Skip to main content
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine logoLink to American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine
. 2019 May 9;14(3):294–303. doi: 10.1177/1559827619847436

An Epigenetics-Based, Lifestyle Medicine–Driven Approach to Stress Management for Primary Patient Care: Implications for Medical Education

Jenny Lee 1,2,3, Frank Papa 1,2,3,, Paresh Atu Jaini 1,2,3, Sarah Alpini 1,2,3, Tim Kenny 1,2,3
PMCID: PMC7232902  PMID: 32477032

Abstract

Over 75% of patients in the primary care setting present with stress-related complaints. Curiously, patients and health care providers all too often see stress as a relatively benign sequela of many common illnesses such as heart disease, cancer, lung disease, dementia, diabetes, and mental illness. Unfortunately, various day-to-day lifestyle choices and environmental factors, unrelated to the presence of any disease, can cause stress sufficient to contribute to the development of various diseases/disorders and suboptimal health. There is evidence suggesting that counseling in stress management–oriented therapeutic interventions (as offered by lifestyle medicine–oriented practitioners) may prevent or reduce the onset, severity, duration, and/or overall burden of stress-related illnesses. Such counseling often involves considerations such as the patient’s nutrition, physical activity, interest in/capacity to meditate, drug abuse/cessation, and so on. Unfortunately, lifestyle medicine–oriented approaches to stress management are rarely offered in primary care—the patient care arena wherein such counseling would likely be best received by patients. Would health care outcomes improve if primary care providers offered counseling in both stress management and positive lifestyle choices? The purpose of this article is to provide both primary care practitioners and educators in health care training programs with an introductory overview of epigenetics. An emerging field of science offering insights into how factors such as stress and lifestyle choices interact with our genes in ways that can both positively and negatively impact the various micro (eg, cellular) through macro (eg, physiologic, pathophysiologic) processes that determine our tendencies toward illness or wellness. A deeper understanding of epigenetics, as provided herein, should enable primary care providers and medical educators to more confidently advocate for the primary benefits associated with counseling in both stress reduction and the pursuit of healthy lifestyle choices.

Keywords: epigenetics, lifestyle medicine, stress, patients, medical education


‘. . . epigenetics offers insights into how factors such as stress and lifestyle choices regulate the level of activity of our genes and, subsequently, our genes’ capacity to both positively and negatively affect the various . . . processes that determine our tendencies toward illness or wellness.’

Over 75% of patients visit their primary care physicians (PCPs) for stress-related complaints.1,2 Stress (physiologic, pathophysiologic, and psychologic) is associated with many of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality in the United States (eg, cardiovascular disease,3-5 cancer,6,7 chronic respiratory disease,8,9 cerebrovascular disease,10,11 Alzheimer’s disease,12,13 diabetes,14 influenza and pneumonia,15-17 depression,18-20 suicide21), suboptimal health, and a shortened lifespan.22 Unfortunately, often overlooked is the fact the stress responses associated with many diseases can induce negative lifestyle choices that both worsen the severity and duration of disease states while also triggering the deterioration of an individual’s overall health. For example, job loss (not an uncommon sequela of chronic disease) can trigger numerous maladaptive psychosocial and physiologic responses leading to adverse lifestyle behaviors, such as abuse of alcohol and drugs, poor nutrition, physical inactivity, sleep deprival, etc.. These factors may in turn trigger conditions such as oxidative stress, metabolic syndrome, and/or a predisposition to other diseases/disorders later in life.14,23,24

Unfortunately, stress management–oriented therapeutic interventions are often inadequate or nonexistent in contemporary health care.2,25,26 For example, despite the long recognized association between depression and stress, only 3% of patients with depression are likely to receive stress-related counseling.18 Evidence also suggests that while over 90% of PCPs believe stress management to be an important component of health promotion and disease prevention, almost half rarely or never discuss stress with patients.27

The authors suggest that PCPs who have a deep understanding of how stress can be both the sequela and precipitant of illness will be well positioned to mitigate a patient’s stress-related tendencies toward those maladaptive lifestyle practices that lead to further worsening of their health. More specifically, they can provide their patients with an evidence-based approach to stress management via a form of health care increasingly referred to as lifestyle medicine, which is defined as “the application of environmental, behavioral, medical, and motivational principles to the management of lifestyle-related health problems.”28-30 However, it is also important for PCPs to understand that many of the health promotion and disease prevention benefits associated with a lifestyle-oriented approach to patient care are based on a body of evidence emerging from a field of science referred to as epigenetics. Simply put, epigenetics offers insights into how factors such as stress and lifestyle choices regulate the level of activity of our genes and, subsequently, our genes’ capacity to both positively and negatively affect the various micro (eg, cellular) through macro (eg, physiologic, pathophysiologic) processes that determine our tendencies toward illness or wellness.

The purpose of this article is to provide primary care practitioners and medical educators with an introductory overview of both epigenetics and lifestyle medicine. The authors suggest that such an understanding can overcome two barriers that impede the PCP’s capacity to optimize the health and welfare of their patients: (1) a suboptimal understanding of how stress-induced biochemical and physiologic factors can increase both the severity of ongoing disease states, and a tendency to precipitate the onset of disease,31-38 and (2) lack of confidence in their ability to offer effective, evidence-based lifestyle-oriented counseling.2,27 With such an understanding, medical educators can design rudimentary course offerings in epigenetics and lifestyle-oriented health care so that tomorrow’s health care providers might more efficiently and effectively optimize the heath of their patients. Hopefully, as more practitioners adopt a lifestyle medicine–based approach to patient care, and demonstrate improvements in patient care outcomes, medical school and residency curricula will increasingly provide training in both epigenetics and lifestyle medicine sufficient to assure optimal health care for all.

Background: A Broad Overview of Epigenetics

The evidence introduced in this article is derived from a targeted literature search of MEDLINE conducted via the PubMed interface. The search was limited to English language articles published from 2007 to 2017 and was based on keywords and phrases such as stress, stress management, epigenetics, epigenetic literature related to these keywords and phrases, along with an informal scanning of related literature.

Broadly stated, the field of epigenetics attempts to provide an evidence-based understanding of how internally (eg, thought, perception, feeling, nutrition, movement, sleep, stress) and externally (eg, social relationship, shift-work, pollutions, light, stressor) induced lifestyle and environmental factors change our biochemical landscape. These biochemical changes subsequently lead to the epigenetically mediated regulation of gene activity, function, and expression, and thereby contribute to both illness and health without inducing changes in the genetic code.31-38 Some of these biochemical reactions include DNA methylation, histone acetylation, miRNA, and non-coding RNAs—reactions that play a significant role in promoting health or tendencies towards illness. Epigenetically induced biochemical changes can also lead to changes in molecular memory through transcription changes within the genome, changes that can serve as biomarkers for adaptive and maladaptive physical and behavioral phenotypes.39,40 Epigenetically induced biochemical changes can also cause transgenerational effects such as tendencies or predispositions toward certain diseases in offspring.41-46

More narrowly stated, epigenetically induced biochemical reactions continuously shape, and/or are shaped by, behavioral, psychological, lifestyle, and environmental factors. Examples of these factors include poor nutrition,34,47,48 obesity,49,50 tobacco,51,52 alcohol consumption,53,54 psychosocial stress,55-57 sleep deprivation,58,59 and environmental pollution.60,61 Similarly, a variety of socially determined factors such as poverty, low social status, low educational level, and living in disadvantaged neighborhoods contribute to an increase in the occurrence of disease.62-64 The epigenome can also be positively affected by health-promoting lifestyle choices (ie, fruit and vegetable intake,65,66 drinking green tea,67-69 exercise,70-75 meditation and relaxation,76,77 and a positive outlook on life78) and social factors (ie, prosocial behavior,79,80 comforting social relationships,81 and social support networks63,82).

In summary, the field of epigenetics is increasingly appreciated as a primary means of understanding how stress and maladaptive lifestyles induce genome-wide changes in gene expression, which can negatively affect the trajectory of our lives. Epigenetics is also informing us about how stress management techniques and positive lifestyle health behaviors can induce genetic expression contributing to positive health outcomes and an improved quality of life. A broad understanding of how epigenetics can induce both negative and positive health outcomes should motivate tomorrow’s PCPs to incorporate stress management interventions and the promotion of positive lifestyle choices among their patients. The following provides a sampling of how epigenetically induced biochemical changes can lead to very specific, maladaptive, and deleterious responses to stress.

Epigenetic Evidence of Biochemically Mediated Responses to Stress

Epigenetics and HPA

Stress is defined as any stimulus (internally or externally induced) that disrupts the body’s homeostasis; disruptions affecting the body’s ability to maintain a steady state of balance within and between organ systems.83,84 The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis has long been understood as the body’s primary means of responding to stressful stimuli.85 In response to stress, there is an upregulation of gene expression of HPA axis–mediated hormones.86,87 Some of these changes involve increased catecholamine and cortisol production, and the transcription of pro-inflammatory molecules; changes intended to optimize the body’s capacity to overcome stress and thereby regain homeostasis. From an epigenetic perspective, these biochemical changes influence gene activity, function, and expression (ie, influence one’s epigenetics) and ultimately the body’s capacity to mitigate and/or overcome stress and illness, and regain health and wellness.

Prenatal Stress and Outcomes

Maternal stress produces hormones that inform the fetus in terms of how to adapt its phenotype to the environment.88 These adaptations are thought to be carried out by epigenetic changes that alter fetal HPA axis development,88,89 immune system function,16,90-92 and nervous system development.91,92 Distress in pregnancy is also associated with defects in fetal cognitive development and subsequent childhood behavioral problems, exemplifying epigenetically modifiable relationships between prenatal stress and fetal phenotype outcomes. Fetal alcohol syndrome also has an epigenetic impact through DNA methylation of POMC (Proopiomelanocortin) neurons, which are regulators of HPA axis, immunity, and energy homeostasis, thus further exemplifying the relationship between perinatal stress and phenotype outcomes.93

Early Life Stress and Outcomes

Stress during infancy and childhood greatly increase the risk of chronic disease morbidity and mortality.94-96 A variety of perinatal and postnatal stresses such as adverse living conditions, drug use, malnutrition, and trauma; experiences impacting the infants’ mothers, can lead to epigenetic changes that affect the lives of their offspring.95-97 For example, children of maternal Holocaust survivors report greater use of medications for hypertension, lipid disorders, as well as a greater tendency to develop psychological disorders as adults.97 Additional studies of perinatal maternal stress revealed increased DNA methylation in 1675 CGs affiliated with over 900 genes related to immune function.98 Research also suggests that childhood stress is encoded in macrophages via epigenetic, posttranslational, and tissue remodeling changes. Changes which result in exaggerated pro-inflammatory responses and decreased sensitivity to inhibition, and further worsened by dysregulated hormones and abhorrent behavioral tendencies.94 Childhood stress also negatively affects social skills, relationships, self-regulation, and lifestyle.34,37,55

The Epigenetic Clock and Stress

Average methylation levels at CpG sites can be used as a means of estimating DNA methylation, a metric that may represent one’s epigenetic clock (a metric referred to as DNA methylation age).22,99 An individual’s epigenetically mediated rate of aging is estimated via assaying factors reflecting the amount of extrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (EEAA) and intrinsic epigenetic age acceleration (IEAA) in blood cells. Researchers are attempting to determine the relationship between epigenetic age (via EEAA and IEAA levels in blood cells) and a variety of lifestyle factors such as diet, alcohol consumption, physical activity, educational attainment, obesity, and lifetime stress.99 Current evidence suggests that elevated systolic blood pressure and C-reactive protein levels associated with oxidative stress100,101 were found to increase the level of EEAA and IEAA factors in blood cells and, thereby, advance the age of our epigenetic clock. An increased BMI (body mass index) and waist-to-hip ratio has been found to be significantly associated with increased IEAA, thus providing new insights into how increased weight is deleterious toward health as a function of lifestyle-induced epigenetic change.101 There is also evidence suggesting that obesity is characterized by chronic low-grade inflammation with permanently increased oxidative stress.102 Other researchers are beginning to suggest that EEAA and IEAA levels might be broadly predicative of morbidity and mortality, the development of specific diseases and disorders, and alterations in cognitive ability and physical functioning.22,100 In essence, such research may ultimately demonstrate how an individual’s chronologic age might be compared with their epigenetic age and thereby produce an estimate of one’s relative health and/or tendency toward early aging and disease.

