Abstract
Most neurodegenerative disorders are associated with accumulation of disease-relevant proteins. Among them, Huntington disease (HD) is of particular interest because of its monogenetic nature. HD is mainly caused by cytotoxicity of the defective protein encoded by the mutant Huntingtin gene (HTT). Thus, lowering mutant HTT protein (mHTT) levels would be a promising treatment strategy for HD. Here we report two kinases HIPK3 and MAPK11 as positive modulators of mHTT levels both in cells and in vivo. Both kinases regulate mHTT via their kinase activities, suggesting that inhibiting these kinases may have therapeutic values. Interestingly, their effects on HTT levels are mHTT-dependent, providing a feedback mechanism in which mHTT enhances its own level thus contributing to mHTT accumulation and disease progression. Importantly, knockout of MAPK11 significantly rescues disease-relevant behavioral phenotypes in a knockin HD mouse model. Collectively, our data reveal new therapeutic entry points for HD and target-discovery approaches for similar diseases.
Keywords: PolyQ, high-throughput screening, protein homeostasis, kinase, positive feedback mechanism, neurodegenerative disorders
Introduction
Neurodegenerative disorders are devastating diseases caused by progressive loss of neurons in the central nervous systems. They influence millions of people, especially in the aged population. Treatment of such diseases has been extremely challenging, due to the complexity of their diagnosis and pathogenic mechanisms1. On the other hand, many types of neurodegenerative disorders share the common feature of the accumulation of misfolded and aggregation-prone proteins, and lowering the levels of these proteins is considered as an appealing therapeutic strategy2. This strategy is likely to be more effective in inherited monogenetic neurodegenerative diseases, because the casual relationships between the mutant proteins and the diseases are clear: the mutant proteins encoded by these mutated genes are more likely to be the causes rather than the consequences of the diseases. In addition, the patients can be diagnosed earlier, offering the possibility of preventative treatment.
Thus, Huntington's disease (HD) represents an important model for neurodegenerative disorders because of its monogenetic nature. HD is caused by the mutation of the Huntingtin (HTT) gene, which encodes the mutant HTT protein (mHTT) with an expanded polyglutamine tract (polyQ)3. The gain of toxic function of mHTT is the major cause of HD, but the molecular mechanisms are unclear and likely involve multiple pathways4, which are highly challenging to target simultaneously. On the other hand, lowering mHTT protein levels has been shown to effectively mitigate mHTT toxicity: in an HD mouse model expressing inducible mHTT N-terminal fragments, turning off transgene expression reversed neuropathology and motor deficits5; in several mammalian models, delivery of short hairpin RNAs or small interference RNAs (siRNAs) or antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) against mHTT attenuate neuropathology and disease-related phenotypes6,7,8,9. Screening studies also revealed genetic and chemical modifiers that reduce mHTT aggregates and rescue HD-relevant phenotypes10. Recent studies have also shown that the level of soluble mHTT is closely related with disease pathology11,12,13, and thus lowering soluble mHTT may provide an effective approach to treat HD by ameliorating any downstream toxicity. If successful, this strategy is able to modify disease progression, and similar strategies could be applied to other diseases as well14. Previous mHTT-lowering studies are mostly based on RNA interference (RNAi) or ASOs. However, it is challenging to deliver such reagents to the affected brain regions of HD patients. Thus, druggable targets for low-molecular weight compounds that can lower mHTT levels are highly desired. Meanwhile, the wild-type HTT protein (wtHTT) is an essential protein during development15,16 and may also play a role in HD17 and lowering wtHTT to an intolerable extent may have a harmful impact. Thus, the wtHTT levels and phenotypic outcomes need to be carefully evaluated in any strategy based upon lowering of HTT levels.
Here, we report an unbiased RNAi screen that reveals the kinases MAPK11 and HIPK3 as novel modulators of mHTT protein levels. Both kinases influence mHTT levels via their kinase activities; opening up new drug discovery opportunities. We further validated the effect of MAPK11 and HIPK3 in vivo in an HD knockin (KI) mouse model, and confirmed their therapeutic potentials in lowering mHTT levels.
Results
Unbiased screen reveals genetic modulators of mHTT levels
To reveal druggable modulators of mHTT levels, we performed an RNAi screen (Figure 1A) using a focused siRNA library (regulome) targeting 2 666 genes expressing proteins (mostly enzymes and receptors) that belong to the protein families that are capable of regulating protein levels. The screen was performed in immortalized HD patient fibroblasts from two independent patients (Q45 and Q68) expressing endogenous full-length human mHTT proteins. mHTT levels were measured by the homologous time-resolved fluorescence (HTRF) assay using the 2B7/MW1 antibody pair which selectively detects mHTT18 (Supplementary information, Figure S1). The HTRF assay utilizes a terbium-conjugated antibody (donor) and a D2-conjugated antibody (acceptor) targeting the same protein; time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer19 occurs when the two antibodies come into close proximity by binding with a common protein molecule. As a result, the HTRF signals are proportional to the target protein concentration and can be used to quantify its level20. This technology has been successfully applied to the measurement of HTT levels in previous studies21,22.
The genes with at least two (out of four) independent siRNAs that reduced mHTT more than 20% in both lines without reducing the cell number by more than 5% (measured by cell titer-glo) were selected as candidate hits. Genes that are not expressed in the human brain based on the BioGPS database23 and the Allen Brain Atlas24 were excluded. The remaining preliminary hits (Figure 1B) were then tested in a human neuronal HD model13 for phenotypic validation (Figure 1C-1F). These neurons were derived from human embryonic stem-cells (hESC) stably expressing mHTT-exon1 (Q73) fragment and exhibited a mHTT-dependent neuronal loss phenotype (measured by cell confluence) under standard non-protective culture conditions13 (Figure 1C). The preliminary hits were tested by transfecting siRNA-pools targeting these hits in 96-well plates with biological duplicates (Figure 1D). The cultures exhibited substantial differences in neuronal survival, which negatively correlated with the mHTT-exon1 Q73 levels measured by HTRF (Figure 1E). This is consistent with the expectation that changing mHTT levels via the modifiers influences the survival of HD neurons. 11 out of the 19 preliminary hits showed obvious rescue of survival in this neuronal model (Figure 1F).
MAPK11 and HIPK3 regulate endogenous mHTT levels
Among the 11 identified putative mHTT modulators, we found a clustering of MAPK-related proteins: MAP2K6 and MAPK11 that belong to the same signaling pathway, in which MAP2K6 phosphorylates MAPK1125; HIPK3, which is regulated by JNK1 and JNK2 (also referred to as MAPK8 and MAPK9)26. The enrichment of genes for MAPK-related proteins suggested that these kinases may have a higher chance of being reliable mHTT modulators and we therefore prioritized MAPK11, MAP2K6 and HIPK3 for further validation.
We first validated these targets in the mouse HD striatal cell line STHdhQ7/Q11127, a well-established cellular model which expresses endogenous full-length mHtt (the mouse homolog of human mHTT) with 111Q. The HTRF assay utilizing the 2B7/MW1 antibody pair does not work properly in STHdh cells. Moreover, the 2B7/2166 antibody pair works well but detects the total signals from both mHtt and the wtHtt28. Thus, we first validated these targets by western blots instead of using HTRF in STHdh cells. Knocking down these targets using siRNAs (Supplementary information, Figure S2A-S2C) significantly reduced the endogenous level of soluble full-length mHtt (Figures 2A and 4A) in HD cells (Q7/Q111). The reduction in mHtt did not appear to result from cleavage changes, because no increase of mHtt fragments at lower molecular weights was observed (Supplementary information, Figure S2D).
To further validate these targets in HD models in which HTT has a polyQ length equivalent to that more commonly found in HD patients, we tested these targets in Q47 human induced-pluripotent-stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons expressing endogenous mHTT with 47Q29. We chose to use the 2B7/MW1 HTRF assay (Supplementary information, Figure S1), which is a more accurate and reliable way of measuring mHTT in these cells29,30. Knocking down these targets by siRNAs (Supplementary information, Figure S2A-S2C) reduced the endogenous soluble mHTT levels in these iPSC-derived neurons (Q47 neurons) (Figure 2B), confirming their value in the human HD neuronal model expressing mHTT with 40-50Q, a polyQ length most commonly found in HD patients.
We then triaged the targets by validating their effects on mHtt levels in mouse models in vivo. MAP2K6 is an upstream activator of MAPK11, its major downstream effector. Thus, MAP2K6 may regulate mHTT through MAPK11. In accord with this, knockdown of Mapk11 diminished the Map2k6-mediated effect on mHTT levels in STHdhQ7/Q111 cells (Supplementary information, Figure S3A). This epistasis effect is in agreement with Mapk11 being downstream of Map2k6. In addition, Map2k6 knockout results in immune defects and delay in testis determination31. Therefore, considering that in vivo validations are highly time-consuming and resource-consuming, we prioritized MAPK11 and HIPK3 for in vivo validation.
We confirmed that MAPK11 and HIPK3 are expressed in both human and mouse brains (Supplementary information, Figure S3B-S3E). We then generated the Mapk11 and Hipk3 knockout mice by TALEN technology (see Materials and Methods section), respectively (Supplementary information, Figure S4A and S4B). Both types of mice were born in a roughly Mendelian ratio (Hipk3: 21% −/−, 23% +/+ and 56% +/−, from 111 mice; Mapk11: 25% −/−, 23% +/+ and 52% +/−, from 295 mice) and were viable and fertile and of normal appearance/weight/size/major tissue size and weight, and had no obvious health problems when kept under standard specific-pathogen-free conditions, consistent with previous reports32,33. We crossed them to a well-established HD KI mouse model expressing endogenous mHtt proteins with a 140Q repeat34. Heterozygous knockout of Hipk3 or Mapk11 significantly lowered full-length Htt levels in vivo in the striata of the HD mice (HdhQ140/Q7, Figure 2C and 2D). Noticeably, heterozygous Hipk3 knockout mice had lower Htt levels at 10 months of age but not at 5 months old (not shown), possibly because Hipk3 expression level is higher in HD only at later ages (Figure 3D).
To test whether Mapk11 or Hipk3-mediated Htt regulation is specific, we tested a number of control proteins including β-actin, Gapdh, Calnexin, Tuj1, Map2, α-tubulin and β-tubulin. None of their levels were significantly reduced in Mapk11 or Hipk3 knockout mice (Supplementary information, Figure S5A-S5D). Of other polyQ proteins including ataxin1, 2&3, we could only detect ataxin3 expression in our models and its levels were not reduced in the Mapk11 or Hipk3 knockout mice (Supplementary information, Figure S5A-S5D). Taken together, these results suggest that the effects of Mapk11 and Hipk3 on the mHtt levels are specific.
Both MAPK11- and HIPK3-mediated effects on HTT levels are mHTT-dependent
Interestingly, we found that both the MAPK11- and HIPK3-mediated effects occurred only in HD, but not in wild-type (WT) cells/tissues (Figure 2). Two possibilities may account for this observation. First, the regulation of HTT by these kinases might be mHTT-specific, i.e., MAPK11 and HIPK3 only regulate mHTT but not wtHTT. Second, the regulation is mHTT-dependent, i.e., both mHTT and wtHTT levels are regulated by MAPK11/HIPK3 only in presence of mHTT. The second possibility seems to be the case, because both the wtHTT and mHTT levels appeared to be lowered similarly in the HD cells or tissues (Supplementary information, Figure S6A and S6B). To further clarify the mHTT-dependence, we expressed the mHTT-exon1 (Q72) fragment35 in WT cells (STHdhQ7/Q7) (Supplementary information, Figure S6C), in which the wtHtt level is insensitive to Mapk11 or Hipk3 (Figure 2A). The regulation of the wtHtt level by Mapk11 or Hipk3 was then enabled in the presence of mHTT-exon1 (Q72) but not wtHTT-exon1 (Q25) protein fragments (Figure 3A and 3B). This suggests that mHTT is sufficient to drive the Mapk11/Hipk3-mediated modulation of Htt that is absent in WT cells. This effect is dependent on mHTT, because expression of the long polyQ itself (Q72-GFP) or another polyQ protein (Atxn1 (Q92)) did not have such effects (Supplementary information, Figure S6D). Moreover, we specifically knocked down mHtt in the STHdhQ7/Q111 cells with an allele-specific siRNA that selectively lowers mHtt via targeting the CAG repeat region36,37,38, and the Mapk11/Hipk3-mediated modulation of both mHtt and wtHtt was diminished (Figure 3C); suggesting that mHTT is required for this regulation. Taken together, this indicates that MAPK11/HIPK3-mediated HTT modulation is dependent on the presence of mHTT proteins: in WT cells without mHTT or in HD cells in which mHTT is knocked down, MAPK11/HIPK3-mediated regulation of HTT is largely absent and thus the HTT level is insensitive to these kinases (Figures 2 and 3C); in HD cells with mHTT or in WT cells with exogenously expressed mHTT-exon1 fragments, the MAPK11-mediated and HIPK3-mediated HTT regulation is enabled, and both the mHTT and wtHTT levels become sensitive to these kinases (Figures 2, 3A and 3B).
Our observation of mHTT-dependent HTT modulation suggests that mHTT may enhance its own level by enabling positive regulation mediated by MAPK11 and HIPK3, which may contribute to disease progression.
mHTT may confer positive effects on MAPK11 and HIPK3
Since mHTT is required for the MAPK11/HIPK3-mediated effects, we speculate that mHTT may elevate the levels or activities of MAPK11 or HIPK3, granting them the capability of regulating HTT levels. Indeed, mHTT has been shown to activate p38 MAPKs and c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNKs)39. MAPK11 is a family member of the p38 MAPKs, which are activated by mHTT. The HIPK3 mRNA level is elevated by JNKs26, which are also activated by mHTT. Thus, these previous results suggest that mHTT may activate MAPK11 kinase activity and elevate the HIPK3 mRNA level, conferring upon them the ability to regulate HTT levels.
In accord with this, the endogenous Hipk3 mRNA level was significantly higher in HD cells (STHdhQ7/Q111) than in WT cells (STHdhQ7/Q7) as determined by qRT-PCR (Figure 3D, left). A similar phenomenon was also observed in vivo in the striata of HD mice (HdhQ140/Q7) compared to WT controls (HdhQ7/Q7) at the age of 6-8 months (Figure 3D, right), in line with previous reports in human brain tissues, where the HIPK3 expression is ∼33% higher in HD patients versus controls40. Noticeably, this difference was not present at earlier ages (2-4 months) (Figure 3D, middle), suggesting that mHtt may increase the expression of Hipk3 as the disease progresses. To further establish the relationship between mHTT and Hipk3 levels, we knocked down Htt (both mHtt and wtHtt) in HD cells (STHdhQ7/Q111), or wtHtt in WT cells, and measured Hipk3 mRNA levels. The Hipk3 mRNA levels are significantly reduced by lowering Htt in HD cells but not by lowering wtHtt in WT cells (Figure 3E). This confirms the positive regulation of Hipk3 mRNA level by mHtt but not wtHtt. A similar phenomenon was observed in patient iPSC-derived neurons (Figure 3F). We observed no increase of Mapk11 mRNA levels in HD cells (STHdhQ7/Q111) compared to the WT cells (STHdhQ7/Q7) (Supplementary information, Figure S6E, left), and a marginal but insignificant increase in the striata of HD mice (HdhQ140/Q7) compared to WT controls (HdhQ7/Q7) (Supplementary information, Figure S6E, right), suggesting that mHtt could enhance kinase activity rather than the Mapk11 level. Consistent with this, over-expression of mHTT (HTTexon1 (Q72)) but not wtHTT (HTTexon1 (Q25)) increased the phosphorylation of MAPK11 detected by the phospho-p38 MAPK antibody (Figure 3G). MAPK11 was over-expressed in this experiment due to a lack of specific antibody-detecting endogenous phosphor-MAPK11. To confirm activation of endogenous MAPK11, we assessed its ability to phosphorylate Atf241. We found that Atf2 phosphorylation was significantly reduced in the striata of Mapk11 knockout mice (Figure 3H), confirming Atf2 as a Mapk11 substrate. Interestingly, Atf2 phosphorylation was significantly increased in the striata of HD mice (HdhQ140/Q7) compared to WT controls (HdhQ7/Q7) (Figure 3I), suggesting that Mapk11's kinase activity was enhanced in HD cells. The enhancement of MAPK11 kinase activity by mHtt is could be partially contributed by elevated oxidative stress, because lowering the oxidative stress by treatment of the NADPH oxidase inhibitor diphenyleneiodonium chloride (DPI)42 significantly decreased mHTT-induced MAPK11 phosphorylation (Figure 3G).
Collectively, our data reveal the positive feedback regulation of HTT mediated by MAPK11 or HIPK3. While this may not be the only mechanism for their mHTT-dependent effects, it suggests a mechanism through which mHTT enhances its own level and thus contributes to its own accumulation and thereby, disease progression.
MAPK11- and HIPK3-mediated effects are dependent on their kinase activities
In order to lower mHTT levels and treat HD via targeting MAPK11 or HIPK3, we asked whether their effects on mHTT levels were dependent on their kinase activities, which could be targeted by low-molecular weight compounds. MAPK11 belongs to the p38 MAPK family, and it is phosphorylated by MAP2K6 to activate its kinase activity25. In HD cells including both STHdhQ7/Q111 and iPSC-derived Q47 neurons, knockdown of MAP2K6 by siRNAs (Supplementary information, Figure S2C) also reduced mHTT levels, an effect not seen in WT cells (Figures 2B and 4A). In addition, the MAP2K6-mediated effect on HTT is dependent on MAPK11 (Supplementary information, Figure S3A). Thus, MAPK11's effect on HTT is likely to be dependent on its kinase activity, which is activated by MAP2K6. Consistent with this idea, we found that dominant negative MAPK11 (DN-MAPK11)43 reduced Htt levels when over-expressed in HD cells (Figure 4B). Moreover, over-expression of MAPK11 but not DN-MAPK11 significantly suppressed the Htt lowering effect of Mapk11 knockdown (Figure 4C), confirming that MAPK11's kinase activity is required for its role in regulating HTT levels. We then tested the potential effects of the Mapk11 inhibitor SB20219044 on Htt levels. However, SB202190 treatment failed to reduce Htt levels in STHdhQ7/Q111 (not shown), possibly because of the off-target effects on other kinases. We therefore tested its effect in other HD models and discovered that SB202190 treatment was able to reduce Htt levels in a Mapk11-dependent manner in primary striatal neurons cultured from the KI HD mice (HdhQ7/Q140) (Figure 4D), further confirming the kinase-activity dependence and providing an entry point for HD drug discovery.
Similarly, over-expression of mouse Hipk3 cDNA increased endogenous Htt levels, while over-expression of the kinase-dead Hipk3 cDNAs (K226M and D322N)45,46 gave a modest reduction in Htt (Figure 4E). This suggests that Hipk3-mediated Htt regulation is also kinase activity-dependent. Consistently, the HIPK3 kinase inhibitor AST48747 effectively lowers mHTT levels (Figure 4F and 4G), and this effect is mitigated by knocking down HIPK3 (Figure 4F and 4G, right panels), confirming that AST487 reduces mHTT levels via inhibiting HIPK3. Finally, AST487 also reduced mHTT levels in the HD patient iPSC-derived neurons (Figure 4H), confirming the effects in a human neuronal model expressing a polyQ length that is close to the ones commonly found in HD patients.
In summary, MAPK11 and HIPK3 regulate HTT through their kinase activities, opening up possibilities for HD drug development.
MAPK11 regulates HTT mRNA stability while HIPK3 regulates HTT degradation via autophagy
In mouse striatal HD cells (STHdhQ7/Q111) but not WT cells (STHdhQ7/Q7), Htt mRNA was significantly reduced by knocking down Mapk11 (Figure 5A, statistics on right), and this showed a significant positive correlation with Mapk11 mRNA levels (Figure 5A, statistics on top). Similar phenomena were observed in HD patient iPSC-derived Q47 neurons and HD mouse (HdhQ7/Q140) striata (Figure 5B and 5C), suggesting that MAPK11 positively regulates HTT mRNA levels. Noticeably, the degree of HTT mRNA lowering somewhat differs from the reduction of HTT protein levels (Figure 2 versus Figure 5). This is likely because the HTT protein level is determined by the balance point of protein synthesis and degradation, which is influenced by not only HTT mRNA levels, but also the dynamics of HTT translation and degradation. This will result in a non-linear relationship between mRNA and protein levels.
Consistent with the observation that MAPK11 may regulate HTT protein levels through regulating HTT mRNA levels, the Htt protein degradation rate was not increased by knocking down Mapk11 (Figure 5D). In addition, Mapk11-mediated Htt regulation was not affected by inhibitors of proteasome or autophagy (Figure 5E), the two major protein degradation machineries.
There are two major mechanisms through which MAPK11 may regulate HTT mRNA levels: transcription and mRNA stability. To test the possible regulation of HTT transcription by MAPK11, we examined HTT promoter activity using a previously published reporter assay for the HTT promoter48 and utilizing the longest version of the described HTT promoter. Mapk11 knockdown did not change HTT promoter activity in STHdhQ7/Q111 cells (Figure 5F), suggesting that the Mapk11-mediated effect on HTT mRNA is not mediated by regulation of HTT transcription, but probably through HTT mRNA stability. We therefore measured HTT mRNA degradation and discovered that it was significantly accelerated by knocking down MAPK11 in both STHdhQ7/Q111 cells and patient iPSC-derived HD Q47 neurons (Figure 5G), confirming that MAPK11 regulates HTT mRNA stability.
In contrast, knockdown of Hipk3 did not significantly influence Htt mRNA levels (Supplementary information, Figure S7A). On the other hand, HIPK3 knockdown accelerated HTT protein degradation (Supplementary information, Figure S7B and S7C). In addition, the HIPK3 knockdown-induced mHTT reduction was blocked by the autophagy flux inhibitors NH4Cl and bafilomycin A, but not by the proteasome inhibitors epoxomycin and MG132 (Supplementary information, Figure S7D), suggesting that HIPK3 may regulate mHTT levels via autophagy. To further confirm the involvement of autophagy, we knocked down several essential autophagy genes (ATG5, ATG12, ATG16L, SQSTM1) and found that the HIPK3 knockdown-induced lowering of mHTT was subsequently lessened (Supplementary information, Figure S7E). Taken together, this indicates that MAPK11 regulates HTT at the mRNA level, whereas HIPK3 regulates mHTT, at least partially, through autophagy-mediated mHTT degradation.
To further investigate the potential effect of HIPK3 on autophagy, we tested the effect of HIPK3 knockdown on autophagy markers p62 (encoded by SQSTM1), LC3 and Beclin1. Autophagosome-bound lipidated LC3-II has been widely used as an indicator of autophagosomes49. Beclin1 is a critical subunit of a class III PI-3 kinase (Vps34) complex required for autophagosome biogenesis50. The p62 protein is a receptor that binds LC3-II and ubiquitin, and is degraded when the autophagosome fuses with the lysosome51. p62 is a preferred marker for measuring autophagic flux as its decreased levels correlate with increased flux49. HIPK3 knockdown led to increased LC3-II and Beclin1 levels and decreased p62 levels in HD patient fibroblasts (Q68), suggesting an increase of autophagosomes and autophagic flux facilitates mHTT degradation (Figure 6A). To further confirm the effect of HIPK3 on autophagy, we expressed GFP-LC3B and observed an increase in the number of LC3 puncta that mark autophagosomes (Figure 6B), suggesting increased autophagy. A similar phenomenon was observed in the patient iPSC-derived Q47 neurons (Figure 6C and 6D), confirming the effect in a human neuronal model with a polyQ length that is close to the ones commonly found in HD patients. Endogenous LC3 was assessed in these neurons by immunostaining using an antibody that preferentially detects LC3II52, because over-expression of LC3-GFP or other LC3 cDNA led to morphological changes and cytotoxicity in these neurons (not shown). Finally, the effect was also confirmed in vivo in heterozygous Hipk3 knockout HD mice (Figure 6E).
As a major substrate of HIPK3, DAXX directly interacts with and is phosphorylated by HIPK346,53 and suppresses autophagy flux54. Thus, DAXX may participate in the HIPK3-mediated regulation of mHTT levels via autophagy. Knocking down DAXX (Figure 7A) blunts the effect of HIPK3 on regulation of mHTT levels in patient fibroblasts and patient iPSC-derived neurons (Figure 7A and 7B), suggesting the involvement of DAXX in HIPK3-mediated mHTT regulation.
We then further tested if HIPK3 regulates autophagy through DAXX as predicted. In patient iPSC-derived neurons (Q47), the knockdown of DAXX mitigated the effect of HIPK3 knockdown on LC3 puncta and LC3II/p62 levels (Figure 7C and 7D). This confirms that HIPK3 regulates autophagy via DAXX. Finally, lowering HIPK3 significantly reduced the level of DAXX protein (Figure 7E), possibly due to a reduction of phosphorylated DAXX protein. Taken together, this indicates that HIPK3 regulates mHTT levels via the autophagy suppressor DAXX.
In summary, MAPK11 and HIPK3 regulate mHTT levels through a potential positive feedback loop via distinct mechanisms, as illustrated in the model in Figure 7F.
Lowering MAPK11 rescues HD-relevant phenotypes in an HD KI mouse model
In order to validate the therapeutic significance of the discovered modifiers of mHTT levels, it is critical to test whether these targets influence HD-relevant phenotypes. Hipk3 knockout may cause metabolic defects32, while the Mapk11 knockout does not seem to have obvious phenotypes based on previous reports33. While the previously reported models were generated by different approaches than ours, all available information suggests that targeting Mapk11 is probably safer. Thus, we prioritized Mapk11 for testing the potential rescue of HD-relevant phenotypes.
At the cellular level, it has been reported that mHTT toxicity induces caspase-3 activation under the BDNF-deprived culture condition in HD patient iPSC-derived neurons. Thus caspase-3 activation could be used as a readout for mHTT-mediated toxicity55. We found that MAPK11 knockdown significantly lowered the mHTT-dependent caspase-3 activation under this condition, suggesting that lowering MAPK11 ameliorates mHTT toxicity in HD patient iPSC-derived neurons (Figure 8A).
mHTT forms insoluble aggregates in the striata of aged HD mice, and these aggregates can be recognized by immunofluorescence (Figure 8B; from 11-month-old homozygous HD mice HdhQ140/Q140). Compared to homozygous mice, heterozygous HD mice HdhQ7/Q140 exhibited many fewer aggregates, and so we focused on homozygous HD mice to better quantify protein aggregates and assess Mapk11's effect on mHtt levels. Remarkably, aggregation levels in these homozygous HD mice were reduced to wild-type levels when the mice were also either Mapk11+/− or Mapk11−/− (Figure 8B). This is quite striking considering that soluble mHTT was reduced by less than 50% in the Mapk11+/− condition (Figure 2D; Supplementary information, Figure S8B). Meanwhile, since Mapk11+/− resulted in mHtt reduction well before the formation of aggregates, it is likely that either the Mapk11+/− or Mapk11−/− genotype reduced soluble mHtt at early ages and prevented formation of mHtt aggregates (Figure 8B). This is consistent with previous studies, which showed a drastic reduction of mHtt aggregates by short-term Htt-targeting using siRNA or ASO treatment8,9.
We further investigated whether the heterozygous or homozygous knockout of Mapk11 also rescues HD-relevant behavioral phenotypes in mice. We explored a number of behavioral assays including the rotarod test, gripping force measurement, the open-field test, activity measurement, the water maze test and the nest building test in both HD and WT mice. Consistent with other reports34, we observed several motor function-related phenotypes in this model. At the age of 7.5 months, the homozygous HD (HdhQ140/Q140) mice showed less activity (measured by the frequency of active behaviors including rearing and climbing) in a pen holder with mashed surface (Figure 8C, comparison between the first group of each plot). They also exhibited mobility defects in the open-field test (Figure 8D, comparison between the first group of each plot). However, we failed to detect reliable behavioral phenotypes in the heterozygous HD mice (HdhQ7/Q140, Supplementary information, Figure S8A) and thus performed further testing in the homozygous HD mice. By crossing the Mapk11 knockouts to the HD mice for several generations, we obtained both Mapk11 heterozygous (Mapk11+/−) and homozygous (Mapk11−/−) knockouts and related controls (Mapk11+/+) in both the HD (HdhQ140/Q140) and WT (HdhQ7/Q7) backgrounds. The soluble mHtt level was significantly lowered by Mapk11+/− in striata from these mice (Supplementary information, Figure S8B), similar to heterozygous HD mice (Figure 2D). Both Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− genotypes showed significant (P < 0.05) or marginal (P = 0.1) rescue of the behavioral defects of the HD mice in activity (Figure 8C) and open-field tests (Figure 8D). These data confirm the protective effect of lowering Mapk11 on HD phenotypes. Of note, although Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− caused a mild reduction of the activity frequency in the WT background, such an effect was reversed in the HD background (Figure 8C). In the open-field tests, Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− did not have positive effects in the WT background, but they did show a rescue effect in the HD background (Figure 8D). The results confirm that the effects of Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− on motor functions are HD-specific since no positive effects were observed in the WT background.
HD patients have gait phenotypes and show impaired coupling56. We thus further tested the potential gait phenotype of these HD mice by the gait analysis system, which records the gait of mice passing through a scoring lane (Supplementary information, Movies S1-S2). The HD mice showed some gait abnormalities with more irregular steps and more overlaps of footprints; these abnormalities seemed to be rescued in the Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− backgrounds (Figure 8E; Supplementary information, Movies S1-S2). Of the 214 parameters quantified by the gait analysis equipment, 36 are coupling-related parameters. In order to capture the major components of the gait coupling phenotype, we have applied principle component analysis57 to all these 36 coupling-related parameters and revealed the top principle component that depicts the defects in the HD mice (Figure 8F and Supplementary information, Table S1). Based on the PCA analysis, the gait defects were markedly improved in Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− HD mice (Figure 8F).
To further confirm Mapk11's effect, we analyzed all the 214 single parameters without PCA transformation. We identified 6 out of the 214 parameters that showed a significant (P < 0.05) difference between HD and WT animals (Supplementary information, Table S2, yellow blocks). None of these six parameters are standard parameters in describing gait defects and they are unlikely to capture the major differences between HD and WT sufficiently. Given that there are so many parameters analyzed, these six parameters may have just passed the P< 0.05 threshold by chance. To capture the gait defects more accurately, we selected all the 26 parameters that showed at least a 10% difference with a relatively small P value (P < 0.2, by unpaired two-tailed t tests) between the HD and WT groups. We then determined whether the phenotype captured by a single parameter was rescued or exacerbated by comparing the averages of Mapk11+/− or Mapk11−/− with Mapk11+/+ mice in the same Htt background; the judgment was solely based on the direction of the changes (Supplementary information, Table S2). If the parameters were not influenced, random noise should result in equal probability of rescue versus exacerbation. In the HD mice (Supplementary information, Table S2, right parts), Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− showed overwhelmingly more rescues (green) than exacerbations (orange), an outcome highly unlikely to have resulted from random noise (Mapk11+/−: 21 rescues versus 5 exacerbations, P = 0.0009; Mapk11−/−: 22 rescues versus 4 exacerbations, P = 0.00009; Mapk11+/− & Mapk11−/− together: 43 rescues versus 9 exacerbations, P = 5E−7). In the WT mice, Mapk11+/− and Mapk11−/− did not have such effects (Supplementary information, Table S2, left parts). These distributions were summarized in a bar plot (Figure 8G) and strongly suggested that lowering Mapk11 significantly rescued mHTT-induced gait phenotypes. Finally, while behavior phenotypes in the heterozygous HD mice (HdhQ7/Q140) were too weak to be assayed (Supplementary information, Figure S8A), they exhibited significantly lower levels of the medium spiny neuron marker Darpp32 compared to the WT (Supplementary information, Figure S8C). Moreover, this phenotype was also rescued by heterozygous knockout of Mapk11 (HdhQ7/Q140, Mapk11+/−) (Supplementary information, Figure S8C), suggesting that the rescue effect of lowering Mapk11 is also present in heterozygous HD mice.
Collectively, our data provide encouraging in vivo evidence to establish Mapk11 as a potential therapeutic target for HD drug discovery. While we cannot entirely exclude the involvement of other mechanisms in the phenotypic rescue, lowering mHtt is most likely the major mechanism that rescues HD phenotypes, because lowering Mapk11 reduces mHtt in vivo and reduction of mHtt by various approaches has been shown to rescue HD phenotypes.
Discussion
Screening for HTT protein modifiers
In summary, using an unbiased genetic screen and validating the output, we have identified MAPK11 and HIPK3 as robust modulators of HTT levels both in cells and in vivo (Figure 2). This regulation is dependent on their kinase activity, providing promising opportunities for drug development (Figure 4). Finally, heterozygous or homozygous deletion of Mapk11 lowers mHTT aggregates in HD striata and rescues the behavioral phenotypes of the HD mice in vivo, confirming the therapeutic potential of reducing the activity of this protein kinase.
Disease progression-modifying treatments are highly desired and yet unavailable for neurodegenerative disorders. Lowering disease protein levels is a promising strategy to achieve this goal. For HD, previous screening efforts focused on protein aggregation, cleavage or toxicity58,59,60,61. Our present study focuses on decreasing soluble mHTT levels for two reasons: first, soluble mHTT has been shown to be closely related with toxicity11,12,13; second, as the mechanism underlying mHTT toxicity is unclear, we chose to focus on the presence of soluble mHTT as an earlier event in disease pathogenesis. This approach would ensure that changes achieved in protein level should cascade through downstream steps and impact disease-relevant phenotypes, including aggregation (Figure 8B).
In our previous screening effort using Drosophila S2R cells, we only obtained hits that upregulate mHTT when knocked down30. This is likely because the primary screen was performed in cells over-expressing exogenous mHTT fragments, and the screening system may elevate pathways that clear the over-expressed mHTT fragments and thus could be biased towards enhancer hits in a knockdown screen. Here we optimized the screen in human patient fibroblasts expressing the endogenous full-length human mHTT protein and focusing upon targets that may reduce mHTT when knocked down.
Other than MAPK11 and HIPK3, we identified a number of other targets (including the gene for MAPK11's upstream regulator MAP2K6) that reduced mHTT and rescued hESC-derived Q73 neurons in our knockdown screen (Figure 1). The negative correlation between mHTT-exon1 protein level and neuronal survival strongly suggests that these targets reduce mHTT toxicity through lowering its level (Figure 1E), although further validation with more replicates and in more HD models is definitely needed. MAPK11 and HIPK3, as well as the other newly identified targets have not previously been reported to have physical interactions with HTT. Thus, they probably regulate mHTT through indirect mechanisms rather than through a direct interaction with mHTT. Noticeably, besides the identified kinases, the targets USP39, RNF145 and PRPF19 are all related with ubiquitination processes, whereas MMP25, NPEPL1 and ECE1 are proteases/peptidases. This suggest that ubiquitination and protein cleavage likely play important roles in mHTT modulation. Like any other high-throughput screen, our screen may identify false-targets due to the limitations of cellular models, HTT detection and insufficient knockdown. The siRNA library used for our screens were ordered from Qiagen Inc., and most of them have been validated based on the manufacturer's information. Consistently, most of the siRNAs knocked down their targets more than 70% based on our qPCR validation of transcript levels in our present and previous studies. In addition, we tested four siRNAs targeting each gene and two positive siRNAs were used as the hit selection criteria. This further decreases the false-negative rate, although we can never completely exclude them.
Reducing wtHTT
Lowering Mapk11 or Hipk3 reduces both mHtt and wtHtt in HD cells (Figure 2). This raises an important concern over the tolerance of losing wtHTT, which is essential for embryonic development15,16,62. Consistently, it has been reported that compound heterozygous variants in HTT are found in association with an autosomal recessive neurodevelopmental disorder63. Presence of a single-nucleotide polymorphism on the WT HTT allele that represses HTT transcription is associated with an earlier age of onset in HD patients in an extreme case-based cohort17. A very recent study also suggested that very low levels of wtHtt in mice during embryonic and postnatal development may lead to HD-like phenotypes later64. These studies suggest that loss of wtHTT to a certain extent may be harmful and may contribute to HD as well. On the other hand, lowering wtHTT levels up to 60%-70% has been shown to be safe in a primate model65 and ablation of wtHTT in adult mice at > 4 months of age does not lead to neurodegeneration or other defects in mouse models66, suggesting that lowering wtHTT in old adults is well tolerated. Consistent with this, HTT-lowering by RNAi or ASOs targeting both mHTT and wtHTT showed significant benefits in HD models7,8,9,67,68, confirming lowering both mHTT and wtHTT as a potential strategy for HD treatment. Encouragingly, the IONIS HTT-Rx clinical trial has been launched, using a non-allele specific ASO, HTTRx, for HD treatment (https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02519036). Another appealing strategy is to use allele-specific HTT ASOs to selectively lower mHTT36,69,70,71, although whether HD-relevant phenotypes in vivo could be rescued by the allele-specific strategy needs to be further addressed. Taken together, while lowering both mHTT and wtHTT to a certain extent may be beneficial, precautions need to be taken due to the potential harmful effects of reducing wtHTT to an intolerable extent.
In our study, lowering Mapk11 or Hipk3 reduces wtHtt by the extent of < 50% in vivo (Supplementary information, Figure S6B), and the reduction of wtHTT level appears within its tolerable range according to previous studies. Indeed, lowering Mapk11 by genetic silencing led to rescue rather than exacerbation of phenotypes in HD mice and cells (Figure 8).
We believe that mHtt lowering per se is likely to be the major mechanism that mediates the effect of Mapk11 on HD-relevant phenotypes, given the compelling evidence showing that reducing mHtt by many different approaches including directly knocking down Htt can rescue HD-relevant phenotypes5,6,7,8,68. This is because the potential diverse secondary effects from these approaches are unlikely to lead to rescuing effects through a common mechanism. Importantly, although lowering Mapk11 has no positive effects in WT mice in the behavioral assays, it rescues HD mice (Figure 8), suggesting that the effect is likely mediated through the lowering of mHtt. However, it is impossible to entirely exclude potential secondary effects that may have also been involved. Nevertheless, identification of Mapk11 as a potential druggable target to lower mHtt and associated toxicity warrants its further study for HD therapy.
HD mouse models
Currently over a dozen HD mouse models have been established for various studies, including N-terminal HTT fragment models that include N171-82Q and R6 mice72,73; full-length transgenic models such as BACHD or YAC12874,75; or KI models such as Q140 and zQ17534,76. Each model has its own characteristics and advantages depending on the experimental approach to be taken. In this study, we chose to use a KI model, which expresses a human-mouse chimeric mHtt protein from the original locus of Htt at endogenous levels34 and this faithfully depicts HD genetics. Similar to human patients, the polyQ length in the KI mouse models correlates well with the degree and the age of onset of HD-relevant transcriptional dysregulation and behavioral deficits77,78, thus confirming KI mice as a reliable HD model. Among the commonly used KI models, the zQ175 model expresses the longest polyQ tract and has the strongest phenotypes76, but this model shows significant weight loss and the age of onset of behavioral deficits is around 4.5 months (20-30 years in human age), much earlier than the age of onset in most HD patients (40-50 years old). The KI model that we used in this study, HdhQ14034, has relatively mild behavioral phenotypes which are only observable in homozygous mice at least under our experimental conditions (Figure 8). On the other hand, while all the other models mentioned above display weight changes, the HdhQ140 model does34, thus minimizing potential artifacts from this aspect. In addition, the age of onset of behavioral deficits (∼7 months) in this model is analogous to that of HD patients. Particularly, our study has revealed that Mapk11 regulates endogenous Htt mRNA levels. Given that KI mice express mHtt from the endogenous mouse Htt promoter34, we reason that KI models are well suited for our study to examine the effects of Mapk11. Thus, we utilized HdhQ140 for our first in vivo validation.
MAPK and polyQ proteins
MAPK11 regulates HTT levels by regulating stability of its mRNA while HIPK3 regulates mHTT via autophagy. As a novel modulator of autophagy, HIPK3 may not only be able to regulate mHTT, but also other disease proteins degraded by autophagy. Interestingly, wtHTT could also be regulated by HIPK3 in the presence of mHTT (Figures 2 and 3), suggesting that autophagy may partially mediate wtHTT degradation as well. This may not be surprising given that wtHTT protein participates in the autophagy process79,80. While we have revealed a mechanistic sketch of MAPK11-mediated and HIPK3-mediated HTT regulation, many mechanistic details remain to be identified. We discovered that MAPK11 mainly regulates HTT mRNA stability (Figure 5), but the downstream mechanism of its action is still unclear. Since MAPK family members are known to regulate RNA binding proteins and miRNAs81,82, we speculate that MAPK11 regulates HTT mRNA via certain RNA binding protein(s) and/or miRNA(s), which will need further study to confirm. Similarly, the mechanistic details need to be determined of how HIPK3 regulates autophagy through DAXX.
MAPKs can have critical and systematic involvement in regulating mHTT/polyQ proteins. Another hit from our screen, MAP2K6, is known to be a stress sensor upstream of MAPK11. HIPK3 has been shown to be elevated by JNKs26, which are also members of the MAPK family that mediate the stress response downstream of polyQ expansion proteins83. In addition, other members of the MAPK family have been shown to elevate the levels of mutant ATXN114, another disease-causing polyQ expansion protein. The homolog of MAP2K6 in Caenorhabditis elegans, sek-1, has been shown to increase the expression of the polyQ expansion protein, pqn41-c, which leads to linker cell death during development84. Collectively, the MAPKs appear to play vital roles in regulating polyQ proteins that can lead to cell death during both disease and development, and they may provide a critical link between stress and cell death by regulating the polyQ-expansion proteins.
Materials and Methods
Plasmid constructs
The human HTT-exon1 constructs (Q72 and Q25) were synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific and subcloned into the pcDNA/DEST40 vector (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #12274-015). The mouse full-length Hipk3 cDNA was codon-optimized and synthesized by Thermo Fisher Scientific and subcloned into the pTT5SH8Q2 vector (NRC Biotechnology) with N-terminal GFP tag. The human or rat Hipk3 cDNA failed to express efficiently in STHdh cells. The Q72-GFP construct (expressing Methionine-Q72-GFP) was cloned by PCR amplification from the HTT-exon1 constructs, and ligation to the pcDNA-GFP plasmid. The QuikChange Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Agilent Technologies) was used to generate the point mutation constructs: kinase-dead mouse Hipk3 (K226M and D322N), DN-MAPK11 (TGY (180-182) to AGF). The MAPK11 (#20355) and GFP-LC3B (#24987) construct was obtained from Addgene.
Cell culture and cell line generation
STHdh (CH00097 – Q7/Q7 and CH00096 – Q111/Q7) and human fibroblasts (GM03868 – Q45; GM21757 – Q68) were obtained from Coriell Cell Repositories. The Q47 fibroblasts were obtained from a Mongolian HD patient, and the study was approved by the ethic community of IBS at Fudan University (No.28). Verbal and written consent was obtained from patients. STHdh cells were cultured in DMEM (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #11965) with 10% FBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #10082). Immortalized human patient fibroblasts were generated by SV40 large T-antigen and cultured in DMEM with 15% FBS. Primary fibroblasts were cultured under the same condition. Human ESC-derived neurons stably expressing HTT-exon1 fragments were generated and authenticated as previously reported13, and the generation and authentication of HD iPSC-derived neurons were described previously29. All the mammalian cell lines were maintained at 37 °C incubator with 5% CO2, except STHdh cells, which were maintained at 33 °C with 5% CO2. The cells were tested for mycoplasma contamination every month. Primary mouse neurons from striata acutely dissected from P0 pups and tissue was digested with Trypsin (Sigma, #T1005, 2 mg/ml) and DNaseI (Roche, #10104159001, 1 mg/ml) in DMEM for 30 min with occasional mixing. The digestion was then stopped by 10% serum, and the tissue was then triturated and plated in the Neurobasal A medium (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #21103049) supplemented with 1× B27 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #17504044), 1× N2 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #17502048), 0.5× Antibiotic-Antimycotic (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #15240062) and 1× Glutamax (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #35050061)
Neuronal loss and apoptosis measurements
The secondary screen for neuronal loss of hESC-derived HD neurons was performed similarly to a previously study13. Basically, the neurons were moved from protective culture condition to standard culture condition and displayed mHTT-dependent neuronal shrinkage and death, which could be quantitated by confluence measurement using incuCyte (Essen Biosciences)13. For measurements of caspase-3 activity of the iPSC-derived neurons, the NucView 488 caspase-3 dye (Biotium, #30029) was used for the caspase 3 activity detection as an indicator of apoptosis. The images of the caspase-3 dye treated cells were taken by IncuCyte automatically. The phase-contrast images were then taken by the IncuCyte equipment (Essen BioScience) and analyzed for confluence by the IncuCyte software.
Protein extraction and western blots
Cell pellets were collected and lysed on ice for 30 min in 1× PBS+1% Triton X-100+1× Complete protease inhibitor (Roche), sonicated for 10 s, and centrifuged at > 20 000× g at 4 oC for 10 min. The supernatants were then loaded and transferred onto nitrocellulose membranes for western blots. For mouse brain tissues, the striata and cortices were dissected on ice and ground with a tissue grinder for 5 min at 60 Hz and lysed on ice for 60 min in brain lysis buffer (50 mM Tris, 250 mM NaCl, 5 mM EDTA, 1% Triton X-100 pH=7.4) + 1× Complete protease inhibitor (Roche). The samples were then spun at > 20 000× g at 4 oC for 15 min. The suspensions were then collected for western blots. The anti-HTT antibodies 2B718, ab185 and MW186 have been described previously. The antibody S830 for immunostaining of Htt aggregates is a kind gift from Dr Gillian Bates. Commercially purchased antibodies include anti-HTT antibodies 2166 (Millipore, #MAB2166, RRID:AB_2123255), 3B5H10 (Sigma, #P1874), anti-β-tubulin (Abcam, #ab6046, RRID:AB_2210370), anti-Ataxin3 (Millipore, #MAB5360), anti-Mapk11 (Thermofisher Scientific, #33-8700), anti-Tuj1 (Covance, #MMS-435P, RRID:AB_2313773), anti-Darpp32 (Abcam, #ab40801, RRID:AB_731843), anti-P62 (Abcam, #ab56416, RRID:AB_945626), anti-DAXX (Proteintech, #20489-1-AP, RRID:AB_10693620), anti-LC3B (Proteintech, #18725-1-AP), anti-HIPK3 (Santa cruz, #sc-66920, RRID:AB_2117734) ), anti-β-actin (Abcam, #ab6276), anti-Calnexin (Enzo, #ADI-SPA-860-F), anti-Gapdh (Santa cruz, #sc-25778), anti-α-tubulin (Proteintech, #11224-1-AP), anti-MAP2 (Santa cruz, #sc-20172), anti-phospho-ATF2 (Cell Signaling Technology, #9225, RRID:AB_2060933), anti-ATF2 (Cell Signaling Technology, #9226, RRID:AB_2060930), anti-Phospho-p38 (Cell Signaling Technology, #4511, RRID:AB_2139682), anti-Beclin1 (Thermofisher, #PA1-46464) and anti-LC3 antibody that preferentially detects LC3II (Thermofisher, #70012)52. The specificity of all antibodies has been validated by previous reports or our knockdown or knockout experiments.
Homogeneous time-resolved fluorescence assay
The HTRF assays were performed similarly to those previously described30. Basically, the cells were lysed in the lysis buffer (1× PBS with 0.4% Triton X-100 and 1× protease inhibitor final) and the target detected with indicated antibody pairs. The principles are explained in Supplementary information, Figure S1. Note that the 2B7/MW1 antibody pair is needed to test mHTT in human cells, while this antibody pair does not work properly in mouse STHdh cells. Another antibody pair 2B7/2166 was used to measure Htt levels (wtHtt and mHtt) in mouse STHdh cells28. This antibody pair could also be used to detect wtHTT proteins in the WT cells or HTT proteins including both mHTT and wtHTT in the HD cells21. For all samples, the total protein concentration (by BCA, Pierce, #23225) and/or the total DNA content (by Picogreen, #P7589) were measured to correct the loadings. Different protein concentrations or cell numbers per well were tested to ensure that the signals were in the linear range. Background corrections were performed by subtracting the background signals from blank samples.
cDNA and siRNA transfection
The siRNAs were reversely transfected into the STHdh cells with lipofectamine 2000 (Life Technologies, #11668) and into the iPSC-derived neurons with lipofectamine RNAiMAX (Life Technologies, #13778) whereas cDNAs were transfected with lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies, # L3000). All transfections were performed according to the manufacturer's protocol. Cells were collected 3 days after siRNA transfection or 2 days after cDNA transfection for western blot, HTRF or Immunofluorescence. All siRNAs have been validated by qPCR and/or western blots for target knockdown. For the siRNA target sequences, see Supplementary information, Data S1.
Mouse models
The generation and characterization of the Hdh140Q KI mice have been previously described34. Mice were provided by Dr. Marian DiFiglia at Massachusetts's General Hospital, USA. The mice were then bred at the mouse facility at Fudan University. Mapk11 and Hipk3 knockouts were generated by Cyagen Biosciences Inc. using TALEN technology. The knockout mice were produced by microinjecting TALEN mRNAs into fertilized eggs from the C57BL/6 strain. The knockout alleles were validated by sequencing for an early frameshift of the target genes as well as western blots (Supplementary information, Figure S5). The mice were back-crossed to the C57BL/6 WT background for five generations before crossing to the HD mice (with the same genetic background) or performing other experiments. Mice were group-housed (up to five adult mice per cage) in individually vented cages with a 12 h light/dark cycle. The mouse experiments were carried out following the general guidelines published by the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care. The Animal Care and Use Committee of the School of Medicine at Fudan University approved the protocol used in animal experiments (Approval #20140904). For protein extraction from the mouse brain, the brains were collected and the striata and cortices were acutely dissected.
RT-qPCR
mRNA levels were determined by qPCR. RNA from siRNA-transfected or compound-treated cells was extracted using RNAprep Pure Cell/Bacteria Kit (Tiangen, #DP430). DNase I was added to break down the genomic DNA. Random-primed cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription using the FastQuant RT Kit (Tiangen, #KR106). qPCR was then performed using SYBR Green Realtime PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, #QPK-201). All the primers were tested with standard curve, amplification efficiency was between 95% and 105%, and the R2 for linear relationship is > 0.999. No reverse-transcriptase controls were used to ensure the specificity of the signals.
mRNA stability measurements were similar as previously described87. The cultured cells were treated with transcriptional inhibitor actinomycin D (5 μg/ml, Sigma, #A9315) and the cells were collected at indicated time points after treatment for measurement of HTT mRNA levels by RT-qPCR.
For all the qPCR primer sequences see Supplementary information, Data S1.
Nonradioactive pulse-chase experiments
The Click-iT AHA (ℒ-azidohomoalaine) kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #C10102) was used and the assay was similar to that previously described30,88. Briefly, cells were starved with methionine-free media for 1 h prior to adding Click-iT AHA for 12 h (pulse, 50 μM). The cells were then incubated in normal serum-containing media for the indicated periods before harvesting (chase) for analysis. The Click-iT AHA labeled proteins were then conjugated with biotin by treatment with biotin-DIBO Alkyne (Thermo Fisher Scientific, #C10412). The biotin conjugated proteins were then pulled-down using streptavidin beads (Pierce, #20349), and the HTT level is determined by HTRF88.
HTT promoter transcription assay
The assay was performed similarly to that previously described48. Basically, cells were transfected with the reporter plasmid expressing firefly luciferase driven by the human HTT promoter (pHTT-A) mixed with control plasmid expressing renilla luciferase (pRL-TK) using lipofectamine 3000. The pHTT-A and pRL-TK plasmids were co-transfected at 10:1 ratio. After 48 h of transfection, firefly and renilla luciferase activities were measured using the dual-glo luciferase reporter assay system (Promega, #E2920). The firefly luciferase activity was normalized to the renilla luciferase activity to reflect the promoter activity.
Compound treatment
For compound treatment, the cells were plated at the same density as the one for siRNA transfection, and the compounds were diluted in OPTI-MEM in 10× concentrations and added 1-2 days later. The cells were then collected after 1-2 days for further analysis. Compounds were obtained as follows: bafilomycin A (Sigma, #B1793, 100 nM), epoxomicin (Cayman Chemical, #BU4061T, 100 nM), MG132 (Sigma, #M7449, 1 μM), ammonium chloride (Sigma, #A9434, 10 mM), SB202190 (Sigma, #152121-30-7, at indicated concentrations), DPI (Sigma, #D2926, 100 nM, at indicated concentrations) and AST487 (Chemexpress, #HY-15002, at indicated concentrations).
Immunofluorescence and immunohistochemistry
For immunofluorescence, cultured cells were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) after washing with 1× PBS for three times, and then permeablizing in 0.5% TritonX-100 for 10 min. The cells were then blocked in 4% BSA + 0.1% Triton X-100 in 1× PBS for 30 min and incubated overnight at 4 °C with primary antibodies, and then washed three times with blocking buffer and incubated with secondary antibody at room temperature for 1 h. Coverslips were then washed three times, stained with 0.5 mg/ml DAPI (Beyotime Biotechnology, #C1002) for 5 min at room temperature, and then mounted in vectashield mounting medium (Vector, #H-1002).
For mouse brain slices, mice were killed and then perfused with PBS and 4% paraformaldehyde. The brains were then dissected out, and fixed with 4% PFA for 48 h at 4 °C. The brains were then incubated in 30% sucrose for 48 h at 4 °C and sectioned at −20 °C into 35 μm thick slices. The immunofluorescence experiments were then performed as described above for cells except substituting 3% donkey serum for blocking.
Sample brain slices from human patients were obtained from Addenbrookes Hospital (Cambridge, UK) with an appropriate ethical approval from Brain UK (14/007). The slices were deparaffinized with dimethylbenzene, rehydrated with reverse gradient ethanol and then boiled in sodium citrate buffer (pH = 6.0) for antigen retrieval. Endogenous peroxidase was then quenched with 3% H2O2. Incubation with primary antibodies (Hipk3: GeneTex, #GTX108369 and Mapk11: Thermofisher Scientific #33-8700) was at 4 °C overnight after blocking with 4% goat serum. Detection was with peroxidase streptavidin-biotinylated complex and diaminobenzidine (DAB)/H2O2 (Boster, #SA1050). Experiments without primary antibodies and knockdown experiments in cells were utilized to confirm the specificity of the antibodies. Images were taken using Zeiss LSM confocal microscopes.
Mouse behavioral experiments
All the behavioral experiments were performed during the light phase and the experimenters were blind to the genotype of each mouse. Both males and females were used. All the mice were kept in the behavioral test room in dim red light for 1 h before starting the experiments. For activity tests, mice were placed in a pen holder with a mashed surface (98 mm height × 91 mm diameter) for 5 min. The activity number indicates the total number of active behaviors including rearing (lifting two paws, most frequent) and climbing (lifting three or more paws onto the wall, rare). For open-field tests, mice were placed in a 30 × 30 × 40 cm white Plexiglas chamber (equipment from Med-Associates) in a behavior room, and locomotion was captured by camera on top of the chamber and recorded for 15 min. The traveling trace and distance were then analyzed using the Med-Associates Activity Monitor program. For gait analysis, CatWalk XT was used as a complete system for quantitative assessment of the gait of mice. Mice were placed in an enclosed walkway on a glass plate and allowed to traverse from one side of the walkway to the other. Their motion and footprints were captured by a high speed video camera positioned underneath the walkway. The equipment was set so that failure to move to the other side within 9 sec was considered as a failure, not suitable for quantification. Three successful trials were performed for each mouse and the data were analyzed with the CatWalk software to obtain the different parameters. The principle component analysis was based on the average of three trials for each mouse. Some of the animals were tested by all three behavioral assays whenever time and equipment availability allowed.
Statistical analysis
Statistical comparisons between two groups were conducted by the two-tailed unpaired Student's t-tests. Statistical comparisons among multiple groups were conducted by ANOVA tests. Significance was established at P< 0.05. In all graphs, error bars indicate SEM, and the biological replicate numbers are indicated on top of each bar and/or as the n numbers in the legends. The statistical powers for all analyses were calculated and confirmed to be > 80%. The key experiments including detecting Htt level changes upon Mapk11/Hipk3 knockdown or knockout and the analysis of aggregates or LC3 puncta were confirmed by blind tests in which different investigators prepared/labeled the samples and the analyses were carried out without information exchange before obtaining the results. The mouse behavioral experiments were all performed in completely blind manner. Data were excluded when there were clear indications of artifact or experimental failures, such as contamination, transfection/infection failure, etc.
Author Contributions
BL initiated the project and designed the experiments; MY, Y F, YL, PW carried out the experiments in cell cultures and mouse tissues; YL performed immunohistochemistry in human putamen slices; BL, YY, LM and YF performed the experiments in human stem cell-derived neurons; MY and HS carried out the mouse behavioral experiments; XW performed molecular cloning; SL provided essential reagents and help with autophagy-relevant experiments.
Competing Financial Interests
The authors declare no competing financial interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank Drs Marian Difiglia, Juan Botas and Leslie Pond for critical readings of earlier versions of the manuscript, Drs James Palacino and Marc Hild for providing help with the screening, Drs Min Jiang, Linyun Liu and Qian Huang for their technical support of mouse behavioral experiments, Dr Chenqi Lu (Biostatistician) for performing the statistical analysis, Dr Gillian Bates for providing the S830 antibody. The authors wished to thank National Natural Science Foundation of China and National Key Research and Development Program of China (NSFC 91649105, 2016YFC0905100, and NSFC 31422024) for funding supports. FY is supported by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2016M601495), SL is supported by Medical Research Council (MR/M023605/1).
Footnotes
(Supplementary information is linked to the online version of the paper on the Cell Research website.)
Supplementary Information
References
- Martin JB. Molecular basis of the neurodegenerative disorders. N Engl J Med 1999; 340:1970–1980. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Soto C. Unfolding the role of protein misfolding in neurodegenerative diseases. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4:49–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- The Huntington's Disease Collaborative Research Group. A novel gene containing a trinucleotide repeat that is expanded and unstable on Huntington's disease chromosomes. Cell 1993; 72:971–983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rubinsztein DC, Carmichael J. Huntington's disease: molecular basis of neurodegeneration. Expert Rev Mol Med 2003; 5:1–21. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yamamoto A, Lucas JJ, Hen R. Reversal of neuropathology and motor dysfunction in a conditional model of Huntington's disease. Cell 2000; 101:57–66. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodriguez-Lebron E, Denovan-Wright EM, Nash K, Lewin AS, Mandel RJ. Intrastriatal rAAV-mediated delivery of anti-huntingtin shRNAs induces partial reversal of disease progression in R6/1 Huntington's disease transgenic mice. Mol Ther 2005; 12:618–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Harper SQ, Staber PD, He X, et al. RNA interference improves motor and neuropathological abnormalities in a Huntington's disease mouse model. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102:5820–5825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- DiFiglia M, Sena-Esteves M, Chase K, et al. Therapeutic silencing of mutant huntingtin with siRNA attenuates striatal and cortical neuropathology and behavioral deficits. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2007; 104:17204–17209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kordasiewicz HB, Stanek LM, Wancewicz EV, et al. Sustained therapeutic reversal of Huntington's disease by transient repression of huntingtin synthesis. Neuron 2012; 74:1031–1044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Jimenez-Sanchez M, Lam W, Hannus M, et al. siRNA screen identifies QPCT as a druggable target for Huntington's disease. Nat Chem Biol 2015; 11:347–354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Arrasate M, Mitra S, Schweitzer ES, Segal MR, Finkbeiner S. Inclusion body formation reduces levels of mutant huntingtin and the risk of neuronal death. Nature 2004; 431:805–810. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller J, Arrasate M, Brooks E, et al. Identifying polyglutamine protein species in situ that best predict neurodegeneration. Nat Chem Biol 2011; 7:925–934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu B, Palacino J. A novel human embryonic stem cell-derived Huntington's disease neuronal model exhibits mutant huntingtin (mHTT) aggregates and soluble mHTT-dependent neurodegeneration. FASEB J 2013; 27:1820–1829. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park J, Al-Ramahi I, Tan Q, et al. RAS-MAPK-MSK1 pathway modulates ataxin 1 protein levels and toxicity in SCA1. Nature 2013; 498:325–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nasir J, Floresco SB, O'Kusky JR, et al. Targeted disruption of the Huntington's disease gene results in embryonic lethality and behavioral and morphological changes in heterozygotes. Cell 1995; 81:811–823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Duyao MP, Auerbach AB, Ryan A, et al. Inactivation of the mouse Huntington's disease gene homolog Hdh. Science 1995; 269:407–410. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Becanovic K, Norremolle A, Neal SJ, et al. A SNP in the HTT promoter alters NF-kappaB binding and is a bidirectional genetic modifier of Huntington disease. Nat Neurosci 2015; 18:807–816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiss A, Abramowski D, Bibel M, et al. Single-step detection of mutant huntingtin in animal and human tissues: a bioassay for Huntington's disease. Anal Biochem 2009; 395:8–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathis G. Rare earth cryptates and homogeneous fluoroimmunoassays with human sera. Clin Chem 1993; 39:1953–1959. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paganetti P, Weiss A, Trapp M, et al. Development of a method for the high-throughput quantification of cellular proteins. Chembiochem 2009; 10:1678–1688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Weiss A, Trager U, Wild EJ, et al. Mutant huntingtin fragmentation in immune cells tracks Huntington's disease progression. J Clin Invest 2012; 122:3731–3736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moscovitch-Lopatin M, Goodman RE, Eberly S, et al. HTRF analysis of soluble huntingtin in PHAROS PBMCs. Neurology 2013; 81:1134–1140. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu C, Orozco C, Boyer J, et al. BioGPS: an extensible and customizable portal for querying and organizing gene annotation resources. Genome Biol 2009; 10:R130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hawrylycz MJ, Lein ES, Guillozet-Bongaarts AL, et al. An anatomically comprehensive atlas of the adult human brain transcriptome. Nature 2012; 489:391–399. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moriguchi T, Kuroyanagi N, Yamaguchi K, et al. A novel kinase cascade mediated by mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 6 and MKK3. J Biol Chem 1996; 271:13675–13679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Curtin JF, Cotter TG. JNK regulates HIPK3 expression and promotes resistance to Fas-mediated apoptosis in DU 145 prostate carcinoma cells. J Biol Chem 2004; 279:17090–17100. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Trettel F, Rigamonti D, Hilditch-Maguire P, et al. Dominant phenotypes produced by the HD mutation in STHdh (Q111) striatal cells. Hum Mol Genet 2000; 9:2799–2809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Liang Y, Yao Y, Lu M, Hou J, Yu S, Lu B. TR-FRET assays for endogenous huntingtin protein level in mouse cells. J Huntingtons Dis 2014; 3:253–259. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Yao Y, Cui X, Al-Ramahi I, et al. A striatal-enriched intronic GPCR modulates huntingtin levels and toxicity. Elife 2015; 4. doi: 10.7554/eLife.05449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lu B, Al-Ramahi I, Valencia A, et al. Identification of NUB1 as a suppressor of mutant Huntington toxicity via enhanced protein clearance. Nat Neurosci 2013; 16:562–570. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Warr N, Siggers P, Carre GA, Wells S, Greenfield A. Genetic analyses reveal functions for MAP2K3 and MAP2K6 in mouse testis determination. Biol Reprod 2016; 94:103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Shojima N, Hara K, Fujita H, et al. Depletion of homeodomain-interacting protein kinase 3 impairs insulin secretion and glucose tolerance in mice. Diabetologia 2012; 55:3318–3330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Beardmore VA, Hinton HJ, Eftychi C, et al. Generation and characterization of p38beta (MAPK11) gene-targeted mice. Mol Cell Biol 2005; 25:10454–10464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menalled LB, Sison JD, Dragatsis I, Zeitlin S, Chesselet MF. Time course of early motor and neuropathological anomalies in a knockin mouse model of Huntington's disease with 140 CAG repeats. J Comp Neurol 2003; 465:11–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cui X, Liang Q, Liang Y, Lu M, Ding Y, Lu B. TR-FRET assays of Huntingtin protein fragments reveal temperature and PolyQ length-dependent conformational changes. Sci Rep 2014; 4:5601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hu J, Liu J, Corey DR. Allele-selective inhibition of huntingtin expression by switching to an miRNA-like RNAi mechanism. Chem Biol 2010; 17:1183–1188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hammaker D, Topolewski K, Edgar M, et al. Decreased collagen-induced arthritis severity and adaptive immunity in MKK-6-deficient mice. Arthritis Rheum 2012; 64:678–687. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Suzuki H, Wu J, Hossain K, et al. Involvement of MKK6 in TCRalphabeta(int)CD69lo: a target population for apoptotic cell death in thymocytes. FASEB J 2003; 17:1538–1540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor DM, Moser R, Regulier E, et al. MAP kinase phosphatase 1 (MKP-1/DUSP1) is neuroprotective in Huntington's disease via additive effects of JNK and p38 inhibition. J Neurosci 2013; 33:2313–2325. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Labadorf A, Hoss AG, Lagomarsino V, et al. RNA sequence analysis of human huntington disease brain reveals an extensive increase in inflammatory and developmental gene expression. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0143563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Stein B, Yang MX, Young DB, et al. p38-2, a novel mitogen-activated protein kinase with distinct properties. J Biol Chem 1997; 272:19509–19517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Valencia A, Sapp E, Kimm JS, et al. Elevated NADPH oxidase activity contributes to oxidative stress and cell death in Huntington's disease. Hum Mol Genet 2013; 22:1112–1131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- Wang Y, Huang S, Sah VP, et al. Cardiac muscle cell hypertrophy and apoptosis induced by distinct members of the p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase family. J Biol Chem 1998; 273:2161–2168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Frantz B, Klatt T, Pang M, et al. The activation state of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase determines the efficiency of ATP competition for pyridinylimidazole inhibitor binding. Biochemistry 1998; 37:13846–13853. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Varjosalo M, Bjorklund M, Cheng F, et al. Application of active and kinase-deficient kinome collection for identification of kinases regulating hedgehog signaling. Cell 2008; 133:537–548. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rochat-Steiner V, Becker K, Micheau O, et al. FIST/HIPK3: a Fas/FADD-interacting serine/threonine kinase that induces FADD phosphorylation and inhibits fas-mediated Jun NH(2)-terminal kinase activation. J Exp Med 2000; 192:1165–1174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Davis MI, Hunt JP, Herrgard S, et al. Comprehensive analysis of kinase inhibitor selectivity. Nat Biotechnol 2011; 29:1046–1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang R, Luo Y, Ly PT, et al. Sp1 regulates human huntingtin gene expression. J Mol Neurosci 2012; 47:311–321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mizushima N, Yoshimori T. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy 2007; 3:542–545. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Luo S, Garcia-Arencibia M, Zhao R, et al. Bim inhibits autophagy by recruiting Beclin 1 to microtubules. Mol Cell 2012; 47:359–370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mathew R, Karp CM, Beaudoin B, et al. Autophagy suppresses tumorigenesis through elimination of p62. Cell 2009; 137:1062–1075. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hancock MK, Hermanson SB, Dolman NJ. A quantitative TR-FRET plate reader immunoassay for measuring autophagy. Autophagy 2012; 8:1227–1244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lan HC, Wu CF, Shih HM, Chung BC. Death-associated protein 6 (Daxx) mediates cAMP-dependent stimulation of Cyp11a1 (P450scc) transcription. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:5910–5916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Puto LA, Brognard J, Hunter T. Transcriptional repressor DAXX promotes prostate cancer tumorigenicity via suppression of autophagy. J Biol Chem 2015; 290:15406–15420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- HD iPSC Consortium. Induced pluripotent stem cells from patients with Huntington's disease show CAG-repeat-expansion-associated phenotypes. Cell Stem Cell 2012; 11:264–278. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Daneault JF, Carignan B, Sadikot AF, Duval C. Inter-limb coupling during diadochokinesis in Parkinson's and Huntington's disease. Neurosci Res 2015; 97:60–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mandeville DS, Osternig LR, Lantz BA, Mohler CG, Chou LS. A multivariate statistical ranking of clinical and gait measures before and after total knee replacement. Gait Posture 2009; 30:197–200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller JP, Yates BE, Al-Ramahi I, et al. A genome-scale RNA-interference screen identifies RRAS signaling as a pathologic feature of Huntington's disease. PLoS Genet 2012; 8:e1003042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Doumanis J, Wada K, Kino Y, Moore AW, Nukina N. RNAi screening in Drosophila cells identifies new modifiers of mutant huntingtin aggregation. PLoS One 2009; 4:e7275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang S, Binari R, Zhou R, Perrimon N. A genomewide RNA interference screen for modifiers of aggregates formation by mutant Huntingtin in Drosophila. Genetics 2010; 184:1165–1179. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller JP, Holcomb J, Al-Ramahi I, et al. Matrix metalloproteinases are modifiers of huntingtin proteolysis and toxicity in Huntington's disease. Neuron 2010; 67:199–212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeitlin S, Liu JP, Chapman DL, Papaioannou VE, Efstratiadis A. Increased apoptosis and early embryonic lethality in mice nullizygous for the Huntington's disease gene homologue. Nat Genet 1995; 11:155–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rodan LH, Cohen J, Fatemi A, et al. A novel neurodevelopmental disorder associated with compound heterozygous variants in the huntingtin gene. Eur J Hum Genet 2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- Arteaga-Bracho EE, Gulinello M, Winchester ML, et al. Postnatal and adult consequences of loss of huntingtin during development: Implications for Huntington's disease. Neurobiol Dis 2016; 96:144–155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Grondin R, Kaytor MD, Ai Y, et al. Six-month partial suppression of Huntingtin is well tolerated in the adult rhesus striatum. Brain 2012; 135:1197–1209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wang G, Liu X, Gaertig MA, Li S, Li XJ. Ablation of huntingtin in adult neurons is nondeleterious but its depletion in young mice causes acute pancreatitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2016; 113:3359–3364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Drouet V, Perrin V, Hassig R, et al. Sustained effects of nonallele-specific Huntingtin silencing. Ann Neurol 2009; 65:276–285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Boudreau RL, McBride JL, Martins I, et al. Nonallele-specific silencing of mutant and wild-type huntingtin demonstrates therapeutic efficacy in Huntington's disease mice. Mol Ther 2009; 17:1053–1063. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gagnon KT, Pendergraff HM, Deleavey GF, et al. Allele-selective inhibition of mutant huntingtin expression with antisense oligonucleotides targeting the expanded CAG repeat. Biochemistry 2010; 49:10166–10178. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zhang Y, Engelman J, Friedlander RM. Allele-specific silencing of mutant Huntington's disease gene. J Neurochem 2009; 108:82–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- van Bilsen PH, Jaspers L, Lombardi MS, et al. Identification and allele-specific silencing of the mutant huntingtin allele in Huntington's disease patient-derived fibroblasts. Hum Gene Ther 2008; 19:710–719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mangiarini L, Sathasivam K, Seller M, et al. Exon 1 of the HD gene with an expanded CAG repeat is sufficient to cause a progressive neurological phenotype in transgenic mice. Cell 1996; 87:493–506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schilling G, Savonenko AV, Klevytska A, et al. Nuclear-targeting of mutant huntingtin fragments produces Huntington's disease-like phenotypes in transgenic mice. Hum Mol Genet 2004; 13:1599–1610. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slow EJ, van Raamsdonk J, Rogers D, et al. Selective striatal neuronal loss in a YAC128 mouse model of Huntington disease. Hum Mol Genet 2003; 12:1555–1567. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gray M, Shirasaki DI, Cepeda C, et al. Full-length human mutant huntingtin with a stable polyglutamine repeat can elicit progressive and selective neuropathogenesis in BACHD mice. J Neurosci 2008; 28:6182–6195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Menalled LB, Kudwa AE, Miller S, et al. Comprehensive behavioral and molecular characterization of a new knock-in mouse model of Huntington's disease: zQ175. PLoS One 2012; 7:e49838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Langfelder P, Cantle JP, Chatzopoulou D, et al. Integrated genomics and proteomics define huntingtin CAG length-dependent networks in mice. Nat Neurosci 2016; 19:623–633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Alexandrov V, Brunner D, Menalled LB, et al. Large-scale phenome analysis defines a behavioral signature for Huntington's disease genotype in mice. Nat Biotechnol 2016; 34:838–844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ochaba J, Lukacsovich T, Csikos G, et al. Potential function for the Huntingtin protein as a scaffold for selective autophagy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2014; 111:16889–16894. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rui YN, Xu Z, Patel B, et al. Huntingtin functions as a scaffold for selective macroautophagy. Nat Cell Biol 2015; 17:262–275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Joassard OR, Belanger G, Karmouch J, et al. HuR mediates changes in the stability of AChR beta-subunit mRNAs after skeletal muscle denervation. J Neurosci 2015; 35:10949–10962. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Paroo Z, Ye X, Chen S, Liu Q. Phosphorylation of the human microRNA-generating complex mediates MAPK/Erk signaling. Cell 2009; 139:112–122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Merienne K, Helmlinger D, Perkin GR, Devys D, Trottier Y. Polyglutamine expansion induces a protein-damaging stress connecting heat shock protein 70 to the JNK pathway. J Biol Chem 2003; 278:16957–16967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Blum ES, Abraham MC, Yoshimura S, Lu Y, Shaham S. Control of nonapoptotic developmental cell death in Caenorhabditis elegans by a polyglutamine-repeat protein. Science 2012; 335:970–973. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sapp E, Valencia A, Li X, et al. Native mutant huntingtin in human brain: evidence for prevalence of full-length monomer. J Biol Chem 2012; 287:13487–13499. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ko J, Ou S, Patterson PH. New anti-huntingtin monoclonal antibodies: implications for huntingtin conformation and its binding proteins. Brain Res Bull 2001; 56:319–329. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leppek K, Schott J, Reitter S, Poetz F, Hammond MC, Stoecklin G. Roquin promotes constitutive mRNA decay via a conserved class of stem-loop recognition motifs. Cell 2013; 153:869–881. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wu P, Lu MX, Cui XT, et al. A high-throughput-compatible assay to measure the degradation of endogenous Huntingtin proteins. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2016; 37:1307–1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.