Abstract
PTEN phosphatase acts as a tumor suppressor by negatively regulating the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway. It is unclear which downstream components of this pathway are necessary for oncogenic transformation. In this report we show that transformed cells of PTEN+/− mice have elevated levels of phosphorylated Akt and activated p70/S6 kinase associated with an increase in proliferation. Pharmacological inactivation of mTOR/RAFT/FRAP reduced neoplastic proliferation, tumor size, and p70/S6 kinase activity, but did not affect the status of Akt. These data suggest that p70/S6K and possibly other targets of mTOR contribute significantly to tumor development and that inhibition of these proteins may be therapeutic for cancer patients with deranged PI3K signaling.
The PTEN tumor suppressor is mutated in a wide variety of human sporadic and inherited cancers (1). PTEN acts as a negative regulator of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) signaling pathway by dephosphorylating the second messengers phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate [PtdIns(3,4,5)P3] and phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate [PtdIns(3,4)P2] at the D3 position of the inositol ring, thereby opposing PI3K function (2). Consistent with the role of PTEN as a PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 phosphatase, Pten-deficient cells have elevated levels of intracellular PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 (3, 4).
In flies, expression of PTEN can rescue lethality caused by overexpression of d-PI3K (Dp110) or the fly insulin receptor (Inr) (5, 6). The loss-of-function phenotypes of dPTEN, increased cell size and proliferation, are suppressed by inactivating mutations in dAKT1 and the translational initiation factor eif4A, suggesting that dPTEN acts through the AKT-signaling pathway to regulate translation (7). Loss-of-function mutations in another translational regulator, Drosophila p70/S6 kinase (dS6K) (8), as well as its upstream regulators dPI3K, Inr, and chico (fly insulin receptor substrate 1–4) decrease cell size in Drosophila (9). For p70/S6 kinase (S6K) the ability to control cell size is conserved in mammals (10, 11). In addition, S6K−/− mouse embryonic stem cells have a defect in proliferation with a greater proportion of cells in G0/G1 (10). The increased size and proliferation of dPTEN-deficient cells is consistent with the antagonistic role of PTEN in the PI3K-signaling pathway and suggests that PTEN may play a role in regulating S6K.
Mitogen-induced activation of S6K is mediated through the PI3K-dependent phosphorylation of several residues (12, 13). This activation is in part performed by 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1 (14, 15). In addition, membrane-tethered AKT is able to activate S6K, whereas untethered, activated mutants of AKT do not have this effect (16). Activation of S6K can be blocked by the pharmacological agent rapamycin (17, 18). Rapamycin has potent immunosuppressant and tumor inhibitory activities (19). To exert its effect, rapamycin binds an immunophilin, FK-506-binding protein 12, and this complex inhibits the cellular target of rapamycin, mTOR/RAFT/FRAP (20–22). mTOR is a member of the ataxia-telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) family of kinases that seems to function in a checkpoint for nutritional status in G1 and in response to the PI3K/AKT pathway (23, 24). AKT can directly phosphorylate mTOR (25, 26), although the impact of this phosphorylation on the activity of mTOR has not been firmly established. Several studies have demonstrated control of S6K activity by mTOR by direct (27, 28) and indirect (29–31) mechanisms. Recent studies of the fly homolog of mTOR, dTOR, have demonstrated that mutants of dTOR have reduced cell size and proliferation and fail to develop to maturity (32, 33). Overexpression of dS6K rescued dTOR mutants from embryonic lethality (32). Moreover, the large cell size and hyperproliferative phenotypes of dPTEN were completely masked by mutation of dTOR. These data suggest that dS6K is a critical downstream target of dTOR and dPTEN.
S6K is amplified and overexpressed in breast cancer, which suggests a potential oncogenic function (34, 35). Constitutive activation of S6K in PTEN-deficient tumor cells has been reported previously and can be corrected by reintroduction of PTEN (36). To investigate the potential contribution of the mTOR/S6K pathway to the transformation induced by Pten loss, we examined the effect of inhibiting mTOR with the rapamycin ester CCI-779 in the Pten+/− mouse tumor model system.
Materials and Methods
Mice and Treatment.
Pten+/− mice were generated as described (37). The rapamycin analog CCI-779 was provided by Wyeth Ayerst Laboratories (Marietta, PA). The drug was first diluted to 50 mg/ml in 100% ethanol and then quickly mixed with 5% Tween-80 (GIBCO/BRL)/5% polyethylene glycol-400 (Sigma) to a 2 mg/ml drug/4% ethanol final concentration. The drug solution, or the vehicle alone, was delivered to mice through the tail vein at a dose of 20 mg/kg (10 μl/g of body weight).
Histology.
Mice were given i.p. injections of 125 mg/kg of BrdUrd (Sigma) 1 h before euthanasia. Organs for histological analysis were kept in 10% formalin overnight, then changed to 70% ethanol. Paraffin embedding was performed no later than a week after organ collection. For the long-term CCI-779 experiment, paraffin tissue blocks from individual mice were coded from 1 to 20 and hematoxylin/eosin stains of those were analyzed in blinded fashion by at least three investigators (K.P., R.P., P.F., and L.H.-E.). Catecholamines were measured from blood collected at the time of death with an HPLC kit from Bio-Rad according to the manufacturer's instructions.
Immunohistochemistry.
All immunohistochemistry stains were performed on 4-μm-thick tissue slices as described (38). The following antibodies and dilutions were used: mouse monoclonal anti-BrdUrd (Becton Dickinson) 1:200, rabbit polyclonal anti-PTEN (Neomarkers Ab-2) 1:500, rabbit polyclonal anti-phospho-AKT (Ser-473; NEB, Beverly, MA) 1:50, and mouse monoclonal anti-p27 (Transduction Laboratories, Lexington, KY) 1:500. Apoptosis was measured with the terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay. Positive controls included irradiated organs and DNase-treated sections. The apoptotic index was calculated similar to the BrdUrd incorporation index (see below). TUNEL staining was performed on paraffin-embedded sections that were deparaffinized in xylenes and transferred to 95% methanol and then water. Slides then were treated with 20 μg/ml proteinase K for 20 min, washed, and endogenous peroxidases were blocked in 3% H2O2 in methanol, dipped in terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase (TdT) buffer, and incubated for 60 min at 37°C with the TdT/Bio-16-dUTP mix. After a wash, slides were incubated with Avidin-horseradish peroxidase (Dako) 1:400 for 20 min. The horseradish peroxidase substrate 3-amino-9-ethylcarbazole was incubated with the slides in a glass contained in the acetate buffer (10.5 mM acetic acid/80 mM Na acetate solution, pH 5.5) until full color development and counterstained with Mayer's hematoxylin.
Measurement of Proliferation, Apoptosis, Lesion Size.
Anti-BrdUrd and TUNEL-stained uterine cross-sections (3–5 per mouse) and adrenal medullas were acquired at ×40 magnification by a Diagnostic Instruments (Sterling Heights, MI) digital SPOT (Diagnostic Instruments, Sterling Heights, MI) camera in Adobe PHOTOSHOP. Vertical and horizontal diameters of the uteri, complex atypical hyperplasia (CAH) lesions, and medullas were measured by using the loop tool. All BrdUrd- and TUNEL-positive cells were counted in the secretory epithelium of the uterus and in the medulla. Resulting numbers were entered in a Microsoft EXCEL spreadsheet. Areas were calculated by averaging horizontal and vertical diameters to obtain the radius. The BrdUrd and TUNEL indexes for adrenals in all experiments and untreated and short-term-treated uterine samples were calculated by dividing the absolute number of positive cells by the uterine or adrenal section area. In transition zones, up to 100 nuclei were counted in transformed and nontransformed regions, and the BrdUrd index was calculated per total number of nuclei. For the long-term treatment group, all secretory epithelial cells were counted in one section per mouse, and the BrdUrd and TUNEL index was calculated per total number of cells. Lesions in stained sections were acquired at ×25 magnification and measured with use of NIH IMAGE 1.62. P values were calculated with Student's t test. Error bars represent standard deviation. P values were obtained by comparing two given groups by Student's two-tailed t test.
Western Blotting.
Frozen uteri and adrenals were ground in liquid nitrogen by mortar and pestle and tissue powder was transferred into 1× loading buffer and boiled for 5 min. Samples were spun and soluble protein concentrations were determined before loading on a gel. Antibodies to AKT and phospho-389-S6K were obtained from NEB and anti-tubulin was purchased from Babco (Richmond, CA). The C-2 antibody for S6K was used.
Pten Loss of Heterozygosity.
To study loss of heterozygosity of Pten in the CAH of the endometrium, the wild-type and mutant alleles were amplified from DNA prepared from microdissected, formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded uterine lesions. Both the mutant and wild-type alleles were amplified simultaneously by using a common 5′ primer within intron 4 and two 3′ primers, one within exon 5 of Pten and one within the Pgk gene: GGGATTATCTTTTTGCAACAGT (Pten 5′), GGCCTCTTGTGCCTTTA (Pten 3′), and TTCCTGACTAGGGGAGGAGT (Pgk 3′). Tail DNAs of a healthy PTEN heterozygous mouse and a wild-type mouse were used as controls. PCR was performed in 50-μl reactions containing 10 mM Tris⋅HCl (pH 9.2), 1.5 mM MgCl2, 75 mM KCl, 0.4 μM of each 3′ primer, 0.8 μM 5′ primer, 160 μM each dNTP, and 2.5 units of Taq polymerase(GIBCO). Forty cycles of PCR were performed; each cycle consisted of 1 min at 95°C, 1 min at 57°C, and 1 min at 72°C followed by a single 5-min extension at 72°C. To study the loss of heterozygosity of Pten in the adrenals, Southern blotting was performed on DNA extracted from normal adrenals, pheochromocytomas, and tail DNA as a control. 3′ probe flanking the targeted region was used on the PstI-digested DNA.
S6K Assay.
The S6K kinase assay was performed essentially as described previously (10, 39). In short, frozen uteri of 35- to 50-week-old animals were homogenized in 10 mM KPO4, 10 mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, and 0.1% Nonidet P-40 in the presence of protease and phosphatase inhibitors. Protein concentration was measured from the soluble fraction, and samples were normalized to equal protein concentration in each experiment. S6K was immunoprecipitated from tissue lysates with protein A/G agarose (C-18, Santa Cruz Biotechnology) at 4°C overnight. Samples were washed twice in the lysis buffer followed by a wash in kinase buffer (20 mM Tris, pH 7.5/10 mM MgCl2/0.1 mg/ml BSA/0.4 mM DTT). The kinase reaction was performed at 30°C for15 min in the presence of 100 μM ATP, 200 μCi/ml [γ-32P]ATP, and 125 μM S6 peptide substrate (Upstate Biotechnology, Lake Placid, NY). Stopped reactions were loaded onto phosphocellulose columns (Pierce) and unbound label was washed with 75 mM phosphoric acid. Bound, labeled probe was measured in a liquid scintillation counter.
Results
To use the Pten+/− mice for preclinical trials of candidate drugs, the penetrance and variability of tumor phenotypes was documented. Multifocal CAH developed in the uterine secretory epithelium of almost every (29/30) Pten+/− female mouse by 26 weeks of age. Two types of transformed lesions were present: cribriform glands and transformed cysts. Cribriform glands were defined as continuous foci of crowded glands. Transformed cysts were defined as cavities fully or partially lined with transformed epithelium. Some cavities appeared empty and some were filled with necrotic masses. In some sections a stretch of normal epithelium was observed in the cyst wall, with a clear transition zone between normal and transformed epithelium. Some of the older wild-type mice had cysts in the endometrium, but the epithelial lining was never transformed. We also observed that nearly all of the Pten+/− mice developed neoplasia of the chromaffin cells of the adrenal medulla by 6 months (48/49; Fig. 1 A and B). This neoplasia was bilateral and multifocal. In mice more than 1 year of age the tumors were frequently diagnosed as pheochromocytomas. Elevated serum levels of both norepinephrine (P = 0.069) and epinephrine (P = 0.039) suggested that the tumor cells retained some of the functional characteristics of the chromaffin cell (Fig. 1 C and D).
Proliferation Is Increased in the Lesions.
Loss of Pten has been linked to both increased proliferation and to defects in apoptosis. To investigate whether either of these mechanisms contributed to uterine neoplasia, we first studied the frequency of BrdUrd incorporation in wild-type and mutant uteri of 35- to 38-week-old animals. Overall, Pten+/− uterine CAH had a 2-fold increase in BrdUrd-positive cells when compared with wild-type secretory epithelium (+/−, n = 4; wild type, n = 3; Fig. 2A). Analysis of seven cystic lesions composed of both transformed and untransformed epithelium revealed a 3-fold increase in BrdUrd-positive cells in the transformed epithelium (Fig. 2B; P = 0.007). At the same time we measured the level of BrdUrd incorporation in the adrenal medulla. We found that there was a substantial increase in the proliferation of medullary cells of Pten+/− mice that occurred in regions of neoplasia (Fig. 2 C–E; P < 0.001). With use of terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase labeling of DNA nicks with the TUNEL assay on the same tissues, no difference in the apoptotic frequency was observed between wild-type and heterozygous tissues (data not shown).
Loss of the Wild-Type Allele Occurs in the Lesions.
Uteri then were examined for loss of wild-type Pten. Protein expression analysis of the total lysates of mutant uteri demonstrated reduced PTEN expression relative to wild type (data not shown). PCR analysis of the individual lesions in seven Pten+/− mice detected loss of the wild-type Pten allele in 30% (9/30) lesions studied (Fig. 3A). An example of loss of heterozygosity in a lesion is shown in lane 3; lesions with no discernible loss of heterozygosity are shown in lanes 4 and 5 (Fig. 3A). The frequency of loss may be an underestimate because of normal tissue contamination during microdissection. In the adrenal lesions, loss of the wild-type allele was observed in five of six heterozygous adrenals by Southern blotting (Fig. 3B).
Neoplasia Is Characterized by Reduced PTEN Expression and Increased Phosphorylation of AKT.
Immunohistochemical analysis of uterine sections demonstrated that untransformed epithelial cells stained intensely for PTEN in the cytoplasm, whereas significantly decreased levels of Pten staining occurred in regions of transformation (n = 60; Fig. 3 C and D). Pten-deficient cells typically have activated AKT. Analysis of phosphorylated Akt in the serial sections of the uteri of Pten+/− mice detected phospho-Akt (Ser-473) in all of the areas of transformation (n = 60) in a membrane-specific pattern (Fig. 3E). The signal also corresponded precisely to the areas of Pten down-regulation. Staining for total AKT revealed that nearly all of the AKT shifted from the cytoplasm and nucleus in normal epithelium to the membrane in CAH (data not shown). We did not detect phospho-Akt in any of the uterine sections of 35- to 38-week-old wild-type mice (data not shown). In the adrenal medulla, staining for PTEN occurred in both the nucleus and cytoplasm of medullary chromaffin cells (Fig. 3F). In Pten+/− mice, multifocal regions of reduced PTEN expression were found. An example of a focus of reduced staining is shown in Fig. 3F. In addition, increased staining for phospho-AKT could be detected in areas of reduced PTEN staining (Fig. 3G).
Altered Activity of S6K in the Neoplastic Uterus.
Because CAH was consistently found in older Pten+/− mice, we decided to determine whether S6K kinase activity was elevated in their uteri. We also tested whether a mTOR inhibitor could affect S6K activity in established endogenous tumors. We chose to use the rapamycin ester, CCI-779, which was developed for i.v. administration in cancer patients (19, ‡‡). For 3 days, 34- to 44-week-old Pten+/− females were injected once daily with 20 mg/kg CCI-779 or the vehicle only. The choice of dose was based on prior studies of mouse response to CCI-779 (J.G., unpublished observations). Tissues were collected on the last day of injection from treated (n = 3) and untreated (n = 4) Pten+/− and untreated wild-type (n = 4) mice. S6K activity was elevated in the uteri of heterozygous mice relative to wild type (Fig. 4A). CCI-779 seemed to inhibit kinase activity to wild-type levels. Uterine lysates also were analyzed for the mobility of S6K, because its slower migrating form is associated with increased phosphorylation and kinase activity. Lysates from starved and epidermal growth factor-pulsed 293 cells were loaded as controls for the detection of the fast- and slow-moving species. The slow-moving species of S6K was observed only in the epidermal growth factor-treated 293 lysate and the lysates from two untreated Pten heterozygous uteri (Fig. 4C). CCI-779 treatment led to the presence of only the hypophosphorylated, inactive, and faster migrating form. Uteri of Pten heterozygous females that received CCI-779 injections for 3 days had a modest 40% reduction in epithelial proliferation (Fig. 4B). Although CCI-779 had a marked effect on S6K activity, the level of phospho-Akt (Ser-473) was not affected in either uterine or adrenal tissues (Fig. 4D). No difference in apoptosis levels was detected among the different groups as assessed by terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase labeling of DNA nicks (data not shown).
Trial of CCI-779 in Pten+/− Mice.
To determine whether CCI-779 could be used to treat the mouse tumors, a longer course of CCI-779 was given. A second group of Pten+/− females (24–28 weeks old) were injected daily with 20 mg/kg CCI-779 (n = 7) or vehicle (n = 7), or were left untreated (n = 6) for 10 weeks (weeks 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8: 5 days on, 2 days off; weeks 3, 5, 7: 7 days off; week 9: 4 days on, 3 days off; week 10: 2 days on). Tissues were collected on the day after the last injection. Long-term treatment with CCI-779 produced detectable improvement in the health of the animals. Animals receiving drug injections appeared more active, and by the end of the study all were alive, whereas three animals died in the untreated and mock-treated groups. The cause of death was not determined, but was typically caused by uterine or gastrointestinal tumors.
We chose to focus on the drug's effect on the two tumor phenotypes with the highest penetrance by 25 weeks of age, uterine and adrenal medullary neoplasia. Morphological analysis showed that drug-treated Pten heterozygotes had a marked reduction in uterine and adrenal lesion size when compared with the mock-treated or untreated group (Fig. 5 A and B; P = 0.09, P = 0.039). However, the effect appeared to be cytostatic because lesion size of the treated group and untreated 26-week-old mice was similar. Drug-treated mice also had a substantial reduction in the frequency of BrdUrd incorporation in both types of neoplasia relative to mock-treated controls (Fig. 5 C and D; P = 0.028, P < 0.001). Immunohistochemical analysis of uterine sections still detected reduced Pten and activated Akt levels in drug-treated lesions (n = 35), indicating that the intervention occurred downstream of these molecules (Fig. 5 E and F). Although both PTEN and rapamycin have been linked to the regulation of p27, no alteration of p27 was detected by immunohistochemistry in either treated or untreated lesions (40, 41).
Discussion
It is likely that the loss of Pten found in the tumors of PTEN+/− mice leads to increased levels of PtdIns(3,4,5)P3, which in turn is able to activate AKT, 3-phosphoinositide-dependent kinase 1, S6K, mTOR, and many other proteins. In combination, these activated proteins probably contribute to the transformation and increased tumor proliferation that was observed in a variety of organs (Figs. 1 and 2). Of these activated proteins, S6K is likely to play a major role in the progression of the cell cycle into the S phase. Microinjection of anti-S6K antibodies into quiescent rat embryo fibroblasts prevents the mitogenic effect of serum (32, 33). In T cells, which are unable to proliferate in the presence of rapamycin, a rapamycin-resistant allele of S6K is sufficient to rescue the activation of an E2F reporter (42). S6K1−/− mouse embryonic stem cells have an elevated proportion of cells in G0/G1 and slower proliferation relative to wild type (10). Finally, dTOR mutation is associated with G0/G1 accumulation and lack of animal viability that can be rescued by overexpression of dS6K (32). Such data suggest that inhibition of S6K is an important mediator of the antiproliferative effects of mTOR.
Another regulator of translation and cell growth, 4E-BP1, is controlled by the PI3K/AKT and mTOR pathways (24, 25, 43, 44). In its unphosphorylated state, 4E-BP1 binds to EIF-4E to inhibit the translation of 5′-capped messages (45). On stimulation of cell growth, 4E-BP1 becomes phosphorylated and no longer inhibits translation. Inhibitors of mTOR block phosphorylation of 4E-BP1. Although we have not studied 4E-BP1 phosphorylation, alterations of its function may be contributing to the neoplasias that we see.
We conclude that the tumor stasis and the reduced proliferation that we have observed with the rapamycin analog CCI-779 is in part caused by the inhibition of the elevated S6K activity found in the tumors (Figs. 4 and 5). Our findings suggest that S6K and possibly other proteins regulated by mTOR contribute to the oncogenic effects of Pten loss.
Although we see a reduction in tumor proliferation in the mouse tumors, rapamycin and CCI-779 are not broadly antiproliferative. Rapamycin is well tolerated when administered in vivo and inhibits the growth of only a subset of tumors expressing mTOR (46). In a recent report by the Vogt lab, rapamycin was found to inhibit the growth of fibroblasts transformed with AKT and PI3K but had no effect on cells transformed with v-Jun or v-Src (47). This group found that the growth of v-H-Ras and v-Myc transformants was stimulated by rapamycin. It also has been reported that rapamycin is able to induce apoptosis in tumors. We have not seen such apoptosis and presume that this may be a reflection of the benign nature of the mouse neoplasias. Huang et al. have recently shed light on this paradox (48). They found that tumor cells and mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking intact p53 or p21 were unable to arrest in G1 in response to rapamycin and instead underwent apoptosis. However, when the p53 pathway was reconstituted or intact, cells arrested in G1 and did not die. These data suggest that rapamycin analogs may be more potent in the clinical setting in which the PTEN and p53 pathways are altered.
We have found that disease progression caused by Pten mutation can be delayed by inhibiting mTOR and biochemical targets downstream of mTOR such as S6K. This finding suggests that enzymes other than AKT are excellent targets for the treatment of PTEN−/− tumors. With respect to human endometrial cancers, which lack PTEN in more than 60% of cases, inhibition of mTOR may prove to be a useful agent for patients with disease that is refractory to standard treatments. Moreover, rapamycin and its analog CCI-779 are well tolerated in people, suggesting that there may be a usable therapeutic dose with limited systemic toxicity (19). In the future, it will be interesting to determine in Pten+/− mice whether the inducible disruption of S6K1, mTOR, or 4E-BP1 or a combination of these will have antitumor effects that are similar to CCI-779.
Acknowledgments
We thank Giorgio Cattoretti for his assistance with immunohistochemical staining and generous sharing of reagents. R.T.L. was supported by the Peter Jay Sharp Foundation, the Don Shula Foundation, and the American Society of Clinical Oncology. This work was supported by National Cancer Institute Grant CA 75553.
Abbreviations
- PI3K
phosphoinositide 3-kinase
- CAH
complex atypical hyperplasia
- PtdIns(3,4,5)P3
phosphatidylinositol-3,4,5-trisphosphate
- TUNEL
terminal deoxynucleotidyltransferase-mediated dUTP nick end labeling
Footnotes
This paper was submitted directly (Track II) to the PNAS office.
See commentary on page 10031.
Gibbons, J. J., Discafani, C., Petersen, R., Hernandez, R., Skotnicki, J. & Frost, P. (1999) Proc. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 40, 301 (abstr.).
References
- 1.Ali I U, Schriml L M, Dean M. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1922–1932. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.22.1922. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cantley L C, Neel B G. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4240–4245. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Stambolic V, Suzuki A, de la Pompa J L, Brothers G M, Mirtsos C, Sasaki T, Ruland J, Penninger J M, Siderovski D P, Mak T W. Cell. 1998;95:29–39. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)81780-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Sun H, Lesche R, Li D M, Liliental J, Zhang H, Gao J, Gavrilova N, Mueller B, Liu X, Wu H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:6199–6204. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.6199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Huang H, Potter C J, Tao W, Li D M, Brogiolo W, Hafen E, Sun H, Xu T. Development (Cambridge, UK) 1999;126:5365–5372. doi: 10.1242/dev.126.23.5365. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Goberdhan D C, Paricio N, Goodman E C, Mlodzik M, Wilson C. Genes Dev. 1999;13:3244–3258. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.24.3244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Gao X, Neufeld T P, Pan D. Dev Biol. 2000;221:404–418. doi: 10.1006/dbio.2000.9680. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Montagne J, Stewart M J, Stocker H, Hafen E, Kozma S C, Thomas G. Science. 1999;285:2126–2129. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5436.2126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Leevers S J. Science. 1999;285:2082–2083. doi: 10.1126/science.285.5436.2082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kawasome H, Papst P, Webb S, Keller G M, Johnson G L, Gelfand E W, Terada N. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:5033–5038. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.9.5033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Shima H, Pende M, Chen Y, Fumagalli S, Thomas G, Kozma S C. EMBO J. 1998;17:6649–6659. doi: 10.1093/emboj/17.22.6649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Chung J, Grammer T C, Lemon K P, Kazlauskas A, Blenis J. Nature (London) 1994;370:71–75. doi: 10.1038/370071a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Cheatham B, Vlahos C J, Cheatham L, Wang L, Blenis J, Kahn C R. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:4902–4911. doi: 10.1128/mcb.14.7.4902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alessi D R, Kozlowski M T, Weng Q P, Morrice N, Avruch J. Curr Biol. 1998;8:69–81. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(98)70037-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Pullen N, Dennis P B, Andjelkovic M, Dufner A, Kozma S C, Hemmings B A, Thomas G. Science. 1998;279:707–710. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5351.707. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dufner A, Andjelkovic M, Burgering B M, Hemmings B A, Thomas G. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:4525–4534. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.6.4525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Price D J, Grove J R, Calvo V, Avruch J, Bierer B E. Science. 1992;257:973–977. doi: 10.1126/science.1380182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Chung J, Kuo C J, Crabtree G R, Blenis J. Cell. 1992;69:1227–1236. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90643-q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Dancey J E. In: American Society of Clinical Oncology 2000 Educational Book. Perry M C, editor. Alexandria, VA: Am. Soc. Clin. Oncol.; 2000. pp. 68–75. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Sabers C J, Martin M M, Brunn G J, Williams J M, Dumont F J, Wiederrecht G, Abraham R T. J Biol Chem. 1995;270:815–822. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.2.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sabatini D M, Erdjument-Bromage H, Lui M, Tempst P, Snyder S H. Cell. 1994;78:35–43. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(94)90570-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Brown E J, Albers M W, Shin T B, Ichikawa K, Keith C T, Lane W S, Schreiber S L. Nature (London) 1994;369:756–758. doi: 10.1038/369756a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Scott P H, Brunn G J, Kohn A D, Roth R A, Lawrence J C., Jr Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:7772–7777. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.13.7772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Gingras A C, Kennedy S G, O'Leary M A, Sonenberg N, Hay N. Genes Dev. 1998;12:502–513. doi: 10.1101/gad.12.4.502. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Nave B T, Ouwens M, Withers D J, Alessi D R, Shepherd P R. Biochem J. 1999;344:427–431. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sekulic A, Hudson C C, Homme J L, Yin P, Otterness D M, Karnitz L M, Abraham R T. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3504–3513. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Burnett P E, Barrow R K, Cohen N A, Snyder S H, Sabatini D M. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:1432–1437. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.4.1432. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Isotani S, Hara K, Tokunaga C, Inoue H, Avruch J, Yonezawa K. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:34493–34498. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.48.34493. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Westphal R S, Coffee R L, Jr, Marotta A, Pelech S L, Wadzinski B E. J Biol Chem. 1999;274:687–692. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.2.687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Peterson R T, Desai B N, Hardwick J S, Schreiber S L. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:4438–4442. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.8.4438. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Brown E J, Beal P A, Keith C T, Chen J, Shin T B, Schreiber S L. Nature (London) 1995;377:441–446. doi: 10.1038/377441a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang H, Stallock J P, Ng J C, Reinhard C, Neufeld T P. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2712–2724. doi: 10.1101/gad.835000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Oldham S, Montagne J, Radimerski T, Thomas G, Hafen E. Genes Dev. 2000;14:2689–2694. doi: 10.1101/gad.845700. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Barlund M, Monni O, Kononen J, Cornelison R, Torhorst J, Sauter G, Kallioniemi O-P, Kallioniemi A. Cancer Res. 2000;60:5340–5344. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Barlund M, Forozan F, Kononen J, Bubendorf L, Chen Y, Bittner M L, Torhorst J, Haas P, Bucher C, Sauter G, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000;92:1252–1259. doi: 10.1093/jnci/92.15.1252. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Lu Y, Lin Y Z, LaPushin R, Cuevas B, Fang X, Yu S X, Davies M A, Khan H, Furui T, Mao M, et al. Oncogene. 1999;18:7034–7045. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1203183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Podsypanina K, Ellenson L H, Nemes A, Gu J, Tamura M, Yamada K M, Cordon-Cardo C, Catoretti G, Fisher P E, Parsons R. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96:1563–1568. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.4.1563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Cattoretti G, Fei Q. In: Antigen Retrieval Technique. Shan-Rong Shi J G, Taylor C R, editors. Natick, MA: Eaton Publishing; 2000. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Terada N, Takase K, Papst P, Nairn A C, Gelfand E W. J Immunol. 1995;155:3418–3426. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Li D M, Sun H. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:15406–15411. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.26.15406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Luo Y, Marx S O, Kiyokawa H, Koff A, Massague J, Marks A R. Mol Cell Biol. 1996;16:6744–6751. doi: 10.1128/mcb.16.12.6744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Brennan P, Babbage J W, Thomas G, Cantrell D. Mol Cell Biol. 1999;19:4729–4738. doi: 10.1128/mcb.19.7.4729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Beretta L, Gingras A C, Svitkin Y V, Hall M N, Sonenberg N. EMBO J. 1996;15:658–664. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Brunn G J, Hudson C C, Sekulic A, Williams J M, Hosoi H, Houghton P J, Lawrence J C, Jr, Abraham R T. Science. 1997;277:99–101. doi: 10.1126/science.277.5322.99. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gingras A C, Gygi S P, Raught B, Polakiewicz R D, Abraham R T, Hoekstra M F, Aebersold R, Sonenberg N. Genes Dev. 1999;13:1422–1437. doi: 10.1101/gad.13.11.1422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hosoi H, Dilling M B, Liu L N, Danks M K, Shikata T, Sekulic A, Abraham R T, Lawrence J C, Jr, Houghton P J. Mol Pharmacol. 1998;54:815–824. doi: 10.1124/mol.54.5.815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Aoki M, Blazek E, Vogt P K. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98:136–141. doi: 10.1073/pnas.011528498. . (First Published December 26, 2000; 10.1073/pnas.011528498) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Huang S, Liu L N, Hosoi H, Dilling M B, Shikata T, Houghton P J. Cancer Res. 2001;61:3373–3381. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]