Epigenetics and the Glucocorticoid Receptor Gene

The glucocorticoid receptor (GR) gene NR3C1 plays a role in controlling the development and metabolism of the immune system and HPA axis regulation. Psychological stress has been shown to have increased rates of DNA methylation within the GR gene. A meta-analysis of over 900 individuals born to mothers who experienced perinatal psychosocial stress identified significant DNA methylation at 5 consecutive CpG sites of NR3C1, which has been suggested to serve as a determinant of aberrant neurobehavior and cortisol reactivity of newborns.103 In another study involving women exposed to extreme psychosocial stress, their offspring had increased methylation of NR3C1 as well as decreased birth weight.104 The authors suggested NR3C1 methylation suppress plasticity of GR, which contributes to chronic disease development due to decreased adaptability to stress. Another study showed that traumatic events during childhood and stressful life events in adolescence resulted in higher rates of NR3C1 methylation in females, which was associated with increased co-stress in adolescence.105 Furthermore, cumulative lifetime stress in African Americans living in urban areas was associated with increased methylation of glucocorticoid response elements and accelerated aging.106 These findings clearly demonstrate the impact of psychosocial stress resulting in epigenetic changes of the NR3C1 glucocorticoid receptor, which may be an ideal biomarker to study the relationship between DNA methylation and stress.

Additional Epigenetic-Induced Methylation Changes Resulting From Stress

Stress can produce alterations in methylation of the SKA2 gene, which is implicated in altering the HPA axis and thereby an increased risk of suicide completion and the development of PTSD (posttraumatic stress disorder).107 Furthermore, SKA2 methylation measured in saliva and blood are significantly predictive of lifetime suicide attempts, likely making it a useful biomarker for suicide risk. Fetal alcohol syndrome (FAS) also has an epigenetic role through DNA methylation of pro-opiomelanocortin (POMC) neurons, which are regulators of HPA axis, immunity, and energy homeostasis.93 Hypermethylation of POMC neurons results in their decreased expression and subsequently increased responsiveness to stress in adulthood. Differential methylation and histone modifications of the glial cell-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) also play a role in mouse response to stress.108 These findings suggest that higher DNA methylation as a result of stress, and subsequently a decreased expression of neurotrophic factors, contribute to neural disorders, mental health issues, and other unhealthy, stress-related outcomes. Methylation changes at the CpG sites of corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF) gene have been described in response to chronic stress and depression.109 Hypermethylation of the tyrosine hydroxylase (TH) gene is correlated with both occupational stress and an overall elevation of stress levels.110

Epigenetics and Genetic Polymorphisms

Polymorphisms within the genome can explain how epigenetically mediated biochemical changes induce variations in health and disease-related outcomes. That is, individuals may respond differently to the same stress due to their unique genetic code and associated epigenetic changes. A review of the relationship between variable phenotypes of FKBP5, a co-chaperone involved in modulation of glucocorticoid receptor activity and stress revealed diverse responses ranging from mood disorders, cardiovascular disease, cancer, PTSD, and adaptive responses including improved response to antidepressants.111 This also highlights the role that genetic variability, particularly at FKBP5, plays in differential responses to similar stressors and how some individuals are more prone to disease versus adaptation. Differences in SLC6A4 serotonin transporter gene DNA methylation were shown to contribute to stress response resulting in increased susceptibility or resilience to stress depending on 5-TTLPR polymorphism at the gene.112 Decreased methylation of CpG residues of SLC6A4 promoter in shift-work nurses with stressful jobs has also been noted, which would account for decreased SLC6A4 expression among others performing shift-work.113 However, there was no significant change in 5-HTLPR polymorphism in relation to stress. The varied stress responses due to different SLC6A4 methylation patterns warrants further investigation to see if this may be a useful biomarker in stress management.

Epigenetic Evidence of the Benefits of Stress Management–Oriented Interventions

In this section, we describe epigenetic evidence demonstrating how beneficial lifestyle behaviors modulate gene expression that attenuate the stress response. An understanding of the positive benefits of healthy lifestyle choices, especially those interacting with epigenetic activities, should enable PCPs to more aggressively, assertively, and confidently promote stress management techniques and positive lifestyle choices among their patients.

Mindfulness

A single day of intensive mindful meditation reduced the expression of pro-inflammatory genes (COX2, RIPK2, and histone deacetylase genes 2, 3, and 9) while also promoting a more rapid recovery of appropriate cortisol levels.114 Another mindfulness-based study directed at improving coping skills and cognition of women with stage 0-III breast cancer resulted in over 50% reduction in the expression of unfavorable alterations in 91 genes compared to controls at 6 and 12 months.115 More specifically, this study demonstrated that training in mindfulness resulted in downregulation of epigenetically expressed pro-inflammatory cytokines, prostaglandin-synthesis enzyme COX2, inflammatory chemokines, chemokine receptors, as well as upregulation in epigenetically expressed wound healing and immune-protective interferon-related genes. A systematic review of MBSR (mindfulness-based stress reduction) interventions demonstrated that such practices were associated with downregulation of nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) pathway, a transcription factor for inflammatory gene expression, which is upregulated as part of chronic stress.116

Meditation and Lifestyle Modification Education

A small randomized clinical trial looked at the diet, regular exercise, meditation, weight reduction, and sodium restriction in a hypertensive cohort.117 In addition to mitigating stress levels, both groups saw a decrease in systolic blood pressure. Furthermore, both groups also showed significantly increased telomerase gene expression, which is inversely related to chronic stress. This study further supported existing evidence that telomerase expression is tied to the mechanics of stress levels. In this instance, lifestyle modification, including meditation, positively spurred telomerase expression.117 In another study, stress management techniques involving 3 months of education directed at the adoption of a positive lifestyle, paced respirations, and relaxation techniques designed to reduce stress and anxiety, were associated with the decreased transcription of pro-inflammatory NF-κB, pro-sympathetic CREB, and oxidative stress marker NFR2 among transplant patient caregivers.118 Furthermore, genome profiling showed 57 health-promoting genes with over 1.5 times upregulation in the intervention group compared to control.

Lifestyle Choices Intended to Slow the Epigenetic Clock

Several studies have been directed at determining the relationship between positive lifestyles/stress management and the slowing of our epigenetic clock/age. It was found that EEAA was decreased with a diet consisting of fruits, vegetables, fish, whole grains, and dietary fiber (very similar in scope to the Mediterranean diet119), along with physical activity and moderate alcohol consumption, indicating that healthy lifestyle choices decrease the production of EEAA and thereby are likely to slow our epigenetic clock.99 Fish consumption on its own, has also been demonstrated to be protective against age-related pathology.99 High blood carotenoid levels may be useful in quantifying fruit and vegetable intake, while also exhibiting an inverse correlation with EEAA. Interestingly in this study, metformin, a front-line medication for the treatment of type 2 diabetes, does not appear to reduce/delay advances in epigenetic age/clock.99

Nutrient Availability, Caloric Restriction, and Tea

In both human and animal studies, caloric restriction has been shown to delay the incidence of age-related chronic diseases such as cancer, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.120-122 For example, it has been estimated that 30% to 35% of cancers are associated with overnutrition (excessive nutrient and calorie consumption). Overnutrition has been demonstrated to induce oxidative stress, which disrupts oxidative homeostasis, thereby increasing the epigenetic expression of the histone deacetylase SIRT1 and increased DNA methylation.121 SIRT1 plays a critical role in the longevity response to caloric restriction. Also, compounds that mimic caloric restriction like resveratrol, a natural polyphenolic compound, induces protective antioxidant effects and positive health benefits including cardiovascular health and anti-aging benefits.123 Investigations into the molecular mechanisms of compounds contained in tea showed benefits in terms of the prevention of cancer and various inflammatory and metabolic diseases (eg, cardiovascular disease, obesity, metabolic syndrome, and neurodegenerative diseases).124-130 More specifically, these studies found that the polyphenols, such as theaflavins and catechins contained in green and black tea, are effective in reducing oxidative stress and inflammation by activating Nrf2 transcription factors. Activities that upregulate detoxifying and antioxidant enzymes and downregulate NF-κB, the master transcription factor that regulates inflammation.

Regular Exercise

Stress induces both an inflammatory response and atherosclerosis.131,132 It was found that acute bouts of exercise such as intensive cardiac endurance training induces an immediate pro-inflammatory response including alteration of gene expression in leukocytes.133,134 However, the prolonged and regular exercise led to an anti-inflammatory environment in the peripheral blood cells and tissues, which reduce the risk of developing inflammatory-related diseases such as atherosclerosis by mediating the gene expression of pro-inflammatory markers.134-136

Yoga

Eight weeks of yoga meditation in subjects suffering from stress (ie, caregivers for family members with dementia) resulted in decreased depression, and improved mental health and cognition along with beneficial changes in the epigenetic expression of 68 genes.118 Through yoga, there was also an upregulation of the caregivers immunoglobulin-related transcripts including antiviral response interferon regulatory factor 1 (IRF1) and downregulation of pro-inflammatory NF-κB-associated genes—clear evidence that yogic meditation can mitigate maladaptive gene expression in stressed individuals. A systematic review found that yoga, in a manner similar to other mind-body interventions, aided in downregulation of NF-κB pathway, a transcription factor for inflammatory gene expression, which is upregulated as part of chronic stress.116

Discussion

There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that stress management and healthy lifestyle practices such as mindfulness, exercise, a nutritious diet inclusive of whole foods and plant-based intake, physical activity, adequate sleep, positive psychology, social support, higher levels of education, weight reduction, meditation, and yoga provide positive health benefits and an increased quality of life. These benefits appear to be the result of lifestyle medicine mediated (eg, stress reduction, healthful living), epigenetically induced, biochemical changes.

Curiously, only a small number of PCPs appreciate the epigenetic factors underlying patient tendencies toward both health and illness. However, any increase in the number of PCPs who confidently and proactively offer their patients an informed, evidence-based approach to stress management and the pursuit of positive, health and wellness–oriented lifestyles, will be largely dependent on continuing education programs and undergraduate and residency curricula offering training in both epigenetics and lifestyle medicine.

The content and concepts put forward in this article should assist both today’s PCPs and medical educators in more deeply and confidently understanding the positive benefits to be gained by the incorporation of lifestyle medicine in the practice of contemporary health care. As more practitioners adopt a lifestyle medicine–based approach to patient care, and demonstrate improvements in patient care outcomes, medical educators will likely be more willing to seriously consider the development of curricula providing training in both the biochemistry of epigenetics, lifestyle medicine, and stress-management techniques. Imparting such training to tomorrow’s health care providers will likely lead to an increase in knowledge and confidence with which they offer counseling directed at improving their patient care outcomes.

One approach to the development of such curricular offerings could come in the form of what is often referred to as an active (as opposed to a passive) training environment. In such an environment, learners would be exposed to patient scenarios (real, computer-driven, standardized patients, etc), wherein they are given the opportunity to diagnose the disease or disorder causing the patient’s medical presentation and treat it with conventional therapies. They would also be required to develop a lifestyle-oriented therapeutic intervention based on current epigenetic theories, evidence, and outcomes-oriented clinical findings. Schools interested in offering epigenetic training and lifestyle-oriented therapeutic interventions would face considerable resistance in the form of faculty concerns suggesting that their curriculum is already overburdened with too many concepts and topics. In anticipation of such barriers and concerns, initial curricular initiatives in epigenetics and lifestyle medicine could be directed at launching a small initiative such as five, 2-hour long modules with each focused on one of the more common, important, and “high impact” diseases or disorders likely to benefit from such training and interventions. Furthermore, such training could be delivered by a team of educators comprised of faculty representing (1) traditional medical specialties, (2) health promotion and disease prevention, (3) biochemistry, (4) genetics/epigenetics, (5) psychiatrists, behavioral psychologists, and counselors, and (6) lifestyle medicine practitioners.

Currently, there are only a handful of postgraduate medical training programs that teach lifestyle medicine, including Loma Linda University, Harvard University, and University of Florida.28,29,137 Furthermore, there appears to be only 5 medical schools that formally incorporate a biopsychosocial or lifestyle and environmental focus into their undergraduate medical curriculum.30 For those schools unable to adopt a major change in their current undergraduate training programs, another method of incorporating a lifestyle medicine training model would be to develop an optional, parallel “optional” curriculum for students interested in lifestyle medicine.

Summary

The frequency and severity of stress poses a largely unmanaged threat to health. More specifically, evidence suggests that stress: (1) represents a frequently encountered, yet unaddressed sequela of disease, (2) is likely to worsen the severity of disease, and (3) has the capacity to induce disease. The field of epigenetics is in part oriented to providing an evidence-based explanation of how internally and externally induced stress influences the biochemically medicated processes that regulate gene activity, function, and expression, and thereby contribute to both illness and health. Epigenetics also provides biochemical and genetically based evidence of the benefits of stress management and lifestyle-oriented techniques such as those involving mindfulness, meditation, yoga, exercise, breathing techniques, sleep hygiene, social connectedness and support, smoking cessation, and the reduction and/or elimination of alcohol and drug use. The authors suggest that the adoption of curricular changes inclusive of training in the role of epigenetics-based lifestyle medicine should enable tomorrow’s PCPs to make more intelligent, meaningful, and insightful inquiries into their patients’ medical histories for stress and stress-inducing lifestyle choices. And when appropriate, confidently prescribe those specific stress-management and positive lifestyles considerations likely to lead to improved health outcomes. By counseling patients in how to reduce stress and adopt healthy lifestyles, tomorrow’s PCPs can alter a patient’s epigenetic landscape, thereby promoting healing and optimal health, and subsequently improved patient care outcomes.

Footnotes

Declaration of Conflicting Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding: The author(s) received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ethical Approval: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Trial Registration: Not applicable, because this article does not contain any clinical trials.

References

  • 1. American Psychological Association. Stress in America: The Impact of Stress. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2011. [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Avey H, Matheny KB, Robbins A, Jacobson TA. Health care providers’ training, perceptions, and practices regarding stress and health outcomes. J Natl Med Assoc. 2003;95:833. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. An K, Salyer J, Brown RE, Kao HF, Starkweather A, Shim I. Salivary biomarkers of chronic psychosocial stress and CVD risks: a systematic review. Biol Res Nurs. 2016;18:241-263. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Kivimäki M, Kawachi I. Work stress as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2015;17:630. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Baccarelli A, Wright R, Bollati V, et al. Ischemic heart disease and stroke in relation to blood DNA methylation. Epidemiology. 2010;21:819-828. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Moreno-Smith M, Lutgendorf SK, Sood AK. Impact of stress on cancer metastasis. Future Oncol. 2010;6:1863-1881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Wolford CC, McConoughey SJ, Jalgaonkar SP, et al. Transcription factor ATF3 links host adaptive response to breast cancer metastasis. J Clin Invest. 2013;123:2893-2906. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Douros K, Moustaki M, Tsabouri S, Papadopoulou A, Papadopoulos M, Priftis KN. Prenatal maternal stress and the risk of asthma in children. Front Pediatr. 2017;5:202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Horner CC, Dula C, Bacharier LB, et al. Daily global stress is associated with nocturnal asthma awakenings in school-age children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016;138:1196-1199.e3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Aggarwal NT, Clark CJ, Beck TL, et al. Perceived stress is associated with subclinical cerebrovascular disease in older adults. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2014;22:53-62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Ramírez-Moreno JM, Vega PM, Espada S, Alberca SB, Aguirre J, Peral D. Association between self-perceived psychological stress and transitory ischaemic attack and minor stroke: a case-control study [published online December 22, 2017]. Neurologia. doi: 10.1016/j.nrl.2017.09.012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Piirainen S, Youssef A, Song C, et al. Psychosocial stress on neuroinflammation and cognitive dysfunctions in Alzheimer’s disease: the emerging role for microglia? Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;77:148-164. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Thal DR, Del Tredici K, Ludolph AC, et al. Stages of granulovacuolar degeneration: their relation to Alzheimer’s disease and chronic stress response. Acta Neuropathol. 2011;122:577-589. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Brunner EJ, Kivimäki M. Epidemiology: work-related stress and the risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2013;9:449-450. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Avitsur R, Hunzeker J, Sheridan JF. Role of early stress in the individual differences in host response to viral infection. Brain Behav Immun. 2006;20:339-348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Avitsur R, Sheridan JF. Neonatal stress modulates sickness behavior. Brain Behav Immun. 2009;23:977-985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Kiecolt-Glaser JK, Glaser R, Gravenstein S, Malarkey WB, Sheridan J. Chronic stress alters the immune response to influenza virus vaccine in older adults. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93:3043-3047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Bartolomucci A, Leopardi R. Stress and depression: preclinical research and clinical implications. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Plieger T, Melchers M, Montag C, Meermann R, Reuter M. Life stress as potential risk factor for depression and burnout. Burn Res. 2015;2:19-24. [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Ross RA, Foster SL, Ionescu DF. The role of chronic stress in anxious depression [published online February 17, 2017]. Chronic Stress. doi: 10.1177/2470547016689472 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Feng J, Li S, Chen H. Impacts of stress, self-efficacy, and optimism on suicide ideation among rehabilitation patients with acute pesticide poisoning. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0118011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Chen BH, Marioni RE, Colicino E, et al. DNA methylation-based measures of biological age: meta-analysis predicting time to death. Aging (Albany NY). 2016;8:1844-1865. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Brand JE. The far-reaching impact of job loss and unemployment. Annu Rev Sociol. 2015;41:359-375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Ursache A, Noble KG, Blair C. Socioeconomic status, subjective social status, and perceived stress: associations with stress physiology and executive functioning. Behav Med. 2015;41:145-154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. McKenzie SH, Harris MF. Understanding the relationship between stress, distress and healthy lifestyle behaviour: a qualitative study of patients and general practitioners. BMC Fam Pract. 2013;14:166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Juratli SM, Janisse J, Schwartz K, Arnetz BB. Demographic and lifestyle factors associated with perceived stress in the primary care setting: a MetroNet study. Fam Pract. 2011;28:156-162. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Nerurkar A, Bitton A, Davis RB, Phillips RS, Yeh G. When physicians counsel about stress: results of a national study. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173:76-77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Egger GJ, Binns AF, Rossner SR. The emergence of “lifestyle medicine” as a structured approach for management of chronic disease. Med J Aust. 2009;190:143-145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Kushner R, Sorensen K. Lifestyle medicine: the future of chronic disease management. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes. 2013;20:389-395. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Jaini PA, Lee JS. A review of 21st century utility of a biopsychosocial model in United States medical school education. J Lifestyle Med. 2015;5:49-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Harb H, Renz H. Update on epigenetics in allergic disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015;135:15-24. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Lam LL, Emberly E, Fraser HB, et al. Factors underlying variable DNA methylation in a human community cohort. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(suppl 2):17253-17260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Szyf M, Bick J. DNA methylation: a mechanism for embedding early life experiences in the genome. Child Dev. 2013;84:49-57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Alegría-Torres JA, Baccarelli A, Bollati V. Epigenetics and lifestyle. Epigenomics. 2011;3:267-277. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Montirosso R, Provenzi L. Implications of epigenetics and stress regulation on research and developmental care of preterm infants. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2015;44:174-182. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Vaiserman AM. Epigenetic programming by early-life stress: evidence from human populations. Dev Dyn. 2015;244:254-265. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. McClelland S, Korosi A, Cope J, Ivy A, Baram TZ. Emerging roles of epigenetic mechanisms in the enduring effects of early-life stress and experience on learning and memory. Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2011;96:79-88. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Roth TL. Epigenetic mechanisms in the development of behavior: advances, challenges, and future promises of a new field. Dev Psychopathol. 2013;25(4 pt 2):1279-1291. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. D’Urso A, Brickner JH. Mechanisms of epigenetic memory. Trends Genet. 2014;30:230-236. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. D’Urso A, Brickner JH. Epigenetic transcriptional memory. Curr Genet. 2017;63:435-439. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Skinner MK. Environmental stress and epigenetic transgenerational inheritance. BMC Med. 2014;12:153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Galler J, Rabinowitz DG. The intergenerational effects of early adversity. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2014;128:177-198. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Gapp K, von Ziegler L, Tweedie-Cullen RY, Mansuy IM. Early life epigenetic programming and transmission of stress-induced traits in mammals: how and when can environmental factors influence traits and their transgenerational inheritance? Bioessays. 2014;36:491-502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Grandjean P, Barouki R, Bellinger DC, et al. Life-long implications of developmental exposure to environmental stressors: new perspectives. Endocrinology. 2015;156:3408-3415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Hamlin HJ. Prenatal stress and development: beyond the single cause and effect paradigm. Birth Defects Res C Embryo Today. 2012;96:289-298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Matthews SG, Phillips DI. Transgenerational inheritance of stress pathology. Exp Neurol. 2012;233:95-101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Choi SW, Friso S. Epigenetics: a new bridge between nutrition and health. Adv Nutr. 2010;1:8-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Langley-Evans SC, Muhlhausler BS. Early nutrition, epigenetics, and human health. In: Moskalev AA, Vaiserman A, eds. Epigenetics of Aging and Longevity. Translational Epigenetics Series. Vol 4 Cambridge, MA: Academic Press; 2018:229-250. [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Herrera BM, Keildson S, Lindgren CM. Genetics and epigenetics of obesity. Maturitas. 2011;69:41-49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Stoger R. Epigenetics and obesity. Pharmacogenomics. 2008;9:1851-1860. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Breitling LP. Current genetics and epigenetics of smoking/tobacco-related cardiovascular disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2013;33:1468-1472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Su D, Wang X, Campbell MR, et al. Distinct epigenetic effects of tobacco smoking in whole blood and among leukocyte subtypes. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0166486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Ponomarev I. Epigenetic control of gene expression in the alcoholic brain. Alcohol Res. 2013;35:69-76. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Zakhari S. Alcohol metabolism and epigenetics changes. Alcohol Res. 2013;35:6-16. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Champagne FA. Epigenetic influence of social experiences across the lifespan. Dev Psychobiol. 2010;52:299-311. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Cowan CS, Callaghan BL, Kan JM, Richardson R. The lasting impact of early-life adversity on individuals and their descendants: potential mechanisms and hope for intervention. Genes Brain Behav. 2016;15:155-168. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Fredrickson BL, Grewen KM, Algoe SB, et al. Psychological well-being and the human conserved transcriptional response to adversity. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0121839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Cedernaes J, Osler ME, Voisin S, et al. Acute sleep loss induces tissue-specific epigenetic and transcriptional alterations to circadian clock genes in men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100:E1255-E1261. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Gaine ME, Chatterjee S, Abel T. Sleep deprivation and the epigenome. Front Neural Circuits. 2018;12:14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Breton CV, Marutani AN. Air pollution and epigenetics: recent findings. Curr Envir Health Rpt. 2014;1:35-45. [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Lin VW, Baccarelli AA, Burris HH. Epigenetics—a potential mediator between air pollution and preterm birth. Environ Epigenet. 2016;2(1). doi: 10.1093/eep/dvv008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Borghol N, Suderman M, McArdle W, et al. Associations with early-life socio-economic position in adult DNA methylation. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:62-74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Loi M, Del Savio L, Stupka E. Social epigenetics and equality of opportunity. Public Health Ethics. 2013;6:142-153. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. McGuinness D, McGlynn LM, Johnson PC, et al. Socio-economic status is associated with epigenetic differences in the pSoBid cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41:151-160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Bishop KS, Ferguson LR. The interaction between epigenetics, nutrition and the development of cancer. Nutrients. 2015;7:922-947. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Li Y. Epigenetic food: a new approach for cancer prevention and therapy. J Nutr Food Sci. 2012;2:e103. doi: 10.4172/2155-9600.1000e103 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Ek WE, Tobi EW, Ahsan M, et al. Tea and coffee consumption in relation to DNA methylation in four European cohorts. Hum Mol Genet. 2017;26:3221-3231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Henning SM, Wang P, Carpenter CL, Heber D. Epigenetic effects of green tea polyphenols in cancer. Epigenomics. 2013;5:729-741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Sharma P, de Oca MKM, Alkeswani AR, et al. Tea polyphenols for the prevention of UVB-induced skin cancer. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2018;34:50-59. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Barres R, Yan J, Egan B, et al. Acute exercise remodels promoter methylation in human skeletal muscle. Cell Metab. 2012;15:405-411. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Barres R, Zierath JR. The role of diet and exercise in the transgenerational epigenetic landscape of T2DM. Nat Rev Endocrinol. 2016;12:441-451. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Collins A, Hill LE, Chandramohan Y, Whitcomb D, Droste SK, Reul JM. Exercise improves cognitive responses to psychological stress through enhancement of epigenetic mechanisms and gene expression in the dentate gyrus. PLoS One. 2009;4:e4330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Horsburgh S, Robson-Ansley P, Adams R, Smith C. Exercise and inflammation-related epigenetic modifications: focus on DNA methylation. Exerc Immunol Rev. 2015;21:26-41. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Ronn T, Volkov P, Davegårdh C, et al. A six months exercise intervention influences the genome-wide DNA methylation pattern in human adipose tissue. PLoS Genet. 2013;9:e1003572. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75. Sleiman SF, Henry J, Al-Haddad R, et al. Exercise promotes the expression of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) through the action of the ketone body β-hydroxybutyrate. Elife. 2016;5:e15092. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76. Chong CS, Tsunaka M, Tsang HW, Chan EP, Cheung WM. Effects of yoga on stress management in healthy adults: a systematic review. Altern Ther Health Med. 2011;17:32-38. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77. Smith B, Metzker K, Waite R, Gerrity P. Short-form mindfulness-based stress reduction reduces anxiety and improves health-related quality of life in an inner-city population. Holist Nurs Pract. 2015;29:70-77. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78. Fredrickson BL, Grewen KM, Coffey KA, et al. A functional genomic perspective on human well-being. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:13684-13689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79. Haas BW, Filkowski MM, Cochran RN, et al. Epigenetic modification of OXT and human sociability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016;113:E3816-E3823. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80. Nelson-Coffey SK, Fritz MM, Lyubomirsky S, Cole SW. Kindness in the blood: a randomized controlled trial of the gene regulatory impact of prosocial behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2017;81:8-13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81. Moore SR, McEwen LM, Quirt J, et al. Epigenetic correlates of neonatal contact in humans. Dev Psychopathol. 2017;29:1517-1538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82. Notterman DA, Mitchell C. Epigenetics and understanding the impact of social determinants of health. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2015;62:1227-1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83. Ayada C, Toru Ü, Korkut Y. The relationship of stress and blood pressure effectors. Hippokratia. 2015;19:99-108. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84. Metz GA, Ng JW, Kovalchuk I, Olson DM. Ancestral experience as a game changer in stress vulnerability and disease outcomes. Bioessays. 2015;37:602-611. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85. Herman JP, McKlveen JM, Ghosal S, et al. Regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical stress response. Compr Physiol. 2016;6:603-621. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86. Nezi M, Mastorakos G, Mouslech Z. Corticotropin releasing hormone and the immune/inflammatory response. In: Feingold KR, Anawalt B, Boyce A, et al. eds. Endotext. South Dartmouth, MA: MDText.com; 2000. [Google Scholar]
  • 87. Stephens MA, Wand G. Stress and the HPA axis: role of glucocorticoids in alcohol dependence. Alcohol Res. 2012;34:468-483. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88. Del Giudice M. Fetal programming by maternal stress: insights from a conflict perspective. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2012;37:1614-1629. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89. Dirven BCJ, Homberg JR, Kozicz T, Henckens MJAG. Epigenetic programming of the neuroendocrine stress response by adult life stress. J Mol Endocrinol. 2017;59:R11-R31. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90. Avitsur R, Levy S, Goren N, Grinshpahet R. Early adversity, immunity and infectious disease. Stress. 2015;18:289-296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91. Isgut M, Smith AK, Reimann ES, Kucuk O, Ryan J. The impact of psychological distress during pregnancy on the developing fetus: biological mechanisms and the potential benefits of mindfulness interventions. J Perinat Med. 2017;45:999-1011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92. Gericke GS. Common chromosomal fragile sites (CFS) may be involved in normal and traumatic cognitive stress memory consolidation and altered nervous system immunity. Med Hypotheses. 2010;74:911-918. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93. Bekdash R, Zhang C, Sarkar D. Fetal alcohol programming of hypothalamic proopiomelanocortin system by epigenetic mechanisms and later life vulnerability to stress. Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2014;38:2323-2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94. Lutz PE, Almeida D, Fiori LM, Turecki G. Childhood maltreatment and stress-related psychopathology: the epigenetic memory hypothesis. Curr Pharm Des. 2015;21:1413-1417. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95. Fagundes CP, Glaser R, Kiecolt-Glaser JK. Stressful early life experiences and immune dysregulation across the lifespan. Brain Behav Immun. 2013;27:8-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96. Fisher PA, Beauchamp KG, Roos LE, Noll LK, Flannery J, Delker BC. The neurobiology of intervention and prevention in early adversity. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2016;12:331-357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97. Flory JD, Bierer LM, Yehuda R. Maternal exposure to the holocaust and health complaints in offspring. Dis Markers. 2011;30:133-139. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98. Cao-Lei L, Massart R, Suderman MJ, et al. DNA methylation signatures triggered by prenatal maternal stress exposure to a natural disaster: Project Ice Storm. PLoS One. 2014;9:e107653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99. Quach A, Levine ME, Tanaka T, et al. Epigenetic clock analysis of diet, exercise, education, and lifestyle factors. Aging (Albany NY). 2017;9:419-446. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100. Baradaran A, Nasri H, Rafieian-Kopaei M. Oxidative stress and hypertension: possibility of hypertension therapy with antioxidants. J Res Med Sci. 2014;19:358-367. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101. Cottone S, Mulè G, Nardi E, et al. Relation of C-reactive protein to oxidative stress and to endothelial activation in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertens. 2006;19:313-318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102. Marseglia L, Manti S, D’Angelo G, et al. Oxidative stress in obesity: a critical component in human diseases. Int J Mol Sci. 2014;16:378-400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103. Palma-Gudiel H, Córdova-Palomera A, Eixarch E, Deuschle M, Fañanás L. Maternal psychosocial stress during pregnancy alters the epigenetic signature of the glucocorticoid receptor gene promoter in their offspring: a meta-analysis. Epigenetics. 2015;10:893-902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104. Mulligan CJ, D’Errico NC, Stees J, Hughes DA. Methylation changes at NR3C1 in newborns associate with maternal prenatal stress exposure and newborn birth weight. Epigenetics. 2012;7:853-857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105. van der Knaap LJ, Riese H, Hudziak JJ, et al. Glucocorticoid receptor gene (NR3C1) methylation following stressful events between birth and adolescence. The TRAILS study. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4:e381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106. Zannas AS, Arloth J, Carrillo-Roa T, et al. Lifetime stress accelerates epigenetic aging in an urban, African American cohort: relevance of glucocorticoid signaling. Genome Biol. 2015;16:266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107. Kaminsky Z, Wilcox HC, Eaton WW, et al. Epigenetic and genetic variation at SKA2 predict suicidal behavior and post-traumatic stress disorder. Transl Psychiatry. 2015;5:e627. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108. Uchida S, Hara K, Kobayashi A, et al. Epigenetic status of GDNF in the ventral striatum determines susceptibility and adaptation to daily stressful events. Neuron. 2011;69:359-372. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109. Bakusic J, Schaufeli W, Claes S, Godderis L. Stress, burnout and depression: a systematic review on DNA methylation mechanisms. J Psychosom Res. 2017;92:34-44. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110. Myaki K, Suzuki T, Song Y, et al. Epigenetic changes caused by occupational stress in humans revealed through noninvasive assessment of DNA methylation of the tyrosine hydroxylase gene. J Neurol Neurol Disord. 2015;2:1-8. [Google Scholar]
  • 111. Zannas AS, Wiechmann T, Gassen NC, Binder EB. Gene-Stress-epigenetic regulation of FKBP5: clinical and translational implications. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41:261-274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112. Duman EA, Canli T. Influence of life stress, 5-HTTLPR genotype, and SLC6A4 methylation on gene expression and stress response in healthy Caucasian males. Biol Mood Anxiety Disord. 2015;5:2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113. Alasaari JS, Lagus M, Ollila HM, et al. , Environmental stress affects DNA methylation of a CpG rich promoter region of serotonin transporter gene in a nurse cohort. PLoS One. 2012;7:e45813. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114. Kaliman P, Alvarez-López MJ, Cosín-Tomás M, Rosenkranz MA, Lutz A, Davidson RJ. Rapid changes in histone deacetylases and inflammatory gene expression in expert meditators. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2014;40:96-107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115. Cramer H, Lauche R, Paul A, Dobos G. Mindfulness-based stress reduction for breast cancer—a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Oncol. 2012;19:e343-e352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116. Buric I, Farias M, Jong J, Mee C, Brazil IA. What is the molecular signature of mind–body interventions? A systematic review of gene expression changes induced by meditation and related practices. Front Immunol. 2017;8:670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117. Duraimani S, Schneider RH, Randall OS, et al. Effects of lifestyle modification on telomerase gene expression in hypertensive patients: a pilot trial of stress reduction and health education programs in African Americans. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0142689. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118. Black DS, Cole SW, Irwin MR, et al. Yogic meditation reverses NF-κB and IRF-related transcriptome dynamics in leukocytes of family dementia caregivers in a randomized controlled trial. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38:348-355. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119. Boccardi V, Esposito A, Rizzo MR, Marfella R, Barbieri M, Paolisso G. Mediterranean diet, telomere maintenance and health status among elderly. PLoS One. 2013;8:e62781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062781 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120. Masoro EJ. Subfield history: caloric restriction, slowing aging, and extending life. Sci Aging Knowledge Environ. 2003;2003:RE2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121. Wakeling LA, Ions LJ, Ford D. Could Sirt1-mediated epigenetic effects contribute to the longevity response to dietary restriction and be mimicked by other dietary interventions? Age (Dordr). 2009;31:327-341. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122. Colman RJ, Anderson RM, Johnson SC, et al. Caloric restriction delays disease onset and mortality in rhesus monkeys. Science (New York, NY). 2009;325:201-204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123. Baxter RA. Anti-aging properties of resveratrol: review and report of a potent new antioxidant skin care formulation. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2008;7:2-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124. Afzal M, Safer A, Menon M. Green tea polyphenols and their potential role in health and disease. Inflammopharmacology. 2015;23:151-161. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125. Chacko SM, Thambi PT, Kuttan R, Nishigaki I. Beneficial effects of green tea: a literature review. Chin Med. 2010;5:13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126. Liu M, Tian HL, Wu JH, et al. Relationship between gene expression and the accumulation of catechin during spring and autumn in tea plants (Camellia sinensis L). Hortic Res. 2015;2:15011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127. Pan MH, Lai CS, Wang H, Lo CY, Ho CT, Li S. Black tea in chemo-prevention of cancer and other human diseases. Food Sci Hum Wellness. 2013;2:12-21. [Google Scholar]
  • 128. Reygaert WC. An update on the health benefits of green tea. Beverages. 2017;3:6. [Google Scholar]
  • 129. Roychoudhury S, Agarwal A, Virk G, Cho CL. Potential role of green tea catechins in the management of oxidative stress-associated infertility. Reprod Biomed Online. 2017;34:487-498. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130. Stangl V, Dreger H, Stangl K, Lorenz M. Molecular targets of tea polyphenols in the cardiovascular system. Cardiovasc Res. 2007;73:348-358. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131. Black PH, Garbutt LD. Stress, inflammation and cardiovascular disease. J Psychosom Res. 2002;52:1-23. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132. Liu YZ, Wang YX, Jiang CL. Inflammation: the common pathway of stress-related diseases. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133. Accattato F, Greco M, Pullano SA, et al. Effects of acute physical exercise on oxidative stress and inflammatory status in young, sedentary obese subjects. PLoS One. 2017;12:e0178900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134. Calle MC, Fernandez ML. Effects of resistance training on the inflammatory response. Nutr Res Pract. 2010;4:259-269. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135. Gjevestad GO, Holven KB, Ulven SM. Effects of exercise on gene expression of inflammatory markers in human peripheral blood cells: a systematic review. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2015;9:34. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136. Iyalomhe O, Chen Y, Allard J, et al. A standardized randomized 6-month aerobic exercise-training down-regulated pro-inflammatory genes, but up-regulated anti-inflammatory, neuron survival and axon growth-related genes. Exp Gerontol. 2015;69:159-169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137. Pojednic R, Frates E. A parallel curriculum in lifestyle medicine. Clin Teach. 2015;14:27-31. doi: 10.1111/tct.12475 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES