Abstract
Thallium is considered as an emergent contaminant owing to its potential use in the superconductor alloys. The monovalent thallium, Tl(I), is highly toxic to the animals as it can affect numerous metabolic processes. Here we observed that Tl(I) decreased protein synthesis and phosphorylated eukaryotic initiation factor 2α. Although Tl(I) has been shown to interact with the sulfhydryl groups of proteins and cause the accumulation of reactive oxygen species, it did not activate endoplasmic reticulum stress. Notably, the level of 60S ribosomal subunit showed significant under-accumulation after the Tl(I) treatment. Given that Tl(I) shares similarities with potassium in terms of the ionic charge and atomic radius, we proposed that Tl(I) occupies certain K+-binding sites and inactivates the ribosomal function. However, we observed neither activation of ribophagy nor acceleration of the proteasomal degradation of 60S subunits. On the contrary, the ribosome synthesis pathway was severely blocked, i.e., the impairment of rRNA processing, deformed nucleoli, and accumulation of 60S subunits in the nucleus were observed. Although p53 remained inactivated, the decreased c-Myc and increased p21 levels indicated the activation of nucleolar stress. Therefore, we proposed that Tl(I) interfered the ribosome synthesis, thus resulting in cell growth inhibition and lethality.
Subject terms: Nucleolus, Ribosome
Introduction
Thallium is a natural source of trace element in the earth’s crust, with the concentration usually ranging from 0.3 mg/kg to 0.6 mg/kg. Thallium appears as monovalent Tl(I) and trivalent Tl(III) compounds in the environment. The inorganic Tl(I) is more stable than Tl(III) in solutions, but Tl(III) is more stable in its organic form1–3. Thallium is considered as an emergent contaminant because of its potential use in the superconductor alloys. The demand of thallium from the industries continually increases, and its contamination is becoming an important issue4.
Thallium is considered as a highly toxic element5. People exposed to high concentrations of thallium were shown to develop defects in the nervous system, lung, heart, liver, and kidneys or even death3,6. The chronic toxicity of thallium includes anorexia, pain in the abdomen, alopecia, and blindness6,7. Although thallium is a highly toxic element, the mechanism of its toxicity has been studied to a much lesser degree. Thallium binds to the sulfhydryl group of proteins and mitochondrial membranes, inhibiting various physiological functions, enzymatic reactions, and respiration.8. Thallium treatment also shows defects in DNA synthesis, energy generation, protein synthesis, and cell cycle progression9 in the mammalian cell lines, including PC12 cells10,11, rat hepatocytes12,13, and human T-lymphoblastoid Jurkat cell line14.
As Tl(I) and potassium ion (K+) possess similar ionic radii and are both monovalent, thallium is easily absorbed and affects the metabolic process of potassium and other cation-dependent reactions. Ions are important for the structural stability of the ribosomal subunits15. A total of 116 magnesium ions and 88 monovalent cations, including sodium and potassium, are found in the large ribosomal subunit from Haloarcula marismortui15. If the existing ions were replaced by other kinds of ions, the functions of ribosomes would be influenced. For example, although the total substitution of Ca2+ for Mg2+ resulted in lower activity and conformational change of the 50S ribosomal subunits from E. coli, the replacement of Sr2+ or Ba2+ completely inactivated the 50S subunits16. Studies have shown that the administration of Tl(I) to mice resulted in the reduced protein synthesis and disaggregation of liver polyribosome17. When incubating the isolated ribosomal subunits with a low concentration of Tl(I), Tl(I) could replace potassium in terms of certain partial functions. However, the high concentration of Tl(I) inactivates translation, particular destabilizing the 60S subunits17,18. Under this situation, the structure of the 60S ribosomal subunit was altered using chymotrypsin as a molecular probe17.
In this study, we observed that Tl(I) also affects the 60S ribosome synthesis pathway. The blockage of the 60S subunit synthesis, but not the degradation of abnormal 60S, primarily causes the under-accumulation of the large subunits in vivo. The ribosomes are composed of two subunits, a small subunit and a large subunit, which are the 40S and 60S subunits in the eukaryotic cells, respectively. The 40S and 60S subunits are assembled from a large primary rRNA 47S transcribed by RNA polymerase I. The processing of this rRNA yields the 5.8S, 18S, and 28S rRNA. The 5S rRNA is separately transcribed by RNA polymerase III (See reviews19–22. The 5S, 5.8S, and 28S rRNAs assemble with 46 ribosomal proteins to constitute the 60S subunit, whereas the 18S rRNA and 33 ribosomal proteins constitute the 40S subunit23–25. Ribosome biogenesis is a complex process requiring up to 200 transacting factors. It is essential for cell growth and proliferation. The Tl(I) treatment significantly reduced the 60S ribosomal subunits in a dose-dependent manner. The application of Tl(I) altered rRNA processing, changed the localization and abundance of important nucleolar proteins, and blocked the export process of pre-ribosomes. The impairment of ribosome synthesis induced nucleolar stress, resulting in the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis.
Results
Tl(I) inhibited cell growth
We wanted to focus on the primary blockage of the physiological functions by thallium toxicity. Therefore, we checked the cell lethality at different concentrations of Tl(I) to determine the dosage for further study. After treatment of the HEK293 cell line with Tl(I) for 24 h, we observed that the cells showed 85%, 78%, and 64% viability at Tl(I) concentrations of 5, 10, and 20 ppm, respectively (Fig. 1A).
The toxicity from metals usually results in oxidative stress, which originates from the imbalance of ROS production and the ability of cells to scavenge such molecules. Although the ROS are important for the regulation of various physiological functions, their excess production damages proteins, nucleic acids, membrane and causes the progression of various diseases, i.e., aging and inflammation.We evaluated the oxidative stress stimulated by Tl(I) and observed the elevated production of ROS at Tl(I) concentrations of 10 and 20 ppm (Fig. 1B,C).
The cells were further analyzed if the apoptosis pathway was activated. The cells were treated with Tl(I) and stained with Annexin V and PI. The viable cells decreased (region 3, Fig. 2A), whereas the apoptotic cells increased (region 2 and 4, Fig. 2A) in response to the increasing Tl(I) concentrations. The cell cycle was also analyzed in the cells treated with various concentrations of Tl(I). The cells at G2/M decreased, and those at the sub-G1 phase elevated under the application of Tl(I) (Fig. 2B). Therefore, under the range of applied concentrations, Tl(I) induced apoptosis and blocked the cell cycle progression.
Tl(I) decreased protein synthesis
To further dissect the effects of Tl(I) on the cells, the protein synthesis was analyzed with SUnSET26, a nonradioactive method for monitoring such process. Puromycin, a tRNA analog, can enter the tRNA-binding site of ribosome and conjugate with the peptides under synthesis. The puromycin-labeled nascent peptides could be detected by the anti-puromycin antibody. The level of nascent protein synthesis decreased with the increasing amount of Tl(I) (Fig. 3A). The polysome profiles were also used to assess the protein translation conditions. The amounts of translating ribosomes (Fig. 3B,C. polysome) decreased when Tl(I) was present in the culture. The polysome peaks indicate the amount of translating ribosomes bound on the mRNAs, showing the translation capacity. This observation supports the deficient synthesis of nascent proteins.
Stress usually inactivates global translation from the phosphorylation of eIF2α, preventing this subunit to join translation. This result was also observed when the cells were exposed to Tl(I) (Fig. 3D). Tl(I) has been shown to interact with the thiol groups of proteins and cause protein inactivation8. The accumulation of denatured proteins may activate the ER stress, which induces the phosphorylation of eIF2α and stops translation27. Tl(I) also induced the ROS production (Fig. 1B,C), which has been linked to ER stress. We examined whether Tl(I) decreased the protein synthesis through this route. However, none of the ER stress markers, including XBP1 (X-box binding protein 1), Bip, and CHOP (C/EBP homologous protein), was activated under Tl(I) treatment (data not shown).
Tl(I) decreased the levels of 60S ribosomal subunits
From the polysome profiles, under-accumulation of the 60S ribosomal subunits was observed after Tl(I) exposure (Fig. 3B,E). In the normal cells, the 40S and 60S subunits should be in equivalent ratio. As the 60S ribosome features higher molecular weight than the 40S subunit, it exhibited stronger absorbance at the examined wavelength. The peak area was about 1.5- to 2-fold larger than that of the 40S subunit. Under the increasing amount of Tl(I), the 60S subunit decreased in size. At 20 ppm, the 60S peak was lower than that of the 40S peak (Fig. 3B).
To magnify the changes in the ribosomal subunits, the cells were disrupted in the low-Mg buffer and fractioned through sucrose density gradient. Under this situation, the 40S and 60S subunits dissociated and appeared as two separate peaks. Consistently, the 60S subunit decreased under exposure to high concentrations of Tl(I) (Fig. 4A,B). Similarly, the levels of ribosomal proteins of large subunits decreased (RpL23 and RpL36). However, the levels of ribosomal proteins of small subunits remained unchanged (RpS3a) (Fig. 4C).
We also checked the levels of ribosomal subunits in NIH/3T3, mouse embryonic fibroblast cells, and CL1-0, human lung cancer cells. For a fair comparison, we also treated cells at different Tl(I) concentrations to cause comparable reduction of the cell number similar in HEK293T cells. CL1-0 showed 80% and 60% cell growth at 10 and 20 ppm Tl(I), respectively. Concentrations were required to be elevated to 20 and 100 ppm resulted in similar growth reduction in NIH3T3 (data not shown). Consistently, the 60S subunit was also reduced under Tl(I) treatment (Fig. 4D,E). In the CL1-0 cells, the levels of 40S subunit also dropped under the treatments, but the reduction was not as significant as that of the 60S subunit (Fig. 4E).
Reduction of the 60S ribosomal subunits was not from degradation of mature ribosomes but from underaccumulation of nascent subunits
The lower 60S peak possibly originated from the specific degradation or blockage of biogenesis of the large ribosomal subunits. As Tl(I) and potassium are remarkably similar, Tl(I) may replace potassium and inactivate the ribosomal functions17,18. Therefore, we first examined if Tl(I) reduced the level of 60S ribosome from the elimination of inactive ribosomal subunits. CHX was applied to stop protein synthesis, and the protein levels of ribosomal proteins (i.e., RpL36 and RpLl23) and transacting factors (i.e., Nmd3, fibrillarin, and NPM1) were tracked at different time points for evaluation of stability. The degradation rate did not accelerate under exposure to Tl(I) (Fig. 5A).
Ribosome could be degraded through autophagy, specifically ribophagy, under starvation or elimination of the dysfunctional subunits. Microtubule-associated protein LC3 is wildly used as an autophagy marker. During autophagy, LC3-I is cleaved at the carboxy terminus and yields LC3-II for association with autophagosomes. Therefore, the elevated level of cleaved LC3 form is used as an indicator of autophagy28. While the autophagy activator, chloroquine (CLQ), increased the level of LC3-II, Tl(I) treatment did not result any changes (Fig. 5B). In addition, RpL23a-GFP was used as a reporter for ribophagy. If the ribosomes were degraded through the autophagy route, an increase in GFP would be observed given that this molecule is more resistant to degradation29. Consistent with the results above, the GFP level did not increase under Tl(I) treatments (Fig. 5C). Hence, the lower 60S levels, instead of being caused by degradation, resulted from other events (Fig. 5).
To further dissect if the decrease was caused by the cytoplasmic or nuclear pool of the 60S subunit, we fractioned the cells (Fig. 6A) and analyzed the levels of ribosomal subunits through the sucrose gradients (Fig. 6B). Interestingly, the levels of ribosomes and the ratio between the 40S and 60S subunits from the cytosol remained constant between the control and 20 ppm-treated cells. However, the 60S level in nucleoplasm dropped significantly after the Tl(I) treatment (Fig. 6B,C). This finding suggests that Tl(I) affects the accumulation of pre-ribosomes but not the mature ribosomes.
To further analyze if Tl(I) altered the ribosome biogenesis, the morphology of nucleolus, the compartment where most ribosome synthesis occurs, was examined. NPM1 (B23/nucleophosmin) is a multifunctional nuclear acidic chaperone required in most stages of ribosome biogenesis30. Fibrillarin is an essential rRNA methyltransferase localized in the nucleolus, marked for active RNA polymerase I31. In the controls, both NPM1 and fibrillarin localized in the nucleolus (Fig. 7A,B, respectively). At 5 ppm, NPM1 maintained nucleolar enrichment but partially lost the nuclear signal. At 10 ppm and 20 ppm, NPM1 was shown as less condensed structures resembling necklace (indicated by yellow arrows) and disrupted nucleolar signals, respectively (Fig. 7A). Fibrillarin showed normal spherical shape of nucleolus but stronger cytoplasmic signals at 5 ppm. When Tl(I) increased to 10 ppm, nucleolar fragmentation and necklace formation exhibited (Fig. 7B indicated by yellow arrows). At 20 ppm, most fibrillarin was lost from the nucleolus (Fig. 7B). Tl(I) treatment induced abnormalities in nucleolar structure and mislocalizations of critical nucleolar proteins. This implies impairment of ribosome synthesis.
Tl(I) treatment impaired rRNA processing and ribosome biogenesis
To further investigate how thallium influences the ribosome synthesis pathway, we first examined the rRNA processing in cells treated with thallium. In human cells, 18S, 5.8S and 28S rRNAs are produced by RNA polymerase I on a single transcript. Following this event, a number of cleavage steps transpire to produce the final mature rRNAs (Fig. 7 Supplement). rRNA processing starts from the nucleolus and finishes in the cytoplasm. Nascent ribosomal subunits contain various pre-rRNAs, ribosomal proteins, and transacting factors. The compositions change dynamically and quickly during the synthesis steps. Northern blotting was performed to identify the rRNA processing steps influenced by thallium. The probes specific to the 5ʹ-external transcribed spacers (ETS), internal transcribed spacers (ITS) 1, ITS2, and 5ʹ-ITS2 regions were used to detect the pre-rRNAs (Supplementary Fig. S7).
Under the Tl(I) treatment, the 47S and 41S pre-rRNAs accumulated, whereas the downstream products, the 32S, 30S, 21S, 12S and 7S pre-rRNAs, decreased significantly (Fig. 7C,D). Therefore, rRNA processing was blocked at the very early stages by Tl(I).
We also tracked the cellular distribution of the ribosomal subunits. To track the 60S subunits, we used RpL23A-GFP and RpL36 as reporters. The cells transfected with RpL23A-GFP showed GFP signals in the cytoplasm, nucleoplasm, and nucleolus in the controls. Under Tl(I) exposure, the cytoplasmic signals were decreased (Fig. 8A). RpL36 was detected by immunofluorescence with the anti-RpL36 antibody. A stronger accumulation of RpL36 in the nucleolus was observed, whereas the cytoplasmic signal became weaker (Fig. 8B). By contrast, RpS3a showed no change under exposure to 20 ppm Tl(I) (Fig. 8C).
Tl(I) affected numerous genes in the ribosome biogenesis pathway
The transcriptome of Tl(I)-treated cells was analyzed using NGS technology (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA), and the results were obtained in duplicate. The square of the Pearson correlation coefficients of the controls and 20 ppm Tl(I)-treated samples were 0.992 and 0.991, respectively. These values demonstrate the small differences in the gene expressions between the samples in the same experimental group. A total of 1215 genes showed statistical significance (q value < 0.05) and were differentially expressed in two groups. Among these, 473 genes were upregulated, and 742 genes were downregulated (Fig. 9A).
To analyze the changes in gene expressions, the databases, Gene Ontology and KEGG, were used. The major groups changed in 20 ppm Tl(I) treatment, showing changes in protein export (7 genes among 23 genes), biosynthesis of amino acids (16 genes among 74 genes), RNA transport (26 genes among 163 genes), spliceosome (21 genes among 130 genes), ribosomal proteins (21 genes among 134 genes), and ribosome biogenesis in eukaryotes (13 genes among 84 genes) (Fig. 9B). All these pathways are connected with the ribosome synthesis.
To further confirm that Tl(I) changed the ribosome synthesis pathway, several genes involved in the ribosome biogenesis were selected for qPCR analyses. RNA exonuclease 2 (REXO2) is a 3ʹ-to-5ʹ exonuclease32 and plays roles in DNA repair, replication, and recombination, and in 3ʹ-end processing of U4 and U5 snRNAs and 5S and 5.8S rRNAs33. Nucleolar GTP-binding protein 1 (NOG1) and NOG2 (also called NUG2) are GTPases and important for the ribosome biogenesis34. In the qPCR results, the mRNA levels of REXO2, NOG1, and NOG2 significantly reduced under 5, 10, and 20 ppm Tl(1) exposure (Fig. 9C).
Tl(I) induced p53-independent nucleolar stress response
Impaired ribosome synthesis induces nucleolar stress response. Nucleolar stress may enhance the level of p53, resulting in the arrest of cell cycle or induction of apoptosis. To test this possibility, the transcription and protein level of p53 were examined with qPCR and Western blotting, respectively. However, p53 exhibited no elevation under Tl(I) treatment under either analyses (Fig. 9D; data not shown).
Nucleolar stress could be also activated via the p53-independent pathway35. In the NGS results, although the p53 signaling pathway was one of the most significantly enriched pathways after Tl(I) treatment (Fig. 9B), the expression level of p53 gene remained unchanged, consistent with the qPCR results. Instead, p21, a cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, was highly elevated in the NGS assay. Its accumulation also resulted in the cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. We confirmed this finding with qPCR and observed that p21 increased to about 6-fold at 20 ppm treatment (Fig. 9E). c-Myc is a master regulator, controlling the transcription of the three RNA polymerases. Excess ribosomal proteins from impaired ribosome biogenesis would reduce the level of c-Myc, leading to a decreased cell number in the S phase36. Consistently, the transcription level of c-Myc decreased pronouncedly at 10 and 20 ppm (Fig. 9F). The data above indicate that Tl(I) disturbed the ribosome synthesis and induced p53-independent nucleolar stress. This condition decreased the global protein synthesis and further arrested the cell cycle or triggered apoptosis.
Discussion
Tl(I) decreased the global translation from phosphorylation of eIF2α and blocked the 60S subunit biogenesis
The cellular 60S subunit levels decreased after Tl(I) treatment. As Tl(I) and potassium are very similar, Tl(I) may replace potassium and inactivate the ribosomal functions. Studies have shown that the incubation of isolated ribosome with Tl(I) inactivated ribosomal functions in an in vitro translation system17,18. In our study, we observed neither elimination of mature ribosomes through the proteasome nor the autophagy route.
The ribosome biogenesis, especially that of the large subunits, was impaired by Tl(I) in the nucleus/nucleolus. The ribosome biogenesis is a complicated process, involving more than 200 transacting factors. The biosynthesis of large subunits is more complicated than that of small subunits. The transacting factors include proteins with enzyme activity, such as ATPase, GTPase, and methyltransferase. One and five GTPases are shown to join the synthesis of the 40S and 60S ribosomal subunits, respectively. Three GTPases, Nug1, Nog2 (also called Nug2), and Lsg1, are K+-dependent and function in the biogenesis of large subunits34. One possibility is that Tl(I) competes with potassium for the binding sites of these enzymes and inactivates their functions. Nug1 is required for formation of peptidyl transferase center (PTC). The inactivation of Nug1 causes the blockage of processing at A2 in yeast, which is comparable to that at site 2 in humans37–39. Nog2 binds at the PTC site and is implicated in the 27SB to 7S processing40,41. Nog2 and Nog1 interact with multiple assembly factors and functional rRNA elements to remodel the pre-60S subunit. These GTPases are critical for the ITS2 removal and 60S export42. Lsg1 is a cytoplasmic protein that is required for releasing the essential export adapter Nmd3 from the 60S subunit and allows Nmd3 to return to the nucleus for another round of ribosome transportation43,44. In Tl(I)-treated cells, the accumulation of 47S and 41S rRNA, and under-accumulation of 30S, 32S, and 21S rRNA were observed. This finding is possibly due to the blockage of processing at site 2, potentially from the partial impairment of Nug1 and Nog2.
Tl induced p53-independent nucleolar stress
Stress usually inactivates the global translation from phosphorylation of eIF2α. This was also observed in the cells exposed to Tl(I). Tl(I) has been shown to interact with the thiol groups of proteins and cause protein inactivation. The accumulation of denatured proteins may activate the ER stress, which induces the phosphorylation of eIF2α and stops translation. The elevation of ROS triggered by Tl(I) can result in a reduction–oxidation imbalance and aggravate the ER stress through reducing the efficiency of protein folding pathways45. We examined the potential activations of several ER stress markers. However, neither one was activated under Tl(I) treatment.
Nucleolar stress is characterized by abnormalities in nucleolar structure and function. This leads to activation of p53 or other stress signaling pathways and alterations in cell behavior, i.e. cell cycle arrest or apoptosis35,46,47. Under normal conditions, ribosomal proteins translated in the cytoplasm are rapidly transported to the nucleus for incorporating into the nascent ribosomal subunits. The disturbance of ribosome synthesis causes accumulation of free ribosomal proteins, resulting in stabilization of p5348. However, activation of p53 was not observed in our study.
Excess ribosomal proteins could also induce p53-independent nucleolar stress35. c-Myc is a master regulator controlling the transcription of the three RNA polymerases49. Excess ribosomal proteins bind both c-Myc and its mRNA, reducing the level of c-Myc and the number of cells in the S phase36. p21 is a primary inhibitor of cyclin-dependent kinases. Under the impairment of ribosome biogenesis, a complex of RpL3 and NPM1 binds to the p21 promoter and causes the upregulation of p21 expression50. These two are common factors involved in p53-independent nucleolar stress. The levels of c-Myc and p21 mRNAs decreased and increased, respectively, in response to the concentrations of Tl(I). Though we cannot exclude the possibility that reduction of c-Myc after Tl treatment is the first cause to impair ribosome synthesis from our data. Both situations activate nucleolar stress.
While the reduction of 60S subunits was not significant at 10 ppm (Figs 3B, 4A), the decrease of c-Myc mRNA was dramatic (Fig. 9F). The decrease of RpL36 (Fig. 4C), and abnormalities in nucleolar structure (Fig. 7A) and rRNA processing (Fig. 7C,D) were still observed at 10 ppm. Therefore, the cellular response might correlate to the Tl(I) concentration. In conclusion, the cells exposed to Tl(I) exhibited decreased protein synthesis and impaired ribosome biogenesis, further triggering blockage of cell cycle progression and apoptosis.
Materials and Methods
Cell culture and miscellaneous
Human embryonic kidney 293 (HEK293) T and CL1-0 cell lines were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) (Gibco) with 5% fetal bovine serum, and NIH3T3 was cultured in DMEM with 5% calf serum. After passaging and culturing overnight, the medium was replaced with fresh DMEM containing different concentrations of TlNO3 for 24 h. The cells were harvested for further study. For the cell viability assay, 0.5 mg/mL 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) (Sigma) solution was added to each well of a 96-well plate and incubated for another 2 h. After aspiration, 200 µl dimethyl sulfoxide was added to each well, and the absorbance was recoded at 570 nm. For the transfection, the plasmid and TransIT-X2 (Mirus) reagent were mixed with Opti-MEM and applied to the cells. SUnSET26 was used to measure the global translation rate. The cells were exposed to 5 µg/mL puromycin for 10 min. The puromycin-conjugated nascent peptides were analyzed with anti-puromycin antibody (Millipore, MABE343). To detect the target proteins on the Western blots, the membranes were incubated with primary antibodies, including anti-nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1, or called B23) (Sigma, B0556), anti-fibrillarin (Abcam, Ab5821), anti-p53 (Merk, 05–224), anti-light chain 3 (LC3) B (OriGene, TA301543), anti-RpS3a (Bethyl, A305-03A), anti-RpL36 (Arigo, ARG56376), anti-tubulin (Merk, CBL270), anti-EIF2S1 (phospho S51) ((eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 2 alpha) (Abcam, Ab4837), anti-green fluorescent protein (GFP) (Roche, 11814460001), anti-CHOP (CST, 2895), anti-Bip (CST, 3183), and anti-histone (CST, 4499S) overnight at 4 °C, followed by a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody (Cell Signaling Technology). Protein signals were detected by ClarityTM ECL Substrate (Bio-Rad). Images were acquired with MultiGel-21 (TopBio, Taiwan). The original pictures of Western blots are shown in the Supplemental materials.
Northern blotting
Northern blotting was used to analyze the static state levels of pre-rRNAs. The total RNA prepared with TRI reagent (Sigma) was resolved on a formaldehyde agarose gel for large-molecular-weight rRNAs or urea polyacrylamide gel for small-molecular-weight rRNAs. The RNAs were transferred to a nitrocellulose membrane. The probes were labeled with Biotin 3ʹend labeling kit (Thermo) and continually hybridized and detected with North2South® Chemiluminescent hybridization and detection kit (Thermo), respectively. Table 1 lists the probe sequences.
Table 1.
Probes | Sequence | Source | |
---|---|---|---|
KLO414 | 5′ – ETS | CGGAGGCCCAACCTCTCCGACGACAGGTCGCCAGAGG | 51 |
KLO412 | ITS1 | CCTCGCCCTCCGGGCTCCGGGCTCCGTTAATGATC | 51 |
KLO413 | ITS2 | CTGCGAGGGAACCCCCAGCCGCGCA | 51 |
KLO550 | 5′ – ITS2 | GGGGCGATTGATCGGCAAGCGACGCTC | 51 |
KLO551 | 5.8S mat | CAATGTGTCCTGCAATTCAC | 51 |
KLO535 | 28S | TTCCTATCATTGTGAAGCAGAATTCACCAAGCGTTGGATTGTTCACCCACTAATAGGGAACGTGAGCTGGGTTTAGAC | 52 |
KLO570 | 5S | CATCC AAGTA CTACC AGGCC C | 53 |
Sucrose gradient analysis
For the polysome analyses, the control and Tl-treated cells were treated with 0.1 mg/ml cycloheximide (CHX) for 15 min before the preparation of cell lysates (lysis buffer: 15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 15 mM MgCl2, 200 mM NaCl, and 1% Triton X-100). To analyze the ratio of monosomes, the cells were harvested without CHX treatment and lysed in a low-Mg2+ buffer (15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.25 mM MgCl2, 200 mM NaCl, and 1% Triton X-100). To separate the nuclear and cytoplasmic ribosomal subunits, the cells were collected from seven 10 cm dishes and lysed in a low-Mg2+ buffer (15 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), 0.25 mM MgCl2, 200 mM NaCl, and 0.1% NP-40). After centrifugation at 3000 rpm, the supernatant was collected as a cytosolic fraction. The sonication buffer (25 mM Tris-HCl (pH7.5), 100 mM KCl, 2 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA), and 0.05% NP-40) was added at a 0.5 ml volume to suspend the pellet and sonicated on ice for 3 minutes. After centrifugation at 13,000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was collected as the nuclear fraction.
The protein extracts were loaded onto linear 10%–50% sucrose gradients in the same lysis buffer. After 2 h of centrifugation at 40,000 rpm in a SW41 Ti rotor (Beckman), the gradient fractions were collected on a density gradient fractionator (BR-188, Brandel), with continuous measurement of the absorbance at 254 nm. The fractions were collected for Western blotting. The area under the curve for each peak was calculated by Image J. The ratio of 60S to 40S or Polysome to ribosome was determined.
Microscopy
In the immunofluorescence assays, the cells were cultured overnight in the Millicell slide (Millipore) and then exposed to different concentrations of thallium for 24 h. Cells were fixed in methanol for 20 min and acetone for 1 min. After blocking in 5% bovine serum albumin for 30 min, the cells were incubated with primary antibody diluted in a blocking solution for overnight. After washing twice with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) with Tween 20, the fluorophore-conjugated secondary antibody was added and incubated for 1 h. After washing, the samples were mounted with a mounting solution. RpL23a-GFP was amplified with forward (ATGAGATCTATGGCGCCGAAAGCGAAG) and reverse primers (GCAGAATTCTTAGATGATCCCAATTTTGTTG) and constructed in pEGFP-C1. The RpL23a-GFP was transfected with TransIT-X2 (Mirus). To detect the reactive oxygen species (ROS), the cells were stained with 2ʹ,7ʹ-dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFDA) (Sigma) or MitoSOXTM (Thermo). Fluorescence was visualized on a microscope (AxioScope A1; Zeiss) fitted with a digital microscopy camera (AxioCam MRm Rev. 3), which was controlled with an AxioVision LE module Fluorescence Lite (Zeiss). The images were prepared using Photoshop (version CS3; Adobe).
Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR)
The cDNAs were prepared with High-Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Ambion). Real-time qPCR (RT-qPCR) was performed with a Power SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Ambion) in StepOne Real-Time PCR machine (Applied Biosystems). Table 2 lists the primer sequences.
Table 2.
Gene | Primer Sequence (F: forward, R: reverse) | Source | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
KLO381 | RNA exonuclease 2 homolog (Rex2) | F | CAAGGCAGTGAAGGAGAGTA | This study |
KLO382 | R | GTTTCATGAACTGGGGCATG | ||
KLO392 | β-actin | F | CACACTGTGCCCATCTACGA | This study |
KLO393 | R | GAACCGCTCATTGCCAATGG | ||
KLO588 | p21 | F | CATGTGGACCTGTCACTGTCTTGTA | (He et al., 2017) |
KLO589 | R | GAAGATCAGCCGGCGTTTG | ||
KLO614 | c-Myc | F | AAACACAAACTTGAACAGCTAC | This study |
KLO615 | R | ATTTGAGGCAGTTTACATTATGG | ||
KLO618 | NOG2 | F | GATGGTCCTCAATGACTGGCAG | This study |
KLO619 | R | GGACAACTTCCAAAGATGAGGAG | ||
KLO622 | NOG1 | F | CCGTTTGCCAACCATTGATCCG | This study |
KLO623 | R | GTTGTGAACGCATAGGGCTGGA |
Flow cytometry
To analyze the status of the cell cycle, the cells treated with Tl(I) for 24 h were collected in the tubes. The cells were fixed in cold PBS and methanol solution for 2 h at 4 °C. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with 550 U/mL RNase and 50 µg/ml propidium iodide (PI) for 30 min at 37 °C. To analyze the fraction of apoptotic cells, the cells were labeled with Annexin V–FITC apoptosis detection kit (Strong Biotech Co.). Approximately 10,000/sample cells were analyzed using a flow cytometer (FC500, Beckman Coulter, USA).
Next-generation sequencing (NGS) Analysis
The RNA was prepared in duplicate from cells treated with Tl(I) for 24 h using RNAzol (Sigma). After the RNA samples passed the quality controls, the mRNAs were purified with oligo(dT) beads. The mRNAs were then fragmented randomly, followed by cDNA synthesis using hexamers and the reverse transcriptase. The sequences were analyzed with HiSeq. 4000 (Illumina). The mRNA expression was analyzed with TopHat2. The gene expression values were calculated as fragments per kilo base of exon per million fragments mapped (FPKM), and HTSeq software was used to analyze the gene expression levels in the experiments. The Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) was utilized to generate the enrichment list and scattered plots.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We thank the staff of the Technology commons, College of Life Science, National Taiwan University for techniques support. This work was financially supported by the Mistry of Science and Technology of Taiwan under contract MOST 106-2313-B-002-031-MY3. The authors thank Enago (www.enago.tw) for the English language review.
