Abstract
Besides cell death, autophagy and cell senescence are the main outcomes of anticancer treatment. We demonstrate that tacrine-melatonin heterodimer C10, a potent anti-Alzheimer’s disease drug, has an antiproliferative effect on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. The main cell response to a 24 h-treatment with C10 was autophagy enhancement accompanied by inhibition of mTOR and AKT pathways. Significantly increased autophagy markers, such as LC3B- and ATG16L-positive vesicles, confirmed autophagy induction by C10. However, analysis of autophagic flux using mCherry-GFP-LC3B construct revealed inhibition of autophagy by C10 at the late-stage. Moreover, electron microscopy and analysis of colocalization of LC3B and LAMP-1 proteins provided evidence of autophagosome-lysosome fusion with concomitant inhibition of autolysosomal degradation function. After transient treatment with IC50 dose of C10 followed by cell culture without the drug, 20% of MCF-7 cells displayed markers of senescence. On the other hand, permanent cell treatment with C10 resulted in massive cell death on the 5th or 6th day. Recently, an approach whereby autophagy is induced by one compound and simultaneously blocked by the use of another one has been proposed as a novel anticancer strategy. We demonstrate that the same effect may be achieved using a single agent, C10. Our findings offer a new, promising strategy for anticancer treatment.
Introduction
Cancer cells often become resistant to apoptotic death and thus, recently, much attention has been paid to the induction of cell senescence and/or autophagy as alternative targets of anticancer therapy1,2.
Senescent cells are irreversibly arrested in the cell cycle but they remain metabolically active. There are three types of cellular senescence—replicative one, which is associated with telomere erosion, oncogene-induced and stress-induced premature senescence (SIPS) occurring in response to different stress stimuli3. Cancer cells, due to their ability to overcome the effect of telomere shortening, evade replicative senescence but can undergo SIPS4. A number of studies showed development of the senescence phenotype of cancer cells as the outcome of chemotherapy in vitro and in vivo5,6. Moreover, induction of SIPS requires lower doses of chemotherapeutics than those required to kill cancer cells7. However, there is some evidence proving that senescence of cancer cells is transient and might lead to cancer relapse8–12.
Autophagy is a well-known evolutionarily conserved catabolic program for the degradation of proteins and other subcellular elements through lysosomal lysis. Autophagy serves as a prosurvival mechanism that adapts cells to stress conditions13,14, but may also lead to cell demise called programmed cell death type II15, which is distinct from apoptosis and other cell death modes16,17.
It has been shown that in normal fibroblasts autophagy is activated upon induction of senescence and contributes to the establishment of senescence18. However, the connection between autophagy and senescence in normal and cancer cells seems to be much more complex19–21.
A characteristic feature of macroautophagy (herein referred to as autophagy) is the formation of autophagosomes, which fuse with lysosomes, wherein their cargo is degraded22. Elevated basal autophagy, characteristic for a variety of tumors, has become critical for their metabolism23. There are plethora of reports demonstrating that autophagy inhibition leads to increased efficiency of pharmacological anticancer treatment and to increased effectiveness of radiotherapy24,25. At present, the most promising approach seems to be a combined anticancer therapy, in which autophagy is induced and simultaneously blocked at the degradation stage26,27.
In this study, we present a new compound, tacrine-melatonin heterodimer C10, synthesized by us as an acetylcholinesterase (AChE) and butyrylcholinesterase (BuChE) inhibitor and potential anti-Alzheimer’s drug28, which possesses antiproliferative properties due to autophagy modulation. Heterodimer C10 simultaneously induces autophagy and blocks it at the degradation stage. These properties of C10 place this compound among promising anticancer agents.
Results
C10 has cytostatic/cytotoxic effect on MCF-7 cells
C10 is a compound containing a tacrine and melatonin part, linked by a ten carbon chain (Supplemental Fig. 1A), synthesized according to the procedure described previously28. We show that, 24 h after treatment with C10, the number of MCF-7 cells and their metabolic activity (measured by MTT) decreased in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 1a). The IC50 dose of C10 was calculated from MTT and cell counting curves to be in the range of 2.5–4 μM depending on the batch. The cell death rate after treatment with IC50 of C10 (measured by 7AAD) was close to the level for untreated cells. Thus, the treatment with IC50 dose of C10 for 24 h has cytostatic effect, however, higher doses of C10 caused cell death after 24 h treatment (Fig. 1b). Moreover, prolonged treatment with IC50 concentration led to cell death at the third day. Similar results were obtained after treatment with IC25 dose of C10; however, cells died at fifth day (Fig. 2E). Altogether, C10 has cytostatic effect on cells but prolonged treatment with this compound is cytotoxic and results in death after few days. Interestingly, components of the heterodimer, tacrine and melatonin, applied together in concentrations equal to IC70 of C10 did not affect the death rate of MCF-7 cells (measured by MTT and 7AAD assays) (Supplemental Fig. 1B). Additionally, in a dose-dependent manner treatment with melatonin provoked only a slight decrease in cell metabolic activity, while tacrine evoked a pronounced decrease, starting from 50 μM concentration. On the other hand, C10 caused a 50% drop at the concentration of 3–5.5 μM, depending on cell type (Supplemental Fig. 1D).
C10 causes increase in the number and size of autophagic vesicles in MCF-7 cells
Analysis of cell morphology revealed that a 24 h treatment with IC50 dose of C10 led to an increase in cellular granularity (Fig. 1c), which could suggest modulation of the autophagic process29.
ATG proteins as well as autophagy adaptor protein p62/SQSTM1 and microtubule-associated protein 1 light chain 3 (LC3) are involved in cargo sequestration during autophagosome formation. The most commonly used parameter, which is a sign of autophagy modulation, is lipidation of LC3, which is manifested by the appearance of LC3 signal in punctate structures30. Indeed, we observed that already after 6 h of C10 treatment, MCF-7 cells exhibited increased number of LC3B puncta (Fig. 3a). Quantitative analysis revealed that, after 24 h, the number of LC3B foci per cell increased 7.5 times in comparison with control cells (Fig. 3b). Moreover, electron microscopy analysis showed a C10-induced rise in cell area occupied by autophagic vesicles, which was due to an increase in their number and size (Fig. 3c). Increased number of autophagic vesicles may be a result of autophagy induction or/and its blockade31.
C10 induces autophagy in MCF-7 cells
Western blot analysis showed an increase in the ATG5 level that peaked already after 3 h of treatment with C10 and returned to the basal level after 24 h (Fig. 3e). This transient increase in ATG5 level provides evidence of autophagy induction.
It was demonstrated that the ATG5–ATG12–ATG16L complex is required for the elongation of the isolation membrane and is present on the phagophore but not on a mature autophagosome32,33. Thus, increase in ATG16L-positive puncta is widely used as a marker of autophagy induction. We observed that C10 evoked a detectable increase in ATG16L-positive puncta in MCF-7 cells after 24 h of treatment (Fig. 3d). Subsequently, we found that the level of LC3B II protein augmented progressively within 24 h of treatment (Fig. 3e).
As melatonin has been shown to induce autophagy in different types of tumours34,35, we examined the effect of C10 components on autophagy markers. Treatment with tacrine or melatonin in a dose equal to IC50 for C10 did not cause any pronounced change in LC3B II, ATG5 or p62/SQSTM1 protein levels (Supplemental Fig. 1C). Similarly, treatment with 1 mM melatonin did not affect the number of LC3B foci in MCF-7 cells (Supplemental Fig. 1E). This suggests that the tacrine-melatonin hybrid possesses different properties than its individual components.
It is well known that AKT/mTOR signalling pathway is involved in autophagy regulation36. Indeed, time-dependent analysis of the active, phosphorylated AKT (p-AKT) protein level showed its progressive decrease that became evident after 6 h of treatment with C10 and a drop to a hardly detectable level after 24 h. The attenuation of p-AKT was preceded by a decrease in the level of phosphorylated p70S6 kinase (p-p70S6K), the mTOR substrate (Fig. 3f). These results suggest that in MCF-7 cells C10 evokes inhibition of mTOR activity followed by a decrease in p-AKT kinase level.
C10 blocks autophagic flux
To better understand the impact of C10 on autophagy, we analysed the autophagic flux during C10-treatment in comparison with starvation-induced autophagy and CQ-induced blockade of autophagy. While cell starvation for a few hours leads to autophagy induction and increase in autophagy markers, it may cause disappearance of autophagy proteins if prolonged37. Accordingly, 1-day starvation of MCF-7 cells resulted in a complete disappearance of autophagy markers. In contrast, CQ and C10 caused accumulation of autophagy proteins (p62/SQSTM1, LC3B II) with time (Figs. 3e and 4a). This data suggests that apart from stimulating autophagosome formation, C10 also blocks the autophagic flux at the late stage.
To confirm this assumption, we monitored the autophagic flux with a mCherry-GFP-LC3B construct. GFP fluorescence is quenched after fusion of an autophagosome with an acidic lysosome, while mCherry fluorescence is not affected by acidic environment. Thus, autolysosomes can be visualized as red LC3B foci. On the other hand, when the autophagosome-lysosome fusion is blocked or when autolysosomal pH is increased, both mCherry and GFP can be detected resulting in yellow LC3B puncta31,38 In control cells, we found both red and yellow LC3B puncta as well as dispersed yellow fluorescence in the cytoplasm, which indicates the presence of a non-lipidated LC3B I form. As anticipated, starvation led to an increase in the number of LC3B puncta with predominance of red ones, indicating that the autophagic flux is enhanced. In contrast, CQ treatment evoked accumulation of mostly yellow puncta, which was the consequence of autolysosome maturation blockade. Treatment with C10 yielded a similar pattern to that observed for CQ (Fig. 4b). Overall, these results indicate that C10 inhibits the autophagic flux at the late stage.
C10 affects maturation/degradation of autolysosomes
Blockade of the autophagic flux may be a result of two processes: inhibition of autophagosome and lysosome fusion and/or impairment of lysosomal degradation. Inhibition of fusion leads to accumulation of autophagosomes. However, attenuation of lysosomal function precludes degradation of autolysosome cargo, which results in an increase in the number of non-degraded autolysosomes39. Autophagosomes are double-membrane vesicles, but their fusion with lysosomes leads to formation of single-membrane autolysosomes the electron microscopy images of which are presented on the scheme (Fig. 5b). We showed by electron microscopy that a 24 h-treatment of MCF-7 cells with C10 caused accumulation of big vesicles with dense material (Fig. 5a). The vesicles had single membrane and were bigger than those observed in control cells. Moreover, in C10-treated cells, we observed vesicles similar to multivesicular bodies (MVBs).
Accumulation of single-membrane vesicles suggests that C10 inhibits the autophagic flux through suppression of autolysosome degradation. To test this assumption we utilized mRFP-LC3B and GFP-LAMP-1 plasmids and examined colocalization of LC3B puncta (autophagosomal marker) with LAMP-1 (lysosomal marker) in C10-treated MCF-7 cells. We observed high colocalization of the two signals after C10 treatment, similarly as in cells treated with CQ but not in control or thapsigargin-treated cells (Fig. 5c). Thapsigargin (TG), by raising cytosolic calcium concentration, inhibits vesicle fusion40. Quantitative analysis of LC3B and LAMP-1 proteins colocalization demonstrated significantly higher Pearsons’ correlation coefficient for C10- and CQ-treated cells vs. control and TG-treated cells (Fig. 5d).
Altogether this data reveals that C10 inhibits the autophagic flux in MCF-7 cells, which leads to accumulation of single-membrane autolysosomes with non-degraded cargo.
Prolonged treatment with C10 leads to massive cell death
To examine the effect of prolonged C10-treatment, MCF-7 cells were grown in the presence of IC25 or IC50 dose of C10 for several days (up to 9 days). This led to accumulation of autophagy markers such as LC3B II and p62/SQSTM1 at the protein level and LC3 foci that appeared within 24 h and remained visible during the following days (Fig. 2a,b). Additionally, a decrease in the number of BrdU-positive cells (to 20%) was observed during the treatment with heterodimer (Fig. 2c,d). This suggests that prolonged treatment with C10-evoked autophagy blockade and inhibition of proliferation. Interestingly, cell counting showed that the cell number remained nearly unchanged within 4 days and then dramatically dropped down indicating rapid and massive cell death on the 5th or 6th day. (The high standard deviation reflects differences in the time of cell death observed in different experiments) (Fig. 2e).
Transient treatment with C10 leads to cellular senescence or regrowth
To reveal cell fate after autophagy modulation evoked by transient treatment of MCF-7 cells with C10 we analysed some autophagy markers after C10 removal. We observed progressive disappearance of LC3B-positive foci and a decrease in the level of proteins such as p62/SQSTM1 and LC3B II (Fig. 2f,g). Similar effect could be observed after withdrawal of CQ but not after discontinuation of starvation (Fig. 4a). However, after C10 withdrawal, the ATG5 protein level was similar to this observed in the control (Fig. 2g). Autophagic flux analysis using mCherry-GFP-LC3B plasmid disclosed progressive appearance of red vesicles suggesting autophagy resumption after C10 washout (Fig. 4b). Moreover, electron microscopy revealed formation of empty-like vesicles with degraded cargo and multilamellar bodies (MLBs) on the 3rd day of culture without the drug (Fig. 5a). Formation of MLBs is associated with degradation of lipid-rich autophagic vesicles such as autophagosomes with numerous intraluminal vesicles or MVBs41.
In contrast to prolonged treatment that had an antiproliferative effect on MCF-7 cells followed by cell death, drug removal after 24 h treatment with IC50 dose of C10 caused only transient inhibition of cell proliferation. On day 1+1 (1st day after C10 removal) we found 30% of BrdU-positive cells and then their number increased with time to the control level on the 5th day of culture without C10 (Fig. 2h).
Cellular senescence is associated with cell cycle arrest and may occur in the cancer cells in response to stress such as treatment with chemotherapeutic drugs8,42. Therefore, we have checked senescence markers upon transient C10-treatment. We observed a cell cycle arrest in the G1 phase and an increased level of the cell cycle inhibitor, p21Waf1/Cip1 (Fig. 6a,b). C10 removal resulted in an increased number of SA-β-gal-positive cells that amounted to 20% on the 4th day (Fig. 6c). Moreover, elevation of secreted proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin 6 (IL-6) and 8 (IL-8), characteristic for senescent cancer cells43, was observed (Fig. 6d).
C10 enhances autophagy and blocks autophagic flux in HCT 116 cells and normal fibroblasts
To verify whether C10 affects autophagy in other cell types we used HCT 116 colon cancer cells and normal human fibroblasts treated for 24 h (1 day) with IC50 doses of C10 - 5 μM and 3.5 μM, respectively. The MTT assay showed that HCT 116 cells and fibroblasts were less sensitive to C10 than MCF-7 cells (Fig. 7a). Nonetheless, C10 enhanced autophagy in all types of tested cells, which was confirmed by an increase in LC3B II protein level and in the number of LC3B-positive vesicles (Fig. 7b,c).
These changes were accompanied by accumulation of p62/SQSTM1 protein that suggested blockade of autophagic flux. To verify it we analysed the autophagic flux by transfecting cells with mCherry-GFP-LC3B plasmid. In untreated fibroblasts and HCT 116 cells red and yellow LC3B puncta as well as green and red fluorescence (LC3B I form) dispersed in the cytoplasm were visible. One-day C10-treatment evoked a blockade of the autophagic flux confirmed by accumulation of yellow foci in fibroblasts and a less pronounced effect in HCT 116 cells (Fig. 7d). That blockade was relieved within 2 days after drug removal when the red foci appeared, and p62/SQSTM1 and LC3B II proteins level decreased (Fig. 7b).
Altogether, we have demonstrated that the effect of C10 on autophagy is not limited to MCF-7 cells but occurs also in other cancer (HCT 116) and normal (human fibroblasts) cells, however with different intensity.
Discussion
We demonstrated that tacrine-melatonin heterodimer C10, originally synthesized as an anti-Alzheimer’s drug with inhibitory effect on human erythrocyte AChE, has anticancer properties. The effect of C10 on MCF-7 cells was not caused by AChE inhibition since the compound did not significantly change AChE level and activity in these cells (Supplemental Figs. 2A, B). We observed that the anticancer properties of C10 were not due to the properties of melatonin or tacrine either but resulted from the particular hybrid structure of C10. We have found that C10 induces cellular senescence of MCF-7 cells which, most importantly, is preceded by modulation of the process of autophagy. In C10-treated MCF-7 cells we observed typical markers of autophagy initiation, such as rapid autophagic vesicle formation, confirmed by an increase in ATG16L-positive puncta, and transient elevation of ATG5 protein level followed by an increase in LC3B II protein level. Such changes were not observed when cells were treated with melatonin or tacrine alone at the concentration equal to IC50 dose of C10. Also, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway, one of the key pathways involved in autophagy regulation30, seemed to be affected by C10. C10 affected activation of p70S6K, a mTORC1 substrate, followed by a decline in p-AKT protein level without affecting total mTOR protein level. Attenuation of mTORC1 activity, enhanced by a decrease in p-AKT, together with elevated number of ATG16L-positive vesicles argue for autophagy induction.
It is believed that, once initiated, the process of autophagy proceeds until complete degradation of cargo and disappearance of autolysosomes30. In the case of C10, the increase in autophagy initiation markers was accompanied by accumulation of autolysosomes with undegraded cargo. This indicates that autophagy was induced but, simultaneously, the autophagic flux was inhibited as a result of a block in autolysosome degradation. Undegraded autolysosomal cargo counteracts mTORC1 reactivation that is required for autophagic lysosomal reformation (ALR)44. In this process nascent lysosomes are formed from autolysosomes, which facilitates autophagy completion. On the other hand, enhanced formation of autophagosomes during autophagy induction requires functional lysosomes for cargo degradation, the number of which could be insufficient because of unsettled ALR. Due to its dual action on autophagy C10 represents a novel autophagy modulator.
Most of known compounds that affect autophagy are either inducers or inhibitors of this process. Autophagy inhibitors, CQ and its derivatives, are tested in clinical trials2. However, drugs that are able to affect autophagy in a dual mode, by inducing and inhibiting the process, seem to represent a new strategy in anticancer therapy. Recently, it has been shown that a naphthalene sulphonamide derivative (ML-9) has such a dual effect on autophagy. This drug stimulates autophagosome formation by downregulating the AKT/mTOR pathway and inhibits the autophagic flux by increasing lysosomal pH and affecting autolysosomal maturation in LNCaP prostate carcinoma cells45. Recently it has also been demonstrated that N6-isopentenyladenosine is able to induce and inhibit autophagy by targeting AMPK and Rab7, which leads to AMPK-dependent apoptosis of melanoma cells46. Another compound, Autophagy Modulator with Dual Effect (AMDE-1), had a similar effect on autophagy in some cell lines such as MEFs, A549, Sasos2 and HEK293. AMDE-1 action consists of AMPK-mediated autophagy induction and its blockade by inhibiting the activity of lysosomal cathepsin B without changing lysosomal acidity27. We cannot exclude that C10, as a weak base with lipophilic properties, may be preferentially sequestered in acidic cellular compartments such as lysosomes or autolysosomes. This may lead to attenuation of their degradation capacity and, in consequence, to autophagy perturbations.
Moreover, it has been shown that autophagy inhibitors with lysosomotropic or ionophore properties are able to parallelly activate a noncanonical autophagy pathway that drives LC3 lipidation on endolysosomal membranes47. In the case of C10, attenuation of mTORC1 activity 1–3 h after treatment proves the induction of canonical autophagy. However, inihbition of autophagy by C10 preceded the observed increase in the number of ATG16L foci. C10-evoked autophagy blockade leads to accumulation of autolysosomes with undegraded cargo and may cause rupture of these vesicles. Therefore, we cannot exclude that these damaged autophagic vesicles may, in consequence, induce noncanonical autophagy.
Enhanced autophagy process, when incomplete (due to co-treatment with autophagy inducer and inhibitor), leads to cell degeneration followed by cell death26. C10-induced MCF-7 cell death was observed for doses higher than the IC50 dose. Moreover, long-term treatment of MCF-7 cells with the IC50 or IC25 dose of C10 led to persistent impairment of autophagy and inhibition of cell proliferation until the 5th or 6th day when massive cell death was observed. Autophagy modulation by C10 and absence of functional caspase 3 in MCF-7 cells argue for autophagy-dependent and caspase-independent cell death. Similarly, prolonged treatment with C10 of HCT 116 cells, in which all caspases are functional, evoked autophagy blockade followed by massive cell death on the 6th day (data not shown). This suggests that C10 is able to induce autophagy-dependent cell death in various cancer cells.
In contrast to cell death observed after prolonged C10-treatment relievement of the autophagy blockade led to the regrowth of cells. However, cells that were unable to resume proliferation after stress caused by autophagy perturbation underwent senescence (20%). One can argue that C10 may change pH and lower the activity of SA-β-gal as it was shown in the case of CQ48. This cannot be excluded but cell proliferation can still be observed after C10 removal proving that at least not all cells undergo senescence. Another scenario is also possible, namely reversibility of cancer cell senescence8,43,49,50. However, MCF-7 cells, may undergo both irreversible or reversible cell cycle arrest at least after various treatments with doxorubicin49,51.
There are some reports that autophagy inhibition induces cell death in cancer cells resistant to common therapies; moreover, in some cases, it may restore anticancer drug sensitivity26. It was demonstrated that autophagy was elevated after radiotherapy but CQ applied after irradiation inhibited the post-irradiation recovery process25. It was also found that autophagy inhibition and chemotherapeutics can give synergistic effects in different cancer models52,53. On the other hand there is also evidence that, in some cases, autophagy inducers may enhance anticancer therapy54,55. In this context compounds that are able both to induce and inhibit autophagy may cause extreme metabolic energy exhaustion that leads to cell stress and death. Moreover, accumulated vesicles with undegraded cargo that cannot be recycled may further contribute to cell stress.
Summing up, we showed that C10 causes autophagy modulation in lower doses than other autophagy dual mode agents, namely ML-9 and AMDE-127,45, and exerts higher cytotoxicity than CQ on MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Due to C10 action on both the initiation and degradation stage of autophagy it seems to be a more potent anticancer agent than inhibitors presently used in therapy, such as CQ derivatives. C10 acts on a universal target i.e., the autophagy process, which is involved in tumorigenesis and drug resistance. Moreover, inefficient functioning of autophagy may induce cell death even in cancer cells resistant to caspase-dependent apoptosis. Currently, we are dissecting this possibility by using the protocol of prolonged cancer cell treatment with C10. Moreover, we can speculate that due to the frequently observed higher basal level of autophagy in different types of cancer cells and their higher nutrient demand23,26, such autophagy modulation as evoked by C10 may be more debilitating for cancer than for normal cells.
Materials and Methods
Reagents and antibodies
The following antibodies were obtained from commercial sources: rabbit anti-AChE (1:500, STI, bs-2511R), mouse anti-p21 (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich, P1484), mouse anti-p62 (1:1000, BD Biosciences, 610832), rabbit anti-ATG5 (1:200, Cell Signaling, #2630), mouse anti-ATG16L (1:500, MBL, M150-3), rabbit anti-LC3B (1:500, Sigma-Aldrich, L7543), rabbit anti-AKT (phospho Ser473) (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #4060S), rabbit anti-AKT (1:1000, Cell Signaling, #4691S), rabbit anti-p70S6K (phospho Thr389) (1:500, Cell Signaling, #9208P) and mouse anti-β-ACTIN (1:50,000, Sigma-Aldrich, A1978) or mouse anti-GAPDH (1:50,000, Milipore, MAB374), anti-rabbit Alexa 488 and anti-mouse Alexa 555 (1:500, Life Technologies, A11008 and A31570) secondary antibodies. Chloroquine was purchased from Lab Empire (CHL919), Bafilomycin A and Thapsigargin from Sigma-Aldrich (B1793 and T9033).
Cell culture and treatment
MCF-7 cells and human primary dermal fibroblasts were obtained from ATCC. The human colon HCT 116 cancer cell line was kindly provided by Dr. Bert Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD). Authentication of MCF-7 and HCT 116 cell lines was performed by Cell Line Authentication IdentiCell using STR profiling in 2016.
MCF-7 cells and fibroblasts were cultured in DMEM medium (Sigma-Aldrich, D5546), HCT 116 in McCoy’s medium (Lonza, BE12_168F). Media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (Cytogen, S181H), 2mM L-glutamine and Antibiotics Antimycotic solution (Sigma-Aldrich, G7513 and A5955). Cells were kept in humidified atmosphere (37 °C and 5% CO2 in the air). The cells were seeded 24 h before treatment at a density of 6 × 103 cells/cm2 (MCF-7) or 5 × 103 cells/cm2 (HCT 116 and fibroblasts).
To check long-term effects of heterodimer C10, cells were treated with IC50 dose of C10 for 24 h and then cultured in fresh medium without the compound for several days (1 + n). Every third day the medium was replaced by a fresh one. Control cells were treated with dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) (Sigma-Aldrich, D4540) in appropriate dose and time.
Cell transfection
Cells were transiently transfected with mCherry-GFP-LC3B, or mRFP-LC3B and GFP-LAMP-1 constructs using Lipofectamine 2000 (Invitrogen, 11668-019) as described by the manufacturer. Briefly, fifty thousands of cells were transfected with 0.5 µg of mCherry-GFP-LC3B or mRFP-LC3B and GFP-LAMP-1 plasmid and cultured in growth media containing 50 µg/ml neomycin (Sigma-Aldrich, N1142) with exchange of medium every 24 h. 2 days after transfection cells were used for treatments and confocal imaging.
Cell viability estimation (MTT and Trypan Blue assay)
3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) solution (5 mg/ml) (Sigma-Aldrich, M5655) was added to cells treated for 24 h with the indicated concentrations of C10. Cells were then incubated for 2 h at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere (5% CO2). Formazan formed in living cells was dissolved in DMSO and absorbance of the solution was measured at 570 nm using a microplate reader (Reader 400 SFC, LabInstruments).
Cell viability was also assessed by trypan blue exclusion assay. After treatment with C10, the cells were collected by trypsinization, incubated with Trypan Blue (Sigma-Aldrich, T8154) and viable cells as well as dead ones (blue) were counted.
Cell death detection
After treatment with the indicated concentrations of C10 cells were washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) and stained with 7-amino-actinomycin D (7-AAD) (BD Biosciences, 51-68981E) for 20 min at room temperature (RT). Flow cytometry analyses were performed using FACSCalibur (BD) and the CellQuest analysis software (BD); 10,000 events were counted per sample.
Bromodeoxyuridine incorporation assay
For DNA synthesis assay, bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) (10 μM) (Sigma–Aldrich) was added to the medium and cells were cultured for 24 h. BrdU was detected using primary mouse antibody against BrdU (10 µl/ml) (Becton Dickinson) and anti-mouse Alexa 488 (1:500) (Life Technologies) secondary antibody. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Cells were observed under a Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope with a 40 × /0.75 Nikon lens and the ImagePro Plus.
AChE activity assay
To measure AChE activity the Acetylcholinesterase Assay Kit (Colorimetric) (Abcam, ab138871), which is based on the method of Ellman56, was used. The samples for analysis were obtained by sonication of MCF-7 cells treated with IC50 dose of C10 or incubation of sonicated control cells with IC50 dose of C10. The samples of human erythrocyte AChE were obtained as described by Zawadzka et al.28.
DNA content and granularity analysis
After treatment with IC50 dose of C10 for 24 h the medium was discarded and cells were collected by trypsinization and fixed in 70% ethanol. For DNA analysis, cells were stained with solution of propidium iodide (PI) in PBS (3.8 mM sodium citrate, 500 μg/ml RNAse A, 50 μg/ml PI). Granularity and DNA content was determined by flow cytometry using the CellQuest Software; 10,000 events were counted for each sample (FACSCalibur, Becton Dickinson).
Western blotting analysis
Whole cell protein extracts were prepared according to the Laemmli method57. Equal amounts of protein were separated electrophoretically in 10 or 12% SDS-polyacrylamide gels and transferred to nitrocellulose membranes. Membranes were blocked with 5% non-fat dry milk dissolved in TBS containing 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 h at RT and incubated overnight at 4 °C with one of the primary antibodies (in TBS + 0.1% Tween 20/5% milk): rabbit anti-AChE, mouse anti-p21, mouse anti-p62, rabbit anti-ATG5, rabbit anti-LC3B, rabbit anti-AKT (phospho Ser473), rabbit anti-AKT, rabbit anti-p70S6K (phospho Thr389) and mouse anti-β-ACTIN or mouse anti-GAPDH as a loading control. Specific proteins were detected after 1 h of incubation at RT with appropriate horseradish peroxidase–conjugated secondary antibody (1:2000 in TBS + 0.1% Tween 20/5% milk). The ECL system (GE Health Care, #34080) was used according to the manufacturer’s instruction. All proteins were analyzed by Western blotting at least 3 times (3 independent experiments).
Detection of Senescence-Associated-β-galactosidase
Detection of Senescence-Associated-β-galactosidase (SA-β-gal) was performed according to Dimri et al.58. Briefly, cells were fixed in 2% formaldehyde, 0.2% glutaraldehyde in PBS, washed, and incubated overnight at 37 °C with a solution containing 1 mg/ml 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside, 2.5 mM potassium ferrocyanide, 2.5 mM potassium ferricyanide, 150 mM NaCl, 2 mM MgCl2 and 0.1 M phosphate buffer, pH 6. Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (1 µM in PBS) (Sigma-Aldrich, D9542). Cells were observed under a Nikon Eclipse 50i microscope with a 40 × / 0.75 Nikon lens and the ImagePro Plus.
Cytokine measurement
Conditioned medium was collected at appropriate time points then frozen at −80 and kept until cytokine measurement. Cytokines—IL-6 and IL-8, were estimated using a BD LSRFortessa flow cytometer, equipped with 488 nm and 640 nm lasers and BD FACSDiva 6.2 software. Beads fluorescence was detected with 575/26, 670/14 and 780/60 band passes (BPs) and gated according to the Cytometric Bead Array (CBA) Human Enhanced Sensitivity Master Buffer Kit manual. Data were analyzed with BD FCAP Array TM 3.0 software.
Immunocytochemistry
Cells grown on coverslips were fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) (Sigma-Aldrich, P6148) for 15 min at RT. Then, cells were washed twice with PBS and blocked with 5% bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma-Aldrich, A2153) in PBS containing 0.1% Triton X-100 for 30 min. After washing cells were incubated with appropriate antibody diluted in PBS + 0.1% Triton X-100/1% BSA—first with primary rabbit anti-LC3B monoclonal antibody or mouse anti-ATG16L antibody for 2 h and next with anti-rabbit Alexa 488 or anti-mouse Alexa 555 secondary antibody for 1 h. DNA was stained with DAPI (1 µM in PBS) and the coverslips were mounted. LC3B and ATG16L foci were visualized with Nikon Eclipse Ti, a fluorescent microscope with a 40 × /0.6 Nikon lens, and analyzed using the NIS Elements Basic Research software.
Electron microscopy
Glutaraldehyde was added to cells collected by trypsinization to the final concentration of 2%. Cells were pelleted (conditions: 163 × g, 5 min) and fixed for 1 h in 4 °C. After fixation, cells were rinsed two times for 10 min in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, then incubated overnight in 4 °C. Next, cell pellets were postfixed in 1% osmium tetroxide for 1 h at RT. Dehydration was performed by incubating the sample in increasing ethanol concentrations and in pure propylene oxide. During dehydration cells were stained with 1% uranyl acetate in 70% ethanol. Finally, cells were embedded in the Epon resin. Sixty-five nanometer sections were prepared and poststained with uranyl acetate and Reynold’s lead citrate. Photos were obtained with Morada camera on a JEM 1400 transmission electron microscope at 80 kV (JEOL Co., Japan).
Quantitative analysis
Computational analysis of cell number, foci number, area occupied by autophagic vesicles and Pearson’s correlation coefficient for protein colocalization was determined using ImageJ (FiJi) software. More than 100 cells were counted per sample for each analysis except for estimation of the area occupied by autophagic vesicles from electron microscopy images (30 cells per sample).
Statistical analysis
All experimental results are presented as means ± SD except when indicated otherwise. Statistical analysis was conducted using the STATISTICA software. Two group comparisons were performed using the Mann–Whitney test. A p value of <0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Asterisks denote *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001.
Electronic supplementary material
Acknowledgements
We thank Prof. Terje Johansen (University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway) for the gift of pmCherry-GFP-LC3B construct, Prof. Tamotsu Yoshimori (Osaka University, Japan) for the gift and pmRFP-LC3 (Addgene plasmid #21075), Prof. Jolanta Rędowicz (Nencki Institute of Experimental Biology PAS, Warsaw, Poland) for the gift of GFP-LAMP-1 construct, Dr. Bert Vogelstein (Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD) for HCT 116 cell line.
Funding:
This work was supported by the National Science Centre [grant no. UMO-2015/17/B/NZ3/03531].
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
These authors contributed equally: Karolina Kucharewicz, Magdalena Dudkowska.
Edited by G.M. Fimia
Electronic supplementary material
Supplementary Information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41419-018-0383-6.
Publisher's note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Roninson IB. Tumor cell senescence in cancer treatment. Cancer Res. 2003;63:2705–2715. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Jiang P, Mizushima N. Autophagy and human diseases. Cell Res. 2014;24:69–79. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.161. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Campisi J, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:729–740. doi: 10.1038/nrm2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Gewirtz DA, Holt SE, Elmore LW. Accelerated senescence: an emerging role in tumor cell response to chemotherapy and radiation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2008;76:947–957. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2008.06.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.te Poele RH, Okorokov AL, Jardine L, Cummings J, Joel SP. DNA damage is able to induce senescence in tumor cells in vitro and in vivo. Cancer Res. 2002;62:1876–1883. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Schmitt CA, et al. A senescence program controlled by p53 and p16INK4a contributes to the outcome of cancer therapy. Cell. 2002;109:335–346. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00734-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Chang BD, et al. A senescence-like phenotype distinguishes tumor cells that undergo terminal proliferation arrest after exposure to anticancer agents. Cancer Res. 1999;59:3761–3767. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sliwinska MA, et al. Induction of senescence with doxorubicin leads to increased genomic instability of HCT116 cells. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2009;130:24–32. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2008.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Mosieniak G, et al. Polyploidy formation in doxorubicin-treated cancer cells can favor escape from senescence. Neoplasia. 2015;17:882–893. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.11.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wu PC, Wang Q, Grobman L, Chu E, Wu DY. Accelerated cellular senescence in solid tumor therapy. Exp. Oncol. 2012;34:298–305. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Was H, et al. Bafilomycin A1 triggers proliferative potential of senescent cancer cells in vitro and in NOD/SCID mice. Oncotarget. 2017;8:9303–9322. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Roberson RS, Kussick SJ, Vallieres E, Chen SY, Wu DY. Escape from therapy-induced accelerated cellular senescence in p53-null lung cancer cells and in human lung cancers. Cancer Res. 2005;65:2795–2803. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-1270. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Klionsky DJ. Autophagy: from phenomenology to molecular understanding in less than a decade. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007;8:931–937. doi: 10.1038/nrm2245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Mizushima N, Komatsu M. Autophagy: renovation of cells and tissues. Cell. 2011;147:728–741. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kroemer G, et al. Classification of cell death: recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee on Cell Death 2009. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:3–11. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2008.150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Mariño G, Niso-Santano M, Baehrecke EH, Kroemer G. Self-consumption: the interplay of autophagy and apoptosis. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014;15:81–94. doi: 10.1038/nrm3735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tsujimoto Y, Shimizu S. Another way to die: autophagic programmed cell death. Cell Death Differ. 2005;12:1528–1534. doi: 10.1038/sj.cdd.4401777. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Young AR, et al. Autophagy mediates the mitotic senescence transition. Genes Dev. 2009;23:798–803. doi: 10.1101/gad.519709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Sharma K, et al. A novel cytostatic form of autophagy in sensitization of non-small cell lung cancer cells to radiation by vitamin D and the vitamin D analog, EB 1089. Autophagy. 2014;10:2346–2361. doi: 10.4161/15548627.2014.993283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gewirtz DA. Autophagy and senescence in cancer therapy. J. Cell Physiol. 2014;229:6–9. doi: 10.1002/jcp.24420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Gewirtz DA. Autophagy and senescence: a partnership in search of definition. Autophagy. 2013;9:808–812. doi: 10.4161/auto.23922. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Mizushima N, Ohsumi Y, Yoshimori T. Autophagosome formation in mammalian cells. Cell Struct. Funct. 2002;27:421–429. doi: 10.1247/csf.27.421. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Chen HY, White E. Role of autophagy in cancer prevention. Cancer Prev. Res. 2011;4:973–983. doi: 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-10-0387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Tang JC, Feng YL, Liang X, Cai XJ. Autophagy in 5-fluorouracil therapy in gastrointestinal cancer: trends and challenges. Chin. Med. J. 2016;129:456–463. doi: 10.4103/0366-6999.176069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ratikan JA, Sayre JW, Schaue D. Chloroquine engages the immune system to eradicate irradiated breast tumors in mice. Int J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2013;87:761–768. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.07.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Nagelkerke A, Bussink J, Geurts-Moespot A, Sweep FC, Span PN. Therapeutic targeting of autophagy in cancer. Part II: pharmacological modulation of treatment-induced autophagy. Semin Cancer Biol. 2015;31:99–105. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2014.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Li M, et al. AMDE-1 is a dual function chemical for autophagy activation and inhibition. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0122083. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122083. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zawadzka A, Lozińska I, Molęda Z, Panasiewicz M, Czarnocki Z. Highly selective inhibition of butyrylcholinesterase by a novel melatonin-tacrine heterodimers. J. Pineal. Res. 2013;54:435–441. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Haynes MK, et al. Detection of intracellular granularity induction in prostate cancer cell lines by small molecules using the HyperCyt high-throughput flow cytometry system. J. Biomol. Screen. 2009;14:596–609. doi: 10.1177/1087057109335671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Klionsky DJ, et al. Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) Autophagy. 2016;12:1–222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T, Levine B. Methods in mammalian autophagy research. Cell. 2010;140:313–326. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.01.028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Longatti A, Tooze SA. Vesicular trafficking and autophagosome formation. Cell Death Differ. 2009;16:956–965. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2009.39. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Fujita N, et al. The Atg16L complex specifies the site of LC3 lipidation for membrane biogenesis in autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2008;19:2092–2100. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E07-12-1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Hong Y, et al. Melatonin treatment induces interplay of apoptosis, autophagy, and senescence in human colorectal cancer cells. J. Pineal. Res. 2014;56:264–274. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ordoñez R, et al. Ceramide metabolism regulates autophagy and apoptotic cell death induced by melatonin in liver cancer cells. J. Pineal. Res. 2015;59:178–189. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Noguchi M, Hirata N, Suizu F. The links between AKT and two intracellular proteolytic cascades: ubiquitination and autophagy. Biochim Biophys. Acta. 2014;1846:342–352. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2014.07.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mizushima N, Yoshimori T. How to interpret LC3 immunoblotting. Autophagy. 2007;3:542–545. doi: 10.4161/auto.4600. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kimura S, Noda T, Yoshimori T. Dissection of the autophagosome maturation process by a novel reporter protein, tandem fluorescent-tagged LC3. Autophagy. 2007;3:452–460. doi: 10.4161/auto.4451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yang YP, et al. Application and interpretation of current autophagy inhibitors and activators. Acta Pharmacol. Sin. 2013;34:625–635. doi: 10.1038/aps.2013.5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ganley IG, Wong PM, Gammoh N, Jiang X. Distinct autophagosomal-lysosomal fusion mechanism revealed by thapsigargin-induced autophagy arrest. Mol. Cell. 2011;42:731–743. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.04.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Hariri M, et al. Biogenesis of multilamellar bodies via autophagy. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2000;11:255–268. doi: 10.1091/mbc.11.1.255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Mosieniak G, et al. Curcumin induces permanent growth arrest of human colon cancer cells: link between senescence and autophagy. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2012;133:444–455. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2012.05.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Sikora E, Mosieniak G, Sliwinska MA. Morphological and functional characteristic of senescent cancer cells. Curr. Drug Targets. 2016;17:377–387. doi: 10.2174/1389450116666151019094724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Puertollano R. mTOR and lysosome regulation. F1000Prime Rep. 2014;6:52. doi: 10.12703/P6-52. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kondratskyi A, et al. Identification of ML-9 as a lysosomotropic agent targeting autophagy and cell death. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1193. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.156. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Ranieri, R. et al. N6-isopentenyladenosine dual targeting of AMPK and Rab7 prenylation inhibits melanoma growth through the impairment of autophagic flux. Cell Death Differ. 10.1038/cdd.2017.165 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 47.Jacquin E, et al. Pharmacological modulators of autophagy activate a parallel noncanonical pathway driving unconventional LC3 lipidation. Autophagy. 2017;13:854–867. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2017.1287653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kurz DJ, Decary S, Hong Y, Erusalimsky JD. Senescence-associated (beta)-galactosidase reflects an increase in lysosomal mass during replicative ageing of human endothelial cells. J. Cell Sci. 2000;113:3613–3622. doi: 10.1242/jcs.113.20.3613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Mosieniak G, et al. Curcumin-treated cancer cells show mitotic disturbances leading to growth arrest and induction of senescence phenotype. Int J. Biochem Cell Biol. 2016;74:33–43. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2016.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Gosselin K, et al. Senescence-associated oxidative DNA damage promotes the generation of neoplastic cells. Cancer Res. 2009;69:7917–7925. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2510. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Elmore LW, Di X, Dumur C, Holt SE, Gewirtz DA. Evasion of a single-step, chemotherapy-induced senescence in breast cancer cells: implications for treatment response. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:2637–2643. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li X, Lu Y, Pan T, Fan Z. Roles of autophagy in cetuximab-mediated cancer therapy against EGFR. Autophagy. 2010;6:1066–1077. doi: 10.4161/auto.6.8.13366. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Shao S, et al. Spautin-1, a novel autophagy inhibitor, enhances imatinib-induced apoptosis in chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J. Oncol. 2014;44:1661–1668. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2014.2313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Paglin S, et al. Rapamycin-sensitive pathway regulates mitochondrial membrane potential, autophagy, and survival in irradiated MCF-7 cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11061–11070. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Kuwahara Y, et al. Enhancement of autophagy is a potential modality for tumors refractory to radiotherapy. Cell Death Dis. 2011;2:e177. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2011.56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.ELLMAN GL, COURTNEY KD, ANDRES V, FEATHER-STONE RM. A new and rapid colorimetric determination of acetylcholinesterase activity. Biochem. Pharmacol. 1961;7:88–95. doi: 10.1016/0006-2952(61)90145-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Laemmli UK. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Dimri GP, et al. A biomarker that identifies senescent human cells in culture and in aging skin in vivo. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1995;92:9363–9367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.20.9363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.