Skip to main content
mBio logoLink to mBio
. 2018 Jun 12;9(3):e00640-18. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00640-18

Reassessing the Role of Type II Toxin-Antitoxin Systems in Formation of Escherichia coli Type II Persister Cells

Frédéric Goormaghtigh a,#, Nathan Fraikin a,#, Marta Putrinš b, Thibaut Hallaert a, Vasili Hauryliuk b,c,d, Abel Garcia-Pino a, Andreas Sjödin e,f, Sergo Kasvandik b, Klas Udekwu g, Tanel Tenson b, Niilo Kaldalu b,, Laurence Van Melderen a,
Editor: Gisela Storzh
PMCID: PMC6016239  PMID: 29895634

ABSTRACT

Persistence is a reversible and low-frequency phenomenon allowing a subpopulation of a clonal bacterial population to survive antibiotic treatments. Upon removal of the antibiotic, persister cells resume growth and give rise to viable progeny. Type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems were assumed to play a key role in the formation of persister cells in Escherichia coli based on the observation that successive deletions of TA systems decreased persistence frequency. In addition, the model proposed that stochastic fluctuations of (p)ppGpp levels are the basis for triggering activation of TA systems. Cells in which TA systems are activated are thought to enter a dormancy state and therefore survive the antibiotic treatment. Using independently constructed strains and newly designed fluorescent reporters, we reassessed the roles of TA modules in persistence both at the population and single-cell levels. Our data confirm that the deletion of 10 TA systems does not affect persistence to ofloxacin or ampicillin. Moreover, microfluidic experiments performed with a strain reporting the induction of the yefM-yoeB TA system allowed the observation of a small number of type II persister cells that resume growth after removal of ampicillin. However, we were unable to establish a correlation between high fluorescence and persistence, since the fluorescence of persister cells was comparable to that of the bulk of the population and none of the cells showing high fluorescence were able to resume growth upon removal of the antibiotic. Altogether, these data show that there is no direct link between induction of TA systems and persistence to antibiotics.

KEYWORDS: RelE, YoeB, ampicillin, single cell

IMPORTANCE

Within a growing bacterial population, a small subpopulation of cells is able to survive antibiotic treatment by entering a transient state of dormancy referred to as persistence. Persistence is thought to be the cause of relapsing bacterial infections and is a major public health concern. Type II toxin-antitoxin systems are small modules composed of a toxic protein and an antitoxin protein counteracting the toxin activity. These systems were thought to be pivotal players in persistence until recent developments in the field. Our results demonstrate that previous influential reports had technical flaws and that there is no direct link between induction of TA systems and persistence to antibiotics.

INTRODUCTION

Type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are small operons encoding a toxic protein and an antitoxin protein inhibiting the toxin activity by forming a tight complex (for reviews, see references 1 to 6). The vast majority of toxins are protein synthesis inhibitors using various molecular mechanisms to target different steps of translation (711). Antitoxin proteins are labile and degraded by ATP-dependent proteases (i.e., Lon, ClpXP, and ClpAP) (1214). The expression of TA systems is tightly regulated at the transcriptional level (1517). In steady-state conditions, the toxin-antitoxin complex acts as a negative transcriptional regulator and binds palindromic sequences located in the operon promoter. Under conditions in which the toxin level is higher than that of the antitoxin, autoregulation is alleviated to restore excess antitoxin.

Type II TA systems are widespread and abundant in bacterial genomes (1821). TA systems might represent up to 3% of the total predicted open reading frames (ORFs) in some genomes, with some genomes containing more than 90 TA systems. These observations raise essential questions: why are there so many TA systems and what are they for? These questions are mostly unanswered, and the role of chromosomally encoded TA systems in bacterial physiology is highly debated in the field (2224).

Type II TA systems were first discovered on plasmids in the mid-1980s. Their function in that context is to eliminate daughter cells that did not receive a plasmid copy during cell division and contribute to plasmid maintenance in growing populations (quoted as addiction [25]). In chromosomes, TA systems are mostly part of the accessory genome originating from horizontal gene transfer (20, 26). They are detected on prophages, transposons, and other genomic islands. Their role in such integrated elements is reminiscent of the addiction function (2729). Other systems are involved in protection against mobile genetic elements such as plasmids (antiaddiction function) or phages (abortive infection) (30, 31). On the basis of their general action on bacterial growth, it was hypothesized that chromosomal TA systems could be integrated in the host regulatory networks and involved in stress management. However, an Escherichia coli strain lacking five TA systems (relBE, yefM-yoeB, mazEF, chpB, and dinJ-yafQ) for which the toxins are endoribonucleases, had no survival defects in stress conditions (32). In addition, this strain did not show any fitness disadvantage in competition experiments with the wild-type strain. These observations questioned the role of TA systems in stress management. A recent model proposed a direct connection between TA systems and persistence to antibiotics in vitro. This model became an instant hit in the field, influencing the research on TA modules and persistence for the last years (33, 34). Persistence is defined as a stochastic switch that pushes bacterial physiology toward an increased antibiotic-tolerant state (3538). The low frequency (10−2 to 10−6 depending on the bacterial species, strains, experimental conditions, and antibiotics) combined with the transient nature of persister cells makes them very challenging to study. As a result, the molecular mechanisms underlying persistence remain largely unclear (39). The model linking TA modules and persistence initially stemmed from observations made by the K. Gerdes lab that successive deletions of 10 type II TA systems (later referred to in the field as the Δ10 strain) progressively decreased the level of persistence to antibiotics (33). Deletion of the gene encoding the Lon protease, thought to mediate degradation of different antitoxins, had a similar effect. While this model gained wide acceptance, several independent follow-up studies questioned its validity (4043). Nevertheless, the model was further refined in a follow-up work that focused on the link between TA system activation and persistence at the single-cell level. The authors reported that stochastic accumulation of (p)ppGpp was the trigger for degradation of antitoxins resulting in activation of TA systems (34). In this work, TA activation was monitored using transcriptional fusions of the yefM-yoeB and relBE TA operons to gfp. The intracellular concentration of the (p)ppGpp alarmone was monitored using a translational fusion between the stationary-phase sigma factor RpoS and mCherry as proxy. Using these reporters, the authors observed that rare nongrowing fluorescent cells within the bulk population of nonfluorescent cells were tolerant to high doses of ampicillin. In some cases, fluorescent cells were able to resume growth after ampicillin treatment. On the basis of these data, they proposed that accumulation of (p)ppGpp inhibits polyphosphatase (encoded by the ppx gene), leading to the accumulation of polyphosphate (PolyP). In turn, PolyP binds to Lon and stimulates antitoxin degradation, thereby liberating the toxins from the TA complexes. The resulting free toxins would then inhibit translation and induce persistence. The K. Gerdes lab subsequently proposed that the HipA toxin from the type II hipBA system induces persistence through the activation of the 10 TA systems, reinforcing their role as major effectors of bacterial persistence (44).

In a major paradigm shift, the authors of the model discovered that the reference Δ10 strain on which the aforementioned work was performed was severely compromised by infection of φ80 prophages. In their revision, they attributed the observed loss of persistence to these phage infections and disentangled TA systems from persistence (45), leading to the retraction of the two previous papers (46, 47).

Although the notion of a defective Δ10 strain de facto shatters the model, there are additional issues that were not addressed in the revision (45). Given how influential this model has been over the last years, clarifying all these issues remains paramount. It remains unclear how the phage contamination problems would affect the validity of some aspects of the original model, notably the stochastic activation of TA systems in type II persister cells, since these experiments were performed only in the noninfected wild-type strain (34). The same comment holds for the model in which the HipA toxin induces persistence via the activation of the 10 TA systems (44). In this context, we reassessed the roles of type II TA systems by using an independently constructed Δ10 mutant and by testing the fluorescent reporters described in the aforementioned studies. Our results showed that the previously used methodologies have several drawbacks that led to misinterpretation of the results. Besides the highly mutated Δ10 strain, we show that the fluorescent reporters that were used failed to report TA system activation and (p)ppGpp levels. We therefore designed a new fluorescent reporter that monitors induction of the yefM-yoeB system at the single-cell level using microfluidic chips coupled with fluorescence microscopy. Interestingly, a small number of type II persister cells were observed; however, fluorescence of these cells was comparable to that of the bulk of the population, confirming that there is no direct link between induction of TA systems and persistence to ampicillin.

RESULTS

Deletion of 10 TA systems does not affect persistence to antibiotics.

In parallel to the work performed in the K. Gerdes lab, we constructed a strain with the same 10 TA systems deleted (Δ10LVM) (48). However, the two strains are different in some key aspects. First, the methods used to delete the last five TA operons (see Materials and Methods) in the respective Δ5 strains were different: while we used the λRed method combined with the FLP-FLP recombination target (FRT) recombinase system to remove resistance cassettes from successive deletion mutants (49), the Δ10KG strain was constructed using a counterselection system based on the expression of the type II ParE toxin (33). ParE-based counterselection allowed for scarless deletions but inevitably increased the risk of mutations and rearrangements, since ParE is a DNA gyrase inhibitor (50), which induces DNA double-strand breaks and SOS response (51). Second, while the entire mazEF operon is deleted in our strains, only the mazF toxic gene is deleted in the strains from the Gerdes lab, allowing the possible expression of the antitoxin mazE as well as mazG, the third gene of the mazEFG operon.

Persistence was measured for both Δ10 strains during 5 h of treatment with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) or ofloxacin (5 µg/ml) in steady-state cultures in a chemically defined medium as described in reference 52. The time-kill curves of the different strains have a typical biphasic shape, indicative of a small subpopulation of type II persister cells (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). We did not observe any effect on persister formation in the Δ10LVM mutant after either ampicillin or ofloxacin treatment (Fig. 1A). These observations are consistent with a recent correction published by the K. Gerdes lab in which the authors found no effect on persister formation in both ampicillin and ciprofloxacin, in a newly constructed Δ10′TA strain (45). However and as initially reported (33), using the Δ10KG mutant, we observed a 1,000-fold drop in survival to ofloxacin in the Δ10KG mutant. Survival of the Δ10KG mutant to ampicillin was comparable to that of the wild-type and Δ10LVM strains (Fig. 1A). This discrepancy was lately recognized by the authors, as they observed that the difference in persistence to ampicillin between the Δ10 mutant and the wild-type strain could not be reproduced in better defined experimental conditions when chemically defined growth medium was used (45). This supports our assertion that proper and defined experimental conditions are of major importance when performing persistence assays (52).

FIG 1 .

FIG 1 

Deletion of 10 type II TA systems has no effect on type II persister cell formation. (A) Surviving fraction of bacteria after 5 h of ampicillin (100 µg/ml) (left) or ofloxacin (5 µg/ml) (right) treatment. Values are the means from at least 3 independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (B) Minimum duration for killing (MDK) 99.9% of the population during ampicillin (100 µg/ml) (left) or ofloxacin (5 µg/ml) (right) exposure. Values are the means from at least three independent experiments. Error bars indicate standard deviations. (C) Genome maps of the E. coli MG1655, Δ10KG, and Δ10LVM strains. Deleted TA loci, phage insertions, and large deletions are annotated in gray, blue, and green, respectively. Colored arrows represent intergenic regions between TA modules in the forward direction. Chromosomal inversions and rearrangements in strain Δ10LVM are represented by dashed lines and arrows, respectively.

FIG S1 

Deletion of 10 type II TA systems does not affect growth or sensitivity to ampicillin or ofloxacin. (A) Growth curves of the wild-type strain and Δ10LVM and Δ10KG mutants. Values represent means of two independent replicates. (B and C) MICs of the wild-type strain and Δ10LVM and Δ10KG mutants to ampicillin (B) and ofloxacin (C). Values represent mean values of three independent replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. (D and E) Killing curves of the wild-type strain and Δ10LVM and Δ10KG mutants to ampicillin (100 µg/ml) (D) and ofloxacin (5 µg/ml) (E). Values represent means of three independent replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. Dashed lines represent the survival values (10−3) MDK was extrapolated from (Fig. 1B). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB (419.7KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Persistence of these strains was further confirmed by measuring the minimal duration for killing of 99.9% of the population (MDK99.9), an accurate parameter to assess survival to antibiotics (38) (Fig. 1B). While 99.9% of the wild-type and Δ10LVM populations were killed by ofloxacin treatment in more than 72 min, this time was drastically reduced to 9 min for the Δ10KG strain. Ampicillin treatment yielded MDK99.9 values ranging from 85.2 min for the wild-type strain to 92.4 min for the Δ10KG strain (Fig. 1B). To conclude, the results obtained with an independently constructed Δ10 strain do not support a role for TA systems in persistence and confirms that the earlier report based on the Δ10KG strain is an experimental artifact (45).

Whole-genome and proteomic analysis of the Δ10LVM and Δ10KG strains.

Whole-genome sequencing was performed on the Δ10KG and Δ10LVM strains, as well as intermediate deletion strains used to construct the Δ10KG strain (Δ5KG, Δ7KG, Δ8KG, and Δ9KG) to help retrace the history of phage infections (Fig. 1C; see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Our analysis confirms that the Δ10KG strain genome is largely rearranged (42, 45). In agreement with the Gerdes lab (45), we found that the Δ5KG strain contains an insertion of a λ prophage at the attB site and a φ80 prophage located at the canonical integration site, between yciI and kch (φ80-1).

TABLE S1 

Genetic rearrangements and polymorphisms identified in TA deletion mutants. Download TABLE S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB (468.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

These two phages are detected in all subsequent deletion strains. In addition to these two phages, the Δ7KG and subsequent deletion strains contain another φ80 prophage (φ80-2) located between glgS and ygiJ. Finally, the Δ10KG strain contains a third φ80 prophage (φ80-3) located between yeeJ and yeeL. The presence of the three lysogenic φ80 phages in the Δ10KG strain was further confirmed by PCR using specific primers (Fig. S2A). Polylysogen formation by φ80 at these noncanonical sites was previously reported in another context (53). In their recent correction, the K. Gerdes group failed to detect the φ80-2 and φ80-3 phages but identified a φ80-λ hybrid lysogenic phage (45) that we failed to detect. Our data indicate that these phages were progressively acquired during the successive TA deletions, which could be responsible for the progressive drop of persistence observed by the authors during these successive deletions (33). However, we found Δ7KG, Δ8KG, and Δ9KG strains to be genetically identical aside from TA deletions, while the authors showed a progressive drop of survival from the Δ7KG strain to the Δ9KG strain upon antibiotic treatment (33). We thus checked whether ofloxacin treatment induces prophage-dependent lysis of the Δ10KG strain by monitoring turbidity during treatment. We did not observe a drop in turbidity in the Δ10KG culture, suggesting that, despite the 1,000-fold decrease in survival, massive phage-dependent lysis did not occur (Fig. S2).

