Skip to main content
PLOS Biology logoLink to PLOS Biology
. 2021 Jul 7;19(7):e3001334. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001334

The transcription factor LAG-1/CSL plays a Notch-independent role in controlling terminal differentiation, fate maintenance, and plasticity of serotonergic chemosensory neurons

Miren Maicas 1, Ángela Jimeno-Martín 1,¤, Andrea Millán-Trejo 1, Mark J Alkema 2, Nuria Flames 1,*
Editor: Bing Ye3
PMCID: PMC8289040  PMID: 34232959

Abstract

During development, signal-regulated transcription factors (TFs) act as basal repressors and upon signalling through morphogens or cell-to-cell signalling shift to activators, mediating precise and transient responses. Conversely, at the final steps of neuron specification, terminal selector TFs directly initiate and maintain neuron-type specific gene expression through enduring functions as activators. C. elegans contains 3 types of serotonin synthesising neurons that share the expression of the serotonin biosynthesis pathway genes but not of other effector genes. Here, we find an unconventional role for LAG-1, the signal-regulated TF mediator of the Notch pathway, as terminal selector for the ADF serotonergic chemosensory neuron, but not for other serotonergic neuron types. Regulatory regions of ADF effector genes contain functional LAG-1 binding sites that mediate activation but not basal repression. lag-1 mutants show broad defects in ADF effector genes activation, and LAG-1 is required to maintain ADF cell fate and functions throughout life. Unexpectedly, contrary to reported basal repression state for LAG-1 prior to Notch receptor activation, gene expression activation in the ADF neuron by LAG-1 does not require Notch signalling, demonstrating a default activator state for LAG-1 independent of Notch. We hypothesise that the enduring activity of terminal selectors on target genes required uncoupling LAG-1 activating role from receiving the transient Notch signalling.


This study shows that LAG-1/CSL, the transcriptional mediator of the Notch pathway, establishes and maintains serotonergic neuron fate in the nematode C. elegans, independently of Notch signaling.

Introduction

The generation of the plethora of neuron types present in the nervous system is a complex and protracted process that is currently not well understood. In the earliest steps of neuron specification, morphogens and cell surface signalling molecules specify naive cells towards restricted neuronal progenitors [1]. Sharp differences in gene expression levels between different types of neuronal progenitors are essential for precise neuronal induction. Thus, these signalling molecules act through specific transcription factors (TFs) called signal-regulated TFs. During basal conditions, signal-regulated TFs function as repressors and they shift to temporally and spatially restricted gene activation when the signalling molecule is received [2]. Different mechanisms, including protein instability, posttranslational modifications, negative feedback loops, or cross-inhibition, ensure the transient activating effects of signal-regulated TFs [2,3].

Later in development, during neuronal terminal differentiation, in contrast to the transient activation effects mediated by signal-regulated TFs, the enduring actions of specific combinations of TFs, termed terminal selectors, ensure the direct and sustained transcriptional activation of neuron-type specific effector genes, such as ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors, neurotransmitter biosynthesis enzymes, etc. [4]. Effector genes are ultimately responsible for the specific properties and physiological functions of the neuron, and their expression is sustained throughout the life of the cell. Accordingly, terminal selector TFs are also continuously expressed, and they are necessary not only to establish but also to maintain correct effector gene expression [5,6].

Neuronal terminal selectors have been described in different metazoan groups including mammals [5,7], although they have been best characterised in C. elegans, where at least a terminal selector is known for 76 out of the 118 different neuronal types [8]. Interestingly, despite numerous examples of TFs acting as terminal selectors, only a small number of TF families are known to act as neuronal terminal selectors from over 50 different families that are present in the C. elegans genome. This includes members of the Erythroblast Transformation Specific (ETS), SRY-related HMG-box genes (SOX), Nuclear Hormone Receptors (NHRs), Basic Helix Loop Helix (bHLH), Zinc Finger (ZF), and, most prominently, the Homeodomain (HD) family [8]. Yet, for many neuronal types in C. elegans, not a single terminal selector has been identified so far, thus additional TF families could also be directly involved in neuronal terminal differentiation.

Serotonin (5HT) is a phylogenetically conserved neurotransmitter present in all animal groups. The same enzymes and transporters are used in different organisms to synthesise, release, and reuptake 5HT, which are collectively known as the 5HT pathway effector genes (Fig 1A). C. elegans contains 3 different types of 5HT synthesising neurons: the ADF chemosensory neuron, the NSM neurosecretory neuron, and the HSN motorneuron (Fig 1B). Despite sharing the expression of the 5HT pathway genes, each 5HT neuron type expresses a very different set of additional effector genes [9]. Accordingly, the combination of terminal selectors acting in NSM and HSN are different [9,10]. In contrast to the well-characterised NSM and HSN terminal differentiation programs, no terminal selector has been identified for the ADF chemosensory neuron.

Fig 1. CSL/LAG-1 binding sites are required for serotonin pathway gene expression in the ADF chemosensory neuron.

Fig 1

(A) Phylogenetically conserved serotonin biosynthetic pathway. C. elegans protein names appear in dark font, mammalian in grey. (B) C. elegans hermaphrodite serotonin synthesising system is composed of 3 types of bilateral neurons (NSM, ADF, and HSN, L: left, R: right). (C) 5HT pathway gene minimal CRMs active in ADF neurons. The most significant overrepresented motif shared by all CRMs is depicted in blue. Numbers in brackets represent the coordinates of each construct referred to the translational start site. Red boxes represent coding exons. (D) Scanning mutation analysis of tph-1 minimal CRM unravels the functionality of the first 40 bp. Sequence windows of 20 bp were mutated to poliT. +: >80%; +/−: 80%–20%; −: <20% of mean wild type expression values. See S1 Fig for raw data. (E) Young adult images showing tph-1 minimal CRM tph-1prom17 and the synthetic construct tph-1prom46 (3X 40 bp window), which are expressed exclusively in the ADF neuron. Scale bar: 10 μm. (F) PWM of the most significant enriched motif and its closest match that corresponds to mammalian RBPJ. (G) Mutational analysis of predicted CSL binding sites. Note that for cat-1prom14, in addition to the motif identified in Fig 1C (CGTGAGAA), an extra motif with a better match for CSL consensus site (TATGGGAA) is found. This better match was selected for mutational analysis. +, +/−, and − range values are the same as in D. See S1 Fig for point mutation description and raw data. AADC, aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase; CRM, cis-regulatory module; CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1; GCH, GTP cyclohydrolase; PWM, position weight matrix; SERT, serotonin transporter; TPH, tryptophan hydroxylase; Trp, tryptophan; VMAT, vesicular monoamine transporter; 5HT, serotonin; 5HTP, 5-hydroxytryptophan.

Here, we demonstrate that LAG-1, a signal-regulated TF from the CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1 (CSL) family, which conventionally shows repressor activity until Notch is activated or independent of Notch, is a terminal selector in the ADF neuron acting as an activator independent of Notch signalling. Through cis-regulatory analysis, we identify functional CSL binding sites in ADF-active regulatory sequences for all 5HT pathway genes. Importantly, in contrast to previous reported basal repressive roles for LAG-1, these sites are required for ADF effector gene activation but do not mediate basal repression. We find lag-1 mutants show broad defects in ADF terminal differentiation. LAG-1 is continuously required postembryonically to maintain correct ADF effector gene expression and functions. Finally, we find that LAG-1 ectopic expression is sufficient, in some contexts, to drive ADF effector gene expression. Altogether, these results define LAG-1 as ADF terminal selector. Unexpectedly, we find LAG-1 fulfils its activating role as terminal selector independent from the Notch signalling, thus acting as a constitutive activator. In addition, we also explore LAG-1 actions on tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase gene expression plasticity in the ADF. Our results unravel a complex scenario in which different environmental stimuli modulate tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase gene expression through different TFs and different cis-regulatory regions, and some, but not all, of the responses to these stimuli are dependent on LAG-1 function.

Results

CSL/LAG-1 binding sites are required for serotonin pathway gene expression in the ADF chemosensory neuron

Cis-regulatory analysis of neuron type–specific effector genes has been instrumental to identify the transcriptional regulatory logic directing neuron type differentiation [11]. Thus, we isolated the minimal cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) that drive serotonin pathway gene transcription in the ADF neuron (Fig 1C and S1 Fig) [9]. We next focused on the smallest CRM, a 99-bp region located upstream the tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase locus (tph-1prom17); this construct drives gfp expression exclusively in the ADF neuron (Fig 1C and 1E). We performed serial scanning mutagenesis and identified a 40-bp region inside tph-1prom-17 that is required for ADF neuron expression (Fig 1D). A synthetic construct with 3 copies of this 40-bp minimal region (tph-1prom46) is sufficient to drive gfp expression exclusively in the ADF neuron (Fig 1E), while a single copy of the 40-bp region placed in front of a neuronal minimal promoter not expressed in the ADF is unable to drive ADF expression (S1 Fig). Altogether, these data show that cis-regulatory information located in this small 40-bp region is necessary and sufficient, when multimerized, to drive gene expression specifically in the ADF neuron.

Terminal selectors directly coregulate expression of neuron type–specific effector genes; thus, we performed de novo motif discovery analysis [12] using the 6 minimal 5HT pathway gene CRMs, including the small 40-bp region in the tph-1 locus. The most significantly enriched motif highly resembles the RBPJ binding motif (Fig 1C and 1F). RBPJ, also known as CBF1, is the vertebrate member of the highly conserved CSL TF family, which in C. elegans is composed by the unique member LAG-1. Disruption of the CSL motif in 5HT pathway gene CRMs leads to strong GFP expression defects in the ADF neuron with no significant up-regulation or ectopic GFP expression observed upon mutation (Fig 1G and S1 Fig), suggesting that LAG-1, through its binding to the CSL motif, could directly activate ADF terminal differentiation.

