Abstract
Background
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a process linked to metastasis and drug resistance with non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) playing pivotal roles. We previously showed that miR-100 and miR-125b, embedded within the third intron of the ncRNA host gene MIR100HG, confer resistance to cetuximab, an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody, in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, whether the MIR100HG transcript itself has a role in cetuximab resistance or EMT is unknown.
Methods
The correlation between MIR100HG and EMT was analyzed by curating public CRC data repositories. The biological roles of MIR100HG in EMT, metastasis and cetuximab resistance in CRC were determined both in vitro and in vivo. The expression patterns of MIR100HG, hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 in CRC specimens from patients who progressed on cetuximab and patients with metastatic disease were analyzed by RNAscope and immunohistochemical staining.
Results
The expression of MIR100HG was strongly correlated with EMT markers and acted as a positive regulator of EMT. MIR100HG sustained cetuximab resistance and facilitated invasion and metastasis in CRC cells both in vitro and in vivo. hnRNPA2B1 was identified as a binding partner of MIR100HG. Mechanistically, MIR100HG maintained mRNA stability of TCF7L2, a major transcriptional coactivator of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling, by interacting with hnRNPA2B1. hnRNPA2B1 recognized the N6-methyladenosine (m6A) site of TCF7L2 mRNA in the presence of MIR100HG. TCF7L2, in turn, activated MIR100HG transcription, forming a feed forward regulatory loop. The MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2 axis was augmented in specimens from CRC patients who either developed local or distant metastasis or had disease progression that was associated with cetuximab resistance.
Conclusions
MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 interact to control the transcriptional activity of Wnt signaling in CRC via regulation of TCF7L2 mRNA stability. Our findings identified MIR100HG as a potent EMT inducer in CRC that may contribute to cetuximab resistance and metastasis by activation of a MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2 feedback loop.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12943-022-01555-3.
Keywords: MIR100HG, hnRNPA2B1, TCF7L2, N6-methyladenosine (m6A), Wnt/β-catenin signaling, EMT, Cetuximab resistance, Metastasis, CRC
Introduction
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a dynamic biological process by which epithelial cells lose cell-cell contacts, apical-basal polarity and distinct cytoskeletal architecture to become more motile and invasive [1]. Epithelial cancer cells undergoing EMT can transition to a mesenchymal phenotype characterized by enhanced drug resistance and metastatic ability [2]. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third leading cause of new cancer cases and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [3]. Drug resistance and metastasis occur all too often in CRC patients and are major contributors to poor outcomes [4]. In the clinic, anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-based therapies are frequently used to treat CRC patients with metastatic disease if the tumors are wild-type (WT) KRAS [5]. However, the effectiveness of anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies such as cetuximab and panitumumab is often limited due to de novo and acquired drug resistance [6]. Although inherent genetic mechanisms encompassing mutations in KRAS/NRAS/BRAF and amplification of ERBB2 and MET have primarily been identified as conferring resistance to anti-EGFR treatment, about 30% of cases that are unresponsive to anti-EGFR therapies arise from unknown, apparently non-genetic resistance mechanisms [6]. EMT represents a pivotal program that can be hijacked by cancer cells and is associated with the acquisition of tumor invasiveness and therapeutic resistance, but its involvement in cetuximab resistance in CRC is incompletely understood.
We previously identified that two microRNAs (miRNAs), miR-100 and miR-125b, act in concert to activate Wnt signaling via repression of five Wnt/β-catenin negative regulators that contribute to cetuximab resistance in CRC [7]. Both miR-100 and miR-125b are embedded in the third intron of the gene MIR100HG, which encodes the long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) MIR100HG. MIR100HG is referred to as a miRNA-host gene lncRNA (lnc-MIRHG), a subclass of newly discovered lncRNAs derived from miRNA host genes due to pre-miRNA processing [8]. It is estimated that about 17.5% of miRNAs are generated by lnc-MIRHGs [9]. Although the functions of the encoded miRNAs are usually well studied, determining if independent roles exist for host lnc-MIRHGs is an open area of investigation. Recent studies have begun to converge on miRNA-independent roles of MIR100HG in cancer. It has been reported that MIR100HG regulates the cell cycle by facilitating an interaction between the RNA-binding protein HuR and its target mRNAs [10]. MIR100HG was also found to promote breast cancer cell proliferation by forming an RNA–DNA triplex with the p27 locus [11]. These findings imply that MIR100HG plays an active role in cancer progression and is not merely a precursor or non-functional byproduct of miRNA processing. However, the biological function and underlying mechanism of MIR100HG in cetuximab resistance in CRC has not been studied.
N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is one of the most prevalent internal modifications of eukaryotic mRNAs [12]. The presence of m6A on transcripts affects a diverse set of fundamental cellular processes, including pre-mRNA splicing, nuclear transport, mRNA stabilization and translation [13, 14]. The addition of a m6A modification is a dynamic multistep process introduced by the m6A methyltransferases (termed “writers”), removed by the demethylases (termed “erasers”) and recognized by m6A binding proteins (termed “readers”) [15]. Recent studies indicated that m6A modifications of mRNAs are increased in cancer cells during EMT, and that deletion of the m6A writer, METTL3, can impair EMT, while deletion of the m6A eraser, FTO, can promote EMT [16, 17]. lncRNAs are reported to participate in all steps of m6A processing, including methylation, demethylation and recognition via binding to diverse m6A modifiers [18–20]. Although it is established that lncRNAs are critical regulators of EMT [21], whether their effects on EMT are mediated by modulating m6A modification is unknown. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2B1 (hnRNPA2B1) is a member of the hnRNP family and is involved in RNA transcription, stabilization, splicing and translation [22]. hnRNPA2B1 has been found to play a direct role in cancer development and progression by inducing EMT in various cancer types [23–25]. hnRNPA2B1 has been proposed as a m6A reader involved in primary miRNA processing and the innate immune response to DNA viruses [26, 27]. Recent evidence suggests that hnRNPA2B1 may mediate effects of m6A through a “m6A switch” mechanism [28]. However, it remains unknown whether hnRNPA2B1 modulates the EMT process via regulation of m6A modifications.
Here, we demonstrate that MIR100HG exerts a miRNA-independent role in regulating EMT, cetuximab resistance and metastasis in CRC cells by interacting with hnRNPA2B1. MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 cooperatively enhance the mRNA stability of TCF7L2, a downstream effector of Wnt signaling, in a m6A-dependent manner, which facilitates expression of Wnt target genes. TCF7L2 activates MIR100HG transcription, creating a feed forward regulatory loop. The MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2 axis was augmented in CRC specimens from patients who progressed on cetuximab and those with metastasis. Collectively, our findings reveal an actionable, epigenetic cause of cetuximab resistance and metastasis in advanced CRC involving a MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2 feedback loop.
