Abstract
Sub-Saharan African (SSA) migrants in Europe experience psychosocial stressors, such as perceived discrimination (PD). The effect of such a stressor on health could potentially be mediated via epigenetics. In this study we performed an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) to assess the association between levels of PD with genome-wide DNA methylation profiles in SSA migrants. The Illumina 450 K DNA-methylation array was used on whole blood samples of 340 Ghanaian adults residing in three European cities from the cross-sectional Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants (RODAM) study. PD was assessed using sum scores of the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS). Differentially methylated positions and regions (DMPs and DMRs) were identified through linear regression analysis. Two hypo-methylated DMPs, namely cg13986138 (CYFIP1) and cg10316525(ANKRD63), were found to be associated with PD. DMR analysis identified 47 regions associated with the PD. To the best of our knowledge, this survey is the first EWAS for PD in first generation SSA migrants. We identified two DMPs associated with PD. Whether these associations underlie a consequence or causal effect within the scope of biological functionality needs additional research.
Subject terms: Epigenetics, DNA methylation
Introduction
International migration from low- and middle income to high income countries has been increasing over the years and migrants face a plethora of psychosocial stressors in the host countries, including perceived discrimination (PD)1. In 2014, more than half (55%) of all migrants living in the Netherlands perceived some form of discrimination2. Ethnic background, religious beliefs, and skin colour play an important role in PD among migrants. However, the nature of discrimination varies with context2. For example, sub-Saharan African (SSA) migrants, one of the fastest growing groups of migrants in Europe today, have reported discrimination across a broad range of domains, such as public spaces, nightlife, public institutions (police, schools, etc.), workplace, terms of employment, job seeking, education and access to healthcare. PD has been associated with socio-economic consequences and deleterious effects on health2,3.
Several studies have shown that PD is associated with non-communicable diseases such as depression, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity and cardiovascular diseases3–9. Our previous work from the Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants (RODAM) study, showed that these cardio-metabolic outcomes disproportionally affect SSA migrants in Europe. To date, the underlying causes of this disproportionate burden among SSA migrants and the biological mechanisms underlying these associations remain unclear4,9–11.
Epigenetics is the study of heritable yet reversible molecular modifications to the DNA without altering the DNA sequence, caused by environmental triggers12,13. Epigenetic mechanisms include histone modifications, ncRNAs and DNA methylation of which the latter is the most commonly studied in epigenetics. DNA methylation involves the binding of methyl groups to CpG sites on the DNA. Epigenetics, and thus DNA methylation, can be affected by environmental factors14. Psychosocial stress has been linked to changes in DNA methylation of genes implicated in the stress response system15. These genes include the glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1), serotonin transporter gene (SLC6A4) and the corticotrophin-releasing factor (CRF) gene15–17. Since epigenetics is known to be affected by environmental factors, we hypothesized that exposure to discrimination might result in an altered state of DNA methylation, globally or at specific loci13. Previous reported studies showed that PD represents an important factor associated with the stress response system and mental health disorders and therefore represents relevant psychosocial stressor18.
To date, no study has assessed the association between discrimination and epigenetics in SSA migrants. In the present study, we conducted an epigenome-wide association study (EWAS) where we aimed to detect novel epigenetic loci associated with PD as assessed by the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) in a cohort of Ghanaian migrants from the RODAM study.
Results
We included 340 Ghanaian migrants from the Research on Obesity and Diabetes among African Migrants (RODAM) study. Almost one third (30.8%) of migrants reported work as reason for migration (Table 1). The mean age was about 50 years. Men were slightly overrepresented in the sample (54%), and sex showed a low correlation (rho = −0.14) with the summed EDS. 42% reported secondary education as highest level of education obtained, 60.3% received income from wages, own company or investments. Unskilled manual labour and lower non-manual labour were the most commonly reported occupations. On average, migrants resided 19 years in Europe and felt more Ghanaian than English/German/Dutch. The median total EDS score for the 340 migrants was 16 (IQR, 9,21) out of a possible EDS score ranging from 9 (never on all items) to 45 (very often on all items) (Table 1). Feeling English/German/Dutch was significantly correlated with the summed EDS (rho = −0.116), whereas feeling Ghanaian and length of stay in Europe were not. We evaluated 3 indicators for socio-economic status (SES) and found source of income correlated with the summed EDS (rho = −0132), but not attained education level nor occupation. Furthermore, we observed no correlation between smoking or estimated distribution of CD8+ T cells, CD4+ T cells, Natural Killer Cells, B cells and Granulocytes and summed EDS, but we did observe a low correlation between the estimated relative distribution of Monocytes (spearman’s rho of 0.12).
Table 1.
All | Spearman’s rho with sum EDS |
||
---|---|---|---|
N, (%) | 340 (100%) | ||
Demographics | |||
Age, years# | 49.8 (48.7; 50.8) | 0.00 | |
Sex, female, (%) | 155 (45.6%) | −0.14* | |
PD and migration-related factors | |||
EDS, (25th,75th percentile)## | Total | 16 (9, 21) | |
Female | 14 (9, 20) | ||
Male | 17 (11, 22) | ||
Length of stay in Europe, years# | 19.2 (18.2; 20.2) | 0.073 | |
Work as reason for migration | 104 (30.6%) | 0.068 | |
Feeling English/German/Dutch | Totally agree | 19 (5.6%) | −0.116* |
Agree | 72 (21.2%) | ||
Neutral | 90 (26.5%) | ||
Disagree | 74 (21.8%) | ||
Totally disagree | 71 (20.9%) | ||
Feeling Ghanaian | Totally agree | 187 (55%) | 0.054 |
Agree | 107 (31.5%) | ||
Neutral | 31 (9.1%) | ||
Disagree | 4 (1.2%) | ||
Totally disagree | 6 (1.8%) | ||
Socio-economic status (SES) indicators | |||
Education level, (%) | Never been to school/elementary only | 72 (21.6%) | 0.07 |
Lower vocational or lower secondary schooling | 139 (41.6%) | ||
Intermediate vocational or intermediate/higher secondary schooling | 73 (21.9%) | ||
Higher vocational schooling or university | 50 (15.0%) | ||
Source of income | Wages or income from own company or investments | 205 (60.3%) | −0.132* |
Pension | 16 (4.7%) | ||
Some form of benefits | 44 (12.9%) | ||
Student loan | 3 (0.9%) | ||
Combined wages + benefits | 29 (8.5%) | ||
Other e.g. remittance | 13 (3.8%) | ||
Missing | 30 (8.8%) | ||
Occupation, (%) | Upper non-manual | 40 (11.8%) | −0.008 |
Lower non-manual | 68 (20.0%) | ||
Skilled manual | 21 (6.2%) | ||
Unskilled manual | 129 (37.9%) | ||
Farmer | 2 (0.6%) | ||
Missing | 80 (23.5%) | ||
Factors with the potential to affect DNA methylation | |||
Smoking, yes, (%) | 13 (3.8%) | 0.04 | |
Estimated cell counts, % (IQ)# | CD8+ cells | 11.0 (10.5, 11.4) | 0.03 |
CD4+ cells | 18.0 (17.4, 18.5) | 0.04 | |
NK cells | 9.2 (8.6, 9.7) | −0.05 | |
B cells | 9.7 (9.4, 10.1) | 0.12* | |
Monocytes | 8.3 (8.1, 8.6) | −0.05 | |
Granulocytes | 47.4 (46.4, 48.3) | −0.05 |
Numbers are in n (%) for categorical variables. #Mean (95%CI) for normally distributed continuous variables. ##Median (25th percentile, 75th percentile) for non-normally distributed variables. *Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) at a p < 0.05, **Spearman’s correlation coefficient (rho) at a p < 0.01.
Next, we performed differentially methylation analysis using linear regression analyses on the EDS as a continuous measure for PD. We observed two differential methylated positions (DMPs), cg13986138 (FDR = 0.014) and cg10316525 (FDR = 0.019), that were epigenome-wide significant associated with PD (Table 2 and Fig. 1). The DMP (cg13986138) that was annotated to gene body of the CYFIP1 gene, (also known as Specifically Rac1-associated Protein1;SRA1), was found to be 0.072% hypo methylated per 1 point increase in the EDS sum score (Table 2). The DMP annotated to intergenic region of the ANKRD63 gene (cg10316525) was 0.144% hypo methylated per 1 point increase in the EDS sum score. Figures 2 and 3 visualize the flanking regions around the DMPs annotated to the CYFIP1 and ANKRD63 respectively. We did not observe any known active regulatory elements at or nearby cg13986138 (CYFIP1). However, we were able to tag several known active regulatory elements around cg10316525 (ANKRD63), e.g. poised promoters and insulators.
Table 2.
CpG | Chr | Position | Gene | Featurec | Delta βd | p-value | FDR | p-value BACON |
FDR BACON |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
cg13986138 | 15 | 22963760 | CYFIP1 | Body | −7.49E−4 | 7.61E−8 | 0.016 | 3.27E−08 | 0.014 |
cg10316525 | 15 | 40572137 | ANKRD63a | IGR | −1.46E−3 | 9.81E−9 | 0.042 | 8.93E−08 | 0.019 |
cg12337011 | 2 | 28002424 | MRPL33 | 3′UTR | −1.24E−3 | 2.21E−5 | 0.800 | 3.32E−06 | 0.288 |
cg13145550 | 7 | 1350879 | UNCXb | IGR | −6.57E−3 | 2.64E−5 | 0.800 | 3.36E−06 | 0.288 |
cg15457795 | 3 | 9747183 | CPNE9 | Body | −8.86E−4 | 1.78E−5 | 0.800 | 8.15E−06 | 0.318 |
aCpG is located approximately 15 kb downstream of ANKRD63. bCpG is located approximately 80 kb downstream of UNCX. cBased on manifest feature annotation Illumina (hg19). dNegative beta-values indicate lower DNA methylation (hypo-methylation) in cases compared to controls. FDR < 0.05 was considered significant.
Subsequently we performed differentially methylated region (DMR) analysis. We detected in total 47 DMRs that showed a family wise error rate (FWER) < 0.2 and that included more than two thirds of the probes within the cluster (Supplementary Table 1). The following genome-wide significant DMRs were detected, all annotated to intergenic regions: (1) one DMR located at chromosome 17 approximately 1 kb downstream of ALOX15P1 (FWER = 0.006), (2) a second DMR located at chromosome 15 in the hCG_2003567 gene (FWER = 0.04) and finally (3) a third DMR located at chromosome 2 approximately 2 kb downstream of the STF2D3 gene (FWER = 0.048).
Finally, the 47 observed DMRs were submitted for gene set enrichment analysis. Three enriched GO categories were found for continuous analysis; three cellular component pathways of which two are involved in cell projection and one in neuron projection (Table 3). None of the cellular component pathway contained a genome-wide significant DMP.
Table 3.
Pathway name | Pathway ID | Database | Genes in pathway | C | O | E | R | P-value | FDR |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cell projection part | GO:0044463 | Cellular component | PTPRN2, KCNQ2, RGS14, PALM, CATSPER4, FZD7 | 639 | 6 | 0.94 | 6.40 | 3.0E−04 | 0.012 |
Neuron projection | GO:0043005 | Cellular component | PTPRN2, KCNQ2, RGS14, PALM, FZD7 | 651 | 5 | 0.95 | 5.24 | 2.2E−03 | 0.029 |
Cell projection | GO:0042995 | Cellular component | PTPRN2, ROPN1B, KCNQ2, RGS14, PALM, CATSPER4, FZD7 | 1230 | 7 | 1.80 | 3.88 | 1.5E−03 | 0.029 |
DMP is highlighted in bold, C: the number of reference genes in the category, O: the number of genes in the gene set and the category, E: the expected number in the category, R: ratio of enrichment, p-value: p value from hypergeometric test, FDR: p value adjusted by the FDR multiple test adjustment. FDR < 0.05 was considered significant.
Discussion
This study describes the first EWAS for perceived discrimination in first generation SSA migrants in Europe. A major strength of this research is the relatively homogenous SSA study population, i.e. all Ghanaian, which is necessary to study the environmental influences on the epigenome with limited potential bias caused by population stratification.
We detected two novel DNA methylation loci, cg13986138 (CYFIP1) and cg10316525 (ANKRD63), that were associated with PD in Ghanaian migrants in Europe. The DMP annotated to CYFIP1, also known as Specifically Rac1-associated Protein1 (SRA1) or p140SRA-1, showed an inverse relationship between methylation and PD, i.e. was found hypo-methylated for increasing scores of perceived discrimination. CYFIP1 is a protein coding gene that is involved in two molecular processes: the FMRP-elF4E translation complex and the Wave Regulatory Complex (WRC)19,20. These complexes are essential for synaptic morphology and function regulated by inhibition of local protein synthesis and favouring actin remodelling19. Notably,CYFIP1 mediates the translational repression activity of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein (FMRP) in the brain in the Fragile X Syndrome (FXS)21. In addition, since CYFIP1 provides the binding site for the complex to Rac1 this gene might also have a role in cancer (GTEx Portal) (www.gtexportal.org) and type 2 diabetes mellitus22. Cg13986138 is annotated to the gene body of the CYFIP1 gene and expressed in multiple tissues including brain tissue, lung tissue and blood (GTEx Portal) (www.gtexportal.org). In general, hypo-methylation in the gene-body results in a reduction of gene expression while hypo-methylation in the promoter region of a gene is often associated with increased expression23. Therefore, hypo-methylation of the DMP annotated to the CYFIP1 gene (−0.072%) may indicate a lower gene expression in individuals experiencing higher levels of perceived discrimination. Hypo-methylation of the DMP annotated CYFIP1 gene could lead to dysregulation of synaptic function and morphology. However, as differences in DNA methylation are low, differences in CYFIP1 gene expression are presumably of limiting impact. This low variation in DNA methylation of this locus could indicate that the heterogeneity of the tissue, i.e. whole blood, diminishes the effect size, although estimates of these different types of cells were included in the model. Further translational research, targeting specific brain cells, could give insight into whether the activity of locus is truly associated with its epigenetic state and whether this locus is indeed susceptible for environmental exposure.
The DMP annotated to ANKRD63 showed an inverse relationship between methylation and PD and was annotated to an intergenic region. Intergenic regions can involve several possible functions, i.e. enhancer regions or intergenic transcription factor binding sites24. The DMP annotated gene has been previously found to be expressed in brain tissue, more specifically the Nucleus Accumbens, Putamen and the Caudate (GTEx Portal) (www.gtexportal.org). ANKRD63 is a protein-coding gene that is part of the Ankyrin (ANK) repeat proteins. In general, ANK-repeat proteins are involved in various physiological processes in which they function exclusively through mediating specific protein-protein interactions25. As the function of the intergenic region is not yet fully determined and can differ, the DNA may or may not encode regulatory functions26,27. However, to date, little is known about the exact function of the ANKRD63 gene. Consequently, it is difficult to speculate on the effect that hypo-methylation (−0,144%) in the intergenic region of the ANKRD63 gene may have. Previous research has indicated that the ANKRD63 protein is associated with mental health disorders28. Recently, de Mendoza et al. (2018) reported nine DMPs that were associated with PD in the African-American population29. In this study, it was shown that nine DMPs were genome-wide significant associated with Major Life Discrimination. Although the design and sample of the study of Mendoza et al. differ in great detail from ours, we performed a replication study on these nine reported DMPs. None of the nine DMPs reported by Mendoza et al. were present in our top1000 DMPs (Supplementary Table 1). The fact that our study represents probably less genetic admixture, included male and female participants, and included a different measure of PD compared to the study of Mendoza et al., might explain the absence of replication. In order to detect more general aberrant methylated loci that are associated with PD, a larger sample size is needed, e.g. in combining multiple PD EWAS in meta-analysis approaches.
The present study shows that PD is associated with aberrant DNA methylation of two specific regions. While this study provides clues for further study of the biological mechanisms underlying a possible association between discrimination and epigenetics, further research is needed to elucidate whether the epigenetic aberrations we have detected are the consequence or cause of perceived discrimination. Studies in similar migrant populations are essential to validate and refine this association in order to improve migrant well-being. Studies assessing the association between discrimination and the epigenome could complement the EDS score with a more objective quantitative measure, e.g. cortisol levels or Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) data. The use of an objective measure of stress, such as cortisol, will certainly add validity and objectivity to the use of the self-reported EDS.
This study is subjected to several limitations. The use of the self-reported EDS, which is susceptible to recall bias, potentially increases the phenotypic heterogeneity within the cohort and thereby limiting our statistical power. However, the EDS has demonstrated good internal consistency, stability over time and convergent and divergent validity in previous research indicating that the EDS was a good measure for PD30–34. DNA methylation was assessed in whole blood samples. Given the tissue specific nature of DNA methylation is tissue specific, ideally this study would have analysed target tissue in which the CYFIP1 and ANKRD63 genes are expressed, including brain tissue. However, the availability of these tissues for epidemiological studies is limited. Nevertheless, research indicates that the use peripheral blood samples provides a valuable impression and is relatively consistent with other tissue types35. In this context we submitted the two genome-wide significant probes to the online “Blood Brain DNA Methylation comparison Tool” (www.epigenetics.iop.kcl.ac.uk/bloodbrain)36. This evaluation showed a positive but limited correlation of the DNA-methylation of cg13986138 (CYFIP) between blood and brain tissues (cerebellum, r = 0.17, P = 0.148) and positive moderate correlations between the DNA-methylation of cg10316525 (ANKRD63) between blood and brain tissues (entorhinal cortex, r = 0.29, P = 0.014; superior temporal gyrus, r = 0.28, P = 0.014), suggesting that our results detected in whole blood indeed might reflect at least in part the epigenome in specific brain tissue. We were unable to stratify the analyses by sex due to the limited sample size. There could be a difference in the association between PD and DNA metylation between men and women. We, therefore, compared mean percentage methylation of the novel DMPs identified between men and women. For the novel DMPs identified, we found that cg13986138 mean methylation level did not differ between men (mean = 90.8%) and women (mean = 90.9%) (p-value = 0.77), while cg10316525 was significantly higher methylated in women (mean = 95.3%) than in men (93.8%) (p-value < 0.001). Future studies should consider sex-specific associations between discrimination and DNA methylation. Lastly, the cross-sectional design of the RODAM study precludes causal interpretations.
In conclusion, this study was the first EWAS in first generation SSA migrants assessing the association between PD and DNA methylation. We identified two epigenetic loci that were associated with perceived discrimination. Although further research is essential to validate the results, these findings provide a basis to further investigate the biological mechanisms underlying adverse health consequences of discrimination in migrants.
Methods
This study was based on data from the RODAM study. Ethical approval, in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards, was obtained before the start of data collection from the ethics committees of the following involved institutions: Ghana, School of Medical Sciences/Komfo Anokye Teaching Hospital Committee on Human Research, Publication & Ethical Review Board; The Netherlands, Institutional Review Board of the AMC, University of Amsterdam; Germany, Ethics Committee of Charite-Universitätsmedizin Berlin and the United Kingdom, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine Research Ethics Committee. Informed written consent was obtained from all participants prior to the enrolment in the RODAM study.
The RODAM study aims to unravel the underlying factors for the high prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus and obesity among SSA migrants with a focus on the interaction between environmental exposures and genetics. Details on the study design and data collection have previously been described elsewhere10. In brief, between 2012 and 2015 Ghanaian adults (19–96 years of age) were recruited in rural Ghana, urban Ghana, Amsterdam, London and Berlin. In the present analysis only Ghanaian migrants in Europe were included. Ghanaian origin was defined as being born in Ghana and having at least one parent born in Ghana or not born in Ghana but having both parents born in Ghana. In Amsterdam, Ghanaian participants were randomly drawn from the Amsterdam Municipal Register, which holds data on country of birth of citizens and their parents. In London, Ghanaian organizations served as the sampling frame as there was no population register for migrant groups. In Berlin, member lists of Ghanaian churches and organizations served as the sampling frame.
This EWAS used a subset of the RODAM data for which epigenetics data are available (n = 744). After exclusions based on quality control criteria and missing phenotypic data (n = 81), 663 participants remained for analyses. To avoid bias due to conceptual variation in PD between Ghana and Europe, only migrant Ghanaians in Europe were included for epigenetic analysis. In total 340 Ghanaian migrants were included, of whom 143 resided in Amsterdam, 80 in Berlin and 117 in London.
Information on demographics and self-reported levels of PD were collected by a self- or interviewer-administered questionnaire. PD was assessed with the Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS)34. Based on the construct defined by Essed37 the EDS attempts to measure everyday perceived discrimination, which is discrimination as a structured and chronic part of relatively minor experiences of unfair treatment. The EDS has demonstrated good internal consistency, stability over time, and convergent and divergent validity in prior studies30–34. Within this subset of the RODAM dataset, the EDS displayed a Cronbach’s Alfa of 0.929, indicating excellent internal consistency.
The EDS included nine questions that represent nine events. Participants were asked to indicate how often these nine events happened to them in their daily life. The EDS was scored on a five-point Likert scale; 1 - “Never”, 2 - “Hardly ever”, 3 - “Not too often”, 4 - “Fairly often”, 5 - “Very often”. The sum of these scores resulted in a minimum overall score of 9 (scoring “Never” for each item) to a maximum overall score of 45 (scoring “Very often” for each item). Hence, a higher score indicated more perceived discrimination. Items were considered missing if more than one item was missing (n = 53). If only one item was missing the mean score of the other items (rounded to whole numbers) was used to impute the missing item (n = 15). Participant characteristics on age, sex, smoking behaviour, education, estimated blood cell types (described in detail below) and their relation with PD (summed EDS) were evaluated according spearman’s correlation using SPSS (v20, IBM).
Assessment of the epigenetic profiles, its processing, and quality control within in the RODAM study were described previously38. In brief, fasting whole blood samples were shipped to the Source Bioscience Nottingham, UK, where DNA extraction and DNA methylation profiling was performed. Genome-wide DNA methylation profiles were obtained using the Illumina Human Methylation 450 K beadchip. This array measures approximately 485,000 CpG sites. Quality control was performed using the MethylAid software(version 1.4.0.). Probes annotated to the X, and Y chromosomes, known to involve cross hybridization or to involve a (common) SNP were removed from the dataset, resulting in a total set of 429,419 CpG sites. Blood cell mixture estimation was based on the method described by Houseman et al.39.
We performed association analyses to detect differentially methylated positions (DMPs) and differentially methylated regions (DMRs) for PD (summed EDS). For detection of DMPs, linear regression (lmfit) analyses were performed for the continuous PD variable in “R” with the minfi and limma package using DNA methylation levels as dependent variable. Age, sex, blood cell distribution and technical effects (hybridization batch and plate position) were included as covariates. Within our sample of 340 participants, the first eight principal components of the genome-wide methylation data were subjected to correlation analyses with potential covariates in order to detect additional confounders or bias (Supplementary File 1 – Supplementary Figs. 1 and 2). False Discovery Rate (FDR) adjustment was used to adjust for multiple testing, assuming a FDR of <0.05 statistically significant. The BACON package (version 1.4.0) in “R” software was applied to address possible inflation of our test statistics by systematic biases40. The Bayesian method of this package proposes a bias and inflation correction based on the construction of an empirical null distribution. Q-Q plots were used for model fitting evaluation (Supplementary File 1 – Supplementary Fig. 3). The inflation measure lambda increased from 0.79 to 1.02, after implementation of the BACON package.
The bumphunter function in the minfi package was used to identify DMRs. Similar to the DMP analyses, we fitted models for the EDS as continuous measure including age, sex, estimated cell type distributions and technical effects as covariates. Default settings were used with exception of bootstrapping, for which we applied 500 permutations. The number of DMRs was optimized using a cut-off of 0.075, corresponding to a 7.5% difference in beta values. Methylation cut-offs were optimized based on effect sizes and significance levels in volcano plot of the DMP analysis. DMRs were defined as three or more CpG sites within the cluster. A Family Wise Error Rate (FWER) of <0.05 was assumed statistically significant.
In order to evaluate our findings in a broader and biological context, pathway analyses were performed using the “WEB-based Gene set AnaLysis Toolkit” (WebGestalt) (www.webgestalt.org). This gene set analysis toolkit was used to determine Biological Process, Cellular Component and Molecular Function pathways according the Gene Ontology (GO) terms. We submitted all DMRs with a FWER < 0.200 for continuous (n = 47) in GSE analyses using the following settings: hsapiens, hsapiens_gene_symbol, GO analysis, hsapiens_genome, hypergeometric, BH, significance level q < 0.05, minimum number of genes for category = 4.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors are very grateful to Dr. Erik Beune (Department of Public Health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands) who with great dedication and eye for detail coordinated the RODAM study. A special thanks goes out to Prof Karien Stronks (department of public health, Amsterdam University Medical Center, the Netherlands) for her role in the conceptualization of the RODAM study and to Prof Ama de-Graft Aikins (Regional Institute for Populations Studies, University of Ghana, Ghana) for her valuable contribution to the conceptualization of the RODAM study and data collection in Ghana. We thank Nadine Huckauf and Candy Kalischke for their excellent support in biochemical characterization of the participants and data handling. We gratefully acknowledge Jan van Straalen from the Academic Medical Centre for his valuable support with standardization of the lab procedures and the AMC Biobank for support in biobank management and storage of collected samples. Last but not least, the authors are very grateful to the advisory board members for their valuable support in shaping the methods, to the research assistants, interviewers and other staff of the five research locations who have taken part in gathering the data and, most of all, to the Ghanaian volunteers participating in this project. This work was supported by the European Commission under the Framework Programme (Grant Number: 278901). CG is supported by NutriAct – Competence Cluster Nutrition Research Berlin-Potsdam funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (FKZ: 01EA1408A-G). K.A.C.M. is supported by the Intramural Research Program of the National Institutes of Health in the Center for Research on Genomics and Global Health (CRGGH). The CRGGH is supported by the National Human Genome Research Institute, the National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, the Center for Information Technology, and the Office of the Director at the National Institutes of Health (1ZIAHG200362). Finally, this research was supported by a grant of the Augeo Foundation, Driebergen-Rijsenburg, The Netherlands, a foundation dedicated to the prevention of adverse childhood experiences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Author contributions
L.L., K.M. and P.H. conceived and designed the experiments. L.L., A.V. and K.M. performed the experiments and analysed the data. L.L., K.M. and P.H. wrote the paper. All authors, L.L., K.M., C.A., M.Z., M.M., L.S., K.K., A.A. and P.H. participated in drafting the article or revising it critically for content.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and data transfer agreement.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Loes C. van der Laan and Karlijn A. C. Meeks.
Supplementary information
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41598-020-61649-0.
References
- 1.OECD. International Migration Outlook 2019, https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/publication/c3e35eec-en (2019).
- 2.Andriessen, I., Fernee, H. & Wittebrood, K. Perceived discrimination in the Netherlands, https://www.scp.nl/english/Publications/Publications_by_year/Publications_2014/Perceived_discrimination_in_the_Netherlands (2014).
- 3.Chilunga FP, et al. Perceived discrimination and stressful life events are associated with cardiovascular risk score in migrant and non-migrant populations: The RODAM study. Int. J. cardiology. 2019;286:169–174. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.12.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Williams DR, Mohammed SA. Discrimination and racial disparities in health: evidence and needed research. J. Behav. Med. 2009;32:20–47. doi: 10.1007/s10865-008-9185-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Williams DR, Neighbors HW, Jackson JS. Racial/ethnic discrimination and health: findings from community studies. Am. J. public. health. 2003;93:200–208. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.93.2.200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cozier, Y. C. et al. Racism, segregation, and risk of obesity in the Black Women’s Health Study. American journal of epidemiology, kwu004 (2014). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 7.Pascoe EA, Smart Richman L. Perceived discrimination and health: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bull. 2009;135:531. doi: 10.1037/a0016059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ikram UZ, et al. Perceived Ethnic Discrimination and the Metabolic Syndrome in Ethnic Minority Groups: The Healthy Life in an Urban Setting Study. Psychosom. Med. 2017;79:101–111. doi: 10.1097/PSY.0000000000000350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Agyemang C, et al. Obesity and type 2 diabetes in sub-Saharan Africans–Is the burden in today’s Africa similar to African migrants in Europe? The RODAM study. BMC Med. 2016;14:166. doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0709-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Agyemang C, et al. Rationale and cross-sectional study design of the Research on Obesity and type 2 Diabetes among African Migrants: the RODAM study. BMJ open. 2014;4:e004877. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-004877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Boateng D, et al. Migration and cardiovascular disease risk among Ghanaian populations in Europe: The RODAM study. Eur. J. Public. Health. 2016;26(ckw170):028. [Google Scholar]
- 12.Egger G, Liang G, Aparicio A, Jones PA. Epigenetics in human disease and prospects for epigenetic therapy. Nat. 2004;429:457–463. doi: 10.1038/nature02625. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Meaney MJ. Epigenetics and the biological definition of gene× environment interactions. Child. Dev. 2010;81:41–79. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01381.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Alegría-Torres, J. A., Baccarelli, A. & Bollati, V. Epigenetics and lifestyle. (2011). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 15.Unternaehrer, E. & Meinlschmidt, G. In Epigenetics and Neuroendocrinology 227–261 (Springer, 2016).
- 16.Gudsnuk K, Champagne FA. Epigenetic influence of stress and the social environment. ILAR J. 2012;53:279–288. doi: 10.1093/ilar.53.3-4.279. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kuzawa CW, Sweet E. Epigenetics and the embodiment of race: developmental origins of US racial disparities in cardiovascular health. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2009;21:2–15. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.20822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Mama SK, et al. Psychosocial mechanisms linking the social environment to mental health in African Americans. PLoS one. 2016;11:e0154035. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0154035. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.De Rubeis S, et al. CYFIP1 coordinates mRNA translation and cytoskeleton remodeling to ensure proper dendritic spine formation. Neuron. 2013;79:1169–1182. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.06.039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kobayashi K, et al. p140Sra-1 (specifically Rac1-associated protein) is a novel specific target for Rac1 small GTPase. J. Biol. Chem. 1998;273:291–295. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.1.291. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Napoli I, et al. The fragile X syndrome protein represses activity-dependent translation through CYFIP1, a new 4E-BP. Cell. 2008;134:1042–1054. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2008.07.031. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Koronakis V, et al. WAVE regulatory complex activation by cooperating GTPases Arf and Rac1. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:14449–14454. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1107666108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Jones PA. Functions of DNA methylation: islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012;13:484–492. doi: 10.1038/nrg3230. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Hindorff LA, et al. Potential etiologic and functional implications of genome-wide association loci for human diseases and traits. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2009;106:9362–9367. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0903103106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sedgwick SG, Smerdon SJ. The ankyrin repeat: a diversity of interactions on a common structural framework. Trends biochemical Sci. 1999;24:311–316. doi: 10.1016/S0968-0004(99)01426-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Niu D-K, Jiang L. Can ENCODE tell us how much junk DNA we carry in our genome? Biochemical biophysical Res. Commun. 2013;430:1340–1343. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2012.12.074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Qu H, Fang X. A brief review on the Human Encyclopedia of DNA Elements (ENCODE) project. Genomics, Proteom. Bioinforma. 2013;11:135–141. doi: 10.1016/j.gpb.2013.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Consortium”, S. W. G. O. T. P. G Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci. Nat. 2014;511:421–427. doi: 10.1038/nature13595. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kilpatrick Quentin K., Taylor John. Racial/Ethnic Contrasts in the Relationships between Physical Disability, Perceived Discrimination, and Depressive Symptoms. Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities. 2018;5(6):1238–1246. doi: 10.1007/s40615-018-0470-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Taylor TR, Kamarck TW, Shiffman S. Validation of the Detroit Area Study Discrimination Scale in a community sample of older African American adults: the Pittsburgh healthy heart project. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2004;11:88–94. doi: 10.1207/s15327558ijbm1102_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Krieger N, Smith K, Naishadham D, Hartman C, Barbeau EM. Experiences of discrimination: validity and reliability of a self-report measure for population health research on racism and health. Soc. Sci. Med. 2005;61:1576–1596. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.03.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Kessler, R. C., Mickelson, K. D. & Williams, D. R. The prevalence, distribution, and mental health correlates of perceived discrimination in the United States. Journal of health and social behavior, 208–230 (1999). [PubMed]
- 33.Lewis TT, et al. Chronic exposure to everyday discrimination and coronary artery calcification in African-American women: the SWAN Heart Study. Psychosom. Med. 2006;68:362–368. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000221360.94700.16. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Williams DR, Yu Y, Jackson JS, Anderson NB. Racial differences in physical and mental health: Socio-economic status, stress and discrimination. J. health Psychol. 1997;2:335–351. doi: 10.1177/135910539700200305. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Kato N, et al. Trans-ancestry genome-wide association study identifies 12 genetic loci influencing blood pressure and implicates a role for DNA methylation. Nat. Genet. 2015;47:1282–1293. doi: 10.1038/ng.3405. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Hannon E, Lunnon K, Schalkwyk L, Mill J. Interindividual methylomic variation across blood, cortex, and cerebellum: implications for epigenetic studies of neurological and neuropsychiatric phenotypes. Epigenetics. 2015;10:1024–1032. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1100786. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Essed, P. Understanding everyday racism: An interdisciplinary theory. Vol. 2 (Sage, 1991).
- 38.Meeks KAC, et al. An epigenome-wide association study in whole blood of measures of adiposity among Ghanaians: the RODAM study. Clin. Epigenetics. 2017;9:103. doi: 10.1186/s13148-017-0403-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Houseman EA, et al. DNA methylation arrays as surrogate measures of cell mixture distribution. BMC Bioinforma. 2012;13:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.van Iterson M, van Zwet EW, Heijmans BT. Controlling bias and inflation in epigenome-and transcriptome-wide association studies using the empirical null distribution. Genome Biol. 2017;18:19. doi: 10.1186/s13059-016-1131-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request and data transfer agreement.