Abstract
During development, signal-regulated transcription factors (TFs) act as basal repressors and upon signalling through morphogens or cell-to-cell signalling shift to activators, mediating precise and transient responses. Conversely, at the final steps of neuron specification, terminal selector TFs directly initiate and maintain neuron-type specific gene expression through enduring functions as activators. C. elegans contains 3 types of serotonin synthesising neurons that share the expression of the serotonin biosynthesis pathway genes but not of other effector genes. Here, we find an unconventional role for LAG-1, the signal-regulated TF mediator of the Notch pathway, as terminal selector for the ADF serotonergic chemosensory neuron, but not for other serotonergic neuron types. Regulatory regions of ADF effector genes contain functional LAG-1 binding sites that mediate activation but not basal repression. lag-1 mutants show broad defects in ADF effector genes activation, and LAG-1 is required to maintain ADF cell fate and functions throughout life. Unexpectedly, contrary to reported basal repression state for LAG-1 prior to Notch receptor activation, gene expression activation in the ADF neuron by LAG-1 does not require Notch signalling, demonstrating a default activator state for LAG-1 independent of Notch. We hypothesise that the enduring activity of terminal selectors on target genes required uncoupling LAG-1 activating role from receiving the transient Notch signalling.
This study shows that LAG-1/CSL, the transcriptional mediator of the Notch pathway, establishes and maintains serotonergic neuron fate in the nematode C. elegans, independently of Notch signaling.
Introduction
The generation of the plethora of neuron types present in the nervous system is a complex and protracted process that is currently not well understood. In the earliest steps of neuron specification, morphogens and cell surface signalling molecules specify naive cells towards restricted neuronal progenitors [1]. Sharp differences in gene expression levels between different types of neuronal progenitors are essential for precise neuronal induction. Thus, these signalling molecules act through specific transcription factors (TFs) called signal-regulated TFs. During basal conditions, signal-regulated TFs function as repressors and they shift to temporally and spatially restricted gene activation when the signalling molecule is received [2]. Different mechanisms, including protein instability, posttranslational modifications, negative feedback loops, or cross-inhibition, ensure the transient activating effects of signal-regulated TFs [2,3].
Later in development, during neuronal terminal differentiation, in contrast to the transient activation effects mediated by signal-regulated TFs, the enduring actions of specific combinations of TFs, termed terminal selectors, ensure the direct and sustained transcriptional activation of neuron-type specific effector genes, such as ion channels, neurotransmitter receptors, neurotransmitter biosynthesis enzymes, etc. [4]. Effector genes are ultimately responsible for the specific properties and physiological functions of the neuron, and their expression is sustained throughout the life of the cell. Accordingly, terminal selector TFs are also continuously expressed, and they are necessary not only to establish but also to maintain correct effector gene expression [5,6].
Neuronal terminal selectors have been described in different metazoan groups including mammals [5,7], although they have been best characterised in C. elegans, where at least a terminal selector is known for 76 out of the 118 different neuronal types [8]. Interestingly, despite numerous examples of TFs acting as terminal selectors, only a small number of TF families are known to act as neuronal terminal selectors from over 50 different families that are present in the C. elegans genome. This includes members of the Erythroblast Transformation Specific (ETS), SRY-related HMG-box genes (SOX), Nuclear Hormone Receptors (NHRs), Basic Helix Loop Helix (bHLH), Zinc Finger (ZF), and, most prominently, the Homeodomain (HD) family [8]. Yet, for many neuronal types in C. elegans, not a single terminal selector has been identified so far, thus additional TF families could also be directly involved in neuronal terminal differentiation.
Serotonin (5HT) is a phylogenetically conserved neurotransmitter present in all animal groups. The same enzymes and transporters are used in different organisms to synthesise, release, and reuptake 5HT, which are collectively known as the 5HT pathway effector genes (Fig 1A). C. elegans contains 3 different types of 5HT synthesising neurons: the ADF chemosensory neuron, the NSM neurosecretory neuron, and the HSN motorneuron (Fig 1B). Despite sharing the expression of the 5HT pathway genes, each 5HT neuron type expresses a very different set of additional effector genes [9]. Accordingly, the combination of terminal selectors acting in NSM and HSN are different [9,10]. In contrast to the well-characterised NSM and HSN terminal differentiation programs, no terminal selector has been identified for the ADF chemosensory neuron.
Here, we demonstrate that LAG-1, a signal-regulated TF from the CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1 (CSL) family, which conventionally shows repressor activity until Notch is activated or independent of Notch, is a terminal selector in the ADF neuron acting as an activator independent of Notch signalling. Through cis-regulatory analysis, we identify functional CSL binding sites in ADF-active regulatory sequences for all 5HT pathway genes. Importantly, in contrast to previous reported basal repressive roles for LAG-1, these sites are required for ADF effector gene activation but do not mediate basal repression. We find lag-1 mutants show broad defects in ADF terminal differentiation. LAG-1 is continuously required postembryonically to maintain correct ADF effector gene expression and functions. Finally, we find that LAG-1 ectopic expression is sufficient, in some contexts, to drive ADF effector gene expression. Altogether, these results define LAG-1 as ADF terminal selector. Unexpectedly, we find LAG-1 fulfils its activating role as terminal selector independent from the Notch signalling, thus acting as a constitutive activator. In addition, we also explore LAG-1 actions on tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase gene expression plasticity in the ADF. Our results unravel a complex scenario in which different environmental stimuli modulate tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase gene expression through different TFs and different cis-regulatory regions, and some, but not all, of the responses to these stimuli are dependent on LAG-1 function.
Results
CSL/LAG-1 binding sites are required for serotonin pathway gene expression in the ADF chemosensory neuron
Cis-regulatory analysis of neuron type–specific effector genes has been instrumental to identify the transcriptional regulatory logic directing neuron type differentiation [11]. Thus, we isolated the minimal cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) that drive serotonin pathway gene transcription in the ADF neuron (Fig 1C and S1 Fig) [9]. We next focused on the smallest CRM, a 99-bp region located upstream the tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase locus (tph-1prom17); this construct drives gfp expression exclusively in the ADF neuron (Fig 1C and 1E). We performed serial scanning mutagenesis and identified a 40-bp region inside tph-1prom-17 that is required for ADF neuron expression (Fig 1D). A synthetic construct with 3 copies of this 40-bp minimal region (tph-1prom46) is sufficient to drive gfp expression exclusively in the ADF neuron (Fig 1E), while a single copy of the 40-bp region placed in front of a neuronal minimal promoter not expressed in the ADF is unable to drive ADF expression (S1 Fig). Altogether, these data show that cis-regulatory information located in this small 40-bp region is necessary and sufficient, when multimerized, to drive gene expression specifically in the ADF neuron.
Terminal selectors directly coregulate expression of neuron type–specific effector genes; thus, we performed de novo motif discovery analysis [12] using the 6 minimal 5HT pathway gene CRMs, including the small 40-bp region in the tph-1 locus. The most significantly enriched motif highly resembles the RBPJ binding motif (Fig 1C and 1F). RBPJ, also known as CBF1, is the vertebrate member of the highly conserved CSL TF family, which in C. elegans is composed by the unique member LAG-1. Disruption of the CSL motif in 5HT pathway gene CRMs leads to strong GFP expression defects in the ADF neuron with no significant up-regulation or ectopic GFP expression observed upon mutation (Fig 1G and S1 Fig), suggesting that LAG-1, through its binding to the CSL motif, could directly activate ADF terminal differentiation.
LAG-1 controls ADF neuron terminal differentiation
We next analysed ADF neuron terminal differentiation in lag-1 mutants. LAG-1 is the signal-regulated TF of the Notch signalling pathway that mediates cell–cell interactions during development. lag-1(q385) allele is a premature STOP (Fig 2A) that displays the strongest phenotypes of all characterised lag-1 alleles, including lethality, and it is considered to be a null allele [13,14]. lag-1(q385) individuals arrest soon after hatching in the first larval stage (L1) with numerous defects reflecting a failure of Notch-mediated cell fate specification during embryogenesis [14]. Analysis of freshly hatched lag-1(q385) worms revealed a dramatic loss of 5HT pathway reporter gene expression in the ADF neuron (Fig 2B). Interestingly, the 2 knock-in endogenous reporters analysed, tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase (vlc46) and mod-5/5HT transporter (vlc47), show the greatest expression defects compared to other scored reporters built as multicopy extrachromosomal or integrated simple arrays [otIs221(cat-1::gfp), otIs225(cat-4::gfp), and vlcEx2433(bas-1::gfp)] (Fig 2B). This observation suggests that endogenous reporters might be more sensitive to lag-1 loss. Expression of other effector genes not directly related to serotonin biosynthesis, such as srh-142/serpentine receptor and gpa-13/Gα protein, is also reduced in lag-1(q385) animals (Fig 2C), suggesting a broader role for LAG-1 in ADF neuron terminal differentiation, not limited to serotonin metabolism, as would be expected for a terminal selector. Importantly, we determined that ADF neuron is still generated in lag-1(q385) mutant as 82% of lag-1(q395) animals still show detectable srh-142/serpentine receptor expression albeit at lower levels (Fig 2C). We next analysed odr-1/guanylate cyclase effector gene expression in AWB neurons, the sister cell of ADF, and found similar odr-1/guanylate cyclase expression in lag-1(q385) mutant and wild-type animals (S2 Fig). Altogether, these results suggest that LAG-1 function is dispensable for the generation of 2 neurons in the terminal branch of the ADF lineage (ADF and AWB neurons) or for ADF neuron survival, but it is necessary for correct ADF neuron terminal differentiation, likely through direct activation of ADF expressed effector genes. Similar broad ADF expression defects are found in the thermosensitive hypomorphic allele lag-1(om13), although the phenotype is observed only when worms are grown at 15 °C and only transiently during L1 (S2 Fig). This allele shows slight germline and somatic defects, which are stronger at 20 to 25 °C compared to 15 °C [15]. The transient phenotype we observe is likely due to the weak nature of this hypomorphic allele in which enough LAG-1 activity in the ADF neuron might be reached either at longer times or at higher temperatures. Finally, as will be discussed in more detail below, lag-1 RNAi also displays broad serotonin pathway gene expression defects specifically in the ADF.
LAG-1 is expressed in the postmitotic ADF neuron to induce and maintain ADF neuron fate
Cis-regulatory analysis and lag-1 mutant characterisation suggested that LAG-1 acts as terminal selector for the ADF chemosensory neuron. Available single-cell RNAseq (sc-RNAseq) expression data from C. elegans embryos [16] reveal bilateral lag-1 expression in the ADF lineage starting at the postmitotic ADF neuroblast, supporting a terminal role for LAG-1 (Fig 3A). Embryonic lag-1 expression is also detected in the terminal division of 3 additional postmitotic neuroblasts RIB, AIM, and RIH. Interestingly, AIM and RIH express mod-5/5HT transporter and cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter to reuptake 5HT from the extracellular space. In addition to ADF specification defects, lag-1(q385) animals show mod-5/5HT transporter and cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter reporter expression defects in AIM and RIH (S2 Fig), suggesting LAG-1 could also play a role in the terminal differentiation of these additional neuronal types.
To assess postembryonic LAG-1 expression, we labelled the endogenous lag-1 locus with a fluorescent reporter (lag-1::T2A::mNeonGreen) (Fig 3B). This construct generates a unique mRNA transcript that, upon translation, undergoes autocatalytic cleavage, giving rise to 2 independent proteins, LAG-1 and the fluorescent mNeonGreen protein, ensuring correct LAG-1 function (Fig 3B). At L1, mNeonGreen expression is observed in several neurons in the head including ADF neuron (Fig 3B). Strong LAG-1 expression in ADF neuron is maintained at all larval stages and throughout the life of the animal (Fig 3B). Similar strong ADF expression at L1 and young adult stages was observed for a fusion protein LAG-1::GFP using a fosmid-recombineered reporter strain (vlcEx496) (S3 Fig).
We next further characterised lag-1 expression in the context of the known ADF gene regulatory network. During embryonic development, the LIM HD TF lim-4 is expressed in the mother cell of ADF/AWB. lim-4(yz12) mutant animals generate 2 neurons in the terminal division of the ADF lineage, but ADF neuron fails to properly differentiate [17]. Our data indicate that LIM-4 is required for LAG-1 expression in the ADF neuron (S4 Fig).
Terminal selectors are often required to maintain neuron fate [6]. As LAG-1 is continuously expressed in the ADF neuron, we checked whether its activity is also required for ADF cell fate maintenance. Postembryonic knockdown of lag-1 by feeding with lag-1 RNAi L1 rrf-3(pk1426) animals, an RNAi neuron-sensitised strain, leads to sterile animals, similar to postembryonic lin-12 and glp-1 Notch receptors RNAi treatment. lag-1 P0 RNAi animals show a significant loss of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase, cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter, bas-1/aromatic amino-acid decarboxylase, and cat-4/GTP cyclo-hydrolase reporter expression in young adult animals, as well as 5HT staining defects (Fig 3C and S4 Fig). These defects are not due to neurodegeneration of the ADF neuron as srh-142/serpentine receptor reporter expression is unaffected (Fig 3C).
Next, we attempted to assess whether ADF specification defects in lag-1 mutants can be rescued by cell autonomous LAG-1 expression under srh-142 promoter, which is unaffected in lag-1(om13) hypomorphic mutants (S4 Fig). lag-1 gene codes for 4 different splicing variants (S3 Fig), we failed to observe significant tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression rescue with any individual isoform or with a combination of the 4 transcripts (S4 Fig). lag-1(om13) phenotype is only transiently observed during L1; this short time window might limit our ability to detect lag-1 rescue; alternatively, different levels of specific isoform or earlier expression might be required for rescue. As an alternative to cell autonomous rescue, we performed cell autonomous knockdown of lag-1 in postmitotic ADF neurons using the ADF-specific promoter srh-142 to drive lag-1 double-stranded RNA. Cell type–specific lag-1 RNAi depletes endogenous LAG-1 specifically from the ADF neuron (Fig 4A), and this depletion is sufficient to induce expression defects of endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase in the ADF (Fig 4A). These data support a cell autonomous role for LAG-1 in ADF terminal differentiation.
Finally, we assessed if LAG-1 is not only necessary but also sufficient to induce ADF fate. We used a heat shock–inducible promoter to broadly express LAG-1 in embryos at the stage of neurogenesis. LAG-1 isoform D, but not LAG-1 isoform A, is sufficient to drive ectopic tph-1 reporter expression (Fig 4B), suggesting LAG-1 is sufficient in some contexts to induce ADF gene expression and unravelling isoform specific functions for LAG-1. Both isoforms share the CSL DNA binding domain and the Notch interacting domain, located at the carboxyl terminal region of the protein, but differ in the amino-terminal region, which has unknown functions.
Altogether, our data strongly indicate that LAG-1 acts as terminal selector to directly induce and maintain expression of ADF effector genes.
Physiological processes dependent on ADF neuron require postembryonic LAG-1 function
5HT release from ADF chemosensory neuron mediates a variety of processes and behaviours. Thus, we next explored if postembryonic lag-1 function is required for correct display of ADF-regulated behaviours. To circumvent larval lethality of lag-1(q385) null mutants, we took advantage of postembryonic knockdown of lag-1 by RNAi in the rrf-3(pk1426) sensitised strain.
ADF has been implicated in pharyngeal pumping in well-fed animals [18]; however, this role is unclear as other reports implicate 5HT release from NSM and not ADF as the main regulator of pharyngeal pumping [19]. We find that lag-1 RNAi-fed rrf-3(pk1426) worms show no difference in pumping rates compared to L4440 RNAi-fed animals (Fig 5A), suggesting LAG-1 function is not required, at least under these conditions, to modulate pharyngeal pumping.
ADF, together with ASI and ASG chemosensory neurons, is required to prevent dauer entry [20], and, accordingly, tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase mutant animals show enhanced dauer entry [21,22]. We find a significant increase in the percentage of dauer animals upon pheromone treatment in P0 lag-1 RNAi-fed worms compared to controls (Fig 5B), suggesting LAG-1 is required to prevent dauer entry. Of note, the lag-1(om13) hypomorphic allele, which shows no obvious ADF specification defects after L1, has been previously used to show a role for lag-1 in dauer maintenance and dauer exit, a process that is mediated through expression of the Notch ligand lag-2 in the IL2 neurons, but a role for ADF neuron in this processes has not been reported [23].
5HT release from ADF neuron also promotes fat mobilisation [24]; accordingly, we find that lag-1 RNAi induces a significant increase in lipid storage (Fig 5C), a phenotype also observed in tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase mutants [24]. In addition, ADF function is also involved in foraging: after a food deprivation period, when worms are approaching food source, they reduce their speed [25]. This behaviour is mediated by 5HT release from NSM and ADF neurons [26]. We find that postembryonic knockdown of lag-1 by RNAi does not affect basal locomotion, but lag-1 RNAi-fed animals fail to decelerate upon food detection prior to contact (Fig 5D and 5E). As neither lag-1 RNAi nor lag-1(q385) mutants show NSM serotonergic specification defects, our results suggest that postembryonic LAG-1 function in ADF is required for correct foraging behaviour.
Finally, we directly tested ADF activation in lag-1 RNAi-fed worms by calcium imaging. As expected, ADF L4440-fed control RNAi animals respond to short exposures to Cu+2 solution [27] (Fig 5F). In sharp contrast, the same stimulus fails to activate the ADF neuron in worms fed with lag-1 RNAi (Fig 5G). Thus, LAG-1 function is required postembryonically to either allow for copper detection or to elicit correct activation in response to this stimulus.
Altogether, our physiological and behavioural assays show that postembryonic LAG-1 function is required not only for 5HT pathway gene expression but also for correct ADF activation and proper performance of ADF-mediated processes.
LAG-1 activating functions in ADF neuron are Notch independent
LAG-1 is the signal-regulated transcriptional mediator of the phylogenetically conserved Notch intercellular signalling pathway [13]. Accordingly, we next aimed to explore if depletion of other components of the Notch pathway produce similar ADF specification defects. C. elegans genome codes for 2 Notch receptors GLP-1 and LIN-12, which, upon activation, are proteolytically cleaved, allowing the intracellular domain to translocate to the nucleus (Fig 6A). In the nucleus, the Notch intracellular domain (NICD) forms a complex with LAG-1 and the coactivator SEL-8 to shift the basal repressor activity of LAG-1 towards transcriptional activation of target genes [28]. Previously reported phenotypes for lag-1 are mimicked by glp-1, lin-12, and sel-8 mutants [14,29]. Accordingly, rrf-3(pk1426) L1 larvae fed with glp-1, lin-12, or sel-8 RNAi develop into young adults that are sterile or produce dead embryos, similar to lag-1 RNAi-fed animals. However, in contrast to lag-1 RNAi, these animals do not show defects in tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase or cat-1/vesicular monoamine transporter reporter expression (Fig 6B and 6C). We next analysed ADF fate in lin-12(n941) glp-1(q46) double mutants and the sel-8(ok387) single mutant, which should abrogate all zygotic Notch pathway activity. Similar to lag-1(q385) null homozygotes, these animals die at L1; however, contrary to lag-1 mutants, L1 larvae show normal tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression in the ADF neuron (Fig 6B and 6C).
glp-1 is required maternally for early embryonic development [30]. To bypass this requirement and test the possibility that maternally supplied glp-1 in lin-12(n941) glp-1(q46) double mutants could be contributing to ADF terminal differentiation, we used a temperature-sensitive allele of glp-1. glp-1(e2144) gravid mothers, which contain embryos that have passed the stage where maternal glp-1 is required, were placed at restrictive temperature and allowed to lay eggs. Eggs are grown at restrictive temperature since approximately 30-cell stage, which corresponds to 4 divisions prior ADF birth. As expected from glp-1 depletion, these animals are sterile; however, they do not display tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression defects in the ADF neuron at L1 or as young adult (Fig 6B). Finally, we were unable to detect ADF expression of lin-12 or glp-1 at L1 or young adult using both endogenous knock-in and fosmid-based fluorescent reporters (S5 Fig). Similarly, available embryonic or L2 sc-RNAseq data do not show sel-8, glp-1, or lin-12 expression in the ADF or the ADF mother cell [16,31] (S5 Fig). Altogether, these data strongly suggest that LAG-1 functions as activator of ADF effector genes are independent of the canonical Notch pathway.
Notch-independent activating functions for CSL TFs have been previously reported. In mammals, Rbpj/CSL specifies mouse pancreatic cells and cerebellar and spinal cord GABAergic neurons through its interaction with the bHLH TF Ptf1a [32,33]. These data prompted us to explore the possibility that LAG-1 acts together with HLH-13, C. elegans ortholog of Ptf1a, in the specification of the ADF neuron. However, hlh-13(tm2279) mutants show normal 5HT pathway gene expression in ADF neurons (S6 Fig). In mammals, Rbpj, Ptf1a, and an E protein form a trimeric complex that binds a DNA motif composed by an Ebox and a CSL site [33,34]. Thus, we reasoned that, if LAG-1 interacts similarly with other unknown TFs, a composite site “CSL+ unknown DNA motif” might be present in the regulatory regions of ADF effector genes. We thus performed sequence alignments with all experimentally determined functional CSL binding sites +/− 30 bp of flanking sequences in C. elegans and other Caenorhabditis species. We retrieved 66 conserved CSL binding sites from 19 different species (S6 Fig). Alignment of all these sequences does not reveal any additional motif flanking the CSL site (S6 Fig), which might be due to flexibility in the position and/or orientation of the additional motif. Thus we performed de novo motif analysis using this set of 66 sequences, which retrieved, in addition to CSL binding site, 2 motifs that show some similarity to bHLH TF binding motifs (S6 Fig). C. elegans genome codes for 41 bHLH TFs in addition to hlh-13, it is possible that other bHLH TF could work together with LAG-1 to induce ADF fate. Further studies should be aimed to identify such factor.
LAG-1 regulates ADF tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity upon pathogen infection and cilia defects
ADF is a plastic sensory neuron that, in response to several insults, up-regulates expression of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase, the rate-limiting enzyme for 5HT biosynthesis, increasing 5HT signalling. Thus, we tested the role of LAG-1 in tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity in the ADF neuron.
In agreement with previous reports based on tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transgenic reporter strains [22,35,36], we found that dauer entry, heat stress, and unc-43/CAMKII gain-of-function mutation (a mediator of neuronal activity and synaptic plasticity) induce expression of the endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase locus (vlc46) (Fig 7A, 7C, and 7D). A similar increase in expression is observed in dauer animals from lag-1 RNAi-fed worms, in heat shocked lag-1(om13) or unc-43(n498gof); lag-1(om13) double mutants animals (Fig 7B–7D), suggesting tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity under these conditions is independent of LAG-1 function.
tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcriptional reporter expression is also induced in animals with cilia morphology defects [22]. In agreement with these data, we find that endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression (vlc46) is induced in mutants that have cilia defects, dyf-1(yz66) and che-11(e1810) (Fig 7E and 7F). Importantly, this induction is not observed when LAG-1 function is compromised with the lag-1(om13) allele (Fig 7E and 7F), indicating that, in contrast to dauer state, heat stress, or CAMKII overactivation, LAG-1 mediates tph-1 expression plasticity induced by cilia morphology defects.
Finally, we analysed tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase induction upon pathogenic infection. Pathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas aeruginosa induces tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression in the ADF neuron; this increase in transcription is mediated by Toll and Interleukin 1 Receptor (TIR-1) [37–39]. In agreement with previous reports with transcriptional reporters [37–39], we find that a gain-of-function allele tir-1(yz68) shows increased expression of the endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase locus (vlc46) (Fig 7G). We failed to generate viable tir-1(yz68); lag-1(om13) double mutants; therefore, we performed lag-1 RNAi in tir-1(yz68); rrf-3(pk1416) animals. lag-1 RNAi abolishes tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter induction (Fig 7H), suggesting that, similar to cilia morphology defects, LAG-1 is necessary to mediate ADF plastic response to pathogenic bacteria. Similar to its role as terminal selector, LAG-1 function on tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity is also Notch independent as neither glp-1 nor lin-12 are necessary for tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase induction (S7 Fig).
DAF-19, the only RFX TF in C. elegans, is required for developmental tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression as well as to mediate tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcriptional increase upon different insults including bacterial infection or cilia morphology defects. However, DAF-19 does not regulate expression of other ADF 5HT effector genes [38]. DAF-19 has been suggested to act indirectly on tph-1 expression through yet unidentified factors [38]. We find that ADF LAG-1 expression in daf-19(m86) mutants shows no difference compared to controls (S8 Fig), indicating lag-1 transcription is not downstream of DAF-19.
Different cis-regulatory elements mediate tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity to external stimuli
The mechanistic details of how plastic gene expression responses are integrated at the cis-regulatory level are still very scarce. Thus, we next analysed if tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression modulation is mediated through the developmental minimal CRM (tph-1p17) that contains a functional LAG-1/CSL binding site (Fig 8A). Interestingly, as explained in detail below, our results reveal that a complex variety of cis-regulatory mechanisms are used to integrate responses to different stimuli.
unc-43/CAMKII gain-of-function mutation, which induces endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase independently of LAG-1 (Fig 7D), does not induce activation through tph-1prom17 (Fig 8B), suggesting that cis-regulatory elements outside this developmental CRM mediate the plastic gene expression response to neuronal activity. Unexpectedly, tir-1(yz68) gain-of-function allele, which requires LAG-1 for endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase induction (Fig 7H), does not activate tph-1prom17 (Fig 8C), suggesting that the response to pathogenic bacteria is also integrated outside the developmental minimal CRM. One additional CSL binding site is present in the intergenic region of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase, which is located immediately outside of tph-1prom17 CRM (S8 Fig). In contrast to the absolute requirement of the CSL binding site in tph-1prom17, mutation of this site in a context of a longer tph-1 CRM (tph-1prom2) that contains both CSL sites produce only a partial loss of GFP expression (S8 Fig). Only when both CSL sites are mutated GFP expression is completely abolished, unravelling the functionality of this additional CSL site (S8 Fig). In contrast to lack of tph-1prom17 activation, tph-1prom2 expression is induced in tir-1(yz68) gain-of-function animals. tir-1(yz68) induction of tph-1prom2 is completely abolished when both CSL sites are mutated (S8 Fig). Thus, LAG-1 mediates tph-1 gene induction in the presence of pathogenic bacteria through both CSL binding sites.
In contrast, dauer state, heat stress, and cilia morphology defects enhance tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression through the activation of tph-1prom17 minimal CRM (Fig 8D–8F). As we had previously determined that heat stress and dauer stage induction of endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase act independently of LAG-1 (Fig 7A–7C), we hypothesised that the response to these stimuli might be integrated through additional non-CSL binding sites. In agreement with this hypothesis, we find that neither heat stress nor dauer state increase tph-1prom46 transcription, the synthetic reporter composed by 3 CSL binding motifs that is specifically expressed in the ADF, suggesting that these stimuli act on additional TF binding sites present in the tph-1prom17 minimal CRM (Fig 8D and 8E). Interestingly, CSL mutation in the minimal CRM (tph-1prom42) not only abolishes transcription in basal conditions but also prevents enhancement of expression upon heat stress or in dauers (Fig 8D and 8E), indicating that a basal level of activity in the CRM might be required to allow for the integration of plastic responses to external stimuli later in the life of the animal, even if they are mediated independently of LAG-1.
Finally, we find that dyf-1(yz66) cilia morphology mutant, which induces endogenous tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcription in an LAG-1–dependent manner (Fig 7G), not only activates tph-1prom17 minimal CRM but also enhances transcription of the 3XCSL synthetic construct (Fig 8F), suggesting that information from this stimulus is integrated through the developmentally activated CSL binding site. dyf-1(yz66) mutants fail to induce transcription of tph-1 minimal CRM baring a mutation of the CSL binding site (tph-1prom42) (Fig 8F) further supporting a direct role for LAG-1 mediating these stimuli.
In summary, we find that, in addition to its developmental role as ADF terminal selector, LAG-1 is actively involved in the regulation of ADF gene expression plasticity. Our results unveil a complex scenario with a combination of LAG-1 dependent and independent gene expression responses. LAG-1–independent integration of some external stimuli (heat stress and dauer) is mediated through the developmental minimal CRM while other stimuli (neuronal activity) act outside this minimal regulatory region (Fig 8G). Seemingly, LAG-1–mediated responses are also specific to stimulus. While cilia defects act through the CSL site present in the developmental enhancer, information regarding pathogenic bacteria is integrated through 2 CSL binding sites, one of them located outside the minimal developmental enhancer (Fig 8G).
Discussion
In this work, we describe the role of the CSL TF family in neuronal terminal differentiation in C. elegans. We found that LAG-1, the signal-regulated TF mediator of Notch signalling, induces and maintains the terminal differentiation program of the ADF serotoninergic neuron. Our results show that the enduring activating action that LAG-1 exerts in ADF gene expression and function is achieved independent of Notch activity. LAG-1 role as an activator independent of Notch signalling contrasts previous reports on LAG-1 functions.
Analysis of coregulated cis-regulatory elements allows the identification of novel terminal selectors
Terminal selectors coregulate transcription of multiple effector genes; therefore, regulatory regions of their target genes share the corresponding regulatory signature. We studied the CRMs of the 5HT pathway genes active in the ADF and identified the common presence of functional CSL binding sites, leading us to the unexpected identification of LAG-1 as a terminal selector for the ADF neuronal fate.
Previously identified terminal selectors have been mostly isolated from forward genetic screens. However, the null phenotype of lag-1 is larval or embryonic lethal [14], and we found that lag-1(om13), a partially lethal hypomorphic allele, does not display ADF phenotypes in adult animals. These facts likely explain why lag-1 alleles have not been previously isolated from forward genetic screen for ADF specification defects [22,35,38,40,41]. Additional terminal selectors with lethal phenotypes have been also identified using similar cis-regulatory approaches [11], which underscore the complementarity of forward genetics and cis-regulatory analysis. Our results not only extend the number of C. elegans neuron types with an assigned terminal selector but more importantly expand the number of different TF families that act as terminal selectors.
LAG-1 terminal selector action is independent of Notch signalling
C. elegans LAG-1 has been shown to act as a basal repressor in the absence of Notch signalling [42,43]. Here, we describe Notch-independent functions for LAG-1 as an activator. Most probably, these Notch-independent LAG-1 activating functions in the ADF neuron are mediated in concert with unidentified tissue-specific cofactors, as discussed further below.
In addition, we find that LAG-1 Notch-independent activating functions are continuously required to maintain correct gene expression in the ADF. Postembryonic removal of LAG-1 does not only affect reporter expression and 5HT staining but also leads to broad functional defects in ADF-mediated physiological processes, exposing the extensive actions of LAG-1 in ADF gene expression and function. Finally, in some contexts, LAG-1 is also sufficient to drive ADF effector gene expression. Altogether, LAG-1 shows all known attributes for a terminal selector: cell fate induction, direct action on effector genes, and cell fate maintenance [8]. In addition to activating roles for terminal selectors, in some contexts, these TFs have been shown to also act as repressors of alternative cell fates [44–46]; although our work has not deeply explored this possibility for LAG-1, lag-1 mutants do not up-regulate expression of odr-1 reporter in the ADF neuron (odr-1 is an effector gene for AWB, the sister cell of ADF), suggesting that lag-1 acts mainly activating gene expression rather than repressing alternative fates.
LAG-1 modulates ADF plastic gene expression responses to specific external stimuli
In some cell types, the implementation of robust and stable cell identities during development must be combined with additional mechanisms that ensure adaptive responses to specific external stimuli. How robustness and plasticity of gene expression are both integrated in the cell is currently not well understood. Terminal selectors, working in concert with other transcriptional activators and repressors, are involved in ON/OFF gene switches that take place upon dauer entry [47] or in the acquisition of sexually dimorphic gene expression [48]. In addition to these ON/OFF switches, some gene plasticity responses require subtle modulation of gene expression. Here, we have uncovered the role of a terminal selector in tuning gene expression in response to external stimuli.
Previous work in C. elegans identified a great variety of stimuli that increase tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase transcriptional levels. These stimuli work through different parallel pathways; however, direct transcriptional mediators of tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase expression plasticity had not been described [22,35,36,38]. Here, we find that transcriptional response to specific stimuli (cilia morphology defects and pathogenic bacteria), but not to others (dauer, heat stress, and neuronal activity), requires LAG-1 function. This specificity is important because it reveals a complex scenario in which terminal selector function is not always necessary to modulate gene expression and additional TFs could be specifically devoted to mediate gene expression plasticity.
Phylogenetically conserved Notch-independent role for CSL TFs in neuronal terminal differentiation
Notch-independent activating functions for CSL TFs have been previously reported for Su(H) in Drosophila mechanosensory socket cell fate maintenance [49] and for Rbpj in the specification of mouse pancreatic cells, and cerebellar and spinal cord GABAergic neurons [32,33]. The mechanism by which Su(H) acts as an activator in Drosophila is unknown, but in mammals, Rbpj interacts through its NICD interacting domain with the bHLH TF Ptf1a. We find that hlh-13, C. elegans ortholog of Ptf1a, is not required for correct tph-1/tryptophan hydroxylase reporter expression in the ADF. Nevertheless, the formal logic that has been described in mammalian cells may still operate in C. elegans ADF: that is, additional uncharacterized TFs might be acting together with LAG-1 to mediate its Notch-independent activating role in the ADF neuron. Thus, CSL TFs display a phylogenetically conserved Notch-independent role in activating neuronal terminal differentiation. We additionally found that LAG-1 is continuously required for neuron cell fate maintenance. Intriguingly, although postembryonic roles of Rbpj have not been studied, some neuronal populations in the adult spinal cord maintain Rbpj expression [50], suggesting that, similar to LAG-1, mammalian RBPJ may display additional Notch-independent roles in cell fate maintenance or neuronal plasticity.
Material and methods
Strains
C. elegans strains were maintained as described [51]. Wild-type animals are Bristol strain N2. Strains used in this study are listed in S2 Data. Deletion alleles were genotyped by PCR and point mutations by sequencing. Primers are included in S3 Data.
Generation of C. elegans transgenic lines
Gene constructs for cis-regulatory analyses were generated by cloning into the pPD95.75 vector. Synthetic construct tph-1prom46 (GenScript Biotech, Netherlands) and tph-1prom45 construct were generated by annealing the phosphorylated primers and cloned into pPD95.75. Primers are listed in S3 Data (the whole sequences of these promoters are also included). MEME suite tool [12] and TOMTOM [52] were used for motif enrichment analysis. RTGGGAA [13] and YGTGGGAA [53] LAG-1 consensus sites where used for the identification of additional sites. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed by Quickchange II XL site-directed mutagenesis kit (Agilent/Stratagene, Santa Clara, CA, United States). Ectopic lag-1 expression, ADF lag-1 rescue experiments, microinjections, and CRISPR/Cas9-mediated strain generation details are included in S4 Data. All primers are listed in S3 Data.
RNAi feeding experiments and cell type–specific RNAi
RNAi feeding experiments were performed following standard protocols [54]; see S4 Data for more details. PCR fusion of srh-142 promoter to sense or antisense lag-1 cDNA sequences were injected for cell-specific lag-1 RNAi experiments as previously described [55], 100 ng/μl each sense or antisense PCR together with ttx-3::mcherry (25 ng/μl) and rol-6(su1006) (25 ng/μl) coinjection markers. Primers are listed in S3 Data.
5HT staining
C. elegans 5HT antibody staining was performed using the tube fixation protocol [56]; exact protocol is described in S4 Data.
Behavioural and physiological assays
Dauer induction was performed using filtered liquid culture of worms grown at 7 worms/μl for 4 days. Briefly, 300 μl of pheromone containing extracts or control extracts (culture media alone) were added to 60 mm of IPTG RNAi-seeded plates. After drying, gravid worms were added within a drop of alkaline hypochlorite solution and maintained at 27 °C. The percentage of dauer animals was scored in each condition, 72 hours later (P0). For tph-1 reporter quantification at dauer, the intensity level of the fluorescent reporter was quantified in the ADF neuron (n > 60 neurons). For pharyngeal pumping rate, quantification of a minimum of 12 young adult worms fed on lag-1 RNAi (P0) or control bacteria were recorded with an AxioCam MRm monochrome digital camera using a ZEISS Axio Zoom.V16 microscope (Oberkochen, Germany). Pharyngeal pumping rate was measured by counting the contraction of the pharyngeal bulb over a 10-second period. For quantification of lipid accumulation, oil red O staining was conducted as previously reported [57], with slight modifications included in S4 Data. The analysis of the enhanced slowing response was performed as described [25]. Young adult worms fed with lag-1 RNAi (P0) or L4440 control bacteria were washed with M9 1X buffer for 5 times and transferred for freely crawl (2 hours) to unseeded IPTG plates, whose agar perimeter was delimited with a 4 M fructose (D-Fructose (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), 1% Red Congo dye/ddH2O) ring to avoid worms to scape. After that period of fasting, animals were recovered washing the plate with M9 1X medium. To analyze locomotion of worms approaching a source of food, worms were placed in IPTG plates seeded with 25 μL of bacteria 5X concentrated. Animals were recorded, at room temperature (22 °C), with a multi-worm tracker device. Four groups of 8 to 15 worms were recorded per RNAi clone, approximately 50 worms per condition. RNAi empty vector, L4440, was considered the control group. Recording and analysis details are included in S4 Data. For calcium imaging recordings sensitised RNAi strain, rrf-3(pk1426), animals carrying a genetically engineered protein, GCaMP3, expressed only in the ADF were used [58]. Young adult animals fed with RNAi from hatching (P0) were washed with M9 1X and treated for 30 minutes with 1 mM tetramisole hydrochloride (Sigma/Aldrich/Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) to paralyse their movements. Worms were transferred inside a methacrylate microfluidics chamber (self-custom at Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Massachusetts, USA) and settled on an inverted fluorescence microscope (Axio VertA.1, Zeiss) connected to a liquid flow system. M13 buffer (30 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, and 10 mM KCl) was used as basal solution, and stimulation solution was prepared adding CuSO4 (10 mM) to M13 buffer and adjusting to pH 4. Both buffers contained tetramisole (1 mM) to avoid worm movement. Images were captured with a CCD camera (Prosilica GC2450, Allied Vision Technologies, Stadtroda, Germany) with 20X objective at 2 frames per second with Micro-Manager software [59]. More details of the analysis are included in S4 Data.
Temperature shift experiment
glp-1(e2144) gravid hermaphrodites were placed on prewarmed plates at the restrictive temperature of 25 °C. Mothers were removed after 6 hours, and L1 and young adult worms were scored.
Heat shock treatment
Plates with worms incubated at 20 °C were shifted to 37.5 °C for 90 minutes and returned to 20 °C for 6 hours. lag-1(om13) worms were incubated at 15 °C pre- and post-heat shock treatment. Fluorescent reporter expression was quantified in the ADF neurons at L1 larvae stage. Embryonic heat shock for ectopic lag-1 expression and 5HT fate induction are explained in S4 Data.
Scorings
Scoring was performed using 40X or 63X objective in a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope. Micrographs for figures were obtained with a TCS-SP8 Leica Microsystems confocal microscope using 63X objective. Scoring values and conditions are detailed in S1 Data.
For cis-analysis and RNAi screening experiments, a minimum of 30 young adult animals per line or per RNAi clone and replicate were analysed; for mutants analysis, 50 individuals were scored (100 neurons). ON, FAINT, or OFF determinations were established qualitatively by direct observation under the fluorescent microscope: lack of detectable GFP signal was considered OFF, and, if GFP expression was clearly weaker than wild type but still detectable, “FAINT” category was included.
For site-directed mutagenesis, mean expression value of wild type lines is considered the reference value. Mutated constructs are considered to show normal expression when GFP expression was 100% to 80% of average expression of the corresponding wild type construct (“+” phenotype). Compared to wild type reference value, 80% to 20% reduction was considered a partial phenotype “+/−”. GFP expression detected in less than 20% of the animals was considered as loss of expression (“−” phenotype).
Cis-regulatory and mutant analyses were performed at 25 °C, while RNAi experiments and intensity level analyses were performed at 20 °C, unless other temperature is indicated in S1 Data.
For quantification of intensity levels, measurements of a minimum of 30 worms (60 neurons) were analysed. Intensity levels were evaluated by capturing images of individual ADF neurons at fixed exposure times for each reporter in a Zeiss Axioplan 2 microscope (see S1 Data for exposure times). The external contour of each ADF neuron was delineated, and fluorescence intensity within the entire neuron was quantified using the ImageJ software and normalised by the area of the neuron. All genetic backgrounds or conditions of each experiment were done the same day. Young adult animals were scored, unless other stage is indicated.
Statistics
Mutant and RNAi analysis data were categorically classified as “on” or “off,” and the significance of the association was examined using the two-tailed Fisher exact test; “faint” phenotype was included as “on” for the statistics. For intensity level of the fluorescent reporters, as samples did not follow a normal distribution, the nonparametric Mann–Whitney test was used with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. For deceleration rate, normality of the data was confirmed and data sets were compared using two-tailed t test. For calcium imaging analysis, the percentage of changes in fluorescence intensity relative to the initial intensity F0, ΔF = (F − F0) / F0 × 100%, were plotted as a function of time. The following statistical nomenclature was used: n.s, nonsignificant; *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
We thank CGC (P40 OD010440) for providing strains; Dr Laura Chirivella, Noemi Daroqui, and Elia García for technical help; Dr Carlos Mora for building tph-1 and mod-5 endogenous reporters; Dr Rafal Ciosk for sharing glp-1 endogenous reporter; and Dr Iva Greenwald, Dr Luisa Cochella, and Dr Ines Carrera for scientific discussion and paper comments.
Abbreviations
- 5HT
serotonin
- bHLH
Basic Helix Loop Helix
- CRM
cis-regulatory module
- CSL
CBF-1, Su (H), LAG-1
- ETS
Erythroblast Transformation Specific
- HD
Homeodomain
- L1
first larval stage
- NHR
Nuclear Hormone Receptor
- NICD
Notch intracellular domain
- sc-RNAseq
single-cell RNAseq
- SOX
SRY-related HMG-box genes
- TF
transcription factor
- TIR-1
Toll and Interleukin 1 Receptor
- ZF
Zinc Finger
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting information files.
Funding Statement
NF research is funded by European Research Council (ERC StG 281920; ERC COG 101002203), Spanish Government (SAF2017-84790-R) and Generalitat Valenciana (PROMETEO/2018/055). A.M.T holds the PRE2018-086632 fellowship from Spanish Government and A.J the ACIF/2015/398 fellowship from Generalitat Valenciana. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Grove EA, Monuki ES. Morphogens, patterning centers, and their mechanisms of action. Patterning and Cell Type Specification in the Developing CNS and PNS. Elsevier Inc.; 2020. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barolo S, Posakony JW. Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: Principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev. 2002;16:1167–81. doi: 10.1101/gad.976502 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Gibb S, Maroto M, Dale JK. The segmentation clock mechanism moves up a notch. Trends Cell Biol. 2010;20:593–600. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hobert O. Regulatory logic of neuronal diversity: Terminal selector genes and selector motifs. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0806070105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hobert O, Kratsios P. Neuronal identity control by terminal selectors in worms, flies, and chordates. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.12.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Deneris ES, Hobert O. Maintenance of postmitotic neuronal cell identity. Nat Neurosci. 2014. doi: 10.1038/nn.3731 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tournière O, Dolan D, Richards GS, Sunagar K, Columbus-Shenkar YY, Moran Y, et al. NvPOU4/Brain3 Functions as a Terminal Selector Gene in the Nervous System of the Cnidarian Nematostella vectensis. Cell Rep. 2020;30:4473–4489.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2020.03.031 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hobert O. A map of terminal regulators of neuronal identity in Caenorhabditis elegans. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Dev Biol. 2016. doi: 10.1002/wdev.233 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lloret-Fernández C, Maicas M, Mora-Martínez C, Artacho A, Jimeno-Martín Á, Chirivella L, et al. A transcription factor collective defines the HSN serotonergic neuron regulatory landscape. eLife. 2018. doi: 10.7554/eLife.32785 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Zhang F, Bhattacharya A, Nelson JC, Abe N, Gordon P, Lloret-Fernandez C, et al. The LIM and POU homeobox genes ttx-3 and unc-86 act as terminal selectors in distinct cholinergic and serotonergic neuron types. Development. 2014. doi: 10.1242/dev.099721 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Flames N, Hobert O. Gene regulatory logic of dopamine neuron differentiation. Nature. 2009. doi: 10.1038/nature07929 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bailey TL, Boden M, Buske FA, Frith M, Grant CE, Clementi L, et al. MEME Suite: Tools for motif discovery and searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkp335 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Christensen S, Kodoyianni V, Bosenberg M, Friedman L, Kimble J. lag-1, a gene required for lin-12 and glp-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, is homologous to human CBF1 and Drosophila Su(H). Development. 1996;122:1373–83. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lambie EJ, Kimble J. Two homologous regulatory genes, lin-12 and glp-1, have overlapping functions. Development. 1991;112:231–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Qiao L, Lissemore JL, Shu P, Smardon A, Gelber MB, Maine EM. Enhancers of glp-1, a gene required for cell-signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans, define a set of genes required for germline development. Genetics. 1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Packer JS, Zhu Q, Huynh C, Sivaramakrishnan P, Preston E, Dueck H, et al. A lineage-resolved molecular atlas of C. elegans embryogenesis at single-cell resolution. Science. 2019:365. doi: 10.1126/science.aax1971 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zheng X, Chung S, Tanabe T, Sze JY. Cell-type specific regulation of serotonergic identity by the C. elegans LIM-homeodomain factor LIM-4. Dev Biol. 2005. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2005.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Liu H, Qin LW, Li R, Zhang C, Al-Sheikh U, Wu ZX. Reciprocal modulation of 5-HT and octopamine regulates pumping via feedforward and feedback circuits in C. Elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1819261116 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lee KS, Iwanir S, Kopito RB, Scholz M, Calarco JA, Biron D, et al. Serotonin-dependent kinetics of feeding bursts underlie a graded response to food availability in C. elegans. Nat Commun. 2017:8. doi: 10.1038/ncomms14221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Bargmann CI, Horvitz HR. Control of larval development by chemosensory neurons in Caenorhabditis elegans. Science. 1991;251:1243–6. doi: 10.1126/science.2006412 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Sze JY, Victor M, Loer C, Shi Y, Ruvkun G. Food and metabolic signalling defects in a Caenorhabditis elegans serotonin-synthesis mutant. Nature. 2000;403:560–4. doi: 10.1038/35000609 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Moussaif M, Sze JY. Intraflagellar transport/hedgehog-related signaling components couple sensory cilium morphology and serotonin biosynthesis in caenorhabditis elegans. J Neurosci. 2009. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0044-09.2009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Ouellet J. Li S, Roy R. Notch signalling is required for both dauer maintenance and recovery in C elegans. Development. 2008;135:2583–92. doi: 10.1242/dev.012435 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Noble T, Stieglitz J, Srinivasan S. An integrated serotonin and octopamine neuronal circuit directs the release of an endocrine signal to control C. Elegans body fat. Cell Metab. 2013. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2013.09.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Sawin ER, Ranganathan R, Horvitz HR. C. elegans locomotory rate is modulated by the environment through a dopaminergic pathway and by experience through a serotonergic pathway. Neuron. 2000. doi: 10.1016/s0896-6273(00)81199-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Iwanir S, Brown AS, Nagy S, Najjar D, Kazakov A, Lee KS, et al. Serotonin promotes exploitation in complex environments by accelerating decision-making. BMC Biol. 2016;14:1–15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guo M, Wu TH, Song YX, Ge MH, Su CM, Niu WP, et al. Reciprocal inhibition between sensory ASH and ASI neurons modulates nociception and avoidance in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Commun. 2015. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6655 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Henrique D, Schweisguth F. Mechanisms of notch signaling: A simple logic deployed in time and space. Development. 2019;146. doi: 10.1242/dev.172148 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Doyle TG, Wen C, Greenwald I. SEL-8, a nuclear protein required for LIN-12 and GLP-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000;97:7877–81. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.14.7877 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Moskowitz IPG. Rothman JH. lin-12 and glp-1 are required zygotically for early embryonic cellular interactions and are regulated by maternal GLP-1 signaling in Caenorhabditis elegans. Development. 1996;122:4105–17. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Cao J, Packer JS, Ramani V, Cusanovich DA, Huynh C, Daza R, et al. Comprehensive single-cell transcriptional profiling of a multicellular organism. Science. 2017. doi: 10.1126/science.aam8940 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hori K, Cholewa-Waclaw J, Nakada Y, Glasgow SM, Masui T, Henke RM, et al. A nonclassical bHLH-Rbpj transcription factor complex is required for specification of GABAergic neurons independent of Notch signaling. Genes Dev. 2008. doi: 10.1101/gad.1628008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Masui T, Long Q, Beres TM, Magnuson MA, MacDonald RJ. Early pancreatic development requires the vertebrate Suppressor of Hairless (RBPJ) in the PTF1 bHLH complex. Genes Dev. 2007. doi: 10.1101/gad.1575207 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Beres TM, Masui T, Swift GH, Shi L, Henke RM, MacDonald RJ. PTF1 Is an Organ-Specific and Notch-Independent Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Complex Containing the Mammalian Suppressor of Hairless (RBP-J) or Its Paralogue. RBP-L Mol Cell Biol. 2006;26:117–30. doi: 10.1128/MCB.26.1.117-130.2006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Zhang S, Sokolchik I, Blanco G, Sze JY. Caenorhabditis elegans TRPV ion channel regulates 5HT biosynthesis in chemosensory neurons. Development. 2004. doi: 10.1242/dev.01047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Qin Y, Zhang X, Zhang Y. A neuronal signaling pathway of CaMKII and Gqα regulates experience-dependent transcription of tph-1. J Neurosci. 2013. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2355-12.2013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Zhang Y, Lu H, Bargmann CI. Pathogenic bacteria induce aversive olfactory learning in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature. 2005. doi: 10.1038/nature04216 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Xie Y, Moussaif M, Choi S, Xu L, Sze JY. RFX Transcription Factor DAF-19 Regulates 5-HT and Innate Immune Responses to Pathogenic Bacteria in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2013;9. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1003324 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Shivers RP, Kooistra T, Chu SW, Pagano DJ, Kim DH. Tissue-Specific Activities of an Immune Signaling Module Regulate Physiological Responses to Pathogenic and Nutritional Bacteria in C. elegans. Cell Host Microbe. 2009;6:321–30. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.09.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Sze JY, Zhang S, Li J, Ruvkun G. The C. elegans POU-domain transcription factor UNC-86 regulates the tph-1 tryptophan hydroxylase gene and neurite outgrowth in specific serotonergic neurons. Development. 2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Xu L, Choi S, Xie Y, Sze JY. Cell-Autonomous Gβ Signaling Defines Neuron-Specific Steady State Serotonin Synthesis in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS Genet. 2015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005540 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Luo KL, Underwood RS, Greenwald I. Positive autoregulation of lag-1 in response to LIN-12 activation in cell fate decisions during C. elegans reproductive system development. Development. 2020. doi: 10.1242/dev.193482 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Ghai V, Gaudet J. The CSL transcription factor LAG-1 directly represses hlh-6 expression in C. elegans. Dev Biol. 2008;322:334–44. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2008.07.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Feng W, Li Y, Dao P, Aburas J, Islam P, Elbaz B, et al. A terminal selector prevents a Hox transcriptional switch to safeguard motor neuron identity throughout life. eLife. 2020. doi: 10.7554/eLife.50065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Kerk SY, Kratsios P, Hart M, Mourao R, Hobert O. Diversification of C. elegans Motor Neuron Identity via Selective Effector Gene Repression. Neuron. 2017;93:80–98. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.11.036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Remesal L, Roger-Baynat I, Chirivella L, Maicas M, Brocal-Ruiz R, Pérez-Villalva A, et al. PBX1 acts as terminal selector for olfactory bulb dopaminergic neurons. Development. 2020; dev.186841. doi: 10.1242/dev.186841 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Bhattacharya A, Aghayeva U, Berghoff EG, Hobert O. Plasticity of the Electrical Connectome of C. elegans. Cell. 2019;176: 1174–1189.e16. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.024 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Serrano-Saiz E, Oren-Suissa M, Bayer EA, Hobert O. Sexually Dimorphic Differentiation of a C. elegans Hub Neuron Is Cell Autonomously Controlled by a Conserved Transcription Factor. Curr Biol. 2017;27:199–209. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2016.11.045 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Barolo S, Walker RG, Polyanovsky AD, Freschi G, Keil T, Posakony JW. A notch-independent activity of suppressor of hairless is required for normal mechanoreceptor physiology. Cell. 2000. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)00198-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sathyamurthy A, Johnson KR, Matson KJE, Dobrott CI, Li L, Ryba AR, et al. Massively Parallel Single Nucleus Transcriptional Profiling Defines Spinal Cord Neurons and Their Activity during Behavior. Cell Rep. 2018. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Brenner S. The genetics of Caenorhabditis elegans. Genetics. 1974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Gupta S, Stamatoyannopoulos JA, Bailey TL, Noble WS. Quantifying similarity between motifs. Genome Biol. 2007. doi: 10.1186/gb-2007-8-2-r24 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Kurooka H, Kuroda K, Honjo T. Roles of the ankyrin repeats and C-terminal region of the mouse Notch1 intracellular region. Nucleic Acids Res. 1998. doi: 10.1093/nar/26.23.5448 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Kamath RS, Martinez-Campos M, Zipperlen P, Fraser AG, Ahringer J. Effectiveness of specific RNA-mediated interference through ingested double-stranded RNA in Caenorhabditis elegans. Genome Biol. 2001. doi: 10.1186/gb-2000-2-1-research0002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Esposito G, Di Schiavi E, Bergamasco C, Bazzicalupo P. Efficient and cell specific knock-down of gene function in targeted C. elegans neurons. Gene. 2007;395: 170–176. doi: 10.1016/j.gene.2007.03.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.McIntire SL, Garriga G, White J, Jacobson D, Robert Horvitz H. Genes necessary for directed axonal elongation or fasciculation in C. elegans. Neuron. 1992. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90297-q [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Escorcia W, Ruter DL, Nhan J, Curran SP. Quantification of lipid abundance and evaluation of lipid distribution in Caenorhabditis elegans by nile red and oil red o staining. J Vis Exp. 2018. doi: 10.3791/57352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Tian L, Hires SA, Mao T, Huber D, Chiappe ME, Chalasani SH, et al. Imaging neural activity in worms, flies and mice with improved GCaMP calcium indicators. Nat Methods. 2009. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Edelstein A, Amodaj N, Hoover K, Vale R, Stuurman N. Computer control of microscopes using manager. Curr Protoc Mol Biol. 2010. doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb1420s92 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]