Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2019 Jul 12;7(4):10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0022-2018. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.gpp3-0022-2018

Immunology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Infections

Jonathan Kevin Sia 1, Jyothi Rengarajan 2
Editors: Vincent A Fischetti3, Richard P Novick4, Joseph J Ferretti5, Daniel A Portnoy6, Miriam Braunstein7, Julian I Rood8
PMCID: PMC6636855  NIHMSID: NIHMS998412  PMID: 31298204

ABSTRACT

Tuberculosis (TB) is a serious global public health challenge that results in significant morbidity and mortality worldwide. TB is caused by infection with the bacilli Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M. tuberculosis), which has evolved a wide variety of strategies in order to thrive within its host. Understanding the complex interactions between M. tuberculosis and host immunity can inform the rational design of better TB vaccines and therapeutics. This chapter covers innate and adaptive immunity against M. tuberculosis infection, including insights on bacterial immune evasion and subversion garnered from animal models of infection and human studies. In addition, this chapter discusses the immunology of the TB granuloma, TB diagnostics, and TB comorbidities. Finally, this chapter provides a broad overview of the current TB vaccine pipeline.

INTRODUCTION

Mycobacterium tuberculosis, the etiologic agent of tuberculosis (TB), remains a significant global public health burden (1). In 2016, there were 10.4 million new TB cases reported globally and nearly 1.7 million TB-related deaths (1). Understanding the host response to M. tuberculosis infection is a key aspect of efforts to eradicate TB through the development of effective vaccines and immune therapeutics. M. tuberculosis is an intracellular pathogen transmitted via inhalation of aerosolized, bacteria-containing droplets. Innate immune cells in the lungs, primarily macrophages, dendritic cells, monocytes, and neutrophils, readily phagocytose M. tuberculosis and are the earliest defenders against the pathogen. The transformation of bacteria-containing phagosomes into acidified, antimicrobial compartments is a central tenet of defense against M. tuberculosis. In this regard, the production of interferon-γ (IFN-γ), which can activate infected myeloid cells and inhibit bacterial replication, is a well-known antimycobacterial contribution by adaptive immune cells such as CD4 and CD8 T cells. Despite pressures from host immunity, M. tuberculosis is able to persist in the host. M. tuberculosis infection results in hallmark lesions called granulomas, which are initially aggregates of infected and uninfected myeloid cells circumscribed by a lymphocytic cuff. The granuloma is thought to prevent bacterial dissemination to extrapulmonary sites but can also become a niche for long-term bacterial persistence. M. tuberculosis has evolved myriad strategies to evade and subvert immune responses to persist within a host, and it is becoming increasingly clear that the immune response to M. tuberculosis infection involves contributions from a wide variety of innate and adaptive immune cells. A clearer understanding of the complex cross talk between M. tuberculosis and host immunity is essential for the development of efficacious TB vaccines. Despite being developed nearly a century ago, Mycobacterium bovis bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), an attenuated strain of M. bovis, remains the only licensed vaccine against TB. Vaccination with BCG provides protection against severe forms of disseminated TB in children but has variable efficacy in preventing pulmonary disease in children and adults (24). However, the immunological basis for the poor efficacy of BCG remains unclear. Moreover, long-held concepts regarding the nature of desired immune responses in an ideal TB vaccine, namely, the induction of antigen-specific CD4 T cells producing IFN-γ, are being updated to reflect the expanding knowledge of host immunity to M. tuberculosis infection gathered from animal models and human cohort studies. Advances in imaging and single-cell technologies combined with high-throughput approaches and systems-based analyses are providing more information on the immune response to M. tuberculosis infection at increasingly higher resolutions. As our understanding of the host response to M. tuberculosis infection grows, opportunities to leverage knowledge of the immunology of M. tuberculosis infection toward improving therapeutics and vaccines for TB are increasing.

This article will cover integral features of the innate and adaptive immune response to M. tuberculosis infection. Additionally, it will highlight recent findings on the hallmark granuloma and novel cellular players contributing to the host response to M. tuberculosis infection. Finally, it will provide an overview of the state of TB vaccine research, including a summary of BCG-based vaccines and the TB vaccine pipeline.

IMMUNOPATHOGENESIS OF TB IN HUMANS AND ANIMAL MODELS

Overview of Human TB Disease and Comorbidities

Transmission of M. tuberculosis occurs after inhalation of aerosolized droplets containing live bacteria into the lungs. Successful transmission is influenced by a variety of conditions, including proximity and duration of contact with an individual with active TB (ATB) disease and the immune-competency of the individual infected with M. tuberculosis (57). We now appreciate that in a clinical setting, M. tuberculosis infection presents as a continuum of diseased/infected states ranging from asymptomatic latent TB infection (LTBI) to ATB disease. This complexity, combined with remarkable heterogeneity in lesions within a single patient, has presented unique challenges to the eradication of TB (8). While the majority of individuals exposed to M. tuberculosis are able to control infection in the form of LTBI, an estimated 5 to 10% of people exposed to M. tuberculosis develop ATB, which is characterized by a persistent cough accompanied by sputum production, weight loss, weakness, and night sweats (9). Clinical diagnosis and treatment of M. tuberculosis infection is complicated by a variety of coinfections and comorbidities.

Comorbidities that modulate immune function can exacerbate TB disease or contribute to progression of individuals with LTBI to ATB. HIV coinfection in latently infected individuals increases the risk of developing TB from a 5 to 10% lifetime risk to a 10% annual risk, and HIV infection is the single greatest risk factor for the development of TB (1014). The relevance of HIV coinfection to global TB mortality is highlighted by the fact that more than a fifth of all TB-related deaths in 2016 were in HIV-positive individuals (1). Progressive depletion and dysfunction of CD4 T cells following HIV infection leads to immune suppression and negatively impacts immunity to M. tuberculosis. Specific depletion of M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells has been reported in the peripheral blood (15, 16) and broncheoalveolar lavage (BAL) samples (17, 18) of HIV-infected individuals with LTBI. Several studies indicate that specific depletion may be a consequence of enhanced HIV coreceptor expression in CD4 T cells, particularly CCR5, in TB patients (15, 1924). Alternative hypotheses to explain specific depletion of M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells include differential functionality of specific T cells. In HIV coinfected LTBI, M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells are reported to secrete interleukin 2 (IL-2) in contrast to MIP-1β (macrophage inflammatory protein 1 beta) secreted by cytomegalovirus-specific CD4 T cells (16). Analysis of viral loads in HIV coinfected LTBI showed an inverse correlation between viral load and the frequency of M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells secreting IL-2 (25), suggesting that IL-2 producing M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells may be specifically depleted in the context of HIV coinfection. Relatedly, HIV-coinfected individuals have lower frequencies of cytokine-producing M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells with impaired proliferative capacity compared to HIV-uninfected individuals with LTBI (2628), suggesting M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T-cell dysfunction during HIV-infection. The relative contributions of depletion versus dysfunction of M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells to enhanced TB risk following HIV infection remains unclear. Further, HIV infection may perturb protective immunity to M. tuberculosis in other immune compartments, such as CD8 T cells. For instance, M. tuberculosis-specific CD8 T cells from individuals with LTBI are reported to have impaired proliferation and degranulation in HIV-infected compared to HIV-uninfected individuals (29). Studies have also described associations between TB and many other conditions or activities, including smoking, malnutrition, diabetes, helminth infections, chronic lung diseases, and cancer (30, 31). Further investigations will be required to fully understand the basis of identified associations with other infections and morbidities.

Animal Models of Infection

Knowledge of the host response to M. tuberculosis infection has benefited greatly from the development of animal models of infection. The variable outcomes of M. tuberculosis infection in humans are challenging to model in a single animal model. Many experimental animals are susceptible to M. tuberculosis infection and can inform us about aspects of human disease. The mouse model for TB benefits from many advantages: ease of manipulation and housing, availability of well-characterized inbred strains, sophisticated techniques for the generation of mutant strains, availability of immunological and other reagents, and relatively low cost. Mice have been utilized to model host responses to M. tuberculosis infection, to evaluate drug and vaccine candidates, and to study the immune response to mutant strains of mycobacteria. Experimental infection can be delivered through multiple routes: intravenously, intraperitoneally, intratracheally, or via aerosolized particles. The latter method, especially low-dose aerosol infection, is the most physiologically relevant and has become the preferred method. Different mouse strains have well-characterized lung pathologies and levels of susceptibility (3236). Typically, following bacterial deposition into the lungs, it takes approximately 2 weeks to begin priming adaptive immune responses in the lung-draining lymph nodes and a further 1 to 2 weeks for robust participation in the lungs by adaptive immune cells, but bacterial burdens continue to be maintained at a high level in the lungs of M. tuberculosis-infected mice. There are limitations to what can be gleaned from mouse models of M. tuberculosis infection due to the differences in lung pathology between mice and humans. Further, true latent infection and significant immune control of infection are difficult to establish in the mouse model, though chemotherapeutically induced models of paucibacillary disease in mice exist (37, 38). The development of humanized mice that can recapitulate the heterogeneity of human lung pathology may extend the advantages of the mouse model, but humanized mice are also reported to display aberrant T-cell responses and be unable to control bacterial burden (39, 40).

Other animal models of M. tuberculosis infection include guinea pigs, rabbits, fish, and non-human primates (NHP). Each has distinct advantages and disadvantages that make their use particularly suitable for different types of research questions. Following infection, guinea pigs exhibit pathological features, such as the organization and development of caseous necrotic granulomas, that more accurately recapitulate the human granulomatous response compared to mice (41). Further, guinea pigs are very susceptible to M. tuberculosis infection and, thus, are a good choice for testing candidate drugs and vaccines and studying dissemination dynamics. Similarly, rabbits develop a well-organized granuloma that can become necrotic following mycobacterial infection. However, rabbits are resistant to M. tuberculosis, and high numbers of bacteria during inoculation or use of more virulent strains are needed (4245). Nevertheless, the rabbit model has been leveraged to study relatively rarer forms of TB, such as cutaneous and meningeal TB (46, 47). The usefulness of both the guinea pig and rabbit models is hampered by the scarcity of immunologic reagents relative to mice. The zebrafish model has provided novel insights into the establishment of the mycobacterial granuloma. Infection of transparent zebrafish larvae with the natural fish pathogen Mycobacterium marinum leads to the establishment of well-organized granulomas that become necrotic and can be visually monitored (48). The primary advantage of the zebrafish model is the transparency of the zebrafish larvae, which, alongside facile manipulation of host and bacterial genetics, has been leveraged for insight into early innate immune events leading to the formation of the granuloma as well as insights into human disease. Adaptive immunity is present in adult zebrafish, and different populations of CD4 T cells have recently been described (49, 50), but these animals are no longer transparent, and relevance of the adult zebrafish immune response to human TB have yet to be established.

The NHP model of M. tuberculosis infection reflects much of the heterogeneity observed in human TB. Infection of NHPs is typically performed by aerosol or direct bronchoscopic deposition into the lungs of rhesus or cynomolgus macaques and, depending on the dose of the inoculation and the strain of bacteria utilized, leads to symptomatic ATB disease or asymptomatic infection in which bacteria persist at low levels akin to LTBI. The NHP model accurately recapitulates many of the hallmark granulomas seen in humans, including the heterogeneity of granulomas that can be present in the same animal (51), and presents clinical symptoms similar to those seen in humans (5257). The NHP model is regarded as an important preclinical model for TB research and is an excellent model for studying immunity to M. tuberculosis and assessing candidate drug and vaccine efficacies (5863). Further, the NHP model can be used to study reactivation in the setting of simian immunodeficiency virus coinfection or other types of immune modulation, such as anti-tumor necrosis-α (anti-TNF-α) treatment, CD4 depletion, or inhibition of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) (6471).

INNATE IMMUNITY TO M. TUBERCULOSIS INFECTION

The earliest encounter between host and pathogen in TB occurs at the interface between innate immune cells and M. tuberculosis. While innate immunity is critical for early antimycobacterial responses, it is also important for the progression of infection and long-term control of M. tuberculosis by continually priming and educating adaptive immune responses and by regulating inflammation. However, innate immune cells are often niches for bacterial replication, and M. tuberculosis utilizes a variety of strategies that subvert innate immune responses to establish a chronic infection. Here, we will detail key features of the innate immune response to M. tuberculosis infection, starting from recognition of the bacterium and phagosomal defenses within infected macrophages to priming of adaptive immune responses by professional antigen-presenting cells. In between, we will highlight how neutrophils and monocytes are mobilized after M. tuberculosis infection, the role that natural killer (NK) cells play during infection, how the balance of inflammation is regulated by the innate immune system, and how cell death affects the immune response. In each section, we will also highlight some of the myriad strategies that M. tuberculosis utilizes to subvert or evade the host innate immune response.

Recognition of M. tuberculosis by Pattern Recognition Receptors

Pathogen-associated molecular patterns on M. tuberculosis are recognized via a variety of receptors to mediate opsonic and nonopsonic bacterial uptake: C-type lectins (e.g., mannose receptors, DC-SIGN, Dectin-1, Dectin-2, Mincle), complement receptors (e.g., complement receptor 3), collectins (e.g., surfactant proteins A and D, mannose-binding lectin), scavenger receptors (e.g., MARCO, SR-A1, CD36, SR-B1), Fc receptors (e.g., FcgR), glycophosphatidylinositol-anchored membrane receptors (e.g., CD14), and Toll-like receptors (TLRs) (e.g., TLR-2, TLR-4, TLR-9) (7274). Mannosylated lipoarabinomannan, phosphatidyl-inositol mannosides, phthiocerol dimycocerosates, phenolic glycolipids (PGLs), trehalose dimycolate, peptidoglycan, and other mycobacterial components are recognized by an array of cell surface and intracellular receptors that mediate phagocytosis and/or antimicrobial defenses. M. tuberculosis DNA (75, 76) or bacterial second messengers (77) can be recognized by cytosolic pattern recognition receptors (PRRs), such as cGAS and STING (78, 79), to induce downstream cytokine production and autophagy. Further, nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptors (NLRs) are cytosolic PRRs that recognize M. tuberculosis pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as muramyl dipeptide, to activate a multiprotein complex termed the inflammasome. Functional redundancies for many of the receptors are likely to exist due to promiscuous ligand binding by different receptors and the wide array of available ligands on M. tuberculosis. Indeed, single or double knockouts for canonical scavenger receptors and C-type lectin receptors did not modulate susceptibility or attenuate immune responses following M. tuberculosis infection (80). However, increased susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection in a variety of knockout mice demonstrate that a number of PRRs and their associated signaling pathways also play important, nonredundant roles in host defense against M. tuberculosis infection.

M. tuberculosis expresses a variety of known or putative TLR ligands, and TLR-2, TLR-4, and TLR-9 have been implicated in host recognition of M. tuberculosis (reviewed in 73, 74). Polymorphisms in specific TLRs or TLR signaling proteins have also been strongly associated with pulmonary TB in humans and have been shown to influence immunity against M. tuberculosis (8184). The contribution of individual TLRs to immunity against M. tuberculosis infection is variable, but the importance of the TLR signaling pathway to antimycobacterial immunity is evident in studies showing that mice lacking the common TLR adaptor protein, myeloid differentiation factor 88 (MyD88), quickly succumb to M. tuberculosis infection (85, 86). Susceptibility of MyD88–/– mice to M. tuberculosis infection has been attributed to deficient expression of NOS2 (86), impaired ability to activate the IL-1β or IL-1 receptor (IL1R) pathway (87, 88), impaired receptivity of macrophages to IFN-γ signaling (89), and impaired IL-12 and TNF-α responses in macrophages and dendritic cells (DCs) (85). Gene-deletion studies in single TLRs have revealed that innate immune responses to M. tuberculosis are likely the result of the complex activation of multiple signaling pathways. For instance, mice lacking both TLR-2 and TLR-9 are more susceptible to M. tuberculosis infection than mice lacking the ability to signal through either TLR by itself (90). The susceptibility of MyD88–/– mice to M. tuberculosis infection is an example of the importance of common adaptor molecules that integrate signals from multiple PRRs and other innate immune pathways for the induction of antimycobacterial immunity. Further evidence for this concept is demonstrated by the increased susceptibility of M. tuberculosis-infected mice lacking CARD9, an adapter molecule integrating signals from C-type lectin receptors, or PYCARD/ASC, an adapter molecule integrating signals from nucleotide oligomerization domain-like receptors for the induction of the inflammasome (91, 92).

MyD88 signaling in innate immunity integrates signaling from TLR and IL-1 receptor families by bridging ligand-receptor binding to IL-1-receptor-associated kinases and the activation of multiple downstream pathways, including NF-κB, mitogen-activated protein kinases, and activator protein 1. The IL-1 signaling pathway is clearly required for resistance to M. tuberculosis infection in mouse models and is supported by human immunogenetics studies (9396). In mice, the absence of IL-1 signaling led to severe susceptibility to M. tuberculosis infection. Both IL-1α and IL-1β, as well as their common receptor, IL-1R1, have been implicated in immunity to M. tuberculosis (87, 88, 97101). Secretion of the mature form of IL-1β requires cleavage by the terminal inflammasome effector, caspase-1, but M. tuberculosis-infected mice lacking MyD88, ASC, or caspase-1 signaling do not display impaired IL-1β levels (87). Further, mice deficient in IL-1β are considerably more susceptible to M. tuberculosis infection than mice lacking ASC or caspase-1 (87). These findings suggest that IL-1β is a key mediator of resistance to M. tuberculosis infection but also indicate that the basis for resistance conferred by MyD88, CARD9, and PYCARD/ASC likely depend on additional factors beyond IL-1β.

While host recognition of M. tuberculosis leads to the activation of innate immunity, M. tuberculosis has also evolved strategies that evade innate immune responses mediated by PRRs. Strain-specific expression of cell envelope components may be associated with differential immune responses. For example, the W-Beijing lineage strain, HN878, has been found to express polyketide synthase-derived phenolic glycolipids that are missing in lab-adapted H37Rv or other clinical isolates (i.e., CDC1551) (102). Expression of PGL by HN878 has been found to diminish production of multiple innate immune cytokines and chemokines (102, 103), though its role in the increased virulence of HN878 remains controversial. Modulation of innate immune responses by M. tuberculosis is also accomplished through the presence of immune-inhibitory lipid components that compete with immune-activating mycobacterial components for the same receptors. For example, expression of tetraacylated sulfoglycolipids by the W-Beijing strain GC1237 can competitively bind TLR-2 to attenuate responses to canonical TLR-2 agonists, including mycobacterial lipomannans (104). Lastly, M. tuberculosis can also impair innate immune responses to cell-envelope components through enzymatic means. For instance, an M. tuberculosis serine-hydrolase, Hip1, was found to cleave multimeric, cell wall-associated GroEL2 to a secreted monomeric form to mediate attenuated macrophage and DC responses (105109). Additionally, M. tuberculosis mutants lacking hip1 or a putative mycobacterial metalloprotease, zmp1, display enhanced inflammasome activation (106, 110), suggesting that M. tuberculosis has multiple strategies for dampening activation of the inflammasome.

Thus, in addition to the array of host receptors that mediate recognition of M. tuberculosis, innate immune responses to infection likely depend on the strain of M. tuberculosis, the presence of cell wall components that can competitively inhibit the activation of PRRs, and the presence of M. tuberculosis enzymes that modify the immunogenicity of cell envelope components.

Phagosomal Defense in Macrophages

Macrophages are the first immune cells to encounter M. tuberculosis during infection and also represent the primary replicative niche for M. tuberculosis. Recognition of M. tuberculosis by macrophages leads to phagocytosis and sequestration of the bacterium in phagosomes, which typically eradicate pathogens via fusion with lysosomes and consequent acidification of the pathogen-containing phagolysosome. However, M. tuberculosis is able to survive and replicate in the phagosome by inhibiting phagosomal maturation and phagolysosomal generation through a variety of mechanisms (reviewed in 72, 111). Further, transcriptional profiling of intraphagosomal bacteria indicated that M. tuberculosis readily counters the nitrosative, oxidative, hypoxic, and nutrient-poor phagosomal environment through the expression of stress-adaptive genes (112), though a genome-wide transposon site hybridization screen for M. tuberculosis survival in macrophages suggested that M. tuberculosis constitutively expresses genes required for its survival (113). Nevertheless, it is clear that M. tuberculosis has adapted for a lifestyle inside the macrophage and employs many strategies to survive within these cells.

M. tuberculosis glycolipids can prevent accumulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate on phagosomal membranes and prevent phagolysosome biosynthesis (114). M. tuberculosis also secretes phosphatases (SapM and PtpA) and serine/threonine kinases (PknG) that are proposed to interfere with phagosomal maturation (115121). There is also evidence that M. tuberculosis lipids, in particular, phthiocerol dimycocerosates, can mediate escape from the phagosome and host cell death (122). An M. tuberculosis secretion system, ESX-1, is also known for mediating disruptions in phagosomal integrity and preventing phagosome maturation. Promotion of aberrant phagosomal integrity and bacterial replication by M. tuberculosis ESX-1 is countered by IFN-γ-induced, Rab20-mediated phagosomal maturation (123). ESX-1-mediated phagosomal escape of bacteria is hypothesized to work through disruption of the phagosome by the 6-kDa early secretory antigenic target (ESAT-6) (124127), though recent evidence proposes a contact-dependent, ESAT-6-independent mechanism for ESX-1-mediated phagosomal permeabilization (128). Nevertheless, ESX-1-mediated permeabilization of the phagosome exposes M. tuberculosis pathogen-associated molecular patterns, such as N-glycolyl-muramyl dipeptide, to cytoplasmic nucleotide oligomerization domain 2 receptors to induce type I IFNs (129, 130). ESX-1-mediated permeabilization of the phagosome also exposes extracellular bacterial DNA to the cytosolic DNA-sensing pathway, which leads to targeting of M. tuberculosis to autophagosomes for subsequent killing (75). M. tuberculosis ESX-3 has also been implicated in modulating intracellular trafficking of bacteria to avoid phagosomal maturation through inhibition of the host endosomal sorting complex required for transport (131133). Thus, studies of the M. tuberculosis ESX secretion system have provided evidence for its role in both bacterial evasion of phagosomal pressures and host sensing of bacterial components. In addition to the ESX system, M. tuberculosis also expresses two SecA ATPase protein homologues (SecA1 and SecA2) involved in protein export (134). SecA2, in particular, has been implicated in virulence and intracellular growth (135, 136). Interestingly, both M. tuberculosis and BCG ΔsecA2 mutants are enriched in acidified phagosomes, indicating that mycobacterial SecA2 is required for arrest of phagosome maturation (137).

M. tuberculosis entry into macrophages through different receptors can lead to distinct activation of pathways that can inhibit or promote bacterial replication. The overall effect of multiple receptors engaging distinct or overlapping M. tuberculosis ligands is a complex and dynamic issue. For example, M. tuberculosis uptake by complement receptor 3 depended on host cholesterol, which mediated phagosomal association with coronin-1 and consequent inhibition of phagolysosome formation through activation of host calcineurin (138, 139). Alternatively, TLR-2 recognition of mycobacterial mannosylated lipoarabinomannan activates NF-κB and NOS2 gene transcription that leads to antimycobacterial nitric oxide (NO) production (140). NO production is strongly associated with resistance to M. tuberculosis, though evidence for the antimycobacterial effects of NO is stronger in the mouse model. In mice, reactive nitrogen intermediates are toxic to mycobacteria in vitro (141143), and infection can be exacerbated by the inhibition of NOS in vitro (144, 145) or in vivo (146148). NO production following IFN-γ signaling has also been reported to limit overt inflammation by inhibiting processing of IL-1β by the inflammasome (149). Relatedly, mice with disrupted NOS2 alleles display exacerbated disease following M. tuberculosis infection (146, 150). Although in vitro studies using human alveolar macrophages and primary monocytes did not find an antimycobacterial role for NO (151153), specific staining for NOS2 in the BAL of TB patients reveals upregulation in infected individuals compared to healthy controls (154). Nevertheless, M. tuberculosis has several strategies to cope with otherwise damaging reactive nitrogen and oxygen intermediates: M. tuberculosis KatG, a catalase-peroxidase, can inactivate phagosomal reactive oxygen (155), and the M. tuberculosis proteasome can mediate resistance to nitrosative stresses (156). Promiscuous recognition of mycobacterial antigens by the same receptor may also have convergent outcomes as in the case for TLR-2-mediated recognition of M. tuberculosis cell wall fractions leading to TNF-α production in murine macrophages (157). TLR-mediated recognition of M. tuberculosis is also reported to synergize with the vitamin D pathway to induce the antimicrobial peptide (AMP), cathelicidin, in human macrophages (158, 159). The biologically active vitamin D metabolite, calcitriol, induces hCAP-18, a gene encoding the pro-form of cathelicidin, following TLR ligation of macrophages (158160). In addition to direct antimicrobial activity, cathelicidin has been shown to exert antimicrobial functions by activating transcription of host autophagy genes Beclin-1 and Atg5 (161). The vitamin D pathway also synergizes with IFN-γ secreted by T cells to induce IL-15 autocrine signaling to promote autophagy and phagosomal maturation in M. tuberculosis-infected human macrophages (162).

Autophagy is the process whereby cytoplasmic constituents are degraded or recycled. A role for autophagy in antimycobacterial immunity in macrophages has been extensively characterized. Initial studies utilizing M. bovis suggested that autophagy plays a role in promoting phagosomal maturation to enhance bacterial killing (163). Moreover, LRG-47, an IFN-γ inducible p47 GTPase reported to be critical for phagosomal maturation and control of M. tuberculosis (164), is also involved in the induction of autophagy in M. bovis-infected macrophages (165). Autophagy-related genes were revealed to be involved in regulating the intracellular bacterial load of lab-adapted and clinical isolates of M. tuberculosis in a genome-wide small interfering RNA screen in infected human macrophage-like THP-1 cells (166). Accumulating evidence indicates that autophagy is integrated into the host response to M. tuberculosis infection by synergizing with pathogen sensing, phagosomal maturation, and IFN-γ inducible pathways to mediate antimycobacterial immunity: STING-dependent cytosolic sensing of M. tuberculosis DNA is required to deliver bacteria to autophagosomes and restrict bacterial replication (75); knockdown of cGAS in infected macrophages attenuated the induction of autophagy and survival during chronic M. tuberculosis infection (78); detection of cyclic-di-AMP secreted by M. tuberculosis in macrophages induced type I IFN production and autophagy to limit bacterial virulence (77); PARKIN, a conserved ubiquitin ligase, was shown to ubiquitinate M. tuberculosis-containing phagosomes to facilitate ubiquitin-mediated autophagy and restrict bacterial replication (167); IFN-γ-induced host ubiquilin-1 colocalizes with M. tuberculosis and mediates trafficking of bacteria to autophagosomes (168); IFN-γ receptor signaling mediated by the MyD88 adaptor-like (Mal) molecule induced autophagy and killing of intracellular M. tuberculosis in macrophages (169). Several studies have also delineated strategies employed by M. tuberculosis to evade autophagy. M. tuberculosis is reported to induce the expression of microRNA-33 to inhibit autophagy and regulate intracellular lipid metabolism to benefit bacterial replication (170). Further, a screen of M. tuberculosis cosmid clones in search of genes that inhibited bone marrow-derived DC antigen presentation revealed M. tuberculosis PE_PGRS47 (Rv2741) as an inhibitor of autophagy-mediated antigen presentation (171), suggesting that M. tuberculosis-mediated impairment of innate immunity can also negatively impact the generation of adaptive immunity. It is also becoming clear that autophagy-related proteins are likely to perform multiple functions, and care must be taken when interpreting specific knockouts or knockdowns of individual genes. For instance, myeloid cell-specific ablation of Atg5, but not other autophagy genes, compromised control of M. tuberculosis (172, 173). Deletion of the autophagy-related genes Ulk1, Ulk2, Atg4B, or p62 compromised the ability to induce autophagy, but they were dispensable for the control of M. tuberculosis (173). Analysis of lung sections from M. tuberculosis-infected Atg5 knockout mice indicated that Atg5 may be involved in regulation of neutrophil responses during infection, suggesting autophagy-independent roles for Atg5. Further, a recently described role for Atg5 in LC3-associated phagocytosis during M. tuberculosis infection supports the notion that specific components of autophagy can also overlap with other phagosomal pathways in immunity against mycobacteria (174).

Taken together, it is clear that macrophage recognition and phagocytosis of M. tuberculosis lead to a dynamic tug of war between antimycobacterial defenses and M. tuberculosis immune evasion. Macrophage defenses include AMPs, nitrosative stresses, phagolysosomal fusion, and autophagy and may operate independently of or subsequent to IFN-γ signaling. On the other hand, M. tuberculosis can subvert macrophage defenses at the level of the bacterial cell wall components that limit phagosomal maturation and the bacterial genes that combat or allow adaptation to intracellular immune pressure.

Recruitment and Function of Neutrophils and Monocytes Following M. tuberculosis Infection

Secretion of cytokines and chemokines early during infection recruits additional phagocytes to the site of infection. Early secretion of chemoattractants may be attributed to infected alveolar macrophages as well as lung epithelial cells (175177). Moreover, a recent study suggests that cross talk between primary bronchial epithelial cells and infected macrophages may also promote secretion of chemokines (178). Trafficking of additional monocytes and granulocytes to the lung exerts immune pressure on M. tuberculosis and is crucial for the initiation of adaptive immune responses, but it may also promote M. tuberculosis cell-to-cell transmission and dissemination.

Recruitment of neutrophils serves as an early line of defense against M. tuberculosis infection via secretion of antimicrobial molecules and inflammatory mediators, but neutrophils also serve as niches for bacterial replication and can impede immunity against M. tuberculosis. In humans with active pulmonary TB, neutrophils have been found to be a significant population of M. tuberculosis-infected phagocytes in the BAL and sputum (179). Whole blood transcriptional profiling also identified a neutrophil signature in ATB patients that is associated with type I and type II IFN-inducible genes (180) and expression of the inhibitory molecule PD-L1 (181), suggesting that neutrophils may play an immunomodulatory role in human TB. In mice, the kinetics and magnitude of neutrophil recruitment following M. tuberculosis infection depends on the strain of mouse infected. Evidence for a pathogenic role for neutrophils is shown in studies comparing neutrophil recruitment in resistant versus susceptible mouse strains (182, 183). When comparing resistant C57BL/6 mice to susceptible DBA/2 mice after M. tuberculosis infection, a study found that neutrophils were rapidly recruited into the broncheoalveolar space at higher magnitudes in susceptible mice. Depletion of neutrophils at the onset of M. tuberculosis infection specifically extended the life spans of DBA/2 mice, suggesting that early neutrophil involvement was pathogenic in genetically susceptible mice (183). Similarly, neutrophil depletion in susceptible I/St mice shortly after M. tuberculosis infection reduced lung pathology and bacterial growth and improved survival compared to C57BL/6 mice (184). In a separate study, depletion of neutrophils 5 weeks after aerosol M. tuberculosis infection of resistant BALB/c mice enhanced the levels of lung IL-6 and IL-17 without impacting IFN-γ and modestly enhanced control of bacterial burden (185). Neutrophil depletion in the first 4 days following intravenous M. tuberculosis infection of BALB/c mice, however, led to enhanced bacterial growth at extrapulmonary sites, suggesting that antimycobacterial immunity conferred by neutrophils may be dependent on the route of infection and the kinetics of neutrophil involvement (186). Utilizing fluorescently labeled bacteria, a recent study demonstrated that bacterial distribution in myeloid cells shifts from CD11b+Ly6G– monocytes and macrophages to CD11b+Ly6G+ neutrophils in Nos2–/– animals infected with M. tuberculosis, suggesting that neutrophil influx can create a growth-permissive environment for M. tuberculosis under NO-deficient conditions (187). Evidence for beneficial roles that neutrophils play in antimycobacterial defense focus on neutrophil secretion of AMPs such as cathelicidin and lipocalin-2 to restrict bacterial replication (188) or via uptake of AMP-containing apoptotic neutrophils by M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages (189). Neutrophils can also release chromatin scaffolds that trap extracellular bacteria in an AMP-containing mesh. M. tuberculosis has been shown to induce the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in vitro (190), and levels of neutrophil extracellular traps detected in the plasma of ATB patients were associated with disease severity and decreased with antibiotic therapy (191). Further, as discussed later in the chapter, dysregulation of neutrophil recruitment by unrestrained IL-17 responses during M. tuberculosis infection can incur pathological consequences by driving lung-damaging inflammation. Thus, the overall effect of neutrophil recruitment to the site of M. tuberculosis infection may be determined by host genetics, the context of infection (pulmonary versus extrapulmonary), or timing and duration of neutrophil activity.

In addition to neutrophils, monocytes are recruited to the site of M. tuberculosis infection. Similar to neutrophils, monocyte recruitment is important for innate immunity during M. tuberculosis infection but may also inadvertently promote M. tuberculosis dissemination. C-C chemokine receptor type 2 (CCR2) is a chemokine receptor expressed on monocytes and is responsible for CCL2-mediated recruitment of monocytes to sites of bacterial infection (192). CCR2 was found to mediate immunity against M. tuberculosis depending on the dose of infection. CCR2 knockout mice were more susceptible to high-dose intravenous M. tuberculosis infection (193), but not after low-dose infection (194). Monocytes have been shown to differentiate into macrophages and DCs following M. tuberculosis infection, and monocytes transferred into M. tuberculosis-infected mice were shown to be the predominant population of innate immune cells producing iNOS (195). Additionally, monocyte delivery of M. tuberculosis to pulmonary lymph nodes can coordinate with DCs to prime CD4 T cells after infection (196). Monocytes may therefore represent a recruited population of innate cells that combat M. tuberculosis infection through the production of reactive nitrogen intermediates and priming of adaptive immunity. However, monocyte recruitment following M. tuberculosis infection may also be detrimental to the host by providing an environment full of permissive cells. Treatment of M. tuberculosis-infected mice with polyinosinic-polycytidylic acid (polyIC) led to CCR2-dependent recruitment of a population of M. tuberculosis-permissive monocytes, severe susceptibility, and early mortality (197). Interestingly, susceptibility of polyIC-treated mice to M. tuberculosis infection was dependent on type I IFN signaling and was not due to any particular alteration to the T-cell response. The recruitment of neutrophils and monocytes to the site of M. tuberculosis infection represents a host strategy to contain bacterial replication that is co-opted by the bacterium to facilitate its growth and dissemination.

NK Cells in M. tuberculosis Infection

NK cells are innate lymphocytes with the capacity to secrete IFN-γ and perform cytolytic functions to mediate control of a variety of pathogens, including M. tuberculosis. Various components of the M. tuberculosis cell wall can bind directly to NKp44 found on NK cells (198), and NK cells can also recognize stress molecules upregulated on the surface of M. tuberculosis-infected cells (199). NK cells can mediate direct killing of M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages (199) but can also restrict intracellular bacterial replication via secretion of IL-22 (200) and IFN-γ (201) to increase phagolysosomal fusion of M. tuberculosis-containing phagosomes. Additionally, NK cells can enhance immunity against M. tuberculosis indirectly by enhancing CD8 T-cell production of IFN-γ (202) by promoting the expansion of γδ T cells (203) and by lysing M. tuberculosis-expanded regulatory T cells (204). The cytolytic capacity of NK cells is diminished in ATB patients relative to healthy controls and can be reconstituted following antibiotic therapy (205). Further, NK cell function in TB patients can be attenuated by monocyte-derived IL-10 (201). Interestingly, a population of IL-21-dependent NK cells that appears following BCG vaccination has been shown to expand following M. tuberculosis challenge (206), suggesting that NK cells may also display some hallmark characteristics of memory cells.

Inflammation and Cell Death During M. tuberculosis Infection

The regulation of inflammation is a critical factor that determines the outcome of M. tuberculosis infection. Overexuberant inflammation impairs cellular immunity, damages lung tissue, and can lead to lung cavitation and enhanced transmission. Inversely, too little inflammation can impair control of bacterial burden by delaying the induction of innate and adaptive immunity. While neutrophil recruitment and activity during M. tuberculosis infection can help contain bacterial replication, sustained neutrophilic inflammation can mediate damaging inflammation and promote disease. Importantly, whole blood transcriptomics identified a neutrophil-driven type I IFN-inducible signature in human TB that decreased upon treatment (180). Excessive type I IFN signaling has been shown to promote disease in mouse models and human samples. Mice lacking type I IFN signaling are more resistant to M. tuberculosis infection (207210), though signaling through type I IFNs may play a protective role in the absence of IFN-γ (211, 212). Mechanisms underlying the pathogenic role of type I IFNs during M. tuberculosis infection include inhibition of IL-1β production (213, 214), induction of IL-10 to impair innate cytokine production (215), and loss of IFN-γ responsiveness in infected macrophages (215). In addition to induction of type I IFNs, neutrophils have also been reported to drive lung destruction through the secretion of matrix metalloproteinase 8 (216). The matrix metalloproteinase family of enzymes has been implicated in lung tissue destruction during M. tuberculosis infection (217220) but has also been shown to promote macrophage recruitment and bacterial dissemination during infection of zebrafish (221).

Eicosanoids are lipid mediators of inflammation derived from the oxidation of arachidonic acid. The balance between proinflammatory prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) and anti-inflammatory lipoxin A4 (LXA4), two members of the eicosanoid family of signaling molecules, can determine the outcome of M. tuberculosis infection (222224). During M. tuberculosis infection, mice incapable of synthesizing PGE2 display increased susceptibility (223), and absence of the enzyme 5-lipoxygenase, which metabolizes arachidonic acid to LXA4, confers resistance (222). Importantly, therapeutic correction of low PGE2 levels can confer enhanced survival in highly susceptible mice infected with M. tuberculosis (100). Leukotriene A4 hydrolase is an enzyme that catalyzes the production of proinflammatory leukotriene B4 from leukotriene A4, which can also be converted to anti-inflammatory LXA4 as a counterbalance. In zebrafish, LTA4H mutants were found to be hypersusceptible to M. marinum infection due to dysregulation of the balance between leukotrienes and lipoxins; increased levels of LXA4 in LTA4H mutants impaired TNF-α responses and promoted susceptibility (225). The relevance of this finding to humans is highlighted in a TB meningitis cohort in Vietnam where heterozygosity for six LTA4H polymorphisms conferred a survival advantage over homozygosity (225). Indeed, anti-inflammatory glucocorticoid treatment efficacy in TB meningitis patients can be differentiated by a single nucleotide polymorphism in the LTA4H promoter controlling transcriptional activity, which suggests that the balance of inflammation is critical to disease progression and treatment outcomes in TB meningitis (226).

TNF-α is a critical proinflammatory cytokine in immunity against M. tuberculosis infection and can be secreted by a number of innate and adaptive immune cells. The importance of TNF-α in antimycobacterial immunity is clearly demonstrated by heightened susceptibility of TNF-α antibody-depleted animals or in animals lacking TNF receptor signaling following M. tuberculosis infection (227). TNF-α is also a critical mediator of immunity against TB in humans. This is demonstrated by increased rates of progression to ATB in LTBI patients receiving anti-TNF treatment for inflammatory disorders (228), which can be recapitulated in the NHP model of infection (70). The effects of anti-TNF treatment in humans and NHPs, as well as in mice (229231), suggests that TNF-α is critical for maintaining sequestration of M. tuberculosis in the granuloma. Histopathological evidence from gene-disrupted or antibody-depleted mice infected with M. tuberculosis also suggests that TNF-α signaling may be playing a role in modulating apoptotic or necrotic cell death following infection (229, 231).

Cell death can be a means of restricting bacterial replication by the host or a way to disseminate to secondary loci of infection for M. tuberculosis. Apoptosis of M. tuberculosis-infected cells leads to fewer viable bacteria and effective cross-presentation of bacterial antigens (224, 232, 233), whereas necrosis of M. tuberculosis-infected cells allows viable bacteria to exit and disseminate (223, 234, 235). Proapoptotic M. tuberculosis mutants lacking secA2 (236) and nuoG (237) were attenuated in vivo, and mice infected with these strains displayed enhanced priming of adaptive immunity compared to infection with wild-type M. tuberculosis, suggesting that prevention of host cell apoptosis is an M. tuberculosis virulence strategy. Relatedly, M. tuberculosis-infected murine neutrophils can aid in DC trafficking to the draining lymph nodes to initiate antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses (238), but M. tuberculosis delays CD4 T-cell priming by inhibiting neutrophil apoptosis (239). Infection with the proapoptotic nuoG mutant M. tuberculosis resulted in earlier DC trafficking to lung-draining lymph nodes and earlier priming of antigen-specific CD4 T cells, but enhanced priming was abrogated upon neutrophil depletion (239). Additionally, uninfected macrophages performing a constitutive housekeeping function called efferocytosis can uptake M. tuberculosis-containing apoptotic bodies, which leads to delivery and killing of bacteria in lysosomes (240). This suggests that apoptosis may be a host strategy to limit bacterial replication by sequestering bacteria in vesicles that can be safely degraded by nearby innate immune cells. Inhibition of apoptosis by M. tuberculosis is driven by host intrinsic factors following infection with virulent strains. The proinflammatory eicosanoid PGE2 has been demonstrated to regulate synaptotagmin-7, a calcium sensor that maintains plasma membrane integrity (241). Human macrophages infected with virulent M. tuberculosis H37Rv, but not avirulent H37Ra, promote LXA4 production and inhibition of PGE2 biosynthesis, which impairs resealing of plasma membrane disruptions to preferentially induce host cell necrosis instead of apoptosis (241). Mice lacking PGE2 also suffered from increased lung bacterial burden following low-dose aerosol infection with virulent M. tuberculosis (223). Host cell necrosis following M. tuberculosis infection can be induced through activation of the cytosolic receptor interacting protein kinase 3 pathway, which inhibits apoptosis of infected macrophages through Bcl-xL and promotes necrosis through upregulation of ROS (242). Additionally, macrophages infected with virulent H37Rv, but not avirulent H37Ra, undergo proteolysis at the N-terminal of annexin-1, which prevents the completion of the apoptotic envelope and drives macrophage necrosis (235). Taken together, apoptosis represents a strategy by the host to limit infection through the combination of bacterial sequestration in apoptotic vesicles and the induction of adaptive immune responses, but M. tuberculosis may delay apoptosis or promote necrosis to facilitate replication and dissemination.

Initiation of Adaptive Immunity to M. tuberculosis by DCs

An important function of innate immunity during M. tuberculosis infection is the priming of adaptive immune responses. DCs are professional antigen-presenting cells that initiate adaptive immunity by presenting M. tuberculosis antigens in the context of major histocompatibility complex (MHC), costimulatory molecules, and cytokines. Depletion of cells expressing the pan-DC marker, CD11c, following M. tuberculosis infection impaired control of bacterial burden and delayed the initiation of adaptive immunity, illustrating the importance of DCs in mobilizing adaptive immune responses that can control bacterial replication (243). There is abundant evidence that M. tuberculosis is able to infect murine (244246) and human DCs (247249). In mice infected with green fluorescent protein GFP-expressing M. tuberculosis, DCs were found to be the major population of phagocytes infected by bacteria after 4 weeks (246). Upon M. tuberculosis infection, DCs mature and migrate to the lung-draining lymph nodes to initiate antigen-specific T-cell responses, which depended on the chemokine receptor CCR7 and its corresponding chemokines CCL19 and CCL21 (250252). Further, IL-12, a cytokine secreted by myeloid cells and important for the induction of IFN-γ responses, is required for DC migration during M. tuberculosis infection (253). Priming of adaptive immune responses requires the transport of live bacteria to the lung-draining lymph nodes (246, 250), but antigen-specific T cells can be primed by both the infected migratory DC and uninfected lymph node resident DC. A study demonstrated that infected DCs migrate to the lung-draining lymph nodes, where they secrete soluble, unprocessed M. tuberculosis antigens that are summarily phagocytosed by uninfected lymph node resident DCs (254). The exportation of M. tuberculosis antigens was initially proposed to benefit the host by circumventing inefficient antigen presentation by infected DCs. However, secretion of M. tuberculosis antigens by infected DCs may also benefit the pathogen by diverting antigen away from MHC class II antigen presentation (255).

Effective interaction between DCs and T cells is dependent on appropriate function of antigen presentation machinery, including expression of MHC, costimulatory molecules, and cytokines following M. tuberculosis infection. However, there is abundant evidence that M. tuberculosis infection impairs antigen presentation to evade antigen-specific T-cell responses. It is well recognized that M. tuberculosis infection leads to impaired MHC class II antigen presentation by macrophages (reviewed in 256). M. tuberculosis-mediated inhibition of phagosomal maturation has been implicated in attenuating processing of M. tuberculosis antigen 85 (Ag85) and the MHC class II-associated invariant chain (257). Multiple studies have also reported that M. tuberculosis infection impairs MHC class II expression in macrophages through inhibition of class II transactivator, a master transcriptional regulator controlling expression of MHC class II molecules (258261), although there is little evidence of similar inhibition of MHC class II in DCs. Nevertheless, M. tuberculosis infection of DCs leads to functional impairment of antigen presentation. M. tuberculosis infection has been shown to impair DC maturation of human (reviewed in 262) and murine DC functions (reviewed in 263, 264). Studies examining proliferation of T-cell receptor transgenic CD4 T cells specific for M. tuberculosis Ag85 as a proxy for functional antigen presentation have demonstrated that M. tuberculosis EsxH can impair antigen processing through inhibition of the host endosomal sorting complex required for transport (ESCRT) (265). Additionally, M. tuberculosis promotes suboptimal antigen presentation in vitro and in vivo without detectable differences in the expression levels of costimulatory molecules when compared to BCG-infected DCs (266). Interestingly, studies using a mutant M. tuberculosis strain lacking hip1 (discussed above) indicate that M. tuberculosis readily impairs DC costimulation and cytokine production to evade antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses (107, 109), and a recent study demonstrated that BCG hip1 retains similar immune evasion functions (267). Taken together, the initiation of the adaptive immune response requires the participation of DCs, which themselves are readily infected and subverted by M. tuberculosis infection. M. tuberculosis subversion of DC functions can interfere with antigen presentation and delay or impair the initiation of the adaptive immune response. Improving DC functions during M. tuberculosis infection may improve innate and adaptive immunity and enhance immune control of bacterial burden. A study that exogenously engaged the CD40 costimulation pathway in M. tuberculosis-infected DCs improved DC functions and promoted antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses that augmented control of lung bacterial burden (268). Further, mucosal transfer of Ag85B-loaded DCs following challenge with M. tuberculosis augmented the efficacy of BCG vaccination (269), suggesting that early antigen presentation by DCs is an important component that determines the efficacy of vaccine-induced immunity. DCs are critical players that initiate adaptive immune responses to M. tuberculosis and determine the outcome of infection. Interventions or therapies that improve DC functions may provide benefits by augmenting cross talk between DCs and antigen-specific T cells.

ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY AGAINST M. TUBERCULOSIS

Protective immunity to M. tuberculosis and control of bacterial replication requires adaptive immune responses. This is best exemplified by the extreme susceptibility to mycobacterial infections of lymphopenic HIV patients and gene-deleted mice lacking MHC class II or T cells in general. Cytokine secretion and direct antimicrobial actions of antigen-specific T cells are key features of the adaptive immune response against M. tuberculosis infection. Further, the long-lived nature of antigen-specific memory T cells provides the basis for developing vaccines that induce antimycobacterial immunity. There are also expanding roles for B cells, γδ T cells, and CD1-restricted T cells that provide specific responses to a diverse set of M. tuberculosis antigens that complement antigens classically presented through MHC class I and II. However, adaptive immune responses can also become malignant by promoting excessive inflammation or be rendered ineffective from chronic antigen exposure. Here, we cover the importance of timing, location, and quality of CD4 T-cell responses during M. tuberculosis infection, how CD8 T cells contribute to immunity against M. tuberculosis, the roles that inhibitory receptors play during infection, the phenotypes and functions of memory T cells, and the roles that B cells, γδ T cells, CD1-restricted lymphocytes, and mucosal associated invariant T (MAIT) cells play in immunity against M. tuberculosis.

Kinetics and Homing of CD4 T Cells after M. tuberculosis Infection

In the mouse model of infection, CD4 T-cell responses are absolutely required to control bacterial replication, and animals lacking such responses succumb rapidly (270, 271). MHC class II knockout mice or CD4 depletion led to abrupt mortality following M. tuberculosis infection (270, 271). CD8 T cells play a key role in immunity against M. tuberculosis but cannot compensate for CD4 deficiency (270). Similarly, antibody depletion of CD4 in cynomolgus macaques severely compromised control of M. tuberculosis and led to reactivation in latently infected animals (69). Thus, the initiation of the CD4 T-cell response is a key feature defining the outcome of M. tuberculosis infection. There is a widely recognized delay in the initiation of antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses following low-dose aerosol infection of mice (250, 272275) and NHPs (276). M. tuberculosis-infected cynomolgus macaques had detectable antigen-specific responses 4 weeks postinfection (276). In mouse models of infection, antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses are first detected in the lung-draining lymph nodes 2 weeks after infection. Significant antigen-specific lung CD4 T-cell responses are subsequently detected in the lungs 3 weeks after infection. This is in stark contrast to antigen-specific responses to other bacterial (277) or viral (278) pathogens, which are detected swiftly after infection. Adoptive transfer of ESAT-6-specific CD4 T cells prior to aerosol M. tuberculosis infection have demonstrated an apparent kinetic bottleneck whereby lung antigen-specific activation occurs only 7 days after infection despite the presence of antigen-specific T cells (279), suggesting that antigen-specific responses are delayed by mechanisms other than trafficking of CD4 T cells from the mediastinal lymph nodes to the lungs. Delay in the initiation of adaptive immune responses to M. tuberculosis infection may be due to a variety of factors, including slow growth of the bacterium, inhibited apoptosis of infected macrophages and neutrophils, and delayed activation and migration of DCs, which cumulatively allow M. tuberculosis to establish a persistent infection in the lung.

CD4 T cells interact with infected macrophages to restrict intracellular M. tuberculosis replication. Thus, the effectiveness of the CD4 T-cell response depends on proper homing of antigen-specific CD4 T cells from lymphoid tissues to M. tuberculosis-infected cells in the lung. In M. tuberculosis-infected mice, antigen-specific CD4 T cells expressing CXCR3 localized to the lung parenchyma and were more efficient at controlling bacteria following M. tuberculosis infection when compared to vasculature-restricted CD4 T cells that expressed CX3CR1 (280). Interestingly, cells retained in the lung vasculature secreted the highest amount of IFN-γ during infection (280). Adoptive transfer studies demonstrated that IFN-γ accounted for greater control of bacterial burden in the spleen over the lung and drove immunopathology when overexpressed (281), suggesting that the function of IFN-γ may be to mediate control of bacterial dissemination to extrapulmonary sites and that IFN-γ may be detrimental when unrestrained. The distinction between vasculature-restricted and parenchyma-localizing CD4 T cells seems less important in rhesus macaques (282), where the majority of antigen-specific CD4 T cells can be found in the lung parenchyma but are restricted to the outer lymphocytic cuff of granulomas. Notably, studies have demonstrated that expression of IDO by cells in the granulomas of M. tuberculosis-infected rhesus macaques can mediate inhibition of T cell entrance into granuloma, and biochemical inhibition of IDO led to reorganization of the granuloma to include T cells localizing into the macrophage core (66, 283). Taken together, there is strong evidence that localization of antigen-specific CD4 T cells into the lung tissues where M. tuberculosis-infected myeloid cells reside is an important feature of protective immunity to M. tuberculosis.

Quality and Specificity of the CD4 T-Cell Response to M. tuberculosis

The quality of the T-cell response is an important feature determining the outcome of M. tuberculosis infection. Canonically, the production of IFN-γ by Th1 cells, CD8 T cells, and other lymphocytes is considered essential for protection against mycobacterial infections. In human immunogenetics studies, Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease (MSMD) is a spectrum of genetic mutations in five autosomal genes (IFNGR1, IFNGR2, STAT1, IL12B, IL12RB) and an X-linked gene that confer susceptibility to avirulent environmental mycobacteria and BCG (284). Deficiencies related to IFN-γ signaling in young patients with mutations in IFNGR1 and IFNGR2 confer fatal susceptibility to mycobacterial infections (285288). STAT1 is an intracellular molecule important for IFN-γ signaling, and individuals with heterozygous germline STAT1 mutations lose gamma-interferon activating factor (GAF) expression (289). GAF is an important transcription factor that facilitates IFN-γ-induced gene expression. Individuals with heterozygous STAT1 mutations have impaired nuclear accumulation of GAF and suffer from recurrent mycobacterial infections (289). Additionally, mutations affecting IL-12 expression levels and signaling also confer susceptibility to mycobacterial infections. Two mutations in the leucine zipper domain of NEMO, an intracellular protein involved in NF-κB activation, impairs CD40-mediated IL-12 production in monocytes and DCs (290) and leads to recurrent mycobacterial infections. Similarly, defects that impair IL-12p40 lead to decreased IFN-γ levels and confer susceptibility to mycobacterial infections (291294). Mutations in IL12RB are the most frequent genetic factors associated with Mendelian susceptibility to mycobacterial disease, but recurrent mycobacterial susceptibility in individuals with IL12RB mutations can be mitigated with BCG vaccination or primary BCG disease (291, 292, 295298), suggesting that IL-12/IL-23 signaling may not be completely required for secondary immunity. IFN-γ is readily detected in human BAL in patients with TB disease and decreases following therapy (299), which is likely a consequence of decreasing bacterial loads. In contrast, studies of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells show a decrease in IFN-γ responses in ATB patients compared to controls (300305). Lower frequencies of M. tuberculosis-specific IFN-γ responses in ATB patients may reflect trafficking of these cells to the lungs, resulting in specific depletion from the periphery. IFN-γ secretion is also an important tool leveraged for the detection of M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T-cell responses in humans and in animal models. Genome-wide analysis of M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T-cell epitopes in LTBI individuals revealed three broadly immunodominant antigenic islands related to bacterial secretion systems recognized by IFN-γ secreting CD4 T cells (306). Animal models of TB also demonstrate a key role for IFN-γ in immunity against M. tuberculosis infection. Mice deficient in IFN-γ succumb to low-dose M. tuberculosis infection (307, 308). Correspondingly, mice lacking IL-12 are also unable to control M. tuberculosis infection (253, 309, 310). The antimycobacterial effects of IFN-γ in mouse models are broadly related to the induction of AMPs, iNOS, and cytokines that activate infected macrophages to restrict intracellular bacterial replication, though other mechanisms underlying IFN-γ-mediated immunity to M. tuberculosis infection are still being elucidated. IL-10-deficient mice are less susceptible to M. tuberculosis infection due to an enhanced Th1 response (311), suggesting that IL-10 limits Th1 immunity during M. tuberculosis infection. However, Th1 cells secreting IL-10 can also impair host control of M. tuberculosis infection (312), and CD4 T cells producing both IFN-γ and IL-10 are detected in the BAL of ATB patients (313). Given that IL-10 secretion by Th1 cells has been shown to be a result of high antigen dose (314), it is possible that adaptive immunity at stages of infection when bacterial burden is high may be compromised by T cell-derived IL-10. T-bet is a member of the T-box family of transcription factors that is encoded by Tbx21 and is the master transcriptional regulator for lineage commitment to the Th1 subset (315). Interestingly, adoptive transfer of T-bet knockout ESAT-6-specific T-cell receptor-transgenic CD4 T cells skewed toward Th1 in vitro retains the capacity for early protection against M. tuberculosis infection (316), suggesting that protection conferred by Th1 cells may be independent of T-bet or IFN-γ production. Taken together, these studies demonstrate a clear requirement for the IL-12/IFN-γ axis in immunity against M. tuberculosis infection in humans and animal models. Further studies delineating the mechanisms underlying IFN-γ- and Th1-mediated immunity against M. tuberculosis are warranted.

Although Th1 responses are important for immunity against TB, studies have also demonstrated that CD4 T-cell subsets secreting IL-17 (Th17) and FoxP3+ regulatory CD4 T cells contribute to the response against M. tuberculosis infection. There are context-dependent beneficial or detrimental roles for Th17s during infection with M. tuberculosis. Infection with a W-Beijing lineage strain of M. tuberculosis, HN878, induce Th17 responses, and mice deficient in IL-17 display increased bacterial burden following infection (317). IL-17 receptor A subunit knockout mice (318) and IL-17A knockout mice (319) also displayed impaired long-term control of high-dose infection with H37Rv. Transfer of BCG-specific, IFN-γ knockout Th17 cells into M. tuberculosis infected, T cell-deficient mice conferred enhanced protection and prolonged survival compared to transfer of naive IFN-γ knockout CD4 T cells (320), suggesting that Th17 cells can mediate protection independently of IFN-γ. In humans, significant frequencies of IL-17-producing CD4 T cells were found in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells and BAL of BCG-vaccinated healthy individuals and declined in patients with active disease (321). Further, individuals with bi-allelic RORC loss-of-function mutations displayed impaired IL-17 and IFN-γ responses and were susceptible to mycobacterial disease and candidiasis (322). The generation of Th17 responses to M. tuberculosis in vitro requires costimulation through the CD40-CD40L pathway since the absence of CD40 on DCs or CD40L on CD4 T cells attenuates antigen-specific IL-17 responses (268). Activation of M. tuberculosis-infected DCs through CD40 promoted enhanced antigen-specific Th1 and Th17 responses that contributed to better control of bacterial burden in vivo (268), suggesting that a balanced Th1 and Th17 response is desirable for immunity against M. tuberculosis. The precise role of Th17 cells in protective immunity to M. tuberculosis remains unclear but may be related to their role in the development of less hypoxic granulomas (323), in the recruitment of Th1 cells (324), or in the induction of CXC-chemokines and B-cell follicles (325). However, unrestrained IL-17 responses have also been shown to promote detrimental immunopathology, typically through pathological neutrophilia. IFN-γR1 knockout animals (326) or IFN-γR1 bone marrow chimeric mice selectively lacking the receptor in nonhematopoietic cells (327) display amplified Th17 responses following M. tuberculosis infection that lead to a pathogenic accumulation of neutrophils detrimental to the host, suggesting that IFN-γ signaling serves a regulatory role by limiting excessive IL-17-mediated neutrophilia.

FoxP3+ CD4 T cells, or T-regulatory cells (T-regs), can impair antimycobacterial T-cell responses and contribute to disease but can also limit overt inflammation. FoxP3+ T-regs can be found in the peripheral blood and airways of M. tuberculosis-infected macaques (328) and humans (329334). In mice, T-regs accumulate in the lung-draining lymph nodes and the lungs following low-dose aerosol M. tuberculosis infection (335). Importantly, FoxP3+ T-regs localized to pulmonary areas adjacent to effector CD4 T cells and depletion of T-regs before and early after infection-enhanced control of bacterial burden (335). Further, M. tuberculosis-specific T-regs delay the expansion of antimycobacterial CD4 and CD8 T cells and, consequently, transfer of M. tuberculosis-specific T-regs confers increased susceptibility to infection (336). Regulation of T-regs during M. tuberculosis infection may be mediated by Th1 responses since M. tuberculosis-specific T-regs are selectively eliminated following IL-12 driven T-bet expression (337). The functional properties of T-regs responsible for limiting antimycobacterial CD4 and CD8 responses remains unclear. IL-10 was not found to be secreted by T-regs in mice infected with H37Rv (335). In contrast, T-regs from mice infected with the W-Beijing strain, HN878, were found to secrete IL-10, express inhibitory receptors, and expand to greater degrees compared to infection with H37Rv (209), suggesting that IL-10 secretion by T-regs may be dependent on bacterial strain. Notably, the expansion of T-regs in the lungs of mice and outbred guinea pigs infected with W-Beijing strains occurred concurrently with a loss of Th1 responses and is associated with severe pulmonary pathology (209, 338). However, progressive loss of T-regs in chronically infected TLR-2 knockout mice was associated with increased pulmonary inflammation (339), highlighting a role for TLR-2-mediated recruitment of T-regs in limiting tissue pathology at chronic stages of disease. Taken together, these results suggest that the functional contribution of T-regs to immunity against M. tuberculosis infection and outcome of disease may be dependent on multiple factors, including strain of bacteria and stage of infection.

In humans and animal models, M. tuberculosis establishes a persistent infection despite the induction of adaptive immune responses. Persistent inflammation and chronic antigen exposure precedes functional exhaustion due to chronic antigenic stimulation. In contrast to the expression of Ag85B, which decreases early following infection, ESAT-6 is expressed by M. tuberculosis throughout infection (340, 341). Multiple studies examining CD4 T-cell responses to ESAT-6 and Ag85B have suggested that antigen-specific responses are dictated by bacterial expression of those antigens throughout infection. CD4 T cells specific for ESAT-6 display a terminally differentiated phenotype with evidence for functional exhaustion, which runs in contrast to Ag85B-specific CD4 T cells that appear functional but are quickly diminished (272, 342347). Indeed, a vaccine that contains ESAT-6, Ag85B, and Rv2660c, which is expressed at late stages of infection, demonstrated enhanced efficacy compared to BCG or to a vaccine containing ESAT-6 and Ag85B (348), suggesting that rational incorporation of antigens present at different stages of infection may improve vaccine efficacy. A clearer understanding of protective CD4 T-cell immunity will require further studies of the spectrum of antigens recognized by CD4 T cells following infection with M. tuberculosis in animal models and in humans.

Role of CD8 T Cells in M. tuberculosis Infection

Mice with gene deletion of β2 microglobulin, which abrogates MHC class I antigen presentation, or mice depleted of CD8 T cells live longer than corresponding disruptions to the MHC class II pathway or CD4 T-cell responses following M. tuberculosis infection (270). Regardless, CD8 T cells contribute significantly to immunity against M. tuberculosis infection. Mice lacking TAP-1 (transporter associated with antigen processing 1) antigen presentation molecules have deficient CD8 T-cell responses and succumb more rapidly following M. tuberculosis infection compared to wild-type controls (349, 350). Depletion of CD8 T cells in rhesus macaques compromises protective immunity from BCG vaccination or chemotherapeutic interventions (57), suggesting that CD8 T cells are important components of recall responses to M. tuberculosis infection. Similarly, in a mouse model of latency induced by antibiotic treatment, CD8 T-cell responses were found to be important in preventing reactivation (351). The importance of CD8 T cells during M. tuberculosis infection is related to their secretion of cytokines and cytolytic effector molecules that can limit bacterial replication. In addition to IFN-γ and TNF-α, CD8 T cells secrete perforin to lyse M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages (352). CD8 T cells can also release granulysin in cytotoxic granules to directly kill intracellular M. tuberculosis (353, 354). The use of anti-TNF-α therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis depletes a subset of effector memory CD8 T cells that secrete granulysin and express cell surface TNF (355), which may partially explain the increased progression from LTBI to ATB in patients undergoing anti-TNF-α therapy. Human CD8 T cells respond to epitopes in CFP10 (356), ESAT-6 (357, 358), and the Ag85 complex (359, 360). A variety of human CD8 T-cell clones tested against a panel of synthetic peptides derived from immunodominant M. tuberculosis antigens revealed that CD8 T-cell responses are concentrated toward a limited set of epitopes and are generally restricted by the HLA-B allele (361, 362). M. tuberculosis escape from the phagosome and induction of apoptosis by M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages can promote cross-presentation of M. tuberculosis antigens to CD8 T cells. However, as previously discussed, virulent M. tuberculosis has been shown to inhibit host apoptosis and favor necrosis to circumvent efficient induction of CD8 T-cell responses. All considered, CD8 T cells are a critical component of adaptive immunity to M. tuberculosis infection and play an important role in different disease contexts by limiting reactivation during latency and by directly participating in antimicrobial functions during active infections.

Inhibitory Receptors During M. tuberculosis Infection

Chronic viral infections, such as HIV, induce the expression of coinhibitory receptors on the surface of T cells that can dampen T-cell functionality. Abrogation of coinhibitory receptor ligation has been shown to be a viable strategy to revitalize functionally exhausted virus-specific T-cell responses. The evidence for the importance of coinhibitory receptors during M. tuberculosis infection in animal models and in human samples varies between human and small animal models and between the specific inhibitory receptor studied. PD-1, CD160, and 2B4 are inhibitory receptors associated with CD8 T-cell dysfunction in chronic viral infections (363, 364) but are expressed at low levels on M. tuberculosis-specific CD8 T cells (365). Expression of inhibitory molecules, including PD-1 and CTLA-4, among M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells has been shown to decrease following treatment (366, 367). Importantly, expression of PD-1 on antigen-specific CD4 T cells from LTBI was not associated with decreased effector functions, and these cells proved to be polyfunctional with respect to cytokine production upon antigen restimulation (368), suggesting that PD-1 may be an indicator of bacterial burden and CD4 T-cell activation rather than functional exhaustion. However, there is some in vitro evidence from human samples suggesting that blockade of PD-1/PD-L1 interaction can prevent M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T-cell apoptosis (369) and enhance CD8 T-cell degranulation and antigen-specific IFN-γ responses from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of a subset of high-responding ATB patients (370). There is evidence that T-cell responses during ATB disease are less polyfunctional and have limited proliferative capacity compared to LTBI individuals (371, 372), but whether this functional impairment is mediated by inhibitory receptors such as PD-1 remains unclear. PD-1-deficient mice infected with M. tuberculosis have increased bacterial burden, neutrophilic infiltration, overt inflammation, tissue necrosis, and diminished lifespan compared to wild-type mice (373), suggesting that PD-1 is required to prevent aberrant inflammation during M. tuberculosis infection. Further, adoptive transfer studies demonstrated that PD-1-expressing CD4 T cells are highly proliferative (342, 346), and CD4 T cells lacking PD-1 can drive pathology and mortality following M. tuberculosis infection (374), together suggesting that PD-1 may mark functional CD4 T cells with intrinsic capacity for immunoregulation. T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing 3 (Tim-3) is another inhibitory receptor shown to play a role in mediating antimicrobial responses by binding to one of its ligands, galectin-9 (375), and inducing the production of IL-1β by human and murine macrophages infected with M. tuberculosis (375, 376). In contrast to PD-1, Tim-3-deficient mice were less susceptible to M. tuberculosis infection, and Tim-3 blockade was shown to improve antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T-cell cytokine expression (377), suggesting that Tim-3 may play a role in limiting T-cell responses by promoting functional exhaustion. However, Tim-3-expressing, M. tuberculosis-specific T cells from ATB patients were functionally superior to T cells expressing low levels of Tim-3. Further, small interfering RNA- or antibody-mediated disruption of Tim-3 signaling on the T cells from ATB patients led to attenuated IFN-γ and TNF-α production by Tim-3-expressing T cells, while Tim-3 ligation augmented IFN-γ production (378). The mechanisms underlying the roles of receptors such as PD-1 and Tim-3 require further study and may deviate from their role in viral immunity. The evidence accumulated thus far suggests that these molecules mark functional T cells that play important roles in antimicrobial activity and prevention of uncontrolled inflammation following M. tuberculosis infection.

Memory T-Cell Responses

In humans, antigen-specific memory T-cell responses have been detected in individuals with LTBI and in TB patients following successful treatment and cure. Memory T-cell subsets can be identified according to their cell surface phenotype and functional properties, and distinct populations of antigen-specific memory T cells can be categorized based on their expression of a panel of cell surface activation markers and chemokine receptors (379). Characterization of M. tuberculosis-specific memory CD4 T cells in LTBI indicated that these cells did not express activation markers and were largely of a CD45RA-CCR7 phenotype descriptive of T effector memory cells (368, 380). In contrast, analysis of LTBI individuals using MHC class II tetramers revealed a population of tetramer+CD45RA-CCR7+ central memory CD4 T cells that further expressed CXCR3+CCR6+ (306), highlighting the heterogeneity of memory CD4 T-cell phenotypes that can vary based on antigen specificity, disease status, and manner in which specific responses are identified. Human memory CD8 T cells are predominantly terminally differentiated effector memory T cells in individuals with LTBI (365, 381). Memory T-cell responses have also been studied in the context of “memory-immune” mice, which are M. tuberculosis-infected mice that subsequently receive antibiotic treatment. In this context, both memory CD4 (382, 383) and CD8 (384, 385) T cells play a role in immunity against M. tuberculosis infection. T cells from memory-immune mice expanded rapidly, secreted IFN-γ, and conferred a significant level of protection at early timepoints after infection (383, 386388) but are ultimately unable to confer long-term protection (389), suggesting that memory T cells generated after primary M. tuberculosis infection have limited capacity to protect from reinfection.

B-Cell and Antibody Responses During M. tuberculosis Infection

There is a body of evidence suggesting that humoral immunity plays a role in defense against M. tuberculosis infection (reviewed in 390). B cells can be found alongside T cells in the lymphocytic cuff in human granulomas (391393), and whole blood gene expression analysis revealed significant changes in B-cell-associated genes in TB patients after initiation of TB treatment (394). Notably, antibodies to M. tuberculosis proteins have been reported in the sera of TB patients (395), and antibodies identified in a subset of health care workers exposed to M. tuberculosis provide modest protection in vitro and in a mouse model of infection (396). Utilization of a high-throughput approach to identifying antibody targets in the M. tuberculosis proteome revealed a set of extracellular antigens recognized by antibodies in the plasma of patients with ATB (397), suggesting that B cells are active participants in immunity to M. tuberculosis infection. B-cell-deficient mice have elevated neutrophilic recruitment and exacerbated lung immunopathology following M. tuberculosis infection (398), which is mediated through enhanced IL-17 responses in M. tuberculosis-infected B-cell-deficient or B-cell-depleted animals (399). These studies suggest that B cells can influence the outcome of M. tuberculosis infection by moderating inflammatory responses. Antibody production by B cells can promote divergent outcomes (400). Binding of antibody to the inhibitory Fc gamma receptor II B attenuates macrophage IL-12 production and negatively impacts Th1 responses (401), while passive transfer of monoclonal antibodies specific for M. tuberculosis cell wall components can improve the outcome of infection in mice (390). B-cell secretion of cytokines can also influence M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages. Type I IFN expression by murine B cells and B cells from pleural effusion of TB patients altered macrophage polarization toward an anti-inflammatory phenotype (402). Taken together, these studies highlight a role for B cells, which constitute a significant population of lymphocytes around lung granulomas in the adaptive immune response to M. tuberculosis infection by modulating inflammation through the secretion of antibodies and cytokines.

γδ, CD1-Restricted T Cells, and MAIT Cells in Immunity against M. tuberculosis

γδ T cells are a population of T cells that express a restricted repertoire of T-cell receptor genes, recognize nonpeptide antigens such as microbial metabolites and phosphoantigens (403), and can be found at mucosal surfaces including the lung (404). γδ T cells proliferate when exposed to M. tuberculosis-infected monocytes (405). Multiple M. tuberculosis metabolites, including pyrophosphate, prenyl pyrophosphate derivatives (406, 407), and triphosphorylated thymidine-containing compounds (408), are recognized by human γδ T cells. Human γδ T cells can also respond to mycobacterial heat shock proteins (409), though this response may be dependent on BCG immunization (410). Vγ9Vδ2-expressing γδ T cells represent a significant proportion of M. tuberculosis-reactive T cells in peripheral blood (411413) and can restrict intracellular M. tuberculosis replication in macrophages (414). Interestingly, Vγ9Vδ2 T cells can function as antigen presentation cells via provision of CD40 costimulation to promote the expansion of αβ T cells with enhanced capacity to restrict intracellular BCG replication (415). Additionally, human Vγ2Vδ2 T cells recognize M. tuberculosis (416), and in NHPs, Vγ2Vδ2 T cells are expanded by phosphoantigen and IL-2 administration (417). Adoptively transferred Vγ2Vδ2 T cells into naive animals confer protection against M. tuberculosis infection (418). γδ T cells have been shown to mediate direct killing of M. tuberculosis via secretion of granulysin and perforin (419) or through the induction of TNF-α by monocytes (420). There is also evidence that γδ T cells can influence DC cross talk with T cells by promoting DC maturation and expression of costimulatory molecules (421). In mice, γδ T cells accumulate in the lung-draining lymph nodes, are responsive to M. tuberculosis antigen independent of MHC class II (422), and are significant sources of early IL-17 production following M. tuberculosis infection (423).

Due to the large repertoire of glycolipids present on the mycobacterial cell wall, a significant T-cell response is directed at glycolipid antigens presented by the CD1 family of molecules. CD1 molecules are a family of MHC class I-like antigen presentation molecules that present glycolipid antigens to T cells. There are five CD1 family members in humans, split into two groups based on sequence homology. Group 1 molecules include CD1a, CD1b, CD1c, and CD1e. CD1d is the sole inclusion in group 2 (424). Mycobacterial lipids are readily presented by CD1 molecules in human cells, but mechanistic studies of this family of molecules is limited because mice only express two orthologs of CD1d and do not express group 1 molecules. Nevertheless, studies in human cells revealed that mycobacterial lipids presented by group 1 CD1 molecules promote T-cell proliferation and cytokine production (425432). Mycobacterial glycerol monomycolate, glucose monomycolate, sulphoglycolipids, and mycolic acid can be presented through CD1b (426428, 433). CD1b-restricted T cells expand and secrete IFN-γ and IL-2 upon interaction with cognate antigen and contract following anti-TB therapy (430). Interestingly, use of CD1b tetramers loaded with glucose monomycolate revealed that CD1b-restricted T cells are antigen-specific and also express CD4 (429, 434). M. tuberculosis lipids presented through CD1a and CD1c have also been identified. A family of M. tuberculosis lipopeptides called didehydroxymycobactins are presented by CD1a (435), and a variety of phospholipid antigens are presented by CD1c (425). The precise role of CD1-restricted T cells in immunity during M. tuberculosis infection remains unclear, and further studies of their function in the periphery and especially in BAL would inform their potential as targets for TB vaccines.

MAIT cells are a subset of T cells with innate-like qualities enriched in mucosal tissues, including the intestinal mucosa, lung, and liver (436438). These cells recognize antigen through a nonpolymorphic MHC class I-related molecule 1 (439) presenting pterin-containing byproducts of riboflavin synthesis in bacteria and fungi (440). In humans, MAIT cells express a semi-invariant Vα7.2 and CD161 and can either be double negative for CD4 and CD8 or CD4-CD8+ (436, 441). MAIT cells have been described in the peripheral blood of healthy individuals and are depleted in ATB patients (442), possibly reflecting migration into the lung. These cells produce IFN-γ and TNF-α upon activation (442, 443), but their contribution to the immune response to M. tuberculosis infection requires further study.

INITIATION AND HETEROGENEITY OF THE GRANULOMA

The granuloma is a hallmark histopathological structure in TB. It represents host sequestration of bacteria to limit dissemination as well as a niche for long-term persistence of M. tuberculosis. Further, the selectively drug-permeable nature of the TB granuloma can diminish the efficacy of drugs meant to treat persistent bacteria (444). The granuloma is composed of an aggregate of M. tuberculosis-infected and -uninfected macrophages in varying stages of maturation and differentiation (445447). Macrophages in the granuloma can undergo an epithelioid transformation, become lipid-filled foamy macrophages, or merge into multinucleated giant cells. This central core of macrophages is accompanied by neutrophils, DCs, and fibroblasts circumscribed by T and B lymphocytes and progressively becomes a hypoxic environment where many cells undergo necrotic death to form an acellular core termed the caseum (448). The granuloma is a hallmark structure in human TB that is modeled variably among available animal models. C57BL/6 and BALB/C mice do not naturally recapitulate the human granuloma in that lung lesions are rarely necrotic and caseating. The animal models that most closely recapitulate the heterogeneity of human granulomas include certain susceptible inbred mouse strains that present with necrotizing granulomas (C3HeB/FeJ, DBA/2, CBA/J, I/St), guinea pigs, rabbits, and the NHP model. Additionally, the zebrafish model has also yielded fundamental insights into the initiation and dynamics of the tuberculous granuloma.

The transparency of zebrafish larvae has made direct visualization of the initiation of the granuloma possible following infection with M. marinum (48). Studies based on this model have revealed that the innate immune response is sufficient to initiate the granuloma following infection. Recruitment of additional macrophages mediated, in part, by mycobacterial ESX-1 proteins initiates a cascade of events that leads to the establishment of the mycobacterial granuloma (221, 449). Importantly, recruited macrophages can traffic through the initial granuloma to phagocytose apoptotic infected macrophages and egress to form distal secondary granulomas (450). Mycobacterial lipids play a key role in establishing the granuloma by limiting macrophage effector functions and promoting the recruitment of additional macrophages to facilitate dissemination. In particular, mycobacterial phthiocerol dimycocerosate can mask TLR-signaling and prevent induction of nitrosative stresses (451), and mycobacterial PGL can induce macrophage production of CCL2 to recruit CCR2+ monocytes that permit bacterial dissemination (452). These studies collectively indicate that the initiation of the mycobacterial granuloma is dependent on recruitment of bacteria-permissive macrophages and monocytes following initial infection and can be mediated by mycobacterial secreted factors and membrane lipids.

TB granulomas can vary in their cellular composition, oxygenation levels, inflammatory milieu, and bacterial burden. This heterogeneity can exist between and within infected hosts. Infection of cynomolgus macaques with a panel of M. tuberculosis isolates that differed by a single nucleotide polymorphism revealed that individual granulomas can be founded by a single bacterium and can vary in their bacterial burden compared to other granulomas within the same host (51). Analysis of T-cell functionality between sterile and nonsterile granulomas revealed a modest association between IL-10 and IL-17 responses and clearance of M. tuberculosis in sterile granulomas (453). However, in the context of TNF-α neutralization in latently infected macaques, IL-10 and IL-17 responses were associated with animals at higher risk of reactivation (71). Proteome analysis of laser-capture microdissected human and rabbit lung lesions suggests that inflammatory responses typical of the center of the TB granuloma are physically segregated from anti-inflammatory responses in adjacent lung tissue (454). T-cell functionality in the granuloma may therefore be a function of disease status and proximity to the bacteria-containing, hypoxic, and necrotic core of the TB granuloma. Additionally, T cells near the granuloma can be negatively impacted by the depletion of key amino acids required for proper function. As mentioned previously, IDO, an enzyme that functions in the catabolism of tryptophan, is expressed by cells in the core of the granulomas of rhesus macaques infected with M. tuberculosis (283), and inhibition of IDO promoted granuloma reorganization and attenuated disease (66). The functionality of T cells within granulomas may also be regulated by direct cross talk with infected myeloid cells, including macrophages and DCs. Intravital imaging of mycobacteria-induced liver granulomas revealed limited antigen-specific T-cell migration arrest in response to infected myeloid cells (345), suggesting that T cells do not interact meaningfully with infected cells in granulomas. Taken together, these studies highlight the vast complexity and heterogeneity of the TB granuloma.

IMMUNOLOGY OF TB DIAGNOSTICS

TB diagnosis relies on evaluation of clinical symptoms and patient history combined with radiographic examination and detection of bacteria in sputum (9). The presence of acid-fast bacilli in sputum smears by microscopy does not specifically indicate infection with M. tuberculosis; microbiological culture and nucleic acid amplification-based tests are required to confirm the presence of M. tuberculosis infection. Xpert MTB/RIF, a cartridge-based near-patient diagnostic assay utilizing real-time nucleic acid amplification of M. tuberculosis DNA, which also detects drug resistance to the first-line drug rifampicin, is recommended by the World Health Organization for TB diagnosis (455, 456). IFN-γ release assays (IGRAs), which leverage the specificity of the immune response to M. tuberculosis, are the basis of the QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube and T-SPOT.TB diagnostic assays. IGRAs measure IFN-γ produced by antigen-specific T cells in blood that recognize M. tuberculosis antigens (ESAT-6, CFP-10, TB7.7) (457). IGRAs provide increased specificity over traditional Mantoux skin tests that depend on delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions to purified protein derivative, which is not specific to M. tuberculosis infection, and positive results may be due to BCG vaccination or exposure to environmental mycobacteria. However, IGRAs do not differentiate between active and latent TB and cannot be used to diagnose TB disease. While sputum-based smear and culture techniques are established worldwide for clinical indication of M. tuberculosis infection, collection of sputum, especially from children, can be challenging and is not completely reliable. Therefore, there is interest in developing non-sputum-based diagnostic approaches for TB. Detection of urinary lipoarabinomannan in suspected TB cases is being investigated in HIV-infected (458) and -uninfected (459) individuals. Blood-based biomarkers discriminating between LTBI and ATB are being investigated for potential application to TB diagnostics and treatment response (460462). HLA-DR, CD38, and Ki67 expression on M. tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells from peripheral blood is reported to be a highly specific and sensitive method to discriminate LTBI and ATB and evaluate treatment response (460). A recent study suggests that HLA-DR could function as a robust marker distinguishing LTBI and ATB in HIV-infected populations (461). Further understanding of the spectrum of antigen-specific responses to M. tuberculosis infection can be leveraged to develop diagnostics that can monitor infection and treatment response.

TB VACCINES

The only currently licensed vaccine against TB is bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG), an attenuated strain of M. bovis (463, 464). BCG confers protection against severe forms of TB, including miliary TB and TB meningitis (465), but does not reliably protect against pulmonary TB in children or adults (3, 4, 466). The lack of validated correlates of protection against TB is a severe limitation to TB vaccine development. Despite the importance of IFN-γ responses in resistance against M. tuberculosis infection in humans and animal models, accumulating evidence suggests that induction of enhanced IFN-γ responses is not sufficient to obtain a more efficacious TB vaccine. Indeed, the frequency and functional profile of BCG-specific CD4, CD8, and γδ T cells from whole blood, including IFN-γ-producing T cells, did not correlate with protection against TB in newborns (467). As of 2017, there are 14 TB vaccine candidates in varying phases of clinical development representing three broad strategies: subunit vaccines pairing M. tuberculosis antigens with adjuvants, viral-vectored vaccines utilizing an attenuated virus for antigen delivery, and whole-cell vaccines utilizing attenuated M. tuberculosis or related mycobacterial species. Protein subunit vaccines currently under clinical development include M72/AS01E (468), H4:IC31 (469), H56:IC31 (470), and ID93/GLA-SE (471). Among viral-vectored vaccines, results from the MVA85A phase IIb clinical trial have prompted reevaluation of immune correlates to aim for in a TB vaccine. MVA85A is a modified vaccinia Ankara virus expressing Ag85A from M. tuberculosis that was utilized as a booster vaccine in infants previously vaccinated with BCG (472). Notably, vaccination with MVA85A enhanced frequencies of antigen-specific, polyfunctional CD4 T cells co-expressing IFN-γ, IL-2, and TNF-α (472). Although MVA85A vaccination enhanced antigen-specific CD4 T-cell responses, it did not provide added protection against TB disease in infants (472). Other viral-vectored vaccines in various stages of development include Ad5Ag85A (473), ChAdOx1.85A + MVA85A (474), MVA85A-IMX313 (475), and TB/FLU-04L. Additionally, a recent study utilizing a recombinant cytomegalovirus demonstrated protection in rhesus macaques (476). While viral vectors do not require the use of adjuvants, previous exposure to the vector may attenuate vaccine-induced responses and represents a potential complication to the use of viral vectors. Whole-cell vaccines currently under development include killed Mycobacterium vaccae, DAR-901 (477), VPM1002, MTBVAC, and RUTI. VPM1002 is an approach to improve BCG immunogenicity and vaccine potential by engineering BCG to express lysteriolysin from Listeria monocytogenes to escape the phagosome and carry a urease deletion mutation that facilitates phagosomal acidification, thereby enhancing MHC class I antigen presentation to CD8 T cells (478). MTBVAC is a genetically attenuated M. tuberculosis strain lacking phoP and fadD26 that abrogates synthesis of various surface lipids (479). Lastly, the therapeutic vaccine candidate RUTI was developed by growing M. tuberculosis under stress prior to fragmentation, detoxification, and delivery in liposomes to individuals with LTBI to prevent progression to ATB (480482).

There have been substantial advances in our understanding of immunity against M. tuberculosis from the days of Drs. Calmette and Guérin. Nevertheless, the absence of suitable alternatives to BCG highlights the challenges before us. M. tuberculosis is adept at subverting the cross talk between innate and adaptive immunity, and it will be important to understand that cross talk for the rational development of better vaccines. Even in the absence of protective correlates and in the face of disappointing preliminary results for MVA85A, the state of TB vaccine development is resurgent now more than ever and provides cause for optimism for the development of more efficacious vaccines and therapeutics against TB.

REFERENCES

  • 1.WHO. 2017. Global Tuberculosis Report. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Abubakar I, Pimpin L, Ariti C, Beynon R, Mangtani P, Sterne JA, Fine PE, Smith PG, Lipman M, Elliman D, Watson JM, Drumright LN, Whiting PF, Vynnycky E, Rodrigues LC. 2013. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the current evidence on the duration of protection by bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination against tuberculosis. Health Technol Assess 17:1–372, v–vi 10.3310/hta17370. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Roy A, Eisenhut M, Harris RJ, Rodrigues LC, Sridhar S, Habermann S, Snell L, Mangtani P, Adetifa I, Lalvani A, Abubakar I. 2014. Effect of BCG vaccination against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in children: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 349:g4643 10.1136/bmj.g4643. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Mangtani P, Abubakar I, Ariti C, Beynon R, Pimpin L, Fine PE, Rodrigues LC, Smith PG, Lipman M, Whiting PF, Sterne JA. 2014. Protection by BCG vaccine against tuberculosis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Infect Dis 58:470–480 10.1093/cid/cit790. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Turner RD, Chiu C, Churchyard GJ, Esmail H, Lewinsohn DM, Gandhi NR, Fennelly KP. 2017. Tuberculosis infectiousness and host susceptibility. J Infect Dis 216(Suppl 6):S636–S643 10.1093/infdis/jix361. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Churchyard G, Kim P, Shah NS, Rustomjee R, Gandhi N, Mathema B, Dowdy D, Kasmar A, Cardenas V. 2017. What we know about tuberculosis transmission: an overview. J Infect Dis 216(Suppl 6):S629–S635 10.1093/infdis/jix362. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Mathema B, Andrews JR, Cohen T, Borgdorff MW, Behr M, Glynn JR, Rustomjee R, Silk BJ, Wood R. 2017. Drivers of tuberculosis transmission. J Infect Dis 216(Suppl 6):S644–S653 10.1093/infdis/jix354. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Barry CE III, Boshoff HI, Dartois V, Dick T, Ehrt S, Flynn J, Schnappinger D, Wilkinson RJ, Young D. 2009. The spectrum of latent tuberculosis: rethinking the biology and intervention strategies. Nat Rev Microbiol 7:845–855 10.1038/nrmicro2236. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dheda K, Gumbo T, Maartens G, Dooley KE, McNerney R, Murray M, Furin J, Nardell EA, London L, Lessem E, Theron G, van Helden P, Niemann S, Merker M, Dowdy D, Van Rie A, Siu GK, Pasipanodya JG, Rodrigues C, Clark TG, Sirgel FA, Esmail A, Lin HH, Atre SR, Schaaf HS, Chang KC, Lange C, Nahid P, Udwadia ZF, Horsburgh CR Jr, Churchyard GJ, Menzies D, Hesseling AC, Nuermberger E, McIlleron H, Fennelly KP, Goemaere E, Jaramillo E, Low M, Jara CM, Padayatchi N, Warren RM. 2017. The epidemiology, pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant, and incurable tuberculosis. Lancet Respir Med 5:291–360. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Jones BE, Young SM, Antoniskis D, Davidson PT, Kramer F, Barnes PF. 1993. Relationship of the manifestations of tuberculosis to CD4 cell counts in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. Am Rev Respir Dis 148:1292–1297 10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1292. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Leroy V, Salmi LR, Dupon M, Sentilhes A, Texier-Maugein J, Dequae L, Dabis F, Salamon R. 1997. Progression of human immunodeficiency virus infection in patients with tuberculosis disease. A cohort study in Bordeaux, France, 1988-1994. The Groupe d’Epidémiologie Clinique du Sida en Aquitaine (GECSA). Am J Epidemiol 145:293–300 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009105. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Havlir DV, Barnes PF. 1999. Tuberculosis in patients with human immunodeficiency virus infection. N Engl J Med 340:367–373 10.1056/NEJM199902043400507. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Toossi Z. 2003. Virological and immunological impact of tuberculosis on human immunodeficiency virus type 1 disease. J Infect Dis 188:1146–1155 10.1086/378676. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Sonnenberg P, Glynn JR, Fielding K, Murray J, Godfrey-Faussett P, Shearer S. 2005. How soon after infection with HIV does the risk of tuberculosis start to increase? A retrospective cohort study in South African gold miners. J Infect Dis 191:150–158 10.1086/426827. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Geldmacher C, Schuetz A, Ngwenyama N, Casazza JP, Sanga E, Saathoff E, Boehme C, Geis S, Maboko L, Singh M, Minja F, Meyerhans A, Koup RA, Hoelscher M. 2008. Early depletion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T helper 1 cell responses after HIV-1 infection. J Infect Dis 198:1590–1598 10.1086/593017. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Geldmacher C, Ngwenyama N, Schuetz A, Petrovas C, Reither K, Heeregrave EJ, Casazza JP, Ambrozak DR, Louder M, Ampofo W, Pollakis G, Hill B, Sanga E, Saathoff E, Maboko L, Roederer M, Paxton WA, Hoelscher M, Koup RA. 2010. Preferential infection and depletion of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells after HIV-1 infection. J Exp Med 207:2869–2881 10.1084/jem.20100090. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kalsdorf B, Scriba TJ, Wood K, Day CL, Dheda K, Dawson R, Hanekom WA, Lange C, Wilkinson RJ. 2009. HIV-1 infection impairs the bronchoalveolar T-cell response to mycobacteria. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 180:1262–1270 10.1164/rccm.200907-1011OC. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bunjun R, Riou C, Soares AP, Thawer N, Müller TL, Kiravu A, Ginbot Z, Oni T, Goliath R, Kalsdorf B, von Groote-Bidlingmaier F, Hanekom W, Walzl G, Wilkinson RJ, Burgers WA. 2017. Effect of HIV on the frequency and number of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T cells in blood and airways during latent M. tuberculosis infection. J Infect Dis 216:1550–1560 10.1093/infdis/jix529. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Rosas-Taraco AG, Arce-Mendoza AY, Caballero-Olín G, Salinas-Carmona MC. 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis upregulates coreceptors CCR5 and CXCR4 while HIV modulates CD14 favoring concurrent infection. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 22:45–51 10.1089/aid.2006.22.45. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Juffermans NP, Speelman P, Verbon A, Veenstra J, Jie C, van Deventer SJ, van Der Poll T. 2001. Patients with active tuberculosis have increased expression of HIV coreceptors CXCR4 and CCR5 on CD4(+) T cells. Clin Infect Dis 32:650–652 10.1086/318701. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mayanja-Kizza H, Wajja A, Wu M, Peters P, Nalugwa G, Mubiru F, Aung H, Vanham G, Hirsch C, Whalen C, Ellner J, Toossi Z. 2001. Activation of beta-chemokines and CCR5 in persons infected with human immunodeficiency virus type 1 and tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 183:1801–1804 10.1086/320724. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Morris L, Cilliers T, Bredell H, Phoswa M, Martin DJ. 2001. CCR5 is the major coreceptor used by HIV-1 subtype C isolates from patients with active tuberculosis. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 17:697–701 10.1089/088922201750236979. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Santucci MB, Bocchino M, Garg SK, Marruchella A, Colizzi V, Saltini C, Fraziano M. 2004. Expansion of CCR5+ CD4+ T-lymphocytes in the course of active pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur Respir J 24:638–643 10.1183/09031936.04.000105403. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Wolday D, Tegbaru B, Kassu A, Messele T, Coutinho R, van Baarle D, Miedema F. 2005. Expression of chemokine receptors CCR5 and CXCR4 on CD4+ T cells and plasma chemokine levels during treatment of active tuberculosis in HIV-1-coinfected patients. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 39:265–271 10.1097/01.qai.0000163027.47147.2e. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Day CL, Mkhwanazi N, Reddy S, Mncube Z, van der Stok M, Klenerman P, Walker BD. 2008. Detection of polyfunctional Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T cells and association with viral load in HIV-1-infected persons. J Infect Dis 197:990–999 10.1086/529048. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Riou C, Bunjun R, Müller TL, Kiravu A, Ginbot Z, Oni T, Goliath R, Wilkinson RJ, Burgers WA. 2016. Selective reduction of IFN-γ single positive mycobacteria-specific CD4+ T cells in HIV-1 infected individuals with latent tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 101:25–30 10.1016/j.tube.2016.07.018. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Strickland N, Müller TL, Berkowitz N, Goliath R, Carrington MN, Wilkinson RJ, Burgers WA, Riou C. 2017. Characterization of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific cells using MHC class II tetramers reveals phenotypic differences related to HIV infection and tuberculosis disease. J Immunol 199:2440–2450. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Day CL, Abrahams DA, Harris LD, van Rooyen M, Stone L, de Kock M, Hanekom WA. 2017. HIV-1 infection is associated with depletion and functional impairment of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4 T cells in individuals with latent tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 199:2069–2080 10.4049/jimmunol.1700558. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Kalokhe AS, Adekambi T, Ibegbu CC, Ray SM, Day CL, Rengarajan J. 2015. Impaired degranulation and proliferative capacity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD8+ T cells in HIV-infected individuals with latent tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 211:635–640 10.1093/infdis/jiu505. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fox GJ, Menzies D. 2013. Epidemiology of tuberculosis immunology. Adv Exp Med Biol 783:1–32 10.1007/978-1-4614-6111-1_1. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marais BJ, Lönnroth K, Lawn SD, Migliori GB, Mwaba P, Glaziou P, Bates M, Colagiuri R, Zijenah L, Swaminathan S, Memish ZA, Pletschette M, Hoelscher M, Abubakar I, Hasan R, Zafar A, Pantaleo G, Craig G, Kim P, Maeurer M, Schito M, Zumla A. 2013. Tuberculosis comorbidity with communicable and non-communicable diseases: integrating health services and control efforts. Lancet Infect Dis 13:436–448 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70015-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Cooper AM. 2014. Mouse model of tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 5:a018556 10.1101/cshperspect.a018556. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Fortin A, Abel L, Casanova JL, Gros P. 2007. Host genetics of mycobacterial diseases in mice and men: forward genetic studies of BCG-osis and tuberculosis. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 8:163–192 10.1146/annurev.genom.8.080706.092315. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Medina E, North RJ. 1998. Resistance ranking of some common inbred mouse strains to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and relationship to major histocompatibility complex haplotype and Nramp1 genotype. Immunology 93:270–274 10.1046/j.1365-2567.1998.00419.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Sánchez F, Radaeva TV, Nikonenko BV, Persson AS, Sengul S, Schalling M, Schurr E, Apt AS, Lavebratt C. 2003. Multigenic control of disease severity after virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. Infect Immun 71:126–131 10.1128/IAI.71.1.126-131.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Marquis JF, Lacourse R, Ryan L, North RJ, Gros P. 2009. Genetic and functional characterization of the mouse Trl3 locus in defense against tuberculosis. J Immunol 182:3757–3767 10.4049/jimmunol.0802094. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.McCune RM Jr, McDermott W, Tompsett R. 1956. The fate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mouse tissues as determined by the microbial enumeration technique. II. The conversion of tuberculous infection to the latent state by the administration of pyrazinamide and a companion drug. J Exp Med 104:763–802 10.1084/jem.104.5.763. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Scanga CA, Mohan VP, Joseph H, Yu K, Chan J, Flynn JL. 1999. Reactivation of latent tuberculosis: variations on the Cornell murine model. Infect Immun 67:4531–4538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Calderon VE, Valbuena G, Goez Y, Judy BM, Huante MB, Sutjita P, Johnston RK, Estes DM, Hunter RL, Actor JK, Cirillo JD, Endsley JJ. 2013. A humanized mouse model of tuberculosis. PLoS One 8:e63331 10.1371/journal.pone.0063331. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Heuts F, Gavier-Widén D, Carow B, Juarez J, Wigzell H, Rottenberg ME. 2013. CD4+ cell-dependent granuloma formation in humanized mice infected with mycobacteria. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:6482–6487 10.1073/pnas.1219985110. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.McMurray DN. 2001. Disease model: pulmonary tuberculosis. Trends Mol Med 7:135–137 10.1016/S1471-4914(00)01901-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Allison MJ, Zappasodi P, Lurie MB. 1962. Host-parasite relationships in natively resistant and susceptible rabbits on quantitative inhalation of tubercle bacilli. Their significance for the nature of genetic resistance. Am Rev Respir Dis 85:553–569. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bishai WR, Dannenberg AM Jr, Parrish N, Ruiz R, Chen P, Zook BC, Johnson W, Boles JW, Pitt ML. 1999. Virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis CDC1551 and H37Rv in rabbits evaluated by Lurie’s pulmonary tubercle count method. Infect Immun 67:4931–4934. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Manabe YC, Dannenberg AM Jr, Tyagi SK, Hatem CL, Yoder M, Woolwine SC, Zook BC, Pitt ML, Bishai WR. 2003. Different strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cause various spectrums of disease in the rabbit model of tuberculosis. Infect Immun 71:6004–6011 10.1128/IAI.71.10.6004-6011.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Dorman SE, Hatem CL, Tyagi S, Aird K, Lopez-Molina J, Pitt ML, Zook BC, Dannenberg AM Jr, Bishai WR, Manabe YC. 2004. Susceptibility to tuberculosis: clues from studies with inbred and outbred New Zealand white rabbits. Infect Immun 72:1700–1705 10.1128/IAI.72.3.1700-1705.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tsenova L, Ellison E, Harbacheuski R, Moreira AL, Kurepina N, Reed MB, Mathema B, Barry CE III, Kaplan G. 2005. Virulence of selected Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolates in the rabbit model of meningitis is dependent on phenolic glycolipid produced by the bacilli. J Infect Dis 192:98–106 10.1086/430614. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Sun H, Ma X, Zhang G, Luo Y, Tang K, Lin X, Yu H, Zhang Y, Zhu B. 2012. Effects of immunomodulators on liquefaction and ulceration in the rabbit skin model of tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 92:345–350 10.1016/j.tube.2012.03.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Davis JM, Clay H, Lewis JL, Ghori N, Herbomel P, Ramakrishnan L. 2002. Real-time visualization of mycobacterium-macrophage interactions leading to initiation of granuloma formation in zebrafish embryos. Immunity 17:693–702 10.1016/S1074-7613(02)00475-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Dee CT, Nagaraju RT, Athanasiadis EI, Gray C, Fernandez Del Ama L, Johnston SA, Secombes CJ, Cvejic A, Hurlstone AF. 2016. CD4-transgenic zebrafish reveal tissue-resident Th2- and regulatory T cell-like populations and diverse mononuclear phagocytes. J Immunol 197:3520–3530 10.4049/jimmunol.1600959. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Kasheta M, Painter CA, Moore FE, Lobbardi R, Bryll A, Freiman E, Stachura D, Rogers AB, Houvras Y, Langenau DM, Ceol CJ. 2017. Identification and characterization of T reg-like cells in zebrafish. J Exp Med 214:3519–3530 10.1084/jem.20162084. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Lin PL, Ford CB, Coleman MT, Myers AJ, Gawande R, Ioerger T, Sacchettini J, Fortune SM, Flynn JL. 2014. Sterilization of granulomas is common in active and latent tuberculosis despite within-host variability in bacterial killing. Nat Med 20:75–79 10.1038/nm.3412. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Flynn JL, Gideon HP, Mattila JT, Lin PL. 2015. Immunology studies in non-human primate models of tuberculosis. Immunol Rev 264:60–73 10.1111/imr.12258. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kaushal D, Mehra S. 2012. Faithful experimental models of human Mycobacterium Tuberculosis infection. Mycobact Dis 2:2 10.4172/2161-1068.1000e108. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Hunter RL, Actor JK, Hwang SA, Khan A, Urbanowski ME, Kaushal D, Jagannath C. 2018. Pathogenesis and animal models of post-primary (bronchogenic) tuberculosis: a review. Pathogens 7:7 10.3390/pathogens7010019. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Mothé BR, Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Dow C, Dillon MBC, Wiseman RW, Bohn P, Karl J, Golden NA, Gilpin T, Foreman TW, Rodgers MA, Mehra S, Scriba TJ, Flynn JL, Kaushal D, O’Connor DH, Sette A. 2015. The TB-specific CD4(+) T cell immune repertoire in both cynomolgus and rhesus macaques largely overlap with humans. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 95:722–735 10.1016/j.tube.2015.07.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Lai X, Shen Y, Zhou D, Sehgal P, Shen L, Simon M, Qiu L, Letvin NL, Chen ZW. 2003. Immune biology of macaque lymphocyte populations during mycobacterial infection. Clin Exp Immunol 133:182–192 10.1046/j.1365-2249.2003.02209.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Chen CY, Huang D, Wang RC, Shen L, Zeng G, Yao S, Shen Y, Halliday L, Fortman J, McAllister M, Estep J, Hunt R, Vasconcelos D, Du G, Porcelli SA, Larsen MH, Jacobs WR Jr, Haynes BF, Letvin NL, Chen ZW. 2009. A critical role for CD8 T cells in a nonhuman primate model of tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000392 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000392. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kaushal D, Foreman TW, Gautam US, Alvarez X, Adekambi T, Rangel-Moreno J, Golden NA, Johnson AM, Phillips BL, Ahsan MH, Russell-Lodrigue KE, Doyle LA, Roy CJ, Didier PJ, Blanchard JL, Rengarajan J, Lackner AA, Khader SA, Mehra S. 2015. Mucosal vaccination with attenuated Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces strong central memory responses and protects against tuberculosis. Nat Commun 6:8533 10.1038/ncomms9533. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Verreck FA, Vervenne RA, Kondova I, van Kralingen KW, Remarque EJ, Braskamp G, van der Werff NM, Kersbergen A, Ottenhoff TH, Heidt PJ, Gilbert SC, Gicquel B, Hill AV, Martin C, McShane H, Thomas AW. 2009. MVA.85A boosting of BCG and an attenuated, phoP deficient M. tuberculosis vaccine both show protective efficacy against tuberculosis in rhesus macaques. PLoS One 4:e5264 10.1371/journal.pone.0005264. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Rahman S, Magalhaes I, Rahman J, Ahmed RK, Sizemore DR, Scanga CA, Weichold F, Verreck F, Kondova I, Sadoff J, Thorstensson R, Spångberg M, Svensson M, Andersson J, Maeurer M, Brighenti S. 2012. Prime-boost vaccination with rBCG/rAd35 enhances CD8+ cytolytic T-cell responses in lesions from Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected primates. Mol Med 18:647–658 10.2119/molmed.2011.00222. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Lin PL, Coleman T, Carney JP, Lopresti BJ, Tomko J, Fillmore D, Dartois V, Scanga C, Frye LJ, Janssen C, Klein E, Barry CE III, Flynn JL. 2013. Radiologic responses in cynomolgus macaques for assessing tuberculosis chemotherapy regimens. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 57:4237–4244 10.1128/AAC.00277-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.White AG, Maiello P, Coleman MT, Tomko JA, Frye LJ, Scanga CA, Lin PL, Flynn JL. 2017. Analysis of 18FDG PET/CT Imaging as a tool for studying Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and treatment in non-human primates. J Vis Exp (127):10.3791/56375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Lin PL, Dartois V, Johnston PJ, Janssen C, Via L, Goodwin MB, Klein E, Barry CE III, Flynn JL. 2012. Metronidazole prevents reactivation of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in macaques. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:14188–14193 10.1073/pnas.1121497109. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Mehra S, Golden NA, Dutta NK, Midkiff CC, Alvarez X, Doyle LA, Asher M, Russell-Lodrigue K, Monjure C, Roy CJ, Blanchard JL, Didier PJ, Veazey RS, Lackner AA, Kaushal D. 2011. Reactivation of latent tuberculosis in rhesus macaques by coinfection with simian immunodeficiency virus. J Med Primatol 40:233–243 10.1111/j.1600-0684.2011.00485.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Foreman TW, Mehra S, LoBato DN, Malek A, Alvarez X, Golden NA, Bucşan AN, Didier PJ, Doyle-Meyers LA, Russell-Lodrigue KE, Roy CJ, Blanchard J, Kuroda MJ, Lackner AA, Chan J, Khader SA, Jacobs WR Jr, Kaushal D. 2016. CD4+ T-cell-independent mechanisms suppress reactivation of latent tuberculosis in a macaque model of HIV coinfection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E5636–E5644 10.1073/pnas.1611987113. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Gautam US, Foreman TW, Bucsan AN, Veatch AV, Alvarez X, Adekambi T, Golden NA, Gentry KM, Doyle-Meyers LA, Russell-Lodrigue KE, Didier PJ, Blanchard JL, Kousoulas KG, Lackner AA, Kalman D, Rengarajan J, Khader SA, Kaushal D, Mehra S. 2018. In vivo inhibition of tryptophan catabolism reorganizes the tuberculoma and augments immune-mediated control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 115:E62–E71 10.1073/pnas.1711373114. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Diedrich CR, Mattila JT, Klein E, Janssen C, Phuah J, Sturgeon TJ, Montelaro RC, Lin PL, Flynn JL. 2010. Reactivation of latent tuberculosis in cynomolgus macaques infected with SIV is associated with early peripheral T cell depletion and not virus load. PLoS One 5:e9611 10.1371/journal.pone.0009611. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Mattila JT, Diedrich CR, Lin PL, Phuah J, Flynn JL. 2011. Simian immunodeficiency virus-induced changes in T cell cytokine responses in cynomolgus macaques with latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are associated with timing of reactivation. J Immunol 186:3527–3537 10.4049/jimmunol.1003773. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lin PL, Rutledge T, Green AM, Bigbee M, Fuhrman C, Klein E, Flynn JL. 2012. CD4 T cell depletion exacerbates acute Mycobacterium tuberculosis while reactivation of latent infection is dependent on severity of tissue depletion in cynomolgus macaques. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses 28:1693–1702 10.1089/aid.2012.0028. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Lin PL, Myers A, Smith L, Bigbee C, Bigbee M, Fuhrman C, Grieser H, Chiosea I, Voitenek NN, Capuano SV, Klein E, Flynn JL. 2010. Tumor necrosis factor neutralization results in disseminated disease in acute and latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection with normal granuloma structure in a cynomolgus macaque model. Arthritis Rheum 62:340–350. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Lin PL, Maiello P, Gideon HP, Coleman MT, Cadena AM, Rodgers MA, Gregg R, O’Malley M, Tomko J, Fillmore D, Frye LJ, Rutledge T, DiFazio RM, Janssen C, Klein E, Andersen PL, Fortune SM, Flynn JL. 2016. PET CT identifies reactivation risk in cynomolgus macaques with latent M. tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005739 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005739. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Philips JA, Ernst JD. 2012. Tuberculosis pathogenesis and immunity. Annu Rev Pathol 7:353–384 10.1146/annurev-pathol-011811-132458. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Jo EK, Yang CS, Choi CH, Harding CV. 2007. Intracellular signalling cascades regulating innate immune responses to Mycobacteria: branching out from Toll-like receptors. Cell Microbiol 9:1087–1098 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2007.00914.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Kleinnijenhuis J, Oosting M, Joosten LA, Netea MG, Van Crevel R. 2011. Innate immune recognition of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Clin Dev Immunol 2011:405310 10.1155/2011/405310. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Watson RO, Manzanillo PS, Cox JS. 2012. Extracellular M. tuberculosis DNA targets bacteria for autophagy by activating the host DNA-sensing pathway. Cell 150:803–815 10.1016/j.cell.2012.06.040. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Manzanillo PS, Shiloh MU, Portnoy DA, Cox JS. 2012. Mycobacterium tuberculosis activates the DNA-dependent cytosolic surveillance pathway within macrophages. Cell Host Microbe 11:469–480 10.1016/j.chom.2012.03.007. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dey B, Dey RJ, Cheung LS, Pokkali S, Guo H, Lee JH, Bishai WR. 2015. A bacterial cyclic dinucleotide activates the cytosolic surveillance pathway and mediates innate resistance to tuberculosis. Nat Med 21:401–406 10.1038/nm.3813. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Collins AC, Cai H, Li T, Franco LH, Li XD, Nair VR, Scharn CR, Stamm CE, Levine B, Chen ZJ, Shiloh MU. 2015. Cyclic GMP-AMP synthase is an innate immune DNA sensor for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe 17:820–828 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Watson RO, Bell SL, MacDuff DA, Kimmey JM, Diner EJ, Olivas J, Vance RE, Stallings CL, Virgin HW, Cox JS. 2015. The cytosolic sensor cGAS detects Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA to induce type I interferons and activate autophagy. Cell Host Microbe 17:811–819 10.1016/j.chom.2015.05.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Court N, Vasseur V, Vacher R, Frémond C, Shebzukhov Y, Yeremeev VV, Maillet I, Nedospasov SA, Gordon S, Fallon PG, Suzuki H, Ryffel B, Quesniaux VF. 2010. Partial redundancy of the pattern recognition receptors, scavenger receptors, and C-type lectins for the long-term control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 184:7057–7070 10.4049/jimmunol.1000164. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Velez DR, Wejse C, Stryjewski ME, Abbate E, Hulme WF, Myers JL, Estevan R, Patillo SG, Olesen R, Tacconelli A, Sirugo G, Gilbert JR, Hamilton CD, Scott WK. 2010. Variants in toll-like receptors 2 and 9 influence susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis in Caucasians, African-Americans, and West Africans. Hum Genet 127:65–73 10.1007/s00439-009-0741-7. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Ma X, Liu Y, Gowen BB, Graviss EA, Clark AG, Musser JM. 2007. Full-exon resequencing reveals toll-like receptor variants contribute to human susceptibility to tuberculosis disease. PLoS One 2:e1318 10.1371/journal.pone.0001318. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Davila S, Hibberd ML, Hari Dass R, Wong HE, Sahiratmadja E, Bonnard C, Alisjahbana B, Szeszko JS, Balabanova Y, Drobniewski F, van Crevel R, van de Vosse E, Nejentsev S, Ottenhoff TH, Seielstad M. 2008. Genetic association and expression studies indicate a role of toll-like receptor 8 in pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS Genet 4:e1000218 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000218. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Khor CC, Chapman SJ, Vannberg FO, Dunne A, Murphy C, Ling EY, Frodsham AJ, Walley AJ, Kyrieleis O, Khan A, Aucan C, Segal S, Moore CE, Knox K, Campbell SJ, Lienhardt C, Scott A, Aaby P, Sow OY, Grignani RT, Sillah J, Sirugo G, Peshu N, Williams TN, Maitland K, Davies RJ, Kwiatkowski DP, Day NP, Yala D, Crook DW, Marsh K, Berkley JA, O’Neill LA, Hill AV. 2007. A Mal functional variant is associated with protection against invasive pneumococcal disease, bacteremia, malaria and tuberculosis. Nat Genet 39:523–528 10.1038/ng1976. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Fremond CM, Yeremeev V, Nicolle DM, Jacobs M, Quesniaux VF, Ryffel B. 2004. Fatal Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection despite adaptive immune response in the absence of MyD88. J Clin Invest 114:1790–1799 10.1172/JCI200421027. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Scanga CA, Bafica A, Feng CG, Cheever AW, Hieny S, Sher A. 2004. MyD88-deficient mice display a profound loss in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis associated with partially impaired Th1 cytokine and nitric oxide synthase 2 expression. Infect Immun 72:2400–2404 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2400-2404.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Mayer-Barber KD, Barber DL, Shenderov K, White SD, Wilson MS, Cheever A, Kugler D, Hieny S, Caspar P, Núñez G, Schlueter D, Flavell RA, Sutterwala FS, Sher A. 2010. Caspase-1 independent IL-1beta production is critical for host resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and does not require TLR signaling in vivo. J Immunol 184:3326–3330 10.4049/jimmunol.0904189. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Fremond CM, Togbe D, Doz E, Rose S, Vasseur V, Maillet I, Jacobs M, Ryffel B, Quesniaux VF. 2007. IL-1 receptor-mediated signal is an essential component of MyD88-dependent innate response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 179:1178–1189 10.4049/jimmunol.179.2.1178. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Shi S, Nathan C, Schnappinger D, Drenkow J, Fuortes M, Block E, Ding A, Gingeras TR, Schoolnik G, Akira S, Takeda K, Ehrt S. 2003. MyD88 primes macrophages for full-scale activation by interferon-gamma yet mediates few responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med 198:987–997 10.1084/jem.20030603. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Bafica A, Scanga CA, Feng CG, Leifer C, Cheever A, Sher A. 2005. TLR9 regulates Th1 responses and cooperates with TLR2 in mediating optimal resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med 202:1715–1724 10.1084/jem.20051782. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Dorhoi A, Desel C, Yeremeev V, Pradl L, Brinkmann V, Mollenkopf HJ, Hanke K, Gross O, Ruland J, Kaufmann SH. 2010. The adaptor molecule CARD9 is essential for tuberculosis control. J Exp Med 207:777–792 10.1084/jem.20090067. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.McElvania Tekippe E, Allen IC, Hulseberg PD, Sullivan JT, McCann JR, Sandor M, Braunstein M, Ting JP. 2010. Granuloma formation and host defense in chronic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection requires PYCARD/ASC but not NLRP3 or caspase-1. PLoS One 5:e12320 10.1371/journal.pone.0012320. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Eklund D, Welin A, Andersson H, Verma D, Söderkvist P, Stendahl O, Särndahl E, Lerm M. 2014. Human gene variants linked to enhanced NLRP3 activity limit intramacrophage growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 209:749–753 10.1093/infdis/jit572. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Bellamy R, Ruwende C, Corrah T, McAdam KP, Whittle HC, Hill AV. 1998. Assessment of the interleukin 1 gene cluster and other candidate gene polymorphisms in host susceptibility to tuberculosis. Tuber Lung Dis 79:83–89 10.1054/tuld.1998.0009. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Wilkinson RJ, Patel P, Llewelyn M, Hirsch CS, Pasvol G, Snounou G, Davidson RN, Toossi Z. 1999. Influence of polymorphism in the genes for the interleukin (IL)-1 receptor antagonist and IL-1beta on tuberculosis. J Exp Med 189:1863–1874 10.1084/jem.189.12.1863. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Flores-Villanueva PO, Ruiz-Morales JA, Song CH, Flores LM, Jo EK, Montaño M, Barnes PF, Selman M, Granados J. 2005. A functional promoter polymorphism in monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 is associated with increased susceptibility to pulmonary tuberculosis. J Exp Med 202:1649–1658 10.1084/jem.20050126. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Juffermans NP, Florquin S, Camoglio L, Verbon A, Kolk AH, Speelman P, van Deventer SJ, van Der Poll T. 2000. Interleukin-1 signaling is essential for host defense during murine pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 182:902–908 10.1086/315771. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Sugawara I, Yamada H, Hua S, Mizuno S. 2001. Role of interleukin (IL)-1 type 1 receptor in mycobacterial infection. Microbiol Immunol 45:743–750 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2001.tb01310.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Yamada H, Mizumo S, Horai R, Iwakura Y, Sugawara I. 2000. Protective role of interleukin-1 in mycobacterial infection in IL-1 alpha/beta double-knockout mice. Lab Invest 80:759–767 10.1038/labinvest.3780079. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Mayer-Barber KD, Andrade BB, Oland SD, Amaral EP, Barber DL, Gonzales J, Derrick SC, Shi R, Kumar NP, Wei W, Yuan X, Zhang G, Cai Y, Babu S, Catalfamo M, Salazar AM, Via LE, Barry CE III, Sher A. 2014. Host-directed therapy of tuberculosis based on interleukin-1 and type I interferon crosstalk. Nature 511:99–103 10.1038/nature13489. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Di Paolo NC, Shafiani S, Day T, Papayannopoulou T, Russell DW, Iwakura Y, Sherman D, Urdahl K, Shayakhmetov DM. 2015. Interdependence between interleukin-1 and tumor necrosis factor regulates TNF-dependent control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunity 43:1125–1136 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.11.016. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Reed MB, Domenech P, Manca C, Su H, Barczak AK, Kreiswirth BN, Kaplan G, Barry CE III. 2004. A glycolipid of hypervirulent tuberculosis strains that inhibits the innate immune response. Nature 431:84–87 10.1038/nature02837. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Sinsimer D, Huet G, Manca C, Tsenova L, Koo MS, Kurepina N, Kana B, Mathema B, Marras SA, Kreiswirth BN, Guilhot C, Kaplan G. 2008. The phenolic glycolipid of Mycobacterium tuberculosis differentially modulates the early host cytokine response but does not in itself confer hypervirulence. Infect Immun 76:3027–3036 10.1128/IAI.01663-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Blanc L, Gilleron M, Prandi J, Song OR, Jang MS, Gicquel B, Drocourt D, Neyrolles O, Brodin P, Tiraby G, Vercellone A, Nigou J. 2017. Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibits human innate immune responses via the production of TLR2 antagonist glycolipids. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:11205–11210 10.1073/pnas.1707840114. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Rengarajan J, Murphy E, Park A, Krone CL, Hett EC, Bloom BR, Glimcher LH, Rubin EJ. 2008. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Rv2224c modulates innate immune responses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:264–269 10.1073/pnas.0710601105. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Madan-Lala R, Peixoto KV, Re F, Rengarajan J. 2011. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Hip1 dampens macrophage proinflammatory responses by limiting Toll-like receptor 2 activation. Infect Immun 79:4828–4838 10.1128/IAI.05574-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Madan-Lala R, Sia JK, King R, Adekambi T, Monin L, Khader SA, Pulendran B, Rengarajan J. 2014. Mycobacterium tuberculosis impairs dendritic cell functions through the serine hydrolase Hip1. J Immunol 192:4263–4272 10.4049/jimmunol.1303185. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Naffin-Olivos JL, Georgieva M, Goldfarb N, Madan-Lala R, Dong L, Bizzell E, Valinetz E, Brandt GS, Yu S, Shabashvili DE, Ringe D, Dunn BM, Petsko GA, Rengarajan J. 2014. Mycobacterium tuberculosis Hip1 modulates macrophage responses through proteolysis of GroEL2. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004132 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004132. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Georgieva M, Sia JK, Bizzell E, Madan-Lala R, Rengarajan J. 2018. Mycobacterium tuberculosis GroEL2 modulates dendritic cell responses. Infect Immun 86:e00387-17. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Master SS, Rampini SK, Davis AS, Keller C, Ehlers S, Springer B, Timmins GS, Sander P, Deretic V. 2008. Mycobacterium tuberculosis prevents inflammasome activation. Cell Host Microbe 3:224–232 10.1016/j.chom.2008.03.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Ehrt S, Schnappinger D. 2009. Mycobacterial survival strategies in the phagosome: defence against host stresses. Cell Microbiol 11:1170–1178 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01335.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Schnappinger D, Ehrt S, Voskuil MI, Liu Y, Mangan JA, Monahan IM, Dolganov G, Efron B, Butcher PD, Nathan C, Schoolnik GK. 2003. Transcriptional adaptation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within macrophages: insights into the phagosomal environment. J Exp Med 198:693–704 10.1084/jem.20030846. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Rengarajan J, Bloom BR, Rubin EJ. 2005. Genome-wide requirements for Mycobacterium tuberculosis adaptation and survival in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 102:8327–8332 10.1073/pnas.0503272102. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Fratti RA, Chua J, Vergne I, Deretic V. 2003. Mycobacterium tuberculosis glycosylated phosphatidylinositol causes phagosome maturation arrest. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:5437–5442 10.1073/pnas.0737613100. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Saleh MT, Belisle JT. 2000. Secretion of an acid phosphatase (SapM) by Mycobacterium tuberculosis that is similar to eukaryotic acid phosphatases. J Bacteriol 182:6850–6853 10.1128/JB.182.23.6850-6853.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Vergne I, Chua J, Lee HH, Lucas M, Belisle J, Deretic V. 2005. Mechanism of phagolysosome biogenesis block by viable Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:4033–4038 10.1073/pnas.0409716102. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Bach H, Papavinasasundaram KG, Wong D, Hmama Z, Av-Gay Y. 2008. Mycobacterium tuberculosis virulence is mediated by PtpA dephosphorylation of human vacuolar protein sorting 33B. Cell Host Microbe 3:316–322 10.1016/j.chom.2008.03.008. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Nguyen L, Pieters J. 2005. The Trojan horse: survival tactics of pathogenic mycobacteria in macrophages. Trends Cell Biol 15:269–276 10.1016/j.tcb.2005.03.009. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Majlessi L, Combaluzier B, Albrecht I, Garcia JE, Nouze C, Pieters J, Leclerc C. 2007. Inhibition of phagosome maturation by mycobacteria does not interfere with presentation of mycobacterial antigens by MHC molecules. J Immunol 179:1825–1833 10.4049/jimmunol.179.3.1825. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Walburger A, Koul A, Ferrari G, Nguyen L, Prescianotto-Baschong C, Huygen K, Klebl B, Thompson C, Bacher G, Pieters J. 2004. Protein kinase G from pathogenic mycobacteria promotes survival within macrophages. Science 304:1800–1804 10.1126/science.1099384. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Cowley S, Ko M, Pick N, Chow R, Downing KJ, Gordhan BG, Betts JC, Mizrahi V, Smith DA, Stokes RW, Av-Gay Y. 2004. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis protein serine/threonine kinase PknG is linked to cellular glutamate/glutamine levels and is important for growth in vivo. Mol Microbiol 52:1691–1702 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04085.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Quigley J, Hughitt VK, Velikovsky CA, Mariuzza RA, El-Sayed NM, Briken V. 2017. The cell wall lipid PDIM contributes to phagosomal escape and host cell exit of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. MBio 8:e00148-17 10.1128/mBio.00148-17. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Schnettger L, Rodgers A, Repnik U, Lai RP, Pei G, Verdoes M, Wilkinson RJ, Young DB, Gutierrez MG. 2017. A Rab20-dependent membrane trafficking pathway controls M. tuberculosis replication by regulating phagosome spaciousness and integrity. Cell Host Microbe 21:619–628.e5 10.1016/j.chom.2017.04.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.de Jonge MI, Pehau-Arnaudet G, Fretz MM, Romain F, Bottai D, Brodin P, Honoré N, Marchal G, Jiskoot W, England P, Cole ST, Brosch R. 2007. ESAT-6 from Mycobacterium tuberculosis dissociates from its putative chaperone CFP-10 under acidic conditions and exhibits membrane-lysing activity. J Bacteriol 189:6028–6034 10.1128/JB.00469-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.van der Wel N, Hava D, Houben D, Fluitsma D, van Zon M, Pierson J, Brenner M, Peters PJ. 2007. M. tuberculosis and M. leprae translocate from the phagolysosome to the cytosol in myeloid cells. Cell 129:1287–1298 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.059. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Houben D, Demangel C, van Ingen J, Perez J, Baldeón L, Abdallah AM, Caleechurn L, Bottai D, van Zon M, de Punder K, van der Laan T, Kant A, Bossers-de Vries R, Willemsen P, Bitter W, van Soolingen D, Brosch R, van der Wel N, Peters PJ. 2012. ESX-1-mediated translocation to the cytosol controls virulence of mycobacteria. Cell Microbiol 14:1287–1298 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2012.01799.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.De Leon J, Jiang G, Ma Y, Rubin E, Fortune S, Sun J. 2012. Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT-6 exhibits a unique membrane-interacting activity that is not found in its ortholog from non-pathogenic Mycobacterium smegmatis. J Biol Chem 287:44184–44191 10.1074/jbc.M112.420869. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Conrad WH, Osman MM, Shanahan JK, Chu F, Takaki KK, Cameron J, Hopkinson-Woolley D, Brosch R, Ramakrishnan L. 2017. Mycobacterial ESX-1 secretion system mediates host cell lysis through bacterium contact-dependent gross membrane disruptions. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:1371–1376 10.1073/pnas.1620133114. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Pandey AK, Yang Y, Jiang Z, Fortune SM, Coulombe F, Behr MA, Fitzgerald KA, Sassetti CM, Kelliher MA. 2009. NOD2, RIP2 and IRF5 play a critical role in the type I interferon response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 5:e1000500 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000500. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Coulombe F, Divangahi M, Veyrier F, de Léséleuc L, Gleason JL, Yang Y, Kelliher MA, Pandey AK, Sassetti CM, Reed MB, Behr MA. 2009. Increased NOD2-mediated recognition of N-glycolyl muramyl dipeptide. J Exp Med 206:1709–1716 10.1084/jem.20081779. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Mehra A, Zahra A, Thompson V, Sirisaengtaksin N, Wells A, Porto M, Köster S, Penberthy K, Kubota Y, Dricot A, Rogan D, Vidal M, Hill DE, Bean AJ, Philips JA. 2013. Mycobacterium tuberculosis type VII secreted effector EsxH targets host ESCRT to impair trafficking. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003734 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003734. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Tinaztepe E, Wei JR, Raynowska J, Portal-Celhay C, Thompson V, Philips JA. 2016. Role of metal-dependent regulation of ESX-3 secretion in intracellular survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 84:2255–2263 10.1128/IAI.00197-16. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Tufariello JM, Chapman JR, Kerantzas CA, Wong KW, Vilchèze C, Jones CM, Cole LE, Tinaztepe E, Thompson V, Fenyö D, Niederweis M, Ueberheide B, Philips JA, Jacobs WR Jr. 2016. Separable roles for Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESX-3 effectors in iron acquisition and virulence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 113:E348–E357 10.1073/pnas.1523321113. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Hou JM, D’Lima NG, Rigel NW, Gibbons HS, McCann JR, Braunstein M, Teschke CM. 2008. ATPase activity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA1 and SecA2 proteins and its importance for SecA2 function in macrophages. J Bacteriol 190:4880–4887 10.1128/JB.00412-08. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Braunstein M, Espinosa BJ, Chan J, Belisle JT, Jacobs WR Jr. 2003. SecA2 functions in the secretion of superoxide dismutase A and in the virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mol Microbiol 48:453–464 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03438.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Kurtz S, McKinnon KP, Runge MS, Ting JP, Braunstein M. 2006. The SecA2 secretion factor of Mycobacterium tuberculosis promotes growth in macrophages and inhibits the host immune response. Infect Immun 74:6855–6864 10.1128/IAI.01022-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Sullivan JT, Young EF, McCann JR, Braunstein M. 2012. The Mycobacterium tuberculosis SecA2 system subverts phagosome maturation to promote growth in macrophages. Infect Immun 80:996–1006 10.1128/IAI.05987-11. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Gatfield J, Pieters J. 2000. Essential role for cholesterol in entry of mycobacteria into macrophages. Science 288:1647–1650 10.1126/science.288.5471.1647. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Jayachandran R, Sundaramurthy V, Combaluzier B, Mueller P, Korf H, Huygen K, Miyazaki T, Albrecht I, Massner J, Pieters J. 2007. Survival of mycobacteria in macrophages is mediated by coronin 1-dependent activation of calcineurin. Cell 130:37–50 10.1016/j.cell.2007.04.043. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Brightbill HD, Libraty DH, Krutzik SR, Yang RB, Belisle JT, Bleharski JR, Maitland M, Norgard MV, Plevy SE, Smale ST, Brennan PJ, Bloom BR, Godowski PJ, Modlin RL. 1999. Host defense mechanisms triggered by microbial lipoproteins through toll-like receptors. Science 285:732–736 10.1126/science.285.5428.732. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Long R, Light B, Talbot JA. 1999. Mycobacteriocidal action of exogenous nitric oxide. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 43:403–405. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Yu K, Mitchell C, Xing Y, Magliozzo RS, Bloom BR, Chan J. 1999. Toxicity of nitrogen oxides and related oxidants on mycobacteria: M. tuberculosis is resistant to peroxynitrite anion. Tuber Lung Dis 79:191–198 10.1054/tuld.1998.0203. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.O’Brien L, Carmichael J, Lowrie DB, Andrew PW. 1994. Strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis differ in susceptibility to reactive nitrogen intermediates in vitro. Infect Immun 62:5187–5190. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Flesch IE, Kaufmann SH. 1991. Mechanisms involved in mycobacterial growth inhibition by gamma interferon-activated bone marrow macrophages: role of reactive nitrogen intermediates. Infect Immun 59:3213–3218. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Chan J, Xing Y, Magliozzo RS, Bloom BR. 1992. Killing of virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis by reactive nitrogen intermediates produced by activated murine macrophages. J Exp Med 175:1111–1122 10.1084/jem.175.4.1111. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.MacMicking JD, North RJ, LaCourse R, Mudgett JS, Shah SK, Nathan CF. 1997. Identification of nitric oxide synthase as a protective locus against tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94:5243–5248 10.1073/pnas.94.10.5243. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Chan J, Tanaka K, Carroll D, Flynn J, Bloom BR. 1995. Effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors on murine infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 63:736–740. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Flynn JL, Scanga CA, Tanaka KE, Chan J. 1998. Effects of aminoguanidine on latent murine tuberculosis. J Immunol 160:1796–1803. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Mishra BB, Rathinam VA, Martens GW, Martinot AJ, Kornfeld H, Fitzgerald KA, Sassetti CM. 2013. Nitric oxide controls the immunopathology of tuberculosis by inhibiting NLRP3 inflammasome-dependent processing of IL-1β. Nat Immunol 14:52–60 10.1038/ni.2474. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Scanga CA, Mohan VP, Tanaka K, Alland D, Flynn JL, Chan J. 2001. The inducible nitric oxide synthase locus confers protection against aerogenic challenge of both clinical and laboratory strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Infect Immun 69:7711–7717 10.1128/IAI.69.12.7711-7717.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Thoma-Uszynski S, Stenger S, Takeuchi O, Ochoa MT, Engele M, Sieling PA, Barnes PF, Rollinghoff M, Bolcskei PL, Wagner M, Akira S, Norgard MV, Belisle JT, Godowski PJ, Bloom BR, Modlin RL. 2001. Induction of direct antimicrobial activity through mammalian Toll-like receptors. Science 291:1544–1547 10.1126/science.291.5508.1544. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Jung JY, Madan-Lala R, Georgieva M, Rengarajan J, Sohaskey CD, Bange FC, Robinson CM. 2013. The intracellular environment of human macrophages that produce nitric oxide promotes growth of mycobacteria. Infect Immun 81:3198–3209 10.1128/IAI.00611-13. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 153.Aston C, Rom WN, Talbot AT, Reibman J. 1998. Early inhibition of mycobacterial growth by human alveolar macrophages is not due to nitric oxide. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 157:1943–1950 10.1164/ajrccm.157.6.9705028. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Nicholson S, Bonecini-Almeida MG, Lapa e Silva JR, Nathan C, Xie QW, Mumford R, Weidner JR, Calaycay J, Geng J, Boechat N, Linhares C, Rom W, Ho JL. 1996. Inducible nitric oxide synthase in pulmonary alveolar macrophages from patients with tuberculosis. J Exp Med 183:2293–2302 10.1084/jem.183.5.2293. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Li Z, Kelley C, Collins F, Rouse D, Morris S. 1998. Expression of katG in Mycobacterium tuberculosis is associated with its growth and persistence in mice and guinea pigs. J Infect Dis 177:1030–1035 10.1086/515254. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Darwin KH, Ehrt S, Gutierrez-Ramos JC, Weich N, Nathan CF. 2003. The proteasome of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is required for resistance to nitric oxide. Science 302:1963–1966 10.1126/science.1091176. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Underhill DM, Ozinsky A, Smith KD, Aderem A. 1999. Toll-like receptor-2 mediates mycobacteria-induced proinflammatory signaling in macrophages. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 96:14459–14463 10.1073/pnas.96.25.14459. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Liu PT, Stenger S, Li H, Wenzel L, Tan BH, Krutzik SR, Ochoa MT, Schauber J, Wu K, Meinken C, Kamen DL, Wagner M, Bals R, Steinmeyer A, Zügel U, Gallo RL, Eisenberg D, Hewison M, Hollis BW, Adams JS, Bloom BR, Modlin RL. 2006. Toll-like receptor triggering of a vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial response. Science 311:1770–1773 10.1126/science.1123933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Liu PT, Stenger S, Tang DH, Modlin RL. 2007. Cutting edge: vitamin D-mediated human antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis is dependent on the induction of cathelicidin. J Immunol 179:2060–2063 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2060. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Martineau AR, Wilkinson KA, Newton SM, Floto RA, Norman AW, Skolimowska K, Davidson RN, Sørensen OE, Kampmann B, Griffiths CJ, Wilkinson RJ. 2007. IFN-gamma- and TNF-independent vitamin D-inducible human suppression of mycobacteria: the role of cathelicidin LL-37. J Immunol 178:7190–7198 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7190. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Yuk JM, Shin DM, Lee HM, Yang CS, Jin HS, Kim KK, Lee ZW, Lee SH, Kim JM, Jo EK. 2009. Vitamin D3 induces autophagy in human monocytes/macrophages via cathelicidin. Cell Host Microbe 6:231–243 10.1016/j.chom.2009.08.004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Fabri M, Stenger S, Shin DM, Yuk JM, Liu PT, Realegeno S, Lee HM, Krutzik SR, Schenk M, Sieling PA, Teles R, Montoya D, Iyer SS, Bruns H, Lewinsohn DM, Hollis BW, Hewison M, Adams JS, Steinmeyer A, Zügel U, Cheng G, Jo EK, Bloom BR, Modlin RL. 2011. Vitamin D is required for IFN-gamma-mediated antimicrobial activity of human macrophages. Sci Transl Med 3:104ra102 10.1126/scitranslmed.3003045. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Gutierrez MG, Master SS, Singh SB, Taylor GA, Colombo MI, Deretic V. 2004. Autophagy is a defense mechanism inhibiting BCG and Mycobacterium tuberculosis survival in infected macrophages. Cell 119:753–766 10.1016/j.cell.2004.11.038. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.MacMicking JD, Taylor GA, McKinney JD. 2003. Immune control of tuberculosis by IFN-gamma-inducible LRG-47. Science 302:654–659 10.1126/science.1088063. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Singh SB, Davis AS, Taylor GA, Deretic V. 2006. Human IRGM induces autophagy to eliminate intracellular mycobacteria. Science 313:1438–1441 10.1126/science.1129577. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Kumar D, Nath L, Kamal MA, Varshney A, Jain A, Singh S, Rao KV. 2010. Genome-wide analysis of the host intracellular network that regulates survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Cell 140:731–743 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Manzanillo PS, Ayres JS, Watson RO, Collins AC, Souza G, Rae CS, Schneider DS, Nakamura K, Shiloh MU, Cox JS. 2013. The ubiquitin ligase parkin mediates resistance to intracellular pathogens. Nature 501:512–516 10.1038/nature12566. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Sakowski ET, Koster S, Portal Celhay C, Park HS, Shrestha E, Hetzenecker SE, Maurer K, Cadwell K, Philips JA. 2015. Ubiquilin 1 promotes IFN-γ-induced xenophagy of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005076 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005076. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Ní Cheallaigh C, Sheedy FJ, Harris J, Muñoz-Wolf N, Lee J, West K, McDermott EP, Smyth A, Gleeson LE, Coleman M, Martinez N, Hearnden CH, Tynan GA, Carroll EC, Jones SA, Corr SC, Bernard NJ, Hughes MM, Corcoran SE, O’Sullivan M, Fallon CM, Kornfeld H, Golenbock D, Gordon SV, O’Neill LA, Lavelle EC, Keane J. 2016. A common variant in the adaptor Mal regulates interferon gamma signaling. Immunity 44:368–379 10.1016/j.immuni.2016.01.019. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Ouimet M, Koster S, Sakowski E, Ramkhelawon B, van Solingen C, Oldebeken S, Karunakaran D, Portal-Celhay C, Sheedy FJ, Ray TD, Cecchini K, Zamore PD, Rayner KJ, Marcel YL, Philips JA, Moore KJ. 2016. Mycobacterium tuberculosis induces the miR-33 locus to reprogram autophagy and host lipid metabolism. Nat Immunol 17:677–686 10.1038/ni.3434. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Saini NK, Baena A, Ng TW, Venkataswamy MM, Kennedy SC, Kunnath-Velayudhan S, Carreño LJ, Xu J, Chan J, Larsen MH, Jacobs WR Jr, Porcelli SA. 2016. Suppression of autophagy and antigen presentation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis PE_PGRS47. Nat Microbiol 1:16133 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.133. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Castillo EF, Dekonenko A, Arko-Mensah J, Mandell MA, Dupont N, Jiang S, Delgado-Vargas M, Timmins GS, Bhattacharya D, Yang H, Hutt J, Lyons CR, Dobos KM, Deretic V. 2012. Autophagy protects against active tuberculosis by suppressing bacterial burden and inflammation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:E3168–E3176 10.1073/pnas.1210500109. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Kimmey JM, Huynh JP, Weiss LA, Park S, Kambal A, Debnath J, Virgin HW, Stallings CL. 2015. Unique role for ATG5 in neutrophil-mediated immunopathology during M. tuberculosis infection. Nature 528:565–569 10.1038/nature16451. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Köster S, Upadhyay S, Chandra P, Papavinasasundaram K, Yang G, Hassan A, Grigsby SJ, Mittal E, Park HS, Jones V, Hsu FF, Jackson M, Sassetti CM, Philips JA. 2017. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is protected from NADPH oxidase and LC3-associated phagocytosis by the LCP protein CpsA. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:E8711–E8720. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Lin Y, Zhang M, Barnes PF. 1998. Chemokine production by a human alveolar epithelial cell line in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 66:1121–1126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Wickremasinghe MI, Thomas LH, Friedland JS. 1999. Pulmonary epithelial cells are a source of IL-8 in the response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis: essential role of IL-1 from infected monocytes in a NF-kappa B-dependent network. J Immunol 163:3936–3947. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Nouailles G, Dorhoi A, Koch M, Zerrahn J, Weiner J III, Faé KC, Arrey F, Kuhlmann S, Bandermann S, Loewe D, Mollenkopf HJ, Vogelzang A, Meyer-Schwesinger C, Mittrücker HW, McEwen G, Kaufmann SH. 2014. CXCL5-secreting pulmonary epithelial cells drive destructive neutrophilic inflammation in tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 124:1268–1282 10.1172/JCI72030. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Reuschl AK, Edwards MR, Parker R, Connell DW, Hoang L, Halliday A, Jarvis H, Siddiqui N, Wright C, Bremang S, Newton SM, Beverley P, Shattock RJ, Kon OM, Lalvani A. 2017. Innate activation of human primary epithelial cells broadens the host response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the airways. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006577 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006577. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Eum SY, Kong JH, Hong MS, Lee YJ, Kim JH, Hwang SH, Cho SN, Via LE, Barry CE III. 2010. Neutrophils are the predominant infected phagocytic cells in the airways of patients with active pulmonary TB. Chest 137:122–128 10.1378/chest.09-0903. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Berry MP, Graham CM, McNab FW, Xu Z, Bloch SA, Oni T, Wilkinson KA, Banchereau R, Skinner J, Wilkinson RJ, Quinn C, Blankenship D, Dhawan R, Cush JJ, Mejias A, Ramilo O, Kon OM, Pascual V, Banchereau J, Chaussabel D, O’Garra A. 2010. An interferon-inducible neutrophil-driven blood transcriptional signature in human tuberculosis. Nature 466:973–977 10.1038/nature09247. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.McNab FW, Berry MP, Graham CM, Bloch SA, Oni T, Wilkinson KA, Wilkinson RJ, Kon OM, Banchereau J, Chaussabel D, O’Garra A. 2011. Programmed death ligand 1 is over-expressed by neutrophils in the blood of patients with active tuberculosis. Eur J Immunol 41:1941–1947 10.1002/eji.201141421. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Eruslanov EB, Lyadova IV, Kondratieva TK, Majorov KB, Scheglov IV, Orlova MO, Apt AS. 2005. Neutrophil responses to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in genetically susceptible and resistant mice. Infect Immun 73:1744–1753 10.1128/IAI.73.3.1744-1753.2005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Keller C, Hoffmann R, Lang R, Brandau S, Hermann C, Ehlers S. 2006. Genetically determined susceptibility to tuberculosis in mice causally involves accelerated and enhanced recruitment of granulocytes. Infect Immun 74:4295–4309 10.1128/IAI.00057-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Yeremeev V, Linge I, Kondratieva T, Apt A. 2015. Neutrophils exacerbate tuberculosis infection in genetically susceptible mice. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 95:447–451 10.1016/j.tube.2015.03.007. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Zhang X, Majlessi L, Deriaud E, Leclerc C, Lo-Man R. 2009. Coactivation of Syk kinase and MyD88 adaptor protein pathways by bacteria promotes regulatory properties of neutrophils. Immunity 31:761–771 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.09.016. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Pedrosa J, Saunders BM, Appelberg R, Orme IM, Silva MT, Cooper AM. 2000. Neutrophils play a protective nonphagocytic role in systemic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection of mice. Infect Immun 68:577–583 10.1128/IAI.68.2.577-583.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Mishra BB, Lovewell RR, Olive AJ, Zhang G, Wang W, Eugenin E, Smith CM, Phuah JY, Long JE, Dubuke ML, Palace SG, Goguen JD, Baker RE, Nambi S, Mishra R, Booty MG, Baer CE, Shaffer SA, Dartois V, McCormick BA, Chen X, Sassetti CM. 2017. Nitric oxide prevents a pathogen-permissive granulocytic inflammation during tuberculosis. Nat Microbiol 2:17072 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2017.72. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Martineau AR, Newton SM, Wilkinson KA, Kampmann B, Hall BM, Nawroly N, Packe GE, Davidson RN, Griffiths CJ, Wilkinson RJ. 2007. Neutrophil-mediated innate immune resistance to mycobacteria. J Clin Invest 117:1988–1994 10.1172/JCI31097. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Tan BH, Meinken C, Bastian M, Bruns H, Legaspi A, Ochoa MT, Krutzik SR, Bloom BR, Ganz T, Modlin RL, Stenger S. 2006. Macrophages acquire neutrophil granules for antimicrobial activity against intracellular pathogens. J Immunol 177:1864–1871 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1864. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Ramos-Kichik V, Mondragón-Flores R, Mondragón-Castelán M, Gonzalez-Pozos S, Muñiz-Hernandez S, Rojas-Espinosa O, Chacón-Salinas R, Estrada-Parra S, Estrada-García I. 2009. Neutrophil extracellular traps are induced by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 89:29–37 10.1016/j.tube.2008.09.009. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Schechter MC, Buac K, Adekambi T, Cagle S, Celli J, Ray SM, Mehta CC, Rada B, Rengarajan J. 2017. Neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) levels in human plasma are associated with active TB. PLoS One 12:e0182587 10.1371/journal.pone.0182587. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Serbina NV, Pamer EG. 2006. Monocyte emigration from bone marrow during bacterial infection requires signals mediated by chemokine receptor CCR2. Nat Immunol 7:311–317 10.1038/ni1309. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Peters W, Scott HM, Chambers HF, Flynn JL, Charo IF, Ernst JD. 2001. Chemokine receptor 2 serves an early and essential role in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:7958–7963 10.1073/pnas.131207398. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Scott HM, Flynn JL. 2002. Mycobacterium tuberculosis in chemokine receptor 2-deficient mice: influence of dose on disease progression. Infect Immun 70:5946–5954 10.1128/IAI.70.11.5946-5954.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Sköld M, Behar SM. 2008. Tuberculosis triggers a tissue-dependent program of differentiation and acquisition of effector functions by circulating monocytes. J Immunol 181:6349–6360 10.4049/jimmunol.181.9.6349. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Samstein M, Schreiber HA, Leiner IM, Susac B, Glickman MS, Pamer EG. 2013. Essential yet limited role for CCR2+ inflammatory monocytes during Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T cell priming. eLife 2:e01086 10.7554/eLife.01086. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Antonelli LR, Gigliotti Rothfuchs A, Gonçalves R, Roffê E, Cheever AW, Bafica A, Salazar AM, Feng CG, Sher A. 2010. Intranasal poly-IC treatment exacerbates tuberculosis in mice through the pulmonary recruitment of a pathogen-permissive monocyte/macrophage population. J Clin Invest 120:1674–1682 10.1172/JCI40817. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Esin S, Counoupas C, Aulicino A, Brancatisano FL, Maisetta G, Bottai D, Di Luca M, Florio W, Campa M, Batoni G. 2013. Interaction of Mycobacterium tuberculosis cell wall components with the human natural killer cell receptors NKp44 and Toll-like receptor 2. Scand J Immunol 77:460–469 10.1111/sji.12052. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Vankayalapati R, Garg A, Porgador A, Griffith DE, Klucar P, Safi H, Girard WM, Cosman D, Spies T, Barnes PF. 2005. Role of NK cell-activating receptors and their ligands in the lysis of mononuclear phagocytes infected with an intracellular bacterium. J Immunol 175:4611–4617 10.4049/jimmunol.175.7.4611. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Dhiman R, Indramohan M, Barnes PF, Nayak RC, Paidipally P, Rao LV, Vankayalapati R. 2009. IL-22 produced by human NK cells inhibits growth of Mycobacterium tuberculosis by enhancing phagolysosomal fusion. J Immunol 183:6639–6645 10.4049/jimmunol.0902587. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Schierloh P, Alemán M, Yokobori N, Alves L, Roldán N, Abbate E, del C Sasiain M, de la Barrera S. 2005. NK cell activity in tuberculosis is associated with impaired CD11a and ICAM-1 expression: a regulatory role of monocytes in NK activation. Immunology 116:541–552. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Vankayalapati R, Klucar P, Wizel B, Weis SE, Samten B, Safi H, Shams H, Barnes PF. 2004. NK cells regulate CD8+ T cell effector function in response to an intracellular pathogen. J Immunol 172:130–137 10.4049/jimmunol.172.1.130. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Zhang R, Zheng X, Li B, Wei H, Tian Z. 2006. Human NK cells positively regulate gammadelta T cells in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 176:2610–2616 10.4049/jimmunol.176.4.2610. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Roy S, Barnes PF, Garg A, Wu S, Cosman D, Vankayalapati R. 2008. NK cells lyse T regulatory cells that expand in response to an intracellular pathogen. J Immunol 180:1729–1736 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1729. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.Nirmala R, Narayanan PR, Mathew R, Maran M, Deivanayagam CN. 2001. Reduced NK activity in pulmonary tuberculosis patients with/without HIV infection: identifying the defective stage and studying the effect of interleukins on NK activity. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 81:343–352 10.1054/tube.2001.0309. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Venkatasubramanian S, Cheekatla S, Paidipally P, Tripathi D, Welch E, Tvinnereim AR, Nurieva R, Vankayalapati R. 2017. IL-21-dependent expansion of memory-like NK cells enhances protective immune responses against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol 10:1031–1042 10.1038/mi.2016.105. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.Manca C, Tsenova L, Bergtold A, Freeman S, Tovey M, Musser JM, Barry CE III, Freedman VH, Kaplan G. 2001. Virulence of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis clinical isolate in mice is determined by failure to induce Th1 type immunity and is associated with induction of IFN-alpha/beta. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:5752–5757 10.1073/pnas.091096998. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Manca C, Tsenova L, Freeman S, Barczak AK, Tovey M, Murray PJ, Barry C III, Kaplan G. 2005. Hypervirulent M. tuberculosis W/Beijing strains upregulate type I IFNs and increase expression of negative regulators of the Jak-Stat pathway. J Interferon Cytokine Res 25:694–701 10.1089/jir.2005.25.694. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Ordway D, Henao-Tamayo M, Harton M, Palanisamy G, Troudt J, Shanley C, Basaraba RJ, Orme IM. 2007. The hypervirulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain HN878 induces a potent TH1 response followed by rapid down-regulation. J Immunol 179:522–531 10.4049/jimmunol.179.1.522. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Stanley SA, Johndrow JE, Manzanillo P, Cox JS. 2007. The type I IFN response to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis requires ESX-1-mediated secretion and contributes to pathogenesis. J Immunol 178:3143–3152 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.3143. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Desvignes L, Wolf AJ, Ernst JD. 2012. Dynamic roles of type I and type II IFNs in early infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 188:6205–6215 10.4049/jimmunol.1200255. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Moreira-Teixeira L, Sousa J, McNab FW, Torrado E, Cardoso F, Machado H, Castro F, Cardoso V, Gaifem J, Wu X, Appelberg R, Castro AG, O’Garra A, Saraiva M. 2016. Type I IFN inhibits alternative macrophage activation during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and leads to enhanced protection in the absence of IFN-γ signaling. J Immunol 197:4714–4726 10.4049/jimmunol.1600584. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Novikov A, Cardone M, Thompson R, Shenderov K, Kirschman KD, Mayer-Barber KD, Myers TG, Rabin RL, Trinchieri G, Sher A, Feng CG. 2011. Mycobacterium tuberculosis triggers host type I IFN signaling to regulate IL-1β production in human macrophages. J Immunol 187:2540–2547 10.4049/jimmunol.1100926. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Mayer-Barber KD, Andrade BB, Barber DL, Hieny S, Feng CG, Caspar P, Oland S, Gordon S, Sher A. 2011. Innate and adaptive interferons suppress IL-1α and IL-1β production by distinct pulmonary myeloid subsets during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunity 35:1023–1034 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.12.002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.McNab FW, Ewbank J, Howes A, Moreira-Teixeira L, Martirosyan A, Ghilardi N, Saraiva M, O’Garra A. 2014. Type I IFN induces IL-10 production in an IL-27-independent manner and blocks responsiveness to IFN-γ for production of IL-12 and bacterial killing in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected macrophages. J Immunol 193:3600–3612 10.4049/jimmunol.1401088. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Ong CW, Elkington PT, Brilha S, Ugarte-Gil C, Tome-Esteban MT, Tezera LB, Pabisiak PJ, Moores RC, Sathyamoorthy T, Patel V, Gilman RH, Porter JC, Friedland JS. 2015. Neutrophil-derived MMP-8 drives AMPK-dependent matrix destruction in human pulmonary tuberculosis. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004917 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004917. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Elkington PT, Emerson JE, Lopez-Pascua LD, O’Kane CM, Horncastle DE, Boyle JJ, Friedland JS. 2005. Mycobacterium tuberculosis up-regulates matrix metalloproteinase-1 secretion from human airway epithelial cells via a p38 MAPK switch. J Immunol 175:5333–5340 10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.5333. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Elkington PT, Nuttall RK, Boyle JJ, O’Kane CM, Horncastle DE, Edwards DR, Friedland JS. 2005. Mycobacterium tuberculosis, but not vaccine BCG, specifically upregulates matrix metalloproteinase-1. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172:1596–1604 10.1164/rccm.200505-753OC. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Price NM, Farrar J, Tran TT, Nguyen TH, Tran TH, Friedland JS. 2001. Identification of a matrix-degrading phenotype in human tuberculosis in vitro and in vivo. J Immunol 166:4223–4230 10.4049/jimmunol.166.6.4223. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Elkington P, Shiomi T, Breen R, Nuttall RK, Ugarte-Gil CA, Walker NF, Saraiva L, Pedersen B, Mauri F, Lipman M, Edwards DR, Robertson BD, D’Armiento J, Friedland JS. 2011. MMP-1 drives immunopathology in human tuberculosis and transgenic mice. J Clin Invest 121:1827–1833 10.1172/JCI45666. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Volkman HE, Pozos TC, Zheng J, Davis JM, Rawls JF, Ramakrishnan L. 2010. Tuberculous granuloma induction via interaction of a bacterial secreted protein with host epithelium. Science 327:466–469 10.1126/science.1179663. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Bafica A, Scanga CA, Serhan C, Machado F, White S, Sher A, Aliberti J. 2005. Host control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is regulated by 5-lipoxygenase-dependent lipoxin production. J Clin Invest 115:1601–1606 10.1172/JCI23949. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Chen M, Divangahi M, Gan H, Shin DS, Hong S, Lee DM, Serhan CN, Behar SM, Remold HG. 2008. Lipid mediators in innate immunity against tuberculosis: opposing roles of PGE2 and LXA4 in the induction of macrophage death. J Exp Med 205:2791–2801 10.1084/jem.20080767. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Divangahi M, Desjardins D, Nunes-Alves C, Remold HG, Behar SM. 2010. Eicosanoid pathways regulate adaptive immunity to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Nat Immunol 11:751–758 10.1038/ni.1904. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 225.Tobin DM, Vary JC Jr, Ray JP, Walsh GS, Dunstan SJ, Bang ND, Hagge DA, Khadge S, King MC, Hawn TR, Moens CB, Ramakrishnan L. 2010. The lta4h locus modulates susceptibility to mycobacterial infection in zebrafish and humans. Cell 140:717–730 10.1016/j.cell.2010.02.013. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Tobin DM, Roca FJ, Oh SF, McFarland R, Vickery TW, Ray JP, Ko DC, Zou Y, Bang ND, Chau TT, Vary JC, Hawn TR, Dunstan SJ, Farrar JJ, Thwaites GE, King MC, Serhan CN, Ramakrishnan L. 2012. Host genotype-specific therapies can optimize the inflammatory response to mycobacterial infections. Cell 148:434–446 10.1016/j.cell.2011.12.023. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Flynn JL, Goldstein MM, Chan J, Triebold KJ, Pfeffer K, Lowenstein CJ, Schreiber R, Mak TW, Bloom BR. 1995. Tumor necrosis factor-alpha is required in the protective immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in mice. Immunity 2:561–572 10.1016/1074-7613(95)90001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Keane J, Gershon S, Wise RP, Mirabile-Levens E, Kasznica J, Schwieterman WD, Siegel JN, Braun MM. 2001. Tuberculosis associated with infliximab, a tumor necrosis factor alpha-neutralizing agent. N Engl J Med 345:1098–1104 10.1056/NEJMoa011110. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Botha T, Ryffel B. 2003. Reactivation of latent tuberculosis infection in TNF-deficient mice. J Immunol 171:3110–3118 10.4049/jimmunol.171.6.3110. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Chakravarty SD, Zhu G, Tsai MC, Mohan VP, Marino S, Kirschner DE, Huang L, Flynn J, Chan J. 2008. Tumor necrosis factor blockade in chronic murine tuberculosis enhances granulomatous inflammation and disorganizes granulomas in the lungs. Infect Immun 76:916–926 10.1128/IAI.01011-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Mohan VP, Scanga CA, Yu K, Scott HM, Tanaka KE, Tsang E, Tsai MM, Flynn JL, Chan J. 2001. Effects of tumor necrosis factor alpha on host immune response in chronic persistent tuberculosis: possible role for limiting pathology. Infect Immun 69:1847–1855 10.1128/IAI.69.3.1847-1855.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Oddo M, Renno T, Attinger A, Bakker T, MacDonald HR, Meylan PR. 1998. Fas ligand-induced apoptosis of infected human macrophages reduces the viability of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 160:5448–5454. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Keane J, Remold HG, Kornfeld H. 2000. Virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains evade apoptosis of infected alveolar macrophages. J Immunol 164:2016–2020 10.4049/jimmunol.164.4.2016. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Chen M, Gan H, Remold HG. 2006. A mechanism of virulence: virulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis strain H37Rv, but not attenuated H37Ra, causes significant mitochondrial inner membrane disruption in macrophages leading to necrosis. J Immunol 176:3707–3716 10.4049/jimmunol.176.6.3707. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Gan H, Lee J, Ren F, Chen M, Kornfeld H, Remold HG. 2008. Mycobacterium tuberculosis blocks crosslinking of annexin-1 and apoptotic envelope formation on infected macrophages to maintain virulence. Nat Immunol 9:1189–1197 10.1038/ni.1654. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Hinchey J, Lee S, Jeon BY, Basaraba RJ, Venkataswamy MM, Chen B, Chan J, Braunstein M, Orme IM, Derrick SC, Morris SL, Jacobs WR Jr, Porcelli SA. 2007. Enhanced priming of adaptive immunity by a proapoptotic mutant of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 117:2279–2288 10.1172/JCI31947. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Velmurugan K, Chen B, Miller JL, Azogue S, Gurses S, Hsu T, Glickman M, Jacobs WR Jr, Porcelli SA, Briken V. 2007. Mycobacterium tuberculosis nuoG is a virulence gene that inhibits apoptosis of infected host cells. PLoS Pathog 3:e110 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030110. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Blomgran R, Ernst JD. 2011. Lung neutrophils facilitate activation of naive antigen-specific CD4+ T cells during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 186:7110–7119 10.4049/jimmunol.1100001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Blomgran R, Desvignes L, Briken V, Ernst JD. 2012. Mycobacterium tuberculosis inhibits neutrophil apoptosis, leading to delayed activation of naive CD4 T cells. Cell Host Microbe 11:81–90 10.1016/j.chom.2011.11.012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Martin CJ, Booty MG, Rosebrock TR, Nunes-Alves C, Desjardins DM, Keren I, Fortune SM, Remold HG, Behar SM. 2012. Efferocytosis is an innate antibacterial mechanism. Cell Host Microbe 12:289–300 10.1016/j.chom.2012.06.010. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Divangahi M, Chen M, Gan H, Desjardins D, Hickman TT, Lee DM, Fortune S, Behar SM, Remold HG. 2009. Mycobacterium tuberculosis evades macrophage defenses by inhibiting plasma membrane repair. Nat Immunol 10:899–906 10.1038/ni.1758. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.Zhao X, Khan N, Gan H, Tzelepis F, Nishimura T, Park SY, Divangahi M, Remold HG. 2017. Bcl-xL mediates RIPK3-dependent necrosis in M. tuberculosis-infected macrophages. Mucosal Immunol 10:1553–1568 10.1038/mi.2017.12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Tian T, Woodworth J, Sköld M, Behar SM. 2005. In vivo depletion of CD11c+ cells delays the CD4+ T cell response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis and exacerbates the outcome of infection. J Immunol 175:3268–3272 10.4049/jimmunol.175.5.3268. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Bodnar KA, Serbina NV, Flynn JL. 2001. Fate of Mycobacterium tuberculosis within murine dendritic cells. Infect Immun 69:800–809 10.1128/IAI.69.2.800-809.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Jiao X, Lo-Man R, Guermonprez P, Fiette L, Dériaud E, Burgaud S, Gicquel B, Winter N, Leclerc C. 2002. Dendritic cells are host cells for mycobacteria in vivo that trigger innate and acquired immunity. J Immunol 168:1294–1301 10.4049/jimmunol.168.3.1294. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Wolf AJ, Linas B, Trevejo-Nuñez GJ, Kincaid E, Tamura T, Takatsu K, Ernst JD. 2007. Mycobacterium tuberculosis infects dendritic cells with high frequency and impairs their function in vivo. J Immunol 179:2509–2519 10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2509. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Henderson RA, Watkins SC, Flynn JL. 1997. Activation of human dendritic cells following infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 159:635–643. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Tailleux L, Neyrolles O, Honoré-Bouakline S, Perret E, Sanchez F, Abastado JP, Lagrange PH, Gluckman JC, Rosenzwajg M, Herrmann JL. 2003. Constrained intracellular survival of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in human dendritic cells. J Immunol 170:1939–1948 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.1939. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Tailleux L, Schwartz O, Herrmann JL, Pivert E, Jackson M, Amara A, Legres L, Dreher D, Nicod LP, Gluckman JC, Lagrange PH, Gicquel B, Neyrolles O. 2003. DC-SIGN is the major Mycobacterium tuberculosis receptor on human dendritic cells. J Exp Med 197:121–127 10.1084/jem.20021468. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Wolf AJ, Desvignes L, Linas B, Banaiee N, Tamura T, Takatsu K, Ernst JD. 2008. Initiation of the adaptive immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis depends on antigen production in the local lymph node, not the lungs. J Exp Med 205:105–115 10.1084/jem.20071367. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Olmos S, Stukes S, Ernst JD. 2010. Ectopic activation of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T cells in lungs of CCR7-/- mice. J Immunol 184:895–901 10.4049/jimmunol.0901230. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Bhatt K, Hickman SP, Salgame P. 2004. Cutting edge: a new approach to modeling early lung immunity in murine tuberculosis. J Immunol 172:2748–2751 10.4049/jimmunol.172.5.2748. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Khader SA, Partida-Sanchez S, Bell G, Jelley-Gibbs DM, Swain S, Pearl JE, Ghilardi N, Desauvage FJ, Lund FE, Cooper AM. 2006. Interleukin 12p40 is required for dendritic cell migration and T cell priming after Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med 203:1805–1815 10.1084/jem.20052545. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Srivastava S, Ernst JD. 2014. Cell-to-cell transfer of M. tuberculosis antigens optimizes CD4 T cell priming. Cell Host Microbe 15:741–752 10.1016/j.chom.2014.05.007. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 255.Srivastava S, Grace PS, Ernst JD. 2016. Antigen export reduces antigen presentation and limits T cell control of M. tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe 19:44–54 10.1016/j.chom.2015.12.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Harding CV, Boom WH. 2010. Regulation of antigen presentation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a role for Toll-like receptors. Nat Rev Microbiol 8:296–307 10.1038/nrmicro2321. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.Ramachandra L, Noss E, Boom WH, Harding CV. 2001. Processing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen 85B involves intraphagosomal formation of peptide-major histocompatibility complex II complexes and is inhibited by live bacilli that decrease phagosome maturation. J Exp Med 194:1421–1432 10.1084/jem.194.10.1421. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Kincaid EZ, Ernst JD. 2003. Mycobacterium tuberculosis exerts gene-selective inhibition of transcriptional responses to IFN-gamma without inhibiting STAT1 function. J Immunol 171:2042–2049 10.4049/jimmunol.171.4.2042. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Pai RK, Convery M, Hamilton TA, Boom WH, Harding CV. 2003. Inhibition of IFN-gamma-induced class II transactivator expression by a 19-kDa lipoprotein from Mycobacterium tuberculosis: a potential mechanism for immune evasion. J Immunol 171:175–184 10.4049/jimmunol.171.1.175. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Pennini ME, Liu Y, Yang J, Croniger CM, Boom WH, Harding CV. 2007. CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein beta and delta binding to CIITA promoters is associated with the inhibition of CIITA expression in response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis 19-kDa lipoprotein. J Immunol 179:6910–6918 10.4049/jimmunol.179.10.6910. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Pennini ME, Pai RK, Schultz DC, Boom WH, Harding CV. 2006. Mycobacterium tuberculosis 19-kDa lipoprotein inhibits IFN-gamma-induced chromatin remodeling of MHC2TA by TLR2 and MAPK signaling. J Immunol 176:4323–4330 10.4049/jimmunol.176.7.4323. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Sia JK, Georgieva M, Rengarajan J. 2015. Innate immune defenses in human tuberculosis: an overview of the interactions between Mycobacterium tuberculosis and innate immune cells. J Immunol Res 2015:747543 10.1155/2015/747543. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Baena A, Porcelli SA. 2009. Evasion and subversion of antigen presentation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Tissue Antigens 74:189–204 10.1111/j.1399-0039.2009.01301.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Srivastava S, Ernst JD, Desvignes L. 2014. Beyond macrophages: the diversity of mononuclear cells in tuberculosis. Immunol Rev 262:179–192 10.1111/imr.12217. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Portal-Celhay C, Tufariello JM, Srivastava S, Zahra A, Klevorn T, Grace PS, Mehra A, Park HS, Ernst JD, Jacobs WR Jr, Philips JA. 2016. Mycobacterium tuberculosis EsxH inhibits ESCRT-dependent CD4+ T-cell activation. Nat Microbiol 2:16232 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.232. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Grace PS, Ernst JD. 2016. Suboptimal antigen presentation contributes to virulence of Mycobacterium tuberculosisin vivo. J Immunol 196:357–364 10.4049/jimmunol.1501494. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Bizzell E, Sia JK, Quezada M, Enriquez A, Georgieva M, Rengarajan J. 2017. Deletion of BCG Hip1 protease enhances dendritic cell and CD4 T cell responses. J Leukoc Biol 103:739–748. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Sia JK, Bizzell E, Madan-Lala R, Rengarajan J. 2017. Engaging the CD40-CD40L pathway augments T-helper cell responses and improves control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PLoS Pathog 13:e1006530 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006530. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Griffiths KL, Ahmed M, Das S, Gopal R, Horne W, Connell TD, Moynihan KD, Kolls JK, Irvine DJ, Artyomov MN, Rangel-Moreno J, Khader SA. 2016. Targeting dendritic cells to accelerate T-cell activation overcomes a bottleneck in tuberculosis vaccine efficacy. Nat Commun 7:13894 10.1038/ncomms13894. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.Mogues T, Goodrich ME, Ryan L, LaCourse R, North RJ. 2001. The relative importance of T cell subsets in immunity and immunopathology of airborne Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. J Exp Med 193:271–280 10.1084/jem.193.3.271. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Caruso AM, Serbina N, Klein E, Triebold K, Bloom BR, Flynn JL. 1999. Mice deficient in CD4 T cells have only transiently diminished levels of IFN-gamma, yet succumb to tuberculosis. J Immunol 162:5407–5416. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Reiley WW, Calayag MD, Wittmer ST, Huntington JL, Pearl JE, Fountain JJ, Martino CA, Roberts AD, Cooper AM, Winslow GM, Woodland DL. 2008. ESAT-6-specific CD4 T cell responses to aerosol Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are initiated in the mediastinal lymph nodes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105:10961–10966 10.1073/pnas.0801496105. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Urdahl KB, Shafiani S, Ernst JD. 2011. Initiation and regulation of T-cell responses in tuberculosis. Mucosal Immunol 4:288–293 10.1038/mi.2011.10. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Chackerian AA, Alt JM, Perera TV, Dascher CC, Behar SM. 2002. Dissemination of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is influenced by host factors and precedes the initiation of T-cell immunity. Infect Immun 70:4501–4509 10.1128/IAI.70.8.4501-4509.2002. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Winslow GM, Cooper A, Reiley W, Chatterjee M, Woodland DL. 2008. Early T-cell responses in tuberculosis immunity. Immunol Rev 225:284–299 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2008.00693.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Lin PL, Pawar S, Myers A, Pegu A, Fuhrman C, Reinhart TA, Capuano SV, Klein E, Flynn JL. 2006. Early events in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in cynomolgus macaques. Infect Immun 74:3790–3803 10.1128/IAI.00064-06. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Kursar M, Bonhagen K, Köhler A, Kamradt T, Kaufmann SH, Mittrücker HW. 2002. Organ-specific CD4+ T cell response during Listeria monocytogenes infection. J Immunol 168:6382–6387 10.4049/jimmunol.168.12.6382. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Manicassamy B, Manicassamy S, Belicha-Villanueva A, Pisanelli G, Pulendran B, García-Sastre A. 2010. Analysis of in vivo dynamics of influenza virus infection in mice using a GFP reporter virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:11531–11536 10.1073/pnas.0914994107. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Gallegos AM, Pamer EG, Glickman MS. 2008. Delayed protection by ESAT-6-specific effector CD4+ T cells after airborne M. tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med 205:2359–2368 10.1084/jem.20080353. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Sakai S, Kauffman KD, Schenkel JM, McBerry CC, Mayer-Barber KD, Masopust D, Barber DL. 2014. Cutting edge: control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection by a subset of lung parenchyma-homing CD4 T cells. J Immunol 192:2965–2969 10.4049/jimmunol.1400019. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Sakai S, Kauffman KD, Sallin MA, Sharpe AH, Young HA, Ganusov VV, Barber DL. 2016. CD4 T cell-derived IFN-γ plays a minimal role in control of pulmonary Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and must be actively repressed by PD-1 to prevent lethal disease. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005667 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005667. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Kauffman KD, Sallin MA, Sakai S, Kamenyeva O, Kabat J, Weiner D, Sutphin M, Schimel D, Via L, Barry CE III, Wilder-Kofie T, Moore I, Moore R, Barber DL. 2017. Defective positioning in granulomas but not lung-homing limits CD4 T-cell interactions with Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected macrophages in rhesus macaques. Mucosal Immunol 11:462–473. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Mehra S, Alvarez X, Didier PJ, Doyle LA, Blanchard JL, Lackner AA, Kaushal D. 2013. Granuloma correlates of protection against tuberculosis and mechanisms of immune modulation by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 207:1115–1127 10.1093/infdis/jis778. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Ottenhoff TH, Kumararatne D, Casanova JL. 1998. Novel human immunodeficiencies reveal the essential role of type-I cytokines in immunity to intracellular bacteria. Immunol Today 19:491–494 10.1016/S0167-5699(98)01321-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Jouanguy E, Altare F, Lamhamedi S, Revy P, Emile JF, Newport M, Levin M, Blanche S, Seboun E, Fischer A, Casanova JL. 1996. Interferon-gamma-receptor deficiency in an infant with fatal bacille Calmette-Guérin infection. N Engl J Med 335:1956–1961 10.1056/NEJM199612263352604. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Newport MJ, Huxley CM, Huston S, Hawrylowicz CM, Oostra BA, Williamson R, Levin M. 1996. A mutation in the interferon-gamma-receptor gene and susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. N Engl J Med 335:1941–1949 10.1056/NEJM199612263352602. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Dorman SE, Holland SM. 1998. Mutation in the signal-transducing chain of the interferon-gamma receptor and susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. J Clin Invest 101:2364–2369 10.1172/JCI2901. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Jouanguy E, Lamhamedi-Cherradi S, Lammas D, Dorman SE, Fondanèche MC, Dupuis S, Döffinger R, Altare F, Girdlestone J, Emile JF, Ducoulombier H, Edgar D, Clarke J, Oxelius VA, Brai M, Novelli V, Heyne K, Fischer A, Holland SM, Kumararatne DS, Schreiber RD, Casanova JL. 1999. A human IFNGR1 small deletion hotspot associated with dominant susceptibility to mycobacterial infection. Nat Genet 21:370–378 10.1038/7701. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Dupuis S, Dargemont C, Fieschi C, Thomassin N, Rosenzweig S, Harris J, Holland SM, Schreiber RD, Casanova JL. 2001. Impairment of mycobacterial but not viral immunity by a germline human STAT1 mutation. Science 293:300–303 10.1126/science.1061154. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Filipe-Santos O, Bustamante J, Haverkamp MH, Vinolo E, Ku CL, Puel A, Frucht DM, Christel K, von Bernuth H, Jouanguy E, Feinberg J, Durandy A, Senechal B, Chapgier A, Vogt G, de Beaucoudrey L, Fieschi C, Picard C, Garfa M, Chemli J, Bejaoui M, Tsolia MN, Kutukculer N, Plebani A, Notarangelo L, Bodemer C, Geissmann F, Israël A, Véron M, Knackstedt M, Barbouche R, Abel L, Magdorf K, Gendrel D, Agou F, Holland SM, Casanova JL. 2006. X-linked susceptibility to mycobacteria is caused by mutations in NEMO impairing CD40-dependent IL-12 production. J Exp Med 203:1745–1759 10.1084/jem.20060085. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Altare F, Durandy A, Lammas D, Emile JF, Lamhamedi S, Le Deist F, Drysdale P, Jouanguy E, Döffinger R, Bernaudin F, Jeppsson O, Gollob JA, Meinl E, Segal AW, Fischer A, Kumararatne D, Casanova JL. 1998. Impairment of mycobacterial immunity in human interleukin-12 receptor deficiency. Science 280:1432–1435 10.1126/science.280.5368.1432. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Altare F, Lammas D, Revy P, Jouanguy E, Döffinger R, Lamhamedi S, Drysdale P, Scheel-Toellner D, Girdlestone J, Darbyshire P, Wadhwa M, Dockrell H, Salmon M, Fischer A, Durandy A, Casanova JL, Kumararatne DS. 1998. Inherited interleukin 12 deficiency in a child with bacille Calmette-Guérin and Salmonella enteritidis disseminated infection. J Clin Invest 102:2035–2040 10.1172/JCI4950. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Elloumi-Zghal H, Barbouche MR, Chemli J, Béjaoui M, Harbi A, Snoussi N, Abdelhak S, Dellagi K. 2002. Clinical and genetic heterogeneity of inherited autosomal recessive susceptibility to disseminated Mycobacterium bovis bacille Calmette-Guérin infection. J Infect Dis 185:1468–1475 10.1086/340510. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Picard C, Fieschi C, Altare F, Al-Jumaah S, Al-Hajjar S, Feinberg J, Dupuis S, Soudais C, Al-Mohsen IZ, Génin E, Lammas D, Kumararatne DS, Leclerc T, Rafii A, Frayha H, Murugasu B, Wah LB, Sinniah R, Loubser M, Okamoto E, Al-Ghonaium A, Tufenkeji H, Abel L, Casanova JL. 2002. Inherited interleukin-12 deficiency: IL12B genotype and clinical phenotype of 13 patients from six kindreds. Am J Hum Genet 70:336–348 10.1086/338625. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.de Jong R, Altare F, Haagen IA, Elferink DG, Boer T, van Breda Vriesman PJ, Kabel PJ, Draaisma JM, van Dissel JT, Kroon FP, Casanova JL, Ottenhoff TH. 1998. Severe mycobacterial and Salmonella infections in interleukin-12 receptor-deficient patients. Science 280:1435–1438 10.1126/science.280.5368.1435. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.Altare F, Ensser A, Breiman A, Reichenbach J, Baghdadi JE, Fischer A, Emile JF, Gaillard JL, Meinl E, Casanova JL. 2001. Interleukin-12 receptor beta1 deficiency in a patient with abdominal tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 184:231–236 10.1086/321999. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Caragol I, Raspall M, Fieschi C, Feinberg J, Larrosa MN, Hernández M, Figueras C, Bertrán JM, Casanova JL, Español T. 2003. Clinical tuberculosis in 2 of 3 siblings with interleukin-12 receptor beta1 deficiency. Clin Infect Dis 37:302–306 10.1086/375587. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Fieschi C, Bosticardo M, de Beaucoudrey L, Boisson-Dupuis S, Feinberg J, Santos OF, Bustamante J, Levy J, Candotti F, Casanova JL. 2004. A novel form of complete IL-12/IL-23 receptor beta1 deficiency with cell surface-expressed nonfunctional receptors. Blood 104:2095–2101 10.1182/blood-2004-02-0584. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Tsao TC, Chen CH, Hong JH, Hsieh MJ, Tsao KC, Lee CH. 2002. Shifts of T4/T8 T lymphocytes from BAL fluid and peripheral blood by clinical grade in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Chest 122:1285–1291 10.1378/chest.122.4.1285. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Bhattacharyya S, Singla R, Dey AB, Prasad HK. 1999. Dichotomy of cytokine profiles in patients and high-risk healthy subjects exposed to tuberculosis. Infect Immun 67:5597–5603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Hirsch CS, Toossi Z, Othieno C, Johnson JL, Schwander SK, Robertson S, Wallis RS, Edmonds K, Okwera A, Mugerwa R, Peters P, Ellner JJ. 1999. Depressed T-cell interferon-gamma responses in pulmonary tuberculosis: analysis of underlying mechanisms and modulation with therapy. J Infect Dis 180:2069–2073 10.1086/315114. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Torres M, Herrera T, Villareal H, Rich EA, Sada E. 1998. Cytokine profiles for peripheral blood lymphocytes from patients with active pulmonary tuberculosis and healthy household contacts in response to the 30-kilodalton antigen of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 66:176–180. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Vekemans J, Lienhardt C, Sillah JS, Wheeler JG, Lahai GP, Doherty MT, Corrah T, Andersen P, McAdam KP, Marchant A. 2001. Tuberculosis contacts but not patients have higher gamma interferon responses to ESAT-6 than do community controls in The Gambia. Infect Immun 69:6554–6557 10.1128/IAI.69.10.6554-6557.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Pathan AA, Wilkinson KA, Klenerman P, McShane H, Davidson RN, Pasvol G, Hill AV, Lalvani A. 2001. Direct ex vivo analysis of antigen-specific IFN-gamma-secreting CD4 T cells in Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected individuals: associations with clinical disease state and effect of treatment. J Immunol 167:5217–5225 10.4049/jimmunol.167.9.5217. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Sodhi A, Gong J, Silva C, Qian D, Barnes PF. 1997. Clinical correlates of interferon gamma production in patients with tuberculosis. Clin Infect Dis 25:617–620 10.1086/513769. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Lindestam Arlehamn CS, Gerasimova A, Mele F, Henderson R, Swann J, Greenbaum JA, Kim Y, Sidney J, James EA, Taplitz R, McKinney DM, Kwok WW, Grey H, Sallusto F, Peters B, Sette A. 2013. Memory T cells in latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection are directed against three antigenic islands and largely contained in a CXCR3+CCR6+ Th1 subset. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003130 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003130. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Flynn JL, Chan J, Triebold KJ, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Bloom BR. 1993. An essential role for interferon gamma in resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med 178:2249–2254 10.1084/jem.178.6.2249. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Cooper AM, Dalton DK, Stewart TA, Griffin JP, Russell DG, Orme IM. 1993. Disseminated tuberculosis in interferon gamma gene-disrupted mice. J Exp Med 178:2243–2247 10.1084/jem.178.6.2243. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Cooper AM, Magram J, Ferrante J, Orme IM. 1997. Interleukin 12 (IL-12) is crucial to the development of protective immunity in mice intravenously infected with mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med 186:39–45 10.1084/jem.186.1.39. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Feng CG, Jankovic D, Kullberg M, Cheever A, Scanga CA, Hieny S, Caspar P, Yap GS, Sher A. 2005. Maintenance of pulmonary Th1 effector function in chronic tuberculosis requires persistent IL-12 production. J Immunol 174:4185–4192 10.4049/jimmunol.174.7.4185. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Redford PS, Boonstra A, Read S, Pitt J, Graham C, Stavropoulos E, Bancroft GJ, O’Garra A. 2010. Enhanced protection to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in IL-10-deficient mice is accompanied by early and enhanced Th1 responses in the lung. Eur J Immunol 40:2200–2210 10.1002/eji.201040433. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Moreira-Teixeira L, Redford PS, Stavropoulos E, Ghilardi N, Maynard CL, Weaver CT, Freitas do Rosário AP, Wu X, Langhorne J, O’Garra A. 2017. T cell-derived IL-10 impairs host resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 199:613–623 10.4049/jimmunol.1601340. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Gerosa F, Nisii C, Righetti S, Micciolo R, Marchesini M, Cazzadori A, Trinchieri G. 1999. CD4(+) T cell clones producing both interferon-gamma and interleukin-10 predominate in bronchoalveolar lavages of active pulmonary tuberculosis patients. Clin Immunol 92:224–234 10.1006/clim.1999.4752. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Saraiva M, Christensen JR, Veldhoen M, Murphy TL, Murphy KM, O’Garra A. 2009. Interleukin-10 production by Th1 cells requires interleukin-12-induced STAT4 transcription factor and ERK MAP kinase activation by high antigen dose. Immunity 31:209–219 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.05.012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 315.Szabo SJ, Kim ST, Costa GL, Zhang X, Fathman CG, Glimcher LH. 2000. A novel transcription factor, T-bet, directs Th1 lineage commitment. Cell 100:655–669 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80702-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Gallegos AM, van Heijst JW, Samstein M, Su X, Pamer EG, Glickman MS. 2011. A gamma interferon independent mechanism of CD4 T cell mediated control of M. tuberculosis infection in vivo. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002052 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002052. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Gopal R, Monin L, Slight S, Uche U, Blanchard E, Fallert Junecko BA, Ramos-Payan R, Stallings CL, Reinhart TA, Kolls JK, Kaushal D, Nagarajan U, Rangel-Moreno J, Khader SA. 2014. Unexpected role for IL-17 in protective immunity against hypervirulent Mycobacterium tuberculosis HN878 infection. PLoS Pathog 10:e1004099 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004099. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Freches D, Korf H, Denis O, Havaux X, Huygen K, Romano M. 2013. Mice genetically inactivated in interleukin-17A receptor are defective in long-term control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunology 140:220–231 10.1111/imm.12130. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Okamoto Yoshida Y, Umemura M, Yahagi A, O’Brien RL, Ikuta K, Kishihara K, Hara H, Nakae S, Iwakura Y, Matsuzaki G. 2010. Essential role of IL-17A in the formation of a mycobacterial infection-induced granuloma in the lung. J Immunol 184:4414–4422 10.4049/jimmunol.0903332. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Wozniak TM, Saunders BM, Ryan AA, Britton WJ. 2010. Mycobacterium bovis BCG-specific Th17 cells confer partial protection against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in the absence of gamma interferon. Infect Immun 78:4187–4194 10.1128/IAI.01392-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Scriba TJ, Kalsdorf B, Abrahams DA, Isaacs F, Hofmeister J, Black G, Hassan HY, Wilkinson RJ, Walzl G, Gelderbloem SJ, Mahomed H, Hussey GD, Hanekom WA. 2008. Distinct, specific IL-17- and IL-22-producing CD4+ T cell subsets contribute to the human anti-mycobacterial immune response. J Immunol 180:1962–1970 10.4049/jimmunol.180.3.1962. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Okada S, et al. 2015. Immunodeficiencies. Impairment of immunity to Candida and Mycobacterium in humans with bi-allelic RORC mutations. Science 349:606–613 10.1126/science.aaa4282. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Domingo-Gonzalez R, Das S, Griffiths KL, Ahmed M, Bambouskova M, Gopal R, Gondi S, Muñoz-Torrico M, Salazar-Lezama MA, Cruz-Lagunas A, Jiménez-Álvarez L, Ramirez-Martinez G, Espinosa-Soto R, Sultana T, Lyons-Weiler J, Reinhart TA, Arcos J, de la Luz Garcia-Hernandez M, Mastrangelo MA, Al-Hammadi N, Townsend R, Balada-Llasat JM, Torrelles JB, Kaplan G, Horne W, Kolls JK, Artyomov MN, Rangel-Moreno J, Zúñiga J, Khader SA. 2017. Interleukin-17 limits hypoxia-inducible factor 1α and development of hypoxic granulomas during tuberculosis. JCI Insight 2:92973 10.1172/jci.insight.92973. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Khader SA, Bell GK, Pearl JE, Fountain JJ, Rangel-Moreno J, Cilley GE, Shen F, Eaton SM, Gaffen SL, Swain SL, Locksley RM, Haynes L, Randall TD, Cooper AM. 2007. IL-23 and IL-17 in the establishment of protective pulmonary CD4+ T cell responses after vaccination and during Mycobacterium tuberculosis challenge. Nat Immunol 8:369–377 10.1038/ni1449. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Khader SA, Guglani L, Rangel-Moreno J, Gopal R, Junecko BA, Fountain JJ, Martino C, Pearl JE, Tighe M, Lin YY, Slight S, Kolls JK, Reinhart TA, Randall TD, Cooper AM. 2011. IL-23 is required for long-term control of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and B cell follicle formation in the infected lung. J Immunol 187:5402–5407 10.4049/jimmunol.1101377. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Nandi B, Behar SM. 2011. Regulation of neutrophils by interferon-γ limits lung inflammation during tuberculosis infection. J Exp Med 208:2251–2262 10.1084/jem.20110919. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Desvignes L, Ernst JD. 2009. Interferon-gamma-responsive nonhematopoietic cells regulate the immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Immunity 31:974–985 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.007. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Green AM, Mattila JT, Bigbee CL, Bongers KS, Lin PL, Flynn JL. 2010. CD4(+) regulatory T cells in a cynomolgus macaque model of Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Infect Dis 202:533–541 10.1086/654896. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Geffner L, Basile JI, Yokobori N, Sabio Y García C, Musella R, Castagnino J, Sasiain MC, de la Barrera S. 2014. CD4(+) CD25(high) forkhead box protein 3(+) regulatory T lymphocytes suppress interferon-γ and CD107 expression in CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells from tuberculous pleural effusions. Clin Exp Immunol 175:235–245 10.1111/cei.12227. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Guyot-Revol V, Innes JA, Hackforth S, Hinks T, Lalvani A. 2006. Regulatory T cells are expanded in blood and disease sites in patients with tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 173:803–810 10.1164/rccm.200508-1294OC. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Ribeiro-Rodrigues R, Resende Co T, Rojas R, Toossi Z, Dietze R, Boom WH, Maciel E, Hirsch CS. 2006. A role for CD4+CD25+ T cells in regulation of the immune response during human tuberculosis. Clin Exp Immunol 144:25–34 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2006.03027.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Chen X, Zhou B, Li M, Deng Q, Wu X, Le X, Wu C, Larmonier N, Zhang W, Zhang H, Wang H, Katsanis E. 2007. CD4(+)CD25(+)FoxP3(+) regulatory T cells suppress Mycobacterium tuberculosis immunity in patients with active disease. Clin Immunol 123:50–59 10.1016/j.clim.2006.11.009. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Hougardy JM, Place S, Hildebrand M, Drowart A, Debrie AS, Locht C, Mascart F. 2007. Regulatory T cells depress immune responses to protective antigens in active tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 176:409–416 10.1164/rccm.200701-084OC. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Garg A, Barnes PF, Roy S, Quiroga MF, Wu S, García VE, Krutzik SR, Weis SE, Vankayalapati R. 2008. Mannose-capped lipoarabinomannan- and prostaglandin E2-dependent expansion of regulatory T cells in human Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Eur J Immunol 38:459–469 10.1002/eji.200737268. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Scott-Browne JP, Shafiani S, Tucker-Heard G, Ishida-Tsubota K, Fontenot JD, Rudensky AY, Bevan MJ, Urdahl KB. 2007. Expansion and function of Foxp3-expressing T regulatory cells during tuberculosis. J Exp Med 204:2159–2169 10.1084/jem.20062105. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Shafiani S, Tucker-Heard G, Kariyone A, Takatsu K, Urdahl KB. 2010. Pathogen-specific regulatory T cells delay the arrival of effector T cells in the lung during early tuberculosis. J Exp Med 207:1409–1420 10.1084/jem.20091885. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Shafiani S, Dinh C, Ertelt JM, Moguche AO, Siddiqui I, Smigiel KS, Sharma P, Campbell DJ, Way SS, Urdahl KB. 2013. Pathogen-specific Treg cells expand early during mycobacterium tuberculosis infection but are later eliminated in response to interleukin-12. Immunity 38:1261–1270 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.06.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Shang S, Harton M, Tamayo MH, Shanley C, Palanisamy GS, Caraway M, Chan ED, Basaraba RJ, Orme IM, Ordway DJ. 2011. Increased Foxp3 expression in guinea pigs infected with W-Beijing strains of M. tuberculosis. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 91:378–385 10.1016/j.tube.2011.06.001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.McBride A, Konowich J, Salgame P. 2013. Host defense and recruitment of Foxp3+ T regulatory cells to the lungs in chronic Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection requires toll-like receptor 2. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003397 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003397. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Rogerson BJ, Jung YJ, LaCourse R, Ryan L, Enright N, North RJ. 2006. Expression levels of Mycobacterium tuberculosis antigen-encoding genes versus production levels of antigen-specific T cells during stationary level lung infection in mice. Immunology 118:195–201 10.1111/j.1365-2567.2006.02355.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Shi L, North R, Gennaro ML. 2004. Effect of growth state on transcription levels of genes encoding major secreted antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in the mouse lung. Infect Immun 72:2420–2424 10.1128/IAI.72.4.2420-2424.2004. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Moguche AO, Shafiani S, Clemons C, Larson RP, Dinh C, Higdon LE, Cambier CJ, Sissons JR, Gallegos AM, Fink PJ, Urdahl KB. 2015. ICOS and Bcl6-dependent pathways maintain a CD4 T cell population with memory-like properties during tuberculosis. J Exp Med 212:715–728 10.1084/jem.20141518. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Moguche AO, Musvosvi M, Penn-Nicholson A, Plumlee CR, Mearns H, Geldenhuys H, Smit E, Abrahams D, Rozot V, Dintwe O, Hoff ST, Kromann I, Ruhwald M, Bang P, Larson RP, Shafiani S, Ma S, Sherman DR, Sette A, Lindestam Arlehamn CS, McKinney DM, Maecker H, Hanekom WA, Hatherill M, Andersen P, Scriba TJ, Urdahl KB. 2017. Antigen availability shapes T cell differentiation and function during tuberculosis. Cell Host Microbe 21:695–706.e5 10.1016/j.chom.2017.05.012. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Bold TD, Banaei N, Wolf AJ, Ernst JD. 2011. Suboptimal activation of antigen-specific CD4+ effector cells enables persistence of M. tuberculosisin vivo. PLoS Pathog 7:e1002063 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002063. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Egen JG, Rothfuchs AG, Feng CG, Horwitz MA, Sher A, Germain RN. 2011. Intravital imaging reveals limited antigen presentation and T cell effector function in mycobacterial granulomas. Immunity 34:807–819 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.03.022. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Reiley WW, Shafiani S, Wittmer ST, Tucker-Heard G, Moon JJ, Jenkins MK, Urdahl KB, Winslow GM, Woodland DL. 2010. Distinct functions of antigen-specific CD4 T cells during murine Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:19408–19413 10.1073/pnas.1006298107. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Winslow GM, Roberts AD, Blackman MA, Woodland DL. 2003. Persistence and turnover of antigen-specific CD4 T cells during chronic tuberculosis infection in the mouse. J Immunol 170:2046–2052 10.4049/jimmunol.170.4.2046. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Aagaard C, Hoang T, Dietrich J, Cardona PJ, Izzo A, Dolganov G, Schoolnik GK, Cassidy JP, Billeskov R, Andersen P. 2011. A multistage tuberculosis vaccine that confers efficient protection before and after exposure. Nat Med 17:189–194 10.1038/nm.2285. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Behar SM, Dascher CC, Grusby MJ, Wang CR, Brenner MB. 1999. Susceptibility of mice deficient in CD1D or TAP1 to infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med 189:1973–1980 10.1084/jem.189.12.1973. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Sousa AO, Mazzaccaro RJ, Russell RG, Lee FK, Turner OC, Hong S, Van Kaer L, Bloom BR. 2000. Relative contributions of distinct MHC class I-dependent cell populations in protection to tuberculosis infection in mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4204–4208 10.1073/pnas.97.8.4204. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.van Pinxteren LA, Cassidy JP, Smedegaard BH, Agger EM, Andersen P. 2000. Control of latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection is dependent on CD8 T cells. Eur J Immunol 30:3689–3698 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Stenger S, Mazzaccaro RJ, Uyemura K, Cho S, Barnes PF, Rosat JP, Sette A, Brenner MB, Porcelli SA, Bloom BR, Modlin RL. 1997. Differential effects of cytolytic T cell subsets on intracellular infection. Science 276:1684–1687 10.1126/science.276.5319.1684. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Stenger S, Hanson DA, Teitelbaum R, Dewan P, Niazi KR, Froelich CJ, Ganz T, Thoma-Uszynski S, Melián A, Bogdan C, Porcelli SA, Bloom BR, Krensky AM, Modlin RL. 1998. An antimicrobial activity of cytolytic T cells mediated by granulysin. Science 282:121–125 10.1126/science.282.5386.121. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Ernst WA, Thoma-Uszynski S, Teitelbaum R, Ko C, Hanson DA, Clayberger C, Krensky AM, Leippe M, Bloom BR, Ganz T, Modlin RL. 2000. Granulysin, a T cell product, kills bacteria by altering membrane permeability. J Immunol 165:7102–7108 10.4049/jimmunol.165.12.7102. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Bruns H, Meinken C, Schauenberg P, Härter G, Kern P, Modlin RL, Antoni C, Stenger S. 2009. Anti-TNF immunotherapy reduces CD8+ T cell-mediated antimicrobial activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in humans. J Clin Invest 119:1167–1177 10.1172/JCI38482. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Shams H, Klucar P, Weis SE, Lalvani A, Moonan PK, Safi H, Wizel B, Ewer K, Nepom GT, Lewinsohn DM, Andersen P, Barnes PF. 2004. Characterization of a Mycobacterium tuberculosis peptide that is recognized by human CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in the context of multiple HLA alleles. J Immunol 173:1966–1977 10.4049/jimmunol.173.3.1966. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Lalvani A, Brookes R, Wilkinson RJ, Malin AS, Pathan AA, Andersen P, Dockrell H, Pasvol G, Hill AV. 1998. Human cytolytic and interferon gamma-secreting CD8+ T lymphocytes specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:270–275 10.1073/pnas.95.1.270. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Pathan AA, Wilkinson KA, Wilkinson RJ, Latif M, McShane H, Pasvol G, Hill AV, Lalvani A. 2000. High frequencies of circulating IFN-gamma-secreting CD8 cytotoxic T cells specific for a novel MHC class I-restricted Mycobacterium tuberculosis epitope in M. tuberculosis-infected subjects without disease. Eur J Immunol 30:2713–2721 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Klein MR, Smith SM, Hammond AS, Ogg GS, King AS, Vekemans J, Jaye A, Lukey PT, McAdam KP. 2001. HLA-B*35-restricted CD8 T cell epitopes in the antigen 85 complex of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 183:928–934 10.1086/319267. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Caccamo N, Meraviglia S, La Mendola C, Guggino G, Dieli F, Salerno A. 2006. Phenotypical and functional analysis of memory and effector human CD8 T cells specific for mycobacterial antigens. J Immunol 177:1780–1785 10.4049/jimmunol.177.3.1780. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Lewinsohn DA, Winata E, Swarbrick GM, Tanner KE, Cook MS, Null MD, Cansler ME, Sette A, Sidney J, Lewinsohn DM. 2007. Immunodominant tuberculosis CD8 antigens preferentially restricted by HLA-B. PLoS Pathog 3:1240–1249 10.1371/journal.ppat.0030127. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Lewinsohn DM, Swarbrick GM, Cansler ME, Null MD, Rajaraman V, Frieder MM, Sherman DR, McWeeney S, Lewinsohn DA. 2013. Human Mycobacterium tuberculosis CD8 T Cell antigens/epitopes identified by a proteomic peptide library. PLoS One 8:e67016 10.1371/journal.pone.0067016. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Wherry EJ. 2011. T cell exhaustion. Nat Immunol 12:492–499 10.1038/ni.2035. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Day CL, Kaufmann DE, Kiepiela P, Brown JA, Moodley ES, Reddy S, Mackey EW, Miller JD, Leslie AJ, DePierres C, Mncube Z, Duraiswamy J, Zhu B, Eichbaum Q, Altfeld M, Wherry EJ, Coovadia HM, Goulder PJ, Klenerman P, Ahmed R, Freeman GJ, Walker BD. 2006. PD-1 expression on HIV-specific T cells is associated with T-cell exhaustion and disease progression. Nature 443:350–354 10.1038/nature05115. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Rozot V, Vigano S, Mazza-Stalder J, Idrizi E, Day CL, Perreau M, Lazor-Blanchet C, Petruccioli E, Hanekom W, Goletti D, Bart PA, Nicod L, Pantaleo G, Harari A. 2013. Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD8+ T cells are functionally and phenotypically different between latent infection and active disease. Eur J Immunol 43:1568–1577 10.1002/eji.201243262. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Saharia KK, Petrovas C, Ferrando-Martinez S, Leal M, Luque R, Ive P, Luetkemeyer A, Havlir D, Koup RA. 2016. Tuberculosis therapy modifies the cytokine profile, maturation state, and expression of inhibitory molecules on Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T-cells. PLoS One 11:e0158262 10.1371/journal.pone.0158262. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Hassan SS, Akram M, King EC, Dockrell HM, Cliff JM. 2015. PD-1, PD-L1 and PD-L2 gene expression on T-cells and natural killer cells declines in conjunction with a reduction in PD-1 protein during the intensive phase of tuberculosis treatment. PLoS One 10:e0137646 10.1371/journal.pone.0137646. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Adekambi T, Ibegbu CC, Kalokhe AS, Yu T, Ray SM, Rengarajan J. 2012. Distinct effector memory CD4+ T cell signatures in latent Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection, BCG vaccination and clinically resolved tuberculosis. PLoS One 7:e36046 10.1371/journal.pone.0036046. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Singh A, Mohan A, Dey AB, Mitra DK. 2013. Inhibiting the programmed death 1 pathway rescues Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific interferon γ-producing T cells from apoptosis in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. J Infect Dis 208:603–615 10.1093/infdis/jit206. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Jurado JO, Alvarez IB, Pasquinelli V, Martínez GJ, Quiroga MF, Abbate E, Musella RM, Chuluyan HE, García VE. 2008. Programmed death (PD)-1:PD-ligand 1/PD-ligand 2 pathway inhibits T cell effector functions during human tuberculosis. J Immunol 181:116–125 10.4049/jimmunol.181.1.116. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Govender L, Abel B, Hughes EJ, Scriba TJ, Kagina BM, de Kock M, Walzl G, Black G, Rosenkrands I, Hussey GD, Mahomed H, Andersen P, Hanekom WA. 2010. Higher human CD4 T cell response to novel Mycobacterium tuberculosis latency associated antigens Rv2660 and Rv2659 in latent infection compared with tuberculosis disease. Vaccine 29:51–57 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.10.022. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Day CL, Abrahams DA, Lerumo L, Janse van Rensburg E, Stone L, O’rie T, Pienaar B, de Kock M, Kaplan G, Mahomed H, Dheda K, Hanekom WA. 2011. Functional capacity of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific T cell responses in humans is associated with mycobacterial load. J Immunol 187:2222–2232 10.4049/jimmunol.1101122. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Lázár-Molnár E, Chen B, Sweeney KA, Wang EJ, Liu W, Lin J, Porcelli SA, Almo SC, Nathenson SG, Jacobs WR Jr. 2010. Programmed death-1 (PD-1)-deficient mice are extraordinarily sensitive to tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:13402–13407 10.1073/pnas.1007394107. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Barber DL, Mayer-Barber KD, Feng CG, Sharpe AH, Sher A. 2011. CD4 T cells promote rather than control tuberculosis in the absence of PD-1-mediated inhibition. J Immunol 186:1598–1607 10.4049/jimmunol.1003304. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Jayaraman P, Sada-Ovalle I, Beladi S, Anderson AC, Dardalhon V, Hotta C, Kuchroo VK, Behar SM. 2010. Tim3 binding to galectin-9 stimulates antimicrobial immunity. J Exp Med 207:2343–2354 10.1084/jem.20100687. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Sada-Ovalle I, Chávez-Galán L, Torre-Bouscoulet L, Nava-Gamiño L, Barrera L, Jayaraman P, Torres-Rojas M, Salazar-Lezama MA, Behar SM. 2012. The Tim3-galectin 9 pathway induces antibacterial activity in human macrophages infected with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 189:5896–5902 10.4049/jimmunol.1200990. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Jayaraman P, Jacques MK, Zhu C, Steblenko KM, Stowell BL, Madi A, Anderson AC, Kuchroo VK, Behar SM. 2016. TIM3 mediates T cell exhaustion during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005490 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005490. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Qiu Y, Chen J, Liao H, Zhang Y, Wang H, Li S, Luo Y, Fang D, Li G, Zhou B, Shen L, Chen CY, Huang D, Cai J, Cao K, Jiang L, Zeng G, Chen ZW. 2012. Tim-3-expressing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in human tuberculosis (TB) exhibit polarized effector memory phenotypes and stronger anti-TB effector functions. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002984 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002984. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Mahnke YD, Brodie TM, Sallusto F, Roederer M, Lugli E. 2013. The who’s who of T-cell differentiation: human memory T-cell subsets. Eur J Immunol 43:2797–2809 10.1002/eji.201343751. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Sallusto F, Lenig D, Förster R, Lipp M, Lanzavecchia A. 1999. Two subsets of memory T lymphocytes with distinct homing potentials and effector functions. Nature 401:708–712 10.1038/44385. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.Caccamo N, Guggino G, Meraviglia S, Gelsomino G, Di Carlo P, Titone L, Bocchino M, Galati D, Matarese A, Nouta J, Klein MR, Salerno A, Sanduzzi A, Dieli F, Ottenhoff TH. 2009. Analysis of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD8 T-cells in patients with active tuberculosis and in individuals with latent infection. PLoS One 4:e5528 10.1371/journal.pone.0005528. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 382.Griffin JP, Orme IM. 1994. Evolution of CD4 T-cell subsets following infection of naive and memory immune mice with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 62:1683–1690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Andersen P, Smedegaard B. 2000. CD4(+) T-cell subsets that mediate immunological memory to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in mice. Infect Immun 68:621–629 10.1128/IAI.68.2.621-629.2000. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Serbina NV, Flynn JL. 2001. CD8(+) T cells participate in the memory immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 69:4320–4328 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4320-4328.2001. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Kamath A, Woodworth JS, Behar SM. 2006. Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and the development of central memory during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 177:6361–6369 10.4049/jimmunol.177.9.6361. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Hubbard RD, Flory CM, Collins FM. 1991. Memory T cell-mediated resistance to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in innately susceptible and resistant mice. Infect Immun 59:2012–2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Andersen P, Heron I. 1993. Specificity of a protective memory immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 61:844–851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Orme IM. 1988. Characteristics and specificity of acquired immunologic memory to Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 140:3589–3593. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 389.Kamath AB, Behar SM. 2005. Anamnestic responses of mice following Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Infect Immun 73:6110–6118 10.1128/IAI.73.9.6110-6118.2005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Achkar JM, Chan J, Casadevall A. 2015. B cells and antibodies in the defense against Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Immunol Rev 264:167–181 10.1111/imr.12276. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Ulrichs T, Kosmiadi GA, Trusov V, Jörg S, Pradl L, Titukhina M, Mishenko V, Gushina N, Kaufmann SH. 2004. Human tuberculous granulomas induce peripheral lymphoid follicle-like structures to orchestrate local host defence in the lung. J Pathol 204:217–228 10.1002/path.1628. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Tsai MC, Chakravarty S, Zhu G, Xu J, Tanaka K, Koch C, Tufariello J, Flynn J, Chan J. 2006. Characterization of the tuberculous granuloma in murine and human lungs: cellular composition and relative tissue oxygen tension. Cell Microbiol 8:218–232 10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00612.x. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Kozakiewicz L, Phuah J, Flynn J, Chan J. 2013. The role of B cells and humoral immunity in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Adv Exp Med Biol 783:225–250 10.1007/978-1-4614-6111-1_12. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Cliff JM, Lee JS, Constantinou N, Cho JE, Clark TG, Ronacher K, King EC, Lukey PT, Duncan K, Van Helden PD, Walzl G, Dockrell HM. 2013. Distinct phases of blood gene expression pattern through tuberculosis treatment reflect modulation of the humoral immune response. J Infect Dis 207:18–29 10.1093/infdis/jis499. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Lyashchenko K, Colangeli R, Houde M, Al Jahdali H, Menzies D, Gennaro ML. 1998. Heterogeneous antibody responses in tuberculosis. Infect Immun 66:3936–3940. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Li H, Wang XX, Wang B, Fu L, Liu G, Lu Y, Cao M, Huang H, Javid B. 2017. Latently and uninfected healthcare workers exposed to TB make protective antibodies against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 114:5023–5028 10.1073/pnas.1611776114. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Kunnath-Velayudhan S, Salamon H, Wang HY, Davidow AL, Molina DM, Huynh VT, Cirillo DM, Michel G, Talbot EA, Perkins MD, Felgner PL, Liang X, Gennaro ML. 2010. Dynamic antibody responses to the Mycobacterium tuberculosis proteome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:14703–14708 10.1073/pnas.1009080107. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Maglione PJ, Xu J, Chan J. 2007. B cells moderate inflammatory progression and enhance bacterial containment upon pulmonary challenge with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 178:7222–7234 10.4049/jimmunol.178.11.7222. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Kozakiewicz L, Chen Y, Xu J, Wang Y, Dunussi-Joannopoulos K, Ou Q, Flynn JL, Porcelli SA, Jacobs WR Jr, Chan J. 2013. B cells regulate neutrophilia during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection and BCG vaccination by modulating the interleukin-17 response. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003472 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003472. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Maglione PJ, Chan J. 2009. How B cells shape the immune response against Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur J Immunol 39:676–686 10.1002/eji.200839148. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Maglione PJ, Xu J, Casadevall A, Chan J. 2008. Fc gamma receptors regulate immune activation and susceptibility during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 180:3329–3338 10.4049/jimmunol.180.5.3329. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Benard A, Sakwa I, Schierloh P, Colom A, Mercier I, Tailleux L, Jouneau L, Boudinot P, Al-Saati T, Lang R, Rehwinkel J, Loxton AG, Kaufmann SH, Anton-Leberre V, O’Garra A, Del Carmen Sasiain M, Gicquel B, Fillatreau S, Neyrolles O, Hudrisier D. 2017. B cells producing type I interferon modulate macrophage polarization in tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 197:801–813. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Carding SR, Egan PJ. 2002. Gammadelta T cells: functional plasticity and heterogeneity. Nat Rev Immunol 2:336–345 10.1038/nri797. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Bonneville M, O’Brien RL, Born WK. 2010. Gammadelta T cell effector functions: a blend of innate programming and acquired plasticity. Nat Rev Immunol 10:467–478 10.1038/nri2781. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Havlir DV, Ellner JJ, Chervenak KA, Boom WH. 1991. Selective expansion of human gamma delta T cells by monocytes infected with live Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Clin Invest 87:729–733 10.1172/JCI115053. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Tanaka Y, Sano S, Nieves E, De Libero G, Rosa D, Modlin RL, Brenner MB, Bloom BR, Morita CT. 1994. Nonpeptide ligands for human gamma delta T cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91:8175–8179 10.1073/pnas.91.17.8175. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Tanaka Y, Morita CT, Tanaka Y, Nieves E, Brenner MB, Bloom BR. 1995. Natural and synthetic non-peptide antigens recognized by human gamma delta T cells. Nature 375:155–158 10.1038/375155a0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Constant P, Davodeau F, Peyrat MA, Poquet Y, Puzo G, Bonneville M, Fournié JJ. 1994. Stimulation of human gamma delta T cells by nonpeptidic mycobacterial ligands. Science 264:267–270 10.1126/science.8146660. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Haregewoin A, Soman G, Hom RC, Finberg RW. 1989. Human gamma delta+ T cells respond to mycobacterial heat-shock protein. Nature 340:309–312 10.1038/340309a0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Kabelitz D, Bender A, Schondelmaier S, Schoel B, Kaufmann SH. 1990. A large fraction of human peripheral blood gamma/delta + T cells is activated by Mycobacterium tuberculosis but not by its 65-kD heat shock protein. J Exp Med 171:667–679 10.1084/jem.171.3.667. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Kabelitz D, Bender A, Prospero T, Wesselborg S, Janssen O, Pechhold K. 1991. The primary response of human gamma/delta + T cells to Mycobacterium tuberculosis is restricted to V gamma 9-bearing cells. J Exp Med 173:1331–1338 10.1084/jem.173.6.1331. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Boom WH, Chervenak KA, Mincek MA, Ellner JJ. 1992. Role of the mononuclear phagocyte as an antigen-presenting cell for human gamma delta T cells activated by live Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Infect Immun 60:3480–3488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.De Libero G, Casorati G, Giachino C, Carbonara C, Migone N, Matzinger P, Lanzavecchia A. 1991. Selection by two powerful antigens may account for the presence of the major population of human peripheral gamma/delta T cells. J Exp Med 173:1311–1322 10.1084/jem.173.6.1311. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Dieli F, Troye-Blomberg M, Ivanyi J, Fournié JJ, Bonneville M, Peyrat MA, Sireci G, Salerno A. 2000. Vgamma9/Vdelta2 T lymphocytes reduce the viability of intracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Eur J Immunol 30:1512–1519 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Abate G, Spencer CT, Hamzabegovic F, Blazevic A, Xia M, Hoft DF. 2015. Mycobacterium-specific γ9δ2 T cells mediate both pathogen-inhibitory and CD40 ligand-dependent antigen presentation effects important for tuberculosis immunity. Infect Immun 84:580–589 10.1128/IAI.01262-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Panchamoorthy G, McLean J, Modlin RL, Morita CT, Ishikawa S, Brenner MB, Band H. 1991. A predominance of the T cell receptor V gamma 2/V delta 2 subset in human mycobacteria-responsive T cells suggests germline gene encoded recognition. J Immunol 147:3360–3369. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 417.Chen CY, Yao S, Huang D, Wei H, Sicard H, Zeng G, Jomaa H, Larsen MH, Jacobs WR Jr, Wang R, Letvin N, Shen Y, Qiu L, Shen L, Chen ZW. 2013. Phosphoantigen/IL2 expansion and differentiation of Vγ2Vδ2 T cells increase resistance to tuberculosis in nonhuman primates. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003501 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003501. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Qaqish A, Huang D, Chen CY, Zhang Z, Wang R, Li S, Yang E, Lu Y, Larsen MH, Jacobs WR Jr, Qian L, Frencher J, Shen L, Chen ZW. 2017. Adoptive transfer of phosphoantigen-specific γδ T cell subset attenuates Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection in nonhuman primates. J Immunol 198:4753–4763 10.4049/jimmunol.1602019. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Dieli F, Troye-Blomberg M, Ivanyi J, Fournié JJ, Krensky AM, Bonneville M, Peyrat MA, Caccamo N, Sireci G, Salerno A. 2001. Granulysin-dependent killing of intracellular and extracellular Mycobacterium tuberculosis by Vgamma9/Vdelta2 T lymphocytes. J Infect Dis 184:1082–1085 10.1086/323600. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 420.Spencer CT, Abate G, Sakala IG, Xia M, Truscott SM, Eickhoff CS, Linn R, Blazevic A, Metkar SS, Peng G, Froelich CJ, Hoft DF. 2013. Granzyme A produced by γ(9)δ(2) T cells induces human macrophages to inhibit growth of an intracellular pathogen. PLoS Pathog 9:e1003119 10.1371/journal.ppat.1003119. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Meraviglia S, Caccamo N, Salerno A, Sireci G, Dieli F. 2010. Partial and ineffective activation of V gamma 9V delta 2 T cells by Mycobacterium tuberculosis-infected dendritic cells. J Immunol 185:1770–1776 10.4049/jimmunol.1000966. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 422.Janis EM, Kaufmann SH, Schwartz RH, Pardoll DM. 1989. Activation of gamma delta T cells in the primary immune response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science 244:713–716 10.1126/science.2524098. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Lockhart E, Green AM, Flynn JL. 2006. IL-17 production is dominated by gammadelta T cells rather than CD4 T cells during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. J Immunol 177:4662–4669 10.4049/jimmunol.177.7.4662. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Strominger JL. 2010. An alternative path for antigen presentation: group 1 CD1 proteins. J Immunol 184:3303–3305 10.4049/jimmunol.1090008. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Moody DB, Ulrichs T, Mühlecker W, Young DC, Gurcha SS, Grant E, Rosat JP, Brenner MB, Costello CE, Besra GS, Porcelli SA. 2000. CD1c-mediated T-cell recognition of isoprenoid glycolipids in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Nature 404:884–888 10.1038/35009119. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Ulrichs T, Moody DB, Grant E, Kaufmann SH, Porcelli SA. 2003. T-cell responses to CD1-presented lipid antigens in humans with Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection. Infect Immun 71:3076–3087 10.1128/IAI.71.6.3076-3087.2003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Gilleron M, Stenger S, Mazorra Z, Wittke F, Mariotti S, Böhmer G, Prandi J, Mori L, Puzo G, De Libero G. 2004. Diacylated sulfoglycolipids are novel mycobacterial antigens stimulating CD1-restricted T cells during infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Exp Med 199:649–659 10.1084/jem.20031097. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Layre E, Collmann A, Bastian M, Mariotti S, Czaplicki J, Prandi J, Mori L, Stenger S, De Libero G, Puzo G, Gilleron M. 2009. Mycolic acids constitute a scaffold for mycobacterial lipid antigens stimulating CD1-restricted T cells. Chem Biol 16:82–92 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.11.008. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Kasmar AG, van Rhijn I, Cheng TY, Turner M, Seshadri C, Schiefner A, Kalathur RC, Annand JW, de Jong A, Shires J, Leon L, Brenner M, Wilson IA, Altman JD, Moody DB. 2011. CD1b tetramers bind αβ T cell receptors to identify a mycobacterial glycolipid-reactive T cell repertoire in humans. J Exp Med 208:1741–1747 10.1084/jem.20110665. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Montamat-Sicotte DJ, Millington KA, Willcox CR, Hingley-Wilson S, Hackforth S, Innes J, Kon OM, Lammas DA, Minnikin DE, Besra GS, Willcox BE, Lalvani A. 2011. A mycolic acid-specific CD1-restricted T cell population contributes to acute and memory immune responses in human tuberculosis infection. J Clin Invest 121:2493–2503 10.1172/JCI46216. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Ly D, Kasmar AG, Cheng TY, de Jong A, Huang S, Roy S, Bhatt A, van Summeren RP, Altman JD, Jacobs WR Jr, Adams EJ, Minnaard AJ, Porcelli SA, Moody DB. 2013. CD1c tetramers detect ex vivo T cell responses to processed phosphomycoketide antigens. J Exp Med 210:729–741 10.1084/jem.20120624. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Seshadri C, Turner MT, Lewinsohn DM, Moody DB, Van Rhijn I. 2013. Lipoproteins are major targets of the polyclonal human T cell response to Mycobacterium tuberculosis. J Immunol 190:278–284 10.4049/jimmunol.1201667. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Beckman EM, Porcelli SA, Morita CT, Behar SM, Furlong ST, Brenner MB. 1994. Recognition of a lipid antigen by CD1-restricted alpha beta+ T cells. Nature 372:691–694 10.1038/372691a0. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Sieling PA, Ochoa MT, Jullien D, Leslie DS, Sabet S, Rosat JP, Burdick AE, Rea TH, Brenner MB, Porcelli SA, Modlin RL. 2000. Evidence for human CD4+ T cells in the CD1-restricted repertoire: derivation of mycobacteria-reactive T cells from leprosy lesions. J Immunol 164:4790–4796 10.4049/jimmunol.164.9.4790. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Moody DB, Young DC, Cheng TY, Rosat JP, Roura-Mir C, O’Connor PB, Zajonc DM, Walz A, Miller MJ, Levery SB, Wilson IA, Costello CE, Brenner MB. 2004. T cell activation by lipopeptide antigens. Science 303:527–531 10.1126/science.1089353. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Martin E, Treiner E, Duban L, Guerri L, Laude H, Toly C, Premel V, Devys A, Moura IC, Tilloy F, Cherif S, Vera G, Latour S, Soudais C, Lantz O. 2009. Stepwise development of MAIT cells in mouse and human. PLoS Biol 7:e54 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000054. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Gold MC, Lewinsohn DM. 2013. Co-dependents: MR1-restricted MAIT cells and their antimicrobial function. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:14–19 10.1038/nrmicro2918. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Le Bourhis L, Mburu YK, Lantz O. 2013. MAIT cells, surveyors of a new class of antigen: development and functions. Curr Opin Immunol 25:174–180 10.1016/j.coi.2013.01.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Treiner E, Duban L, Bahram S, Radosavljevic M, Wanner V, Tilloy F, Affaticati P, Gilfillan S, Lantz O. 2003. Selection of evolutionarily conserved mucosal-associated invariant T cells by MR1. Nature 422:164–169 10.1038/nature01433. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Kjer-Nielsen L, Patel O, Corbett AJ, Le Nours J, Meehan B, Liu L, Bhati M, Chen Z, Kostenko L, Reantragoon R, Williamson NA, Purcell AW, Dudek NL, McConville MJ, O’Hair RA, Khairallah GN, Godfrey DI, Fairlie DP, Rossjohn J, McCluskey J. 2012. MR1 presents microbial vitamin B metabolites to MAIT cells. Nature 491:717–723 10.1038/nature11605. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.Dusseaux M, Martin E, Serriari N, Péguillet I, Premel V, Louis D, Milder M, Le Bourhis L, Soudais C, Treiner E, Lantz O. 2011. Human MAIT cells are xenobiotic-resistant, tissue-targeted, CD161hi IL-17-secreting T cells. Blood 117:1250–1259 10.1182/blood-2010-08-303339. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Gold MC, Cerri S, Smyk-Pearson S, Cansler ME, Vogt TM, Delepine J, Winata E, Swarbrick GM, Chua WJ, Yu YY, Lantz O, Cook MS, Null MD, Jacoby DB, Harriff MJ, Lewinsohn DA, Hansen TH, Lewinsohn DM. 2010. Human mucosal associated invariant T cells detect bacterially infected cells. PLoS Biol 8:e1000407 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000407. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Gold MC, Eid T, Smyk-Pearson S, Eberling Y, Swarbrick GM, Langley SM, Streeter PR, Lewinsohn DA, Lewinsohn DM. 2013. Human thymic MR1-restricted MAIT cells are innate pathogen-reactive effectors that adapt following thymic egress. Mucosal Immunol 6:35–44 10.1038/mi.2012.45. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Prideaux B, Via LE, Zimmerman MD, Eum S, Sarathy J, O’Brien P, Chen C, Kaya F, Weiner DM, Chen PY, Song T, Lee M, Shim TS, Cho JS, Kim W, Cho SN, Olivier KN, Barry CE III, Dartois V. 2015. The association between sterilizing activity and drug distribution into tuberculosis lesions. Nat Med 21:1223–1227 10.1038/nm.3937. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Ramakrishnan L. 2012. Revisiting the role of the granuloma in tuberculosis. Nat Rev Immunol 12:352–366 10.1038/nri3211. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.Cadena AM, Fortune SM, Flynn JL. 2017. Heterogeneity in tuberculosis. Nat Rev Immunol 17:691–702 10.1038/nri.2017.69. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Russell DG, Cardona PJ, Kim MJ, Allain S, Altare F. 2009. Foamy macrophages and the progression of the human tuberculosis granuloma. Nat Immunol 10:943–948 10.1038/ni.1781. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Via LE, Lin PL, Ray SM, Carrillo J, Allen SS, Eum SY, Taylor K, Klein E, Manjunatha U, Gonzales J, Lee EG, Park SK, Raleigh JA, Cho SN, McMurray DN, Flynn JL, Barry CE III. 2008. Tuberculous granulomas are hypoxic in guinea pigs, rabbits, and nonhuman primates. Infect Immun 76:2333–2340 10.1128/IAI.01515-07. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Volkman HE, Clay H, Beery D, Chang JCW, Sherman DR, Ramakrishnan L. 2004. Tuberculous granuloma formation is enhanced by a mycobacterium virulence determinant. PLoS Biol 2:e367 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020367. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 450.Davis JM, Ramakrishnan L. 2009. The role of the granuloma in expansion and dissemination of early tuberculous infection. Cell 136:37–49 10.1016/j.cell.2008.11.014. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 451.Cambier CJ, Takaki KK, Larson RP, Hernandez RE, Tobin DM, Urdahl KB, Cosma CL, Ramakrishnan L. 2014. Mycobacteria manipulate macrophage recruitment through coordinated use of membrane lipids. Nature 505:218–222 10.1038/nature12799. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 452.Cambier CJ, O’Leary SM, O’Sullivan MP, Keane J, Ramakrishnan L. 2017. Phenolic glycolipid facilitates mycobacterial escape from microbicidal tissue-resident macrophages. Immunity 47:552–565.e4 10.1016/j.immuni.2017.08.003. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.Gideon HP, Phuah J, Myers AJ, Bryson BD, Rodgers MA, Coleman MT, Maiello P, Rutledge T, Marino S, Fortune SM, Kirschner DE, Lin PL, Flynn JL. 2015. Variability in tuberculosis granuloma T cell responses exists, but a balance of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines is associated with sterilization. PLoS Pathog 11:e1004603 10.1371/journal.ppat.1004603. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Marakalala MJ, Raju RM, Sharma K, Zhang YJ, Eugenin EA, Prideaux B, Daudelin IB, Chen PY, Booty MG, Kim JH, Eum SY, Via LE, Behar SM, Barry CE III, Mann M, Dartois V, Rubin EJ. 2016. Inflammatory signaling in human tuberculosis granulomas is spatially organized. Nat Med 22:531–538 10.1038/nm.4073. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Helb D, Jones M, Story E, Boehme C, Wallace E, Ho K, Kop J, Owens MR, Rodgers R, Banada P, Safi H, Blakemore R, Lan NT, Jones-López EC, Levi M, Burday M, Ayakaka I, Mugerwa RD, McMillan B, Winn-Deen E, Christel L, Dailey P, Perkins MD, Persing DH, Alland D. 2010. Rapid detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis and rifampin resistance by use of on-demand, near-patient technology. J Clin Microbiol 48:229–237 10.1128/JCM.01463-09. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 456.Stevens WS, Scott L, Noble L, Gous N, Dheda K. 2017. Impact of the GeneXpert MTB/RIF technology on tuberculosis control. Microbiol Spectr 5:10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0040-2016 10.1128/microbiolspec.TBTB2-0040-2016. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Mazurek GH, Jereb J, Vernon A, LoBue P, Goldberg S, Castro K, Committee IE, IGRA Expert Committee, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 2010. Updated guidelines for using interferon gamma release assays to detect Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection: United States, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep 59(RR-5):1–25. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Lawn SD, Kerkhoff AD, Vogt M, Wood R. 2012. Diagnostic accuracy of a low-cost, urine antigen, point-of-care screening assay for HIV-associated pulmonary tuberculosis before antiretroviral therapy: a descriptive study. Lancet Infect Dis 12:201–209 10.1016/S1473-3099(11)70251-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Paris L, Magni R, Zaidi F, Araujo R, Saini N, Harpole M, Coronel J, Kirwan DE, Steinberg H, Gilman RH, Petricoin EF III, Nisini R, Luchini A, Liotta L. 2017. Urine lipoarabinomannan glycan in HIV-negative patients with pulmonary tuberculosis correlates with disease severity. Sci Transl Med 9:9 10.1126/scitranslmed.aal2807. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Adekambi T, Ibegbu CC, Cagle S, Kalokhe AS, Wang YF, Hu Y, Day CL, Ray SM, Rengarajan J. 2015. Biomarkers on patient T cells diagnose active tuberculosis and monitor treatment response. J Clin Invest 125:1827–1838 10.1172/JCI77990. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Riou C, Berkowitz N, Goliath R, Burgers WA, Wilkinson RJ. 2017. Analysis of the phenotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4+ T cells to discriminate latent from active tuberculosis in HIV-uninfected and HIV-infected individuals. Front Immunol 8:968 10.3389/fimmu.2017.00968. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Wilkinson KA, Oni T, Gideon HP, Goliath R, Wilkinson RJ, Riou C. 2016. Activation profile of Mycobacterium tuberculosis-specific CD4(+) T cells reflects disease activity irrespective of HIV status. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 193:1307–1310 10.1164/rccm.201601-0116LE. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Calmette A. 1931. Preventive vaccination against tuberculosis with BCG. Proc R Soc Med 24:1481–1490. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 464.Behr MA, Wilson MA, Gill WP, Salamon H, Schoolnik GK, Rane S, Small PM. 1999. Comparative genomics of BCG vaccines by whole-genome DNA microarray. Science 284:1520–1523 10.1126/science.284.5419.1520. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 465.Rodrigues LC, Diwan VK, Wheeler JG. 1993. Protective effect of BCG against tuberculous meningitis and miliary tuberculosis: a meta-analysis. Int J Epidemiol 22:1154–1158 10.1093/ije/22.6.1154. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Colditz GA, Brewer TF, Berkey CS, Wilson ME, Burdick E, Fineberg HV, Mosteller F. 1994. Efficacy of BCG vaccine in the prevention of tuberculosis. Meta-analysis of the published literature. JAMA 271:698–702 10.1001/jama.1994.03510330076038. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Kagina BM, Abel B, Scriba TJ, Hughes EJ, Keyser A, Soares A, Gamieldien H, Sidibana M, Hatherill M, Gelderbloem S, Mahomed H, Hawkridge A, Hussey G, Kaplan G, Hanekom WA, other members of the South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative. 2010. Specific T cell frequency and cytokine expression profile do not correlate with protection against tuberculosis after bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccination of newborns. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 182:1073–1079 10.1164/rccm.201003-0334OC. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Gillard P, Yang PC, Danilovits M, Su WJ, Cheng SL, Pehme L, Bollaerts A, Jongert E, Moris P, Ofori-Anyinam O, Demoitié MA, Castro M. 2016. Safety and immunogenicity of the M72/AS01E candidate tuberculosis vaccine in adults with tuberculosis: A phase II randomised study. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 100:118–127 10.1016/j.tube.2016.07.005. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.Geldenhuys H, Mearns H, Miles DJ, Tameris M, Hokey D, Shi Z, Bennett S, Andersen P, Kromann I, Hoff ST, Hanekom WA, Mahomed H, Hatherill M, Scriba TJ, van Rooyen M, Bruce McClain J, Ryall R, de Bruyn G, H4:IC31 Trial Study Group. 2015. The tuberculosis vaccine H4:IC31 is safe and induces a persistent polyfunctional CD4 T cell response in South African adults: a randomized controlled trial. Vaccine 33:3592–3599 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.05.036. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.Luabeya AK, Kagina BM, Tameris MD, Geldenhuys H, Hoff ST, Shi Z, Kromann I, Hatherill M, Mahomed H, Hanekom WA, Andersen P, Scriba TJ, Schoeman E, Krohn C, Day CL, Africa H, Makhethe L, Smit E, Brown Y, Suliman S, Hughes EJ, Bang P, Snowden MA, McClain B, Hussey GD, H56-032 Trial Study Group. 2015. First-in-human trial of the post-exposure tuberculosis vaccine H56:IC31 in Mycobacterium tuberculosis infected and non-infected healthy adults. Vaccine 33:4130–4140 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.06.051. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Baldwin SL, Reese VA, Huang PW, Beebe EA, Podell BK, Reed SG, Coler RN. 2015. Protection and long-lived immunity induced by the ID93/GLA-SE vaccine candidate against a clinical Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolate. Clin Vaccine Immunol 23:137–147 10.1128/CVI.00458-15. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Tameris MD, Hatherill M, Landry BS, Scriba TJ, Snowden MA, Lockhart S, Shea JE, McClain JB, Hussey GD, Hanekom WA, Mahomed H, McShane H, MVA85A 020 Trial Study Team. 2013. Safety and efficacy of MVA85A, a new tuberculosis vaccine, in infants previously vaccinated with BCG: a randomised, placebo-controlled phase 2b trial. Lancet 381:1021–1028 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60177-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Smaill F, Jeyanathan M, Smieja M, Medina MF, Thanthrige-Don N, Zganiacz A, Yin C, Heriazon A, Damjanovic D, Puri L, Hamid J, Xie F, Foley R, Bramson J, Gauldie J, Xing Z. 2013. A human type 5 adenovirus-based tuberculosis vaccine induces robust T cell responses in humans despite preexisting anti-adenovirus immunity. Sci Transl Med 5:205ra134 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006843. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Stylianou E, Griffiths KL, Poyntz HC, Harrington-Kandt R, Dicks MD, Stockdale L, Betts G, McShane H. 2015. Improvement of BCG protective efficacy with a novel chimpanzee adenovirus and a modified vaccinia Ankara virus both expressing Ag85A. Vaccine 33:6800–6808 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.10.017. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Minhinnick A, Satti I, Harris S, Wilkie M, Sheehan S, Stockdale L, Manjaly Thomas ZR, Lopez-Ramon R, Poulton I, Lawrie A, Vermaak S, Le Vert A, Del Campo J, Hill F, Moss P, McShane H. 2016. A first-in-human phase 1 trial to evaluate the safety and immunogenicity of the candidate tuberculosis vaccine MVA85A-IMX313, administered to BCG-vaccinated adults. Vaccine 34:1412–1421 10.1016/j.vaccine.2016.01.062. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Hansen SG, Zak DE, Xu G, Ford JC, Marshall EE, Malouli D, Gilbride RM, Hughes CM, Ventura AB, Ainslie E, Randall KT, Selseth AN, Rundstrom P, Herlache L, Lewis MS, Park H, Planer SL, Turner JM, Fischer M, Armstrong C, Zweig RC, Valvo J, Braun JM, Shankar S, Lu L, Sylwester AW, Legasse AW, Messerle M, Jarvis MA, Amon LM, Aderem A, Alter G, Laddy DJ, Stone M, Bonavia A, Evans TG, Axthelm MK, Früh K, Edlefsen PT, Picker LJ. 2018. Prevention of tuberculosis in rhesus macaques by a cytomegalovirus-based vaccine. Nat Med 24:130–143 10.1038/nm.4473. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Lahey T, Laddy D, Hill K, Schaeffer J, Hogg A, Keeble J, Dagg B, Ho MM, Arbeit RD, von Reyn CF. 2016. Immunogenicity and protective efficacy of the DAR-901 booster vaccine in a murine model of tuberculosis. PLoS One 11:e0168521 10.1371/journal.pone.0168521. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 478.Grode L, Ganoza CA, Brohm C, Weiner J III, Eisele B, Kaufmann SH. 2013. Safety and immunogenicity of the recombinant BCG vaccine VPM1002 in a phase 1 open-label randomized clinical trial. Vaccine 31:1340–1348 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.12.053. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 479.Aguilo N, Uranga S, Marinova D, Monzon M, Badiola J, Martin C. 2016. MTBVAC vaccine is safe, immunogenic and confers protective efficacy against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in newborn mice. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 96:71–74 10.1016/j.tube.2015.10.010. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Cardona PJ. 2006. RUTI: a new chance to shorten the treatment of latent tuberculosis infection. Tuberculosis (Edinb) 86:273–289 10.1016/j.tube.2006.01.024. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Vilaplana C, Montané E, Pinto S, Barriocanal AM, Domenech G, Torres F, Cardona PJ, Costa J. 2010. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled Phase I clinical trial of the therapeutical antituberculous vaccine RUTI. Vaccine 28:1106–1116 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.09.134. [PubMed] [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Nell AS, D’lom E, Bouic P, Sabaté M, Bosser R, Picas J, Amat M, Churchyard G, Cardona PJ. 2014. Safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of the novel antituberculous vaccine RUTI: randomized, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial in patients with latent tuberculosis infection. PLoS One 9:e89612 10.1371/journal.pone.0089612. [PubMed] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES