Skip to main content
Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine logoLink to Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
. 2021 May 1;25(12):5572–5585. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.16569

RNA‐seq analysis of ageing human retinal pigment epithelium: Unexpected up‐regulation of visual cycle gene transcription

Joe M Butler 1,3, Wasu Supharattanasitthi 1,4, Yit C Yang 2, Luminita Paraoan 1,
PMCID: PMC8184696  PMID: 33934486

Abstract

Ageing presents adverse effects on the retina and is the primary risk factor for age‐related macular degeneration (AMD). We report the first RNA‐seq analysis of age‐related transcriptional changes in the human retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), the primary site of AMD pathogenesis. Whole transcriptome sequencing of RPE from human donors ranging in age from 31 to 93 reveals that ageing is associated with increasing transcription of main RPE‐associated visual cycle genes (including LRAT, RPE65, RDH5, RDH10, RDH11; pathway enrichment BH‐adjusted P = 4.6 × 10−6). This positive correlation is replicated in an independent set of 28 donors and a microarray dataset of 50 donors previously published. LRAT expression is positively regulated by retinoid by‐products of the visual cycle (A2E and all‐trans‐retinal) involving modulation by retinoic acid receptor alpha transcription factor. The results substantiate a novel age‐related positive feedback mechanism between accumulation of retinoid by‐products in the RPE and the up‐regulation of visual cycle genes.

Keywords: A2E, ageing, macular degeneration, retinal pigment epithelium, retinol metabolism, RNA‐seq, visual cycle

1. INTRODUCTION

Age is a key risk factor for a number of retinal diseases including age‐related macular degeneration (AMD), the leading cause of blindness in higher income countries with ageing populations. One of the critical tissues involved in the pathogenesis of AMD is the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE), a monolayer of pigmented cells located between the vasculature of the choriocapillaris and the neurosensory retina. This unique environment presents the RPE with a number of important functions to support and maintain the visual processing of the retina, including transepithelial transport, absorption of light that has passed through the neurosensory retina, phagocytosis of photoreceptor outer segments and a fundamental role in maintaining the retinoid cycle or visual cycle. 1 Age‐related changes in the RPE observed through microscopy include the accumulation of more numerous lysosomes, more remnants of phagosomes and morphological changes to mitochondria. However, the most characteristic physical sign of retinal ageing is the accumulation of lipoprotein‐rich sub‐RPE deposits also known as lipofuscin. 2 , 3

Lipofuscin accumulation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of atrophic degeneration of the retina, such as dry age‐related macular degeneration (AMD) and Stargardt disease. 4 , 5 Key mechanistic insights into the accumulation of lipofuscin were gleaned from observations that its accumulation is dependent on dietary vitamin A 6 and on a functioning visual cycle. 7 This latter study showed that in mice with an impaired visual cycle, lacking both copies of the RPE65 gene, accumulation of lipofuscin in the RPE was abolished. Since then further evidence linking the visual cycle with lipofuscin accumulation and retinal degeneration has been mounting. Impaired clearance of all‐trans‐retinal (atRAL), a product of the photoisomerization stage of the visual cycle, has been shown to lead to lipofuscin deposits and retinal degeneration in mice. 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 If atRAL is not reduced back to retinol, it can inadvertently react to form condensation products such as di‐retinoid‐pyridinium‐ethanolamine (A2E) and all‐trans‐retinal dimer. A2E is the product of a condensation reaction between two molecules of atRAL and one molecule of the common phospholipid, phospatidylethanolamine (PE). 12 The discovery that A2E is a constituent of lipofuscin 13 provided further evidence linking the visual cycle with lipofuscin accumulation. The accumulation of A2E is detrimental to RPE cells, due to its amphiphilic structure and its photo‐reactivity with blue light. 14 Photo degradation of A2E generates dicarbonyls (glyoxal and methylglyoxal), which are known to modify proteins by forming advanced glycation end products (AGEs). 15 In turn, AGEs are well documented to be linked with ageing and a number of age‐related pathologies including AMD. 16

Quantitative analyses of gene expression changes are essential in furthering our understanding of the mechanisms underlying ageing and age‐related diseases. With respect to the retina, microarray studies have been applied to characterize human RPE transcriptome 17 , 18 , 19 and more recently both bulk RNA‐seq and single‐cell RNA‐seq have been used to study the neuroretina and RPE, 20 , 21 with the latter studies having a particular emphasis on AMD. The current study, to our knowledge, is the first to use RNA‐seq analysis to exclusively investigate the molecular changes underlying the ageing process in the human RPE.

2. MATERIALS AND METHODS

2.1. Human donor eyes

RPE tissue was dissected from 41 human eyes donated for corneal transplantation and/or medical research through the Manchester Eye Bank, Manchester Royal Eye Hospital, UK, with consent by donors’ next of kin and in accordance with the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki. Tissue collection and use were carried out under National Research Ethics Service approval obtained through Liverpool Research Ethics Committee and performed in accordance with HTA code of practice regarding utilization of human tissue. Samples from 13 donors ranging in age from 31 to 93 years were used for transcriptome profiling by RNA‐seq and a further 28 samples from donors ranging in age from 45 to 88 years were used for validation by qPCR. Donors with recorded retinal pathology or with over 48 hours between death and RNA isolation were excluded.

2.2. Microdissection of RPE/choroid, RPE isolation and RNA extraction

Following enucleation of the globes and removal of the anterior segment as part of the Corneal Transplant Service, the vitreous was removed and the posterior segment was rinsed in phosphate‐buffered saline. The neural retina was peeled away with jeweller's forceps, and the RPE/choroid complex was teased from the sclera with the aid of a binocular dissecting microscope. The RPE‐choroid was then subjected to a modified version of the Simultaneous RPE Isolation and RNA Stabilization (SRIRS) protocol 22 with appropriate scaling up for human eyes involving placing the dissected RPE‐choroid from one eye in 2 mL RNAprotect Cell Reagent (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK). The solution was agitated for 15 minutes at room temperature allowing the RPE cells to dissociate from the choroid. RNA was extracted using RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK). Purity, concentration and quality of RNA preparations were determined using a Nanodrop ND‐100 spectrophotometer (Labtech, Uckfield, East Sussex, UK) and a Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent Technologies, Palo Alto, CA, USA), as well as by non‐denaturing electrophoresis. All samples submitted for RNA‐seq had A260/A280 ratios of the total RNA >2, the ratio of 28S/18S ribosomal RNA bands >1.8 and a RIN value >4. RPE purity was determined using the downstream RNA‐seq analysis; if photoreceptor genes RHO, SAG, GNAT1, GNB1, GNGT1, PDE6A, PDE6B, PDE6G, ROM1, PRPH2, RCVRN, CNGA1, CNGB1 and GUCA1A 23 cumulatively contributed to more than 1% of the total transcriptome then the sample was excluded.

2.3. RNA‐seq analysis: cDNA library preparation and sequencing

Total RNA was processed by the Centre for Genomic Research, University of Liverpool, for library preparation and sequencing using the Illumina HiSeq 2000 platform. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) was depleted from total RNA using the Ribo‐Zero rRNA Removal kit (Epicentre, Madison, WI, USA). cDNA libraries were prepared with the ScriptSeq v2 RNA‐Seq library preparation kit (Epicentre) by using 50 ng rRNA‐depleted RNA as starting material. One lane of the Illumina HiSeq 2000 was used to sequence eight samples using paired‐end sequencing (2 × 100 bp). The raw sequence data and processed counts data were deposited in the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE159435.

2.4. Mapping and gene level analysis

The raw fastq files were trimmed for the presence of Illumina adapter sequences using Cutadapt version 1.2.1. 24 This trimmed the 3' end of any reads which match the adapter sequence for 3bp or more. The reads were further trimmed using Sickle version 1.200 (window quality score > 20). Reads shorter than 10bp after trimming were removed. Quality control checks and measures were performed using FastQC. 25 Mapping of the paired reads to the human reference genome (hg19) was performed using TopHat2 version 1.3.0 KIM201, using default settings. Read counts were measured with HTSeq, 26 using the genome annotation by Ensembl (GRCh37.72) (n = 62,893).

Gene level analysis was carried out using DESeq2, 27 which automatically filters out weakly expressed genes (to improve performance by reducing multiple testing). There remained 20,154 genes after filtering. As we were interested in the effect of age on gene expression, DESeq2 was implemented to perform a linear regression between age and the read count of each gene. Age was the variable of interest; however, we also included the additional covariates of gender and sequencing batch (1 or 2), making this a multi‐factor design. As our independent variable (age) is continuous rather than dichotomous, we find it more appropriate to define a significantly correlated gene (SCG) rather than the conventional differentially expressed gene. An SCG is any gene with an expression level significantly correlated (positively or negatively) with age. Specifically, we define an SCG as any gene with an expression level correlated with age such that its Benjamini‐Hochberg (BH) adjusted P‐value < .05 and its |βage| > 0.025. Applying the standard adjusted P‐value cut‐off of .05 filters out 98% of all genes, then the βage cut‐off of 0.025 (which excludes genes with a small gradient) filters out less than 1% of the total number of genes.

2.5. Validation of gene expression data by real‐time quantitative PCR (qPCR)

To remove any remaining genomic DNA after RNA extraction, the independent set of 28 human donor samples were treated with DNA‐free DNA Removal Kit (Invitrogen, UK). Complementary DNA was then synthesised with First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Life Technologies/Thermo Fisher Scientific, UK), following the manufacturer's standard protocols. qPCR was performed with technical triplicates using a modified protocol described previously 28 with MESA BLUE qPCR Mastermix Plus Kit for SYBR assay (Low ROX; Eurogentec, Southampton, UK) and a Stratagene MX3005P® qPCR System (Stratagene, La Jolla, CA, USA). The primer sets (Table S1) were custom synthesized (Eurogentec, Southampton, UK). The melt curve analysis and agarose gel electrophoresis were used to confirm the specificity of amplification reactions. The comparative expression value of the gene of interest was calculated using the efficiency‐corrected ddCt method, with normalization against three house‐keeping genes (GAPDH, RPL5 and ACTB) for the in situ data and four house‐keeping genes (GAPDH, RPL5, ACTB and TUBB) for the hfRPE in vitro studies. All house‐keeping genes were selected and combined into a single standard using BestKeeper version1. 29

2.6. Gene set and pathway enrichment analyses

To test whether a KEGG pathway was enriched with SCGs we used the hypergeometric test, applying Benjamini‐Hochberg adjustment to cater for multiple testing. SCGs were rendered onto the relevant KEGG pathway map using the Pathview package in R/Bioconductor. 30 Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) 31 was applied to a single pathway of the Reactome database. 32

2.7. Validation using publicly available microarray gene expression data

Gene Expression Omnibus dataset (GSE29801) 33 was downloaded, and only patients with no ocular disease were selected. To combine both macular and periphery data, we implemented a mixed model for each gene where retinal position and age are the fixed effect predictors and the patient ID is the random effect predictor.

2.8. In vitro measurement of effect of A2E, atRAL and Am580 on LRAT expression

Human foetal RPE (hfRPE) cells were grown to confluence in hfRPE media (15% FBS) and then maintained in 5% FBS as previously described. 34 Stock solutions (10 mmol/L) of Am580 (Sigma‐Aldrich, Merck Life Science UK Limited, Gillingham, UK), all‐trans‐retinal (Sigma‐Aldrich) and A2E (gift from T. Michael Redmond, synthesised as previously described 35 ) were prepared in DMSO vehicle. A2E and Am580 were diluted to a final concentration of 25 μmol/L, and all‐trans‐retinal to 5 μmol/L, in hfRPE media containing 5% FBS. Cells were treated with a single dose of A2E, Am580, all‐trans‐retinal or vehicle control. All conditions were performed in triplicate wells. After the assigned time, RNA was extracted using RNAprotect Cell Reagent (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK) followed by standard RNeasy Plus Mini Kit (Qiagen, West Sussex, UK). All manipulations involving A2E, all‐trans‐retinal, Am580 and vehicle were conducted under dim (20‐40 lux) red (638 nm) safelight.

3. RESULTS

3.1. Overview of RNA sequencing data

The set of RPE expressed genes on which all following analyses were carried out comprised of 20,154 genes obtained through RNA‐seq analysis of human donor RPE cells, followed by filtering out weakly expressed genes by DESeq2. Out of this set, we defined a significantly correlated gene (SCG) to be one in which its expression level is correlated with age such that its Benjamini‐Hochberg (BH) adjusted P‐value < .05 and |βage| > 0.025, where βage represents the estimated change in gene expression per year of life. Using this definition, we determined a total of 822 SCGs (Table S2). Of these, the majority (n = 659) were protein coding. The non‐coding SCGs included 93 long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs), 35 pseudogenes and six small nuclear and small nucleolar RNAs (snRNAs and snoRNAs). The fact that the expression of 93 lncRNAs is significantly correlated with age corresponds with mounting evidence showing the importance of these RNAs in ageing. 36 Of the total 822 SCGs, 447 were up‐regulated with increasing age (positively correlated) and 345 were down‐regulated with increasing age (negatively correlated) (Figure 1A). These results demonstrate that the transcriptome of the human RPE exhibits significant age‐related transcriptional changes.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

RNA‐seq of RPE reveals visual cycle genes are transcriptionally up‐regulated with increasing human age. A, Volcano plot showing up‐regulated SCGs in green and down‐regulated in magenta. Genes in the retinol metabolism KEGG pathway are labelled. B, Pathway enrichment analysis of 341 KEGG pathways identifies retinol metabolism (map00830) to be the most significantly enriched with positively correlated SCGs. Pathways with a BH‐adjusted P < .05 are highlighted in green. Fraction represents the number of SCGs in the pathway over the total number of genes in the pathway. C, KEGG pathway map of retinol metabolism (map00830), with positive SCGs highlighted in green. D, Scatter plots of the expression of 7 retinol metabolism genes from human donors (n = 13) ranging in age from 31 to 93 years. Regression line (black) with 95% confidence interval (grey shading). E, qPCR validation of the positive correlation between age and transcription level of the core visual cycle genes (LRAT, RPE65 and RDH5). Validation carried out in a separate set of 28 human donors aged 45 to 87 years. Regression line (black) with 95% confidence interval (grey shading); regression was weighted by the RNA integrity score of each sample shown by size of circle

3.2. KEGG pathway enrichment analysis reveals multiple age‐related pathways and identifies retinol metabolism to be the most significantly up‐regulated pathway

We next performed pathway enrichment analysis using the 341 human KEGG pathways, separately for positive SCGS and negative SCGs. For the positive SCGs, we found that the most significantly enriched pathway is the retinol metabolism (hsa00830) pathway, in which seven out of the 24 pathway genes are positive SCGs (BH‐adjusted P = 2.58 × 10−5) (Figure 1B,C). The seven SCGs in this pathway are lecithin retinol acyltransferase (LRAT), retinoid isomerase (RPE65), three retinol dehydrogenases (RDH5, RDH10 and RDH11), beta‐carotene oxygenase 1 (BCO1) and a retinaldehyde dehydrogenase 3 (ALDH1A3) (Table 1). For each of these seven genes, the positive correlation between its expression and age of the 13 donors is shown in Figure 1D. The significant positive correlation with age of the expression of all these genes indicated that the retinoid cycle in the RPE is transcriptionally up‐regulated with increasing human age. We further investigated the expression of three of these genes (LRAT, RPE65 and RDH5) by qPCR in an independent set of 28 human donors ranging in age from 41 to 90 years. For all three genes, a significant positive correlation between donor age and RPE transcription level was determined (Figure 1E).

TABLE 1.

KEGG pathways most significantly enriched with up‐regulated SCGs

Pathway KEGG ID P BH.adj.P Genes in pathway SCGs in pathway Gene symbols of SCGs in pathway
Retinol metabolism hsa00830 1.62 × 10−7 4.6 × 10−6 24 7 ALDH1A3, BCO1, LRAT, RDH10, RDH11, RDH5, RPE65
Cytokine‐cytokine receptor interaction hsa04060 .000298 .00783 113 10 ACVR1C, BMP4, BMP6, BMP7, BMP8B, CXCR2, GDF11, IL16, IL17RB, TNFRSF10C
Ether lipid metabolism hsa00565 .00078 .0166 27 4 ENPP2, PLA2G5, PLA2G7, SELENOI
Gastric acid secretion hsa04971 .00303 .0517 52 5 CAMK2B, HRH2, PRKCB, SLC26A7, SLC4A2
Glycerophospholipid metabolism hsa00564 .00346 .0561 71 6 GPAM, GPD1, PCYT1B, PLA1A, PLA2G5, SELENOI
Cysteine and methionine metabolism hsa00270 .00424 .0628 39 4 BCAT1, CDO1, CTH, GOT2
Bile secretion hsa04976 .00527 .0691 41 4 SLC22A8, SLC4A2, SLC4A5, SLCO1A2
Mineral absorption hsa04978 .00527 .0691 41 4 ATP2B2, CLCN2, TRPM6, TRPM7

The second most significantly up‐regulated pathway is cytokine‐cytokine receptor interaction (hsa04060; BH‐adjusted P = .0018) (Table 1). The genes up‐regulated in this pathway include bone morphogenetic proteins (BMP4, BMP6, BMP7, BMP8B) that are part of the transforming growth factor‐beta superfamily, interleukins and chemokine receptors (IL16, IL17RB and CXCR2). This finding is consistent with the increasing body of evidence of increased inflammation in the ageing RPE, 37 and increased expression of the chemokine signalling in AMD. 38 The third most significantly up‐regulated pathway is ether lipid metabolism (hsa00565). One of the most important classes of ether lipids is plasmalogens, and their function in the RPE may be involved in protection against oxidative stress; plasmalogen deficiency is associated with early onset retinal abnormalities and/or retinopathy. 39

Many pathways were found to be significantly down‐regulated with age (Figure S1A; Table 2), the most significant one being protein digestion and absorption (Figure S1); this pathway is annotated in relation to nutritional homeostasis and as such this finding may reflect some similarities between the RPE and the intestinal epithelial cells such as phagolysosome function. Interestingly, five of the eight significantly down‐regulated genes in this pathway are collagens (Table 2) and two in particular have been found to have relevance for ocular ageing. Collagen type IV alpha 6 (COL4A6) is a major structural component of basement membranes and is found in most ocular basement membranes. 40 Collagen type II alpha 1 (COL2A1) is a fibrillar collagen found in the vitreous humour and mutations in this gene are associated with Stickler syndrome in which patients suffer from ocular pathologies such as vitreous degeneration, high myopia, retinal detachment and cataracts.

TABLE 2.

KEGG pathways most significantly enriched with down‐regulated SCGs

Pathway KEGG ID P BH.adj.P Genes in pathway SCGs in pathway Gene symbols of SCGs in pathway
Protein digestion and absorption hsa04974 5.33 × 10−7 1.51 × 10−5 61 8 ATP1A2, COL25A1, COL2A1, COL4A6, COL6A3, COL9A3, SLC8A1, SLC8A3
Cell adhesion molecules hsa04514 6.77 × 10−7 1.78x × 10−5 101 10 CADM1, CD274, CDH2, CNTNAP2, LRRC4C, NCAM1, NLGN1, NLGN4X, NRXN1, NRXN3
Neuroactive ligand‐receptor interaction hsa04080 1.46 × 10−6 3.56 × 10−5 109 10 CHRM4, DRD1, GABBR2, GRIA3, GRIA4, GRID2, GRIK1, GRM1, HTR2A, OXTR
Calcium signalling pathway hsa04020 4.95 × 10−6 .000113 148 11 CAMK4, DRD1, GRM1, HTR2A, MYLK4, NTRK3, OXTR, PDE1A, SLC8A1, SLC8A3, TRDN
Glutamatergic synapse hsa04724 7.43 × 10−6 .000158 83 8 ADCY5, DLGAP1, GRIA3, GRIA4, GRIK1, GRM1, KCNJ3, SLC38A1
Morphine addiction hsa05032 1.05 × 10−5 .000208 66 7 ADCY5, DRD1, GABBR2, KCNJ3, PDE11A, PDE1A, PDE4D
Amphetamine addiction hsa05031 1.10 × 10−5 .000208 48 6 ADCY5, CAMK4, DRD1, GRIA3, GRIA4, PPP1R1B
cAMP signalling pathway hsa04024 1.67 × 10−5 .000299 140 10 ADCY5, ATP1A2, CAMK4, DRD1, GABBR2, GRIA3, GRIA4, OXTR, PDE4D, PPP1R1B
Gap junction hsa04540 2.72 × 10−5 .000464 75 7 ADCY5, DRD1, GRM1, GUCY1A2, HTR2A, PRKG1, TUBB2B

The next most significantly down‐regulated pathway is cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) (hsa04514). This includes genes such as cadherins (CDH2), neurexins (CNTNAP2, NRXN1, NRXN2 and NRXN3) and other cell adhesion molecules (CADM1, L1CAM and NCAM1) (Table 2). Adhesion between RPE cells and the underlying Bruch's membrane is essential for RPE barrier and retinal support functions, and defects in adhesion are suspected to play a role in choroidal neovascularization (CNV) initiation and progression. 41 Previous research in our laboratory found that advanced glycation end products (AGEs), which are known to accumulate on the Bruch's membrane with increasing age, 16 reduce the transepithelial resistance of the RPE. 42 Thus, taken together, we propose that with increasing age, the accumulated AGEs on the Bruch's membrane lead to decreased expression of CAMs by the RPE, which results in reduced transepithelial resistance. We also note that these molecules may be involved in maintaining attachment of the RPE to the neurosensory retina, and that they are down‐regulated with age may explain the increased risk of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the elderly. 43 It is also intriguing that cell adhesion molecules were found to be remarkably enriched in common protein networks shared between age‐related diseases and longevity‐associated processes. 44 The fact that these adhesion molecules have been linked to longevity invites future research to explore whether restoring levels of these molecules may ameliorate the effects of ageing in the retina and elsewhere in the body.

Finally, we perform a KEGG pathway enrichment analysis of the full set of 822 SCGs (ie both positively and negatively correlated genes). The most significantly enriched pathway in this analysis is the Calcium signalling pathway (hsa04020), which is also one of the pathways previously observed when only considering the down‐regulated genes (Figure S1A). Calcium is needed for a number of regulatory processes in RPE cells such as photoreceptor outer segment phagocytosis, transcellular fluid and ion transport, cell differentiation and the control of gene expression. 45 Our finding suggests that calcium signalling in the RPE may become dysregulated with increasing age.

3.3. Reactome pathway analysis confirms the visual cycle gene transcription up‐regulation with age and identifies further significantly associated genes

From herein, we focus the analysis on the retinol metabolism (hsa00830) KEGG pathway due to both its novel link with ageing and its highest level of significance. Having identified this pathway to be the most significantly up‐regulated KEGG pathway, we sought to test this finding using the same data in a different pathway database, namely the Reactome database. We identified the pathway most closely resembling the KEGG retinol metabolism to be the pathway named The canonical retinoid cycle in rods (twilight vision) [R‐HSA‐2453902] (despite the mention of rods in its name, the description of the pathway states that this also takes place in the RPE). Here, we applied the Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) approach and confirmed that this pathway is indeed significantly enriched (P = .00258) with a positive Normalized Enrichment Score (NES), confirming this pathway is up‐regulated with age (Figure 2A). This analysis also revealed three further positive SCGs related to the retinoid cycle; these are retinol‐binding protein (RBP1), retinaldehyde‐binding protein 1 (RLBP1; also known as CRALBP) and transthyretin (TTR). For all three of these genes, the positive correlation between expression and age is highly significant, with a BH‐adjusted P < .01 (Figure 2B‐D). Two more genes related to the retinoid cycle known to be expressed in the RPE, namely RPE‐retinal G protein‐coupled receptor (RGR) and transcription factor SOX9 (Masuda et al 2014) were also found significantly positively correlated with age (Figure 2B,C). In total, the combined analysis found 12 visual cycle‐associated genes transcriptionally up‐regulated with increasing age.

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Reactome pathway analysis identifies a further set of visual cycle‐related genes that have increased expression with increasing age. A, GSEA enrichment plot for the canonical retinoid cycle pathway (R‐HSA‐2453902) from the Reactome database. B, Volcano plot showing expression levels of additional visual cycle genes identified from the Reactome pathway (RLBP1, RBP1 and TTR), as well as two other visual cycle genes previously documented (SOX9 and RGR). C, Scatter plots of the expression levels of five additional retinol metabolism genes, from human donors (n = 13) ranging in age from 31 to 93 years. Regression line (black) with 95% confidence interval (grey shading). D, Visual cycle diagram adapted from Reactome pathway browser. 74 Significantly positively correlated genes, and complexes which include a SCG, are highlighted in green. Non‐significant genes are in grey and other compounds which are not proteins are shown in white

Upon observing the SOX9 transcription factor is itself transcriptionally up‐regulated with age, we sought to investigate if its target genes were enriched within the 822 age‐related SCGs. Using a transcription factor (TF) enrichment analysis tool called ChIP‐X Enrichment Analysis 3 (ChEA3), 46 we found the SOX9 target gene set was ranked 93rd out of all 1632 TFs (ie in the top 6%) using the mean rank across all ChEA3 libraries. When using only the GTEx coexpression library the SOX9 gene set was ranked 3rd (top 0.2%), and this was highly significant (FDR = 2 × 10−11). We also noticed that the target genes of the Retinoic Acid Receptor Related Orphan Receptor B (RORB) transcription factor were also highly enriched within our SCGs; RORB was ranked 9th when using the mean rank of all libraries and 82nd in the GTEx coexpression library, which was also highly significant (FDR = 4.65 × 10−5).

3.4. Validation of age‐related increase in visual cycle gene transcription using previously published microarray expression data

Next, we sought to validate our results using publicly available expression data from an independent set of donors. For this purpose, we performed a search of all publicly available RPE transcriptome data and selected the study with the largest range of age of donors with no ocular disease (used as controls in the respective study). 33 This dataset contains microarray transcriptome data of the RPE from 50 normal human donors from the USA ranging in age from 10 to 93. All 50 donors have a sample from the macula, and 46 have also a sample from the periphery. All the 12 previously identified visual cycle‐related SCGs were found to be positively correlated with age (β > 0) in this independent cohort, and 10 of them were significant (P < .05) when combining both macular and periphery data (Figure 3A). All the core visual cycle‐related genes (RPE65, LRAT and the three RDHs) were validated in this independent cohort; the two genes BCMO1 and ALDH1A3 that did not validate are more peripheral in the visual cycle biochemistry. We also assessed macular and periphery data separately and observed all 12 visual cycle‐related genes are up‐regulated with age in the macula alone, and likewise in the periphery alone (Figure 3B). Additionally, when comparing the effect of age in the macula versus the periphery, we detected positive correlation between the respective transcriptional profiles of the visual cycle‐related genes (Figure 3C). These results, as well as validating our primary finding, which was discovered from pooling RPE cells from the entire posterior retina, show that increasing age leads to increased visual cycle gene expression in both the macular and the periphery of the retina.

FIGURE 3.

FIGURE 3

Microarray data from an independent cohort GEO29801 33 confirm that visual cycle genes exhibit increased expression with increasing age in both macular and periphery of the RPE. A, Scatter plots of the 12 previously identified visual cycle genes from donors with no ocular disease and with an age ranging from 9 to 93 years. Showing data from both the macular (in blue; n = 50) and the periphery (in orange; n = 46). To calculate the overall P‐value (H0age = 0) combining both macular and periphery data, we implemented a mixed model for each gene. B, Volcano plots for macular and periphery RPE gene expression with respect to age. P values are adjusted for all genes in the genome using the Benjamini‐Hochberg procedure. C, Showing the relationship of the gradient (βage) in the macular versus periphery for the whole RPE transcriptome. Visual cycle genes highlighted in black are all in the upper‐right quadrant, indicative of similar age‐related effect on their transcription in both regions. All data for this figure are selected from the Gene Expression Omnibus dataset GEO29801 33

3.5. LRAT transcription is positively regulated by A2E and atRAL treatment in hfRPE cells

The unexpected result of enhanced RPE expression of visual cycle‐related genes with ageing prompted the investigation of the effect of visual cycle by‐products, known to accumulate in the RPE with progressing age, on the transcription of these genes. We observed that LRAT mRNA expression showed a significant increase after 8 hours of A2E treatment (Figure 4A). An even greater increase in LRAT expression was observed after 8 hour treatment with Am580, a selective retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα) agonist (and resistant to rapid catabolism by enzymes of the cytochrome P450 CYP26 family). For Am580, further increases in LRAT expression were observed after 24 and 48 hours exposure with a linear trend. These results indicate that LRAT transcription is positively regulated in a RARα‐mediated manner. The increased LRAT transcription following 8 hour A2E exposure implies that A2E acts through RARα to increase LRAT expression. After 24 and 48 hours exposure to A2E, we did not observe a significant increase in LRAT expression. As it has previously been shown that a functional RPE lysosome is able to clear A2E, 47 , 48 we propose that the observed transcriptional trend in the presence of A2E is explained by the RPE cells’ response to the A2E, which after a number of hours begins to be cleared by the functional hfRPE lysosome. In contrast the synthetic retinoid Am580 is unable to be cleared, even by a functional lysosome. We also determined that LRAT expression increased in hfRPE after exposure to all‐trans‐retinal (atRAL) (Figure 4B). We also tested the RPE65 and RDH5 expression after exposure to these retinoids in this experimental model but did not find evidence of up‐regulation (data not shown), indicating that these two visual cycle genes are under different regulatory control compared with LRAT.

FIGURE 4.

FIGURE 4

Visual cycle retinoid by‐products positively regulate LRAT transcription in hfRPE cells. A, Two separate hfRPE cell lines were tested for LRAT transcription after treatment with A2E and Am580 for 8, 24 and 48 hours. B, A single hfRPE donor was tested for LRAT transcription after treatment with atRAL for 1, 8 and 24 hours. For all experiments, four house‐keeping genes (ACTB, TUBB, RPL5 and GAPDH) were used as internal controls. All values are calculated relative to the control of the corresponding time‐point. The data shown are mean ± standard error (for each donor, at each time‐point, we performed a minimum of 3 replicates). Asterisks above bars represent significance levels: < 0.05 (*), < 0.01 (**), < 0.001 (***). C, Proposed mechanistic model illustrating the positive feedback effect of A2E upon the visual cycle. Solid broad arrows represent chemical reaction of the visual cycle, catalysed by the visual cycle enzymes. Narrow solid arrows represent non‐enzymatic reaction. Dotted arrow represents positive effect of A2E upon transcription of LRAT

4. DISCUSSION

The transcriptome analysis performed by this study reveals important ways in which the human RPE changes with age. Most importantly, we discovered that the transcription level of genes involved in the visual cycle are up‐regulated with advancing age. To our knowledge, this is the first time that transcriptional up‐regulation of this pathway has been reported in the ageing human RPE. However, a strikingly similar observation has been reported in the rat where a RNA‐seq transcriptome study of the rat retina found that the genes up‐regulated in senescence accelerated rats ‘are unexpectedly associated with phototransduction’. 49 In our study, we observe age‐related increase in expression of the main visual cycle genes: LRAT, RPE65, RDH5, RDH10, RDH11, BCO1 and ALDH1A3. LRAT and RPE65 act sequentially to catalyse the isomerization of all‐trans‐retinol to 11‐cis‐retinol. The RDH genes operate together to catalyse the oxidation of 11‐cis‐retinol to 11‐cis‐retinal, 50 whereas BCO1 catalyses the synthesis of all‐trans retinal. ALDH1A3 is a retinoic acid synthesizing enzyme that may function in detoxifying retinal, either in a free or in a cellular retinol‐binding protein form. We also find that a number of other genes related to the visual cycle are up‐regulated with age including RGR, the retinoid carrier proteins (RBP1, RBPL1) and SOX9 a key transcription factor for the visual cycle regulation. 51 We also note that one of the age‐associated visual cycle genes, RDH5, was identified as one of the 15 putative causal genes for advanced AMD; a SNP (rs3138141) at the RDH5 locus identified from an AMD GWAS influences expression of this gene in the RPE. 20 Another one of the genes that we identified, TTR, also contains a SNP (rs1667255) discovered by a GWAS; in this case, the association is with circulating retinol/vitamin A levels. 52 Thus, we provide further support for prioritization of these genes for future AMD therapeutic research.

Our finding of increased visual cycle transcription with increased age substantiates another avenue of innovative therapeutic research. There is a growing body of evidence supporting the use of pharmacological intervention to slow down the visual cycle in order to prevent lipofuscin accumulation. 53 A properly functioning visual cycle gives rise to a number of natural by‐products. One category of such by‐products that have been shown to accumulate in aged wild‐type mice eyes are retinyl esters. 54 Also, bisretinoids, including the well‐characterized A2E, are well documented to accumulate with increasing age in lipofuscin. 13 , 55 Indeed the accumulation of these lipofuscin bisretinoids is dependent on a normal visual cycle, 7 and mice with an impaired visual cycle (Rpe65‐/‐) show less accumulation and are more resistant to light‐induced retinal degeneration. 56 It was this work that first identified that the absence of retinaldehyde (both atRAL and 11‐cis) drastically reduced formation of lipofuscin fluorophores. Consequently, pharmaceutical research to slow down this accumulation has begun with the aim of preventing dry AMD/geographic atrophy. 57 These pharmaceuticals known as visual cycle modulators (VCMs) include fenretinide, a synthetic retinoid, which reduces serum retinol and, therefore, inhibits the ocular uptake of all‐trans‐retinol, and emixustat hydrochloride, a small‐molecule inhibitor of the visual cycle isomerase RPE65. Another class of such pharmaceuticals is represented by the RBP4 antagonists that dissociate circulating RBP4‐TTR‐retinol complexes, reduce serum RBP4 levels and inhibit bisretinoid synthesis in models of enhanced retinal lipofuscinogenesis. 58

We further present evidence that the visual cycle gene LRAT is transcriptionally up‐regulated in RPE in response to A2E, atRAL and Am580 (a RARα agonist) (Figure 4A,B). This finding is consistent with a number of observations from other studies that have studied the transcription of LRAT. In human prostate cells, retinoic acid receptors (RARs) activate transcription of LRAT. 59 Also in the neonatal, lung retinoic acid (RA) synergizes with vitamin A to enhance LRAT expression 60 and Am580 dramatically increases LRAT expression. 61 Dietary vitamin A has also been found to have a stimulatory effect on the expression of LRAT in the retina. 62 Deprivation of vitamin A resulted in a significant reduction in LRAT expression in mice retina, whereas the LRAT expression was rescued in vitamin A deficient mice by intraperitoneal injection of RA.

Intriguingly, it has also been shown that RA is produced by the retina upon light exposure in mice. 63 This corroborates well with recent in vitro evidence which found that all‐trans‐retinal is metabolized by RPE into both all‐trans‐retinol through reduction (via conventional visual cycle), and into trans‐RA through oxidation. 64 Furthermore, the RARα‐selective agonist Am580, but not RXR agonists, has also been shown to stimulate the expression of the SOX9 transcription factor in a cartilage‐derived cell line, 65 various breast cancer cell lines 66 and melanoma cells. 67 Taken together this body of evidence suggests RA can accumulate in the RPE leading to activation of visual cycle expression through RAR and the SOX9 transcription factors. This is in line with our TF analysis that found the SCGs are enriched within SOX9 and RORB target genes. A final piece of important evidence consistent with our data is that A2E and atRAL have the capacity to activate RAR, 10 with A2E inducing sustained activation of RAR target genes in ARPE19 cells. 68

Taken together, these observations evoke a mechanism to explain, at least in part, our primary finding that visual cycle transcription increases with age. A2E and/or other visual cycle retinoid by‐products accumulate with age in the RPE, where they act as RAR‐ligands to stimulate transcription of LRAT. Collectively, the data suggest the existence of a novel mechanism involving a positive feedback loop between the transcription of visual cycle genes and the age‐related accumulation of visual cycle by‐products; age‐related increased retinoid by‐products accumulated from life‐time visual cycle activity stimulate increased transcription of key visual cycle gene(s) (Figure 4C). It remains to be elucidated whether this mechanism arises solely as a consequence of the ageing process or whether it may be part of a coping, adaptive process to maintain vision. A compellingly similar mechanism has been proposed previously to explain the cytoprotective effect of a pharmacological inhibitor of CYP2C involved in RA metabolism. 69 This mechanism calls for further research into new interventions to slow down the accumulation of A2E/retinoid by‐products, for instance new VCMs that inhibit RAR‐activated gene transcription in the RPE.

The finding that there is a lack of spatial correlation between A2E and lipofuscin in the human retina, and that A2E is scarcely present in the macula 70 casted some doubt over it being a direct contributor to macular degeneration pathogenesis. However, this does not preclude A2E from being a transitory intermediate in this pathogenic process; indeed studies have shown that bisretinoids undergo photo‐oxidation induced degradation when irradiated with short‐wavelength visible (blue) light. 71 Photo‐degradation of A2E and all‐trans‐retinal dimer generates the dicarbonyls glyoxal and methylglyoxal, known to form advanced glycation end products (AGEs). 15 This observation corresponds well with the fact that AGE accumulation on the Bruch's membrane increases with age. 16 , 72 Importantly, such accumulation of AGEs has been shown to affect RPE function 42 and has been linked with AMD. 73 Thus the accumulation of certain atRAL condensation products followed by their photo‐degradation, leading to AGE formation may represent one mechanism of atrophic macular degeneration.

In conclusion, even though the exact process by which accumulated visual cycle by‐products lead to retinal degeneration remains to be confirmed, our study, besides revealing the unexpected age‐related increase in visual cycle gene transcription, presents further evidence that accumulated visual cycle by‐products can actually activate visual cycle gene expression, thus exacerbating their own accumulation.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors confirm that there are no conflicts of interest.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Joe M. Butler: Conceptualization (equal); Data curation (lead); Formal analysis (equal); Investigation (equal); Methodology (lead); Validation (supporting); Visualization (lead); Writing‐original draft (lead); Writing‐review & editing (equal). Wasu Supharattanasitthi: Formal analysis (supporting); Investigation (supporting); Methodology (supporting); Validation (equal); Writing‐original draft (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Yit C. Yang: Conceptualization (supporting); Funding acquisition (equal); Investigation (supporting); Resources (equal); Supervision (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (supporting). Luminita Paraoan: Conceptualization (lead); Data curation (supporting); Formal analysis (supporting); Funding acquisition (lead); Investigation (equal); Methodology (supporting); Project administration (lead); Resources (lead); Software (supporting); Supervision (lead); Validation (supporting); Visualization (supporting); Writing‐original draft (supporting); Writing‐review & editing (equal).

Supporting information

Figure S1

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

We thank the donors, their families and the Manchester Eye Bank for their generous role in this research. We thank Drs Sheldon Miller and Arvydas Maminishkis of NEI, NIH, USA for generously providing hfRPE cells and valuable advice for their use, and Dr T. Michael Redmond for the kind gift of A2E. We also acknowledge the support received from R & D Royal Wolverhampton NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, UK.

Butler JM, Supharattanasitthi W, Yang YC, Paraoan L. RNA‐seq analysis of ageing human retinal pigment epithelium: Unexpected up‐regulation of visual cycle gene transcription. J Cell Mol Med. 2021;25:5572–5585. 10.1111/jcmm.16569

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The raw sequence data and processed counts data were deposited in the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE159435.

REFERENCES

  • 1. Strauss O. The retinal pigment epithelium in visual function. Physiol Rev. 2005;85(3):845‐881. 10.1152/physrev.00021.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Feeney L. Lipofuscin and melanin of human retinal pigment epithelium. Fluorescence, enzyme cytochemical, and ultrastructural studies. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;17(7):583‐600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Wing GL, Blanchard GC, Weiter JJ. The topography and age relationship of lipofuscin concentration in the retinal pigment epithelium. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;17(7):601‐607. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Delori FC, Dorey CK, Staurenghi G, Arend O, Goger DG, Weiter JJ. In vivo fluorescence of the ocular fundus exhibits retinal pigment epithelium lipofuscin characteristics. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995;36(3):718‐729. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Holz FG, Bellman C, Staudt S, Schütt F, Völcker HE. Fundus autofluorescence and development of geographic atrophy in age‐related macular degeneration. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(5):1051‐1056. 10.1016/S0002-9394(01)01394-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Katz ML, Drea CM, Gerald RW. Relationship between dietary retinol and lipofuscin in the retinal pigment epithelium. Mech Ageing Dev. 1986;35(3):291‐305. 10.1016/0047-6374(86)90131-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Katz ML, Redmond MT. Effect of Rpe65 knockout on accumulation of lipofuscin fluorophores in the retinal pigment epithelium. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(12):3023‐3030. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Chen C, Thompson DA, Koutalos Y. Reduction of all‐trans‐retinal in vertebrate rod photoreceptors requires the combined action of RDH8 and RDH12. J Biol Chem. 2012;287(29):24662‐24670. 10.1074/jbc.M112.354514 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Maeda A, Maeda T, Golczak M, Palczewski K. Retinopathy in mice induced by disrupted all‐trans‐retinal clearance. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(39):26684‐26693. 10.1074/jbc.M804505200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Maeda A, Golczak M, Maeda T, Palczewski K. Limited roles of Rdh8, Rdh12, and Abca4 in all‐trans‐retinal clearance in mouse retina. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(11):5435‐5443. 10.1167/iovs.09-3944 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Quazi F, Molday RS. ATP‐binding cassette transporter ABCA4 and chemical isomerization protect photoreceptor cells from the toxic accumulation of excess 11‐cis‐retinal. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(13):5024‐5029. 10.1073/pnas.1400780111 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Liu J, Itagaki Y, Ben‐Shabat S, Nakanishi K, Sparrow JR. The biosynthesis of A2E, a fluorophore of aging retina, involves the formation of the precursor, A2‐PE, in the photoreceptor outer segment membrane. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(38):29354‐29360. 10.1074/jbc.M910191199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Sparrow JR, Fishkin N, Zhou J, et al. A2E, a byproduct of the visual cycle. Vision Res. 2003;43(28):2983‐2990. 10.1016/S0042-6989(03)00475-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sparrow JR, Cai B. Blue light‐induced apoptosis of A2E‐containing RPE: involvement of caspase‐3 and protection by Bcl‐2. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42(6):1356‐1362. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yoon KD, Yamamoto K, Ueda K, Zhou J, Sparrow JR. A novel source of methylglyoxal and glyoxal in Retina: implications for age‐related macular degeneration. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41309. 10.1371/journal.pone.0041309 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Glenn JV, Mahaffy H, Wu K, et al. Advanced glycation end product (AGE) accumulation on Bruch's membrane: links to age‐related RPE dysfunction. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2009;50(1):441‐451. 10.1167/iovs.08-1724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Strunnikova NV, Maminishkis A, Barb JJ, et al. Transcriptome analysis and molecular signature of human retinal pigment epithelium. Hum Mol Genet. 2010;19(12):2468‐2486. 10.1093/hmg/ddq129 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Cai H, Fields MA, Hoshino R, Priore LVD. Effects of aging and anatomic location on gene expression in human retina. Front Aging Neurosci. 2012;4: 1–20. 10.3389/fnagi.2012.00008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Yoshida S, Yashar BM, Hiriyanna S, Swaroop A. Microarray analysis of gene expression in the aging human retina. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43(8):2554‐2560. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Orozco LD, Chen HH, Cox C, et al. Integration of eQTL and a single‐cell atlas in the human eye identifies causal genes for age‐related macular degeneration. Cell Rep. 2020;30(4):1246‐1259.e6. 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.12.082 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Voigt AP, Mulfaul K, Mullin NK, et al. Single‐cell transcriptomics of the human retinal pigment epithelium and choroid in health and macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2019;116(48):24100‐24107. 10.1073/pnas.1914143116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Xin‐Zhao Wang C, Zhang K, Aredo B, Lu H, Ufret‐Vincenty RL. Novel method for the rapid isolation of RPE cells specifically for RNA extraction and analysis. Exp Eye Res. 2012;102:1‐9. 10.1016/j.exer.2012.06.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Sharon D, Blackshaw S, Cepko CL, Dryja TP. Profile of the genes expressed in the human peripheral retina, macula, and retinal pigment epithelium determined through serial analysis of gene expression (SAGE). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2002;99(1):315‐320. 10.1073/pnas.012582799 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Martin M. Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high‐throughput sequencing reads. EMBnet.Journal. 2011;17(1):10. 10.14806/ej.17.1.200 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Andrews S. FastQC A Quality Control tool for High Throughput Sequence Data. Babraham Bioinforma. 2010; https://www.bioinformatics.babraham.ac.uk/projects/fastqc/ [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Anders S, Pyl PT, Huber W. HTSeq‐a python framework to work with high‐throughput sequencing data. Bioinformatics. 2015;31(2):166‐169. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu638 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Love MI, Huber W, Anders S. Moderated estimation of fold change and dispersion for RNA‐seq data with DESeq2. Genome Biol. 2014;15(12): 1–21. 10.1186/s13059-014-0550-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Davies L, Gray D, Spiller D, et al. P53 apoptosis mediator PERP: localization, function and caspase activation in uveal melanoma. J Cell Mol Med. 2009;13(8b):1995‐2007. 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2008.00590.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Pfaffl MW, Tichopad A, Prgomet C, Neuvians TP. Determination of stable housekeeping genes, differentially regulated target genes and sample integrity: bestkeeper ‐ excel‐based tool using pair‐wise correlations. Biotechnol Lett. 2004;26(6):509‐515. 10.1023/B:BILE.0000019559.84305.47 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Luo W, Brouwer C. Pathview: an R/Bioconductor package for pathway‐based data integration and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(14):1830‐1831. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt285 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. Yu G, He QY. ReactomePA: an R/Bioconductor package for reactome pathway analysis and visualization. Mol Biosyst. 2016;12(2):477‐479. 10.1039/c5mb00663e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32. Fabregat A, Jupe S, Matthews L, et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D649‐D655. 10.1093/nar/gkx1132 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33. Newman AM, Gallo NB, Hancox LS, et al. Systems‐level analysis of age‐related macular degeneration reveals global biomarkers and phenotype‐specific functional networks. Genome Med. 2012;4(2):16. 10.1186/gm315 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34. Maminishkis A, Chen S, Jalickee S, et al. Confluent monolayers of cultured human fetal retinal pigment epithelium exhibit morphology and physiology of native tissue. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47(8):3612‐3624. 10.1167/iovs.05-1622 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Poliakov E, Strunnikova NV, Jiang J, et al. Multiple A2E treatments lead to melanization of rod outer segment‐challenged ARPE‐19 cells. Mol Vis. 2014;20:285‐300. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Abdelmohsen K, Panda A, Kang MJ, et al. Senescence‐associated lncRNAs: senescence‐associated long noncoding RNAs. Aging Cell. 2013;12(5):890‐900. 10.1111/acel.12115 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Kauppinen A, Paterno JJ, Blasiak J, Salminen A, Kaarniranta K. Inflammation and its role in age‐related macular degeneration. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2016;73(9):1765‐1786. 10.1007/s00018-016-2147-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Saddala MS, Lennikov A, Mukwaya A, Fan L, Hu Z, Huang H. Transcriptome‐wide analysis of differentially expressed chemokine receptors, SNPs, and SSRs in the age‐related macular degeneration. Hum Genomics. 2019;13(1):15. 10.1186/s40246-019-0199-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Acar N, Gregoire S, Andre A, et al. Plasmalogens in the retina: In situ hybridization of dihydroxyacetone phosphate acyltransferase (DHAP‐AT) ‐ the first enzyme involved in their biosynthesis ‐ and comparative study of retinal and retinal pigment epithelial lipid composition. Exp Eye Res. 2007;84(1):143‐151. 10.1016/j.exer.2006.09.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Bai X, Dilworth DJ, Weng YC, Gould DB. Developmental distribution of collagen IV isoforms and relevance to ocular diseases. Matrix Biol. 2009;28(4):194‐201. 10.1016/j.matbio.2009.02.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Shirinifard A, Glazier JA, Swat M, et al. Adhesion failures determine the pattern of choroidal neovascularization in the eye: a computer simulation study. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;8(5):e1002440. 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002440 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Kay P, Yang YC, Hiscott P, Gray D, Maminishkis A, Paraoan L. Age‐related changes of cystatin C expression and polarized secretion by retinal pigment epithelium: potential age‐related macular degeneration links. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(2):926‐934. 10.1167/iovs.13-13239 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Mitry D, Charteris DG, Fleck BW, Campbell H, Singh J. The epidemiology of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: geographical variation and clinical associations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2010;94(6):678‐684. 10.1136/bjo.2009.157727 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Wolfson M, Budovsky A, Tacutu R, Fraifeld V. The signaling hubs at the crossroad of longevity and age‐related disease networks. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41(3):516‐520. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.08.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Wimmers S, Strauss O. Basal calcium entry in retinal pigment epithelial cells is mediated by TRPC channels. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2007;48(12):5767‐5772. 10.1167/iovs.07-0412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Keenan AB, Torre D, Lachmann A, et al. ChEA3: transcription factor enrichment analysis by orthogonal omics integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019;47(W1):W212‐W224. 10.1093/nar/gkz446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Sparrow JR, Parish CA, Hashimoto M, Nakanishi K. A2E, a lipofuscin fluorophore, in human retinal pigmented epithelial cells in culture. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1999;40(12):2988‐2995. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Damek‐Poprawa M, Diemer T, Lopes VS, et al. Melanoregulin (MREG) modulates lysosome function in pigment epithelial cells. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(16):10877‐10889. 10.1074/jbc.M808857200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Kozhevnikova OS, Korbolina EE, Ershov NI, Kolosova NG. Rat retinal transcriptome: effects of aging and AMD‐like retinopathy. Cell Cycle. 2013;12(11):1745‐1761. 10.4161/cc.24825 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Kim TS, Maeda A, Maeda T, et al. Delayed dark adaptation in 11‐cis‐retinol dehydrogenase‐deficient mice: a role of RDH11 in visual processes in vivo. J Biol Chem. 2005;280(10):8694‐8704. 10.1074/jbc.M413172200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Masuda T, Wahlin K, Wan J, et al. Transcription factor sox9 plays a key role in the regulation of visual cycle gene expression in the retinal pigment epithelium. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(18):12908‐12921. 10.1074/jbc.M114.556738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Mondul AM, Yu K, Wheeler W, et al. Genome‐wide association study of circulating retinol levels. Hum Mol Genet. 2011;20(23):4724‐4731. 10.1093/hmg/ddr387 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Petrukhin K. Pharmacological inhibition of lipofuscin accumulation in the retina as a therapeutic strategy for dry AMD treatment. Drug Discov Today Ther Strateg. 2013;10(1):e11‐e20. 10.1016/j.ddstr.2013.05.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Marneros AG, Keene DR, Hansen U, et al. Collagen XVIII/endostatin is essential for vision and retinal pigment epithelial function. EMBO J. 2004;23(1):89‐99. 10.1038/sj.emboj.7600014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55. Sparrow JR, Gregory‐Roberts E, Yamamoto K, et al. The bisretinoids of retinal pigment epithelium. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2012;31(2):121‐135. 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2011.12.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56. Grimm C, Wenzel A, Hafezi F, Yu S, Redmond TM, Remé CE. Protection of Rpe65‐deficient mice identifies rhodopsin as a mediator of light‐induced retinal degeneration. Nat Genet. 2000;25(1):63‐66. 10.1038/75614 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57. Dobri N, Qin Q, Kong J, et al. A1120, a nonretinoid RBP4 antagonist, inhibits formation of cytotoxic bisretinoids in the animal model of enhanced retinal lipofuscinogenesis. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(1):85‐95. 10.1167/iovs.12-10050 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58. Cioffi CL, Muthuraman P, Raja A, Varadi A, Racz B, Petrukhin K. Discovery of bispecific antagonists of retinol binding protein 4 that stabilize transthyretin tetramers: scaffolding hopping, optimization, and preclinical pharmacological evaluation as a potential therapy for two common age‐related comorbidities. J Med Chem. 2020;63(19):11054‐11084. 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.0c00996 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59. Cai K, Gudas LJ. Retinoic acid receptors and GATA transcription factors activate the transcription of the human lecithin:retinol acyltransferase gene. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2009;41(3):546‐553. 10.1016/j.biocel.2008.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60. Wu L, Ross AC. Acidic retinoids synergize with vitamin A to enhance retinol uptake and STRA6, LRAT, and CYP26B1 expression in neonatal lung. J Lipid Res. 2010;51(2):378‐387. 10.1194/jlr.M001222 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61. Wu L, Zolfaghari R, Ross AC. Acidic retinoids in small amounts promote retinyl ester formation in neonatal lung, with transient increases in retinoid homeostatic gene expression. Nutr Metab. 2013;10(1):72. 10.1186/1743-7075-10-72 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62. Hu Y, Chen Y, Moiseyev G, Takahashi Y, Mott R, Ma JX. Comparison of ocular pathologies in vitamin A‐deficient mice and RPE65 gene knockout mice. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(8):5507‐5514. 10.1167/iovs.10-7118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63. Mccaffery P, Mey J, Dräger UC. Light‐mediated retinoic acid production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93(22):12570‐12574. 10.1073/pnas.93.22.12570 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64. Mihai DM, Washington I. Vitamin A dimers trigger the protracted death of retinal pigment epithelium cells. Cell Death Dis. 2014;5(7):e1348. 10.1038/cddis.2014.314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65. Sekiya I, Tsuji K, Koopman P, et al. SOX9 enhances aggrecan gene promoter/enhancer activity and is up‐ regulated by retinoic acid in a cartilage‐derived cell line, TC6. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(15):10738‐10744. 10.1074/jbc.275.15.10738 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66. Afonja O, Raaka BM, Huang A, et al. RAR agonists stimulate SOX9 gene expression in breast cancer cell lines: Evidence for a role in retinoid‐mediated growth inhibition. Oncogene. 2002;21(51):7850‐7860. 10.1038/sj.onc.1205985 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67. Passeron T, Valencia JC, Namiki T, et al. Upregulation of SOX9 inhibits the growth of human and mouse melanomas and restores their sensitivity to retinoic acid. J Clin Invest. 2009;119(4):954‐963. 10.1172/JCI34015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68. Iriyama A, Fujiki R, Inoue Y, et al. A2E, a pigment of the lipofuscin of retinal pigment epithelial cells, is an endogenous ligand for retinoic acid receptor. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(18):11947‐11953. 10.1074/jbc.M708989200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69. Chang Q, Berdyshev E, Cao D, et al. Cytochrome P450 2C epoxygenases mediate photochemical stress‐induced death of photoreceptors. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(12):8337‐8352. 10.1074/jbc.M113.507152 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70. Ablonczy Z, Higbee D, Anderson DM, et al. Lack of correlation between the spatial distribution of A2E and lipofuscin fluorescence in the human retinal pigment epithelium. Investig Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2013;54(8):5535‐5542. 10.1167/iovs.13-12250 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71. Wu Y, Yanase E, Feng X, Siegel MM, Sparrow JR. Structural characterization of bisretinoid A2E photocleavage products and implications for age‐related macular degeneration. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(16):7275‐7280. 10.1073/pnas.0913112107 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72. Beattie JR, Pawlak AM, Boulton ME, et al. Multiplex analysis of age‐related protein and lipid modifications in human Bruch's membrane. FASEB J. 2010;24(12):4816‐4824. 10.1096/fj.10-166090 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73. Ishibashi T, Murata T, Hangai M, et al. Advanced glycation end products in age‐related macular degeneration. Arch Ophthalmol. 1998;116(12):1629‐1632. 10.1001/archopht.116.12.1629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74. Fabregat A, Sidiropoulos K, Viteri G, et al. Reactome diagram viewer: data structures and strategies to boost performance. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(7):1208‐1214. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btx752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Figure S1

Table S1

Table S2

Table S3

Data Availability Statement

The raw sequence data and processed counts data were deposited in the GEO repository (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/) under accession number GSE159435.


Articles from Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine are provided here courtesy of Blackwell Publishing

RESOURCES