FIG S2 

Confirmation of phage insertions by PCR and monitoring of bacterial lysis. (A) PCR was used to amplify junctions between attachment sites and prophages to determine the presence of prophages at specific loci determined by whole-genome sequencing. (B and C) Changes in turbidity during ampicillin (100 µg/ml) (B) or ofloxacin (5 µg/ml) (C) treatment. Values represent means of three independent replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.4 MB (436.3KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

The Δ10KG strain also contains a 10-kbp deletion encompassing 10 genes. In addition, the Δ5KG strain and its derivatives seem to contain numerous mutations in three of the MG1655 cryptic prophages (DPL12, Rac, and Qin/Kim) as shown by Shan et al. (42). However, reads containing these mutations can also be matched to φ80, suggesting that these polymorphisms might be assembly artifacts due to the presence of φ80 prophages in the Δ10KG strain.

The Δ10LVM strain is devoid of any contaminant prophages (as well as the Δ5LVM strain; data not shown) but shows large chromosomal inversions most likely due to the presence of multiple FRT scars at the deletion sites, allowing for FLP-dependent site-specific and/or homologous recombination between these loci (Fig. 1C). Nevertheless, these rearrangements neither affect growth or sensitivity nor persistence to ampicillin or ofloxacin treatments (Fig. 1A and B and Fig. S1).

We performed label-free quantification mass spectrometry (LFQ-MS) of whole-cell proteomes to compare the Δ10 strains to the wild-type strain (Table S2). In agreement with genomic data, GltI, GltL, and RihA are not detected in the Δ10KG strain, which is deleted for 10 kbp encompassing these genes. The TabA protein level was decreased in the Δ10LVM strain, probably due to a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) located upstream of the tabA ORF (Table S1). Proteomic analysis also revealed differences in expression of MazG. As mentioned above, in the Δ10KG strain, only mazF was deleted, leading to a derepression of the mazEFG operon and to higher levels of MazE and MazG (10- and 64-fold, respectively). In the Δ10LVM strain, as expected, MazE and MazG are not detected. It is noteworthy that overexpression of MazG, a nonspecific nucleotide triphosphate pyrophosphohydrolase, has been reported to inhibit growth, prevent (p)ppGpp accumulation, and therefore reduce survival to various stresses (54). However, the persistence rate of a single mutant deleted only for mazF is comparable to that of the wild-type strain (33), indicating that overproduction of MazG alone is not responsible for the persistence defect.

TABLE S2 

LFQ-MS analysis of Δ10 strains. Log2 LFQ values are represented for proteins differentially expressed in either the Δ10KG or Δ10LVM strain exclusively. Genes associated with proteins represented in bold font also showed genetic alterations in genome sequences. ND, not detected. Download TABLE S2, PDF file, 0.5 MB (513.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Expression of the rpoS-mcherry translational fusion is likely to report carryover cells from stationary phase in exponentially growing cultures.

Maisonneuve et al. hypothesized that stochastic synthesis of (p)ppGpp was responsible for toxin activation and growth arrest, therefore contributing to persister formation in exponentially growing cultures (34). In order to test this, they used an RpoS-mCherry translational fusion as a proxy for (p)ppGpp concentration at the single-cell level (34, 44). The authors observed rare fluorescent cells that were persistent to ampicillin, i.e., cells that did not lyse in the presence of ampicillin and were able to resume growth after treatment. They concluded that stochastic induction of (p)ppGpp synthesis leads to persistence to ampicillin. However, the use of an rpoS fusion to report (p)ppGpp may be problematic. Regulation of rpoS occurs at multiple levels (transcription, translation, degradation, and activity) and involves many regulators besides (p)ppGpp (cAMP, small RNAs, RssB adaptor, ClpXP protease, antiadaptors) (55). Moreover, while (p)ppGpp is involved in basal regulation of rpoS expression, it does not appear to play a major role in rpoS expression in stationary phase. Strains devoid of (p)ppGpp show full induction of rpoS in stationary phase but with a 2- to 3-h delay compared to the wild-type strain (56).

To test the validity of the reporter, we transformed the rpoS-mcherry reporter strain constructed by the Gerdes group with a plasmid (pETgfpmut2) carrying a gfp reporter under control of the inducible ptac promoter to monitor proliferation of individual cells (57) (Fig. 2A). Bacteria were grown to stationary phase with isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) to induce gfp expression, washed, diluted in fresh medium without IPTG, and grown for 150 min to mid-exponential phase, allowing green fluorescent protein (GFP) to be diluted by successive divisions. As expected, most stationary-phase cells displayed both green and red fluorescence. After dilution and growth to exponential phase, both the GFP and RpoS-mCherry fluorescence dropped in the majority of the cells (Fig. 2B). However, some cells (2.38% of the population) retained high red fluorescence concomitantly with high GFP signal, indicating that these cells are carryovers from stationary phase. A small proportion of RpoS-mCherry-positive cells showed no GFP fluorescence (0.20% of the population), indicating that in these cells, rpoS might indeed be induced stochastically. Examination of the RpoS-mCherry-positive cells by microscopy showed that, in some cells, the fusion protein was distributed uniformly (Fig. 2A), similarly to the previously published microscopic images (34, 44). However, in many cells, the red fluorescence was localized in dense bodies at the cell poles (Fig. 2A and Fig. S3), which is typical of inclusion bodies and aggregates of misfolded proteins (58). Formation of inclusion bodies suggests that the fusion protein is prone to aggregation and might not be symmetrically distributed during divisions, as previously described for mCherry fusions (59). Thus, the cells with polar RpoS-mCherry signal and low GFP signal in both stationary-phase and growing cultures might be dead or dying cells that have leaked out the soluble GFP but retained the aggregated polar RpoS-mCherry, which accumulated during stationary phase. The inclusion bodies of RpoS-mCherry formed as well when the cells did not contain the gfp reporter plasmid (Fig. S3). In addition, we checked that stationary-phase cells of the reporter-free control have no red autofluorescence, showing that the red fluorescence is indeed caused by the production of RpoS-mCherry (Fig. S3).

FIG 2 .

FIG 2 

RpoS-mCherry reports nongrowing cells in exponentially growing cultures. (A) Illustration of the GFP dilution system used (57). E. coli MG1655 rpoS-mcherry cells transformed with pETgfpmut2 were grown to stationary phase with IPTG to induce gfp expression, washed, diluted in fresh LB medium without IPTG, and grown for 150 min. GFP will be diluted in dividing cells while it will be retained in nongrowing cells. Fluorescence microscopy images of both stationary-phase and exponential-phase cells are shown. (B) Fluorescence microscopy population analysis of cells prepared as in panel A. A total of 35,185 (stationary phase; left) and 29,469 (exponential phase; right) cells from two independent replicates were identified by CellProfiler. Log median red and green fluorescence values for each cell were measured and plotted. Fluorescence is shown in arbitrary units (AU). The percentage of cells in each quadrant is indicated.

FIG S3 

RpoS-mCherry aggregates in vivo. The plasmid-free MG1655 and MG1655 rpoS-mcherry cells were grown to exponential phase and visualized by confocal microscopy as in Fig. 3. TL, transmitted light; Ex, excitation; Em, emission. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.3 MB (294.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Altogether, these results indicate that the rpoS-mcherry fusion is an inadequate reporter to study formation of persister cells in exponentially growing cultures, as it might report carryover cells from a previous stationary phase instead of stochastic switching to a nongrowing state due to (p)ppGpp fluctuations. However, these results do not rule out a potential role of (p)ppGpp in persister formation. An important step toward answering such question would be the design of a sensitive and specific (p)ppGpp reporter, which to our knowledge, is still missing in the field.

TA::gfp transcriptional fusions do not report stochastic activation of toxin-antitoxin transcription.

Stochastic activation of TA modules in type II persister cells became the cornerstone of the model linking the rise in (p)ppGpp levels with the activation of toxins. To test this hypothesis, Maisonneuve et al. monitored the induction of the yefM-yoeB and relBE TA systems at the single-cell level using transcriptional reporters (34). In their design, the gfp gene was inserted downstream of the toxin genes at the TA loci. Green fluorescence was monitored either in microfluidic time-lapse microscopy experiments or in liquid cultures by taking microscopy snapshots. In both setups, the authors found a few cells displaying higher green fluorescence than the bulk of the population. However, the original experiment lacked a necessary control, as the authors did not compare the fluorescence of these strains to that of cells without fluorescent constructs (34). Using the same conditions, we compared the strains carrying the TA::gfp fusions to the wild-type strain lacking the gfp gene (Fig. 3). We were able to detect green fluorescence heterogeneity with confocal microscopy in the TA::gfp-carrying strains, with some cells being more fluorescent than the bulk of the population. However, we were also able to detect rare fluorescent events that stood out from the rest of the population in the control strain (Fig. 3A). Our results actually show that the fluorescence of these reporter strains is similar to that of a control strain devoid of the reporter constructs. Flow cytometry further revealed that fluorescence distributions are unimodal and similar for the wild-type strain and for both yoeB::gfp and relE::gfp reporter strains (Fig. 3B). Moreover, we measured fluorescence using excitation wavelength of 488 nm and recording emission at wavelengths of 530/30 nm and 575/26 nm for the wild-type strain expressing GFP or not expressing GFP and the TA::gfp strains (data not shown). For the strain expressing GFP, the 530:575 nm ratio is around sixfold. However, the 530:575 nm ratio of the TA::gfp strains is comparable to that of the wild-type strain, suggesting that the GFP signal of these reporters is weak and masked by autofluorescence in the whole population. The higher autofluorescence of some cells (Fig. 3) may be linked to oxidative stress that has been shown to increase bacterial autofluorescence caused by oxidized forms of riboflavin and flavin nucleotides such as FAD and FMN (60). More severe oxidative damage experienced by some bacteria could explain their nongrowing condition and the nonlysing state during the ampicillin treatment. Interestingly, the nongrowing cells, which had retained RpoS-mCherry at the cell poles, also had a high level of green autofluorescence (Fig. S3). Altogether, these data show that yoeB::gfp and relE::gfp reporters do not report expression of the relBE and yefM-yoeB systems.

FIG 3 .

FIG 3 

Fluorescence analysis of TA::gfp reporters. (A) Confocal microscopy of E. coli MG1655 and its derivatives containing yoeB::gfp and relE::gfp grown to exponential phase. The white arrows show cells with above-average fluorescence levels. TL, transmitted light; Ex, excitation; Em, emission. (B) Flow cytometry analysis of strain MG1655 in comparison with the yoeB::gfp and relE::gfp reporter strains grown to exponential phase. Analyses were performed on 1,000,000 events. Three independent biological experiments were performed, and a representative example is displayed for each strain.

Type II persister cells do not show higher levels of pyefM-yoeB fluorescence than the bulk of the population.

We thus sought to design more sensitive reporters for TA transcriptional activity. Using a single-copy plasmid, the relBE and yefM-yoeB promoters were cloned upstream of the mScarlet-I gene encoding a bright red fluorescent protein (61). Fluorescence of exponentially growing cells containing the prelBE and pyefM-yoeB fusions was analyzed by flow cytometry in the wild-type strain and in the corresponding TA-deleted strains and compared to the wild-type strain containing a promoterless vector as a control. Fluorescence of the wild-type cells containing the prelBE reporter is comparable to that of the control (Fig. 4A) with a normalized mean fluorescence of 2 arbitrary units (AU) (Fig. 4B). In the ΔrelBE mutant, as expected, derepression of the system leads to an 11-fold increase in fluorescence (22 AU [Fig. 4A and B]). For the pyefM-yoeB reporter, fluorescence of the wild-type cells is substantially higher than that observed for the relBE promoter (138 AU), and a fourfold increase in fluorescence is observed in the ΔyefM-yoeB mutant as a result of promoter derepression (576 AU [Fig. 4A and B]). For both fluorescent reporters, a small subpopulation of highly fluorescent cells is observed, while none was detected with the promoterless fusion, indicating that high fluorescence is specific to these promoters (Fig. 4A and Fig. S4). However, the nature of these cells is still uncertain but does not appear to rely only on TA autoregulation.

FIG 4 .

FIG 4 

Stochastic expression of yefM-yoeB does not lead to persistence. (A) Flow cytometry analysis of cells carrying prelBE::mSc and pyefM-yoeB::mSc reporters grown to exponential phase. Three independent biological experiments were performed counting 1,000,000 events, and a representative example is displayed for each strain. (B) Population analysis of prelBE::mSc and pyefM-yoeB::mSc expression. Mean population fluorescence values from panel A were corrected for background fluorescence using the mean value of the pmSc construct. Error bars represent standard deviations. (C) Time-lapse microscopy of type II persister cells transformed with the pyefM-yoeB::mSc plasmid. Stationary-phase cells were grown for 3 h perfused in MOPS medium, challenged with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) for 5 h, and regrown for 16 h with fresh medium. (D) Population analysis of pyefM-yoeB::mSc fluorescence before treatment from Movie S1 in the supplemental material. Fluorescence was measured for 512 nonpersister cells and 11 persister cells. Persisters are plotted above their respective bins as individual black dots.

FIG S4 

Rare fluorescent events in TA::mSc constructs. Constructs prelBE::mSc and pyefM-yoeB::mSc were transformed in wild-type cells or cells with the corresponding TA system deleted (ΔrelBE, lower left panel, ΔyefM-yoeB, lower right panel), grown to exponential phase, and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.4 MB (407.8KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Since the pyefM-yoeB::mScarlet-I fusion shows detectable fluorescence levels in the wild-type cells, we chose to perform time-lapse fluorescence microscopy in a microfluidic chamber with cells containing this reporter. Among the 2.7 × 105 cells that were analyzed, we could detect 11 type II persister cells (0.0041%) that regrew within 16 h after antibiotic removal (Fig. 4C; see the top panels in Movie S1 in the supplemental material). As far as we know, this is the first direct observation of type II persister cells in wild-type E. coli cells. None of these persister cells showed a fluorescence level above the population average at treatment time (Fig. 4D, black circles). A few highly fluorescent cells (0.012%) were detected and monitored during ampicillin treatment. About half of them (47%) did not lyse but were unable to resume growth after removal of the antibiotic, even 16 h after the end of the treatment (Movie S1, middle panels). Most of these cells showed a significant loss of contrast 16 h after ampicillin removal, indicating damage. The other half lysed during the ampicillin treatment (Movie S1, bottom panels). Altogether, these data show that the type II persister cells we observed did not show a high level of pyefM-yoeB fluorescence, underscoring that induction of the yefM-yoeB system is not implicated in the generation of persister cells in steady-state growth conditions.

MOVIE S1 

Persistence is not dependent on yefM-yoeB induction. Time-lapse microscopy of MG1655 cells transformed with pyefM-yoeB::mSc. Stationary-phase cells were grown for 3 h perfused in MOPS medium, challenged with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) for 5 h, and regrown for 16 h with fresh medium. The movie shows a combination of persister cells (top panels), fluorescent cells not lysed by the treatment (middle panels), and fluorescent cells lysed by the treatment (bottom panels). Time from the start of the experiment and treatment time frame are shown on the bottom right corner. Numbers in the corner of each series indicate the multiplication of red fluorescence intensity. Figure 4C was sampled from the top left panel. Download MOVIE S1, AVI file, 18.9 MB (19.4MB, avi) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

DISCUSSION

The biological role of chromosomally encoded type II TA systems has been extensively debated during the last 25 years. The model linking TA systems and persistence to antibiotics had a major impact in the microbiology community as a whole. Recently, this model was invalidated (46, 47), reopening the question of the role of these widespread systems.

In this work, we provide a series of population and single-cell complementary evidence that further debunk the persistence model previously proposed by the Gerdes group (33, 34, 44). We show here that a newly constructed strain lacking 10 TA systems (Δ10LVM) behaves as the wild-type strain and displays similar persistence levels with ampicillin and ofloxacin. Although this strain contains large genomic inversions, the growth rate, MIC, and persistence rate are comparable to those observed for the wild-type strain. We also constructed transcriptional fusions coupling the promoter of the relBE and yefM-yoeB systems to the mScarlet-I fluorescent reporter. Fluorescence analysis by flow cytometry showed that the activity of TA promoters is quite low in the wild-type strain, especially in the case of the relBE system, as expected due to autoregulation. In the corresponding TA-deleted strain, an increase in fluorescence was observed, therefore validating the constructs.

We used the yefM-yoeB::mScarlet reporter to monitor TA system induction at the single-cell level using a microfluidic system coupled to fluorescence microscopy. Interestingly, we observed that type II persister cells, those that are able to generate viable progeny after the removal of the antibiotics, did not show high levels of fluorescence. Thus, our work shows that there is no link or role for the induction of the yefM-yoeB system in the formation of E. coli persister cells during steady-state growth conditions.

Therefore, the direct outcome of our work reopens a fundamental question involving TA systems: what is the benefit of having so many systems for bacteria? Another important question concerns the redundancy of these TA systems. The persistence model originally arose from the observation that successive deletions of type II TA systems progressively led to a decrease of persistence to both ciprofloxacin and ampicillin. This phenotype was not attributable to any specific systems and led to the erroneous conclusion that TA systems are redundant and have a cumulative effect. Knowing that TA systems are part of the mobilome and are highly variable from one isolate to the other, it appears quite unlikely that they all contribute to a common phenotype. Given the diversity of these systems, their functions might vary depending on their genomic locations, the type of toxin activity, and their bacterial host. One might also consider that they are “just” selfish elements that propagate within bacterial genomes at the expense of their host (2224).

Several publications implicate (p)ppGpp and type II TA in type II persister formation (11, 62, 63). However, constraining the quite complex phenomenon of antibiotic persistence to a single molecular mechanism or a single genetic cascade is extremely reductive (39). Other (p)ppGpp-independent mechanisms of persister formation implicating factors such as efflux pumps (64), the tisAB type I TA system (65), or the concentration of ATP (42) have also been reported. A direct correlation between type II persister cells, (p)ppGpp, and induction of TA systems was considered an alluring prospect driving the field for many years. This assumption was extrapolated from the E. coli and the Δ10KG context and used as the template for research in other bacteria and TA systems. It also gave rise to multiple theoretical models that attempted to simulate and drive conclusions regarding persister cells based on these misguided experimental observations (6668). Consequently, it remains of paramount importance that such works are reexamined in the light of our results and the current state of the art.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains and plasmids.

Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S3 in the supplemental material. The Δ10LVM strain was previously constructed from strain LVM100 (Δ5LVM) (48). mScarlet reporter plasmids were constructed by cloning TA promoters (200 bp upstream of ATG) between AvrII and NsiI sites in pNF02, a derivative of the single-copy plasmid pBeloBAC11. Primers used for the construction of the TA reporters are listed in Table S4. The pNF02 plasmid encodes a codon-optimized mScarlet-I transcriptionally insulated by a lambda T1 terminator in 5′ end and a T7 terminator doubled with a two-way LuxIA terminator in 3′ end.

TABLE S3 

Strains and plasmids used in this study. Download TABLE S3, PDF file, 0.4 MB (372.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4 

Primers used in this study. Download TABLE S4, PDF file, 0.2 MB (224.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

Media and growth conditions.

Experiments testing rpoS-mCherry, relBE::gfp, and yefM-yoeB::gfp expression were performed in autoclaved LB to reproduce experimental conditions described in reference 34. All the other experiments were performed in morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS)-based medium prepared as described in reference 69, supplemented with 0.4% glucose.

Persistence assays.

Persistence was essentially assayed as described previously (52) with increased sampling frequency. Sampling was performed every 10 min from time zero to 200 min and every 20 min from 200 min to 300 min. Ofloxacin was used at 5 µg/ml, corresponding to 56-fold the MIC for E. coli MG1655. Ampicillin was used at 100 µg/ml, corresponding to 18-fold the MIC for MG1655. The frequency of persistence is the ratio of the number of colonies at a given time to the number of colonies at treatment time. The minimal duration for killing (MDK) was determined by log linear extrapolation between the two time points bordering 10−3 of survival rate to precisely evaluate the minimal time required to eliminate 99.9% of the cells (MDK99.9) (see Fig. S1D and E in the supplemental material).

Whole-genome sequencing.

Genomic DNA was extracted from 2-ml overnight LB cultures using a DNeasy Power Soil extraction kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to manufacturer’s protocol. The extract was then purified with Agencourt AMPure XP magnetic beads (Beckman Coulter, Beverly, MA, USA) and quantified using the Quantifluor double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) system (Promega, Madison, WI, USA). We sequenced 6 pM genomic DNA (gDNA) on an Illumina MiSeq instrument using the Nextera library preparation protocol and the MiSeq reagent kit v3 (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), spiking the flow cell with 1% phiX DNA. Quality of generated paired-end reads were assessed with FastQC and de novo assembled using Abyss (70), and obtained contigs were polished using Pilon (71) by mapping reads back to contigs using BWA (72). Generated genome sequences were aligned versus each other using progressiveMauve (73), and structural variants were visualized with genomeRing (74). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) differences were characterized using snippy and dnadiff (75). PHASTER (PHAge Search Tool Enhanced Release) (76) was used to search for potential phage insert in the genome assembly. All genomic analyses were performed using Snakemake (77) as workflow manager together with software installations from Bioconda (78). Reads and assemblies for Δ10KG and Δ10LVM have been deposited in the NCBI BioProject Repository (PRJNA454100).

Analysis of rpoS-mCherry expression.

Cultures of E. coli MG1655 and MG1655 rpoS-mcherry containing the pETgfpmut2 plasmid were grown overnight in LB medium supplemented with chloramphenicol (25 µg/ml) and 1 mM IPTG to induce gfp expression. Bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove the traces of IPTG, diluted 100-fold in 10 ml of fresh IPTG-free LB, and incubated at 37°C with shaking in a 100-ml flask. Bacteria were sampled immediately after the dilution and during growth, spotted onto agar pads and imaged with a Zeiss Axio Observer.Z1 microscope equipped with a 63× objective, AuroxCam camera, and filter set 61 HE (Colibri). Cells were detected from phase-contrast images, and the median values of red (mCherry) and green (GFP) fluorescence of each bacterium were measured using Cell Profiler software.

Fluorescence analysis of chromosomally encoded relE::gfp and yoeB::gfp fusions.

Overnight cultures grown in LB medium were diluted 100-fold in 10 ml of LB and incubated at 37°C with shaking in a 100-ml flask. Bacteria were sampled immediately after inoculation and during growth and analyzed using an LSR II (BD Biosystems) flow cytometer equipped with a 488-nm laser, a 530/30 nm filter, and a 575/26 nm filter. Microscopic images of bacteria were acquired using a confocal fluorescence microscope (LSM710; Zeiss). A 488-nm laser and a 493-to-575-nm emission window were used for detection of green fluorescence.

Single-cell analysis of yefM-yoeB::mSc expression.

Overnight cultures grown in MOPS medium containing glucose (0.4%) supplemented with Casamino Acids (0.2%) (Difco) (vitamin free) and sodium bicarbonate (10 mM) were diluted to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.02, grown 3 h to exponential phase (OD600 of ~0.3), and diluted in PBS before injection into an Attune NXT flow cytometer. 106 events per experiment were analyzed with a 561-nm laser and a 620/15 emission filter. The same overnight cultures were diluted 50 times in PBS and loaded into a B04A CellASIC ONIX plate. Trapped cells were perfused for 3 h in MOPS medium under 1 lb/in2, challenged with the same medium supplemented with ampicillin for 5 h, and regrown with fresh medium for 16 h. Images were taken every 15 min using a Zeiss Axiobserver.Z1 microscope equipped with an ORCA-Flash 4.0 complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) camera and filter set 00.

Analysis of fluorescence was performed using the MicrobeJ suite for ImageJ.

TEXT S1 

Supplemental Materials and Methods. Download TEXT S1, PDF file, 0.3 MB (354.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Natacha Mine, Mariliis Hinnu, Spyridon Gkotzis, and Bertrand Delahaye for technical support and Philippe Goffin for providing plasmids. We thank Etienne Maisonneuve and Kenn Gerdes for donating strains. We thank the reviewers for their constructive comments.

This work is supported by the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) (T.0147.15F PDR and J.0061.16F CDR to L.V.M.) and FRFS-WELBIO grant (CR-2017S-03, T.0066.18 PDR and F.4505.16 MIS to A.G.-P.), the Fonds d’Encouragement à la Recherche ULB (FER-ULB) (to A.G.-P. and L.V.M.), the Interuniversity Attraction Poles Program initiated by the Belgian Science Policy Office (MICRODEV to L.V.M.), the Fonds Jean Brachet and Fondation Van Buuren (to L.V.M. and A.G.-P.), the Estonian Research Council (IUT2-22 to T.T., M.P., and N.K.), the European Regional Development Fund through the Centre of Excellence in Molecular Cell Engineering (to V.H., M.P., N.K., and T.T.), the Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsrådet) (2013-4680 to V.H.) and the Ragnar Söderberg Foundation (Ragnar Söderberg Fellow in Medicine 2014 to V.H.). N.F. is a Ph.D. fellow at FNRS-FRS (Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique).

Footnotes

Citation Goormaghtigh F, Fraikin N, Putrinš M, Hallaert T, Hauryliuk V, Garcia-Pino A, Sjödin A, Kasvandik S, Udekwu K, Tenson T, Kaldalu N, Van Melderen L. 2018. Reassessing the role of type II toxin-antitoxin systems in formation of Escherichia coli type II persister cells. mBio 9:e00640-18. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00640-18.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Díaz-Orejas R, Espinosa M, Yeo CC. 2017. The importance of the expendable: toxin-antitoxin genes in plasmids and chromosomes. Front Microbiol 8:1479. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01479. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Hall AM, Gollan B, Helaine S. 2017. Toxin-antitoxin systems: reversible toxicity. Curr Opin Microbiol 36:102–110. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.02.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Hayes F, Van Melderen L. 2011. Toxins-antitoxins: diversity, evolution and function. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 46:386–408. doi: 10.3109/10409238.2011.600437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hõrak R, Tamman H. 2017. Desperate times call for desperate measures: benefits and costs of toxin-antitoxin systems. Curr Genet 63:69–74. doi: 10.1007/s00294-016-0622-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Brzozowska I, Zielenkiewicz U. 2013. Regulation of toxin-antitoxin systems by proteolysis. Plasmid 70:33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Loris R, Garcia-Pino A. 2014. Disorder- and dynamics-based regulatory mechanisms in toxin-antitoxin modules. Chem Rev 114:6933–6947. doi: 10.1021/cr400656f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Christensen SK, Mikkelsen M, Pedersen K, Gerdes K. 2001. RelE, a global inhibitor of translation, is activated during nutritional stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:14328–14333. doi: 10.1073/pnas.251327898. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Castro-Roa D, Garcia-Pino A, De Gieter S, van Nuland NAJ, Loris R, Zenkin N. 2013. The Fic protein Doc uses an inverted substrate to phosphorylate and inactivate EF-Tu. Nat Chem Biol 9:811–817. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Jurėnas D, Chatterjee S, Konijnenberg A, Sobott F, Droogmans L, Garcia-Pino A, Van Melderen L. 2017. AtaT blocks translation initiation by N-acetylation of the initiator tRNAfMet. Nat Chem Biol 13:640–646. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang Y, Zhang J, Hoeflich KP, Ikura M, Qing G, Inouye M. 2003. MazF cleaves cellular mRNAs specifically at ACA to block protein synthesis in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell 12:913–923. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(03)00402-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cheverton AM, Gollan B, Przydacz M, Wong CT, Mylona A, Hare SA, Helaine S. 2016. A Salmonella toxin promotes persister formation through acetylation of tRNA. Mol Cell 63:86–96. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.05.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Tsuchimoto S, Nishimura Y, Ohtsubo E. 1992. The stable maintenance system pem of plasmid R100: degradation of PemI protein may allow PemK protein to inhibit cell growth. J Bacteriol 174:4205–4211. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.13.4205-4211.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Van Melderen L, Bernard P, Couturier M. 1994. Lon-dependent proteolysis of CcdA is the key control for activation of CcdB in plasmid-free segregant bacteria. Mol Microbiol 11:1151–1157. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1994.tb00391.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lehnherr H, Yarmolinsky MB. 1995. Addiction protein Phd of plasmid prophage P1 is a substrate of the ClpXP serine protease of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 92:3274–3277. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.8.3274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Afif H, Allali N, Couturier M, Van Melderen L. 2001. The ratio between CcdA and CcdB modulates the transcriptional repression of the ccd poison-antidote system. Mol Microbiol 41:73–82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2001.02492.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Tsuchimoto S, Ohtsubo E. 1993. Autoregulation by cooperative binding of the PemI and PemK proteins to the promoter region of the pem operon. Mol Gen Genet 237:81–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Garcia-Pino A, De Gieter S, Talavera A, De Greve H, Efremov RG, Loris R. 2016. An intrinsically disordered entropic switch determines allostery in Phd-Doc regulation. Nat Chem Biol 12:490–496. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pandey DP, Gerdes K. 2005. Toxin-antitoxin loci are highly abundant in free-living but lost from host-associated prokaryotes. Nucleic Acids Res 33:966–976. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Leplae R, Geeraerts D, Hallez R, Guglielmini J, Drèze P, Van Melderen L. 2011. Diversity of bacterial type II toxin-antitoxin systems: a comprehensive search and functional analysis of novel families. Nucleic Acids Res 39:5513–5525. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ramisetty BC, Santhosh RS. 2016. Horizontal gene transfer of chromosomal type II toxin-antitoxin systems of Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 363:fnv238. doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnv238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sala A, Bordes P, Genevaux P. 2014. Multitasking SecB chaperones in bacteria. Front Microbiol 5:666. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Van Melderen L. 2010. Toxin-antitoxin systems: why so many, what for? Curr Opin Microbiol 13:781–785. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2010.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Van Melderen L, Saavedra De Bast M. 2009. Bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems: more than selfish entities? PLoS Genet 5:e1000437. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Magnuson RD. 2007. Hypothetical functions of toxin-antitoxin systems. J Bacteriol 189:6089–6092. doi: 10.1128/JB.00958-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Yarmolinsky MB. 1995. Programmed cell death in bacterial populations. Science 267:836–837. doi: 10.1126/science.7846528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Guglielmini J, Van Melderen L. 2011. Bacterial toxin-antitoxin systems: translation inhibitors everywhere. Mob Genet Elements 1:283–290. doi: 10.4161/mge.18477. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Wozniak RA, Waldor MK. 2009. A toxin-antitoxin system promotes the maintenance of an integrative conjugative element. PLoS Genet 5:e1000439. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Huguet KT, Gonnet M, Doublet B, Cloeckaert A. 2016. A toxin antitoxin system promotes the maintenance of the IncA/C-mobilizable Salmonella Genomic Island 1. Sci Rep 6:32285. doi: 10.1038/srep32285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Szekeres S, Dauti M, Wilde C, Mazel D, Rowe-Magnus DA. 2007. Chromosomal toxin-antitoxin loci can diminish large-scale genome reductions in the absence of selection. Mol Microbiol 63:1588–1605. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05613.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Koga M, Otsuka Y, Lemire S, Yonesaki T. 2011. Escherichia coli rnlA and rnlB compose a novel toxin-antitoxin system. Genetics 187:123–130. doi: 10.1534/genetics.110.121798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Saavedra De Bast M, Mine N, Van Melderen L. 2008. Chromosomal toxin-antitoxin systems may act as antiaddiction modules. J Bacteriol 190:4603–4609. doi: 10.1128/JB.00357-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tsilibaris V, Maenhaut-Michel G, Mine N, Van Melderen L. 2007. What is the benefit to Escherichia coli of having multiple toxin-antitoxin systems in its genome? J Bacteriol 189:6101–6108. doi: 10.1128/JB.00527-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Maisonneuve E, Shakespeare LJ, Jørgensen MG, Gerdes K. 2011. Bacterial persistence by RNA endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:13206–13211. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1100186108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 34.Maisonneuve E, Castro-Camargo M, Gerdes K. 2013. (p)ppGpp controls bacterial persistence by stochastic induction of toxin-antitoxin activity. Cell 154:1140–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Balaban NQ, Merrin J, Chait R, Kowalik L, Leibler S. 2004. Bacterial persistence as a phenotypic switch. Science 305:1622–1625. doi: 10.1126/science.1099390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Lewis K. 2010. Persister cells. Annu Rev Microbiol 64:357–372. doi: 10.1146/annurev.micro.112408.134306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Balaban NQ. 2011. Persistence: mechanisms for triggering and enhancing phenotypic variability. Curr Opin Genet Dev 21:768–775. doi: 10.1016/j.gde.2011.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Brauner A, Fridman O, Gefen O, Balaban NQ. 2016. Distinguishing between resistance, tolerance and persistence to antibiotic treatment. Nat Rev Microbiol 14:320–330. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro.2016.34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Kaldalu N, Hauryliuk V, Tenson T. 2016. Persisters —as elusive as ever. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 100:6545–6553. doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7648-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ramisetty BC, Ghosh D, Roy Chowdhury M, Santhosh RS. 2016. What is the link between stringent response, endoribonuclease encoding type II toxin-antitoxin systems and persistence? Front Microbiol 7:1882. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Theodore A, Lewis K, Vulic M. 2013. Tolerance of Escherichia coli to fluoroquinolone antibiotics depends on specific components of the SOS response pathway. Genetics 195:1265–1276. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.152306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Shan Y, Brown Gandt A, Rowe SE, Deisinger JP, Conlon BP, Lewis K. 2017. ATP-dependent persister formation in Escherichia coli. mBio 8:e02267-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02267-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Van Melderen L, Wood TK. 2017. Commentary: what is the link between stringent response, endoribonuclease encoding type II toxin-antitoxin systems and persistence? Front Microbiol 8:191. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Germain E, Roghanian M, Gerdes K, Maisonneuve E. 2015. Stochastic induction of persister cells by HipA through (p)ppGpp-mediated activation of mRNA endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:5171–5176. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1423536112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 45.Harms A, Fino C, Sørensen MA, Semsey S, Gerdes K. 2017. Prophages and growth dynamics confound experimental results with antibiotic-tolerant persister cells. mBio 8:e01964-17. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01964-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Maisonneuve E, Shakespeare LJ, Jorgensen MG, Gerdes K. 2018. Retraction: bacterial persistence by RNA endonucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E2901. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1803278115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Maisonneuve E, Castro-Camargo M, Gerdes K. 2018. Retraction: (p)ppGpp controls bacterial persistence by stochastic induction of toxin-antitoxin activity. Cell 172:1135. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Goeders N, Drèze PL, Van Melderen L. 2013. Relaxed cleavage specificity within the RelE toxin family. J Bacteriol 195:2541–2549. doi: 10.1128/JB.02266-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Datsenko KA, Wanner BL. 2000. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:6640–6645. doi: 10.1073/pnas.120163297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Jiang Y, Pogliano J, Helinski DR, Konieczny I. 2002. ParE toxin encoded by the broad-host-range plasmid RK2 is an inhibitor of Escherichia coli gyrase. Mol Microbiol 44:971–979. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.02921.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Yuan J, Yamaichi Y, Waldor MK. 2011. The three Vibrio cholerae chromosome II-encoded ParE toxins degrade chromosome I following loss of chromosome II. J Bacteriol 193:611–619. doi: 10.1128/JB.01185-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Goormaghtigh F, Van Melderen L. 2016. Optimized method for measuring persistence in Escherichia coli with improved reproducibility. Methods Mol Biol 1333:43–52. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2854-5_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kholodii GY, Mindlin SZ. 1985. Integration of bacteriophages lambda and phi 80 in wild-type Escherichia coli at secondary attachment sites. II. Genetic structure and mechanism of polylysogen formation for lambda, phi 80 and the lambda att80 hybrid. Mol Gen Genet 198:491–496. doi: 10.1007/BF00332945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gross M, Marianovsky I, Glaser G. 2006. MazG—a regulator of programmed cell death in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 59:590–601. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04956.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Battesti A, Majdalani N, Gottesman S. 2011. The RpoS-mediated general stress response in Escherichia coli. Annu Rev Microbiol 65:189–213. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Hirsch M, Elliott T. 2002. Role of ppGpp in rpoS stationary-phase regulation in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184:5077–5087. doi: 10.1128/JB.184.18.5077-5087.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Roostalu J, Jõers A, Luidalepp H, Kaldalu N, Tenson T. 2008. Cell division in Escherichia coli cultures monitored at single cell resolution. BMC Microbiol 8:68. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Lindner AB, Madden R, Demarez A, Stewart EJ, Taddei F. 2008. Asymmetric segregation of protein aggregates is associated with cellular aging and rejuvenation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:3076–3081. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0708931105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Landgraf D, Okumus B, Chien P, Baker TA, Paulsson J. 2012. Segregation of molecules at cell division reveals native protein localization. Nat Methods 9:480–482. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1955. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Choi H, Yang Z, Weisshaar JC. 2015. Single-cell, real-time detection of oxidative stress induced in Escherichia coli by the antimicrobial peptide CM15. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:E303–E310. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1417703112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Bindels DS, Haarbosch L, van Weeren L, Postma M, Wiese KE, Mastop M, Aumonier S, Gotthard G, Royant A, Hink MA, Gadella TW Jr.. 2017. mScarlet: a bright monomeric red fluorescent protein for cellular imaging. Nat Methods 14:53–56. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Kudrin P, Varik V, Oliveira SR, Beljantseva J, Del Peso Santos T, Dzhygyr I, Rejman D, Cava F, Tenson T, Hauryliuk V. 2017. Subinhibitory concentrations of bacteriostatic antibiotics induce relA-dependent and relA-independent tolerance to beta-lactams. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02173-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02173-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Helaine S, Cheverton AM, Watson KG, Faure LM, Matthews SA, Holden DW. 2014. Internalization of Salmonella by macrophages induces formation of nonreplicating persisters. Science 343:204–208. doi: 10.1126/science.1244705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Adams KN, Takaki K, Connolly LE, Wiedenhoft H, Winglee K, Humbert O, Edelstein PH, Cosma CL, Ramakrishnan L. 2011. Drug tolerance in replicating mycobacteria mediated by a macrophage-induced efflux mechanism. Cell 145:39–53. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.02.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Dörr T, Vulić M, Lewis K. 2010. Ciprofloxacin causes persister formation by inducing the TisB toxin in Escherichia coli. PLoS Biol 8:e1000317. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000317. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gelens L, Hill L, Vandervelde A, Danckaert J, Loris R. 2013. A general model for toxin-antitoxin module dynamics can explain persister cell formation in E. coli. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1003190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Cataudella I, Sneppen K, Gerdes K, Mitarai N. 2013. Conditional cooperativity of toxin - antitoxin regulation can mediate bistability between growth and dormancy. PLoS Comput Biol 9:e1003174. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003174. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Tian C, Semsey S, Mitarai N. 2017. Synchronized switching of multiple toxin-antitoxin modules by (p)ppGpp fluctuation. Nucleic Acids Res 45:8180–8189. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx552. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Neidhardt FC, Bloch PL, Smith DF. 1974. Culture medium for enterobacteria. J Bacteriol 119:736–747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Jackman SD, Vandervalk BP, Mohamadi H, Chu J, Yeo S, Hammond SA, Jahesh G, Khan H, Coombe L, Warren RL, Birol I. 2017. ABySS 2.0: resource-efficient assembly of large genomes using a Bloom filter. Genome Res 27:768–777. doi: 10.1101/gr.214346.116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Walker BJ, Abeel T, Shea T, Priest M, Abouelliel A, Sakthikumar S, Cuomo CA, Zeng Q, Wortman J, Young SK, Earl AM. 2014. Pilon: an integrated tool for comprehensive microbial variant detection and genome assembly improvement. PLoS One 9:e112963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0112963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Li H, Durbin R. 2009. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics 25:1754–1760. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Darling AE, Mau B, Perna NT. 2010. progressiveMauve: multiple genome alignment with gene gain, loss and rearrangement. PLoS One 5:e11147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011147. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Herbig A, Jäger G, Battke F, Nieselt K. 2012. GenomeRing: alignment visualization based on SuperGenome coordinates. Bioinformatics 28:i7–i15. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Marçais G, Delcher AL, Phillippy AM, Coston R, Salzberg SL, Zimin A. 2018. MUMmer4: a fast and versatile genome alignment system. PLoS Comput Biol 14:e1005944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Köster J, Rahmann S. 2012. Snakemake—a scalable bioinformatics workflow engine. Bioinformatics 28:2520–2522. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts480. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Grüning B, Dale R, Sjödin A, Rowe J, Chapman BA, Tomkins-Tinch CH, Valieris R, The Bioconda Team, Köster J. 2017. Bioconda: a sustainable and comprehensive software distribution for the life sciences. bioRxiv doi: 10.1101/207092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

FIG S1 

Deletion of 10 type II TA systems does not affect growth or sensitivity to ampicillin or ofloxacin. (A) Growth curves of the wild-type strain and Δ10LVM and Δ10KG mutants. Values represent means of two independent replicates. (B and C) MICs of the wild-type strain and Δ10LVM and Δ10KG mutants to ampicillin (B) and ofloxacin (C). Values represent mean values of three independent replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. (D and E) Killing curves of the wild-type strain and Δ10LVM and Δ10KG mutants to ampicillin (100 µg/ml) (D) and ofloxacin (5 µg/ml) (E). Values represent means of three independent replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. Dashed lines represent the survival values (10−3) MDK was extrapolated from (Fig. 1B). Download FIG S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB (419.7KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S1 

Genetic rearrangements and polymorphisms identified in TA deletion mutants. Download TABLE S1, PDF file, 0.4 MB (468.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S2 

Confirmation of phage insertions by PCR and monitoring of bacterial lysis. (A) PCR was used to amplify junctions between attachment sites and prophages to determine the presence of prophages at specific loci determined by whole-genome sequencing. (B and C) Changes in turbidity during ampicillin (100 µg/ml) (B) or ofloxacin (5 µg/ml) (C) treatment. Values represent means of three independent replicates. Error bars represent standard deviations. Download FIG S2, PDF file, 0.4 MB (436.3KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S2 

LFQ-MS analysis of Δ10 strains. Log2 LFQ values are represented for proteins differentially expressed in either the Δ10KG or Δ10LVM strain exclusively. Genes associated with proteins represented in bold font also showed genetic alterations in genome sequences. ND, not detected. Download TABLE S2, PDF file, 0.5 MB (513.5KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S3 

RpoS-mCherry aggregates in vivo. The plasmid-free MG1655 and MG1655 rpoS-mcherry cells were grown to exponential phase and visualized by confocal microscopy as in Fig. 3. TL, transmitted light; Ex, excitation; Em, emission. Download FIG S3, PDF file, 0.3 MB (294.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

FIG S4 

Rare fluorescent events in TA::mSc constructs. Constructs prelBE::mSc and pyefM-yoeB::mSc were transformed in wild-type cells or cells with the corresponding TA system deleted (ΔrelBE, lower left panel, ΔyefM-yoeB, lower right panel), grown to exponential phase, and visualized by fluorescence microscopy. Download FIG S4, PDF file, 0.4 MB (407.8KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

MOVIE S1 

Persistence is not dependent on yefM-yoeB induction. Time-lapse microscopy of MG1655 cells transformed with pyefM-yoeB::mSc. Stationary-phase cells were grown for 3 h perfused in MOPS medium, challenged with ampicillin (100 µg/ml) for 5 h, and regrown for 16 h with fresh medium. The movie shows a combination of persister cells (top panels), fluorescent cells not lysed by the treatment (middle panels), and fluorescent cells lysed by the treatment (bottom panels). Time from the start of the experiment and treatment time frame are shown on the bottom right corner. Numbers in the corner of each series indicate the multiplication of red fluorescence intensity. Figure 4C was sampled from the top left panel. Download MOVIE S1, AVI file, 18.9 MB (19.4MB, avi) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S3 

Strains and plasmids used in this study. Download TABLE S3, PDF file, 0.4 MB (372.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TABLE S4 

Primers used in this study. Download TABLE S4, PDF file, 0.2 MB (224.9KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.

TEXT S1 

Supplemental Materials and Methods. Download TEXT S1, PDF file, 0.3 MB (354.6KB, pdf) .

Copyright © 2018 Goormaghtigh et al.

This content is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license.


Articles from mBio are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES