Abstract
The nematode Angiostrongylus cantonensis is a zoonotic pathogen and the etiological agent of human angiostrongyliasis or rat lungworm disease. Hawai‘i, particularly east Hawai‘i Island, is the epicenter for angiostrongyliasis in the USA. Rats (Rattus spp.) are the definitive hosts while gastropods are intermediate hosts. The main objective of this study was to collect adult A. cantonensis from wild rats to isolate protein for the development of a blood-based diagnostic, in the process we evaluated the prevalence of infection in wild rats. A total of 545 wild rats were sampled from multiple sites in the South Hilo District of east Hawai‘i Island. Adult male and female A. cantonensis (3,148) were collected from the hearts and lungs of humanely euthanized Rattus rattus, and R. exulans. Photomicrography and documentation of multiple stages of this parasitic nematode in situ were recorded. A total of 45.5% (197/433) of rats inspected had lung lobe(s) (mostly upper right) which appeared granular indicating this lobe may serve as a filter for worm passage to the rest of the lung. Across Rattus spp., 72.7% (396/545) were infected with adult worms, but 93.9% (512/545) of the rats were positive for A. cantonensis infection based on presence of live adult worms, encysted adult worms, L3 larvae and/or by PCR analysis of brain tissue. In R. rattus we observed an inverse correlation with increased body mass and infection level of adult worms, and a direct correlation between body mass and encysted adult worms in the lung tissue, indicating that larger (older) rats may have developed a means of clearing infections or regulating the worm burden upon reinfection. The exceptionally high prevalence of A. cantonensis infection in Rattus spp. in east Hawai‘i Island is cause for concern and indicates the potential for human infection with this emerging zoonosis is greater than previously thought.
Introduction
The rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) is a nematode that causes human angiostrongyliasis (frequently called rat lungworm disease or RLWD). East Hawai‘i Island is the epicenter for angiostrongyliasis in the USA [1]. Symptoms of A. cantonensis infection range from mild (flu-like) to severe (including eosinophilic meningitis, paralysis, and coma), and the infection can be fatal in humans [2, 3]. Rats (Rattus spp.) are the definitive hosts while gastropods are obligatory intermediate hosts. Angiostrongylus cantonensis was initially discovered in China [4], and in Hawai‘i the first human case of angiostrongyliasis was reported in 1959 [5]. This zoonotic pathogen is also found in Asia, Australia, Brazil, the Caribbean islands and other Pacific Islands and has spread to and within the US continent (Louisiana, Texas, Oklahoma, and Florida) with more than 2,800 cases of human infection reported in 30 countries [2, 6, 7, 8]. Angiostrongylus cantonensis is typically described as a tropical parasite but it appears to be adapting to gastropod hosts found in more temperate climates [9]. The number of reported human angiostrongyliasis cases has recently increased in Hawai‘i and this increase parallels the circa 2004 introduction and subsequent spread of the semi-slug (Parmarion martensi) in east Hawai‘i Island [10]. For the period 2010–2014 an average of 2.4 human cases per year were reported by the Hawai‘i Health Information Corporation (HHIC), which bases numbers on discharge data from hospitals and emergency rooms statewide, indicating that the cases were sufficiently severe to warrant a trip to the hospital. In 2015 the HHIC reported nine cases, in 2016 reported 21 cases, and from January to April 2017, reported 16 cases of human angiostrongyliasis in Hawai‘i, including an outbreak on Maui. An invasive, highly competent intermediate host, P. martensi, has also recently been documented on Maui by one of the authors of this paper (Kay Howe, personal communication). Based on these data there is an obvious, relatively recent, upward trend in the number of cases of human angiostrongyliasis, most of them originating on Hawai‘i Island.
Three rat species are found in Hawai‘i, including the Polynesian rat (R. exulans), the Norway rat (R. norvegicus), and the black rat (R. rattus). The arrival of Polynesian rats in Hawai‘i is attributed to voyaging Polynesians, estimated between 1219–1266 A.D [11]. Norway rats are thought to have arrived in Hawai‘i between 1825–1842 [12, 13], while black rats are thought to have arrived on Oahu, Hawai‘i between 1870–1890 and subsequently spread to the other Hawaiian Islands over the next 10–15 years [14]. The Norway rat is the largest rat found in Hawai‘i, reaching 203 to 254 mm long. The black rat is a medium to large sized rat (127 to 178 mm long) with the Polynesian rat being smaller in size (102 to 127 mm long).
In a previous study [15], all three species of rats were captured in 2009 and 2011 at six different locations on east Hawai‘i Island, 54% (20/37) tested positive for adult A. cantonensis worms with 1 to 30 adult worms detected in each positive rat. In this study, 100% of rat lung samples tested positive by real-time PCR for A. cantonensis, including those that were not visually positive for adult worms. In another previous study [1] 61 rats (R. rattus) were trapped in the Waiakea Forest Reserve in east Hawai‘i Island at 533 m elevation. Upon necropsy 10/61 (16.4%) of rats examined had adult worms in their hearts and/or lungs, with a range of 1–24 worms and with an average of 7.5 adult worms found. Surveys of A. cantonensis infection in other R. rattus studies show similar levels in Jamaica (12.9%), Australia (16%), Puerto Rico (15.9%), and the Canary Islands (15%) at one time point and much higher (55.6%) at another [16]. A recent study conducted in Florida found 22.8% (39/171) R. rattus positive for A. cantonensis [9].
The life cycle of A. cantonensis includes five larval stages (L1-L5) before becoming a sexually mature adult with larvae increasing in size throughout each stage of growth [17]. Larval stages L1 through L3 develop in the intermediate gastropod host. L1 larvae measure approximately 0.3 mm in length and 0.015 mm in width. Sufficient growth to reach the threshold of L2 occurs within six-twelve days and molting begins. L2 larvae are about 0.45 by 0.03 mm with L3 larvae being of similar size. It is the L3 larvae which are infective to rats, humans and other susceptible hosts. In humans, ingestion of the L3 larvae on uncooked or unfrozen produce or in liquids (e.g. water) are thought to be the main causes of infection. Rats become infected by consuming an infected gastropod harboring L3 larvae. L3 larvae then burrow into the small intestine and enter the rat’s bloodstream. L3 larvae are carried in the blood to the brain, penetrating the central nervous system (CNS) within 24 hours. The larvae continue to grow within the brain. During the sixth or seventh day after ingestion, molting occurs again. The larvae at this point are now L4 stage with a length around 1.0 mm by 0.04 mm in width; by the time they become young sub adults (L5), they are approximately 2 mm by 0.06 mm in diameter. Before leaving the brain the L5 larvae grow to approximately 12 mm (females) and 11 mm (males) in length. L5 larvae departing the brain are carried by the rat host’s blood flow to the heart and lungs, where, if successful, they may ensconce in a chamber of the heart or in the lung tissue, but with a majority ultimately residing in the pulmonary artery. These adult worms reside in the heart and lungs and increase substantially in size (females 35 mm x 0.6 mm, males 25 mm x 0.4 mm), become sexually mature and reproduce thus completing the life cycle [17].
In this study we visually document multiple stages and locations of development for A. cantonensis in wild rats, determine prevalence, and examine patterns of infection. We describe incidental evidence of the impact of infection on rat tissues, and evaluate data trends of A. cantonensis infection in wild-caught rats from east Hawai‘i Island. We then interpret and discuss how these data can be used to improve risk assessment and guide research development to better prevent and control human infection with A. cantonensis in affected areas.
Methods
Study area
Sampling was conducted between 31 January and 24 February 2017 on the east side of Hawai‘i Island, in and around the South Hilo District (Fig 1). This region has a tropical rainforest climate with considerable rainfall occurring throughout the year (average of 3218 mm) with an average annual temperature of 23.25°C.
Rat capture
Wild rats were captured from multiple sites in the South Hilo District of east Hawai‘i Island by USDA-APHIS National Wildlife Research Center (NWRC) and the Hawai‘i Department of Health (HDOH) Vector Control Branch. Due to the paucity of data on A. cantonensis infection in rats in Hawai‘i, rat trapping was conducted opportunistically. Sampling sites chosen and number of traps used were based on minimizing trapping effort and maximizing individuals caught. Trapping efforts ranged from sea level to 400 m in elevation and typically consisted of sites along roads and forest-edge in close proximity to urban areas, along with one rural farm site. No specific permission for trapping was required from the authorities, because the target species are classified as invasive pests and the methods used did not involve any endangered or protected species. However, permission for trapping was given by the landowners. Wild rats were trapped using Haguruma live-traps (Osaka, Japan), and transported to a laboratory facility in early morning. Rats were humanely euthanized in a CO2 chamber upon arrival to the lab. Every effort was made to ensure minimal suffering. Rats were immediately dusted with pyrethrin post-euthanisia. All animal procedures were conducted according to the Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research [18] and following approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee protocols (US Department of Agriculture, National Wildlife Research Center) QA-2747 and (University of Hawaii) 17–2553. This study was approved by University of Hawaii Institutional Biosafety Committee (protocol 17-01-505-08A).
Harvesting of worms
Post euthanasia, rats were assigned a specimen ID number and the species, body mass, and sex (when discernable) was recorded. The heart and lungs were removed from each specimen and placed in a standard petri dish. Using either Leica or Olympus (4X-10X) dissecting microscopes, adult worms were manually extracted with fine-tipped forceps from the pulmonary artery, heart, and lungs. Other data collection (e.g. presence of L3 larvae, encysted adults, and a recognizable pattern of granular progression in one to five lung lobes) was based on observations as the study progressed; these sometimes did not occur or were not detected until part way through the study. Thus, recording for some measures was not uniform and complete throughout from start to finish in all specimens. Fresh rat feces from some rats were collected from under the rat traps and immediately dissolved in tap water for microscopic viewing. A main goal of this study was to isolate adult A. cantonensis for diagnostics development and exposure to bleach would cause deleterious protein degradation. Consequently, dissection tools were washed between uses on each rat in 70% ETOH instead of bleach and wiped dry with disposable Kimwipes® (Kimberly-Clark, Roswell, GA, USA) between uses. All tools were soaked and cleaned in bleach at the end of each day. Harvested worms were tallied by sex, washed 3X in 1X PBS and placed in pre-weighed tubes containing cold 1X PBS with 1X protease inhibitor (Halt™ Protease and Phosphatase Inhibitor Single-Use Cocktail EDTA-free, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) on ice. Worms found within sections of heart/lung contaminated with rat hair and/or pyrethrin powder as well as worms that burst upon isolation were discarded and were not tallied. Whenever a tube became at least half full, that tube was again weighed to determine the net mass of the worms, and then stored at -80°C. A sample of the heart/lung tissue for every rat dissected was placed in 150 ul DNA lysis buffer (0.1 M Tris–HCl, 0.1 M EDTA, 2% SDS) and stored at -80°C. The rat carcasses and compartmentalized heart/lung tissues were placed in an individually labelled plastic bag and frozen (immediately at -20°C and then moved to -80°C for long term storage). Prior to carcass disposal, rat heads were collected from 273 carcasses and stored along with the corresponding heart and lung tissue at -80°C. Images and video taken throughout were captured by a MiniVID microscope digital camera (LW Scientific, Inc., Lawrenceville, GA, USA), and processed by TOUPVIEW software v. 3.7 (AmScope, Irvine, CA, USA).
