Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) shows a high level of basal autophagy. Here we investigated the role of optineurin (OPTN) in PDAC cell lines, which is a prominent member of the autophagy system. To that purpose, mining of publically available databases showed that OPTN is highly expressed in PDAC and that high levels of expression are related to reduced survival. Therefore, the role of OPTN on proliferation, migration, and colony formation was investigated by transient knockdown in Miapaca, BXPC3, and Suit2-007 human PDAC cells. Furthermore, gene expression modulation in response to OPTN knockdown was assessed by microarray. The influence on cell cycle distribution and cell death signaling cascades was followed by FACS, assays for apoptosis, RT-PCR, and western blot. Finally, autophagy and ROS induction were screened by acridine orange and DCFH-DA fluorescent staining respectively. OPTN knockdown caused significant inhibition of colony formation, increased migration and no significant effect on proliferation in Miapaca, BXPC3 and Suit2-007 cells. The microarray showed modulation of 293 genes in Miapaca versus 302 in Suit2-007 cells, of which 52 genes overlapped. Activated common pathways included the ER stress response and chaperone-mediated autophagy, which was confirmed at mRNA and protein levels. Apoptosis was activated as shown by increased levels of cleaved PARP, Annexin V binding and nuclear fragmentation. OPTN knockdown caused no increased vacuole formation as assessed by acridine orange. Also, there was only marginally increased ROS production. Combination of OPTN knockdown with the autophagy inducer erufosine or LY294002, an inhibitor of autophagy, showed additive effects, which led us to hypothesize that they address different pathways. In conclusion, OPTN knockdown was related to activation of ER stress response and chaperone-mediated autophagy, which tend to confine the damage caused by OPTN knockdown and thus question its value for PDAC therapy.
Subject terms: Gastrointestinal cancer, Preclinical research
Introduction
Optineurin (OPTN) is encoded by a gene on chromosome 10p13, which has 16 exons, 3 of which are noncoding. After translation the protein consists of 577 amino acids (Fig. 1a, b)1,2, has an apparent size of a 67 kDa, a half-life of ~8 h, and its turnover involves the ubiquitin proteasomal system3. OPTN consists of several domains: a Nemo NF-κB-essential molecule -like domain, leucine zipper motif, an LC3-interacting region, coiled-coil motifs, an ubiquitin-binding domain, and a C-terminal C2H2 type zinc finger motif4,5 (Fig. 1c). OPTN interacts with itself to form homo-oligomers6 as well as with other molecules including Ras-related protein 8 (Rab8)7, huntingtin8, myosin VI9, transferrin receptor10, LC3/GABARAP2, polo-like kinase 111,12, TANK binding kinase 113 as well as many others4 (Fig. 1d). The conformation of certain parts of OPTN has been determined by X-ray analysis (Fig. 1e)14–16.
OPTN has several physiological roles including membrane trafficking, maintenance of the Golgi apparatus, exocytosis and protein secretion, cell division control, suppression of the NF-κB pathway, and host defense against pathogens1,2,4,17. Overexpression of OPTN was protective against H2O2 mediated cell death7.
OPTN was identified as a selective autophagy receptor because it binds to polyubiquitinated cargoes and brings them to autophagosomes via its LC3-interacting region4,18–20. Thus, it can get rid of pathogens as salmonella18, defective mitochondria20, misfolded protein aggregates21 or can have a role in tumor suppression19. The role of OPTN in autophagy can be also independent from ubiquitination4.
Beside all the physiological roles, mutations of OPTN or its altered expression are associated with multiple diseases, including normal tension glaucoma and primary open-angle glaucoma22, as well as plenty of neurodegenerative diseases23. Diminished OPTN expression might increase the risk of developing Crohn’s disease24 and predisposes to the occurrence of Paget’s disease by enhancing osteoclast differentiation, as OPTN was identified as a regulator of bone resorption25. Increased expression has been found in several cancers, including pancreatic cancer (for details see “Results” section).
Pancreatic cancers are suspected to become the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States by the year of 203026. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounts for 90% of all diagnosed pancreatic cancers27. PCAC has a poor prognosis with a mortality rate that is almost equal to the incidence rate and a 5-year survival rate of only 7% for all stages28.
Surgery remains the only potentially curative treatment for nonmetastatic PDAC29,30. Combination chemotherapy or targeted therapy cause only modest improvement in survival29,31,32. This background is reason for modern strategies pending on new biomarker identification and patient selection31.
The role of autophagy in PDAC is quite complex, with several studies indicating that autophagy has a tumor suppressive role and others reporting an onco-stimulatory effect33. An exciting point about PDAC is that primary tumors and cell lines show elevated basal autophagy34, yet the role of autophagy in PDAC is still to be clarified35.
Here, we investigated the role of OPTN in PDAC cells. After transient knockdown, alterations in cellular properties were observed including proliferation, migration, and colony formation as well as induction of autophagy and apoptosis. Furthermore, OPTN expression of PDAC patients was used from the Human Protein Atlas database. Our results hint to OPTN as a versatile factor in the progression of cancer in general and of PDAC in particular.
Results
Optineurin is overexpressed in pancreatic cancer
For assessing the expression of OPTN in human cancers, publically available databases were explored. An overview of the RNA-seq data provided by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed high expression of the OPTN gene across several tumor types (Fig. 2a)36.
Remarkably, pancreatic cancer was associated with the second highest OPTN expression of all tumor tissues, superseded only by renal cancer, as shown in Fig. 2a36. The median number of fragments per kilobase of exon per million reads (FPKM) was 25 for pancreatic cancer. Increased OPTN expression was related to a significantly reduced survival probability of PDAC patients (P = 0.014; Fig. 2b)37–39.
As the reported high expression could render OPTN an attractive target for therapy, we became interested in its function. OPTN is an autophagy receptor, the importance of which is substantiated by the observation that almost all members of the autophagy process show increased expression in PDAC (Fig. 2c). As found from a TCGA cohort with a sample size of 179 PDAC patients, most of the autophagy genes show genomic expression above average, as indicated by >7.5 log2 rsem (RNA-Seq by expectation maximization). Among these genes, OPTN showed the second highest expression superseded only by sequestosome 1(SQSTM1) (Fig. 2c). Prompted by this information, we set out to discover the role of OPTN in PDAC using a panel of PDAC cell lines.
Effect of OPTN knockdown on cellular functions
Target specific siRNA (12.5 nM) knocked down OPTN expression successfully in three pancreatic cancer cell lines (Miapaca, Suit2-007 and BXPC3). The knockdown efficacy at mRNA level as tested by qRT-PCR (Fig. 3a), was comparably high in all three cell lines ranging from 95% (BXPC3) to >96% (Miapaca and Suit2-007).
At protein level, as determined by western blot (Fig. 3b), the knockdown efficiency ranged from 80% (Miapaca) to 70% (BXPC3) and 50% (Suit2-007). The subsequent experiments focused on the effect of OPTN knockdown on cellular functions.
As shown in Fig. 3c, proliferation was not significantly altered by OPTN knockdown in the three cell lines. In partial contrast, migration was significantly increased in BXPC3 and Miapaca cells, but not significantly in Suit2-007 cells (Fig. 3d). The most striking effect was observed for colony formation (Fig. 3e), which was reduced to 32.5, 48, and 45% in Miapaca, BXPC3 and Suit2-007 cells, respectively, in comparison with siRNAcontrol (100%).
Modulation of genes in response to OPTN knockdown
To possibly explain the changes in cellular functions following OPTN knockdown, a microarray was performed in two cell lines (Miapaca and Suit2-007). A cutoff (1.5-fold) was used for differentiating between significant and background changes in expression. The results were analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) software and revealed 293 genes being significantly modulated in Miapaca compared with 304 genes in Suit2-007 cells. From these, 52 genes were significantly deregulated in both cell lines as shown by the Venn diagram (Fig. 4a). Overall 38 of these 52 genes were downregulated (e.g., CDK6: −2.38-fold in Miapaca and −1.76-fold in Suit2-007; CCNE1: −1.79-fold in Miapaca and −1.60-fold in Suit2-007; and protein arginine methyltransferase 6 (PRMT6): −2.47-fold in Miapaca and −1.76-fold in Suit2-007). In addition, 11 of 52 genes were upregulated (e.g., BCAT1: 1.7-fold in Miapaca and 1.5-fold in Suit2-007, claudin 1 (CLDN1): 1.95-fold in Miapaca and 1.85-fold in Suit2-007; and Lysosomal associated membrane protein 2 (LAMP2): 1.6-fold in both cell lines). Finally, three genes were differently modulated (e.g., interferon- induced transmembrane protein 3 (IFITM3): 1.5-fold in Miapaca and −1.713-fold in Suit2-007). All modulated genes are given in Supplementary Tables 1–3.
Canonical pathway analysis revealed the activation of phospholipase C and thrombin signaling in both cell lines. From the other 11 canonical pathways identified by IPA, the majority was altered in Miapaca cells, only (Fig. 4b).
For validating the effect on cell cycle in Miapaca cells, the DNA distribution was analyzed by flow cytometry. As shown in Fig. 4c, there were moderate reductions in cells undergoing G1 and G2/M phases, and a mild increase in S phase cells (Fig. 4c, d). The pre-G1 (subG1) fraction, as an indicator of cell death, was increased in OPTN knockdown samples with a percentage of 12.7% compared with 2.7% in the siRNAcontrol when analyzed by flowing software. These observations correlate with reduced expression of CDK6 mRNA in all three cell lines (Fig. 4e), and of CDK6 protein in Miapaca cells (Fig. 4f). Concomitantly, a less prominent reduction of CDK4 at mRNA and protein levels was observed. For cyclins, a less uniform modulation was observed, as cyclin D1 was increased in Miapaca (mRNA and protein) and Suit2-007 cells (mRNA), but decreased in BXPC3 cells (mRNA). Similarly, cyclin D3 was increased in Miapaca, but slightly decreased in Suit2-007 and BXPC3 cells (mRNA). Furthermore, p27 was increased in Miapaca cells at protein level in response to OPTN knockdown (Fig. 4f).
Analysis of upstream regulators showed matching upregulation of activating transcription factor 4 (ATF4), nuclear protein 1, uncoupling protein 1, Combgap, KRAS Proto-Oncogene-GTPase (KRAS), claudin 7, platelet derived growth factor B, and NK2 Homeobox 3. All other upstream regulators showed divergent results between the two cell lines (Fig. 4g).
OPTN knockdown activates ER stress and chaperone-mediated autophagy
As ATF4 was found among the highly modulated upstream regulators of OPTN, the related network was studied more closely. This analysis showed activation of several ATF4 network genes, which, however, differed in modulation between the two cell lines, except for ASNS and branched chain amino acid transaminase 1 (BCAT1) (Fig. 5a). Interestingly, at mRNA level, ATF4 was upregulated only in Miapaca cells; however, at protein level, it was distinctly higher expressed in Suit2-007 than in Miapaca cells (3.3 vs. 1.4-fold; Fig. 5b). Other proteins of the ER stress response, as phosphorylated and unphosphorylated eIF2α and pPERK echoed this relationship, except for ATF6α, which was higher expressed in Miapaca than in Suit2-007 cells. The differential activation of the ER pathway at mRNA and protein levels was associated, however, with a highly similar activation of apoptosis, as indicated by the cleaved PARP levels (Fig. 5b). In line with PARP cleavage, staining of the Miapaca cells with Annexin V-FITC showed a higher population of early and late dead cells (Fig. 5c), while staining with Hoechst dye revealed nuclear fragmentation and shrinkage following OPTN knockdown (Fig. 5d). Staining of Suit2-007 and BXPC3 nuclei with Hoechst dye showed similar changes regarding fragmentation and shrinkage (Supplementary Fig. 1A). Annexin V-FITC staining of Suit2-007 and BXPC3 cells showed a mild increase in the number of apoptotic and necrotic cells in knockdown samples when compared with siRNA control (Supplementary Fig. 1B).
In addition, OPTN knockdown caused modulation of autophagy controlling genes. As revealed by microarray, several heat shock proteins (HSPE1, HSPA1A/HSPA1B and HSP90AB1) showed downregulation, and LAMP2, a main player in chaperone-mediated autophagy, was upregulated (Supplementary Table 2). These data were confirmed at protein level for total HSP90 and LAMP2 in all three cell lines (Fig. 5e).
For detecting autophagy in a cellular assay, acridine orange was used to visualize changes in the frequency of acidic vacuoles. However, no clear differences were observed between control and OPTN knockdown PDAC cells (Supplementary Fig. 2A, B). Furthermore, a DCFH-DA-based flow cytometric analysis was used to check for reactive oxygen species (ROS) production. In BXPC3 and Miapaca cells, this method revealed a minute increase in ROS production when comparing siRNAOPTN versus siRNAcontrol exposure. However, no effect was detected in Suit2-007 cells (Supplementary Fig. 3).
Drugs alter the expression of OPTN
As OPTN knockdown influences genes involved in autophagy and apoptosis, two drugs were selected, which affect these cellular processes. Exposure of Miapaca and Suit2-007 cells to erufosine and LY294002, which differently influence autophagy, was followed at mRNA and protein levels as well as for their effect on proliferation. Erufosine caused concentration dependently increased mRNA transcription of OPTN, which was less prominent in Miapaca than in Suit2-007 cells. A similar increase was seen for mRNA levels of LC3B, which, however, were lower in Suit2-007 than in Miapaca cells (Fig. 6a). LY294002-induced concentration dependently increased mRNA transcription of OPTN, which was more distinct in Miapaca than in Suit2-007 cells, but LC3B mRNA levels were not significantly increased in Miapaca and even decreased in Suit2-007 cells (Fig. 6a). At protein level, erufosine caused a 40% reduction of OPTN levels in Miapaca but a 1.6-fold increase in Suit2-007 cells. Concomitantly, the concentrations of LC3B were increased in both cell lines (Fig. 6b). LY294002 caused a uniform increase of OPTN in both cell lines, but no effect (Miapaca) and a slight reduction (Suit2-007) in LC3B levels (Fig. 6c). Both drugs caused an antiproliferative effect in the PDAC cell lines. The effect of erufosine was more pronounced in Miapaca than in Suit2-007 cells; whereas that of LY294002 was higher in Suit2-007 than in Miapaca cells (Fig. 6d). In combination with OPTN knockdown, however, erufosine exposure of Miapaca and Suit2-007 cells caused no additional decrease in OPTN mRNA or protein levels compared with OPTN knockdown alone (Supplementary Fig. 4A, B). Equivalent results were observed for the combination of OPTN knockdown and exposure to LY294002 (Supplementary Fig. 4A, C). For LC3B, there was no significantly increased concentration at mRNA and protein levels when OPTN knockdown was combined with either erufosine or LY294002 (Supplementary Fig. 4A, D).
The observed additive interaction effects were confirmed by respective studies on the proliferation of Miapaca and Suit2-007 cells in response to erufosine, LY294002, or knockdown of OPTN alone, or combination of OPTN knockdown with either erufosine or LY294002 exposure (Supplementary Fig. 4E).
Discussion
Physiologically, OPTN has a function as autophagy receptor and its presence stimulates autophagy4. In addition, OPTN is known for its role in neurodegenerative diseases as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and open angle glaucoma23. Interestingly, autophagy plays a role in neurodegenerative diseases as well as in cancer40. Based on publically available data we found that OPTN is highly expressed in cohort studies of 17 cancer types, with the highest expression in renal followed by pancreatic cancer, and the lowest expression detected in prostate cancer36. In addition, when mining TCGA, OPTN was the second most expressed gene in PDAC from all autophagy related genes. Thus, we investigated the role of OPTN in PDAC, a cancer with almost identical incidence and mortality rates.
In this first study on the role of OPTN in experimental pancreatic cancer, it was tempting to reduce OPTN levels, which are generally increased in PDAC, by a knockdown strategy in order to investigate its value as therapeutic target. Following successful knockdown in three PDAC cell lines, changes in cancer growth related cellular properties were recorded. They were used as surrogate for a response of PDAC in vivo. In addition, changes in gene expression caused by OPTN knockdown were recorded by a microarray.
The knockout of other autophagy genes as ATG5 was associated with increased proliferation, migration and colony formation in mouse embryonic fibroblast and NIH 3T3 cells41,42. In contrast, knockdown of OPTN had a minor and nonsignificant effect on the proliferation of pancreatic cancer cells, caused slightly but significantly increased migration in two of three PDAC cell lines and decreased colony formation distinctly in all three pancreatic cancer cell lines when compared with nonspecific siRNA control.
In order to understand the mechanisms that govern these alterations, a microarray was performed in two PDAC cell lines after transient OPTN knockdown to obtain a comprehensive analysis of related mRNA expression changes. With regard to genes, which were modulated significantly in both cell lines (n = 52), 11 genes were found to be related to cell movement and motility. In addition, 2 of these 11 genes were related also to colony formation. From these 11 genes, 4 are known for their relationship to cancer progression: they include BCAT1, which was more than 1.5-fold upregulated in both cell lines. Interestingly, knockdown of BCAT1 was associated with reduced migration of nasopharyngeal and ovarian cancer cells43,44. Another gene was CLDN1, which was upregulated more than 1.8-fold in both cell lines. CLDN1 is a member of the tight junction family of genes and has attracted attention because of its altered expression in many cancers as well as its association with cellular properties (invasion, migration) indicating cancer progression, which are normalized upon its knockdown in breast and lung cancer cells45,46. Further, PRMT6 was downregulated more than 1.7-fold in both cell lines. PRMT6 knockdown reduced the number of colonies in U2OS osteosarcoma cells47 as well as in ZR75 and MCF7 breast cancer cells overexpressing proline-, glutamic acid-, and leucine-rich protein 148. Moreover, PRMT6 was found to regulate embryonic stem cell identity by modulating pluripotency genes and inducing expression of differentiation markers49. In contrast, overexpression of PRMT6 was associated with reduced colony formation in breast and prostate cancer cells50. Finally, IFITM3 was 1.5-fold upregulated in Miapaca and 1.7-fold downregulated in Suit2-007 cells. IFITM3 is known as part of the cellular defense against influenza infection, but also plays a role in cancer progression as its knockdown suppressed migration and invasion in gastric cancer cells51.
In addition to these functions influencing cell behavior, the microarray on PDAC cells with OPTN knockdown revealed induction of ER stress and chaperone-mediated autophagy. The activation of these cellular systems could be interpreted as adaptive mechanisms elicited in response to OPTN knockdown. In this perception (see Fig. 7), OPTN knockdown causes inhibition of autophagy. The PDAC cells, however, try to overcome this situation by releasing ER stress, as indicated by increased ATF4 levels and related signaling molecules including pPERK, (p) eIF2α and ATF6. The central role of ATF4 in ER stress and in inducing autophagy in response to hypoxic conditions has been well documented52–54. ROS contribute to autophagy induction55.
Further, heat shock proteins HSP90AB1, HSPA1A/HSPA1B, HSPE1 were downregulated following knockdown of OPTN. HSP90 has a regulatory role in the chaperone complex transferring damaged and misfolded proteins to the lysosome for chaperone-mediated autophagic (CMA) degradation. CMA is another form of autophagy, where proteins are transported directly from cytosol to the lysosomal lumen via interactions with chaperones located in their membrane and via a protein translocation complex56. The concomitant reduction of HSP70 levels presumably further weakens the chaperone complex, which plays a central role through its capability to recognize the amino acid consensus sequence of misfolded and damaged proteins56. LAMP2 was twofold upregulated following OPTN knockdown. This protein is the docking station for HSP70 and imports proteins tagged for degradation into the lysosomes. It is conceivable that the twofold increased expression at mRNA and protein levels was triggered by the diminished chaperone complex. In addition, ER stress may be responsible for LAMP2 induction57. Apart from the role of HSP90 in CMA, specific inhibitors of HSP90, as geldanamycin, may induce autophagy58.
Apoptosis was found to be upregulated in all cell lines in response to OPTN knockdown as proven by increased cleaved PARP expression, fragmentation of the nuclei by DAPI staining and increased Annexin V binding in respective pancreatic cancer cells. In this context, autophagy inhibition was found to induce apoptosis through P53 and ER stress59. Li et al. demonstrated that withaferin A, a biologically active extract, induced ER stress mediated apoptosis through inhibition of lysosomal autophagic and proteosomal degradation60. Another study revealed a switch that decreases apoptosis in favor of protective autophagy in methotrexate-resistant choriocarcinoma cells. This change was indicated by ER stress through the PERK/ATF4 pathway, or by ROS production through JNK/p62 signals61, which are both capable to induce autophagy.
Owing to these rescue mechanisms that counteract autophagic inhibition and restore autophagy back to basal levels, we did not find many cellular effects that could be related to autophagy. Any of these mild effects found in response to OPTN knockdown were more pronounced in Miapaca than in Suit2-007 cells. The sub lying reason could be that Suit2-007 cells have undergone more mutations than Miapaca cells and therefore show less dependency on internal signaling. The effect on different pancreatic cellular functions following OPTN-KD was mild. The most important changes following knockdown are summarized in Fig. 7.
Contrasting with the mild changes related to autophagy, the cell cycle was clearly changed in Miapaca cells in response to OPTN knockdown. In line with the altered G1/S and G2/M checkpoint regulation described by our IPA analysis, there were increased levels of p27, which in conjunction with reduced CDK6 levels caused an increase in non-phosphorylated cyclin D1. Concomitantly, there were reduced percentages of G2/M and post G2/M phases, as the cell cycle did not move further after reaching the S phase. In this scenario, the reduction observed for the G1 phase corresponds to the increase seen for the Pre-G1 phase as these cells probably underwent apoptosis.
Although OPTN is part of the autophagy system, autophagy was only mildly affected in response to OPTN knockdown. This was surprising because a decreased OPTN level was expected to be in imbalance with cellular LC3 levels, for which OPTN has a binding site (Fig. 1c, d). We thus speculate that other autophagy receptors as e.g., SQSTM1/p62 took over and replaced the function of OPTN. Therefore, two drugs were used, which modulate autophagy in a reverse manner.
LY294002 is a well-known inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) that acts on the ATP binding site of the enzyme62. It was chosen as PI3K is required for autophagy and inhibition of PI3K with LY294002 can inhibit autophagic sequestration63. Erufosine, on the other hand, is a potent inhibitor of mTOR and inducer of LC3B64,65. As expected, erufosine increased the expression of LC3B in both cell lines, whereas LY294002 caused no or a depressive effect on this indicator of autophagy66. However, both drugs were largely ineffective in reversing the knockdown caused by siRNA against OPTN. Further, we had anticipated that the upregulation of LC3B by erufosine would enlarge the imbalance between OPTN and LC3B. However, the erufosine effect on LC3B levels was not antagonized by OPTN knockdown, indicating that the two autophagy proteins are regulated differently. Taken together, the influence of the two drugs on LC3B was not paralleled by their influence on OPTN and in combination with OPTN knockdown, the two drugs caused additive interactions; hence it is plausible that the two drugs and OPTN knockdown serve different pathways.
The autophagy receptor OPTN is highly expressed in many human cancers including pancreatic cancer. Its knockdown in a panel of PDAC cells was related to mildly increased migration and distinctly reduced colony formation. In response to its knockdown, different rescue mechanisms became active; namely ER stress response and chaperone-mediated autophagy. These mechanisms reduce the potential damage caused by the gene’s knockdown. Finally, OPTN knockdown probably influences pathways different from those of erufosine and LY294002 in modulating autophagy.
Materials and methods
Cell lines and cell culture condition
Three human pancreatic adenocarcinoma cell lines were cultured in RPMI-1640 (BXPC3, Suit2-007) and DMEM (Miapaca) medium (Invitrogen and Sigma Aldrich, Germany respectively). All media were supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum and L-glutamine (2 mM), penicillin (100 IU/ml) and streptomycin (100 μg/ml) (Invitrogen, Karlsruhe, Germany). The cells were passaged routinely using 0.25% Trypsin/EDTA solution and maintained under standard incubation conditions (5% CO2, 37 °C) in a humidified atmosphere. Cell lines were authenticated using Multiplex Cell Authentication by Multiplexion (Heidelberg, Germany) as described recently67. The SNP profiles matched known profiles or were unique.
Small interfering RNA (siRNA) experiments
Human OPTN siRNA (siRNAOPTN) was purchased (Invitrogen, Germany). siRNA seq (5′- 3′) sense: GGA AGU UUA CUG UUC UGA U (dT) (dT); antisense: AUC AGA ACA GUA AAC UUC C (dT) (dT)). AllStars siRNA serving as a non-targeting siRNA control was purchased from Qiagen, Germany. Cells were seeded at pre-optimized cell density in a six-well plate (8–10 × 104/2000 μl), 24 h later siRNA was added in OptiMEM media to a final concentration of 12.5 nM using lipofectamine RNAimax (Invitrogen, Germany) as a transfection agent. Cells were incubated for 48 h under standard conditions until start of subsequent experiments.
Cell viability assay
Viability of selected cell lines, following knockdown by siRNAOPTN and siRNAcontrol, or after treatment with erufosine (gift from Prof. H. Eibl, Max Planck-Institute of Biophysical Chemistry, Goettingen, Germany) or LY294002 (Cayman Chemical, USA) was tested by the MTT (3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5 diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay as described before68.
Migration assay
The migratory behavior of pretreated pancreatic cancer cells by siRNA was studied by seeding cells in a 2 compartment model separated by 8 μm pore size polycarbonate membranes (Millicell, Millipore, Schwalbach, Germany) in a 24-well plate.
The bottom layer of the plate consisted of 700-μl media with 20% FCS. Then, tumor cells (0.5–1 × 105 cells/300 μl optiMEM media) were seeded in the upper compartment. After 48 h, cell titer blue (Promega Gmbh, Mannheim, Germany) was added into the lower compartment (140 µl) at a ratio of 1/5 of the total amount of media contained. Fluorescence emitted by migrating viable cells due to their ability to reduce the dye Resazurin into the fluorescent pink dye Resorufin was estimated using a fluorometer at wavelengths (560/20) for excitation and 590/10) for emission.
Colony formation assay (CFA)
The cells were treated for 48 h, harvested and counted. Cells were then transferred into semi-solid medium containing 0.8% methylcellulose (MC) and 40% FCS, and plated onto 24-well plates (0.4 ml/well, with a final number of 100, 250, and 500 cells for Suit2-007, Miapaca, and BXPC3, respectively). These were incubated under usual cell culture conditions (37 °C, 5% CO2 in humidified air) and colonies were counted under the microscope after 7–10 days. Clusters of ≥10 cells were counted as colony. Data were represented as a percentage of the untreated control colony forming units (CFU).
Cell cycle assay
The distribution of DNA following knockdown was assessed using Propidium iodide staining and flow cytometry. Shortly, treated cells were harvested and resuspended in 0.1 ml of PBS (≈2 × 105 cells) after 48 h followed by the addition of 1.4 ml ice-cold ethanol (70%)/sample for fixation. The cells were incubated for 2 h at 4 °C, then washed, resuspended in PBS containing RNase A (1 mg/ml) for digesting any contaminating RNA and incubated for 30 min at 37 °C. Subsequently, PI (50 µg/ml) was added to the cells, and analysis was done immediately using a FACS Calibur (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA, USA). Ten thousand cells (events) were analyzed from each sample, and the cell’s distributions in G0/G1, S and G2/M phases of cell cycle were calculated by flowing software.
RNA isolation and cDNA synthesis
After 48 h of exposure, the treated cells were harvested and washed; total RNA was extracted from the cell pellets with RNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s protocol. Concentrations of the extracted RNA were measured using a Nanodrop spectrophotometer (Nanodrop Technologies, Germany), and 1000 ng RNA was used to synthesize complementary DNA (cDNA) by using reverse transcriptase (Revertaid enzyme, Thermo Scientific, Schwerte, Germany). The cDNA samples were used as a template for further real-time PCR amplification and analysis.
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR
Modulation of OPTN expression (for primers and probes used, see Supplemantary Table 4) following gene knockdown with siRNA was investigated by qRT-PCR. Briefly, 5 μl of LC480 2X Master Mix (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) was used in the amplification procedure of the cDNA sample, with 0.2 μl of each of the primers, 0.1 μl of the appropriate probe from the Human Universal Probe library (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) and 2.5 μl of water per reaction and 2 μl of the cDNA. The mixture was added into 384-well plates with a total volume of 10 μl/well. Each sample was represented in triplicate. GAPDH was used as reference gene in the normalization process of the corresponding sample. Corresponding changes in the expression levels of selected genes were calculated by 2ΔΔCT method.
Western blot analysis
At 48 h following treatment of pancreatic cancer cells by siRNA, erufosine or LY294002, the cells were harvested from six-well plates and washed with PBS. The cell pellets were thoroughly suspended in an adequate volume of lysis buffer consisting of RIPA buffer, complete protease inhibitor cocktail tablets (Roche, Mannheim, Germany), phosphostop tablets, and sodium vanadate. The samples were kept under constant agitation for 30 min at 4 °C, then centrifuged for 20 min (14000 rpm, 4 °C). Afterward, the supernatants were collected and the protein concentration was estimated using the Pierce Protein Assay. The calculated total protein lysates (20–30 μg) were added together with a DTT detergent and 4X dye to be denatured for 5 min (99 °C, 350 rpm) and thereafter were subjected to electrophoresis process using a 4–12% gradient polyacrylamide SDS gels in a 1X Laemmli running buffer. Transfer of proteins to PVDF membranes was done using a wet blotting system. The membranes were subject of test for several proteins using specific primary antibodies: OPTN (c2) (sc-166576, G2315), OPTN (D2L8S) (cs- 58981 S), ATF4 (sc-2280), ATF6 (sc-22799), cdk6 (cs-3136), cdk4 (cs-12790), cdk1 (Ab-133327), EIF2-α (cs-9722), pEIF2-α (cs-9721), pPERK(sc-32577), LAMP2 (cs-49067S), LC3B (cs-2775S), HSP90 (C45G5) (cs-4877), P27 kip (cs-2552), Cyclin D1 (cs-2978), cleaved PARP (cs-9541s), β-actin; mouse monoclonal antibody (sc-47778), and β-actin; goat polyclonal antibody (sc-1615). A corresponding secondary antibody was added and then the immunoblots were developed using an ECL-system (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech, Munich, Germany). Relative concentrations to β-actin, which was used as the loading control for whole cell lysates, were evaluated by densitometric analysis of images using the ImageJ software.
Microarray analysis
Total RNA was eluted in Rnase free water. The microarray was performed by the genomics and proteomics core facility in the DKFZ using Illumina Human HT-12 v4 Expression BeadChip Kits. Analysis of omic-data was done using the IPA software after the application of a cutoff of 1.5-fold change with comparison of knockdown samples with siRNA negative control.
Acridine orange (AO) staining
Acidic and autophagic vacuoles emit red fluorescence when stained with AO stain. Briefly, 0.8–1 × 105 cells were seeded in a six-well plate and treated with siRNA for 48 h. Cells were then allowed to stay for 15 min in serum-free medium containing 1 μg/ml 3,6-bis(dimethylamine) acridine orange and then observed with a Zeiss cell observer microscope. The excitation filter used was 488 nm and the emission filter was 505–530 nm and >650 nm.
Hoechst 33342 staining
Following transfection, study the nuclear integrity was determined by using fluorescent Hoechst stains. Cells in a density of 0.8–1 × 105 cells were seeded on sterilized cover slips in six-well plates and allowed to attach and grow under standard incubation conditions. This was followed by siRNA treatment 24 h later. After 48 h, the cells were washed once with PBS and fixed by 4% paraformaldehyde for 10 min. Later, the cells were permeabilized with 0.3% Triton X-100 in 1 ml PBS for 10 min, stained with Hoechst 33342 solution, and kept in a dark environment for 10 min. The cells, grown on cover slips, were placed top-down on glass slides and photographed with a fluorescence microscope (350 nm excitation wavelength).
Reactive oxygen species measurement
2′,7′–Dichlorofluorescin diacetate (DCFH2-DA) is a cell permeable fluorogenic dye that measures ROS activity within the cell. In short, 0.8–1 × 105 cells were seeded in a six-well plate and treated with siRNA for 48 h. A working solution of 10 μM DCFH2-DA was prepared in serum-free media. Cells are washed twice in PBS and incubated for 30 min in the dark with DCFH2-DA. The cells were then washed, harvested and cell pellets suspended in 1 ml PBS. All samples as well as negative and positive controls were subjected to ROS detection using the 488 nm laser for excitation and 535 nm for detection with a BD Accuri C6 flow cytometer.
Annexin V assay
The Annexin V-FITC Kit (Biolegend, 640914) and rh Annexin V/APC (Invitrogen, BMS306APC-100) allow detection of apoptotic cells through their affinity to bind to phosphatidylserine residues, which become exposed upon apoptosis and then allow their detection and quantitative determination by fluorescent flow cytometry. The included PI permits labeling of cellular DNA, which is a feature of necrosis when the cellular membrane has been totally compromised. The combined use of both reagents allows the differentiation between three cell populations; i.e., early apoptotic, necrotic, and viable cell populations in response to treatment. Briefly, cells were seeded in a six-well plate, treated by siRNA and harvested following 48 h with EDTA free trypsin (0.25%), then washed once with PBS as well as with 1X binding buffer. The cells were counted and 2*105 cells were re-suspended in 100 μl of the 1X binding buffer containing 5 μl Annexin V-FITC per sample. The cells were incubated for 15 min at room temperature in the dark, followed by washing with 1X binding buffer to remove the unbound Annexin V-FITC, and centrifuged. The cell pellets were resuspended in 200 μl of the 1X binding buffer and 5 µl of propidium iodide/sample (provided with the kit) per sample. Analyses were done using flowing software.
Statistical analysis
Student’s t-test (2 groups) was used to estimate the significance of the group of interest in comparison with a control group for either viability of the cells, colony formation inhibition or increased migration in the siRNA- versus nonsense-treated cells. Graphs and calculations were created using the Graphpad prism version-6 software. P-values below 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to Dr Ashwini K. Sharma for the generation of Fig. 2-C and his continuous support with questions related to bioinformatics. Doaa M. Ali was supported by a PhD Grant from the Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst (DAAD). The authors would like to acknowledge the excellent technical support of the DKFZ Light Microscopy Core Facility (Dr F. Bestvater), the DKFZ FACS Core Facility (Dr S. Schmitt), and the DKFZ Genomics and Proteomics Core Facility (Prof. S. Wiemann). The authors thank the Human Protein Atlas https://www.proteinatlas.org/ as data for optineurin protein expression and survival curve were publically available on their website.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Footnotes
Edited by M.V. Niklison Chirou
Publisher’s note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version of this article (10.1038/s41420-019-0206-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
References
- 1.Kachaner D, Genin P, Laplantine E, Weil R. Toward an integrative view of Optineurin functions. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:2808–2818. doi: 10.4161/cc.20946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Ying H, Yue BY. Cellular and molecular biology of optineurin. Int Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2012;294:223–258. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-394305-7.00005-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Shen X, et al. Processing of optineurin in neuronal cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:3618–3629. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.175810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Ying H, Yue BY. Optineurin: the autophagy connection. Exp. Eye Res. 2016;144:73–80. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.06.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Turturro S, Shen X, Shyam R, Yue BY, Ying H. Effects of mutations and deletions in the human optineurin gene. Springer Plus. 2014;3:99. doi: 10.1186/2193-1801-3-99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Gao J, Ohtsubo M, Hotta Y, Minoshima S. Oligomerization of optineurin and its oxidative stress- or E50K mutation-driven covalent cross-linking: possible relationship with glaucoma pathology. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e101206. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101206. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.De Marco N, Buono M, Troise F, Diez-Roux G. Optineurin increases cell survival and translocates to the nucleus in a Rab8-dependent manner upon an apoptotic stimulus. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:16147–16156. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M601467200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.del Toro D, et al. Mutant huntingtin impairs post-Golgi trafficking to lysosomes by delocalizing optineurin/Rab8 complex from the Golgi apparatus. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009;20:1478–1492. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e08-07-0726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bond LM, Peden AA, Kendrick-Jones J, Sellers JR, Buss F. Myosin VI and its binding partner optineurin are involved in secretory vesicle fusion at the plasma membrane. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2011;22:54–65. doi: 10.1091/mbc.e10-06-0553. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Nagabhushana A, et al. Regulation of endocytic trafficking of transferrin receptor by optineurin and its impairment by a glaucoma-associated mutant. BMC Cell Biol. 2010;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1471-2121-11-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Kachaner D, et al. Plk1-dependent phosphorylation of optineurin provides a negative feedback mechanism for mitotic progression. Mol. Cell. 2012;45:553–566. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.12.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Kachaner D, Laplantine E, Genin P, Weil R. Optineurin: a new vision of cell division control. Cell Cycle. 2012;11:1481–1482. doi: 10.4161/cc.20116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gleason CE, Ordureau A, Gourlay R, Arthur JS, Cohen P. Polyubiquitin binding to optineurin is required for optimal activation of TANK-binding kinase 1 and production of interferon beta. J. Biol. Chem. 2011;286:35663–35674. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.267567. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li F, et al. Structural insights into the interaction and disease mechanism of neurodegenerative disease-associated optineurin and TBK1 proteins. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12708. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12708. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ishii, R., Nureki, O. 5B83 Crystal structure of Optineurin UBAN in complex with linear ubiquitin (2016). Available from https://www.rcsb.org/structure/5B83.
- 16.Nakazawa S, et al. Linear ubiquitination is involved in the pathogenesis of optineurin-associated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Nat. Commun. 2016;7:12547. doi: 10.1038/ncomms12547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sahlender DA, et al. Optineurin links myosin VI to the Golgi complex and is involved in Golgi organization and exocytosis. J. Cell Biol. 2005;169:285–295. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200501162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Wild P, et al. Phosphorylation of the autophagy receptor optineurin restricts Salmonella growth. Science. 2011;333:228–233. doi: 10.1126/science.1205405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Liu Z, et al. Ubiquitylation of autophagy receptor Optineurin by HACE1 activates selective autophagy for tumor suppression. Cancer Cell. 2014;26:106–120. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wong YC, Holzbaur EL. Optineurin is an autophagy receptor for damaged mitochondria in parkin-mediated mitophagy that is disrupted by an ALS-linked mutation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:E4439–E4448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1405752111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Shen WC, Li HY, Chen GC, Chern Y, Tu PH. Mutations in the ubiquitin-binding domain of OPTN/optineurin interfere with autophagy-mediated degradation of misfolded proteins by a dominant-negative mechanism. Autophagy. 2015;11:685–700. doi: 10.4161/auto.36098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Chalasani ML, Swarup G, Balasubramanian D. Optineurin and its mutants: molecules associated with some forms of glaucoma. Ophthalmic Res. 2009;42:176–184. doi: 10.1159/000232400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Osawa T, et al. Optineurin in neurodegenerative diseases. Neuropathology. 2011;31:569–574. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1789.2011.01199.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Chew TS, et al. Optineurin deficiency in mice contributes to impaired cytokine secretion and neutrophil recruitment in bacteria-driven colitis. Dis. Model Mech. 2015;8:817–829. doi: 10.1242/dmm.020362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Obaid R, et al. Optineurin negatively regulates osteoclast differentiation by modulating NF-kappaB and interferon signaling: implications for Paget’s disease. Cell Rep. 2015;13:1096–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Rahib L, et al. Projecting cancer incidence and deaths to 2030: the unexpected burden of thyroid, liver, and pancreas cancers in the United States. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2913–2921. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Adamska A, Domenichini A, Falasca M. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: current and evolving therapies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017;18:1338–1380. doi: 10.3390/ijms18071338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Loosen SH, Neumann UP, Trautwein C, Roderburg C, Luedde T. Current and future biomarkers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317692231. doi: 10.1177/1010428317692231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Garrido-Laguna I, Hidalgo M. Pancreatic cancer: from state-of-the-art treatments to promising novel therapies. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2015;12:319–334. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2015.53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Patel BN, Olcott E, Jeffrey RB. Extrapancreatic perineural invasion in pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Abdom. Radiol. (NY) 2018;43:323–331. doi: 10.1007/s00261-017-1343-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chiaravalli M, Reni M, O’Reilly EM. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: state-of-the-art 2017 and new therapeutic strategies. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2017;60:32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zeng Y, Rucki AA, Che X, Zheng L. Shifting paradigm of developing biologics for the treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2017;8:441–448. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2016.10.02. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gomez VE, Giovannetti E, Peters GJ. Unraveling the complexity of autophagy: potential therapeutic applications in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2015;35:11–19. doi: 10.1016/j.semcancer.2015.09.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang S, et al. Pancreatic cancers require autophagy for tumor growth. Genes Dev. 2011;25:717–729. doi: 10.1101/gad.2016111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Hashimoto D, et al. Autophagy is needed for the growth of pancreatic adenocarcinoma and has a cytoprotective effect against anticancer drugs. Eur. J. Cancer. 2014;50:1382–1390. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2014.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Courtesy of Human Protein Atlas. OPTN. OPTN RNA Expression Overview. https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000123240-OPTN/pathology (2016).
- 37.Thul Peter J., Åkesson Lovisa, Wiking Mikaela, Mahdessian Diana, Geladaki Aikaterini, Ait Blal Hammou, Alm Tove, Asplund Anna, Björk Lars, Breckels Lisa M., Bäckström Anna, Danielsson Frida, Fagerberg Linn, Fall Jenny, Gatto Laurent, Gnann Christian, Hober Sophia, Hjelmare Martin, Johansson Fredric, Lee Sunjae, Lindskog Cecilia, Mulder Jan, Mulvey Claire M., Nilsson Peter, Oksvold Per, Rockberg Johan, Schutten Rutger, Schwenk Jochen M., Sivertsson Åsa, Sjöstedt Evelina, Skogs Marie, Stadler Charlotte, Sullivan Devin P., Tegel Hanna, Winsnes Casper, Zhang Cheng, Zwahlen Martin, Mardinoglu Adil, Pontén Fredrik, von Feilitzen Kalle, Lilley Kathryn S., Uhlén Mathias, Lundberg Emma. A subcellular map of the human proteome. Science. 2017;356(6340):eaal3321. doi: 10.1126/science.aal3321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Uhlen Mathias, Zhang Cheng, Lee Sunjae, Sjöstedt Evelina, Fagerberg Linn, Bidkhori Gholamreza, Benfeitas Rui, Arif Muhammad, Liu Zhengtao, Edfors Fredrik, Sanli Kemal, von Feilitzen Kalle, Oksvold Per, Lundberg Emma, Hober Sophia, Nilsson Peter, Mattsson Johanna, Schwenk Jochen M., Brunnström Hans, Glimelius Bengt, Sjöblom Tobias, Edqvist Per-Henrik, Djureinovic Dijana, Micke Patrick, Lindskog Cecilia, Mardinoglu Adil, Ponten Fredrik. A pathology atlas of the human cancer transcriptome. Science. 2017;357(6352):eaan2507. doi: 10.1126/science.aan2507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Courtesy of Human Protein Atlas. OPTN. Pancreatic Cancer—Interactive Survival Scatter Plot & Survival Analysis (2016). Available from https://www.proteinatlas.org/ENSG00000123240-OPTN/pathology/tissue/pancreatic+cancer.
- 40.Huang J, Klionsky DJ. Autophagy and human disease. Cell Cycle. 2007;6:1837–1849. doi: 10.4161/cc.6.15.4511. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Qiang L, et al. Regulation of cell proliferation and migration by p62 through stabilization of Twist1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2014;111:9241–9246. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1322913111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 42.Hwang SH, Han BI, Lee M. Knockout of ATG5 leads to malignant cell transformation and resistance to Src family kinase inhibitor PP2. J. Cell Physiol. 2018;233:506–515. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25912. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Zhou W, et al. Over-expression of BCAT1, a c-Myc target gene, induces cell proliferation, migration and invasion in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Mol. Cancer. 2013;12:53. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-12-53. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wang ZQ, et al. BCAT1 expression associates with ovarian cancer progression: possible implications in altered disease metabolism. Oncotarget. 2015;6:31522–31543. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhao X, et al. Lentiviral vector mediated claudin1 silencing inhibits epithelial to mesenchymal transition in breast cancer cells. Viruses. 2015;7:2965–2979. doi: 10.3390/v7062755. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhao Z, et al. CLDN1 Increases drug resistance of non-small cell lung cancer by activating autophagy via upregulation of ULK1 phosphorylation. Med. Sci. Monit. 2017;23:2906–2916. doi: 10.12659/MSM.904177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Stein C, Riedl S, Ruthnick D, Notzold RR, Bauer UM. The arginine methyltransferase PRMT6 regulates cell proliferation and senescence through transcriptional repression of tumor suppressor genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:9522–9533. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Mann M, Zou Y, Chen Y, Brann D, Vadlamudi R. PELP1 oncogenic functions involve alternative splicing via PRMT6. Mol. Oncol. 2014;8:389–400. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2013.12.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Lee YH, et al. Protein arginine methyltransferase 6 regulates embryonic stem cell identity. Stem Cells Dev. 2012;21:2613–2622. doi: 10.1089/scd.2011.0330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Kim NH, Kim SN, Seo DW, Han JW, Kim YK. PRMT6 overexpression upregulates TSP-1 and downregulates MMPs: its implication in motility and invasion. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;432:60–65. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.01.085. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Hu J, et al. Mechanism and biological significance of the overexpression of IFITM3 in gastric cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2014;32:2648–2656. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Song S, Tan J, Miao Y, Zhang Q. Crosstalk of ER stress-mediated autophagy and ER-phagy: Involvement of UPR and the core autophagy machinery. J. Cell. Physiol. 2018;233:3867–3874. doi: 10.1002/jcp.26137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Rzymski T, et al. Regulation of autophagy by ATF4 in response to severe hypoxia. Oncogene. 2010;29:4424–4435. doi: 10.1038/onc.2010.191. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Rzymski T, Milani M, Singleton DC, Harris AL. Role of ATF4 in regulation of autophagy and resistance to drugs and hypoxia. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:3838–3847. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.23.10086. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li ZY, Yang Y, Ming M, Liu B. Mitochondrial ROS generation for regulation of autophagic pathways in cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011;414:5–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.09.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Cuervo AM, Wong E. Chaperone-mediated autophagy: roles in disease and aging. Cell Res. 2014;24:92–104. doi: 10.1038/cr.2013.153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Li W, Yang Q, Mao Z. Signaling and induction of chaperone-mediated autophagy by the endoplasmic reticulum under stress conditions. Autophagy. 2018;14:1094–1096. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2018.1444314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Wang B, et al. Hsp90 regulates autophagy and plays a role in cancer therapy. Tumour Biol. 2016;37:1–6. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-4142-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Sakitani K, et al. Inhibition of autophagy exerts anti-colon cancer effects via apoptosis induced by p53 activation and ER stress. BMC Cancer. 2015;15:795. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1789-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Li X, et al. Simultaneous inhibition of the ubiquitin-proteasome system and autophagy enhances apoptosis induced by ER stress aggravators in human pancreatic cancer cells. Autophagy. 2016;12:1521–1537. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2016.1191722. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Shen Y, et al. The switch from ER stress-induced apoptosis to autophagy via ROS-mediated JNK/p62 signals: a survival mechanism in methotrexate-resistant choriocarcinoma cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2015;334:207–218. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Vlahos CJ, Matter WF, Hui KY, Brown RF. A specific inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, 2-(4-morpholinyl)-8-phenyl-4H-1-benzopyran-4-one (LY294002) J. Biol. Chem. 1994;269:5241–5248. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Blommaart EF, Krause U, Schellens JP, Vreeling-Sindelarova H, Meijer AJ. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors wortmannin and LY294002 inhibit autophagy in isolated rat hepatocytes. Eur. J. Biochem. 1997;243:240–246. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1997.0240a.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kapoor V, Zaharieva MM, Das SN, Berger MR. Erufosine simultaneously induces apoptosis and autophagy by modulating the Akt-mTOR signaling pathway in oral squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2012;319:39–48. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2011.12.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Ansari SS, et al. Induction of ER and mitochondrial stress by the alkylphosphocholine erufosine in oral squamous cell carcinoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:296. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0342-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Schaaf MB, Keulers TG, Vooijs MA, Rouschop KM. LC3/GABARAP family proteins: autophagy-(un)related functions. FASEB J. 2016;30:3961–3978. doi: 10.1096/fj.201600698R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Castro F, et al. High-throughput SNP-based authentication of human cell lines. Int J. Cancer. 2013;132:308–314. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Ansari SS, Akgun N, Berger MR. Erufosine increases RhoB expression in oral squamous carcinoma cells independent of its tumor suppressive mode of action - a short report. Cell Oncol. 2017;40:89–96. doi: 10.1007/s13402-016-0302-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.