Author Contributions
Study concept and design (Y.C. and K.L.); acquisition of data and statistical analysis (Y.C.); analysis and interpretation of data (Y.C. and K.L.); drafting of the manuscript (K.L.). All authors reviewed the manuscript.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-43413-1.
References
- 1.Galvan-Arzate S, Santamaria A. Thallium toxicity. Toxicology letters. 1998;99:1–13. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4274(98)00126-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Cvjetko P, Cvjetko I, Pavlica M. Thallium toxicity in humans. Arhiv za higijenu rada i toksikologiju. 2010;61:111–119. doi: 10.2478/10004-1254-61-2010-1976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Peter AL, Viraraghavan T. Thallium: a review of public health and environmental concerns. Environment international. 2005;31:493–501. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2004.09.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nriagu JO. Thallium. Chem Eng NewS. 2003;81:153. doi: 10.1021/cen-v081n036.p153. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cheam V. Thallium contamination of water in Canada. Water Qual Res J Can. 2001;36:851–878. doi: 10.2166/wqrj.2001.046. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lemper, F. H. & P. B. H. Thallium Metals and their compounds in the environment: occurrence, analysis, and biological relevance. New York: Weinheim, 1227–1241 (1991).
- 7.Zhang Z, Zhang BG, Long JP, Zhang XM, Chen GL. Thallium pollution associated with mining of thallium deposits. Sci China Ser D. 1998;41:75–81. doi: 10.1007/BF02932424. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Mulkey JP, Oehme FW. A Review of Thallium Toxicity. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1993;35:445–453. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Pino MT, Verstraeten SV. Tl(I) and Tl(III) alter the expression of EGF-dependent signals and cyclins required for pheochromocytoma (PC12) cell-cycle resumption and progression. Journal of applied toxicology: JAT. 2015;35:952–969. doi: 10.1002/jat.3096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hanzel CE, Gubiani MFA, Verstraeten SV. Endosomes and lysosomes are involved in early steps of Tl(III)-mediated apoptosis in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells. Arch Toxicol. 2012;86:1667–1680. doi: 10.1007/s00204-012-0878-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hanzel CE, Verstraeten SV. Tl(I) and Tl(III) activate both mitochondrial and extrinsic pathways of apoptosis in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells. Toxicol Appl Pharm. 2009;236:59–70. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2008.12.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Eskandari MR, Pourahmad J, Daraei B. Thallium(I) and thallium(III) induce apoptosis in isolated rat hepatocytes by alterations in mitochondrial function and generation of ROS. Toxicol Environ Chem. 2011;93:145–156. doi: 10.1080/02772248.2010.505826. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pourahmad J, Eskandari MR, Daraei B. A Comparison of Hepatocyte Cytotoxic Mechanisms for Thallium (I) and Thallium (III) Environ Toxicol. 2010;25:456–467. doi: 10.1002/tox.20590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Verstraeten SV. Relationship between thallium(I)-mediated plasma membrane fluidification and cell oxidants production in Jurkat T cells. Toxicology. 2006;222:95–102. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2006.01.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Klein DJ, Moore PB, Steitz TA. The contribution of metal ions to the structural stability of the large ribosomal subunit. RNA. 2004;10:1366–1379. doi: 10.1261/rna.7390804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Weiss RL, Kimes BW, Morris DR. Cations and ribosome structure. 3. Effects on the 30S and 50S subunits of replacing bound Mg 2+ by inorganic cations. Biochemistry. 1973;12:450–456. doi: 10.1021/bi00727a014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hultin T, Naslund PH. Effects of thallium (I) on the structure and functions of mammalian ribosomes. Chemico-biological interactions. 1974;8:315–328. doi: 10.1016/0009-2797(74)90010-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hultin T, Naslund PH. Stimulation of enzymatic phe-tRNA binding to mammalian ribosomes by thallium ions at concentrations blocking other ribosomal functions. European journal of biochemistry/FEBS. 1978;88:143–148. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1978.tb12431.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Gerhardy S, Menet AM, Pena C, Petkowski JJ, Panse VG. Assembly and nuclear export of pre-ribosomal particles in budding yeast. Chromosoma. 2014;123:327–344. doi: 10.1007/s00412-014-0463-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ciganda M, Williams N. Eukaryotic 5S rRNA biogenesis. Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. RNA. 2011;2:523–533. doi: 10.1002/wrna.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Strunk BS, Karbstein K. Powering through ribosome assembly. RNA. 2009;15:2083–2104. doi: 10.1261/rna.1792109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Woolford JL, Jr., Baserga SJ. Ribosome biogenesis in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics. 2013;195:643–681. doi: 10.1534/genetics.113.153197. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Planta RJ, Mager WH. The list of cytoplasmic ribosomal proteins of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast. 1998;14:471–477. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0061(19980330)14:5<471::AID-YEA241>3.0.CO;2-U. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sengupta J, et al. Identification of the versatile scaffold protein RACK1 on the eukaryotic ribosome by cryo-EM. Nature structural & molecular biology. 2004;11:957–962. doi: 10.1038/nsmb822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Ben-Shem A, et al. The structure of the eukaryotic ribosome at 3.0 A resolution. Science. 2011;334:1524–1529. doi: 10.1126/science.1212642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Schmidt EK, Clavarino G, Ceppi M, Pierre P. SUnSET, a nonradioactive method to monitor protein synthesis. Nature methods. 2009;6:275–277. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Walter P, Ron D. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science. 2011;334:1081–1086. doi: 10.1126/science.1209038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tanida I, Ueno T, Kominami E. LC3 and Autophagy. Methods Mol Biol. 2008;445:77–88. doi: 10.1007/978-1-59745-157-4_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ossareh-Nazari B, et al. Cdc48 and Ufd3, new partners of the ubiquitin protease Ubp3, are required for ribophagy. EMBO reports. 2010;11:548–554. doi: 10.1038/embor.2010.74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Lindstrom MS. NPM1/B23: A Multifunctional Chaperone in Ribosome Biogenesis and Chromatin Remodeling. Biochem Res Int. 2011;2011:195209. doi: 10.1155/2011/195209. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Rodriguez-Corona U, Sobol M, Rodriguez-Zapata LC, Hozak P, Castano E. Fibrillarin from Archaea to human. Biol Cell. 2015;107:159–174. doi: 10.1111/boc.201400077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Tamura K, et al. Identification of EloA-BP1, a novel Elongin A binding protein with an exonuclease homology domain. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2003;309:189–195. doi: 10.1016/S0006-291X(03)01556-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nariai M, et al. Synergistic defect in 60S ribosomal subunit assembly caused by a mutation of Rrs1p, a ribosomal protein L11-binding protein, and 3′-extension of 5S rRNA in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:4553–4562. doi: 10.1093/nar/gki772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Karbstein K. Role of GTPases in ribosome assembly. Biopolymers. 2007;87:1–11. doi: 10.1002/bip.20762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.James A, Wang YB, Raje H, Rosby R, DiMario P. Nucleolar stress with and without p53. Nucleus. 2014;5:402–426. doi: 10.4161/nucl.32235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Dai MS, Arnold H, Sun XX, Sears R, Lu H. Inhibition of c-Myc activity by ribosomal protein L11. EMBO J. 2007;26:3332–3345. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bassler J, et al. Identification of a 60S preribosomal particle that is closely linked to nuclear export. Molecular Cell. 2001;8:517–529. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00342-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bassler J, Kallas M, Hurt E. The NUG1 GTPase reveals and N-terminal RNA-binding domain that is essential for association with 60 S pre-ribosomal particles. J Biol Chem. 2006;281:24737–24744. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M604261200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Manikas RG, Thomson E, Thoms M, Hurt E. The K+−dependent GTPase Nug1 is implicated in the association of the helicase Dbp10 to the immature peptidyl transferase centre during ribosome maturation. Nucleic Acids Research. 2016;44:1800–1812. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Matsuo Y, et al. Coupled GTPase and remodelling ATPase activities form a checkpoint for ribosome export. Nature. 2014;505:112–116. doi: 10.1038/nature12731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Saveanu C, et al. Nog2p, a putative GTPase associated with pre-60S subunits and required for late 60S maturation steps. EMBO J. 2001;20:6475–6484. doi: 10.1093/emboj/20.22.6475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu S, et al. Diverse roles of assembly factors revealed by structures of late nuclear pre-60S ribosomes. Nature. 2016;534:133–137. doi: 10.1038/nature17942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Hedges J, West M, Johnson AW. Release of the export adapter, Nmd3p, from the 60S ribosomal subunit requires Rpl10p and the cytoplasmic GTPase Lsg1p. EMBO J. 2005;24:567–579. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kallstrom G, Hedges J, Johnson A. The putative GTPases Nog1p and Lsg1p are required for 60S ribosomal subunit biogenesis and are localized to the nucleus and cytoplasm, respectively. Mol Cell Biol. 2003;23:4344–4355. doi: 10.1128/MCB.23.12.4344-4355.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Plaisance V, et al. Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Links Oxidative Stress to Impaired Pancreatic Beta-Cell Function Caused by Human Oxidized LDL. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163046. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163046. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Boulon S, Westman BJ, Hutten S, Boisvert FM, Lamond AI. The nucleolus under stress. Mol Cell. 2010;40:216–227. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.09.024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Yang K, Yang J, Yi J. Nucleolar Stress: hallmarks, sensing mechanism and diseases. Cell Stress. 2018;2:125–140. doi: 10.15698/cst2018.06.139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Russo, A. & Russo, G. Ribosomal Proteins Control or Bypass p53 during Nucleolar Stress. Int J Mol Sci. 18 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 49.van Riggelen J, Yetil A, Felsher DW. MYC as a regulator of ribosome biogenesis and protein synthesis. Nature Reviews Cancer. 2010;10:301–309. doi: 10.1038/nrc2819. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Russo A, et al. Human rpL3 induces G(1)/S arrest or apoptosis by modulating p21 (waf1/cip1) levels in a p53-independent manner. Cell Cycle. 2013;12:76–87. doi: 10.4161/cc.22963. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tafforeau L, et al. The complexity of human ribosome biogenesis revealed by systematic nucleolar screening of Pre-rRNA processing factors. Mol Cell. 2013;51:539–551. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Bruick RK. Expression of the gene encoding the proapoptotic Nip3 protein is induced by hypoxia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:9082–9087. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.9082. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Smirnov A, Entelis N, Martin RP, Tarassov I. Biological significance of 5S rRNA import into human mitochondria: role of ribosomal protein MRP-L18. Genes Dev. 2011;25:1289–1305. doi: 10.1101/gad.624711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.