Materials and methods
Cell culture
The human CRC cell lines NCI-H508, Caco-2, SW403, SW948, HT29, SK-CO-1, DLD-1, SW480, SW837, SW48, SW620, LoVo, COLO205, T84, LS174T, NCIH716, HCT8, HCT15, SW1116, RKO, COLO320DM, HuTu80, LS123, HCT116, DiFi, GEO, LIM1215, LIM2405 and V9P were used as previously described [7]. Cetuximab-sensitive CC cells and cetuximab-resistant CC-CR cells were generated by culturing the CRC cell line, HCA-7, in a three-dimensional (3D) system with type-1 collagen and continuous cetuximab (3 μg/ml) treatment for approximately 4 months [7]. All cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM, Gibco) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Gibco), glutamine (Gibco), nonessential amino acids (Gibco), 100 U/ml penicillin and 100 μg/ml streptomycin (HyClone) in 5% CO2 at 37 °C. All cell lines were confirmed to be free of mycoplasma contamination. 3D collagen cultures were performed as previously described [7].
RNAscope assay
MIR100HG and TCF7L2 mRNA expression was detected by in situ hybridization (ISH) using an RNAscope Multiplex Fluorescent Kit V2 combined with immunofluorescence on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue sections according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Advanced Cell Diagnostics). The MIR100HG (No. 483151) and TCF7L2 probes (No. 420041) were purchased from Advanced Cell Diagnostics. A confocal microscope (Nikon A1R) was used for image analysis. RNAscope staining was categorized into five grades 0, 1, 2, 3 and 4, according to the following criteria: 0, no staining or less than 5% tumor cells in each field examined; 1, 5 ~ 10% tumor cells stained in each field examined; 2, 10 ~ 25% tumor cells stained in each field examined; 3, 25 ~ 50% tumor cells stained in each field examined; 4, 50 ~ 100% tumor cells stained in each field examined. A score ≥ 2 was considered positive. Three fields of a tissue section were selected for histology quantification. Spearman rank correlation was adopted for statistical analyses of the association between target genes of interest.
A detailed description of the Materials and Methods used in this study can be found in Supplementary Material.
Results
MIR100HG is closely related to and involved in the regulation of EMT in CRC
We previously described the generation of cetuximab-sensitive CC cells and cetuximab-resistant CC-CR cells from human HCA-7 cells, a WT KRAS/NRAS/BRAF, microsatellite unstable CRC cell line [7]. CC cells seeded in 3D culture using type-1 collagen generated hollow, fully polarized structures, as indicated by apical localization of atypical PKC, GP135, Ezrin and lateral localization of p120-catenin. In contrast, the majority of CC-CR cells exhibited solid, disorganized structures with loss of apico-basalateral polarity (Fig. 1a). The loss of cell polarity is considered a hallmark of cancer progression with epithelial cells undergoing a mesenchymal transition as an important step [1]. CC-CR cells showed a loss of E-cadherin-mediated adherens junctions, reduction of the tight junction protein, ZO-1, and increased expression of mesenchymal markers, N-cadherin and vimentin, compared to CC cells (Fig. 1b, c and Supplementary Fig. 1a). Expression of EMT-inducing transcription factors (EMT-TFs), including Snail, Twist and ZEB family members, were also elevated in CC-CR cells (Fig. 1c and Supplementary Fig. 1a). These features suggest EMT occurs in CC-CR cells in 3D culture.
Since MIR100HG is the most overexpressed transcript in CC-CR compared to CC, we thus investigated whether MIR100HG was involved in EMT. We first analyzed the correlation between MIR100HG and a list of EMT gene expression signatures [29] in a large human CRC data set (n = 2375) and found that MIR100HG and EMT were highly correlated (Fig. 1d, Pearson R = 0.764, P < 0.0001). By employing an EMT hallmark gene set from the Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) [30], we demonstrated that EMT gene expression patterns were significantly enriched in CRC samples with a high level of MIR100HG by Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) (n = 478, Fig. 1e). Furthermore, analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) CRC data repository (n = 433) revealed that there were strong positive correlations between MIR100HG and the expression of mesenchymal genes or EMT-TFs (Fig. 1f). In addition, weak but significant negative correlations between MIR100HG and the expression of epithelial genes were also observed (Supplementary Fig. 1b). These results strongly suggest that MIR100HG expression is correlated with a mesenchymal state of CRC.
MIR100HG is encoded by four exons (3129 bp in length) of the MIR100HG gene, which spans 394 kb of chromosome. To determine whether MIR100HG regulates the EMT process in CRC cells, we specifically deleted the longest exon, exon 4, of MIR100HG (2638 bp) using CRISPR/Cas9 gene-editing (Supplementary Fig. 1c) in CC-CR cells; the resulting line is designated MIR100HGKOE4. We also overexpressed MIR100HG in CC cells by transduction of a lentiviral vector expressing the full-length MIR100HG transcript (Supplementary Fig. 1d). qPCR confirmed that cells with depleted or overexpressed MIR100HG did not show a significant change in levels of the MIR100HG intron-encoded miR-100 or miR-125b (Supplementary Fig. 1d). MIR100HG-overexpressing CC cells showed reduced expression of E-cadherin and increased expression of mesenchymal genes and EMT-TFs; in marked contrast, increased expression of these genes was observed in MIR100HGKOE4 cells (Fig. 1g and h). Similar results were observed in SW480 (low endogenous MIR100HG expression) and SW620 (moderate endogenous MIR100HG expression) cells after MIR100HG overexpression or knockdown by transfection with antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs), respectively (Fig. 1i, j and Supplementary Fig. 1d, e). Collectively, these results indicate that MIR100HG induces EMT in CRC.
MIR100HG is important for maintaining cetuximab resistance and promoting metastasis in CRC cells
We next investigated whether MIR100HG is involved in drug resistance and metastasis in CRC, phenotypes closely associated with EMT [2, 31]. We first analyzed cetuximab responsiveness in 29 CRC cell lines stratified by gene expression-based consensus molecular subtyping (CMS) [32] (Supplementary Table 9). We found that cells in the CMS2 and CMS3 classifications were responsive to cetuximab treatment, while cells in the CMS4 mesenchymal group exhibited cetuximab resistance (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Fig. 2a), supporting that EMT confers cetuximab resistance in CRC. In 3D culture, MIR100HGKOE4 CC-CR cells showed comparable colony numbers to the WT cells; however, in the presence of cetuximab, MIR100HGKOE4 cells showed a significant reduction in colony numbers compared to WT (Fig. 2b). Decreased Ki-67 and increased cleaved caspase-3 staining were observed in MIR100HGKOE4 CC-CR cells following cetuximab treatment (Fig. 2c and Supplementary Fig. 2b). Restoration of the full-length MIR100HG transcript (MIR100HG-FL), but not the antisense one (MIR100HG-AS), largely abrogated responsiveness to cetuximab in MIR100HGKOE4 CC-CR cells (Fig. 2d). To determine whether these findings could be recapitulated in vivo, we established subcutaneous xenografts in athymic nude mice with MIR100HGKOE4 CC-CR cells transduced with a luciferase-expressing lentiviral vector and then treated the mice with cetuximab (Fig. 2e). The in vivo bioluminescence, as well as tumor volumes and weights, in the MIR100HGKOE4 group after cetuximab treatment were markedly decreased compared to the control group (Fig. 2f and g). Immunohistochemical (IHC) staining showed that MIR100HGKOE4 tumors treated with cetuximab contained fewer Ki-67-positive cells and more cleaved caspase-3-positive cells (Supplementary Fig. 2c). These results indicate that MIR100HG is important for maintenance of cetuximab resistance in CRC cells and that reducing the levels of MIR100HG can restore drug sensitivity.
We next determined whether MIR100HG contributes to CRC metastasis. Analysis of the TCGA data repository revealed that MIR100HG expression is significantly higher in CRC patients with metastasis than in patients without metastasis (Fig. 2h). Upregulation of MIR100HG in SW480 cells, as well as in DiFi cells (low endogenous MIR100HG expression; Supplementary Fig. 1e), significantly increased migration and invasion (Fig. 2i and Supplementary Fig. 2d). In contrast, knockdown of MIR100HG in SW620 cells, as well as in HCT116 cells (high endogenous MIR100HG expression; Supplementary Fig. 1e), hindered their migration and invasion abilities (Fig. 2j and Supplementary Fig. 2e). Furthermore, we employed in vivo metastasis assays by injecting MIR100HG-silenced SW620 or LoVo (moderate endogenous MIR100HG expression; Supplementary Fig. 1e) cells into the tail vein of nude mice. Compared to the control group, mice injected with MIR100HG-silenced cells showed a decrease in metastasis, as indicated by the overall bioluminescence signal and number of lung metastasis, and improved survival (Fig. 2k-n and Supplementary Fig. 2f). These results indicate that MIR100HG promotes tumor invasion and enhances metastatic capability in CRC cells.
hnRNPA2B1 is a direct and functional binding partner of MIR100HG
One of the ways that lncRNAs can exert their effects is by directly interacting with RNA binding proteins [33]. Since MIR100HG is mainly located in the nucleus, we performed chromatin isolation by RNA purification (ChIRP) coupled to mass spectrometry-based profiling to identify nuclear-localized interacting partners of MIR100HG in CRC cells. In total, 173 and 76 ChIRP-purified proteins were isolated from CC-CR and HCT116 cells, respectively, using two groups of biotin-labeled oligo probe sets targeting MIR100HG (Fig. 3a; Supplementary Table 8 and 10). Among them, five candidates, hnRNPA2B1, SUPT16H, SNRNP70, DKC1 and PES1, were enriched in all groups (Fig. 3a). hnRNPA2B1 was chosen for further investigation as it has been reported to be an EMT regulator in various cancer types [23–25]. The enrichment of hnRNPA2B1 by MIR100HG probes was confirmed in CC-CR and HCT116 cells (Fig. 3a) and further validated by RNA-binding protein immunoprecipitation (RIP) assays which showed that MIR100HG was significantly enriched in pull-downs using antibodies against hnRNPA2B1 compared to control IgG (Fig. 3b). To determine the specific region of MIR100HG that binds to hnRNPA2B1, a series of MIR100HG fragments were generated based on its secondary structure predicted by the RNAfold web server (Fig. 3c) and then these constructs were used in biotin-labeled RNA pull-down assays. The results showed that hnRNPA2B1 mainly binds to a MIR100HG fragment that is transcribed from nucleotides 2170 to 3100 (Fig. 3d). In addition, RIP assays using antibodies against full-length or truncated hnRNPA2B1 with a Flag-tag were carried out to elucidate the specific domain of hnRNPA2B1 that mediates the interaction with MIR100HG (Fig. 3e). The results revealed that the RNA recognition motif 2 (RRM2) domain of hnRNPA2B1 was primarily responsible for the interaction with MIR100HG (Fig. 3f). These results indicate that hnRNPA2B1 is a bona fide interacting partner of MIR100HG in CRC cells.
We then investigated the role of hnRNPA2B1 in CRC progression. Silencing of hnRNPA2B1 increased E-cadherin and reduced vimentin expression in CC-CR and LoVo cells (relatively high endogenous MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 expression; Supplementary Fig. 1e and 3a), consistent with the effect of MIR100HG on EMT (Figs. 1h, h and 3g). In 3D culture, knockdown of hnRNPA2B1 in CC-CR cells reduced total colony numbers with the reduction being more pronounced with cetuximab treatment, indicating that hnRNPA2B1 can contribute to cetuximab resistance (Fig. 3h). Meanwhile, knockdown of hnRNPA2B1 markedly hindered cell migration and invasion (Fig. 3i and Supplementary Fig. 3b). We next sought to elucidate the role of hnRNPA2B1 in MIR100HG-mediated cetuximab resistance and metastasis. Silencing of hnRNPA2B1 reversed E-cadherin reduction, which was mediated by MIR100HG overexpression in CC and SW480 cells (Fig. 3j). In the presence of cetuximab, MIR100HGKOE4 CC-CR cells exhibited reduced colony numbers, which was partially offset by hnRNPA2B1 overexpression (Fig. 3k). Knockdown of hnRNPA2B1 also abolished the enhanced migration and invasion ability of MIR100HG-overexpressing cells (Fig. 3l and Supplementary Fig. 3c). Collectively, these results suggest that MIR100HG promotes CRC progression via its interaction with hnRNPA2B1.
MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 regulate TCF7L2 mRNA stability and activate Wnt signaling
To explore how MIR100HG contributes to CRC progression through binding to hnRNPA2B1, we first examined whether MIR100HG affects hnRNPA2B1 expression. Neither overexpression nor knockdown of MIR100HG influenced mRNA or protein levels of hnRNPA2B1 in CRC cells (Supplementary Fig. 4a-c). Since hnRNPA2B1 shuttles between the nucleus and the cytoplasm [34], we analyzed the subcellular distribution of hnRNPA2B1 in MIR100HG-overexpressing and silenced cells and found that MIR100HG had no influence on cellular distribution of hnRNPA2B1 (Supplementary Fig. 4d and e). Given that hnRNPs are associated with precursor mRNAs (pre-mRNAs) and influence pre-mRNA processing and metabolism [22], we speculated that certain mRNAs might be affected by the interaction between MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1. To profile mRNA candidates regulated by both MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1, we silenced either MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 and performed RNA sequencing. Notably, TCF7L2 (also known as TCF4) was identified as the only significantly downregulated gene (fold-change > 2, p < 0.05) consistent across all MIR100HG- and hnRNPA2B1-silenced groups (Fig. 4a). Since our previous study revealed that a positive correlation exists between MIR100HG and Wnt signaling [7], we decided to focus efforts on TCF7L2 since it is a critical transcriptional coactivator of Wnt signaling, which is tightly linked to drug resistance, metastasis and EMT [35]. As shown in Fig. 4b, knockdown of MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 reduced TCF7L2 mRNA and protein expression in CC-CR and HCT116 cells (high endogenous MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 expression; Supplementary Fig. 1e, 3a, 4f and 4g), while overexpression of MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 increased TCF7L2 mRNA and protein levels in CC and SW480 cells (relatively low endogenous MIR100HG and moderate hnRNPA2B1 expression; Supplementary Fig. 1a, 3a, 4f and 4g). However, manipulation of MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 did not affect the transcription of TCF7L2, as evidenced by the unchanged levels of pre-mRNA of TCF7L2 (Supplementary Fig. 4h), suggesting that TCF7L2 is regulated post-transcriptionally by MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1.
hnRNPs are known regulators of RNA stability [22]. To test whether hnRNPA2B1 could affect the stability of TCF7L2 mRNA, we treated cells with Actinomycin D to halt new RNA synthesis and examined TCF7L2 mRNA levels. Accelerated mRNA decay of TCF7L2 upon hnRNPA2B1 knockdown was confirmed in CC-CR and HCT116 cells (Fig. 4c and Supplementary Fig. 4i), indicating that hnRNPA2B1 acts to stabilize TCF7L2 mRNA. Knockdown of MIR100HG also enhanced TCF7L2 mRNA degradation (Fig. 4d and Supplementary Fig. 4j). Overexpression of MIR100HG extended the half-life of TCF7L2 mRNA in CC and Caco-2 cells, but silencing of hnRNPA2B1 abrogated the stabilizing effect of MIR100HG (Fig. 4e). These results indicate that hnRNPA2B1 and MIR100HG cooperatively upregulate TCF7L2 expression by enhancing mRNA stability. We next determined whether TCF7L2 is involved in MIR100HG- or hnRNPA2B1-mediated CRC progression. Overexpression of TCF7L2 in MIR100HG- or hnRNPA2B1-depleted CRC cells rescued cetuximab resistance, cell migration and invasion (Fig. 4f, g and Supplementary Fig. 4k). Restoration of TCF7L2 induced EMT, which was inhibited by MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 downregulation, as demonstrated by reduced E-cadherin and increased vimentin expression (Fig. 4h). These results indicate that MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 function mainly by TCF7L2 modulation.
We next examined whether the functions of MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2 axis are mediated by activating Wnt signaling. A luciferase reporter plasmid harboring three optimal TCF/LEF1-binding sites (TOP-flash) or three mutated TCF/LEF1-binding sites (FOP-flash) was transfected into HEK293T cells. TOP/FOP-flash activity was significantly repressed after MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 knockdown, whereas this inhibition was rescued by TCF7L2 overexpression, especially after administration of the canonical Wnt ligand Wnt3A (Fig. 4i). In addition, a subset of Wnt target genes, which are associated with cell growth (c-Myc and Cyclin D1) and EMT (ZEB1 and Slug), was significantly upregulated in MIR100HG- and hnRNPA2B1-overexpressing CRC cells (Fig. 4j, k and Supplementary Fig. 4l, m). In contrast, knockdown of MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 led to a reduction of these Wnt target genes in CC-CR and HCT116 cells (Fig. 4j, k and Supplementary Fig. 4l, m). Collectively, these results suggest that MIR100HG enhances the stability of TCF7L2 mRNA via interaction with hnRNPA2B1 and subsequently activates the Wnt signaling pathway.
Stabilization of TCF7L2 mRNA by hnRNPA2B1 and MIR100HG is m6A-dependent
In terms of base modifications of mRNA, m6A is one of the most abundant alterations, and it can have profound effects on mRNA stability [12]. Since hnRNPA2B1 is a mediator of m6A-dependent nuclear RNA processing events [26, 28], we speculated that hnRNPA2B1 might regulate TCF7L2 mRNA stability in a m6A-dependent manner. We found that silencing of the m6A methyltransferase METTL3 in CC-CR and HCT116 cells decreased TCF7L2 mRNA levels (Fig. 5a). Methylated RNA immunoprecipitation (MeRIP) assays further confirmed that silencing of METTL3 reduced the level of m6A modification for TCF7L2 mRNA (Fig. 5b). Five predicted m6A sites in the TCF7L2 mRNA were identified using the SRAMP online tool [36] and then validated by MeRIP assays (Fig. 5c). The greatest enrichment of TCF7L2 mRNA after pull-down with antibodies against m6A was for the + 2133 site in the 3’UTR near the stop codon (Fig. 5c). These results indicate that TCF7L2 mRNA is m6A modified and that this modification stabilizes TCF7L2 mRNA. Next, we determined whether the interaction between hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 depends on the m6A modification. RIP assays demonstrated that TCF7L2 mRNA was enriched by the hnRNPA2B1 antibody in CC-CR and HCT116 cells (Fig. 5d), indicating an interaction between hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 mRNA. Knockdown of METTL3 reduced this enrichment (Fig. 5e), suggesting that the m6A modification on TCF7L2 mRNA was necessary for its interaction with hnRNPA2B1. Notably, TCF7L2 mRNA precipitated by hnRNPA2B1 was markedly decreased in MIR100HGKOE4 CC-CR and HCT116 cells (Fig. 5f), implying that the interaction between hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 is also dependent on MIR100HG. Furthermore, we performed an in vivo RNA precipitation assay to validate whether the interaction between hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 is m6A-dependent. In this case, TCF7L2 fragments harboring WT or a mutant + 2133 m6A modification site were tagged with S1m (Fig. 5g), a modified streptavidin-binding aptamer that acts similar to biotin but with a higher affinity [37]. Utilization of a system where CC and HCT8 cells were transfected with the S1m-tagged TCF7L2 constructs allowed for m6A modification to occur in vivo. The streptavidin aptamer-based capture showed that mutation of the m6A site for TCF7L2 abrogated association with hnRNPA2B1 (Fig. 5g). This suggests that m6A modification of TCF7L2 mRNA is critical for its association with hnRNPA2B1. In addition, we constructed a firefly luciferase reporter carrying the WT or mutant TCF7L2 sequence (Supplementary Fig. 5a). Ectopic hnRNPA2B1 induced a significant increase in luciferase activity of the WT reporter, but this increase was impaired by mutation of the m6A site in HCT8 and HEK293T cells (Fig. 5h and i). Consistently, the hnRNPA2B1-mediated increase of luciferase activity was blocked by METTL3 or MIR100HG knockdown (Fig. 5j and k). Collectively, these data suggest that the m6A modification of TCF7L2 mRNA is required for its binding to hnRNPA2B1 with MIR100HG serving as an indispensable partner for the interaction.
TCF7L2 activates MIR100HG transcription and forms a reciprocal positive feedback loop
To further explore the mechanism by which MIR100HG is upregulated in CC-CR cells, we analyzed predicted TF binding motifs in the 2-kb promoter region of MIR100HG by using the JASPAR database [38]. Of note, four TCF7L2 binding sites were identified in the MIR100HG promoter (Fig. 6a), suggesting that MIR100HG may be a TCF7L2-responsive lncRNA. Consistent with this, silencing of TCF7L2 in CC-CR and HCT116 cells (high endogenous TCF7L2 expression; Supplementary Fig. 5b) resulted in reduced MIR100HG expression (Fig. 6b), suggesting that TCF7L2 may be a transcriptional regulator of MIR100HG. In line with this, overexpression of TCF7L2 enhanced MIR100HG expression in CC and Caco-2 cells (low endogenous TCF7L2 expression; Supplementary Fig. 5b) (Fig. 6b). To determine whether TCF7L2 activates MIR100HG transcription, luciferase reporter constructs containing the TCF7L2 binding sites in the MIR100HG promoter were transduced into CC-CR and HCT116 cells (Fig. 6c). Serial deletion analysis and site-directed mutagenesis of the MIR100HG promoter showed that TCF7L2-binding sites 1 and 2 are the predominant sites for TCF7L2-mediated transcriptional activation (Fig. 6d and e). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assays confirmed that TCF7L2 protein bound directly to the MIR100HG promoter at TCF7L2-binding sites 1 and 2 (Fig. 6f). In addition, a positive correlation was observed between TCF7L2 and MIR100HG expression in a panel of CRC cell lines, as well as in the TCGA data repository (Fig. 6g and h). Collectively, these results suggest that a mutual regulatory mechanism exists between MIR100HG and TCF7L2, wherein MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 stabilize TCF7L2 mRNA, and, in turn, TCF7L2 elevates MIR100HG abundance via transcriptional activation (Fig. 6i).
Validation of MIR100HG, hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 expression in CRC specimens
To examine whether the MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2 axis plays a role in cetuximab resistance of CRC patients, we obtained paired tumor specimens from 12 individuals before the start of cetuximab treatment and at the time of tumor progression (Supplementary Table 1). Acquired mutations and amplifications in post-treatment samples were documented if detected (Supplementary Table 11). Using chromogenic RNAscope in situ hybridization, we found that MIR100HG and TCF7L2 were significantly overexpressed in tumors that progressed on cetuximab treatment compared to pre-treatment counterparts (Fig. 7a and b). Increased hnRNPA2B1 immunoreactivity was also observed in serial sections of tumors that progressed on cetuximab (Fig. 7a and b). Positive correlations between MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 with TCF7L2 expression were observed (Fig. 7c). These results demonstrate that upregulation of MIR100HG, hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 occurs in the setting of cetuximab resistance in CRC patients.
We next analyzed MIR100HG, hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 expression in 14 paired specimens of primary CRC tissues, adjacent nontumor tissues and their matched lymph node or distant metastasis samples (Supplementary Table 2 and 3). Compared to primary lesions, lymph node, as well as distant metastasis, exhibited significantly higher expression of MIR100HG, hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 (Fig. 7d-f). Positive associations were also identified between MIR100HG or hnRNPA2B1 with TCF7L2 expression in the primary CRC tissues and metastatic lesions (Fig. 7g and h). These results indicate that expression of MIR100HG, hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 is increased in metastatic lesions compared to the primary tumor of these CRC patients.
Discussion
MIR100HG harbors miR-100, let-7a-2 and miR-125b-1 within its third intron, and hence is referred to as a miRNA host gene. The expression and function of the MIR100HG-embedded miRNAs are well documented [8], but a role for the lncRNA from the MIR100HG locus in this context has not been studied. In the present study, we uncovered a novel role for MIR100HG in promoting EMT-mediated cetuximab resistance and metastasis in CRC. MIR100HG and its binding partner, hnRNPA2B1, co-regulate the stabilization of TCF7L2 mRNA, thus enhancing Wnt signaling in CRC cells. We found that the m6A modification of the TCF7L2 transcript is a prerequisite for binding to hnRNPA2B1 and that MIR100HG expression is transcriptionally regulated by TCF7L2, thus forming a positive feedback loop. This regulatory circuitry is clinically actionable as verified by the analysis of MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2 expression patterns in CRC specimens from patients whose tumors progressed on cetuximab and patients with lymph node or distant metastasis. These data support the potential therapeutic and predictive value of the proposed model.
As an important member of the A/B subfamily of heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoproteins (hnRNPs), hnRNPA2B1 aids in the transcription, splicing, stability, and translation of a variety of RNA molecules as well as controlling the expression of numerous genes by recognizing and binding specific RNA substrates and DNA motifs [22]. Recent studies demonstrated that hnRNPA2B1 is a common binding partner of lncRNAs and plays a critical role in EMT, drug resistance and metastasis in multiple cancers. In pancreatic cancer, hnRNPA2B1 interacts with linc01232 to accelerate metastasis through A-Raf-induced MAPK/ERK signaling pathway activation [39]. hnRNPA2B1 also reduces the sensitivity of breast cancer cells to chemotherapy drugs by regulating the alternative splicing of Bcl-x pre-mRNA [40]. Our study revealed that hnRNPA2B1 was a direct and functional binding partner of MIR100HG, which adds to the literature describing interactions between hnRNPA2B1 and lncRNAs in the setting of drug resistance and metastasis. TCF7L2 mRNA is stabilized by interaction with hnRNPA2B1 through the assistance of MIR100HG and m6A modification.
It should be noted that the mechanism behind hnRNPA2B1 affecting the stability of TCF7L2 mRNA is not fully elucidated. Regulation of mRNA stability depends in part on specific cis-acting sequences and trans-acting factors [41]. It has been reported that hnRNPA2B1 regulates mRNA stability by binding UAASUUAU sequences or (U)16 elements in the 3′-UTR of mRNAs [42, 43]. hnRNPA2B1 can also influence mRNA half-life by regulating polyadenylation [44]. Our in vivo pull-down assay revealed that the recognition site between hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2 is in the 3′-UTR of TCF7L2 mRNA near the stop codon, providing evidence that the 3′-UTR might be important for this mRNA’s half-life [45]. Understanding the mechanisms underpinning hnRNPA2B1 effects on the stability of TCF7L2 mRNA will be the focus of our future studies.
Our previous study revealed that Wnt signaling was augmented in cetuximab-resistant CRC cells and tumors that progressed on cetuximab treatment due to repression of the five negative regulators (DKK1, DKK3, ZNRF3, RNF43 and APC2) of Wnt signaling by MIR100HG-derived miRNAs, miR-100 and miR-125b [7]. In the present study, we provide further evidence regarding the activation of Wnt signaling by finding that MIR100HG interacted with hnRNPA2B1 to enhance Wnt signaling through stabilization of TCF7L2 mRNA, with TCF7L2 as a core component that binds to nuclear β-catenin to promote downstream Wnt target gene transcription [46]. Based on our findings, we propose that MIR100HG and miR-100/125b function at different levels of Wnt signaling via complementary mechanisms that augment Wnt signaling activity in the setting of advanced CRC (Supplementary Fig. 5c). Our findings are in line with the recent studies supporting that lnc-MIRHGs frequently function in concert with their encoded miRNAs. For instance, miR503HG and its encoded miR-503 cooperatively inhibit tumor metastasis in hepatocellular carcinoma [47, 48], and lncRNA H19 and miR-675 both promote tumor cell proliferation in CRC [49, 50].
Wnt signaling is considered a potent regulator of EMT in diverse cancer types [51]. In this study, we observed that the MIR100HG/hnRNPA2B1/TCF7L2-mediated activation of Wnt signaling coincides with an EMT signature in CRC. Consistently, EMT-TFs including ZEB1 and Slug, which are known Wnt target genes, were significantly modulated upon MIR100HG and hnRNPA2B1 overexpression or knockdown. It is well acknowledged that EMT is a key driver of cancer metastasis [1], but EMT also can override the cytostatic effects of anti-EGFR therapy by increasing Snail and AXL expression [52]. In addition, EMT confers anti-EGFR therapy resistance by reducing BIM expression, which is transcriptionally repressed by the EMT-TF ZEB1 [53]. Based on the above evidence, we speculate that MIR100HG mainly functions via the regulation of EMT. MIR100HG overexpression appears to have proportionally greater effects on inducing mesenchymal genes than suppressing epithelial genes within the EMT program.
We cannot exclude that other Wnt target genes or signaling pathways may also contribute to the acquisition of drug resistance and metastatic capability. Notably, accumulating evidence indicates that activation of EMT via the Wnt signaling pathway is closely linked to cancer cells adopting a cancer stem cell (CSC) state [2, 54, 55]. In the present study, we did notice elevated expression of CD44, a CSC-associated cell-surface marker, after MIR100HG expression in CRC cells. Delving deeper into roles for and mechanism(s) by which MIR100HG achieves a CSC phenotype will be the focus of our future studies that may reveal additional dimensions to EMT in driving CRC progression.
m6A modifications play a pivotal role in controlling RNA fate [33]. Recently, it was reported that TCF7L2 mRNA is rich in m6A modifications and that these alterations can affect TCF7L2 expression [36]. Consistent with this, we found that the m6A modification of TCF7L2 mRNA is indispensable for its stabilization and interaction with hnRNPA2B1. Our results also support recent evidence that hnRNPA2B1 acts as a m6A reader and that the recognition of m6A sites might be a general mechanism mediating the binding between hnRNPA2B1 and its target RNA transcripts [26, 27]. Considering that m6A modifications are relevant to cancer development and catalyzed predominately by the METTL3-METTL14 methyltransferase complex, a selective METTL3 inhibitor has recently been developed and exhibits a significant therapeutic effect in acute myeloid leukemia [56]. In this study, we found that METTL3 interference dramatically hindered the interaction between TCF7L2 mRNA and hnRNPA2B1, thus leading to reduced TCF7L2 expression. Therefore, targeting METTL3 by small molecules may be a promising strategy to overcome TCF7L2 augmented cetuximab resistance in CRC, a direction which deserves further study.
Our findings have important therapeutic implications for targeting lncRNA MIR100HG in CRC patients. Recent studies support that targeting specific oncogenic lncRNAs by ASOs, like targeting TUG1 in glioma [57] or LINC02273 in breast cancer [58], have significant therapeutic value. Although challenging, it may be beneficial to develop MIR100HG-targeting therapies to treat cetuximab-resistant or metastatic CRC. More interestingly, EMT also plays a pivotal role in tumor immunosuppression and immune evasion, and the interplay between EMT and PD-L1 signaling contributes to therapeutic resistance of immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) [58, 59]. The use of nude mice excluded exploring the immunological effects of cetuximab treatment, which is a limitation of the current study. Therefore, combining a targeting strategy for MIR100HG with ICB might be a future treatment strategy to enhance patient responsiveness to immunotherapy in CRC.
Conclusions
Our results uncover a previously unidentified role for MIR100HG in regulating EMT-related cetuximab resistance and metastasis in CRC by forming a regulatory circuit involving hnRNPA2B1 and TCF7L2. MIR100HG interacts with hnRNPA2B1 to mediate the stabilization of TCF7L2 mRNA in a m6A-dependent manner. TCF7L2, in turn, regulates MIR100HG transcription, closing the feed forward regulatory loop that leads to the increased activation of Wnt signaling.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Nan Wu (Northwest University of China) for help with RNA pull-down assays.
Abbreviations
- EMT
Epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition
- lncRNA
Long non-coding RNA
- CRC
Colorectal cancer
- EGFR
Epidermal growth factor receptor
- lnc-MIRHG
MiRNA-host gene lncRNA
- m6A
N6-methyladenosine
- hnRNPA2B1
Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein A2B1
- FFPE
Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded
- 3D
Three-dimension
- TF
Transcription factor
- TCGA
The Cancer Genome Atlas
- GSEA
Gene Set Enrichment Analysis
- CMS
Consensus molecular subtyping
Authors’ contributions
XZ, YL, RJC and DF conceived of and directed the project. XZ, YL, RJC, and HL designed the experiments. HL, LS, HQ, LM, AF, RGD and TJY performed the experiments. HL, XZ, YL, JLF, LM and JGP prepared figures and Tables. YL, HZ, SJ, ZC, XW and TD provided the samples. JK, JGP, YF and YN contributed reagents and/or analytical tools. HL, QL, HG, CL and JW conducted the data analysis and interpreted the results. HL, XZ, YL, RJC and SEG wrote and edited the manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81822031, 82073197, 81871913, 81972224, 81972761 and 82173256), National Science and Technology Support Program (No. 2015BAI13B07), the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS (No. 2018212), National Institutes of Health T32 (No. CA009582–33), National Science Foundation (No. 1937963), National Cancer Institute R35 (No. CA197570), U19 (No. CA179514) and P50 (No. CA236733). RJC acknowledges the generous support of the Nichola Tierney GI Cancer Memorial Fund.
Availability of data and materials
All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
This study was approved by the Ethics Committees of Xijing Hospital, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University and Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital. The study was conducted according to the principles expressed in the Declaration of Helsinki.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Hao Liu, Danxiu Li and Lina Sun contributed equally to this work.
Contributor Information
Daiming Fan, Email: fandaim@fmmu.edu.cn.
Robert J. Coffey, Email: robert.coffey@vumc.org
Xiaodi Zhao, Email: leedyzhao@fmmu.edu.cn.
Yuanyuan Lu, Email: luyuan11@fmmu.edu.cn.
References
- 1.Nieto MA, Huang RY, Jackson RA, Thiery JP. EMT: 2016. Cell. 2016;166(1):21–45. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.06.028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Shibue T, Weinberg RA. EMT, CSCs, and drug resistance: the mechanistic link and clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(10):611–629. doi: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2017.44. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Siegel RL, Miller KD, Fuchs HE, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(1):7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brenner H, Kloor M, Pox CP. Colorectal cancer. Lancet (London, England) 2014;383(9927):1490–1502. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61649-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Piawah S, Venook AP. Targeted therapy for colorectal cancer metastases: a review of current methods of molecularly targeted therapy and the use of tumor biomarkers in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Cancer. 2019;125(23):4139–4147. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32163. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Misale S, Di Nicolantonio F, Sartore-Bianchi A, Siena S, Bardelli A. Resistance to anti-EGFR therapy in colorectal cancer: from heterogeneity to convergent evolution. Cancer Discov. 2014;4(11):1269–1280. doi: 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-14-0462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lu Y, Zhao X, Liu Q, Li C, Graves-Deal R, Cao Z, et al. lncRNA MIR100HG-derived miR-100 and miR-125b mediate cetuximab resistance via Wnt/beta-catenin signaling. Nat Med. 2017;23(11):1331–1341. doi: 10.1038/nm.4424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Sun Q, Song YJ, Prasanth KV. One locus with two roles: microRNA-independent functions of microRNA-host-gene locus-encoded long noncoding RNAs. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2021;12(3):e1625. doi: 10.1002/wrna.1625. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Dhir A, Dhir S, Proudfoot NJ, Jopling CL. Microprocessor mediates transcriptional termination of long noncoding RNA transcripts hosting microRNAs. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22(4):319–327. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.2982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sun Q, Tripathi V, Yoon JH, Singh DK, Hao Q, Min KW, et al. MIR100 host gene-encoded lncRNAs regulate cell cycle by modulating the interaction between HuR and its target mRNAs. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(19):10405–10416. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky696. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Wang S, Ke H, Zhang H, Ma Y, Ao L, Zou L, et al. LncRNA MIR100HG promotes cell proliferation in triple-negative breast cancer through triplex formation with p27 loci. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9(8):805. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0869-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fu Y, Dominissini D, Rechavi G, He C. Gene expression regulation mediated through reversible m6A RNA methylation. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15(5):293–306. doi: 10.1038/nrg3724. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang X, Lu Z, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue Y, Han D, et al. N6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505(7481):117–120. doi: 10.1038/nature12730. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zaccara S, Ries RJ, Jaffrey SR. Reading, writing and erasing mRNA methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2019;20(10):608–624. doi: 10.1038/s41580-019-0168-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.He L, Li H, Wu A, Peng Y, Shu G, Yin G. Functions of N6-methyladenosine and its role in cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):176. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1109-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lin X, Chai G, Wu Y, Li J, Chen F, Liu J, et al. RNA m (6) a methylation regulates the epithelial mesenchymal transition of cancer cells and translation of snail. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):2065. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-09865-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar] [Retracted]
- 17.Yue B, Song C, Yang L, Cui R, Cheng X, Zhang Z, et al. METTL3-mediated N6-methyladenosine modification is critical for epithelial-mesenchymal transition and metastasis of gastric cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):142. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1065-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Sun T, Wu Z, Wang X, Wang Y, Hu X, Qin W, et al. LNC942 promoting METTL14-mediated m (6) a methylation in breast cancer cell proliferation and progression. Oncogene. 2020;39(31):5358–5372. doi: 10.1038/s41388-020-1338-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Qin B, Dong M, Wang Z, Wan J, Xie Y, Jiao Y, et al. Long non-coding RNA CASC15 facilitates esophageal squamous cell carcinoma tumorigenesis via decreasing SIM2 stability via FTO-mediated demethylation. Oncol Rep. 2021;45(3):1059–1071. doi: 10.3892/or.2020.7917. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wang Y, Lu JH, Wu QN, Jin Y, Wang DS, Chen YX, et al. LncRNA LINRIS stabilizes IGF2BP2 and promotes the aerobic glycolysis in colorectal cancer. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1105-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Dhamija S, Diederichs S. From junk to master regulators of invasion: lncRNA functions in migration, EMT and metastasis. Int J Cancer. 2016;139(2):269–280. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Liu Y, Shi SL. The roles of hnRNP A2/B1 in RNA biology and disease. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA. 2020;12(2):e1612. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 23.Wu Y, Yang X, Chen Z, Tian L, Jiang G, Chen F, et al. m(6) A-induced lncRNA RP11 triggers the dissemination of colorectal cancer cells via upregulation of Zeb1. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1014-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Yu PF, Kang AR, Jing LJ, Wang YM. Long non-coding RNA CACNA1G-AS1 promotes cell migration, invasion and epithelial-mesenchymal transition by HNRNPA2B1 in non-small cell lung cancer. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2018;22(4):993–1002. doi: 10.26355/eurrev_201802_14381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Dai S, Zhang J, Huang S, Lou B, Fang B, Ye T, et al. HNRNPA2B1 regulates the epithelial-mesenchymal transition in pancreatic cancer cells through the ERK/snail signalling pathway. Cancer Cell Int. 2017;17:12. doi: 10.1186/s12935-016-0368-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alarcón CR, Goodarzi H, Lee H, Liu X, Tavazoie S, Tavazoie SF. HNRNPA2B1 is a mediator of m (6) A-dependent nuclear RNA processing events. Cell. 2015;162(6):1299–1308. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.08.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wang L, Wen M, Cao X. Nuclear hnRNPA2B1 initiates and amplifies the innate immune response to DNA viruses. Science (New York, NY). 2019;365(6454):eaav0758. [DOI] [PubMed]
- 28.Wu B, Su S, Patil DP, Liu H, Gan J, Jaffrey SR, et al. Molecular basis for the specific and multivariant recognitions of RNA substrates by human hnRNP A2/B1. Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):420. doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-02770-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Schell MJ, Yang M, Missiaglia E, Delorenzi M, Soneson C, Yue B, et al. A composite gene expression signature optimizes prediction of colorectal Cancer metastasis and outcome. Clin Cancer Res. 2016;22(3):734–745. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-0143. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The molecular signatures database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015;1(6):417–425. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Bakir B, Chiarella AM, Pitarresi JR, Rustgi AK. EMT, MET, plasticity, and tumor metastasis. Trends Cell Biol. 2020;30(10):764–776. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2020.07.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Sveen A, Bruun J, Eide PW, Eilertsen IA, Ramirez L, Murumägi A, et al. Colorectal Cancer consensus molecular subtypes translated to preclinical models uncover potentially targetable Cancer cell dependencies. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(4):794–806. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Huarte M. The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer. Nat Med. 2015;21(11):1253–1261. doi: 10.1038/nm.3981. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang Y, Huang W, Yuan Y, Li J, Wu J, Yu J, et al. Long non-coding RNA H19 promotes colorectal cancer metastasis via binding to hnRNPA2B1. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2020;39(1):141. doi: 10.1186/s13046-020-01619-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Clevers H, Nusse R. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling and disease. Cell. 2012;149(6):1192–1205. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Gao Q, Yang L, Shen A, Li Y, Li Y, Hu S, et al. A WNT7B-m (6) A-TCF7L2 positive feedback loop promotes gastric cancer progression and metastasis. Signal Transduct Targeted Ther. 2021;6(1):43. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00397-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Hu X, Peng WX, Zhou H, Jiang J, Zhou X, Huang D, et al. IGF2BP2 regulates DANCR by serving as an N6-methyladenosine reader. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(6):1782–1794. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0461-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Sandelin A, Alkema W, Engström P, Wasserman WW, Lenhard B. JASPAR: an open-access database for eukaryotic transcription factor binding profiles. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32(Database issue):D91–D94. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Meng LD, Shi GD, Ge WL, Huang XM, Chen Q, Yuan H, et al. Linc01232 promotes the metastasis of pancreatic cancer by suppressing the ubiquitin-mediated degradation of HNRNPA2B1 and activating the A-Raf-induced MAPK/ERK signaling pathway. Cancer Lett. 2020;494:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2020.08.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Singh R, Gupta SC, Peng WX, Zhou N, Pochampally R, Atfi A, et al. Regulation of alternative splicing of Bcl-x by BC200 contributes to breast cancer pathogenesis. Cell Death Dis. 2016;7(6):e2262. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2016.168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Boo SH, Kim YK. The emerging role of RNA modifications in the regulation of mRNA stability. Exp Mol Med. 2020;52(3):400–408. doi: 10.1038/s12276-020-0407-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Geissler R, Grimson A. A position-specific 3'UTR sequence that accelerates mRNA decay. RNA Biol. 2016;13(11):1075–1077. doi: 10.1080/15476286.2016.1225645. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Fähling M, Mrowka R, Steege A, Martinka P, Persson PB, Thiele BJ. Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein-A2/B1 modulate collagen prolyl 4-hydroxylase, alpha (I) mRNA stability. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(14):9279–9286. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M510925200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Martinez FJ, Pratt GA, Van Nostrand EL, Batra R, Huelga SC, Kapeli K, et al. Protein-RNA networks regulated by Normal and ALS-associated mutant HNRNPA2B1 in the nervous system. Neuron. 2016;92(4):780–795. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.09.050. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Griseri P, Pagès G. Control of pro-angiogenic cytokine mRNA half-life in cancer: the role of AU-rich elements and associated proteins. J Interf Cytokine Res. 2014;34(4):242–254. doi: 10.1089/jir.2013.0140. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhao C, Deng Y, Liu L, Yu K, Zhang L, Wang H, et al. Dual regulatory switch through interactions of Tcf7l2/Tcf4 with stage-specific partners propels oligodendroglial maturation. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10883. doi: 10.1038/ncomms10883. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wang H, Liang L, Dong Q, Huan L, He J, Li B, et al. Long noncoding RNA miR503HG, a prognostic indicator, inhibits tumor metastasis by regulating the HNRNPA2B1/NF-κB pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. Theranostics. 2018;8(10):2814–2829. doi: 10.7150/thno.23012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li B, Liu L, Li X, Wu L. miR-503 suppresses metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma cell by targeting PRMT1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;464(4):982–987. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.06.169. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Yang W, Ning N, Jin X. The lncRNA H19 promotes cell proliferation by competitively binding to miR-200a and Derepressing β-catenin expression in colorectal Cancer. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:2767484. doi: 10.1155/2017/2767484. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Yang X, Lou Y, Wang M, Liu C, Liu Y, Huang W. miR-675 promotes colorectal cancer cell growth dependent on tumor suppressor DMTF1. Mol Med Rep. 2019;19(3):1481–1490. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9780. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Wu ZQ, Li XY, Hu CY, Ford M, Kleer CG, Weiss SJ. Canonical Wnt signaling regulates slug activity and links epithelial-mesenchymal transition with epigenetic breast Cancer 1, early onset (BRCA1) repression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109(41):16654–16659. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1205822109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Zhang Z, Lee JC, Lin L, Olivas V, Au V, LaFramboise T, et al. Activation of the AXL kinase causes resistance to EGFR-targeted therapy in lung cancer. Nat Genet. 2012;44(8):852–860. doi: 10.1038/ng.2330. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Song KA, Niederst MJ, Lochmann TL, Hata AN, Kitai H, Ham J, et al. Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition antagonizes response to targeted therapies in lung Cancer by suppressing BIM. Clin Cancer Res. 2018;24(1):197–208. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-1577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Boesch M, Spizzo G, Seeber A. Concise review: aggressive colorectal Cancer: role of epithelial cell adhesion molecule in Cancer stem cells and epithelial-to-Mesenchymal transition. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2018;7(6):495–501. doi: 10.1002/sctm.17-0289. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Batlle E, Clevers H. Cancer stem cells revisited. Nat Med. 2017;23(10):1124–1134. doi: 10.1038/nm.4409. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Yankova E, Blackaby W, Albertella M, Rak J, De Braekeleer E, Tsagkogeorga G, et al. Small molecule inhibition of METTL3 as a strategy against myeloid leukaemia. Nature. 2021;593(7860):597-601. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 57.Katsushima K, Natsume A, Ohka F, Shinjo K, Hatanaka A, Ichimura N, et al. Targeting the notch-regulated non-coding RNA TUG1 for glioma treatment. Nat Commun. 2016;7:13616. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Xiu B, Chi Y, Liu L, Chi W, Zhang Q, Chen J, et al. LINC02273 drives breast cancer metastasis by epigenetically increasing AGR2 transcription. Mol Cancer. 2019;18(1):187. doi: 10.1186/s12943-019-1115-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Guo Y, Lu X, Chen Y, Rendon B, Mitchell RA, Cuatrecasas M, et al. Zeb1 induces immune checkpoints to form an immunosuppressive envelope around invading cancer cells. Sci Adv. 2021;7(21):eabd7455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding authors upon reasonable request.