Skip to main content
Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy logoLink to Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy
. 2019 Dec 17;4:62. doi: 10.1038/s41392-019-0095-0

Targeting epigenetic regulators for cancer therapy: mechanisms and advances in clinical trials

Yuan Cheng 1,#, Cai He 1,#, Manni Wang 1, Xuelei Ma 1, Fei Mo 1, Shengyong Yang 1, Junhong Han 1, Xiawei Wei 1,
PMCID: PMC6915746  PMID: 31871779

Abstract

Epigenetic alternations concern heritable yet reversible changes in histone or DNA modifications that regulate gene activity beyond the underlying sequence. Epigenetic dysregulation is often linked to human disease, notably cancer. With the development of various drugs targeting epigenetic regulators, epigenetic-targeted therapy has been applied in the treatment of hematological malignancies and has exhibited viable therapeutic potential for solid tumors in preclinical and clinical trials. In this review, we summarize the aberrant functions of enzymes in DNA methylation, histone acetylation and histone methylation during tumor progression and highlight the development of inhibitors of or drugs targeted at epigenetic enzymes.

Subject terms: Drug development, Cancer epidemiology

Introduction

After the discovery of DNA and the double helix structure, classic genetics has long assumed that the sequences of DNA determine the phenotypes of cells. DNA is packaged as chromatin in cells, with nucleosomes being the fundamental repeating unit. Four core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, and H4) form an octamer and are then surrounded by a 147-base-pair (bp) segment of DNA. Nucleosomes are separated by 10–60 bp DNA. Researchers have gradually found organisms that share the same genetic information but have different phenotypes, such as somatic cells from the same individual that share a genome but function completely differently. The term epigenetics was first proposed and established in 1942 when Conrad Waddington tried to interpret the connection between genotype and phenotype.1 Later, Arthur Riggs and his group interpreted epigenetics as inherited differences in mitosis and meiosis, which could explain the changes in phenotypes. They were both trying to find the link between genotype and phenotype. Epigenetics is usually referred to as a genomic mechanism that reversibly influences gene expression without altering DNA sequences. Holliday assumed that epigenetics was also mitotically and/or meiotically heritable without DNA sequence change. Aberrant DNA methylation could be repaired via meiosis, but some patterns are still transmitted to offspring.2 This phenomenon covers a wide range of cellular activities, such as cell growth, differentiation, and disease development, and is heritable.3 Generally, epigenetic events involve DNA methylation, histone modification, the readout of these modifications, chromatin remodeling and the effects of noncoding RNA. The elements involved in different modification patterns can be divided into three roles, “writer,” “reader,” and “eraser”. The “writers” and “erasers” refer to enzymes that transfer or remove chemical groups to or from DNA or histones, respectively. “Readers” are proteins that can recognize the modified DNA or histones (Fig. 1). To coordinate multiple biological processes, the epigenome cooperates with other regulatory factors, such as transcription factors and noncoding RNAs, to regulate the expression or repression of the genome. Epigenetics can also be influenced by cellular signaling pathways and extracellular stimuli. These effects are temporary and yet long-standing. Given the importance of epigenetics in influencing cell functions, a better understanding of both normal and abnormal epigenetic processes can help to understand the development and potential treatment of different types of diseases, including cancer.

Fig. 1. Epigenetic regulation of DNA methylation, histone acetylation, and histone methylation.

Fig. 1

Gene silencing in mammalian cells is usually caused by methylation of DNA CpG islands together with hypoacetylated and hypermethylated histones. The “writers” (DNMTs, HATs, and HMTs) and “erasers” (DNA-demethylating enzymes, HDACs, and KDMs) are enzymes responsible for transferring or removing chemical groups to or from DNA or histones; MBDs and other binding proteins are “readers” that recognize methyl-CpGs and modified histones. DNMTs, DNA methyltransferases; MBDs, methyl-CpG binding domain proteins; HATs, histone acetylases; HDACs, histone deacetylases; HMTs, histone methyltransferases; KDMs, histone-demethylating enzymes.

The etiology of cancer is quite complicated and involves both environmental and hereditary influences. In cancer cells, the alteration of genomic information is usually detectable. Like genome instability and mutation, epigenome dysregulation is also pervasive in cancer (Fig. 2). Some of the alterations determine cell function and are involved in oncogenic transformation.4 However, by reversing these mutations by drugs or gene therapy, the phenotype of cancer can revert to normal. Holliday proposed a theory that epigenetic changes are responsible for tumorigenesis. The alteration of cellular methylation status by a specific methyltransferase might explain the differences in the probability of malignant transformation.5 In clinical settings, we noticed that although cancer patients share the same staging and grade, they present totally different outcomes. In tumor tissues, different tumor cells show various patterns of histone modification, genome-wide or in individual genes, indicating that epigenetic heterogeneity exists at a cellular level.6 Likewise, using molecular biomarkers is thought to be a potential method to divide patients into different groups. It is important to note that tumorigenesis is the consequence of the combined action of multiple epigenetic events. For example, the repression of tumor suppressor genes is usually caused by methylation of DNA CpG islands together with hypoacetylated and hypermethylated histones.7 During gene silencing, several hallmarks of epigenetic events have been identified, including histone H3 and H4 hypoacetylation, histone H3K9 methylation, and cytosine methylation.8,9

Fig. 2. Epigenetic regulations in cancer.

Fig. 2

Alterations in epigenetic modifications in cancer regulate various cellular responses, including cell proliferation, apoptosis, invasion, and senescence. Through DNA methylation, histone modification, chromatin remodeling, and noncoding RNA regulation, epigenetics play an important role in tumorigenesis. These main aspects of epigenetics present reversible effects on gene silencing and activation via epigenetic enzymes and related proteins. DNMTs, DNA methyltransferases; TETs, ten-eleven translocation enzymes; HATs, histone acetylases; HDACs, histone deacetylases; HMTs, histone methyltransferases; HDMs, histone-demethylating enzymes. MLL, biphenotypic (mixed lineage) leukemia.

Therefore, epigenetics enables us to investigate the potential mechanism underlying cancer phenotypes and provides potential therapy options. In this review, we focused and briefly expanded on three aspects of epigenetics in cancer: DNA methylation, histone acetylation and histone methylation. Finally, we summarized the current developments in epigenetic therapy for cancers.

DNA methylation

The DNA methylation pattern in mammals follows certain rules. Germ cells usually go through a stepwise demethylation to ensure global repression and suitable gene regulation during embryonic development. After implantation, almost all CpGs experience de novo methylation except for those that are protected.10 Normal dynamic changes in DNA methylation and demethylation based on altered expression of enzymes have been known to be associated with aging.11,12 However, inappropriate methylation of DNA can result in multiple diseases, including inflammatory diseases, precancerous lesions, and cancer.1315 Of note, de novo methylation of DNA in cancer serves to prevent reactivation of repressed genes rather than inducing gene repression.16 Because researchers have found that over 90% of genes undergoing de novo methylation in cancer are already in a repressed status in normal cells.17 Nevertheless, aberrant DNA methylation is thought to serve as a hallmark in cancer development by inactivating gene transcription or repressing gene transcription and affecting chromatin stability.18

The precise mechanism by which DNA methylation affects chromatin structure unclear, but it is known that methyl-DNA is closely associated with a closed chromatin structure, which is relatively inactive.19 Hypermethylation of promoters and hypomethylation of global DNA are quite common in cancer. It is widely accepted that gene promoters, especially key tumor suppressor genes, are unmethylated in normal tissues and highly methylated in cancer tissues.20 P16, a tumor suppressor encoded by CDKN2A, has been found to gain de novo methylation in ~20% of different primary neoplasms.21 Mutations in important and well-studied tumor-suppressive genes, such as P53 and BRCA1, are frequently identified in multiple cancers.2224 Studies have found that the level of methylation is positively associated with tumor size. In support of this, a whole-genome methylation array analysis in breast cancer patients found significantly increased CpG methylation in FES, P2RX7, HSD17B12, and GSTM2 coincident with increasing tumor stage and size.25 After analysis of long-range epigenetic silencing at chromosome 2q14.2, methylation of EN1 and SCTR, the first well-studied example of coordinated epigenetic modification, was significantly increased in colorectal and prostate cancers.26,27 EN1 methylation has also been observed to be elevated by up to 60% in human salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma.28 Of note, only ~1% of normal samples exhibited EN1 CpG island hypermethylation.26 Therefore, the significant difference between cancer cells and normal cells makes EN1 a potential cancer marker in diagnosis. In human pancreatic cancer, the APC gene, encoding a regulator of cell junctions, is hypermethylated by DNMT overexpression.29 During an analysis of colorectal disease methylation patterns, researchers found several genes that showed significant changes between precancerous diseases and cancers, including RUNX3, NEUROG1, CACNA1G, SFRP2, IGF2 DMR0, hMLH1, and CDKN2A.30 In the human colon cancer cell line HCT116, hMLH1 and CDKN2A always bear genetic mutation and hypermethylation of one allele, and this leads to inactivation of key tumor suppressors.31 It is known that p16, p15, and pax6 are usually aberrantly methylated in bladder cancer and show enhanced methylation in cell culture.32. Unlike gene promoter methylation, gene body methylation usually results in increased transcriptional activity.33 This process often occurs in CpG-poor areas and causes a base transition from C to T.34 The hypermethylation of specific CpG islands in cancer tissues is informative of mutations when the gene in normal tissues is unmethylated. One representative marker is glutathione S-transferase-π (GSTP1), which is still the most common alteration in human prostate cancer.35 Recently, DNA methylation in cancer has generally been associated with drug resistance and predicting response to treatment.36 For example, MGMT (O-6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase) hypermethylation is still the best independent predictor of response to BCNU (carmustine) and temozolomide in gliomas because hypermethylation of MGMT makes tumor cells more sensitive to treatments and is associated with regression of tumor and prolonged overall survival.37,38 Similarly, MGMT is also a useful predictor of response to cyclophosphamide in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma39 (Table 1).

Table 1.

Key regulatory factors of DNA methylation in cancer.

Enzyme Roles in cancer Cancer type Associated biological process (involved mechanism and molecules)
DNA methyltransferases
DNMT1: DNMT1 is responsible for maintenance of DNA methylation and is expressed at high concentrations in dividing cells to guard existing methylated sites.
Promoter AML, CML, cervical cancer, colorectal cancer, glioma, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, esophageal cancer, bladder cancer, prostate cancer, thyroid cancer, ovarian cancer92100 Promotes EMT phenotype, cell apoptosis, cell proliferation, migration, cancer stemness, and cisplatin sensitivity (β-catenin, E-cadherin, PTEN, p18, p27, P21, P16, miR-124, miR-148a, miR-152, miR-185, miR-506), DNMT1 is also upregulated by Helicobacter pylori CagA
Suppressor Prostate cancer, cervical cancer101,102 Cell migration, EMT and stem cell potential
DNMT3a: DNMT3a methylates unmethylated DNA de novo and is required for maternal imprinting at different methylated regions.
Promoter Cervical cancer, CML, breast cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, bone cancer, testicular cancer52,103107 Promotes cell proliferation and invasion. (VEGFA, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, miR-182, miR-708-5p)
Suppressor Lymphoma, AML, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer108110 Low level of DNMT3a is associated with the poor survival of cancer patients and promotes tumor progression but not initiation
DNMT3b: DNMT3b is also responsible for de novo methylation and is required for methylation of centromeric minor satellite repeats and CGIs in inactive X chromosomes.
Promoter CML, AML, glioma, lung cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, pancreatic cancer, bladder cancer, cervical cancer52,94,111113 Promotes cell proliferation, and invasion and the chemotherapy effects of cisplatin; is associated with poor prognosis (E-cadherin, PTEN, P21, P16, miR-29b, miR-124, miR-506)
Suppressor AML, bladder cancer109,114 Downregulation of DNMT3a is associated with poor prognosis
Methyl-CpG binding proteins
MeCP2 Promoter Prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer115,116 Promotes cell proliferation, invasion, metastasis, apoptosis, cell cycle arrest in the G0/G1 phase, chemotherapy effects, regulation of estrogen receptor status, involves the MEK1/2-ERK1/2 signaling pathway (miR-638, miR-212)
Suppressor Pancreatic cancer117 Decreased expression of MeCP2 contributes to cancer development
MBD1 Promoter Pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer118,119 Promotes cell EMT, proliferation, invasion, and metastasis and the chemoradioresistance of cancer cells and induces an antioxidant response (E-cadherin)
MBD2 Promoter Lung cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer94,120122 Promotes cell invasion and metastasis (p14)
MBD4 Promoter Colon cancer, breast cancer123,124 Causes dominant negative impairment of DNA repair
KAISO (ZBTB33) Promoter Colon cancer, cervical cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer, and chronic myeloid leukemia125128 Silencing of tumor suppressor genes, EMT, apoptosis, migration and invasion (Wnt/β-catenin, TGFβ, EGFR, Notch, miR-4262, miR-31)
ZBTB4 Suppressor Breast cancer, Ewing sarcoma, prostate cancer, bladder cancer77,129131 Promotes cell growth and apoptosis and controls the cellular response to p53 activation, promoting long-term cell survival (miR-17-92/106b-25
ZBTB38 Promoter Bladder cancer132 Promotes cell migration and invasion (Wnt/β‑catenin pathway)
UHRF1 Promoter Hepatocellular carcinoma, bladder cancer, renal cell carcinoma, lung cancer, retinoblastoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, colon cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, hepatoblastoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, cervical cancer, breast cancer, thyroid cancer133138 Promotes cell proliferation, EMT, and viability, increases hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)1α, CSCs, taxane resistance correlates with poor pathological characteristics, human papillomavirus (HPV) contributes to overexpression of UHRF1 (miR-101, miR-124, PI3K/Akt signaling pathway, MEK/ERK pathway)
UHRF2 Promoter Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, colon cancer139,140 Promotes cell migration and invasion, and is associated with lower disease-free survival
suppressor Colon cancer, lung cancer, esophageal carcinoma141,142 Low level of UHRF2 is associated with shorter overall survival, vascular invasion and poor prognosis
DNA demethylases
TET1: TET1 is highly expressed in mouse embryonic stem cells, the inner cell mass of blastocysts, and developing PGCs.
Promoter MLL-rearranged leukemia, AML, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer, renal cancer143147 TET1-MLL fusion, cell migration, anchorage-independent growth, cancer stemness, and tumorigenicity, prevention of senescence via loss of p53, associated with a worse overall survival and sensitivity to drugs (PI3K-mTOR pathway)
Suppressor Hematopoietic malignancy, hepatocellular carcinoma, prostate cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma cells, ovarian cancer90,148,149 Promotes EMT and increases cancer cell growth, migration, and invasion (miR-21-5p, Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, AKT and FAK pathways)
TET2/TET3: TET2 and TET3 are present in multiple mouse adult tissues, whereas only TET3 is present in mouse oocytes and one-cell zygotes
TET2 Suppressor MDS, AML, CML, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, leukemia87,150153 Promotes cell proliferation, colony formation, metastasis, is associated with reduced patient survival, pathologic stage, tumor grading, lymph node metastasis, and vascular thrombosis (caspase-4, ET2/E-cadherin/β-catenin regulatory loop)
TET3 Promoter Renal cell carcinoma154 Acts as an independent predictor of poor outcome
Suppressor Head and neck cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer155,156 Is associated with EMT, overall survival, disease-free survival (miR-30d)

AML acute myeloid leukemia, CML chronic myeloid leukemia, EMT epithelial-mesenchymal transition, VEGFR vascular endothelial growth factor receptor

DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs)

DNA methylation is a covalent modification of DNA and is one of the best-studied epigenetic markers. It plays an important role in normal cell physiology in a programmed manner. The best-known type of DNA methylation is methylation of cytosine (C) at the 5th position of its carbon ring (5-mC), especially at a C followed by a guanine (G), so-called CpG sites. Non-CpG methylation, such as methylation of CpA (adenine) and CpT (thymine), is not common and usually has restricted expression in mammals.40 CpG islands traverse ~60% of human promoters, and methylation at these sites results in obvious transcriptional regression.41 Meanwhile, among the ~28 million CpGs in the human genome in somatic cells, 60–80% are methylated in a symmetric manner and are frequently found in promoter regions.42,43 The process of DNA methylation is regulated by the DNA methyltransferase (DNMT) family via the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosyl-L-methionine (SAM) to cytosine.44 There are five members of the DNMT family: DNMT1, DNMT2, DNMT3a, DNMT3b, and DNMT3L. DNMT1 is responsible for the maintenance of methyl-DNA, recognizes hemimethylated DNA strands and regenerates the fully methylated DNA state of DNA during cell division.45 In a recent study, DNMT1 with Stella, a factor essential for female fertility, was responsible for the establishment of the oocyte methylome during early embryo development.46 DNMT3a and DNMT3b are regarded as de novo methylation enzymes that target unmethylated CpG dinucleotides and establish new DNA methylation patterns, but they have nonoverlapping functions during different developmental stages.47,48 DNMT2 and DNMT3L are not regarded as catalytically active DNA methyltransferases. DNMT2 functions as an RNA methyltransferase, while DNMT3L contains a truncated inactive catalytic domain and acts as an accessory partner to stimulate the de novo methylation activity of DNMT3A. The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L can modulate DNMT3a activity as a stimulatory factor.49

During aberrant DNA methylation, DNMTs play an important role. Compared with DNMT1 and DNMT3a, DNMT3b was significantly overexpressed in tumor tissues.50 Overexpression of DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b has been observed in multiple cancers, including AML, CML, glioma, and breast, gastric, colorectal, hepatocellular, pancreatic, prostate, and lung cancers. In cervical cancer patients, DNMT1 was expressed in more than 70% of cancer cells, whereas only 16% of normal cells expressed DNMT1. The higher level of DNMT1 expression was also associated with worse prognosis.51 The expression of DNMT1, DNMT3a, and DNMT3b has been observed to be elevated in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and various solid cancers. These three methyltransferases do not show significant changes in the chronic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), but they are significantly increased during progression to the acute phase in CML.52,53 Notably, downregulation of DNMTs can also lead to tumorigenesis (Table 1).

Methyl-CpG recognition proteins

How DNA methylation leads to gene repression has been considered in many studies. Several hypotheses have been proposed. Three methyl-CpG binding domain protein (MeCP) families can read the established methylated DNA sequences and in turn recruit histone deacetylases, a group of enzymes responsible for repressive epigenetic modifications, to inhibit gene expression and maintain genome integrity.10,54 The first group is methyl-CpG binding domain (MBD) proteins, including MeCP2, MBD1, MBD2, and MBD4. MeCP1 is a complex containing MBD2, the histone deacetylase (HDAC) proteins HDAC1 and HDAC2, and the RbAp46 and RbAp48 proteins (also known as RBBP7 and RBBP4).55 MBD3 is unlike the other four family members and is not capable of binding to methylated DNA but instead binds to hydroxymethylated DNA.56 The zinc-finger and BTB domain-containing protein family is the second group and comprises three structurally different proteins, KAISO (ZBTB33), ZBTB4 and ZBTB38, which bind to methylated DNA via zinc-finger motifs. The third family includes two ubiquitin-like proteins with PHD and RING finger domains, UHRF1 and UHRF2, which recognize 5-mC via RING finger-associated (SRA) domains. On the other hand, methylation of DNA can also be a barrier for certain transcription factors to bind to promoter sites such as AP-2, c-Myc, CREB/ATF, E2F, and NF-kB.13

As for methyl-group binding proteins, many studies have investigated their roles in various cancers, but the mechanism underlying these alterations remains unclear. MBD proteins cooperate with other proteins to regulate gene transcription.57,58 However, the role of MBD1 and MBD2 has not been identified in human lung or colon cancer, with only limited mutations being detected.59 Furthermore, loss of MBD1 did not show any carcinogenic effect in MBD−/− mice.60 Compared with MBD1, MBD2 shows more effect on tumorigenesis. Deficiency of MBD2 strongly suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis in APCMin-background mice.61 A possible reason is that many important signaling pathways are downregulated in colorectal cancer, and loss of MBD2 leads to reexpression of these genes.62 Meanwhile, inhibition of MBD2 shows promising effects on suppression of the tumorigenesis of human lung cancer and colon cancer.63 Although MBD3 does not directly bind to methylated DNA, it regulates the methylation process via interactions with other proteins, such as MBD2 and HDAC. For example, application of an HDAC inhibitor in lung cancer cells upregulated p21 (also known as CDKN1A) and downregulated ErbB2, leading to inhibition of cancer cell growth. Silencing of MBD3 blocked the effects of an HDAC inhibitor.64 MBD3 and MBD2 form a complex, nucleosome remodeling and deacetylase (NuRD), which interacts with histone-demethylating enzymes to regulate gene expression in cancer.65 Mutation of MBD4 has been found in colorectal cancer, endometrial carcinoma and pancreatic cancer.66 Furthermore, this mutation unexpectedly affects the stability of the whole genome, not only CpG sites.67 Knockout of MBD4 indeed increased tumorigenesis in APCMin-background mice, which makes MBD4 a tumor suppressor.68 MBD4 is important in DNA damage repair, given the interaction between MBD4 and MMR.69 In contrast, the expression of MeCP2 and the UHRF family tends to promote tumor growth.7074 In the KAISO family, KAISO directly binds to p120ctn, a protein with an alternative location in some cancer cells, and they together regulate cell adhesion and motility.75,76 However, deficiency of ZBTB4 contributes to tumorigenesis77 (Table 1).

DNA-demethylating enzymes

DNA methylation is a stable and highly conserved epigenetic modification of DNA in many organisms.78 However, loss of 5-mC and DNA demethylation have been identified in different biologic processes. For example, DNA demethylation is important for primordial germ cells (PGCs) to gain pluripotent ability.79,80 DNA demethylation is actively regulated by the TET protein family (ten-eleven translocation enzymes, TET1-3) via the removal of a methyl group from 5-mC. These three proteins differ from each other in terms of expression depending on the developmental stage and cell type.18 TETs oxidize 5-mC in an iterative manner and catalyze the conversion of 5-mC to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5-hmC), which is a key intermediate in the demethylation process.81 5-hmC, as a relatively stable intermediate substrate, is less prone to further oxidation by TET proteins than 5-mC.82 However, overexpression of only TET1 and TET2 can cause a global decrease of 5-mC.18 Stepwise oxidation of 5-hmC by TET proteins can yield two products: 5-formylcytosine (5-fC) and 5-carboxylcytosine (5-caC).83 These two molecules can be excised by thymine-DNA glycosylase (TDG) and eventually be repaired to unmodified C.84 DNA demethylation or restoration of the unmodified cytosine can also occur passively through replication-dependent dilution of 5-mC.

Disruption of normal DNA demethylation is thought to be associated with oncogenesis. TET proteins were initially associated with leukemia. Researchers have found that in a small number of AML patients, TET1 is fused to MLL via the chromosome translocation t(10;11)(q22;q23).85 Further studies found that TET2 was more widely expressed in different tissues than TET1 and TET3. Analyses revealed that mutation or deficiency of TET2 occurred in ~15% of patients with myeloid cancers, including myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS), myeloproliferative disorders, and AML.86 In patients with CML, mutation of TET2 has been detected in ~50% of patients.87 Although TET2 mutations have been found in several myeloid malignancies, their prognostic effect remains controversial. Based on the phenomenon that mutation of TET2 was elevated in patients whose disease transformed from chronic myeloid malignancy to AML, researchers considered that TET2 loss was important for cells to regain the ability to self-renew.88 The role of TET proteins has also been investigated in several solid tumors. Compared with surrounding normal tissues, 5-hmC is significantly reduced in human breast, liver, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers with reduced expression of TET family proteins.89 Deficiency of TET1 in prostate and breast cancer is associated with tumor cell invasion and breast xenograft tumor formation via the inhibition of the methylation of metalloproteinase (TIMP) family proteins 2 and 3.90 Loss of 5-hmC is an epigenetic hallmark of melanoma, and thus, introducing TET2 into melanoma cells results in suppression of tumor growth and increased survival in an animal model91 (Table 1).

Histone modification

Histone modification can occur to the flexible tails as well as the core domain of histones, including those sites that are buried by DNA. In particular, the flexible histone tails are enriched with basic Lys/Arg and hydroxyl group-containing Ser/Thr/Tyr residues, thereby being hotspots for hallmark histone modifications. The tails extend from the surface of the nucleosome and are readily modulated by covalent posttranslational modification (PTM). PTMs modify histones by adding or removing chemical groups and regulate many biological processes via the activation or inactivation of genes. These processes mainly include acetylation and methylation of lysines (K) and arginines (R), phosphorylation of serines (S) and threonines (T), ubiquitylation, and sumoylation of lysines. In addition to those mentioned and discussed above, histone modifications also include citrullination, ADP-ribosylation, deamination, formylation, O-GlcNAcylation, propionylation, butyrylation, crotonylation, and proline isomerization at over 60 amino acid residues.157,158 In addition to conventional PTMs, novel PTM sites are also found outside of the N-terminal tails.

Histone modifications at certain sites, such as promoters and enhancers, are thought to be largely invariant, whereas a small number of these sites remain dynamic. H3K4me1 and H3K27ac, two dynamic modifications, were identified to activate enhancers and regulate gene expression.159 H3K9ac and H3K9me3 are two common modifications at promoters.160,161 Appropriate histone modifications are important in gene expression and human biology; otherwise, alterations in PTMs may be associated with tumorigenesis. Analysis of cancer cells reveals that they exhibit aberrant histone modifications at individual genes or globally at the single-nuclei level.6,162 Understanding histone modification patterns in cancer cells can help us to predict and treat cancers. Thus far, most studies have focused on aberrant modifications within an individual site, such as H4K20me3 or H4K16ac, rather than enzymatic activity-associated abnormalities. Generally, alterations in histone modifications occur at an early stage and accumulate during tumorigenesis.163

Histone acetylation (lysine)

Histone acetylation occurs at multiple lysine residues at the N-terminus via the catalysis of histone acetyltransferases (HATs), also named lysine acetyltransferases (KATs). Histone acetylation regulates the compaction state of chromatin via multiple mechanisms, such as neutralizing the basic charge at unmodified lysine residues, and is associated with active transcription, especially at gene promoters and enhancers and the gene body; it also facilitates the recruitment of coregulators and RNA polymerase complexes to the locus.157,164 To date, HATs and histone deacetylases (HDACs) are the two of the best characterized groups of enzymes involved in histone PTMs. HATs transfer the acetyl groups from acetyl-CoA cofactors to lysine residues at histones, whereas the role of HDACs is the opposite, which makes histone acetylation a highly reversible process.

Histone acetyltransferases

HATs are predominantly located in the nucleus, but multiple lines of evidence have shown lysine acetylation in the cytoplasm, and their acetylation is associated with key cellular events.165 In addition, lysine acetylation found outside histones reminds us of the role of HATs in nonhistone PTMs.166 The first HAT was identified in yeast, and was named HAT1,167 and was then isolated from tetrahymena as HAT A by Allis and coworkers.168 In humans, HATs can be roughly divided into three groups: general control nondepressible 5 (GCN5)-related N-acetyl transferase (GNAT) (based on the protein Gcn5 found in yeast; including GCN5 and PCAF), MYST (based on the protein MOZ; including MOZ, MOF, TIP60, and HBO1), and p300/cAMP-responsive element-binding protein (CBP).169 Other HATs, including nuclear receptors and transcription factors, such as SRC1, MGEA5, ATF-2, and CLOCK, also harbor the ability to acetylate histones. Notably, a number of acetyltransferases also perform protein acetylation outside histones, such as TFIIB, MCM3AP, ESCO, and ARD1.170 Knockout of CBP/p300 is lethal for early embryonic mouse models.171,172 The acetyl group transfer strategies for each HAT subfamily are different. For the GCN5 and PCAF family, the protein crystal structure shows a conserved glutamate in the active site. Blockade of this amino leads to a significantly decreased acetylation function.173,174 Similarly, there is also a conserved glutamate plus a cysteine residue located at active sites of MYST family proteins.175 Unlike the other two families, the p300/CBP HAT subfamily has two other potential conserved residues, a tyrosine and a tryptophan.176 Generally, their catalytic mechanisms of acetyl group transfer can be divided into two groups. The GNAT family depends on a sequential ordered mechanism, whereas the members of the MYST family use a so-called ping-pong (i.e., double displacement) catalytic mechanism, which means that the acetyl groups are first transferred to a cysteine residue and then transferred to a lysine residue.177 In addition to differences in the acetyl transfer mechanism, HAT subfamilies, even different proteins in the same family, also have remarkable diversity in targeting sites.

Appropriate acetylation within cells is important since upregulation or downregulation of HATs is associated with tumorigenesis or poor prognosis.162,178 Compared with solid tumors, the association between histone modifications and cancer has been widely investigated in hematological malignancies. Germline mutation of CBP results in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome along with an increased predisposition to childhood malignancies. Meanwhile, loss of another family member, p300, has also been associated with hematological malignancies.179,180 Therefore, both CBP and p300 seem to function as tumor suppressors. During cancer development, the expression of HAT genes can be disrupted by chromosomal translocations, although these are rare events. Generation of the fused protein CBP-MOZ is the result of the t(8,16)(p11,p13) translocation in AML.181 Translocation of t(10;16)(q22;p13) leads to the CBP-MORF chimera.182 Similarly, p300-MOZ, MLL-CBP, and MLL-p300 (MLL, mixed lineage leukemia) have also been identified in hematological malignancies.183185 Generally, chromosomal rearrangements involving CBP are more common than those involving p300. Researchers have also investigated solid tumors, which are less mutated. The expression of translocated P300 in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) tissue is much higher than that in adjacent normal tissue and is associated with advanced stage and poor prognosis.178 Missense point mutations in p300 are found in colorectal adenocarcinoma, gastric adenocarcinoma and breast cancer with quite low incidences.186,187 Rare inactivating mutations in CBP and PCAF have only been identified in cancer cell lines but not primary tumors.188 Based on these findings, we hypothesize that the differences between cell lines and primary tumors cannot be ignored. Amplified in breast cancer 1 (AIB1), also frequently called NCOA3 (nuclear receptor coactivator 3) or SRC3 (steroid receptor coactivator 3), is overexpressed in ~60% of human breast cancers, and increased levels of AIB1 are associated with tamoxifen resistance and decreased overall survival.189 Steroid receptor coactivator 1 (SRC1) is also associated with the chromosomal translocation t(2;2)(q35;p23), which results in PAX3–NCOA1 gene fusion in rhabdomyosarcoma without a consistent genetic abnormality during embryonic development190 (Table 2).

Table 2.

Important enzymes or proteins that regulate histone acetylation in cancer.

Enzyme Synonym Role in cancer Cancer type Associated biological process (involved mechanism and molecules)
Histone acetylases: the writers
HAT1
 HAT1 / Promoter Pancreatic cancer, nasopharyngeal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal carcinoma227230 Promote cell apoptosis, proliferation, differentiation and cisplatin resistance, associated with poor prognosis and upregulates PD-L1
Suppressor Lung cancer, osteosarcoma231,232 Restores Fas expression and induces cancer cell apoptosis (Ras-ERK1/2 signaling)
GANT
 GCN5L2 GCN5 Promoter Prostate cancer, breast cancer, non-small-cell lung cancer, colorectal cancer233235 Promotes cell proliferation, apoptosis, EMT, poor prognosis of patients, promotion of E2F1, cyclin D1, and cyclin E1 expression (PI3K/PTEN/Akt signaling, TGF-β/Smad signaling pathway)
 PCAF / Suppressor Colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer236238 Decreased PCAF is associated with 5-FU resistance, poor clinical outcome (PCAF-p16-CDK4 axis, p53, miR-17)
MYST
 HTATIP TIP60 Promoter Liver cancer, prostate cancer239,240 Promotes cancer cell EMT, metastasis, radioresistance
Suppressor Breast cancer, lung cancer, bladder cancer, colorectal cancer241243 Is associated with cell viability and invasion, and low Tip60 expression is correlated with poor overall survival and relapse-free survival
 MYST1 MOF Promoter Prostate cancer244 MYST1 increases the resistance to therapeutic regimens and promotes aggressive tumor growth (androgen receptor and NF-κB)
 MYST2 HBO1 Promoter Ovarian cancer, bladder cancer, breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, leukemia245247 Promotes cell proliferation, enrichment of cancer stem-like cells, gemcitabine resistance (Wnt/β-catenin signaling)
 MYST3 MOZ Promoter Colorectal cancer, breast cancer, leukemia248250 Promotes cell proliferation, activates ERα expression (multiple fusion proteins: MOZ-TIF2, MOZ-NCOA2 and MOZ-CBP)
 MYST4 MORF Promoter Leukemia251 MORF-CREBBP fusion
p300/CBP
 P300 EP300, KAT3B Promoter Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma, leukemia, nasopharyngeal carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer, prostate cancer, cervical cancer, pancreatic cancer252257 Promotes cell proliferation, migration, invasion, EMT, and malignant transformation, is associated with advanced clinical stage, poor recurrence-free survival and overall survival, enhances ERα expression and contributes to tamoxifen resistance, castration resistance, and gemcitabine sensitivity, (p21, p27, β-catenin, MLL-p300, MOZ-p300 fusion, Smad2 and Smad3 in the TGF-β signaling pathway, p300/YY1/miR-500a-5p/HDAC2 signaling axis)
Suppressor Bladder cancer, colorectal cancer258,259 Downregulation of P300 is associated with chemosensitivity to 5-FU treatment and doxorubicin resistance
 CBP CREBBP, KAT3A Promoter Lung cancer, leukemia, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma256,260262 Is associated with drug resistance, a highly tumorigenic, cancer stem-like phenotype and enhances the activity of estrogen receptor-beta (ER-β) (CXCL8, PI3K/Akt/β-catenin/CBP axis); KAT6A-CREBBP, MOZ-CBP, MORF-CREBBP, MLL-CBP fusions in leukemia
Suppressor Lung cancer, prostate cancer263,264 Loss of CBP reduces transcription of cellular adhesion genes while driving tumorigenesis
SRC/p160
 NCOA1 SRC1 Promoter Prostate cancer, colon cancer, breast cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma265267 Promotes cell invasion, proliferation, metastasis, is associated with shorter overall survival and progression-free survival (M-CSF1, miR-4443, miR-105-1)
 NCOA2 TIF2 Promoter Prostate cancer, leukemia268,269 Is associated with resistance to AR antagonism and bicalutamide; MOZ-TIF2 fusion in leukemia
Suppressor Colorectal cancer, liver cancer270,271 TIF2 is able to impair protumorigenic phenotypes
 NCOA3 AIB1, ACTR Promoter Ovarian cancer, breast cancer, bladder cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer272275 Promotes cell proliferation, EMT, metastasis, invasiveness and is correlated to higher estrogen receptor expression, poor PFS and OS and predicts resistance to chemoradiotherapy (AKT, E2F1, SNAI1, cyclin E, cdk2, p53, matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 expression); however, high AIB1 expression has been correlated to both a good response to adjuvant tamoxifen and tamoxifen resistance.
Others
 ATF-2 CREB2, CREBP1 Promoter Pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, leukemia276278 Promotes cell proliferation, EMT, gemcitabine sensitivity (JNK1/c-Jun and p38 MAPK/ATF-2 pathways, miR-451); however, the level of ATF-2 is a key determinant of the sensitivity to tamoxifen
 TFIIIC / Promoter Ovarian cancer279 TFIIIC is overexpressed in cancer tissues
 TAF1 TAFII250 / / /
 CLOCK KIAA0334 Promoter Ovarian cancer, breast cancer280,281 Promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion, is associated with drug resistance (cisplatin)
Suppressor Lung cancer282 Is associated with cancer progression and metastasis
 CIITA MHC2TA Suppressor Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, head and neck cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma283285 Regulates the expression of MHC II and HLA-DR induction
 MGEA5 NCOAT promoter Laryngeal cancer286 Is associated with larger tumor size, nodal metastases, higher grade and tumor behavior (TGFBR3-MGEA5 fusion)
Suppressor Breast cancer287 MGEA5 transcript levels were significantly lower in grade II and III than in grade I tumors; associated with lymph node metastasis
 CDY / / / /
Acetyl-lysine binding protein: the readers
BRD and extraterminal domain (BET) proteins family
 BRD2-4, BRDt / Promoter Breast cancer, prostate cancer, gastric tumors, lung cancer, ovarian carcinoma, pancreatic cancer, hematologic malignancy, Ewing sarcoma, glioblastoma, melanoma288291 Is associated with cell proliferation, self-renewal, metabolism, metastasis, and expression of immune checkpoint molecules (oncogenic AR and MYC signaling, AMIGO2-PTK7 axis, Jagged1/Notch1 signaling, IKK activity)
Histone deacetylases (HDACs): the erasers
HDAC Class I
 HDAC1 / Promoter Thyroid cancer, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, esophageal cancer, gallbladder cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer292295 Promotes cell invasion, viability, apoptosis, EMT; is associated with chemotherapy response. (CXCL8, P53, p38 MAPK, miRNA-34a)
 HDAC2 / Promoter Pancreatic cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, breast cancer, prostate cancer, renal carcinoma, ovarian cancer, gastric cancer296300 Promotes cell proliferation, metastasis, invasion, clonal expansion and EMT (E-cadherin, p63, mTORC1, AKT, PELP1/HDAC2/miR-200, p300/YY1/miR-500a-5p/HDAC2 axis, Sp1/HDAC2/p27 axis)
 HDAC3 / Promoter Colorectal cancer, pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, esophageal cancer, lung cancer301304 Promotes cell proliferation and invasion, migration, chemosensitivity; increases PD-L1 expression (NF‑κB signaling)
 HDAC8 / Promoter Cervical cancer, breast cancer, colon cancer305307 Promotes cell migration, affects cell morphology and promotes the cell cycle (p53, HDAC8/YY1 axis)
Suppressor Breast cancer308 HDAC8 suppresses EMT (HDAC8/FOXA1 signaling)
HDAC Class II
 HDAC4 / Promoter Head and neck cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer309311 Promotes cell viability, drug resensitization (tamoxifen, platinum) (STAT1, p21, miR-10b)
 HDAC5 / Promoter Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer312,313 Promotes cell proliferation, invasion, migration and EMT; is associated with hormone therapy resistance (HDAC5-LSD1 axis, Survivin and miR-125a-5p, miR-589-5p)
 HDAC6 / Promoter Cervical cancer, breast cancer, colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, liver cancer, ovarian cancer314317 Promotes pluripotency of CSCs, cancer cell proliferation and migration (α-tubulin, heat shock protein (HSP) 90, the NF-κB/MMP2 pathway, JNK/c-Jun pathway, miR-22, miR-221)
 HDAC7 / Promoter Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer318320 Is associated with cancer stem cell-specific functions, tumor growth and invasion, and therapy resistance (miR-489, miR-34a)
 HDAC9 / Promoter Breast cancer321 Enhances invasive and angiogenic potential (miR-206)
Suppressor Lung cancer322 HDAC9 is downregulated in adenocarcinomas; is associated with tumor growth ability
 HDAC10 / Promoter Ovarian cancer, lung cancer323,324 Promotes cells proliferation, reduced DNA repair capacity and sensitization to platinum therapy (AKT phosphorylation)
HDAC Class III: sir2-like proteins (sirtuins)
 Sirt1 / Promoter Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, liver cancer, lung cancer, pancreatic cancer, cervical cancer, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer325327 Promotes cell proliferation, migration, metastasis, EMT, metabolic flexibility and self-renewal of cancer stem cells, chemoresistance (miR-30a, miR-15b-5p)
 Sirt2 / promoter Colorectal cancer lung cancer, renal cell carcinoma, gastric cancer, cervical cancer328330 Highly expressed in stem-like cells and promotes migration, invasion and metastasis (p53, RAS/ERK/JNK/MMP-9 pathway)
Suppressor Breast cancer, prostate cancer lung cancer331-333 Sensitizes cancer cells to intracellular DNA damage and the cell death induced by oxidative stress, and low Sirt2 levels were associated with poor patient survival (p27)
 Sirt3 / Promoter Cervical cancer, lung cancer334,335 Is associated with PD-L1-induced lymph node metastasis (p53)
Suppressor Pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer336338 Loss of SIRT3 leads to reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation that amplifies HIF-α stabilization; metastasis (c-MYC, CagA, PI3K/Akt pathway, Wnt/β-catenin pathway, AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK))
 Sirt4 / Suppressor Pancreatic cancer, thyroid cancer, gastric cancer, colorectal cancer339,340 Promotes cell proliferation, aerobic glycolysis, migration and invasion, and in inhibition of glutamine metabolism (E-cadherin)
 Sirt5 / Promoter Colorectal cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer341343 Promotes autophagy, cell proliferation, and drug resistance, and is associated with poor clinical outcomes
Suppressor Liver cancer, gastric cancer344,345 Inhibits peroxisome-induced oxidative stress (CDK2)
 Sirt6 / Promoter Pancreatic cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer346348 Enhances cytokine production, and promotes EMT, cell migration and tumor metastasis, and predicts poor prognosis (ERK1/2/MMP9 pathway, SIRT6/Snail/KLF4 axis)
Suppressor Pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer349,350 Promotes increased glycolysis, cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth, and is associated with paclitaxel, epirubicin, and trastuzumab sensitivity (survivin, NF-κB pathway)
 Sirt7 / Promoter Colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, bladder cancer351,352 Accelerates cell growth, proliferation, motility and apoptosis (MAPK pathway)
Suppressor Pancreatic cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer353355 Sensitizes to gemcitabine and radiotherapy, and low levels of SIRT7 are associated with an aggressive tumor phenotype and poor outcome (TGF-β signaling, p38 MAPK)
HDAC Class IV
 HDAC11 / Promoter Liver cancer, Hodgkin lymphoma, neuroblastoma, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer356359 Promotes the mitotic cell cycle, cell apoptosis; is associated with cancer progression and survival (OX40 ligand, p53)

EMT epithelial-mesenchymal transition, PI3K phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase, TGF-β transforming growth factor β, ER estrogen receptor, CSF colony-stimulating factor, AR androgen receptor, MMP matrix metalloproteinase

Acetyl-lysine recognition proteins

The bromodomain (BRD) motif is an ~110-amino-acid conserved protein module and is regarded as the first and sole histone-binding module that contains a hydrophobic pocket to identify acetyl-lysine.191 The specificity of different BRDs depends on the sequences within the loops that form the hydrophobic pocket. Therefore, each BRD has a preference for different histones.192,193 In addition to their recognition of acetyl-lysine, BRDs are also capable of interacting with other chromatin molecules, such as plant homeodomain (PHD) finger motifs or another BRD. To date, 42 proteins containing bromodomains and 61 unique bromodomains have been discovered.194,195 Based on the sequence length and sequence identity of BRDs, the human BRD family can be divided into nine groups and one additional set of outliers, which has been well illustrated in published papers.169,194 Different BRD-containing proteins contain one to six BRDs. Intriguing, the most notable and well-studied bromodomain proteins are also HATs, such as PCAF, GCN5, and p300/CBP. Yaf9, ENL, AF9, Taf14, Sas5 (YEATS), and double PHD finger (DPF) have also been discovered to be acyl-lysine reader domains.191,196 Human MOZ and DPF2 are two proteins containing the DPF domain. Mutations in the YEATS and DPF domains are associated with cancer. For example, mutation of AF9 has been found in hematological malignancies, and ENL dysregulation leads to kidney cancer.197,198

Another important family is the BRD and extraterminal domain (BET) protein family, including BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDt, and this family shares two conserved N-terminal bromodomains and a more divergent C-terminal recruitment domain.199,200 These bromodomain proteins are critical as mediators of gene transcriptional activity.201 Of note, bromodomains have also been found in some histone lysine methyltransferases, such as ASH1L and MLL. BRDs are promiscuous domains and have been discussed in other well-constructed papers.169,194 In this review, we focus on the role of BRDs in tumorigenesis.

As histone acetylation “readers”, bromodomain proteins play important roles in tumorigenesis. BRD4 recruits the positive transcription elongation factor complex (P-TEFb), a validated target in chronic lymphocytic leukemia associated with c-Myc activity.202204 Chromosomal translocation of BRD4, via the t(15;19) translocation, results in the generation of the fusion protein BRD4-NUT (nuclear protein in testis), which is found in NUT midline carcinoma (NMC). Importantly, inhibition of BRD4-NUT induces differentiation of NMC cells.205 Moreover, BRD4 is required for the maintenance of AML with sustained expression of Myc206 (Table 2).

Histone deacetylases

Histone deacetylases (HDACs) have recently attracted increasing attention. In humans, the genome encodes 18 HDACs. In contrast to the function of HATs, HDACs usually act as gene silencing mediators and repress transcription. Similarly, HDACs are expressed not only in the nucleus but also in the cytoplasm, and their substrates are also not limited to histones. Based on sequence similarity, HDACs can be divided into four classes: class I HDACs, yeast Rpd3-like proteins, are transcriptional corepressors and have a single deacetylase domain at the N-terminus and diversified C-terminal regions (HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC8); class II HDACs, yeast Hda1-like proteins, have a deacetylase domain at a C-terminal position (HDAC4, HDAC5, HDAC6, HDAC7, HDAC9, and HDAC10); class III HDACs are yeast silent information regulator 2 (Sir2)-like proteins (SIRT1, SIRT2, SIRT3, SIRT4, SIRT5, SIRT6, and SIRT7); and class IV involves one protein (HDAC11). The class IV protein shares sequence similarity with both class I and class II proteins.207,208 Classes I, II, and IV are included in the histone deacetylase family, whereas class III HDACs belong to the Sir2 regulator family.209 The catalytic mechanisms for these two families are different; classes I, II, and IV are Zn2+-dependent HDACs, whereas sir2-like proteins (sirtuins) are nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+)-dependent HDACs and are also capable of mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity, another pattern of histone modification.210 Intriguingly, SIRT4 is thought to have more mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase activity than HDAC activity. SIR2 and SIRT6 seem to have equal levels of both mono-ADP-ribosyltransferase and HDAC activities.211,212 Moreover, after revealing the crystal structure of SIRT5, researchers found that SIRT5 is also a lysine desuccinylase and demalonylase.213 Therefore, the diversity of the sirtuin family makes them a group of multifunctional enzymes.

So far, the major known recognition sites of each HDAC are different, and these largely remain to be uncovered. For example, HDAC3 is thought to deacetylate H4K8 and H4K12,214 but in an HDAC3-knockout HeLa cell line, the acetylation levels of H4K8 and H4K12, even the overall acetylation levels of H3 and H4, were comparable with those in wild-type cells.215 Nevertheless, HDAC1 or HDAC3 siRNA can indeed increase the acetylation levels of H3K9 and H3K18.215 Therefore, partially because of the functional complementation and diversity within HDAC families, especially in class I, II, and IV, it is difficult to identify the specific substrates of certain HDACs. However, the substrates of the sirtuin family are quite clear. It is notable that because SIRT4 and SIRT5 are only located in mitochondria, they have no effect on histones. However, nonhistone lysine acetylation is also prevalent, since more than 3600 acetylation sites on 1750 proteins have been identified.166 The tumor suppressor p53 and the cytoskeletal protein α-tubulin are two representative substrates of HDACs.216218 Notably, HDACs are also capable of regulating gene transcription by deacetylating other proteins that are responsible for epigenetic events, such as DNMTs, HATs, and HDACs.166,219 Another phenomenon is that some HDACs have to form a complex along with other components to function as transcriptional corepressors, which provides ideas and methods to design novel HDAC inhibitors. The Sin3, NuRD, and CoREST complexes are three complexes containing HDAC1 and HDAC2. Studies have found that purified HDAC1 or HDAC2 without associated components shows fairly weak deacetylation activity in vitro.220 HDAC3 interacts with the corepressors SMRT/NCoR to form the functional complexes, which significantly increases HDAC3 activity. NCoR also interacts with HDAC1, HDAC2 and the class II deacetylases HDAC4, HDAC5, and HDAC7, but usually not in the form of a complex.221,222 Deleted in breast cancer 1 (DBC1) and active regulator of SIRT1 (AROS) are two proteins that are able to bind to SIRT1, whereas their interactions present opposite functions. The DBC1/SIRT1 complex inhibits the deacetylation activity of SIRT1, whereas the combination of AROS and SIRT1 stimulates the activity of SIRT1.223,224

HDACs not only are able to deacetylate histones and nonhistone proteins but also interact with other epigenetic-associated enzymes, which gives them a vital role in tumorigenesis.162,178 Alterations in HDACs in cancers usually result in aberrant deacetylation and inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. For example, hypoacetylation of the promoter of p21, a tumor suppressor encoded by CDKN1A, can be reversed by HDAC inhibitors, resulting in an antitumor effect.225 A screen of the mutations in several HATs and HDACs, such as CBP, PCAF, HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC5, HDAC7, and SIRT1, in more than 180 cancer samples including primary tumors and cancer cells indicated that the expression profiles of HDAC1, HDAC5, HDAC7, and SIRT1 are distinctive for colorectal cancers and normal colorectal mucosa, and the expression profiles of HDAC4 and CBP are capable of distinguishing breast cancer tissue from normal tissues226 (Table 2).

Histone methylation (lysine and arginine)

Similar to the process of histone acetylation, histone methylation also consists of three important components: “writers”, histone methyltransferases (HMTs), “readers”, histone methylation-recognizing proteins, and “erasers”, histone demethylases (HDMs). Methylation of histones occurs at arginine and lysine residues. Arginine and lysine both can be monomethylated or dimethylated, whereas lysine is also capable of being trimethylated. Histone methylation can either promote or inhibit gene expression, which depends on the specific situation. For example, lysine methylation at H3K9, H3K27, and H4K20 is generally associated with suppression of gene expression, whereas methylation of H3K4, H3K36, and H3K79 induces gene expression.360 Mutation of H3K27M (lysine 27 to methionine) and H3K36M are two important oncogenic events, and H3K27M and H3K36M serve as drivers of pediatric gliomas and sarcomas. H3K27M has been identified in more than 70% of diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPGs) and 20% of pediatric glioblastomas, which results in a global reduction in the trimethylation of H3K27 (H3K27me3).361363 However, the H3K36M mutation impairs the differentiation of mesenchymal progenitor cells and generates undifferentiated sarcoma, leading to increased levels of H3K27me3 and global loss of H3K36 (me2 and me).364,365 Meanwhile, depletion of H3K36 methyltransferases results in similar phenotypes to those seen with H3K36M mutation.364 To date, KMTs (lysine methyltransferases) have been better studied than arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) due to their sequence of discovery, different prevalence and impact. Their targets are not limited to only histones, they also modify other key proteins, such as the tumor suppressor p53, TAF10, and Piwi proteins.366368

Histone methyltransferases

All KMTs contain a 130-amino-acid conserved domain, the SET (suppressor of variegation, enhancer of Zeste, trithorax) domain, except for DOT1L. The SET domain is responsible for the enzymatic activity of SET-containing KMTs. Instead of methylating lysine residues in histone tails, DOT1L methylates lysine in the globular core of the histone, and its catalytic domain is more similar to that of PRMTs.369,370 The enzymatic activity of KMTs results in the transfer of a methyl group from S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) to a the ε-amino group of a lysine residue. The first identified KMT was SUV39H1, which targets H3K9.371 Sequentially, more than 50 SET-containing proteins have been identified with proven or predicted lysine methylation potential. Of note, KMTs are highly specific enzymes, meaning that they are highly selective for lysine residues they can methylate and the specific methylation degree they can achieve. For example, SUV39H1 and SUV39H2 specifically methylate histone 3 at lysine 9 (H3K9), and DOT1L only methylates H3K79.371 Based on their structure and sequence around the SET domain, generally, KMTs can be divided into six groups, SUV39, SET1, SET2, EZH, SMYD, and RIZ (PRDM) (reviewed by Volkel and Angrand372). The Pre-SET domain of the SUV39 family contains nine conserved cysteines that coordinate with three zinc ions to function. The SET1 family members share a similar Post-SET motif that contains three conserved cysteine residues. The SET2 family possesses an AWS motif that contains 7–9 cysteines. Their SET domain is located between the AWS motif and a Post-SET motif. The members of the enhancer of zeste homolog (EZH) family are the catalytic components of polycomb repressive complexes (PRCs), which are responsible for gene silencing. EZH proteins have no Post-SET motif but have 15 cysteines in front of the SET domain and show no methylated activity as isolated proteins.373 PRC2 shows lysine methylation activity through its catalytic components, EZH2 or its homolog EZH1.374 EZH2 can methylate not only histone H3 but also histone H1 at lysine 26.375 The SMYD family members, which are SET and MYND domain-containing proteins, possesses a MYND (myeloid-nervy-DEAF1) domain, a zinc-finger motif responsible for protein–protein interaction.376 The RIZ (PRDM) family is a large family containing a homolog of the SET domain, the PR domain. The PR and SET domains share 20–30% sequence identity and are both capable of inducing histone H3 methylation.377 However, most members of the RIZ family responsible for histone methylation are still unknown. So far, two of them have been proven to induce the methylation of histones: PRDM2 (RIZ1) is associated with H3K9 methylation; and Meisetz, the mouse homolog of PRDM9, trimethylates H3K4.378 Meanwhile, PRDM1 has been identified to interact with EHMT2, a member of the SUV39 family. PRDM6 acts as a transcription suppressor by interacting with class I HDACs and EHMT2 to induce cell proliferation and inhibit cell differentiation.379 Meanwhile, the recruitment of EHMT2 is based on the formation of a complex with PRDM1.380 Due to the lack of a characteristic sequence or structure flanking the SET domain, other SET-containing KMTs, such as SET7/9, SET8, SUV4-20H1, and SUV4-20H2, cannot be classified into these families. Notably, some KMTs contain more than one domain, which allows them to interact with other proteins, especially other epigenetic modifying proteins. SUV39H1 possesses a chromodomain that directly binds to nucleic acids and forms heterochromatin.381 MLL1 recognizes unmethylated DNA through its CpG-interacting CXXC domain. SETDB1 contains an MBD that interacts with methylated DNA.382 The Tudor domain in SETDB1 may potentially recognize the methylation of lysine residues.383 ASH1 is able to interact with CBP, a HAT, via a bromodomain within ADH1.384

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMTs) can be divided into two groups. Among the nine PRMTs, only PRMT5, PRMT7, and PRMT9 are type II PRMTs, and the other five PRMTs, except for PRMT2, are type I PRMTs. PRMT2 was identified by sequence homology385 but has not shown any catalytic activity during investigations, although PRMT2 acts as a strong coactivator for androgen receptor (AR), which is thought to be associated with arginine methylation.386 Both types of PRMTs first catalyze the formation of monomethylarginine as an intermediate. However, sequentially, type I PRMTs can form asymmetric dimethylarginine (ADMA, Rme2a), but type II PRMTs form symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA, Rme2s). Rme2a means two methyl groups on one ω-amino group, whereas an Rme2s has one methyl group on each ω-amino group. PRMT1-PRMT8 were investigated by Herrmann and Fackelmayer,387 and FBXO11 was identified as PRMT9, which symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues.388

Most enzymes for histone methylation are substrate-specific proteins; therefore, alterations in the aberrant expression of enzymes are usually associated with specific histone residue mutations. One of the best-known examples of alterations in tumorigenesis is H3K4me3, which is associated with biphenotypic (mixed lineage) leukemia (MLL). The location of the MLL gene is where chromosomal translocations in AML and ALL usually occur.389 When the MLL gene is translocated, the catalytic SET domain is lost, which results in MLL translocation-generated fusion proteins, which recruit DOT1L.390 Maintenance of MLL-associated ALL depends on the methylation of H3K79 catalyzed by DOT1L.391 Therefore, DOT1L is usually associated with hematological malignancies rather than solid tumors. Alteration of the EZH2-induced methylation of H3K27 has been observed in multiple cancers, including various solid tumors (prostate, breast, kidney, bladder, and lung cancers) and hematological malignancies.392 Meanwhile, overexpression of EZH2 has been found in multiple cancers and is associated with poor prognosis.393 Different mechanisms have been proposed to describe the role of EZH2 in tumorigenesis (Table 3).

Table 3.

Important enzymes or proteins that regulate histone methylation in cancer.

Enzymes Synonyms Role in cancer Cancer type Mechanism
Histone methyltransferases (lysine): the writers for lysine
SUV39
 KMT1A SUV39H1, MG44, SUV39H Promoter Gastric cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer, colorectal cancer, bladder cancer421426 Promotes cell migration and cancer stem cell self-renewal (KMT1A-GATA3-STAT3 axis)
Suppressor Breast cancer, cervical cancer427,428 SUV39H1-low tumors are correlated with poor clinical outcomes
 KMT1B FLJ23414, SUV39H2 Promoter Colorectal cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer429431 Promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion and tumor metastasis
 KMT1C EHMT2, G9A, BAT8, NG36 Promoter Breast cancer, pancreatic cancer, bladder cancer, ovarian cancer, liver cancer, colon cancer, lung cancer432435 Promotes cell proliferation, metastasis, and apoptosis, and is associated with poor prognosis (p27, PMAIP1-USP9X-MCL1 axis, Wnt signaling pathway)
 KMT1E SETDB1, ESET, KG1T Promoter Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver cancer436439 SETDB1 promotes cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT (p53)
Suppressor Lung cancer440 SETDB1 acts as a metastasis suppressor, and inhibits cell migration and invasive behavior.
SET1
 KMT2A MLL1, HRX, TRX1, ALL-1 Promoter Head and neck cancer, pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer441,442 Promotes PD-L1 transcription and is associated with the self-renewal of cancer cells (Wnt/β-catenin pathway)
 KMT2B ALR, MLL2 promoter Bladder cancer, lung cancer, breast cancer443445 Is associated with the self-renewal of CSCs and expansion (Wnt/β-catenin pathway)
 KMT2C MLL3, HALR Suppressor Colorectal cancer, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma446 Inhibits tumor growth and metastasis
 KMT2D MLL4, HRX2 Promoter Breast cancer447 Promotes cell proliferation and invasiveness
 KMT2E MLL5 Promoter Glioblastoma448 Is associated with cancer cell self-renewal
 KMT2F SET1A Promoter Liver cancer449 Promotes liver cancer growth and hepatocyte-like stem cell malignant transformation
EZH
 EZH1 KIAA0388 Promoter Breast cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer, colorectal cancer, liver cancer, gastric cancer, melanoma, lymphoma, myeloma, Ewing’s sarcoma, glioblastoma, thyroid carcinoma, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, lung cancer, ovarian cancer, renal cancer392,450452 Promotes cell proliferation, colony formation, migration and tumor metastasis; is associated with cancer stem cell maintenance; predicts chemotherapeutic efficacy and response to tamoxifen therapy (E-cadherin, RUNX3, MEK-ERK1/2-Elk-1 pathway)
 EZH2 KMT6, ENX-1, MGC9169
SET2
 KMT3A SETD2, SET2, HIF-1, Suppressor Renal cancer, lung cancer453,454 Maintains genome integrity and attenuates cisplatin resistance (ERK signaling pathway)
 WHSC1 NSD2, WHS, TRX5 Promoter Prostate cancer, gastric cancer455,456 Promotes cell invasive properties, EMT and cancer metastasis
 WHSC1L1 NSD3, MGC126766 Promoter Breast cancer, head and neck cancer457 Is associated with ERα overexpression and enhances the oncogenic activity of EGFR
RIZ (PRDM)
 PRDM1 BLIMP1 Promoter Pancreatic cancer, breast cancer458,459 Promotes cell invasiveness and cancer metastasis
Suppressor Lung cancer, colon cancer460,461 Inhibits cell invasion and metastasis (p21)
 PRDM2 RIZ Promoter Colorectal cancer, breast cancer462,463 Is associated with poor clinicopathological variables and mediates the proliferative effect of estrogen
 PRDM3 EVI1, MDS1-EVI1 Promoter Ovarian cancer, nasopharyngeal carcinoma464,465 Promotes cell proliferation, migration, EMT, cancer stem cells and chemoresistance/radioresistance
 PRDM4 PFM1 Promoter Breast cancer466 Is associated with cancer cell stemness, tumorigenicity, and tumor metastasis
 PRDM5 PFM2 Suppressor Colorectal cancer, gastric cancer, cervical cancer467 Among the PRDM family genes tested, PRDM5 was the most frequently silenced in colorectal and gastric cancer
 PRDM9 PFM6 Promoter N/A468 Impairs genomic instability and drives tumorigenesis
 PRDM14 PFM11 Promoter Testicular cancer, pancreatic cancer469,470 Is associated with early germ cell specification and promotes cancer stem-like properties and liver metastasis
 PRDM16 MEL1, PFM13 promoter Gastric cancer471 Inhibits TGF-beta signaling by stabilizing the inactive Smad3-SKI complex
SMYD
 KMT3C SMYD2 Promoter Pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer, breast cancer, lung cancer472,473 Promotes cancer cell proliferation and survival (STAT3, EML4-ALK, p65)
 KMT3E SMYD3, ZMYND1, ZNFN3A1, FLJ21080 Promoter Liver and colon cancer, prostate cancer, breast cancer474476 Promotes cell proliferation, invasion, EMT and cancer stem cell maintenance (Myc, MMP-9, Ctnnb1, JAK/Stat3 pathway, Wnt pathway, androgen receptor transcription)
 SMYD4 ZMYND21 Suppressor Breast cancer477 SMYD4 acts as a suppressor in tumorigenesis
Others
 DOT1L KMT4 promoter MLL-rearranged leukemia, colorectal cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer391,478,479 Increases EMT, cancer stemness and tumorigenic potential and is required for MLL rearrangement
 SET8 KMT5A, SETD8, PR-set7 promoter Breast cancer, prostate cancer, ovarian cancer, lung cancer480,481 Promotes cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and EMT (MiR-502)
 SUV4-20H2 KMT5C, MGC2705 Suppressor Breast cancer482 SUV4-20H2 is downregulated in breast cancer
 SetD6 / Promoter Colorectal cancer, bladder cancer, breast cancer483,484 Promotes cell survival and colony formation and contributes to increased susceptibility to cancer
 SET7/9 SETD7, KMT7 Suppressor Breast cancer, gastric cancer, AML, lung cancer485487 Promotes cell proliferation, EMT and the generation of cancer stem cells; a low level of SET7/9 is correlated with clinical aggressiveness and worse prognosis (β-catenin stability)
Histone methyltransferases (arginine): the writers for arginine
 PRMT1 ANM1, HCP1, IR1B4 Promoter Breast cancer, colon cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer488490 Promotes EMT, cancer cell migration, and invasion and is associated with chemosensitivity and poor clinical and histological parameters
Suppressor Pancreatic cancer491 Inhibits cell proliferation and invasion in pancreatic cancer
 PRMT2 / Suppressor Breast cancer492 Induces cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in breast cancer
 PRMT4 CARM1 Promoter Ovarian cancer, breast cancer, liver cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer450,493,494 Promotes cell proliferation and blocks cell differentiation (Wnt/β-catenin signaling)
Suppressor Pancreatic cancer495 Inhibits glutamine metabolism and suppresses cancer progression
 PRMT5 JBP1, SKB1, IBP72 Promoter Breast cancer, prostate cancer, colorectal cancer, lung cancer496498 Promotes cell survival, proliferation, invasiveness and sensitivity to 5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) (SHARPIN-PRMT5-H3R2me1 axis)
Suppressor Breast cancer499 High PRMT5 expression favors a better prognosis in BC patients
 PRMT6 HRMT1L6 Promoter Prostate cancer, gastric cancer500,501 Is associated with cell apoptosis, invasiveness and viability (PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway, H3R2me2as)
Suppressor Hepatocellular carcinoma502 Negatively correlates with aggressive cancer features
 PRMT7 FLJ10640, KIAA1933 Promoter Lung cancer, breast cancer503,504 Promotes cancer cell EMT and tumor metastasis
 PRMT8 HRMT1L3, HRMT1L4 Promoter Breast, ovarian and gastric cancer505 Overexpression of PRMT8 is correlated with decreased patient survival
 PRMT9 FBXO11 Promoter Breast cancer506 Fuels tumor formation via restraint of the p53/p21 pathway
Methyl-histone recognition proteins: the readers
Chromodomain
 HP1 / Promoter Breast cancer507 Overexpression of HP1 is associated with breast cancer progression
 Chd1 / Promoter Prostate cancer508 Is associated with cell invasiveness, double-strand break repair and response to DNA-damaging therapy
Suppressor Prostate cancer509 Loss of MAP3K7 and CHD1 promotes an aggressive phenotype in prostate cancer
WD40 repeat domain
 WDR5 / / /
MBT domain
 BPTF / Promoter Lung cancer, hepatocellular carcinoma510,511 Promotes cell proliferation, migration, stem cell-like traits and invasion (miR-3666)
 L3MBTL1 / Suppressor Breast cancer512 Expression of L3MBTL1 is associated with a low risk of disease recurrence and breast cancer-related death
 ING2 Promoter Colon cancer513 Increases invasion by enhancing MMP13 expression
Suppressor Lung cancer514 Suppresses tumor progression via regulation of p53
BHC80 Promoter Prostate cancer515 Stimulates cell proliferation and tumor progression via the MyD88-p38-TTP pathway
Tudor domains
JMJD2A Promoter Breast cancer, liver cancer, colon cancer516,517 Promotes cells apoptosis and proliferation and contributes to tumor progression (ARHI, miR372)
Suppressor Bladder cancer518 Low JMJD2A correlates with poor prognostic features and predicts significantly decreased overall survival
KDMs: the erasers
KDM1
 KDM1A LSD1 Promoter Breast cancer, lung cancer, prostate cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, gastric cancer519521 Contributes to cell proliferation and stem cell maintenance and self-renewal (p21, AR, HIF1α-dependent glycolytic process)
Suppressor Breast cancer522 Inhibits invasion and metastatic potential
 KDM1B LSD2 Promoter Breast cancer523 Contributes to cancer progression and cancer stem cell enrichment
KDM2/JHDM1
 KDM2A JHDM1A, CXXC8 Promoter Breast cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, cervical cancer524526 Promotes cancer cell proliferation, metastasis, and invasiveness (HDAC3, TET2)
 KDM2B JHDM1B, FBXL10, Promoter Prostate cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer527,528 Promotes cell migration, angiogenesis, and the self-renewal of cancer stem cells
KDM3/JHDM2/JMJD1
 KDM3A JHDM2A, JMJD1A Promoter Colorectal cancer, ovarian cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, bladder cancer529531 Promotes cancer cell growth, metastasis, stemness and chemoresistance (c-Myc, Wnt/β-catenin signaling, glycolysis, HIF1α)
 KDM3C JHDM2C, JMJD1C Promoter Esophageal cancer, colorectal cancer532,533 Promotes cancer cell proliferation and metastasis (YAP1 signaling, ATF-2)
KDM4/JHMD3/JMJD2
 KDM4A JHDM3A, JMJD2A Promoter Breast cancer, liver cancer516,534 Promotes cancer progression through repression of the tumor suppressor ARHI (miR372)
Suppressor Bladder cancer518 Downregulated in cancer tissues and significantly decreases as cancer progresses
 KDM4B JMJD2B Promoter Breast cancer, gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, colorectal cancer, prostate cancer535537 Promotes EMT and metastasis, and regulates the seeding and growth of peritoneal tumors; is involved in resistance to PI3K inhibition (p-ERK, β-catenin)
 KDM4C JMJD2C, GASC1 Promoter Breast cancer, pancreatic cancer538,539 Promotes cancer progression (HIF-1α, miR-335-5p)
 KMD4D JMJD2D Promoter Colorectal cancer540 Promotes cell proliferation and tumor growth (β-catenin)
KDM5/JARID
 KDM5A JARID1A, RBP2 Promoter Breast cancer, colorectal cancer, cervical cancer541,542 Promotes proliferative activity and invasion, and inhibition of KDM5A causes growth arrest at the G1 phase (c-Myc)
 KDM5B JARID1B, RBP2-like Promoter Colorectal cancer, lung cancer, gastric cancer543 Promotes cell proliferation, metastasis, and expression of CSCs, and inhibition of KDM5B results in cell cycle arrest, apoptosis, and senescence (E2F/RB pathway)
 KDM5C JARID1C, SMCX Promoter Prostate cancer, lung cancer544 Overexpression of KDM5C predicts therapy failure and is associated with cancer cell growth, migration and invasion
Suppressor Colon cancer545 Inhibits the multidrug resistance of colon cancer cell lines by downregulating ABCC1
 KDM5D JARID1D, SMCY Promoter Gastric cancer546 Promotes cell proliferation and EMT
Suppressor Prostate cancer547 Loss of KDM5D expression induces resistance to docetaxel
 JARID2 JUMONJI Promoter Bladder cancer, lung and colon cancers548,549 Regulates cancer cell EMT and stem cell maintenance and is associated with poor survival
Suppressor Prostate cancer550 Inhibits cell proliferation, migration, and tumor development via inhibition of Axl
KDM6/UT
 KDM6A UTX Promoter Breast cancer447 Promotes cell proliferation and invasiveness
Suppressor Bladder cancer, pancreatic cancer551,552 KDM6A loss induces squamous-like, metastatic pancreatic cancer
 KDM6B JMJD3 Promoter Ovarian cancer, breast cancer, gastric cancer553,554 High expression of KDM6B is correlated with poor prognosis
 KDM6C UTY Suppressor Bladder cancer555 UTY-knockout cells have increased cell proliferation compared to wild-type cells
KDM7/PHF
 KDM7A JHDM1D Promoter Prostate cancer556 Promotes cell proliferation and upregulated androgen receptor activity
 KDM7C PHF2, JHDM1E Suppressor N/A420 Is a suppressor and promotes p53-driven gene expression
 KDM7B PHF8, JHDM1F Promoter Prostate cancer, gastric cancer, lung cancer, leukemia, colorectal cancer557559 Promotes cell proliferation, migration and invasion, and high PHF8 expression predicts poor survival (miR-488)
Others
 JMJD5 KDM8 Promoter Breast cancer560,561 Promotes metastasis and indicates a poor prognosis; is required for cell cycle progression via because of its actions in the cyclin A1 coding region.
 RSBN1 KDM9 Promoter Breast cancer562 Is a new potential HIF target
 JMJD6 PSR, PTDSR Promoter Breast cancer, oral cancer, lung cancer563565 Promotes cancer cell proliferation, EMT and motility, and maintains cancer cell stemness properties (autophagy pathway, WNT/β-catenin pathway)
 PADI4 / Promoter Breast cancer, esophageal cancer566 Promotes cancer progression and is correlated with pathological classification (c-Fos)

EMT epithelial-mesenchymal transition, CSC cancer stem cell, EGFR epidermal growth factor receptor, MMP matrix metalloproteinase, PI3K phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase

Methyl-histone recognition proteins

“Readers” of histone methylation contain several specific domains recognizing lysine or arginine methylation, such as a chromodomain,394 the WD40 repeat, the MBT (malignant brain tumor) domain, the Tudor domain395 and the PHD (plant homeodomain) finger motif.396 Representative chromodomain-containing proteins in humans are HP1 and Chd1, which can recognize H3K9me and H3K27me, respectively.394,397 WDR5 is a protein containing WD40 repeats. In addition to H3K4me, WDR5 prefers to bind to H3K4me2 via a histone-methylating complex and is required for maintaining H3K4me3.395 Later, WDR5 was shown to directly read H3R2, a “WIN” motif of MLL1, as well as symmetrical H3R2 dimethylation through the WD40 domain.398 L3MBTLs are a group of proteins containing three MBT repeat domains. L3MBTL1 represses gene expression via monomethylation or dimethylation of H4K20 or H1BK26.399 BPTF, RAG2, PYGO, and the tumor suppressor ING2 are representative proteins containing PHD finger motifs. They are all able to recognize and bind to H3K4me3.400 Intriguingly, DNMT3L and BHC80 also possess a PHD finger motif, but they selectively bind to unmethylated H3K4.401,402 There are a number of proteins containing Tudor domains, with a representative protein being JMJD2A. JMJD2A is a histone demethylase that equally binds to H3K4me3 and H4K20me3403 (Table 3).

Histone demethylases

The identification of histone demethylases (HDMs or KDMs) has lagged behind that of HMTs. Thus far, KDMs can be classified into two groups. The amine-oxidase type lysine-specific demethylases (LSDs) and the highly conserved JumonjiC (JMJC) domain-containing histone demethylases. LSD1 and LSD2, also known as KDM1A and B, are flavin adenine dinucleotide (FAD)-dependent amine oxidases that can only demethylate monomethylated and dimethylated lysine residues. LSD1 has been identified to specifically activate androgen receptor (AR) target genes along with AR by demethylating H3K9.404 The human genome codes more than 30 JMJC-containing KDMs that are able to remove methyl groups from all three methyl-lysine states. JHDM1A was the first characterized JMJC domain-containing HDM and specifically demethylates H3K36me2 and H3K36me1.405 Not all JMJC domain-containing proteins are able to demethylate histone proteins, such as HIF1AN and the transmembrane phosphatidylserine receptor PTDSR. JMJC-containing HDMs can be divided into six families:360 the JHDM1, JHDM2 (JMJD1), JHMD3 (JMJD2), JARID, PHF, and UT families. Notably, not all of these families possess the ability of histone demethylation. However, some JMJC-containing proteins, including those that are not included in these six families, contain one or more methylated-histone-binding domains. Their potential to demethylate methyl-lysine or methyl-arginine must be investigated. In addition to demethylases for lysine residues, JMJD6 is the first described arginine demethylase and lysine hydroxylase. It can remove methyl groups from H3R2 and H4R3.406 Another kind of protein is peptidylarginine deiminases (PADs or PADIs) or protein-arginine deiminases, which are able to convert arginine and monomethylated arginine to citrulline.407

LSD1 (KDM1A) is one of the best-studied KDMs and has been found to be increased in multiple cancers. Inhibition of LSD1 leads to global H3K4 methylation and promotes differentiation of neuroblastoma cells.408 Unlike KDM1A, KDM1B is mostly involved in growing oocytes with a restricted expression pattern.409 Similar to the dual roles of LSD1, members of the KDM2 family can either promote tumor formation or inhibit tumorigenesis.410 Through dimethylating H3K36 in DUSP3 (dual specific phosphatase 3), KDM2A activates ERK1/2 expression in lung cancer cells.411 Knockout of KDM2B in breast cancer downregulates the tumor stem cell markers ALDH and CD44 via the repression of polycomb complexes. KDM2B is also overexpressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) and cooperates with KrasG12D to promote PDAC formation in mouse models.412 The LSD1 and KDM2 family possesses context-dependent tumor-promoting and -inhibiting functions, which might depend on the different features of various cancers and the specific substrates of the enzymes. Therefore, further studies should take the dual roles of these enzymes into consideration. KDM3A, induced by hypoxia and nutrient starvation within the tumor microenvironment, shows carcinogenic effects via the promotion of tumor cell migration and invasion. Inhibition of KDM3A downregulates tumor-associated angiogenesis and macrophage infiltration.413,414 KDM3C is required for MLL-AF9 leukemia maintenance and is mutated in patients with intracranial germline tumors.415,416 KDM4A, KDM4B, and KDM4C have shown increased expression in prostate cancer with decreased levels of H3K9me2/3 and increased levels of H3K9me1.417 H3K9me3 is thought to be a hallmark of heterochromatic areas of the genome. In addition, KDM4 family members were the first identified demethylases targeting trimethylated lysines. Aberrant expression of KDM4 family members might lead to instability of the genome and become involved in tumorigenesis.410 Members of the KDM6 family usually act as tumor suppressors and are thought to cause cell growth arrest.418 For example, the tumor suppressor proteins p16INK4A and p14ARF, encoded by the INK4A-ARF locus, are repressed by H3K27me3. When stimulated by oncogenic factors, KDM6B is recruited to the INK4A-ARF locus and activates the transcription of these two tumor suppressors.419 In colorectal cancer, KDM7C is required for the efficacy of oxaliplatin and doxorubicin and for the activation of p53420 (Table 3).

Noncoding RNA

Epigenetic related noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) include microRNAs (miRNAs), small interfering RNA (siRNAs), Piwi-interacting RNA (piRNAs), and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). MiRNAs, one of the most studied ncRNAs, are small RNAs between 19 and 22 nucleotides in length that play important roles in the regulation of gene expression by controlling mRNA translation. Intriguingly, the regions that miRNAs usually target are frequently associated with carcinogenesis.567 Generally, they can be divided into tumor-promoting and tumor-suppressing miRNAs. During tumorigenesis, oncogenic miRNAs such as miR-155, miR-21 and miR-17-92 are usually overexpressed, and tumor-suppressive miRNAs such as miR-15-16 are downregulated.568 There is another type of miRNA, cellular context-dependent miRNAs, functioning in tumorigenesis. For example, miR-146 has been shown to be overexpressed in multiple cancers, whereas a recent study has proven that miR-146 can reduce the expression of BRCA1.568,569 Meanwhile, the expression of proteins and enzymes is also regulated by certain miRNAs. MiR-101 directly represses EZH2, and abnormal downregulation of miR-101 has been observed in cancers.570,571 The expression of the miR-29 family is inversely correlated with that of DNMT3A and -3B in lung cancer tissues. Forced expression of miR-29 inhibits tumorigenesis by inducing reexpression of methylation-silenced tumor suppressor genes.572 LncRNAs are another large group of noncoding RNAs that play a vital role in tumorigenesis. Some lncRNAs are cancer type-specific, such as PCGEM1 in prostate cancer and HEIH in hepatocellular carcinoma.573,574 Many aberrant lncRNAs have been discovered in various cancers. Dysregulation of HOTAIR has been found in lung, pancreatic, and colorectal cancer.575577

Therefore, ncRNAs can either be directly involved in tumorigenesis or indirectly affect tumor development by participating in other epigenetic events.

Inhibitors and clinical trials

Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations are reversible. Given the importance of epigenetic marks in tumorigenesis, the availability of corresponding inhibitors has attracted extensive attention. Meanwhile, epigenetic regulation of a gene usually requires more than one epigenetic event. Currently, there are six epigenetic drugs approved for clinical use by the FDA (Table 4).

Table 4.

Epigenetic drugs approved by the FDA.

Compound Synonym Clinical name Condition Approved year Company
Azacitidine 5-Azacitidine, 5-Aza-CR Vidaza MDS U.S. FDA (2004) Pharmion Corporation
5-Aza-2′-deoxycytidine 5-Aza-CdR, decitabine Dacogen MDS U.S. FDA (2006) Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) Vorinostat Zolinza CTCL U.S. FDA (2006) Merck
Romidepsin Depsipeptide, FK-229, FR901228 Istodax CTCL U.S. FDA (2009) Celgene
Belinostat PXD101 Beleodaq PTCL U.S. FDA (2014) TopoTarget
Panobinostat LBH589 Farydak Multiple myeloma U.S. FDA (2015) Novartis
Chidamide Tucidinostat, HBI-8000 Epidaza PTCL China FDA (2015) Chipscreen Biosciences

FDA Food and Drug Administration, MDS myelodysplastic syndrome, CTCL cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, PTCL peripheral T-cell lymphoma

Targeting DNA methylation

Blockade of DNMTs is the most effective way to prevent aberrant DNA hypermethylation. However, until now, targeting of the methyltransferase enzymes still lacks specificity and even causes hypomethylation of the global genome.578 Complete deletion of DNMT1 in mice results in embryonic lethality.579 Knockout of DNMT1 in fibroblast cells causes aberrant expression of 10% of genes and p53-dependent death.580 Administration of DNA methylation inhibitors results in tumorigenesis in male Fischer rats.581 Regulation of DNA methylation is vital in cell survival and function, and in addition to the specificity needed and the side effect associated, it is hard to identify proper drugs.

DNA methylation inhibitors can be divided into two groups: nucleoside analogs and nonnucleoside analogs. Nucleoside analogs have a modified cytosine ring and can be turned into nucleotides and incorporated into newly synthesized DNA or RNA. DNA methyltransferases are bound by covalent complexes with the analogs, which inhibits DNA methylation. 5-Azacitidine (5-Aza-CR) and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (5-Aza-CdR) are currently the two most studied and promising demethylation agents.582 5-Aza-CR and zebularine are ribonucleoside analogs that can be phosphorylated to be able to incorporate into RNA. However, they can also be incorporated into DNA via the ribonucleotide reductase pathway. 5-Azacitidine, an analog of cytidine, is an injectable suspension for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs). It promotes cell differentiation, demethylation, and reexpression of inactivated genes.583 The 5-azacitidine side effects include fetal abnormalities584 and decreased male fertility, especially at high doses, but its analog, 6-azacytidine, does not show such effects.585 Notably, after treating the noninvasive breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and ZR-75-1 with azacytidine, the cells gained invasive abilities due to the hypomethylation of several prometastasis genes.586 Decitabine (5-Aza-CdR) and 5-fluoro-2′-deoxycytidine (5-F-CdR) are deoxyribonucleoside analogs that are capable of incorporating into DNA following phosphorylation. Decitabine (5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine) inhibits DNA methylation in a dosage-dependent manner. It can reactivate silenced genes at low doses but gains cytotoxicity at high doses, while myelosuppression is the major side effect at all doses.587. Dihydro-5-azacytidine (DHAC) is a biologically active and chemically stable analog of 5-azacitidine with decreased toxicity.588,589 Because of its hydrolytic stability, it may be administrated via prolonged i.v. infusion, potentially eliminating the acute toxicities caused by administration of 5-azacytidine.590 Zebularine is a potential oral DNA-demethylating drug with stability in acidic environments and in aqueous solutions.591 However, the near millimolar dose requirements and the limited bioavailability in rodents (<7%) and primates (<1%) leave zebularine far from clinical translation.592

Among the drugs discussed, 5-Aza-CR593 and 5-Aza-CdR594 have already been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of certain subtypes of MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Because of their intrinsic preference for newly synthetic DNA, they tend to affect dividing cells, i.e., cancer cells.595 Ongoing preclinical experiments and clinical trials are exploring their efficacy in solid tumors. The common side effects of these nucleoside-like analogs are mutagenic risk and genomic instability. Nonnucleoside analogs are capable of avoiding these side effects.

Currently, many nonnucleoside analogs have been developed to prevent DNA from aberrant hypermethylation. These drugs are usually small molecular inhibitors and directly target catalytic sites rather than incorporating into DNA. Based on a three-dimensional model of DNMT1, RG108 was designed to block the activity of this enzyme and cause demethylation.596 Psammaplin is a group of natural extracts from the sponge Pseudoceratina purpurea and is capable of inhibiting both DNA methyltransferases and histone deacetylases with mild cytotoxicity.597 Similarly, EGCG ((-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate) is the major polyphenol from green tea and reversibly demethylates methyl-DNA, resulting in the reactivation of multiple key genes, including hMLH1, P16, and RA, in colon, esophageal, and prostate cancer cell lines.598 Both hydralazine and procainamide, two drugs associated with lupus-like autoimmune diseases, can inhibit DNA methylation and induce self-reactivity in cloned T-cell lines.599 They have promising tumor suppressor-reactivating and antitumor actions in breast cancer.600,601 Another strategy is developing antisense oligonucleotides to inhibit DNMT transcription. MG98 is a second-generation phosphorothioate antisense oligodeoxynucleotide that prevents DNMT1 mRNA translation effects but has no obvious antitumor effect.602 It has been under investigation in preclinical experiments and phase I/II clinical trials, especially in solid tumors.603,604 Of note, in a systemic analysis comparing nonnucleoside inhibitors with 5-Aza-CdR, the latter showed better efficacy in DNA demethylation inhibition.605

To date, hundreds of clinical trials have investigated the effects of anti-DNA methylation therapy for various cancers (Table 5).

Table 5.

Important ongoing clinical trials with DNA methylation-targeted therapies.

Condition Design Sample size Phase Current status NCT
Azacitidine (5-azacitidine)-based trials
High-risk MDS Azacitidine 44 IV Completed NCT01201811
Low-risk MDS Azacitidine 216 III Active, not recruiting NCT01566695
High-risk MDS Azacitidine 358 III Completed NCT00071799
CML Azacitidine 11 II Completed NCT01350947
AML, MDS Azacitidine 187 III Completed NCT00887068
Relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma Azacitidine 20 III Recruiting NCT03703375
AML with complete remission Azacitidine 472 III Active, not recruiting NCT01757535
Recurrent IDH1/2-mutated glioma Azacitidine 63 II Not yet
recruiting NCT03666559
Prostate cancer Azacytidine 36 II Completed NCT00384839
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Azacitidine 25 II Recruiting NCT02178072
Locally advanced or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma Azacitidine 36 II Completed NCT02269943
Pancreatic cancer Azacitidine 80 II Recruiting NCT01845805
Solid tumors and hematological disorders Azacitidine 125 II Recruiting NCT02494258
AML Azacitidine + venetoclax 42 II Recruiting NCT03466294
AML Azacitidine + venetoclax 30 II Recruiting NCT03573024
AML Azacitidine + venetoclax 400 III Recruiting NCT02993523
AML, MDS Azacitidine + eltrombopag 25 II Completed NCT01488565
MDS Azacitidine + eltrombopag 356 III Terminated NCT02158936
MDS Azacitidine + APR-246 156 III Recruiting NCT03745716
AML, MDS Azacitidine + DLI 30 II Completed NCT01541280
AML/MDS Azacitidine + lenalidomide 72 II N/A NCT01556477
High-risk MDS with 5q deletion Azacytidine + lenalidomide 50 II Completed NCT01088373
AML Azacitidine + lenalidomide 88 II Completed NCT01358734
Elderly patients with AML Azacitidine + lenalidomide 120 II Completed NCT01301820
Refractory AML Azacitidine + lenalidomide 37 II Completed NCT01743859
MDS, CMML and AML relapsing after allo-HSCT Azacitidine + lenalidomide + DLI 50 II Active, not recruiting NCT02472691
MDS with excess blasts 2 Azacitidine + vosaroxin 168 II Recruiting NCT03338348
AML Azacitidine vs conventional care regimen 488 III Completed NCT01074047
AML, MDS with FLT3-ITD mutation Azacitidine + sorafenib 17 II Completed NCT02196857
Advanced solid tumors Azacitidine + durvalumab 60 II Recruiting NCT02811497
High-risk MDS, AML Azacitidine + durvalumab 213 II Active, not recruiting NCT02775903
MDS patients with excess blasts, progressing Azacitidine + rigosertib 67 III Active, not recruiting NCT01928537
AML, MDS, CML Azacitidine + HAG regimen 120 III Not yet
recruiting NCT03873311
Refractory or relapsed AML Azacitidine + lirilumab 37 II Completed NCT02399917
AML Azacitidine + induction therapy 336 II N/A NCT01180322
AML with NPM1 mutation Azacitidine + pembrolizumab 28 II Not yet recruiting NCT03769532
Pancreatic cancer Azacitidine + pembrolizumab 31 II Recruiting NCT03264404
Metastatic melanoma Azacitidine + pembrolizumab 71 II Recruiting NCT02816021
MDS Azacitidine + pembrolizumab 40 II Recruiting NCT03094637
Chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer Azacitidine + pembrolizumab 31 II Active, not recruiting NCT02260440
Advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer Azacitidine + pembrolizumab 100 II Active, not recruiting NCT02546986
Platinum-resistant ovarian cancer Azacitidine + pembrolizumab 20 II Recruiting NCT02900560
MDS Azacitidine + lintuzumab 7 II Terminated NCT00997243
Prostate cancer Azacitidine + ATRA 20 II Recruiting NCT03572387
Recurrent or refractory disease with IDH2 mutation Azacitidine + enasidenib 50 II Recruiting NCT03683433
High-risk MDS with IDH2 mutation Azacitidine + enasidenib 105 II Recruiting NCT03383575
Elderly patients with AML Azacitidine + standard therapy 214 II Completed NCT00915252
Refractory or relapsed AML Azacitidine + avelumab 52 I/II Recruiting NCT02953561
AML, MDS, CML Azacitidine + pevonedistat 450 III Recruiting NCT03268954
Relapsed or refractory AML Azacitidine + pevonedistat 72 II Not yet recruiting NCT03745352
High-risk MDS, AML, CML Azacitidine + pevonedistat 120 II Active, not recruiting NCT02610777
AML without remission after allogeneic stem cell transplantation Azacitidine + pevonedistat 30 II Recruiting NCT03709576
MDS Azacitidine + pevonedistat 71 II Recruiting NCT03238248
Elderly patients with AML Azacitidine + gemtuzumab ozogamicin 133 II Active, not recruiting NCT00658814
Recurrent and resectable osteosarcoma Azacitidine + nivolumab 51 I/II Not yet recruiting NCT03628209
Childhood relapsed/refractory AML Azacitidine + nivolumab 26 I/II Not yet recruiting NCT03825367
Elderly patients with AML or high-risk MDS Azacitidine/decitabine + nivolumab or midostaurin 1670 II/III Suspended NCT03092674
Refractory/relapsed AML Azacitidine + ipilimumab + nivolumab 182 II Recruiting NCT02397720
MDS Azacitidine + nivolumab + ipilimumab 120 II Recruiting NCT02530463
MDS Azacitidine + lirilumab + nivolumab 12 II Completed NCT02599649
High-risk MDS, AML Azacitidine + sirolimus 74 II Recruiting NCT01869114
AML with IDH1 mutation Azacitidine + AG-120 392 III Recruiting NCT03173248
Relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Azacitidine + rituximab 27 II Not yet recruiting NCT03719989
Leukemia Azacitidine + PKC412 54 I/II Completed NCT01202877
MDS Azacitidine + sonidegib 78 I Active, not recruiting NCT02129101
MDS, AML and CMML Azacitidine + PF-04449913 102 II Recruiting NCT02367456
MDS Azacitidine + etanercept 32 I/II Completed NCT00118287
MDS, myeloproliferative neoplasm Azacitidine + ruxolitinib Phosphate 123 II Completed NCT01787487
Relapsed or refractory AML, MDS Azacitidine + quizartinib 72 I/II Recruiting NCT01892371
AML Azacitidine vs fludarabine + cytarabine 289 III Active, not recruiting NCT02319135
AML, high-risk MDS Azacitidine + cytarabine + tosedostat 96 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT01636609
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma Azacitidine + CHOP 20 II Recruiting NCT03542266
AML Azacitidine + intensive chemotherapy 720 III Recruiting NCT03416179
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Azacitidine + paclitaxel 240 II Active, not recruiting NCT02250326
Decitabine (5-aza-2deoxycytidine)-based trials
Refractory CML Decitabine 40 II Completed NCT00042003
Metastatic papillary thyroid cancer or follicular thyroid cancer Decitabine 12 II Completed NCT00085293
AML with TP53 mutation Decitabine 60 II Recruiting NCT03063203
AML Decitabine 546 II Completed NCT00416598
MDS Decitabine 128 II Completed NCT00067808
Elderly patients with AML Decitabine 238 II Completed NCT00866073
Advanced-stage MDS Decitabine 160 III Completed NCT00043381
Relapse and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Decitabine 60 IV Recruiting NCT03579082
Relapsed or refractory T lymphoblastic lymphoma Decitabine 40 IV Recruiting NCT03558412
CML Decitabine + imatinib mesylate 80 II Completed NCT00054431
High-risk MDS, AML Decitabine + tosedostat 34 II Completed NCT01567059
Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer Decitabine + enzalutamide 21 I/II Not yet recruiting NCT03709550
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma Decitabine + CHOP 100 III Not yet recruiting NCT03553537
Relapsed FLT3-ITD-mutated AML, MDS Decitabine + quizartinib 52 I/II Recruiting NCT03661307
AML Decitabine + clofarabine 727 II Active, not recruiting NCT02085408
AML Decitabine + ruxolitinib Phosphate 42 I/II Recruiting NCT02257138
AML Decitabine + bortezomib 165 II Active, not recruiting NCT01420926
AML Decitabine + cytarabine + daunorubicin hydrochloride 180 II Active, not recruiting NCT01627041
Guadecitabine (SGI-110)-based trials
AML Guadecitabine 815 III Completed NCT02348489
Philadelphia-negative MDS Guadecitabine 50 II Recruiting NCT03075826
High-risk MDS Guadecitabine 103 II Recruiting NCT02131597
Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) Guadecitabine 51 II Completed NCT01752933
AML, MDS Guadecitabine 401 I/II Completed NCT01261312
MDS, CMML Guadecitabine 408 III Recruiting NCT02907359
AML, MDS Guadecitabine + DLI 40 II Not yet recruiting NCT03454984
MDS relapsing post AlloSCT Guadecitabine + DLI 90 II Recruiting NCT02684162
Refractory metastatic colorectal cancer Guadecitabine + nivolumab 45 I/II Not yet recruiting NCT03576963
Recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or fallopian tube cancer Guadecitabine + Pembrolizumab 38 II Recruiting NCT02901899
Metastatic colorectal cancer Guadecitabine + irinotecan 108 II Active, not recruiting NCT01896856
Advanced kidney cancer Guadecitabine + durvalumab 58 I/II Recruiting NCT03308396
Refractory or resistant urothelial carcinoma Guadecitabine + atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1 antibody) 53 II Recruiting NCT03179943
Advanced MDS CMML Guadecitabine + atezolizumab 72 I/II Recruiting NCT02935361
Recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer Guadecitabine + CDX-1401 Vaccine + atezolizumab 75 I/II Recruiting NCT03206047
Ovarian cancer Guadecitabine + carboplatin 120 II Completed NCT01696032
5-F-CdR-based trials
Advanced cancer 5-Fluoro-2-deoxycytidine (FdCyd) 58 I Completed NCT00359606
Hydralazine-based trials
Ovarian cancer Hydralazine + valproate 211 III N/A NCT00533299
Cervical cancer Hydralazine + valproate 143 III N/A NCT00532818
Recurrent-persistent cervical cancer Hydralazine + valproate 230 III N/A NCT02446652
Cervical cancer Hydralazine + valproate + cisplatin 18 II Completed NCT00404326
Refractory solid tumors Hydralazine + magnesium valproate 15 II Completed NCT00404508

Venetoclax, Bcl-2-selective inhibitor; Eltrombopag, c-mpl (TpoR) receptor agonist; APR-246, p53 agonist; DLI, donor leukocyte infusion; lenalidomide, derivative of thalidomide; sorafenib, multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor; durvalumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody; rigosertib, Ras mimetic; HAG regimen, homoharringtonine + cytarabine + G-CSF; lirilumab, anti-KIR monoclonal antibody; pembrolizumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody; lintuzumab, anti-CD33 monoclonal antibody; enasidenib, IDH2 inhibitor; avelumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody; pevonedistat, NEDD8 inhibitor; nivolumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody; sirolimus, MTOR inhibitors; AG-120, IDH1 inhibitor; rituximab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody; PKC412, multitargeted protein kinase inhibitor; birinapant, SMAC mimetic antagonist; sonidegib, Hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor; PF-04449913 (glasdegib), hedgehog signaling pathway inhibitor; etanercept, TNF inhibitor; ruxolitinib phosphate, JAK inhibitor; quizartinib, tyrosine kinase inhibitor; tosedostat, inhibitor of the M1 family of aminopeptidases; atezolizumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody

Inhibitors of histone modifications

Compared with DNA methylation, histone modifications have been investigated in broader areas of diseases, including solid tumors, hematological malignancies, and even many inflammatory diseases (such as viral infection, diabetes and inflammatory lung diseases). During the process of gene silencing, lysine deacetylation and demethylation of H3K4 rather than demethylation of H3K9 or cytosine methylation might be the primary causative event.606 Therefore, histone modification plays an essential role in the regulation of gene expression, which also makes it a promising target for disease treatment. Clinical trials targeting histone acetylation and histone methylation are listed in Table 6 and Table 7, respectively.

Table 6.

Important ongoing clinical trials with histone acetylation-targeted therapies.

Condition Design Sample size Phase Current status NCT
Anti-HDAC
Valproic acid-based trials
Advanced thyroid cancers Valproic acid 13 II Completed NCT01182285
Uveal melanoma Valproic acid 150 II Recruiting NCT02068586
Pancreatic cancer Valproic acid 20 II N/A NCT01333631
Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, Hodgkin lymphoma, CLL Valproic acid 52 II N/A NCT01016990
Locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma Valproic acid + platinum-based chemoradiation 14 II Completed NCT01695122
Non-small-cell lung cancer Valproic acid + chemoradiotherapy 20 I/II N/A NCT01203735
Recurrent high-grade glioma Valproic acid + sildenafil citrate + sorafenib tosylate 66 II Recruiting NCT01817751
Glioma Valproic acid + levetiracetam 120 IV Recruiting NCT03048084
Virus-associated cancer Valproic acid + avelumab 39 II Recruiting NCT03357757
Colorectal cancer Valproic acid + radiation therapy 152 I/II N/A NCT01898104
Refractory or relapsing small-cell lung cancer Valproic acid + doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide and vindesine 64 II Completed NCT00759824
High-grade gliomas, brain tumors Valproic acid + temozolomide + radiation therapy 43 II Completed NCT00302159
High-grade gliomas or diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma Valproic acid + radiation 38 II Active, not recruiting NCT00879437
Advanced malignant neoplasm Valproic acid + bevacizumab + temsirolimus 216 I Recruiting NCT01552434
Malignant mesothelioma Valproic acid + doxorubicin 45 II Completed NCT00634205
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Valproic acid + rituximab + CHOP 50 I/II Completed NCT01622439
Sodium phenylbutyrate-based trials
Progressive or recurrent brain tumors Phenylbutyrate 120 II Completed NCT00006450
Relapsed or refractory Epstein-Barr virus-positive cancer Phenylbutyrate + valganciclovir 14 II N/A NCT00387530
Refractory or relapsed AML Phenylbutyrate + dexamethasone + sargramostim N/A II Completed NCT00006240
AN-9 (pivaloyloxymethyl butyrate)-based trials
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Pivanex + docetaxel 225 II Completed NCT00073385
Phenylacetate-based trials
Children with recurrent or progressive brain tumors Phenylacetate N/A II NCT00003241
Vorinostat (SAHA)-based trials
Advanced cancer Vorinostat 143 I Active, not recruiting NCT01266057
BRAFV600-mutated advanced melanoma Vorinostat 22 I/II Recruiting NCT02836548
Breast cancer Vorinostat 49 I/II N/A NCT00416130
Advanced, metastatic soft tissue sarcoma Vorinostat 40 II Completed NCT00918489
AML Vorinostat 37 II Completed NCT00305773
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Vorinostat 16 II Completed NCT00138203
Recurrent or persistent ovarian epithelial or primary peritoneal cavity cancer Vorinostat 60 II Completed NCT00132067
advanced adenoid cystic carcinoma advanced thyroid cancer Vorinostat 30 II Completed NCT01175980
Advanced thyroid cancer Vorinostat 19 II Completed NCT00134043
Kidney cancer Vorinostat 14 II Completed NCT00278395
Metastatic or unresectable melanoma Vorinostat 32 II Completed NCT00121225
Low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma Vorinostat 37 II Completed NCT00253630
Progressive glioblastoma multiforme Vorinostat 103 II Completed NCT00238303
Progressive metastatic prostate cancer Vorinostat 29 II Completed NCT00330161
Advanced cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Vorinostat 74 II Completed NCT00091559
Advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma Vorinostat 662 III Completed NCT00128102
Metastatic or recurrent gastric cancer Vorinostat + capecitabine + cisplatin 45 I/II Completed NCT01045538
Breast cancer Vorinostat + tamoxifen 43 II Completed NCT00365599
T-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Vorinostat + CHOP 14 I/II Completed NCT00787527
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Vorinostat + bortezomib 18 II Completed NCT00798720
Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma Vorinostat + bortezomib 143 II Completed NCT00773838
Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme Vorinostat + bortezomib 44 II Completed NCT00641706
Advanced soft tissue sarcoma Vorinostat + bortezomib 16 II Completed NCT00937495
Multiple myeloma Vorinostat + bortezomib 637 III Completed NCT00773747
Unresectable or metastatic kidney cancer Vorinostat + bevacizumab 37 I/II Completed NCT00324870
Glioblastoma multiforme Vorinostat + temozolomide + radiation therapy 125 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT00731731
Diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma Vorinostat + radiation therapy 80 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT01189266
Recurrent ovarian cancer vorinostat + paclitaxel + carboplatin vorinostat + pembrolizumab 70 II N/A NCT00772798
Stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Vorinostat + pembrolizumab 100 I/II Recruiting NCT02638090
CLL, small lymphocytic lymphoma Vorinostat + fludarabine phosphate + cyclophosphamide + rituximab 40 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT00918723
Relapse/refractory AML Vorinostat + temozolomide 23 II Completed NCT01550224
Stage II, III, or IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Vorinostat + rituximab 83 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT00972478
Metastatic breast cancer Vorinostat + paclitaxel + bevacizumab 54 I/II Completed NCT00368875
High-grade glioma Vorinostat + radiation therapy 101 II/III Completed NCT01236560
High-risk MDS, AML Vorinostat + idarubicin + cytarabine 106 II Completed NCT00656617
Colorectal cancer Vorinostat + hydroxychloroquine 76 II Recruiting NCT02316340
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Vorinostat + carboplatin + paclitaxel 94 II Completed NCT00481078
Metastatic colorectal cancer Vorinostat + fluorouracil + leucovorin calcium 58 II Completed NCT00942266
Recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) Vorinostat + isotretinoin + temozolomide 135 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT00555399
Breast cancer Vorinostat + carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel 68 II Completed NCT00616967
Diffuse large B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Vorinostat + chemotherapy + rituximab 107 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT01193842
Advanced sarcoma Vorinostat + gemcitabine + docetaxel 67 I/II Recruiting NCT01879085
AML Vorinostat + cytarabine + daunorubicin Hydrochloride/idarubicin 754 III Completed NCT01802333
Neuroblastoma Vorinostat + 131I-MIBG 105 II Recruiting NCT02035137
Multiple myeloma Vorinostat + lenalidomide 4420 III Active, not recruiting NCT01554852
Relapsed/refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) Vorinostat vs KW-0761 372 III Active, not recruiting NCT01728805
TSA (Trichostatin A)-based trials
Relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies Trichostatin A 42 I Recruiting NCT03838926
Belinostat (PAHA, PXD101)-based trials
Advanced solid tumors or lymphoma Belinostat 121 I Completed NCT00413075
Relapsed or refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma Belinostat 129 II Completed NCT00865969
Liver cancer Belinostat 54 I/II Completed NCT00321594
MDS Belinostat 21 II Completed NCT00357162
Relapsed or refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma Belinostat 22 II Completed NCT00303953
Advanced multiple myeloma Belinostat 25 II Completed NCT00131261
Solid tumors or hematological malignancies Belinostat + warfarin 27 I Completed NCT01317927
Soft tissue sarcomas Belinostat + doxorubicin 41 I/II Completed NCT00878800
Relapsed/refractory NHL Belinostat + carfilzomib 19 I Completed NCT02142530
Relapsed or refractory AML, MDS Belinostat + pevonedistat 45 I Not yet recruiting NCT03772925
Adult T-cell leukemia-lymphoma Belinostat + zidovudine 20 II Recruiting NCT02737046
Recurrent ovarian epithelial cancer Belinostat + carboplatin 29 II Completed NCT00993616
Stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) Belinostat + carboplatin + paclitaxel 23 I/II Completed NCT01310244
Ovarian cancer Belinostat + carboplatin + paclitaxel 80 I/II Completed NCT00421889
Cancer of unknown primary site Belinostat + carboplatin + paclitaxel 89 II Completed NCT00873119
Entinostat (MS-275)-based trials
Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma Entinostat 49 II Completed NCT00866333
MDS, AML, ALL Entinostat 24 II Completed NCT00462605
Metastatic melanoma Entinostat 28 II Completed NCT00185302
Advanced breast cancer Entinostat 512 III Recruiting NCT03538171
Metastatic kidney cancer Entinostat + aldesleukin 45 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT01038778
TN breast cancer Entinostat + atezolizumab 88 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT02708680
Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer Entinostat + avelumab 140 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT02915523
Metastatic colorectal cancer Entinostat + regorafenib + hydroxychloroquine 44 I/II Recruiting NCT03215264
Advanced renal cell carcinoma Entinostat + bevacizumab + atezolizumab 62 I/II Recruiting NCT03024437
Endometrioid endometrial cancer Entinostat + medroxyprogesterone acetate 50 II Active, not recruiting NCT03018249
Renal cell carcinoma Entinostat + IL-2 46 II Recruiting NCT03501381
NSCLC, melanoma, and colorectal cancer Entinostat + pembrolizumab 202 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT02437136
Relapsed and refractory lymphomas Entinostat + pembrolizumab 78 II Recruiting NCT03179930
Stage III/IV melanoma Entinostat + pembrolizumab 14 II Recruiting NCT03765229
High-risk refractory malignancies Entinostat + nivolumab 128 I/II Not yet recruiting NCT03838042
Metastatic cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic adenocarcinoma Entinostat + nivolumab 54 II Recruiting NCT03250273
Renal cell carcinoma Entinostat + nivolumab + ipilimumab 53 II Recruiting NCT03552380
Advanced breast cancer Entinostat + exemestane 130 II Completed NCT00676663
Breast cancer Entinostat + exemestane 600 III Active, not recruiting NCT02115282
Advanced NSCLC Entinostat + erlotinib 132 I/II Completed NCT00602030
Non-small-cell lung carcinoma Entinostat + erlotinib 70 II Completed NCT00750698
Panobinostat (LBH589)-based trials
High-risk MDS, AML Panobinostat 62 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT01451268
Advanced hematological malignancies Panobinostat 175 I/II Completed NCT00621244
Metastatic thyroid cancer Panobinostat 13 II Completed NCT01013597
Advanced soft tissue sarcoma Panobinostat 53 II Completed NCT01136499
Refractory prostate cancer Panobinostat 35 II Completed NCT00667862
Refractory clear cell renal carcinoma Panobinostat 20 II Completed NCT00550277
Relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma Panobinostat 129 II Completed NCT00742027
Refractory colorectal cancer Panobinostat 29 II Completed NCT00690677
HER2-negative locally recurrent or metastatic breast cancer Panobinostat 54 II Completed NCT00777049
Relapsed and bortezomib-refractory multiple myeloma Panobinostat 55 II Completed NCT01083602
Relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma Panobinostat 41 II Active, not recruiting NCT01261247
Refractory CML Panobinostat 27 II/III Completed NCT00449761
Refractory/resistant cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Panobinostat 9 II/III Completed NCT00490776
Refractory CML Panobinostat 29 II/III Completed NCT00451035
Refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma Panobinostat 139 II/III Completed NCT00425555
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) Panobinostat 41 III Completed NCT01034163
Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma Panobinostat + carfilzomib 80 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT01496118
Recurrent high-grade glioma Panobinostat + bevacizumab 51 I/II Completed NCT00859222
Recurrent prostate cancer after castration Panobinostat + bicalutamide 52 I/II Completed NCT00878436
AML Panobinostat + idarubicin + cytarabine 46 I/II Completed NCT00840346
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) Panobinostat + rituximab 42 II N/A NCT01238692
Relapsed and refractory lymphoma Panobinostat + everolimus 31 I/II Completed NCT00967044
Gliomas Panobinostat + everolimus 32 II Recruiting NCT03632317
Recurrent multiple myeloma, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or Hodgkin lymphoma Panobinostat + everolimus 124 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT00918333
Relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma or NK/T-cell lymphoma Panobinostat + bortezomib 25 II Completed NCT00901147
Relapsed or relapsed- and-refractory multiple myeloma Panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone 240 II Recruiting NCT02654990
Relapsed multiple myeloma Panobinostat + bortezomib + dexamethasone 768 III Completed NCT01023308
Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma Panobinostat + lenalidomide 24 II Completed NCT01460940
Mocetinostat (MGCD0103)-based trials
Advanced solid tumors or non-Hodgkin lymphoma Mocetinostat 42 I Completed NCT00323934
Refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia Mocetinostat 21 II Completed NCT00431873
Relapsed and refractory lymphoma Mocetinostat 74 II Completed NCT00359086
Tumors Mocetinostat + gemcitabine 47 I/II Completed NCT00372437
Relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma Mocetinostat + brentuximab vedotin 7 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT02429375
Advanced solid tumors and NSCLC Mocetinostat + durvalumab 119 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT02805660
Metastatic leiomyosarcoma Mocetinostat + gemcitabine 20 II Completed NCT02303262
Non-small-cell lung cancer Mocetinostat + glesatinib + sitravatinib + nivolumab 209 II Recruiting NCT02954991
CI-994-based trials
Advanced myeloma CI-994 6 II Completed NCT00005624
Advanced pancreatic cancer CI-994 + gemcitabine N/A II Completed NCT00004861
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer CI-994 + gemcitabine N/A III Completed NCT00005093
Romidepsin (Depsipeptide, FR901228, FK228)-based trials
Recurrent high-grade gliomas Romidepsin 50 I/II Completed NCT00085540
Progressive or relapsed peripheral T-cell lymphoma Romidepsin 131 II Active, not recruiting NCT00426764
Soft tissue sarcoma Romidepsin 40 II Completed NCT00112463
Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck Romidepsin 14 II Completed NCT00084682
Metastatic breast cancer Romidepsin 37 II Completed NCT00098397
Relapsed small-cell lung cancer Romidepsin 36 II Completed NCT00086827
Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma and peripheral T-cell lymphoma Romidepsin 131 II Completed NCT00007345
Relapsed or refractory AML Romidepsin 47 II Completed NCT00062075
Relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma Romidepsin 50 II Completed NCT00066638
Relapsed or refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma Romidepsin 35 II Completed NCT00077194
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) Romidepsin + nivolumab + cisplatin 54 I/II Recruiting NCT02393794
Relapsed/refractory T-cell lymphoma Romidepsin + tenalisib 42 I/II Recruiting NCT03770000
Lymphoid hematopoietic malignancy Romidepsin + pembrolizumab 39 I/II Recruiting NCT03278782
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) Romidepsin + ixazomib 48 I/II Recruiting NCT03547700
Relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies Romidepsin + pralatrexate 93 I/II Recruiting NCT01947140
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma Romidepsin + CHOP 421 III Active, not recruiting NCT01796002
Relapsed/refractory peripheral T-cell lymphoma Romidepsin + gemcitabine 20 II Completed NCT01822886
Relapsed or refractory lymphomas and myeloma Romidepsin + lenalidomide 62 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT01755975
Relapsed or refractory B- and T-cell lymphomas Romidepsin + lenalidomide + carfilzomib 31 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT02341014
Peripheral T-cell lymphoma Romidepsin + lenalidomide 35 II Recruiting NCT02232516
Nicotinamide-based trials
Skin cancer prevention Nicotinamide 120 II Recruiting NCT03769285
Lung cancer Nicotinamide 110 II/III Active, not recruiting NCT02416739
Bladder cancer Niacinamide + radiation + carbogen 330 III Completed NCT00033436
Inhibitors of sirtuins
Suramin-based trials
Recurrent primary brain tumors Suramin N/A II Completed NCT00002639
Hormone-refractory prostate cancer Suramin 390 III Completed NCT00002723
Metastatic renal cell (kidney) cancer Suramin + fluorouracil 36 I/II Completed NCT00083109
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Suramin + docetaxel 80 II N/A NCT01671332
Stage IIIB-IV breast cancer Suramin + paclitaxel 31 I/II Completed NCT00054028
Stage IIIB or IV non-small-cell lung cancer Suramin + paclitaxel + carboplatin 82 II Completed NCT00006929
Poor-prognosis prostate carcinoma Suramin + flutamide + leuprolide 70 II Completed NCT00001266
Prostate cancer Suramin + flutamide + hydrocortisone N/A III Completed NCT00002881
Inhibitors for HATs
CBP-targeted therapy
Advanced myeloid malignancies PRI-724 49 I/II Completed NCT01606579
Advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma PRI-724 + gemcitabine 20 I Completed NCT01764477
BRD (BET) inhibitors
GSK525762 (I-BET762, molibresib)-based trials
Relapsed, refractory hematologic malignancies GSK525762 180 I Recruiting NCT01943851
NUT midline carcinoma (NMC) and other cancers GSK525762 195 I Active, not recruiting NCT01587703
Castration-resistant prostate cancer GSK525762 + androgen deprivation therapy 37 I Active, not recruiting NCT03150056
Advanced or metastatic breast cancer GSK525762 + fulvestrant 294 II Recruiting NCT02964507
CPI-0610-based trials
Multiple myeloma CPI-0610 30 I Completed NCT02157636
Progressive lymphoma CPI-0610 64 I Active, not recruiting NCT01949883
RO6870810 (TEN-010, RG6146, JQ2)-based trials
AML, MDS RO6870810 26 I Completed NCT02308761
Advanced solid tumors RO6870810 52 I Completed NCT01987362
Advanced multiple myeloma RO6870810 86 I Recruiting NCT03068351
Advanced ovarian cancer or triple-negative breast cancer RO6870810 + atezolizumab 116 I Suspended NCT03292172
High-grade B-cell lymphoma RO6870810 + venetoclax + rituximab 94 I Recruiting NCT03255096
BAY1238097-based trials
Neoplasms BAY1238097 8 I Terminated NCT02369029
MK8628 (OTX-015, birabresib)-based trials
Advanced solid tumors MK-8628 47 I Completed NCT02259114
Hematologic malignancies MK-8628 9 I Active, not recruiting NCT02698189
Hematologic malignancies MK-8628 141 I Completed NCT01713582
FT-1101-based trials
Relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies FT-1101 160 I Recruiting NCT02543879
INCB057643-based trials
Advanced malignancies INCB057643 136 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT02711137

Lenalidomide, derivative of thalidomide; durvalumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody; avelumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody; bevacizumab, VEGF inhibitor; temsirolimus, mTOR inhibitor; rituximab, anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody; regorafenib, multikinase inhibitor; nivolumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody; sitravatinib, multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitor; tenalisib, inhibitor of PI3K; pembrolizumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody; atezolizumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody

Table 7.

Important ongoing clinical trials with histone methylation-targeted therapies.

Condition Design Sample size Phase Current status NCT
HMT inhibitor
DOT1L-targeted therapy
Pinometostat (EPZ-5676)-based trials
Relapsed/refractory leukemias Pinometostat 51 I Completed NCT01684150
Acute myeloid leukemia with MLL gene rearrangement Pinometostat + standard chemotherapy 37 I/II Recruiting NCT03724084
Tazemetostat (EPZ-6438)-based trials
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma Tazemetostat 133 I/II Suspended NCT02889523
Advanced tumors/lymphomas Tazemetostat 420 I/II Recruiting NCT01897571
Relapsed or refractory B-cell lymphoma with EZH2 gene mutation Tazemetostat 21 II Active, not recruiting NCT03456726
Recurrent ovarian, primary peritoneal, or endometrial cancer Tazemetostat 43 II Recruiting NCT03348631
Lymphoma, advanced solid tumors Tazemetostat 300 II Recruiting NCT02875548
Malignant mesothelioma Tazemetostat 67 II Active, not recruiting NCT02860286
INI1-negative tumors or relapsed/ refractory synovial sarcoma Tazemetostat 250 II Recruiting NCT02601950
Relapsed/refractory lymphoma Tazemetostat + atezolizumab 92 I Active, not recruiting NCT02220842
Advanced urothelial carcinoma Tazemetostat + pembrolizumab 30 I/II Not yet recruiting NCT03854474
GSK2816126-based trials
Relapsed/refractory lymphomas, solid tumors and multiple myeloma GSK2816126 41 I Terminated NCT02082977
CPI-1205-based trials
B-cell lymphomas CPI-1205 41 I Active, not recruiting NCT02395601
Advanced solid tumors CPI-1205 24 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT03525795
Castration-resistant prostate cancer CPI-1205 242 I/II Recruiting NCT03480646
Histone demethylase inhibitors
LSD1-targeted therapy
TCP-based trials
AML and MDS TCP 17 I Active, not recruiting NCT02273102
Relapsed or refractory AML TCP 16 I/II N/A NCT02261779
ORY-2001-based trials
Mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease ORY-2001 33 II Not yet recruiting NCT03867253
GSK2879552-based trials
High-risk MDS GSK2879552 + azacitidine 74 II Recruiting NCT02929498
4SC-202-based trials
Advanced hematologic malignancy 4SC-202 36 I Completed NCT01344707
Malignant melanoma 4SC-202 + pembrolizumab 40 I/II Recruiting NCT03278665

Atezolizumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody; pembrolizumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody

Inhibitors for HATs and BETs

Generally, there are two strategies for preventing aberrant histone acetylation, including altering interactions within the active sites within HATs or using mimetic products of enzymatic substrates. To date, many inhibitors targeting BRD proteins have been investigated in clinical trials, whereas there are no clinical trials investigating inhibitors for HATs.

Bisubstrate inhibitors are selective inhibitors for PCAF, p300, and TIP60. They mimic two substrates of HATs: the cofactor acetyl coenzyme A (Ac-CoA) and a peptide resembling the lysine substrate.607,608 However, due to their peptidic nature and size, they are not membrane-permeable and require the assistance of a delivery system. Based on inhibitory strategies for HATs, nonpeptide small molecular inhibitors have been developing as potential therapeutic agents. Several small molecule inhibitors are natural products, including garcinol, curcumin, and anacardic acid.609611 These natural HAT inhibitors lack selectivity between HATs and often have other targets. Therefore, structurally modified and synthetic compounds have been reported. Α-Methylene-g-butyrolactones are small molecular inhibitors of HATs with selectivity for either GCN5L2 or PCAF.612 Isothiazolone is another HAT inhibitor targeting p300 and PCAF.613 However, high reactivity towards thiolates limits the application of HAT inhibitors in biological systems. Other inhibitors of HATs, such as thiazide sulfonamide and C646, have been gradually identified and show promising effects in multiple cancers. Another strategy to inhibit HAT activity is to target protein–protein interactions between HATs and their interaction partners. This method is dependent on the function of the interactions rather than the acetylation activity of HATs. ICG-001 and PRI-724 are representatives of this kind of inhibitor. Appropriately applying HAT agonists is also important to correct aberrant acetylation during diseases. CTPB is derived from anacardic acid and selectively activates p300, resulting in gene transcription.609 TTK21 and SPV106 are two other agonists based on anacardic acid.

Binding to BRDs and blocking acetylated lysine recognition is another mechanism that inhibits acetylation. JQ1 and I-BET762 are two representative inhibitors of the BET family. JQ1 is a cell-permeable small molecule and can competitively bind to BRD4 fusion oncoproteins, such as BRD4-NUT, resulting in cancer cell differentiation and apoptosis.614 Similarly, I-BET762 is also a synthetic mimic of and competes with BRD4.615 Other compounds, such as MS417, OTX-015, RVX-208, OXFBD, I-BET151, PFI-1, MS436, and XD14, are also BET inhibitors and have been well illustrated in other published papers.616 We will focus on the associations between these compounds and cancers. However, a number of non-BET proteins containing BRDs have attracted considerable attention. Many non-BET bromodomain inhibitors are based on a structure called the “WPF shelf” and a “gatekeeper” residue located at the start of the C helix.617 Several HATs have a BRD, such as Gcn5, PCFA, p300, and CBP. Inhibitors for CBP include MS2126, MS7972, ischemin, SGC-CBP30 and I-CBP112; optimized 1-(1H-indol-1-yl) ethanone derivatives have also shown promising results in inhibiting CBP and p300.618 BAZ2A/B bromodomain inhibitors include BAZ2-ICR and GSK2801. The quinolone-fused lactam LP99 was the first synthetic selective inhibitor for BRD7/9. I-BRD9 was identified by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) and is a selective inhibitor of BRD9, which has more than 200-fold selectivity for BRD9 over BRD7 and 700-fold selectivity for BRD9 over BET family members.619 PFI-3 is a potential inhibitor of SMARCA4 and PB1 with a stronger affinity for the bromodomain of SMARCA4. However, Vangamudi et al. identified that the ATPase domain within SMARC4 bypassed the anticancer effects related to the bromodomain since PFI-3 did not inhibit cell proliferation.620 The BRPF1 (bromodomain and PHD finger-containing 1) protein is part of the BRPF family, which is a component of MYST family complexes. The inhibitors of BRPF1 include PFI-4, OF-1, and NI-57. 1,3-Dimethyl benzimidazolones were the first selective inhibitors of BRPF1. PFI-4 and OF-1 are two close analogs of 1,3-dimethyl benzimidazolone that have been identified by the Structural Genomics Consortium (SGC). Another BRPF1 inhibitor, NI-57, was discovered by the SGC based on a new quinolinone scaffold. Both NI-57 and OF-1 are thought to interact with BRPF1-3 as pan-BRPF bromodomain inhibitors. Based on the bromodomain contained within both TRIM24 (tripartite motif containing protein 24) and BRPF1, a dual inhibitor, IACS-9571, has been identified.621 Bromosporine is a panbromodomain inhibitor with good cellular activity, whereas in a recent study, researchers noticed that bromodomain inhibitors only targeted the BET family rather than other BRDs.622

Inhibition of HDACs

Given that multiple methods can regulate HDAC activity, the designation of HDAC inhibitors has its own advantages. In the 1970s, butyrate was found to induce the accumulation of acetylated histones in cancer cells, which is thought to be associated with the inhibition of deacetylation.623 Later, a natural extract, trichostatin A (TSA), was identified to inhibit the activity of partially purified HDACs and induce cancer cell differentiation and apoptosis.624 Gradually, more natural and synthetic compounds have been identified to inhibit histone deacetylation. A study reported that administration of HDAC inhibitors only regulates a small number of genes (1–2%) but induces an obvious and rapid decrease in c-Myc gene expression, which indicated that a restricted set of cellular genes was uniquely sensitive to regulation of histone acetylation.625 The combination of two HDAC inhibitors, SAHA and TSA, induced melanoma cell growth arrest by upregulating p21, p27 and NF-κB, and MG132 can enhance the effect of TSA.626 The inhibition of HDACs has been investigated in various cancers, with promising antitumor effects.627,628 Based on the characteristics of their chemical structures, HDAC inhibitors can be divided into five groups: short-chain fatty acids, hydroxamic acids, benzamides, cyclic peptides, and hybrid molecules. In addition to those included in the five groups, some new synthetic compounds also act as inhibitors of HDACs.

The short-chain fatty acid group contains sodium butyrate, valproic acid (VPA), sodium phenylbutyrate, and AN-9 (pivaloyloxymethyl butyrate). The effective concentration of butyrate is usually at the micromolar level. The group of hydroxamic acids includes more than ten members and is the best-studied class. Structural analyses of TSA and suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) show that they are noncompetitive inhibitors of HDACs since they share significant homology with class I and class II HDACs, which makes them mimics of the lysine substrates.629 In addition, they chelate the active zinc ion in a bidentate manner, which is crucial for enzymatic activity.624 Hexamethylene bisacetamide (HMBA) is a representative of the hybrid polar compounds (HPCs), whereas second-generation HPCs, such as oxamflatin, SAHA, suberic bishydroxamic acid (SBHA), and m-carboxycinnamic acid bishydroxamide (CBHA), have shown better inhibition of HDACs and anticancer effects than first-generation agents.630 Oxamflatin, scriptaid, and amide are analogs of TSA and show anticancer effects.631633 Benzamide inhibitors (MS-275, MGCD0103, and CI-994) are well-studied and show promising effects in the treatment of diseases, especially cancers. They inhibit histone deacetylation via binding to catalytic zinc ions within HDACs through carbonyl and amino groups. Inhibition of HDACs by benzamide inhibitors is thought to be reversible, but the bond may become tight and pseudoirreversible in a time-dependent manner.634,635 However, benzamide inhibitors have less activity than members of the hydroxamate or cyclic peptide families, with an effective concentration around the micromolar range.636 Cyclic peptides can be further divided into two groups: cyclic tetrapeptide containing a 2-amino-8-oxo-9, 10-epoxy-decanoyl (AOE) moiety (HC-toxin, trapoxin) and cyclic peptides without the AOE moiety (apicidin and romidepsin). The epoxyketone group is essential for the inhibitors to bind to active zinc ions, but the epoxyketone-based bond is irreversible. Trapoxin is a fungal cyclic peptide and can irreversibly inhibit the activity of HDACs.637 Romidepsin, also known as FK228, most likely relies on one of the thiol groups to coordinate to the active site zinc ion.638 Garlic-associated derivatives, such as diallylsulfide and allylmercaptan, are capable of generating a thiol group that makes them potential inhibitors of HDACs.639 K-trap, an analog of trapoxin, and other derivatives, including 9-acyloxyapicidins and 9-hydroxy, have been under investigation. Depudecin is a natural epoxide derivative isolated from the fungus Alternaria brassicicola. Psammaplins is isolated from a marine sponge Pseudoceratina purpurea. These two natural extracts can inhibit the activity of HDACs.

Early HDAC inhibitors were nonselective because of the high homology of the structure and catalytic mechanism of HDACs within each group. The first selective HDAC inhibitor was tubacin, which targets HDAC6 with increased tubulin acetylation but not histone acetylation.640 PCI-34051, a specific inhibitor of HDAC8, can induce caspase-dependent apoptosis in T-cell lymphoma but does not increase histone acetylation.641 Another benzamide inhibitor, SHI-1:2, shows HDAC1/HDAC2-specific inhibitory activity that is >100-fold more selective than that of other HDACs.642 New synthetic chemicals, such as SK7041 and splitomicin, selectively target class I HDACs and sir2-like family members, respectively. The same efforts have been made to develop inhibitors for sirtuins, the class III HDACs. Nicotinamide, a byproduct of the sirtuin enzyme reaction, is a widely used inhibitor of all sirtuins. Other compounds, such as cambinol, salermide, tenovin, EX-527, suramin, and AGK2, have also been reported as sirtuin inhibitors. Sirtuin inhibitors (such as nicotinamide) function via interactions with the NAD+ within the active site of sirtuins or through binding to acetyl-lysine.

Of note, second-generation HDACs, including hydroxamic acids (vorinostat (SAHA), belinostat (PXD101), LAQ824, and panobinostat (LBH589)) and benzamides (entinostat (MS-275), tacedinaline (CI-994), and mocetinostat (MGCD0103)), are currently in clinical trials, and some of them have already been approved for disease treatment. The success of romidepsin in phase I clinical trials in cutaneous and peripheral T-cell lymphoma accelerated the development of HDAC inhibitors as anticancer drugs. In 2006, SAHA (vorinostat) was first approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of cancer, restricted to patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), as an HDAC inhibitor.643 Romidepsin (Istodax) was the second approved HDAC inhibitor, which was approved in 2009. Three members of the benzamide family have also shown clinical significance in anticancer drug development. Belinostat (Beleodaq, previously known as PXD101) was approved in 2014 by the US FDA and European Medicines Agency to treat peripheral T-cell lymphoma. Another HDAC inhibitor, panobinostat, is a nonselective HDAC (pan-HDAC). It has shown promising effects in anticancer treatments; therefore, the FDA accelerated its approval for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma. Intriguing, as we mentioned before, truncating mutations in HDAC2 have been found in sporadic carcinomas and colorectal cancer and result in resistance to traditional HDAC inhibitors.644 Mutations in other HDACs also exist; therefore, screening of these mutations in cancer can improve the efficacy of HDAC inhibitors.

Inhibitor of HMTs and HDMTs

EPZ004777 was the first identified selective inhibitor of DOT1L and selectively kills MLL-translocated cells over those without MLL translocation.645 However, due to its poor pharmacokinetic properties, a second generation of EPZ004777, EPZ-5767, was developed with a cyclobutyl ring replacing the ribose moiety.646 EPZ-5767 also shows synergistic effects with cytarabine, daunorubicin, and the DNMT inhibitor azacitidine in treatments for ALL with MLL translocation. EPZ-5767, though still showing low oral bioavailability, has been investigated in clinical trials for the treatment of leukemia with MLL rearrangement.647 There are several inhibitors of EZH2. 3-Deazaneplanocin A (DZNep), a derivative of the antibiotic neplanocin-A, is one of the most studied compounds. In fact, DZNep is a SAH-hydrolase inhibitor and decreases EZH2 expression via upregulation of SAH, which leads to degradation of PRC2 in a feedback inhibition mechanism.648,649 Another kind of inhibitor is SAM competitive inhibitors. SAM is responsible for the methyl moiety of KMTs. EI1, a small molecular inhibitor of EZH2, inhibits EZH2 activity by directly binding to EZH2 and competing with SAM.650 GSK343 and GSK126 are two other SAM competitive inhibitors that have been investigated in clinical trials.651,652 EPZ005687, a potent inhibitor of EZH2, significantly reduces H3K27 methylation in lymphoma cells with point mutations at the Tyr641 and Ala677 residues of EZH2 without obvious effects on the proliferation of wild-type cells.653 EPZ-6438, which shows similar effects and superior oral bioavailability, was developed next.654 CPI-1205 is a novel inhibitor of EZH2 that belongs to the pyridone family.

Tranylcypromine (TCP) is an approved drug for depression due to its ability to inhibit monoamine oxidase (MAO) activity. The structures of LSD enzymes and MAOs share many similarities. Therefore, the side effects of TCP as an HDMT inhibitor, including orthostatic hypotension, dizziness, and drowsiness,655 are mostly caused by targeting of MAO. Administration of TCP in MLL-AF9 leukemia promotes tumor cell differentiation and apoptosis.656 TCP is also capable of resensitizing non-acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL) AML cells to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) treatment via increasing H3K4me2 and the expression of myeloid-differentiation-associated genes.657 Several derivatives of TCP have been developed to achieve better bioavailability and selectivity, including OG-002, RN-1, SP2509, and GSK690.658660 Another LSD1 selective inhibitor, ORY-1001, can also promote the differentiation of leukemia cell lines, especially cells with translocations in MLL, and has good oral bioavailability.661 To date, three LSD1 inhibitors, including TCP, ORY-1001, and GSK2879552, have been under investigation in clinical trials for the treatment of cancer patients. Daminozide (N-(dimethylamino) succinamic acid, 160 Da), a plant growth regulator, selectively inhibits KDM2/7 by chelating the active site metal.662 Daminozide and siRNA can similarly downregulate KDM7 expression and then regulate tumor-repopulating cells via demethylation of H3K9.663 GSK-J1 was the first identified KDM6 inhibitor with restricted cellular permeability, which resulted from its highly polar structure. Its ethyl ester, GSK-J4, possesses an improved ability to enter cells.664 However, scientists have found that GSK-J1 shows compatible selectivity for the KDM6 and KDM5 families and that GSK-J4 is also a potential inhibitor for KDM5B and KDM4C.665 EPT-103182, a selective inhibitor of KDM5B, has shown promising results in terms of antiproliferative effects in hematological and solid cancer cells. KDM8 and JMJD6 share homology and can be inhibited by a broad spectrum inhibitor, NOG.661

Specific inhibitors usually have similar selectivity to closely related homologs within a group, and even across different groups, which needs to be taken into consideration when using compounds that are not highly selective.

Combined therapy

Epigenetic regulation during tumorigenesis is complicated and involves multiple steps. Therefore, the combination of two or more therapies targeting various epigenetic events seems helpful. This combination synergistically inhibits the expression of tumor-growth-promoting genes and promotes the reexpression of tumor suppressor genes. 4SC-202 is a small molecular drug with dual effects that can inhibit HDAC1/2/3 and LSD1 with similar low micromolar potency. This drug is under clinical investigation. Other studies have administered two or more kinds of epigenetic drugs for anticancer therapy. Relevant clinical trials are listed in Table 8.

Table 8.

Important ongoing clinical trials with combination therapies including DNA methylation and histone modification.

Condition Design Sample size Phase Current status NCT
Histone acetylation inhibitor + DNA methylation inhibitor
Solid tumors, hematologic malignancies Azacitidine + pracinostat 85 I Completed NCT00741234
MDS Azacitidine + pracinostat 102 II Completed NCT01873703
High-risk MDS Azacitidine + pracinostat 60 II Active, not recruiting NCT03151304
AML Azacitidine + pracinostat 500 III Recruiting NCT03151408
MDS Azacitidine + mocetinostat 18 I/II Completed NCT02018926
High-risk MDS, AML Azacitidine + mocetinostat 66 I/II Completed NCT00324220
Advanced cancers Azacitidine + valproic acid 69 I Completed NCT00496444
AML, MDS Azacitidine + valproic acid 50 II Recruiting NCT02124174
Intermediate II and high-risk MDS Azacitidine + valproic acid 62 II Completed NCT00439673
AML, MDS Azacitidine + valproic acid + ATRA 34 II Completed NCT00326170
High-risk MDS Azacitidine + valproic acid/lenalidomide/idarubicin 320 II Active, not recruiting NCT01342692
Higher-risk MDS, CML Azacitidine + vorinostat 282 II Active, not recruiting NCT01522976
AML, high-risk MDS Azacitidine + vorinostat 260 II Active, not recruiting NCT01617226
AML, MDS Azacitidine + vorinostat 135 I/II Active, not recruiting NCT00392353
Relapsed/refractory lymphoma Azacitidine + vorinostat 17 I/II Completed NCT01120834
Relapsed/refractory lymphoid malignancies Azacitidine + romidepsin 60 I/II Recruiting NCT01998035
Relapsed or refractory AITL Azacitidine + romidepsin + bendamustine + gemcitabine 86 III Recruiting NCT03593018
Lymphoma Azacitidine + romidepsin + durvalumab + pralatrexate 148 I/II Recruiting NCT03161223
Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer Azacitidine + entinostat 162 II Completed NCT00387465
AML Azacitidine + entinostat 108 II Recruiting NCT01305499
Advanced breast cancer Azacitidine + entinostat 58 II Active, not recruiting NCT01349959
AML, MDS, CML Azacitidine + entinostat 197 II Completed NCT00313586
Metastatic colorectal cancer Azacitidine + entinostat 47 II Completed NCT01105377
Non-small-cell lung cancer Azacitidine + entinostat + nivolumab 120 II Recruiting NCT01928576
Leukemia, lung cancer, lymphoma, multiple myeloma, prostate cancer Azacitidine + phenylbutyrate N/A II Completed NCT00006019
AML with 11q23 rearrangement Azacitidine + pinometostat 36 I/II Not yet recruiting NCT03701295
High-risk MDS Azacitidine + GSK2879552 74 II Recruiting NCT02929498
AML, MDS Decitabine + valproic acid 153 II Completed NCT00414310
Relapsed/refractory MDS, leukemia Decitabine + valproic acid 54 I/II Completed NCT00075010
AML Decitabine + valproic acid 204 II Completed NCT00867672
AML, MDS Decitabine + vorinostat 71 I Completed NCT00479232
AML, MDS Decitabine + panobinostat 52 I/II Completed NCT00691938
Relapsed or refractory leukemia and MDS Decitabine + romidepsin 36 I Completed NCT00114257
Advanced lung cancer Guadecitabine + mocetinostat + pembrolizumab 40 I Recruiting NCT03220477
Lung cancer Hydralazine + valproic acid 29 I Completed NCT00996060
Metastatic cervical cancer Hydralazine + valproate 143 III N/A NCT00532818
Ovarian cancer Hydralazine + valproate 211 III N/A NCT00533299
Cervical cancer Hydralazine + valproate + cisplatin chemoradiation 18 II Completed NCT00404326
Refractory solid tumors Hydralazine + magnesium valproate 15 II Completed NCT00404508
BET inhibitor + DNA methylation inhibitor
Relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies FT-1101 + azacitidine 160 I Recruiting NCT02543879
AML, MDS GSK3326595 (selective inhibitor of protein arginine methyltransferase 5 (PRMT5)) vs azacitidine 302 I/II Recruiting NCT03614728

Pembrolizumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody; lenalidomide, derivative of thalidomide; durvalumab, anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody; nivolumab, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody

Conclusion

Although more specific mechanisms need to be investigated, it is well accepted that epigenetic events are important in normal biological processes as well as in tumorigenesis and that the epigenetic status is usually widely altered during cancer initiation. This makes epigenome-targeted therapy a promising strategy for the treatment of cancer. Based on the complexity of cancer, epigenetic alterations have influenced multiple aspects in cancer, such as the expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes and signal transduction, resulting in enhanced cancer growth, invasion and metastasis. Although epigenetic therapy has a rational and profound basis in theory, some problems remain to be discussed and solved. The first and most important is the problem of selectivity. Epigenetic events are ubiquitously distributed across normal and cancer cells. In fact, some cancers depend on certain epigenetic alterations and can be sensitive to this regulation, whereas under usual regulation, normal cells have the ability to compensate for these epigenetic changes. Therefore, the priority is to determine the most important epigenetic alterations for different cancers. The second problem extends from the first problem. Thus far, epigenetic therapy has obtained impressive results in hematological malignancies but not in solid tumors. The properties of hematological malignant cells and solid tumor cells are different. However, researchers have still investigated the appropriate strategies for solid tumors. Since epigenetic alterations have effects on the sensitivity of small molecule targeted therapy and chemotherapy or radiotherapy, epigenetic-targeted therapy seems to be an important adjunctive therapy. The combination of epigenetic therapy and immunotherapy has also been investigated in preclinical and clinical trials.

Based on the achievements obtained, epigenetic-targeted therapy is a promising strategy for anticancer treatment. Epigenomes in cancer are related to many aspects during cancer initiation. A better understanding of the specific mechanisms underlying those alterations in different cancers is necessary. Meanwhile, optimized treatment options, including a variety of combinations, still remain to be discovered.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Excellent Youth Foundation of Sichuan Scientific Committee Grant in China (No. 2019JDJQ0008), the National Major Scientific and Technological Special Project for “Significant New Drugs Development” of China (No. 2018ZX09733001) , and the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFA0201402). This research did not receive any specific grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Footnotes

These authors contributed equally: Yuan Cheng, Cai He

References

  • 1.Waddington CH. The epigenotype. Int J. Epidemiol. 2012;41:10–13. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyr184. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Holliday R. The inheritance of epigenetic defects. Science. 1987;238:163–170. doi: 10.1126/science.3310230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bird A. Perceptions of epigenetics. Nature. 2007;447:396–398. doi: 10.1038/nature05913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Shen H, Laird PW. Interplay between the cancer genome and epigenome. Cell. 2013;153:38–55. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Holliday R. A new theory of carcinogenesis. Br. J. Cancer. 1979;40:513–522. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1979.216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Seligson DB, et al. Global histone modification patterns predict risk of prostate cancer recurrence. Nature. 2005;435:1262–1266. doi: 10.1038/nature03672. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Fahrner JA, Eguchi S, Herman JG, Baylin SB. Dependence of histone modifications and gene expression on DNA hypermethylation in cancer. Cancer Res. 2002;62:7213–7218. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Ben-Porath I, Cedar H. Epigenetic crosstalk. Mol. Cell. 2001;8:933–935. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(01)00399-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Richards EJ, Elgin SC. Epigenetic codes for heterochromatin formation and silencing: rounding up the usual suspects. Cell. 2002;108:489–500. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00644-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cedar H, Bergman Y. Programming of DNA methylation patterns. Annu Rev. Biochem. 2012;81:97–117. doi: 10.1146/annurev-biochem-052610-091920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Sun D, et al. Epigenomic profiling of young and aged HSCs reveals concerted changes during aging that reinforce self-renewal. Cell. Stem Cell. 2014;14:673–688. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.03.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Valentini E, et al. Analysis of the machinery and intermediates of the 5hmC-mediated DNA demethylation pathway in aging on samples from the MARK-AGE Study. Aging. 2016;8:1896–1922. doi: 10.18632/aging.101022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kulis M, Esteller M. DNA methylation and cancer. Adv. Genet. 2010;70:27–56. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380866-0.60002-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Karatzas PS, Mantzaris GJ, Safioleas M, Gazouli M. DNA methylation profile of genes involved in inflammation and autoimmunity in inflammatory bowel disease. Medicine. 2014;93:e309. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Easwaran H, Tsai HC, Baylin SB. Cancer epigenetics: tumor heterogeneity, plasticity of stem-like states, and drug resistance. Mol. Cell. 2014;54:716–727. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2014.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Klutstein M, Nejman D, Greenfield R, Cedar H. DNA methylation in cancer and aging. Cancer Res. 2016;76:3446–3450. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-3278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Keshet I, et al. Evidence for an instructive mechanism of de novo methylation in cancer cells. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:149–153. doi: 10.1038/ng1719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ito S, et al. Role of Tet proteins in 5mC to 5hmC conversion, ES-cell self-renewal and inner cell mass specification. Nature. 2010;466:1129–1133. doi: 10.1038/nature09303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Keshet I, Lieman-Hurwitz J, Cedar H. DNA methylation affects the formation of active chromatin. Cell. 1986;44:535–543. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(86)90263-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Baylin SB, Jones PA. A decade of exploring the cancer epigenome—biological and translational implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:726–734. doi: 10.1038/nrc3130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Merlo A, et al. 5′ CpG island methylation is associated with transcriptional silencing of the tumour suppressor p16/CDKN2/MTS1 in human cancers. Nat. Med. 1995;1:686–692. doi: 10.1038/nm0795-686. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rideout WM, Coetzee GA, Olumi AF, Jones PA. 5-Methylcytosine as an endogenous mutagen in the human LDL receptor and p53 genes. Science. 1990;249:1288–1290. doi: 10.1126/science.1697983. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kleihues P, et al. Tumors associated with p53 germline mutations: a synopsis of 91 families. Am. J. Pathol. 1997;150:1–13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Caputo S, et al. Description and analysis of genetic variants in French hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families recorded in the UMD-BRCA1/BRCA2 databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D992–D1002. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr1160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Christensen BC, et al. Breast cancer DNA methylation profiles are associated with tumor size and alcohol and folate intake. PLoS Genet. 2010;6:e1001043. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1001043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Mayor R, et al. Long-range epigenetic silencing at 2q14.2 affects most human colorectal cancers and may have application as a non-invasive biomarker of disease. Br. J. Cancer. 2009;100:1534–1539. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Devaney J, et al. Epigenetic deregulation across chromosome 2q14.2 differentiates normal from prostate cancer and provides a regional panel of novel DNA methylation cancer biomarkers. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2011;20:148–159. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-10-0719. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Bell A, Bell D, Weber RS, El-Naggar AK. CpG island methylation profiling in human salivary gland adenoid cystic carcinoma. Cancer. 2011;117:2898–2909. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.He S, et al. Expression of DNMT1 and DNMT3a are regulated by GLI1 in human pancreatic cancer. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e27684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0027684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 30.Ibrahim AE, et al. Sequential DNA methylation changes are associated with DNMT3B overexpression in colorectal neoplastic progression. Gut. 2011;60:499–508. doi: 10.1136/gut.2010.223602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Baylin SB, Ohm JE. Epigenetic gene silencing in cancer - a mechanism for early oncogenic pathway addiction. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2006;6:107–116. doi: 10.1038/nrc1799. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Markl ID, et al. Global and gene-specific epigenetic patterns in human bladder cancer genomes are relatively stable in vivo and in vitro over time. Cancer Res. 2001;61:5875–5884. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Wolf SF, et al. Methylation of the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase locus on the human X chromosome: implications for X-chromosome inactivation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1984;81:2806–2810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.81.9.2806. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:484–492. doi: 10.1038/nrg3230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Lee WH, et al. Cytidine methylation of regulatory sequences near the pi-class glutathione S-transferase gene accompanies human prostatic carcinogenesis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1994;91:11733–11737. doi: 10.1073/pnas.91.24.11733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wilting RH, Dannenberg JH. Epigenetic mechanisms in tumorigenesis, tumor cell heterogeneity and drug resistance. Drug Resist Updat. 2012;15:21–38. doi: 10.1016/j.drup.2012.01.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Esteller M, et al. Inactivation of the DNA-repair gene MGMT and the clinical response of gliomas to alkylating agents. N. Engl. J. Med. 2000;343:1350–1354. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200011093431901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Hegi ME, et al. MGMT gene silencing and benefit from temozolomide in glioblastoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2005;352:997–1003. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa043331. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Esteller M, et al. Hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene O(6)-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase and survival of patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94:26–32. doi: 10.1093/jnci/94.1.26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ramsahoye BH, et al. Non-CpG methylation is prevalent in embryonic stem cells and may be mediated by DNA methyltransferase 3a. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:5237–5242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.10.5237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Saxonov S, Berg P, Brutlag DL. A genome-wide analysis of CpG dinucleotides in the human genome distinguishes two distinct classes of promoters. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:1412–1417. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510310103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Smith ZD, Meissner A. DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2013;14:204–220. doi: 10.1038/nrg3354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Mitchell AR, et al. Epigenetic control of mammalian centromere protein binding: does DNA methylation have a role. J. Cell Sci. 1996;109(Pt 9):2199–2206. doi: 10.1242/jcs.109.9.2199. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Schübeler D. Function and information content of DNA methylation. Nature. 2015;517:321–326. doi: 10.1038/nature14192. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Goyal R, Reinhardt R, Jeltsch A. Accuracy of DNA methylation pattern preservation by the Dnmt1 methyltransferase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:1182–1188. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Li Y, et al. Stella safeguards the oocyte methylome by preventing de novo methylation mediated by DNMT1. Nature. 2018;564:136–140. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0751-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wu H, Zhang Y. Reversing DNA methylation: mechanisms, genomics, and biological functions. Cell. 2014;156:45–68. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.12.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Okano M, Bell DW, Haber DA, Li E. DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are essential for de novo methylation and mammalian development. Cell. 1999;99:247–257. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81656-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chedin F, Lieber MR, Hsieh CL. The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2002;99:16916–16921. doi: 10.1073/pnas.262443999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Robertson KD, et al. The human DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) 1, 3a and 3b: coordinate mRNA expression in normal tissues and overexpression in tumors. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:2291–2298. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.11.2291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Piyathilake CJ, et al. A higher degree of expression of DNA methyl transferase 1 in cervical cancer is associated with poor survival outcome. Int J. Women’s Health. 2017;9:413–420. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S133441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mizuno S, et al. Expression of DNA methyltransferases DNMT1, 3A, and 3B in normal hematopoiesis and in acute and chronic myelogenous leukemia. Blood. 2001;97:1172–1179. doi: 10.1182/blood.V97.5.1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mirza S, et al. Expression of DNA methyltransferases in breast cancer patients and to analyze the effect of natural compounds on DNA methyltransferases and associated proteins. J. Breast Cancer. 2013;16:23–31. doi: 10.4048/jbc.2013.16.1.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Klose RJ, Bird AP. Genomic DNA methylation: the mark and its mediators. Trends Biochem Sci. 2006;31:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Feng Q, Zhang Y. The MeCP1 complex represses transcription through preferential binding, remodeling, and deacetylating methylated nucleosomes. Genes Dev. 2001;15:827–832. doi: 10.1101/gad.876201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yildirim O, et al. Mbd3/NURD complex regulates expression of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine marked genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell. 2011;147:1498–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2011.11.054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Villa R, et al. The methyl-CpG binding protein MBD1 is required for PML-RARalpha function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2006;103:1400–1405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0509343103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Watanabe S, et al. Methylated DNA-binding domain 1 and methylpurine-DNA glycosylase link transcriptional repression and DNA repair in chromatin. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:12859–12864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2131819100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Bader S, et al. MBD1, MBD2 and CGBP genes at chromosome 18q21 are infrequently mutated in human colon and lung cancers. Oncogene. 2003;22:3506–3510. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1206574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Zhao X, et al. Mice lacking methyl-CpG binding protein 1 have deficits in adult neurogenesis and hippocampal function. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:6777–6782. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1131928100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Sansom OJ, et al. Deficiency of Mbd2 suppresses intestinal tumorigenesis. Nat. Genet. 2003;34:145–147. doi: 10.1038/ng1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Suzuki H, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of SFRP genes allows constitutive WNT signaling in colorectal cancer. Nat. Genet. 2004;36:417–422. doi: 10.1038/ng1330. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Campbell PM, Bovenzi V, Szyf M. Methylated DNA-binding protein 2 antisense inhibitors suppress tumourigenesis of human cancer cell lines in vitro and in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 2004;25:499–507. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgh045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Noh EJ, et al. Methyl CpG-binding domain protein 3 mediates cancer-selective cytotoxicity by histone deacetylase inhibitors via differential transcriptional reprogramming in lung cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2005;65:11400–11410. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-1092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Biswas M, et al. MBD3/NuRD loss participates with KDM6A program to promote DOCK5/8 expression and Rac GTPase activation in human acute myeloid leukemia. FASEB J. 2019;33:5268–5286. doi: 10.1096/fj.201801035R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Riccio A, et al. The DNA repair gene MBD4 (MED1) is mutated in human carcinomas with microsatellite instability. Nat. Genet. 1999;23:266–268. doi: 10.1038/15443. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Bader SA, Walker M, Harrison DJ. A human cancer-associated truncation of MBD4 causes dominant negative impairment of DNA repair in colon cancer cells. Br. J. Cancer. 2007;96:660–666. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6603592. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Millar CB, et al. Enhanced CpG mutability and tumorigenesis in MBD4-deficient mice. Science. 2002;297:403–405. doi: 10.1126/science.1073354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Sansom OJ, Bishop SM, Bird A, Clarke AR. MBD4 deficiency does not increase mutation or accelerate tumorigenesis in mice lacking MMR. Oncogene. 2004;23:5693–5696. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1207767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Bernard D, et al. The methyl-CpG-binding protein MECP2 is required for prostate cancer cell growth. Oncogene. 2006;25:1358–1366. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Müller HM, et al. MeCP2 and MBD2 expression in human neoplastic and non-neoplastic breast tissue and its association with oestrogen receptor status. Br. J. Cancer. 2003;89:1934–1939. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6601392. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Mudbhary R, et al. UHRF1 overexpression drives DNA hypomethylation and hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell. 2014;25:196–209. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Unoki M, et al. UHRF1 is a novel molecular marker for diagnosis and the prognosis of bladder cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2009;101:98–105. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Unoki M, et al. UHRF1 is a novel diagnostic marker of lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2010;103:217–222. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6605717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Prokhortchouk A, et al. The p120 catenin partner Kaiso is a DNA methylation-dependent transcriptional repressor. Genes Dev. 2001;15:1613–1618. doi: 10.1101/gad.198501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.van Roy FM, McCrea PD. A role for Kaiso-p120ctn complexes in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2005;5:956–964. doi: 10.1038/nrc1752. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Kim K, et al. Identification of oncogenic microRNA-17–92/ZBTB4/specificity protein axis in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2012;31:1034–1044. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Law JA, Jacobsen SE. Establishing, maintaining and modifying DNA methylation patterns in plants and animals. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2010;11:204–220. doi: 10.1038/nrg2719. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Feng S, Jacobsen SE, Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science. 2010;330:622–627. doi: 10.1126/science.1190614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Hajkova P, et al. Epigenetic reprogramming in mouse primordial germ cells. Mech. Dev. 2002;117:15–23. doi: 10.1016/S0925-4773(02)00181-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Tahiliani M, et al. Conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine in mammalian DNA by MLL partner TET1. Science. 2009;324:930–935. doi: 10.1126/science.1170116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Hu L, et al. Structural insight into substrate preference for TET-mediated oxidation. Nature. 2015;527:118–122. doi: 10.1038/nature15713. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Ito S, et al. Tet proteins can convert 5-methylcytosine to 5-formylcytosine and 5-carboxylcytosine. Science. 2011;333:1300–1303. doi: 10.1126/science.1210597. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.He YF, et al. Tet-mediated formation of 5-carboxylcytosine and its excision by TDG in mammalian DNA. Science. 2011;333:1303–1307. doi: 10.1126/science.1210944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Lorsbach RB, et al. TET1, a member of a novel protein family, is fused to MLL in acute myeloid leukemia containing the t(10;11)(q22; q23) Leukemia. 2003;17:637–641. doi: 10.1038/sj.leu.2402834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Delhommeau F, et al. Mutation in TET2 in myeloid cancers. N. Engl. J. Med. 2009;360:2289–2301. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Kosmider O, et al. TET2 gene mutation is a frequent and adverse event in chronic myelomonocytic leukemia. Haematologica. 2009;94:1676–1681. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2009.011205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Abdel-Wahab O, et al. Genetic analysis of transforming events that convert chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms to leukemias. Cancer Res. 2010;70:447–452. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-3783. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Yang H, et al. Tumor development is associated with decrease of TET gene expression and 5-methylcytosine hydroxylation. Oncogene. 2013;32:663–669. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.67. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Hsu CH, et al. TET1 suppresses cancer invasion by activating the tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Cell Rep. 2012;2:568–579. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2012.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Lian CG, et al. Loss of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is an epigenetic hallmark of melanoma. Cell. 2012;150:1135–1146. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Cao YL, et al. Exosomal DNMT1 mediates cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer. Cell Biochem Funct. 2017;35:296–303. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3276. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Rajendran G, et al. Epigenetic regulation of DNA methyltransferases: DNMT1 and DNMT3B in gliomas. J. Neurooncol. 2011;104:483–494. doi: 10.1007/s11060-010-0520-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Xing J, et al. Expression of methylation-related genes is associated with overall survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2008;98:1716–1722. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604343. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Hong L, et al. The interaction between miR-148a and DNMT1 suppresses cell migration and invasion by reactivating tumor suppressor genes in pancreatic cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2018;40:2916–2925. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6700. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Nagai M, Nakamura A, Makino R, Mitamura K. Expression of DNA (5-cytosin)-methyltransferases (DNMTs) in hepatocellular carcinomas. Hepatol. Res. 2003;26:186–191. doi: 10.1016/S1386-6346(03)00091-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Wang Y, Hu Y, Guo J, Wang L. miR-148a-3p suppresses the proliferation and invasion of esophageal cancer by targeting DNMT1. Genet Test. Mol. Biomark. 2019;23:98–104. doi: 10.1089/gtmb.2018.0285. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Hu Y, et al. LncRNA-SNHG1 contributes to gastric cancer cell proliferation by regulating DNMT1. Biochem Biophys. Res Commun. 2017;491:926–931. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.07.137. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Chen F, et al. MiR-137 suppresses triple-negative breast cancer stemness and tumorigenesis by perturbing BCL11A-DNMT1 interaction. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;47:2147–2158. doi: 10.1159/000491526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Gao X, et al. Calpain-2 triggers prostate cancer metastasis via enhancing CRMP4 promoter methylation through NF-κB/DNMT1 signaling pathway. Prostate. 2018;78:682–690. doi: 10.1002/pros.23512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Zhang Y, et al. Effects of DNMT1 silencing on malignant phenotype and methylated gene expression in cervical cancer cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;30:98. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lee E, et al. DNMT1 regulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cells, which promotes prostate cancer metastasis. Neoplasia. 2016;18:553–566. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2016.07.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Chen BF, et al. microRNA-199a-3p, DNMT3A, and aberrant DNA methylation in testicular cancer. Epigenetics. 2014;9:119–128. doi: 10.4161/epi.25799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Sun J, et al. miR-182 induces cervical cancer cell apoptosis through inhibiting the expression of DNMT3a. Int J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8:4755–4763. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Pang Y, et al. MYC and DNMT3A-mediated DNA methylation represses microRNA-200b in triple negative breast cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018;22:6262–6274. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Zhou Y, et al. Ginsenoside 20(S)-Rg3 inhibits the warburg effect via modulating DNMT3A/ MiR-532-3p/HK2 pathway in ovarian cancer cells. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;45:2548–2559. doi: 10.1159/000488273. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Zhang Q, Feng Y, Liu P, Yang J. MiR-143 inhibits cell proliferation and invasion by targeting DNMT3A in gastric cancer. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317711312. doi: 10.1177/1010428317711312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Gao Q, et al. Deletion of the de novo DNA methyltransferase Dnmt3a promotes lung tumor progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:18061–18066. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1114946108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Garzon R, et al. MicroRNA-29b induces global DNA hypomethylation and tumor suppressor gene reexpression in acute myeloid leukemia by targeting directly DNMT3A and 3B and indirectly DNMT1. Blood. 2009;113:6411–6418. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-170589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Deivendran S, et al. Metastasis-associated protein 1 is an upstream regulator of DNMT3a and stimulator of insulin-growth factor binding protein-3 in breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:44225. doi: 10.1038/srep44225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Tang X, et al. Autocrine TGF-β1/miR-200s/miR-221/DNMT3B regulatory loop maintains CAF status to fuel breast cancer cell proliferation. Cancer Lett. 2019;452:79–89. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.02.044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Chen Z, et al. miR-124 and miR-506 inhibit colorectal cancer progression by targeting DNMT3B and DNMT1. Oncotarget. 2015;6:38139–38150. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.5709. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Qiu W, et al. Kaempferol modulates DNA methylation and downregulates DNMT3B in bladder cancer. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2017;41:1325–1335. doi: 10.1159/000464435. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Peres R, et al. Angiogenin contributes to bladder cancer tumorigenesis by DNMT3b-mediated MMP2 activation. Oncotarget. 2016;7:43109–43123. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Song N, et al. Lentivirus‑mediated knockdown of MeCP2 inhibits the growth of colorectal cancer cells in vitro. Mol. Med Rep. 2016;13:860–866. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2015.4612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Ray BK, et al. Epigenetic regulation by Z-DNA silencer function controls cancer-associated ADAM-12 expression in breast cancer: cross-talk between MeCP2 and NF1 transcription factor family. Cancer Res. 2013;73:736–744. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2601. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Xu M, et al. MeCP2 suppresses LIN28A expression via binding to its methylated-CpG islands in pancreatic cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7:14476–14485. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7507. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Yaqinuddin A, et al. Silencing of MBD1 and MeCP2 in prostate-cancer-derived PC3 cells produces differential gene expression profiles and cellular phenotypes. Biosci. Rep. 2008;28:319–326. doi: 10.1042/BSR20080032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Zhang B, et al. MBD1 is an epigenetic regulator of KEAP1 in pancreatic cancer. Curr. Mol. Med. 2016;16:404–411. doi: 10.2174/1566524016666160316154150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Pulukuri SM, Rao JS. CpG island promoter methylation and silencing of 14-3-3σ gene expression in LNCaP and Tramp-C1 prostate cancer cell lines is associated with methyl-CpG-binding protein MBD2. Oncogene. 2006;25:4559–4572. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Martin V, et al. MBD2-mediated transcriptional repression of the p14ARF tumor suppressor gene in human colon cancer cells. Pathobiology. 2008;75:281–287. doi: 10.1159/000151708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Pontes TB, et al. Reduced mRNA expression levels of MBD2 and MBD3 in gastric carcinogenesis. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:3447–3453. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1455-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Zhang Y, et al. Epigenetic silencing of RNF144A expression in breast cancer cells through promoter hypermethylation and MBD4. Cancer Med. 2018;7:1317–1325. doi: 10.1002/cam4.1324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Abdel-Rahman WM, et al. Truncation of MBD4 predisposes to reciprocal chromosomal translocations and alters the response to therapeutic agents in colon cancer cells. DNA Repair. 2008;7:321–328. doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.11.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Pierre CC, Hercules SM, Yates C, Daniel JM. Dancing from bottoms up—roles of the POZ-ZF transcription factor Kaiso in cancer. Biochim Biophys. Acta Rev. Cancer. 2019;1871:64–74. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.10.005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Wang H, et al. Kaiso, a transcriptional repressor, promotes cell migration and invasion of prostate cancer cells through regulation of miR-31 expression. Oncotarget. 2016;7:5677–5689. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6801. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Dai SD, et al. Kaiso is expressed in lung cancer: its expression and localization is affected by p120ctn. Lung Cancer. 2010;67:205–215. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2009.06.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Bassey-Archibong BI, et al. Kaiso depletion attenuates the growth and survival of triple negative breast cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2689. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.92. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Roussel-Gervais A, et al. Loss of the methyl-CpG-binding protein ZBTB4 alters mitotic checkpoint, increases aneuploidy, and promotes tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2017;77:62–73. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Yu Y, et al. Tumor suppressive ZBTB4 inhibits cell growth by regulating cell cycle progression and apoptosis in Ewing sarcoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;100:108–115. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.01.132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Kim K, et al. Induction of the transcriptional repressor ZBTB4 in prostate cancer cells by drug-induced targeting of microRNA-17-92/106b-25 clusters. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2012;11:1852–1862. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-12-0181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Jing J, et al. The role of ZBTB38 in promoting migration and invasive growth of bladder cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2019;41:1980–1990. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6937. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Saidi S, Popov Z, Janevska V, Panov S. Overexpression of UHRF1 gene correlates with the major clinicopathological parameters in urinary bladder cancer. Int Braz. J. Urol. 2017;43:224–229. doi: 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2016.0126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Jiao D, et al. UHRF1 promotes renal cell carcinoma progression through epigenetic regulation of TXNIP. Oncogene. 2019;38:5686–5699. doi: 10.1038/s41388-019-0822-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Kong X, et al. Defining UHRF1 domains that support maintenance of human colon cancer DNA methylation and oncogenic properties. Cancer Cell. 2019;35:633–648.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.03.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Hu Q, et al. UHRF1 promotes aerobic glycolysis and proliferation via suppression of SIRT4 in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Lett. 2019;452:226–236. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2019.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Wei C, et al. Upregulation of UHRF1 promotes the progression of melanoma by inducing cell proliferation. Oncol. Rep. 2018;39:2553–2562. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6356. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Gao SP, et al. UHRF1 promotes breast cancer progression by suppressing KLF17 expression by hypermethylating its promoter. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017;7:1554–1565. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Lu S, et al. Ubiquitin-like with PHD and ring finger domains 2 is a predictor of survival and a potential therapeutic target in colon cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2014;31:1802–1810. doi: 10.3892/or.2014.3035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Zhang T, et al. UHRF2 decreases H3K9ac expression by interacting with it through the PHD and SRA/YDG domain in HepG2 hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Int J. Mol. Med. 2017;39:126–134. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Iguchi T, et al. Identification of UHRF2 as a negative regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal transition and its clinical significance in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Oncology. 2018;95:179–187. doi: 10.1159/000488860. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Jin C, et al. Loss of UHRF2 is associated with non-small cell lung carcinoma progression. J. Cancer. 2018;9:2994–3005. doi: 10.7150/jca.25876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Si Y, et al. Fisetin decreases TET1 activity and CCNY/CDK16 promoter 5hmC levels to inhibit the proliferation and invasion of renal cancer stem cell. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2019;23:1095–1105. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.14010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Huang H, et al. TET1 plays an essential oncogenic role in MLL-rearranged leukemia. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:11994–11999. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1310656110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Jiang X, et al. Targeted inhibition of STAT/TET1 axis as a therapeutic strategy for acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2099. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02290-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Chen LY, et al. TET1 reprograms the epithelial ovarian cancer epigenome and reveals casein kinase 2α as a therapeutic target. J. Pathol. 2019;248:363–376. doi: 10.1002/path.5238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Filipczak PT, et al. p53-Suppressed oncogene TET1 prevents cellular aging in lung cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79:1758–1768. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-1234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Liu C, et al. Decrease of 5-hydroxymethylcytosine is associated with progression of hepatocellular carcinoma through downregulation of TET1. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e62828. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Guo H, et al. TET1 suppresses colon cancer proliferation by impairing á-catenin signal pathway. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:12559–12565. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28522. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Cimmino L, et al. Restoration of TET2 function blocks aberrant self-renewal and leukemia progression. Cell. 2017;170:1079–1095.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2017.07.032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Langemeijer SM, et al. Acquired mutations in TET2 are common in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:838–842. doi: 10.1038/ng.391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 152.Zhu X, Li S. TET2 inhibits tumorigenesis of breast cancer cells by regulating caspase-4. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:16167. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-34462-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 153.Huang Y, et al. Loss of nuclear localization of TET2 in colorectal cancer. Clin. Epigenetics. 2016;8:9. doi: 10.1186/s13148-016-0176-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 154.Chen D, et al. TOP2A, HELLS, ATAD2, and TET3 are novel prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma. Urology. 2017;102:265.e1–265.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.12.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 155.Yang L, et al. Reduced expression of TET1, TET2, TET3 and TDG mRNAs are associated with poor prognosis of patients with early breast cancer. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0133896. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0133896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 156.Ye Z, et al. TET3 inhibits TGF-β1-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition by demethylating miR-30d precursor gene in ovarian cancer cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;35:72. doi: 10.1186/s13046-016-0350-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 157.Kouzarides T. Chromatin modifications and their function. Cell. 2007;128:693–705. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.02.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 158.Audia JE, Campbell RM. Histone modifications and cancer. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016;8:a019521. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019521. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 159.Hawkins RD, et al. Dynamic chromatin states in human ES cells reveal potential regulatory sequences and genes involved in pluripotency. Cell Res. 2011;21:1393–1409. doi: 10.1038/cr.2011.146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 160.Hon GC, Hawkins RD, Ren B. Predictive chromatin signatures in the mammalian genome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2009;18:R195–R201. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddp409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 161.Heintzman ND, et al. Histone modifications at human enhancers reflect global cell-type-specific gene expression. Nature. 2009;459:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature07829. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 162.Seligson DB, et al. Global levels of histone modifications predict prognosis in different cancers. Am. J. Pathol. 2009;174:1619–1628. doi: 10.2353/ajpath.2009.080874. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 163.Fraga MF, et al. Loss of acetylation at Lys16 and trimethylation at Lys20 of histone H4 is a common hallmark of human cancer. Nat. Genet. 2005;37:391–400. doi: 10.1038/ng1531. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 164.Di CV, Schneider R. Cancers with wrong HATs: the impact of acetylation. Brief. Funct. Genomics. 2013;12:231–243. doi: 10.1093/bfgp/els065. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 165.Sadoul K, Wang J, Diagouraga B, Khochbin S. The tale of protein lysine acetylation in the cytoplasm. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2011;2011:970382. doi: 10.1155/2011/970382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 166.Choudhary C, et al. Lysine acetylation targets protein complexes and co-regulates major cellular functions. Science. 2009;325:834–840. doi: 10.1126/science.1175371. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 167.Kleff S, Andrulis ED, Anderson CW, Sternglanz R. Identification of a gene encoding a yeast histone H4 acetyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 1995;270:24674–24677. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.42.24674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 168.Brownell JE, et al. Tetrahymena histone acetyltransferase A: a homolog to yeast Gcn5p linking histone acetylation to gene activation. Cell. 1996;84:843–851. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81063-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 169.Marmorstein R, Zhou MM. Writers and readers of histone acetylation: structure, mechanism, and inhibition. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a018762. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018762. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 170.Heery DM, Fischer PM. Pharmacological targeting of lysine acetyltransferases in human disease: a progress report. Drug Disco. Today. 2007;12:88–99. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2006.11.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 171.Yao TP, et al. Gene dosage-dependent embryonic development and proliferation defects in mice lacking the transcriptional integrator p300. Cell. 1998;93:361–372. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(00)81165-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 172.Oike Y, et al. Truncated CBP protein leads to classical Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome phenotypes in mice: implications for a dominant-negative mechanism. Hum. Mol. Genet. 1999;8:387–396. doi: 10.1093/hmg/8.3.387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 173.Tanner KG, et al. Catalytic mechanism and function of invariant glutamic acid 173 from the histone acetyltransferase GCN5 transcriptional coactivator. J. Biol. Chem. 1999;274:18157–18160. doi: 10.1074/jbc.274.26.18157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 174.Tanner KG, Langer MR, Denu JM. Kinetic mechanism of human histone acetyltransferase P/CAF. Biochemistry. 2000;39:15652. doi: 10.1021/bi005121q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 175.Yan Y, Harper S, Speicher DW, Marmorstein R. The catalytic mechanism of the ESA1 histone acetyltransferase involves a self-acetylated intermediate. Nat. Struct. Biol. 2002;9:862–869. doi: 10.1038/nsb0902-638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 176.Liu X, et al. The structural basis of protein acetylation by the p300/CBP transcriptional coactivator. Nature. 2008;451:846–850. doi: 10.1038/nature06546. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 177.Marmorstein R. Biochemical and structural characterization of recombinant histone acetyltransferase proteins. Methods Enzymol. 2004;376:106–119. doi: 10.1016/S0076-6879(03)76007-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 178.Chen YF, et al. High expression levels of COX-2 and P300 are associated with unfavorable survival in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Eur. Arch. Otorhinolaryngol. 2013;270:1009–1017. doi: 10.1007/s00405-012-2275-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 179.Korzus E. Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome and epigenetic alterations. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2017;978:39–62. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-53889-1_3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 180.Miller RW, Rubinstein JH. Tumors in Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome. Am. J. Med. Genet. 1995;56:112–115. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320560125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 181.Borrow J, et al. The translocation t(8;16)(p11; p13) of acute myeloid leukaemia fuses a putative acetyltransferase to the CREB-binding protein. Nat. Genet. 1996;14:33–41. doi: 10.1038/ng0996-33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 182.Panagopoulos I, et al. Fusion of the MORF and CBP genes in acute myeloid leukemia with the t(10;16)(q22; p13) Hum. Mol. Genet. 2001;10:395–404. doi: 10.1093/hmg/10.4.395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 183.Chaffanet M, et al. MOZ is fused to p300 in an acute monocytic leukemia with t(8;22) Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2000;28:138–144. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2264(200006)28:2&#x0003c;138::AID-GCC2&#x0003e;3.0.CO;2-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 184.Ida K, et al. Adenoviral E1A-associated protein p300 is involved in acute myeloid leukemia with t(11;22)(q23;q13) Blood. 1997;90:4699–4704. doi: 10.1182/blood.V90.12.4699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 185.Taki T, Sako M, Tsuchida M, Hayashi Y. The t(11;16)(q23;p13) translocation in myelodysplastic syndrome fuses the MLL gene to the CBP gene. Blood. 1997;89:3945–3950. doi: 10.1182/blood.V89.11.3945. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 186.Muraoka M, et al. p300 gene alterations in colorectal and gastric carcinomas. Oncogene. 1996;12:1565–1569. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 187.Gayther SA, et al. Mutations truncating the EP300 acetylase in human cancers. Nat. Genet. 2000;24:300–303. doi: 10.1038/73536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 188.Ozdağ H, et al. Mutation analysis of CBP and PCAF reveals rare inactivating mutations in cancer cell lines but not in primary tumours. Br. J. Cancer. 2002;87:1162–1165. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6600554. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 189.Burwinkel B, et al. Association of NCOA3 polymorphisms with breast cancer risk. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:2169–2174. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1621. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 190.Wachtel M, et al. Gene expression signatures identify rhabdomyosarcoma subtypes and detect a novel t(2;2)(q35; p23) translocation fusing PAX3 to NCOA1. Cancer Res. 2004;64:5539–5545. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-0844. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 191.Dhalluin C, et al. Structure and ligand of a histone acetyltransferase bromodomain. Nature. 1999;399:491–496. doi: 10.1038/20974. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 192.Thompson M. Polybromo-1: the chromatin targeting subunit of the PBAF complex. Biochimie. 2009;91:309–319. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2008.10.019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 193.Zhang Q, et al. Biochemical profiling of histone binding selectivity of the yeast bromodomain family. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e8903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008903. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 194.Sanchez R, Zhou MM. The role of human bromodomains in chromatin biology and gene transcription. Curr. Opin. Drug Disco. Devel. 2009;12:659–665. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 195.Filippakopoulos P, Knapp S. Targeting bromodomains: epigenetic readers of lysine acetylation. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2014;13:337–356. doi: 10.1038/nrd4286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 196.Li Y, et al. AF9 YEATS domain links histone acetylation to DOT1L-mediated H3K79 methylation. Cell. 2014;159:558–571. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.09.049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 197.Morin RD, et al. Genetic landscapes of relapsed and refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphomas. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:2290–2300. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-2123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 198.Perlman EJ, et al. MLLT1 YEATS domain mutations in clinically distinctive Favourable Histology Wilms tumours. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:10013. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 199.Chiang CM. Brd4 engagement from chromatin targeting to transcriptional regulation: selective contact with acetylated histone H3 and H4. F1000 Biol. Rep. 2009;1:98. doi: 10.3410/B1-98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 200.Zeng L, Zhou MM. Bromodomain: an acetyl-lysine binding domain. FEBS Lett. 2002;513:124–128. doi: 10.1016/S0014-5793(01)03309-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 201.Pirrotta V. The necessity of chromatin: a view in perspective. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2016;8:a019547. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a019547. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 202.Yang Z, et al. Recruitment of P-TEFb for stimulation of transcriptional elongation by the bromodomain protein Brd4. Mol. Cell. 2005;19:535–545. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2005.06.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 203.Phelps MA, et al. Clinical response and pharmacokinetics from a phase 1 study of an active dosing schedule of flavopiridol in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood. 2009;113:2637–2645. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-07-168583. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 204.Rahl PB, et al. c-Myc regulates transcriptional pause release. Cell. 2010;141:432–445. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.030. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 205.French CA, et al. BRD-NUT oncoproteins: a family of closely related nuclear proteins that block epithelial differentiation and maintain the growth of carcinoma cells. Oncogene. 2008;27:2237–2242. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1210852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 206.Zuber J, et al. RNAi screen identifies Brd4 as a therapeutic target in acute myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2011;478:524–528. doi: 10.1038/nature10334. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 207.de Ruijter AJ, et al. Histone deacetylases (HDACs): characterization of the classical HDAC family. Biochem J. 2003;370:737–749. doi: 10.1042/bj20021321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 208.Verdin E, Dequiedt F, Kasler HG. Class II histone deacetylases: versatile regulators. Trends Genet. 2003;19:286–293. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9525(03)00073-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 209.Seto E, Yoshida M. Erasers of histone acetylation: the histone deacetylase enzymes. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2014;6:a018713. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a018713. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 210.Imai S, Armstrong CM, Kaeberlein M, Guarente L. Transcriptional silencing and longevity protein Sir2 is an NAD-dependent histone deacetylase. Nature. 2000;403:795–800. doi: 10.1038/35001622. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 211.Liszt G, Ford E, Kurtev M, Guarente L. Mouse Sir2 homolog SIRT6 is a nuclear ADP-ribosyltransferase. J. Biol. Chem. 2005;280:21313–21320. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M413296200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 212.Frye RA. Characterization of five human cDNAs with homology to the yeast SIR2 gene: Sir2-like proteins (sirtuins) metabolize NAD and may have protein ADP-ribosyltransferase activity. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 1999;260:273–279. doi: 10.1006/bbrc.1999.0897. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 213.Du J, et al. Sirt5 is a NAD-dependent protein lysine demalonylase and desuccinylase. Science. 2011;334:806–809. doi: 10.1126/science.1207861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 214.Johnson CA, et al. Human class I histone deacetylase complexes show enhanced catalytic activity in the presence of ATP and co-immunoprecipitate with the ATP-dependent chaperone protein Hsp70. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:9590–9597. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M107942200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 215.Zhang X, et al. Activation of the growth-differentiation factor 11 gene by the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor trichostatin A and repression by HDAC3. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004;24:5106–5118. doi: 10.1128/MCB.24.12.5106-5118.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 216.Hubbert C, et al. HDAC6 is a microtubule-associated deacetylase. Nature. 2002;417:455–458. doi: 10.1038/417455a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 217.Luo J, et al. Deacetylation of p53 modulates its effect on cell growth and apoptosis. Nature. 2000;408:377–381. doi: 10.1038/35042612. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 218.Vaziri H, et al. hSIR2(SIRT1) functions as an NAD-dependent p53 deacetylase. Cell. 2001;107:149–159. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(01)00527-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 219.Peng L, et al. SIRT1 negatively regulates the activities, functions, and protein levels of hMOF and TIP60. Mol. Cell Biol. 2012;32:2823–2836. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00496-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 220.Ayer DE. Histone deacetylases: transcriptional repression with SINers and NuRDs. Trends Cell Biol. 1999;9:193–198. doi: 10.1016/S0962-8924(99)01536-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 221.Wen YD, et al. The histone deacetylase-3 complex contains nuclear receptor corepressors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:7202–7207. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.13.7202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 222.Watson PJ, Fairall L, Santos GM, Schwabe JW. Structure of HDAC3 bound to co-repressor and inositol tetraphosphate. Nature. 2012;481:335–340. doi: 10.1038/nature10728. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 223.Kang H, et al. Peptide switch is essential for Sirt1 deacetylase activity. Mol. Cell. 2011;44:203–213. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2011.07.038. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 224.Kim EJ, Kho JH, Kang MR, Um SJ. Active regulator of SIRT1 cooperates with SIRT1 and facilitates suppression of p53 activity. Mol. Cell. 2007;28:277–290. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2007.08.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • ☑225.Ocker M, Schneider-Stock R. Histone deacetylase inhibitors: signalling towards p21cip1/waf1. Int J. Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;39:1367–1374. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2007.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 226.Ozdağ H, et al. Differential expression of selected histone modifier genes in human solid cancers. BMC Genomics. 2006;7:90. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 227.Xue L, et al. RNAi screening identifies HAT1 as a potential drug target in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Int J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014;7:3898–3907. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 228.Fan P, et al. Overexpressed histone acetyltransferase 1 regulates cancer immunity by increasing programmed death-ligand 1 expression in pancreatic cancer. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:47. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1044-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 229.Miao BP, et al. Histone acetyltransferase 1 up regulates Bcl2L12 expression in nasopharyngeal cancer cells. Arch. Biochem Biophys. 2018;646:72–79. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2018.03.040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 230.Jin X, Tian S, Li P. Histone acetyltransferase 1 promotes cell proliferation and induces cisplatin resistance in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol. Res. 2017;25:939–946. doi: 10.3727/096504016X14809827856524. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 231.Zhang J, Liu M, Liu W, Wang W. Ras-ERK1/2 signalling promotes the development of osteosarcoma through regulation of H4K12ac through HAT1. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2019;47:1207–1215. doi: 10.1080/21691401.2019.1593857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 232.Han N, et al. HAT1 induces lung cancer cell apoptosis via up regulating Fas. Oncotarget. 2017;8:89970–89977. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.21205. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 233.Yin YW, et al. The histone acetyltransferase GCN5 expression is elevated and regulated by c-Myc and E2F1 transcription factors in human colon cancer. Gene Expr. 2015;16:187–196. doi: 10.3727/105221615X14399878166230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 234.Zhao L, Pang A, Li Y. Function of GCN5 in the TGF-β1-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2018;16:3955–3963. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.9134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 235.Zhao C, et al. C5a induces A549 cell proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer via GDF15 gene activation mediated by GCN5-dependent KLF5 acetylation. Oncogene. 2018;37:4821–4837. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0298-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 236.Watts GS, et al. The acetyltransferase p300/CBP-associated factor is a p53 target gene in breast tumor cells. Neoplasia. 2004;6:187–194. doi: 10.1593/neo.03292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 237.Brasacchio D, et al. Down-regulation of a pro-apoptotic pathway regulated by PCAF/ADA3 in early stage gastric cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:442. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0470-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 238.Yu C, et al. Phenethyl isothiocyanate inhibits androgen receptor-regulated transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells through suppressing PCAF. Mol. Nutr. Food Res. 2013;57:1825–1833. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201200642. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 239.Xie X, et al. Tip60 is associated with resistance to X-ray irradiation in prostate cancer. FEBS Open Bio. 2018;8:271–278. doi: 10.1002/2211-5463.12371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 240.Wang LT, et al. TIP60-dependent acetylation of the SPZ1-TWIST complex promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis in liver cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38:518–532. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0457-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 241.Sakuraba K, et al. Down-regulation of Tip60 gene as a potential marker for the malignancy of colorectal cancer. Anticancer Res. 2009;29:3953–3955. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 242.McGuire A, et al. Quantifying Tip60 (Kat5) stratifies breast cancer. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:3819. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-40221-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 243.Yang Y, et al. Tat-interactive protein-60KDA (TIP60) regulates the tumorigenesis of lung cancer in vitro. J. Cancer. 2017;8:2277–2281. doi: 10.7150/jca.19677. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 244.Jaganathan A, et al. Coactivator MYST1 regulates nuclear factor-κB and androgen receptor functions during proliferation of prostate cancer cells. Mol. Endocrinol. 2014;28:872–885. doi: 10.1210/me.2014-1055. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 245.Hayashi Y, et al. NUP98-HBO1-fusion generates phenotypically and genetically relevant chronic myelomonocytic leukemia pathogenesis. Blood Adv. 2019;3:1047–1060. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018025007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 246.Quintela M, et al. HBO1 directs histone H4 specific acetylation, potentiating mechano-transduction pathways and membrane elasticity in ovarian cancer cells. Nanomedicine. 2019;17:254–265. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2019.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 247.Chen Z, et al. HBO1 promotes cell proliferation in bladder cancer via activation of Wnt/β-catenin signaling. Mol. Carcinog. 2018;57:12–21. doi: 10.1002/mc.22715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 248.Deguchi K, et al. MOZ-TIF2-induced acute myeloid leukemia requires the MOZ nucleosome binding motif and TIF2-mediated recruitment of CBP. Cancer Cell. 2003;3:259–271. doi: 10.1016/S1535-6108(03)00051-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 249.Mohammadi K, et al. Investigation of the changes in the expression levels of MOZ gene in colorectal cancer tissues. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2019;10:68–73. doi: 10.21037/jgo.2018.09.12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 250.Yu L, et al. Identification of MYST3 as a novel epigenetic activator of ERα frequently amplified in breast cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:2910–2918. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 251.Vizmanos JL, et al. t(10;16)(q22; p13) and MORF-CREBBP fusion is a recurrent event in acute myeloid leukemia. Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2003;36:402–405. doi: 10.1002/gcc.10174. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 252.Ono H, Basson MD, Ito H. P300 inhibition enhances gemcitabine-induced apoptosis of pancreatic cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:51301–51310. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 253.Pattabiraman DR, et al. Interaction of c-Myb with p300 is required for the induction of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) by human AML oncogenes. Blood. 2014;123:2682–2690. doi: 10.1182/blood-2012-02-413187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 254.Hou X, et al. p300 promotes proliferation, migration, and invasion via inducing epithelial-mesenchymal transition in non-small cell lung cancer cells. BMC Cancer. 2018;18:641. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4559-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 255.Xu B, et al. The LIM protein Ajuba recruits DBC1 and CBP/p300 to acetylate ERα and enhances ERα target gene expression in breast cancer cells. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47:2322–2335. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1306. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 256.Wang YM, et al. Histone acetyltransferase p300/CBP inhibitor C646 blocks the survival and invasion pathways of gastric cancer cell lines. Int J. Oncol. 2017;51:1860–1868. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.4176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 257.He H, et al. Selective p300 inhibitor C646 inhibited HPV E6-E7 genes, altered glucose metabolism and induced apoptosis in cervical cancer cells. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017;812:206–215. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2017.06.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 258.Huh JW, et al. Prognostic impact of p300 expression in patients with colorectal canceu. J. Surg. Oncol. 2013;108:374–377. doi: 10.1002/jso.23405. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 259.Takeuchi A, et al. p300 mediates cellular resistance to doxorubicin in bladder cancer. Mol. Med Rep. 2012;5:173–176. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2011.593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 260.Inagaki Y, et al. Epigenetic regulation of proliferation and invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma cells by CBP/p300 histone acetyltransferase activity. Int J. Oncol. 2016;48:533–540. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2015.3288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 261.Díaz-Beyá M, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia with translocation (8;16)(p11; p13) and MYST3-CREBBP rearrangement harbors a distinctive microRNA signature targeting RET proto-oncogene. Leukemia. 2013;27:595–603. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.278. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 262.Jin L, et al. Therapeutic targeting of the CBP/p300 bromodomain blocks the growth of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2017;77:5564–5575. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0314. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 263.Ding L, et al. CBP loss cooperates with PTEN haploinsufficiency to drive prostate cancer: implications for epigenetic therapy. Cancer Res. 2014;74:2050–2061. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1659. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 264.Jia D, et al. Crebbp loss drives small cell lung cancer and increases sensitivity to HDAC inhibition. Cancer Discov. 2018;8:1422–1437. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-18-0385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 265.Pavón MA, et al. CKMT1 and NCOA1 expression as a predictor of clinical outcome in patients with advanced-stage head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Head. Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E1392–E1403. doi: 10.1002/hed.24232. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 266.Qin L, et al. NCOA1 directly targets M-CSF1 expression to promote breast cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3477–3488. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2639. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 267.Ma YS, et al. High expression of miR-105–1 positively correlates with clinical prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting oncogene NCOA1. Oncotarget. 2017;8:11896–11905. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.14435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 268.Aikawa Y, et al. PU.1-mediated upregulation of CSF1R is crucial for leukemia stem cell potential induced by MOZ-TIF2. Nat. Med. 2010;16:580–585. doi: 10.1038/nm.2122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 269.Fancher AT, et al. Reconfiguring the AR-TIF2 protein-protein interaction HCS Assay in Prostate Cancer Cells and Characterizing the Hits from a LOPAC Screen. Assay. Drug Dev. Technol. 2016;14:453–477. doi: 10.1089/adt.2016.741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 270.O’Donnell KA, et al. A Sleeping Beauty mutagenesis screen reveals a tumor suppressor role for Ncoa2/Src-2 in liver cancer. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:E1377–E1386. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115433109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 271.Yu J, et al. Disruption of NCOA2 by recurrent fusion with LACTB2 in colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2016;35:187–195. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.72. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 272.Kumar S, et al. NCOA3-mediated upregulation of mucin expression via transcriptional and post-translational changes during the development of pancreatic cancer. Oncogene. 2015;34:4879–4889. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 273.Alkner S, et al. Prognostic and predictive importance of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 in a randomized trial comparing adjuvant letrozole and tamoxifen therapy in postmenopausal breast cancer: the Danish cohort of BIG 1–98. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2017;166:481–490. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4416-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 274.Zou JX, et al. ACTR/AIB1/SRC-3 and androgen receptor control prostate cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth through direct control of cell cycle genes. Prostate. 2006;66:1474–1486. doi: 10.1002/pros.20477. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 275.Xie D, et al. Correlation of AIB1 overexpression with advanced clinical stage of human colorectal carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2005;36:777–783. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2005.05.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 276.Liu WH, Chang LS. Arachidonic acid induces Fas and FasL upregulation in human leukemia U937 cells via Ca2+/ROS-mediated suppression of ERK/c-Fos pathway and activation of p38 MAPK/ATF-2 pathway. Toxicol. Lett. 2009;191:140–148. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2009.08.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 277.Desai S, Laskar S, Pandey BN. Autocrine IL-8 and VEGF mediate epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasiveness via p38/JNK-ATF-2 signalling in A549 lung cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2013;25:1780–1791. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2013.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 278.Sun X, Lou L, Zhong K, Wan L. MicroRNA-451 regulates chemoresistance in renal cell carcinoma by targeting ATF-2 gene. Exp. Biol. Med. 2017;242:1299–1305. doi: 10.1177/1535370217701625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 279.Winter AG, et al. RNA polymerase III transcription factor TFIIIC2 is overexpressed in ovarian tumors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2000;97:12619–12624. doi: 10.1073/pnas.230224097. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 280.Xiao L, et al. Induction of the CLOCK gene by E2-ERα signaling promotes the proliferation of breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e95878. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 281.Xu H, Wang Z, Mo G, Chen H. Association between circadian gene CLOCK and cisplatin resistance in ovarian cancer cells: a preliminary study. Oncol. Lett. 2018;15:8945–8950. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 282.Xiang R, et al. Circadian clock gene Per2 downregulation in non‑small cell lung cancer is associated with tumour progression and metastasis. Oncol. Rep. 2018;40:3040–3048. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6704. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 283.Xie XW, et al. Expression of CIITA-related MHCII molecules in tumors linked to prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Int J. Oncol. 2009;34:681–688. doi: 10.3892/ijo_00000238. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 284.Truax AD, Thakkar M, Greer SF. Dysregulated recruitment of the histone methyltransferase EZH2 to the class II transactivator (CIITA) promoter IV in breast cancer cells. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e36013. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 285.Satoh A, et al. Epigenetic inactivation of class II transactivator (CIITA) is associated with the absence of interferon-gamma-induced HLA-DR expression in colorectal and gastric cancer cells. Oncogene. 2004;23:8876–8886. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 286.Starska K, et al. Gene and protein expression of O-GlcNAc-cycling enzymes in human laryngeal cancer. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015;15:455–468. doi: 10.1007/s10238-014-0318-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 287.Krześlak A, et al. Gene expression of O-GlcNAc cycling enzymes in human breast cancers. Clin. Exp. Med. 2012;12:61–65. doi: 10.1007/s10238-011-0138-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 288.Fontanals-Cirera B, et al. Harnessing BET inhibitor sensitivity reveals AMIGO2 as a melanoma survival gene. Mol. Cell. 2017;68:731–744.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.11.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 289.Pérez-Pena J, et al. Mapping Bromodomains in breast cancer and association with clinical outcome. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-41934-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 290.Handoko L, et al. JQ1 affects BRD2-dependent and independent transcription regulation without disrupting H4-hyperacetylated chromatin states. Epigenetics. 2018;13:410–431. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2018.1469891. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 291.Sherman MH, et al. Stromal cues regulate the pancreatic cancer epigenome and metabolome. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2017;114:1129–1134. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1620164114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 292.Zhang Q, et al. By recruiting HDAC1, MORC2 suppresses p21 Waf1/Cip1 in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2015;6:16461–16470. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.3889. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 293.Dong ZY, Zhou YR, Wang LX. HDAC1 is indirectly involved in the epigenetic regulation of p38 MAPK that drive the lung cancer progression. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharm. Sci. 2018;22:5980–5986. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201809_15932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 294.Zhang N, et al. SREBP1, targeted by miR-18a-5p, modulates epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer via forming a co-repressor complex with Snail and HDAC1/2. Cell Death Differ. 2019;26:843–859. doi: 10.1038/s41418-018-0158-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 295.Li SZ, et al. Nemo-like kinase (NLK) primes colorectal cancer progression by releasing the E2F1 complex from HDAC1. Cancer Lett. 2018;431:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.05.032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 296.von BJ, et al. E-cadherin regulates metastasis of pancreatic cancer in vivo and is suppressed by a SNAIL/HDAC1/HDAC2 repressor complex. Gastroenterology. 2009;137:361–371.e1–5. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.04.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 297.Tang W, et al. The p300/YY1/miR-500a-5p/HDAC2 signalling axis regulates cell proliferation in human colorectal cancer. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:663. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08225-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 298.Zhu W, et al. FKBP3 promotes proliferation of non-small cell lung cancer cells through regulating Sp1/HDAC2/p27. Theranostics. 2017;7:3078–3089. doi: 10.7150/thno.18067. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 299.Roy SS, et al. Significance of PELP1/HDAC2/miR-200 regulatory network in EMT and metastasis of breast cancer. Oncogene. 2014;33:3707–3716. doi: 10.1038/onc.2013.332. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 300.Hulsurkar M, et al. Beta-adrenergic signaling promotes tumor angiogenesis and prostate cancer progression through HDAC2-mediated suppression of thrombospondin-1. Oncogene. 2017;36:1525–1536. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 301.Miao LJ, et al. Stat3 inhibits Beclin 1 expression through recruitment of HDAC3 in nonsmall cell lung cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:7097–7103. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-1961-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 302.Chen G, et al. Long noncoding RNA SBF2-AS1 promotes colorectal cancer proliferation and invasion by inhibiting miR-619–5p activity and facilitating HDAC3 expression. J. Cell Physiol. 2019;234:18688–18696. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28509. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 303.Bayat S, et al. Downregulation of HDAC2 and HDAC3 via oleuropein as a potent prevention and therapeutic agent in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:9172–9180. doi: 10.1002/jcb.28193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 304.Lucas J, et al. Upregulation of PD‑L1 expression by resveratrol and piceatannol in breast and colorectal cancer cells occurs via HDAC3/p300‑mediated NF‑κB signaling. Int J. Oncol. 2018;53:1469–1480. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 305.Kang Y, et al. HDAC8 and STAT3 repress BMF gene activity in colon cancer cells. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5:e1476. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2014.422. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 306.Vanaja GR, Ramulu HG, Kalle AM. Overexpressed HDAC8 in cervical cancer cells shows functional redundancy of tubulin deacetylation with HDAC6. Cell Commun. Signal. 2018;16:20. doi: 10.1186/s12964-018-0231-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 307.Wang ZT, et al. Histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress mutant p53 transcription via HDAC8/YY1 signals in triple negative breast cancer cells. Cell Signal. 2016;28:506–515. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2016.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 308.Wu S, et al. Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA) promotes the epithelial mesenchymal transition of triple negative breast cancer cells via HDAC8/FOXA1 signals. Biol. Chem. 2016;397:75–83. doi: 10.1515/hsz-2015-0215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 309.Halkidou K, et al. Nuclear accumulation of histone deacetylase 4 (HDAC4) coincides with the loss of androgen sensitivity in hormone refractory cancer of the prostate. Eur. Urol. 2004;45:382–389. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2003.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 310.Wang B, et al. A dual role of miR-22 modulated by RelA/p65 in resensitizing fulvestrant-resistant breast cancer cells to fulvestrant by targeting FOXP1 and HDAC4 and constitutive acetylation of p53 at Lys382. Oncogenesis. 2018;7:54. doi: 10.1038/s41389-018-0063-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 311.Wei JY, et al. Melatonin induces apoptosis of colorectal cancer cells through HDAC4 nuclear import mediated by CaMKII inactivation. J. Pineal Res. 2015;58:429–438. doi: 10.1111/jpi.12226. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 312.Cao C, et al. HDAC5-LSD1 axis regulates antineoplastic effect of natural HDAC inhibitor sulforaphane in human breast cancer cells. Int. J. Cancer. 2018;143:1388–1401. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 313.Liu C, et al. Hypermethylation of miRNA-589 promoter leads to upregulation of HDAC5 which promotes malignancy in non-small cell lung cancer. Int. J. Oncol. 2017;50:2079–2090. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2017.3967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 314.Sun S, et al. HDAC6 inhibitor TST strengthens the antiproliferative effects of PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 in breast cancer cells via suppressing RTK activation. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:929. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0931-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 315.Won HR, et al. A452, an HDAC6-selective inhibitor, synergistically enhances the anticancer activity of chemotherapeutic agents in colorectal cancer cells. Mol. Carcinog. 2018;57:1383–1395. doi: 10.1002/mc.22852. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 316.Wang Z, Hu P, Tang F, Xie C. HDAC6-mediated EGFR stabilization and activation restrict cell response to sorafenib in non-small cell lung cancer cells. Med. Oncol. 2016;33:50. doi: 10.1007/s12032-016-0765-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 317.Seidel C, et al. 4-Hydroxybenzoic acid derivatives as HDAC6-specific inhibitors modulating microtubular structure and HSP90α chaperone activity against prostate cancer. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2016;99:31–52. doi: 10.1016/j.bcp.2015.11.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 318.Witt AE, et al. Identification of a cancer stem cell-specific function for the histone deacetylases, HDAC1 and HDAC7, in breast and ovarian cancer. Oncogene. 2017;36:1707–1720. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 319.Wu MY, et al. MiR-34a regulates therapy resistance by targeting HDAC1 and HDAC7 in breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014;354:311–319. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.08.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 320.Miremadi A, Oestergaard MZ, Pharoah PD, Caldas C. Cancer genetics of epigenetic genes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2007;16:R28–R49. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddm021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 321.Salgado E, et al. HDAC9 overexpression confers invasive and angiogenic potential to triple negative breast cancer cells via modulating microRNA-206. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;503:1087–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.120. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 322.Okudela K, et al. Expression of HDAC9 in lung cancer-potential role in lung carcinogenesis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014;7:213–220. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 323.Yang Y, et al. HDAC10 promotes lung cancer proliferation via AKT phosphorylation. Oncotarget. 2016;7:59388–59401. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 324.Islam MM, et al. HDAC10 as a potential therapeutic target in ovarian cancer. Gynecol. Oncol. 2017;144:613–620. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 325.Qin J, et al. Hypoxia-inducible factor 1 alpha promotes cancer stem cells-like properties in human ovarian cancer cells by upregulating SIRT1 expression. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:10592. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09244-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 326.Santolla MF, et al. SIRT1 is involved in oncogenic signaling mediated by GPER in breast cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1834. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 327.Sun L, et al. A SUMOylation-dependent pathway regulates SIRT1 transcription and lung cancer metastasis. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105:887–898. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djt118. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 328.Farooqi AS, et al. Novel lysine-based thioureas as mechanism-based inhibitors of Sirtuin 2 (SIRT2) with anticancer activity in a colorectal cancer murine model. J. Med Chem. 2019;62:4131–4141. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.9b00191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 329.Hoffmann G, Breitenbücher F, Schuler M, Ehrenhofer-Murray AE. A novel sirtuin 2 (SIRT2) inhibitor with p53-dependent pro-apoptotic activity in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:5208–5216. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.487736. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 330.Li Y, et al. SIRT2 promotes the migration and invasion of gastric cancer through RAS/ERK/JNK/MMP-9 pathway by increasing PEPCK1-related metabolism. Neoplasia. 2018;20:745–756. doi: 10.1016/j.neo.2018.03.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 331.Li Z, et al. SIRT2 inhibits non-small cell lung cancer cell growth through impairing Skp2-mediated p27 degradation. Oncotarget. 2016;7:18927–18939. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.7816. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 332.Fiskus W, et al. SIRT2 deacetylates and inhibits the peroxidase activity of peroxiredoxin-1 to sensitize breast cancer cells to oxidant stress-inducing agents. Cancer Res. 2016;76:5467–5478. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-0126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 333.Damodaran S, et al. Dysregulation of Sirtuin 2 (SIRT2) and histone H3K18 acetylation pathways associates with adverse prostate cancer outcomes. BMC Cancer. 2017;17:874. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3853-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 334.Xiong Y, et al. SIRT3 deacetylates and promotes degradation of P53 in PTEN-defective non-small cell lung cancer. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2018;144:189–198. doi: 10.1007/s00432-017-2537-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 335.Wang S, et al. Programmed death ligand 1 promotes lymph node metastasis and glucose metabolism in cervical cancer by activating integrin β4/SNAI1/SIRT3 signaling pathway. Oncogene. 2018;37:4164–4180. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0252-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 336.Wu Y, et al. SIRT3 aggravates metformin-induced energy stress and apoptosis in ovarian cancer cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2018;367:137–149. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2018.03.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 337.Quan Y, et al. SIRT3 inhibits prostate cancer by destabilizing oncoprotein c-MYC through regulation of the PI3K/Akt pathway. Oncotarget. 2015;6:26494–26507. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.4764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 338.Lee DY, et al. Regulation of SIRT3 signal related metabolic reprogramming in gastric cancer by Helicobacter pylori oncoprotein CagA. Oncotarget. 2017;8:78365–78378. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18695. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 339.Miyo M, et al. Tumour-suppressive function of SIRT4 in human colorectal cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;113:492–499. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2015.226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 340.Sun H, et al. SIRT4 acts as a tumor suppressor in gastric cancer by inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, and invasion. Onco Targets Ther. 2018;11:3959–3968. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S156143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 341.Xu L, et al. SIRT5 as a biomarker for response to anthracycline-taxane-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2018;39:2315–2323. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6319. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 342.Shi L, et al. SIRT5-mediated deacetylation of LDHB promotes autophagy and tumorigenesis in colorectal cancer. Mol. Oncol. 2019;13:358–375. doi: 10.1002/1878-0261.12408. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 343.Lu W, Zuo Y, Feng Y, Zhang M. SIRT5 facilitates cancer cell growth and drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:10699–10705. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2372-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 344.Tang Z, et al. CDK2 positively regulates aerobic glycolysis by suppressing SIRT5 in gastric cancer. Cancer Sci. 2018;109:2590–2598. doi: 10.1111/cas.13691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 345.Chen XF, et al. SIRT5 inhibits peroxisomal ACOX1 to prevent oxidative damage and is downregulated in liver cancer. EMBO Rep. 2018;19:e45124. doi: 10.15252/embr.201745124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 346.Liu Y, et al. Inhibition of SIRT6 in prostate cancer reduces cell viability and increases sensitivity to chemotherapeutics. Protein Cell. 2013;4:702–710. doi: 10.1007/s13238-013-3054-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 347.Bauer I, et al. The NAD+-dependent histone deacetylase SIRT6 promotes cytokine production and migration in pancreatic cancer cells by regulating Ca2+ responses. J. Biol. Chem. 2012;287:40924–40937. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M112.405837. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 348.Bai L, et al. Upregulation of SIRT6 predicts poor prognosis and promotes metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer via the ERK1/2/MMP9 pathway. Oncotarget. 2016;7:40377–40386. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.9750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 349.Min L, et al. Liver cancer initiation is controlled by AP-1 through SIRT6-dependent inhibition of survivin. Nat. Cell Biol. 2012;14:1203–1211. doi: 10.1038/ncb2590. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 350.Thirumurthi U, et al. MDM2-mediated degradation of SIRT6 phosphorylated by AKT1 promotes tumorigenesis and trastuzumab resistance in breast cancer. Sci. Signal. 2014;7:ra71. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.2005076. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 351.Han Y, et al. Hsa-miR-125b suppresses bladder cancer development by down-regulating oncogene SIRT7 and oncogenic long noncoding RNA MALAT1. FEBS Lett. 2013;23:3875–3882. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2013.10.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 352.Yu H, et al. Overexpression of sirt7 exhibits oncogenic property and serves as a prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014;20:3434–3445. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-2952. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 353.Tang M, et al. Downregulation of SIRT7 by 5-fluorouracil induces radiosensitivity in human colorectal cancer. Theranostics. 2017;7:1346–1359. doi: 10.7150/thno.18804. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 354.Tang X, et al. SIRT7 antagonizes TGF-β signaling and inhibits breast cancer metastasis. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:318. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00396-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 355.Jiang Y, Han Z, Wang Y, Hao W. Depletion of SIRT7 sensitizes human non-small cell lung cancer cells to gemcitabine therapy by inhibiting autophagy. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 2018;506:266–271. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.10.089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 356.Deubzer HE, et al. HDAC11 is a novel drug target in carcinomas. Int J. Cancer. 2013;132:2200–2208. doi: 10.1002/ijc.27876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 357.Gong D, Zeng Z, Yi F, Wu J. Inhibition of histone deacetylase 11 promotes human liver cancer cell apoptosis. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2019;11:983–990. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 358.Huang R, et al. Clinicopathological features and prediction values of HDAC1, HDAC2, HDAC3, and HDAC11 in classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Anticancer Drugs. 2018;29:364–370. doi: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 359.Thole TM, et al. Neuroblastoma cells depend on HDAC11 for mitotic cell cycle progression and survival. Cell Death Dis. 2017;8:e2635. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2017.49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 360.Völkel P, Angrand PO. The control of histone lysine methylation in epigenetic regulation. Biochimie. 2007;89:1–20. doi: 10.1016/j.biochi.2006.07.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 361.Wu G, et al. Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas. Nat. Genet. 2012;44:251–253. doi: 10.1038/ng.1102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 362.Fang D, et al. H3.3K27M mutant proteins reprogram epigenome by sequestering the PRC2 complex to poised enhancers. Elife. 2018;7:e36696. doi: 10.7554/eLife.36696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 363.Chan KM, et al. A lesson learned from the H3.3K27M mutation found in pediatric glioma: a new approach to the study of the function of histone modifications in vivo. Cell Cycle. 2013;12:2546–2552. doi: 10.4161/cc.25625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 364.Lu C, et al. Histone H3K36 mutations promote sarcomagenesis through altered histone methylation landscape. Science. 2016;352:844–849. doi: 10.1126/science.aac7272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 365.Fang D, et al. The histone H3.3K36M mutation reprograms the epigenome of chondroblastomas. Science. 2016;352:1344–1348. doi: 10.1126/science.aae0065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 366.Chuikov S, et al. Regulation of p53 activity through lysine methylation. Nature. 2004;432:353–360. doi: 10.1038/nature03117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 367.Kouskouti A, et al. Gene-specific modulation of TAF10 function by SET9-mediated methylation. Mol. Cell. 2004;14:175–182. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00182-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 368.Vagin VV, et al. Proteomic analysis of murine Piwi proteins reveals a role for arginine methylation in specifying interaction with Tudor family members. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1749–1762. doi: 10.1101/gad.1814809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 369.Frederiks F, Stulemeijer IJ, Ovaa H, van Leeuwen F. A modified epigenetics toolbox to study histone modifications on the nucleosome core. Chembiochem. 2011;12:308–313. doi: 10.1002/cbic.201000617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 370.Min J, et al. Structure of the catalytic domain of human DOT1L, a non-SET domain nucleosomal histone methyltransferase. Cell. 2003;112:711–723. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00114-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 371.Rea S, et al. Regulation of chromatin structure by site-specific histone H3 methyltransferases. Nature. 2000;406:593–599. doi: 10.1038/35020506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 372.Zhang X, et al. Structure of the Neurospora SET domain protein DIM-5, a histone H3 lysine methyltransferase. Cell. 2002;111:117–127. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00999-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 373.Cao R, Zhang Y. SUZ12 is required for both the histone methyltransferase activity and the silencing function of the EED-EZH2 complex. Mol. Cell. 2004;15:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2004.06.020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 374.Margueron R, Reinberg D. The Polycomb complex PRC2 and its mark in life. Nature. 2011;469:343–349. doi: 10.1038/nature09784. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 375.Kuzmichev A, Jenuwein T, Tempst P, Reinberg D. Different EZH2-containing complexes target methylation of histone H1 or nucleosomal histone H3. Mol. Cell. 2004;14:183–193. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(04)00185-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 376.Spellmon N, et al. Structure and function of SET and MYND domain-containing proteins. Int J. Mol. Sci. 2015;16:1406–1428. doi: 10.3390/ijms16011406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 377.Derunes C, et al. Characterization of the PR domain of RIZ1 histone methyltransferase. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 2005;333:925–934. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2005.05.190. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 378.Hayashi K, Yoshida K, Matsui Y. A histone H3 methyltransferase controls epigenetic events required for meiotic prophase. Nature. 2005;438:374–378. doi: 10.1038/nature04112. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 379.Davis CA, et al. PRISM/PRDM6, a transcriptional repressor that promotes the proliferative gene program in smooth muscle cells. Mol. Cell Biol. 2006;26:2626–2636. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.7.2626-2636.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 380.Gyory I, et al. PRDI-BF1 recruits the histone H3 methyltransferase G9a in transcriptional silencing. Nat. Immunol. 2004;5:299–308. doi: 10.1038/ni1046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 381.Johnson WL, et al. RNA-dependent stabilization of SUV39H1 at constitutive heterochromatin. Elife. 2017;6:e25299. doi: 10.7554/eLife.25299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 382.Hashimoto H, Vertino PM, Cheng X. Molecular coupling of DNA methylation and histone methylation. Epigenomics. 2010;2:657–669. doi: 10.2217/epi.10.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 383.Jurkowska RZ, et al. H3K14ac is linked to methylation of H3K9 by the triple Tudor domain of SETDB1. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:2057. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02259-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 384.Bantignies F, Goodman RH, Smolik SM. Functional interaction between the coactivator Drosophila CREB-binding protein and ASH1, a member of the trithorax group of chromatin modifiers. Mol. Cell Biol. 2000;20:9317–9330. doi: 10.1128/MCB.20.24.9317-9330.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 385.Katsanis N, Yaspo ML, Fisher EM. Identification and mapping of a novel human gene, HRMT1L1, homologous to the rat protein arginine N-methyltransferase 1 (PRMT1) gene. Mamm. Genome. 1997;8:526–529. doi: 10.1007/s003359900491. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 386.Meyer R, Wolf SS, Obendorf M. PRMT2, a member of the protein arginine methyltransferase family, is a coactivator of the androgen receptor. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2007;107:1–14. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.05.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 387.Herrmann F, et al. Human protein arginine methyltransferases in vivo-distinct properties of eight canonical members of the PRMT family. J. Cell Sci. 2009;122:667–677. doi: 10.1242/jcs.039933. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 388.Cook JR, et al. FBXO11/PRMT9, a new protein arginine methyltransferase, symmetrically dimethylates arginine residues. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006;342:472–481. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.01.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 389.Slany RK. The molecular biology of mixed lineage leukemia. Haematologica. 2009;94:984–993. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2008.002436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 390.Okada Y, et al. Leukaemic transformation by CALM-AF10 involves upregulation of Hoxa5 by hDOT1L. Nat. Cell Biol. 2006;8:1017–1024. doi: 10.1038/ncb1464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 391.Bernt KM, et al. MLL-rearranged leukemia is dependent on aberrant H3K79 methylation by DOT1L. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:66–78. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 392.Chase A, Cross NC. Aberrations of EZH2 in cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011;17:2613–2618. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-2156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 393.Takawa M, et al. Validation of the histone methyltransferase EZH2 as a therapeutic target for various types of human cancer and as a prognostic marker. Cancer Sci. 2011;102:1298–1305. doi: 10.1111/j.1349-7006.2011.01958.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 394.Bannister AJ, et al. Selective recognition of methylated lysine 9 on histone H3 by the HP1 chromo domain. Nature. 2001;410:120–124. doi: 10.1038/35065138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 395.Wysocka J, et al. WDR5 associates with histone H3 methylated at K4 and is essential for H3 K4 methylation and vertebrate development. Cell. 2005;121:859–872. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2005.03.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 396.Shi X, et al. ING2 PHD domain links histone H3 lysine 4 methylation to active gene repression. Nature. 2006;442:96–99. doi: 10.1038/nature04835. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 397.Flanagan JF, et al. Double chromodomains cooperate to recognize the methylated histone H3 tail. Nature. 2005;438:1181–1185. doi: 10.1038/nature04290. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 398.Migliori V, et al. Symmetric dimethylation of H3R2 is a newly identified histone mark that supports euchromatin maintenance. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2012;19:136–144. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2209. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 399.Trojer P, et al. L3MBTL1, a histone-methylation-dependent chromatin lock. Cell. 2007;129:915–928. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.03.048. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 400.Adams-Cioaba MA, Min J. Structure and function of histone methylation binding proteins. Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;87:93–105. doi: 10.1139/O08-129. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 401.Lan F, et al. Recognition of unmethylated histone H3 lysine 4 links BHC80 to LSD1-mediated gene repression. Nature. 2007;448:718–722. doi: 10.1038/nature06034. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 402.Ooi SK, et al. DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature. 2007;448:714–717. doi: 10.1038/nature05987. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 403.Lee J, Thompson JR, Botuyan MV, Mer G. Distinct binding modes specify the recognition of methylated histones H3K4 and H4K20 by JMJD2A-tudor. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2008;15:109–111. doi: 10.1038/nsmb1326. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 404.Metzger E, et al. LSD1 demethylates repressive histone marks to promote androgen-receptor-dependent transcription. Nature. 2005;437:436–439. doi: 10.1038/nature04020. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 405.Tsukada Y, et al. Histone demethylation by a family of JmjC domain-containing proteins. Nature. 2006;439:811–816. doi: 10.1038/nature04433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 406.Chang B, Chen Y, Zhao Y, Bruick RK. JMJD6 is a histone arginine demethylase. Science. 2007;318:444–447. doi: 10.1126/science.1145801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 407.Wang Y, et al. Human PAD4 regulates histone arginine methylation levels via demethylimination. Science. 2004;306:279–283. doi: 10.1126/science.1101400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 408.Schulte JH, et al. Lysine-specific demethylase 1 is strongly expressed in poorly differentiated neuroblastoma: implications for therapy. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2065–2071. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-1735. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 409.Ciccone DN, et al. KDM1B is a histone H3K4 demethylase required to establish maternal genomic imprints. Nature. 2009;461:415–418. doi: 10.1038/nature08315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 410.Pedersen MT, Helin K. Histone demethylases in development and disease. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:662–671. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.08.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 411.Wagner KW, et al. KDM2A promotes lung tumorigenesis by epigenetically enhancing ERK1/2 signaling. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:5231–5246. doi: 10.1172/JCI68642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 412.Tzatsos A, et al. KDM2B promotes pancreatic cancer via Polycomb-dependent and -independent transcriptional programs. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123:727–739. doi: 10.1172/JCI64535. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 413.Tee AE, et al. The histone demethylase JMJD1A induces cell migration and invasion by up-regulating the expression of the long noncoding RNA MALAT1. Oncotarget. 2014;5:1793–1804. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.1785. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 414.Osawa T, et al. Inhibition of histone demethylase JMJD1A improves anti-angiogenic therapy and reduces tumor-associated macrophages. Cancer Res. 2013;73:3019–3028. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-3231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 415.Wang J, et al. Epigenetic regulation of miR-302 by JMJD1C inhibits neural differentiation of human embryonic stem cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:2384–2395. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.535799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 416.Wang L, et al. Novel somatic and germline mutations in intracranial germ cell tumours. Nature. 2014;511:241–245. doi: 10.1038/nature13296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 417.Cloos PA, et al. The putative oncogene GASC1 demethylates tri- and dimethylated lysine 9 on histone H3. Nature. 2006;442:307–311. doi: 10.1038/nature04837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 418.Wang JK, et al. The histone demethylase UTX enables RB-dependent cell fate control. Genes Dev. 2010;24:327–332. doi: 10.1101/gad.1882610. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 419.Agger K, et al. The H3K27me3 demethylase JMJD3 contributes to the activation of the INK4A-ARF locus in response to oncogene- and stress-induced senescence. Genes Dev. 2009;23:1171–1176. doi: 10.1101/gad.510809. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 420.Lee KH, et al. PHF2 histone demethylase acts as a tumor suppressor in association with p53 in cancer. Oncogene. 2015;34:2897–2909. doi: 10.1038/onc.2014.219. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 421.Cai M, et al. Epigenetic silenced miR-125a-5p could be self-activated through targeting Suv39H1 in gastric cancer. J. Cell Mol. Med. 2018;22:4721–4731. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.13716. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 422.Yu T, et al. Metformin inhibits SUV39H1-mediated migration of prostate cancer cells. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e324. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.28. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 423.Mo W, et al. mTOR inhibitors suppress homologous recombination repair and synergize with PARP inhibitors via regulating SUV39H1 in BRCA-proficient triple-negative breast cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016;22:1699–1712. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1772. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 424.Pandey M, et al. Involvement of EZH2, SUV39H1, G9a and associated molecules in pathogenesis of urethane induced mouse lung tumors: potential targets for cancer control. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2014;280:296–304. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2014.08.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 425.Kang MY, et al. Association of the SUV39H1 histone methyltransferase with the DNA methyltransferase 1 at mRNA expression level in primary colorectal cancer. Int J. Cancer. 2007;121:2192–2197. doi: 10.1002/ijc.22953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 426.Yang Z, et al. The KMT1A-GATA3-STAT3 circuit is a novel self-renewal signaling of human bladder cancer stem cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:6673–6685. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0882. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 427.Khanal P, et al. Prolyl isomerase Pin1 negatively regulates the stability of SUV39H1 to promote tumorigenesis in breast cancer. FASEB J. 2013;27:4606–4618. doi: 10.1096/fj.13-236851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 428.Rodrigues C, et al. A SUV39H1-low chromatin state characterises and promotes migratory properties of cervical cancer cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2019;378:206–216. doi: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2019.02.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 429.Shuai W, et al. SUV39H2 promotes colorectal cancer proliferation and metastasis via tri-methylation of the SLIT1 promoter. Cancer Lett. 2018;422:56–69. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 430.Yoon KA, et al. Novel polymorphisms in the SUV39H2 histone methyltransferase and the risk of lung cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2006;27:2217–2222. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgl084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 431.Nishikawaji T, et al. Oncogenic roles of the SETDB2 histone methyltransferase in gastric cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:67251–67265. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 432.Wang YF, et al. G9a regulates breast cancer growth by modulating iron homeostasis through the repression of ferroxidase hephaestin. Nat. Commun. 2017;8:274. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00350-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 433.Tian YF, et al. Preprogramming therapeutic response of PI3K/mTOR dual inhibitor via the regulation of EHMT2 and p27 in pancreatic cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018;8:1812–1822. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 434.Cui J, et al. EHMT2 inhibitor BIX-01294 induces apoptosis through PMAIP1-USP9X-MCL1 axis in human bladder cancer cells. Cancer Cell Int. 2015;15:4. doi: 10.1186/s12935-014-0149-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 435.Ezponda T, et al. The histone methyltransferase MMSET/WHSC1 activates TWIST1 to promote an epithelial-mesenchymal transition and invasive properties of prostate cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32:2882–2890. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.297. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 436.Ryu TY, et al. SETDB1 regulates SMAD7 expression for breast cancer metastasis. BMB Rep. 2019;52:139–144. doi: 10.5483/BMBRep.2019.52.2.235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 437.Chen K, et al. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 promotes the progression of colorectal cancer by inhibiting the expression of TP53. J. Cancer. 2017;8:3318–3330. doi: 10.7150/jca.20482. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 438.Wong CM, et al. Up-regulation of histone methyltransferase SETDB1 by multiple mechanisms in hepatocellular carcinoma promotes cancer metastasis. Hepatology. 2016;63:474–487. doi: 10.1002/hep.28304. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 439.Fei Q, et al. Histone methyltransferase SETDB1 regulates liver cancer cell growth through methylation of p53. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:8651. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9651. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 440.Wu PC, et al. H3K9 histone methyltransferase, KMT1E/SETDB1, cooperates with the SMAD2/3 pathway to suppress lung cancer metastasis. Cancer Res. 2014;74:7333–7343. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3572. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 441.Zhu Q, et al. The Wnt-driven Mll1 epigenome regulates salivary gland and head and neck cancer. Cell Rep. 2019;26:415–428.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.12.059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 442.Lu C, et al. The MLL1-H3K4me3 axis-mediated PD-L1 expression and pancreatic cancer immune evasion. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2017;109:djw283. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djw283. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 443.Yang Z, et al. Single-cell sequencing reveals variants in ARID1A, GPRC5A and MLL2 driving self-renewal of human bladder cancer stem cells. Eur. Urol. 2017;71:8–12. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 444.Augert A, et al. Small cell lung cancer exhibits frequent inactivating mutations in the histone methyltransferase KMT2D/MLL2: CALGB 151111 (Alliance) J. Thorac. Oncol. 2017;12:704–713. doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 445.Chen J, et al. Pygo2 associates with MLL2 histone methyltransferase and GCN5 histone acetyltransferase complexes to augment Wnt target gene expression and breast cancer stem-like cell expansion. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010;30:5621–5635. doi: 10.1128/MCB.00465-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 446.Xia M, et al. Downregulation of MLL3 in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is required for the growth and metastasis of cancer cells. Tumour Biol. 2015;36:605–613. doi: 10.1007/s13277-014-2616-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 447.Kim JH, et al. UTX and MLL4 coordinately regulate transcriptional programs for cell proliferation and invasiveness in breast cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:1705–1717. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1896. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 448.Gallo M, et al. MLL5 orchestrates a cancer self-renewal state by repressing the histone variant H3.3 and globally reorganizing chromatin. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:715–729. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 449.Li T, et al. SET1A cooperates with CUDR to promote liver cancer growth and hepatocyte-like stem cell malignant transformation epigenetically. Mol. Ther. 2016;24:261–275. doi: 10.1038/mt.2015.208. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
  • 450.Karakashev S, et al. CARM1-expressing ovarian cancer depends on the histone methyltransferase EZH2 activity. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:631. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-03031-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 451.Crea F, et al. An EZH2 polymorphism is associated with clinical outcome in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 2012;23:1207–1213. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 452.Reijm EA, et al. High protein expression of EZH2 is related to unfavorable outcome to tamoxifen in metastatic breast cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2014;25:2185–2190. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdu391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 453.Kanu N, et al. SETD2 loss-of-function promotes renal cancer branched evolution through replication stress and impaired DNA repair. Oncogene. 2015;34:5699–5708. doi: 10.1038/onc.2015.24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 454.Kim IK, et al. Acquired SETD2 mutation and impaired CREB1 activation confer cisplatin resistance in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer. Oncogene. 2019;38:180–193. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0429-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 455.Li N, et al. AKT-mediated stabilization of histone methyltransferase WHSC1 promotes prostate cancer metastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 2017;127:1284–1302. doi: 10.1172/JCI91144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 456.Li J, et al. MiR-2392 suppresses metastasis and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by targeting MAML3 and WHSC1 in gastric cancer. FASEB J. 2017;31:3774–3786. doi: 10.1096/fj.201601140RR. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 457.Saloura V, et al. WHSC1L1-mediated EGFR mono-methylation enhances the cytoplasmic and nuclear oncogenic activity of EGFR in head and neck cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:40664. doi: 10.1038/srep40664. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 458.Chiou SH, et al. BLIMP1 induces transient metastatic heterogeneity in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov. 2017;7:1184–1199. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0250. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 459.Sciortino M, et al. Dysregulation of Blimp1 transcriptional repressor unleashes p130Cas/ErbB2 breast cancer invasion. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:1145. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-01332-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 460.Zhu Z, et al. Downregulation of PRDM1 promotes cellular invasion and lung cancer metastasis. Tumour Biol. 2017;39:1010428317695929. doi: 10.1177/1010428317695929. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 461.Kang HB, et al. PRDM1, a tumor-suppressor gene, is induced by genkwadaphnin in human colon cancer SW620 cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2016;117:172–179. doi: 10.1002/jcb.25262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 462.Emterling A, Wallin A, Arbman G, Sun XF. Clinicopathological significance of microsatellite instability and mutated RIZ in colorectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2004;15:242–246. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdh045. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 463.Abbondanza C, et al. Identification of a functional estrogen-responsive enhancer element in the promoter 2 of PRDM2 gene in breast cancer cell lines. J. Cell Physiol. 2012;227:964–975. doi: 10.1002/jcp.22803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 464.Nanjundan M, et al. Amplification of MDS1/EVI1 and EVI1, located in the 3q26.2 amplicon, is associated with favorable patient prognosis in ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2007;67:3074–3084. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-2366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 465.Lu Y, et al. EVI1 promotes epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, cancer stem cell features and chemo-/radioresistance in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2019;38:82. doi: 10.1186/s13046-019-1077-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 466.Taniguchi H, et al. Silencing PRDM14 expression by an innovative RNAi therapy inhibits stemness, tumorigenicity, and metastasis of breast cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:46856–46874. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.16776. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 467.Watanabe Y, et al. PRDM5 identified as a target of epigenetic silencing in colorectal and gastric cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2007;13:4786–4794. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-0305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 468.Houle AA, et al. Aberrant PRDM9 expression impacts the pan-cancer genomic landscape. Genome Res. 2018;28:1611–1620. doi: 10.1101/gr.231696.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 469.Ruark E, et al. Identification of nine new susceptibility loci for testicular cancer, including variants near DAZL and PRDM14. Nat. Genet. 2013;45:686–689. doi: 10.1038/ng.2635. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 470.Moriya C, et al. Inhibition of PRDM14 expression in pancreatic cancer suppresses cancer stem-like properties and liver metastasis in mice. Carcinogenesis. 2017;38:638–648. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgx040. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 471.Takahata M, et al. SKI and MEL1 cooperate to inhibit transforming growth factor-beta signal in gastric cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2009;284:3334–3344. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M808989200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 472.Reynoird N, et al. Coordination of stress signals by the lysine methyltransferase SMYD2 promotes pancreatic cancer. Genes Dev. 2016;30:772–785. doi: 10.1101/gad.275529.115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 473.Komatsu S, et al. Overexpression of SMYD2 contributes to malignant outcome in gastric cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2015;112:357–364. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 474.Sarris ME, et al. Smyd3 is a transcriptional potentiator of multiple cancer-promoting genes and required for liver and colon cancer development. Cancer Cell. 2016;29:354–366. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2016.01.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 475.Cock-Rada AM, et al. SMYD3 promotes cancer invasion by epigenetic upregulation of the metalloproteinase MMP-9. Cancer Res. 2012;72:810–820. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1052. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 476.Fenizia C, et al. SMYD3 promotes the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in breast cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;47:1278–1293. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 477.Hu L, Zhu YT, Qi C, Zhu YJ. Identification of Smyd4 as a potential tumor suppressor gene involved in breast cancer development. Cancer Res. 2009;69:4067–4072. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-4097. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 478.Kryczek I, et al. IL-22(+)CD4(+) T cells promote colorectal cancer stemness via STAT3 transcription factor activation and induction of the methyltransferase DOT1L. Immunity. 2014;40:772–784. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.03.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 479.Cho MH, et al. DOT1L cooperates with the c-Myc-p300 complex to epigenetically derepress CDH1 transcription factors in breast cancer progression. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7821. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 480.Liu B, et al. MiR-502/SET8 regulatory circuit in pathobiology of breast cancer. Cancer Lett. 2016;376:259–267. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.04.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 481.Yang S, et al. Association of miR-502-binding site single nucleotide polymorphism in the 3′-untranslated region of SET8 and TP53 codon 72 polymorphism with non-small cell lung cancer in Chinese population. Acta Biochim Biophys. Sin. 2014;46:149–154. doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmt138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 482.Tryndyak VP, Kovalchuk O, Pogribny IP. Loss of DNA methylation and histone H4 lysine 20 trimethylation in human breast cancer cells is associated with aberrant expression of DNA methyltransferase 1, Suv4–20h2 histone methyltransferase and methyl-binding proteins. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2006;5:65–70. doi: 10.4161/cbt.5.1.2288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 483.Martín-Morales L, et al. SETD6 dominant negative mutation in familial colorectal cancer type X. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2017;26:4481–4493. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddx336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 484.Yao R, et al. Lysines 207 and 325 methylation of WDR5 catalyzed by SETD6 promotes breast cancer cell proliferation and migration. Oncol. Rep. 2018;40:3069–3077. doi: 10.3892/or.2018.6669. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 485.Shen C, et al. SET7/9 regulates cancer cell proliferation by influencing β-catenin stability. FASEB J. 2015;29:4313–4323. doi: 10.1096/fj.15-273540. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 486.Gu Y, et al. Opposite effects of SET7/9 on apoptosis of human acute myeloid leukemia cells and lung cancer cells. J. Cancer. 2017;8:2069–2078. doi: 10.7150/jca.19143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 487.Montenegro MF, et al. Tumor suppressor SET9 guides the epigenetic plasticity of breast cancer cells and serves as an early-stage biomarker for predicting metastasis. Oncogene. 2016;35:6143–6152. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 488.Liu LM, et al. Methylation of C/EBPα by PRMT1 inhibits its tumor suppressive function in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2019;79:2865–2877. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 489.Avasarala S, et al. PRMT1 is a novel regulator of epithelial-mesenchymal-transition in non-small cell lung cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2015;290:13479–13489. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.636050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 490.Mathioudaki K, et al. The PRMT1 gene expression pattern in colon cancer. Br. J. Cancer. 2008;99:2094–2099. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6604807. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 491.Lin Z, et al. Overexpressing PRMT1 inhibits proliferation and invasion in pancreatic cancer by inverse correlation of ZEB1. IUBMB Life. 2018;70:1032–1039. doi: 10.1002/iub.1917. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 492.Zhong J, et al. PRMT2β, a C-terminal splice variant of PRMT2, inhibits the growth of breast cancer cells. Oncol. Rep. 2017;38:1303–1311. doi: 10.3892/or.2017.5786. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 493.Al-Dhaheri M., Wu J., Skliris G. P., Li J., Higashimato K., Wang Y., White K. P., Lambert P., Zhu Y., Murphy L., Xu W. CARM1 Is an Important Determinant of ER -Dependent Breast Cancer Cell Differentiation and Proliferation in Breast Cancer Cells. Cancer Research. 2011;71(6):2118–2128. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-2426. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 494.Zhong XY, et al. CARM1 methylates GAPDH to regulate glucose metabolism and is suppressed in liver cancer. Cell Rep. 2018;24:3207–3223. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.08.066. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 495.Wang YP, et al. Arginine methylation of MDH1 by CARM1 inhibits glutamine metabolism and suppresses pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cell. 2016;64:673–687. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.09.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 496.Rengasamy M, et al. The PRMT5/WDR77 complex regulates alternative splicing through ZNF326 in breast cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45:11106–11120. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 497.Fu T, Lv X, Kong Q, Yuan C. A novel SHARPIN-PRMT5-H3R2me1 axis is essential for lung cancer cell invasion. Oncotarget. 2017;8:54809–54820. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.18957. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 498.Demetriadou C, et al. NAA40 contributes to colorectal cancer growth by controlling PRMT5 expression. Cell Death Dis. 2019;10:236. doi: 10.1038/s41419-019-1487-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 499.Huang S, et al. CAPG enhances breast cancer metastasis by competing with PRMT5 to modulate STC-1 transcription. Theranostics. 2018;8:2549–2564. doi: 10.7150/thno.22523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 500.Almeida-Rios D, et al. Histone methyltransferase PRMT6 plays an oncogenic role of in prostate cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:53018–53028. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.10061. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 501.Okuno K, et al. Asymmetric dimethylation at histone H3 arginine 2 by PRMT6 in gastric cancer progression. Carcinogenesis. 2019;40:15–26. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgy147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 502.Chan LH, et al. PRMT6 regulates RAS/RAF binding and MEK/ERK-mediated cancer stemness activities in hepatocellular carcinoma through CRAF methylation. Cell Rep. 2018;25:690–701.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.09.053. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 503.Cheng D, et al. PRMT7 contributes to the metastasis phenotype in human non-small-cell lung cancer cells possibly through the interaction with HSPA5 and EEF2. Onco. Targets Ther. 2018;11:4869–4876. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S166412. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 504.Yao R, et al. PRMT7 induces epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and promotes metastasis in breast cancer. Cancer Res. 2014;74:5656–5667. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-0800. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 505.Hernandez SJ, Dolivo DM, Dominko T. PRMT8 demonstrates variant-specific expression in cancer cells and correlates with patient survival in breast, ovarian and gastric cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017;13:1983–1989. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 506.Bagger SO, et al. Aggressiveness of non-EMT breast cancer cells relies on FBXO11 activity. Mol. Cancer. 2018;17:171. doi: 10.1186/s12943-018-0918-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 507.Lee YH, Ann DK. Bi-phasic expression of Heterochromatin Protein 1 (HP1) during breast cancer progression: potential roles of HP1 and chromatin structure in tumorigenesis. J. Nat. Sci. 2015;1:e127. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 508.Shenoy TR, et al. CHD1 loss sensitizes prostate cancer to DNA damaging therapy by promoting error-prone double-strand break repair. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28:1495–1507. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 509.Rodrigues LU, et al. Coordinate loss of MAP3K7 and CHD1 promotes aggressive prostate cancer. Cancer Res. 2015;75:1021–1034. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-1596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 510.Pan L, Tang Z, Pan L, Tang R. miR-3666 inhibits lung cancer cell proliferation, migration and invasion by targeting BPTF. Biochem Cell Biol. 2018;97:415–422. doi: 10.1139/bcb-2018-0301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 511.Zhao X, et al. BPTF promotes hepatocellular carcinoma growth by modulating hTERT signaling and cancer stem cell traits. Redox Biol. 2019;20:427–441. doi: 10.1016/j.redox.2018.10.018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 512.Zeng H, et al. Physical activity and breast cancer survival: an epigenetic link through reduced methylation of a tumor suppressor gene L3MBTL1. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2012;133:127–135. doi: 10.1007/s10549-011-1716-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 513.Kumamoto K, et al. ING2 is upregulated in colon cancer and increases invasion by enhanced MMP13 expression. Int J. Cancer. 2009;125:1306–1315. doi: 10.1002/ijc.24437. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 514.Okano T, et al. Alterations in novel candidate tumor suppressor genes, ING1 and ING2 in human lung cancer. Oncol. Rep. 2006;15:545–549. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 515.Li Y, et al. RNA splicing of the BHC80 gene contributes to neuroendocrine prostate cancer progression. Eur. Urol. 2019;76:157–166. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2019.03.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 516.Li LL, et al. JMJD2A contributes to breast cancer progression through transcriptional repression of the tumor suppressor ARHI. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16:R56. doi: 10.1186/bcr3667. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 517.Kim TD, et al. The JMJD2A demethylase regulates apoptosis and proliferation in colon cancer cells. J. Cell Biochem. 2012;113:1368–1376. doi: 10.1002/jcb.24009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 518.Kauffman EC, et al. Role of androgen receptor and associated lysine-demethylase coregulators, LSD1 and JMJD2A, in localized and advanced human bladder cancer. Mol. Carcinog. 2011;50:931–944. doi: 10.1002/mc.20758. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 519.Cao C, et al. Functional interaction of histone deacetylase 5 (HDAC5) and lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) promotes breast cancer progression. Oncogene. 2017;36:133–145. doi: 10.1038/onc.2016.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 520.Stewart CA, Byers LA. Altering the course of small cell lung cancer: targeting cancer stem cells via LSD1 inhibition. Cancer Cell. 2015;28:4–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2015.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 521.Liang Y, et al. LSD1-mediated epigenetic reprogramming drives CENPE expression and prostate cancer progression. Cancer Res. 2017;77:5479–5490. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-17-0496. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 522.Wang Y, et al. LSD1 is a subunit of the NuRD complex and targets the metastasis programs in breast cancer. Cell. 2009;138:660–672. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.05.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 523.Chen L, et al. Functional characterization of lysine-specific demethylase 2 (LSD2/KDM1B) in breast cancer progression. Oncotarget. 2017;8:81737–81753. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.19387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 524.Chen JY, et al. Lysine demethylase KDM2A inhibits TET2 to promote DNA methylation and silencing of tumor suppressor genes in breast cancer. Oncogenesis. 2017;6:e369. doi: 10.1038/oncsis.2017.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 525.Kong Y, et al. RUNX3-mediated up-regulation of miR-29b suppresses the proliferation and migration of gastric cancer cells by targeting KDM2A. Cancer Lett. 2016;381:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2016.07.038. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 526.Dhar SS, et al. Transcriptional repression of histone deacetylase 3 by the histone demethylase KDM2A is coupled to tumorigenicity of lung cancer cells. J. Biol. Chem. 2014;289:7483–7496. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M113.521625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 527.Zacharopoulou N, et al. The epigenetic factor KDM2B regulates cell adhesion, small rho GTPases, actin cytoskeleton and migration in prostate cancer cells. Biochim Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 2018;1865:587–597. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 528.Kottakis F, et al. NDY1/KDM2B functions as a master regulator of polycomb complexes and controls self-renewal of breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Res. 2014;74:3935–3946. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-2733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 529.Peng K, et al. Histone demethylase JMJD1A promotes colorectal cancer growth and metastasis by enhancing Wnt/β-catenin signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2018;293:10606–10619. doi: 10.1074/jbc.RA118.001730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 530.Ramadoss S, et al. Lysine-specific demethylase KDM3A regulates ovarian cancer stemness and chemoresistance. Oncogene. 2017;36:6508. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 531.Wade MA, et al. The histone demethylase enzyme KDM3A is a key estrogen receptor regulator in breast cancer. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:196–207. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku1298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 532.Cai Y, Fu X, Deng Y. Histone demethylase JMJD1C regulates esophageal cancer proliferation Via YAP1 signaling. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017;7:115–124. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 533.Chen C, et al. Downregulation of histone demethylase JMJD1C inhibits colorectal cancer metastasis through targeting ATF2. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2018;8:852–865. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 534.An J, et al. HistoneH3 demethylase JMJD2A promotes growth of liver cancer cells through up-regulating miR372. Oncotarget. 2017;8:49093–49109. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.17095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 535.Wang W, et al. KDM4B-regulated unfolded protein response as a therapeutic vulnerability in PTEN-deficient breast cancer. J. Exp. Med. 2018;215:2833–2849. doi: 10.1084/jem.20180439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 536.Zhao L, et al. JMJD2B promotes epithelial-mesenchymal transition by cooperating with β-catenin and enhances gastric cancer metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013;19:6419–6429. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-0254. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 537.Fu LN, et al. Role of JMJD2B in colon cancer cell survival under glucose-deprived conditions and the underlying mechanisms. Oncogene. 2018;37:389–402. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.345. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 538.Luo W, et al. Histone demethylase JMJD2C is a coactivator for hypoxia-inducible factor 1 that is required for breast cancer progression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:E3367–E3376. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217394109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 539.An Y, et al. circZMYM2 competed endogenously with miR-335-5p to regulate JMJD2C in pancreatic cancer. Cell Physiol. Biochem. 2018;51:2224–2236. doi: 10.1159/000495868. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 540.Peng K, et al. Histone demethylase JMJD2D interacts with β-catenin to induce transcription and activate colorectal cancer cell proliferation and tumor growth in mice. Gastroenterology. 2019;156:1112–1126. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 541.Yang GJ, et al. Selective inhibition of lysine-specific demethylase 5A (KDM5A) using a Rhodium(III) complex for triple-negative breast cancer therapy. Angew. Chem. Int Ed. Engl. 2018;57:13091–13095. doi: 10.1002/anie.201807305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 542.Uemura M, et al. Jumonji domain containing 1A is a novel prognostic marker for colorectal cancer: in vivo identification from hypoxic tumor cells. Clin. Cancer Res. 2010;16:4636–4646. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 543.Hayami S, et al. Overexpression of the JmjC histone demethylase KDM5B in human carcinogenesis: involvement in the proliferation of cancer cells through the E2F/RB pathway. Mol. Cancer. 2010;9:59. doi: 10.1186/1476-4598-9-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 544.Li N, Jiang D. Jumonji domain containing 2C promotes cell migration and invasion through modulating CUL4A expression in lung cancer. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2017;89:305–315. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 545.Lin H, et al. KDM5c inhibits multidrug resistance of colon cancer cell line by down-regulating ABCC1. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018;107:1205–1209. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2018.08.041. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 546.Shen X, et al. KDM5D inhibit epithelial-mesenchymal transition of gastric cancer through demethylation in the promoter of Cul4A in male. J. Cell Biochem. 2019;120:12247–12258. doi: 10.1002/jcb.27308. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 547.Komura K, et al. Resistance to docetaxel in prostate cancer is associated with androgen receptor activation and loss of KDM5D expression. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113:6259–6264. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600420113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 548.Zhu XX, et al. Jarid2 is essential for the maintenance of tumor initiating cells in bladder cancer. Oncotarget. 2017;8:24483–24490. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.15522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 549.Tange S, et al. JARID2 is involved in transforming growth factor-beta-induced epithelial-mesenchymal transition of lung and colon cancer cell lines. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115684. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115684. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 550.Paccez JD, et al. Dihydroartemisinin inhibits prostate cancer via JARID2/miR-7/miR-34a-dependent downregulation of Axl. Oncogenesis. 2019;8:14. doi: 10.1038/s41389-019-0122-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 551.Ler LD, et al. Loss of tumor suppressor KDM6A amplifies PRC2-regulated transcriptional repression in bladder cancer and can be targeted through inhibition of EZH2. Sci. Transl. Med. 2017;9:eaai8312. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aai8312. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 552.Andricovich J, et al. Loss of KDM6A activates super-enhancers to induce gender-specific squamous-like pancreatic cancer and confers sensitivity to BET inhibitors. Cancer Cell. 2018;33:512–526.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2018.02.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 553.Mo J, et al. Multifunctional nanoparticles for co-delivery of paclitaxel and carboplatin against ovarian cancer by inactivating the JMJD3-HER2 axis. Nanoscale. 2017;9:13142–13152. doi: 10.1039/C7NR04473A. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 554.Wang W, et al. KDM6B counteracts EZH2-mediated suppression of IGFBP5 to confer resistance to PI3K/AKT inhibitor treatment in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2018;17:1973–1983. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0802. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 555.Ahn J, et al. Target sequencing and CRISPR/Cas editing reveal simultaneous loss of UTX and UTY in urothelial bladder cancer. Oncotarget. 2016;7:63252–63260. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.11207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 556.Lee KH, et al. Histone demethylase KDM7A controls androgen receptor activity and tumor growth in prostate cancer. Int J. Cancer. 2018;143:2849–2861. doi: 10.1002/ijc.31843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 557.Björkman M, et al. Systematic knockdown of epigenetic enzymes identifies a novel histone demethylase PHF8 overexpressed in prostate cancer with an impact on cell proliferation, migration and invasion. Oncogene. 2012;31:3444–3456. doi: 10.1038/onc.2011.512. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 558.Li S, et al. Histone demethylase PHF8 promotes progression and metastasis of gastric cancer. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2017;7:448–461. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-2350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 559.Shen Y, Pan X, Zhao H. The histone demethylase PHF8 is an oncogenic protein in human non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014;451:119–125. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2014.07.076. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 560.Zhao Z, et al. Overexpression of histone demethylase JMJD5 promotes metastasis and indicates a poor prognosis in breast cancer. Int J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015;8:10325–10334. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 561.Hsia DA, et al. KDM8, a H3K36me2 histone demethylase that acts in the cyclin A1 coding region to regulate cancer cell proliferation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2010;107:9671–9676. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1000401107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 562.Abu-Jamous B, Buffa FM, Harris AL, Nandi AK. In vitro downregulated hypoxia transcriptome is associated with poor prognosis in breast cancer. Mol. Cancer. 2017;16:105. doi: 10.1186/s12943-017-0673-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 563.Liu Y, et al. JMJD6 regulates histone H2A.X phosphorylation and promotes autophagy in triple-negative breast cancer cells via a novel tyrosine kinase activity. Oncogene. 2019;38:980–997. doi: 10.1038/s41388-018-0466-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 564.Lee YF, et al. JMJD6 is a driver of cellular proliferation and motility and a marker of poor prognosis in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res. 2012;14:R85. doi: 10.1186/bcr3200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 565.Zhang Z, Yang Y, Zhang X. MiR-770 inhibits tumorigenesis and EMT by targeting JMJD6 and regulating WNT/β-catenin pathway in non-small cell lung cancer. Life Sci. 2017;188:163–171. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2017.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 566.Chang X, et al. Investigating the pathogenic role of PADI4 in oesophageal cancer. Int J. Biol. Sci. 2011;7:769–781. doi: 10.7150/ijbs.7.769. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 567.Calin GA, et al. Human microRNA genes are frequently located at fragile sites and genomic regions involved in cancers. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:2999–3004. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307323101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 568.Kasinski AL, Slack FJ. Epigenetics and genetics. MicroRNAs en route to the clinic: progress in validating and targeting microRNAs for cancer therapy. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 2011;11:849–864. doi: 10.1038/nrc3166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 569.Garcia AI, et al. Down-regulation of BRCA1 expression by miR-146a and miR-146b-5p in triple negative sporadic breast cancers. EMBO Mol. Med. 2011;3:279–290. doi: 10.1002/emmm.201100136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 570.Friedman JM, et al. The putative tumor suppressor microRNA-101 modulates the cancer epigenome by repressing the polycomb group protein EZH2. Cancer Res. 2009;69:2623–2629. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-3114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 571.Varambally S, et al. Genomic loss of microRNA-101 leads to overexpression of histone methyltransferase EZH2 in cancer. Science. 2008;322:1695–1699. doi: 10.1126/science.1165395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 572.Fabbri M, et al. MicroRNA-29 family reverts aberrant methylation in lung cancer by targeting DNA methyltransferases 3 A and 3B. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2007;104:15805–15810. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707628104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 573.Yang L, et al. lncRNA-dependent mechanisms of androgen-receptor-regulated gene activation programs. Nature. 2013;500:598–602. doi: 10.1038/nature12451. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 574.He Y, et al. Long noncoding RNAs: Novel insights into hepatocelluar carcinoma. Cancer Lett. 2014;344:20–27. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2013.10.021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 575.Kim K, et al. HOTAIR is a negative prognostic factor and exhibits pro-oncogenic activity in pancreatic cancer. Oncogene. 2013;32:1616–1625. doi: 10.1038/onc.2012.193. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 576.Kogo R, et al. Long noncoding RNA HOTAIR regulates polycomb-dependent chromatin modification and is associated with poor prognosis in colorectal cancers. Cancer Res. 2011;71:6320–6326. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-1021. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 577.Nakagawa T, et al. Large noncoding RNA HOTAIR enhances aggressive biological behavior and is associated with short disease-free survival in human non-small cell lung cancer. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013;436:319–324. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.05.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 578.Gius D, et al. Distinct effects on gene expression of chemical and genetic manipulation of the cancer epigenome revealed by a multimodality approach. Cancer Cell. 2004;6:361–371. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2004.08.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 579.Li E, Bestor TH, Jaenisch R. Targeted mutation of the DNA methyltransferase gene results in embryonic lethality. Cell. 1992;69:915–926. doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(92)90611-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 580.Jackson-Grusby L, et al. Loss of genomic methylation causes p53-dependent apoptosis and epigenetic deregulation. Nat. Genet. 2001;27:31–39. doi: 10.1038/83730. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 581.Carr BI, et al. The tumorigenicity of 5-azacytidine in the male Fischer rat. Carcinogenesis. 1984;5:1583–1590. doi: 10.1093/carcin/5.12.1583. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 582.Christman JK. 5-Azacytidine and 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine as inhibitors of DNA methylation: mechanistic studies and their implications for cancer therapy. Oncogene. 2002;21:5483–5495. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1205699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 583.Jones PA, Laird PW. Cancer epigenetics comes of age. Nat. Genet. 1999;21:163–167. doi: 10.1038/5947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 584.Rosen MB, House HS, Francis BM, Chernoff N. Teratogenicity of 5-azacytidine in the Sprague-Dawley rat. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health. 1990;29:201–210. doi: 10.1080/15287399009531383. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 585.Doerksen T, Trasler JM. Developmental exposure of male germ cells to 5-azacytidine results in abnormal preimplantation development in rats. Biol. Reprod. 1996;55:1155–1162. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod55.5.1155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 586.Chik F, Szyf M. Effects of specific DNMT gene depletion on cancer cell transformation and breast cancer cell invasion; toward selective DNMT inhibitors. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32:224–232. doi: 10.1093/carcin/bgq221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 587.Issa JP, et al. Phase 1 study of low-dose prolonged exposure schedules of the hypomethylating agent 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) in hematopoietic malignancies. Blood. 2004;103:1635–1640. doi: 10.1182/blood-2003-03-0687. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 588.Beisler JA, Abbasi MM, Kelley JA, Driscoll JS. Synthesis and antitumor activity of dihydro-5-azacytidine, a hydrolytically stable analogue of 5-azacytidine. J. Med. Chem. 1977;20:806–812. doi: 10.1021/jm00216a013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 589.Presant CA, Coulter D, Valeriote F, Vietti TJ. Contrasting cytotoxicity kinetics of 5-azacytidine and dihydro-5-azacytidine hydrochloride in L1210 leukemia in mice. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66:1151–1154. doi: 10.1093/jnci/66.6.1151. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 590.Curt GA, et al. A phase I and pharmacokinetic study of dihydro-5-azacytidine (NSC 264880) Cancer Res. 1985;45:3359–3363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 591.Cheng JC, et al. Inhibition of DNA methylation and reactivation of silenced genes by zebularine. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 2003;95:399–409. doi: 10.1093/jnci/95.5.399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 592.Holleran JL, et al. Plasma pharmacokinetics, oral bioavailability, and interspecies scaling of the DNA methyltransferase inhibitor, zebularine. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:3862–3868. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 593.Kaminskas E, et al. Approval summary: azacitidine for treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome subtypes. Clin. Cancer Res. 2005;11:3604–3608. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 594.Steensma DP. Decitabine treatment of patients with higher-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Leuk. Res. 2009;33(Suppl 2):S12–S17. doi: 10.1016/S0145-2126(09)70228-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 595.Liang G, et al. Analysis of gene induction in human fibroblasts and bladder cancer cells exposed to the methylation inhibitor 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Cancer Res. 2002;62:961–966. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 596.Brueckner B, et al. Epigenetic reactivation of tumor suppressor genes by a novel small-molecule inhibitor of human DNA methyltransferases. Cancer Res. 2005;65:6305–6311. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 597.Piña IC, et al. Psammaplins from the sponge Pseudoceratina purpurea: inhibition of both histone deacetylase and DNA methyltransferase. J. Org. Chem. 2003;68:3866–3873. doi: 10.1021/jo034248t. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 598.Fang MZ, et al. Tea polyphenol (-)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate inhibits DNA methyltransferase and reactivates methylation-silenced genes in cancer cell lines. Cancer Res. 2003;63:7563–7570. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 599.Cornacchia E, et al. Hydralazine and procainamide inhibit T cell DNA methylation and induce autoreactivity. J. Immunol. 1988;140:2197–2200. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 600.Segura-Pacheco B, et al. Reactivation of tumor suppressor genes by the cardiovascular drugs hydralazine and procainamide and their potential use in cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. 2003;9:1596–1603. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 601.Villar-Garea A, Fraga MF, Espada J, Esteller M. Procaine is a DNA-demethylating agent with growth-inhibitory effects in human cancer cells. Cancer Res. 2003;63:4984–4989. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 602.Davis AJ, et al. Phase I and pharmacologic study of the human DNA methyltransferase antisense oligodeoxynucleotide MG98 given as a 21-day continuous infusion every 4 weeks. Invest N. Drugs. 2003;21:85–97. doi: 10.1023/A:1022976528441. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 603.Amato RJ. Inhibition of DNA methylation by antisense oligonucleotide MG98 as cancer therapy. Clin. Genitourin. Cancer. 2007;5:422–426. doi: 10.3816/CGC.2007.n.029. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 604.Plummer R, et al. Phase I study of MG98, an oligonucleotide antisense inhibitor of human DNA methyltransferase 1, given as a 7-day infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009;15:3177–3183. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-08-2859. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 605.Chuang JC, et al. Comparison of biological effects of non-nucleoside DNA methylation inhibitors versus 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005;4:1515–1520. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 606.Mutskov V, Felsenfeld G. Silencing of transgene transcription precedes methylation of promoter DNA and histone H3 lysine 9. EMBO J. 2004;23:138–149. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 607.Lau OD, et al. HATs off: selective synthetic inhibitors of the histone acetyltransferases p300 and PCAF. Mol. Cell. 2000;5:589–595. doi: 10.1016/S1097-2765(00)80452-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 608.Yang C, Ngo L, Zheng YG. Rational design of substrate-based multivalent inhibitors of the histone acetyltransferase Tip60. ChemMedChem. 2014;9:537–541. doi: 10.1002/cmdc.201300478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 609.Balasubramanyam K, Swaminathan V, Ranganathan A, Kundu TK. Small molecule modulators of histone acetyltransferase p300. J. Biol. Chem. 2003;278:19134–19140. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M301580200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 610.Balasubramanyam K, et al. Curcumin, a novel p300/CREB-binding protein-specific inhibitor of acetyltransferase, represses the acetylation of histone/nonhistone proteins and histone acetyltransferase-dependent chromatin transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:51163–51171. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M409024200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 611.Balasubramanyam K, et al. Polyisoprenylated benzophenone, garcinol, a natural histone acetyltransferase inhibitor, represses chromatin transcription and alters global gene expression. J. Biol. Chem. 2004;279:33716–33726. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M402839200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 612.Biel M, et al. Design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of a small-molecule inhibitor of the histone acetyltransferase Gcn5. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2004;43:3974–3976. doi: 10.1002/anie.200453879. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 613.Stimson L, et al. Isothiazolones as inhibitors of PCAF and p300 histone acetyltransferase activity. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2005;4:1521–1532. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-05-0135. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 614.Filippakopoulos P, et al. Selective inhibition of BET bromodomains. Nature. 2010;468:1067–1073. doi: 10.1038/nature09504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 615.Nicodeme E, et al. Suppression of inflammation by a synthetic histone mimic. Nature. 2010;468:1119–1123. doi: 10.1038/nature09589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 616.Brand M, et al. Small molecule inhibitors of bromodomain-acetyl-lysine interactions. ACS Chem. Biol. 2015;10:22–39. doi: 10.1021/cb500996u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 617.Romero FA, et al. Disrupting acetyl-lysine recognition: progress in the development of bromodomain inhibitors. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:1271–1298. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01514. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 618.Xiang Q, et al. Discovery and optimization of 1-(1H-indol-1-yl)ethanone derivatives as CBP/EP300 bromodomain inhibitors for the treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2018;147:238–252. doi: 10.1016/j.ejmech.2018.01.087. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 619.Theodoulou NH, et al. Discovery of I-BRD9, a selective cell active chemical probe for bromodomain containing protein 9 inhibition. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:1425–1439. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00256. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 620.Vangamudi B, et al. The SMARCA2/4 ATPase domain surpasses the bromodomain as a drug target in SWI/SNF-mutant cancers: insights from cDNA rescue and PFI-3 inhibitor studies. Cancer Res. 2015;75:3865–3878. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-14-3798. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 621.Palmer WS, et al. Structure-guided design of IACS-9571, a selective high-affinity dual TRIM24-BRPF1 bromodomain inhibitor. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:1440–1454. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 622.Picaud S, et al. Promiscuous targeting of bromodomains by bromosporine identifies BET proteins as master regulators of primary transcription response in leukemia. Sci. Adv. 2016;2:e1600760. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1600760. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 623.Riggs MG, Whittaker RG, Neumann JR, Ingram VM. n-Butyrate causes histone modification in HeLa and Friend erythroleukaemia cells. Nature. 1977;268:462–464. doi: 10.1038/268462a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 624.Yoshida M, Kijima M, Akita M, Beppu T. Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A. J. Biol. Chem. 1990;265:17174–17179. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 625.Van Lint C, Emiliani S, Verdin E. The expression of a small fraction of cellular genes is changed in response to histone hyperacetylation. Gene Expr. 1996;5:245–253. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 626.Fandy TE, et al. Interactive effects of HDAC inhibitors and TRAIL on apoptosis are associated with changes in mitochondrial functions and expressions of cell cycle regulatory genes in multiple myeloma. Neoplasia. 2005;7:646–657. doi: 10.1593/neo.04655. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 627.Fang JY. Histone deacetylase inhibitors, anticancerous mechanism and therapy for gastrointestinal cancers. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2005;20:988–994. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2005.03807.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 628.Singh TR, Shankar S, Srivastava RK. HDAC inhibitors enhance the apoptosis-inducing potential of TRAIL in breast carcinoma. Oncogene. 2005;24:4609–4623. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1208585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 629.Finnin MS, et al. Structures of a histone deacetylase homologue bound to the TSA and SAHA inhibitors. Nature. 1999;401:188–193. doi: 10.1038/43710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 630.Richon VM, et al. A class of hybrid polar inducers of transformed cell differentiation inhibits histone deacetylases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 1998;95:3003–3007. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 631.Jung M, et al. Amide analogues of trichostatin A as inhibitors of histone deacetylase and inducers of terminal cell differentiation. J. Med. Chem. 1999;42:4669–4679. doi: 10.1021/jm991091h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 632.Kim YB, et al. Oxamflatin is a novel antitumor compound that inhibits mammalian histone deacetylase. Oncogene. 1999;18:2461–2470. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1202564. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 633.Su GH, Sohn TA, Ryu B, Kern SE. A novel histone deacetylase inhibitor identified by high-throughput transcriptional screening of a compound library. Cancer Res. 2000;60:3137–3142. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 634.Bressi JC, et al. Benzimidazole and imidazole inhibitors of histone deacetylases: synthesis and biological activity. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2010;20:3138–3141. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2010.03.092. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 635.Ito T, et al. Real-time imaging of histone H4K12-specific acetylation determines the modes of action of histone deacetylase and bromodomain inhibitors. Chem. Biol. 2011;18:495–507. doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2011.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 636.Suzuki T, et al. Synthesis and histone deacetylase inhibitory activity of new benzamide derivatives. J. Med. Chem. 1999;42:3001–3003. doi: 10.1021/jm980565u. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 637.Kijima M, et al. Trapoxin, an antitumor cyclic tetrapeptide, is an irreversible inhibitor of mammalian histone deacetylase. J. Biol. Chem. 1993;268:22429–22435. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 638.Furumai R, et al. FK228 (depsipeptide) as a natural prodrug that inhibits class I histone deacetylases. Cancer Res. 2002;62:4916–4921. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 639.Lea MA, Randolph VM, Patel M. Increased acetylation of histones induced by diallyl disulfide and structurally related molecules. Int J. Oncol. 1999;15:347–352. doi: 10.3892/ijo.15.2.347. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 640.Haggarty SJ, et al. Domain-selective small-molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6)-mediated tubulin deacetylation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2003;100:4389–4394. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0430973100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 641.Balasubramanian S, et al. A novel histone deacetylase 8 (HDAC8)-specific inhibitor PCI-34051 induces apoptosis in T-cell lymphomas. Leukemia. 2008;22:1026–1034. doi: 10.1038/leu.2008.9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 642.Methot JL, et al. Exploration of the internal cavity of histone deacetylase (HDAC) with selective HDAC1/HDAC2 inhibitors (SHI-1:2) Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008;18:973–978. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2007.12.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 643.Mann BS, et al. FDA approval summary: vorinostat for treatment of advanced primary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Oncologist. 2007;12:1247–1252. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.12-10-1247. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 644.Ropero S, et al. A truncating mutation of HDAC2 in human cancers confers resistance to histone deacetylase inhibition. Nat. Genet. 2006;38:566–569. doi: 10.1038/ng1773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 645.Daigle SR, et al. Selective killing of mixed lineage leukemia cells by a potent small-molecule DOT1L inhibitor. Cancer Cell. 2011;20:53–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2011.06.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 646.Daigle SR, et al. Potent inhibition of DOT1L as treatment of MLL-fusion leukemia. Blood. 2013;122:1017–1025. doi: 10.1182/blood-2013-04-497644. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 647.Basavapathruni A, et al. Nonclinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of EPZ-5676, a novel DOT1L histone methyltransferase inhibitor. Biopharm. Drug Dispos. 2014;35:237–252. doi: 10.1002/bdd.1889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 648.Miranda TB, et al. DZNep is a global histone methylation inhibitor that reactivates developmental genes not silenced by DNA methylation. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009;8:1579–1588. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-09-0013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 649.Glazer RI, et al. 3-Deazaneplanocin: a new and potent inhibitor of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase and its effects on human promyelocytic leukemia cell line HL-60. Biochem Biophys. Res. Commun. 1986;135:688–694. doi: 10.1016/0006-291X(86)90048-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 650.Qi W, et al. Selective inhibition of Ezh2 by a small molecule inhibitor blocks tumor cells proliferation. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:21360–21365. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1210371110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 651.Verma SK, et al. Identification of Potent, Selective, Cell-Active Inhibitors of the Histone Lysine Methyltransferase EZH2. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 2012;3:1091–1096. doi: 10.1021/ml3003346. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 652.McCabe MT, et al. EZH2 inhibition as a therapeutic strategy for lymphoma with EZH2-activating mutations. Nature. 2012;492:108–112. doi: 10.1038/nature11606. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 653.Knutson SK, et al. A selective inhibitor of EZH2 blocks H3K27 methylation and kills mutant lymphoma cells. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2012;8:890–896. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.1084. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 654.Knutson SK, et al. Selective inhibition of EZH2 by EPZ-6438 leads to potent antitumor activity in EZH2-mutant non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2014;13:842–854. doi: 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-13-0773. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 655.Fiedorowicz JG, Swartz KL. The role of monoamine oxidase inhibitors in current psychiatric practice. J. Psychiatr. Pract. 2004;10:239–248. doi: 10.1097/00131746-200407000-00005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 656.Harris WJ, et al. The histone demethylase KDM1A sustains the oncogenic potential of MLL-AF9 leukemia stem cells. Cancer Cell. 2012;21:473–487. doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2012.03.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 657.Schenk T, et al. Inhibition of the LSD1 (KDM1A) demethylase reactivates the all-trans-retinoic acid differentiation pathway in acute myeloid leukemia. Nat. Med. 2012;18:605–611. doi: 10.1038/nm.2661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 658.Liang Y, et al. A novel selective LSD1/KDM1A inhibitor epigenetically blocks herpes simplex virus lytic replication and reactivation from latency. MBio. 2013;4:e00558–00512. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00558-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 659.Neelamegam R, et al. Brain-penetrant LSD1 inhibitors can block memory consolidation. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2012;3:120–128. doi: 10.1021/cn200104y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 660.Fiskus W, et al. Highly effective combination of LSD1 (KDM1A) antagonist and pan-histone deacetylase inhibitor against human AML cells. Leukemia. 2014;28:2155–2164. doi: 10.1038/leu.2014.119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 661.Maes T, et al. Advances in the development of histone lysine demethylase inhibitors. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2015;23:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2015.05.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 662.Rose NR, et al. Plant growth regulator daminozide is a selective inhibitor of human KDM2/7 histone demethylases. J. Med Chem. 2012;55:6639–6643. doi: 10.1021/jm300677j. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 663.Tan Y, et al. Matrix softness regulates plasticity of tumour-repopulating cells via H3K9 demethylation and Sox2 expression. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4619. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 664.Kruidenier L, et al. A selective jumonji H3K27 demethylase inhibitor modulates the proinflammatory macrophage response. Nature. 2012;488:404–408. doi: 10.1038/nature11262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 665.Heinemann B, et al. Inhibition of demethylases by GSK-J1/J4. Nature. 2014;514:E1–E2. doi: 10.1038/nature13688. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES