/vol] water-saturated phenol–ethanol) and ground using a Powerlyzer (Mo Bio Laboratories, Carlsbad, CA) for 1.5 cycles of 90 s each. Between grinding cycles, the rotor and tubes were placed on ice to minimize sample heating. The homogenate was centrifuged for 7 min in prechilled 1.5-ml tubes at 20,817 × g, supernatant was discarded, and the pellet was frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80°C. RNA was extracted using the modified hot-phenol method as previously described (29). The RNA concentration and purity were determined by the use of a Nanodrop instrument (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Wilmington, DE), and sample quality was assessed using an Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 Nanochip instrument (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA). Each biological replicate contained RNA pooled from six infected plants. The RNA-seq experiment included three biological replicates per treatment.
Library preparation and sequencing were performed by Protein CT Biotechnologies (Madison, WI). Briefly, 850 ng total RNA was treated with RiboZero kits (Epicentre, Madison, WI) to reduce bacterial and plant rRNA levels, followed by tomato mRNA reduction using poly(A) selection, and was used to make libraries with a Illumina TruSeq strand-specific mRNA sample preparation system. After RNA fragmentation, strand-specific libraries were constructed by first-strand cDNA synthesis using random primers, sample cleanup, second-strand synthesis, and DNA polymerase I and RNase H. A single “A” base was added to the cDNA fragments followed by ligation of the adapters. The final cDNA library was further purified and enriched with PCR and was quality checked using a Bioanalyzer 2100 instrument. The libraries were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 system, yielding ~20 million 1× 50-bp reads per sample.
Data quality check and analysis.
Illumina read raw data quality was verified with fastQC. The following genomes were used for mapping: the ITAG2.4 tomato genome (S_lycopersicum_chromosomes. 2.50.fa) and the R. solanacearum strain GMI1000 genome (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_003295.1 and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NC_003296.1). Raw sequence reads were mapped to genomes using the Subjunc aligner from Subread; most reads (>90% for all samples) aligned to the combined genomes, with about 1.2 to 4.5% total (84) reads per sample aligned to the bacterial genome. Bacterial alignment bam files were compared to the gene annotation GFF file, and raw counts for each gene were generated using the Subread featureCounts tool. Raw count data were normalized using the R Limma voom package (85) and then analyzed for differential expression. Blast2GO (86) was used for further data analysis and presentation.
Metabolomic analysis of xylem sap.
Tomato xylem sap was harvested by root pressure. At 1 to 3 h after light onset, well-watered 26- to 28-day-old plants were detopped with a sharp blade. The sap that accumulated in the first 3 min was discarded, the stump was rinsed with water, and then sap was collected for 30 min. Five sap samples, each containing sap pooled from 4 plants, were analyzed. Samples were shipped on dry ice to the West Coast Metabolomics Center (Davis, CA) for gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis. Metabolites were detected on a Pegasus IV GC instrument (Leco Corp., St. Joseph, MI) coupled to a Pegasus IV time of flight-MS (TOF-MS) system as previously described (87).
Nitrite measurement.
Nitrite was quantified both in vitro and in planta as previously described (38). The in vitro experiment included three biological replicates with three technical replicates each. For in planta measurements, homogenized stems of uninfected plants were used as controls. Nitrite concentrations were calculated on a per-cell basis. Fourteen plants were sampled for each treatment.
Biofilm formation.
Biofilm assays and confocal microscopy of R. solanacearum biofilm were performed as previously described (46). Confocal images were analyzed using Comstat2 (88).
Scanning electron microscopy to visualize R. solanacearum in tomato xylem.
Scanning electron microscopy was performed as previously described (46). The experiment was repeated twice with a minimum of three plants per treatment. Two sections from each plant were visualized using a LEO 1530 scanning electron microscope at the University of Wisconsin—Madison (UW-Madison) Material Sciences Center.
qRT-PCR.
Expression of selected plant and bacterial genes was measured by quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR (qRT-PCR) as previously described (29). The threshold cycle (ΔΔCT) method was used to calculate log fold expression changes; data reflect three biological replicates, with two technical replicates each. Primers used for qPCR are listed in Table S4.
Accession number(s).
The complete experimental data set was deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database under GenBank accession number GSE98074.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We thank Beth Dalsing, April MacIntyre, Alicia Truchon, Ashish Ranjan, Remi Peyraud, and Lavanya Babujee for critical comments and useful discussions. We thank Madeline Hayes for technical assistance and useful suggestions. We gratefully acknowledge technical microscopy support from Sarah Swanson (Newcomb Imaging Center, UW-Madison Department of Botany), Richard Noll (UW-Madison Material Sciences Center), and Fikrullah Kisa (UW-Madison Animal Sciences Department) and Annett Milling for designing the ACO5 primer.
This paper is dedicated to Timothy P. Denny in recognition of his discovery and characterization of the PhcA quorum sensing system.
Footnotes
Citation Khokhani D, Lowe-Power TM, Tran TM, Allen C. 2017. A single regulator mediates strategic switching between attachment/spread and growth/virulence in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. mBio 8:e00895-17. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00895-17.
REFERENCES
- 1.Antunes LC, Ferreira RB, Buckner MM, Finlay BB. 2010. Quorum sensing in bacterial virulence. Microbiology 156:2271–2282. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.038794-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Rutherford ST, Bassler BL. 2012. Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2:a012427. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a012427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Von Bodman SB, Bauer WD, Coplin DL. 2003. Quorum sensing in plant-pathogenic bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 41:455–482. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.41.052002.095652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Waters CM, Bassler BL. 2005. Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 21:319–346. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.131001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Genin S, Denny TP. 2012. Pathogenomics of the Ralstonia solanacearum species complex. Annu Rev Phytopathol 50:67–89. doi: 10.1146/annurev-phyto-081211-173000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Hayward AC. 1991. Biology and epidemiology of bacterial wilt caused by Pseudomonas solanacearum. Annu Rev Phytopathol 29:65–87. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.29.090191.000433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Denny TP. 2006. Plant pathogenic Ralstonia species, p 573–644. In Gnanamanickam SS. (ed), Plant-associated bacteria. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands. [Google Scholar]
- 8.Schell MA. 1993. Molecular biology of the LysR family of transcriptional regulators. Annu Rev Microbiol 47:597–626. doi: 10.1146/annurev.mi.47.100193.003121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Clough SJ, Flavier AB, Schell MA, Denny TP. 1997. Differential expression of virulence genes and motility in Ralstonia (Pseudomonas) solanacearum during exponential growth. Appl Environ Microbiol 63:844–850. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Clough SJ, Schell MA, Denny TP. 1994. Evidence for involvement of a volatile extracellular factor in Pseudomonas solanacearum virulence gene expression. Mol Plant Microbe 7:621–630. doi: 10.1094/Mpmi-7-0621. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Clough SJ, Lee KE, Schell MA, Denny TP. 1997. A two-component system in Ralstonia (Pseudomonas) solanacearum modulates production of PhcA-regulated virulence factors in response to 3-hydroxypalmitic acid methyl ester. J Bacteriol 179:3639–3648. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Brumbley SM, Denny TP. 1990. Cloning of wild-type Pseudomonas solanacearum phcA, a gene that when mutated alters expression of multiple traits that contribute to virulence. J Bacteriol 172:5677–5685. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Brumbley SM, Carney BF, Denny TP. 1993. Phenotype conversion in Pseudomonas solanacearum due to spontaneous inactivation of PhcA, a putative LysR transcriptional regulator. J Bacteriol 175:5477–5487. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.17.5477-5487.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Smith EF. 1896. A bacterial disease of tomato, eggplant, and Irish potato (Bacterium solanacearum nov. sp.). USDA Div Veg Physiol Pathol Bull 12:191. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Husain A, Kelman A. 1958. Relation of slime production to mechanism of wilting and pathogenicity in Pseudomonas solanacearum. Phytopathology 48:155–165. [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kelman A. 1954. The relationship of pathogenicity of Pseudomonas solanacearum to colony appearance in tetrazolium medium. Phytopathology 44:693–695. [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kelman A, Hruschka J. 1973. The role of motility and aerotaxis in the selective increase of avirulent bacteria in still broth cultures of Pseudomonas solanacearum. J Gen Microbiol 76:177–188. doi: 10.1099/00221287-76-1-177. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Huang J, Carney BF, Denny TP, Weissinger AK, Schell MA. 1995. A complex network regulates expression of eps and other virulence genes of Pseudomonas solanacearum. J Bacteriol 177:1259–1267. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Bhatt G, Denny TP. 2004. Ralstonia solanacearum iron scavenging by the siderophore staphyloferrin B is controlled by PhcA, the global virulence regulator. J Bacteriol 186:7896–7904. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.23.7896-7904.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huang J, Yindeeyoungyeon W, Garg RP, Denny TP, Schell MA. 1998. Joint transcriptional control of xpsR, the unusual signal integrator of the Ralstonia solanacearum virulence gene regulatory network, by a response regulator and a LysR-type transcriptional activator. J Bacteriol 180:2736–2743. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schell MA. 2000. Control of virulence and pathogenicity genes of Ralstonia solanacearum by an elaborate sensory network. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:263–292. doi: 10.1146/annurev.phyto.38.1.263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Schell MA. 1996. To be or not to be: how Pseudomonas solanacearum decides whether or not to express virulence genes. Eur J Plant Pathol 102:459–469. doi: 10.1007/BF01877140. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kang Y, Saile E, Schell MA, Denny TP. 1999. Quantitative immunofluorescence of regulated eps gene expression in single cells of Ralstonia solanacearum. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2356–2362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.McGarvey JA, Denny TP, Schell MA. 1999. Spatial-temporal and quantitative analysis of growth and EPS I production by Ralstonia solanacearum in resistant and susceptible tomato cultivars. Phytopathology 89:1233–1239. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.1999.89.12.1233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Flavier AB, Clough SJ, Schell MA, Denny TP. 1997. Identification of 3-hydroxypalmitic acid methyl ester as a novel autoregulator controlling virulence in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol Microbiol 26:251–259. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1997.5661945.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Tans-Kersten J, Huang H, Allen C. 2001. Ralstonia solanacearum needs motility for invasive virulence on tomato. J Bacteriol 183:3597–3605. doi: 10.1128/JB.183.12.3597-3605.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Genin S, Brito B, Denny TP, Boucher C. 2005. Control of the Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system (Hrp) genes by the global virulence regulator PhcA. FEBS Lett 579:2077–2081. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2005.02.058 ISI: 000228310700010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Brown DG, Allen C. 2004. Ralstonia solanacearum genes induced during growth in tomato: an inside view of bacterial wilt. Mol Microbiol 53:1641–1660. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04237.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Jacobs JM, Babujee L, Meng F, Milling A, Allen C. 2012. The in planta transcriptome of Ralstonia solanacearum: conserved physiological and virulence strategies during bacterial wilt of tomato. mBio 3:e00114-12. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00114-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Monteiro F, Genin S, van Dijk I, Valls M. 2012. A luminescent reporter evidences active expression of Ralstonia solanacearum type III secretion system genes throughout plant infection. Microbiology 158:2107–2116. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.058610-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Tans-Kersten J, Guan Y, Allen C. 1998. Ralstonia solanacearum pectin methylesterase is required for growth on methylated pectin but not for bacterial wilt virulence. Appl Environ Microbiol 64:4918–4923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Silverman JM, Brunet YR, Cascales E, Mougous JD. 2012. Structure and regulation of the type VI secretion system. Annu Rev Microbiol 66:453–472. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-121809-151619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sauer K, Camper AK, Ehrlich GD, Costerton JW, Davies DG. 2002. Pseudomonas aeruginosa displays multiple phenotypes during development as a biofilm. J Bacteriol 184:1140–1154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Bocsanczy A, Yuen J, Mangravita-Novo A, Norman D. 2016. Characterization of the T6SS secretion system of Ralstonia solanacearum and its role in virulence at low temperatures, abstr 724-P Abstr Am Phytopathol Soc Ann Meet, 30 July–August 2016. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang L, Xu J, Xu J, Chen K, He L, Feng J. 2012. TssM is essential for virulence and required for type VI secretion in Ralstonia solanacearum. J Plant Dis Protect 119:125–134. doi: 10.1007/BF03356431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang L, Xu J, Xu J, Zhang H, He L, Feng J. 2014. TssB is essential for virulence and required for type VI secretion system in Ralstonia solanacearum. Microb Pathog 74:1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2014.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Dalsing BL, Allen C. 2014. Nitrate assimilation contributes to Ralstonia solanacearum root attachment, stem colonization, and virulence. J Bacteriol 196:949–960. doi: 10.1128/JB.01378-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Dalsing BL, Truchon AN, Gonzalez-Orta ET, Milling AS, Allen C. 2015. Ralstonia solanacearum uses inorganic nitrogen metabolism for virulence, ATP production, and detoxification in the oxygen-limited host xylem environment. mBio 6:e02471-14. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02471-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Williams JS, Hall SA, Hawkesford MJ, Beale MH, Cooper RM. 2002. Elemental sulfur and thiol accumulation in tomato and defense against a fungal vascular pathogen. Plant Physiol 128:150–159. doi: 10.1104/pp.010687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Buchner P, Takahashi H, Hawkesford MJ. 2004. Plant sulphate transporters: co-ordination of uptake, intracellular and long-distance transport. J Exp Bot 55:1765–1773. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Dixon GR, Pegg GF. 1972. Changes in amino-acid content of tomato xylem sap following infection with strains of Verticillium albo-atrum. Ann Bot 36:147–154. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084567. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Senden MHMN, Van Der Meer AJGM, Limborgh J, Wolterbeek HT. 1992. Analysis of major tomato xylem organic acids and PITC-derivatives of amino acids by RP-HPLC and UV detection. Plant Soil 142:81–89. doi: 10.1007/BF00010177. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Bialczyk J, Lechowski Z, Dziga D. 2004. Composition of the xylem sap of tomato seedlings cultivated on media with HCO3− and nitrogen source as NO3− or NH4+. Plant Soil 263:265–272. doi: 10.1023/B:PLSO.0000047739.11698.ca. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Zuluaga AP, Puigvert M, Valls M. 2013. Novel plant inputs influencing Ralstonia solanacearum during infection. Front Microbiol 4:349. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2013.00349. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Yao J, Allen C. 2007. The plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum needs aerotaxis for normal biofilm formation and interactions with its tomato host. J Bacteriol 189:6415–6424. doi: 10.1128/JB.00398-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Tran TM, MacIntyre A, Khokhani D, Hawes M, Allen C. 2016. Extracellular DNases of Ralstonia solanacearum modulate biofilms and facilitate bacterial wilt virulence. Environ Microbiol 18:4103–4117. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Milling A, Babujee L, Allen C. 2011. Ralstonia solanacearum extracellular polysaccharide is a specific elicitor of defense responses in wilt-resistant tomato plants. PLoS One 6:e15853. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mellgren EM, Kloek AP, Kunkel BN. 2009. Mqo, a tricarboxylic acid cycle enzyme, is required for virulence of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato strain DC3000 on Arabidopsis thaliana. J Bacteriol 191:3132–3141. doi: 10.1128/JB.01570-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Tamir-Ariel D, Rosenberg T, Burdman S. 2011. The Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria citH gene is expressed early in the infection process of tomato and is positively regulated by the TctDE two-component regulatory system. Mol Plant Pathol 12:57–71. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2010.00652.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Pieretti I, Royer M, Barbe V, Carrere S, Koebnik R, Couloux A, Darrasse A, Gouzy J, Jacques MA, Lauber E, Manceau C, Mangenot S, Poussier S, Segurens B, Szurek B, Verdier V, Arlat M, Gabriel DW, Rott P, Cociancich S. 2012. Genomic insights into strategies used by Xanthomonas albilineans with its reduced artillery to spread within sugarcane xylem vessels. BMC Genomics 13:658. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-658. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Magasanik B. 1982. Genetic-control of nitrogen assimilation in bacteria. Annu Rev Genet 16:135–168. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ge.16.120182.001031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.van Faassen EE, Bahrami S, Feelisch M, Hogg N, Kelm M, Kim-Shapiro DB, Kozlov AV, Li H, Lundberg JO, Mason R, Nohl H, Rassaf T, Samouilov A, Slama-Schwok A, Shiva S, Vanin AF, Weitzberg E, Zweier J, Gladwin MT. 2009. Nitrite as regulator of hypoxic signaling in mammalian physiology. Med Res Rev 29:683–741. doi: 10.1002/med.20151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Gouzy A, Poquet Y, Neyrolles O. 2014. Nitrogen metabolism in Mycobacterium tuberculosis physiology and virulence. Nat Rev Microbiol 12:729–737. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Peyraud R, Cottret L, Marmiesse L, Gouzy J, Genin S. 2016. A resource allocation trade-off between virulence and proliferation drives metabolic versatility in the plant pathogen Ralstonia solanacearum. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005939. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sabri S, Nielsen LK, Vickers CE. 2013. Molecular control of sucrose utilization in Escherichia coli W, an efficient sucrose-utilizing strain. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:478–487. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02544-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Alvarez B, López MM, Biosca EG. 2008. Survival strategies and pathogenicity of Ralstonia solanacearum phylotype II subjected to prolonged starvation in environmental water microcosms. Microbiology 154:3590–3598. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.2008/019448-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Suzuki H, Koyanagi T, Izuka S, Onishi A, Kumagai H. 2005. The yliA, -B, -C, and -D genes of Escherichia coli K-12 encode a novel glutathione importer with an ATP-binding cassette. J Bacteriol 187:5861–5867. doi: 10.1128/JB.187.17.5861-5867.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Vuilleumier S. 1997. Bacterial glutathione S-transferases: what are they good for? J Bacteriol 179:1431–1441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Tans-Kersten J, Brown D, Allen C. 2004. Swimming motility, a virulence trait of Ralstonia solanacearum, is regulated by FlhDC and the plant host environment. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:686–695. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.6.686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Ferenci T. 2016. Trade-off mechanisms shaping the diversity of bacteria. Trends Microbiol 24:209–223. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Romantschuk M. 1992. Attachment of plant pathogenic bacteria to plant surfaces. Annu Rev Phytopathol 30:225–243. doi: 10.1146/annurev.py.30.090192.001301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Ray SK, Rajeshwari R, Sharma Y, Sonti RV. 2002. A high-molecular-weight outer membrane protein of Xanthomonas oryzae pv. oryzae exhibits similarity to non-fimbrial adhesins of animal pathogenic bacteria and is required for optimum virulence. Mol Microbiol 46:637–647. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03188.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Rojas CM, Ham JH, Deng WL, Doyle JJ, Collmer A. 2002. HecA, a member of a class of adhesions produced by diverse pathogenic bacteria, contributes to the attachment, aggregation, epidermal cell killing, and virulence phenotypes of Erwinia chrysanthemi EC16 on Nicotiana clevelandii seedlings. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:13142–13147. doi: 10.1073/pnas.202358699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Feil H, Feil WS, Lindow SE. 2007. Contribution of fimbrial and afimbrial adhesins of Xylella fastidiosa to attachment to surfaces and virulence to grape. Phytopathology 97:318–324. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO-97-3-0318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Darsonval A, Darrasse A, Durand K, Bureau C, Cesbron S, Jacques MA. 2009. Adhesion and fitness in the bean phyllosphere and transmission to seed of Xanthomonas fuscans subsp. fuscans. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 22:747–757. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-22-6-0747. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.James GA, Korber DR, Caldwell DE, Costerton JW. 1995. Digital image analysis of growth and starvation responses of a surface-colonizing Acinetobacter sp. J Bacteriol 177:907–915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lowe TM, Ailloud F, Allen C. 2015. Hydroxycinnamic acid degradation, a broadly conserved trait, protects Ralstonia solanacearum from chemical plant defenses and contributes to root colonization and virulence. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 28:286–297. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-09-14-0292-FI. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lange R, Hengge-Aronis R. 1991. Growth phase-regulated expression of bolA and morphology of stationary-phase Escherichia coli cells are controlled by the novel sigma factor sigma S. J Bacteriol 173:4474–4481. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Luscombe BM, Gray TRG. 1974. Characteristics of Arthrobacter grown in continuous culture. J Gen Microbiol 82:213–222. doi: 10.1099/00221287-82-2-213. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Young KD. 2006. The selective value of bacterial shape. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:660–703. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00001-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sequeira L, Graham TL. 1977. Agglutination of avirulent strains of Pseudomonas solanacearum by potato lectin. Physiol Plant Pathol 11:43–54. doi: 10.1016/0048-4059(77)90086-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Koutsoudis MD, Tsaltas D, Minogue TD, von Bodman SB. 2006. Quorum-sensing regulation governs bacterial adhesion, biofilm development, and host colonization in Pantoea stewartii subspecies stewartii. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:5983–5988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509860103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Chatterjee S, Newman KL, Lindow SE. 2008. Cell-to-cell signaling in Xylella fastidiosa suppresses movement and xylem vessel colonization in grape. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 21:1309–1315. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-21-10-1309. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Newman KL, Almeida RP, Purcell AH, Lindow SE. 2004. Cell-cell signaling controls Xylella fastidiosa interactions with both insects and plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:1737–1742. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308399100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Huot B, Yao J, Montgomery BL, He SY. 2014. Growth-defense tradeoffs in plants: a balancing act to optimize fitness. Mol Plant 7:1267–1287. doi: 10.1093/mp/ssu049. 24777989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Tang HB, DiMango E, Bryan R, Gambello M, Iglewski BH, Goldberg JB, Prince A. 1996. Contribution of specific Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence factors to pathogenesis of pneumonia in a neonatal mouse model of infection. Infect Immun 64:37–43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Dulla G, Lindow SE. 2008. Quorum size of Pseudomonas syringae is small and dictated by water availability on the leaf surface. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:3082–3087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0711723105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Gonzalez JE, Keshavan ND. 2006. Messing with bacterial quorum sensing. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 70:859–875. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00002-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Lindow S, Newman K, Chatterjee S, Baccari C, Lavarone AT, Ionescu M. 2014. Production of Xylella fastidiosa diffusible signal factor in transgenic grape causes pathogen confusion and reduction in severity of Pierce’s disease. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 27:244–254. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-13-0197-FI. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Hendrick CA, Sequeira L. 1984. Lipopolysaccharide-defective mutants of the wilt pathogen Pseudomonas solanacearum. Appl Environ Microbiol 48:94–101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Boucher C, Barberis P, Trigalet A, Demery D. 1985. Transposon mutagenesis of Pseudomonas solanacearum: isolation of Tn5-induced avirulent mutants. J Gen Microbiol 131:2449–2457. doi: 10.1099/00221287-131-9-2449. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Tran TM, MacIntyre A, Hawes M, Allen C. 2016. Escaping underground nets: extracellular DNases degrade plant extracellular traps and contribute to virulence of the plant pathogenic bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005686. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Monteiro F, Solé M, van Dijk I, Valls M. 2012. A chromosomal insertion toolbox for promoter probing, mutant complementation, and pathogenicity studies in Ralstonia solanacearum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 25:557–568. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-07-11-0201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liao Y, Smyth GK, Shi W. 2013. The Subread aligner: fast, accurate and scalable read mapping by seed-and-vote. Nucleic Acids Res 41:e108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt214. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W, Smyth GK. 2015. Limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 43:e47. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M. 2005. Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization and analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674–3676. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Fiehn O, Wohlgemuth G, Scholz M, Kind T, Lee DY, Lu Y, Moon S, Nikolau B. 2008. Quality control for plant metabolomics: reporting MSI-compliant studies. Plant J 53:691–704. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03387.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Heydorn A, Nielsen AT, Hentzer M, Sternberg C, Givskov M, Ersbøll BK, Molin S. 2000. Quantification of biofilm structures by the novel computer program COMSTAT. Microbiology 146:2395–2407. doi: 10.1099/00221287-146-10-2395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Fraebel DT, Mickalide H, Schnitkey D, Merritt J, Kuhlman TE, Kuehn S. 2017. Environment determines evolutionary trajectory in a constrained phenotypic space. eLife 6:e24669. doi: 10.7554/eLife.24669. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.