The rhizobium-legume symbiosis contributes around 65% of biological nitrogen fixation in agriculture systems and is critical for sustainable agriculture by reducing the amount of chemical nitrogen fertilizer being used. Rhizobial inocula have been commercialized for more than 100 years, but the efficiency of inoculation can vary among legume cultivars, field sites, and years. These long-lasting challenging problems impede the establishment of a sustainable agriculture, particularly in developing countries. Here, we report that rhizobial zinc starvation machinery containing a conserved high-affinity zinc transporter and accessory components makes cumulative contributions to modulating rhizobial symbiotic compatibility. This work highlights a critical role of largely unexplored nutritional immunity in the rhizobium-legume symbiosis, which makes zinc starvation machinery an attractive target for improving rhizobial symbiotic compatibility.
KEYWORDS: Sinorhizobium, soybean, zinc, nodulation, compatibility
ABSTRACT
Pathogenic bacteria need high-affinity zinc uptake systems to counteract the nutritional immunity exerted by infected hosts. However, our understanding of zinc homeostasis in mutualistic systems such as the rhizobium-legume symbiosis is limited. Here, we show that the conserved high-affinity zinc transporter ZnuABC and accessory transporter proteins (Zip1, Zip2, and c06450) made cumulative contributions to nodulation of the broad-host-range strain Sinorhizobium fredii CCBAU45436. Zur acted as a zinc-dependent repressor for the znuC-znuB-zur operon, znuA, and c06450 by binding to the associated Zur box, but did not regulate zip1 and zip2. ZnuABC was the major zinc transporter. Combined mutants lacking znuA and one of the three accessory genes had more severe defects in nodulation and growth under zinc starvation conditions than the znuA mutant, though rhizoplane colonization by these mutants was not impaired. In contrast to the elite strain CCBAU45436, more drastic symbiotic defects were observed for the znuA mutants of other Sinorhizobium strains, which lack at least one of the three accessory genes in their genomes and are characterized by their limited host range and geographical distribution. The znu-derived mutants showed a higher expression level of nod genes involved in Nod factor biosynthesis and a reduced expression of genes encoding a type three secretion system and its effector NopP, which can interfere with the host immune system. Application of exogenous zinc restored the nodulation ability of these znu-derived mutants. Therefore, the conserved ZnuABC and accessory components in the zinc starvation machinery play an important role in modulating symbiotic compatibility.
INTRODUCTION
Zinc (Zn) is an essential trace metal for all living organisms since it functions as a catalytic cofactor or structural element in a large number of proteins (1). In bacteria, zinc homeostasis is tightly maintained for optimal growth and survival by coordinating different uptake, storage and export systems, which are regulated by separate regulator proteins (2–4). Zinc sufficiency, in most bacteria that have been investigated, is sensed by Zur (zinc uptake regulator), belonging to the well-known Fur (iron-uptake regulator) family, which acts as a repressor for zinc uptake genes (3, 5–7). However, this regulation can be complex due to the variation in the number and characteristics of zinc uptake systems in different genomic backgrounds. In Escherichia coli, the low-affinity zinc importer ZupT, in the ZIP (zinc-iron permease) family, exerted a cumulative effect with the conserved high-affinity zinc importer ZnuABC on bacterial fitness during urinary tract infection, though the loss of ZupT had a less significant effect on zinc uptake than znuABC disruption (8). A similar conclusion was drawn for ZupT of Salmonella enterica (9). In contrast to the less-studied low-affinity zinc transporter, the conserved ZnuABC has been widely studied in many bacteria, such as E. coli, S. enterica, Bacillus subtilis, Yersinia pestis, Yersinia ruckeri, Streptomyces coelicolor, and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (6, 10–16). It has been established that ZnuABC plays an essential role in bacterial growth under zinc-deplete conditions and dramatically affects virulence of diverse bacteria (14, 17–19). However, a few exceptions exist. In Y. pestis, disruption of znuABC has no impact on virulence, though ZnuABC is the major zinc importer (20). In A. tumefaciens, TroCBA rather than ZnuABC predominately functions for zinc uptake (6). ZinT can participate in zinc uptake as an auxiliary component of ZnuA in E. coli and S. enterica (16, 17, 21), whereas in A. tumefaciens, ZinT may interact with the dominant high-affinity zinc uptake transporter TroCBA rather than with ZnuA (6, 15).
In contrast to the intensive study of pathogenic bacteria, the role of zinc homeostasis in mutualistic interactions remains largely unexplored. The rhizobium-legume symbiosis is a model system of mutualistic interactions between bacteria and eukaryotes and has global impacts on the nitrogen cycle due to its ability to reduce atmospheric nitrogen into ammonium. Rhizobia need key symbiosis genes (nod, nif, and fix) to form nitrogen-fixing nodules on legumes, though diverse core and accessory functions are also required for optimizing the compatibility and efficiency of rhizobial interactions with legumes (22–26). It was recently reported that znuABC genes of a broad-host-range strain Sinorhizobium fredii CCBAU45436 were upregulated in nodules of cultivated soybean (Glycine max) and wild soybean (Glycine soja) compared to those in free-living rhizobial cells in rich medium (26, 27), implying that the nodule is a zinc-limiting condition for rhizobia. A deletion mutant of znuA in S. fredii CCBAU45436 formed ineffective nodules on G. max cv. JD17 and cv. C08 and induced a reduced number of effective nodules on G. soja accession W05 (26, 27). On the other hand, it was shown that a soybean zinc transporter GmZIP1 is localized on the membrane of the symbiosome, which harbors nitrogen-fixing rhizobia (called bacteroids) within nodule cells, and isolated soybean symbiosomes can take up zinc from the medium (28). The downregulation of a zinc transporter MtZIP6 in Medicago truncatula resulted in reductions of nitrogenase activity, the number of red nodules, and plant biomass (29). These findings imply a role of zinc uptake in rhizobial interactions with legumes at both nodulation and nitrogen-fixation stages. However, the host-dependent variation in the symbiotic performance of the znuA mutant of S. fredii CCBAU45436 (26, 27) suggests that unidentified low-affinity zinc uptake systems might be involved in rhizobial adaptations to different hosts. Moreover, it remains unknown how Znu and other potential zinc uptake systems are regulated in rhizobia and how rhizobia sense the fluctuating zinc levels.
To strengthen our knowledge on the role of zinc homeostasis in the rhizobium-legume symbiosis, we performed a systematic investigation of zinc-responding genes, particularly those zinc uptake genes within the genome of S. fredii CCBAU45436. First, in vivo transcriptional and translational analyses were used to test whether the conserved Zur works as a zinc-responding transcriptional factor. Then, the Zur regulon and zinc-responding metal transporters were identified by using transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) and reverse transcription-quantitative PCR (qRT-PCR) studies of the wild-type CCBAU45436 and the zur mutant under zinc-replete and -deplete conditions. Bioinformatics and in vitro gel shift assays using purified Zur protein were performed to identify direct targets of Zur. The role of Zur, ZnuABC, and other putative transporters in zinc uptake and symbiotic interactions were further investigated using individual or combined mutants of these genes. The symbiotic defects associated with znu-derived mutants can be overcome by adding replete zinc into the legume rhizosphere, and the underlying mechanism was also investigated. Findings obtained in this study highlighted the importance of the cumulative contributions by ZnuABC and accessory zinc uptake systems to modulating rhizobial nodulation signaling pathways.
RESULTS
Response of Zur to fluctuating zinc levels.
A putative zinc uptake regulator gene zur (c18210) was found downstream from znuC and znuB (Fig. 1A). Reverse transcription PCR analysis showed that PCR products were obtained for fragments covering the intergenic regions between znuB and zur and between znuC and znuB but not for the regions between znuA and znuC and between c18250 and znuA (Fig. 1A). Therefore, znuC, znuB, and zur constitute an operon.
c18210 is very similar (91.6% identity) to Zur in the model rhizobium Sinorhizobium meliloti 1021, and five conserved residues (H77, C87, C90, C128, and C130) critical for the specific binding to zinc ions are present in c18210 and Zur of other bacteria such as E. coli and B. subtilis (see Fig. S1 in the supplemental material). The protein level of Zur in CCBAU45436 was significantly elevated in medium supplemented with the zinc chelator TPEN [N,N,N′,N′-tetrakis(2-pyridinylmethyl)-1,2-ethanediamine)] compared to that with ZnSO4 or no treatment (Fig. 1B). The transcription level of zur was increased around 10-fold in the medium containing 4 μM TPEN compared to that in the medium with 200 μM ZnSO4 (P < 0.001) (Fig. 1C). These observations demonstrate that Zur expression is controlled by zinc levels.
Identification of Zur-regulated transporter genes responding to zinc depletion.
RNA-seq analysis revealed that 1,115 and 957 genes were up- and downregulated, respectively, in CCBAU45436 under low-zinc conditions (4 μM TPEN) compared to expression in cells with a high zinc supply (200 μM ZnSO4) (Fig. 2A and Table S1A). To determine the regulon of Zur, these transcriptional profiles were compared with those of an in-frame deletion mutant of zur under the same conditions (Mzur) (Fig. 2A and Table S1A). Mzur showed 86 and 20 differentially expressed genes under high- and low-zinc conditions, respectively, compared with expression in CCBAU45436. Notably, four genes encoding putative components of metal transporters were upregulated both in CCBAU45436 under low-zinc conditions (log2R ranged from 5.6 to 8.6) and in Mzur under high-zinc conditions (log2R ranged from 3.8 to 8.1) compared to that in CCBAU45436 under high-zinc conditions (Fig. 2B and Table S1A). They are znuA, znuB, znuC, and c06450, the last of which encodes a putative periplasmic protein (COG5266) of an ABC-type Co2+ transport system (Fig. 2B). Further qRT-PCR experiments confirmed the upregulation of znuA and c06450 under low-zinc conditions (Fig. 2C) and the Zur-dependent repression of znuA (Fig. 2D), znuC-znuB-zur operon, and c06450 (Fig. 2E) under high-zinc conditions.
In the genome of CCBAU45436, there are two genes encoding low-affinity zinc transporters of the ZIP family, but no homologs of troCBA from A. tumefaciens were found. Conserved regions of ZIP homologs are present in Zip1 (b54490) and Zip2 (d66670) (see Fig. S2). The zip1 gene was actively transcribed under high-zinc conditions (reads per kilobase per million mapped reads [RPKM] = 916), and showed an even higher transcription level under zinc depletion conditions (log2R = 2.7) as revealed by RNA-seq, but this induction was not dependent on Zur (log2R = 0.15) (Table S1A) and could not be detected by qRT-PCR (Fig. 2C and E). The zip2 gene was constitutively transcribed at a rather low level under the tested conditions (RPKM < 30) (Fig. 2B and C) and was not regulated by Zur (Fig. 2B and E).
It is intriguing that c06450 encodes a putative periplasmic component of a Co2+ transport system responding to zinc depletion, while znuA encodes a periplasmic component of a Zn2+ transport system (COG4531) (Fig. 2B). To test the specificity of c06450 and ZnuA, qRT-PCR was used to determine transcriptional responses of znuA and c06450 to Co2+, Zn2+, Fe3+, and Ni2+ (200 μM), with 25 μM EDTA as a control. High concentrations of both Co2+ and Zn2+ exerted significant repression on transcription of c06450 and znuA (Fig. 2F and G) (P < 0.05) compared to that with EDTA treatment, though the strongest repression was mediated by Zn2+. The repression of these two genes by replete Co2+ was significantly relieved in Mzur compared to that in CCBAU45436 (Fig. 2H), while zip1 and zip2 were not regulated by Zur under the same conditions. Therefore, c06450 and znuA can respond to both zinc and cobalt in a Zur-dependent manner.
Further analysis using a translational PznuA-lacZ fusion revealed that expression of ZnuA was unchanged in Mzur under zinc-replete conditions (50 to 300 μM ZnSO4) (Fig. 3A), while the same fusion in the wild-type CCBAU45436 showed a stepwise decreased expression pattern with increasing ZnSO4 levels in the medium. This is in line with the decreased Zur expression upon elevated zinc level (Fig. 1B). To test whether Zur can directly bind the putative Zur box of the znuA promoter, an electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) with purified His6-Zur protein was performed. When the concentration of purified His6-Zur protein was increased (above 1.32 μM), the znuA promoter probe showed a typical gel shift pattern of oligomeric Zur binding compared with the pattern observed with a lower concentration of Zur (Fig. 3B). When the Zn2+ chelator TPEN was present, the amount of retarded DNA fragment was significantly reduced, indicating a zinc-dependent binding of Zur to the znuA promoter.
Bioinformatics analyses further identified a consensus sequence for the Zur box containing a 15-bp palindromic motif (7-1-7 inverted repeat) and found 17 binding sites in the genome of CCBAU45436 (Fig. 3C; Table S1B). In addition to binding sites within promoter regions of znuC and znuA, a binding box was found in the promoter region of c06450. No binding sites were found around the coding regions of zip1 and zip2. The other fourteen putative Zur targets included transcriptional regulators belonging to the LuxR and MerR families and components of transport systems for capsular polysaccharide, lipopolysaccharide, and l-proline/glycine/betaine (Table S1B). Four representative Zur boxes (those associated with c06450, e68370, d65890, and a42610) were further verified by EMSA. All four tested fragments were retarded in the EMSA when the Zn2+ chelator TPEN was absent (Fig. 3D). However, not all genes with a Zur box were differentially expressed under test conditions (Table S1B), indicating the involvement of other transcriptional factors in regulating these target genes. Zur-dependent regulation was only detected under high-zinc conditions for five boxes associated with znuA, znuC-znuB-zur, c06450, c06460 (encoding a glutathione S-transferase), and d65890 (encoding a chemotaxis protein methyltransferase CheR) (Table S1B).
ZnuABC is the predominant zinc uptake transporter under zinc-deplete conditions.
Although c06450 was annotated as a putative cobalt transport protein, metal uptake experiments showed that znu rather than c06450 played a more important role in uptake of both cobalt and zinc (see Fig. S3). The contribution of Zip1 and Zip2 was also limited under test conditions. To further determine the relative importance of znuA, c06450, zip1, and zip2 under zinc-deplete conditions, individual and combined mutants of these genes were inoculated in equal quantities onto plates with the M9 minimal medium with or without 50 μM ZnSO4 (see Fig. S4). Colonies were rarely observed on the M9 minimal medium (10−1 to 10−5 dilutions) without supplementing ZnSO4 for the znuA mutant (MznuA) and its derived mutants lacking both znuA and other putative zinc transporter genes (MznuAzip1, MznuAzip2, MznuAc06450, MznuAczip1zip2, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2). No defects were found for the other mutants harboring intact znuABC genes (Mzur, Mzip1, Mzip2, Mzip1zip2, and Mc06450). The growth defects of mutants lacking the znuA gene were restored either by adding 50 μM ZnSO4 or by introducing the complementary vector pB-znuA (but not pB-zip1 or pB-c06450) into corresponding mutants. On the other hand, 2 μM CoCl2 partially restored the growth of mutants lacking znuA on M9 plates, and 20 μM CoCl2 further improved their growth to a level similar to that of CCBAU45436 (Fig. S4). No difference was observed between MznuA and the other combined mutants lacking znuA, and 20 μM CoCl2 itself reduced the growth of CCBAU45436 on M9 plates. When the growth curves of representative strains were monitored in liquid M9 medium (Fig. S3), a more severe growth defect than that of MznuA was observed for the combined mutants lacking znuA and at least one more gene among zip1, zip2, and c06450. A replete supply of ZnSO4 restored their growth rate (Fig. S3). When all mutants lacking znuA were grown on the rich medium, yeast-mannitol-agar (YMA), no significant growth defects were found (Fig. S4). However, the mutants without the znuA gene were sensitive to supplemented 50 μM EDTA, which can sequester metal ions in the YMA medium. Introducing a functional znuA carried by pB-znuA into corresponding znuA-lacking mutants can restore this growth defect. The sequestration effect of EDTA can be released by adding 50 μM ZnSO4 (Fig. S4). Therefore, ZnuA is critical for adaptation to zinc-deplete conditions, while the contribution by Zip1, Zip2, and c06450 can only be detected under certain conditions.
MznuB, MznuC, and MznuAznuB exhibited delayed growth curves similar to that of MznuA in liquid M9 medium compared to that of CCBAU45436 (Fig. S3). Mc06450znuB, MznuAc06450znuB, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2znuB showed similar growth curves, with a reduced optical density at 600 nm (OD600) at the stationary phase compared to that of mutants lacking just znu genes (MznuA, MznuB, MznuC, and MznuAznuB) (Fig. S3). These results imply that ZnuA is the major periplasmic zinc binding protein to deliver zinc to ZnuBC under the test conditions.
Zinc uptake systems make cumulative contributions to symbiotic adaptations.
MznuA and other tested mutants lacking znu genes (MznuAzip1, MznuAzip2, MznuAzip1zip2, MznuAc06450, MznuAc06450zip1zip2, MznuB, MznuC, MznuAznuB, Mc06450znuB, MznuAc06450znuB, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2znuB) induced fewer nodules on Glycine max C08, Glycine soja W05, and Cajanus cajan than CCBAU45436 and mutants harboring intact zunABC genes (Mzip1, Mzip2, Mzip1zip2, and Mc06450) (Fig. 4A to C; see also Fig. S5) (Duncan’s test, alpha = 0.05). Notably, plants of three legume species inoculated with MznuAzip1, MznuAzip2, MznuAzip1zip2, MznuAc06450, MznuAc06450zip1zip2, MznuB, MznuC, MznuAznuB, Mc06450znuB, MznuAc06450znuB, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2znuB had fewer nodules than plants inoculated with MznuA (Fig. 4A to C; Fig. S5) (Duncan’s test, alpha = 0.05), indicating cumulative contributions of znuA, zip1, zip2, and c06450 genes and that ZnuBC may also receive zinc from sources other than ZnuA during symbiosis.
Those mutants that showed more severe symbiotic defects than MznuA induced many bumps on G. max and G. soja roots (Fig. 4D and E; Fig. S5). Root bumps were frequently observed on C. cajan roots inoculated with MznuA (Fig. 4F) and other combined mutants lacking znu genes. As shown in light microscopy (Fig. 4F) and transmission electron microscopy (Fig. 4G) photos, these bumps were poorly infected compared with nodules induced by the same mutant. In contrast to G. max plants, these bumps were not found in all G. soja and C. cajan plants inoculated with corresponding mutants (Fig. 4D to F), possibly due to intrinsic genetic variation in seeds of these two species. On the other hand, for those nodules of G. max, G. soja, and C. cajan induced by the mutants lacking the znuA gene, most of them were well infected except a small number of G. max nodules that harbored a clearly reduced number of intracellular bacteroids (see Fig. S6). Shoot dry weights of G. max and C. cajan, but not G. soja, inoculated with the mutants lacking znu genes were significantly lower than those of plants inoculated with the other strains tested (see Fig. S7) (Duncan’s test, alpha = 0.05).
The reduced number of nodules induced on G. max, G. soja, and C. cajan by mutants lacking intact znuABC (MznuAzip1, MznuAzip2, MznuAzip1zip2, MznuAc06450, MznuAc06450zip1zip2, MznuA, MznuB, MznuC, MznuAznuB, Mc06450znuB, MznuAc06450znuB, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2znuB) were largely rescued by adding 700 μM ZnSO4 to the growth medium, which was vermiculite moistened with low-N nutrient solution (Fig. 5A to D; Fig. S5), but not by adding cobalt (see Fig. S8). Moreover, the root bumps induced by various mutants, such as those on G. max plants inoculated with MznuAzip1, were not observed when 700 μM ZnSO4 was added to the vermiculite (Fig. 5A). Symbiotic defects of MznuAzip1 were fully and partially restored by introducing pB-znuA and pB-zip1, respectively (Fig. 5E). Further analysis revealed that the numbers of CFU of mutants such as MznuAzip1zip2 and MznuAc06450 on the rhizoplane of G. max were indistinguishable from those of the wild-type CCBAU45436 (Fig. 5F). This suggests that these mutants have similar survival rates on the root surface as the wild-type strain. The symbiotic performance of Mzur was indistinguishable from that of the wild-type CCBAU45436 regarding nodule number and shoot dry weight on G. max, G. soja, and C. cajan.
The contribution of znu to symbiotic adaptation is lineage dependent.
Comparative genomics analysis showed that znuABC orthologous genes are conserved in Sinorhizobium, while zip1, zip2, and c06450 are accessory genes with limited phyletic distribution (Fig. 5G). For example, S. fredii CCBAU25509 lacks zip2, and Sinorhizobium sojae CCBAU05684 and Sinorhizobium sp. CCBAU05631 do not contain zip1, zip2, or c06450, though these three strains and CCBAU45436 are all effective microsymbionts of G. soja W05. The znuA mutants of CCBAU25509, CCBAU05684, and CCBAU05631 formed a reduced number of nodules on G. soja W05 than the wild-type strains and the znuA mutant of CCBAU45436 (Fig. 5H and 4B), indicating an important role of the znuA gene in modulating nodulation of all tested strains on G. soja W05. These nodulation defects can be restored by adding replete ZnSO4 to the vermiculite (Fig. 5H).
Shoot dry weights of G. soja W05 plants inoculated with the znuA mutant of CCBAU25509 or CCBAU05684 were significantly lower than those of plants inoculated with the wild-type strains (Fig. S7) (P < 0.001), and these two znuA mutants induced root bumps on G. soja plants. These phenomena were not observed for the znuA mutants of CCBAU45436 and CCBAU05631 (Fig. S7). Therefore, despite the fact that CCBAU05631 lacks zip1, zip2, and c06450 as CCBAU05684 does, the symbiotic defect of the znuA mutant of CCBAU05631 was not as severe as that of the znuA mutant of CCBAU05684, implying differential integrations of Znu with different genomic backgrounds.
Zinc uptake systems are required for proper induction of nodulation and T3SS genes.
The root bumps of G. max plants inoculated with mutants such as MznuAzip1, MznuAzip1zip2, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2 indicated potential disturbance of symbiotic signaling. qRT-PCR analysis of free-living cultures in the presence of symbiotic signal genistein (Fig. 6A and B) revealed that nodD2 (encoding a transcriptional repressor of nod genes) rather than nodD1 (encoding a transcriptional activator of nod genes) was downregulated in MznuAzip1, MznuAzip1zip2, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2 compared with that in CCBAU45436 (P < 0.05). The nodA gene, one of the core nod genes, was upregulated in these mutants (P < 0.05), while ttsI encoding the transcriptional activator of type 3 secretion system (T3SS) genes, the T3SS component gene rhcT, and the effector gene nopP were downregulated (P < 0.05). These differential transcriptional profiles were restored by supplying replete zinc, as shown for MznuAc06450zip1zip2 (Fig. 6B), indicating that proper induction of nodulation and T3SS genes requires ample zinc.
DISCUSSION
Efficient zinc uptake is critical for diverse pathogens to infect eukaryotes, but the role of zinc homeostasis in symbiosis is poorly understood (18, 30). A notable symbiotic defect of znu-derived mutants of CCBAU45436 was the reduced number of nodules on G. max, G. soja, and C. cajan plants. This phenomenon was also observed for the znuA mutants of S. fredii CCBAU25509, S. sojae CCBAU05684, and Sinorhizobium sp. CCBAU05631 on G. soja. Moreover, poorly infected pseudonodules can be frequently found on host roots inoculated with these znu-derived mutants. This could be due to the downregulation of nodD2, ttsI, T3SS genes, and nopP in znu-derived mutants. This view is supported by several lines of evidence as described below. The poorly infected root bumps are commonly observed on soybean roots inoculated with incompatible Sinorhizobium and Bradyrhizobium strains (25, 31–33). It has been demonstrated that soybean allelic genes Rj2 and Rfg1 encoding the Toll-interleukin receptor/nucleotide-binding site/leucine-rich repeat class of plant resistance proteins are involved in restricting nodulation by certain rhizobia (34). In the presence of rj2 (Rfg1) soybean cultivar JD17, compatible Sinorhizobium clones, with their T3SS gene cluster including nopP disrupted by indigenous mobile insertion sequences, can be selected by the host from the inocula of incompatible ancestral strains, including CCBAU05631, CCBAU25509, and S. fredii CCBAU83666 (25). By swapping nopP between CCBAU45436 and CCBAU25509, it was further demonstrated that nopP45436 from CCBAU45436 enabled CCBAU25509 to nodulate the rj2 (Rfg1) soybean C08, while CCBAU45436 carrying nopP25509 did not nodulate C08 (35). These studies highlight that natural variation in NopP from different Sinorhizobium strains can modulate symbiotic compatibility with soybeans and that NopP from CCBAU45436 is a compatible effector with rj2 (Rfg1) soybeans. Similarly, natural variation of NopP sequences was found in Bradyrhizobium and determines bradyrhizobial incompatibility with Rj2 soybeans, in which the plant defense marker gene PR-2 was activated by incompatible strains (33). Therefore, NopP can be one of the key effectors modulating the compatibility of rhizobia associated with different genotypes of soybeans. Moreover, the secretion of NopP by S. fredii NGR234 and its phosphorylation by plant kinase from diverse host legumes have been demonstrated (36, 37). The mutation of nopP in NGR234 can have a negative, positive, or little effect on the nodule number on different legume species (36, 37), possibly due to the diverse immunity systems of different legumes. These findings suggest that the formation of poorly infected root bumps and reduced number of infected nodules by znu-derived mutants may be mediated by effector-triggered immunity.
TtsI is the transcriptional activator of T3SS genes and effector genes, including nopP, and can be transcriptionally induced by the NodD1-flavonoid complex (38, 39), which can also activate the transcription of nod genes involved in the biosynthesis of Nod factors (NFs). Although rhizobial NFs are the key symbiotic signal initiating both infection and nodule organogenesis (40), it was recently demonstrated that excess amounts of NFs negatively regulate the initiation of infection threads in M. truncatula, and NF hydrolase MtNFH1 is involved (41). The abnormal branching of indeterminate nodules, as seen on MtNFH1-deficient M. truncatula plants, was also observed on C. cajan roots inoculated with mutants lacking znu genes of CCBAU45436 in this study. It should be noted that nodA, one of the core nod genes, was upregulated in MznuAzip1, MznuAzip1zip2, and MznuAc06450zip1zip2 in the presence of soybean flavonoid genistein, while nodD2 rather than nodD1 was downregulated. There is evidence that nodD2 in Bradyrhizobium japonicum and S. fredii strains nodulating soybeans can repress the transcription of nod genes (42, 43). In S. fredii NGR234, NodD2 can repress the transcription of nodABC genes, and the nodD2 mutant formed bacteria-free pseudonodules on Lablab purpureus, Pachyrhizus tuberosus, Psophocarpus palustris, Tephrosia vogelii, Crotalaria juncea, and Flemingia congesta, and Fix− nodules on Vigna unguiculata and C. cajan (38, 44). In S. fredii HH103, a nolR mutant with a higher level of NF production formed significantly fewer nodules on G. max than the wild-type strain (45), though this gene was not differentially transcribed in MznuAc06450zip1zip2. Therefore, the downregulation of nodD2 and upregulation of nod genes involved in NF biosynthesis in these mutants in the presence of genistein are in line with the impaired infection and nodulation ability.
Cumulative contributions of c06450, Zip1, and Zip2 to Znu-dependent regulation of infection and nodulation were observed, and symbiotic defects of mutants lacking znu genes can be recovered by a replete supply of zinc. ZIP, found in all kingdoms of life, can mediate metal uptake into the cytosol (46). Zip1 and Zip2 are accessory proteins in Sinorhizobium and were not regulated by Zur in CCBAU45436. Both of them were required for the Znu-dependent best symbiotic performance of CCBAU45436. Similarly, a constitutively expressed ZIP protein ZupT and the conserved ZnuABC in Salmonella enterica are required for maximum virulence in mice and the infection rate of the znu-zup double mutant was significantly lower than the znu mutant (9). Although bacterial and plant ZIPs have been reported to be relatively nonselective, promoting the uptake of Zn2+, Fe2+, Co2+, and Mn2+ in E. coli and Zn2+, Fe2+ and Cd2+ in plants (46), adding zinc to the rhizosphere of legumes can restore the effective symbiotic performance of MznuAzip1, MznuAzip2, and MznuAzip1zip2. Similarly, the more severe symbiotic defect of MznuAc06450 and MznuAc06450zip1zip2 than MznuA can be overcome by adding zinc to the legume rhizosphere. c06450 is an accessory periplasmic metal-binding protein and was highly induced under zinc-deplete conditions. It has been reported that a periplasmic zinc-binding protein ZinT may deliver Zn2+ to ZnuA in E. coli and S. enterica and contribute to Znu-dependent bacterial infection (16, 17, 21). Therefore, zinc restriction by host (18) is a common nutritional immunity faced by both pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria.
In addition to znuA and znuC-znuB-zur, conserved in many other bacteria (6, 10–16), accessory c06450 was directly repressed by the canonical zinc-sensing transcriptional factor Zur. Similar to Zn2+, replete Co2+ led to Zur-dependent repression of znu operons and c06450. This is consistent with the ability of Co2+ to bind the Zur dimer in its four exchangeable Zn2+ sites in vitro and to promote Zur binding to the promoter of znuA in Salmonella (47). This phenomenon can be explained as cobalt mismetalation observed under inhibitory concentration of cobalt for Salmonella (47) and for Sinorhizobium strains in this study. Moreover, a higher binding affinity of Zur to Zn2+ than to Co2+ has been demonstrated in vitro (47), and adding Co2+ to the G. max rhizosphere failed to restore the nodulation defect of MznuAc06450zip1zip2.
In contrast to mutants lacking znu genes, symbiotic performance of Mzur was not impaired despite its reduced competitive nodulation ability (48). This can largely be explained by the observation that the high-affinity zinc transporter genes znuABC and c06450 were upregulated in Mzur. Moreover, transcriptomics analysis of the zur mutant and the wild-type CCBAU45436 demonstrated that Zur is a local regulator for a small subset of the zinc regulon (4.2%). This is consistent with the small Zur regulon of other bacteria such as Neisseria meningitidis (49). Notably, some zinc-responding genes are within the list of direct targets of Zur but did not show a Zur-dependent transcriptional profile under test conditions, indicating the coordinated transcriptional regulation by other factors. Alternatively, this could be due to the fact that dimeric or oligomeric Zur formed under different zinc levels can exert differential regulation on target genes through extension of its DNA-binding footprint (50). Oligomeric Zur binding of DNA in vitro can also be observed with increased concentration of purified Zur from Streptomyces coelicolor (50) and, in this study, S. fredii. Although bacteria have a low fraction of zinc proteins (4.9%) on average, these proteins have diverse functions such as enzyme activity and roles in transcription, storage transport, and signal transduction (51). Consequently, as many as 2,072 differentially expressed genes between zinc-deplete and -replete conditions were identified herein for CCBAU45436, indicating a cascade regulation of almost one-third of the genome by zinc under the tested free-living conditions. It can be deduced that zinc depletion in mutants lacking znu genes may lead to a global effect on cellular physiology. When the symbiotic signal genistein from soybean was present (52), the transcription of key symbiosis genes such as nodD2, nodA, ttsI, nopP, and T3SS genes was altered in mutants lacking multiple zinc transport components compared to that in the wild-type CCBAU45436. In the presence of replete zinc, these transcriptional changes were restored to the level of the wild-type strain. Therefore, zinc homeostasis modulated by zinc transporters is crucial for optimizing the transcription profiles of key genes involved in early symbiotic interaction with legume hosts, though the mechanisms underlying this link remain elusive. Notably, in the mutant of mucR1 lacking a zinc-finger transcriptional regulator, nodD2 was significantly upregulated compared with that in the wild-type CCBAU45436 under symbiotic conditions with soybean (27). MucR1 has a conserved C2H2 zinc coordination sphere essential for its DNA-binding activity (53). It should be further investigated how MucR1 and other putative zinc-responding factors are involved in regulating nod and/or T3SS genes.
Conclusions.
In this study, we show that znuABC and c06450 were directly repressed by the zinc-dependent transcriptional regulator Zur in S. fredii CCBAU45436 under zinc-replete conditions and were derepressed under zinc-deplete conditions. These zinc starvation-responsive genes were not essential for rhizoplane colonization. However, accessory proteins, including c06450 and low-affinity zinc transporters Zip1 and Zip2, made cumulative contributions to Znu-associated regulation of Sinorhizobium compatibility with legume hosts. In this process, rhizobia needed enough zinc to modulate the transcriptional level of nodulation and T3SS genes, which were induced by a symbiotic signal (genistein) from soybean and are well known for their crucial roles in modulating infection and nodulation (Fig. 7). The regulation mechanisms of nodulation and T3SS genes by zinc homeostasis during the establishment of symbiosis remain elusive, considering that around one-third of the genome can be differentially expressed under zinc starvation conditions. In contrast to the elite strain S. fredii CCBAU45436, more severe defects in nodulation were observed for the znuA mutant of Sinorhizobium strains that harbor an incomplete set of c06450, zip1, and zip2 in their genomes and are characterized by their limited symbiotic host range and geographical distribution patterns (24–26, 54–56). These findings imply that accessory components in zinc starvation machinery may contribute to the modulation of nutrient immunity and ecological success of rhizobia.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial strains, plasmids, and growth conditions.
Bacterial strains and plasmids used in this study are listed in Table S2 in the supplemental material. Sinorhizobium strains were grown at 28°C in tryptone-yeast extract (TY) medium (57), YMA medium (57), or modified-M9 minimal medium (58). E. coli strains were cultured in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium at 37°C (58). Antibiotics were added at concentrations described earlier (59).
Construction and complementation of Sinorhizobium mutants.
The PCR primers and their specific roles in this study are listed and described in Table S2. To construct the marker-free znuA deletion mutant MznuA from the ΔznuA::Gm mutant constructed earlier (27), the gentamicin resistance cassette was excised by introducing, by conjugation, the plasmid pCM157 expressing Cre recombinase (60), and pCM157-cured clones were identified as tetracycline-sensitive ones. To generate Mzur, Mzip1, Mzip2, MznuAzip1, and MznuAzip2, the cre-lox system (60) was used for individual deletion of zur, zip1, and zip2 in the wild-type CCBAU45436 and the deletion of zip1 or zip2 in MznuA. The same procedure described previously was used (59). Briefly, the suicide plasmid pCM351 containing the upstream and downstream flanking regions of each target gene was constructed and subsequently transformed into the recipient strain by triparental conjugation with helper plasmid pRK2013 (61).
Various pVO155 (62) derivatives containing an internal fragment of individual target genes were used to construct insertion mutations of zip2 in the backgrounds of MznuAzip1 or Mzip1 derived from CCBAU45436 and to generate insertion mutations of znuA in CCBAU25509 or CCBAU05684, while a znuA mutation in CCBAU05631 was generated by pJQ200SK (62) containing its internal fragment. These genetic manipulations generated MznuAzip1zip2, Mzip1zip2A, M25509znuA, M05684znuA, and M05631znuA.
To generate Mc06450, MznuAc06450, and MznuAzip1zip2c06450, a seamless cloning approach as described earlier (59, 63), using a pJQ200SK derivative harboring two PCR fragments encompassing the upstream and the downstream regions of c06450, was used to delete c06450 in the backgrounds of wild-type CCBAU45436, MznuA, or MznuAzip1zip2. The seamless cloning approach was also used to delete znuB in the backgrounds of wild-type CCBAU45436, MznuA, Mc06450, MznuAc06450, or MznuAc06450zip1zip2 and to delete znuC in the wild-type CCBAU45436, resulting in MznuB, MznuAznuB, Mc06450znuB, MznuAc06450znuB, MznuAc06450zip1zip2znuB, and MznuC.
CCBAU45436_3×Myc was constructed by introducing a pVO155 derivative containing a fragment amplified using the primers Zur_tag_F/Zur_tag_F. To construct the plasmids expressing znuA, c06450, or zip1, the fragments containing individual coding sequences of CCBAU45436 were amplified and cloned into pBBR1MCS-3 (64). The resultant pBBR1MCS-3 derivatives were then conjugated into corresponding mutants by triparental mating. All constructs were verified by PCR and Sanger sequencing.
Bioinformatics procedure.
To predict Zur-binding sites, 42 manually curated Zur-binding motifs from Rhizobiales, described on the RegPrecise website (65), were used as a training set, and then a weight matrix was constructed using the CONSENSUS algorithm (66) on the Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tools (RSAT) website (67). Then, we used this matrix to perform a genome-wide screening for putative Zur-binding sites in the CCBAU45436 genome. Six hits with scores above ten were added to the training set, resulting in a set of 48 curated Zur-binding motifs. This updated training set was then used for final prediction of Zur-binding sites in CCBAU45436 (score > 5). DNA sequence logos were generated by WebLogo (68). Protein sequence alignment was generated using ClustalW (69). A neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree was constructed using MEGA 7 (70). Protein structure homology modeling for Zip1 and Zip2 was performed on the SWISS-MODEL server (71), using two different Zn2+-substituted structures at 2.4 Å as the structural templates, and results are shown in Fig. 2B and Fig. 7. Core genomes of nine Sinorhizobium strains were defined by the bidirectional best-hit algorithm as described earlier (54). Two thousand one hundred sixty-six core genes were aligned with ClustalW (69) and trimmed using Gblocks (72). The trimmed alignment was used for the construction of a maximum likelihood phylogenic tree through MEGA 7 (70).
RNA-seq, Real-time qPCR, reverse transcriptase PCR, and β-galactosidase activity assays.
Early mid-log-phase rhizobial cultures in modified M9 minimal medium were supplemented with 4 μM TPEN, 200 μM metals (ZnSO4, FeCl3, CoCl2, or NiSO4), 25 μM EDTA, and/or 1 μM genistein as indicated in the text. Cultures were harvested 12 h later, and RNA was extracted using an RNAprep Pure Cell/Bacteria kit (Tiangen). Strand-specific RNA sequencing was carried out by Novogene (Beijing, China) with next-generation sequencing. For RNA-seq data, Bowtie2 was used to map clean reads in fastq files to the CCBAU45436 reference genome (default parameters) (73). The number of unique mapped reads for each protein-coding gene was extracted from sorted bam files using HTseq-count (74), and differentially expressed genes (Log2R > 1, false-discovery rate [FDR] < 0.001) were identified by DESeq2 (75). Summary statistics for the clean reads data and mapping results are shown in Table S1A.
Gene-specific primers used in qRT-PCR are listed in Table S2. cDNA was synthesized by using PrimeScript RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa). qRT-PCR was performed by using GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega) and an ABI QuantStudioT 6 Flex System real-time PCR system. Transcription levels were normalized to the expression of the internal control gene 16S rRNA, measured in the same samples. Three independent biological replicates were performed.
To determine the cotranscription of znuB, znuC, and zur, reverse transcription-PCR was conducted. Total RNA was extracted from the bacterial culture grown overnight at 28°C in modified M9 minimal medium. The RNA samples were first treated with gDNA Eraser (TaKaRa) to remove any contaminating genomic DNA, and then cDNA synthesis was performed using the PrimeScript RT reagent kit (TaKaRa). Gene-specific primers for the gene junctions were used for separate PCRs using the 2×High-GC PCR StarMix (GenStar). Three independent experiments were performed.
The translational fusion plasmid pGD926 with the lacZ reporter gene (76) was used to construct PznuA-lacZ in the backgrounds of CCBAU45436 and its zur mutant, using the procedure described earlier (59). To determine the effect of different zinc concentrations on znuA expression, cells from an overnight culture of WT/PznuA-lacZ and zur/PznuA-lacZ were washed once in M9 minimal medium and inoculated in 30 ml M9 minimal medium, supplemented with different ZnSO4 concentrations, to and OD600 of 0.05. β-Galactosidase activity was measured 16 h later as described previously (58).
Determination of rhizobial growth and metal content.
Rhizobial cells were grown overnight in M9 minimal medium. The overnight cultures were washed once and resuspended to an OD600 of 0.05 in M9 minimal medium with or without 100 μM ZnSO4. Growth of cells was monitored by measuring optical density at 600 nm on the Bioscreen C system (Oy Growth Curves Ab Ltd., Finland). The overnight cultures were also used to inoculate M9 minimal medium containing 10 μM ZnSO4 or CoCl2 with an initial OD600 of 0.05. Strains were cultured for 48 h and were then pelleted, washed twice with 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4)–4 mM EDTA followed by one wash using 20 mM Tris-HCl (pH 7.4), and dried at 100°C to a constant weight. The total intracellular zinc or cobalt content was measured by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) (Agilent 7700x; Agilent, USA).
Purification of S. fredii Zur, Western blotting, and electrophoretic mobility shift assay.
The PCR product of zur amplified using primers zur-ORF-F/zur-ORF-R was digested with BamHI and HindIII and ligated into expression vector pET-28a(+) to generate pET28a-Zur, which was then transformed into E. coli BL21(DE3). The expression of N-terminal His6-tagged Zur in E. coli cells grown in LB medium was induced with 1 mM (final concentration) isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG; Coolaber) for 4 h at 37°C. Cells were then harvested, washed, resuspended using lysis buffer (50 mM NaH2PO4, 300 mM NaCl) with protease inhibitor cocktail (Coolaber), and sonicated on ice. Cell extracts were loaded onto Nickel-IDA agarose beads (GenStar), and Zur protein was purified in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions. The concentration of Zur protein was determined by the Bradford method using Quick Start Bradford Dye reagent (Bio-Rad).
For EMSA, CCBAU45436_3×Myc cells were cultured in the same way as bacteria used for qRT-PCR. Cell extracts were electrophoresed on 15% SDS-PAGE gels. Monoclonal mouse antibody against 3×Myc epitope (SC-40; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) and the horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin G (IgG) secondary antibody (SC-2005; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) were used at 1:200 and 1:10,000 dilution ratios, respectively. Signals of the protein on X-ray film were recorded by chemiluminescence detection.
Binding reactions were performed with approximately 50 fmol of biotin-labeled probes and 2.64 μmol of purified Zur in 15 μl of the reaction buffer (10 mM Tris [pH 7.5], 50 mM KCl, 1 mM dithiothreitol [DTT], 1 μg of poly(dI-dC), and 200 μM ZnSO4, with or without 50 μM TPEN, followed by incubation at 25°C for 20 min. The binding mixture was subjected to electrophoresis at 4°C on 5% (wt/vol) native polyacrylamide gels at 150 V in TB (44.5 mM Tris, 44.5 mM boric acid) buffer for 1 h. After electrophoresis, DNA in the gels was transferred to a nylon membrane (Roche). Signals from biotin-labeled DNAs were detected by chemiluminescence through the imager apparatus (Alpha Flurechemical).
Plant assays, cytological observation, and root surface colonization assay.
Seeds were surface sterilized using NaClO solution and allowed to germinate as described earlier (24, 77). Seedlings were inoculated using 1 ml of culture with an OD600 equivalent to 0.25 and grown in vermiculite moistened with low-N nutrient solution without zinc at 24°C under a day/night regimen of 12 h/12 h (57). When required, ZnSO4 or CoCl2 was added to the desired concentration. Forty days postinoculation (dpi), leaf chlorophyll content and shoot dry weight were determined using the procedure described earlier (24, 77). Nodules were harvested and fixed with 2.5% (vol/vol) glutaraldehyde in 0.05 M cacodylate buffer when necessary (78). For electron microscopy, ultrathin sections of fixed nodules were prepared and observed in a JEM-1230 transmission electron microscope (TEM) using procedures described previously (79). For light microscopy, root nodule sections were stained with 0.01% toluidine blue in 0.1 M phosphate buffer at pH 7.2 as previously described (80) and visualized under an Olympus BX53F light microscope.
For the colonization experiment, germinated soybean seeds were transferred to a sterile plastic petri dish (diameter, 9 cm) with low-N nutrient solution medium free of zinc, and inoculated with CCBAU45436 and its derivatives (1 ml culture with an OD600 equivalent to 1 in 0.85% NaCl solution for every plant). Plants were cultivated in a growth chamber at 24°C for 7 days under a day/night regimen of 12 h/12 h. Roots on plates containing bacteria were then sampled at 7 dpi, pooled, weighed, washed 7 times, and then suspended in 200 ml 0.85% NaCl solution. After exposure to 6 cycles of 30-s ultrasound treatment and agitation on a vortex for 2 min, the suspension was diluted and plated on TY plates with antibiotics. Colonies were counted 5 days after plating.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570069), the National Basic Research Program of China (973 program 2015CB158301), the Innovative Project of State Key Laboratory of Agrobiotechnology (2018SKLAB1-2 and 2019SKLAB1-9), and Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (2018QC178 and 2019TC086). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication.
We thank J. Peter W. Young from the University of York for language editing.
Conceptualization, C.-F.T. and P.Z.; methodology, P.Z.; investigation, P.Z., B.Z., J.J., and S.-Q.D.; writing – original draft, P.Z. and C.-F.T.; writing – review and editing, C.-F.T. and P.Z.; funding acquisition, C.-F.T. and W.-X.C.; resources, C.-F.T. and W.-X.C.; supervision, C.-F.T.
We declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Citation Zhang P, Zhang B, Jiao J, Dai S-Q, Chen W-X, Tian C-F. 2020. Modulation of symbiotic compatibility by rhizobial zinc starvation machinery. mBio 11:e03193-19. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.03193-19.
REFERENCES
- 1.Andreini C, Banci L, Bertini I, Rosato A. 2006. Zinc through the three domains of life. J Proteome Res 5:3173–3178. doi: 10.1021/pr0603699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Hantke K. 2001. Bacterial zinc transporters and regulators. Biometals 14:239–249. doi: 10.1023/a:1012984713391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hantke K. 2005. Bacterial zinc uptake and regulators. Curr Opin Microbiol 8:196–202. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Nies DH. 2003. Efflux-mediated heavy metal resistance in prokaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 27:313–339. doi: 10.1016/S0168-6445(03)00048-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Schmidt C, Schwarzenberger C, Große C, Nies DH. 2014. FurC regulates expression of zupT for the central zinc importer ZupT of Cupriavidus metallidurans. J Bacteriol 196:3461–3471. doi: 10.1128/JB.01713-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Chaoprasid P, Dokpikul T, Johnrod J, Sirirakphaisarn S, Nookabkaew S, Sukchawalit R, Mongkolsuk S. 2016. Agrobacterium tumefaciens Zur regulates the high-affinity zinc uptake system TroCBA and the putative metal chaperone YciC, along with ZinT and ZnuABC, for survival under zinc-limiting conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:3503–3514. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00299-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Garrido ME, Bosch M, Medina R, Llagostera M, Pérez de Rozas AM, Badiola I, Barbé J. 2003. The high-affinity zinc-uptake system znuACB is under control of the iron-uptake regulator (fur) gene in the animal pathogen Pasteurella multocida. FEMS Microbiol Lett 221:31–37. doi: 10.1016/S0378-1097(03)00131-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sabri M, Houle S, Dozois CM. 2009. Roles of the extraintestinal pathogenic Escherichia coli ZnuACB and ZupT zinc transporters during urinary tract infection. Infect Immun 77:1155–1164. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01082-08. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Cerasi M, Liu JZ, Ammendola S, Poe AJ, Petrarca P, Pesciaroli M, Pasquali P, Raffatellu M, Battistoni A. 2014. The ZupT transporter plays an important role in zinc homeostasis and contributes to Salmonella enterica virulence. Metallomics 6:845–853. doi: 10.1039/c3mt00352c. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Gaballa A, Helmann JD. 1998. Identification of a zinc-specific metalloregulatory protein, Zur, controlling zinc transport operons in Bacillus subtilis. J Bacteriol 180:5815–5821. doi: 10.1128/JB.180.22.5815-5821.1998. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Patzer SI, Hantke K. 2000. The zinc-responsive regulator Zur and its control of the znu gene cluster encoding the ZnuABC zinc uptake system in Escherichia coli. J Biol Chem 275:24321–24332. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001775200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Shin JH, Oh SY, Kim SJ, Roe JH. 2007. The zinc-responsive regulator Zur controls a zinc uptake system and some ribosomal proteins in Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). J Bacteriol 189:4070–4077. doi: 10.1128/JB.01851-06. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Li Y, Qiu Y, Gao H, Guo Z, Han Y, Song Y, Du Z, Wang X, Zhou D, Yang R. 2009. Characterization of Zur-dependent genes and direct Zur targets in Yersinia pestis. BMC Microbiol 9:128. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-9-128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Dahiya I, Stevenson RMW. 2010. The ZnuABC operon is important for Yersinia ruckeri infections of rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss (Walbaum). J Fish Dis 33:331–340. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2761.2009.01125.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Bhubhanil S, Sittipo P, Chaoprasid P, Nookabkaew S, Sukchawalit R, Mongkolsuk S. 2014. Control of zinc homeostasis in Agrobacterium tumefaciens via zur and the zinc uptake genes znuABC and zinT. Microbiology 160:2452–2463. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.082446-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ilari A, Alaleona F, Tria G, Petrarca P, Battistoni A, Zamparelli C, Verzili D, Falconi M, Chiancone E. 2014. The Salmonella enterica ZinT structure, zinc affinity and interaction with the high-affinity uptake protein ZnuA provide insight into the management of periplasmic zinc. Biochim Biophys Acta 1840:535–544. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Gabbianelli R, Scotti R, Ammendola S, Petrarca P, Nicolini L, Battistoni A. 2011. Role of ZnuABC and ZinT in Escherichia coli O157:H7 zinc acquisition and interaction with epithelial cells. BMC Microbiol 11:36. doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-11-36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Hood MI, Skaar EP. 2012. Nutritional immunity: transition metals at the pathogen-host interface. Nat Rev Microbiol 10:525–537. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2836. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Murphy TF, Brauer AL, Kirkham C, Johnson A, Koszelak-Rosenblum M, Malkowski MG. 2013. Role of the zinc uptake ABC transporter of Moraxella catarrhalis in persistence in the respiratory tract. Infect Immun 81:3406–3413. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00589-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Desrosiers DC, Bearden SW, Mier I, Abney J, Paulley JT, Fetherston JD, Salazar JC, Radolf JD, Perry RD. 2010. Znu is the predominant zinc importer in Yersinia pestis during in vitro growth but is not essential for virulence. Infect Immun 78:5163–5177. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00732-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Petrarca P, Ammendola S, Pasquali P, Battistoni A. 2010. The Zur-regulated ZinT protein is an auxiliary component of the high-affinity ZnuABC zinc transporter that facilitates metal recruitment during severe zinc shortage. J Bacteriol 192:1553–1564. doi: 10.1128/JB.01310-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Remigi P, Zhu J, Young JPW, Masson-Boivin C. 2016. Symbiosis within symbiosis: evolving nitrogen-fixing legume symbionts. Trends Microbiol 24:63–75. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2015.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Capela D, Marchetti M, Clérissi C, Perrier A, Guetta D, Gris C, Valls M, Jauneau A, Cruveiller S, Rocha EPC, Masson-Boivin C. 2017. Recruitment of a lineage-specific virulence regulatory pathway promotes intracellular infection by a plant pathogen experimentally evolved into a legume symbiont. Mol Biol Evol 34:2503–2521. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msx165. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Liu LX, Li QQ, Zhang YZ, Hu Y, Jiao J, Guo HJ, Zhang XX, Zhang B, Chen WX, Tian CF. 2017. The nitrate-reduction gene cluster components exert lineage-dependent contributions to optimization of Sinorhizobium symbiosis with soybeans. Environ Microbiol 19:4926–4938. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13948. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao R, Liu LX, Zhang YZ, Jiao J, Cui WJ, Zhang B, Wang XL, Li ML, Chen Y, Xiong ZQ, Chen WX, Tian CF. 2018. Adaptive evolution of rhizobial symbiotic compatibility mediated by co-evolved insertion sequences. ISME J 12:101–111. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2017.136. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Jiao J, Ni M, Zhang B, Zhang Z, Young JPW, Chan T-F, Chen WX, Lam H-M, Tian CF. 2018. Coordinated regulation of core and accessory genes in the multipartite genome of Sinorhizobium fredii. PLoS Genet 14:e1007428. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1007428. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Jiao J, Wu LJ, Zhang B, Hu Y, Li Y, Zhang XX, Guo HJ, Liu LX, Chen WX, Zhang Z, Tian CF. 2016. MucR is required for transcriptional activation of conserved ion transporters to support nitrogen fixation of Sinorhizobium fredii in soybean nodules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 29:352–361. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-01-16-0019-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Moreau S, Thomson RM, Kaiser BN, Trevaskis B, Guerinot ML, Udvardi MK, Puppo A, Day DA. 2002. GmZIP1 encodes a symbiosis-specific zinc transporter in soybean. J Biol Chem 277:4738–4746. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M106754200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Abreu I, Saéz Á, Castro-Rodríguez R, Escudero V, Rodríguez-Haas B, Senovilla M, Larue C, Grolimund D, Tejada-Jiménez M, Imperial J, González-Guerrero M. 2017. Medicago truncatula Zinc-iron permease 6 provides zinc to rhizobia-infected nodule cells. Plant Cell Environ 40:2706–2719. doi: 10.1111/pce.13035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Clarke VC, Loughlin PC, Day D. a, Smith PMC. 2014. Transport processes of the legume symbiosome membrane. Front Plant Sci 5:699. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2014.00699. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Okazaki S, Kaneko T, Sato S, Saeki K. 2013. Hijacking of leguminous nodulation signaling by the rhizobial type III secretion system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:17131–17136. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1302360110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Yasuda M, Miwa H, Masuda S, Takebayashi Y, Sakakibara H, Okazaki S. 2016. Effector-triggered immunity determines host genotype-specific incompatibility in legume-rhizobium symbiosis. Plant Cell Physiol 57:1791–1800. doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcw104. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sugawara M, Takahashi S, Umehara Y, Iwano H, Tsurumaru H, Odake H, Suzuki Y, Kondo H, Konno Y, Yamakawa T, Sato S, Mitsui H, Minamisawa K. 2018. Variation in bradyrhizobial NopP effector determines symbiotic incompatibility with Rj2-soybeans via effector-triggered immunity. Nat Commun 9:3139. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05663-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yang S, Tang F, Gao M, Krishnan HB, Zhu H. 2010. R gene-controlled host specificity in the legume-rhizobia symbiosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107:18735–18740. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011957107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rehman HM, Cheung W-L, Wong K-S, Xie M, Luk C-Y, Wong F-L, Li M-W, Tsai S-N, To W-T, Chan L-Y, Lam H-M. 2019. High-throughput mass spectrometric analysis of the whole proteome and secretome from Sinorhizobium fredii strains CCBAU25509 and CCBAU45436. Front Microbiol 10:2569. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ausmees N, Kobayashi H, Deakin WJ, Marie C, Krishnan HB, Broughton WJ, Perret X. 2004. Characterization of NopP, a type III secreted effector of Rhizobium sp. strain NGR234. J Bacteriol 186:4774–4780. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4774-4780.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Skorpil P, Saad MM, Boukli NM, Kobayashi H, Ares-Orpel F, Broughton WJ, Deakin WJ. 2005. NopP, a phosphorylated effector of Rhizobium sp strain NGR234, is a major determinant of nodulation of the tropical legumes Flemingia congesta and Tephrosia vogelii. Mol Microbiol 57:1304–1317. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04768.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Kobayashi H, Naciri-Graven Y, Broughton WJ, Perret X, Graven YN. 2004. Flavonoids induce temporal shifts in gene-expression of nod-box controlled loci in Rhizobium sp. NGR234. Mol Microbiol 51:335–347. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.2003.03841.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Wassem R, Kobayashi H, Kambara K, Le Quéré A, Walker GC, Broughton WJ, Deakin WJ. 2008. TtsI regulates symbiotic genes in Rhizobium species NGR234 by binding to tts boxes. Mol Microbiol 68:736–748. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06187.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Oldroyd GED. 2013. Speak, friend, and enter: signalling systems that promote beneficial symbiotic associations in plants. Nat Rev Microbiol 11:252–263. doi: 10.1038/nrmicro2990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cai J, Zhang L-Y, Liu W, Tian Y, Xiong J-S, Wang Y-H, Li R-J, Li H-M, Wen J, Mysore KS, Boller T, Xie Z-P, Staehelin C. 2018. Role of the nod factor hydrolase MtNFH1 in regulating nod factor levels during rhizobial infection and in mature nodules of Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell 30:397–414. doi: 10.1105/tpc.17.00420. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Machado D, Pueppke SG, Vinardel JM, Ruiz-Sainz JE, Krishnan HB. 1998. Expression of nodD1 and nodD2 in Sinorhizobium fredii, a nitrogen-fixing symbiont of soybean and other legumes. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 11:375–382. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.1998.11.5.375. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Garcia M, Dunlap J, Loh J, Stacey G. 1996. Phenotypic characterization and regulation of the nolA gene of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 9:625–635. doi: 10.1094/mpmi-9-0625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Fellay R, Hanin M, Montorzi G, Frey J, Freiberg C, Golinowski W, Staehelin C, Broughton WJ, Jabbouri S. 1998. nodD2 of Rhizobium sp. NGR234 is involved in the repression of the nodABC operon. Mol Microbiol 27:1039–1050. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1998.00761.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Vinardell JM, Ollero FJ, Hidalgo A, López-Baena FJ, Medina C, Ivanov-Vangelov K, Parada M, Madinabeitia N, Espuny M. d R, Bellogín RA, Camacho M, Rodríguez-Navarro D-N, Soria-Díaz ME, Gil-Serrano AM, Ruiz-Sainz JE. 2004. NoIR regulates diverse symbiotic signals of Sinorhizobium fredii HH103. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:676–685. doi: 10.1094/MPMI.2004.17.6.676. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Blindauer CA. 2015. Advances in the molecular understanding of biological zinc transport. Chem Commun (Camb) 51:4544–4563. doi: 10.1039/c4cc10174j. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Osman D, Foster AW, Chen J, Svedaite K, Steed JW, Lurie-Luke E, Huggins TG, Robinson NJ. 2017. Fine control of metal concentrations is necessary for cells to discern zinc from cobalt. Nat Commun 8:1884. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02085-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wang D, Wang YC, Wu LJ, Liu JX, Zhang P, Jiao J, Yan H, Liu T, Tian CF, Chen WX. 2016. Construction and pilot screening of a signature-tagged mutant library of Sinorhizobium fredii. Arch Microbiol 198:91–99. doi: 10.1007/s00203-015-1161-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Pawlik MC, Hubert K, Joseph B, Claus H, Schoen C, Vogel U. 2012. The zinc-responsive regulon of Neisseria meningitidis comprises 17 genes under control of a Zur element. J Bacteriol 194:6594–6606. doi: 10.1128/JB.01091-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Choi S-H, Lee K-L, Shin J-H, Cho Y-B, Cha S-S, Roe J-H. 2017. Zinc-dependent regulation of zinc import and export genes by Zur. Nat Commun 8:15812. doi: 10.1038/ncomms15812. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Andreini C, Bertini I, Rosato A. 2009. Metalloproteomes: a bioinformatic approach. Acc Chem Res 42:1471–1479. doi: 10.1021/ar900015x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pueppke SG, Bolanos-Vasquez MC, Werner D, Bec-Ferte MP, Prome JC, Krishnan HB. 1998. Release of flavonoids by the soybean cultivars McCall and Peking and their perception as signals by the nitrogen-fixing symbiont Sinorhizobium fredii. Plant Physiol 117:599–608. doi: 10.1104/pp.117.2.599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Baglivo I, Russo L, Esposito S, Malgieri G, Renda M, Salluzzo A, Di Blasio B, Isernia C, Fattorusso R, Pedone PV. 2009. The structural role of the zinc ion can be dispensable in prokaryotic zinc-finger domains. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106:6933–6938. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0810003106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Tian CF, Zhou YJ, Zhang YM, Li QQ, Zhang YZ, Li DF, Wang S, Wang J, Gilbert LB, Li YR, Chen WX. 2012. Comparative genomics of rhizobia nodulating soybean suggests extensive recruitment of lineage-specific genes in adaptations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109:8629–8634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1120436109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Li QQ, Wang ET, Zhang YZ, Zhang YM, Tian CF, Sui XH, Chen WF, Chen WX. 2011. Diversity and biogeography of rhizobia isolated from root nodules of Glycine max grown in Hebei province, China. Microb Ecol 61:917–931. doi: 10.1007/s00248-011-9820-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang YM, Li Y, Chen WF, Wang ET, Tian CF, Li QQ, Zhang YZ, Sui XH, Chen WX. 2011. Biodiversity and biogeography of rhizobia associated with soybean plants grown in the North China Plain. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:6331–6342. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00542-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Vincent JM. 1970. A manual for the practical study of root nodule bacteria. Blackwell, Oxford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
- 58.Miller JH. 1972. Experiments in molecular genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 59.Hu Y, Jiao J, Liu LX, Sun YW, Chen WF, Sui XH, Chen WX, Tian CF. 2018. Evidence for phosphate starvation of rhizobia without terminal differentiation in legume nodules. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 31:1060–1068. doi: 10.1094/MPMI-02-18-0031-R. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Marx CJ, Lidstrom ME. 2002. Broad-host-range cre-lox system for antibiotic marker recycling in Gram-negative bacteria. Biotechniques 33:1062–1067. doi: 10.2144/02335rr01. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Ditta G, Stanfield S, Corbin D, Helinski DR. 1980. Broad host range DNA cloning system for Gram-negative bacteria: construction of a gene bank of Rhizobium meliloti. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 77:7347–7351. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.12.7347. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Oke V, Long SR. 1999. Bacterial genes induced within the nodule during the Rhizobium-legume symbiosis. Mol Microbiol 32:837–849. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1999.01402.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Quandt J, Hynes MF. 1993. Versatile suicide vectors which allow direct selection for gene replacement in Gram-negative bacteria. Gene 127:15–21. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(93)90611-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Kovach ME, Elzer PH, Hill DS, Robertson GT, Farris MA, Roop RM, Peterson KM. 1995. Four new derivatives of the broad-host-range cloning vector pBBR1MCS, carrying different antibiotic-resistance cassettes. Gene 166:175–176. doi: 10.1016/0378-1119(95)00584-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Novichkov PS, Kazakov AE, Ravcheev DA, Leyn SA, Kovaleva GY, Sutormin RA, Kazanov MD, Riehl W, Arkin AP, Dubchak I, Rodionov DA. 2013. RegPrecise 3.0 - a resource for genome-scale exploration of transcriptional regulation in bacteria. BMC Genomics 14:745. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-14-745. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Hertz GZ, Hartzell GW, Stormo GD. 1990. Identification of consensus patterns in unaligned DNA sequences known to be functionally related. Comput Appl Biosci 6:81–92. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/6.2.81. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Medina-Rivera A, Defrance M, Sand O, Herrmann C, Castro-Mondragon JA, Delerce J, Jaeger S, Blanchet C, Vincens P, Caron C, Staines DM, Contreras-Moreira B, Artufel M, Charbonnier-Khamvongsa L, Hernandez C, Thieffry D, Thomas-Chollier M, van Helden J. 2015. RSAT 2015: Regulatory Sequence Analysis Tools. Nucleic Acids Res 43:W50–W56. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv362. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia JM, Brenner SE. 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14:1188–1190. doi: 10.1101/gr.849004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chenna R, Sugawara H, Koike T, Lopez R, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG, Thompson JD. 2003. Multiple sequence alignment with the Clustal series of programs. Nucleic Acids Res 31:3497–3500. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkg500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. 2016. MEGA7: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 33:1870–1874. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, Schmidt T, Kiefer F, Gallo Cassarino T, Bertoni M, Bordoli L, Schwede T. 2014. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res 42:W252–W258. doi: 10.1093/nar/gku340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Castresana J. 2000. Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026334. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Langmead B, Salzberg SL. 2012. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat Methods 9:357–359. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1923. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. 2015. HTSeq-a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics 31:166–169. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. 2014. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA-seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol 15:550. doi: 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Ditta G, Schmidhauser T, Yakobson E, Lu P, Liang XW, Finlay DR, Guiney D, Helinski DR. 1985. Plasmids related to the broad host range vector, pRK290, useful for gene cloning and for monitoring gene-expression. Plasmid 13:149–153. doi: 10.1016/0147-619x(85)90068-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Li YZ, Wang D, Feng XY, Jiao J, Chen WX, Tian CF. 2016. Genetic analysis reveals the essential role of nitrogen phosphotransferase system components in Sinorhizobium fredii CCBAU 45436 symbioses with soybean and pigeonpea plants. Appl Environ Microbiol 82:1305–1315. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03454-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Van de Velde W, Guerra JCP, De Keyser A, De Rycke R, Rombauts S, Maunoury N, Mergaert P, Kondorosi E, Holsters M, Goormachtig S. 2006. Aging in legume symbiosis. A molecular view on nodule senescence in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol 141:711–720. doi: 10.1104/pp.106.078691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Li Y, Tian CF, Chen WF, Wang L, Sui XH, Chen WX. 2013. High-resolution transcriptomic analyses of Sinorhizobium sp. NGR234 bacteroids in determinate nodules of Vigna unguiculata and indeterminate nodules of Leucaena leucocephala. PLoS One 8:e70531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0070531. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Ronson CW, Lyttleton P, Robertson JG. 1981. C4-dicarboxylate transport mutants of Rhizobium trifolii form ineffective nodules on Trifolium repens. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 78:4284–4288. doi: 10.1073/pnas.78.7.4284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.