Molecular detection of A. cantonensis
DNA was extracted and qPCR carried out as previously described [19] on extracted brain tissues, several samples of microscopically small (partially) black worms observed in the lungs, and other suspected non-A. cantonensis worms. The brains from rats that were either completely negative for all visual cues of infection (n = 27) or were negative for all visual cues but were not completely evaluated (n = 11) were dissected for the visual and molecular detection of A cantonensis (29 R rattus; 7 R exulans; 2 unknown). An approximate 30 mg cross-section of the cerebellum, taken diagonally from the superior-anterior to the inferior-posterior, which included white matter from the brain stem, was the standard tissue collected and stored in DNA lysis buffer or ATL (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). Dissection tools were either individual use (blades), or cleaned with bleach, rinsed 2X with water, dipped in 70% ETOH to dry, and exposed to 200 m J/cm2 for 1 minute on each side in a UVP cx-2000 UV crosslinker between uses. If worms were found anywhere in the brain, they were processed separately for verification of species or were combined with a portion of adjacent brain tissue.
Data analysis
Generalized linear models (GLMs) were used to explore the effects of host species, host sex, host body mass, and sampling site on infection levels of A. cantonensis. Rats were grouped by body mass into six categories (<45, 45–60, 60–90, 90–120, 120–150, and ≥150 g). If an individual’s body mass was between categories, then it was grouped with the upper category. A binary logistic regression was used to model the prevalence (herein defined as presence/absence observed in this study) of live adult A. cantonensis, encysted adult worms, L3 larvae, and granular lung lobe(s), as well as a negative binomial distribution with log link to investigate adult worm intensity (mean number of worms present in infected rats). Due to incomplete values for some sampled rats, only individuals with recorded data from each of the four variables were included in the analysis. We included all combinations and interactions of predictors and then used a model selection approach to identify best-fit models using Akaike’s Information Criterion corrected for small sample size (AICc). Models were ranked based on the lowest AICc value, with models differing by two units considered competitive (ΔAICc ≤ 2). Chi-square tests were used to compare rates of infection and unpaired, two-tailed t-tests were used to compare mean body masses. All analyses were performed using the statistical software IBM SPSS Statistics version 20.0 (SPSS Inc. Chicago, IL, USA) and a significance level of 0.05 was used.
Results
Data summary
A total of 545 Rattus spp. were sampled from 11 sites from the east side of Hawai‘i Island and examined for A. cantonensis infection (Table 1, Fig 1). The number of rats trapped differed among sites due to the varying trapping efforts and opportunistic sampling methods. Due to incomplete data, sample sizes differ between total rats sampled (n = 545), rats of known species (n = 510), and rats of known sex (n = 409). Two rat species were trapped in this study, R. exulans (200/510: 39.2%) and R. rattus (310/510: 60.8%), with slightly more female rats (239/409: 58.4%) than males (170/409: 41.6%). The mean body masses for R. exulans and R. rattus in this study were 48.0 g and 96.8 g, with the largest individuals weighing 88.0 g and 241.8 g respectively.
Table 1. List of trapping locations for rats (Rattus. exulans and Rattus rattus) sampled for rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) on east Hawai‘i Island (see Fig 1 for site map).
Site | Agency | # of rats sampled | # infected rats | Latitude (°N) | Longitude (°W) | Elevation (m) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A | NWRC | 227 | 177 (78%) | 19.714 | -155.055 | 10 |
B | NWRC | 30 | 26 (87%) | 19.720 | -155.063 | 6 |
C | HDOH | 17 | 11 (65%) | 19.710 | -155.038 | 12 |
D | HDOH | 3 | 2 (67%) | 19.710 | -155.02 | 10 |
E | NWRC | 16 | 10 (63%) | 19.440 | -154.95 | 311 |
F | HDOH | 19 | 5 (26%) | 19.731 | -155.049 | 1 |
G | HDOH | 10 | 8 (80%) | 19.734 | -155.036 | 1 |
H | NWRC | 35 | 25 (71%) | 19.630 | -155.081 | 232 |
I | NWRC | 3 | 0 (0%) | 19.728 | -155.098 | 71 |
J | NWRC | 27 | 9 (33%) | 19.634 | -155.132 | 400 |
K | NWRC | 158 | 123 (78%) | 19.655 | -155.075 | 115 |
Total | 545 | 396 (72.7%) |
Overall, 72.7% (396/545) of Rattus spp. were infected with live adult stages of A. cantonensis. We observed a higher rate of infection of adult worms in R. exulans (93.0%; 186/200) compared to R. rattus (57.4%; 178/310) (χ2 = 75.32, d.f. = 1, P < 0.0001) (Fig 2). The mean body mass of R. rattus individuals infected with adult worms (79.1 ± 5.9 g; P < 0.0001), was significantly lower than uninfected individuals (120.8 ± 6.7 g) with no difference observed in R. exulans (Table 2). A total of 3,148 adult worms were harvested with an observed mean intensity of 8.01 (n = 396). A number of worms were lost to contamination (hair or pyrethrin) and/or excessively damaged during extraction and so were not included in the study. Mean intensities of adult A. cantonensis observed in infected R. exulans and R. rattus were 8.97 and 7.09 respectively, while mean intensities of female (n = 153) and male (n = 123) Rattus spp. individuals were 7.88 and 8.16, respectively. The greatest number of adult worms harvested from a single individual rat was 45 from R. rattus (host body mass of 66.3 g), with 31 adult worms found in a single R. exulans individual (host body mass of 45.0 g).
Table 2. Mean body mass (g) and confidence intervals for observed presence/absence of adult rat lungworms (Angiostrongylus cantonensis), third stage (L3) larvae, encysted adult worms, and granular lung lobes in wild rats (Rattus spp.) on east Hawai‘i Island.
Observed | R. exulans | R. rattus | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Positive | Negative | p-Value | Positive | Negative | p-Value | |
Adult worms | 48.5 ± 1.8 | 42.1 ± 8.3 | > 0.05 | 79.1 ± 5.9 | 120.8 ± 6.7 | < 0.0001 |
L3 larvae | 50.3 ± 4.5 | 46.5 ± 2.0 | > 0.05 | 107.1 ± 6.6 | 90.1 ± 8.4 | < 0.01 |
Encysted worms | 60.0 ± 5.4 | 46.9 ± 1.8 | < 0.0001 | 114.6 ± 8.6 | 90.6 ± 5.8 | < 0.0001 |
Granular lungs | 48.9 ± 2.1 | 47.3 ± 3.7 | > 0.05 | 68.1 ± 7.8 | 104.5 ± 6.4 | < 0.0001 |
The 3,148 adult A. cantonensis worms had a total mass of approximately 20 grams. Most of the worms were found in, or closely associated with, the pulmonary artery, with some adult worms found in the heart or lung tissue itself. Images of A. cantonensis eggs were captured in both rat lung tissue (Fig 3a) and the uterus of a gravid A. cantonensis female (Fig 3b). Microscopic L1 larvae were observed in the rat lungs (Fig 3c) and in the feces (Fig 3d). Substantially larger yet still microscopic small black worms were observed in the lung tissue of 39% (168/427) of individuals (Fig 3e and 3f). We observed a lower rate of infection of L3 larvae in R. exulans (22.4%; 38/170) compared to R. rattus (50.6%; 130/257) (χ2 = 34.17, d.f. = 1, P < 0.0001) (Fig 2). The mean body mass of R. rattus individuals infected with L3 larvae (107.1 ± 6.6 g; P < 0.01) was significantly higher than uninfected individuals (90.1 ± 8.4 g), with no difference observed in R. exulans (Table 2). The DNA of multiple small black worms was extracted from five specimens, and subjected to PCR analysis which confirmed them as A. cantonensis. Since these worms were observed in the lung tissue, they can only be newly hatched L1 larvae or a current infection of L3 larvae, since L2 larvae would not survive the acidic conditions in the rat stomach [17]. Based on size and movement [20], in combination with PCR results, the small black worms were thus determined to be L3 A. cantonensis larvae. Also noted in 18% (98/545) of rats was the presence of decaying and encysted adult A. cantonensis in the lungs (Fig 4a), possibly a definitive sign of an older infection. For both R. exulans and R. rattus, the mean body mass for individuals observed with encysted worms was higher than those observed without (60.0 ± 5.4 vs 46.9 ± 1.8 and 114.6 ± 8.6 vs 90.6 ± 5.8 g respectively; P < 0.0001) (Table 2). In total, 90% (490/545) of rats sampled in this study were visually positive for A. cantonensis, through observation or collection of live adult worms, encysted adults, or L3 larvae. During the study, we documented rats with granular lobes of the lungs, most commonly observed in the upper right lobe (Fig 4b). The tissue characteristics and apparent respiratory viability of the lungs’ lobes varied considerably, as previously documented by [17]. We observed granular lungs in 45% (197/433) of all rats inspected, and in 60% (177/315) of rats infected with adult worms. Of note, 100% (197/197) of all rats showing signs of granular lung lobes were positive for adult worms. The mean body mass of R. rattus individuals with granular lung lobes (68.1 ± 7.8 g) was significantly lower than uninfected individuals (104.5 ± 6.4; P < 0.0001), with no difference observed in R. exulans (Table 2). An image of the abundance of worms packed into the pulmonary artery of a rat is visible in Fig 4c, and adult worms emerging from a pulmonary artery which has been ruptured is shown in Fig 4d. Of note, a large abdominal burden from one type of intestinal worm, pending identification and presumed to be the common acanthacephalan (Moniliformis moniliformis), was present in large quantity in both number of individuals and in biomass in one individual.
The skulls of 38 rats were dissected and visually 24% (9/38) of rats had worms on the surface of the brain. Of those visually positive 77.8% (7/9) larvae were primarily found at the superior-anterior position of the cerebellum, along the cerebral transverse fissure (Fig 4e). Of the worms visualized, most worms appeared to be L3 larvae based on size, but in 33.3% (3/9) the worms were larger; these worms were presumed to be at the L5 stage and measured ~10 mm in length (Fig 4f). A total of 60.5% (23/38) of brains had discoloration on their surface (dot in left side of Fig 4e). Qualitative PCR resulted in 22 samples testing positive for A. cantonensis, seven samples testing negative and nine samples were undetermined. Of the samples visually positive for worms, 100% (9/9) came up positive by PCR and also had discoloration on the surface of the brain. All R exulans tested positive (7/7) by PCR. Based on data including presence of live adult worms, encysted adult worms, L3 larvae, and/or were positive by PCR analysis of brain tissue, a total of 90% (280/310) of R. rattus were infected, and 99%, (198/200) R exulans were infected with A. cantonensis. Among all 545 rats captured, 93.9% (512/545) were positive for A. cantonensis infection.
Model factors influencing A. cantonensis infection
Results from the five GLM analyses resulted in multiple candidate models (Table 3A–3E), with the best-fit models discussed here. Host species and body mass factors contributed to the observed prevalence of adult A. cantonensis (Wald χ28 = 92.142, P < 0.001) (Table 3A), with more infected R. exulans 92.9% (n = 168) identified than R. rattus 49.8% (n = 237). These values were similar to those observed in the overall summary statistics from this study (Fig 2). However, an interaction effect between host species and body mass was identified as an inverse correlation observed between adult worm prevalence and host body mass, but only for R. rattus (Fig 5). Host body mass also contributed to A. cantonensis infection intensity in Rattus spp. (Wald χ25 = 19.156, P = 0.002) (model 1; Table 3B), with mean adult worm numbers observed at 8.2 (n = 84), 9.6 (n = 76), 8.7 (n = 92), 4.2 (n = 59), 4.5 (n = 45), and 4.2 (n = 49) respectively from lowest to highest body mass category. As seen with live adult worm prevalence, host body mass was also significantly associated with the presence of encysted worms (Wald χ25 = 41.343, P < 0.001) (Table 3C), but with an opposite, direct correlation observed. Prevalence of encysted worms was observed at 4.8% (n = 84), 9.2% (n = 76), 28.3% (n = 92), 35.6% (n = 59), 40.0% (n = 45), and 36.7% (n = 49) respectively from lowest to highest body mass category. The observed prevalence of L3 larvae was best explained by host species (Wald χ21 = 43.706, P < 0.001) as well as sampling site (Wald χ210 = 39.974, P < 0.001), but not body mass (Table 3D). Prevalence of L3 larvae was higher in R. rattus 55.3% (n = 206) than R. exulans 22.9% (n = 33), values which were similar to those observed in the overall summary statistics from this study (Fig 2). As seen in the adult worm prevalence analysis, we identified a significant interaction between host species and body mass using prevalence of granular lungs as the response variable (Wald χ28 = 71.045, P < 0.001) (Table 3E). However while the presence of granular lungs did not differ significantly between body mass categories for R. exulans, differences were observed for R. rattus, supporting the trend seen in Table 2.
Table 3. Summary of AICc (Akaike’s Information Criterion corrected for small sample size) model selection of rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) infection in rats (Rattus spp.) sampled on east Hawai‘i Island for five independent generalized linear model (GLM) analyses (A-E).
Analysis | Model | k | Log-Likelihood | AICc | ΔAICc |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(A) Prevalence of adult worms | 1. Mass*Species† | 7 | -90.889 | 200.23 | 0.00 |
2. Mass*Species† + Sex | 8 | -90.120 | 200.24 | 0.01 | |
(B) Intensity of adult worms | 1. Mass† | 6 | -843.809 | 1699.94 | 0.00 |
2. Sex*Species† | 3 | -846.450 | 1701.05 | 1.11 | |
3. Species + Mass | 7 | -843.328 | 1701.08 | 1.14 | |
4. Species† | 2 | -848.617 | 1701.28 | 1.34 | |
(C) Prevalence of encysted worms | 1. Mass† + Site | 16 | -80.695 | 194.79 | 0.00 |
2. Mass*Species† + Site | 17 | -77.899 | 195.77 | 0.98 | |
3. Mass† + Site + Species | 17 | -80.461 | 196.50 | 1.71 | |
(D) Prevalence of 3rd stage (L3) larvae | 1. Species† + Site† | 12 | -83.916 | 192.76 | 0.00 |
2. Species† + Site† + Sex | 13 | -83.472 | 192.95 | 0.19 | |
3. Sex*Species† + Site† | 13 | -82.029 | 193.31 | 0.55 | |
4. Species† + Site† + Mass | 17 | -79.074 | 193.99 | 1.23 | |
5. Species† + Site† + Sex + Mass | 18 | -78.128 | 194.33 | 1.57 | |
6. Sex*Species† + Site† + Mass | 18 | -77.020 | 194.34 | 1.58 | |
(E) Prevalence of granulated lobes | 1. Mass*Species† + Site | 17 | -76.783 | 193.862 | 0.00 |
2. Mass*Species† + Site + Sex | 18 | -76.638 | 195.820 | 1.96 |
† Indicates a significant variable or interaction in the model (P < 0.05); asterisks (*) denote interaction terms.
Discussion
Eastern Hawai‘i Island appears to have an extremely high prevalence of A. cantonensis infection in Rattus spp. and is the epicenter for angiostrongyliasis in the USA. It is known that the parasite exists on all main Hawaiian Islands in a variety of intermediate gastropod host species [21]. It is also noted that the increase in the number of human angiostrongyliasis cases has paralleled the introduction of the semi-slug P. martensi to east Hawai‘i, and that the semi-slug is also heavily infected [10]. A previous study was completed on Hawai‘i Island examining the definitive hosts in which 37 rats from east Hawai‘i Island were evaluated morphologically and by real-time PCR for A. cantonensis infection levels [15]. Most of the rats in this prior study were captured in 2009 and 2011 in the Puna district, which is adjacent to the South Hilo district, and while only 54% were visually positive for adult worms, 100% were positive for A. cantonensis by PCR. This demonstrates either current or prior infection in all rats. Previously, we captured 61 rats (R. rattus) in 2012 in the Waikea Forest Reserve in east Hawai‘i Island [19], and only 16.4% of those were visually positive for adult A. cantonensis. Surveys for A. cantonensis in rats on the US mainland in Florida report 22.8% (39/171) of R. rattus were positive [9]. In Louisiana, two R. norvegicus were found positive and in Oklahoma, one Sigmodon hispidus was found positive (total 2.2% or 3/137 brain samples) [22]. However in this study, we observed 72.7% (396/545) of Rattus spp. from east Hawaii Island were infected with adult stages of A. cantonensis, and 90% (490/545) were visually positive for live adult worms, encysted decaying adult worms, and/or L3 larvae embedded in the lung tissue. We also used PCR to test brain tissue of rats which were visually negative (or not completely visually evaluated) for all stages of A. cantonensis. Including this PCR data, 90% (279/310) of R. rattus, 99% (198/200) of R exulans, and in total, 93.9% (512/545) of all rats from this study were determined to be infected with A. cantonensis.
Whereas much of the literature on A. cantonensis has been completed in the L1-L3 stages found in intermediate gastropod hosts, this study visually documents multiple stages within the definitive rat host. We imaged larvated eggs in the lungs and in a female worm (Fig 3a and 3b). L1 larvae were visualized in both rat lungs and feces and were clearly smaller than the L3 larvae (Fig 3c and 3d). Whereas L3 larvae are typically transparent in the gastropod, in the lungs they appear as dark worms due to dark matter in the digestive tract, but not in the esophageal bulb (Fig 3e and 3f). The dark matter may be due to ingested materials or may possibly be refractive granules [20]. Some rats had decaying and/or encysted adult worms in their lung tissues suggesting an older infection, and some concurrently had live adult worms in their lung tissues, indicating multiple infections. Instances were noted where the rats had both adult worms and L3 larvae simultaneously, and some were even positive for live adults, encysted adults, and L3 larvae in the lungs. This diversity in presentation could suggest independent infections occurring serially, concurrently, or as a single infection in which the L3 larvae became trapped in the lungs and never progress to the brain. It is known that not all L3 larvae ingested are successful in reproducing as adults in rats [1], though the limiting mechanism(s) remain(s) a mystery, and it is uncertain in each infection where the ‘lost’ larvae may end up in the tissues. It would be advisable to thoroughly investigate the longevity and impact of larvae that do not reach the brain. In humans or other accidental hosts, especially in the absence of anthelmintic drugs, these potentially long-lived ‘lost’ larvae might continue to cause damage or produce unexpected symptoms over time in unexpected tissues. Whatever the self-limiting mechanism may be present in A. cantonensis, or Rattus spp., or in a dialectic between this parasite and definitive host, it would be useful to define these mechanisms and thus potentially be able to apply the lessons learned in control and treatment efforts.
We found significantly higher rates of infection of adult worms in R. exulans than in R. rattus. One possible explanation for this observation could be a greater access to gastropods by R. exulans. Rattus exulans prefers agricultural lands, burrows, and gulches, as compared to R. rattus (also known as the roof rat) which prefers to nest in high places off the ground [23]. However in our study both species were trapped together, essentially from shared living spaces. All traps were placed on the ground, and both species were caught at the same locations and on the same nights. Also, the semi-slug P. martensi has shown a propensity for climbing [10] which may mean potential predation on infective intermediate hosts is not necessarily limited to the ground. Another explanation for the higher adult worm infection levels observed in R. exulans compared to R. rattus could be related to dietary preference. A previous study conducted on a different island in Hawai‘i observed a greater relative abundance of invertebrates in the diet of R. exulans (83%) than R. rattus (40%) [24], although gastropods were not distinguished from other invertebrates.
A significant difference in prevalence of L3 larvae in the lungs was also observed between both rat species, but in this case, the higher levels were in R. rattus. It is possible that some rat individuals are acquiring L3 larvae outside the trapping areas, as R. rattus will travel farther in search of food than R. exulans and may not necessarily feed and nest in the same landscapes [23, 25]. Also R. rattus, being the larger of the two species, could simply be consuming more infective gastropods than R. exulans. Regardless of what factors are driving these differences in prevalence between the two host species, why would one host species show higher infection levels in adult worms and another show higher infection levels in L3 larvae? One explanation could be differences in host susceptibility to the parasite, with L3 larvae more successful in completing their lifecycle in certain individuals. While results from our GLM analyses show host species to be a significant predictor of both adult worm and L3 larvae prevalence, host body mass was also identified as a predictor, but only for adult worms and not for the presence of L3 larvae in the lungs (Table 3). Host body mass in wild rats is positively correlated with age [26] and is often used as a proxy for age when comparing groups of individuals [27, 28]. Interestingly, adult worm prevalence in R. rattus for smaller (younger) individuals was observed at high levels similar to those seen in R. exulans, but prevalence was significantly lower in the larger (older) R. rattus individuals (Fig 5). Of note, a previous study in Brazil reported an opposite trend to our findings, with a positive relationship observed between adult A. cantonensis and host body mass in R. norvegicus [27]. The authors went on to suggest that these results may be related to a longer period of exposure to infection. So then why would infection levels (both prevalence and intensity) be lower in older R. rattus in east Hawai‘i? One hypothesis is that these rats’ mature immune systems may be able to clear infections or are somehow able to moderate or regulate the worm burden upon reinfections, with longer living individuals more likely to be reinfected over time. A previous study showed lower adult lungworm burdens in laboratory R. norvegicus individuals that have been previously infected when compared to those that had not [29]. Additional support for this theory are the opposite trends observed in the mean body masses of R. rattus individuals found positive and negative for live adult worms (current infections) compared to those for encysted adult worms (previous infections) (Table 2), with the larger/older rats showing more evidence of past infections and less evidence of current infections than smaller/younger rats.
While the presence of encysted adult worms provides clues about previous infections, our observations of granular lung lobes may provide clues about recent infections. Although 100% (197/197) of all rats showing signs of granular lungs were infected with adult worms, the mean body mass for infected R. rattus individuals was significantly lower in positive vs negative individuals (Table 2). Additionally, granular lungs were observed in only 12% (8/66) of R. rattus with decaying and/or encysted adult worms, which could suggest the development of granular lungs are not only related to recent infections, but possibly to primary infections (first-time infections). In the rats with granular lungs, it was the upper right lobe which was mostly affected, suggesting that this lobe may serve as a filter for worm passage to the rest of the lung. However the trends observed between body mass and infection levels in R. rattus were not observed in R. exulans, the smaller of the two species. Although the lifespan of both host species in the wild is similar, R. rattus is reported to live slightly longer (mean lifespan of one year or less, with a maximum lifespan of two years) [30] than R. exulans (mean lifespan of less than on year) [25]. Experimental infections are likely needed to properly determine differences in host susceptibility and parasite survival in definitive rat hosts, and our results emphasize the need for a better understanding of rat lungworm host-parasite dynamics, particularly in Hawai‘i.
If some definitive hosts are indeed able to regulate their parasite burden after multiple infections resulting in the younger, more immunologically naïve individuals contributing disproportionately to the successful transmission of A. cantonensis in the wild, then this could have major management implications. For example, in a control operation if rat numbers are not reduced to a very low level the remaining rats will rapidly reproduce, and sometimes even exceed their former density [23], potentially leading to a higher ratio of naïve individuals, more capable of successful transmission of L1 larvae to the environment. Additionally, the successful removal of a rat population from an area can free up niche resources within that territory allowing for the potential immigration of rats from outside the area. More research is needed to confirm these scenarios, but if some older rats are indeed regulating their worm burden more effectively than younger rats, then these findings may provide more support for the deworming of certain rat populations in high transmission areas as opposed to the attempted removal of individuals or populations.
While results from our analyses of R. rattus showed body mass contributed to variation in rat lungworm infection levels at the adult stage, the same was not true for L3 larvae prevalence in the lungs. Study site however, was shown to be a significant factor influencing observed L3 prevalence, but not adult worm prevalence (Table 3). Although more research is needed to explore habitat influences on infection, these findings suggest that while location may be more important for the transmission of infective L3 larvae from intermediate host to definitive host, host characteristics, such as the hosts’ response to previous infections, may be more important in regulating the successful completion of the parasite lifecycle. Studies such as this assist to highlight current gaps in knowledge, that if filled, could allow for a more complete understanding of rat lungworm transmission dynamics, as well as more informed approaches to monitoring infection levels and implementing control measures for wild hosts. Given that east Hawai‘i Island has the highest prevalence of A. cantonensis in definitive as well as intermediate hosts in the USA, east Hawai‘i Island is the ideal location for conducting future fundamental and applied studies.
Conclusion
When reporting prevalence of A. cantonensis infection in rat populations, an important consideration is the careful evaluation of which life cycle stages of the parasite are being sampled. Results from our study show infection with L3 larvae is not necessarily a good indicator of adult worm presence. Although documenting L1 larvae in the feces of a rat may be the only way to truly document completion of the parasite lifecycle in the rat host, the presence of adult worms is a more accurate measure than the presence of L3 larvae. Many studies use PCR to document presence/absence of A. cantonensis in rats [15, 1, 22, 9], but since this method reports any presence of the parasite DNA, it does not distinguish between life stages. In other words, identifying the infection levels of adult worms in rat populations (i.e. a near completed parasite life cycle) may be more important to understanding the epidemiology of A. cantonensis in the wild than simply confirming the presence of L3 larvae in the bloodstream or tissues. However even when using the presence of adult worms to report infection levels in rats, our results show that infection can vary greatly by body mass (i.e. age) of the individual, as we report lower infection levels (both prevalence and intensity) in older black rats (R. rattus); this result in particular holds promise for further research into Rattus immune response vis a vis A. cantonensis. Host body mass and species should always be recorded and presented along with infection level data, especially when attempting to compare levels over time or between different locations.
One of the main pathways for global spread of A. cantonensis is thought to be through transporting infected rats on voyaging ships [31]. Hilo, HI is a port town, and given the high infection level in local rats, every effort should be made to reduce the spread of A. cantonensis especially around docks and harbors by implementing deworming protocols in rats, enhancing population control, and/or devising better safeguards for blocking rats from boarding on, or disembarking from ships. The extremely high prevalence of A. cantonensis observed in Rattus spp. in east Hawai‘i Island suggests the potential for human infection is greater than previously thought. Assuming a direct correlation between the introduction and spread of the invasive slug P. martensi (a highly competent intermediate host for A. cantonensis and vector for accidental ingestion by humans, pets, and stock animals) and an increase in human cases originating from east Hawai‘i, control measures preventing accidental export of P. martensi are warranted, especially to warm, subtropical destinations of agricultural significance.
Angiostrongyliasis is currently a serious public health concern in east Hawai‘i. While any gastropod has potential as an intermediate host, P. martensi is highly effective and has been recently been recorded spreading to another Hawaiian island followed by a corresponding outbreak of human angiostrongyliasis (on Maui). This intermediate host has not yet been reported on the continental US, however, A. cantonensis is actively gaining entry. As with Zika, dengue, and other emerging tropical diseases, the clear and present danger this complex and difficult-to-eradicate disease constitutes warrants increased measures to control its spread in both gastropods and rodents, thereby protecting human and animal populations, food production, and several sectors of the US economy.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Hawaii DOH Vector Control Branch for assistance with trapping rats and mahalo to Dr. Mark Kimura for assistance with graphics presentation.
Data Availability
All relevant data are contained within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
Support for this study was provided by the Hawaii Community Foundation – Medical Research ID#16CON-78923, https://www.hawaiicommunityfoundation.org/grants/medical-research-grants, and the Daniel K. Inouye College of Pharmacy at the University of Hawaii at Hilo, http://pharmacy.uhh.hawaii.edu/. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Jarvi SI, Pitt WC, Farias ME, Shiels L, Severino MG, Howe KM, et al. Detection of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in the blood And peripheral tissues of wild Hawaiian rats (Rattus rattus) by a quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay. PLOS ONE 2015: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123064 April 24, 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wang QP, Lai DH, Zhu XU, Chen XG, Lun ZR. Human angiostrongyliasis. Lancet Infectious Disease 2008: 8: 621–630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang QP, Wu ZD, Wei RL, Owen ZR, Lun ZR. Human Angiostrongylus cantononsis: an update. Eur. J Clin Microbiol. Infect. Dis 2012: 31:389–395. doi: 10.1007/s10096-011-1328-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Chen HT. Un nouveau nematode pulmonaire, pulmonema cantonensis, NGN sp. Des rats de Canton. Ann. Parasit. 1935: 13:312. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Rosen L, Chappell R, Laqueur GL, Wallace GD, Weinstein PP. Eosinophilic meningoencephalitis caused by a metastrongylid lungworm of rats. JAMA. 1962: 179: 620–624. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Teem JL, Qvarnstrom Y, Bishop H, da Silva A, Carter J, White-Mclean J, et al. The occurrence of the rat lungworm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis, in nonindigenous snails in the Gulf of Mexico region of the United States. Hawai‘i J Medicine & Public Health. 2013: 72: (sup. 2) 10–14 [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chan D, Barratt J, Roberts T, Lee R, Shea M, Marriott D, et al. The prevalence of Angiostrongylus cantonensis/mackerrasae complex in molluscs from the Sydney Region. PLoS ONE 10, 2015: e0128128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Iwanowicz DD, Sanders LR, Schill WB, Xayavong MV, da Silva AJ, Qvarnstrom Y, et al. Spread of the rat lungworm (Angiostrongylus cantonensis) in giant African land snails (Lissachatina fulica) in Florida, USA. Journal of Wildlife Diseases 2015: 51, 749–753. doi: 10.7589/2014-06-160 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Walden HDS, Slapcinsky JD, Roff S, Calle JM, Goodwin ZD, Stern J, et al. Geographic distribution of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in wild rats (Rattus rattus) and terrestrial snails in Florida, USA PLOS ONE 2017. May 18: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177910 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hollingsworth RG, Kaneta RK, Sullivan JJ, Bishop HS, Qvarnstrom Y, da Silva AJ, et al. Distribution of Parmarion cf. martensi (Pulmonata: Helicarionidae), a new semi-slug pest on Hawai‘i Island, and its potential as a vector for human angiostrongyliasis. Pacific Science. 2007: 61:457–468. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wilmshursta JM, Hunt TL, Lipoc CP, and Anderson AJ. High-precision radiocarbon dating shows recent and rapid initial human colonization of East Polynesia PNAS February 1, 2011:| vol. 108 no. 5 418154–1820. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1015876108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kramer RJ. Hawai‘ian Land Mammals. Charles E. Tuttle Company, Rutland, Vermont: 1971. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Atkinson IAE. A reassessment of factors, particularly Rattus rattus L., that influenced the decline of endemic forest birds in the Hawai‘ian Islands. Pac Sci 1977; 31(2): 109–133. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Long JL. Introduced mammals of the world: Their history, distribution and influence. CABI Pub, Wal; 2003 [Google Scholar]
- 15.Qvarnstrom Y, Bishop HS, da Silva A J. Detection of rat lungworm in intermediate, definitive, and paratenic hosts obtained from environmental sources. Hawai’i Journal of Medicine and Public Health. 2013: 72, 63–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Barratt J, Chan D, Sandaradura I, Maliks R, Speilman D, Lee R, et al. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: a review of its distribution, molecular biology and clinical significance as a human pathogen Parasitology 2016: 143, 1087–111. doi: 10.1017/S0031182016000652 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mackerras M, Sandars D. The life history of the rat lungworm, Angiostrongylus cantonensis (Chen) (Nematoda: Metastrongylidae). Australian Journal of Zoology 1955: 3, 1–25. [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sikes RS, Gannon WL. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of wild mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy. 2011: 92: 235–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Jarvi SI, Farias MEM, Howe K, Jacquier S, Hollingsworth R, Pitt W. Quantitative PCR estimates Angiostrongylus cantonensis infection levels in semi-slugs (Parmarion martensi). Molecular and Biochemical Parasitology 2012: 185: 174–176. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2012.08.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Lv S, Zhang Y, Zhang C, Steinmann P, Zhou X, Utzinger J. Angiostrongylus cantonensis: morphological and behavioral investigation within the freshwater snail Pomacea canaliculata. Parasitol. Res. 2009: doi: 10.1007/s00436-009-1334-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kim JR, Hayes KA, Yeung NW, Cowie RH. Diverse gastropod hosts of Angiostrongylus cantonensis, the rat lungworm, globally and with a focus on the Hawaiian Islands. PLoS ONE. 2014: 9, e94969 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094969 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.York E. M., Creecy J. P., Lord W. D. and Caire W. Geographic range expansion for rat lungworm in North America. Emerging Infectious Diseases. 2015: 21, 1234–1236. doi: 10.3201/eid2107.141980 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Marsh R.E. Roof rats. Prev. Control, 1994: 125–132. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sugihara RT. Rodent damage research in Hawai‘i: Changing times and priorities. Pages 40–45 in Timm RM and Schmidt RH, eds. Proceedings of the 20th Vertebrate Pest Conference. 2002. University of California, Davis.
- 25.Tobin ME. Polynesian Rats. Prev. Control Wildl. Damage, 1994: B121–B124 [Google Scholar]
- 26.Hirata DN, Nass RD. Growth and sexual maturation of laboratory-reared, wild Rattus norvegicus, R. rattus, and R. exulans in Hawaii. J. Mammal. 1974: 55, 472–474. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Simões RO, Júnior AM, Olifiers N, Garcia JS, Valéria A, Bertolino FA, et al. A longitudinal study of Angiostrongylus cantonensis in an urban population of Rattus norvegicus in Brazil: the influences of seasonality and host features on the pattern of infection. Parasites & Vectors 2014: 7:100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Webster JP, Macdonald DW. Parasites of wild brown rats (Rattus norvegicus) on UK farms.Parasitology, 1995: 111, 247–255. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Au ACS, Ko RC. Changes in worm burden, haematological and serological response in rats after single and multiple Angiostrongylus cantonensis infections. Parasitol. Res., 1979: 58, 233–242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Shiels A. B., Pitt W. C., Sugihara R. T., and Witmer G. W.. 2014. Biology and Impacts of Pacific Island Invasive Species. 11. Rattus rattus, the Black Rat (Rodentia: Muridae). Pacific Sci. 68: 145–184.) [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kliks MM, Palumbo NE. Eosinophilic meningitis beyond the Pacific Basin: the global dispersal of a peridomestic zoonosis caused by Angiostrongylus cantonensis, the nematode lungworm of rats. Soc Sci Med. 1992. January; 34(2):199–212. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are contained within the paper and its Supporting Information files.