Skip to main content
Clinical Microbiology Reviews logoLink to Clinical Microbiology Reviews
. 2019 Feb 27;32(2):e00111-18. doi: 10.1128/CMR.00111-18

Candida parapsilosis: from Genes to the Bedside

Renáta Tóth a, Jozef Nosek b, Héctor M Mora-Montes c, Toni Gabaldon d,e,f, Joseph M Bliss g, Joshua D Nosanchuk h,i, Siobhán A Turner j, Geraldine Butler j, Csaba Vágvölgyi a, Attila Gácser a,k,
PMCID: PMC6431126  PMID: 30814115

Patients with suppressed immunity are at the highest risk for hospital-acquired infections. Among these, invasive candidiasis is the most prevalent systemic fungal nosocomial infection.

KEYWORDS: Candida parapsilosis, antifungal, epidemiology, experimental tools, genome, host response, pathogenicity, treatment, virulence

SUMMARY

Patients with suppressed immunity are at the highest risk for hospital-acquired infections. Among these, invasive candidiasis is the most prevalent systemic fungal nosocomial infection. Over recent decades, the combined prevalence of non-albicans Candida species outranked Candida albicans infections in several geographical regions worldwide, highlighting the need to understand their pathobiology in order to develop effective treatment and to prevent future outbreaks. Candida parapsilosis is the second or third most frequently isolated Candida species from patients. Besides being highly prevalent, its biology differs markedly from that of C. albicans, which may be associated with C. parapsilosis’ increased incidence. Differences in virulence, regulatory and antifungal drug resistance mechanisms, and the patient groups at risk indicate that conclusions drawn from C. albicans pathobiology cannot be simply extrapolated to C. parapsilosis. Such species-specific characteristics may also influence their recognition and elimination by the host and the efficacy of antifungal drugs. Due to the availability of high-throughput, state-of-the-art experimental tools and molecular genetic methods adapted to C. parapsilosis, genome and transcriptome studies are now available that greatly contribute to our understanding of what makes this species a threat. In this review, we summarize 10 years of findings on C. parapsilosis pathogenesis, including the species’ genetic properties, transcriptome studies, host responses, and molecular mechanisms of virulence. Antifungal susceptibility studies and clinician perspectives are discussed. We also present regional incidence reports in order to provide an updated worldwide epidemiology summary.

INTRODUCTION

Candida species account for the majority of fungal systemic bloodstream infections in intensive care units (ICUs) worldwide (13). Although the most prevalent and invasive species is Candida albicans, during the last two decades, its dominance has decreased as the numbers of invasive infections by non-albicans Candida (NAC) species have risen (4, 5). Of these, Candida parapsilosis is of particular importance, as it is able to form tenacious biofilms on central venous catheters (CVCs) and other medically implanted devices, thus threatening patients who have undergone invasive medical interventions. C. parapsilosis likewise grows rapidly in total parenteral nutrition administered to ICU patients, thereby placing undernourished children and low-birth-weight neonates (58) at increased risk. Although C. parapsilosis infections generally result in lower morbidity and mortality rates than C. albicans infections, several clinical isolates of this species have been reported to be less susceptible to echinocandins, and in some regions, resistance to azole treatment has also been noted, which complicates the choice of empirical antifungal drug therapy (912). Nosocomial outbreaks have also been reported in various geographical regions (1315). Horizontal transmission is another feature of C. parapsilosis, in contrast to the prior-colonization-dependent vertical transmission of C. albicans (16). Due to these species-specific characteristics, C. parapsilosis is often the second or third most frequently isolated Candida species in ICUs.

Since the development of an effective system to specifically disrupt genes was reported in 2007 (17, 18), our understanding of C. parapsilosis biology has significantly advanced, and the number of investigations has increased, as this pathogen has continued to rise in clinical importance. Hence, this review aims to provide an up-to-date worldwide epidemiology of C. parapsilosis-driven candidemia and to summarize the latest findings on its pathogenesis, including a discussion of the species’ genetic properties and molecular mechanisms of virulence. Transcriptome studies, potential antifungal drug resistance mechanisms, host immune responses, and clinicians’ perspectives are also discussed.

INCIDENCE AND DISTRIBUTION TRENDS

Since the early 2000s, NAC species have significantly increased and currently often surpass C. albicans as the most prevalent causes of invasive Candida infections, depending on the geographical region (6, 1922). For example, according to a recent national surveillance study in Japan by Kakeya et al. (21), C. albicans accounted for 58.2% of all candidemia episodes in 2003 yet only 30% of cases by 2014. Another recent study, by Pfaller et al. (23), highlighted that at 62% of the examined sites in North America, NAC species were responsible for more than half of all candidemia cases. Similarly, Xiao et al. (19) reported that in Chinese hospitals, only 32% of Candida blood infections could be attributed to C. albicans.

Several studies also associate the increasing prevalence of NAC species with decreased susceptibility to commonly used antifungal drugs (12, 19, 24, 25). Of the commonly isolated NAC species, C. parapsilosis is often the second or third most prevalent, depending on the patient group as well as geographical regions. Although regional epidemiology studies are available, we lack an up-to-date view of the worldwide distribution of C. parapsilosis prevalence. We therefore collected data from national studies of Candida epidemiology from the last decade from each continent (Table 1). Reports were collected from 2009 to early 2018 and were filtered into multicenter/multihospital studies of invasive candidiasis, possibly representing entire countries. If nationwide studies were not available, data from reports involving multiple regions of a country were gathered. The data from regional studies collected cover epidemiological data from 2000 to 2015. Although C. albicans is the major cause of invasive candidiasis worldwide, C. parapsilosis is the second most commonly isolated species in southern Europe, some regions of Asia, and Latin America, in accordance with data from previous global epidemiology studies (26, 27). Regarding the Mediterranean regions of Europe, C. parapsilosis invasive infections account for 20 to 25% of episodes due to Candida species in Greece, Portugal, Italy, and Spain (2833). Furthermore, a recent study by Arsić Arsenijević et al. highlights the increasing prevalence of C. parapsilosis infections in Serbia, where it is responsible for 46% of cases of invasive candidiasis in adults, which is similar to the frequency of C. albicans (34). In central Europe and Scandinavia, Candida glabrata is the most common NAC species, although C. parapsilosis follows closely behind (3543). The same can be observed in Australia, where C. parapsilosis accounts for 16.5% of Candida bloodstream infections (44). In Asia and North America, the prevalence of C. parapsilosis is also region dependent. For instance, it is the second most commonly identified species in the hospital environment in Japan and China, being responsible for 20 to 23% of all Candida bloodstream infections, while it is the third most frequently identified Candida species in India and other tropical regions of Asia (19, 21, 45, 46). In North America, C. glabrata and C. parapsilosis equally account for cases of NAC-driven invasive candidiasis; however, the increasing prevalence of C. parapsilosis in Latin America is undebatable (47, 48). Besides being the most frequently isolated NAC species in South America, C. parapsilosis even outranks C. albicans infections in regions such as Colombia (38.5% to 36.7%) and Venezuela (39% to 26.8%) (4953). Interestingly, a recent study by Govender et al. also highlights the increased incidence of C. parapsilosis in South Africa, where this species accounts for 35% of invasive Candida infections in the public sector (second most common) and >50% in private-sector hospitals, thus outranking C. albicans (12). In addition, only 37% of the isolated C. parapsilosis strains were shown to be susceptible to azole derivates, and cross-resistance was also reported, raising concern regarding the treatment of these infections (12). It is unclear whether the increased incidence of C. parapsilosis in South African regions is a recent trend or an already existing phenomenon, due to the limited number of available epidemiology studies from this region. This further underscores the need for up-to-date, regionwide surveys. Nevertheless, the empirical antifungal practice in these countries might be contributing to C. parapsilosis’ increased prevalence.

TABLE 1.

Update on candidemia episodes caused by C. parapsilosisa

Region % C. parapsilosis incidence (ranking) % C. albicans incidence (ranking) Yr(s) No. of hospitals included Reference
Europe
    Southern region
        Spain 24.9 (2nd) 45.3 (1st) 2010–2011 29 hospitals, nationwide 30
        Italy 22 (4th) 73.4 (1st) Undefined 3 hospitals in southern Italy 31
14.8 (3rd, Lombardy) 52.1 (1st, Lombardy) 2009 34 centers, nationwide 32
23.5 (2nd, other areas) 45.2 (1st, other areas)
20 (2nd) 59 (1st) 2012–2013 39 hospitals, northern Italy 33
        Portugal 23 (2nd) 40.4 (1st) 2011–2012 10 hospitals, nationwide 29
        Greece 22.7 (2nd) 45.4 (1st) 2005–2009 PICU only, nationwide 28
        Serbia 46 46 2014–2015 5 adult ICUs, nationwide 34
    Middle/northern regions
        Finland 5 (3rd) 67 2004–2007 5 regions, nationwide 35
        Austria 8.7 (3rd) 52.2 (1st) 2007–2008 9 centers 36
        France 7.5 (3rd) 57 (1st) 2005–2006 180 ICUs, nationwide 37
        United Kingdom 10.3 (3rd) 52 (1st) 2008 3 centers in Scotland, 2 centers in Wales 38
        Switzerland 5.4 (4th) 61.9 (1st) 2004–2009 17 hospitals 39
        Denmark 3.7 (3rd in females, 5th in males) 57.1 (1st) 2004–2009 6 hospitals 40
        Norway 4.3 (4th) 67.7 (1st) 2004–2012 National surveillance study 41
        Sweden 9 (3rd) 61 (1st) 2005–2006 Undefined, nationwide 42
        Iceland 5 (5th) 56 (1st) 2000–2011 14 hospitals 43
America
    South America
        Continental study 26.5 (all episodes) 37.6 (all episodes) 2008–2010 21 hospitals from 7 countries 53
        Argentina 23.9 (2nd) 42.5 (1st)
        Brazil 25.8 (2nd) 40.5 (1st)
        Chile 28.9 (2nd) 42.1 (1st)
        Colombia 38.5 (1st) 36.7 (2nd) 2008–2010 21 hospitals from 7 countries 53
        Ecuador 30.4 (2nd) 52.2 (1st)
        Honduras 14.1 (4th) 27.4 (1st)
        Venezuela 39 (1st) 26.8 (2nd)
        Peru 25.3 (2nd) 27.8 (1st) 2013–2015 3 hospitals, Lima-Callao 50
28.1 (1st) 39.9 (1st) 2009–2011 9 hospitals, Lima 49
        Argentina 22 (2nd) 44 (1st) 2010–2012 5 institutions 51
        Brazil 24.1 (2nd) 34.3 (1st) 2007–2010 16 hospitals, 5 regions, nationwide 52
    North America
        Continental study 12.2 (3rd) 49.5 (1st) 2004–2008 23 centers in USA, 2 in Canada 24
        USA 17 (3rd) 38 (1st) 2008–2011 17 hospitals (Baltimore, MD), 24 hospitals (Atlanta, GA) 47
17.4 (2nd) 50.7 (1st) 1998–2006 52 hospitals, nationwide 48
        Canada 21 (2nd) 59 (1st) 2003–2013 Nationwide NICU surveillance 54
Asia
    Continental study 12.1 (4th) 41.3 (1st) 2010–2011 25 hospitals across Asia 46
    Japan 23.3 (2nd) 39.5 (1st) 2003–2014 10 university hospitals, nationwide 21
    China 20.0 (2nd) 44.9 (1st) 2009–2014 65 general hospitals from 27 provinces 19
    India 10.9 (3rd) 20.9 (2nd) 2011–2012 27 ICUs, nationwide 45
Oceania
    Australia 16.5 (3rd) 44.4 (1st) 2014–2015 Nationwide surveillance 44
Africa
    South Africa 35 (public hospitals) (2nd), >50 (private hospitals) (1st) 46 (1st) 2009–2010 Hospitals in 11 public sectors, >85 private sectors 12
a

ICU, intensive care unit; PICU, pediatric intensive care unit.

In addition to threatening adult patients in ICUs, C. parapsilosis poses a well-recognized serious threat to newborns, especially those born prematurely and with low birth weight. A recent meta-analysis of cases of neonatal candidiasis by Pammi et al. revealed that C. parapsilosis is responsible for 33% of all invasive Candida diseases in newborns and accounts for approximately 80% of NAC-driven invasive infections (7). Furthermore, neonatal Candida disease due to this species is especially common in North America (33.8%) as well as in Australia (35.8%) (7). A nationwide study provided by Pfaller et al. further showed that among NAC species, C. parapsilosis accounts for most of the invasive candidiasis cases in children (<9 years old) and in neonates in North America (23). Furthermore, a national surveillance study of neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) in Canada revealed that although C. albicans remains the major cause of neonatal invasive Candida disease (59%), C. parapsilosis is also highly prevalent (21%) (54). Recently, cases from European countries were also reported. For instance, according to a recent surveillance over 22 years in Norway, C. parapsilosis was the second most common cause of neonatal candidiasis (41). Similarly, the United Kingdom neonatal surveillance network also reported that during a 6-year period, C. parapsilosis was the second most common cause of neonatal invasive Candida disease, accounting for 20% of cases in England (55).

All these available data underscore the importance of C. parapsilosis and urge us to enhance the investigation of this species’ pathogenesis.

GENOMIC ANALYSIS

Genome Organization and Properties

Since 2009, the complete genome sequence of C. parapsilosis strain CDC317 has been available, along with those of five other species of the Candida clade (56). The genome size is about 13 Mbp. C. parapsilosis is diploid, with eight chromosome pairs whose sizes range from 0.9 to 3.0 Mbp. The chromosomes terminate at both ends with tandem arrays of telomeric repeats of a 23-nucleotide-long motif (5′-GGTCCGGATGTTGATTATACTGA-3′) that was originally identified by analysis of the RNA subunit of telomerase TER1 (57). In Candida orthopsilosis and C. metapsilosis, classified in the C. parapsilosis sensu lato complex, telomeric sequences differ from this motif at 6 and 8 nucleotide positions, respectively.

Initial analyses of the C. parapsilosis genome confirmed previous findings that the mating-type locus MTLa2 is a pseudogene (58) and also revealed a strikingly low level of heterozygosity, with only 1 heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) per 15,553 bases. The level of heterozygosity was 25- to 70-fold lower than that found in other diploid Candida species. Characterization of the genetic variability among strains using standard techniques, such as amplification fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis, revealed low levels of polymorphisms across clinical isolates from different regions (59). Furthermore, analyses of more than 200 clinical isolates revealed that all of them had only the MTLa idiomorph (i.e. no strain of the alpha type was found) and confirmed that MTLa2 is a pseudogene (60). Altogether, such low genetic variability suggested a recent global expansion of a virulent clone with a defective mating system (60).

In the early 2010s, the significant drop in sequencing costs brought about by next-generation sequencing (NGS) enabled the sequencing of additional clinical and environmental strains (61). A comparison of four fully sequenced genomes of C. parapsilosis isolates from Europe and North America further confirmed extremely low levels of heterozygosity and low levels of genetic variation. The examined strains contained a certain level of variation in gene content, which included genes encoding lysophospholipases, efflux pumps, and peptidases. Notably, however, significant differences were found in the agglutinin-like sequence (ALS) gene family, which encodes large cell surface glycoproteins that play a role in host-pathogen interactions (62). In addition, the amount of copy number variations (CNVs) was considerable, with 40 such events being detected among the four strains. Importantly, one such variation affected the same gene, a putative arsenite transporter, with different genomic boundaries and copy numbers, indicating its independent occurrence. This finding indicated a shared strong selective pressure, which possibly occurred in the environment, as arsenite levels are normally exceedingly low in the human body. This analysis suggested that clinical isolates likely had recent, independent origins from the environment. In addition, nonmonophyletic patterns of shared CNVs and the presence of clustered regions with higher SNP density suggested the possibility of recombination among different C. parapsilosis strains.

In 2005, Tavanti et al. confirmed by multilocus sequence typing that C. parapsilosis isolates represent a species complex. This complex is now subdivided into three distinct species: C. parapsilosis sensu stricto (previously group I), C. orthopsilosis (previously group II), and C. metapsilosis (previously group III) (63). The first genome sequence of a C. orthopsilosis strain was reported in 2012, from a highly homozygous isolate (64). However, later sequencing of additional clinical strains obtained from the United States and Singapore highlighted the existence of hybrids in this species. The hybrid genomes consisted of highly heterozygous blocks interspersed with highly homozygous blocks, indicating that loss-of-heterozygosity events had occurred since the hybridization event (65). It was subsequently proposed that the bulk of C. orthopsilosis isolates are hybrids, resulting from at least four independent events of hybridization between the same parental species, which diverge by approximately 5% at the nucleotide level (66). Whole-genome sequencing of 11 clinical isolates of C. metapsilosis revealed that this is also a hybrid species (67). All of the analyzed C. metapsilosis strains obtained from globally distributed locations are the result of the same hybridization event between two as-yet-unknown nonpathogenic parental lineages. Hence, the C. parapsilosis clade is thought to consist of at least five lineages, of which two pairs can form hybrids. Interestingly, both C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis hybrids seem to have higher virulence potential in humans than their parents, because the homozygous C. metapsilosis parent strains have not been isolated from clinical samples, and only one of the homozygous parents of C. orthopsilosis was found in the clinical environment. This raises the possibility that virulent species can emerge from the hybridization of nonvirulent (or less-virulent) species (68).

Today, the genome sequence of C. parapsilosis is accessible at the Candida Genome Database (69), with up-to-date annotations, references, supplementations from genome-wide or transcriptomic studies, and additional sources of both coding and noncoding genomic regions (70). Its availability greatly contributes to advances in C. parapsilosis-related investigations. The Candida Gene Order Browser (71) provides syntenic information from comparisons of several Candida species, including C. parapsilosis. A comprehensive evolutionary analysis of every gene of C. parapsilosis along with precomputed and browsable gene phylogenies are provided by PhylomeDB (72). In addition, MetaPhORs provides phylogeny-based predictions of ortholog and paralog relationships between C. parapsilosis genes and those of hundreds of other species, including most other sequenced Candida species (73).

Unlike Saccharomyces cerevisiae, C. albicans, and most other yeast species, C. parapsilosis possesses a mitochondrial genome with an unusual molecular architecture. The mitochondrial genome consists of 30.9-kbp-long linear DNA molecules terminating on both sides with specific telomeric structures that have little resemblance to telomeres at the ends of eukaryotic nuclear chromosomes (74). The mitochondrial telomeres consist of inverted repeats with a subterminal repeat followed by tandem arrays of a 738-bp-long unit. These linear molecules include the genes for conserved mitochondrial proteins (i.e., seven subunits of NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase, three subunits of cytochrome c oxidase, apocytochrome b, and three subunits of ATP synthase), two rRNAs, and a set of 24 tRNAs (75, 76). In addition, C. parapsilosis mitochondria also contain extragenomic circular DNAs, dubbed telomeric circles (t-circles), that are composed exclusively of multimers of the telomeric sequence. The t-circles replicate autonomously via the rolling-circle mechanism, thus generating arrays of telomeric repeats that eventually recombine with the ends of linear DNA molecules (77, 78).

Essentially the same molecular architecture of the mitochondrial genome has also been found in several closely related species from the Lodderomyces clade, such as C. metapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. theae (79, 80) (E. Hegedűsová, B. Brejová, and J. Nosek, unpublished results). Because these species differ in the sequences of their mitochondrial telomeres, the telomeric motifs were proposed as potential molecular markers for clinical diagnostics (81). Interestingly, the mitochondria of several isolates of C. metapsilosis and C. orthopsilosis contain a mutant form of the genome. These mutants lack the t-circles, and their mitochondrial genomes have circularized via end-to-end fusions, further supporting the key role of t-circles in telomere maintenance (67, 79, 80, 82). Importantly, the t-circle-dependent maintenance of mitochondrial telomeres may have medical implications, as it parallels the alternative (telomerase-independent) lengthening of telomeres (ALT) at the ends of eukaryotic nuclear chromosomes (83). Moreover, as human cells possess a circular mitochondrial genome, the replication strategy of linear mitochondrial DNA in C. parapsilosis has been proposed as a promising molecular target for therapeutic intervention (84).

The linear mitochondrial genome and/or the corresponding DNA replication machinery seems to be responsible for the tolerance of C. parapsilosis to high doses of intercalating agents, such as ethidium bromide and acridine orange (85). On the other hand, compounds interfering with the splicing of a group II intron occurring in the mitochondrial cox1 gene inhibit the growth of C. parapsilosis cells and represent potent antifungal drugs (86). Moreover, other mitochondrial functions such as the intricate electron transport pathways consisting of a conventional respiratory chain with all three phosphorylation coupling sites, a parallel respiratory chain, and alternative oxidase were shown to play a role in the susceptibility of C. parapsilosis cells to a range of drugs (8789).

In the following sections, we focus on C. parapsilosis group I isolates only. The history, epidemiology, genomics, and virulence of the Candida psilosis complex have recently been reviewed by Németh et al. (90).

Transcriptome Studies

Similar to whole-genome sequencing, NGS approaches enable the unbiased interrogation of the transcriptome under various conditions. Massive sequencing of cDNA libraries (RNAseq) has gradually replaced the use of microarray-based technologies in transcriptome analyses of pathogenic species (91, 92). Standard, easy-to-use protocols are available for RNAseq to determine differential gene expression profiles in yeasts (93), which have been extensively applied in research of fungal pathogens. Furthermore, transcriptome sequencing technologies offer a plethora of additional possibilities such as the refinement of genome annotation, including the determination of the noncoding gene repertoire (94), assessing the structure of RNA transcripts (95, 96), and the dual interrogation of host and pathogen transcriptomes (97).

The first comprehensive transcriptomic study of C. parapsilosis by RNAseq was performed in 2011 after exposing this yeast to several conditions, including different media, temperatures, and oxygen concentrations (98). The detection of differentially expressed genes under these conditions enabled not only the identification of regulators of the hypoxia response in this species but also a comprehensive reannotation of the C. parapsilosis reference genome. Indeed, neither of the two previous versions of C. parapsilosis gene annotations (using CPAG and CPAR as gene name prefixes, respectively) included prediction introns in their gene models. RNAseq analyses of C. parapsilosis cells under a diverse set of conditions enabled the detection of transcripts for over 90% of the annotated protein-coding genes, enabling the identification of 422 introns, the annotation of 5′ and 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs), and the removal of more than 300 unsupported and the correction of approximately 900 gene models. RNAseq analysis of C. parapsilosis therefore facilitated a much-improved annotation of the reference genome (the refined version uses CPAR2 as the gene name prefix).

Subsequent studies in C. parapsilosis have exploited RNAseq to identify genes involved in specific pathways. One recent example is the identification of enzymes and transporters involved in the metabolism of hydroxyderivatives of benzene and benzoic acid in this species (as discussed below) (99, 100). In these studies, RNAseq, together with phylogenetic and synteny analyses, was instrumental in pinpointing the right candidates among paralogous members of several gene families, including 138 paralogs of the major facilitator superfamily of transporters (MFS), by identifying those expressed in the presence of the substrate. Finally, the identification of C. parapsilosis transcripts expressed upon exposure to human macrophages was used to prioritize the construction of knockout mutants to study host-pathogen interactions (101). Notably, 84% of the 19 constructed knockout mutants showed a phenotype different from that of the wild type under conditions related to virulence and interaction with the human host. The use of increased expression upon exposure to human macrophages as a selection criterion likely facilitated the high ratio of deletion mutants exhibiting a phenotype. It is expected that future studies will further exploit the possibilities of RNAseq in C. parapsilosis, particularly with respect to the relevant interactions with the host. In this context, the use of RNAseq for the identification of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and for the dual assessment of expression by the host and pathogen has the potential to reveal novel pathways and interactions (97).

Genetic Toolbox

Use of reporter genes.

Alternative codon usage in CTG clade species such as C. parapsilosis (which translate CTG as serine rather than leucine) causes difficulties in the design of reporter systems as well as the choice of selectable markers (102). Codon-modified versions of green fluorescent protein (yeast-enhanced green fluorescent protein [yeGFP]) suitable for use in C. albicans were first described by Cormack et al. (103) and Morschhauser et al. (104). Gerami-Nejad et al. (105) used site-directed mutagenesis to generate yellow fluorescent protein (yeYFP) and cyan fluorescent protein (yeCFP) variants designed to integrate at the C terminus and later at the N terminus (106) of target proteins. Red versions (red fluorescent protein [RFP] and yemCherry) and a new C. albicans GFP (CaGFP) were added later (107109).

GFP fusions were first used in C. parapsilosis by Kosa et al. (110). Those authors constructed a series of replicating plasmids based on the CpARS7 origin of replication and using MET2, LYS4, GAL1, URA3, or IMH3 as a selectable marker. Some of the plasmids can be used to express heterologous genes from the CpGAL1 promoter. The introduction of eGFP by Cormack et al. (103) facilitated the tagging and localization of mitochondrial carriers, mitochondrial telomere binding proteins, metabolic enzymes, as well as plasma membrane transporters in C. parapsilosis (99, 100, 111113). Constructs suitable for PCR-mediated C-terminal tagging of target genes with green, yellow, or mCherry fluorescent proteins using NAT1 as the selectable marker are also available (114). GFP-labeled strains of C. parapsilosis have already been used to study phagocytosis of macrophages (115).

Recently, Defosse et al. (116) described a comprehensive toolkit for labeling C. parapsilosis and other yeasts of the CTG clade. Sets of plasmids express yeGFP, yeYFP, yeCFP, or yemCherry from promoters selected to function in many CTG species. A series of selectable markers is available, including SAT1, HPH, and IMH3, also expressed from species-specific promoters. The plasmids integrate randomly into the target species. Those authors also incorporated other reporter genes, including luciferase (gLUC59) and beta-galactosidase (StlacZ). It is likely that these plasmids will prove to be extremely useful for future studies in C. parapsilosis.

Gene disruption methods.

Deleting or editing genes in C. parapsilosis faces the same problems encountered in many Candida species. The genome is diploid; thus, two alleles of each gene must be targeted, and the noncanonical translation of the CTG codon (102) means that many selectable markers cannot be directly used. However, transformation methods have been available for several decades.

Early attempts using “Candida” species showed that Candida utilis and Candida (Yarrowia) lipolytica, which do not belong to the CTG clade, can be transformed (117). By 1985, true CTG clade species (Candida maltosa and Pichia guilliermondii) were transformed with a plasmid expressing ARG4 from S. cerevisiae, which returned auxotrophic strains to prototrophy (118). ADE2 auxotrophs of C. albicans were complemented by transformation in 1986 (119). Transformation procedures were rapidly adapted for generating gene disruptions. Kelly et al. (120) used a C. albicans ADE2 gene flanked by regions from URA3 to disrupt one allele of URA3 in C. albicans by homologous recombination. “URA blaster” methods remain popular methods for generating gene disruptions in C. albicans. However, there are several concerns associated with using ura3 auxotrophic strains. First, in some backgrounds (such as C. albicans strains derived from CAI4), a proportion of the adjacent IRO1 gene involved in iron utilization was removed when URA3 was disrupted (121). Second, expression of URA3 at ectopic positions can affect virulence phenotypes (122). Generating strains with multiple auxotrophies (e.g., C. albicans BWP17 his1 arg4 ura3) made several selectable markers available (123).

Early gene disruption strategies for Candida species relied on having auxotrophic strains, which somewhat limited the potential applications. Dominant drug-resistance-selectable markers were therefore developed by modifying the coding sequence of existing systems to replace CTG codons.

The SAT1 (streptothricin acetyltransferase) gene, which confers resistance to nourseothricin, is probably the most commonly used dominant selectable marker in Candida species. The first codon-modified versions were generated by replacing CTG codons with CTT or CTC and expressing the gene from the C. albicans ACT1 promoter (124, 125). Reuss et al. (124) combined the marker with a regulatable FLP recombinase and surrounded the entire region with FLP recombination target (FRT) sites. This SAT1 flipper cassette can be used to disrupt one allele of a target gene by homologous recombination (directed by sequences outside the cassette). SAT1 and the rest of the cassette are recycled by inducing the expression of the FLP recombinase by growth on maltose, and the transformation step is repeated by using the same or a similar cassette to target the second allele. The SAT1 flipper cassette was the first gene disruption method that was adapted for use in C. parapsilosis. Gácser et al. (17) applied the C. albicans constructs directly to C. parapsilosis, whereas Ding and Butler (18) adapted it by replacing the promoters driving the expression of SAT1 and FLP with the orthologous sequences from C. parapsilosis. The SAT1 flipper cassette has since been used to delete several genes in C. parapsilosis (60, 126133).

The SAT1 cassette has numerous advantages, in that it can be used in any isolate and more than one gene can be targeted. However, the system is relatively slow. Homologous sequences are usually added to the end of the cassette by cloning, and the cassette must be recycled from the first allele of each target gene before the second allele is disrupted. Some of these issues were addressed for C. albicans, when Noble and Johnson (134, 135) developed a system using a strain auxotrophic for three markers, leu2, arg4, and his1. Each allele of a target gene is disrupted using a different marker: LEU2 derived from C. maltosa or HIS1 or ARG4 from C. dubliniensis. Sequences derived from the target gene are added by PCR, in a rapid and efficient process. This approach was used to delete several hundred regulatory genes in C. albicans (134). The system was adapted for C. parapsilosis, first by using the SAT1 cassette to disrupt LEU2 and HIS1. This facilitated the generation of a collection of >100 strains deleted for transcription factors and protein kinases (127). Later studies used the same method for the generation of smaller mutant sets (101, 136, 137).

Another alternative for gene deletion in yeast is via the newly introduced clustered regularly interspersed short palindromic repeat (CRISPR)-Cas9 system.

Introduction of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing.

Gene editing using CRISPR together with Cas9 and other endonucleases is gradually gathering momentum in yeasts (reviewed in references 138 and 139). The tools have many advantages, including the ability to target almost any sequence using carefully designed short guide RNAs (sgRNA) and the fact that in diploid genomes, both alleles are usually edited at the same time. In many yeasts, homology-directed repair (HR) is at least as efficient as, or more efficient than, nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). A double-stranded break introduced by Cas9 can therefore easily be repaired using a donor DNA (repair template) that introduces stop codons or specific mutations or that results in gene deletions.

CRISPR-based systems have three main requirements: (i) expression of CAS9 and targeting to the nucleus, (ii) expression of an sgRNA, and (iii) provision of a repair template. CRISPR was first used for gene editing in C. albicans by Vyas et al. (140). A codon-modified version of CAS9 with a nuclear localization sequence from simian virus 40 (SV40) and a SAT1 flipper cassette is targeted to the ENO1 gene by selection for nourseothricin resistance. The SAT1 cassette can be excised by recombination, allowing the marker to be reused to facilitate the integration of the sgRNA at a different site (RP10 locus). Alternatively, both CAS9 and sgRNA are integrated at ENO1. The sgRNA is expressed from a polymerase III (Pol III) promoter (SNR52). The repair template (constructed by overlapping PCR) is transformed into the cells at the same time as the integration cassettes. The system is very efficient, leading to editing rates of up to 80%. In early versions of the method, CAS9 remained in the genome. The approach also requires that both CAS9 and the sgRNA be integrated into the genome, which can be slow and makes sequential editing of several genes difficult. Later, improved versions of CRISPR-Cas9-based genome-editing methods were further developed by exploiting recent observations of C. albicans genetic properties (141146). These methods now allow single- or double-gene deletions, tagging, as well as open reading frame (ORF) reconstitutions.

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has been adapted for other Candida species, including C. lusitaniae (147). The authors of that study found that the efficiency of homology-directed repair in this species was increased by deleting KU70 and DNA ligase 4, parts of the NHEJ pathway. CRISPR has also been used successfully in C. lusitaniae and Candida auris by providing purified Cas9 protein (148). The CRISPR-Cas9 system developed for C. parapsilosis differs in many respects from systems used for other Candida species (149). One significant difference is that most of the components are carried on an autonomously replicating plasmid, originally described by the Nosek group (110, 150). The origin of replication (CpARS7) in the plasmid is artificial, in that it is derived from two different places on the C. parapsilosis genome. However, it is maintained under selection and is easily lost when selection is removed. A codon-adapted version of CAS9 is expressed from the C. parapsilosis TEF1 promoter, and SAT1 is expressed from the C. albicans ACT1 promoter. The guide RNA is present on the same plasmid, expressed from a polymerase II promoter (C. parapsilosis glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene [GAPDH]) and surrounded by Hammerhead and hepatitis delta virus (HDV) ribozymes. The repair template is cotransformed with the plasmid. One significant advantage of the plasmid system is that it can be transformed into any isolate of C. parapsilosis: Lombardi et al. (149) used it to edit genes in 20 different clinical strains. Design of the repair template facilitates gene editing (introduction of stop codons or specific mutations), gene deletion, or the addition of specific tags or epitopes. Any number of genes can be sequentially edited in the same strain.

Autonomously replicating plasmids are not generally used in Candida species. However, they have been described for Candida maltosa (151, 152) and Candida tropicalis (153). It may therefore be possible to develop plasmid-based CRISPR systems for other species in the CTG clade.

MOLECULAR MECHANISMS OF C. PARAPSILOSIS VIRULENCE

Adhesion

Adhesion to various biotic and abiotic surfaces is a key preliminary stage of host colonization. These surfaces include indwelling medical devices, such as catheters and prosthetic devices made of polyvinyl chloride (PVC), polyurethane, or silicone, as well as host epithelial tissues. C. parapsilosis is particularly known for its ability to cause systemic infections through the colonization of implanted medical devices and high-glucose-containing parenteral nutrition. Therefore, the species’ adhesive abilities, a critical step preceding biofilm formation, have been explored (154, 155). Interestingly, during these studies, an unusually high intraspecies variation in adhesion has been identified among C. parapsilosis clinical isolates compared to other Candida species (156). A correlation between the site of isolation and the rate of adhesion has also been observed, as C. parapsilosis mucocutaneous isolates express a higher-adhesion profile (156). Furthermore, cell surface hydrophobicity strongly correlates with adhesion to both polystyrene surfaces and buccal epithelial cells (ECs) (154, 156).

The molecular mechanisms for C. parapsilosis adhesion have also been investigated. Several proteins have been suggested to influence the adherence of this species to both abiotic and biotic surfaces. For example, either C. parapsilosis cell wall proteins (CWPs) that are covalently attached to the fungal cell wall, known as “true” CWPs, or cytoplasm-derived, temporary “atypical” CWPs effectively bind host cell extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins such as fibronectin, vitronectin, and laminin (157). These include true Als-, Hwp-, or Hyr-like proteins as well as transitory proteins required for various metabolic processes. The glycolysis and gluconeogenesis regulatory proteins Pgk (phosphoglycerate kinase) and Eno1 (enolase 1) are required for the adhesion of C. parapsilosis to silicone-made materials (158).

Als-like proteins are present on the surface of C. parapsilosis pseudohyphae (157). The C. parapsilosis ortholog of CaALS7 is a key determinant for adhesion to host epithelial cells, as gene disruption led to a decreased ability to adhere to human buccal epithelial cells and also resulted in decreased virulence in vivo (129). CpALS7 is also necessary for C. parapsilosis to adhere to host ECM proteins under shear force (159). Additionally, C. parapsilosis cells require the presence of calcium, glutamic acid, and proline for adherence under shear flow conditions. A study by Butler et al. predicted that the C. parapsilosis genome encodes 5 Als-like proteins (56). Pryszcz et al. subsequently found a wide degree of variability among ALS genes, ranging from 1 to 5 gene copy numbers per isolate (61). However, whether an increase in copy number contributes to a different degree of virulence has not yet been confirmed. Orthologs of CFEMs (common in fungal extracellular membranes), another set of proteins influencing adhesion and biofilm formation in C. albicans, are also present in the C. parapsilosis genome, although their exact role in adhesion is not yet known (160, 161).

Morphology

Although various methods of molecular diagnostics are available to identify clinical isolates, species identification through microbiological phenotyping is still a commonly applied method. Laffey and Butler described four heritable colony morphologies of C. parapsilosis, including smooth and crater-like or concentric and crepe phenotypes, which are either white or creamy (162). Whereas the former two contain many yeast cells, the latter have more pseudohyphae (162). Later, Nosek et al. described additional colony phenotypes, such as wrinkled (white), stalk, and superwrinkled (creamy) (163).

To date, there is no record of true hyphae formed by C. parapsilosis. Environmental stimuli that are thought to influence morphology transition are stress-inducing conditions, including elevated temperature (37°C), the presence of serum, starvation, and high CO2 levels and low O2 levels that are present within the host (164166). Although the exact inducers of the yeast-to-pseudohypha switch are poorly investigated, a specific subset of amino acids promotes this behavior (167). Furthermore, morphological transformation is usually associated with alterations in the cell wall structure. For example, during the yeast-to-filamentous growth transition, pseudohypha-specific cell surface proteins and adhesins (e.g., Als-like sequences) appear on the external layer of the elongating yeast’s cell wall (157).

C. parapsilosis pseudohyphae contribute to virulence. Although in terms of uptake, host phagocytic cells do not differentiate between yeast and pseudohyphal forms, C. parapsilosis pseudohyphae are more resistant to killing by macrophages and induce higher levels of host cell damage in vitro, thus contributing to the species’ pathogenicity (115, 168). Therefore, the underlying molecular mechanisms regulating morphology transition have also been investigated. Recent studies have identified several transcriptional regulators responsible for morphology regulation. These include transcriptional factors and kinases that are also involved in adhesion and biofilm regulation.

One such regulator is the ortholog of C. albicans EFG1, a transcriptional factor inhibiting the yeast-to-filamentous growth transition, that plays a similar role in controlling C. parapsilosis morphology (126). The transcriptional factor UME6 also induces filamentous growth in C. parapsilosis, which is similar to its reported function in C. albicans (127, 169). Orthologs of C. albicans CPH2 and CZF1 in C. parapsilosis also positively regulate the yeast-to-pseudohyphal switch, as their removal results in reduced colony wrinkling and biofilms of the corresponding strain with the mutants growing mainly as yeast cells (127). C. parapsilosis OCH1 also determines morphology, as deletion of this gene significantly decreases the amount of pseudohyphae under filamentous-growth-inducing conditions (170). Additional regulators of C. parapsilosis pseudohyphal growth include the ortholog of CaSPT3 (CPAR2_200390), which negatively regulates filamentous growth, whereas CPAR2_501400, equivalent to CaCWH41, is essential for pseudohyphal formation (101, 171, 172). Notably, CpEFG1, CpOCH1, and CpSPT3 are important factors in virulence (101, 126, 170). Due to their pleiotropic effects as signaling regulators, the specific key points at which these genes contribute to morphology status are still unclear.

Biofilm Formation

Adhered cells set the stage for biofilm formation on both biotic and abiotic surfaces. Following attachment, fungal cells rapidly proliferate to colonize the base material, thereby forming a monolayer. Following initiation, yeast cells undergo morphology transition, and filamentous forms appear, enhancing multilayer formation. Besides establishing a mixed population, during maturation, fungal cells also produce and secrete extracellular matrix elements to provide both structural and functional stability. Once the complex and stable multistructural biofilm stage is achieved, fungal cells are protected and await beneficial environmental conditions to initiate dispersal (173). The generated mature biofilm is a threat to the host, as it provides protection against both antifungal reagents as well as immune recognition (174, 175).

The structure and composition of biofilms formed by Candida species are highly species dependent. Compared to C. albicans, C. parapsilosis forms less-complex and thin biofilms. However, the presence of C. parapsilosis biofilms on plastic medically implanted devices is still the major source of infections. In terms of structure, biofilms formed by this species mainly consist of aggregated blastospores, pseudohyphae, and large amounts of extracellular carbohydrates with low levels of proteins (176, 177). Large variation in the overall biofilm-forming abilities among different clinical isolates was reported (176, 178). In the presence of high-glucose or lipid-rich media, however, C. parapsilosis biofilms are readily formed (179), which correlates with the increased incidence of C. parapsilosis-driven candidemia in patients receiving parenteral nutrition (163).

Previous studies also reported the resistance of Candida biofilms to various antifungal drugs. Nett et al. used radiolabeled fluconazole to show that beta-glucans in the ECM of C. albicans biofilms effectively sequester the drug (180). Subsequent work showed that matrix beta-glucans sequester multiple classes of antifungals in biofilms formed by C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, and other Candida species (181183). The activity of efflux pumps was also shown to contribute to antifungal resistance in early-stage biofilm production by C. albicans. Mukherjee et al. showed that deletion of drug efflux pumps (encoded by CDR1, CDR2, and MDR1) led to increased azole sensitivity of this species within the first 6 h of biofilm formation (184). The role of these families in the drug resistance of C. parapsilosis biofilms is currently unknown. Nevertheless, resistance to amphotericin B, terbinafine, fluconazole, voriconazole, ravuconazole, and posaconazole was recorded in various cases of C. parapsilosis biofilms (185187).

Due to the necessity and complexity of the various stages of biofilm formation, the process requires an extensive regulatory network. Although the molecular background of C. albicans biofilm formation is the most extensively studied to date, advances have been made in understanding C. parapsilosis biofilms. The described biofilm regulatory network in C. albicans is different from that of C. parapsilosis. Holland et al. compared the transcriptional profiles of biofilms formed by the two species and found that the expression of genes involved in metabolism and hyphal growth was increased in biofilms of both species (127). A cohort of C. parapsilosis-specific genes was further identified, including many predicted membrane transporters as well as a large number of genes with as-yet-unknown functions. In addition, the transcriptomic changes revealed during biofilm formation are similar to transcriptomic responses to hypoxia in this species (188). Many of the genes upregulated under both conditions encode proteins involved in fatty acid (FA) biosynthesis or glycolysis. Hydrolytic lipase secretion as well as trehalose metabolism also influence biofilm development (17, 132).

Although C. parapsilosis’ biofilm regulatory network has not yet been entirely defined, major differences have been observed in biofilm development regulation relative to that of C. albicans. For instance, BRG1 and TEC1 have key roles in C. albicans biofilm formation; however, no such role has been confirmed for the orthologous genes in C. parapsilosis (127). Although CZF1, UME6, GZF3, and CPH2 were highlighted as key contributors in C. parapsilosis, all these genes are negligible in C. albicans (127). ACE2, BCR1, and EFG1 are further required for biofilm development, similar to C. albicans (126, 127, 161). Additionally, RBT1, a cell surface protein, was confirmed to promote C. parapsilosis biofilm formation (188). MKC1 was also suggested to be involved in the formation of C. parapsilosis biofilms (127). CFEM proteins, such as Rbt5, Pga10, and Csa1, were proposed to be required for C. albicans biofilms (189). Although the CFEM family has undergone expansion in C. parapsilosis (7 genes), these proteins appear not to be required for biofilm formation (161). Likewise, four members of the C. albicans biofilm regulatory network (TEC1, ROB1, FLO8, and BRG1) have no role in C. parapsilosis (127, 190). Furthermore, although the role of NDT80 and NRG1 in C. albicans biofilm development is evident, their function in C. parapsilosis may be altered, as deletion of the corresponding genes results in a severe growth deficiency (127, 191). All these recent findings confirm that biofilm formation in the two species is regulated in different ways.

Hydrolytic Enzyme Production

During invasion, pathogenic fungi secrete various hydrolytic enzymes in order to facilitate host entry. Secreted hydrolytic enzymes disrupt host cell membranes, degrade extracellular matrix elements, and, thus, damage host tissues. Besides impairing host barrier function, fungal hydrolytic enzymes may also promote cell adhesion, biofilm formation, or intracellular survival. Such secreted fungal enzymes are divided into three major groups: secreted aspartyl proteases, lipases, and phospholipases. To date, among C. parapsilosis secreted hydrolytic enzymes, aspartyl proteases and lipases are the best characterized.

Previously, Ramos et al. showed that 15 out of 16 C. parapsilosis clinical isolates, derived from cases of cutaneous candidiasis, actively secreted aspartyl proteases (Saps) (192). Similarly, additional studies reported that >88% of C. parapsilosis clinical isolates actively secreted these enzymes (168, 193195). On the other hand, others reported a lower number (<37%) of clinical strains producing hydrolytic proteases (196199). Although there is wide variability among C. parapsilosis isolates in terms of Sap production, it is commonly agreed that isolates derived from host surfaces (e.g., skin or vaginal mucosa) are more likely to produce and secrete these enzymes than those obtained from systemic infections or from the environment. This could explain why surface isolates are more invasive. The molecular background of C. parapsilosis Sap production has been rigorously investigated. To date, three aspartyl protease-encoding genes (SAPP1 to SAPP3) have been identified. Out of these, SAPP1 is responsible for the majority of Sapp production. Interestingly, this gene is duplicated in the C. parapsilosis genome, generating SAPP1a and SAPP1b loci (131). Studies with a ΔΔsapp1a-ΔΔsapp1b deletion mutant strain confirmed that C. parapsilosis secreted proteases enhance yeast cell survival in human serum, promote resistance to phagocytosis and killing by the host, and also facilitate intracellular survival and host cell damage (131). SAPP genes are further suggested to contribute to host invasion by degrading proteins involved in host defense, such as complement and antimicrobial proteins, or antibodies to evade humoral immune responses. They are also thought to degrade various additional proteins (e.g., extracellular matrix and cell surface proteins) in order to enhance nutrient acquisition during invasion. Although Sapp1 greatly determines the virulence of C. parapsilosis, it is not solely responsible for protease production. Horvath et al. previously showed that in the absence of SAPP1, the expression of an additional secreted-protease-encoding gene (SAPP2) is significantly elevated, revealing a compensatory effect (131). Sapp2 acts on substrates different from those cleaved by Sapp1, which suggests that there are altered activation mechanisms for the two proteins (200). SAPP3 may also translate to an active protein, as Silva et al. reported elevated SAPP3 expression levels during infection of reconstituted human oral epithelium (201). Although these studies confirmed the activation of Sapp2 and Sapp3 under the applied conditions, their direct role in C. parapsilosis virulence has yet to be determined. In addition to the disruption of SAPP1, the protease inhibitor pepstatin A greatly decreases the destruction of host epithelial and epidermal surfaces by this species (202, 203). Hence, C. parapsilosis secreted proteases are some of the most potent pathogenicity-enhancing factors.

Lipases secreted by C. parapsilosis are also considered key virulence determinants. If present, their secretion varies greatly between isolates (36% to 80%), and they significantly enhance pathogenicity (168, 197). To date, four secreted-lipase-encoding genes have been identified in the genome of C. parapsilosis, although only two (LIP1 and LIP2) have been confirmed to encode functionally active proteins (17). Deletion of CpLIP1 and CpLIP2 revealed their role in mechanisms required for successful host invasion, including nutrient acquisition and sustainability in a lipid-rich environment, enhancement of adhesion and biofilm formation, suppression of both cellular and humoral immune responses during infection, promotion of survival after phagocytosis, and progression of host tissue invasion (17, 115, 204). Furthermore, the lipase inhibitor ebelactone B and aspirin also protect reconstituted human tissue (RHT) in the setting of C. parapsilosis infection, which supports a role for secreted lipases in pathogenesis (203, 205). For a comprehensive review of C. parapsilosis secreted lipases as potent pathogenicity determinants, see our previous minireview (206).

C. parapsilosis also secretes phospholipases albeit with wide intraspecies variation, with studies reporting that 9 to 90% of clinical isolates produce the enzyme (193, 196, 198, 199). However, their contribution to pathogenicity is still a matter of debate, as there is no direct link between their expression and the degree of virulence. It is hypothesized that fungal phospholipases may enhance virulence by disrupting host cell membranes (207, 208). Unfortunately, the molecular background of phospholipase production is as yet unexplored in C. parapsilosis.

Cell Wall Assembly

Given that the first contact of the host-pathogen interaction takes place between the fungal cell wall and host cell surface receptors, studying the nature of this interaction is indispensable in order to explore host immune responses. However, the dynamically changing nature of fungal cell walls makes their investigation rather challenging. Such behavior is due to the changes in the environmental conditions between specific niches that these cells encounter.

Regardless of environmental stress conditions, in general, fungal cell walls contain four major components in different layers. Ranging from interior to exterior, the cell wall of Candida species consists of a basal chitin layer, coated by β-1,3- and β-1,6-glucans, that is penetrated by highly glycosylated mannoproteins and covered by a relatively rich layer of mannans (209). Depending on the site of mannosylation, one can differentiate between N-linked (oligosaccharides attached to asparagine) and O-linked (oligosaccharides binding to serine/threonine) mannans that influence cell adhesion and also cell wall integrity (170, 210). The compositions of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis cell walls are quite similar; however, the proportions and organizations of the different components vary. For example, while C. albicans chitin and β-1,3-glucans are mostly found close to the plasma membrane and are therefore masked by mannans (211, 212), both polysaccharides are significantly more exposed on the surface of C. parapsilosis cells (213). This observation is consistent with the high cell wall porosity found in C. parapsilosis (213). The obtained data also suggest that C. parapsilosis N-linked mannans are shorter than those of C. albicans, generating a porous wall surface, and this feature could help to expose inner wall polysaccharides on the cell surface (213, 214). Furthermore, the amount of glycan under the mannan layer of C. parapsilosis is larger than in C. albicans, which may function to strengthen/stabilize the cell wall (213, 215). In contrast to the C. albicans cell wall, C. parapsilosis O-linked mannans are naturally masked by N-linked mannans, which may affect interactions with immune cells (170). These data demonstrate that despite having similar components, C. albicans and C. parapsilosis cell walls have subtle but relevant differences in both composition and organization.

To identify specific proteins present on the surface of C. parapsilosis cells, surfaceomics and shotgun proteomics studies have been performed. In addition to classic CWPs (e.g., Als adhesins and Hwp), atypical proteins (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, Hsp70 chaperones, enolase 1, and endo-1,3-beta-glucanase) are also present on the surface, as mentioned above (157). Fungal CWPs not only play a structural role in maintaining the shape and strength of this cellular component but also have diverse functions during fungal adaptation to different niches. For example, transcriptional regulation of proteins involved in glycolysis (Eno1, Pgk, and Gapdh), general metabolic enzymes (Pdc1 and Pdc11), and heat shock proteins (Ssa1) is markedly altered under oxidative stress (216). Similarly, a CFEM family member (cell surface adhesins in C. albicans) and two orthologs of C. albicans classic cell wall proteins, Pir1 and Ecm33, are differentially regulated in the presence of human sera (217). Under the same conditions, human serum proteins attached to the surface of C. parapsilosis cells were also examined, among which complement components, apolipoproteins, fibrinogen, vitronectin, and albumin were identified (217). Interacting partners of laminin, fibronectin, and vitronectin as major extracellular matrix proteins were subsequently identified, as described above. Fungal proteins with possible human plasminogen and high-molecular-mass kininogen binding roles were also later identified. These include the heat shock protein Ssa2, the above-mentioned Als-like proteins, and 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase 1 (217, 218). This could represent a mechanism to disguise the fungal cells, avoiding recognition by elements of the immune system.

Immunogenic proteins associated with the cell wall also modify host-pathogen interactions. Among the most prevalent immunogenic proteins found in the C. parapsilosis cell wall are the translation initiation factor eIF4A subunit (Tif1), ATP synthase subunit beta (Atp2), enolase (Eno1), glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gap1), heat shock protein 70 (Ssb1p), pyruvate decarboxylase (Pdc11), ATP synthase subunit alpha (Atp1), phosphoglycerate kinase (Pgk1), alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1), fructose-bisphosphate aldolase (Fba1), isocitrate dehydrogenase (Idh2), and guanine nucleotide binding protein subunit beta-like protein (Bel1) (219). These cell wall moonlighting proteins have also been identified as being immunogenic in C. albicans, with the exception of Idh2 (219). Other CWPs could have a role in nutrient acquisition or interaction with host components, such as the cell wall adsorbed aspartic proteinase 1 (Aspp1) or an ectophosphatase, as they influence adhesion to epithelial cells (220, 221).

Thus far, there are no functional studies to demonstrate how C. parapsilosis cell wall components are synthesized, but bioinformatic analyses of the genome indicate that this organism possesses the basic components to elaborate glucans and mannans, as described for C. albicans (56). The α1,6-mannosyltransferase Och1 is one of the few proteins characterized so far in C. parapsilosis, and as in C. albicans, it provides the addition of the first mannose residue of the N-linked glycan outer chain, allowing the further extension of the α1,6-polymannose backbone that is further decorated by lateral mannooligosaccharides (170). Possibly via regulating cell wall homeostasis, C. parapsilosis Och1 also regulates virulence, similarly to that of C. albicans (170).

Although no mechanistic studies have been conducted, orthologs of C. albicans CHS1, CHS2, CHS3, and CHS8 (encoding chitin synthases) and CHT1, CHT2, CHT3, and CHT4 (encoding chitinases) have been identified within the C. parapsilosis genome (101). This suggests that similar machineries are present for cell wall biosynthesis and chitin homeostasis regulation in both species. Notably, however, a recent study demonstrated the role of C. parapsilosis Spt3, a filamentous growth regulatory transcriptional factor, in cell wall homeostasis maintenance, which is a function not associated with the orthologous gene in C. albicans, and this finding might suggest the presence of alternative routes for cell wall homeostasis regulation (101).

Among the targets currently explored for detection of this species in the clinical setting, hyphal wall protein 1 (HWP1), a hypha-specific cell wall protein with adhesive properties, has been suggested to be a good marker for species identification (222). The cell wall β-1,3-glucan content has been used to discriminate fungal cells growing in a planktonic stage from those forming biofilms. The level of this cell wall component increased 10-fold in both in vivo and in vitro biofilms generated by Candida cells, including those from C. parapsilosis (223). Therefore, it has been proposed that the β-1,3-glucan levels in cells isolated from indwelling devices be evaluated to assess the possible formation of fungal biofilms (223). In contrast, other cell wall components were not effective markers of C. parapsilosis infections. For example, detection of mannan antigen with the Platelia Candida Ag Plus assay showed a relatively low sensitivity in clinical samples (224).

Although our knowledge has recently significantly expanded regarding the cell wall structure of C. parapsilosis, there are major unexplored areas that are yet to be investigated.

Fatty Acid Metabolism

Fatty acids, as key building components of lipids, play an indispensable role in the organization and maintenance of cell membranes and various intracellular compartments. Both saturated fatty acids (SFAs) and unsaturated fatty acids (UFAs) determine membrane flexibility, regulate metabolic processes, and serve as precursors for a wide variety of complex macromolecules; thus, they are essential for viability. Recently, it was also suggested that FAs influence the virulence of pathogenic species; however, whether this is a direct or an indirect effect needs to be further investigated.

Pathogenic species acquire fatty acids either via de novo synthesis or through the degradation of external sources. De novo fatty acid synthesis requires both fatty acid synthases (chain elongation) as well as fatty acid desaturases (double-bond introduction), while secreted hydrolytic lipases contribute to the utilization of fatty acid from external lipids. A defect in either route will not affect fungal viability on its own, although if they malfunction simultaneously, the result is lethal (225).

Fatty acid synthases along with elongases are required for long-chain SFA biosynthesis, a preliminary step for later UFA production. CpFAS1 is essential for the growth of C. parapsilosis in the absence of exogenous (saturated) fatty acids, as disruptant cells are severely restricted in UFA production (130). Furthermore, subsequent gene deletion affects not only the yeast’s fatty acid metabolism but also its pathogenicity, as Δ/Δfas2 cells were sensitive to the presence of human serum and less virulent both in vitro and in vivo (130). Nguyen et al. showed that the fatty acid desaturase Ole1, which introduces the first double bond to saturated fatty acids, is also essential in C. parapsilosis, as Δ/Δole1 cells were unable to produce unsaturated FAs in the absence of exogenous fatty acids. Furthermore, CpOLE1 also influences virulence, as Δ/Δole1 cells were sensitive to human serum and less virulent both in vitro and in vivo, similarly to Δ/Δfas2 cells (128).

In order to provide protection against gluco- and lipotoxicity, C. parapsilosis cells form lipid droplets (LDs) to prevent the accumulation of fatty acids and free glucose in toxic concentrations within the cytoplasm. In C. parapsilosis, FIT2 regulates the formation of such triacylglycerol-containing cytoplasmic compartments serving as free fatty acid and lipid precursor reservoirs. Besides regulating fungal viability, FIT2 also affects C. parapsilosis’ virulence, possibly in an indirect manner (226). Interestingly, it has been suggested that FAS2 and OLE1 are also required for protection against gluco- and lipotoxicity via enhancing the formation of LDs. This was confirmed by the impaired LD formation in both the Δ/Δfas2 and Δ/Δole1 strains (227).

Ole2, another fatty acid desaturase with hypothetical delta-9 desaturase activity, is involved in the processing of palmitoleic and oleic acids in C. parapsilosis (136). Interestingly, the amount of monounsaturated FAs increased markedly in the Δ/Δole2 strain, thereby calling into question Ole2’s presumed delta-9 desaturase activity (136). Enhanced phagocytosis and killing of Δ/Δole2 cells and the induced increased levels of interleukin-10 (IL-10) suggested that CpOLE2 may also be involved in virulence regulation (136). Although functional Δ12/Δ15- and Δ15-fatty acid desaturases (FAD2 and FAD3) have also been identified in this species, their influence on virulence has not yet been investigated (228).

Prostaglandin Production

FAs also serve as precursors for the synthesis of complex macromolecules, including immunomodulatory prostaglandins. In the host, prostaglandins are physiologically active compounds acting as potent regulators of diverse mechanisms, including inflammation. Several genera of pathogenic fungi are capable of producing prostaglandin-like molecules (136, 229233), and these macromolecules enhance fungal pathogenesis by hijacking host immune responses (233). C. parapsilosis, similarly to C. albicans, is able to produce prostaglandins from exogenous arachidonic acids. This includes the biosynthesis of prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and PGD2, although other subsets of prostanoids have also been identified in smaller amounts (e.g., PGA2 and PGB2) (136). To date, only a few attempts have been made to identify the molecular bases of their biogenesis.

Due to the presence of a cytochrome b domain, it has been suggested that besides regulating fatty acid metabolism, Ole2 is also involved in the regulation of prostaglandin production, particularly PGE2. However, while Ole2 greatly determines PGE2 production in C. albicans, it cannot be associated with such functions in C. parapsilosis (136, 230). Recently, Chakraborty et al. identified genes potentially involved in C. parapsilosis prostaglandin production. These include the orthologous genes of CaFET3, ScPOX1-3, and ScPOT1, affecting the production of PGE2, 15-keto-PGE2, and PGD2 (137). Besides regulating eicosanoid biosynthesis, they also influence fungal pathogenicity, as their removal results in enhanced phagocytosis and killing by human macrophages and also alters cytokine responses in vitro. Furthermore, disruption of CpFET3 and CpPOT1 resulted in attenuated virulence in vivo.

Nutrient Competition

During invasion, pathogenic fungi require carbon and nitrogen sources as well as trace elements for survival within the host. Such species are in constant competition with the host, along with the residual commensal microbes. In order to acquire essential nutrients under such restrictive environmental conditions, pathogenic species have evolved different acquisition mechanisms. For instance, several pathogenic fungi secrete various hydrolytic enzymes to degrade complex macromolecules in their close environment, which, besides enhancing deep invasion, also provide a wide range of carbon as well as nitrogen sources ready for uptake. Such enzymes include the above-mentioned fungal secreted lipases and proteases. Trace elements are likewise important for both viability as well as pathogenicity, due to the diverse roles of metalloproteins. These proteins require zinc, copper, or iron cofactors for proper functioning. HAP5, a subunit of the core binding factor (CBF) transcription regulatory complex, is required for the uptake of accessible iron in C. parapsilosis, similar to its role in C. albicans (101, 234). It has also been suggested that CpHAP5 influences the activity of cytochrome proteins (hemeproteins) of the respiratory chain, possibly in an indirect manner. C. parapsilosis HAP5 also enhances virulence, as null mutant strains were less virulent both in vitro and in vivo (101). Unfortunately, to date, we lack information about zinc and copper acquisition regulatory factors that could influence uptake mechanisms in this species. Previous studies revealed that C. parapsilosis cells tolerate the presence of potassium (KCl), sodium (NaCl), and lithium cations (LiCa) at high concentrations (235237). However, whether this feature directly contributes to pathogenesis is yet to be determined.

Survival Strategies

In order to survive the restrictive environmental conditions present in the host, several pathogenic fungi have evolved different escape mechanisms (238244). Besides inducing a delayed, tolerogenic immune response (discussed below), other survival mechanisms have been observed during C. parapsilosis infections. For example, similar to other pathogenic yeasts, C. parapsilosis cells are able to survive within phagocytes and endothelial cells (115, 245). Intracellular budding, pseudohypha formation, and induced exocytosis were also observed. Furthermore, engulfed yeast cells inhibited the host cells’ attempt to complete mitosis (115). In endothelial cells, internalized yeasts resist acidification by the host cell and are protected from neutrophil killing in vitro (246). Although the underlying molecular mechanisms regulating the above-mentioned phenomena are largely unknown, it has been suggested that the species’ secreted lipases and extracellular proteases might be involved in survival within maturing phagosomes. For instance, removal of CpSAPP1 as well as CpLIP1-LIP2 resulted in delayed phagolysosome maturation following uptake by human macrophages (131, 247).

Metabolism of Hydroxyderivatives of Benzene and Benzoic Acid

Hydroxyderivatives of benzene and benzoic acid are toxic compounds exhibiting antimicrobial activities. For example, salicylate (2-hydroxybenzoate), aspirin (acetylsalicylate), phenol, and catechol are highly toxic to C. parapsilosis cells (113, 248). However, this yeast is able to assimilate a range of hydroxybenzenes (hydroquinone and resorcinol) and hydroxybenzoates (3-hydroxybenzoate, 4-hydroxybenzoate, 2,5-dihydroxybenzoate [gentisate], 2,4-dihydroxybenzoate, and 3,4-dihydroxybenzoate [protocatechuate]). Functional analyses have demonstrated that these compounds are metabolized via the 3-oxoadipate and gentisate pathways, and most of the genes coding for the corresponding enzymes are organized into metabolic gene clusters (MGCs). The gentisate pathway gene cluster is located in the subtelomeric region of chromosome V and comprises the genes for four enzymes catalyzing biochemical reactions in this pathway (3-hydroxybenzoate 6-hydroxylase, gentisate 1,2-dioxygenase, a putative maleylpyruvate isomerase, and fumarylpyruvate hydrolase), a transporter belonging to the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) involved in hydroxybenzoate transport across the plasma membrane, and a binuclear zinc cluster (Zn2Cys6) transcription factor controlling gene expression. The 3-oxoadipate pathway gene cluster contains genes for three metabolic enzymes (hydroxyquinol 1,2-dioxygenase, a putative maleylacetate reductase, and 3-oxoadipate CoA transferase) and a zinc cluster transcription factor. The remaining enzymes of this pathway (i.e., 4-hydroxybenzoate 1-hydroxylase, hydroquinone hydroxylase, and 3-oxoadipyl-CoA thiolase) and the corresponding plasma membrane transporters are encoded by genes located outside this cluster. Both MGCs are regulated independently in a substrate-specific manner. They are highly expressed in cells assimilating hydroxyaromatic substrates but repressed in cells grown in glucose-containing media (99, 100, 113; A. Cillingová, R. Tóth, A. Gácser, and J. Nosek, unpublished data).

Although both hydroxybenzoates and hydroxybenzenes can be degraded via the 3-oxoadipate pathway, there is an important physiological difference in the degradation of these compounds. The conversion of 4-hydroxybenzoate to hydroquinone includes a decarboxylation step, releasing carbon dioxide that is readily converted by a carbonic anhydrase into bicarbonate anion. In fungi, bicarbonate activates intracellular signaling via adenylyl cyclase, thus affecting various processes, including filamentation and virulence (249). These features illustrate another difference between C. parapsilosis and C. albicans, as the latter assimilates hydroxybenzenes but does not metabolize hydroxybenzoates. The C. albicans genome contains two MGCs coding for the catechol and hydroxyhydroquinone branch of the 3-oxoadipate pathway, but it lacks the gene for decarboxylating monooxygenase (4-hydroxybenzoate 1-hydroxylase), orthologs of hydroxybenzoate transporters, as well as the gentisate pathway cluster. Hence, it grows in media containing phenol, catechol, hydroquinone, or resorcinol as a sole carbon source (250).

In addition to hydroxybenzenes and hydroxybenzoates, other compounds can be channeled into these pathways. For example, C. parapsilosis cells overexpressing monooxygenases that catalyze the first reaction in both pathways (i.e., 3-hydroxybenzoate 6-hydroxylase and 4-hydroxybenzoate 1-hydroxylase) exhibit increased tolerance to terbinafine (Lamisil) (113). This observation is consistent with the finding that salicylate 1-monooxygenase from Aspergillus nidulans also confers resistance to this antifungal drug (251). Esters of phthalic acid (phthalates) are additional putative substrates of the 3-oxoadipate pathway (e.g., terephthalate can be decarboxylated to 4-hydroxybenzoate or hydroquinone) (A. Cillingová and J. Nosek, unpublished data). These compounds are commonly used as additives to increase the flexibility and durability of plastic materials, and the ability of C. parapsilosis to utilize phthalates as carbon sources may, in part, explain its affinity for surfaces of medical plastics.

ANTIFUNGAL SUSCEPTIBILITY AND RESISTANCE

Although an extensive discussion of pharmacotherapy for candidiasis is beyond the scope of this review, a discussion of some points relevant to infections caused by C. parapsilosis is warranted. Unlike C. glabrata, C. parapsilosis has maintained high rates of susceptibility to the azole antifungals. Although testing for azole susceptibility is recommended, these agents have largely retained their usefulness for C. parapsilosis infections. Echinocandins (caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin) are currently recommended as first-line empirical therapy for patients with suspected or proven disseminated candidiasis in many clinical settings (252). C. parapsilosis has been reported to have higher MICs for the echinocandins than other Candida species (9, 253). However, patients with C. parapsilosis candidemia who were initially treated with echinocandins have not been noted to have worse outcomes (254), and no clinical studies have demonstrated the superiority of another class of antifungals over echinocandins for C. parapsilosis (252).

Susceptibility testing is recommended for all Candida isolates associated with invasive disease. In particular, azole testing is recommended to provide an oral therapeutic option. Especially for patients previously receiving an echinocandin, echinocandin susceptibility testing of C. parapsilosis isolates should be performed (252). With the exception of endocarditis, amphotericin B is no longer commonly used in adults for invasive candidiasis due to toxicities, albeit the lipid formulations have reduced nephrotoxicities (255257). Notably, amphotericin B is relatively well tolerated in neonates (258, 259). Susceptibility testing for C. parapsilosis has been well validated by methodologies from both the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) (standard M27-A4) (260) and the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) (10, 261).

Azole resistance is well documented in C. parapsilosis. Despite the concern for a genetic predisposition to resistance to echinocandins, surveys of Candida collections show that azole resistance occurred more commonly than echinocandin nonsusceptibility. For example, out of 122 C. parapsilosis strains, 9.8% were resistant to fluconazole, while 3.2% were resistant to echinocandins (10). In a prospectively collected series of C. parapsilosis isolates, 4.8% were resistant to fluconazole and 0.6% were resistant to echinocandins (11). The global rates of fluconazole resistance range between 2 and 5% (262, 263), and a recent review assessed 6,023 isolates and revealed an overall rate of resistance to fluconazole of 3.4% (25).

Azole resistance has been well associated with prior or current fluconazole use (264267), and resistance can develop even with exposure to systemic antibiotics (268, 269). Surveys of isolate collections reveal the rate of fluconazole resistance to be 0 to 4.6% (270274). The average MIC50 values of fluconazole for C. parapsilosis are from 0.5 to 1 μg/ml (186, 200, 271, 275277). Rates of resistance to itraconazole range from 1.5 to 4% (270, 271). Given the low MIC50 (≤0.03 μg/ml) of voriconazole, the rate of resistance is less than 2% (272, 278). Cross-resistance to azoles can occur, including in strains responsible for outbreaks (279). For example, one large study found that only 37% of fluconazole-resistant isolates were susceptible to voriconazole (272). Voriconazole resistance can also develop in patients during exposure to fluconazole (280).

During recent years, advances have been achieved in terms of understanding the molecular bases of decreased antifungal drug susceptibility. For example, alterations in ergosterol biosynthetic mechanisms and upregulation of multidrug transporters in the cell wall are the two most common pathways of development of azole resistance (281283). In C. albicans, three major regulators are commonly highlighted to regulate azole resistance, two multidrug transporters (Cdr1 and Mdr1) and an enzyme involved in ergosterol biosynthesis (Erg11), as all three are overexpressed in the presence of azole derivates.

Among the members of the ERG family (genes encoding proteins involved in the ergosterol biosynthesis pathway) in C. albicans, as well as in C. parapsilosis, overexpression of ERG11 (encoding a lanosterol 14-α-demethylase) in the presence of azoles has been highlighted by multiple studies (25, 283285). In C. albicans, Upc2, the key transcriptional regulator of ERG11, has also been identified, as gain-of-function mutations in the corresponding gene’s sequence led to a significant increase in ERG11 expression (286). The Y132F substitution in ERG11 is exclusively found in azole-resistant isolates of C. albicans (25, 285). In C. parapsilosis, the same substitution event also correlates with azole resistance (281, 287). However, the transcriptional regulator Upc2 does not regulate ERG11 (overexpresses independently from UPC2) in this species but is required for the expression of 13 other ergosterol biosynthesis genes (281, 288). Besides Upc2, another transcriptional factor, Ndt80, is also suggested to regulate ergosterol synthesis in C. parapsilosis and thus determines azole resistance, similarly to C. albicans (288, 289).

In C. albicans, besides ERGs, upregulation of multidrug transporters (efflux pumps) has also been observed during exposure to azole derivates. Two such efflux pumps are encoded by CDR1 and MDR1 (290293). The expression levels of both transporters are elevated if mutations occur in the corresponding transcriptional regulators’ sequences. Of these, upon gain-of-function mutations in the transcriptional factor MRR1, expression levels of MDR1 are elevated, whereas gain-of-function point mutations in TAC1 enhance the expression of CDR1 in C. albicans (294, 295). The upregulation of CDR1 and MDR1 orthologs was also confirmed in C. parapsilosis in the presence of azoles (281, 283). However, their regulation differs from what was observed in C. albicans. In C. parapsilosis, overexpression of MDR1 and CDR1 is less dependent on mutations in MRR1 and TAC1 (281). Further studies revealed that both Cdr1 and Mdr1 in this species are only partially required for decreased azole susceptibility, as disruption of the corresponding genes resulted in only a mild decrease in fluconazole MICs (281). These studies suggest that there is often a combination of molecular mechanisms, including sterol and efflux pump gene alterations, responsible for resistance in C. parapsilosis (133, 283, 296).

C. parapsilosis displays reduced susceptibility in vitro to echinocandins (297299), and the yeast can cause infection in the setting of echinocandin administration (300305). Notably, caspofungin MICs for C. parapsilosis are higher than for other Candida species, with MIC50 values typically ranging from 0.85 to 2 μg/ml (186, 271, 275, 306, 307). Similarly, micafungin has an average MIC50 of 1 μg/ml (271, 308), and anidulafungin has an average MIC50 of 2 μg/ml (271, 276, 309). Interestingly, pharmacodynamics evaluations reveal that echinocandin requirements for efficacy against C. parapsilosis by AUC/MIC (area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC) targeting were higher than for the other Candida species tested (310). Alterations in cell wall structure, reduced affinities for the glucan synthase protein complex, and variations in regulatory networks are thought to contribute to resistance (307). C. parapsilosis has more naturally occurring fks polymorphisms than most other pathogenic Candida strains (311). One such example is the naturally occurring amino acid substitution “P660A” in the “hot spot” 1 (HS1) region of FKS1, which might result in a decreased sensitivity of the corresponding glucan synthase to echinocandins (312, 313). It has also been suggested that substitutions in the HS regions of FKS2 could have similar effects, although to date, no such alterations have been revealed (314). According to Martí-Carrizosa et al. (314), mutations outside the HS regions of FKS sequences could also contribute to such a response (304, 312, 315). Notably, C. parapsilosis FKS1 and FKS2 mutations are different from those located in HS regions of other Candida species (314). Interestingly, the mitochondrial respiratory pathways in C. parapsilosis are also linked to echinocandin susceptibilities (89). A concerning result was obtained in an experiment where susceptible C. parapsilosis isolates were subjected to serial exposure to echinocandins, which led to high rates of resistance to caspofungin, micafungin, and anidulafungin as well as cross-resistance to all three drugs. Furthermore, serial exposure to echinocandins also induced resistance to azoles and flucytosine (316). Remarkably, echinocandins can paradoxically promote the growth of some isolates of C. parapsilosis and other Candida species in vitro at concentrations above the MIC50 for the isolates (317). However, murine studies with caspofungin-resistant isolates have revealed that administration of caspofungin to mice infected with caspofungin-resistant isolates modified virulence, demonstrating that in vitro data may not clearly correlate with in vivo outcomes and suggesting that host immune responses may contribute to this effect (318).

Ongoing studies continue to expand our understanding of azole and echinocandin resistance. Interestingly, resistance to these agents can be linked to single pathways. For example, a recent publication reveals that C-5 desaturase activity regulates susceptibility to both azoles and echinocandins, as disruption of ERG3 leads to high-level azole and intermediate- to high-level echinocandin resistance (319).

Amphotericin B “tolerance” in C. parapsilosis was first noted in 1983, when minimal fungicidal concentrations of several strains were noted to be ≥32-fold higher than their respective MICs (320). Moreover, resistance to amphotericin has been well documented (321323), with surveys of clinical strains revealing a resistance rate of ∼3% (271). However, a recent analysis of C. parapsilosis isolates from pediatric patients in Argentina reveals that 15% of the isolates displayed high amphotericin MIC50 values, with a range of 0.5 to 2 μg/ml and a geometric mean of 1 μg/ml (324). A review of data from a large collection of studies, however, shows that the typical MIC50 range of amphotericin B for C. parapsilosis is 0.13 to 1 μg/ml (186, 200, 271, 275277).

Although infrequently utilized, flucytosine can be used in combination, typically with azoles or amphotericin B, for candidal meningitis (325, 326) or endocarditis (327). Flucytosine resistance rates generally range from 2% to 6.4%, although a 1975 study reported that 24% of C. parapsilosis isolates were resistant (271, 328).

The studies described above show that in vitro drug susceptibility results are not clearly correlated with patient outcomes. C. parapsilosis biofilms are a major factor in outcomes for certain patients (329), particularly in the setting of infected foreign materials. In particular, C. parapsilosis is frequently associated with central venous catheters (330333). Biofilms can adversely impact the function of antifungals, primarily through binding the compounds or otherwise impairing their ability to reach yeast cells. C. parapsilosis biofilms have increased resistance to standard formulations of amphotericin B and azoles (185, 334), but amphotericin lipid formulations may retain activity (186), and echinocandins can reduce the metabolic activities of C. parapsilosis biofilms (185, 186, 335).

HOST IMMUNE RESPONSES

Our knowledge of antifungal immunity has expanded at a remarkable pace over the past decade. For example, new host recognition mechanisms with intracellular signaling pathways along with intercellular and humoral effects have been revealed. The control of C. parapsilosis-driven infections, similarly to other fungal species, relies on the proper activation of both innate and adaptive immune responses. Along with new knowledge about other pathogenic fungi, advances have also been achieved in terms of the exploitation of anti-C. parapsilosis immune responses.

Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and C-type lectin receptors (CLRs) are two main classes of pathogen recognition receptors (PRRs) that commonly recognize fungal pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs). Among the TLRs, TLR2, TLR4, and TLR6 are involved in the recognition of C. parapsilosis cells by both gingival epithelial cells (ECs) and human macrophages (336, 337). Further studies suggest that among CLRs, Galectin-3 and Dectin-1 are required for C. parapsilosis-induced immune responses (338340). According to Linden et al., Galectin-3 blockers added to neutrophils inhibited C. parapsilosis phagocytosis, while the addition of exogenous Galectin-3 to the culturing medium enhanced yeast cell uptake (338). Additionally, gal3−/− mice were more susceptible to C. parapsilosis infection than wild-type mice (339). The same study further demonstrated that lower levels of Galectin-3 are present in human neonatal cord blood sera than in healthy adult sera, which might also explain the susceptibility of infants to this species. Decreased inflammatory cytokine levels after Dectin-1 inhibition also suggested the receptor’s inclusion in C. parapsilosis recognition by human blood-derived macrophages (340). To date, we lack further information about the inclusion of other pattern recognition receptors in C. parapsilosis recognition.

In terms of the immune responses triggered following recognition, the activation and effector functions of innate and adaptive immune cells have also been examined.

Among myeloid cells, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), peripheral blood mononuclear cell-derived macrophages (PBMC-DMs), polymorphonuclear neutrophils (PMNs), dendritic cells (DCs), and bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) all participate in the innate immune responses triggered by C. parapsilosis. Out of these, effector functions and cytokine release of PBMC-DMs, PMNs, and PBMCs upon C. parapsilosis challenge are the most examined. Professional phagocytes actively phagocytose and kill C. parapsilosis cells (both yeast and pseudohyphae) to enhance clearance (115, 341344). Complement activation and proinflammatory (IL-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha [TNF-α]) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokine production were further observed in the case of PBMCs (340, 343). Upon C. parapsilosis infection, all three classical mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs) (p38, extracellular signal-regulated kinase [ERK], and Jun N-terminal protein kinase [JNK]) are involved in cytokine production in mononuclear cells, although the induced cytokine responses vary from those induced by C. albicans (340). NF-κB activation was also confirmed during C. parapsilosis invasion, along with the formation of a granuloma-like structure by PBMCs, which was later infiltrated by PMNs and CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, enhancing the early production of gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and control of the infection (344, 345). Besides phagocytosis, killing, and the production of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1α, IL-6, TNF-α, and CXCL-8), DCs also form fungipods, pseudopodial protrusions observed especially in the presence of C. parapsilosis that are thought to promote fungal recognition (346, 347). On the contrary, BMDMs have been shown to release IL-27 in the presence of this fungus, which resulted in an anti-inflammatory response. This was supported by the observation that IL-27R−/− mice displayed enhanced fungal clearance (348). Thus, innate immune responses against C. parapsilosis greatly differ between the examined myeloid cell types.

Regarding host cell killing, C. parapsilosis causes relatively mild damage to PBMC-DMs compared to C. albicans (115). Host cell rupture due to pseudohyphal growth of the ingested cells has been reported (115). Additionally, this species induces macrophage death via inflammation-derived apoptosis (pyroptosis) similarly to C. albicans, although this event is possibly differently regulated by the two species (337).

ECs at barrier sites are also active participants in innate immune responses, as during colonization with a pathogenic species, they produce various cytokines and chemokines to attract professional immune cells to the site of invasion. For example, C. albicans infection triggers strong cytokine release from epithelial cells, including the secretion of neutrophil and monocyte attractants (349351). In contrast, small amounts of cytokines are released during oral epithelial cell colonization by C. parapsilosis (352). This phenomenon is possibly due to the unresponsiveness of the MAPK/c-Fos signaling pathway, the primary invasion-alarming intracellular signaling route in epithelial cells for other yeasts (353). Besides maintaining a defined although still relatively low level of IL-1α induction, only mild host cell damage has been observed after coincubation of C. parapsilosis with oral squamous epithelial cells (352).

Nevertheless, by using an engineered human oral mucosa model, C. parapsilosis has been shown to be capable of forming biofilms and invading connective tissues (336). Interestingly, however, in this model, upregulation of TLR2, TLR4, and TLR6 was observed in human gingival epithelial cells, which was accompanied by the production of IL-1β, TNF-α, IFN-γ, β-defensin-1, β-defensin-2, and β-defensin-3 (336), which is likely responsible for the growth inhibition of C. parapsilosis cells (336).

These results suggest that during the colonization of epithelial barriers, host inflammatory responses triggered by C. parapsilosis may be present; however, they are not comparable to those induced by C. albicans. As during C. albicans invasion, the presence of true hyphae is thought to be the major inducer of immune responses (352), C. parapsilosis’ inability to form true hyphae may contribute to the lack of an effective inflammatory reaction. Previous studies also showed that C. albicans hyphae actively secrete candidalysin, a fungal toxin encoded by ECE1 that also actively contributes to host cell damage (354). In silico data analyses suggest that the orthologous gene is not present in C. parapsilosis, which may further explain the ineffective induction of an adequate immune response.

In terms of adaptive immunity, T helper 1 (Th1) and T helper 17 (Th17) cells are the main T lymphocytes required for anti-Candida albicans responses (355, 356). Interestingly, C. parapsilosis is not able to induce significant levels of cytokines that are associated with Th1/Th17 responses; instead, host cells infected with this species produced elevated levels of IL-10, a cytokine that is characteristic of Th2 activation (340). Such results suggest that C. parapsilosis may cause a Th1-to-Th2 shift in T lymphocyte responses during infection, which might promote anti-inflammatory responses.

Inflammasomes are cytoplasmic multiprotein complexes that are required for the regulation of proinflammatory cytokine production (IL-1β and IL-18) as well as for pyroptosis induction (357, 358). As a result of its function, the processed mature and released form of IL-1β activates acute-phase inflammatory responses as well as adaptive immune responses through inducing the differentiation of Th17 cells (359). However, for the activation of caspase-1, a member of the NLRP3 inflammasome required for pro-IL-1β maturation, a second signal (i.e., a danger signal) is required (360). For instance, NLRP3 inflammasomes activate rapidly upon C. albicans exposure, due to lysosome rupture, increased K+ efflux, and intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) release (361). C. parapsilosis also induces NLRP3 inflammasome activation although only after 24 h of coincubation. The difference between the two species might be due to the lack of early-phase ROS release from mitochondria after engagement with C. parapsilosis and also to delayed lysosome rupture possibly as a result of slow phagocytosis (337). Consequently, the delayed activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes causes late-phase IL-1β release and, thus, a late antifungal immune response to C. parapsilosis.

It is therefore possible that instead of the early-phase acute immune activation commonly observed in the case of C. albicans, C. parapsilosis induces a prolonged and possibly tolerogenic host reaction that may promote the fungus’ hiding as a potential survival strategy. These observations further highlight the differences between the biologies of C. albicans and C. parapsilosis infections.

Nevertheless, it has also been shown that human peripheral blood lymphocytes are capable of inducing the production of immunoglobulins against invasive Candida species to promote fungal clearance (362). During investigations of such responses, antibodies specific to the carboxyl fragment of C. albicans heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) have been identified (363, 364). The level of such antibodies was shown to correlate with disease outcome (365, 366). Given that the identified epitope also has homologs in other closely related species, such as C. parapsilosis, a recombinant human antibody fragment (Mycograb) was produced, and its efficiency and synergy with other anticandidal drugs were tested in vitro and later in vivo (367, 368). Mycograb alone reduced fungal burdens in the liver, kidney, and spleen of mice challenged with C. parapsilosis and reduced the number of positive biopsy samples. A certain level of synergy with amphotericin B but no synergistic effect with fluconazole was detected in mice infected with this species (368). Later, a recombinant human IgG1 antimannan antibody, whose epitope is found on the cell walls of several Candida species, including C. parapsilosis, was used to passively immunize mice before infection with lethal doses of fungal cells. Immunized animals were significantly more resistant to disseminated infection by C. albicans than control animals and showed reductions of infection foci in kidneys (369). This protection involved the promotion of fungal uptake and killing by macrophages, demonstrating that a humoral response could lead to protective immunity against Candida cells (369).

CLINICAL PERSPECTIVES

Clinical features of human infections with C. parapsilosis in many ways mimic those associated with Candida infection in general. Although the signs and symptoms vary according to the characteristics of the patient population at risk, a common presentation is sepsis or septic shock, which can be indistinguishable from the same condition attributable to a bacterial infection (370). As such, a high index of suspicion must be maintained in appropriate clinical settings in order to consider and empirically treat a fungal etiology. For example, a disseminated fungal infection must be among the etiologies considered in a neutropenic bone marrow transplant patient with fever and/or other signs of sepsis, particularly if other risk factors are present, such as the presence of a central venous catheter or recent exposure to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Empirical antifungal therapy is warranted in these cases, as early recognition and treatment are associated with decreased mortality (371). The clinical features in neonates are likewise similar to those seen with bacterial infections. However, neonates who develop invasive candidiasis are more likely to be thrombocytopenic and to have hyperglycemia (372374).

Despite the significant overlap in clinical aspects of candidiasis, some features that distinguish C. parapsilosis infection from that associated with C. albicans have been noted. Data from a population-based surveillance study in Spain compared 78 episodes of C. parapsilosis bloodstream infection with 175 controls with infection caused by C. albicans. Factors that independently predicted C. parapsilosis infection included being of a neonatal age, being a transplant recipient, having prior antifungal therapy (mainly fluconazole), and receiving parenteral nutrition. The mortality rate was lower in patients with C. parapsilosis than in those with C. albicans infections (375, 376). A lower mortality rate from C. parapsilosis infection was also noted in a prospective, population-based study among adults hospitalized in medical and surgical ICUs throughout Spain. The rate of death within 7 days for C. parapsilosis infection was 7%, versus 56% for C. albicans (odds ratio, −0.21), in this series (371).

The lower mortality rate seen with C. parapsilosis is consistent with its reduced virulence relative to C. albicans, as described above and as noted in animal models (339, 377, 378). A recent series of autopsy findings in premature infants with candidemia who died likewise supports the reduced virulence of this species (379). C. albicans infection is frequently widely disseminated in postmortem tissues and can also be associated with inflammatory and tissue-destructive features. In contrast, C. parapsilosis-infected tissues generally lacked severe inflammation, and the organism was not easily detected by routine histopathological staining. However, a heavy fungal burden was nonetheless present in blood, intestines, and lungs when assessed by targeted immunohistochemical assays.

CONCLUDING REMARKS

During recent years, a decrease in the frequency of C. albicans-driven invasive disease has been observed, while the number of C. parapsilosis infections has risen. Although invasive candidiasis caused by the two species manifests similarly, there are considerable differences between the pathobiology of C. albicans and that of C. parapsilosis. Such divergent behaviors might determine the patient groups at risk as well as the species’ incidence.

In this review, we summarize factors that could help clinicians and infection biologists better understand the pathogenesis of C. parapsilosis, which may later set the groundwork for a different approach for treating such infections. C. parapsilosis is most common in Latin America and the Mediterranean regions of Europe; however, outbreaks have occurred in diverse geographical regions. The reason for the species’ region preference is yet unknown, although similarly to the cases of other pathogenic species, HLA polymorphism could be a potential factor that may determine prevalence. At this time, more is known about the preferred patient groups at risk: the increased prevalence among children and low-birth-weight neonates is possibly due to horizontal transmission of the fungus. Both transition from the hands of health care workers and prolonged use of total parenteral nutrition are suggested to serve as the origins of neonatal infections, while prolonged use of central venous catheters and other medically implanted devices serve as high-risk factors for infections among surgically treated patients.

Following the local colonization of abiotic surfaces, C. parapsilosis forms biofilms effectively, providing protection for planktonic cells that later serve as the source of infection (Fig. 1A). Following the rapid colonization of biotic surfaces, fungal cells may invade an impaired barrier that is promoted by morphology transition along with cell wall rearrangements, secretion of host cell/tissue-degrading enzymes, and the release of other host immunomodulatory compounds, e.g., fungal prostaglandins (Fig. 1B). Fungal cell wall rearrangements may further contribute to impairment of recognition and the host response. Notably, C. parapsilosis cells not only survive phagocytosis but also may induce exocytosis and actively proliferate within host cells (Fig. 1C).

FIG 1.

FIG 1

Transmission routes and pathogenesis of C. parapsilosis. (A) Central venous catheter (CVC) colonized by C. parapsilosis cells as the source of infection. Implantation of the contaminated device results in systemic dissemination. (B) Colonization and invasion of host epithelial surfaces. Invasion is supported by various virulence factors, including morphology transition and the release of fungal secretions such as hydrolytic enzymes. (C) Following phagocytosis, fungal cells not only survive but also may induce exocytosis or replicate within host cells. (Microscopic image series were taken by Csaba Papp.)

Despite our increased understanding of C. parapsilosis biology through discoveries by clinical and basic science research over the past decade, several virulence and survival mechanisms are yet to be explored. For example, fungal metabolic pathways are altered during a progressing infection, although how this contributes to virulence in C. parapsilosis is not yet known. Furthermore, pathogens compete for available micronutrients and trace elements, but the strategy by which C. parapsilosis acquires these essential elements during interaction with the host is not known. Such mechanisms are yet to be revealed.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

H.M.M.-M. is supported by the Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología, Mexico (reference numbers PDCPN2014-247109 and FC 2015-02-834), the Universidad de Guanajuato (reference number CIIC 95/2018), and the Red Temática Glicociencia en Salud (CONACYT-Mexico). G.B. is supported by the Science Foundation Ireland (12/IA/1343). J.M.B. is supported by an institutional development award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) (P30GM114750) and the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development at the NIH (R21HD089278). J.N. is supported by the Slovak Research and Development Agency (APVV-14-0253) and the Slovak Grant Agency (VEGA 1/0333/15). A.G. is funded by NKFIH K 123952, GINOP2-3-2-15-2016-00015, and GINOP 2.3.3-15-2016-00006. A.G. is further supported by a momentum grant of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (LP2018-15/2018) and by a grant of the Ministry of Human Capacities, Hungary (20391-3/2018/FEKUSTRAT).

We thank Csaba Papp for preparing the intracellular survival images.

We declare no competing financial interests.

Biographies

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0002.gif

Renáta Tóth, Ph.D., is currently a research fellow in the Mycobiome Research Group of Dr. Attila Gácser at the Department of Microbiology, University of Szeged, Hungary. Dr. Tóth completed her M.Sc. program in Molecular Biology, Microbiology, and Immunology in 2012 at the University of Szeged, where she also finished her Ph.D. in 2016 in the field of infection biology, examining the molecular bases of C. parapsilosis pathobiology. During her program, she also studied intracellular survival mechanisms of the same species. Her current research focuses on studying innate immune responses to Candida species, with a special focus on human epithelial cells.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0003.gif

Jozef Nosek, Ph.D., D.Sc., is Professor of Biochemistry at the Faculty of Natural Sciences, Comenius University, Bratislava, Slovakia. Dr. Nosek received doctorate degrees in Genetics (Ph.D., 1994) and Molecular Biology (D.Sc., 2006) from Comenius University in Bratislava. During his postdoctoral studies at the Institute Curie (Orsay, France) and the Institute of Genetics and Microbiology (University of Paris XI, France), he investigated the molecular architecture and replication of the linear mitochondrial genome in C. parapsilosis and the evolution of mitochondrial telomeres. From 2001 to 2010, he was an international research scholar of the Howard Hughes Medical Institute (USA). His current work is focused on functional analysis of metabolic gene clusters involved in degradation of hydroxyaromatic compounds and the evolution of corresponding biochemical pathways.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0004.gif

Héctor M. Mora-Montes, Ph.D., is a Full-Time Professor at the Universidad de Guanajuato, Mexico. He is a Clinical Chemist who completed the M.Sc. program in Genetics and Molecular Biology (CINVESTAV, Mexico, 2002) and obtained his Ph.D. in Experimental Biology from the Universidad de Guanajuato in 2006. He was then a postdoctoral research fellow at University of Aberdeen (Scotland) until 2009. Throughout his career, his work has focused on biochemical and molecular aspects of protein glycosylation pathways and the biosynthesis of the fungal cell wall, developing innovative protocols for the isolation and purification of several wall components. He is the head of the Laboratory of Fungal Glycobiology (Universidad de Guanajuato), whose main goal is to understand the synthesis mechanisms of the fungal cell wall and the interaction of fungal pathogens with the host.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0005.gif

Toni Gabaldon leads the comparative genomics group at the Centre for Genomic Regulation (Barcelona, Spain) and teaches genomics and bioinformatics at the Pompeu Fabra University. He received his Ph.D. at the Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences (NCMLS), Radboud University Nijmegen, in 2005 in the field of comparative genomics and evolution. He is an ICREA Research Professor and has received ERC starting and consolidator grants. His research focuses on understanding biological systems from an evolutionary and functional perspective. One of his research projects focuses on using an evolutionary genomics approach to understand the evolutionary emergence of virulence in yeasts.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0006.gif

Joseph M. Bliss, M.D., Ph.D., is an Associate Professor of Pediatrics at the Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University and a neonatologist and Fellowship Director of Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine at Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island in Providence, RI. His interest in the pathogenesis of Candida infections and the unique susceptibility of the neonatal host to these infections dates back to his fellowship at the University of Rochester in 2000 in Rochester, NY, where he also completed his residency in Pediatrics and his M.D. and Ph.D. in the area of microbial pathogenesis. His continued interest in this host-pathogen interface has led to studies of interactions between Candida and host factors using both animal and human ex vivo models as well as routes of colonization and associations between Candida virulence traits and disease outcomes.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0007.gif

Joshua D. Nosanchuk, M.D., is Senior Associate Dean for Medical Education and Professor of Medicine (Infectious Diseases) and Microbiology/Immunology at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine. Dr. Nosanchuk is an Infectious Diseases physician who has worked on fungal pathogenesis since he entered his postdoctoral fellowship at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in 1996 in Bronx, NY. Prior to that, he received his undergraduate and medical doctorate degrees from Cornell University and completed a residency in Internal Medicine at Cornell and New York Hospital, each in New York. In 2007, Dr. Gácser and Dr. Nosanchuk reported the targeted gene deletion system that dramatically advanced the Candida parapsilosis field, and Dr. Nosanchuk has continued to explore the pathobiology of C. parapsilosis since that time.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0008.gif

Siobhán A. Turner is a research fellow in the laboratory of Dr. Lynne Howell at The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), University of Toronto, Canada. Dr. Turner received her master’s degree in 2013 from Trinity College Dublin, studying the role of chromatin remodeling in human cells. She joined the Butler laboratory at University College Dublin and graduated with a Ph.D. in 2107. Dr. Turner has a specific interest in the role of biofilm development in disease. She identified regulators of biofilm development in C. parapsilosis, and she continues to work on bacterial biofilms.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0009.gif

Geraldine Butler is a Professor of Genetics at the Conway Institute at University College Dublin, Ireland. Prof. Butler has worked on yeast since her Ph.D. studies in Trinity College Dublin in the 1980s, followed by postdoctoral training at the University of Michigan. She began to study Candida parapsilosis in the early 2000s, attracted by its significant role as a pathogen and the lack of associated molecular research. Prof. Butler’s group carried out the first genome sequence survey of C. parapsilosis, followed by the first complete genome sequence in 2009. Her laboratory helped develop methods for molecular analysis, including generating large numbers of gene deletions and, together with Dr. Siobhán Turner, developing a CRISPR-based gene-editing system. Prof. Butler is particularly interested in genome evolution of fungi.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0010.gif

Csaba Vágvölgyi, Ph.D., is Professor of Microbiology at the Faculty of Science and Informatics, University of Szeged, Hungary. He received his doctoral degree at Attila József University, Szeged, in 1996. Professor Vágvölgyi is currently the Head of the Department of Microbiology and also the Head of the Doctoral School in Biology at the University of Szeged. He is Vice-Chair of the Committee on Microbiology of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences (HAS). His experience includes over 30 years in mycology. He has been the principal investigator for many programs focusing on microscopic fungi and coauthored over 250 papers published in peer-reviewed journals.

graphic file with name CMR.00111-18-f0011.gif

Attila Gácser is a Professor of Microbiology and Immunology at the University of Szeged, where he is the Head of the Institute of Biology. Dr. Gácser completed his Ph.D. at the University of Szeged, working on Cryptococcus hungaricus. During his first postdoctoral training at the University of Hamburg, Germany, as a Marie Curie Fellow, he studied opportunistic Candida species. In 2005, he joined Prof. Joshua D. Nosanchuk’s laboratory at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York, where he made important advances in our understanding of the virulence and pathogenesis of several different fungal pathogens, such as Histoplasma capsulatum, Cryptococcus neoformans, and Candida parapsilosis. In 2008, he returned to Hungary, and the current research in his laboratory focuses on the development of tools for genetic manipulation of C. parapsilosis and the study of Candida virulence and pathogenesis, the host response, and the immunology of fungal infections.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Azie N, Neofytos D, Pfaller M, Meier-Kriesche HU, Quan SP, Horn D. 2012. The PATH (Prospective Antifungal Therapy) Alliance registry and invasive fungal infections: update 2012. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 73:293–300. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2012.06.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Vincent JL, Rello J, Marshall J, Silva E, Anzueto A, Martin CD, Moreno R, Lipman J, Gomersall C, Sakr Y, Reinhart K. 2009. International study of the prevalence and outcomes of infection in intensive care units. JAMA 302:2323–2329. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1754. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tabah A, Koulenti D, Laupland K, Misset B, Valles J, Bruzzi de Carvalho F, Paiva JA, Cakar N, Ma X, Eggimann P, Antonelli M, Bonten MJ, Csomos A, Krueger WA, Mikstacki A, Lipman J, Depuydt P, Vesin A, Garrouste-Orgeas M, Zahar JR, Blot S, Carlet J, Brun-Buisson C, Martin C, Rello J, Dimopoulos G, Timsit JF. 2012. Characteristics and determinants of outcome of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections in intensive care units: the EUROBACT International Cohort Study. Intensive Care Med 38:1930–1945. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2695-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Rinaldi MG, Barnes R, Hu B, Veselov AV, Tiraboschi N, Nagy E, Gibbs DL. 2005. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study: a 6.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole by standardized disk diffusion testing. J Clin Microbiol 43:5848–5859. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.12.5848-5859.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Paramythiotou E, Frantzeskaki F, Flevari A, Armaganidis A, Dimopoulos G. 2014. Invasive fungal infections in the ICU: how to approach, how to treat. Molecules 19:1085–1119. doi: 10.3390/molecules19011085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Harrington R, Kindermann SL, Hou Q, Taylor RJ, Azie N, Horn DL. 2017. Candidemia and invasive candidiasis among hospitalized neonates and pediatric patients. Curr Med Res Opin 33:1803–1812. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1354824. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pammi M, Holland L, Butler G, Gacser A, Bliss JM. 2013. Candida parapsilosis is a significant neonatal pathogen: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32:e206–e216. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3182863a1c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Weems JJ Jr, Chamberland ME, Ward J, Willy M, Padhye AA, Solomon SL. 1987. Candida parapsilosis fungemia associated with parenteral nutrition and contaminated blood pressure transducers. J Clin Microbiol 25:1029–1032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Pfaller MA, Moet GJ, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2011. Candida bloodstream infections: comparison of species distributions and antifungal resistance patterns in community-onset and nosocomial isolates in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2008–2009. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:561–566. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01079-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Meletiadis J, Curfs-Breuker I, Meis JF, Mouton JW. 2017. In vitro antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida isolates with the EUCAST methodology, a new method for ECOFF determination. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02372-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02372-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Cantón E, Pemán J, Quindós G, Eraso E, Miranda-Zapico I, Álvarez M, Merino P, Campos-Herrero I, Marco F, de la Pedrosa EGG, Yagüe G, Guna R, Rubio C, Miranda C, Pazos C, Velasco D. 2011. Prospective multicenter study of the epidemiology, molecular identification, and antifungal susceptibility of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis isolated from patients with candidemia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:5590–5596. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00466-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Govender NP, Patel J, Magobo RE, Naicker S, Wadula J, Whitelaw A, Coovadia Y, Kularatne R, Govind C, Lockhart SR, Zietsman IL. 2016. Emergence of azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis causing bloodstream infection: results from laboratory-based sentinel surveillance in South Africa. J Antimicrob Chemother 71:1994–2004. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw091. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Pinhati HM, Casulari LA, Souza AC, Siqueira RA, Damasceno CM, Colombo AL. 2016. Outbreak of candidemia caused by fluconazole resistant Candida parapsilosis strains in an intensive care unit. BMC Infect Dis 16:433. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1767-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Qi L, Fan W, Xia X, Yao L, Liu L, Zhao H, Kong X, Liu J. 2018. Nosocomial outbreak of Candida parapsilosis sensu stricto fungaemia in a neonatal intensive care unit in China. J Hosp Infect 100:e246–e252. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2018.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hernandez-Castro R, Arroyo-Escalante S, Carrillo-Casas EM, Moncada-Barron D, Alvarez-Verona E, Hernandez-Delgado L, Torres-Narvaez P, Lavalle-Villalobos A. 2010. Outbreak of Candida parapsilosis in a neonatal intensive care unit: a health care workers source. Eur J Pediatr 169:783–787. doi: 10.1007/s00431-009-1109-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Lupetti A, Tavanti A, Davini P, Ghelardi E, Corsini V, Merusi I, Boldrini A, Campa M, Senesi S. 2002. Horizontal transmission of Candida parapsilosis candidemia in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 40:2363–2369. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.7.2363-2369.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Gácser A, Trofa D, Schafer W, Nosanchuk JD. 2007. Targeted gene deletion in Candida parapsilosis demonstrates the role of secreted lipase in virulence. J Clin Invest 117:3049–3058. doi: 10.1172/JCI32294. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ding C, Butler G. 2007. Development of a gene knockout system in Candida parapsilosis reveals a conserved role for BCR1 in biofilm formation. Eukaryot Cell 6:1310–1319. doi: 10.1128/EC.00136-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Xiao M, Sun ZY, Kang M, Guo DW, Liao K, Chen SC, Kong F, Fan X, Cheng JW, Hou X, Zhou ML, Li Y, Yu SY, Huang JJ, Wang H, Xu YC, China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net Study Group. 2018. Five-year national surveillance of invasive candidiasis: species distribution and azole susceptibility from the China Hospital Invasive Fungal Surveillance Net (CHIF-NET) study. J Clin Microbiol 56:e00577-18. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00577-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Al-Dorzi HM, Sakkijha H, Khan R, Aldabbagh T, Toledo A, Ntinika P, Al Johani SM, Arabi YM. 8 April 2018. Invasive candidiasis in critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study in two tertiary care centers. J Intensive Care Med doi: 10.1177/0885066618767835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Kakeya H, Yamada K, Kaneko Y, Yanagihara K, Tateda K, Maesaki S, Takesue Y, Tomono K, Kadota JI, Kaku M, Miyazaki Y, Kamei K, Shibuya K, Niki Y, Yoshida M, Sei Y. 2018. National trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia in Japan from 2003 to 2014. Med Mycol J 59:E19–E22. (In Japanese.) doi: 10.3314/mmj.17-00014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Caggiano G, Lovero G, De Giglio O, Barbuti G, Montagna O, Laforgia N, Montagna MT. 2017. Candidemia in the neonatal intensive care unit: a retrospective, observational survey and analysis of literature data. Biomed Res Int 2017:7901763. doi: 10.1155/2017/7901763. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Pfaller MA, Andes DR, Diekema DJ, Horn DL, Reboli AC, Rotstein C, Franks B, Azie NE. 2014. Epidemiology and outcomes of invasive candidiasis due to non-albicans species of Candida in 2,496 patients: data from the Prospective Antifungal Therapy (PATH) registry 2004-2008. PLoS One 9:e101510. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2014. Regional data analysis of Candida non-albicans strains collected in United States medical sites over a 6-year period, 2006-2011. Mycoses 57:602–611. doi: 10.1111/myc.12206. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Whaley SG, Berkow EL, Rybak JM, Nishimoto AT, Barker KS, Rogers PD. 2016. Azole antifungal resistance in Candida albicans and emerging non-albicans Candida species. Front Microbiol 7:2173. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.02173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Quindos G. 2014. Epidemiology of candidaemia and invasive candidiasis. A changing face. Rev Iberoam Micol 31:42–48. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2013.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guinea J. 2014. Global trends in the distribution of Candida species causing candidemia. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:5–10. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Vogiatzi L, Ilia S, Sideri G, Vagelakoudi E, Vassilopoulou M, Sdougka M, Briassoulis G, Papadatos I, Kalabalikis P, Sianidou L, Roilides E. 2013. Invasive candidiasis in pediatric intensive care in Greece: a nationwide study. Intensive Care Med 39:2188–2195. doi: 10.1007/s00134-013-3057-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Faria-Ramos I, Neves-Maia J, Ricardo E, Santos-Antunes J, Silva AT, Costa-de-Oliveira S, Cantón E, Rodrigues AG, Pina-Vaz C. 2014. Species distribution and in vitro antifungal susceptibility profiles of yeast isolates from invasive infections during a Portuguese multicenter survey. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 33:2241–2247. doi: 10.1007/s10096-014-2194-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Puig-Asensio M, Padilla B, Garnacho-Montero J, Zaragoza O, Aguado JM, Zaragoza R, Montejo M, Muñoz P, Ruiz-Camps I, Cuenca-Estrella M, Almirante B. 2014. Epidemiology and predictive factors for early and late mortality in Candida bloodstream infections: a population-based surveillance in Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:O245–O254. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Romeo O, Criseo G. 2009. Molecular epidemiology of Candida albicans and its closely related yeasts Candida dubliniensis and Candida africana. J Clin Microbiol 47:212–214. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01540-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Tortorano AM, Prigitano A, Lazzarini C, Passera M, Deiana ML, Cavinato S, De Luca C, Grancini A, Lo Cascio G, Ossi C, Sala E, Montagna MT. 2013. A 1-year prospective survey of candidemia in Italy and changing epidemiology over one decade. Infection 41:655–662. doi: 10.1007/s15010-013-0455-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Tedeschi S, Tumietto F, Giannella M, Bartoletti M, Cristini F, Cioni G, Ambretti S, Carretto E, Sambri V, Sarti M, Viale P. 2016. Epidemiology and outcome of candidemia in internal medicine wards: a regional study in Italy. Eur J Intern Med 34:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ejim.2016.08.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Arsić Arsenijević V, Otašević S, Janić D, Minić P, Matijašević J, Medić D, Savić I, Delić S, Nestorović Laban S, Vasiljević Z, Hadnadjev M. 2018. Candida bloodstream infections in Serbia: first multicentre report of a national prospective observational survey in intensive care units. Mycoses 61:70–78. doi: 10.1111/myc.12700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Poikonen E, Lyytikainen O, Anttila VJ, Koivula I, Lumio J, Kotilainen P, Syrjala H, Ruutu P. 2010. Secular trend in candidemia and the use of fluconazole in Finland, 2004-2007. BMC Infect Dis 10:312. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-312. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Perkhofer S, Hell M, Gustorff B, Von Goedecke A, Illievich U, Kratzer C, Moosbauer W, Wimmer P, Zerlauth U, Nachbaur K, Vogel W, Bellmann R, Schwameis F, Lass-Florl C. 2011. Austrian clinical practice with anidulafungin in 2008: a multicenter survey. J Chemother 23:285–289. doi: 10.1179/joc.2011.23.5.285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Leroy O, Gangneux JP, Montravers P, Mira JP, Gouin F, Sollet JP, Carlet J, Reynes J, Rosenheim M, Regnier B, Lortholary O. 2009. Epidemiology, management, and risk factors for death of invasive Candida infections in critical care: a multicenter, prospective, observational study in France (2005-2006). Crit Care Med 37:1612–1618. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819efac0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chalmers C, Gaur S, Chew J, Wright T, Kumar A, Mathur S, Wan WY, Gould IM, Leanord A, Bal AM. 2011. Epidemiology and management of candidaemia—a retrospective, multicentre study in five hospitals in the UK. Mycoses 54:e795–e800. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2011.02027.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Orasch C, Marchetti O, Garbino J, Schrenzel J, Zimmerli S, Muhlethaler K, Pfyffer G, Ruef C, Fehr J, Zbinden R, Calandra T, Bille J. 2014. Candida species distribution and antifungal susceptibility testing according to European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing and new vs. old Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute clinical breakpoints: a 6-year prospective candidaemia survey from the fungal infection network of Switzerland. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:698–705. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Arendrup MC, Bruun B, Christensen JJ, Fuursted K, Johansen HK, Kjaeldgaard P, Knudsen JD, Kristensen L, Moller J, Nielsen L, Rosenvinge FS, Roder B, Schonheyder HC, Thomsen MK, Truberg K. 2011. National surveillance of fungemia in Denmark (2004 to 2009). J Clin Microbiol 49:325–334. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01811-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Hesstvedt L, Gaustad P, Andersen CT, Haarr E, Hannula R, Haukland HH, Hermansen NO, Larssen KW, Mylvaganam H, Ranheim TE, Sandven P, Nordoy I, Kanestrom A, Grub C, Onken A, Thielsen C, Skaare D, Tofteland S, Sonsteby LJ, Hjetland R, Hide R, Vik E, Kummel A, Asheim S. 2015. Twenty-two years of candidaemia surveillance: results from a Norwegian national study. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:938–945. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Ericsson J, Chryssanthou E, Klingspor L, Johansson AG, Ljungman P, Svensson E, Sjolin J. 2013. Candidaemia in Sweden: a nationwide prospective observational survey. Clin Microbiol Infect 19:E218–E221. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Asmundsdottir LR, Erlendsdottir H, Gottfredsson M. 2013. Nationwide study of candidemia, antifungal use, and antifungal drug resistance in Iceland, 2000 to 2011. J Clin Microbiol 51:841–848. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02566-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Chapman B, Slavin M, Marriott D, Halliday C, Kidd S, Arthur I, Bak N, Heath CH, Kennedy K, Morrissey CO, Sorrell TC, van Hal S, Keighley C, Goeman E, Underwood N, Hajkowicz K, Hofmeyr A, Leung M, Macesic N, Botes J, Blyth C, Cooley L, George CR, Kalukottege P, Kesson A, McMullan B, Baird R, Robson J, Korman TM, Pendle S, Weeks K, Liu E, Cheong E, Chen S. 2017. Changing epidemiology of candidaemia in Australia. J Antimicrob Chemother 72:1103–1108. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkw422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Chakrabarti A, Sood P, Rudramurthy SM, Chen S, Kaur H, Capoor M, Chhina D, Rao R, Eshwara VK, Xess I, Kindo AJ, Umabala P, Savio J, Patel A, Ray U, Mohan S, Iyer R, Chander J, Arora A, Sardana R, Roy I, Appalaraju B, Sharma A, Shetty A, Khanna N, Marak R, Biswas S, Das S, Harish BN, Joshi S, Mendiratta D. 2015. Incidence, characteristics and outcome of ICU-acquired candidemia in India. Intensive Care Med 41:285–295. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3603-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tan BH, Chakrabarti A, Li RY, Patel AK, Watcharananan SP, Liu Z, Chindamporn A, Tan AL, Sun PL, Wu UI, Chen YC. 2015. Incidence and species distribution of candidaemia in Asia: a laboratory-based surveillance study. Clin Microbiol Infect 21:946–953. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.06.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lockhart SR, Iqbal N, Cleveland AA, Farley MM, Harrison LH, Bolden CB, Baughman W, Stein B, Hollick R, Park BJ, Chiller T. 2012. Species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida bloodstream isolates from population-based surveillance studies in two U.S. cities from 2008 to 2011. J Clin Microbiol 50:3435–3442. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01283-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Wisplinghoff H, Ebbers J, Geurtz L, Stefanik D, Major Y, Edmond MB, Wenzel RP, Seifert H. 2014. Nosocomial bloodstream infections due to Candida spp. in the USA: species distribution, clinical features and antifungal susceptibilities. Int J Antimicrob Agents 43:78–81. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2013.09.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bustamante B, Martins MA, Bonfietti LX, Szeszs MW, Jacobs J, Garcia C, Melhem MS. 2014. Species distribution and antifungal susceptibility profile of Candida isolates from bloodstream infections in Lima, Peru. J Med Microbiol 63:855–860. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.071167-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Rodriguez L, Bustamante B, Huaroto L, Agurto C, Illescas R, Ramirez R, Diaz A, Hidalgo J. 2017. A multi-centric study of Candida bloodstream infection in Lima-Callao, Peru: species distribution, antifungal resistance and clinical outcomes. PLoS One 12:e0175172. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0175172. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Riera F, Medeot M, Sartori L, Bergallo C, Minoli J, Vilchez V, Sanchez P, Abiega C, Pincheira C, Correa S, Bartoli C, Figueroa M, Montamat M, Spitale N, Minguez A, Caeiro JP. 2014. Candidemia epidemiology in Cordoba Argentina. Surveillance study of five institutions. Rev Fac Cien Med Univ Nac Cordoba 71:89–93. (In Spanish.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Doi AM, Pignatari ACC, Edmond MB, Marra AR, Camargo LFA, Siqueira RA, da Mota VP, Colombo AL. 2016. Epidemiology and microbiologic characterization of nosocomial candidemia from a Brazilian national surveillance program. PLoS One 11:e0146909. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0146909. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nucci M, Queiroz-Telles F, Alvarado-Matute T, Tiraboschi IN, Cortes J, Zurita J, Guzman-Blanco M, Santolaya ME, Thompson L, Sifuentes-Osornio J, Echevarria JI, Colombo AL. 2013. Epidemiology of candidemia in Latin America: a laboratory-based survey. PLoS One 8:e59373. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059373. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ting J, Roberts A, Synnes A, Canning R, Bodani J, Monterossa L, Shah PS. 2018. Invasive fungal infections in neonates in Canada: epidemiology and outcomes. Pediatr Infect Dis J 37:1154–1159. doi: 10.1097/INF.0000000000001968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Oeser C, Vergnano S, Naidoo R, Anthony M, Chang J, Chow P, Clarke P, Embleton N, Kennea N, Pattnayak S, Reichert B, Scorrer T, Tiron I, Watts T, Sharland M, Heath PT. 2014. Neonatal invasive fungal infection in England 2004-2010. Clin Microbiol Infect 20:936–941. doi: 10.1111/1469-0691.12578. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Butler G, Rasmussen MD, Lin MF, Santos MAS, Sakthikumar S, Munro CA, Rheinbay E, Grabherr M, Forche A, Reedy JL, Agrafioti I, Arnaud MB, Bates S, Brown AJP, Brunke S, Costanzo MC, Fitzpatrick DA, de Groot PWJ, Harris D, Hoyer LL, Hube B, Klis FM, Kodira C, Lennard N, Logue ME, Martin R, Neiman AM, Nikolaou E, Quail MA, Quinn J, Santos MC, Schmitzberger FF, Sherlock G, Shah P, Silverstein KAT, Skrzypek MS, Soll D, Staggs R, Stansfield I, Stumpf MPH, Sudbery PE, Srikantha T, Zeng Q, Berman J, Berriman M, Heitman J, Gow NAR, Lorenz MC, Birren BW, Kellis M, Cuomo CA. 2009. Evolution of pathogenicity and sexual reproduction in eight Candida genomes. Nature 459:657–662. doi: 10.1038/nature08064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Gunisova S, Elboher E, Nosek J, Gorkovoy V, Brown Y, Lucier JF, Laterreur N, Wellinger RJ, Tzfati Y, Tomaska L. 2009. Identification and comparative analysis of telomerase RNAs from Candida species reveal conservation of functional elements. RNA 15:546–559. doi: 10.1261/rna.1194009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Logue ME, Wong S, Wolfe KH, Butler G. 2005. A genome sequence survey shows that the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis has a defective MTLa1 allele at its mating type locus. Eukaryot Cell 4:1009–1017. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.6.1009-1017.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Tavanti A, Hensgens LA, Mogavero S, Majoros L, Senesi S, Campa M. 2010. Genotypic and phenotypic properties of Candida parapsilosis sensu strictu [sic] strains isolated from different geographic regions and body sites. BMC Microbiol 10:203. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-10-203. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Sai S, Holland LM, McGee CF, Lynch DB, Butler G. 2011. Evolution of mating within the Candida parapsilosis species group. Eukaryot Cell 10:578–587. doi: 10.1128/EC.00276-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Pryszcz LP, Nemeth T, Gacser A, Gabaldon T. 2013. Unexpected genomic variability in clinical and environmental strains of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. Genome Biol Evol 5:2382–2392. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evt185. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Hoyer LL, Fundyga R, Hecht JE, Kapteyn JC, Klis FM, Arnold J. 2001. Characterization of agglutinin-like sequence genes from non-albicans Candida and phylogenetic analysis of the ALS family. Genetics 157:1555–1567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Tavanti A, Davidson AD, Gow NA, Maiden MC, Odds FC. 2005. Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis spp. nov. to replace Candida parapsilosis groups II and III. J Clin Microbiol 43:284–292. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.1.284-292.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Riccombeni A, Vidanes G, Proux-Wera E, Wolfe KH, Butler G. 2012. Sequence and analysis of the genome of the pathogenic yeast Candida orthopsilosis. PLoS One 7:e35750. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Pryszcz LP, Nemeth T, Gacser A, Gabaldon T. 2014. Genome comparison of Candida orthopsilosis clinical strains reveals the existence of hybrids between two distinct subspecies. Genome Biol Evol 6:1069–1078. doi: 10.1093/gbe/evu082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Schroder MS, Martinez de San Vicente K, Prandini TH, Hammel S, Higgins DG, Bagagli E, Wolfe KH, Butler G. 2016. Multiple origins of the pathogenic yeast Candida orthopsilosis by separate hybridizations between two parental species. PLoS Genet 12:e1006404. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1006404. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Pryszcz LP, Németh T, Saus E, Ksiezopolska E, Hegedűsová E, Nosek J, Wolfe KH, Gacser A, Gabaldón T. 2015. The genomic aftermath of hybridization in the opportunistic pathogen Candida metapsilosis. PLoS Genet 11:e1005626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005626. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mixao V, Gabaldon T. 2018. Hybridization and emergence of virulence in opportunistic human yeast pathogens. Yeast 35:5–20. doi: 10.1002/yea.3242. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Skrzypek MS, Binkley J, Binkley G, Miyasato SR, Simison M, Sherlock G. 2017. The Candida Genome Database (CGD): incorporation of assembly 22, systematic identifiers and visualization of high throughput sequencing data. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D592–D596. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw924. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Donovan PD, Schroder MS, Higgins DG, Butler G. 2016. Identification of non-coding RNAs in the Candida parapsilosis species group. PLoS One 11:e0163235. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Maguire SL, ÓhÉigeartaigh SS, Byrne KP, Schröder MS, O’Gaora P, Wolfe KH, Butler G. 2013. Comparative genome analysis and gene finding in Candida species using CGOB. Mol Biol Evol 30:1281–1291. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst042. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Huerta-Cepas J, Capella-Gutiérrez S, Pryszcz LP, Marcet-Houben M, Gabaldón T. 2014. PhylomeDB v4: zooming into the plurality of evolutionary histories of a genome. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D897–D902. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Pryszcz LP, Huerta-Cepas J, Gabaldón T. 2011. MetaPhOrs: orthology and paralogy predictions from multiple phylogenetic evidence using a consistency-based confidence score. Nucleic Acids Res 39:e32. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkq953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kovac L, Lazowska J, Slonimski PP. 1984. A yeast with linear molecules of mitochondrial DNA. Mol Gen Genet 197:420–424. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Nosek J, Dinouel N, Kovac L, Fukuhara H. 1995. Linear mitochondrial DNAs from yeasts: telomeres with large tandem repetitions. Mol Gen Genet 247:61–72. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Nosek J, Novotna M, Hlavatovicova Z, Ussery DW, Fajkus J, Tomaska L. 2004. Complete DNA sequence of the linear mitochondrial genome of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. Mol Genet Genomics 272:173–180. doi: 10.1007/s00438-004-1046-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Tomaska L, Nosek J, Makhov AM, Pastorakova A, Griffith JD. 2000. Extragenomic double-stranded DNA circles in yeast with linear mitochondrial genomes: potential involvement in telomere maintenance. Nucleic Acids Res 28:4479–4487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Nosek J, Rycovska A, Makhov AM, Griffith JD, Tomaska L. 2005. Amplification of telomeric arrays via rolling-circle mechanism. J Biol Chem 280:10840–10845. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409295200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Kosa P, Valach M, Tomaska L, Wolfe KH, Nosek J. 2006. Complete DNA sequences of the mitochondrial genomes of the pathogenic yeasts Candida orthopsilosis and Candida metapsilosis: insight into the evolution of linear DNA genomes from mitochondrial telomere mutants. Nucleic Acids Res 34:2472–2481. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl327. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Valach M, Pryszcz LP, Tomaska L, Gacser A, Gabaldon T, Nosek J. 2012. Mitochondrial genome variability within the Candida parapsilosis species complex. Mitochondrion 12:514–519. doi: 10.1016/j.mito.2012.07.109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Nosek J, Tomaska L, Rycovska A, Fukuhara H. 2002. Mitochondrial telomeres as molecular markers for identification of the opportunistic yeast pathogen Candida parapsilosis. J Clin Microbiol 40:1283–1289. doi: 10.1128/JCM.40.4.1283-1289.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Rycovska A, Valach M, Tomaska L, Bolotin-Fukuhara M, Nosek J. 2004. Linear versus circular mitochondrial genomes: intraspecies variability of mitochondrial genome architecture in Candida parapsilosis. Microbiology 150:1571–1580. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.26988-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Tomaska L, Nosek J, Kramara J, Griffith JD. 2009. Telomeric circles: universal players in telomere maintenance? Nat Struct Mol Biol 16:1010–1015. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1660. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Nosek J, Tomaska L, Fukuhara H, Suyama Y, Kovac L. 1998. Linear mitochondrial genomes: 30 years down the line. Trends Genet 14:184–188. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Maleszka R. 1994. The in vivo effects of ethidium bromide on mitochondrial and ribosomal DNA in Candida parapsilosis. Yeast 10:1203–1210. doi: 10.1002/yea.320100908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Fedorova O, Jagdmann GE Jr, Adams RL, Yuan L, Van Zandt MC, Pyle AM. 2018. Small molecules that target group II introns are potent antifungal agents. Nat Chem Biol 14:1073–1078. doi: 10.1038/s41589-018-0142-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Camougrand N, Velours G, Guerin M. 1986. Resistance of Candida parapsilosis to drugs. Biol Cell 58:71–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Milani G, Jarmuszkiewicz W, Sluse-Goffart CM, Schreiber AZ, Vercesi AE, Sluse FE. 2001. Respiratory chain network in mitochondria of Candida parapsilosis: ADP/O appraisal of the multiple electron pathways. FEBS Lett 508:231–235. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Kontoyiannis DP. 2006. Inhibition of Candida parapsilosis mitochondrial respiratory pathways enhances susceptibility to caspofungin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:744–747. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.744-747.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Németh TM, Gácser A, Nosanchuk JD. 2018. Candida psilosis complex In Reference module in life sciences. Elsevier, San Diego, CA: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780128096338207097. [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hrdlickova R, Toloue M, Tian B. 2017. RNA-Seq methods for transcriptome analysis. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 8:e1364. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1364. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Wang Z, Gerstein M, Snyder M. 2009. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics. Nat Rev Genet 10:57–63. doi: 10.1038/nrg2484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Wang C, Schroder MS, Hammel S, Butler G. 2016. Using RNA-seq for analysis of differential gene expression in fungal species. Methods Mol Biol 1361:1–40. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3079-1_1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Atkinson SR, Marguerat S, Bahler J. 2012. Exploring long non-coding RNAs through sequencing. Semin Cell Dev Biol 23:200–205. doi: 10.1016/j.semcdb.2011.12.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Kertesz M, Wan Y, Mazor E, Rinn JL, Nutter RC, Chang HY, Segal E. 2010. Genome-wide measurement of RNA secondary structure in yeast. Nature 467:103–107. doi: 10.1038/nature09322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Saus E, Willis JR, Pryszcz LP, Hafez A, Llorens C, Himmelbauer H, Gabaldon T. 2018. nextPARS: parallel probing of RNA structures in Illumina. RNA 24:609–619. doi: 10.1261/rna.063073.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Wolf T, Kammer P, Brunke S, Linde J. 2018. Two’s company: studying interspecies relationships with dual RNA-seq. Curr Opin Microbiol 42:7–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2017.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Guida A, Lindstadt C, Maguire SL, Ding C, Higgins DG, Corton NJ, Berriman M, Butler G. 2011. Using RNA-seq to determine the transcriptional landscape and the hypoxic response of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. BMC Genomics 12:628. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Zeman I, Nebohacova M, Gerecova G, Katonova K, Janosikova E, Jakubkova M, Centarova I, Dunckova I, Tomaska L, Pryszcz LP, Gabaldon T, Nosek J. 2016. Mitochondrial carriers link the catabolism of hydroxyaromatic compounds to the central metabolism in Candida parapsilosis. G3 (Bethesda) 6:4047–4058. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.034389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Cillingova A, Zeman I, Toth R, Nebohacova M, Dunckova I, Holcova M, Jakubkova M, Gerecova G, Pryszcz LP, Tomaska L, Gabaldon T, Gacser A, Nosek J. 2017. Eukaryotic transporters for hydroxyderivatives of benzoic acid. Sci Rep 7:8998. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09408-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Toth R, Cabral V, Thuer E, Bohner F, Nemeth T, Papp C, Nimrichter L, Molnar G, Vagvolgyi C, Gabaldon T, Nosanchuk JD, Gacser A. 2018. Investigation of Candida parapsilosis virulence regulatory factors during host-pathogen interaction. Sci Rep 8:1346. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-19453-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Ohama T, Suzuki T, Mori M, Osawa S, Ueda T, Watanabe K, Nakase T. 1993. Non-universal decoding of the leucine codon CUG in several Candida species. Nucleic Acids Res 21:4039–4045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Cormack BP, Bertram G, Egerton M, Gow NA, Falkow S, Brown AJ. 1997. Yeast-enhanced green fluorescent protein (yEGFP): a reporter of gene expression in Candida albicans. Microbiology 143(Part 2):303–311. doi: 10.1099/00221287-143-2-303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Morschhauser J, Michel S, Hacker J. 1998. Expression of a chromosomally integrated, single-copy GFP gene in Candida albicans, and its use as a reporter of gene regulation. Mol Gen Genet 257:412–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Gerami-Nejad M, Berman J, Gale CA. 2001. Cassettes for PCR-mediated construction of green, yellow, and cyan fluorescent protein fusions in Candida albicans. Yeast 18:859–864. doi: 10.1002/yea.738. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Gerami-Nejad M, Hausauer D, McClellan M, Berman J, Gale C. 2004. Cassettes for the PCR-mediated construction of regulatable alleles in Candida albicans. Yeast 21:429–436. doi: 10.1002/yea.1080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Gerami-Nejad M, Dulmage K, Berman J. 2009. Additional cassettes for epitope and fluorescent fusion proteins in Candida albicans. Yeast 26:399–406. doi: 10.1002/yea.1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Keppler-Ross S, Noffz C, Dean N. 2008. A new purple fluorescent color marker for genetic studies in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans. Genetics 179:705–710. doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.087080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Zhang C, Konopka JB. 2010. A photostable green fluorescent protein variant for analysis of protein localization in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 9:224–226. doi: 10.1128/EC.00327-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Kosa P, Gavenciakova B, Nosek J. 2007. Development of a set of plasmid vectors for genetic manipulations of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. Gene 396:338–345. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Miyakawa I, Okamuro A, Kinsky S, Visacka K, Tomaska L, Nosek J. 2009. Mitochondrial nucleoids from the yeast Candida parapsilosis: expansion of the repertoire of proteins associated with mitochondrial DNA. Microbiology 155:1558–1568. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.027474-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Pevala V, Truban D, Bauer JA, Košťan J, Kunová N, Bellová J, Brandstetter M, Marini V, Krejčí L, Tomáška L, Nosek J, Kutejová E. 2016. The structure and DNA-binding properties of Mgm101 from a yeast with a linear mitochondrial genome. Nucleic Acids Res 44:2227–2239. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv1529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Holesova Z, Jakubkova M, Zavadiakova I, Zeman I, Tomaska L, Nosek J. 2011. Gentisate and 3-oxoadipate pathways in the yeast Candida parapsilosis: identification and functional analysis of the genes coding for 3-hydroxybenzoate 6-hydroxylase and 4-hydroxybenzoate 1-hydroxylase. Microbiology 157:2152–2163. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.048215-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Gonia S, Larson B, Gale CA. 2016. PCR-mediated gene modification strategy for construction of fluorescent protein fusions in Candida parapsilosis. Yeast 33:63–69. doi: 10.1002/yea.3141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Toth R, Toth A, Papp C, Jankovics F, Vagvolgyi C, Alonso MF, Bain JM, Erwig LP, Gacser A. 2014. Kinetic studies of Candida parapsilosis phagocytosis by macrophages and detection of intracellular survival mechanisms. Front Microbiol 5:633. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2014.00633. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Defosse TA, Courdavault V, Coste AT, Clastre M, de Bernonville TD, Godon C, Vandeputte P, Lanoue A, Touze A, Linder T, Droby S, Rosa CA, Sanglard D, d’Enfert C, Bouchara JP, Giglioli-Guivarc’h N, Papon N. 2018. A standardized toolkit for genetic engineering of CTG clade yeasts. J Microbiol Methods 144:152–156. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.11.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Khan NC, Sen SP. 1974. Genetic transformation in yeasts. J Gen Microbiol 83:237–250. doi: 10.1099/00221287-83-2-237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Kunze G, Petzoldt C, Bode R, Samsonova I, Hecker M, Birnbaum D. 1985. Transformation of Candida maltosa and Pichia guilliermondii by a plasmid containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae ARG4 DNA. Curr Genet 9:205–209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Kurtz MB, Cortelyou MW, Kirsch DR. 1986. Integrative transformation of Candida albicans, using a cloned Candida ADE2 gene. Mol Cell Biol 6:142–149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Kelly R, Miller SM, Kurtz MB, Kirsch DR. 1987. Directed mutagenesis in Candida albicans: one-step gene disruption to isolate ura3 mutants. Mol Cell Biol 7:199–208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Garcia MG, O’Connor JE, Garcia LL, Martinez SI, Herrero E, del Castillo Agudo L. 2001. Isolation of a Candida albicans gene, tightly linked to URA3, coding for a putative transcription factor that suppresses a Saccharomyces cerevisiae aft1 mutation. Yeast 18:301–311. doi:. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Brand A, MacCallum DM, Brown AJ, Gow NA, Odds FC. 2004. Ectopic expression of URA3 can influence the virulence phenotypes and proteome of Candida albicans but can be overcome by targeted reintegration of URA3 at the RPS10 locus. Eukaryot Cell 3:900–909. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.4.900-909.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Wilson RB, Davis D, Mitchell AP. 1999. Rapid hypothesis testing with Candida albicans through gene disruption with short homology regions. J Bacteriol 181:1868–1874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Reuss O, Vik A, Kolter R, Morschhauser J. 2004. The SAT1 flipper, an optimized tool for gene disruption in Candida albicans. Gene 341:119–127. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2004.06.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Roemer T, Jiang B, Davison J, Ketela T, Veillette K, Breton A, Tandia F, Linteau A, Sillaots S, Marta C, Martel N, Veronneau S, Lemieux S, Kauffman S, Becker J, Storms R, Boone C, Bussey H. 2003. Large-scale essential gene identification in Candida albicans and applications to antifungal drug discovery. Mol Microbiol 50:167–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Connolly LA, Riccombeni A, Grozer Z, Holland LM, Lynch DB, Andes DR, Gacser A, Butler G. 2013. The APSES transcription factor Efg1 is a global regulator that controls morphogenesis and biofilm formation in Candida parapsilosis. Mol Microbiol 90:36–53. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Holland LM, Schroder MS, Turner SA, Taff H, Andes D, Grozer Z, Gacser A, Ames L, Haynes K, Higgins DG, Butler G. 2014. Comparative phenotypic analysis of the major fungal pathogens Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004365. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Nguyen LN, Gacser A, Nosanchuk JD. 2011. The stearoyl-coenzyme A desaturase 1 is essential for virulence and membrane stress in Candida parapsilosis through unsaturated fatty acid production. Infect Immun 79:136–145. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00753-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Bertini A, Zoppo M, Lombardi L, Rizzato C, De Carolis E, Vella A, Torelli R, Sanguinetti M, Tavanti A. 2016. Targeted gene disruption in Candida parapsilosis demonstrates a role for CPAR2_404800 in adhesion to a biotic surface and in a murine model of ascending urinary tract infection. Virulence 7:85–97. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1112491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Nguyen LN, Trofa D, Nosanchuk JD. 2009. Fatty acid synthase impacts the pathobiology of Candida parapsilosis in vitro and during mammalian infection. PLoS One 4:e8421. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008421. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Horvath P, Nosanchuk JD, Hamari Z, Vagvolgyi C, Gacser A. 2012. The identification of gene duplication and the role of secreted aspartyl proteinase 1 in Candida parapsilosis virulence. J Infect Dis 205:923–933. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir873. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Sánchez-Fresneda R, Guirao-Abad JP, Martinez-Esparza M, Maicas S, Valentín E, Argüelles J-C. 2015. Homozygous deletion of ATC1 and NTC1 genes in Candida parapsilosis abolishes trehalase activity and affects cell growth, sugar metabolism, stress resistance, infectivity and biofilm formation. Fungal Genet Biol 85:45–57. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Branco J, Ola M, Silva RM, Fonseca E, Gomes NC, Martins-Cruz C, Silva AP, Silva-Dias A, Pina-Vaz C, Erraught C, Brennan L, Rodrigues AG, Butler G, Miranda IM. 2017. Impact of ERG3 mutations and expression of ergosterol genes controlled by UPC2 and NDT80 in Candida parapsilosis azole resistance. Clin Microbiol Infect 23:575.e1–575.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Noble SM, Johnson AD. 2005. Strains and strategies for large-scale gene deletion studies of the diploid human fungal pathogen Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 4:298–309. doi: 10.1128/EC.4.2.298-309.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Noble SM, Johnson AD. 2007. Genetics of Candida albicans, a diploid human fungal pathogen. Annu Rev Genet 41:193–211. doi: 10.1146/annurev.genet.41.042007.170146. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Grozer Z, Toth A, Toth R, Kecskemeti A, Vagvolgyi C, Nosanchuk JD, Szekeres A, Gacser A. 2015. Candida parapsilosis produces prostaglandins from exogenous arachidonic acid and OLE2 is not required for their synthesis. Virulence 6:85–92. doi: 10.4161/21505594.2014.988097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Chakraborty T, Thuer E, Heijink M, Toth R, Bodai L, Vagvolgyi C, Giera M, Gabaldon T, Gacser A. 2018. Eicosanoid biosynthesis influences the virulence of Candida parapsilosis. Virulence 9:1019–1035. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2018.1475797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Raschmanova H, Weninger A, Glieder A, Kovar K, Vogl T. 2018. Implementing CRISPR-Cas technologies in conventional and non-conventional yeasts: current state and future prospects. Biotechnol Adv 36:641–665. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Stovicek V, Holkenbrink C, Borodina I. 2017. CRISPR/Cas system for yeast genome engineering: advances and applications. FEMS Yeast Res 17:fox030. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Vyas VK, Barrasa MI, Fink GR. 2015. A CRISPR system permits genetic engineering of essential genes and gene families. Sci Adv 1:e1500248. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500248. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Min K, Ichikawa Y, Woolford CA, Mitchell AP. 2016. Candida albicans gene deletion with a transient CRISPR-Cas9 system. mSphere 1:e00130-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00130-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Huang MY, Mitchell AP. 2017. Marker recycling in Candida albicans through CRISPR-Cas9-induced marker excision. mSphere 2:e00050-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00050-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Ng H, Dean N. 2017. Dramatic improvement of CRISPR/Cas9 editing in Candida albicans by increased single guide RNA expression. mSphere 2:e00385-16. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00385-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Nguyen N, Quail MMF, Hernday AD. 2017. An efficient, rapid, and recyclable system for CRISPR-mediated genome editing in Candida albicans. mSphere 2:e00149-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphereDirect.00149-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Shapiro RS, Chavez A, Porter CBM, Hamblin M, Kaas CS, DiCarlo JE, Zeng G, Xu X, Revtovich AV, Kirienko NV, Wang Y, Church GM, Collins JJ. 2018. A CRISPR-Cas9-based gene drive platform for genetic interaction analysis in Candida albicans. Nat Microbiol 3:73–82. doi: 10.1038/s41564-017-0043-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Hickman MA, Zeng G, Forche A, Hirakawa MP, Abbey D, Harrison BD, Wang YM, Su CH, Bennett RJ, Wang Y, Berman J. 2013. The ‘obligate diploid’ Candida albicans forms mating-competent haploids. Nature 494:55–59. doi: 10.1038/nature11865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Norton EL, Sherwood RK, Bennett RJ. 2017. Development of a CRISPR-Cas9 system for efficient genome editing of Candida lusitaniae. mSphere 3:e00217-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00217-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Grahl N, Demers EG, Crocker AW, Hogan DA. 2017. Use of RNA-protein complexes for genome editing in non-albicans Candida species. mSphere 3:e00218-17. doi: 10.1128/mSphere.00218-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Lombardi L, Turner SA, Zhao F, Butler G. 2017. Gene editing in clinical isolates of Candida parapsilosis using CRISPR/Cas9. Sci Rep 7:8051. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08500-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Nosek J, Adamikova L, Zemanova J, Tomaska L, Zufferey R, Mamoun CB. 2002. Genetic manipulation of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. Curr Genet 42:27–35. doi: 10.1007/s00294-002-0326-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Polumienko AL, Grigor’eva SP. 1985. New yeast vectors containing the autonomously replicating sequences from Candida maltosa genome. Mol Gen Mikrobiol Virusol 1985:26–31. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Takagi M, Kawai S, Chang MC, Shibuya I, Yano K. 1986. Construction of a host-vector system in Candida maltosa by using an ARS site isolated from its genome. J Bacteriol 167:551–555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Hara A, Ueda M, Matsui T, Furuhashi K, Kanayama N, Tanaka A. 1999. Construction of an autonomously replicating plasmid in n-alkane-assimilating yeast, Candida tropicalis. J Biosci Bioeng 87:717–720. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Panagoda GJ, Ellepola AN, Samaranayake LP. 2001. Adhesion of Candida parapsilosis to epithelial and acrylic surfaces correlates with cell surface hydrophobicity. Mycoses 44:29–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Gerber JG, Nies AS. 1985. Beta-adrenergic blocking drugs. Annu Rev Med 36:145–164. doi: 10.1146/annurev.me.36.020185.001045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Silva-Dias A, Miranda IM, Branco J, Monteiro-Soares M, Pina-Vaz C, Rodrigues AG. 2015. Adhesion, biofilm formation, cell surface hydrophobicity, and antifungal planktonic susceptibility: relationship among Candida spp. Front Microbiol 6:205. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.00205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Kozik A, Karkowska-Kuleta J, Zajac D, Bochenska O, Kedracka-Krok S, Jankowska U, Rapala-Kozik M. 2015. Fibronectin-, vitronectin- and laminin-binding proteins at the cell walls of Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis pathogenic yeasts. BMC Microbiol 15:197. doi: 10.1186/s12866-015-0531-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Nunez-Beltran A, Lopez-Romero E, Cuellar-Cruz M. 2017. Identification of proteins involved in the adhesion of Candida species to different medical devices. Microb Pathog 107:293–303. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Neale MN, Glass KA, Longley SJ, Kim DJ, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Wortzel JD, Shaw SK, Bliss JM. 2018. Role of the inducible adhesin, CpAls7, in binding of Candida parapsilosis to extracellular matrix under fluid shear. Infect Immun 86:e00892-17. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00892-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Synnott JM, Guida A, Mulhern-Haughey S, Higgins DG, Butler G. 2010. Regulation of the hypoxic response in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 9:1734–1746. doi: 10.1128/EC.00159-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Ding C, Vidanes GM, Maguire SL, Guida A, Synnott JM, Andes DR, Butler G. 2011. Conserved and divergent roles of Bcr1 and CFEM proteins in Candida parapsilosis and Candida albicans. PLoS One 6:e28151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0028151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Laffey SF, Butler G. 2005. Phenotype switching affects biofilm formation by Candida parapsilosis. Microbiology 151:1073–1081. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27739-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Nosek J, Holesova Z, Kosa P, Gacser A, Tomaska L. 2009. Biology and genetics of the pathogenic yeast Candida parapsilosis. Curr Genet 55:497–509. doi: 10.1007/s00294-009-0268-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Biswas K, Morschhauser J. 2005. The Mep2p ammonium permease controls nitrogen starvation-induced filamentous growth in Candida albicans. Mol Microbiol 56:649–669. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04576.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Kadosh D. 2016. Control of Candida albicans morphology and pathogenicity by post-transcriptional mechanisms. Cell Mol Life Sci 73:4265–4278. doi: 10.1007/s00018-016-2294-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Mitchell AP. 1998. Dimorphism and virulence in Candida albicans. Curr Opin Microbiol 1:687–692. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Kim SK, El Bissati K, Ben Mamoun C. 2006. Amino acids mediate colony and cell differentiation in the fungal pathogen Candida parapsilosis. Microbiology 152:2885–2894. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.29180-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Nemeth T, Toth A, Szenzenstein J, Horvath P, Nosanchuk JD, Grozer Z, Toth R, Papp C, Hamari Z, Vagvolgyi C, Gacser A. 2013. Characterization of virulence properties in the C. parapsilosis sensu lato species. PLoS One 8:e68704. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0068704. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Lackey E, Vipulanandan G, Childers DS, Kadosh D. 2013. Comparative evolution of morphological regulatory functions in Candida species. Eukaryot Cell 12:1356–1368. doi: 10.1128/EC.00164-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Pérez-García LA, Csonka K, Flores-Carreón A, Estrada-Mata E, Mellado-Mojica E, Németh T, López-Ramírez LA, Toth R, López MG, Vizler C, Marton A, Tóth A, Nosanchuk JD, Gácser A, Mora-Montes HM. 2016. Role of protein glycosylation in Candida parapsilosis cell wall integrity and host interaction. Front Microbiol 7:306. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.00306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Laprade L, Boyartchuk VL, Dietrich WF, Winston F. 2002. Spt3 plays opposite roles in filamentous growth in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Candida albicans and is required for C. albicans virulence. Genetics 161:509–519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Mora-Montes HM, Bates S, Netea MG, Díaz-Jiménez DF, López-Romero E, Zinker S, Ponce-Noyola P, Kullberg BJ, Brown AJP, Odds FC, Flores-Carreón A, Gow NAR. 2007. Endoplasmic reticulum alpha-glycosidases of Candida albicans are required for N glycosylation, cell wall integrity, and normal host-fungus interaction. Eukaryot Cell 6:2184–2193. doi: 10.1128/EC.00350-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Seneviratne CJ, Jin L, Samaranayake LP. 2008. Biofilm lifestyle of Candida: a mini review. Oral Dis 14:582–590. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2007.01424.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Nett JE. 2016. The host’s reply to Candida biofilm. Pathogens 5:E33. doi: 10.3390/pathogens5010033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Silva S, Rodrigues CF, Araujo D, Rodrigues ME, Henriques M. 2017. Candida species biofilms’ antifungal resistance. J Fungi (Basel) 3:E8. doi: 10.3390/jof3010008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Silva S, Henriques M, Martins A, Oliveira R, Williams D, Azeredo J. 2009. Biofilms of non-Candida albicans Candida species: quantification, structure and matrix composition. Med Mycol 47:681–689. doi: 10.3109/13693780802549594. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Kuhn DM, Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, Ghannoum MA. 2002. Comparison of biofilms formed by Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis on bioprosthetic surfaces. Infect Immun 70:878–888. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.878-888.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ. 1995. Variations in DNA subtype, antifungal susceptibility, and slime production among clinical isolates of Candida parapsilosis. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 21:9–14. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Pereira L, Silva S, Ribeiro B, Henriques M, Azeredo J. 2015. Influence of glucose concentration on the structure and quantity of biofilms formed by Candida parapsilosis. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov043. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Nett J, Lincoln L, Marchillo K, Massey R, Holoyda K, Hoff B, VanHandel M, Andes D. 2007. Putative role of beta-1,3 glucans in Candida albicans biofilm resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:510–520. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01056-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Nett JE, Crawford K, Marchillo K, Andes DR. 2010. Role of Fks1p and matrix glucan in Candida albicans biofilm resistance to an echinocandin, pyrimidine, and polyene. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:3505–3508. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00227-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Vediyappan G, Rossignol T, d’Enfert C. 2010. Interaction of Candida albicans biofilms with antifungals: transcriptional response and binding of antifungals to beta-glucans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2096–2111. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01638-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Mitchell KF, Taff HT, Cuevas MA, Reinicke EL, Sanchez H, Andes DR. 2013. Role of matrix beta-1,3 glucan in antifungal resistance of non-albicans Candida biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:1918–1920. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02378-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Mukherjee PK, Chandra J, Kuhn DM, Ghannoum MA. 2003. Mechanism of fluconazole resistance in Candida albicans biofilms: phase-specific role of efflux pumps and membrane sterols. Infect Immun 71:4333–4340. doi: 10.1128/IAI.71.8.4333-4340.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Katragkou A, Chatzimoschou A, Simitsopoulou M, Dalakiouridou M, Diza-Mataftsi E, Tsantali C, Roilides E. 2008. Differential activities of newer antifungal agents against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:357–360. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00856-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Kuhn DM, George T, Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, Ghannoum MA. 2002. Antifungal susceptibility of Candida biofilms: unique efficacy of amphotericin B lipid formulations and echinocandins. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 46:1773–1780. doi: 10.1128/AAC.46.6.1773-1780.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Cavalheiro M, Teixeira MC. 2018. Candida biofilms: threats, challenges, and promising strategies. Front Med (Lausanne) 5:28. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2018.00028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Rossignol T, Ding C, Guida A, d’Enfert C, Higgins DG, Butler G. 2009. Correlation between biofilm formation and the hypoxic response in Candida parapsilosis. Eukaryot Cell 8:550–559. doi: 10.1128/EC.00350-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Pérez A, Pedrós B, Murgui A, Casanova M, López-Ribot JL, Martínez JP. 2006. Biofilm formation by Candida albicans mutants for genes coding fungal proteins exhibiting the eight-cysteine-containing CFEM domain. FEMS Yeast Res 6:1074–1084. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00131.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Nobile CJ, Fox EP, Nett JE, Sorrells TR, Mitrovich QM, Hernday AD, Tuch BB, Andes DR, Johnson AD. 2012. A recently evolved transcriptional network controls biofilm development in Candida albicans. Cell 148:126–138. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Uppuluri P, Pierce CG, Thomas DP, Bubeck SS, Saville SP, Lopez-Ribot JL. 2010. The transcriptional regulator Nrg1p controls Candida albicans biofilm formation and dispersion. Eukaryot Cell 9:1531–1537. doi: 10.1128/EC.00111-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Ramos LDS, Barbedo LS, Braga-Silva LA, dos Santos ALS, Pinto MR, Sgarbi DBDG. 2015. Protease and phospholipase activities of Candida spp. isolated from cutaneous candidiasis. Rev Iberoam Micol 32:122–125. doi: 10.1016/j.riam.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Paula-Mattiello S, Oliveira SD, Medina-Silva R. 2017. In vitro evaluation of hydrolytic enzyme activity and biofilm formation of Candida parapsilosis species complex from a nosocomial environment. Rev Soc Bras Med Trop 50:558–561. doi: 10.1590/0037-8682-0032-2017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Abi-Chacra ÉA, Souza LOP, Cruz LP, Braga-Silva LA, Gonçalves DS, Sodré CL, Ribeiro MD, Seabra SH, Figueiredo-Carvalho MHG, Barbedo LS, Zancopé-Oliveira RM, Ziccardi M, Santos ALS. 2013. Phenotypical properties associated with virulence from clinical isolates belonging to the Candida parapsilosis complex. FEMS Yeast Res 13:831–848. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Ziccardi M, Souza LO, Gandra RM, Galdino AC, Baptista AR, Nunes AP, Ribeiro MA, Branquinha MH, Santos AL. 2015. Candida parapsilosis (sensu lato) isolated from hospitals located in the southeast of Brazil: species distribution, antifungal susceptibility and virulence attributes. Int J Med Microbiol 305:848–859. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmm.2015.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.da Silva BV, Silva LB, de Oliveira DB, da Silva PR, Ferreira-Paim K, Andrade-Silva LE, Silva-Vergara ML, Andrade AA. 2015. Species distribution, virulence factors, and antifungal susceptibility among Candida parapsilosis complex isolates recovered from clinical specimens. Mycopathologia 180:333–343. doi: 10.1007/s11046-015-9916-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Tosun I, Akyuz Z, Guler NC, Gulmez D, Bayramoglu G, Kaklikkaya N, Arikan-Akdagli S, Aydin F. 2013. Distribution, virulence attributes and antifungal susceptibility patterns of Candida parapsilosis complex strains isolated from clinical samples. Med Mycol 51:483–492. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.745953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Trevino-Rangel RDJ, Gonzalez JG, Gonzalez GM. 2013. Aspartyl proteinase, phospholipase, esterase and hemolysin activities of clinical isolates of the Candida parapsilosis species complex. Med Mycol 51:331–335. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2012.712724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Pharkjaksu S, Chongtrakool P, Suwannakarn K, Ngamskulrungroj P. 2018. Species distribution, virulence factors, and antifungal susceptibility among Candida parapsilosis complex isolates from clinical specimens at Siriraj Hospital, Thailand, from 2011 to 2015. Med Mycol 56:426–433. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myx058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Merkerova M, Dostal J, Hradilek M, Pichova I, Hruskova-Heidingsfeldova O. 2006. Cloning and characterization of Sapp2p, the second aspartic proteinase isoenzyme from Candida parapsilosis. FEMS Yeast Res 6:1018–1026. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2006.00142.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Silva S, Henriques M, Oliveira R, Azeredo J, Malic S, Hooper SJ, Williams DW. 2009. Characterization of Candida parapsilosis infection of an in vitro reconstituted human oral epithelium. Eur J Oral Sci 117:669–675. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00677.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Pichova I, Pavlickova L, Dostal J, Dolejsi E, Hruskova-Heidingsfeldova O, Weber J, Ruml T, Soucek M. 2001. Secreted aspartic proteases of Candida albicans, Candida tropicalis, Candida parapsilosis and Candida lusitaniae. Inhibition with peptidomimetic inhibitors. Eur J Biochem 268:2669–2677. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Gacser A, Schafer W, Nosanchuk JS, Salomon S, Nosanchuk JD. 2007. Virulence of Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis in reconstituted human tissue models. Fungal Genet Biol 44:1336–1341. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2007.02.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Toth R, Alonso MF, Bain JM, Vagvolgyi C, Erwig LP, Gacser A. 2015. Different Candida parapsilosis clinical isolates and lipase deficient strain trigger an altered cellular immune response. Front Microbiol 6:1102. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Trofa D, Agovino M, Stehr F, Schafer W, Rykunov D, Fiser A, Hamari Z, Nosanchuk JD, Gacser A. 2009. Acetylsalicylic acid (aspirin) reduces damage to reconstituted human tissues infected with Candida species by inhibiting extracellular fungal lipases. Microbes Infect 11:1131–1139. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2009.08.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Toth R, Toth A, Vagvolgyi C, Gacser A. 2017. Candida parapsilosis secreted lipase as an important virulence factor. Curr Protein Pept Sci 18:1043–1049. doi: 10.2174/1389203717666160813163054. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Ghannoum MA. 2000. Potential role of phospholipases in virulence and fungal pathogenesis. Clin Microbiol Rev 13:122–143. doi: 10.1128/CMR.13.1.122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Kantarcioglu AS, Yucel A. 2002. Phospholipase and protease activities in clinical Candida isolates with reference to the sources of strains. Mycoses 45:160–165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Díaz-Jiménez DF, Pérez-García LA, Martínez-Álvarez JA, Mora-Montes HM. 2012. Role of the fungal cell wall in pathogenesis and antifungal resistance. Curr Fungal Infect Rep 6:275–282. doi: 10.1007/s12281-012-0109-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Bates S, Hughes HB, Munro CA, Thomas WP, MacCallum DM, Bertram G, Atrih A, Ferguson MA, Brown AJ, Odds FC, Gow NA. 2006. Outer chain N-glycans are required for cell wall integrity and virulence of Candida albicans. J Biol Chem 281:90–98. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510360200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Gow NA, Netea MG, Munro CA, Ferwerda G, Bates S, Mora-Montes HM, Walker L, Jansen T, Jacobs L, Tsoni V, Brown GD, Odds FC, Van der Meer JW, Brown AJ, Kullberg BJ. 2007. Immune recognition of Candida albicans beta-glucan by dectin-1. J Infect Dis 196:1565–1571. doi: 10.1086/523110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Mora-Montes HM, Netea MG, Ferwerda G, Lenardon MD, Brown GD, Mistry AR, Kullberg BJ, O’Callaghan CA, Sheth CC, Odds FC, Brown AJ, Munro CA, Gow NA. 2011. Recognition and blocking of innate immunity cells by Candida albicans chitin. Infect Immun 79:1961–1970. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01282-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Estrada-Mata E, Navarro-Arias MJ, Pérez-García LA, Mellado-Mojica E, López MG, Csonka K, Gacser A, Mora-Montes HM. 2015. Members of the Candida parapsilosis complex and Candida albicans are differentially recognized by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Front Microbiol 6:1527. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Shibata N, Ikuta K, Imai T, Satoh Y, Satoh R, Suzuki A, Kojima C, Kobayashi H, Hisamichi K, Suzuki S. 1995. Existence of branched side chains in the cell wall mannan of pathogenic yeast, Candida albicans: structure-antigenicity relationship between the cell wall mannans of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. J Biol Chem 270:1113–1122. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Walker LA, Gow NA, Munro CA. 2013. Elevated chitin content reduces the susceptibility of Candida species to caspofungin. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:146–154. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01486-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Serrano-Fujarte I, López-Romero E, Cuéllar-Cruz M. 2016. Moonlight-like proteins of the cell wall protect sessile cells of Candida from oxidative stress. Microb Pathog 90:22–33. doi: 10.1016/j.micpath.2015.10.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Karkowska-Kuleta J, Zajac D, Bochenska O, Kozik A. 2015. Surfaceome of pathogenic yeasts, Candida parapsilosis and Candida tropicalis, revealed with the use of cell surface shaving method and shotgun proteomic approach. Acta Biochim Pol 62:807–819. doi: 10.18388/abp.2015_1140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Karkowska-Kuleta J, Zajac D, Bras G, Bochenska O, Rapala-Kozik M, Kozik A. 2017. Binding of human plasminogen and high-molecular-mass kininogen by cell surface-exposed proteins of Candida parapsilosis. Acta Biochim Pol 64:391–400. doi: 10.18388/abp.2017_1609. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Lee PY, Gam LH, Yong VC, Rosli R, Ng KP, Chong PP. 2014. Identification of immunogenic proteins of Candida parapsilosis by serological proteome analysis. J Appl Microbiol 116:999–1009. doi: 10.1111/jam.12408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Vinterová Z, Šanda M, Dostál J, Hrušková-Heidingsfeldová O, Pichová I. 2011. Evidence for the presence of proteolytically active secreted aspartic proteinase 1 of Candida parapsilosis in the cell wall. Protein Sci 20:2004–2012. doi: 10.1002/pro.744. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Kiffer-Moreira T, de Sá Pinheiro AA, Alviano WS, Barbosa FM, Souto-Padrón T, Nimrichter L, Rodrigues ML, Alviano CS, Meyer-Fernandes JR. 2007. An ectophosphatase activity in Candida parapsilosis influences the interaction of fungi with epithelial cells. FEMS Yeast Res 7:621–628. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00223.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Abastabar M, Hosseinpoor S, Hedayati MT, Shokohi T, Valadan R, Mirhendi H, Mohammadi R, Aghili SR, Rahimi N, Aslani N, Haghani I, Gholami S. 2016. Hyphal wall protein 1 gene: a potential marker for the identification of different Candida species and phylogenetic analysis. Curr Med Mycol 2:1–8. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.cmm.2.4.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Nett J, Lincoln L, Marchillo K, Andes D. 2007. β-1,3 Glucan as a test for central venous catheter biofilm infection. J Infect Dis 195:1705–1712. doi: 10.1086/517522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Held J, Kohlberger I, Rappold E, Busse Grawitz A, Häcker G. 2013. Comparison of (1→3)-β-d-glucan, mannan/anti-mannan antibodies, and Cand-Tec Candida antigen as serum biomarkers for candidemia. J Clin Microbiol 51:1158–1164. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02473-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Nguyen LN, Gacser A, Nosanchuk JD. 2011. Secreted lipases supply fatty acids for yeast growth in the absence of de novo fatty acid synthesis. Virulence 2:538–541. doi: 10.4161/viru.2.6.18244. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Nguyen LN, Hamari Z, Kadereit B, Trofa D, Agovino M, Martinez LR, Gacser A, Silver DL, Nosanchuk JD. 2011. Candida parapsilosis fat storage-inducing transmembrane (FIT) protein 2 regulates lipid droplet formation and impacts virulence. Microbes Infect 13:663–672. doi: 10.1016/j.micinf.2011.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Nguyen LN, Nosanchuk JD. 2011. Lipid droplet formation protects against gluco/lipotoxicity in Candida parapsilosis: an essential role of fatty acid desaturase Ole1. Cell Cycle 10:3159–3167. doi: 10.4161/cc.10.18.16932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Bucek A, Matouskova P, Sychrova H, Pichova I, Hruskova-Heidingsfeldova O. 2014. Delta12-fatty acid desaturase from Candida parapsilosis is a multifunctional desaturase producing a range of polyunsaturated and hydroxylated fatty acids. PLoS One 9:e93322. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0093322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Noverr MC, Phare SM, Toews GB, Coffey MJ, Huffnagle GB. 2001. Pathogenic yeasts Cryptococcus neoformans and Candida albicans produce immunomodulatory prostaglandins. Infect Immun 69:2957–2963. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.5.2957-2963.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Erb-Downward JR, Noverr MC. 2007. Characterization of prostaglandin E2 production by Candida albicans. Infect Immun 75:3498–3505. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00232-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Bordon AP, Dias-Melicio LA, Acorci MJ, Biondo GA, Fecchio D, Peraçoli MTS, de Soares AMVC. 2007. Prostaglandin E(2) production by high and low virulent strains of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis. Mycopathologia 163:129–135. doi: 10.1007/s11046-007-0098-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Kupfahl C, Tsikas D, Niemann J, Geginat G, Hof H. 2012. Production of prostaglandins, isoprostanes and thromboxane by Aspergillus fumigatus: identification by gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and quantification by enzyme immunoassay. Mol Immunol 49:621–627. doi: 10.1016/j.molimm.2011.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Noverr MC, Toews GB, Huffnagle GB. 2002. Production of prostaglandins and leukotrienes by pathogenic fungi. Infect Immun 70:400–402. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.1.400-402.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Baek YU, Li M, Davis DA. 2008. Candida albicans ferric reductases are differentially regulated in response to distinct forms of iron limitation by the Rim101 and CBF transcription factors. Eukaryot Cell 7:1168–1179. doi: 10.1128/EC.00108-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Husekova B, Elicharova H, Sychrova H. 2016. Pathogenic Candida species differ in the ability to grow at limiting potassium concentrations. Can J Microbiol 62:394–401. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2015-0766. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Krauke Y, Sychrova H. 2010. Four pathogenic Candida species differ in salt tolerance. Curr Microbiol 61:335–339. doi: 10.1007/s00284-010-9616-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Elicharova H, Sychrova H. 2013. Fluconazole treatment hyperpolarizes the plasma membrane of Candida cells. Med Mycol 51:785–794. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.779038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Seider K, Brunke S, Schild L, Jablonowski N, Wilson D, Majer O, Barz D, Haas A, Kuchler K, Schaller M, Hube B. 2011. The facultative intracellular pathogen Candida glabrata subverts macrophage cytokine production and phagolysosome maturation. J Immunol 187:3072–3086. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Lewis LE, Bain JM, Lowes C, Gow NA, Erwig LP. 2012. Candida albicans infection inhibits macrophage cell division and proliferation. Fungal Genet Biol 49:679–680. doi: 10.1016/j.fgb.2012.05.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Vylkova S, Lorenz MC. 2014. Modulation of phagosomal pH by Candida albicans promotes hyphal morphogenesis and requires Stp2p, a regulator of amino acid transport. PLoS Pathog 10:e1003995. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Wasylnka JA, Moore MM. 2003. Aspergillus fumigatus conidia survive and germinate in acidic organelles of A549 epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 116:1579–1587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Zaragoza O, Chrisman CJ, Castelli MV, Frases S, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodríguez-Tudela JL, Casadevall A. 2008. Capsule enlargement in Cryptococcus neoformans confers resistance to oxidative stress suggesting a mechanism for intracellular survival. Cell Microbiol 10:2043–2057. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2008.01186.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Lee SC, Kress Y, Zhao ML, Dickson DW, Casadevall A. 1995. Cryptococcus neoformans survive and replicate in human microglia. Lab Invest 73:871–879. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Ma H, Croudace JE, Lammas DA, May RC. 2006. Expulsion of live pathogenic yeast by macrophages. Curr Biol 16:2156–2160. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2006.09.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Shintaku T, Glass KA, Hirakawa MP, Longley SJ, Bennett RJ, Bliss JM, Shaw SK. 2013. Human endothelial cells internalize Candida parapsilosis via N-WASP-mediated endocytosis. Infect Immun 81:2777–2787. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00535-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Glass KA, Longley SJ, Bliss JM, Shaw SK. 2015. Protection of Candida parapsilosis from neutrophil killing through internalization by human endothelial cells. Virulence 6:504–514. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1042643. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Toth A, Nemeth T, Csonka K, Horvath P, Vagvolgyi C, Vizler C, Nosanchuk JD, Gacser A. 2014. Secreted Candida parapsilosis lipase modulates the immune response of primary human macrophages. Virulence 5:555–562. doi: 10.4161/viru.28509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Middelhoven WJ. 1993. Catabolism of benzene compounds by ascomycetous and basidiomycetous yeasts and yeastlike fungi. A literature review and an experimental approach. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 63:125–144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Martin R, Pohlers S, Muhlschlegel FA, Kurzai O. 2017. CO2 sensing in fungi: at the heart of metabolic signaling. Curr Genet 63:965–972. doi: 10.1007/s00294-017-0700-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Gerecova G, Nebohacova M, Zeman I, Pryszcz LP, Tomaska L, Gabaldon T, Nosek J. 2015. Metabolic gene clusters encoding the enzymes of two branches of the 3-oxoadipate pathway in the pathogenic yeast Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res 15:fov006. doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fov006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Graminha MA, Rocha EM, Prade RA, Martinez-Rossi NM. 2004. Terbinafine resistance mediated by salicylate 1-monooxygenase in Aspergillus nidulans. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:3530–3535. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.9.3530-3535.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, Clancy CJ, Marr KA, Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Reboli AC, Schuster MG, Vazquez JA, Walsh TJ, Zaoutis TE, Sobel JD. 2016. Clinical practice guideline for the management of candidiasis: 2016 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis 62:e1–e50. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Pfaller MA, Moet GJ, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2011. Geographic variations in species distribution and echinocandin and azole antifungal resistance rates among Candida bloodstream infection isolates: report from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program (2008 to 2009). J Clin Microbiol 49:396–399. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01398-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Fernandez-Ruiz M, Aguado JM, Almirante B, Lora-Pablos D, Padilla B, Puig-Asensio M, Montejo M, Garcia-Rodriguez J, Peman J, Ruiz Perez de Pipaon M, Cuenca-Estrella M, CANDIPOP Project, GEIH-GEMICOMED (SEIMC), REIPI. 2014. Initial use of echinocandins does not negatively influence outcome in Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infection: a propensity score analysis. Clin Infect Dis 58:1413–1421. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Adler-Moore JP, Gangneux JP, Pappas PG. 2016. Comparison between liposomal formulations of amphotericin B. Med Mycol 54:223–231. doi: 10.1093/mmy/myv111. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Hamill RJ. 2013. Amphotericin B formulations: a comparative review of efficacy and toxicity. Drugs 73:919–934. doi: 10.1007/s40265-013-0069-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Stone NR, Bicanic T, Salim R, Hope W. 2016. Liposomal amphotericin B (AmBisome): a review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, clinical experience and future directions. Drugs 76:485–500. doi: 10.1007/s40265-016-0538-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Turkova A, Roilides E, Sharland M. 2011. Amphotericin B in neonates: deoxycholate or lipid formulation as first-line therapy—is there a ‘right’ choice? Curr Opin Infect Dis 24:163–171. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e328343614e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Le J, Adler-Shohet FC, Nguyen C, Lieberman JM. 2009. Nephrotoxicity associated with amphotericin B deoxycholate in neonates. Pediatr Infect Dis J 28:1061–1063. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e3181af6201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.CLSI. 2017. Reference method for broth microdilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts, 4th ed, CLSI standard M27-A4. CLSI, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Pfaller MA, Castanheira M, Messer SA, Rhomberg PR, Jones RN. 2014. Comparison of EUCAST and CLSI broth microdilution methods for the susceptibility testing of 10 systemically active antifungal agents when tested against Candida spp. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 79:198–204. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.03.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Marti-Carrizosa M, Sanchez-Reus F, March F, Coll P. 2014. Fungemia in a Spanish hospital: the role of Candida parapsilosis over a 15-year period. Scand J Infect Dis 46:454–461. doi: 10.3109/00365548.2014.900190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Pfaller MA, Rhomberg PR, Messer SA, Jones RN, Castanheira M. 2015. Isavuconazole, micafungin, and 8 comparator antifungal agents’ susceptibility profiles for common and uncommon opportunistic fungi collected in 2013: temporal analysis of antifungal drug resistance using CLSI species-specific clinical breakpoints and proposed epidemiological cutoff values. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 82:303–313. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Zhang L, Xiao M, Watts MR, Wang H, Fan X, Kong F, Xu YC. 2015. Development of fluconazole resistance in a series of Candida parapsilosis isolates from a persistent candidemia patient with prolonged antifungal therapy. BMC Infect Dis 15:340. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-1086-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Oxman DA, Chow JK, Frendl G, Hadley S, Hershkovitz S, Ireland P, McDermott LA, Tsai K, Marty FM, Kontoyiannis DP, Golan Y. 2010. Candidaemia associated with decreased in vitro fluconazole susceptibility: is Candida speciation predictive of the susceptibility pattern? J Antimicrob Chemother 65:1460–1465. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkq136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Sarvikivi E, Lyytikainen O, Soll DR, Pujol C, Pfaller MA, Richardson M, Koukila-Kahkola P, Luukkainen P, Saxen H. 2005. Emergence of fluconazole resistance in a Candida parapsilosis strain that caused infections in a neonatal intensive care unit. J Clin Microbiol 43:2729–2735. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.6.2729-2735.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Tumbarello M, Posteraro B, Trecarichi EM, Fiori B, Rossi M, Porta R, de Gaetano Donati K, La Sorda M, Spanu T, Fadda G, Cauda R, Sanguinetti M. 2007. Biofilm production by Candida species and inadequate antifungal therapy as predictors of mortality for patients with candidemia. J Clin Microbiol 45:1843–1850. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00131-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Ben-Ami R, Olshtain-Pops K, Krieger M, Oren I, Bishara J, Dan M, Wiener-Well Y, Weinberger M, Zimhony O, Chowers M, Weber G, Potasman I, Chazan B, Kassis I, Shalit I, Block C, Keller N, Kontoyiannis DP, Giladi M. 2012. Antibiotic exposure as a risk factor for fluconazole-resistant Candida bloodstream infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 56:2518–2523. doi: 10.1128/AAC.05947-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Hebert C, Villaran R, Tolentino J, Best L, Boonlayangoor S, Pitrak D, Lin M, Weber SG. 2010. Prior antimicrobial exposure and the risk for bloodstream infection with fluconazole-non-susceptible Candida strains. Scand J Infect Dis 42:506–509. doi: 10.3109/00365541003699631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Arias A, Arevalo MP, Andreu A, Rodriguez C, Sierra A. 1994. In vitro susceptibility of 545 isolates of Candida spp. to four antifungal agents. Mycoses 37:285–289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Ostrosky-Zeichner L, Rex JH, Pappas PG, Hamill RJ, Larsen RA, Horowitz HW, Powderly WG, Hyslop N, Kauffman CA, Cleary J, Mangino JE, Lee J. 2003. Antifungal susceptibility survey of 2,000 bloodstream Candida isolates in the United States. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:3149–3154. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.10.3149-3154.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Gibbs DL, Newell VA, Meis JF, Gould IM, Fu W, Colombo AL, Rodriguez-Noriega E. 2007. Results from the ARTEMIS DISK Global Antifungal Surveillance Study, 1997 to 2005: an 8.5-year analysis of susceptibilities of Candida species and other yeast species to fluconazole and voriconazole determined by CLSI standardized disk diffusion testing. J Clin Microbiol 45:1735–1745. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00409-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Boyken L, Rice C, Tendolkar S, Hollis RJ, Diekema DJ. 2003. Caspofungin activity against clinical isolates of fluconazole-resistant Candida. J Clin Microbiol 41:5729–5731. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.12.5729-5731.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Pfaller MA, Messer SA, Hollis RJ, Jones RN, Doern GV, Brandt ME, Hajjeh RA. 1998. In vitro susceptibilities of Candida bloodstream isolates to the new triazole antifungal agents BMS-207147, Sch 56592, and voriconazole. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 42:3242–3244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Fleck R, Dietz A, Hof H. 2007. In vitro susceptibility of Candida species to five antifungal agents in a German university hospital assessed by the reference broth microdilution method and Etest. J Antimicrob Chemother 59:767–771. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl555. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Marco F, Danés C, Almela M, Jurado A, Mensa J, de la Bellacasa JP, Espasa M, Martínez JA, Jiménez de Anta MT. 2003. Trends in frequency and in vitro susceptibilities to antifungal agents, including voriconazole and anidulafungin, of Candida bloodstream isolates. Results from a six-year study (1996-2001). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 46:259–264. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Pfaller MA, Jones RN, Doern GV, Sader HS, Hollis RJ, Messer SA. 1998. International surveillance of bloodstream infections due to Candida species: frequency of occurrence and antifungal susceptibilities of isolates collected in 1997 in the United States, Canada, and South America for the SENTRY Program. The SENTRY Participant Group. J Clin Microbiol 36:1886–1889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ, Messer SA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ. 2003. Activities of fluconazole and voriconazole against 1,586 recent clinical isolates of Candida species determined by broth microdilution, disk diffusion, and Etest methods: report from the ARTEMIS Global Antifungal Susceptibility Program, 2001. J Clin Microbiol 41:1440–1446. doi: 10.1128/JCM.41.4.1440-1446.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Clark TA, Slavinski SA, Morgan J, Lott T, Arthington-Skaggs BA, Brandt ME, Webb RM, Currier M, Flowers RH, Fridkin SK, Hajjeh RA. 2004. Epidemiologic and molecular characterization of an outbreak of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections in a community hospital. J Clin Microbiol 42:4468–4472. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.10.4468-4472.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Mugge C, Haustein UF, Nenoff P. 2006. Causative agents of onychomycosis—a retrospective study. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 4:218–228. (In German.) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Berkow EL, Manigaba K, Parker JE, Barker KS, Kelly SL, Rogers PD. 2015. Multidrug transporters and alterations in sterol biosynthesis contribute to azole antifungal resistance in Candida parapsilosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:5942–5950. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01358-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Lotfali E, Ghajari A, Kordbacheh P, Zaini F, Mirhendi H, Mohammadi R, Noorbakhsh F, Rezaie S. 2017. Regulation of ERG3, ERG6, and ERG11 genes in antifungal-resistant isolates of Candida parapsilosis. Iran Biomed J 21:275–281. doi: 10.18869/acadpub.ibj.21.4.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Souza AC, Fuchs BB, Pinhati HM, Siqueira RA, Hagen F, Meis JF, Mylonakis E, Colombo AL. 2015. Candida parapsilosis resistance to fluconazole: molecular mechanisms and in vivo impact in infected Galleria mellonella larvae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:6581–6587. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01177-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.MacPherson S, Akache B, Weber S, De Deken X, Raymond M, Turcotte B. 2005. Candida albicans zinc cluster protein Upc2p confers resistance to antifungal drugs and is an activator of ergosterol biosynthetic genes. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 49:1745–1752. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.5.1745-1752.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Xiang MJ, Liu JY, Ni PH, Wang S, Shi C, Wei B, Ni YX, Ge HL. 2013. Erg11 mutations associated with azole resistance in clinical isolates of Candida albicans. FEMS Yeast Res 13:386–393. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Flowers SA, Barker KS, Berkow EL, Toner G, Chadwick SG, Gygax SE, Morschhauser J, Rogers PD. 2012. Gain-of-function mutations in UPC2 are a frequent cause of ERG11 upregulation in azole-resistant clinical isolates of Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 11:1289–1299. doi: 10.1128/EC.00215-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Grossman NT, Pham CD, Cleveland AA, Lockhart SR. 2015. Molecular mechanisms of fluconazole resistance in Candida parapsilosis isolates from a U.S. surveillance system. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:1030–1037. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04613-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Silva AP, Miranda IM, Guida A, Synnott J, Rocha R, Silva R, Amorim A, Pina-Vaz C, Butler G, Rodrigues AG. 2011. Transcriptional profiling of azole-resistant Candida parapsilosis strains. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 55:3546–3556. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01127-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Sellam A, Tebbji F, Nantel A. 2009. Role of Ndt80p in sterol metabolism regulation and azole resistance in Candida albicans. Eukaryot Cell 8:1174–1183. doi: 10.1128/EC.00074-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Perea S, Lopez-Ribot JL, Kirkpatrick WR, McAtee RK, Santillan RA, Martinez M, Calabrese D, Sanglard D, Patterson TF. 2001. Prevalence of molecular mechanisms of resistance to azole antifungal agents in Candida albicans strains displaying high-level fluconazole resistance isolated from human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:2676–2684. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.10.2676-2684.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Tsao S, Rahkhoodaee F, Raymond M. 2009. Relative contributions of the Candida albicans ABC transporters Cdr1p and Cdr2p to clinical azole resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 53:1344–1352. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00926-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Sanglard D, Ischer F, Monod M, Bille J. 1996. Susceptibilities of Candida albicans multidrug transporter mutants to various antifungal agents and other metabolic inhibitors. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 40:2300–2305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Wirsching S, Michel S, Kohler G, Morschhauser J. 2000. Activation of the multiple drug resistance gene MDR1 in fluconazole-resistant, clinical Candida albicans strains is caused by mutations in a trans-regulatory factor. J Bacteriol 182:400–404. doi: 10.1128/JB.182.2.400-404.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Morschhauser J, Barker KS, Liu TT, Blaß-Warmuth J, Homayouni R, Rogers PD. 2007. The transcription factor Mrr1p controls expression of the MDR1 efflux pump and mediates multidrug resistance in Candida albicans. PLoS Pathog 3:e164. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030164. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Coste AT, Karababa M, Ischer F, Bille J, Sanglard D. 2004. TAC1, transcriptional activator of CDR genes, is a new transcription factor involved in the regulation of Candida albicans ABC transporters CDR1 and CDR2. Eukaryot Cell 3:1639–1652. doi: 10.1128/EC.3.6.1639-1652.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Neji S, Hadrich I, Trabelsi H, Abbes S, Cheikhrouhou F, Sellami H, Makni F, Ayadi A. 2017. Virulence factors, antifungal susceptibility and molecular mechanisms of azole resistance among Candida parapsilosis complex isolates recovered from clinical specimens. J Biomed Sci 24:67. doi: 10.1186/s12929-017-0376-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Canton E, Espinel-Ingroff A, Peman J, del Castillo L. 2010. In vitro fungicidal activities of echinocandins against Candida metapsilosis, C. orthopsilosis, and C. parapsilosis evaluated by time-kill studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2194–2197. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01538-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Ghannoum MA, Chen A, Buhari M, Chandra J, Mukherjee PK, Baxa D, Golembieski A, Vazquez JA. 2009. Differential in vitro activity of anidulafungin, caspofungin and micafungin against Candida parapsilosis isolates recovered from a burn unit. Clin Microbiol Infect 15:274–279. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2008.02660.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Kroeger J, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. 2008. In vitro susceptibility of invasive isolates of Candida spp. to anidulafungin, caspofungin, and micafungin: six years of global surveillance. J Clin Microbiol 46:150–156. doi: 10.1128/JCM.01901-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Brielmaier BD, Casabar E, Kurtzeborn CM, McKinnon PS, Ritchie DJ. 2008. Early clinical experience with anidulafungin at a large tertiary care medical center. Pharmacotherapy 28:64–73. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.1.64. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Kimura M, Araoka H, Yamamoto H, Nakamura S, Nagi M, Yamagoe S, Miyazaki Y, Ogura S, Mitsuki T, Yuasa M, Kaji D, Kageyama K, Nishida A, Taya Y, Shimazu H, Ishiwata K, Takagi S, Yamamoto G, Asano-Mori Y, Uchida N, Wake A, Taniguchi S, Yoneyama A. 2018. Micafungin breakthrough fungemia in patients with hematological disorders. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 62:e02183-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02183-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Norimatsu Y, Morii D, Kogure A, Hamanaka T, Kuwano Y, Yokozawa T, Oda T. 2017. A case of breakthrough Candida parapsilosis fungemia during micafungin therapy for a Candida glabrata bloodstream infection. Med Mycol Case Rep 16:1–3. doi: 10.1016/j.mmcr.2017.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Pfeiffer CD, Garcia-Effron G, Zaas AK, Perfect JR, Perlin DS, Alexander BD. 2010. Breakthrough invasive candidiasis in patients on micafungin. J Clin Microbiol 48:2373–2380. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02390-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Sun HY, Singh N. 2010. Characterisation of breakthrough invasive mycoses in echinocandin recipients: an evidence-based review. Int J Antimicrob Agents 35:211–218. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.09.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Sipsas NV, Lewis RE, Tarrand J, Hachem R, Rolston KV, Raad II, Kontoyiannis DP. 2009. Candidemia in patients with hematologic malignancies in the era of new antifungal agents (2001-2007): stable incidence but changing epidemiology of a still frequently lethal infection. Cancer 115:4745–4752. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Barchiesi F, Spreghini E, Tomassetti S, Giannini D, Scalise G. 2007. Caspofungin in combination with amphotericin B against Candida parapsilosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:941–945. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00880-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Barchiesi F, Spreghini E, Tomassetti S, Della Vittoria A, Arzeni D, Manso E, Scalise G. 2006. Effects of caspofungin against Candida guilliermondii and Candida parapsilosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 50:2719–2727. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00111-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Laverdiere M, Hoban D, Restieri C, Habel F. 2002. In vitro activity of three new triazoles and one echinocandin against Candida bloodstream isolates from cancer patients. J Antimicrob Chemother 50:119–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Pfaller MA, Boyken L, Hollis RJ, Messer SA, Tendolkar S, Diekema DJ. 2005. In vitro activities of anidulafungin against more than 2,500 clinical isolates of Candida spp., including 315 isolates resistant to fluconazole. J Clin Microbiol 43:5425–5427. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5425-5427.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Andes D, Diekema DJ, Pfaller MA, Bohrmuller J, Marchillo K, Lepak A. 2010. In vivo comparison of the pharmacodynamic targets for echinocandin drugs against Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2497–2506. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01584-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Garcia-Effron G, Chua DJ, Tomada JR, DiPersio J, Perlin DS, Ghannoum M, Bonilla H. 2010. Novel FKS mutations associated with echinocandin resistance in Candida species. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 54:2225–2227. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00998-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Garcia-Effron G, Katiyar SK, Park S, Edlind TD, Perlin DS. 2008. A naturally occurring proline-to-alanine amino acid change in Fks1p in Candida parapsilosis, Candida orthopsilosis, and Candida metapsilosis accounts for reduced echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 52:2305–2312. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00262-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Perlin DS. 2015. Echinocandin resistance in Candida. Clin Infect Dis 61:S612–S617. doi: 10.1093/cid/civ791. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Martí-Carrizosa M, Sánchez-Reus F, March F, Cantón E, Coll P. 2015. Implication of Candida parapsilosis FKS1 and FKS2 mutations in reduced echinocandin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 59:3570–3573. doi: 10.1128/AAC.04922-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.van Asbeck E, Clemons KV, Martinez M, Tong AJ, Stevens DA. 2008. Significant differences in drug susceptibility among species in the Candida parapsilosis group. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 62:106–109. doi: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.04.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Chassot F, Venturini TP, Piasentin FB, Rossato L, Fiorini A, Svidzinski TI, Alves SH. 2016. Exploring the in vitro resistance of Candida parapsilosis to echinocandins. Mycopathologia 181:663–670. doi: 10.1007/s11046-016-0028-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Chamilos G, Lewis RE, Albert N, Kontoyiannis DP. 2007. Paradoxical effect of echinocandins across Candida species in vitro: evidence for echinocandin-specific and Candida species-related differences. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 51:2257–2259. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00095-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Dimopoulou D, Hamilos G, Tzardi M, Lewis RE, Samonis G, Kontoyiannis DP. 2014. Anidulafungin versus caspofungin in a mouse model of candidiasis caused by anidulafungin-susceptible Candida parapsilosis isolates with different degrees of caspofungin susceptibility. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:229–236. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01025-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Rybak JM, Dickens CM, Parker JE, Caudle KE, Manigaba K, Whaley SG, Nishimoto AT, Luna-Tapia A, Roy S, Zhang Q, Barker KS, Palmer GE, Sutter TR, Homayouni R, Wiederhold NP, Kelly SL, Rogers PD. 2017. Loss of C-5 sterol desaturase activity results in increased resistance to azole and echinocandin antifungals in a clinical isolate of Candida parapsilosis. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e00651-17. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00651-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Seidenfeld SM, Cooper BH, Smith JW, Luby JP, Mackowiak PA. 1983. Amphotericin B tolerance: a characteristic of Candida parapsilosis not shared by other Candida species. J Infect Dis 147:116–119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Yalaz M, Akisu M, Hilmioglu S, Calkavur S, Cakmak B, Kultursay N. 2006. Successful caspofungin treatment of multidrug resistant Candida parapsilosis septicaemia in an extremely low birth weight neonate. Mycoses 49:242–245. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0507.2006.01220.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Tunkel AR, Thomas CY, Wispelwey B. 1993. Candida prosthetic arthritis: report of a case treated with fluconazole and review of the literature. Am J Med 94:100–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Kovacicova G, Hanzen J, Pisarcikova M, Sejnova D, Horn J, Babela R, Svetlansky I, Lovaszova M, Gogova M, Krcmery V. 2001. Nosocomial fungemia due to amphotericin B-resistant Candida spp. in three pediatric patients after previous neurosurgery for brain tumors. J Infect Chemother 7:45–48. doi: 10.1007/s1015610070045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Cattana ME, Dudiuk C, Fernandez M, Rojas F, Alegre L, Cordoba S, Garcia-Effron G, Giusiano G. 2017. Identification of Candida parapsilosis sensu lato in pediatric patients and antifungal susceptibility testing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e02754-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02754-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Faix RG. 1984. Systemic Candida infections in infants in intensive care nurseries: high incidence of central nervous system involvement. J Pediatr 105:616–622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Smego RA Jr, Perfect JR, Durack DT. 1984. Combined therapy with amphotericin B and 5-fluorocytosine for Candida meningitis. Rev Infect Dis 6:791–801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Hoeprich PD, Ingraham JL, Kleker E, Winship MJ. 1974. Development of resistance to 5-fluorocytosine in Candida parapsilosis during therapy. J Infect Dis 130:112–118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Quindós G, Ruesga MT, Martín-Mazuelos E, Salesa R, Alonso-Vargas R, Carrillo-Muñoz AJ, Brena S, San Millán R, Pontón J. 2004. In-vitro activity of 5-fluorocytosine against 1,021 Spanish clinical isolates of Candida and other medically important yeasts. Rev Iberoam Micol 21:63–69. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Soldini S, Posteraro B, Vella A, De Carolis E, Borghi E, Falleni M, Losito AR, Maiuro G, Trecarichi EM, Sanguinetti M, Tumbarello M. 2018. Microbiologic and clinical characteristics of biofilm-forming Candida parapsilosis isolates associated with fungaemia and their impact on mortality. Clin Microbiol Infect 24:771–777. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2017.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Tumbarello M, Fiori B, Trecarichi EM, Posteraro P, Losito AR, De Luca A, Sanguinetti M, Fadda G, Cauda R, Posteraro B. 2012. Risk factors and outcomes of candidemia caused by biofilm-forming isolates in a tertiary care hospital. PLoS One 7:e33705. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0033705. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Anaissie EJ, Rex JH, Uzun O, Vartivarian S. 1998. Predictors of adverse outcome in cancer patients with candidemia. Am J Med 104:238–245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Devrim İ, Yaman Y, Demirağ B, Oymak Y, Cartı Ö, Özek G, Tulumoğlu Ş, Erdem T, Gamze G, Gözmen S, Güneş BT, Bayram N, Vergin C. 2014. A single center’s experience with Candida parapsilosis related long-term central venous access device infections: the port removal decision and its outcomes. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 31:435–441. doi: 10.3109/08880018.2013.862587. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Ruiz LS, Khouri S, Hahn RC, da Silva EG, de Oliveira VK, Gandra RF, Paula CR. 2013. Candidemia by species of the Candida parapsilosis complex in children’s hospital: prevalence, biofilm production and antifungal susceptibility. Mycopathologia 175:231–239. doi: 10.1007/s11046-013-9616-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Růzicka F, Holá V, Votava M, Tejkalová R. 2007. Importance of biofilm in Candida parapsilosis and evaluation of its susceptibility to antifungal agents by colorimetric method. Folia Microbiol (Praha) 52:209–214. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Cocuaud C, Rodier MH, Daniault G, Imbert C. 2005. Anti-metabolic activity of caspofungin against Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis biofilms. J Antimicrob Chemother 56:507–512. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki269. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Bahri R, Curt S, Saidane-Mosbahi D, Rouabhia M. 2010. Normal human gingival epithelial cells sense C. parapsilosis by Toll-like receptors and module its pathogenesis through antimicrobial peptides and proinflammatory cytokines. Mediators Inflamm 2010:940383. doi: 10.1155/2010/940383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Toth A, Zajta E, Csonka K, Vagvolgyi C, Netea MG, Gacser A. 2017. Specific pathways mediating inflammasome activation by Candida parapsilosis. Sci Rep 7:43129. doi: 10.1038/srep43129. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Linden JR, Kunkel D, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. 2013. The role of galectin-3 in phagocytosis of Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis by human neutrophils. Cell Microbiol 15:1127–1142. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Linden JR, De Paepe ME, Laforce-Nesbitt SS, Bliss JM. 2013. Galectin-3 plays an important role in protection against disseminated candidiasis. Med Mycol 51:641–651. doi: 10.3109/13693786.2013.770607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Toth A, Csonka K, Jacobs C, Vagvolgyi C, Nosanchuk JD, Netea MG, Gacser A. 2013. Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis induce different T-cell responses in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. J Infect Dis 208:690–698. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jit188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Maródi L, Forehand JR, Johnston RB. 1991. Mechanisms of host defense against Candida species. II. Biochemical basis for the killing of Candida by mononuclear phagocytes. J Immunol 146:2790–2794. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Lehrer RI. 1972. Functional aspects of a second mechanism of candidacidal activity by human neutrophils. J Clin Invest 51:2566–2572. doi: 10.1172/JCI107073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Drazin RE, Lehrer RI. 1977. Fungicidal properties of a chymotrypsin-like cationic protein from human neutrophils: adsorption to Candida parapsilosis. Infect Immun 17:382–388. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.van Asbeck EC, Hoepelman AIM, Scharringa J, Herpers BL, Verhoef J. 2008. Mannose binding lectin plays a crucial role in innate immunity against yeast by enhanced complement activation and enhanced uptake of polymorphonuclear cells. BMC Microbiol 8:229. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-8-229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Wu Y, Min F, Pan J, Wang J, Yuan W, Zhang Y, Huang R, Zhang L. 2015. Systemic Candida parapsilosis infection model in immunosuppressed ICR mice and assessing the antifungal efficiency of fluconazole. Vet Med Int 2015:370641. doi: 10.1155/2015/370641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Nagy I, Filkor K, Németh T, Hamari Z, Vágvölgyi C, Gácser A. 2011. In vitro interactions of Candida parapsilosis wild type and lipase deficient mutants with human monocyte derived dendritic cells. BMC Microbiol 11:122. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Neumann AK, Jacobson K. 2010. A novel pseudopodial component of the dendritic cell anti-fungal response: the fungipod. PLoS Pathog 6:e1000760. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Patin EC, Jones AV, Thompson A, Clement M, Liao C-T, Griffiths JS, Wallace LE, Bryant CE, Lang R, Rosenstiel P, Humphreys IR, Taylor PR, Jones GW, Orr SJ. 2016. IL-27 induced by select Candida spp. via TLR7/NOD2 signaling and IFN-β production inhibits fungal clearance. J Immunol 197:208–221. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1501204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Steele C, Fidel PL Jr. 2002. Cytokine and chemokine production by human oral and vaginal epithelial cells in response to Candida albicans. Infect Immun 70:577–583. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.577-583.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Schaller M, Mailhammer R, Grassl G, Sander CA, Hube B, Korting HC. 2002. Infection of human oral epithelia with Candida species induces cytokine expression correlated to the degree of virulence. J Invest Dermatol 118:652–657. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1747.2002.01699.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Moyes DL, Runglall M, Murciano C, Shen C, Nayar D, Thavaraj S, Kohli A, Islam A, Mora-Montes H, Challacombe SJ, Naglik JR. 2010. A biphasic innate immune MAPK response discriminates between the yeast and hyphal forms of Candida albicans in epithelial cells. Cell Host Microbe 8:225–235. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2010.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Moyes DL, Murciano C, Runglall M, Kohli A, Islam A, Naglik JR. 2012. Activation of MAPK/c-Fos induced responses in oral epithelial cells is specific to Candida albicans and Candida dubliniensis hyphae. Med Microbiol Immunol 201:93–101. doi: 10.1007/s00430-011-0209-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Moyes DL, Murciano C, Runglall M, Islam A, Thavaraj S, Naglik JR. 2011. Candida albicans yeast and hyphae are discriminated by MAPK signaling in vaginal epithelial cells. PLoS One 6:e26580. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0026580. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Moyes DL, Wilson D, Richardson JP, Mogavero S, Tang SX, Wernecke J, Hofs S, Gratacap RL, Robbins J, Runglall M, Murciano C, Blagojevic M, Thavaraj S, Forster TM, Hebecker B, Kasper L, Vizcay G, Iancu SI, Kichik N, Hader A, Kurzai O, Luo T, Kruger T, Kniemeyer O, Cota E, Bader O, Wheeler RT, Gutsmann T, Hube B, Naglik JR. 2016. Candidalysin is a fungal peptide toxin critical for mucosal infection. Nature 532:64–68. doi: 10.1038/nature17625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Conti HR, Shen F, Nayyar N, Stocum E, Sun JN, Lindemann MJ, Ho AW, Hai JH, Yu JJ, Jung JW, Filler SG, Masso-Welch P, Edgerton M, Gaffen SL. 2009. Th17 cells and IL-17 receptor signaling are essential for mucosal host defense against oral candidiasis. J Exp Med 206:299–311. doi: 10.1084/jem.20081463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Hernandez-Santos N, Gaffen SL. 2012. Th17 cells in immunity to Candida albicans. Cell Host Microbe 11:425–435. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Joly S, Sutterwala FS. 2010. Fungal pathogen recognition by the NLRP3 inflammasome. Virulence 1:276–280. doi: 10.4161/viru.1.4.11482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Wellington M, Koselny K, Sutterwala FS, Krysan DJ. 2014. Candida albicans triggers NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis in macrophages. Eukaryot Cell 13:329–340. doi: 10.1128/EC.00336-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.van de Veerdonk FL, Joosten LA, Shaw PJ, Smeekens SP, Malireddi RK, van der Meer JW, Kullberg BJ, Netea MG, Kanneganti TD. 2011. The inflammasome drives protective Th1 and Th17 cellular responses in disseminated candidiasis. Eur J Immunol 41:2260–2268. doi: 10.1002/eji.201041226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Sutterwala FS, Haasken S, Cassel SL. 2014. Mechanism of NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1319:82–95. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Pietrella D, Pandey N, Gabrielli E, Pericolini E, Perito S, Kasper L, Bistoni F, Cassone A, Hube B, Vecchiarelli A. 2013. Secreted aspartic proteases of Candida albicans activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Eur J Immunol 43:679–692. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Giacomini E, Boccanera M, Giordani L, Cassone A, Luzzati AL. 1993. Induction of antibody forming cells with specificity for Candida albicans mannoproteins in cultures of human peripheral blood lymphocytes. J Immunol Methods 164:203–211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Panaretou B, Sinclair K, Prodromou C, Johal J, Pearl L, Piper PW. 1999. The Hsp90 of Candida albicans can confer Hsp90 functions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a potential model for the processes that generate immunogenic fragments of this molecular chaperone in C. albicans infections. Microbiology 145:3455–3463. doi: 10.1099/00221287-145-12-3455. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Swoboda RK, Bertram G, Budge S, Gooday GW, Gow NA, Brown AJ. 1995. Structure and regulation of the HSP90 gene from the pathogenic fungus Candida albicans. Infect Immun 63:4506–4514. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Matthews RC, Burnie JP, Tabaqchali S. 1987. Isolation of immunodominant antigens from sera of patients with systemic candidiasis and characterization of serological response to Candida albicans. J Clin Microbiol 25:230–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Matthews RC, Burnie JP, Tabaqchali S. 1984. Immunoblot analysis of the serological response in systemic candidosis. Lancet ii:1415–1418. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Matthews R, Burnie J. 2001. Antifungal antibodies: a new approach to the treatment of systemic candidiasis. Curr Opin Investig Drugs 2:472–476. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Matthews RC, Rigg G, Hodgetts S, Carter T, Chapman C, Gregory C, Illidge C, Burnie J. 2003. Preclinical assessment of the efficacy of mycograb, a human recombinant antibody against fungal HSP90. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:2208–2216. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.7.2208-2216.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Zhang MX, Bohlman MC, Itatani C, Burton DR, Parren PWHI, St Jeor SC, Kozel TR. 2006. Human recombinant antimannan immunoglobulin G1 antibody confers resistance to hematogenously disseminated candidiasis in mice. Infect Immun 74:362–369. doi: 10.1128/IAI.74.1.362-369.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.King J, Pana ZD, Lehrnbecher T, Steinbach WJ, Warris A. 2017. Recognition and clinical presentation of invasive fungal disease in neonates and children. J Pediatr Infect Dis Soc 6:S12–S21. doi: 10.1093/jpids/pix053. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Puig-Asensio M, Pemán J, Zaragoza R, Garnacho-Montero J, Martín-Mazuelos E, Cuenca-Estrella M, Almirante B, Prospective Population Study on Candidemia in Spain Project, Hospital Infection Study Group, Medical Mycology Study Group of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases. 2014. Impact of therapeutic strategies on the prognosis of candidemia in the ICU. Crit Care Med 42:1423–1432. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Guida JD, Kunig AM, Leef KH, McKenzie SE, Paul DA. 2003. Platelet count and sepsis in very low birth weight neonates: is there an organism-specific response? Pediatrics 111:1411–1415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Zhao D, Qiu G, Luo Z, Zhang Y. 2015. Platelet parameters and (1,3)-beta-D-glucan as a diagnostic and prognostic marker of invasive fungal disease in preterm infants. PLoS One 10:e0123907. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Benjamin DK Jr, Stoll BJ, Gantz MG, Walsh MC, Sanchez PJ, Das A, Shankaran S, Higgins RD, Auten KJ, Miller NA, Walsh TJ, Laptook AR, Carlo WA, Kennedy KA, Finer NN, Duara S, Schibler K, Chapman RL, Van Meurs KP, Frantz ID III, Phelps DL, Poindexter BB, Bell EF, O’Shea TM, Watterberg KL, Goldberg RN. 2010. Neonatal candidiasis: epidemiology, risk factors, and clinical judgment. Pediatrics 126:e865–e873. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-3412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Almirante B, Rodriguez D, Cuenca-Estrella M, Almela M, Sanchez F, Ayats J, Alonso-Tarres C, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Pahissa A. 2006. Epidemiology, risk factors, and prognosis of Candida parapsilosis bloodstream infections: case-control population-based surveillance study of patients in Barcelona, Spain, from 2002 to 2003. J Clin Microbiol 44:1681–1685. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.5.1681-1685.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Rodriguez D, Almirante B, Cuenca-Estrella M, Rodriguez-Tudela JL, Mensa J, Ayats J, Sanchez F, Pahissa A. 2010. Predictors of candidaemia caused by non-albicans Candida species: results of a population-based surveillance in Barcelona, Spain. Clin Microbiol Infect 16:1676–1682. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2010.03208.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Arendrup M, Horn T, Frimodt-Moller N. 2002. In vivo pathogenicity of eight medically relevant Candida species in an animal model. Infection 30:286–291. doi: 10.1007/s15010-002-2131-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Trofa D, Soghier L, Long C, Nosanchuk JD, Gacser A, Goldman DL. 2011. A rat model of neonatal candidiasis demonstrates the importance of lipases as virulence factors for Candida albicans and Candida parapsilosis. Mycopathologia 172:169–178. doi: 10.1007/s11046-011-9429-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Hemedez C, Trail-Burns E, Mao Q, Chu S, Shaw SK, Bliss JM, De Paepe ME. 7 September 2018. Pathology of neonatal non-albicans candidiasis: autopsy study and literature review. Pediatr Dev Pathol doi: 10.1177/1093526618798773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Microbiology Reviews are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES