Abstract
In type 1 diabetes, maturation of activated autoreactive CD8+ T cells to fully armed effector cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) occurs within the islet. At present the signals required for the maturation process are poorly defined. Cytokines could potentially provide the necessary “third signal” required to generate fully mature CTL capable of killing insulin-producing β-cells. To determine whether autoreactive CTL within islets respond to cytokines we generated non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice with a reporter for cytokine signalling. These mice express a reporter gene, hCD4, under the control of the endogenous regulatory elements for suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS)1, which is itself regulated by pro-inflammatory cytokines. In NOD mice, the hCD4 reporter was expressed in infiltrated islets and the expression level was positively correlated with the frequency of infiltrating CD45+ cells. SOCS1 reporter expression was induced in transferred β-cell-specific CD8+ 8.3T cells upon migration from pancreatic draining lymph nodes into islets. To determine which cytokines induced SOCS1 promoter activity in islets, we examined hCD4 reporter expression and CTL maturation in the absence of the cytokine receptors IFNAR1 or IL-21R. We show that IFNAR1 deficiency does not confer protection from diabetes in 8.3 TCR transgenic mice, nor is IFNAR1 signalling required for SOCS1 reporter upregulation or CTL maturation in islets. In contrast, IL-21R-deficient 8.3 mice have reduced diabetes incidence and reduced SOCS1 reporter activity in islet CTLs. However IL-21R deficiency did not affect islet CD8+ T cell proliferation or expression of granzyme B or IFNγ. Together these data indicate that autoreactive CD8+ T cells respond to IL-21 and not type I IFNs in the islets of NOD mice, but neither IFNAR1 nor IL-21R are required for islet intrinsic CTL maturation.
Subject terms: Autoimmunity, Interferons, Interleukins, Cytotoxic T cells, Type 1 diabetes
Introduction
Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an organ specific autoimmune disease that results from the destruction of insulin producing β-cells in the pancreatic islets. CD8+ T cells are the main mediators of β-cell destruction in both non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice and humans1,2. In T1D, autoreactive CD8+ T cells become activated in the pancreatic draining lymph node (PLN) and then migrate to the islets via the circulation where they accumulate. Maturation of activated autoreactive CD8+ T cells to fully armed effector cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL) occurs within the islets3 and involves increased expression of cytotoxic machinery including granzyme B, IFNγ and CD107a and enhanced CTL function. While antigen presentation by β-cells is required to promote CD8+ T cell proliferation and accumulation within islets4,5, maturation of CTL effector function occurs independently of antigen presentation by β-cells3. These islet intrinsic proliferation and differentiation events have been termed the “mezzanine response”5. In this context, cytokines produced within the islets provide proliferative signals and it is possible that they may also provide a “third signal” required to generate fully mature and functional CTLs capable of killing β-cells6,7.
Cytokines are essential regulators of CD8+ T cell activation, differentiation and survival8–10. Previously published studies suggest that type I IFNs and/or IL-21 could potentially provide the islet intrinsic maturation signal. Type I IFNs are implicated in the pathogenesis of T1D11–14 and have been shown to influence mouse and human CTL maturation11,15. IL-21 and IL-21R are essential for the development of autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice16–19. Strikingly, transgenic expression of type I IFNs or IL-21 in pancreatic β-cells leads to the development of autoimmune diabetes18,20 suggesting that both are likely to play important roles in islets. IL-21 is an important growth factor for T cells in situations where there is chronic antigen exposure, such as chronic viral infection or autoimmunity21,22. IL-21 induces expression of transcription factors important for CD8+ CTL maturation including T-bet and BATF323,24.
Type I IFNs and IL-21 both signal through the JAK-STAT pathway that is activated in response to numerous cytokines and has essential roles in the differentiation and survival of effector and memory CD8+ T cells25,26. STAT1 is activated in CD8+ T cells after stimulation by cytokines including type I and II interferons (IFNs) and regulates transcriptional responses that control clonal expansion and effector differentiation27,28. Further STAT1 activation induces the expression of suppressor of cytokine signalling (SOCS) proteins such as SOCS1, which are negative regulators of JAK-STAT signalling29,30. These pathways are important regulators of autoimmune diabetes development in mouse models. STAT1 deficient NOD mice are completely protected from the development of diabetes and treating NOD mice with JAK inhibitors prevents autoimmune diabetes31,32.
At present, mechanisms of islet intrinsic CTL maturation and the identity of any potential cytokine “third signal” remain elusive. To address this question we generated novel NOD SOCS1 reporter mice that report pro-inflammatory cytokine signalling33 and used these to determine the influence of SOCS1 activating cytokines in islet CD8+ CTL differentiation processes.
Materials and Methods
Mice
NOD/Lt, NOD8.3, NOD/IFNAR134 and NOD/IL-21R35 have previously been described. Generation of SOCS1/hCD4 reporter mice carrying a modified hCD4 gene immediately 3′ of a SOCS1lox gene in the endogenous SOCS1 locus was previously described33. These mice were backcrossed for 10 generations to the NOD genetic background and maintained as heterozygous NOD.SOCS1lox/+Cre+. Genomic DNA from the 10th generation was processed for Illumina mouse medium density linkage panel containing 1,449 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) loci by The Centre for Applied Genomics (Toronto, ON, Canada). The Jackson Laboratory Mouse Genome Informatics (MGI) and National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) databases were used to identify strain differences. The congenic interval around the Socs1 gene in the backcrossed mice was between and including Chr16:5,029,200 (rs4152838; GRCm38/mm10 assembly) and Chr16:51,637,127 (rs4187143). All mice were bred and housed in microisolator cages under specific pathogen-free conditions at the St Vincent’s Hospital BioResources Centre. All animal care and experiments were approved by the St Vincent’s Animal Ethics Committee. All animal studies were performed following the guidelines of the institutional animal ethics committee and the experiments were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.
Immunohistochemistry
5 μm frozen sections were prepared from 3 levels (200 μm apart), acetone fixed and stained with guinea pig anti-insulin followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-guinea pig Ig (Dako Cytomation, Carpenteria, CA)36. Serial sections were stained with biotinylated anti-hCD4 and anti-mCD8 (both BD Biosciences) followed by incubation with Vectastain Elite ABC reagent. Stains were developed with Sigma Fast 3,3′-Diaminobenzidine peroxidase substrate followed by counterstaining with haemotoxylin. Images were photographed with a Leica microscope fitted with a Leica camera at a magnification of 200x.
Antibodies
Antibodies used for flow cytometric analysis were anti-mouse as follows: CD8 (53-6.7, Biolegend), IFNγ (XMG1.2, Ebioscience), granzyme B (16G6, Ebioscience), except anti-human CD4 (RPA-T4, Biolegend).
Analysis of diabetes
Mice were monitored for diabetes by measurement of urinary glucose levels with Diastix (Bayer Diagnostics). Mice suspected of hyperglycaemia were further tested on two consecutive days and those with three positive tests were considered diabetic. Blood glucose levels (≥15 mmol/L) were confirmed using Advantage II Glucose Strips (Roche).
CFSE labelling, cell transfer and islet isolation
CD8+ T cells from NOD8.3 mice were labelled with carboxy-fluorescein succinimidyl ester (CFSE) as previously described37. Cells were resuspended at 2.5 × 107/ml in PBS, and 200 μl was injected i.v. into the tail vein of recipient mice. After 5 days the mice were sacrificed, and the inguinal lymph node (ILN), pancreatic lymph node (PLN) and islets were harvested. Mouse islets were isolated as described previously38.
Restimulation culture and flow cytometry
Lymph nodes harvested from recipient mice were prepared as single-cell suspensions. Islets were dispersed to single cells with 0.1 mg/ml bovine trypsin (Calbiochem) and 2 mM EDTA for 5 minutes at 37 °C and gentle pipetting. Dispersed islets were washed in RPMI 1640 medium containing penicillin/streptomycin, 2 mM glutamine, nonessential amino acids 50 µM mercaptoethanol and 10% fetal calf serum (complete RPMI; Gibco) and allowed to recover for 1–2 hours at 37 °C in 5% CO2. For IFNγ expression analyses cells were cultured in vitro with IGRP206-214 peptide (VYLKTNVFL, Auspep) for 6 hours. For cell surface staining cells were harvested and resuspended in PBS containing 0.5% BSA and stained using standard procedures. Intracellular staining was performed using the Cytofix/Cytoperm Plus kit (BD Biosciences, San Jose, CA). Data was collected using a BD Fortessa flow cytometer (BD Biosciences) and subsequently analysed on FlowJo software (version 8.7.3).
51Cr release assay
CFSE labelled CD8+ 8.3T cells were isolated from mouse pancreatic lymph nodes and islets 5 days after adoptive transfer and CD45+ CD8+ CFSE diluted cells were sorted using a FACS Aria (BD Biosciences). 51Cr release assays were performed as previously described39. P815 mastocytoma cells were loaded with 200 µCi [51Cr] sodium chromate (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech) and IGRP206-214 peptide. Target P815 cells were incubated with sorted CD8+ T cells at 5:1 effector:target ratio in triplicate for 16 hours at 37 °C. Medium alone or 2% Triton X-100 was added to a set of target cells to determine spontaneous and total cell lysis respectively. The radioactivity of harvested supernatant was measured on a gamma counter (Perkin-Elmer). Specific 51Cr release was calculated as percent lysis = (test cpm − spontaneous cpm)/(total cpm-spontaneous cpm) × 100.
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as the mean ± SEM. Statistical significance was determined using one-way ANOVA with Sidak’s post-test for multiple comparisons and Student’s T-test. Diabetes incidence was analysed using Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test. Statistical significance values indicated as follows: p < 0.05 (*), p < 0.01 (**) and p < 0.001 (***). Analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism 5.0 Software.
Results
Development of a reporter for cytokine signalling in islets
We previously generated mice on the C57BL/6 background with a reporter for SOCS1 promoter activity33. These mice have the Socs1 gene replaced with a modified Socs1 gene flanked by LoxP sites (SOCS1lox) and a 3′ reporter gene. The reporter is human CD4 (hCD4) containing a F43I mutation and intracellular truncation abrogating its function40. When SOCS1lox is deleted with Cre, cell surface hCD4 is expressed in place of SOCS1 and is a reporter of SOCS1 promoter activity. SOCS1lox mice were bred with CMV-Cre mice with Cre expression in early embryogenesis and thus SOCS1 deletion occurred in all cells in the body41. SOCS1lox/+.Cre+ mice were then backcrossed to the NOD genetic background and maintained as SOCS1lox/+ heterozygotes (called NOD.SOCS1/hCD4), which resulted in healthy mice free of any disease normally associated with homozygous SOCS1 deletion42.
SOCS1 reporter activity in pancreatic islets of NOD mice
SOCS1 reporter activity was examined in the islets of NOD.SOCS1/hCD4 mice during progression to diabetes by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry. There was no hCD4 expression in islets of young mice without insulitis (Fig. 1A). In mice with insulitis, hCD4 expression was observed in insulin+ β-cells in close proximity to immune cells, and in the immune cells themselves (Fig. 1A). More cells were hCD4+ in islets with more insulitis. We used flow cytometry to quantify hCD4 expression in the islets of NOD.SOCS1/hCD4 mice. The proportion of β-cells expressing hCD4 increased with age, and correlated positively with the proportion of CD45+ immune cells in the islets (Fig. 1B–D). These data indicate that cytokines that induce SOCS1 expression are present in the islets of NOD mice, and SOCS1 reporter activity increases as insulitis increases.
CTL effector function is acquired in the islet
We have previously demonstrated the existence of islet intrinsic CD8+ CTL differentiation mechanisms in NOD mice3. In these studies, CTL maturation was quantified by flow cytometry of cytotoxic markers including IFNγ, granzyme B and CD107a expression. To confirm that this corresponded to a bone fide increase in CTL activity we performed in vitro CTL assays. NOD8.3T cells were labelled with CFSE and transferred to 12–15 week old NOD recipients. After 5 days CD8+ CFSE+ T cells were isolated from pancreatic draining lymph nodes and islets and used in a CTL assay, against P815 cells loaded with IGRP206-214 peptide. We observed a potent increase in CTL activity in 8.3 cells isolated from islets compared to pLN (Fig. 2A), demonstrating that functional maturation of CD8+ CTLs occurs in islets in accordance with our previous experiments3.
CTLs within islets respond to SOCS1 activating cytokines
We next sought to determine whether cytokine stimulation may be an important part of this CD8+ T cell maturation in islets. We crossed NOD8.3 TCR transgenic mice to NOD.SOCS1/hCD4 reporter mice to generate NOD8.3/hCD4 mice that express hCD4 on the cell surface after stimulation with SOCS1 activating cytokines. CFSE labelled 8.3 T cells expressing the SOCS1/hCD4 reporter were then adoptively transferred into NOD mice. After 5 days, SOCS1/hCD4 reporter expression (mean fluorescence intensity, MFI) was quantified for each cell division number based on CFSE dilution as an indication of SOCS1 promoter activity (Fig. 2B, Supplementary Fig. 1). Our data show that hCD4 expression was increased in transferred cells compared to endogenous cells, and did not change with cell division in pancreatic lymph nodes. In contrast, in the islets hCD4 expression gradually increased as the transferred cells divided (Fig. 2C), with an approx. 2-fold increase in expression level between division 1 and division 7 (p < 0.01). These data suggest that autoreactive CD8+ 8.3T cells upregulate the SOCS1 reporter in the islets of NOD mice, indicating that they respond to proinflammatory cytokines in the islet milieu.
Both type I IFNs and IL-21 regulate SOCS1 expression in T cells43,44 and both regulate the development of type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Thus we next tested whether type I IFNs or IL-21 were mediators of the observed SOCS1 induction in islet CD8+ T cells and/or were required for CTL differentiation and diabetes development.
CD8+ CTL differentiation within islets does not require IFNAR1
Type I IFNs were recently shown to induce CTL effector function in vitro in human CTL avatars recognizing the islet antigen IGRP15. Also, IFNAR1-deficient CD8+ T cells displayed impaired expansion and effector CTL differentiation in viral models45. Further type I IFNs activate SOCS1 expression in T cells46. Thus we tested whether type I IFNs are required for CD8+ CTL differentiation in pancreatic islets. We crossed NOD8.3 mice to NOD/IFNAR1 knockout mice to generate NOD8.3 mice deficient for IFNAR1 (NOD8.3/IFNAR1). The incidence of autoimmune diabetes in female NOD8.3/IFNAR1 mice was indistinguishable from wildtype NOD8.3 mice (Fig. 3A).
We then crossed NOD8.3/hCD4 mice to NOD/IFNAR1 mice to generate SOCS1/hCD4 reporter mice deficient for IFNAR1 (NOD8.3/IFNAR1/hCD4). CFSE labelled T cells from NOD8.3/hCD4 or NOD8.3/IFNAR1/hCD4 mice were adoptively transferred into 12–15 week old NOD mice and analysed on day 5 post-transfer (Fig. 3B). As per our previously published analyses, there were no observable proliferative defects in IFNAR1 deficient 8.3 cells after transfer (data not shown)34. SOCS1/hCD4 reporter expression in the transferred 8.3 T cells was not affected by the absence of IFNAR1 in PLN or pancreatic islets (Fig. 3C). Similarly granzyme B upregulation in islet CD8+ T cells was not affected by the absence of IFNAR1 (Fig. 3D,E), indicating that it is unlikely that type I IFNs play a non-redundant role in islet intrinsic CTL differentiation in NOD mice.
CD8+ CTL within islets respond to IL-21
IL-21 and its receptor IL-21R are critical for the development of autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice and several studies have indicated that this is due in part to its effects on CD8+ T cells19,23,35,47. IL-21 also activates SOCS1 expression in CD8+ T cells48. To test if IL-21R is required for islet CD8+ T cell function we crossed NOD8.3 mice to NOD/IL-21R knockout mice to generate NOD.8.3 mice deficient for IL-21R (NOD8.3/IL-21R). Diabetes incidence in female NOD8.3/IL21R mice was significantly lower than wildtype NOD8.3 mice (Fig. 4A), in accordance with the previously observed protection in IL-21 or IL-21R deficient NOD mice16–19. We then crossed NOD8.3/hCD4 mice to NOD/IL-21R mice to generate NOD8.3/IL-21R/hCD4 to determine whether IL-21R signalling is required for CTL differentiation in vivo. CFSE labelled T cells from NOD8.3/hCD4 or NOD8.3/IL-21R/hCD4 mice were adoptively transferred into 12–15 week old NOD mice and analysed after 5 days (Fig. 4B). SOCS1/hCD4 reporter expression was reduced in pancreatic islet-infiltrating CTL that lacked IL-21R, suggesting that islet CD8+ CTLs upregulate SOCS1 in response to IL-21 (Fig. 4C). However, the proliferation of transferred NOD8.3/IL-21R T cells was not affected by loss of IL-21R (Fig. 4D,+E). In addition, granzyme B expression and IFNγ production were not impaired by loss of IL-21R signalling in transferred NOD8.3/IL-21R T cells in pancreatic lymph nodes or islets (Fig. 4F–I). Together these data indicate that islet CTL respond to IL-21, resulting in upregulation of the SOCS1/hCD4 reporter after transfer, however IL-21R expression on islet CD8+ T cells is not required for CTL proliferation or differentiation, as determined by upregulation of granzyme B and IFNγ expression.
Discussion
Together our experiments provide further insight into cytokine signalling in islet CD8+ T cells in the NOD model of T1D. SOCS1 reporter expression increases in beta cells as the islets become infiltrated during the insulitis phase, consistent with previous findings showing IFNγ action on beta cells of infiltrated islets36. Our data also indicate that CTLs are exposed to IL-21 in islets and that this contributes in a non redundant way to SOCS1 expression in islet CD8+ CTLs. However these IL-21 signals are dispensible for islet CTL maturation. In contrast IFNAR1 was completely dispensible for SOCS1 upregulation and islet CTL maturation events.
Recent data provides a compelling case for IL-21 as a critical immune regulator of T1D pathogenesis, since IL-21 and IL-21R deficient NOD mice are almost completely protected from diabetes, depending on the animal house16–19. Additionally IL-21 blocking antibodies are able to reverse recent onset diabetes in NOD mice49. While it is clear that loss of IL-21R can affect a number of immune lineages including CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, B cells and dendritic cells, it is reasonable to speculate that CD8+ T cells may be an important locus of IL-21 effects for the development of T1D. IL-21 promotes CD8+ CTL development in vitro23,50 and IL-21R deficient CD8+ T cells have impaired diabetogenic function in NOD mice35,47. Given these data we hypothesised that IL-21R signals would be an essential islet intrinsic CTL maturation signal. While 8.3 IL-21R mice are protected from autoimmune diabetes, in keeping with phenotypes of IL-21 and IL-21R deficient NOD mice, surprisingly IL-21R deficient 8.3 CD8+ T cells have no obvious defects in proliferation or CTL maturation in the islets of NOD mice. Together our data indicate that the CD8+ T cell dysfunction in IL-21R deficient NOD mice is unlikely to result from impaired CD8+ T cell priming or CTL maturation.
IL-21 regulates the formation of memory CD8+ T cells51,52 and is required for their optimal function in recall responses in certain viral models53–55 suggesting that the absence of IL-21R on CD8+ T cells may impair the development or function of the islet antigen specific CD8+ T cell memory pool in NOD mice. Additionally IL-21 is important for preventing CD8+ T cell exhaustion in chronic viral infections24,56–58 suggesting that it may have similar effects in the context of T1D. Thus the CD8+ intrinsic defects that are apparent in IL-21R deficient NOD mice may occur after the initial processes of CD8+ T cell priming and CTL maturation.
Type I IFNs have been implicated as one important CTL maturation signal, predominantly in the context of viral infections. IFNα can drive CTL maturation in CD8+ T cells, as demonstrated by upregulation of granzyme B, IFNγ, and FasL15,59, and IFNAR1 knockout CD8+ T cells have impaired granzyme B expression45. Additionally type I IFNs can promote migration of CD8+ T cells into islets12. While NOD mice exhibit a prominent IFN induced gene signature during the time course of disease progression60 and anti IFNAR1 antibodies protected NOD mice from autoimmune diabetes13, our data indicate that IFNAR1 is not required for the development of autoimmune diabetes in NOD mice34. In keeping with those findings we show that IFNAR1 deficient 8.3 mice also have normal diabetes incidence and CD8+ T cells have normal levels of granzyme B expression after transfer and isolation from NOD islets. These data indicate that type I IFNs are not required for islet CD8+ CTL maturation or diabetes onset in 8.3 NOD mice.
In this study we have explored the mechanisms underpinning the islet specific CTL maturation events that are evident in NOD mice. Our data indicate that CTLs are likely to be under the influence of SOCS1 activating cytokines in NOD islets, however neither of the two candidate cytokine receptors tested, IFNAR1 and IL-21R, are necessary for CTL maturation to occur in islets. This may imply that this process is independent of SOCS1 activating effects, that other cytokines are more critical regulators of the maturation processes or that type I IFNs and IL-21 are functionally redundant in this context.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (NHMRC) project grant (APP1071350), program grant (APP1037321) and fellowship (HET). APRS is supported by a Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF) Career Development Award and Diabetes Australia Millennium Award. St Vincent’s Institute receives support from the Operational Infrastructure Support Scheme of the Government of Victoria.
Author contributions
A.P.R.S. and K.L.G. researched data; designed experiments; and reviewed, edited, and wrote the manuscript. M.P., G.J., P.T., T.C. and S.F. researched data and reviewed the manuscript. T.W.H.K. and H.E.T. contributed to experimental design and discussion and reviewed and edited the manuscript.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Andrew P. R. Sutherland and Kate L. Graham.
Contributor Information
Andrew P. R. Sutherland, Email: asutherland@svi.edu.au
Helen E. Thomas, Email: hthomas@svi.edu.au
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-019-51636-5.
References
- 1.Anderson MS, Bluestone JA. The NOD mouse: a model of immune dysregulation. Annu Rev Immunol. 2005;23:447–485. doi: 10.1146/annurev.immunol.23.021704.115643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Graham KL, et al. Pathogenic mechanisms in type 1 diabetes: the islet is both target and driver of disease. Rev Diabet Stud. 2012;9:148–168. doi: 10.1900/RDS.2012.9.148. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Graham KL, et al. Autoreactive cytotoxic T lymphocytes acquire higher expression of cytotoxic effector markers in the islets of NOD mice after priming in pancreatic lymph nodes. Am J Pathol. 2011;178:2716–2725. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2011.02.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Graham KL, et al. Intra-islet proliferation of cytotoxic T lymphocytes contributes to insulitis progression. Eur J Immunol. 2012;42:1717–1722. doi: 10.1002/eji.201242435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Sutherland RM, et al. Cognate antigen engagement on parenchymal cells stimulates CD8(+) T cell proliferation in situ. Nature communications. 2017;8:14809. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Curtsinger JM, Valenzuela JO, Agarwal P, Lins D, Mescher MF. Type I IFNs provide a third signal to CD8 T cells to stimulate clonal expansion and differentiation. J Immunol. 2005;174:4465–4469. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.174.8.4465. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Hervas-Stubbs S, et al. Effects of IFN-alpha as a signal-3 cytokine on human naive and antigen-experienced CD8(+) T cells. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:3389–3402. doi: 10.1002/eji.201040664. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kim MT, Harty JT. Impact of Inflammatory Cytokines on Effector and Memory CD8+ T Cells. Front Immunol. 2014;5:295. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2014.00295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cui W, Kaech SM. Generation of effector CD8+ T cells and their conversion to memory T cells. Immunol Rev. 2010;236:151–166. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-065X.2010.00926.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Cox MA, Harrington LE, Zajac AJ. Cytokines and the inception of CD8 T cell responses. Trends Immunol. 2011;32:180–186. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2011.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Newby BN, Mathews CE, Type I. Interferon Is a Catastrophic Feature of the Diabetic Islet Microenvironment. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2017;8:232. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2017.00232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Marro BS, et al. Progression of type 1 diabetes from the prediabetic stage is controlled by interferon-alpha signaling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2017;114:3708–3713. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1700878114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li Q, et al. Interferon-alpha initiates type 1 diabetes in nonobese diabetic mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:12439–12444. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806439105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Li Q, McDevitt HO. The role of interferon alpha in initiation of type I diabetes in the NOD mouse. Clin Immunol. 2011;140:3–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2011.04.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Newby BN, et al. Type 1 Interferons Potentiate Human CD8(+) T-Cell Cytotoxicity Through a STAT4- and Granzyme B-Dependent Pathway. Diabetes. 2017;66:3061–3071. doi: 10.2337/db17-0106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Datta S, Sarvetnick NE. IL-21 limits peripheral lymphocyte numbers through T cell homeostatic mechanisms. PLoS One. 2008;3:e3118. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Spolski R, Kashyap M, Robinson C, Yu Z, Leonard WJ. IL-21 signaling is critical for the development of type I diabetes in the NOD mouse. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105:14028–14033. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0804358105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sutherland APR, et al. Interleukin-21 Is Required for the Development of Type 1 Diabetes in NOD Mice. Diabetes. 2009;58:1144–1155. doi: 10.2337/db08-0882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.McGuire HM, et al. Interleukin-21 is critically required in autoimmune and allogeneic responses to islet tissue in murine models. Diabetes. 2011;60:867–875. doi: 10.2337/db10-1157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Stewart TA, et al. Induction of type I diabetes by interferon-alpha in transgenic mice. Science. 1993;260:1942–1946. doi: 10.1126/science.8100367. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Leonard Warren J., Wan Chi-Keung. IL-21 Signaling in Immunity. F1000Research. 2016;5:224. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.7634.1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu SM, King C. IL-21-producing Th cells in immunity and autoimmunity. J Immunol. 2013;191:3501–3506. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1301454. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Sutherland AP, et al. IL-21 promotes CD8+ CTL activity via the transcription factor T-bet. J Immunol. 2013;190:3977–3984. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1201730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Xin G, et al. A Critical Role of IL-21-Induced BATF in Sustaining CD8-T-Cell-Mediated Chronic Viral Control. Cell reports. 2015;13:1118–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2015.09.069. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Kaech SM, Cui W. Transcriptional control of effector and memory CD8+ T cell differentiation. Nat Rev Immunol. 2012;12:749–761. doi: 10.1038/nri3307. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Villarino AV, Kanno Y, Ferdinand JR, O’Shea JJ. Mechanisms of Jak/STAT signaling in immunity and disease. J Immunol. 2015;194:21–27. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1401867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Quigley M, Huang X, Yang Y. STAT1 signaling in CD8 T cells is required for their clonal expansion and memory formation following viral infection in vivo. J Immunol. 2008;180:2158–2164. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.180.4.2158. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Gil MP, Salomon R, Louten J, Biron CA. Modulation of STAT1 protein levels: a mechanism shaping CD8 T-cell responses in vivo. Blood. 2006;107:987–993. doi: 10.1182/blood-2005-07-2834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Alexander WS. Suppressors of cytokine signalling (SOCS) in the immune system. Nat Rev Immunol. 2002;2:410–416. doi: 10.1038/nri818. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Krebs DL, Hilton DJ. SOCS proteins: negative regulators of cytokine signaling. Stem Cells. 2001;19:378–387. doi: 10.1634/stemcells.19-5-378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Kim S, et al. Essential role for signal transducer and activator of transcription-1 in pancreatic beta-cell death and autoimmune type 1 diabetes of nonobese diabetic mice. Diabetes. 2007;56:2561–2568. doi: 10.2337/db06-1372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Trivedi PM, et al. Repurposed JAK1/JAK2 Inhibitor Reverses Established Autoimmune Insulitis in NOD Mice. Diabetes. 2017;66:1650–1660. doi: 10.2337/db16-1250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chong MM, et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 is a critical regulator of interleukin-7-dependent CD8+ T cell differentiation. Immunity. 2003;18:475–487. doi: 10.1016/S1074-7613(03)00078-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Quah HS, et al. Deficiency in Type I Interferon Signaling Prevents the Early Interferon-Induced Gene Signature in Pancreatic Islets but Not Type 1 Diabetes in NOD Mice. Diabetes. 2014;63:1032–1040. doi: 10.2337/db13-1210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.McGuire HM, et al. A subset of interleukin-21+ chemokine receptor CCR9+ T helper cells target accessory organs of the digestive system in autoimmunity. Immunity. 2011;34:602–615. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.01.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Thomas HE, Parker JL, Schreiber RD, Kay TW. IFN-gamma action on pancreatic beta cells causes class I MHC upregulation but not diabetes. J Clin Invest. 1998;102:1249–1257. doi: 10.1172/JCI2899. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Krishnamurthy B, et al. Responses against islet antigens in NOD mice are prevented by tolerance to proinsulin but not IGRP. J Clin Invest. 2006;116:3258–3265. doi: 10.1172/JCI29602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Thomas HE, et al. Perturbations in nuclear factor-kappaB or c-Jun N-terminal kinase pathways in pancreatic beta cells confer susceptibility to cytokine-induced cell death. Immunol Cell Biol. 2006;84:20–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1711.2005.01397.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Dudek NL, et al. Cytotoxic T-cells from T-cell receptor transgenic NOD8.3 mice destroy beta-cells via the perforin and Fas pathways. Diabetes. 2006;55:2412–2418. doi: 10.2337/db06-0109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sakihama, T., Hunsicker, M. E., Hussey, R. E. & Reinherz, E. L. Human CD4 residue Phe 43 is critical for repertoire development and maturation of MHC class II restricted CD4 single-positive T lineage cells in vivo. Eur J Immunol30, 279–290, doi:10.1002/1521-4141(200001)30:1<279::AID-IMMU279>3.0.CO;2-5 (2000). [DOI] [PubMed]
- 41.Schwenk F, Baron U, Rajewsky K. A cre-transgenic mouse strain for the ubiquitous deletion of loxP-flanked gene segments including deletion in germ cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995;23:5080–5081. doi: 10.1093/nar/23.24.5080. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Starr R, et al. Liver degeneration and lymphoid deficiencies in mice lacking suppressor of cytokine signaling-1. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:14395–14399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.24.14395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Palmer DC, Restifo NP. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) in T cell differentiation, maturation, and function. Trends Immunol. 2009;30:592–602. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2009.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cornish AL, et al. Suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 regulates signaling in response to interleukin-2 and other gamma c-dependent cytokines in peripheral T cells. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:22755–22761. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M303021200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kolumam GA, Thomas S, Thompson LJ, Sprent J, Murali-Krishna K. Type I interferons act directly on CD8 T cells to allow clonal expansion and memory formation in response to viral infection. J Exp Med. 2005;202:637–650. doi: 10.1084/jem.20050821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zimmerer JM, et al. IFN-alpha-induced signal transduction, gene expression, and antitumor activity of immune effector cells are negatively regulated by suppressor of cytokine signaling proteins. J Immunol. 2007;178:4832–4845. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.178.8.4832. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Van Belle TL, Nierkens S, Arens R, von Herrath MG. Interleukin-21 receptor-mediated signals control autoreactive T cell infiltration in pancreatic islets. Immunity. 2012;36:1060–1072. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2012.04.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Gagnon J, Ramanathan S, Leblanc C, Ilangumaran S. Regulation of IL-21 signaling by suppressor of cytokine signaling-1 (SOCS1) in CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Cell Signal. 2007;19:806–816. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Ryden AK, et al. Anti-IL-21 monoclonal antibody combined with liraglutide effectively reverses established hyperglycemia in mouse models of type 1 diabetes. J Autoimmun. 2017;84:65–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2017.07.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zeng R, et al. Synergy of IL-21 and IL-15 in regulating CD8+ T cell expansion and function. J Exp Med. 2005;201:139–148. doi: 10.1084/jem.20041057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Allard EL, et al. Overexpression of IL-21 promotes massive CD8+ memory T cell accumulation. Eur J Immunol. 2007;37:3069–3077. doi: 10.1002/eji.200637017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Cui W, Liu Y, Weinstein JS, Craft J, Kaech SM. An interleukin-21-interleukin-10-STAT3 pathway is critical for functional maturation of memory CD8+ T cells. Immunity. 2011;35:792–805. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2011.09.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Yi JS, Ingram JT, Zajac AJ. IL-21 deficiency influences CD8 T cell quality and recall responses following an acute viral infection. J Immunol. 2010;185:4835–4845. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Barker BR, Gladstone MN, Gillard GO, Panas MW, Letvin NL. Critical role for IL-21 in both primary and memory anti-viral CD8+ T-cell responses. Eur J Immunol. 2010;40:3085–3096. doi: 10.1002/eji.200939939. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Novy P, Huang X, Leonard WJ, Yang Y. Intrinsic IL-21 signaling is critical for CD8 T cell survival and memory formation in response to vaccinia viral infection. J Immunol. 2011;186:2729–2738. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1003009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Elsaesser H, Sauer K, Brooks DG. IL-21 is required to control chronic viral infection. Science. 2009;324:1569–1572. doi: 10.1126/science.1174182. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Yi JS, Du M, Zajac AJ. A vital role for interleukin-21 in the control of a chronic viral infection. Science. 2009;324:1572–1576. doi: 10.1126/science.1175194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Frohlich A, et al. IL-21R on T cells is critical for sustained functionality and control of chronic viral infection. Science. 2009;324:1576–1580. doi: 10.1126/science.1172815. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Agarwal P, et al. Gene regulation and chromatin remodeling by IL-12 and type I IFN in programming for CD8 T cell effector function and memory. J Immunol. 2009;183:1695–1704. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.0900592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Carrero JA, Calderon B, Towfic F, Artyomov MN, Unanue ER. Defining the Transcriptional and Cellular Landscape of Type 1 Diabetes in the NOD Mouse. PLoS One. 2013;8:e59701. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.