LAG-1 controls ADF neuron terminal differentiation

We next analysed ADF neuron terminal differentiation in lag-1 mutants. LAG-1 is the signal-regulated TF of the Notch signalling pathway that mediates cell–cell interactions during development. lag-1(q385) allele is a premature STOP (Fig 2A) that displays the strongest phenotypes of all characterised lag-1 alleles, including lethality, and it is considered to be a null allele [13,14]. lag-1(q385) individuals arrest soon after hatching in the first larval stage (L1) with numerous defects reflecting a failure of Notch-mediated cell fate specification during embryogenesis [14]. Analysis of freshly hatched lag-1(q385) worms revealed a dramatic loss of 5HT pathway reporter gene expression in the ADF neuron (Fig 2B). Interestingly, the 2 knock-in endogenous reporters analysed, tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase (vlc46) and mod-5/5HT transporter (vlc47), show the greatest expression defects compared to other scored reporters built as multicopy extrachromosomal or integrated simple arrays [otIs221(cat-1::gfp), otIs225(cat-4::gfp), and vlcEx2433(bas-1::gfp)] (Fig 2B). This observation suggests that endogenous reporters might be more sensitive to lag-1 loss. Expression of other effector genes not directly related to serotonin biosynthesis, such as srh-142/serpentine receptor and gpa-13/Gα protein, is also reduced in lag-1(q385) animals (Fig 2C), suggesting a broader role for LAG-1 in ADF neuron terminal differentiation, not limited to serotonin metabolism, as would be expected for a terminal selector. Importantly, we determined that ADF neuron is still generated in lag-1(q385) mutant as 82% of lag-1(q395) animals still show detectable srh-142/serpentine receptor expression albeit at lower levels (Fig 2C). We next analysed odr-1/guanylate cyclase effector gene expression in AWB neurons, the sister cell of ADF, and found similar odr-1/guanylate cyclase expression in lag-1(q385) mutant and wild-type animals (S2 Fig). Altogether, these results suggest that LAG-1 function is dispensable for the generation of 2 neurons in the terminal branch of the ADF lineage (ADF and AWB neurons) or for ADF neuron survival, but it is necessary for correct ADF neuron terminal differentiation, likely through direct activation of ADF expressed effector genes. Similar broad ADF expression defects are found in the thermosensitive hypomorphic allele lag-1(om13), although the phenotype is observed only when worms are grown at 15 °C and only transiently during L1 (S2 Fig). This allele shows slight germline and somatic defects, which are stronger at 20 to 25 °C compared to 15 °C [15]. The transient phenotype we observe is likely due to the weak nature of this hypomorphic allele in which enough LAG-1 activity in the ADF neuron might be reached either at longer times or at higher temperatures. Finally, as will be discussed in more detail below, lag-1 RNAi also displays broad serotonin pathway gene expression defects specifically in the ADF.

Fig 2. LAG-1 TF controls ADF terminal differentiation.

Fig 2

(A) lag-1 locus, grey boxes represent exons and blue boxes correspond to exons coding for the LAG-1 DNA binding domain. Red bars locate point mutations of the corresponding alleles. (B) Quantification of lag-1(q385) mutant phenotypes show significant ADF expression defects for all serotonin pathway genes. tph-1(vlc46) and mod-5(vlc47) are knock-in reporters. L1 stage images show tph-1 expression defects in ADF. Scale bar: 15 μm. See S1 Data for numerical values. (C) lag-1(q385) mutant shows expression defects for additional effector genes srh-142(vlcIs10) and gpa-13(pkIs589). For gpa-13 expression analysis, presence of faint srh-142 reporter expression was used to identify ADF neuron. Micrographs show faint srh-142 and missing gpa-13 expression in the ADF of lag-1(q385) mutant animals. Scale bar: 10 μm. See S1 Data for numerical values. TF, transcription factor.

LAG-1 is expressed in the postmitotic ADF neuron to induce and maintain ADF neuron fate

Cis-regulatory analysis and lag-1 mutant characterisation suggested that LAG-1 acts as terminal selector for the ADF chemosensory neuron. Available single-cell RNAseq (sc-RNAseq) expression data from C. elegans embryos [16] reveal bilateral lag-1 expression in the ADF lineage starting at the postmitotic ADF neuroblast, supporting a terminal role for LAG-1 (Fig 3A). Embryonic lag-1 expression is also detected in the terminal division of 3 additional postmitotic neuroblasts RIB, AIM, and RIH. Interestingly, AIM and RIH express mod-5/5HT transporter and cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter to reuptake 5HT from the extracellular space. In addition to ADF specification defects, lag-1(q385) animals show mod-5/5HT transporter and cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter reporter expression defects in AIM and RIH (S2 Fig), suggesting LAG-1 could also play a role in the terminal differentiation of these additional neuronal types.

Fig 3. LAG-1 is expressed in postmitotic ADF to induce and maintain ADF neuron fate.

Fig 3

(A) ADF lineage representing embryonic lag-1 expression assessed by sc-RNAseq [16]. Black lines represent no expression data available in most cases corresponding to cells that undergo programmed cell death. (B) lag-1 locus tagged with mNeonGreen to monitor lag-1 expression in vivo. Red boxes represent coding exons of lag-1, grey box T2A sequence, green boxes mNeongreen fluorochrome, yellow triangle LoxP site, and blue box 3x flag tag. This locus gives rise to a single mRNA that undergoes autocatalytic cleavage upon translation. mNeongreen expression in the ADF is observed at L1, and expression is maintained throughout the life of the animal. Scale bars: 20 μm and 10 μm. ADF identity was assessed by colocalization with tph-1::dsred. (S2 Data). C) lag-1 P0 RNAi reveals that lag-1 is continuously required to maintain tph-1(otIs517) and cat-1(otIs221) expression and 5HT staining in the ADF but not for shr-142(vlcEx809) reporter expression maintenance. Micrographs show missing tph-1 expression and 5HT staining defects in adult ADF of lag-1 RNAi fed worms while other serotonergic cells are unaffected. See S1 Data for raw data of all replicates. Scale bar: 12 μm. See S1 Data for numerical values. L1, first larval stage; n.s, nonsignificant; sc-RNAseq, single-cell RNAseq; 5HT, serotonin.

To assess postembryonic LAG-1 expression, we labelled the endogenous lag-1 locus with a fluorescent reporter (lag-1::T2A::mNeonGreen) (Fig 3B). This construct generates a unique mRNA transcript that, upon translation, undergoes autocatalytic cleavage, giving rise to 2 independent proteins, LAG-1 and the fluorescent mNeonGreen protein, ensuring correct LAG-1 function (Fig 3B). At L1, mNeonGreen expression is observed in several neurons in the head including ADF neuron (Fig 3B). Strong LAG-1 expression in ADF neuron is maintained at all larval stages and throughout the life of the animal (Fig 3B). Similar strong ADF expression at L1 and young adult stages was observed for a fusion protein LAG-1::GFP using a fosmid-recombineered reporter strain (vlcEx496) (S3 Fig).

We next further characterised lag-1 expression in the context of the known ADF gene regulatory network. During embryonic development, the LIM HD TF lim-4 is expressed in the mother cell of ADF/AWB. lim-4(yz12) mutant animals generate 2 neurons in the terminal division of the ADF lineage, but ADF neuron fails to properly differentiate [17]. Our data indicate that LIM-4 is required for LAG-1 expression in the ADF neuron (S4 Fig).

Terminal selectors are often required to maintain neuron fate [6]. As LAG-1 is continuously expressed in the ADF neuron, we checked whether its activity is also required for ADF cell fate maintenance. Postembryonic knockdown of lag-1 by feeding with lag-1 RNAi L1 rrf-3(pk1426) animals, an RNAi neuron-sensitised strain, leads to sterile animals, similar to postembryonic lin-12 and glp-1 Notch receptors RNAi treatment. lag-1 P0 RNAi animals show a significant loss of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase, cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter, bas-1/aromatic amino-acid decarboxylase, and cat-4/GTP cyclo-hydrolase reporter expression in young adult animals, as well as 5HT staining defects (Fig 3C and S4 Fig). These defects are not due to neurodegeneration of the ADF neuron as srh-142/serpentine receptor reporter expression is unaffected (Fig 3C).

Next, we attempted to assess whether ADF specification defects in lag-1 mutants can be rescued by cell autonomous LAG-1 expression under srh-142 promoter, which is unaffected in lag-1(om13) hypomorphic mutants (S4 Fig). lag-1 gene codes for 4 different splicing variants (S3 Fig), we failed to observe significant tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression rescue with any individual isoform or with a combination of the 4 transcripts (S4 Fig). lag-1(om13) phenotype is only transiently observed during L1; this short time window might limit our ability to detect lag-1 rescue; alternatively, different levels of specific isoform or earlier expression might be required for rescue. As an alternative to cell autonomous rescue, we performed cell autonomous knockdown of lag-1 in postmitotic ADF neurons using the ADF-specific promoter srh-142 to drive lag-1 double-stranded RNA. Cell type–specific lag-1 RNAi depletes endogenous LAG-1 specifically from the ADF neuron (Fig 4A), and this depletion is sufficient to induce expression defects of endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase in the ADF (Fig 4A). These data support a cell autonomous role for LAG-1 in ADF terminal differentiation.

Fig 4. LAG-1 acts cell autonomously in ADF, and it is sufficient to induce ADF effector gene expression.

Fig 4

(A) ADF-specific lag-1 knockdown expressing sense and antisense lag-1 under the srh-142 promoter reduces endogenous lag-1(vlc30) and tph-1(vlc46) expression only in ADF, supporting the cell autonomous effect of LAG-1. Young adult images show the specificity of the lag-1 RNAi. Scale bar: 10 μm. See S1 Data for numerical values. (B) Embryonic ectopic expression of 2 different lag-1 isoforms using a heat shock–inducible reporter. LAG-1D isoform induces ectopic tph-1(zdIs13) reporter expression, while LAG-1A isoform has no effect. Similar effects are observed for 2 independent transgenic lines. n=30. Mean and SEM are represented. Representative micrograph of a lag-1d heat shocked embryo shows tph-1(zdIs13) reporter expression in 7 cells in the head. Asterisks mark ectopic GFP expressing cells. Scale bar: 10 μm. See S1 Data for numerical values. n.s, nonsignificant.

Finally, we assessed if LAG-1 is not only necessary but also sufficient to induce ADF fate. We used a heat shock–inducible promoter to broadly express LAG-1 in embryos at the stage of neurogenesis. LAG-1 isoform D, but not LAG-1 isoform A, is sufficient to drive ectopic tph-1 reporter expression (Fig 4B), suggesting LAG-1 is sufficient in some contexts to induce ADF gene expression and unravelling isoform specific functions for LAG-1. Both isoforms share the CSL DNA binding domain and the Notch interacting domain, located at the carboxyl terminal region of the protein, but differ in the amino-terminal region, which has unknown functions.

Altogether, our data strongly indicate that LAG-1 acts as terminal selector to directly induce and maintain expression of ADF effector genes.

Physiological processes dependent on ADF neuron require postembryonic LAG-1 function

5HT release from ADF chemosensory neuron mediates a variety of processes and behaviours. Thus, we next explored if postembryonic lag-1 function is required for correct display of ADF-regulated behaviours. To circumvent larval lethality of lag-1(q385) null mutants, we took advantage of postembryonic knockdown of lag-1 by RNAi in the rrf-3(pk1426) sensitised strain.

ADF has been implicated in pharyngeal pumping in well-fed animals [18]; however, this role is unclear as other reports implicate 5HT release from NSM and not ADF as the main regulator of pharyngeal pumping [19]. We find that lag-1 RNAi-fed rrf-3(pk1426) worms show no difference in pumping rates compared to L4440 RNAi-fed animals (Fig 5A), suggesting LAG-1 function is not required, at least under these conditions, to modulate pharyngeal pumping.

Fig 5. ADF-mediated processes require postembryonic LAG-1 function.

Fig 5

(A) lag-1 P0 RNAi-fed worms show no defects in pharyngeal pumping rate. n ≥ 10. Mean and SEM are represented. See S1 Data for raw data of all replicates. See S1 Data for numerical values. (B) lag-1 P0 RNAi-fed worms show a significant increase in dauer induction by pheromones compared to control RNAi. n = 148 worms in controls and n = 474 in lag-1 RNAi. Percentage and SEP are represented. See S1 Data for raw data of all replicates. See S1 Data for numerical values. (C) lag-1 P0 RNAi-fed worms contain significantly higher levels of lipids stained by oil red. See S1 Data for raw data of all replicates; n ≥ 15 per replicate. Scale bar: 13 μm Mean and SEM are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (D) Quantification of worm’s speed after a short starvation period when approaching a patch of food in lag-1 P0 RNAi and control animals. Curves represent the mean value for each condition. n = 19 worms in controls; n = 17 worms in lag-1 RNAi. See S1 Data for numerical values. (E) Mean deceleration rate during 15 seconds prior to food encounter shows significant differences between lag-1 RNAi and control animals. n = 19 worms in L4440; n = 17 worms in lag-1 RNAi. Two-tailed t test. Mean and SEM are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (F) Calcium imaging quantification in control worms shows that ADF is activated by Cu+2 and progressively adapts to the stimulus. The curve represents the mean value of analysed worms. n ≥ 15 animals were recorded. See S1 Data for numerical values. (G) ADF is not activated by Cu+2 in lag-1 P0 RNAi-fed animals. The curve represents the mean value of analysed worms. n ≥ 15 animals were recorded. See S1 Data for numerical values. n.s, nonsignificant.

ADF, together with ASI and ASG chemosensory neurons, is required to prevent dauer entry [20], and, accordingly, tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase mutant animals show enhanced dauer entry [21,22]. We find a significant increase in the percentage of dauer animals upon pheromone treatment in P0 lag-1 RNAi-fed worms compared to controls (Fig 5B), suggesting LAG-1 is required to prevent dauer entry. Of note, the lag-1(om13) hypomorphic allele, which shows no obvious ADF specification defects after L1, has been previously used to show a role for lag-1 in dauer maintenance and dauer exit, a process that is mediated through expression of the Notch ligand lag-2 in the IL2 neurons, but a role for ADF neuron in this processes has not been reported [23].

5HT release from ADF neuron also promotes fat mobilisation [24]; accordingly, we find that lag-1 RNAi induces a significant increase in lipid storage (Fig 5C), a phenotype also observed in tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase mutants [24]. In addition, ADF function is also involved in foraging: after a food deprivation period, when worms are approaching food source, they reduce their speed [25]. This behaviour is mediated by 5HT release from NSM and ADF neurons [26]. We find that postembryonic knockdown of lag-1 by RNAi does not affect basal locomotion, but lag-1 RNAi-fed animals fail to decelerate upon food detection prior to contact (Fig 5D and 5E). As neither lag-1 RNAi nor lag-1(q385) mutants show NSM serotonergic specification defects, our results suggest that postembryonic LAG-1 function in ADF is required for correct foraging behaviour.

Finally, we directly tested ADF activation in lag-1 RNAi-fed worms by calcium imaging. As expected, ADF L4440-fed control RNAi animals respond to short exposures to Cu+2 solution [27] (Fig 5F). In sharp contrast, the same stimulus fails to activate the ADF neuron in worms fed with lag-1 RNAi (Fig 5G). Thus, LAG-1 function is required postembryonically to either allow for copper detection or to elicit correct activation in response to this stimulus.

Altogether, our physiological and behavioural assays show that postembryonic LAG-1 function is required not only for 5HT pathway gene expression but also for correct ADF activation and proper performance of ADF-mediated processes.

LAG-1 activating functions in ADF neuron are Notch independent

LAG-1 is the signal-regulated transcriptional mediator of the phylogenetically conserved Notch intercellular signalling pathway [13]. Accordingly, we next aimed to explore if depletion of other components of the Notch pathway produce similar ADF specification defects. C. elegans genome codes for 2 Notch receptors GLP-1 and LIN-12, which, upon activation, are proteolytically cleaved, allowing the intracellular domain to translocate to the nucleus (Fig 6A). In the nucleus, the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) forms a complex with LAG-1 and the coactivator SEL-8 to shift the basal repressor activity of LAG-1 towards transcriptional activation of target genes [28]. Previously reported phenotypes for lag-1 are mimicked by glp-1, lin-12, and sel-8 mutants [14,29]. Accordingly, rrf-3(pk1426) L1 larvae fed with glp-1, lin-12, or sel-8 RNAi develop into young adults that are sterile or produce dead embryos, similar to lag-1 RNAi-fed animals. However, in contrast to lag-1 RNAi, these animals do not show defects in tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase or cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter reporter expression (Fig 6B and 6C). We next analysed ADF fate in lin-12(n941) glp-1(q46) double mutants and the sel-8(ok387) single mutant, which should abrogate all zygotic Notch pathway activity. Similar to lag-1(q385) null homozygotes, these animals die at L1; however, contrary to lag-1 mutants, L1 larvae show normal tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression in the ADF neuron (Fig 6B and 6C).

Fig 6. glp-1 and lin-12 Notch receptors and sel-8 coactivator are not required for ADF specification.

Fig 6

(A) Schematic representation of Notch signalling pathway in C. elegans. (B) P0 RNAi and double mutant analysis for glp-1 and lin-12 Notch receptors and temperature-sensitive allele analysis for glp-1 show no significant difference in tph-1(otIs517) and cat-1(otIs221) reporter expression in the ADF neuron. L1 stage confocal images showing representative examples of the temperature shift assay. Scale bar: 15 μm. See S1 Data for numerical values of all replicates and temperature-sensitive allele scoring at YA stage. (C) P0 RNAi and mutant analysis of sel-8 coactivator shows no difference in tph-1(otIs517) and cat-1(otIs221) reporter expression in the ADF neuron. L1 stage confocal images showing representative examples. See S1 Data for numerical values. L1, first larval stage; NICD, Notch intracellular domain; n.s, nonsignificant; YA, young adult.

glp-1 is required maternally for early embryonic development [30]. To bypass this requirement and test the possibility that maternally supplied glp-1 in lin-12(n941) glp-1(q46) double mutants could be contributing to ADF terminal differentiation, we used a temperature-sensitive allele of glp-1. glp-1(e2144) gravid mothers, which contain embryos that have passed the stage where maternal glp-1 is required, were placed at restrictive temperature and allowed to lay eggs. Eggs are grown at restrictive temperature since approximately 30-cell stage, which corresponds to 4 divisions prior ADF birth. As expected from glp-1 depletion, these animals are sterile; however, they do not display tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression defects in the ADF neuron at L1 or as young adult (Fig 6B). Finally, we were unable to detect ADF expression of lin-12 or glp-1 at L1 or young adult using both endogenous knock-in and fosmid-based fluorescent reporters (S5 Fig). Similarly, available embryonic or L2 sc-RNAseq data do not show sel-8, glp-1, or lin-12 expression in the ADF or the ADF mother cell [16,31] (S5 Fig). Altogether, these data strongly suggest that LAG-1 functions as activator of ADF effector genes are independent of the canonical Notch pathway.

Notch-independent activating functions for CSL TFs have been previously reported. In mammals, Rbpj/CSL specifies mouse pancreatic cells and cerebellar and spinal cord GABAergic neurons through its interaction with the bHLH TF Ptf1a [32,33]. These data prompted us to explore the possibility that LAG-1 acts together with HLH-13, C. elegans ortholog of Ptf1a, in the specification of the ADF neuron. However, hlh-13(tm2279) mutants show normal 5HT pathway gene expression in ADF neurons (S6 Fig). In mammals, Rbpj, Ptf1a, and an E protein form a trimeric complex that binds a DNA motif composed by an Ebox and a CSL site [33,34]. Thus, we reasoned that, if LAG-1 interacts similarly with other unknown TFs, a composite site “CSL+ unknown DNA motif” might be present in the regulatory regions of ADF effector genes. We thus performed sequence alignments with all experimentally determined functional CSL binding sites +/− 30 bp of flanking sequences in C. elegans and other Caenorhabditis species. We retrieved 66 conserved CSL binding sites from 19 different species (S6 Fig). Alignment of all these sequences does not reveal any additional motif flanking the CSL site (S6 Fig), which might be due to flexibility in the position and/or orientation of the additional motif. Thus we performed de novo motif analysis using this set of 66 sequences, which retrieved, in addition to CSL binding site, 2 motifs that show some similarity to bHLH TF binding motifs (S6 Fig). C. elegans genome codes for 41 bHLH TFs in addition to hlh-13, it is possible that other bHLH TF could work together with LAG-1 to induce ADF fate. Further studies should be aimed to identify such factor.

LAG-1 regulates ADF tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity upon pathogen infection and cilia defects

ADF is a plastic sensory neuron that, in response to several insults, up-regulates expression of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme for 5HT biosynthesis, increasing 5HT signalling. Thus, we tested the role of LAG-1 in tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity in the ADF neuron.

In agreement with previous reports based on tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transgenic reporter strains [22,35,36], we found that dauer entry, heat stress, and unc-43/CAMKII gain-of-function mutation (a mediator of neuronal activity and synaptic plasticity) induce expression of the endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase locus (vlc46) (Fig 7A, 7C, and 7D). A similar increase in expression is observed in dauer animals from lag-1 RNAi-fed worms, in heat shocked lag-1(om13) or unc-43(n498gof); lag-1(om13) double mutants animals (Fig 7B–7D), suggesting tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity under these conditions is independent of LAG-1 function.

Fig 7. LAG-1 mediates tph-1 expression induction by specific stimuli.

Fig 7

(A) ADF mNeonGreen intensity quantification of tph-1(vlc46) endogenous reporter in dauer stage shows a significant increase compared to L4. n > 60 neurons. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (B) Dauer animals show increased ADF yzIs71(tph-1::gfp) reporter expression both in lag-1 RNAi and control animals, suggesting that LAG-1 does not mediate tph-1 induction in dauer. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (C) L1 ADF mNeonGreen intensity quantification of tph-1(vlc46) upon heat shock. Heat shock induces tph-1 expression both in wild-type and lag-1(om13) mutant worms, suggesting that lag-1 is not required in the heat response. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (D) L1 ADF mNeonGreen intensity quantification of tph-1(vlc46) endogenous reporter in unc-43(n498)/CAMKII gain of function mutation. unc-43(n498gof) induces tph-1 expression both in wild-type and lag-1(om-13) mutants, suggesting that lag-1 is not required to mediate response to neuronal activation. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (E) L1 ADF mNeonGreen intensity quantification of tph-1(vlc46) endogenous reporter in dyf-1(yz66) mutants shows increased levels of tph-1 expression that are not observed in dyf-1(yz66); lag-1(om13) double mutants, suggesting that lag-1 mediates tph-1 expression response to cilia damage. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (F) Similar lag-1 dependency of tph-1(vlc46) endogenous reporter induction is observed in an additional intraflagellar transport protein mutant, che-11(e1810). Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (G) Young adult ADF mNeonGreen intensity quantification of tph-1(vlc46) endogenous reporter in tir-1(yz68gof) gain-of-function mutation, which mimics response to pathogenic bacteria. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (H) tir-1(yz68gof) induction of yzIs71(tph-1::gfp) reporter is not observed in animals treated with lag-1 RNAi, suggesting that lag-1 mediates tph-1 expression response to pathogenic bacteria. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. IQR, interquartile range; n.s., nonsignificant; YA, young adult.

tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcriptional reporter expression is also induced in animals with cilia morphology defects [22]. In agreement with these data, we find that endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression (vlc46) is induced in mutants that have cilia defects, dyf-1(yz66) and che-11(e1810) (Fig 7E and 7F). Importantly, this induction is not observed when LAG-1 function is compromised with the lag-1(om13) allele (Fig 7E and 7F), indicating that, in contrast to dauer state, heat stress, or CAMKII overactivation, LAG-1 mediates tph-1 expression plasticity induced by cilia morphology defects.

Finally, we analysed tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase induction upon pathogenic infection. Pathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression in the ADF neuron; this increase in transcription is mediated by Toll and Interleukin 1 Receptor (TIR-1) [3739]. In agreement with previous reports with transcriptional reporters [3739], we find that a gain-of-function allele tir-1(yz68) shows increased expression of the endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase locus (vlc46) (Fig 7G). We failed to generate viable tir-1(yz68); lag-1(om13) double mutants; therefore, we performed lag-1 RNAi in tir-1(yz68); rrf-3(pk1416) animals. lag-1 RNAi abolishes tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter induction (Fig 7H), suggesting that, similar to cilia morphology defects, LAG-1 is necessary to mediate ADF plastic response to pathogenic bacteria. Similar to its role as terminal selector, LAG-1 function on tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity is also Notch independent as neither glp-1 nor lin-12 are necessary for tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase induction (S7 Fig).

DAF-19, the only RFX TF in C. elegans, is required for developmental tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression as well as to mediate tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcriptional increase upon different insults including bacterial infection or cilia morphology defects. However, DAF-19 does not regulate expression of other ADF 5HT effector genes [38]. DAF-19 has been suggested to act indirectly on tph-1 expression through yet unidentified factors [38]. We find that ADF LAG-1 expression in daf-19(m86) mutants shows no difference compared to controls (S8 Fig), indicating lag-1 transcription is not downstream of DAF-19.

Different cis-regulatory elements mediate tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity to external stimuli

The mechanistic details of how plastic gene expression responses are integrated at the cis-regulatory level are still very scarce. Thus, we next analysed if tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression modulation is mediated through the developmental minimal CRM (tph-1p17) that contains a functional LAG-1/CSL binding site (Fig 8A). Interestingly, as explained in detail below, our results reveal that a complex variety of cis-regulatory mechanisms are used to integrate responses to different stimuli.

Fig 8. Different tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase cis-regulatory regions mediate plastic responses to specific stimuli.

Fig 8

(A) Schematic representation of analysed reporter constructs. (B) unc-43(n498gof) mutation does not activate tph-1prom17, ADF minimal CRM, in young adult animals. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (C) tir-1(yz68gof) mutation does not activate tph-1prom17 in young adult animals. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (D) Dauer stage induces transcription of tph-1prom17 but not tph-1prom46 3XCSL synthetic enhancer. Mutation of the CSL binding site (tph-1prom42) completely abolishes GFP expression under normal conditions and precludes its induction in dauer. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (E) Heat shock induces transcription of the ADF minimal CRM tph-1prom17 in L1 worms. tph-1prom46 3XCSL synthetic enhancer is not activated upon heat shock stress. Mutation of the CSL binding site completely abolishes GFP expression under normal conditions and precludes induction upon heat shock. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (F) dyf-1(yz66) mutation induces transcription of the ADF minimal CRM tph-1prom17 and tph-1prom46 3XCSL synthetic enhancer in young adult animals. Mutation of the CSL binding site completely abolishes GFP expression under normal conditions and precludes induction in dyf-1(yz66) mutants. Median and IQR are represented. See S1 Data for numerical values. (G) Summary of signalling mechanisms underlying tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity. CRM, cis-regulatory module; CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1; IQR, interquartile range; n.s, nonsignificant.

unc-43/CAMKII gain-of-function mutation, which induces endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase independently of LAG-1 (Fig 7D), does not induce activation through tph-1prom17 (Fig 8B), suggesting that cis-regulatory elements outside this developmental CRM mediate the plastic gene expression response to neuronal activity. Unexpectedly, tir-1(yz68) gain-of-function allele, which requires LAG-1 for endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase induction (Fig 7H), does not activate tph-1prom17 (Fig 8C), suggesting that the response to pathogenic bacteria is also integrated outside the developmental minimal CRM. One additional CSL binding site is present in the intergenic region of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase, which is located immediately outside of tph-1prom17 CRM (S8 Fig). In contrast to the absolute requirement of the CSL binding site in tph-1prom17, mutation of this site in a context of a longer tph-1 CRM (tph-1prom2) that contains both CSL sites produce only a partial loss of GFP expression (S8 Fig). Only when both CSL sites are mutated GFP expression is completely abolished, unravelling the functionality of this additional CSL site (S8 Fig). In contrast to lack of tph-1prom17 activation, tph-1prom2 expression is induced in tir-1(yz68) gain-of-function animals. tir-1(yz68) induction of tph-1prom2 is completely abolished when both CSL sites are mutated (S8 Fig). Thus, LAG-1 mediates tph-1 gene induction in the presence of pathogenic bacteria through both CSL binding sites.

In contrast, dauer state, heat stress, and cilia morphology defects enhance tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression through the activation of tph-1prom17 minimal CRM (Fig 8D–8F). As we had previously determined that heat stress and dauer stage induction of endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase act independently of LAG-1 (Fig 7A–7C), we hypothesised that the response to these stimuli might be integrated through additional non-CSL binding sites. In agreement with this hypothesis, we find that neither heat stress nor dauer state increase tph-1prom46 transcription, the synthetic reporter composed by 3 CSL binding motifs that is specifically expressed in the ADF, suggesting that these stimuli act on additional TF binding sites present in the tph-1prom17 minimal CRM (Fig 8D and 8E). Interestingly, CSL mutation in the minimal CRM (tph-1prom42) not only abolishes transcription in basal conditions but also prevents enhancement of expression upon heat stress or in dauers (Fig 8D and 8E), indicating that a basal level of activity in the CRM might be required to allow for the integration of plastic responses to external stimuli later in the life of the animal, even if they are mediated independently of LAG-1.

Finally, we find that dyf-1(yz66) cilia morphology mutant, which induces endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcription in an LAG-1–dependent manner (Fig 7G), not only activates tph-1prom17 minimal CRM but also enhances transcription of the 3XCSL synthetic construct (Fig 8F), suggesting that information from this stimulus is integrated through the developmentally activated CSL binding site. dyf-1(yz66) mutants fail to induce transcription of tph-1 minimal CRM baring a mutation of the CSL binding site (tph-1prom42) (Fig 8F) further supporting a direct role for LAG-1 mediating these stimuli.

In summary, we find that, in addition to its developmental role as ADF terminal selector, LAG-1 is actively involved in the regulation of ADF gene expression plasticity. Our results unveil a complex scenario with a combination of LAG-1 dependent and independent gene expression responses. LAG-1–independent integration of some external stimuli (heat stress and dauer) is mediated through the developmental minimal CRM while other stimuli (neuronal activity) act outside this minimal regulatory region (Fig 8G). Seemingly, LAG-1–mediated responses are also specific to stimulus. While cilia defects act through the CSL site present in the developmental enhancer, information regarding pathogenic bacteria is integrated through 2 CSL binding sites, one of them located outside the minimal developmental enhancer (Fig 8G).

Discussion

In this work, we describe the role of the CSL TF family in neuronal terminal differentiation in C. elegans. We found that LAG-1, the signal-regulated TF mediator of Notch signalling, induces and maintains the terminal differentiation program of the ADF serotoninergic neuron. Our results show that the enduring activating action that LAG-1 exerts in ADF gene expression and function is achieved independent of Notch activity. LAG-1 role as an activator independent of Notch signalling contrasts previous reports on LAG-1 functions.

Analysis of coregulated cis-regulatory elements allows the identification of novel terminal selectors

Terminal selectors coregulate transcription of multiple effector genes; therefore, regulatory regions of their target genes share the corresponding regulatory signature. We studied the CRMs of the 5HT pathway genes active in the ADF and identified the common presence of functional CSL binding sites, leading us to the unexpected identification of LAG-1 as a terminal selector for the ADF neuronal fate.

Previously identified terminal selectors have been mostly isolated from forward genetic screens. However, the null phenotype of lag-1 is larval or embryonic lethal [14], and we found that lag-1(om13), a partially lethal hypomorphic allele, does not display ADF phenotypes in adult animals. These facts likely explain why lag-1 alleles have not been previously isolated from forward genetic screen for ADF specification defects [22,35,38,40,41]. Additional terminal selectors with lethal phenotypes have been also identified using similar cis-regulatory approaches [11], which underscore the complementarity of forward genetics and cis-regulatory analysis. Our results not only extend the number of C. elegans neuron types with an assigned terminal selector but more importantly expand the number of different TF families that act as terminal selectors.

LAG-1 terminal selector action is independent of Notch signalling

C. elegans LAG-1 has been shown to act as a basal repressor in the absence of Notch signalling [42,43]. Here, we describe Notch-independent functions for LAG-1 as an activator. Most probably, these Notch-independent LAG-1 activating functions in the ADF neuron are mediated in concert with unidentified tissue-specific cofactors, as discussed further below.

In addition, we find that LAG-1 Notch-independent activating functions are continuously required to maintain correct gene expression in the ADF. Postembryonic removal of LAG-1 does not only affect reporter expression and 5HT staining but also leads to broad functional defects in ADF-mediated physiological processes, exposing the extensive actions of LAG-1 in ADF gene expression and function. Finally, in some contexts, LAG-1 is also sufficient to drive ADF effector gene expression. Altogether, LAG-1 shows all known attributes for a terminal selector: cell fate induction, direct action on effector genes, and cell fate maintenance [8]. In addition to activating roles for terminal selectors, in some contexts, these TFs have been shown to also act as repressors of alternative cell fates [4446]; although our work has not deeply explored this possibility for LAG-1, lag-1 mutants do not up-regulate expression of odr-1 reporter in the ADF neuron (odr-1 is an effector gene for AWB, the sister cell of ADF), suggesting that lag-1 acts mainly activating gene expression rather than repressing alternative fates.

LAG-1 modulates ADF plastic gene expression responses to specific external stimuli

In some cell types, the implementation of robust and stable cell identities during development must be combined with additional mechanisms that ensure adaptive responses to specific external stimuli. How robustness and plasticity of gene expression are both integrated in the cell is currently not well understood. Terminal selectors, working in concert with other transcriptional activators and repressors, are involved in ON/OFF gene switches that take place upon dauer entry [47] or in the acquisition of sexually dimorphic gene expression [48]. In addition to these ON/OFF switches, some gene plasticity responses require subtle modulation of gene expression. Here, we have uncovered the role of a terminal selector in tuning gene expression in response to external stimuli.

Previous work in C. elegans identified a great variety of stimuli that increase tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcriptional levels. These stimuli work through different parallel pathways; however, direct transcriptional mediators of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity had not been described [22,35,36,38]. Here, we find that transcriptional response to specific stimuli (cilia morphology defects and pathogenic bacteria), but not to others (dauer, heat stress, and neuronal activity), requires LAG-1 function. This specificity is important because it reveals a complex scenario in which terminal selector function is not always necessary to modulate gene expression and additional TFs could be specifically devoted to mediate gene expression plasticity.

Phylogenetically conserved Notch-independent role for CSL TFs in neuronal terminal differentiation

Notch-independent activating functions for CSL TFs have been previously reported for Su(H) in Drosophila mechanosensory socket cell fate maintenance [49] and for Rbpj in the specification of mouse pancreatic cells, and cerebellar and spinal cord GABAergic neurons [32,33]. The mechanism by which Su(H) acts as an activator in Drosophila is unknown, but in mammals, Rbpj interacts through its NICD interacting domain with the bHLH TF Ptf1a. We find that hlh-13, C. elegans ortholog of Ptf1a, is not required for correct tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression in the ADF. Nevertheless, the formal logic that has been described in mammalian cells may still operate in C. elegans ADF: that is, additional uncharacterized TFs might be acting together with LAG-1 to mediate its Notch-independent activating role in the ADF neuron. Thus, CSL TFs display a phylogenetically conserved Notch-independent role in activating neuronal terminal differentiation. We additionally found that LAG-1 is continuously required for neuron cell fate maintenance. Intriguingly, although postembryonic roles of Rbpj have not been studied, some neuronal populations in the adult spinal cord maintain Rbpj expression [50], suggesting that, similar to LAG-1, mammalian RBPJ may display additional Notch-independent roles in cell fate maintenance or neuronal plasticity.

Material and methods

Strains

C. elegans strains were maintained as described [51]. Wild-type animals are Bristol strain N2. Strains used in this study are listed in S2 Data. Deletion alleles were genotyped by PCR and point mutations by sequencing. Primers are included in S3 Data.

Generation of C. elegans transgenic lines

Gene constructs for cis-regulatory analyses were generated by cloning into the pPD95.75 vector. Synthetic construct tph-1prom46 (GenScript Biotech, Netherlands) and tph-1prom45 construct were generated by annealing the phosphorylated primers and cloned into pPD95.75. Primers are listed in S3 Data (the whole sequences of these promoters are also included). MEME suite tool [12] and TOMTOM [52] were used for motif enrichment analysis. RTGGGAA [13] and YGTGGGAA [53] LAG-1 consensus sites where used for the identification of additional sites. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by Quickchange II XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent/Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Ectopic lag-1 expression, ADF lag-1 rescue experiments, microinjections, and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated strain generation details are included in S4 Data. All primers are listed in S3 Data.

RNAi feeding experiments and cell type–specific RNAi

RNAi feeding experiments were performed following standard protocols [54]; see S4 Data for more details. PCR fusion of srh-142 promoter to sense or antisense lag-1 cDNA sequences were injected for cell-specific lag-1 RNAi experiments as previously described [55], 100 ng/μl each sense or antisense PCR together with ttx-3::mcherry (25 ng/μl) and rol-6(su1006) (25 ng/μl) coinjection markers. Primers are listed in S3 Data.

5HT staining

C. elegans 5HT antibody staining was performed using the tube fixation protocol [56]; exact protocol is described in S4 Data.

Behavioural and physiological assays

Dauer induction was performed using filtered liquid culture of worms grown at 7 worms/μl for 4 days. Briefly, 300 μl of pheromone containing extracts or control extracts (culture media alone) were added to 60 mm of IPTG RNAi-seeded plates. After drying, gravid worms were added within a drop of alkaline hypochlorite solution and maintained at 27 °C. The percentage of dauer animals was scored in each condition, 72 hours later (P0). For tph-1 reporter quantification at dauer, the intensity level of the fluorescent reporter was quantified in the ADF neuron (n > 60 neurons). For pharyngeal pumping rate, quantification of a minimum of 12 young adult worms fed on lag-1 RNAi (P0) or control bacteria were recorded with an AxioCam MRm monochrome digital camera using a ZEISS Axio Zoom.V16 microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). Pharyngeal pumping rate was measured by counting the contraction of the pharyngeal bulb over a 10-second period. For quantification of lipid accumulation, oil red O staining was conducted as previously reported [57], with slight modifications included in S4 Data. The analysis of the enhanced slowing response was performed as described [25]. Young adult worms fed with lag-1 RNAi (P0) or L4440 control bacteria were washed with M9 1X buffer for 5 times and transferred for freely crawl (2 hours) to unseeded IPTG plates, whose agar perimeter was delimited with a 4 M fructose (D-Fructose (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), 1% Red Congo dye/ddH2O) ring to avoid worms to scape. After that period of fasting, animals were recovered washing the plate with M9 1X medium. To analyze locomotion of worms approaching a source of food, worms were placed in IPTG plates seeded with 25 μL of bacteria 5X concentrated. Animals were recorded, at room temperature (22 °C), with a multi-worm tracker device. Four groups of 8 to 15 worms were recorded per RNAi clone, approximately 50 worms per condition. RNAi empty vector, L4440, was considered the control group. Recording and analysis details are included in S4 Data. For calcium imaging recordings sensitised RNAi strain, rrf-3(pk1426), animals carrying a genetically engineered protein, GCaMP3, expressed only in the ADF were used [58]. Young adult animals fed with RNAi from hatching (P0) were washed with M9 1X and treated for 30 minutes with 1 mM tetramisole hydrochloride (Sigma/Aldrich/Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to paralyse their movements. Worms were transferred inside a methacrylate microfluidics chamber (self-custom at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, USA) and settled on an inverted fluorescence microscope (Axio VertA.1, Zeiss) connected to a liquid flow system. M13 buffer (30 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, and 10 mM KCl) was used as basal solution, and stimulation solution was prepared adding CuSO4 (10 mM) to M13 buffer and adjusting to pH 4. Both buffers contained tetramisole (1 mM) to avoid worm movement. Images were captured with a CCD camera (Prosilica GC2450, Allied Vision Technologies, Stadtroda, Germany) with 20X objective at 2 frames per second with Micro-Manager software [59]. More details of the analysis are included in S4 Data.

Temperature shift experiment

glp-1(e2144) gravid hermaphrodites were placed on prewarmed plates at the restrictive temperature of 25 °C. Mothers were removed after 6 hours, and L1 and young adult worms were scored.

Heat shock treatment

Plates with worms incubated at 20 °C were shifted to 37.5 °C for 90 minutes and returned to 20 °C for 6 hours. lag-1(om13) worms were incubated at 15 °C pre- and post-heat shock treatment. Fluorescent reporter expression was quantified in the ADF neurons at L1 larvae stage. Embryonic heat shock for ectopic lag-1 expression and 5HT fate induction are explained in S4 Data.

Scorings

Scoring was performed using 40X or 63X objective in a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope. Micrographs for figures were obtained with a TCS-SP8 Leica Microsystems confocal microscope using 63X objective. Scoring values and conditions are detailed in S1 Data.

For cis-analysis and RNAi screening experiments, a minimum of 30 young adult animals per line or per RNAi clone and replicate were analysed; for mutants analysis, 50 individuals were scored (100 neurons). ON, FAINT, or OFF determinations were established qualitatively by direct observation under the fluorescent microscope: lack of detectable GFP signal was considered OFF, and, if GFP expression was clearly weaker than wild type but still detectable, “FAINT” category was included.

For site-directed mutagenesis, mean expression value of wild type lines is considered the reference value. Mutated constructs are considered to show normal expression when GFP expression was 100% to 80% of average expression of the corresponding wild type construct (“+” phenotype). Compared to wild type reference value, 80% to 20% reduction was considered a partial phenotype “+/−”. GFP expression detected in less than 20% of the animals was considered as loss of expression (“−” phenotype).

Cis-regulatory and mutant analyses were performed at 25 °C, while RNAi experiments and intensity level analyses were performed at 20 °C, unless other temperature is indicated in S1 Data.

For quantification of intensity levels, measurements of a minimum of 30 worms (60 neurons) were analysed. Intensity levels were evaluated by capturing images of individual ADF neurons at fixed exposure times for each reporter in a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (see S1 Data for exposure times). The external contour of each ADF neuron was delineated, and fluorescence intensity within the entire neuron was quantified using the ImageJ software and normalised by the area of the neuron. All genetic backgrounds or conditions of each experiment were done the same day. Young adult animals were scored, unless other stage is indicated.

Statistics

Mutant and RNAi analysis data were categorically classified as “on” or “off,” and the significance of the association was examined using the two-tailed Fisher exact test; “faint” phenotype was included as “on” for the statistics. For intensity level of the fluorescent reporters, as samples did not follow a normal distribution, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test was used with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. For deceleration rate, normality of the data was confirmed and data sets were compared using two-tailed t test. For calcium imaging analysis, the percentage of changes in fluorescence intensity relative to the initial intensity F0, ΔF = (F − F0) / F0 × 100%, were plotted as a function of time. The following statistical nomenclature was used: n.s, nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Primary data for CSL/LAG-1 binding site mutational analysis of ADF serotonin pathway gene CRMs.

CRM, cis-regulatory module; CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1.

(PDF)

S2 Fig. lag-1 mutants show expression defects in ADF serotonergic neuron and RIH and AIM serotonin reuptaker neurons.

n.s, nonsignificant.

(PDF)

S3 Fig. LAG-1 fosmid reporter expression is similar to the endogenously tagged lag-1 reporter.

(PDF)

S4 Fig. LIM-4 activates lag-1 expression in the ADF, and LAG-1 is required for cell fate maintenance acting through the minimal ADF CRMs.

CRM, cis-regulatory module; n.s, nonsignificant.

(PDF)

S5 Fig. LIN-12 and GLP-1 Notch receptors are not expressed in ADF neuron terminal lineage.

(PDF)

S6 Fig. De novo motif analysis of functional CSL binding site flanking sequences.

CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1; WT, wild type.

(PDF)

S7 Fig. LIN-12 and GLP-1 Notch receptors are not required for tph-1 up-regulation under specific stimuli.

L1, first larval stage; YA, young adult.

(PDF)

S8 Fig. DAF-19 does not regulate LAG-1 expression, and additional CSL sites are involved in tph-1 response upon bacterial infection.

CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1; n.s, nonsignificant.

(PDF)

S1 Data. Raw numerical values.

(XLSX)

S2 Data. Strains.

(XLSX)

S3 Data. Primers.

(PDF)

S4 Data. Supporting methods.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank CGC (P40 OD010440) for providing strains; Dr Laura Chirivella, Noemi Daroqui, and Elia García for technical help; Dr Carlos Mora for building tph-1 and mod-5 endogenous reporters; Dr Rafal Ciosk for sharing glp-1 endogenous reporter; and Dr Iva Greenwald, Dr Luisa Cochella, and Dr Ines Carrera for scientific discussion and paper comments.

Abbreviations

5HT

serotonin

bHLH

Basic Helix Loop Helix

CRM

cis-regulatory module

CSL

CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1

ETS

Erythroblast Transformation Specific

HD

Homeodomain

L1

first larval stage

NHR

Nuclear Hormone Receptor

NICD

Notch intracellular domain

sc-RNAseq

single-cell RNAseq

SOX

SRY-related HMG-box genes

TF

transcription factor

TIR-1

Toll and Interleukin 1 Receptor

ZF

Zinc Finger

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.

Funding Statement

NF research is funded by European Research Council (ERC StG 281920; ERC COG 101002203), Spanish Government (SAF2017-84790-R) and Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2018/055). A.M.T holds the PRE2018-086632 fellowship from Spanish Government and A.J the ACIF/2015/398 fellowship from Generalitat Valenciana. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

References

  • 1.Grove EA, Monuki ES. Morphogens, patterning centers, and their mechanisms of action. Patterning and Cell Type Specification in the Developing CNS and PNS. Elsevier Inc.; 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Barolo S, Posakony JW. Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: Principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1167–81. doi: 10.1101/gad.976502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Gibb S, Maroto M, Dale JK. The segmentation clock mechanism moves up a notch. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Hobert O. Regulatory logic of neuronal diversity: Terminal selector genes and selector motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806070105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Hobert O, Kratsios P. Neuronal identity control by terminal selectors in worms, flies, and chordates. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Deneris ES, Hobert O. Maintenance of postmitotic neuronal cell identity. Nat Neurosci. 2014. doi: 10.1038/nn.3731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tournière O, Dolan D, Richards GS, Sunagar K, Columbus-Shenkar YY, Moran Y, et al. NvPOU4/Brain3 Functions as a Terminal Selector Gene in the Nervous System of the Cnidarian Nematostella vectensis. Cell Rep. 2020;30:4473–4489.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hobert O. A map of terminal regulators of neuronal identity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2016. doi: 10.1002/wdev.233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Lloret-Fernández C, Maicas M, Mora-Martínez C, Artacho A, Jimeno-Martín Á, Chirivella L, et al. A transcription factor collective defines the HSN serotonergic neuron regulatory landscape. eLife. 2018. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zhang F, Bhattacharya A, Nelson JC, Abe N, Gordon P, Lloret-Fernandez C, et al. The LIM and POU homeobox genes ttx-3 and unc-86 act as terminal selectors in distinct cholinergic and serotonergic neuron types. Development. 2014. doi: 10.1242/dev.099721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Flames N, Hobert O. Gene regulatory logic of dopamine neuron differentiation. Nature. 2009. doi: 10.1038/nature07929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. MEME Suite: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Christensen S, Kodoyianni V, Bosenberg M, Friedman L, Kimble J. lag-1, a gene required for lin-12 and glp-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, is homologous to human CBF1 and Drosophila Su(H). Development. 1996;122:1373–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Lambie EJ, Kimble J. Two homologous regulatory genes, lin-12 and glp-1, have overlapping functions. Development. 1991;112:231–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Qiao L, Lissemore JL, Shu P, Smardon A, Gelber MB, Maine EM. Enhancers of glp-1, a gene required for cell-signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, define a set of genes required for germline development. Genetics. 1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Packer JS, Zhu Q, Huynh C, Sivaramakrishnan P, Preston E, Dueck H, et al. A lineage-resolved molecular atlas of C. elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution. Science. 2019:365. doi: 10.1126/science.aax1971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zheng X, Chung S, Tanabe T, Sze JY. Cell-type specific regulation of serotonergic identity by the C. elegans LIM-homeodomain factor LIM-4. Dev Biol. 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Liu H, Qin LW, Li R, Zhang C, Al-Sheikh U, Wu ZX. Reciprocal modulation of 5-HT and octopamine regulates pumping via feedforward and feedback circuits in C. Elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819261116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lee KS, Iwanir S, Kopito RB, Scholz M, Calarco JA, Biron D, et al. Serotonin-dependent kinetics of feeding bursts underlie a graded response to food availability in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 2017:8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. Control of larval development by chemosensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1991;251:1243–6. doi: 10.1126/science.2006412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Sze JY, Victor M, Loer C, Shi Y, Ruvkun G. Food and metabolic signalling defects in a Caenorhabditis elegans serotonin-synthesis mutant. Nature. 2000;403:560–4. doi: 10.1038/35000609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Moussaif M, Sze JY. Intraflagellar transport/hedgehog-related signaling components couple sensory cilium morphology and serotonin biosynthesis in caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2009. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0044-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ouellet J. Li S, Roy R. Notch signalling is required for both dauer maintenance and recovery in C elegans. Development. 2008;135:2583–92. doi: 10.1242/dev.012435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Noble T, Stieglitz J, Srinivasan S. An integrated serotonin and octopamine neuronal circuit directs the release of an endocrine signal to control C. Elegans body fat. Cell Metab. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.09.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Sawin ER, Ranganathan R, Horvitz HR. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron. 2000. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81199-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Iwanir S, Brown AS, Nagy S, Najjar D, Kazakov A, Lee KS, et al. Serotonin promotes exploitation in complex environments by accelerating decision-making. BMC Biol. 2016;14:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Guo M, Wu TH, Song YX, Ge MH, Su CM, Niu WP, et al. Reciprocal inhibition between sensory ASH and ASI neurons modulates nociception and avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2015. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Henrique D, Schweisguth F. Mechanisms of notch signaling: A simple logic deployed in time and space. Development. 2019;146. doi: 10.1242/dev.172148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Doyle TG, Wen C, Greenwald I. SEL-8, a nuclear protein required for LIN-12 and GLP-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:7877–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Moskowitz IPG. Rothman JH. lin-12 and glp-1 are required zygotically for early embryonic cellular interactions and are regulated by maternal GLP-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1996;122:4105–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Cao J, Packer JS, Ramani V, Cusanovich DA, Huynh C, Daza R, et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science. 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Hori K, Cholewa-Waclaw J, Nakada Y, Glasgow SM, Masui T, Henke RM, et al. A nonclassical bHLH-Rbpj transcription factor complex is required for specification of GABAergic neurons independent of Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 2008. doi: 10.1101/gad.1628008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Masui T, Long Q, Beres TM, Magnuson MA, MacDonald RJ. Early pancreatic development requires the vertebrate Suppressor of Hairless (RBPJ) in the PTF1 bHLH complex. Genes Dev. 2007. doi: 10.1101/gad.1575207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Beres TM, Masui T, Swift GH, Shi L, Henke RM, MacDonald RJ. PTF1 Is an Organ-Specific and Notch-Independent Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Complex Containing the Mammalian Suppressor of Hairless (RBP-J) or Its Paralogue. RBP-L Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:117–30. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.1.117-130.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zhang S, Sokolchik I, Blanco G, Sze JY. Caenorhabditis elegans TRPV ion channel regulates 5HT biosynthesis in chemosensory neurons. Development. 2004. doi: 10.1242/dev.01047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Qin Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y. A neuronal signaling pathway of CaMKII and Gqα regulates experience-dependent transcription of tph-1. J Neurosci. 2013. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2355-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2005. doi: 10.1038/nature04216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Xie Y, Moussaif M, Choi S, Xu L, Sze JY. RFX Transcription Factor DAF-19 Regulates 5-HT and Innate Immune Responses to Pathogenic Bacteria in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2013;9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Shivers RP, Kooistra T, Chu SW, Pagano DJ, Kim DH. Tissue-Specific Activities of an Immune Signaling Module Regulate Physiological Responses to Pathogenic and Nutritional Bacteria in C. elegans. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;6:321–30. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Sze JY, Zhang S, Li J, Ruvkun G. The C. elegans POU-domain transcription factor UNC-86 regulates the tph-1 tryptophan hydroxylase gene and neurite outgrowth in specific serotonergic neurons. Development. 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Xu L, Choi S, Xie Y, Sze JY. Cell-Autonomous Gβ Signaling Defines Neuron-Specific Steady State Serotonin Synthesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Luo KL, Underwood RS, Greenwald I. Positive autoregulation of lag-1 in response to LIN-12 activation in cell fate decisions during C. elegans reproductive system development. Development. 2020. doi: 10.1242/dev.193482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Ghai V, Gaudet J. The CSL transcription factor LAG-1 directly represses hlh-6 expression in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2008;322:334–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Feng W, Li Y, Dao P, Aburas J, Islam P, Elbaz B, et al. A terminal selector prevents a Hox transcriptional switch to safeguard motor neuron identity throughout life. eLife. 2020. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Kerk SY, Kratsios P, Hart M, Mourao R, Hobert O. Diversification of C. elegans Motor Neuron Identity via Selective Effector Gene Repression. Neuron. 2017;93:80–98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Remesal L, Roger-Baynat I, Chirivella L, Maicas M, Brocal-Ruiz R, Pérez-Villalva A, et al. PBX1 acts as terminal selector for olfactory bulb dopaminergic neurons. Development. 2020; dev.186841. doi: 10.1242/dev.186841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Bhattacharya A, Aghayeva U, Berghoff EG, Hobert O. Plasticity of the Electrical Connectome of C. elegans. Cell. 2019;176: 1174–1189.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Serrano-Saiz E, Oren-Suissa M, Bayer EA, Hobert O. Sexually Dimorphic Differentiation of a C. elegans Hub Neuron Is Cell Autonomously Controlled by a Conserved Transcription Factor. Curr Biol. 2017;27:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Barolo S, Walker RG, Polyanovsky AD, Freschi G, Keil T, Posakony JW. A notch-independent activity of suppressor of hairless is required for normal mechanoreceptor physiology. Cell. 2000. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00198-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Sathyamurthy A, Johnson KR, Matson KJE, Dobrott CI, Li L, Ryba AR, et al. Massively Parallel Single Nucleus Transcriptional Profiling Defines Spinal Cord Neurons and Their Activity during Behavior. Cell Rep. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Gupta S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Bailey TL, Noble WS. Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol. 2007. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Kurooka H, Kuroda K, Honjo T. Roles of the ankyrin repeats and C-terminal region of the mouse Notch1 intracellular region. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.23.5448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Kamath RS, Martinez-Campos M, Zipperlen P, Fraser AG, Ahringer J. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2001. doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-2-1-research0002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Esposito G, Di Schiavi E, Bergamasco C, Bazzicalupo P. Efficient and cell specific knock-down of gene function in targeted C. elegans neurons. Gene. 2007;395: 170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.McIntire SL, Garriga G, White J, Jacobson D, Robert Horvitz H. Genes necessary for directed axonal elongation or fasciculation in C. elegans. Neuron. 1992. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90297-q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Escorcia W, Ruter DL, Nhan J, Curran SP. Quantification of lipid abundance and evaluation of lipid distribution in Caenorhabditis elegans by nile red and oil red o staining. J Vis Exp. 2018. doi: 10.3791/57352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Tian L, Hires SA, Mao T, Huber D, Chiappe ME, Chalasani SH, et al. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat Methods. 2009. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Edelstein A, Amodaj N, Hoover K, Vale R, Stuurman N. Computer control of microscopes using manager. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2010. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1420s92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Roland G Roberts

13 Feb 2021

Dear Dr Flames,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript entitled "Notch independent functions of LAG-1/CSL control terminal differentiation, fate maintenance and gene expression plasticity of a chemosensory neuron" for consideration as a Research Article by PLOS Biology. Please accept my apologies for the delay incurred while we sought external advice.

Your manuscript has now been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editorial staff, as well as by an academic editor with relevant expertise, and I'm writing to let you know that we would like to send your submission out for external peer review.

However, before we can send your manuscript to reviewers, we need you to complete your submission by providing the metadata that is required for full assessment. To this end, please login to Editorial Manager where you will find the paper in the 'Submissions Needing Revisions' folder on your homepage. Please click 'Revise Submission' from the Action Links and complete all additional questions in the submission questionnaire.

Please re-submit your manuscript within two working days, i.e. by Feb 16 2021 11:59PM.

Login to Editorial Manager here: https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology

During resubmission, you will be invited to opt-in to posting your pre-review manuscript as a bioRxiv preprint. Visit http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/preprints for full details. If you consent to posting your current manuscript as a preprint, please upload a single Preprint PDF when you re-submit.

Once your full submission is complete, your paper will undergo a series of checks in preparation for peer review. Once your manuscript has passed all checks it will be sent out for review.

Given the disruptions resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, please expect delays in the editorial process. We apologise in advance for any inconvenience caused and will do our best to minimize impact as far as possible.

Feel free to email us at plosbiology@plos.org if you have any queries relating to your submission.

Kind regards,

Roli Roberts

Roland G Roberts, PhD,

Senior Editor

PLOS Biology

Decision Letter 1

Roland G Roberts

19 Mar 2021

Dear Dr Flames,

Thank you very much for submitting your manuscript "Notch independent functions of LAG-1/CSL control terminal differentiation, fate maintenance and gene expression plasticity of a chemosensory neuron" for consideration as a Research Article at PLOS Biology. Your manuscript has been evaluated by the PLOS Biology editors, an Academic Editor with relevant expertise, and by three independent reviewers.

You'll see that all three reviewers are broadly positive about your study. However, they do have some requests, some involving additional experimental work (especially the three major points from reviewer #1), that should be addressed before further consideration.

In light of the reviews (below), we will not be able to accept the current version of the manuscript, but we would welcome re-submission of a much-revised version that takes into account the reviewers' comments. We cannot make any decision about publication until we have seen the revised manuscript and your response to the reviewers' comments. Your revised manuscript is also likely to be sent for further evaluation by the reviewers.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within 3 months.

Please email us (plosbiology@plos.org) if you have any questions or concerns, or would like to request an extension. At this stage, your manuscript remains formally under active consideration at our journal; please notify us by email if you do not intend to submit a revision so that we may end consideration of the manuscript at PLOS Biology.

**IMPORTANT - SUBMITTING YOUR REVISION**

Your revisions should address the specific points made by each reviewer. Please submit the following files along with your revised manuscript:

1. A 'Response to Reviewers' file - this should detail your responses to the editorial requests, present a point-by-point response to all of the reviewers' comments, and indicate the changes made to the manuscript.

*NOTE: In your point by point response to the reviewers, please provide the full context of each review. Do not selectively quote paragraphs or sentences to reply to. The entire set of reviewer comments should be present in full and each specific point should be responded to individually, point by point.

You should also cite any additional relevant literature that has been published since the original submission and mention any additional citations in your response.

2. In addition to a clean copy of the manuscript, please also upload a 'track-changes' version of your manuscript that specifies the edits made. This should be uploaded as a "Related" file type.

*Re-submission Checklist*

When you are ready to resubmit your revised manuscript, please refer to this re-submission checklist: https://plos.io/Biology_Checklist

To submit a revised version of your manuscript, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' where you will find your submission record.

Please make sure to read the following important policies and guidelines while preparing your revision:

*Published Peer Review*

Please note while forming your response, if your article is accepted, you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*PLOS Data Policy*

Please note that as a condition of publication PLOS' data policy (http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability) requires that you make available all data used to draw the conclusions arrived at in your manuscript. If you have not already done so, you must include any data used in your manuscript either in appropriate repositories, within the body of the manuscript, or as supporting information (N.B. this includes any numerical values that were used to generate graphs, histograms etc.). For an example see here: http://www.plosbiology.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pbio.1001908#s5

*Blot and Gel Data Policy*

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare them now, if you have not already uploaded them. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Thank you again for your submission to our journal. We hope that our editorial process has been constructive thus far, and we welcome your feedback at any time. Please don't hesitate to contact us if you have any questions or comments.

Sincerely,

Roli Roberts

Roland G Roberts, PhD,

Senior Editor,

rroberts@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

*****************************************************

REVIEWERS' COMMENTS:

Reviewer #1

[see attachment for formatted version]

This manuscript by Miren Maicas and colleagues describes a novel function of the transcription factor LAG-1 in terminal differentiation of a pair of ADF serotonergic chemosensory neurons in the nematode C. elegans. Using sequence motif analyses, the authors identified a consensus LAG-1-binding motif in promoter regions of genes essential for producing serotonergic phenotypes, including 5-HT synthesis enzyme tryptophan hydroxylase/tph-1, vesicular monoamine transporter/VMAT/cat-1 and 5-HT uptake transporter/SERT/mod-5. The authors generated a series of GFP reporters of the promoter elements, and demonstrated that this LAG-1 binding motif is necessary for baseline expression of these serotonergic phenotype genes in the ADF neurons, but not in any other serotonergic neurons. Using available loss-of-function lag-1 alleles and RNAi knockdown of lag-1 in larval worms, the authors showed that LAG-1 is essential for the expression of these serotonergic phenotype genes in ADF. They further demonstrated that lag-1 deficiency leads to a wide range of physiological and behavioral deficits previously shown to be regulated by ADF 5-HT signaling. Based on these data, the authors concluded that LAG-1 serves as a terminal selector to induce and maintain the terminal differentiation program of the ADF serotonergic neurons.

An interesting twist from this study is that LAG-1, which was previous known as an effector of the LIN-12/GLP-1 Notch signaling, regulates ADF gene expression independently of LIN-12/GLP-1. Instead, they found that LAG-1 expression in the ADF neurons requires the LIM-domain homeobox gene LIM-4.

The experiments are well done and data are solid. For examples, LAG-1 effects were characterized in two genetic lag-1 alleles and further validated by lag-1 RNAi, and authors characterized temperature-sensitive mutants to exclude potential maternal LIN-12/GLP-1 contributions.

This work is significant. Their findings are consistent with emerging evidence indicating that distinct serotonergic neurons are regulated by distinct intrinsic mechanisms and external cues to influence distinct aspects of physiological processes and behavior in mammals. Notch signaling-independent LAG-1 function is novel, showing that transcription factors involved in early developmental processes may be repurposed to control neuron-specific phenotypes in terminal differentiation.

I have following three recommendations for revision:

1. Given that LAG-1 is expressed in many neurons, the authors should validate the impact of lag-1 deficiency on ADF function by rescuing ADF phenotypes observed in lag-1 (om13) or lag-1 RNAi worms. This is a common approach in C. elegans research, and should be done.

2. While their results clearly showed requirement of LAG-1 for baseline expression of serotonergic phenotype genes in ADF, to conclude that LAG-1 is sufficient to induce 5-HT phenotypes, the authors need to demonstrate that ectopically expression of LAG-1 can trigger serotonergic phenotypes in other neuronal types. Alternatively, the authors may consider to revise the conclusion.

3. In the abstract and text, the authors claimed LAG-1 orchestrating “the protracted actions of terminal differentiation and cell fate maintenance” of ADF. However, there is no data indicating that ADF cell fate is changed in lag-1 mutant worms. Contrary, ADF can upregulate tph-1 expression in response to a variety of neuronal and environmental cues in lag-1 mutants or following lag-1 RNAi (Figures 6 and 7), indicating that the general ADF cell fates and ability to produce 5-HT were preserved. The authors should provide additional data to support their claim, or revise the conclusion.

Reviewer #2:

This manuscript by Maicas et al. provides strong evidence that LAG-1/CSL. best known for its role as the DNA binding component of the Notch nuclear complex, is required to induce and maintain expression of genes in the ADF serotonergic neuron; the target genes include not only serotonin pathway genes but also other genes involved in ADF-mediated behaviors and genes that are differentially regulated in response to environmental stimuli. Unusually for CSL, this is independent of Notch, a conclusion that is supported by multiple lines of evidence. The work is excellent, and in my opinion, up to the standards of PLoS Biology; I find the main conclusions convincing, and I believe it is of interest from both a neuroscience and a Notch perspective.

Specific comments:

(1) Avoid priority statements like "This is the first report in C. elegans of a transiently activated signal-regulated TF re-purposed to orchestrate the protracted actions of terminal differentiation and cell fate maintenance" and l. 75 " which has not been reported before in C. elegans".

(2) Abstract: I think it would be worth mentioning that ADF is one of three serotonergic neuron types, which share serotonergic gene expression but not other effector genes, and LAG-1 is the terminal selector for ADF but not the others.

(3) lines 127-128: perhaps I missed it, but the synthetic construct contains three copies of the 40bp minimal region that contains the LAG-1 binding site for ADF expression. What happens if fewer modules are present, and what is their relative configuration in the construct shown (all in the same direction?)? If the information is known but not in the paper, please provide it for aficionados.

(4) line 148. Please refer the reader to the figure showing the alteration in the lag-1(q385) null allele when you first mention it. However, at first glance seeing that it is a relatively late stop may give some readers pause (although an effect on ADF target genes is later shown by RNAi so not a major issue--and could be mentioned here as "see below"). If another lag-1 null allele was examined for, say, tph-1, or if rescue was assessed, it should be mentioned.

(5) lines 213-214. When postembryonic knock down of lag-1 by feeding rrf-3(pk1426) animals was performed, were postembryonic phenotypes expected of lag-1 loss of function in Notch mediated processes also seen?

(6) One point that I think should be clarified relates to imaging conditions and conclusions about gene expression. I could not find any description of the illumination intensity or duration; the scoring will completely depend on this, and if the same conditions/criteria were used in all experiments. Similarly, there is no real description of the distinctions between "on," "faint," and "off". Was there difference in scoring in Figs. 2 and 3 since only 2 has the 'faint" category? What criteria were used in the supplemental figures? Some of the effects seem weaker when just "on" and "off" are used.

(7) Figure 2. I suggest that you label the "LAG-1 domain" as "DNA binding domain" (we know it's lag-1 but don't know what domain is being featured). Also, I suggest making absence of expression a white bar so it is more clearly distinguished from the others, and perhaps leading with the two endogenous reporters, and then having the transgene reporters follow. Endogenous genes are better than transgenes because of copy number and other potential effects, and it's great to have two endogenous genes in this analysis. Finally, I thought it potentially interesting that loss of lag-1 seems to be a stronger effect on the endogenous targets than transgene reporters. Is that worth a comment? Are all the transgenes made the same way (same markers, same concentrations, etc.)?

(8) Figure 3. the ADF branch practically disappears in pale yellow. Please consider using a color scale that highlights this neuron.

(9) Supp. Fig. 4: The large lineage is almost impossible to navigate. Consider showing only the relevant branches: the ADF branch and the branches leading to other serotonin neurons for which LAG-1 is not expressed; and the branches for RIB, AIM and RIH.

(10) two typos I noticed:

line 75 typo, Homeodomain.

Supp Fig. 4: capitalize Notch.

Reviewer #3:

In this manuscript, Maicas et al. analyzed the mechanisms that regulate the terminal differentiation of the C. elegans serotonergic neuron ADF. Using cis-regulatory region analysis and loss-of-function experiments, they found that the CSL transcription factor LAG-1 acts as a terminal selector for the ADF neuron. This is a surprising result as CSL transcription factors are mostly known as mediators of the Notch pathway that turns them from repressors to activators. In addition, the authors provide data indicating that the role of LAG-1 as terminal selector is independent of the Notch pathway, although they did not identify the mechanism allowing LAG-1 to activate transcription in the absence of Notch signaling. To sum up, this is a very interesting study that deserves publication.

Overall, this is a careful study and the manuscript is clearly written. However, a few points could be addressed before publication.

- The authors suggest that LAG-1 may cooperate with another transcription factor that will turn it to an activator independently of Notch. One way to identify such factor could be to search for the presence of a conserved binding site close to the LAG-1 binding site in the cis-regulatory regions of ADF effector genes. It would nice to provide the sequence alignments between different Caenorhabditis species for each of the minimal ADF cis-regulatory regions that they have identified. This may reveal the presence of conserved putative binding sites close to LAG-1 binding sites. Related to this, it would be interesting to know what are the other motifs (in addition to the CSL motif) identified during their motif enrichment analysis.

- p8, line 169: "thermosensitive hypomorphic allele lag-1(om13)". The authors could tell us a bit more about this allele. What are the restrictive and the permissive temperatures ? Did they try temperature shifts at different time points ?

- p9, line 201: The data with the fosmid reporter LAG-1::GFP (vlcEx496) are not provided. The authors should show them.

- p16, line 359 and p17, line 381 : This is Figure S6 not S5.

- p17, line 381-382: The authors suggest that the response to pathogenic bacteria could be mediated via an additional LAG-1 binding site. Have they tried to mutate this site ?

- Fig. 1: panel G shows two CSL sites in cat-1prom14 while panel C shows only one.

- Fig. 4D, 4F, 4G: are these curves from a representative single neuron or mean curves from several neurons ?

- Sup. Fig. 6: the authors should explain why a daf-12(sa204) is present in the background.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Maicas 00237R1.docx

Decision Letter 2

Roland G Roberts

16 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Flames,

Thank you for submitting your revised Research Article entitled "Notch independent functions of LAG-1/CSL control terminal differentiation, fate maintenance and gene expression plasticity of a chemosensory neuron" for publication in PLOS Biology. The Academic Editor has kindly assessed your revisions and responses to reviewers, thereby saving us another round of review. 

Based on this assessment, we will probably accept this manuscript for publication, provided you satisfactorily address the following data and other policy-related requests.

IMPORTANT:

a) Please could you change the title to something slightly more informative? We suggest "The transcription factor LAG-1/CSL plays a Notch-independent role in controlling terminal differentiation and fate maintenance of serotonergic chemosensory neurons"

b) Please address my Data Policy requests below; specifically, please supply numerical values underlying Figs 2BC, 3C, 4AB, 5ABCDEFG, 6BC, 7ABCDFEGH, 8BCDEFG, S2ABCD, S4ABC, S7AB, S8AD and cite the location of the data clearly in each relevant main and supplementary Fig legend.

c) Please try to make your Abstract more accessible, trying to reduce jargon and spelling out abbreviations.

As you address these items, please take this last chance to review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the cover letter that accompanies your revised manuscript.

We expect to receive your revised manuscript within two weeks.

To submit your revision, please go to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/ and log in as an Author. Click the link labelled 'Submissions Needing Revision' to find your submission record. Your revised submission must include the following:

-  a cover letter that should detail your responses to any editorial requests, if applicable, and whether changes have been made to the reference list

-  a Response to Reviewers file that provides a detailed response to the reviewers' comments (if applicable)

-  a track-changes file indicating any changes that you have made to the manuscript. 

NOTE: If Supporting Information files are included with your article, note that these are not copyedited and will be published as they are submitted. Please ensure that these files are legible and of high quality (at least 300 dpi) in an easily accessible file format. For this reason, please be aware that any references listed in an SI file will not be indexed. For more information, see our Supporting Information guidelines:

https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/supporting-information  

*Published Peer Review History*

Please note that you may have the opportunity to make the peer review history publicly available. The record will include editor decision letters (with reviews) and your responses to reviewer comments. If eligible, we will contact you to opt in or out. Please see here for more details:

https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2019/05/plos-journals-now-open-for-published-peer-review/

*Early Version*

Please note that an uncorrected proof of your manuscript will be published online ahead of the final version, unless you opted out when submitting your manuscript. If, for any reason, you do not want an earlier version of your manuscript published online, uncheck the box. Should you, your institution's press office or the journal office choose to press release your paper, you will automatically be opted out of early publication. We ask that you notify us as soon as possible if you or your institution is planning to press release the article.

*Protocols deposition*

To enhance the reproducibility of your results, we recommend that if applicable you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io, where a protocol can be assigned its own identifier (DOI) such that it can be cited independently in the future. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols

Please do not hesitate to contact me should you have any questions.

Sincerely,

Roli Roberts

Roland G Roberts, PhD,

Senior Editor,

rroberts@plos.org,

PLOS Biology

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA POLICY:

You may be aware of the PLOS Data Policy, which requires that all data be made available without restriction: http://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/data-availability. For more information, please also see this editorial: http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001797 

Note that we do not require all raw data. Rather, we ask that all individual quantitative observations that underlie the data summarized in the figures and results of your paper be made available in one of the following forms:

1) Supplementary files (e.g., excel). Please ensure that all data files are uploaded as 'Supporting Information' and are invariably referred to (in the manuscript, figure legends, and the Description field when uploading your files) using the following format verbatim: S1 Data, S2 Data, etc. Multiple panels of a single or even several figures can be included as multiple sheets in one excel file that is saved using exactly the following convention: S1_Data.xlsx (using an underscore).

2) Deposition in a publicly available repository. Please also provide the accession code or a reviewer link so that we may view your data before publication. 

Regardless of the method selected, please ensure that you provide the individual numerical values that underlie the summary data displayed in the following figure panels as they are essential for readers to assess your analysis and to reproduce it: Figs 2BC, 3C, 4AB, 5ABCDEFG, 6BC, 7ABCDFEGH, 8BCDEFG, S2ABCD, S4ABC, S7AB, S8AD. NOTE: the numerical data provided should include all replicates AND the way in which the plotted mean and errors were derived (it should not present only the mean/average values).

Please also ensure that figure legends in your manuscript include information on where the underlying data can be found, and ensure your supplemental data file/s has a legend.

Please ensure that your Data Statement in the submission system accurately describes where your data can be found.

 ------------------------------------------------------------------------

BLOT AND GEL REPORTING REQUIREMENTS:

We require the original, uncropped and minimally adjusted images supporting all blot and gel results reported in an article's figures or Supporting Information files. We will require these files before a manuscript can be accepted so please prepare and upload them now. Please carefully read our guidelines for how to prepare and upload this data: https://journals.plos.org/plosbiology/s/figures#loc-blot-and-gel-reporting-requirements 

------------------------------------------------------------------------

DATA NOT SHOWN?

- Please note that per journal policy, we do not allow the mention of "data not shown", "personal communication", "manuscript in preparation" or other references to data that is not publicly available or contained within this manuscript. Please either remove mention of these data or provide figures presenting the results and the data underlying the figure(s).

------------------------------------------------------------------------

Decision Letter 3

Roland G Roberts

21 Jun 2021

Dear Dr Flames,

On behalf of my colleagues and the Academic Editor, Bing Ye, I'm pleased to say that we can in principle offer to publish your Research Article "The transcription factor LAG-1/CSL plays a Notch-independent role in controlling terminal differentiation, fate maintenance and plasticity of serotonergic chemosensory neurons" in PLOS Biology, provided you address any remaining formatting and reporting issues. These will be detailed in an email that will follow this letter and that you will usually receive within 2-3 business days, during which time no action is required from you. Please note that we will not be able to formally accept your manuscript and schedule it for publication until you have made the required changes.

Please take a minute to log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pbiology/, click the "Update My Information" link at the top of the page, and update your user information to ensure an efficient production process.

PRESS: We frequently collaborate with press offices. If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper at this point, to enable them to help maximise its impact. If the press office is planning to promote your findings, we would be grateful if they could coordinate with biologypress@plos.org. If you have not yet opted out of the early version process, we ask that you notify us immediately of any press plans so that we may do so on your behalf.

We also ask that you take this opportunity to read our Embargo Policy regarding the discussion, promotion and media coverage of work that is yet to be published by PLOS. As your manuscript is not yet published, it is bound by the conditions of our Embargo Policy. Please be aware that this policy is in place both to ensure that any press coverage of your article is fully substantiated and to provide a direct link between such coverage and the published work. For full details of our Embargo Policy, please visit http://www.plos.org/about/media-inquiries/embargo-policy/.

Thank you again for choosing PLOS Biology for publication and supporting Open Access publishing. We look forward to publishing your study. 

Sincerely,

Roli Roberts

Roland G Roberts, PhD 

Senior Editor 

PLOS Biology

rroberts@plos.org

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Fig. Primary data for CSL/LAG-1 binding site mutational analysis of ADF serotonin pathway gene CRMs.

    CRM, cis-regulatory module; CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1.

    (PDF)

    S2 Fig. lag-1 mutants show expression defects in ADF serotonergic neuron and RIH and AIM serotonin reuptaker neurons.

    n.s, nonsignificant.

    (PDF)

    S3 Fig. LAG-1 fosmid reporter expression is similar to the endogenously tagged lag-1 reporter.

    (PDF)

    S4 Fig. LIM-4 activates lag-1 expression in the ADF, and LAG-1 is required for cell fate maintenance acting through the minimal ADF CRMs.

    CRM, cis-regulatory module; n.s, nonsignificant.

    (PDF)

    S5 Fig. LIN-12 and GLP-1 Notch receptors are not expressed in ADF neuron terminal lineage.

    (PDF)

    S6 Fig. De novo motif analysis of functional CSL binding site flanking sequences.

    CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1; WT, wild type.

    (PDF)

    S7 Fig. LIN-12 and GLP-1 Notch receptors are not required for tph-1 up-regulation under specific stimuli.

    L1, first larval stage; YA, young adult.

    (PDF)

    S8 Fig. DAF-19 does not regulate LAG-1 expression, and additional CSL sites are involved in tph-1 response upon bacterial infection.

    CSL, CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1; n.s, nonsignificant.

    (PDF)

    S1 Data. Raw numerical values.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Data. Strains.

    (XLSX)

    S3 Data. Primers.

    (PDF)

    S4 Data. Supporting methods.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Maicas 00237R1.docx

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_finalv2.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response to reviewers_finalv2.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.


    Articles from PLoS Biology are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES