Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: Semin Immunopathol. 2021 Mar 30;43(3):411–422. doi: 10.1007/s00281-021-00853-0

Eosinophils in the pathogenesis of pancreatic disorders

Murli Manohar #, Hemanth Kumar Kandikattu 1, Sathisha Upparahalli Venkateshaiah 1, Chandra Sekhar Yadavalli 1, Anil Mishra 1,*
PMCID: PMC8249347  NIHMSID: NIHMS1703526  PMID: 33783592

Abstract

Eosinophils comprise approximately 1–4% of total blood leukocytes that reside in the intestine, bone marrow, mammary gland, and adipose tissues to maintain innate immunity in healthy individuals. Eosinophils have four toxic granules known as major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN), and upon degranulation, these granules promote pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases like allergy, asthma, dermatitis, and gastrointestinal disorders. Additionally, the role of eosinophils is underscored in endocrine disorders including pancreatitis. Chronic Pancreatitis (CP) is an inflammatory disorder that occurs due to the alcohol consumption, blockage of the pancreatic duct, and trypsinogen mutation. Eosinophil levels are detected in higher numbers in both CP and pancreatic cancer patients compared with healthy individuals. The mechanistic understanding of chronic inflammation-induced pancreatic malignancy has not yet been reached and requires further exploration. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, evaluation, and management of eosinophil-associated pancreatic disorders and further summarizes current evidence regarding risk factors, pathophysiology, clinical features, diagnostic evaluation, treatment, and prognosis of eosinophilic pancreatitis (EP) and pancreatic cancer

Keywords: Pancreatitis, Eosinophils, Pancreatic cancer, Eosinophilic Pancreatitis

Introduction

Eosinophils, a subset of immune cells were first identified by Paul Ehrlich in 1879 [1], they originate from multipotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in the bone marrow and can be distinguished phenotypically by their bilobed nuclei and cytoplasmic granules [2]. Eosinophils are involved in diverse immune responses associated with innate and adaptive immunity [3] and play an important role in the mucosal immune responses of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Under normal conditions, eosinophils reside in the the mucosa of the intestine that maintain innate immunity and serve as effector and immunoregulatory functions [4]. Eosinophil-associated allergic disorders are characterized by induced levels of tissue eosinophila that promotes the dysfunction of several organs like blood, lung, skin, and gastrointestinal tract. These disorders include hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES), asthma, endocrine disorders, eosinophilic dermatitis, eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), and numerous eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (celiac disease, inflammatory bowel disease and allergic colitis) and eosinophilic pancreatitis [510]. Repeated bouts of acute pancreatitis (AP), an inflammatory disease of the pancreas which can leads to recurrent AP (RAP) and chronic pancreatitis (CP)[11]. AP is associated with significant morbidity and cost and is one of the leading causes of hospital admission in the US [12]. AP is characterized by the release of pro- and anti-inflammatory signals from injured acinar cells and an influx of leukocytes (monocytes, macrophages, and lymphocytes) [1317]. Several case reports show the accumulation of eosinophils in pancreatic inflammation, known as eosinophilic pancreatitis (EP) [6, 18]. This infiltration of eosinophils in the pancreas may not be noticed initially, as most pancreatic biopsies are performed using endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and endoscopic ultrasound with the purpose of detecting only pancreatic malignancy. These commonly used procedures may not provide sufficient tissue for pathological examination; therefore, EP often goes undetected. Notably, pancreas is devoid of eosinophils in healthy state and the mechanism of eosinophils infiltration in the pancreas is yet not understood. However, it remains unclear how eosinophils are recruited to the pancreas under inflammatory conditions; thus, more in-depth investigations are needed to help develop novel targeted therapies for EP patients. Access to pancreatic tissue is not possible in AP or RAP patients and is very limited for CP patients, so we rely on experimental models to study the detailed pathogenesis of EP. Interleukin (IL)-5 is a well-known growth and differentiation factor for the development, differentiation, and maturation of eosinophils [19]; however, we did not observe induced IL-5 in an experimental model of CP, a recent report observed induced IL-3, IL-4 and IL-5 levels by performing highly sensitive Luminex analysis in an experimental model of chronic pancreatitis [20]. These findings are not surprising, as endogenous IL-5 is always present, even in healthy states. We observed that pancreatic IL-18 was induced during CP [19] which was in accordance with previous clinical observations [2123]. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG) is also linked to EP, and we showed that IL-18 overexpression via recombinant IL-18 or transgene insertion promotes EG disorders [24] and that IL-18 plays an important role in generating and transforming naïve eosinophils to pathogenic eosinophils [19, 25]. Additionally, we also observed that accumulated macrophages are the source of NLRP3 regulated induced IL-18 in pancreatitis and the eosinophilic inflammation via intracellular upregulation of NF-κB promotes a series of activation pathway that enhance pancreatic inflammation leading to acinar cell death, acinar to ductal cells metaplasia and pancreatic edema.

Structure and Functions of Eosinophils

Eosinophils typically measure from 10–16 μm in diameter and possess bilobed nuclei with approximately a 30% ratio of nucleus to cytoplasm. The most prominent feature of eosinophils is their stain with acidophilic dye, first observed by Paul Ehrlich in 1879 who described eosinophils for the first time and noted their higher numbers in patients with asthma and helminth infections [1, 26]. Eosinophils have a beneficial role in host defense against nematodes and other parasitic infections and have four different types of eosinophil granules: major basic protein (MBP), eosinophil cationic protein (ECP), eosinophil peroxidase (EPO), and eosinophil-derived neurotoxin (EDN) [27, 28]. Once activated, eosinophils synthesize and release their granules, which individually mediate potential regulatory effects on various cell types [29]. The structures of normal and deregulated eosinophils are shown in Figure 1. Eosinophils reside mainly in the GI tract but are also found in mammary glands, uterus, thymus, bone marrow and adipose tissues in a healthy state [30, 31] and represent ≅1–4% of leukocytes in circulating blood [32]. Human eosinophils can produce, store, and secrete over 30 cytokines; therefore, eosinophils can be distinguished from other immune cells by their capacity for rapid cytokine secretion [33, 34]. Eosinophil-secreted cytokines, chemokines, and growth factors have a profound effect on the progression of immune and inflammatory responses and play roles in tissue regeneration, wound healing, and host defense. Human eosinophils constitutively express immunoregulatory cytokines, such as interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, IL-6, IL-10, IL-12, interferon (IFN)-γ, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α [34]. Eosinophils also have several regulatory functions to modulate lymphocyte recruitment and homeostasis [35]. Eosinophils may behave as antigen-presenting cells (APCs), they can drive Th2 polarization with the help of dendritic cells (DCs) or alone, and they can regulate T cell development in the thymus. Eosinophils express several surface receptors, including IL-5Rα, CC-chemokine receptor 3 (CCR3), Siglec-8 in humans, Siglec-F in mice, and the chemoattractant receptor homologous molecule CRTH2. With the help of these receptors the Eosinophils can survive, proliferate and chemoattract to targeted tissues in disease conditions through their ligands [28] (Figure 2).

Figure 1: Structure and granule eosinophils.

Figure 1:

Structure of normal eosinophils (A) showing a bilobed nucleus in the center of the eosinophil; the 4 major granules (MBP, ECP, EPO, and EDN) are inside the intact eosinophil in homeostatic conditions. Eosinophil degranulation (B) takes place under parasitic conditions, stress, or inflammatory disease to exert their biological effects. Figure created by Biorender.

Figure 2: Eosinophil surface receptors.

Figure 2:

Eosinophils express various surface receptors, such as CCR3, Siglec F, Siglec-8, CRTH2, CD101, CD274, cytokine receptors, chemoattractant receptors, lipid mediator receptors, MHC-II, pattern recognition receptors, adhesion receptors, FC receptors, and their cellular constituents.

Development of Eosinophils

In mice, eosinophils mainly develop from granulocyte/monocyte progenitors (GMP) cells in the bone marrow from intermediate eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors (EoPs) [36]. However, human eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors are derived from common myeloid progenitors (CMPs) or their upstream multipotent progenitors [37]. Expression of the IL-5 receptor on EoPs is a result of the commitment of GMPs to the eosinophil lineage, which means that IL-5 supports eosinophil development from EoPs rather than instructing GMPs to commit to the eosinophil lineage. Eosinophil differentiation in the bone marrow is promoted by the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 [38]. Eosinophil lineage fate is regulated by the interplay of several key transcription factors, including CCAAT/enhancer-binding protein (a C/EBP family member), GATA-1 (a zinc finger family member), PU.1 (an Ets family member), and friend of GATA (FOG) [39, 40], as shown in Figure 3. Recently, it has been shown that the protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2 promotes eosinophil differentiation [38]. They acquire IL-5Rα on their surface at a very early stage during eosinophilopoiesis and differentiate under the strong influence of IL-5 [40]. We earlier reported two distinct subsets of CD101+ [41] and CD274+ [42] eosinophils that exhibit differences in their function. Earlier C101+ eosinophils are reported as IL-5-dependent inflammatory eosinophils in the lungs of house dust mite (HDM) exposed mice, which is functionally different from Il-5-independentt residential eosinophil. However, we found that the blood of IL-5 transgenic mice do not express CD101, which contradict the finding of earlier published report that CD101 is IL-5 dependent eosinophils [41]. Our experimentation indicated that the eosinophils isolated from the spleen of IL-5 transgenic mice, when exposed to IL-18 only then they express CD101 as well CD274 [42]. Similarly, we also found that normal human blood also express CD101 and in disease state another subset of eosinophils is detected that express that increases with the severity of allergic diseases [42]. Interestingly, the nasal or lung lavage of asthmatic individuals and biopsies of EoE patients express both CD101+CD274+ eosinophils [42]. Of note, both CD101 and CD274 expressing eosinophils ae also detected in lungs of asthmatic mice [42]. Apart from the role of IL-5 in eosinophil generation, maturation and differentiation, IL-18 has recently been reported in the transformation and maturation of naïve eosinophils to CD274-expressing pathogenic eosinophils in allergic diseases [9, 25], suggesting a synergistic role of IL-5 and IL-18, as shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3: Development of eosinophils from bone marrow upon allergen or antigen encounter and the synergistic effects of interleukin (IL)-5 and IL-18 in eosinophil-mediated pathogenesis of allergic diseases.

Figure 3:

Upon antigen/allergen challenge, dendritic cells activate Th2 cells to secrete IL-5, a growth and differentiation factor for eosinophils, and affect the bone marrow to generate eosinophil lineage progenitor cells with the help of several transcription factors (e.g., GATA-1, PU.1, c/EBP, IL-5, IL-3, GM-CSF) and FLT3, a growth and differentiation factor for eosinophils that expresses the IL-5 receptor (R). Eotaxins (1,2,3) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) act as chemoattractants to recruit these eosinophils to target tissue (blood: eosinophilia, lung: eosinophilic pneumonia and COPD, esophagus: eosinophilic esophagitis, colon: eosinophilic colitis, stomach: eosinophilic gastritis and gastroenteritis, etc.). Furthermore, IL-18 causes the transformation of IL-5R-, CCR3-, and Seglec F-expressing eosinophils to a pathogenic phenotype by expressing IL-18R, CD101, and CD274 receptors in addition to IL-5R, CCR3, and Siglec F, showing the synergistic effect of IL-5 and IL-18 in eosinophil-mediated allergic diseases.

Eosinophils Role in the Maintenance of Tissue Homeostasis

Eosinophils play a critical role in immune homeostasis, both as effector immune cells committed to host defense mechanisms and as modulators of the shape of innate and adaptive immune responses. Eosinophils in allergen-challenged mice express co-stimulation molecules, including MHC class II, CD80, CD86, CD9, CD28 and CD40. They migrate to lymph nodes without the help of any chemoattractant or specific receptors and promote antigen-specific T cell proliferation, suggesting that they act as antigen-presenting cells (APC) [43, 44]. One report indicates that eosinophils motivate T lymphocyte tissue accumulation; this phenomenon is supported by evidence indicating a reduced number of effector T cells in eosinophil-deficient ΔdblGATA-1 mice, a defect that is overcome by rescuing the eosinophils in eosinophil-deficient mice. Together, these observations indicate that eosinophils have a role in T cell recruitment into the tissue [45]. This is further supported by the findings of induced eosinophils in the Peyer’s patches of interleukin-5 overexpressed, pharmacologically induced IL-5 given and following ova-challenged mice [46]. Taken together, this evidence indicates eosinophils are involved in antigen presentation. Consistent with these results, a reduced Peyer’s patch development along with Th2 cytokine production was observed in ΔdblGATA-1 mice, which highlights the role of eosinophils in lymphocyte homeostasis [45, 47, 48]. Several other studies support eosinophils’ roles in homeostasis. It has been reported that eosinophils are the source of IL-4 in adipose tissues, where they aid in the reconstitution of alternatively activated macrophages (AAMs) in an integrin-dependent process. These activated AAMs have a role in the maintenance of glucose homeostasis in adipose tissue in conjunction with eosinophils [49]. Most recently, new evidence has emerged on the role of eosinophils in promoting healthy aging by sustaining adipose tissue homeostasis [50]. In addition, the contribution of eosinophils in homeostatic immune processes has also been reported: One report shows that the lung has residential eosinophils (rEOS) with a key homeostatic function [41, 51]. In short, the role of eosinophils in the maintenance of tissue homeostasis is an important addition to our knowledge of eosinophil biology, expanding their previously known beneficial role in the maintenance of gastrointestinal innate immunity where they reside in healthy individuals [30].

Eosinophil-Associated Diseases

In several allergic diseases, the human body produces a large number of eosinophils in response to some inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-5, IL-13, and IL-18, that can cause chronic tissue inflammation that reduces organs’ functional capabilities [25, 5254]. Eosinophilic disorders are diagnosed and named according to the location where the levels of eosinophils are elevated. Eosinophil accumulation in the lungs is called asthma, a complex and diverse disease characterized by several processes at the cellular, molecular and genetic levels. Mouse models have been used to explore in-depth mechanisms operational in the development of eosinophil-mediated asthma [55, 56]. Mouse models of asthma are valuable tools to study the physiological, intact respiratory, and immune systems of the disease [57, 58] and provide target molecules for the development of new therapeutic interventions. Similarly, EoE is a disease observed globally over the past two decades in both developed and underdeveloped countries. EoE pathogenies that develop via allergen-induced inflammatory cells, mainly eosinophils, play a crucial role in disease pathogenesis [59]. Nevertheless, the etiology of EoE is not well understood, because eosinophils have very different functions: In the healthy state, they are involved in parasite excretion, whereas in the disease state, they induce inflammatory responses. EoE differs from gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) based on eosinophil accumulation in mucosa, intraepithelial eosinophil levels, and acid suppression response [5, 9, 28, 60]. In the healthy state, in both humans and mice, eosinophils exist in all segments of the gastrointestinal tract except the esophagus from the prenatal to the adult stage [61]. Eosinophil accumulation has been observed in several gastrointestinal diseases, collectively known as eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorder (EGID). EGID include celiac disease (CE), eosinophilic colitis (EC), eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). EGID is a complex digestive disorder in which eosinophil numbers increase during inflammatory conditions, drug reactions, and malignancy in the GI tract. EGID is caused by genetic factors, poor food sanitization, and often by atopic disease conditions [61]. Several experimental mouse models have been developed to understand the pathogenesis of EGID. These mouse models mimic human EGID disease characteristics such as induction of allergen-specific IgE, cytokines (IL-4 and IL-5), and intestinal eosinophilia. A case report diagnosed eosinophilic infiltration of the pancreas with no hypereosinophilia or high levels of immunoglobulin E, but the patient was concomitantly diagnosed with ulcerative colitis, indicating that eosinophilic pancreatitis may also be associated with that of gastrointestinal disorders [62]. However, the eosinophils associated pancreatitis is not yet well established or well recognized and is considered a rare disease. Therefore, the current review is focused mainly on eosinophilic pancreatitis.

Eosinophilic Pancreatitis (EP)

In the past several decades, the accumulation of eosinophils during different stages of pancreatitis (AP, RAP and CP) has been noted and reported as eosinophilic pancreatitis (EP). In 1955, circulatory eosinophils were found in chronic relapsing pancreatitis patients [18], and several cases of EP are currently known [6367]. The influx of eosinophils in the pancreas is also reported in other pancreatic diseases such as lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis, pancreatic allograft rejection, pancreatic pseudocyst, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor, and histiocytosis X [7]. A patient with alcohol-related pancreatitis also showed induced pancreatic eosinophilia while suffering from a pancreatic pseudocyst, and the patient was atopic with a high level of IgE [68]. Abraham et al. [7] noted and explained two types of histological patterns in EP patients: One pattern features diffuse periductal, acinar, and septal eosinophilic infiltrates with eosinophilic phlebitis and arteritis; the other is characterized by localized intense eosinophilic infiltrates associated with pseudocyst formation. In another case, a patient was diagnosed with pleural effusion-associated eosinophilia in the pancreas following the execution of pancreatic resection [69]. In addition to humans, EP is also reported in parasitic infections in dogs [6, 70], nematode infection in horses [71], and scorpion envenomation in rodents [72]. Several cases of eosinophil infiltration have been reported during AP, RAP, CP, pancreatic neoplasia, and diabetes, which we briefly discuss below.

Eosinophils in Acute Pancreatitis (AP)

AP may be induced by obstruction of the pancreatic duct, which leads to swelling of the papillary region of the duodenum due to eosinophil infiltration. However, the literature shows evidence of infiltration of eosinophils in the pancreata of patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG) [7375] and idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome [76, 77]. The presence of peripheral eosinophilia was reported in a 38-year-old woman suffering from acute pancreatitis, pancreatic ascites, and pseudocysts. The patient had elevated serum IgE levels and/or eosinophilic infiltrates in other organs, including the gastrointestinal tract [78]. Baek et al [79] reported a case of a 68-year-old patient with eosinophilic gastroenteritis (a disease characterized by focal or diffuse eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract) who presented with acute pancreatitis and ascites. Furthermore, duodenum biopsies revealed eosinophilic infiltration in the lamina propria, indicating that eosinophilic gastroenteritis may be considered in the differential diagnosis of unexplained acute pancreatitis, especially in patients with duodenal edema on imaging or peripheral eosinophilia [79]. A case of a 25-year-old female with history of pain, vomiting, and diarrhea within 60 minutes of eating eggs showed associated EG symptoms with an unusual presentation of AP. Interestingly, when consumption of all egg products was stopped, the patient had resolution of all symptoms [80]. Additional evidence that cow milk consumption promotes EG associated acute pancreatitis. Cow’s milk allergies are not the severe complications, but some time it induces anaphylaxis, gastroenteritis, and pancreatitis. The EG associated acute pancreatitis improves by the treatment with corticosteroids, and by eliminating cow’s milk from the diet in patients [81]; therefore, EG caused by cow milk may be considered a differential diagnosis (47). Earlier, it has been shown that induced eosinophils during acute inflammatory reactions in trichinous mice with coxsackievirus or turpentine exposure also promotes pancreatitis that suggest eosinopenia is a response to the acute inflammatory process [82].

Eosinophils in Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis (RAP)

RAP is a challenging disease and defined as two attacks of AP without any clinical evidence of CP. It is mostly reported in idiopathic group of patients that forms 20–25% of cases of AP [83, 84]. A case of EP in a 44-year-old male patient was diagnosed after pancreatic resection for recurrent bouts of AP [67]. The patient’s histological evaluations from the pancreatic head revealed reduced numbers of acinar cells and increased fibrosis with infiltration of eosinophils in fibrotic areas and eosinophilic phlebitis of small veins. The patient had only minimal peripheral eosinophilia, no reported history of symptoms related to elevated eosinophilia or IgE, and only mild eosinophilic infiltrates in his gallbladder that improves with intravenous fluids and pain medication [67]. In another case report, a 35-year-old female was referred with symptoms of gastric outlet obstruction due to eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach and the duodenum. The patient had a history of two previous episodes of acute pancreatitis as well as eosinophilia of the bone marrow and ascites [64].

Eosinophils in Chronic Pancreatitis (CP)

Evidence indicates that increased blood eosinophilia is reported in the cohort of 122 patients of CP patients [8587] of whom 17.2% patients (mostly males) had marked blood eosinophilia (i.e., >500 eosinophils/mm3). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the incidence of eosinophilia between patients with alcoholic and nonalcoholic pancreatitis [85]. CP patients had dysfunctional exocrine pancreas with normal endocrine pancreatic function. The eosinophils levels in CP patients causes severe damage to the pleural effusion, pericarditis, and ascites [85]. A close association between marked eosinophilia and severe tissue injury was observed in CP. Additionally, in a cohort of 180 CP patients revealed that 28 patients (15.6%) had blood eosinophilia (>0.5 × 10/L) with a male to female ratio of 8.3:1. Human studies are hampered due to limited access to pancreatic tissue from CP patients; thus, we studied the role of eosinophils using a cerulein-induced experimental model of CP [19, 88]. Cerulein is a ten amino acid oligopeptide that stimulates smooth muscle and increases gastric, biliary, and pancreatic secretion; and certain smooth muscle. Cerulein is a homolog of a hormone termed as cholecystokinin that is secreted by cells in the duodenum and stimulates the release of bile into the intestine and the secretion of enzymes by the pancreas. Cerulein is commonly used to promote chronic pancreatitis in mice [19, 88]. We earlier reported for the first time that eosinophils accumulate in the pancreas and promote disease pathogenesis, including fibrosis in cerulein-induced experimental pancreatitis. Interestingly, GATA-1- and IL-5-deficient mice are protected from induction of CP [19, 89]. In the past, a correlation of perineural fibrosis, inflammation grading with alcohol consumption, and pain severity was described in CP patients. The timing of alcohol intake was correlated with infiltration of eosinophils, suggesting that pain during CP may be facilitated by perineural eosinophils via a chemotaxis mechanism involving alcohol [90].

Eosinophils in Autoimmune Pancreatitis (AIP)

AIP is progressively documented as a form of CP and can be grouped into two different types. Type I AIP is also known as IgG4-related pancreatitis and often has an impact on multiple organs (pancreas, bile ducts in the liver, salivary glands, kidneys, and lymph nodes), whereas Type II AIP (i.e., idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis) seems to affect only the pancreas [91]. AIP is difficult to differentiate from EP due to overlapping clinical symptoms. The most important features observed in EP and AIP are diffused eosinophilia in the pancreatic ducts, acini, and interstitium. The inflammatory cells in the includes granulocytes like neutrophils and eosinophils in EP, whereas, in the the lesions of AIP mostly lymphocytes re detected [7]. EP is also associated with induced levels of IgE, while AIP have induced IgG4. AIP patients generally show a positive test for autoimmune and antinuclear antibodies and have an enlarged (sausage-like) pancreas, rather than enlargement of the pancreatic head or tail [6]. A higher incidence of eosinophilia in AIP patients has been reported compared to non-AIP CP patients [87]. A study by Sah et al [92] revealed that the development of AIP is found associated with allergic disorders with the prevalence rate of ~ 28% and 15%, respectively. However, the eosinophilia in AIP may not reflect allergic phenomenon and may be consistent with the autoimmune mechanism. However, lung and cardiovascular involvements were diagnosed in patients with AIP type I, and involvement was seen in a few patients in the form of eosinophilic myocarditis [93]. Interestingly, the incidence of eosinophilia was significantly higher in AIP than in nonautoimmune CP patients [87]. These findings indicate that the occurrence of eosinophilia during CP may not be unusual and may be related to autoimmune mechanisms, serous membrane response, or the progression of pancreatic inflammation and fibrosis.

Association of Eosinophilic Pancreatitis (EP) and Diabetes

Various reports have indicated that infants can also receive EP from diabetic mothers [9496], indicating the role of diabetes in the development of EP. EP was reported in premature newborn infants of diabetic mothers [95]. Eosinophilic pancreatitis and anencephaly were found in the 34-week-old fetus of a mother suffering from type I diabetes (T1D). The histological analysis of the tissue section revealed eosinophilic infiltrate in the fibrous islets of Langerhans that causes hypertrophy and hyperplasia due to the induced maternak IgG [96]. T1D is an autoimmune disease mainly involving T-cell-mediated destruction of beta cells in the endocrine pancreas. Eosinophils (CD15(dull)/CD14(weak) cells) have been identified from patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus [97] and express induced levels of myeloid alfa-defensins and myeloperoxidase. The presence of eosinophils in T1D further indicates that eosinophils could be part of an intricate innate immune cellular network involved in the development of diabetes [98]. Induced subcutaneous eosinophilia in adipose tissue in metabolic syndrome patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular disease has been reported to play an important role in promoting inflammation-mediated disease pathogenesis [99]. Blood and renal infiltrated eosinophils are prevalent and associated with the severity of diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is associated with induced blood and renal eosinophilia, and urinary eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels are suggested as a biomarker for DN [100]. A diagrammatic representation of all eosinophilic diseases of the pancreas is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4: Eosinophils and pancreatic diseases.

Figure 4:

Eosinophils are associated with pancreatic inflammatory disorders such as acute pancreatitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis, pancreatic cancer, and endocrine pancreas, i.e., diabetes and autoimmune pancreatitis. Figure created by Biorender.

Eosinophils in Pancreatic Cancer

A clinical report showed eosinophils in 68 years old female pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with no allergic or autoimmune disease [101]. The computed tomography of the abdomen indicated mass in the neck of pancreas and fine needle aspiration biopsy both confirms the adenocarcinoma in patient. The patient was treated with FOLFIRINOX which led to resolution of the eosinophilia. Our research findings demonstrate that eosinophil and mast cell accumulation and degranulation are critical in promoting pancreatitis pathogenesis, which may lead to the development of pancreatic fibrosis and malignancy [15]. The role of eosinophils in CP-mediated pancreatic malignancy is not yet clearly understood or explored. In a recent report, inflammatory cells, including mast cells and eosinophils, were implicated in the progression of pancreatic remodeling in cerulein-induced chronic inflammation and the progression of pancreatic cancer in Akt1Myr/KRasG12D mice [102]. The results indicated that pancreas-localized IL-5 induces eosinophils that stimulate IL-5Rα-expressing ductal tumor cells and increase pancreatic tumor cell motility. In response to prolonged eosinophilic inflammation, acinar cells begin to undergo acinar-to-ductal metaplasia and convert these cells into pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PanIN) (Figure 5.) [102]. Furthermore, a case report of a 47-year-old patient showed granular eosinophilic cytoplasm with sporadic pancreatic vasoactive intestinal peptide-producing tumor (VIPoma). VIPoma is a rare disease that is reported in 1 in 10 million people per year [103]. High vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) expression is reported in the pancreas [104] and is implicated in the chemoattraction of eosinophils in allergic diseases such as asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis [105, 106]. In another clinical report, eosinophilic pancreatitis-mediated malignancy was shown to be associated with chronic myocarditis that mimics acute coronary syndrome [107].

Figure 5: The mechanism for IL-5 in chronic pancreatitis-induced pancreatic cancer.

Figure 5:

Upon inflammation, acinar cells begin to undergo acinar-to-ductal metaplasia, secrete IL-5 and induce STAT-5 phosphorylation, which recruits eosinophils into the microenvironment. Eosinophils may activate TGF-β, which causes pancreatic stellate cells to become activated and secrete collagen and periostin, thus prolonging inflammation.

Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Pancreatitis

The diagnosis of EP is very important but challenging [108] because of the similar clinical symptoms, tests, and radiological examinations between EP and pancreatic neoplasia [6, 109]. An EP diagnosis should exclude parasitic infections and eosinophilia during pathological samples evaluation [110, 111]. Eosinophil-associated pancreatic disorders mainly include several cases of acute pancreatitis, recurrent acute pancreatitis, chronic pancreatitis [19, 89], pancreatic cancer [15], and autoimmune pancreatitis [92]. Even in pancreatic cancer a marked eosinophilia is observed [15, 109]; therefore, EP is sometimes misdiagnosed as pancreatic cancer [6, 69, 112, 113]. Several lines of evidence indicate that EP is mostly diagnosed for suspected pancreatic tumors that mimic a pancreatic neoplasm [65, 66, 113]. Routine endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) for resectable pancreatic lesions is controversial [110], but recently, a 37-year-old man was diagnosed with a rare nononcological pancreatic mass representing eosinophilic pancreatitis [114]. In 2019, Pinte et al [115] analyzed 36 publications in a systemic review consisting of case reports and case series. They found that out of 45 patients, 20 subjects with eosinophilic gastroenteritis developed pancreatitis, 20 had eosinophilic pancreatitis, and 5 had hypereosinophilic syndromes involving the pancreas. None of these three groups showed significant differences in clinical, laboratory, or imaging features, despite the multiple theories that explain the association of pancreatic and gastrointestinal eosinophilic infiltration. Overall, the diagnosis of EP is very important, and it may be assumed that pancreatic tissue biopsy procedures (i.e., ERCP, endoscopy) with fine needle aspiration may not provide sufficient tissue for pathological examination, leading to missed diagnosis of EP.

The Mechanism Involved in Promoting Eosinophilic Pancreatitis (EP)

We reported the role of eosinophils during CP pathogeny-associated fibrotic remodeling using an experimental model [19]. We found pancreatic IL-18 was induced during CP [19], which was in accordance with previous clinical observations [2123]. Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EG) is also linked to EP, and we showed that IL-18 overexpression via recombinant IL-18 or transgene insertion promotes EG disorders [24] and that IL-18 plays an important role in generating and transforming naïve eosinophils to pathogenic eosinophils [19, 25].

Eosinophil infiltration and accumulation has been reported during different stages of pancreatitis onset (AP), progression (RAP, CP), and pancreatic malignancy. However, the molecular mechanisms involved in eosinophil accumulation during pancreatitis pathogenesis remain elusive. Eotaxins serve as a chemoattractants for eosinophils [116], and activation of eotaxin-3 via involvement of the STAT6 signaling pathway has been reported in human pancreatic myofibroblasts. Furthermore, in a study pancreatic myofibroblasts are reported as the cellular source of eotaxin-3 and its induction is correlated with Th2 cytokines (IL-4 and IL-13) [117]. We have recently reported eosinophil accumulation and degranulation in the pancreas along with induced mRNA and protein expression levels of proinflammatory cytokines IL-5, IL-18, and chemokines eotaxin-1 and eotaxin-2 in the cerulein-induced experimental mouse model of CP. We also showed that the eosinophil-deficient GATA1 and IL-5-deficient mice were protected from the induction of CP [19]. Furthermore, we also showed induced accumulation and degranulation of eosinophils and mast cells presence in the malignant pancreatitis [15]. Several reports also indicate that nerves expressing VIP are induced in the pancreas [118120], and we recently showed that VIP has chemoattraction activity for eosinophils [105]. Therefore, the induced expression of VIP and eosinophils in pancreatitis indicates that VIP may be a critical molecule that promotes eosinophilic pancreatitis. Notably, even though eosinophils are detected in pancreatic cancer, including pancreatic ductal carcinoma [7, 121124]; but its role in cancer or pancreatic cancer is yet not established. Therefore, it is critical to detect and establish eosinophil’s role in pancreatitis patients based on their eosinophil count, immunoglobulin E levels, and eosinophilic granules in blood and biopsies.

Conclusion

This review mainly provides insights into eosinophils associated with pancreatic disorders, focusing on pancreatitis (acute, recurrent acute, and chronic), diabetes, and pancreatic cancers. The information summarized in this review will be highly useful for future studies focusing on the development of novel treatment options for eosinophils associated with disease. The case reports and experimental models reviewed here indicate the roles of IL-5, IL-18, and VIP in promoting EP; therefore, based on the evidence provided in this review, clinicians should be aware of the role of eosinophils in promoting chronic pancreatitis. Furthermore, the detection of eosinophils in pancreatic tumors indicates that eosinophilic pancreatitis progresses into pancreatic neoplasia. This rationale is based on some recent reports that show (i) the role of eosinophils in the progression of chronic pancreatitis and fibrosis in experimental mouse models and (ii) eosinophil degranulation promotes human pancreatic malignancy. Taken together, evidence indicates that eosinophilic pancreatitis is an independent disease entity that requires further attention from basic scientists and clinicians.

Acknowledgment

We thank Gulshan Singh and Loula Burton from the department of Global Environmental Health Sciences and Office of Research Proposal Development, Tulane University for helping with figure preparation and manuscript editing, respectively. The authors also acknowledge partial financial support of NIH grant R01 AI080581 (AM).

Footnotes

Declarations: Not applicable

Conflict of interest: All authors have declared no conflict of interest for this review.

Publisher's Disclaimer: This Author Accepted Manuscript is a PDF file of a an unedited peer-reviewed manuscript that has been accepted for publication but has not been copyedited or corrected. The official version of record that is published in the journal is kept up to date and so may therefore differ from this version.

References

  • 1.Kay AB, The early history of the eosinophil. Clin Exp Allergy, 2015. 45(3): p. 575–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Fulkerson PC and Rothenberg ME, Eosinophil Development, Disease Involvement, and Therapeutic Suppression. Adv Immunol, 2018. 138: p. 1–34. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Travers J and Rothenberg ME, Eosinophils in mucosal immune responses. Mucosal Immunol, 2015. 8(3): p. 464–75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Straumann A and Safroneeva E, Eosinophils in the gastrointestinal tract: friends or foes? Acta Gastroenterol Belg, 2012. 75(3): p. 310–5. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Shukla A MA, Venkateshaiah SU, Manhoar M, Mahadevappa CP, Mishra A, Elements Involved In Promoting Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders. J Genet Syndr Gene Ther, 2015. 6: p. 265. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Tian L, et al. , Eosinophilic pancreatitis: Three case reports and literature review. Mol Clin Oncol, 2016. 4(4): p. 559–562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Abraham SC, et al. , Eosinophilic pancreatitis and increased eosinophils in the pancreas. Am J Surg Pathol, 2003. 27(3): p. 334–42. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Prussin C, Eosinophilic gastroenteritis and related eosinophilic disorders. Gastroenterol Clin North Am, 2014. 43(2): p. 317–27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Venkateshaiah SU, et al. , A critical role for IL-18 in transformation and maturation of naive eosinophils to pathogenic eosinophils. J Allergy Clin Immunol, 2018. 142(1): p. 301–305. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Venkateshaiah SU, et al. , Possible Noninvasive Biomarker of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: Clinical and Experimental Evidence. Case Rep Gastroenterol, 2016. 10(3): p. 685–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Petrov MS and Yadav D, Global epidemiology and holistic prevention of pancreatitis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2019. 16(3): p. 175–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Colvin SD, et al. , Acute pancreatitis: an update on the revised Atlanta classification. Abdom Radiol (NY), 2020. 45(5): p. 1222–1231. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Manohar M VA, Venkateshaiah SU, Sanders NL, Mishra A Chronic Pancreatitis Associated Acute Respiratory Failure. MOJ Immunology, 2017. 5(2): p. 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Manohar M, et al. , Pathogenic mechanisms of pancreatitis. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther, 2017. 8(1): p. 10–25. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Manohar M, et al. , Significance of Eosinophils in Promoting Pancreatic malignancy. J Gastroenterol Pancreatol Liver Disord, 2017. 5(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zheng L, et al. , Role of immune cells and immune-based therapies in pancreatitis and pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Gastroenterology, 2013. 144(6): p. 1230–40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Manohar M VA, Venkateshaiah SU, Mishra A, Immunological Responses Involved In Promoting Acute and Chronic Pancreatitis. J Clin Immunol Res, 2017. 1: p. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Juniper K Jr., Chronic relapsing pancreatitis with associated marked eosinophilia and pleural effusion. Am J Med, 1955. 19(4): p. 648–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Manohar M, et al. , Role of eosinophils in the initiation and progression of pancreatitis pathogenesis. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 2018. 314(2): p. G211–G222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Xue J, et al. , Alternatively activated macrophages promote pancreatic fibrosis in chronic pancreatitis. Nat Commun, 2015. 6: p. 7158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yuan BS, et al. , Interleukin-18: a pro-inflammatory cytokine that plays an important role in acute pancreatitis. Expert Opin Ther Targets, 2007. 11(10): p. 1261–71. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Ueda T, et al. , Significant elevation of serum interleukin-18 levels in patients with acute pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol, 2006. 41(2): p. 158–65. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Wereszczynska-Siemiatkowska U, Mroczko B, and Siemiatkowski A, Serum profiles of interleukin-18 in different severity forms of human acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol, 2002. 37(9): p. 1097–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Dutt P, et al. , Allergen-induced interleukin-18 promotes experimental eosinophilic oesophagitis in mice. Immunol Cell Biol, 2015. 93(10): p. 849–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Verma AK, et al. , Intestinal overexpression of IL-18 promotes eosinophils-mediated allergic disorders. Immunology, 2019. 157(2): p. 110–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.McBrien CN and Menzies-Gow A, The Biology of Eosinophils and Their Role in Asthma. Front Med (Lausanne), 2017. 4: p. 93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hamann KJ, et al. , The molecular biology of eosinophil granule proteins. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol, 1991. 94(1–4): p. 202–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Kandikattu HK, Venkateshaiah SU, and Mishra A, Synergy of Interleukin (IL)-5 and IL-18 in eosinophil mediated pathogenesis of allergic diseases. Cytokine & growth factor reviews, 2019. 47: p. 83–98. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Varricchi G, et al. , Interleukin-5 pathway inhibition in the treatment of eosinophilic respiratory disorders: evidence and unmet needs. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol, 2016. 16(2): p. 186–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Mishra A, et al. , Fundamental signals that regulate eosinophil homing to the gastrointestinal tract. The Journal of clinical investigation, 1999. 103(12): p. 1719–1727. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Kita H, Eosinophils: multifunctional and distinctive properties. International archives of allergy and immunology, 2013. 161(Suppl. 2): p. 3–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Johnston LK and Bryce PJ, Understanding Interleukin 33 and Its Roles in Eosinophil Development. Front Med (Lausanne), 2017. 4: p. 51. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lacy P and Moqbel R, Eosinophil cytokines. Chem Immunol, 2000. 76: p. 134–55. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Spencer LA, et al. , Human eosinophils constitutively express multiple Th1, Th2, and immunoregulatory cytokines that are secreted rapidly and differentially. J Leukoc Biol, 2009. 85(1): p. 117–23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wen T and Rothenberg ME, The Regulatory Function of Eosinophils. Microbiol Spectr, 2016. 4(5). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Iwasaki H, et al. , Identification of eosinophil lineage-committed progenitors in the murine bone marrow. J Exp Med, 2005. 201(12): p. 1891–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Mori Y, et al. , Identification of the human eosinophil lineage-committed progenitor: revision of phenotypic definition of the human common myeloid progenitor. J Exp Med, 2009. 206(1): p. 183–93. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xia LX, et al. , Eosinophil differentiation in the bone marrow is promoted by protein tyrosine phosphatase SHP2. Cell Death Dis, 2016. 7: p. e2175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Uhm TG, Kim BS, and Chung IY, Eosinophil development, regulation of eosinophil-specific genes, and role of eosinophils in the pathogenesis of asthma. Allergy Asthma Immunol Res, 2012. 4(2): p. 68–79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Blanchard C and Rothenberg ME, Biology of the eosinophil. Adv Immunol, 2009. 101: p. 81–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Mesnil C, et al. , Lung-resident eosinophils represent a distinct regulatory eosinophil subset. The Journal of clinical investigation, 2016. 126(9): p. 3279–3295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Venkateshaiah SU, et al. , Possible noninvasive biomarker of eosinophilic esophagitis: clinical and experimental evidence. Case reports in gastroenterology, 2016. 10(3): p. 685–692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Shi H-Z, et al. , Lymph node trafficking and antigen presentation by endobronchial eosinophils. The Journal of clinical investigation, 2000. 105(7): p. 945–953. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Akuthota P, et al. , MHC Class II and CD9 in human eosinophils localize to detergent-resistant membrane microdomains. American journal of respiratory cell and molecular biology, 2012. 46(2): p. 188–195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Jacobsen EA, et al. , Allergic pulmonary inflammation in mice is dependent on eosinophil-induced recruitment of effector T cells. The Journal of experimental medicine, 2008. 205(3): p. 699–710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mishra A, et al. , Peyer’s patch eosinophils: identification, characterization, and regulation by mucosal allergen exposure, interleukin-5, and eotaxin. Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 2000. 96(4): p. 1538–1544. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Beller A, et al. , Eosinophils promote generation and maintenance of immunoglobulin-A-expressing plasma cells and contribute to gut immune homeostasis. Immunity, 2014. 40(4): p. 582–593. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Jung Y, et al. , IL-1β in eosinophil-mediated small intestinal homeostasis and IgA production. Mucosal immunology, 2015. 8(4): p. 930–942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Wu D, et al. , Eosinophils sustain adipose alternatively activated macrophages associated with glucose homeostasis. Science, 2011. 332(6026): p. 243–247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Brigger D, et al. , Eosinophils regulate adipose tissue inflammation and sustain physical and immunological fitness in old age. Nature metabolism, 2020. 2(8): p. 688–702. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Marichal T, Mesnil C, and Bureau F, Homeostatic Eosinophils: Characteristics and Functions. Front Med (Lausanne), 2017. 4: p. 101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Mishra A, et al. , Enterocyte expression of the eotaxin and interleukin-5 transgenes induces compartmentalized dysregulation of eosinophil trafficking. J Biol Chem, 2002. 277(6): p. 4406–12. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Mishra A, et al. , IL-5 promotes eosinophil trafficking to the esophagus. J Immunol, 2002. 168(5): p. 2464–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Mishra A, et al. , An etiological role for aeroallergens and eosinophils in experimental esophagitis. J Clin Invest, 2001. 107(1): p. 83–90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Aun MV, et al. , Animal models of asthma: utility and limitations . J Asthma Allergy, 2017. 10: p. 293–301. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Braun A and Tschernig T, Animal models of asthma: innovative methods of lung research and new pharmacological targets . Exp Toxicol Pathol, 2006. 57 Suppl 2: p. 3–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Mosmann TR and Coffman RL, TH1 and TH2 cells: different patterns of lymphokine secretion lead to different functional properties. Annu Rev Immunol, 1989. 7: p. 145–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zosky GR and Sly PD, Animal models of asthma. Clin Exp Allergy, 2007. 37(7): p. 973–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Kandikattu HK, et al. , Tacrolimus (FK506) treatment protects allergen, IL-5, and IL-13-induced mucosal eosinophilia. Immunology, 2021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Mishra A, Significance of Mouse Models in Dissecting the Mechanism of Human Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases (EGID). J Gastroenterol Hepatol Res, 2013. 2(11): p. 845–853. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Hogan SP, et al. , A pathological function for eotaxin and eosinophils in eosinophilic gastrointestinal inflammation. Nat Immunol, 2001. 2(4): p. 353–60. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Samlani Z, Lemfadli Y, and Habiyaremye C, Rare association of eosinophilic pancreatitis and ulcerative colitis: a case report and a review of the literature. Gastroenterol Hepatol Open Access, 2020. 11(2): p. 52–55. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bastid C, et al. , Eosinophilic pancreatitis: report of a case. Pancreas, 1990. 5(1): p. 104–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Lyngbaek S, et al. , Recurrent acute pancreatitis due to eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Case report and literature review. JOP, 2006. 7(2): p. 211–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Kakodkar S, et al. , Eosinophilic Pancreatitis Diagnosed With Endoscopic Ultrasound. ACG Case Rep J, 2015. 2(4): p. 239–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Flejou JF, Potet F, and Bernades P, [Eosinophilic pancreatitis: a rare manifestation of digestive allergy?]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 1989. 13(8–9): p. 731–3. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Reppucci J, et al. , Eosinophilic Pancreatitis: A Rare Cause of Recurrent Acute Pancreatitis. Case Rep Gastroenterol, 2017. 11(1): p. 120–126. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Hashimoto F, Transient eosinophilia associated with pancreatitis and pseudocyst formation. Arch Intern Med, 1980. 140(8): p. 1099–100. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Cay A, Imamoglu M, and Cobanoglu U, Eosinophilic pancreatitis mimicking pancreatic neoplasia. Can J Gastroenterol, 2006. 20(5): p. 361–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Hayden DW and Kruiningen HJ, Experimentally induced canine toxocariasis: laboratory examinations and pathologic changes, with emphasis on the gastrointestinal tract. Am J Vet Res, 1975. 36(11): p. 1605–14. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Petty DP, et al. , Necropsies of eight horses infected with Strongylus equinus and Strongylus edentatus. J S Afr Vet Assoc, 1992. 63(2): p. 66–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Novaes G, et al. , Experimental chronic interstitial pancreatitis induced by scorpion toxin in rats. Arq Gastroenterol, 1990. 27(4): p. 187–90. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Vazquez Rodriguez JJ, et al. , Pancreatitis and eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Int Surg, 1973. 58(6): p. 415–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Maeshima A, et al. , Eosinophilic gastroenteritis presenting with acute pancreatitis. J Med, 1997. 28(3–4): p. 265–72. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Polyak S, Smith TA, and Mertz H, Eosinophilic gastroenteritis causing pancreatitis and pancreaticobiliary ductal dilation. Dig Dis Sci, 2002. 47(5): p. 1091–5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Bellaiche G, et al. , [Pancreatic involvement, ascites and diarrhea in idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 1997. 21(6–7): p. 519–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Eugene C, et al. , [Icterus disclosing pancreatic involvement in idiopathic hypereosinophilic syndrome]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 1984. 8(12): p. 966–9. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Rakesh K, et al. , Eosinophilic pancreatitis with pseudocyst. Indian J Gastroenterol, 2007. 26(3): p. 136–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Baek MS, et al. , A patient with eosinophilic gastroenteritis presenting with acute pancreatitis and ascites. Gut Liver, 2014. 8(2): p. 224–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Tse KY and Christiansen SC, Eosinophilic gastroenteritis due to egg allergy presenting as acute pancreatitis. Allergy Rhinol (Providence), 2015. 6(1): p. 80–1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Suzuki S, et al. , Eosinophilic gastroenteritis due to cow’s milk allergy presenting with acute pancreatitis. Int Arch Allergy Immunol, 2012. 158 Suppl 1: p. 75–82. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Bass DA, Behavior of eosinophil leukocytes in acute inflammation. II. Eosinophil dynamics during acute inflammation. J Clin Invest, 1975. 56(4): p. 870–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Kedia S, Dhingra R, and Garg PK, Recurrent acute pancreatitis: an approach to diagnosis and management. Trop Gastroenterol, 2013. 34(3): p. 123–35. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Testoni PA, Acute recurrent pancreatitis: Etiopathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment. World J Gastroenterol, 2014. 20(45): p. 16891–901. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Tokoo M, et al. , Eosinophilia associated with chronic pancreatitis: an analysis of 122 patients with definite chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 1992. 87(4): p. 455–60. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Imbert Y, et al. , [Acute outbreaks of chronic pancreatitis associated with recurrent hypereosinophilia in patients with progressive lipodystrophy]. Presse Med, 1984. 13(30): p. 1850. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Wang Q, et al. , Eosinophilia associated with chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas, 2009. 38(2): p. 149–53. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Manohar M, et al. , IL-15 regulates fibrosis and inflammation in a mouse model of chronic pancreatitis. American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology, 2018. 315(6): p. G954–G965. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Manohar M, Eosinophilic pancreatitis need an attention. J Pulmonol Clin Res., 2017. 1(1): p. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Keith RG, Keshavjee SH, and Kerenyi NR, Neuropathology of chronic pancreatitis in humans. Can J Surg, 1985. 28(3): p. 207–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Hart PA, Zen Y, and Chari ST, Recent Advances in Autoimmune Pancreatitis. Gastroenterology, 2015. 149(1): p. 39–51. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Sah RP, et al. , Eosinophilia and allergic disorders in autoimmune pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol, 2010. 105(11): p. 2485–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Nikolic S, et al. , Cardiovascular and lung involvement in patients with autoimmune pancreatitis. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2020. 9(2): p. 409. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Barresi G, Inferrera C, and De Luca F, Eosinophilic pancreatitis in the newborn infant of a diabetic mother. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histol, 1978. 380(4): p. 341–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Payan H, Lebreuil G, and Vague P, [Eosinophilic cell pancreatitis in newborn infants of diabetic mothers]. Ann Anat Pathol (Paris), 1968. 13(1): p. 87–96. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.George ER, et al. , A Unique Case of Eosinophilic Pancreatitis and Anencephaly in the Fetus of a Type I Diabetic Mother. Gastroenterology Res, 2011. 4(4): p. 174–176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Neuwirth A, et al. , Eosinophils from patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus express high level of myeloid alpha-defensins and myeloperoxidase. Cellular immunology, 2012. 273(2): p. 158–163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Neuwirth A, et al. , Eosinophils from patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus express high level of myeloid alpha-defensins and myeloperoxidase. Cell Immunol, 2012. 273(2): p. 158–63. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Moussa K, et al. , Increased eosinophils in adipose tissue of metabolic syndrome. Journal of Diabetes and its Complications, 2019. 33(8): p. 535–538. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Wu WY, et al. , Interstitial eosinophilic infiltration in diabetic nephropathy is indicative of poor prognosis, with no therapy benefit from steroid. J Diabetes, 2020. 12(12): p. 881–894. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Ibrahim U, et al. , Eosinophilia as the presenting sign in pancreatic cancer: an extremely rare occurrence. Postgrad Med, 2017. 129(3): p. 399–401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Gitto SB, et al. , Identification of a novel IL-5 signaling pathway in chronic pancreatitis and crosstalk with pancreatic tumor cells. Cell Communication and Signaling, 2020. 18(1): p. 1–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Abu-Zaid A, et al. , Sporadic pancreatic vasoactive intestinal peptide-producing tumor (VIPoma) in a 47-year-old male. Hematology/oncology and stem cell therapy, 2014. 7(3): p. 109–115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Schizas D, et al. , Clinicopathological data and treatment modalities for pancreatic vipomas: A systematic review. J BUON, 2019. 24: p. 415–423. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Verma AK, et al. , Role of vasoactive intestinal peptide in promoting the pathogenesis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 2018. 5(1): p. 99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Verma AK, et al. , Neuroendocrine cells derived chemokine vasoactive intestinal polypeptide (VIP) in allergic diseases. Cytokine & growth factor reviews, 2017. 38: p. 37–48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Jang D, Chronic Myocarditis Mimicking Acute Coronary Syndrome due to Hypereosinophilia which was produced by produced by Pancreatic Cancer. Case reports and Images, 2018. 2: p. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Descamps C, et al. , [Eosinophilic pancreatitis: a difficult diagnosis]. Gastroenterol Clin Biol, 1998. 22(11): p. 970–2. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Hirata J, et al. , Pancreatic carcinoma associated with marked eosinophilia: a case report. Eur J Haematol, 1987. 39(5): p. 462–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Le Connie D and Nguyen H, Eosinophilic gastroenteritis, ascites, and pancreatitis: a case report and review of the literature. South Med J, 2004. 97(9): p. 905–6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Javid Bhat K, et al. , Chronic diarrhea, eosinophilic ascites, acute pancreatitis and deep venous thrombosis: A case report. Caspian J Intern Med, 2014. 5(3): p. 182–5. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Euscher E, Vaswani K, and Frankel W, Eosinophilic pancreatitis: a rare entity that can mimic a pancreatic neoplasm. Ann Diagn Pathol, 2000. 4(6): p. 379–85. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Barthet M, et al. , Eosinophilic pancreatitis mimicking pancreatic neoplasia: EUS and ERCP findings--is nonsurgical diagnosis possible? Pancreas, 1998. 17(4): p. 419–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.De Moura DTH, et al. , A rare non-oncological pancreatic mass: eosinophilic pancreatitis diagnosis through EUS-FNA. Endosc Int Open, 2019. 7(2): p. E151–E154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Pinte L and Baicus C, Eosinophilic pancreatitis versus pancreatitis associated with eosinophilic gastroenteritis -a systematic review regarding clinical features and diagnosis. Rom J Intern Med, 2019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Rothenberg ME, et al. , Eotaxin triggers eosinophil-selective chemotaxis and calcium flux via a distinct receptor and induces pulmonary eosinophilia in the presence of interleukin 5 in mice. Mol Med, 1996. 2(3): p. 334–48. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Fujimoto T, et al. , Eotaxin-3 (CCL26) Expression in Human Pancreatic Myofibroblasts. Pancreas, 2016. 45(3): p. 420–4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Stevens KJ and Lisanti C, Pancreas Imaging, in StatPearls. 2020: Treasure Island (FL). [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Schmidt DN and Pandol SJ, Differing effects of ethanol on in vitro stimulated pancreatic enzyme secretion in ethanol-fed and control rats. Pancreas, 1990. 5(1): p. 27–36. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Ebeid AM, Murray PD, and Fischer JE, Vasoative intestinal peptide and the watery diarrhea syndrome. Ann Surg, 1978. 187(4): p. 411–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Varricchi G, et al. , Eosinophils: The unsung heroes in cancer? Oncoimmunology, 2018. 7(2): p. e1393134. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Samoszuk M, Eosinophils and human cancer. Histol Histopathol, 1997. 12(3): p. 807–12. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Iwasaki K, Torisu M, and Fujimura T, Malignant tumor and eosinophils. I. Prognostic significance in gastric cancer. Cancer, 1986. 58(6): p. 1321–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Davis BP and Rothenberg ME, Eosinophils and cancer. Cancer Immunol Res, 2014. 2(1): p. 1–8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES