Skip to main content
Elsevier Sponsored Documents logoLink to Elsevier Sponsored Documents
. 2017 Oct 17;21(3):732–744. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.046

Clonal Heterogeneity Influences the Fate of New Adaptive Mutations

Ignacio Vázquez-García 1,2,9,, Francisco Salinas 3,6, Jing Li 3, Andrej Fischer 1, Benjamin Barré 3, Johan Hallin 3, Anders Bergström 1,3, Elisa Alonso-Perez 4, Jonas Warringer 4,5, Ville Mustonen 1,7,8,∗∗, Gianni Liti 3,8,∗∗∗
PMCID: PMC5656752  PMID: 29045840

Summary

The joint contribution of pre-existing and de novo genetic variation to clonal adaptation is poorly understood but essential to designing successful antimicrobial or cancer therapies. To address this, we evolve genetically diverse populations of budding yeast, S. cerevisiae, consisting of diploid cells with unique haplotype combinations. We study the asexual evolution of these populations under selective inhibition with chemotherapeutic drugs by time-resolved whole-genome sequencing and phenotyping. All populations undergo clonal expansions driven by de novo mutations but remain genetically and phenotypically diverse. The clones exhibit widespread genomic instability, rendering recessive de novo mutations homozygous and refining pre-existing variation. Finally, we decompose the fitness contributions of pre-existing and de novo mutations by creating a large recombinant library of adaptive mutations in an ensemble of genetic backgrounds. Both pre-existing and de novo mutations substantially contribute to fitness, and the relative fitness of pre-existing variants sets a selective threshold for new adaptive mutations.

Keywords: clonal heterogeneity, genetic variation, population dynamics, genome evolution, mutation, adaptation, quantitative traits, drug resistance

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg

Highlights

  • Clonal heterogeneity influences the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance

  • Joint role of pre-existing and de novo genetic variation in clonal evolution

  • Clonal dynamics are shaped by background-dependent fitness effects of mutations

  • Loss of clonal heterogeneity is balanced by genomic instability and diversification


Vázquez-García et al. examine the role of clonal heterogeneity in the acquisition of antimicrobial resistance. They report that pre-existing and de novo genetic variation jointly contribute to clonal evolution. By building a library of adaptive mutations in multiple genetic backgrounds, they resolve the fitness effects of mutations in a clonal lineage.

Introduction

The adaptive response of a cell population can thwart therapeutic control of a wide spectrum of diseases, from bacterial and viral infections to cancer. A prototypical scenario arises when individuals in a population acquire heritable genetic or non-genetic changes to adapt and thrive in a new environment (Balaban et al., 2004, Marusyk et al., 2014, Toprak et al., 2011). Since the seminal findings by Luria and Delbrück (1943) that phage-resistant bacteria can acquire adaptive mutations prior to selection, measuring the fitness effects and dynamics of mutations has been key to map the principles of evolutionary adaptation (Barrick and Lenski, 2013). The focus has typically been on characterizing few mutations at a time under the implicit assumption that beneficial mutations are rare, treating pre-existing and acquired mutations separately. However, many mutations are often simultaneously present in a population, which result in fitness differences between individuals upon which selection can act (Lang et al., 2013, Levy et al., 2015, Parts et al., 2011, Venkataram et al., 2016).

Given that mutations in asexual populations are physically linked in the genome, the fates of pre-existing and de novo mutations are mutually dependent, and selection can only act on these sets of variants in their entirety. Genome evolution experiments on isogenic populations have revealed both adaptive sweeps and pervasive clonal competition in large populations where the mutation supply is high. This phenomenon, known as clonal interference, takes place as mutations in different individuals cannot recombine via sexual reproduction and is now relatively well understood both experimentally and theoretically (Gerrish and Lenski, 1998, Lang et al., 2013, Neher, 2013). Experiments on populations with extensive genetic variation have demonstrated that beneficial mutations expand in a repeatable way (Parts et al., 2011). Theory predicts that the rate of adaptation is proportional to the fitness variance present in a population, generating a traveling fitness wave (Desai and Fisher, 2007, Rouzine and Coffin, 2005). However, the role of de novo mutations has been negligible in these experiments, either because of their short duration or related to the selective constraints used. A study that was able to anticipate new mutations found that one or few genetic variants were sufficient to affect the fate of subsequent beneficial mutations, hinting that the joint dynamics of new mutations have to be considered in the light of pre-existing variation (Lang et al., 2011). The ensuing interaction between existing and subsequent mutations has been theoretically considered under different population genetic scenarios (Good et al., 2012, Hermisson and Pennings, 2005, Orr and Betancourt, 2001, Peter et al., 2012, Schiffels et al., 2011). A key theoretical prediction is that a new beneficial mutation will only establish when it has a selective advantage greater than a characteristic value that depends on the underlying fitness distribution (Good et al., 2012, Schiffels et al., 2011). However, this important hypothesis remains to be tested; namely, whether genetic diversity can change the evolutionary fate of new adaptive mutations by limiting the number of backgrounds where they can still outcompete the fittest extant individuals. Understanding the effect of genetic heterogeneity on adaptive dynamics is particularly urgent because recent findings indicate that it can play a major role in the development of resistant bacterial infections (Lieberman et al., 2014) and in cancer recurrence (Gerlinger et al., 2012, Landau et al., 2013).

We have delineated two lines of enquiry into our hypothesis. To what extent can the adaptive response be attributed to genetic variation already present in a population, and how much to acquired? How do the aggregate effects of pre-existing variation influence the fate of new mutations? To address these questions, we investigated the interaction between pre-existing (or background) genetic variation and new mutations in a population of diploid cells with unique combinations of alleles. The cells originate from two diverged S. cerevisiae strains (Figure 1). We carried out 12 rounds of random mating and sporulation (meiosis) between DBVPG6044, a West African (WA) palm wine strain, and YPS128, a North American (NA) oak tree bark strain (Parts et al., 2011). The cross population (WAxNA) consisted of 107–108 unique haplotypes, with a pre-existing single-nucleotide variant segregating every 230 bp on average. We further identified 91 de novo single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small insertions or deletions (indels) acquired during the crossing phase from genome sequences of 173 founder individuals. This is consistent with a mutation rate of approximately 2.89×1010 mutations per base per generation, close to empirical estimates in other yeast strains (Zhu et al., 2014). We also observed aneuploidy in chromosome IX, indicating the presence of variation other than point mutations. This design results in the frequency spectrum of background mutations to be normally distributed so that pre-existing variants are already established and do not need to overcome genetic drift. We refer to the parental genotype of each individual in the cross as its genetic background, which, on average, differs by ∼31,000 SNVs between individuals. Because naturally occurring deleterious mutations have been selected against over long evolutionary timescales, the recombinant parental genotypes are enriched for functional diversity that is not readily accessible using other techniques, such as random or site-directed mutagenesis. The cross-based approach also reduces genetic linkage of nearby loci, which enables us to localize background alleles responding to selection.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Study Overview

Schematic of the divergence, crossing, and selection phases of the experiment. Two diverged S. cerevisiae lineages (WA and NA) were crossed for twelve rounds, generating a large ancestral population of unique haplotypes. These diploid cells were asexually evolved for 32 days in stress and control environments, and their adaptation was studied by whole-population and isolate sequencing and phenotyping. Populations evolved resistant macroscopic subclones driven by individual cells with beneficial genetic backgrounds (i.e., parental allele configurations) and by beneficial de novo mutations that provided a resistance phenotype.

Starting from WA, NA, and WAxNA founders, we asexually evolved populations of ∼107 cells in serial batch culture under drug inhibition with hydroxyurea (HU) and rapamycin (RM) at concentrations impeding, but not ending, cell proliferation. These drugs were chosen for having known targets and to cover two of the most common modes of action of antimicrobial and chemotherapy drugs: inhibition of nucleic acid synthesis (hydroxyurea) and inhibition of protein synthesis and cell growth (rapamycin). We derived replicate lines of WA, NA (2 each in hydroxyurea and rapamycin), and WAxNA (6 in hydroxyurea, 8 in rapamycin, and 4 in a control environment), propagating them for 32 days in 48-hr cycles (∼54 generations; Experimental Procedures). We monitored evolutionary changes by whole-genome sequencing of populations after 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 days as well as clonal isolates at 0 and 32 days (Table S1). Finally, we measured the rate of growth at the initial and final time points for a subset of populations and quantified the relative fitness contributions of background and de novo variation using a genetic cross.

Results

Two regimes of selection became readily apparent in both sequence and phenotype. Initially, there were local changes in the frequency of parental alleles under selection (Figure 2). Over time, subclonal populations arose and expanded, depleting the pool of genetic diversity. Here and throughout this article, we employ the term “subclone” to refer to a group of cells that carry the same set of mutations. These successful “macroscopic” subclones could be detected by whole-population sequencing and phenotyping, persisting in time, as manifested by broad jumps in the allele frequency visible across the genome and by multiple modes in the fitness distribution (Figures 2 and 3; Figure S2). But what drives these clonal expansions? Is it the founder haplotypes themselves, de novo mutations relegating the parental variation to the role of passengers, or their combined action?

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Genome-wide Allele Frequency Changes

Genome-wide allele frequency of pre-existing parental variants after t=(0,2,4,8,16,32) days, measured by whole-population sequencing for a representative population in rapamycin. Pre-existing and de novo driver mutations are highlighted by dashed lines. Top: chromosomes are shown on the x axis; the frequency of the WA allele at locus i, xiWA, is shown on the y axis. The reciprocal frequency of the NA allele is equivalent because xiNA=1xiWA. Bottom left: enlarged inset of the shaded region showing allele frequency changes in chromosome VIII during selection in rapamycin. Early time points 2, 4, and 8 show localized allele frequency changes at 460–490 kb because of a beneficial NA allele sweeping with hitchhiking passengers. Late time points 16 and 32 show abrupt jumps between successive loci that reflect the parental haplotype of emerging subclone(s). These long-range correlations can alter the frequency of parental alleles independently of their fitness value. In case of a fully clonal population, allele frequencies at 0, 0.5, and 1.0 would correspond to the background genotypes NA/NA, WA/NA, and WA/WA of a diploid clone that reached fixation. Bottom right: we tested a model in which each allele is proposed to be a driver under selection, with linked passenger alleles also changing in frequency by genetic hitchhiking. Top log likelihood scores are shown for all populations in this region of interest (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). We validated the CTF8NA allele to be strongly beneficial for rapamycin resistance (Figure S8).

See also Figures S1 and S2.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Reconstruction of Subclonal Dynamics

Competing subclones evolved in hydroxyurea and rapamycin experienced a variety of fates.

(A and C) Time is shown on the x axis, starting after crossing, when the population has no macroscopic subclones and during selection with (A) hydroxyurea and (C) rapamycin between t=0 and t=32 days. Cumulative haplotype frequency of subclones (bars) and allele frequency of de novo mutants (lines) are shown on the y axis. Most commonly, selective sweeps were observed where a spontaneous mutation arose and increased in frequency. Driver mutations are shown as solid lines and passenger mutations as dashed lines, colored by subclone assignment; circles and squares denote non-synonymous and synonymous mutations, respectively. For driver mutations, the mutated gene and codon are indicated above each line.

(B and D) Variability in intra-population growth rate, estimated by random sampling of 96 individuals at initial (t=0 days, green) and final time points (t=32 days, purple), before and after selection with (B) hydroxyurea and (D) rapamycin. Relative growth rates λk(t) by individual k are shown at the foot of the histogram, calculated by averaging over nr=32 technical replicates per individual. Relative growth rates are normalized with respect to the mean population growth rate λkt=0 at t=0 days. The posterior means of the distribution modes fitted by a Gaussian mixture model are indicated as dashed lines. The fitter individuals (pins) carry driver mutations, detected by targeted sampling and sequencing. The insets on the right depict a schematic of the fitness distribution in two limit cases: when there are many mutations of similar effect, the fitness wave will be smooth and unimodal; when only few mutations of large effect exist, the fitness distribution will become multimodal.

See also Figures S3, S4, and S10.

Selective Effects on Pre-existing Genetic Variation

To determine the adaptive value of background variation, we identified regions where local allele frequencies changed over the time course of the selection experiments. Frequency changes over time indicate that selection is acting on beneficial background alleles. These drivers cause linked passenger mutations to also change in frequency by genetic hitchhiking (Illingworth et al., 2012). We performed a systematic scan for background variants under selection using data up to 4 days, when no population yet had detectable subclones that would distort this signal (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). A region of interest was found in chromosome VIII (coordinates 460–490 kb) in all WAxNA populations under rapamycin (Figure 2B). We evaluated two candidate genes in this region by reciprocal hemizygosity, validating the CTF8NA allele to increase rapamycin resistance. CTF8 harbors two background missense variants and has previously been implicated in sensitivity to rapamycin, although the mechanism remains unknown (Parsons et al., 2004). Carrying the CTF8NA allele confers a 36% growth rate advantage over the CTF8WA allele (Figure S8). KOG1, which falls within the same region and is a subunit of the TORC1 complex, differs by seven missense mutations between the parents. However, reciprocal hemizygous deletions only revealed a modest fitness difference between WA and NA sequences of KOG1. We did not find events that replicated across all populations in hydroxyurea.

Pervasive Selection of Macroscopic Subclones Driven by De Novo Genetic Variation

To reconstruct clonal expansions in the WAxNA populations, we used background genetic variants as markers. Using the cloneHD algorithm (Fischer et al., 2014), we inferred the subclonal genotypes and their frequency in the populations, both of which are unknown a priori (Figure S1; Supplemental Experimental Procedures). We found at least one subclone in all WAxNA populations under selection but none in the control environment (Figure 3; Figure S3). Clonal competition was prevalent with two or more expanding subclones in 12 of 16 WAxNA populations. No population became fully clonal during the experiment, with subclone frequencies stabilizing after 16 days in several rapamycin populations. Similarly, WA and NA populations under selection underwent adaptation, as evidenced by de novo mutation frequencies, except for WA, which became extinct in hydroxyurea (Figure S4).

To genetically characterize the subclones, we isolated and sequenced 44 clones drawn from WAxNA populations after the selection phase (Figure 4; Experimental Procedures). From population and isolate sequence data, we observed 19 recurrent de novo mutations in the ribonucleotide reductase subunits RNR2 and RNR4 during hydroxyurea selection and in the rapamycin targets FPR1 and TOR1 during rapamycin selection (Table 1). Each of these driver mutations had a drug-resistant growth rate phenotype (Figures S6, S7, and S8) and carried a unique background of ∼31,000 passenger mutations on average compared with other sequenced isolates. All FPR1 mutations were homozygous and likely to inactivate the gene or inhibit its expression. In contrast, TOR1 mutations were heterozygous, whereas we found RNR2 and RNR4 mutations in both the heterozygous and homozygous state. All driver mutations occurred in highly conserved functional domains. The variant allele fractions of these mutations mirrored the inferred subclonal dynamics (Figures 3A and 3C; Figures S3 and S4). Other mutated genes with similar dynamics were confirmed as passengers (e.g., DEP1, INP54, and YNR066C; Figure S8). From the genome sequence of the 44 individual clones, we also detected six trisomies as large-scale copy-number aberrations, without conclusive evidence that they are adaptive compared with recurrent point mutations (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Pervasive Selection for Adaptive Mutations and Genomic Instability

Whole-genome sequences of clones sampled from WAxNA F12 populations. SNVs, indels, and chromosome-level aberrations were detected by whole-genome sequencing in single-cell diploid clones derived from evolved populations after t=32 days in (A) hydroxyurea or (B) rapamycin (Table S1). Chromosomes are shown on the x axis; clone isolates are listed on the left, colored by lineage (Figure S3). The consensus shows the majority genotype across population isolates with a sequence identity greater than 80%. WA/WA (blue) and NA/NA (red) represent homozygous diploid genotypes, and WA/NA (purple) represents a heterozygous genotype. Individual cells with a shared background genotype carry de novo SNVs and indels (circles), de novo mis-segregations with loss of heterozygosity (solid segments), and de novo gains or losses in copy number (hatched segments). Driver and passenger mutations are listed along the top (drivers are shown in boldface). Populations marked by ⊗ indicate cross-contamination during the selection phase, but any derived events are independent. All ancestral sequenced isolates can be found in Figure S5. See also Figures 3A and 3C, Table 1, and Table S1.

Table 1.

Summary of Driver Mutations

Gene Chr Position Strand Nucleotide Position Substitution Protein Position Substitution Status Genotype Effect
Selection: Hydroxyurea (YPD+HU 10 mg/mL)
RNR2 X 392,854 + 451 A > C 151 N > H de novo N/A missense
392,864 + 461 A > G 154 E > G de novo +/− missense
392,908 + 505 T > C 169 Y > H de novo +/− missense
393,020 + 617 C > T 206 T > I de novo +/−, −/− missense
RNR4 VII 855,961 341 T > A 114 K > M de novo N/A missense
856,201 101 C > A 34 R > I de novo +/−, −/− missense
856,202 100 T > C 34 R > G de novo −/− missense

Selection: Rapamycin (YPD+RM 0.025 μg/mL)
CTF8 VIII 486,462 170 C(WA) > A(NA) 57 G > V pre-existing N/A missense
486,568 64 T(WA) > C(NA) 22 T > A pre-existing N/A missense
FPR1 XIV 371,920 306–307 T > TTG 102–103 ST > S de novo N/A frameshift (stop codon gained)
371,921 306 A > T 102 S > R de novo N/A missense
372,030 197 C > G 66 W > S de novo −/− missense
372,030 197 C > T 66 W > de novo −/− nonsense (stop codon gained)
372,195 28–31 ATTTT > ATTT 10–11 KI > K de novo N/A frameshift (stop codon gained)
372,224 3 C > A 1 M > I de novo N/A nonsense (start codon lost)
TOR1 X 564,757 + 5,343–5,345 ATGA > A 1,781–1,782 DD > D de novo N/A in-frame deletion
565,330 + 5,915 G > T 1,972 S > I de novo +/− missense
565,331 + 5,916 C > A 1,972 S > R de novo N/A missense
565,528 + 6,113 G > T 2,038 W > L de novo +/− missense
565,529 + 6,114 G > C 2,038 W > C de novo +/− missense
565,550 + 6,135 C > A 2,045 F > L de novo N/A missense

Summary of unique SNVs, insertions and deletions found to be drivers in hydroxyurea (RNR2 and RNR4) and rapamycin (CTF8, FPR1, and TOR1). Nucleotide and protein substitutions show the wild-type and mutated alleles. Nucleotides gained or lost are underlined. Variants are labeled as pre-existing when they differ between the parents and as de novo when they arose during the crossing or selection phases of the experiment. The functional effect of the mutations has been characterized using the Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor (McLaren et al., 2016). Populations and clones carrying mutations in these driver genes are listed in Table S1. The genotype of each mutation in individual clones is shown in Figure 4. The genotype of mutations only found by whole-population sequencing cannot be resolved and is indicated as not applicable (N/A). Chr, chromosome.

Clonal expansions were also evident from changes in the fitness distribution of cells. We established this by phenotyping 96 randomly isolated individuals from 3 populations per environment at 0 and 32 days as well as the 44 sequenced individuals at 32 days (Experimental Procedures). We measured the growth rate of each isolate and determined the population growth rate with respect to the mean of the fitness distribution. The variance of the fitness distribution varied significantly with different drugs, consistent with previous studies (Chevereau et al., 2015). While the variance of the fitness distribution at 0 days was narrow in hydroxyurea (σ2=3.1×103), growth in rapamycin showed a wider response (σ2=5.4×103). In rapamycin selection, the fitness distribution became multimodal after 32 days, reflecting the fitness of subclones substantially improving with respect to the mean fitness of the bulk population (Figure 3D). The clonal subpopulation divided on average twice as fast as the ancestral population. Sequenced isolates with driver mutations in FPR1 and TOR1 were on the leading edge of the fitness distribution, far ahead of the bulk. Furthermore, the bulk component showed a 10% average improvement, possibly because of selection of beneficial genetic backgrounds. Conversely, bimodality was only detected in one population in hydroxyurea selection (WAxNA F12 1 HU 3), where the clonal peak grew 25% faster on average compared with the ancestral population, and the bulk grew 7% faster on average across all populations (Figure 3B). Isolates with RNR2 driver mutations fell onto the leading edge of the fitness distribution. These six isolates originated from the same expanding subclone, and two of them had a 13% faster growth rate than the remaining four, although they all shared the same heterozygous RNR2 driver mutation. In both of these isolates, we found a large region in chromosome II to have undergone loss of heterozygosity (LOH), offering a putative genetic cause for their growth advantage (Figure 4A). Finally, to understand how the fitness of a typical population changes across environments, we characterized the fitness correlations of ancestral and evolved clonal isolates with and without stress (Figure S9). The rank order in clone fitness did not change significantly because of selection when measured in the absence of stress, implying that the evolutionary history of each of the clones did not lead to trade-offs in the average fitness of the population. However, a strong fitness cost of driver mutations in FPR1 was observed.

Diversification and Genomic Instability

We found several of the driver mutations to exist in homozygous rather than heterozygous states. LOH has been shown to rapidly convert beneficial heterozygous mutations to homozygosity in diploid yeast evolving under nystatin stress (Gerstein et al., 2014). Thus, we hypothesized that genomic instability, causing widespread LOH, could be significantly contributing to adaptation. To detect mechanisms of genomic instability, we used heterozygous genetic variants as markers. First, we used the sequences of haploid individuals from the ancestral population, drawn before the last round of crossing, to create in silico diploid genomes and calculate the length distribution of homozygous segments. Similarly, we measured the length distribution of homozygous segments from evolved isolate genomes. We observed a significant increase of long homozygosity tracts in the evolved clones—a hallmark of LOH (Figure 5A). Second, we directly counted LOH events in populations using multiple sequenced isolates from the same expanding subclone (Supplemental Experimental Procedures).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Elevated Rates of Loss of Heterozygosity

(A) The length distribution of homozygous segments, in bins corresponding to 50-kb increments, shows an excess of long homozygosity tracts above 300 kb in hydroxyurea and rapamycin (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, p < 0.01). Ancestral haploid isolates are used to compare a set of in silico diploid genomes to evolved diploid isolates. Only unrelated isolate backgrounds were included.

(B) Background- and environment-dependent rates of loss of heterozygosity were measured in a fluctuation assay by loss of the URA3 marker. Resistant colonies growing in 5-fluororotic acid (5-FOA+) indicate loss of the marker. Based on the number of 5-FOA+ colony-forming units (CFUs), the mean number of LOH events are estimated using the empirical probability-generating function of the Luria-Delbrück distribution (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). The locus-specific LOH rates are shown, given by the mean number of LOH events divided by the total number of cells in YPD. Error bars denote the upper and lower 95% confidence intervals. LOH rates were elevated in hydroxyurea compared with the control environment and manifested background-dependent effects between the parents and their hybrid.

See also Figure 4.

We identified a minimum of 6 events per genome per subclone (Figure 4). Although this estimate is a lower bound and is limited because of the number of sequenced individuals per subclone, the LOH rates are substantial. To exemplify the interaction of genomic instability with pre-existing and de novo variation, inspection of de novo mutations in the WAxNA F12 1 HU 3 population shows that one RNR2 mutation spans six isolates, being part of an expanding subclone (Figure 4A). These isolates have further diversified by acquiring passenger mutations and undergoing LOH. Clones C5 and C6 grow faster than the other four and share a large LOH event in chromosome II that is not present in the other isolates, possibly providing the growth advantage and broadening the fitness distribution (Figure 3B). An alternative route to homozygosity was observed in a single clone found to be haploid (clone C1 in WAxNA F12 2 RM 1) and, therefore, homozygous genome-wide. This haploid clone is closely related to a diploid clone (C3) from the same population, and both clones share the same FPR1 W66 de novo mutation (Figure 4B). These data are consistent with the appearance of the FPR1 heterozygous mutation in an ancestral diploid clone that took two independent routes—focal LOH or meiosis—to unveil the recessive driver mutation. Altogether, we find that genomic instability can render de novo mutations homozygous as a necessary event in a multi-hit process toward drug resistance.

The stress environments themselves have an active role in accelerating genome evolution by genomic instability. Using a fluctuation assay, we investigated the effect of the genetic background and of the selective environment on genomic instability by tracking the loss of the URA3 marker. Consistent with previous studies (Barbera and Petes, 2006), replication stress induced by hydroxyurea caused an increase in LOH rates. We also observed a background-dependent increase in LOH in rapamycin (Figure 5B).

Decomposing Fitness Effects of Genetic Variation by Background Averaging

Finally, we sought to partition and quantify the individual fitness contributions of pre-existing and de novo genetic variation. The genotype space is extremely vast, but we can uniformly sample a representative ensemble to reconstruct a fraction of the genetic backgrounds where beneficial mutations could have arisen. To this end, we designed a genetic cross where background and de novo variants were re-shuffled to create new combinations (Figure 6A). We randomly isolated diploids from both ancestral and evolved populations, sporulated these, and determined whether the derived haploids contained wild-type or mutated RNR2, RNR4, FPR1, and TOR1 alleles. We then crossed haploids to create a large array of diploid hybrids where all genotypes (+/+, +/–, –/–) for each of these genes existed in an ensemble of backgrounds, thus recreating a large fraction of the genotype space conditioned on the presence or absence of driver mutations. We measured the growth rates of both haploid spores and diploid hybrids, estimating and partitioning the variation in growth rate contributed by the background genotype and by de novo genotypes using a linear mixed model (Figure 6B; Figure S10; Supplemental Experimental Procedures).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Ensemble-Averaged Fitness Effects of Genetic Background and De Novo Mutations

(A) To quantify the fitness effects of background variation and de novo mutations in hydroxyurea (RNR2 and RNR4) and rapamycin (FPR1 and TOR1), we isolated individuals from ancestral and evolved populations. From these diploid cells, we sporulated and selected haploid segregants of each mating type. Spores with mutations in RNR2, RNR4, and TOR1 were genotyped to test whether they carry the wild-type or mutated allele. We crossed the MATa and MATα versions to create hybrids (48 × 48 in hydroxyurea and 56 × 56 in rapamycin). Independent segregants were used to measure the biological variability of ancestral and evolved backgrounds.

(B) Variance decomposition of the growth rate of spores (solid) and hybrids (hatched) that can be attributed to different components using a linear mixed model. The model components are the background genotype, b; de novo genotype, d; time of sampling during the selection phase, t; and auxotrophy, x. Estimates of variance components are obtained by restricted maximum likelihood (Figure S12 and Table S6).

(C and E) Relative growth rate of spores, λ{a,α}btd, and hybrids, λbtd, measured for multiple combinations of background and de novo genotypes and averaged over measurement replicates. Relative growth rates are normalized with respect to the mean growth rate of the ancestral WAxNA cross. Measurements of cells selected in (C) hydroxyurea and (E) rapamycin were taken in the respective stress environments. Medians and 25%/75% percentiles across groups are shown, with medians shown as horizontal black lines and colored by de novo genotype (wild-type, blue; heterozygote, cyan; homozygote, green). Outliers (circles) and isolated, selected clones with matching genotypes (diamonds) are highlighted.

(D and F) Ensemble average of the relative growth rate of spores, λ{a,α}td, and hybrids, λtd, measured in (D) hydroxyurea and (F) rapamycin. The color scale for all matrices is shown at the right and indicates the difference in the ensemble average with respect to the ancestral WAxNA crosses.

The symbols in (C)–(F) follow the legend in (A) and indicate combinations of the type of genetic background (WA parent, Inline graphic; NA parent, Inline graphic; WAxNA segregant, Inline graphic) and the genotype of de novo mutations (no de novo mutation, Inline graphic; wild-type, Inline graphic; mutated, Inline graphic). An extended version of the figure with all combinations and controls can be found in Figures S10 and S11, respectively.

The ensemble average over backgrounds showed that the mean effect of RNR2, RNR4, and TOR1 mutations was fully dominant and highly penetrant regardless of the background (Figures 6D and 6F). In contrast, FPR1 mutants were recessive and only increased the growth rate when homozygous, again irrespective of the background (Figure 6F). Recombinants with RNR2 and RNR4 mutations show epistatic interactions, consistent with the products encoded by these genes, which are known to interact as subunits of the same protein complex (Figure 6C). After conditioning for RNR2, RNR4, FPR1, and TOR1 driver mutation status, a large fraction of the phenotypic variance still remained, reflecting the effect of the genetic backgrounds in which they emerged (Figures 6C and 6E). In fact, under hydroxyurea exposure, background genetic variation accounted for an estimated 51% of the growth rate variance, more than twice the estimated 23% contributed by RNR2 and RNR4 de novo mutations. Furthermore, these mutations eventually landed on genetic backgrounds much fitter than average in the ancestral fitness distribution, as denoted by the estimated 7% explained by the time of sampling. Both of these results directly imply that moderate-effect de novo mutations must arise on favorable genetic backgrounds to give rise to macroscopic subclones. In contrast, under rapamycin exposure, the pre-existing genetic variation accounted for only 22% of the variance, much less than the 70% attributed to FPR1 and TOR1 mutations. Such large-effect mutations can expand in a vast majority of backgrounds, explaining how they can almost entirely surpass the bulk of the fitness distribution (Figure 3D). Taken together, these results are consistent with the aggregation of small-effect, pre-existing variants that can condition the fate of new mutations in both selection environments.

Discussion

Here we showed that populations containing extensive fitness variability can adapt to strong selective pressures utilizing both pre-existing and de novo genetic variation. Theory predicts that pre-existing genetic variation forms a traveling fitness wave, with the mean fitness increasing at a rate that is proportional to its fitness variance (Desai and Fisher, 2007, Rouzine and Coffin, 2005). New mutations are expected to be successful when they land on a favorable background or when they are beneficial enough to escape from the bulk dynamics by their own merits. Recent theoretical results have suggested the existence of a selective advantage threshold above which the fate of a new mutation becomes decoupled from the background on which it lands (Good et al., 2012, Schiffels et al., 2011). Our results show that new beneficial mutations expanded on a range of genetic backgrounds and selection concomitantly acted on pre-existing variation through its combined effects on fitness, steadily improving the bulk of the population. The observed dynamics are, at this level, consistent with the theoretical picture.

The rate of adaptation and the type of beneficial mutations that expand and fix in a population depend on multiple factors, such as population size, mutation rate, and ploidy (Barrick and Lenski, 2013, Selmecki et al., 2015, zur Wiesch et al., 2011). Our results show that sufficiently large populations could readily find beneficial de novo mutations, but their adaptive trajectories were simultaneously shaped by pre-existing and de novo variation with overlapping timescales. Previous experimental studies with substantial founder diversity did not observe de novo mutations playing an important role in either asexual or sexual evolution (Burke et al., 2010, Burke et al., 2014, Parts et al., 2011). This may be due to differences in the selective constraints that affect the timescale for the emergence of de novo mutations or may depend on the genetic architecture of the selected phenotype, making the background fitness variation harder to overcome. Despite the large genetic heterogeneity of the founders, mutations in driver genes were recurrent, indicating convergent evolution toward a restricted number of molecular targets. This is an important aspect to be able to predict the outcome of selection. Larger studies that systematically vary key parameters, such as population size, are needed to quantify how pre-existing variation conditions the repeatability of new mutations.

Measurements of the fitness distribution revealed markedly different variability within a population in response to different inhibitors. There were two different outcomes of selection: when many mutations had comparable fitness effects as in hydroxyurea, the fitness distribution remained smooth; on the contrary, when few large-effect mutations were available, such as mutations in the target-of-rapamycin (TOR) pathway in rapamycin, the fitness distribution became multimodal. We were not able to attribute increases in the bulk of the fitness distribution to particular alleles beyond the CTF8 gene, probably because of the contribution of many small-effect loci. Previous studies in isogenic populations have reported adaptive mutations sweeping to fixation on a comparable timescale without specific selective constraints such as drugs (Lang et al., 2013). In contrast, we did not observe complete fixations. This is partially due to the duration of the experiment: the clones are still expanding after 32 days in hydroxyurea. However, most rapamycin-resistant clones become stable between 16 and 32 days. Although we do not know the underlying cause, the observation has important consequences. Notably, the substantial genotypic and phenotypic diversity that remained after selection could be a potent substrate to re-sensitize a population and may compromise targeted therapies against resistant clones. Understanding the role of clonal competition in isogenic and heterogeneous populations requires further work, which could be approached experimentally using lineage tracing (Levy et al., 2015).

We observed a balance between the loss of diversity because of selection and active diversification mechanisms that partially re-established and refined existing variants. The background not only contributed substantially to fitness but was also continuously re-configured by genomic instability, diversifying the expanding clones. Chromosomal rearrangements represent a key mechanism in shaping genome diversity in asexual organisms (Dunham et al., 2002, Flot et al., 2013) and in somatic evolution of cancer (Stephens et al., 2011), where cells accumulate a genetic load during tumor development that LOH can reveal phenotypically. In asexual diploids such as those studied here, successful beneficial mutations are expected to be dominant in a phenomenon known as Haldane’s sieve (Orr and Betancourt, 2001). However, LOH has been shown to overcome this constraint by rapidly converting initially heterozygous mutations to homozygosity (Gerstein et al., 2014). Therefore, LOH may enable asexually evolving populations to approach the adaptive rates seen in sexual organisms with recombination. Here we also saw these dynamics at play because recessive FPR1 mutations needed a second hit by LOH. Additionally, the process gained a new dimension: although these rearrangements were mostly copy number-neutral, they led to fitness increments by changing scores of background variation from the heterozygous to the homozygous state in a single step. As a result, certain passenger mutations hitchhiking with a beneficial driver may provide an additional fitness advantage distributed across one or multiple loci (Figure 4). The implications of the ongoing diversification by chromosomal rearrangements are worthwhile pursuing further, both theoretically and experimentally. Even if a driver mutation were to fully fix, a substantial amount of genetic variation would remain. Multiple genetic backgrounds with the same driver mutation would diverge (Hermisson and Pennings, 2005), and it may drastically alter the theoretical expectation of a sharp transition between evolutionary regimes at the selective threshold (Good et al., 2012, Schiffels et al., 2011). Experimentally, recently developed genome-editing techniques may enable localizing and measuring the fitness effect of specific LOH regions (Sadhu et al., 2016).

We carried out background-averaged fitness measurements of a recombinant library of pre-existing and de novo mutations. We found that large-effect mutations, such as those in the TOR pathway, confer resistance to rapamycin regardless of the genetic background where they arise. These mutations were of sufficient magnitude to surpass the bulk of the fitness distribution and can be interpreted to be above the selective threshold. Conversely, the pre-existing fitness variance influenced the fate of de novo drivers like RNR2 and RNR4 mutations, which needed to land on a favorable background to be competitive. Thus far, most biological systems have been found at the edge of the two regimes. Large-effect mutations being amplified on well-adapted background genotypes have been observed in laboratory populations (Lang et al., 2011) and in the wild (e.g., in the seasonal influenza virus; Illingworth and Mustonen, 2012, Luksza and Lässig, 2014), which suggests that these dynamics represent a general mode of adaptation. Interestingly, our combinatorial strategy of background averaging shows that both of the limit cases can be true. Thus, the predictability of the outcomes of selection will hinge on characterizing the background fitness variance and finding a common framework to describe the selective potential of a population (Boyer et al., 2016). Detecting a known driver mutation without a measurement of the background fitness distribution will be insufficient to predict its ultimate fate. This is a necessary requisite to eventually rationalize the design of therapies for the treatment of bacterial and viral infections or cancer. It may also be possible to balance and control the fitness effects of pre-existent and de novo mutations—i.e., to change the selective threshold; for example, by modulating the dose-dependent effects of inhibitors (Chevereau et al., 2015) or by inhibiting global regulators (Jarosz and Lindquist, 2010).

Taken together, our findings can help us understand the evolution of large asexual populations with extensive genetic variation. Bacterial infections and cancer, which easily reach sizes of billions of cells, host a comparable mutation load before any selective treatment is applied. For example, the number of pre-existing variants in our experiment is comparable with the typical number of somatic mutations accrued before treatment during carcinogenesis, which varies between 102–105 depending on the cancer type (Lawrence et al., 2013), and it is also comparable with the genetic diversity in bacterial communities (e.g., in cystic fibrosis patients; Lieberman et al., 2014). In either of these cases, the number of possible mutations available to escape antimicrobial or chemotherapy drugs is limited, and it is comparable with the balance we observe between the number of drivers and passengers. Clearly, whether these results hold true more generally needs to be studied across systems. Overall, we hope that our results will encourage new theoretical and empirical investigations of the complex interplay of selection simultaneously acting on pre-existing and de novo genetic variation and of the role of genomic instability continuously molding the genomes in a population.

Experimental Procedures

A summary of the experimental protocols of this study is presented here. A full exposé of the experimental methods is given in the Supplemental Experimental Procedures, where we describe protocols for clone isolation, engineering genetic constructs, genetic crossing, fluctuation assays, and growth phenotyping. This is followed by a presentation of the theory and data analysis, where we define the model for localization of drivers among hitchhiking passengers and the probabilistic inference method for subclonal reconstruction. Furthermore, we also discuss the model for the estimation of variance components from background-averaged fitness measurements.

Study Design

In our study, we begin with two yeast strains that have diverged over millions of generations (divergence phase) and are randomly mated by meiotic recombination to generate a large pool of recombinant mosaic haplotypes (crossing phase), followed by applying a selective constraint of the population under stress (selection phase).

Divergence Phase

Parental strains were derived from a WA strain (DBVPG6044; MATα, ura3::KanMX, lys2::URA3, ho::HphMX) isolated from palm wine and a NA strain (YPS128; MATa, ura3::KanMX, ho::HphMX) isolated from the oak tree. These strains were selected from two diverged S. cerevisiae lineages and feature 52,466 single-nucleotide differences uniformly distributed across the genome.

Crossing Phase

The selection experiments were carried out using WA, NA, WAxNA F2, and WAxNA F12 founder populations derived from hybrids between WA and NA. The WAxNA F2 and F12 populations were, respectively, generated from the F1 and F11 hybrids between WA and NA. The WAxNA F1/F11 diploid populations were expanded in YPD and sporulated in solid potassium acetate (KAc) medium (2% potassium acetate, 2% agar) for 14 days at 23°C. Sporulation of diploids was confirmed by visual inspection of asci. Over 90% of sporulation efficiency was observed after 14 days. Any remaining unsporulated cells were selectively removed using the ether protocol (Parts et al., 2011). The haploid population was subjected to mass mating according to the protocol described by Parts et al. (2011). Briefly, the asci were resuspended in 900 μL of sterile water and digested with 100 μL of zymolase (10 mg mL−1) for 1 hr at 37°C. The cells were washed twice with 800 μL of sterile water, vortexed for 5 min to allow spore dispersion, plated in YPD, and incubated for 2 days at 23°C. The YPD plates were replica-plated in minimal medium to select diploid cells (MATa/MATα, LYS2/lys2::URA3). The WAxNA F2/F12 generation was collected from the plates and used as a founder population for the selection experiments and stored at −80°C as a frozen stock.

Selection Phase

In the selection phase, WA, NA, WAxNA F2, and WAxNA F12 founder populations (referred to as ancestral) were evolved asexually in two selective environments and one control environment. Each of the ancestral populations consisted of a total population size of 3.2×107 cells, determined by plating and counting colony-forming units. We serially propagated multiple replicate populations over a period of 32 days, which we refer to as evolved populations. Every 48 hr, 1:10 of the total cell population was transferred to fresh plates, avoiding severe bottlenecks to minimize the effect of genetic drift. We estimated that 1.74 generations per day took place in hydroxyurea and 1.63 generations per day in rapamycin, based on the mean growth rate of three representative populations in each environment and accounting for acceleration and deceleration of growth every 48 hr cycle (Supplemental Experimental Procedures). These empirical estimates amount to ∼54 generations between 0 and 32 days, in agreement with a theoretical bound on the number of generations, assuming exponential growth with a 1:10 dilution factor every 48 hr.

Where indicated, the selective media were supplemented with hydroxyurea (HU) at 10 mg mL−1 or rapamycin (RM) at 0.025 μg mL−1 and maintained at constant drug concentration until day 34. The drug concentrations were chosen based on the dose response of the WA and NA strains. We selected concentrations that maximized the differential growth between the two diploid parents in each environment. We observed a clear dose response in hydroxyurea, with at least 10-fold differential growth between the two diploid parent strains at 10 mg mL−1 (Figure S7). For rapamycin, we used 0.025 μg mL−1, which also results in a 10-fold difference between the parent strains (Figure S8). This concentration is well below the minimum inhibitory concentration of 0.1 μg mL−1 originally used to identify the highly penetrant TOR1 mutations in the lab strain (Heitman et al., 1991).

Whole-Genome Sequencing and Phenotyping

We followed the evolution of these populations over the course of the experiment using whole-genome sequencing and phenotyping of the bulk population and of ancestral and evolved isolates. WA and NA populations are labeled by their background, the environment in the selection phase, and the selection replicate; e.g., NA RM 1. WAxNA populations are labeled by background, number of crossing rounds, cross replicate, selection environment, and selection replicate; e.g., WAxNA F12 2 HU 1. Time series samples are labeled from T0 to T32, and isolate clones carry a suffix; e.g., C1, C2, etc. Whole-population sequencing was performed after t  =  0, 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 days, and ancestral and evolved individuals were also sequenced (Table S1). Genomic DNA was extracted from the samples using the Yeast MasterPure kit (Epicenter, USA). The samples were sequenced with Illumina TruSeq SBS v4 chemistry using paired-end sequencing on Illumina HiSeq 2000/2500 at the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. Phenotyping of ancestral and evolved individuals was performed by monitoring growth after t  =  0 and 32 days using transmissive scanning (Supplemental Experimental Procedures).

Author Contributions

I.V.-G., J.W., V.M., and G.L. designed the research. F.S., J.L., B.B., J.H., A.B., and E.A.P. conducted the experiments. I.V.-G., A.F., and V.M. developed the theory, implemented computational methods, and analyzed data. I.V.-G., V.M., and G.L. wrote the paper.

Acknowledgments

We thank Agnès Llored, Jordi Tronchoni, and Martin Zackrisson for technical help; Elizabeth Gibson for support with library preparation and sequencing; and Erik Garrison, Daniel Kunz, Leopold Parts, David Posada, and Magda Reis for critical reading of the manuscript. We also thank participants of the program on Evolution of Drug Resistance held at the Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics (University of California, Santa Barbara) for discussions. I.V.-G. is a recipient of a Wellcome Trust Ph.D. fellowship and a Sanger Early Career Innovation Award. This research was supported by Wellcome Trust grants WT097678 (to I.V.-G.) and WT098051 (to V.M.), Fundación Ibercaja (to I.V.-G.), ATIP-Avenir (CNRS/INSERM), Fondation ARC grant SFI20111203947, FP7-PEOPLE-2012-CIG grant 322035, French National Research Agency grant ANR-13-BSV6-0006-01, Cancéropôle PACA (AAP Emergence), and a DuPont Young Professor Award (to G.L.). F.S. was supported by ATIP-Avenir (CNRS/INSERM), Becas Chile grant 74130015, CONICYT/FONDECYT grant 3150156, and MN-FISB grant NC120043 postdoctoral fellowships. A.F. was supported by German Research Foundation grant FI 1882/1-1, J.L. by Fondation ARC grant PDF20140601375, B.B. by La Ligue Contre le Cancer grant GB-MA-CD-11287, and J.H. by French National Research Agency grant 11-LABX-0028-01.

Published: October 17, 2017

Footnotes

Supplemental Information includes Supplemental Experimental Procedures, twelve figures, and six tables and can be found with this article online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.046.

Contributor Information

Ignacio Vázquez-García, Email: ivg@sanger.ac.uk.

Ville Mustonen, Email: v.mustonen@helsinki.fi.

Gianni Liti, Email: gianni.liti@unice.fr.

Data and Software Availability

The study accessions for the sequence data reported in this paper are available from the European Nucleotide Archive (ENA) and the NCBI BioProject. The dataset in study accession PRJEB2608 corresponds to raw DNA sequence reads previously reported in Parts et al. (2011). The dataset in study accession PRJEB4645 corresponds to raw DNA sequence reads newly reported in this study. The dataset in study accession PRJEB13491 corresponds to mutation calls in the two aforementioned datasets. All datasets have been jointly analyzed in this manuscript.

Phenotype data, fluctuation assay data, code, and notebooks are available from the GitHub repository (https://github.com/ivazquez/clonal-heterogeneity)

Supplemental Information

Document S1. Supplemental Experimental Procedures, Figures S1–S12, and Table S1–S6
mmc1.pdf (9MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supplemental Information
mmc2.pdf (12.9MB, pdf)

References

  1. Balaban N.Q., Merrin J., Chait R., Kowalik L., Leibler S. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science. 2004;305:1622–1625. doi: 10.1126/science.1099390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Barbera M.A., Petes T.D. Selection and analysis of spontaneous reciprocal mitotic cross-overs in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:12819–12824. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605778103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Barrick J.E., Lenski R.E. Genome dynamics during experimental evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013;14:827–839. doi: 10.1038/nrg3564. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Boyer S., Biswas D., Kumar Soshee A., Scaramozzino N., Nizak C., Rivoire O. Hierarchy and extremes in selections from pools of randomized proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:3482–3487. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517813113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burke M.K., Dunham J.P., Shahrestani P., Thornton K.R., Rose M.R., Long A.D. Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila. Nature. 2010;467:587–590. doi: 10.1038/nature09352. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Burke M.K., Liti G., Long A.D. Standing genetic variation drives repeatable experimental evolution in outcrossing populations of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2014;31:3228–3239. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msu256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chevereau G., Dravecká M., Batur T., Guvenek A., Ayhan D.H., Toprak E., Bollenbach T. Quantifying the determinants of evolutionary dynamics leading to drug resistance. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002299. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Desai M.M., Fisher D.S. Beneficial mutation selection balance and the effect of linkage on positive selection. Genetics. 2007;176:1759–1798. doi: 10.1534/genetics.106.067678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dunham M.J., Badrane H., Ferea T., Adams J., Brown P.O., Rosenzweig F., Botstein D. Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:16144–16149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.242624799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Fischer A., Vázquez-García I., Illingworth C.J.R., Mustonen V. High-definition reconstruction of clonal composition in cancer. Cell Rep. 2014;7:1740–1752. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.04.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Flot J.-F., Hespeels B., Li X., Noel B., Arkhipova I., Danchin E.G.J., Hejnol A., Henrissat B., Koszul R., Aury J.-M. Genomic evidence for ameiotic evolution in the bdelloid rotifer Adineta vaga. Nature. 2013;500:453–457. doi: 10.1038/nature12326. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gerlinger M., Rowan A.J., Horswell S., Math M., Larkin J., Endesfelder D., Gronroos E., Martinez P., Matthews N., Stewart A. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion sequencing. N. Engl. J. Med. 2012;366:883–892. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Gerrish P.J., Lenski R.E. The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica. 1998;102-103:127–144. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerstein A.C., Kuzmin A., Otto S.P. Loss-of-heterozygosity facilitates passage through Haldane’s sieve for Saccharomyces cerevisiae undergoing adaptation. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3819. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Good B.H., Rouzine I.M., Balick D.J., Hallatschek O., Desai M.M. Distribution of fixed beneficial mutations and the rate of adaptation in asexual populations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:4950–4955. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1119910109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Heitman J., Movva N.R., Hall M.N. Targets for cell cycle arrest by the immunosuppressant rapamycin in yeast. Science. 1991;253:905–909. doi: 10.1126/science.1715094. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Hermisson J., Pennings P.S. Soft sweeps: molecular population genetics of adaptation from standing genetic variation. Genetics. 2005;169:2335–2352. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.036947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Illingworth C.J.R., Mustonen V. Components of selection in the evolution of the influenza virus: linkage effects beat inherent selection. PLoS Pathog. 2012;8:e1003091. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Illingworth C.J.R., Parts L., Schiffels S., Liti G., Mustonen V. Quantifying selection acting on a complex trait using allele frequency time series data. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2012;29:1187–1197. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msr289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jarosz D.F., Lindquist S. Hsp90 and environmental stress transform the adaptive value of natural genetic variation. Science. 2010;330:1820–1824. doi: 10.1126/science.1195487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Landau D.A., Carter S.L., Stojanov P., McKenna A., Stevenson K., Lawrence M.S., Sougnez C., Stewart C., Sivachenko A., Wang L. Evolution and impact of subclonal mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Cell. 2013;152:714–726. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.01.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lang G.I., Botstein D., Desai M.M. Genetic variation and the fate of beneficial mutations in asexual populations. Genetics. 2011;188:647–661. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.128942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Lang G.I., Rice D.P., Hickman M.J., Sodergren E., Weinstock G.M., Botstein D., Desai M.M. Pervasive genetic hitchhiking and clonal interference in forty evolving yeast populations. Nature. 2013;500:571–574. doi: 10.1038/nature12344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Lawrence M.S., Stojanov P., Polak P., Kryukov G.V., Cibulskis K., Sivachenko A., Carter S.L., Stewart C., Mermel C.H., Roberts S.A. Mutational heterogeneity in cancer and the search for new cancer-associated genes. Nature. 2013;499:214–218. doi: 10.1038/nature12213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Levy S.F., Blundell J.R., Venkataram S., Petrov D.A., Fisher D.S., Sherlock G. Quantitative evolutionary dynamics using high-resolution lineage tracking. Nature. 2015;519:181–186. doi: 10.1038/nature14279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lieberman T.D., Flett K.B., Yelin I., Martin T.R., McAdam A.J., Priebe G.P., Kishony R. Genetic variation of a bacterial pathogen within individuals with cystic fibrosis provides a record of selective pressures. Nat. Genet. 2014;46:82–87. doi: 10.1038/ng.2848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Luksza M., Lässig M. A predictive fitness model for influenza. Nature. 2014;507:57–61. doi: 10.1038/nature13087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Luria S.E., Delbrück M. Mutations of bacteria from virus sensitivity to virus resistance. Genetics. 1943;28:491–511. doi: 10.1093/genetics/28.6.491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Marusyk A., Tabassum D.P., Altrock P.M., Almendro V., Michor F., Polyak K. Non-cell-autonomous driving of tumour growth supports sub-clonal heterogeneity. Nature. 2014;514:54–58. doi: 10.1038/nature13556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. McLaren W., Gil L., Hunt S.E., Riat H.S., Ritchie G.R.S., Thormann A., Flicek P., Cunningham F. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol. 2016;17:122. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-0974-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Neher R.A. Genetic draft, selective interference, and population genetics of rapid adaptation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2013;44:195–215. [Google Scholar]
  32. Orr H.A., Betancourt A.J. Haldane’s sieve and adaptation from the standing genetic variation. Genetics. 2001;157:875–884. doi: 10.1093/genetics/157.2.875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Parsons A.B., Brost R.L., Ding H., Li Z., Zhang C., Sheikh B., Brown G.W., Kane P.M., Hughes T.R., Boone C. Integration of chemical-genetic and genetic interaction data links bioactive compounds to cellular target pathways. Nat. Biotechnol. 2004;22:62–69. doi: 10.1038/nbt919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Parts L., Cubillos F.A., Warringer J., Jain K., Salinas F., Bumpstead S.J., Molin M., Zia A., Simpson J.T., Quail M.A. Revealing the genetic structure of a trait by sequencing a population under selection. Genome Res. 2011;21:1131–1138. doi: 10.1101/gr.116731.110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Peter B.M., Huerta-Sanchez E., Nielsen R. Distinguishing between selective sweeps from standing variation and from a de novo mutation. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:e1003011. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rouzine I.M., Coffin J.M. Evolution of human immunodeficiency virus under selection and weak recombination. Genetics. 2005;170:7–18. doi: 10.1534/genetics.104.029926. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Sadhu M.J., Bloom J.S., Day L., Kruglyak L. CRISPR-directed mitotic recombination enables genetic mapping without crosses. Science. 2016;352:1113–1116. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Schiffels S., Szöllosi G.J., Mustonen V., Lässig M. Emergent neutrality in adaptive asexual evolution. Genetics. 2011;189:1361–1375. doi: 10.1534/genetics.111.132027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Selmecki A.M., Maruvka Y.E., Richmond P.A., Guillet M., Shoresh N., Sorenson A.L., De S., Kishony R., Michor F., Dowell R., Pellman D. Polyploidy can drive rapid adaptation in yeast. Nature. 2015;519:349–352. doi: 10.1038/nature14187. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Stephens P.J., Greenman C.D., Fu B., Yang F., Bignell G.R., Mudie L.J., Pleasance E.D., Lau K.W., Beare D., Stebbings L.A. Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development. Cell. 2011;144:27–40. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Toprak E., Veres A., Michel J.-B., Chait R., Hartl D.L., Kishony R. Evolutionary paths to antibiotic resistance under dynamically sustained drug selection. Nat. Genet. 2011;44:101–105. doi: 10.1038/ng.1034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Venkataram S., Dunn B., Li Y., Agarwala A., Chang J., Ebel E.R., Geiler-Samerotte K., Hérissant L., Blundell J.R., Levy S.F. Development of a comprehensive genotype-to-fitness map of adaptation-driving mutations in yeast. Cell. 2016;166:1585–1596.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhu Y.O., Siegal M.L., Hall D.W., Petrov D.A. Precise estimates of mutation rate and spectrum in yeast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E2310–E2318. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1323011111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. zur Wiesch P.A., Kouyos R., Engelstädter J., Regoes R.R., Bonhoeffer S. Population biological principles of drug-resistance evolution in infectious diseases. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2011;11:236–247. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(10)70264-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Document S1. Supplemental Experimental Procedures, Figures S1–S12, and Table S1–S6
mmc1.pdf (9MB, pdf)
Document S2. Article plus Supplemental Information
mmc2.pdf (12.9MB, pdf)

RESOURCES