Skip to main content
The Journal of Poultry Science logoLink to The Journal of Poultry Science
. 2021 Apr 25;58(2):110–118. doi: 10.2141/jpsa.0200030

Influence of Dietary Metformin on the Growth Performance and Plasma Concentrations of Amino Acids and Advanced Glycation End Products in Two Types of Chickens

Ryosuke Makino 1,✉, Maaya Uda 1, Syoko Shuto 1, Kazumi Kita 2, Tetsuya Tachibana 1
PMCID: PMC8076621  PMID: 33927565

Abstract

Glycation is a non-enzymatic reaction inducing the bonding of glucose to amino acids and proteins. Glycated amino acids are not useful for protein synthesis, suggesting that glycation reduces the utilization of amino acids. Metformin (MF) is well known as a therapeutic drug for type II diabetes that inhibits glycation. It is possible that treatment with MF raises the utilization of amino acids by the inhibition of glycation, thereby improving the growth performance of chickens. In the present study, therefore, we investigated the influence of dietary MF on the growth performance, and plasma concentrations of free amino acids and Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine (CML), which is an advanced glycation end product, in layer (Experiment 1) and broiler (Experiment 2) chickens. From 7 d of age, chicks were allowed free access to one of the experimental diets containing MF at 3 supplementation levels (0, 150, and 300 mg/kg diet) for 14 days. Body weight and feed intake were measured every week. At the end of the experiments, blood and breast muscle (M. pectoralis major) were collected for further analysis. Dietary MF did not affect weight gain, feed intake, or feed efficiency in both layer and broiler chickens. Dietary MF at the level of 150 mg/kg diet increased breast muscle weight in both layer and broiler chickens. Dietary MF increased plasma concentrations of branched chain amino acids and decreased concentrations of CML in layer chickens, although it did not affect plasma concentrations of glucose. The present study suggested that dietary MF might have the potency to increase breast muscle weight of layer chickens with an increment in plasma concentrations of branched-chain amino acids.

Keywords: amino acids, broiler, Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine, Glycation, layer, metformin

Introduction

Glycation is a non-enzymatic reaction causing condensation between the carbonyl group of glucose and the amino group of proteins and amino acids. Glycation of proteins leads to the formation of a Schiff base, which rearranges to more stable Amadori products. Amadori products undergo further complex reactions such as cross-linking, oxidation, dehydration, and condensation to form advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which have a causative role in the development of diabetes complications represented by nephropathy, neuropathy, and retinopathy (Makita et al., 1994; Koschinsky et al., 1997; Brownlee, 2005).

Metformin (MF), which is one of the biguanide drugs, has been widely used as a first-line treatment for type II diabetes. Biguanides are composed of two guanidino groups combined with each other. Guanidino derivatives, including MF, have anti-hyperglycemic effects by inhibiting hepatic gluconeogenesis and improving insulin sensitivity (Rena et al., 2013; Foretz et al., 2014). It is well known that MF not only decreases blood glucose levels but also inhibits glycation, which is a chemical reaction easily carried out in diabetic patients (Rahbar et al., 2000; Beisswenger and Ruggiero-Lopez, 2003; Chakraborty et al., 2011). It was also reported that therapeutic MF reduced risk of diabetic complications (UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group, 1998).

Chickens are known to be hyperglycemic animals, and their blood glucose level is over 200 mg/dL (Hazelwood and Lorenz, 1959). Because chickens have high blood glucose levels compared to mammals, their amino acids might be more easily converted to glycated amino acids. In our previous study, it was revealed that approximately 10% of tryptophan in chicken plasma was glycated (Makino et al., 2015a). We also reported that glycated amino acids lost the capability to synthesize peptide bonds with other amino acids in vitro since these compounds lack the α-amino group (Makino et al., 2015b). These results suggest that dietary MF acts as an anti-glycation agent and could enhance the bioavailability of amino acids in vivo.

Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of dietary MF on the growth performance and plasma concentrations of free and glycated amino acids in two types of chickens.

Materials and Methods

Animals and Experimental Procedure

In Experiment 1, 50 1-day-old male layer chickens (White Leghorn, Julia) were purchased from a local hatchery (Ninobe Hatchery, Kagawa, Japan). A commercial chicken mash diet (240 g crude protein/kg, 12.8 MJ/kg metabolizable energy; Toyohashi Feed Mills Co. Ltd, Aichi, Japan) and water were available ad libitum to the chickens. Chickens were transferred to the experimental cage at least 2 d before the experiment in order for them to become accustomed to the experimental environment. The commercial diet was then changed to the control diet (Table 1). Before starting dietary treatments, body weight was measured and the chickens were distributed individually into experimental groups so that the average body weight was as uniform as possible. Twenty-four birds were selected and divided into 3 groups of 8 birds each. From 7 d of age, the chickens had free access to one of the experimental diets containing MF at 3 supplementation levels (0, 150, and 300 mg/kg diet) for 14 days. Body weight and feed intake were measured on days 7 and 14 of the experiment. At the end of the experiment, blood samples were collected by heart puncture from chickens anesthetized with isoflurane and transferred to heparin-containing microtubes. Blood samples were centrifuged at 3,000×g for 20 min at 4°C to separate the plasma. Plasma samples were stored at −80°C until analysis. After blood sampling, the right pectoralis major muscles (M. pectoralis major) were weighed and frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at −80°C until analysis.

Table 1. Composition of the control diet for layers and broilersa.

Ingredients Layer (g/kg) Broiler (g/kg)
ISPb 210.5 262.6
L-Methionine 0.8 2.2
L-Cystine 0.9 3.4
L-Threonine 0.4 0.0
Cornstarch 498.0 539.7
Cellulose 194.9 100.6
Corn oil 30.0 27.0
Vitamin mixture 2.0 2.0
Mineral mixture 60.0 60.0
Choline chloride 1.5 1.5
Inositol 1.0 1.0
 
Crude protein (CP) 18% 23%
Metabolizable energy (ME) (kcal/kg) 2850 3200
a

Composition of diets was calculated according to National Research Council (1994).

b

ISP is isolated soybean protein which contains 855 g CP/kg

In Experiment 2, 50 1-day-old male broiler chickens (Chunky, Ross308) were purchased from a local hatchery (Mori Breeding Farm Co. Ltd.). A commercial chicken mash diet (220 g crude protein/kg, 13.0 MJ/kg metabolizable energy; JA Nishinihon Kumiai Shiryou Corporation, Hyogo, Japan) and water were available ad libitum to the chickens. All other procedures were the same as those described in Experiment 1, except for the compositions of the experimental diets (Table 1).

This study was approved by the Committee of Animal Care and Use in Ehime University (No. 08011-10).

Sample Preparation for Analysis of Amino Acids, Nε-(Carboxymethyl) lysine (CML), and MF

Tissue samples of the pectoralis major muscle were homogenized using a bead mill (TissueLyser LT, Qiagen, Germany) with an oscillation frequency of 50Hz for 1 min. Homogenized tissues in Dulbecco's phosphate buffered saline were centrifuged at 14,000×g for 5 min at 4°C, and the supernatant was collected and stored at −80°C until analysis. Before applying ultra performance liquid chromatography (UPLC), 100 µL of plasma or supernatant from the tissue samples was mixed with 50 µL of stable isotope labeled amino acid mixture solution (APDSTAG Wako Amino Acids Internal Standard Mixture Solution, Wako, Osaka, Japan) as an internal standard for amino acids and CML, and 400 ng aminoguanidine as an internal standard for MF. For deproteinization, an equal volume of 4 mmol/L perchloric acid was mixed with the sample and stored on ice for 10 min. Then, the samples were centrifuged at 14,000×g for 5 min at 4°C. The supernatant was passed through a 0.22 µm membrane filter.

Measurement of Amino Acids, CML, and MF in Plasma and Tissues

Separation of amino acids, CML, and MF was performed by UPLC (ACQUITY, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA). The mobile phase A was 20% acetonitrile and 100 mM ammonium formate, while mobile phase B consisted of acetonitrile containing 0.3% formic acid. The flow rate was 600 µL/min. The sample injection volume was 10 µL. The temperature of the column (2.1×100 mm; Intrada Amino Acid, Imtakt Corporation., Kyoto, Japan) was set at 37°C. Samples were quantified using mass spectrometry (ACQUITY TQD, Waters Corporation) with electrospray ionization. Amino acids were measured in positive ion mode using single ion monitoring, and CML and MF were measured using multiple reaction monitoring(Table 2).

Table 2. Overview of m/z values for the analysis of amino acids, Nε-(carboxymethyl) lysine, metformin, and their internal standards.

ID Compounds m/z Internal standards m/z
1 Alanine 90 Alanine-13C3 93
2 Arginine 175 Lysine-13C6, 15N2 182
3 Asparagine 134 Asparagine-13C4, 15N2 137
4 Aspartic Acid 134 Aspartic acid-2, 3, 3-d3 137
5 Cystine 241 Cystine-3, 3', 3'-d6 245
6 Glutamic Acid 148 Glutamic acid-13C5, 15N 154
7 Glutamine 147 Glutamine-13C5, 15N2 154
8 Glycine 76 Glycine-13C5, 15N 79
9 Histidine 156 Histidine-13C6, 15N3 165
10 Isoleucine 132 Isoleucine-13C6, 15N 139
11 Leucine 132 Leucine-5, 5, 5-d3 135
12 Lysine 147 Lysine-13C, 15N2 155
13 Methionine 150 Mehionine-13C5, 15N 156
14 Phenylalanine 166 Phenylalanine-13C9, 15N 176
15 Proline 116 Proline-13C5, 15N 122
16 Serine 106 Serine-13C3, 15N 110
17 Threonine 120 Threonine-13C4 124
18 Tryptophan 205 Tryptophan-13C11, 15N2 218
19 Tyrosine 182 Tyrosine (Ring-13C6) 188
20 Valine 118 Valine-13C5, 15N2 124
21 Anserine 241 Histidine-13C6, 15N3 165
22 Carnosine 227 Histidine-13C6, 15N3 165
23 Citrulline 176 Citrulline-4, 4, 5, 5-d4 180
24 Cystathionine 223 Citrulline-4, 4, 5, 5-d4 180
25 Hydroxylysine 163 Ornithine-13C5 138
26 Hydroxyproline 132 Proline-13C5, 15N 122
27 Monoethanolamine 62 Monoethanolamine-1, 1, 2, 2-d4 66
28 Nτ-Methylhistidine 170 Nτ-methyl-d3-histidine 173
29 Nπ-Methylhistidine 170 Nτ-methyl-d3-histidine 173
30 Ornithine 133 Ornitine-13C5 138
31 Sarcosine 90 Alanine-13C3 93
32 α-Amino butyric Acid 104 Glutamic acid-13C5, 15N 154
33 α-Aminoadipic Acid 162 Alanine-13C3 93
34 β-Alanine 90 Alanine-13C3 93
35 γ-Aminobutyric Acid 104 Alanine-13C3 93
36 Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine 205>84 Lysine-13C, 15N2 155
37 Metformin 130>60 Aminoguanidine 75>45

Measurement of Plasma Glucose

Measurement of plasma glucose was carried out using a commercial kit (Glucose CII test, Wako, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer's instructions.

Statistical Analysis

All data are presented as mean±standard error (SE). Statistical analysis of growth performance was performed by repeated two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and other data analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey's HSD test for multiple comparisons (P<0.05) using the General Linear Model Procedures of SAS (SAS/STAT version 9.4) (SAS Institute, 2012).

Results

Growth Performance and Tissue Weight

Body weight gain, feed intake, and feed efficiency of layer and broiler chickens fed experimental diets with various MF levels are shown in Table 3. Body weight gain, feed intake, and feed efficiency of layer chickens were not affected by dietary MF. Although feed intake and feed efficiency of broiler chickens were also not affected, body weight gain tended to be decreased (P=0.06) after feeding with 300 mg MF/kg diet.

Table 3. Body weight gain, feed intake, and feed efficiency of layer and broiler chickens fed a diet with various metformin concentrations.

Experiment 1 (Layer)
Experiment 2 (Broiler)
Metformin
(mg/kg)
Week Body weight gain
(g)
Feed intake
(g)
Feed efficiency
(%)
Body weight gain
(g)
Feed intake
(g)
Feed efficiency
(%)
0 0–1 46.4±2.4 109.3±2.6 42.5±2.2 163.0±8.8 216.4±8.6 75.1±1.4
1–2 40.9±3.5 124.4±4.4 32.8±2.8 174.4±12.8 321.4±14.0 54.3±3.4
 
150 0–1 53.8±2.5 117.3±3.5 45.8±1.6 162.6±7.9 210.2±7.0 77.1±1.7
1–2 44.1±3.5 140.1±5.1 31.5±1.9 200.8±18.6 347.9±20.0 57.9±4.6
 
300 0–1 46.0±1.7 105.8±2.8 43.5±1.4 139.6±5.8 198.7±4.7 70.2±2.0
1–2 50.4±5.0 144.5±17.2 36.1±3.6 156.9±16.0 302.7±29.5 51.9±3.7
 
Analysis of variance (probability)
Metformin   0.21   0.37   0.66   0.06   0.27   0.13
Week   0.19 <0.01 <0.01 <0.05 <0.01 <0.01
Metformin x Week   0.11   0.26   0.36   0.48   0.48   0.91

Values are given as mean±SE. The number of chickens used in each treatment group was 8.

Breast muscle (M. pectoralis major) weights of the chickens fed on diets including MF are shown in Table 4. Pectoralis major muscle weights of both layer and broiler chickens in the 150 mg/kg MF group were heavier than those in the control group.

Table 4. Breast muscle (right M. pectoralis major) weight of layer and broiler chickens fed a diet with various metformin concentrations.

Experiment 1 (Layer)
Experiment 2 (Broiler)
Metformin
(mg/kg)
Breast muscle weight
(g)
Breast muscle weight
(g)
0 4.7±0.2b 35.2±1.6b
150 5.6±0.2a 41.6±1.8a
300 5.3±0.3ab 32.8±1.8b
a, b

Means not sharing a common superscript letter in the same column were significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, P<0.05). Values are given as mean±SE. The number of chickens used in each treatment group was 8.

Plasma Concentrations of MF, glucose, CML, and Free Amino Acids

MF concentrations in the plasma and breast muscle of layer and broiler chickens are shown in Table 5. MF levels in the plasma and breast muscle of both layer and broiler chickens were increased by dietary MF supplementation.

Table 5. Metformin concentration in the plasma, breast muscle (right M. pectoralis major), and liver of layer and broiler chickens fed a diet with various metformin concentrations.

Experiment 1 (Layer)
Experiment 2 (Broiler)
Metformin
(mg/kg)
Plasma
(µmol/L)
Breast muscle
(nmol/g tissue)
Plasma
(µmol/L)
Breast muscle
(nmol/g tissue)
0 0.0±0.0c 0.0±0.0b   0.0±0.0b 0.0±0.0b
150 0.9±0.0b 1.8±0.8a 17.9±7.0ab 0.8±0.3b
300 1.7±0.0a 2.0±0.6a 35.2±8.4a 1.7±0.3a
a–c

Means in the same column not sharinga common superscript letter were significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, P<0.05). Values are given as mean±SE. The number of chickens used in each treatment group was 8.

Plasma concentrations of glucose and CML in layer and broiler chickens are shown in Table 6. Plasma glucose concentration was not affected by dietary MF in both layer and broiler chickens. The CML levels in the plasma of layer chickens decreased as the dietary MF content increased. However, the plasma levels of CML in broiler chickens were not affected by dietary MF supplementation.

Table 6. Glucose and Nε-(carboxymethyl)lysine concentrations in the plasma of layer and broiler chickens fed a diet with various metformin concentrations.

Experiment 1 (Layer)
Experiment 2 (Broiler)
Metformin
(mg/kg)
Glucose
(mg/100 mL)
Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine
(ng/mL)
Glucose
(mg/100 mL)
Nε-(Carboxymethyl)lysine
(ng/mL)
0 265.8±7.7 0.43±0.03a 331.2±22.6 23.2±5.8
150 274.0±8.0 0.36±0.02ab 360.1±36.5 26.3±6.6
300 278.6±9.5 0.33±0.03b 310.4±15.7 19.7±4.1
a, b

Means not sharinga common superscript letter in the same column were significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, P<0.05). Values are given as mean±SE. The number of chickens used in each treatment group was 8.

Free amino acid profiles in the plasma of layer chickens fed diets supplemented with MF are shown in Table 7. For amino acids, which can be a precursor of body proteins, dietary MF supplementation at levels of 150 and 300 mg/kg diet significantly increased the plasma concentrations of alanine, isoleucine, leucine, and valine in layer chickens. A significant increment of aspartic acid and glutamic acid was observed only in the MF 300 mg/kg diet group. The plasma concentration of Nτ-methylhistidine increased with the increment in dietary MF levels.

Table 7. The profile of free amino acids in the plasma of layers fed a diet with various metformin concentrations.

Metformin (mg/kg)
Amino acids (µmol/L) 0 150 300
Essential amino acids
Arginine 84.0±6.9 109.7±8.7 100.4±6.8
Histidine 140.6±11.6 135.6±7.9 163.1±13.9
Isoleucine 118.5±6.9b 151.0±8.2a 159.2±10.9a
Leucine 165.8±7.9b 195.9±7.0a 194.0±7.9a
Lysine 293.7±23.2 286.0±14.1 313.1±15.7
Methionine 51.4±3.5 60.1±5.8 62.0±6.0
Phenylalanine 105.1±3.7 111.1±2.4 110.0±4.5
Threonine 340.6±21.6 314.3±5.8 336.1±10.2
Tryptophan 72.9±3.0 74.7±3.7 71.4±4.2
Valine 234.8±12.9 276.3±10.9 274.0±13.3
Nonessential amino acids
Alanine 370.4±20.3b 467.8±18.7a 440.8±17.5a
Asparagine 498.0±40.1 666.3±49.3 673.2±68.6
Aspartic acid 25.5±2.8b 27.1±4.6b 46.0±6.2a
Cystine 29.6±3.4 32.0±4.9 37.1±2.6
Glutamine 637.7±33.2 595.8±27.7 646.0±22.1
Glutamic acid 150.6±10.8b 163.6±9.7b 203.2±11.6a
Glycine 392.4±24.2 405.5±20.0 414.3±21.2
Proline 405.7±42.3 477.1±32.7 534.7±35.2
Serine 498.8±42.4 507.4±18.5 462.1±19.5
Tyrosine 120.4±6.2 125.2±4.8 133.3±8.7
α-Aminoadipic acid 5.3±1.2b 7.5±0.5ab 10.9±1.3a
α-Aminobutyric acid 7.4±2.6 6.2±0.8 8.5±2.9
Amino ethanol 7.0±0.5 7.0±0.4 8.3±0.4
Anserine 9.2±0.5b 10.2±0.7ab 12.6±1.1a
β-Alanine 13.3±1.7 12.1±1.0 12.0±1.0
Carnosine 10.4±0.6b 11.0±0.4ab 12.7±0.5a
Citrulline 6.9±0.7 11.5±2.2 11.6±2.1
Cystathionine 8.0±1.6 7.5±1.3 11.7±2.7
Hydroxylysine 2.7±0.7 3.5±0.6 3.6±0.6
Hydroxyproline 132.1±12.2b 294.7±27.3a 330.5±34.2a
Ornithine 57.8±8.1 63.5±7.7 67.5±6.2
Sarcosine 1.7±0.3 1.6±0.2 1.7±0.3
Nπ-Methylhistidine 24.5±2.6 26.1±2.7 29.0±3.6
Nτ-Methylhistidine 9.8±1.2b 15.2±1.2ab 18.0±1.7a
a, b

Means not sharinga common superscript letter in the same row were significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, P<0.05). Values are given as mean±SE. The number of chickens used in each treatment group was 8. ND; not detected.

Free amino acid profiles in the plasma of broiler chickens fed diets supplemented with MF are shown in Table 8. Except for β-alanine, dietary MF supplementation did not affect plasma amino acid concentrations.

Table 8. The profile of free amino acids in the plasma of broilers fed a diet with various metformin concentrations.

Metformin (mg/kg)
Amino acids (µmol/L) 0 150 300
Essential amino acids
Arginine 217.2±17.0 202.9±14.6 170.0±10.3
Histidine 128.2±14.6 105.4±7.6 127.1±8.5
Isoleucine 174.6±21.2 149.3±18.5 139.3±9.3
Leucine 176.9±10.9 153.9±7.5 158.1±7.4
Lysine 227.8±12.4 217.4±8.3 236.7±5.1
Methionine 62.4±5.0 61.1±4.8 58.2±5.5
Phenylalanine 124.7±8.1 118.8±4.1 126.0±5.9
Threonine 244.8±16.9 229.0±22.1 256.3±15.2
Tryptophan 129.7±13.0 132.1±16.5 117.1±9.5
Valine 247.3±27.6 214.4±30.7 209.4±10.6
Nonessential amino acids
Alanine 401.3±32.6 387.4±19.7 416.7±21.5
Asparagine 962.7±201.9 1146.0±195.8 889.9±125.3
Aspartic acid 62.0±8.1 46.1±10.5 73.7±13.3
Cystine 66.2±5.0 57.7±5.7 59.0±5.2
Glutamine 828.2±53.3 973.7±128.6 783.0±49.4
Glutamic acid 168.2±21.1 158.1±17.3 134.0±13.2
Glycine 322.3±26.6 422.4±85.7 320.8±28.6
Proline 284.2±13.8 257.5±17.3 268.8±19.7
Serine 304.0±25.1 394.2±84.4 414.3±56.7
Tyrosine 170.3±13.7 170.7±14.3 146.0±10.3
α-Aminoadipic acid 4.2±0.3 4.7±1.1 4.6±0.3
α-Aminobutyric acid 8.9±2.0 7.3±0.6 8.0±0.8
Amino ethanol 10.4±1.2 11.3±1.5 10.8±0.9
Anserine 11.2±1.9 12.0±1.7 10.9±1.2
β-Alanine 35.3±4.3a 27.4±5.4ab 18.5±3.4b
Carnosine 22.3±2.4 27.6±1.7 22.7±3.5
Citrulline 9.5±1.1 8.9±0.8 10.5±1.0
Cystathionine 34.4±10.0 32.4±6.7 25.4±3.9
Hydroxylysine 2.0±0.3 2.2±0.6 2.3±0.4
Hydroxyproline 39.7±4.3 46.0±1.8 39.2±5.5
Ornithine 101.3±12.2 82.8±8.5 103.2±6.3
Sarcosine 2.7±0.6 2.0±0.3 1.8±0.5
Nπ-Methylhistidine 13.3±1.3 13.5±1.1 15.5±0.8
Nτ-Methylhistidine 9.4±1.4 8.1±1.2 12.0±1.7
a, b

Means in the same row not sharinga common superscript letter were significantly different (Tukey's HSD test, P<0.05). Values are given as mean±SE. The number of chickens used in each treatment group was 8. ND; not detected.

Discussion

It has been reported that MF decreases feed intake in mammals and broilers (Rouru et al., 1992; Lee and Morley, 1998). Ashwell and McMurty (2003) showed that oral administration of a single dose of 300 mg MF/kg body weight reduced feed intake, and chronic intake of MF in drinking water also reduced feed intake and body weight gain in broilers. As shown in Table 3, although dietary MF did not affect both body weight gain and feed intake in layer chickens, body weight gain of broiler chickens tended to be decreased (P=0.06) by feeding on a diet including 300 mg MF/kg diet. It is considered that dietary MF might affect growth performance in broilers but not in layers at an optimal amount of dietary MF.

Avian species, including chickens, have high blood glucose levels which are approximately two to three times higher than healthy humans. This feature implies that the utilization of amino acids would be easily inhibited by glycation in avian species. In our previous study, it was revealed that approximately 10% of tryptophan in chicken plasma was glycated (Makino et al., 2015a) and that these compounds lost the capability to synthesize peptide bonds with other amino acids because of the lack of the α-amino group in the glycated amino acids (Makino et al., 2015b). In the present study, we expected the positive effect of dietary MF, which is an anti-diabetes drug, to inhibit glycation and to improve the growth performance of chickens. As shown in Table 4, the weight of breast muscle in both layers and broilers fed the diet with 150 mg/kg MF were heavier than those of the control group. Increment in tissue weight is caused by protein deposition, which can be expressed as the difference between protein synthesis and protein degradation. As shown in Table 7, the plasma concentration of Nτ-methylhistidine, which is posttranslationally modified histidine found in muscular protein and is known as an index of protein degradation (Young and Munro, 1978), was increased in layer chickens with elevated dietary MF contents. It has been reported that MF increases gene expression and protein levels of myostatin in the C2C12 myotube cell line (Das et al., 2012). Myostatin is known as an inhibitor of myogenesis. Protein degradation was promoted in the soleus of Wister rats treated with myostatin (Manfredi et al., 2017). These findings suggest that MF feeding would enhance protein degradation of skeletal muscle. The fact that the weight of breast muscle rose despite the increase in muscle protein degradation caused by dietary MF suggests that muscle protein synthesis increased more than protein degradation. As shown in Table 7, dietary MF increased the plasma concentrations of leucine and isoleucine in layer chickens. Recently, it has been reported that MF suppresses branched-chain amino acid (BCAA) catabolic enzyme expression in C2C12 myotubes (Rivera et al., 2020). Leucine and isoleucine are known as BCAAs which have a role in promoting protein synthesis (Alvestrand et al., 1990; Nair et al., 1992; Blomstrand et al., 1997). It was reported that leucine serves as a substrate to directly activate the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1) signaling pathway (Dodd and Tee, 2012). These results suggest that MF might raise muscle weight due to the increment in plasma concentrations of leucine and isoleucine, stimulating protein synthesis. On the other hand, there were no significant differences observed in the plasma concentrations of leucine and isoleucine among the groups of broiler chickens. It is unclear whether the mechanisms of breast muscle mass increment in broiler chickens are the same as in layer chickens. It does not seem that MF directly increases protein accumulation in skeletal muscle, because MF contributes to AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation in the skeletal muscle (Zhou et al., 2001), and AMPK activation leads to diminished protein synthesis and promotes protein degradation (Kjøbsted et al., 2018). The concentration of BCAAs might increase in skeletal muscle, although only plasma amino acids were measured in this study. Since MF suppressed BCAA catabolic enzyme mRNA expression in myotubes (Rivera et al., 2020), it is possible that BCAA levels increase in the skeletal muscle. Therefore, the increment of muscle protein synthesis by BCAAs could partially explain the increase in muscle weight in broilers.

As shown in Table 5, dietary MF increased MF levels in the plasma and the breast muscle of both layer and broiler chickens. This result reveals that dietary MF is successfully absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and elevates plasma and muscular concentrations of MF in chickens. Interestingly, plasma concentrations of MF in broilers were dozens of times higher than those in layers. As the feed intake of broilers was higher than that of layers (Table 3), the difference in MF intake caused by the different feed intake would be partially involved in the difference in plasma MF concentration between broilers and layers. Another possible explanation is that the rate of MF elimination might be different between layer and broiler chickens. MF in blood circulation is transferred to tissues via organic cation transporters (OCTs), and further excreted from the kidney into the urine via multidrug and toxin extrusion protein (MATE) (Gong et al., 2012). If the broiler chickens excrete less MF in the urine because the levels of OCT and/or MATE in the broilers are lower than in the layer chickens, that might be the reason for the high MF levels in the plasma of broilers. However, the explanations for the difference in plasma MF levels between layer and broiler chickens are limited due to the lack of knowledge about MF metabolism in birds.

Despite dietary MF being absorbed by the chickens, the plasma glucose level was not changed in both layer and broiler chickens (Table 6). MF has great properties for improving insulin sensitivity and reducing blood glucose levels. A possible explanation for these conflicting results is that homeostasis is maintained, because a blood glucose level of around 300 mg/100 mL is the normal condition for chickens. For instance, oral administration of MF to chickens has a temporary hypoglycemic effect, but their blood glucose levels then return to pre-dose levels (Ashwell and McMurty, 2003). It was reported that oral administration of MF to healthy SD rats had no effect on blood glucose levels (Zhou et al., 2001).

MF inhibits the production of AGEs by reacting with α-dicarbonyl compounds, forming triazepinone-derivatives (Ruggiero-Lopez et al., 1999). In the present study, CML was measured as an index of AGE production. While the plasma concentration of CML in layer chickens was reduced by elevating dietary MF contents (Table 6), the plasma CML concentration in broiler chickens was not affected by dietary MF. In addition, the plasma levels of CML in broilers were approximately one hundred times higher than those in layers. This result indicates that the metabolism of CML might be different in layer and broiler chickens. However, studies of AGE metabolism in chickens have not been conducted, thus this issue needs to be investigated in the future. Although AGE formation decreased with increased dietary MF, suggesting that MF might be involved in suppression of glycation, it has not been clarified whether or not dietary MF would successfully inhibit the formation of glycated amino acids. This issue should be investigated in the future. Even if inhibiting glycation does prove to promote meat production in chickens, it is not practical to use MF as a feed additive. In the future, we will need to search for other feed materials that have anti-glycation properties. Some compounds known to have anti-glycation activity include pyridoxamine (Onorato et al., 2000), thiamine (Babaei-Jadidi et al., 2003), citric acid (Nagai et al., 2010), and quercetin (Li et al., 2014). Various plants have been also shown to have anti-glycation properties (Sadowska-Bartosz and Bartosz, 2015; Asgharpour et al., 2019), and some natural products could likely be added to the diet. For example, thiamin hydrochloride is a vitamin approved for use as a feed additive. Pyridoxine hydrochloride, a precursor to pyridoxamine, is also allowed. Adding these additives and plants with antiglycation properties to the feed might provide MF-like effects.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) Grant Number JP 17K15360.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Alvestrand A, Hagenfeldt L, Merli K, Oureshi A and Eriksson LS. Influence of leucine infusion on intracellular amino acids in humans. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 20: 293-298. 1990. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Asgharpour DF, Ranjkesh Z and Goodarzi MT. A systematic review of antiglycation medicinal plants. Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome, 13: 1225-1229. 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ashwell CM and McMurtry JP. Hypoglycemia and reduced feed intake in broiler chickens treated with metformin. Poultry Science, 82: 106-110. 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Babaei-Jadidi R, Karachalias N, Ahmed N, Battah S and Thornalley PJ. Prevention of incipient diabetic nephropathy by high-dose thiamine and benfotiamine. Diabetes, 52: 2110-2120. 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Beisswenger P and Ruggiero-Lopez D. Metformin inhibition of glycation processes. Diabetes and Metabolism, 29: 6S95-6S103. 2003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Brownlee M. The pathobiology of diabetic complications: a unifying mechanism. Diabetes, 54: 1615-1625. 2005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Blomstrand E, Hassme'n P, Ek S, Ekblom B and Newsholme EA. Influence of ingesting a solution of branched-chain amino acids on perceived exertion during exercise. Acta Physiologica Scandinavica, 159: 41-49. 1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Chakraborty A, Chowdhury S and Bhattacharyya M. Effect of metformin on oxidative stress, nitrosative stress and inflammatory biomarkers in type 2 diabetes patients. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 93: 56-62. 2011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Das AK, Yang Q-Y, Fu X, Liang J-F, Duarte MS, Zhu M-J, Trobridge GD and Du M. AMP-activated protein kinase stimulates myostatin expression in C2C12 cells., Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 427: 36-40. 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dodd KM and Tee AR. Leucine and mTORC1: a complex relationship. American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 302: E1329-E1342. 2012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Foretz M, Guigas B, Bertrand L, Pollak M and Viollet B. Metformin: from mechanisms of action to therapies. Cell Metabolism, 20: 953-966. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Gong L, Goswami S, Giacomini KM, Altman RB and Klein TE. Metformin pathways: pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Pharmacogenetics and Genomics, 22: 820-827. 2012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Hazelwood RL and Lorenz FW. Effects of fasting and insulin on carbohydrate metabolism of the domestic fowl. American Journal of Physiology, 197: 47-51. 1959. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kjøbsted R, Hingst JR, Fentz J, Foretz M, Sanz MN, Pehmøller C, Shum M, Marette A, Mounier R, Treebak JT, Wojtaszewski JFP, Viollet B and Lantier L. AMPK in skeletal muscle function and metabolism., FASEB Journal, 32: 1741-1777. 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Koschinsky T, He CJ, Mitsuhashi T, Bucala R, Liu C, Buenting C, Heitmann K and Vlassara H. Orally absorbed reactive glycation products (glycotoxins): an environmental risk factor in diabetic nephropathy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 94: 6474-6479. 1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Lee A and Morley JE. Metformin decreases food consumption and induces weight loss in subjects with obesity with type II non-insulin-dependent diabetes. Obesity Research, 6: 47-53. 1998. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Li X, Zheng T, Sang S and Lv L. Quercetin inhibits advanced glycation end product formation by trapping methylglyoxal and glyoxal. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 62: 12152-12158. 2014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Makino R, Kawashima Y, Kajita Y, Namauo T, Ogawa S, Muraoka H, Fujimura S and Kita K. Glycated tryptophan in the plasma of chickens fed tryptophan-excess diets. Journal of Poultry Science, 52: 23-27. 2015a. [Google Scholar]
  19. Makino R, Sugahara M and Kita K. Nutritional evaluation of glycated valine and tryptophan as a precursor for protein synthesis in chicken embryo myoblasts. Journal of Poultry Science, 52: 253-259. 2015b. [Google Scholar]
  20. Makita Z, Bucala R, Rayfield EJ, Friedman EA, Kaufman AM, Korbet SM, Barth RH, Winston JA, Fuh H, Manogue KR, Cerami A and Viassara H. Reactive glycosylation endproducts in diabetic uraemia and treatment of renal failure. Lancet, 343: 1519-1522. 1994. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Manfredi LH, Paula-Gomes S, Zanon NM and Kettelhut IC. Myostatin promotes distinct responses on protein metabolism of skeletal and cardiac muscle fibers of rodents., Brazilian Journal of Medical and Biological Research, 50: e6733. 2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Nagai R, Nagai M, Shimasaki S, Baynes JW and Fujiwara Y. Citric acid inhibits development of cataracts, proteinuria and ketosis in streptozotocin (type 1) diabetic rats. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 393: 118-122. 2010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Nair KS, Schwartz RG and Welle S. Leucine as a regulator of whole body and skeletal muscle protein metabolism in humans. American Journal of Physiology: Endocrinology and Metabolism, 263: E928-E934. 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Onorato JM, Jenkins AJ, Thorpe SR and Baynes JW. Pyridoxamine, an inhibitor of advanced glycation reactions, also inhibits advanced lipoxidation reactions. Mechanism of action of pyridoxamine. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 275: 21177-21184. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Rahbar S, Natarajan R, Yerneni K, Scott S, Gonzales N and Nadler JL. Evidence that pioglitazone, metformin and pentoxifylline are inhibitors of glycation. Clinica Chimica Acta, 301: 65-77. 2000. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Rena G, Pearson ER and Sakamoto K. Molecular mechanism of action of metformin: old or new insights? Diabetologia, 56: 1898-1906. 2013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Rivera ME, Lyon ES and Vaughan RA. Effect of metformin on myotube BCAA catabolism., Journal of Cellular Biochemistry, 121: 816-827. 2020 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Rouru J, Huupponen R, Pesonen U and Koulu M. Subchronic treatment with metformin produces anorectic effect and reduces hyperinsulinemia in genetically obese Zucker rats. Life Sciences, 50: 1813-1820. 1992. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Ruggiero-Lopez D, Lecomte M, Moinet G, Patereau G, Lagarde M and Wiernsperger N. Reaction of metformin with dicarbonyl compounds. Possible implication in the inhibition of advanced glycation end product formation. Biochemical Pharmacology, 58: 1765-1773. 1999. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Sadowska-Bartosz I and Bartosz G. Prevention of protein glycation by natural compounds. Molecules, 20: 3309-3334. 2015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Tachibana T, Sato M, Oikawa D and Furuse M. Involvement of CRF on the anorexic effect of GLP-1 in layer chicks. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 143: 112-117. 2006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Effect of intensive blood-glucose control with metformin on complications in overweight patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 34). Lancet, 352: 854-865. 1998. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Young VR and Munro HN. Ntau-methylhistidine (3-methylhistidine) and muscle protein turnover: an overview. Federation Proceedings, 37, 2291-2300. 1978. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Zhou G, Myers R, Li Y, Chen Y, Shen X, Fenyk-Melody J, Wu M, Ventre J, Doebber T, Fujii N, Musi N, Hirshman MF, Goodyear LJ and Moller DE. Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in mechanism of metformin action., Journal of Clinical Investigation, 108: 1167-1174. 2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from The Journal of Poultry Science are provided here courtesy of Japan Poultry Science Association

RESOURCES