Skip to main content
iScience logoLink to iScience
. 2022 Mar 23;25(4):104146. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2022.104146

Rehabilitation of a misbehaving microbiome: phages for the remodeling of bacterial composition and function

Hiba Baaziz 1, Zachary Robert Baker 1,2, Hollyn Claire Franklin 1,2, Bryan Boen Hsu 1,
PMCID: PMC8991392  PMID: 35402871

Summary

The human gut microbiota is considered an adjunct metabolic organ owing to its health impact. Recent studies have shown correlations between gut phage composition and host health. Whereas phage therapy has popularized virulent phages as antimicrobials, both virulent and temperate phages have a natural ecological relationship with their cognate bacteria. Characterization of this evolutionary coadaptation has led to other emergent therapeutic phage applications that do not necessarily rely on bacterial eradication or target pathogens. Here, we present an overview of the tripartite relationship between phages, bacteria, and the mammalian host, and highlight applications of the wildtype and genetically engineered phage for gut microbiome remodeling. In light of new and varied strategies, we propose to categorize phage applications aiming to modulate bacterial composition or function as “phage rehabilitation.” By delineating phage rehab from phage therapy, we believe it will enable greater nuance and understanding of these new phage-based technologies.

Subject areas: Virology, Microbiome

Graphical abstract

graphic file with name fx1.jpg


Virology; Microbiome

The gut microbiome is significant to host health

The human holobiont comprises a diverse microbial community (microbiota) with a composition and density linked to numerous aspects of human health and disease. The gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the densest microbially colonized region of the body with more than 100 trillion microorganisms including viruses (prokaryotic and eukaryotic), bacteria, and at lower densities, archaea, fungi, and protozoa (Thursby and Juge, 2017; Turnbaugh et al., 2007). Partly owing to a high colonization density and limited resources available, these microbes can be highly interactive with an intricate and often symbiotic relationship with the mammalian host (Bäckhed et al., 2005; Ley et al., 2008; Thursby and Juge, 2017). Bacteria are among the most dominant human gut microbes at nearly 1014 cells (Sender et al., 2016) and generally have a commensal relationship with the host (Fan and Pedersen, 2021). However, genetic or environmental factors can result in a maladaptation of the gut microbiome that is deleterious, a state sometimes referred to as dysbiosis. The bacterial composition in the gut has been associated with a variety of host phenotypes including metabolic diseases (Fan and Pedersen, 2021), inflammatory diseases (Clemente et al., 2018), susceptibility to enteric infection (Ducarmon et al., 2019), and neurological disorders (Cryan et al., 2020), among others. Despite considerable advancement in our understanding of the relationship between the gut microbiome and disease, much remains to be characterized (Schmidt et al., 2018).

Compared with bacteria in the gut microbiota, non-bacterial microbes are understudied despite their potential significance. Bacterial viruses, also known as bacteriophages or phages, are obligate intracellular parasites that rely on the metabolic machinery of their bacterial hosts for propagation. Discovered over a century ago, phages are considered the most abundant and diverse biological entity inhabiting Earth’s ecosystems, with an estimated global population size of 1031 particles (Brüssow and Hendrix, 2002; Suttle, 2005; Twort, 1915). Whereas the composition and abundance of phages can vary along the GI tract, especially in the colon (Shkoporov and Hill, 2019), gut phages are estimated to be as numerically dominant as bacteria with ∼109–1010 viral-like particles (VLP) per gram of stool (Hoyles et al., 2014). Though VLP counts include both prokaryotic and eukaryotic viral particles, the latter are comparatively rare (Minot et al., 2011). Furthermore, phages depend on their bacterial hosts for continued persistence. This leads to an interesting bidirectional relationship where fluctuations in one can alter the concentration and/or functions of the other (Weitz, 2016). The longitudinal relationship between phages and bacteria has been of considerable interest, especially in marine environments, leading to a number of ecological models. For example, in kill-the-winner dynamics, the virulent phage (i.e., infection leads to cell lysis and the release of the progeny phage) targeting an abundant bacterial species rapidly reduces the concentration of this cognate host (Figure 1A) (Thingstad, 2000), leading to the expansion of bacterial competitors (Maslov and Sneppen, 2017). These enriched competitors are in turn targeted by their own phages, resulting in fluctuations in the overall abundance and diversity of phage and bacterial communities (Thingstad, 2000). Which bacteria benefit and fill this vacated niche has been subject to additional modeling. A royal family model suggests that a subset of competing species adapted for the same niche will fill the vacancy, whereas an equal opportunity model indicates that this expansion will come from one of the other more numerous, yet less well-adapted, species (Breitbart et al., 2018). In the human infant gut microbiome, virulent phages are prevalent with observed kill-the-winner dynamics (Lim et al., 2015), whereas in the adult microbiome, lysogeny is more prevalent, complicating the application of this model. Accounting for temperate phages, the piggyback-the-winner model indicates that lysogeny (i.e., bacteria with a genomically integrated prophage) is beneficial in high-density microbial environments (Figure 1B), which can lead to higher levels of phage enrichment than that possible by lytic replication alone (Silveira and Rohwer, 2016).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Mechanisms of phage interaction with bacteria and the mammalian host

(A) Infection of bacteria with virulent phage leads to cell lysis and the release of progeny phage.

(B) Temperate phage infection of a host bacterium can lead to the lytic life cycle or genomic integration into the bacterial chromosome as a prophage and the lysogenic life cycle.

(C) Phage can attach to the mucosa through interactions with the capsid.

(D and E) (D) Phage can cross the intestinal epithelium through transcytosis or (E) within a bacterial cell.

Microbiota transplantation can improve host health

The gut microbiota is a factor in various physiological functions such as energy harvesting through extraction, synthesis, and absorption of nutrients and metabolites (Den Besten et al., 2013), immunomodulation (Belkaid and Hand, 2014; Gensollen et al., 2016), and resistance to pathogen colonization (Sassone-Corsi and Raffatellu, 2015). In some instances of chronic disease associated with a compositionally maladapted gut microbiome, restoration of microbial richness and diversity can be achieved by fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT). FMT is a process in which bacteria, viruses, and other fecal components are extracted from healthy donor feces and administered to patients with depleted gut microbiomes (Broecker et al., 2016). This procedure has shown remarkable success in treating recurrent Clostridioides difficile infections (rCDI) (Van Nood et al., 2013). FMTs also have the potential for treating other diseases or disorders such as ulcerative colitis (Jacob et al., 2017), Crohn’s disease (Gordon and Harbord, 2014), chronic constipation (Tian et al., 2017), graft versus host disease (Van Lier et al., 2020), and neurodegenerative diseases (Wang et al., 2021). In instances where gut bacteria can alter drug efficacy, FMTs can reverse this effect as shown with microbiota-associated resistance to anti-PD-1 therapy (Davar et al., 2021). Whereas FMTs are extremely promising as a treatment, there are challenges owing to the use of donor material, which includes scalability issues and a costly reliance on screening for pathogenic species owing to its undefined nature (Panchal et al., 2018).

In addition to bacteria, other microbes such as fungi and phage are engrafted with long-term persistence (Zhang et al., 2021). For treating rCDI, recipients with lower Caudovirales richness and diversity compared with donors were all responsive to treatment and had significantly more Caudovirales taxa engrafted than in non-responders, although there were no significant differences in bacterial engraftment between responders and non-responders (Zuo and Ng, 2018). In another study where all rCDI patients responded to FMT treatment, no significant changes in Caudovirales richness and diversity were found; however, there were significant increases in the richness and diversity of Microviridae (single-stranded DNA phages) and bacteria post-FMT (Fujimoto et al., 2021). Moreover, the examination of the viral contigs transferred to recipients after FMT treatment for ulcerative colitis revealed a high frequency of genes associated with temperate phages, though it is unknown whether these were transferred as free viral particles or as prophages (Chehoud et al., 2016). On removing the potential effects of bacteria, transplantation of a fecal filtrate devoid of bacteria was sufficient to treat rCDI in a small cohort (n = 5) (Ott et al., 2017), which suggests that phages may play a causal role in the success of FMT. Fecal filtrates even showed superiority to conventional FMTs in preventing necrotizing enterocolitis in a preterm piglet model (Brunse et al., 2022). To further isolate the effect of a phage, conventionally colonized mice with diet-induced obesity (i.e., high-fat diet) were administered the viral particles from lean donor mice. This fecal virome transplantation (FVT) resulted in a partial resemblance of the recipient to the donor virome and increased the bacterial diversity but not the viral diversity, suggesting that even a partial engraftment of donor phages was substantial enough to drive phenotypic changes of reduced weight gain and improved glucose tolerance (Rasmussen et al., 2020). In another mouse study, antibiotic-treated conventional mice receiving an autochthonous FVT (i.e., donor material derived from the same mice before antibiotic treatment) showed gut microbiomes that more closely resembled a pre-antibiotic composition than mice receiving a heat-inactivated FVT (Draper et al., 2020). The success of FMT in treating rCDI has been a revelation for demonstrating the importance of a robust gut microbiome. Even more remarkable is that the transplantation of a phage, without bacteria, can have a physiological impact on the host. As is the case with conventional FMTs, if one expects the transfer of a beneficial phenotype from the donor, it is a reasonable possibility that an undesirable phenotype may also be transferred. Thus, it is as important to develop a mechanistic understanding of how phages influence the gut microbiome for improving therapeutic effect as it is to minimize adverse effects that are likely underreported.

Phage-bacteria interactions

The healthy gut phageome is rich and diverse with correlations to health. The composition of phages in the human gut is highly individual-specific (Gregory et al., 2020; Shkoporov et al., 2019) and comprises virulent and temperate phages, with the latter predominant based on sequenced viral particles and the prevalence of prophages in gut bacteria. Recent work has revealed that healthy individuals possess a core set of virulent phages (Shkoporov et al., 2019). These phages are mostly non-enveloped DNA phages, either of the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) Caudovirales or single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) Microviridae families (Manrique et al., 2016; Sausset et al., 2020), with RNA phages being comparatively rare (Zhang et al., 2006). The composition of the gut phageome has been linked to several diseases. For example, patients with IBD had significantly greater Caudovirales richness than in healthy controls, which coincided with decreased bacterial diversity and richness (Norman et al., 2015). Further analysis revealed that in contrast to the abundance of virulent phage in healthy individuals, patients with IBD had a virome largely composed of a temperate phage (Clooney et al., 2019). In ulcerative colitis, the altered mucosal virome is associated with a reduced diversity in function but greater representation of genes associated with bacterial fitness such as virulence and antimicrobial resistance (Zuo et al., 2018). Compositional links between the gut virome and host physiology has also been identified for malnutrition (Reyes et al., 2015), rheumatoid arthritis (Mangalea et al., 2021), type 1 and 2 diabetes (Ma et al., 2018; Tetz et al., 2019), Parkinson’s Disease (Tetz et al., 2018), and growth stunting (Khan Mirzaei et al., 2020).

Taxonomic classification of phage is challenging. Whereas early metagenomic studies have shed light on the complexity and richness of gut phages, much of the gut virome remains difficult to characterize and can neither be assigned a taxonomic position nor be linked to any microbial host (Aggarwala et al., 2017). In the absence of a universal phylogenetic marker (Roux et al., 2015), taxonomic assignment is typically limited to availability in reference databases, an issue that is being addressed with the expansion of the human Gut Phage Database (GPD) to more than 142,809 non-redundant phage genomes (Benler et al., 2021; Camarillo-Guerrero et al., 2021). Nevertheless, advances in culture-independent sequence-based analyses allowed the identification of thousands of phages belonging to three new families of the Caudovirales order (Benler et al., 2021), uncovered more than 10,000 viral species distributed over 248 viral families falling within 17 viral order-level clades (Shah et al., 2021, preprint), and improved our understanding of the human gut phage-host network by revealing new host-phage pairs (Džunková et al., 2019; Shah et al., 2021, preprint). The combined efforts of high-throughput sequencing and genomic data mining tools with cultureomics can lead to the identification, isolation, and purification of important phage species. The dsDNA phage crAssphage, named after the cross-assembly method by which it was first identified, is estimated to be the most abundant phage in the known human gut virome, comprising approximately 90% of VLP metagenomes (Dutilh et al., 2014). Since their initial discovery, crAss-like phages have been found to be relatively stable and widespread in the gut of virtually all tested individuals (Edwards et al., 2019; Manrique et al., 2016; Shkoporov et al., 2018). Culture-based assays have begun to more precisely identify their bacterial hosts, such as Bacteroides intestinalis (Shkoporov et al., 2018), Bacteroides xylanisolvens (Guerin et al., 2021), and Bacteriodes thetaiotaomicron (Hryckowian et al., 2020).

Phages have various lifestyles. In addition to the lytic life cycle that is pursued by virulent phages, temperate phages can also integrate their genomes into the bacterial chromosome as a prophage in the lysogenic life cycle. This expands the pool of bacterial genetic diversity beyond what is capable by mutation alone (Frazao et al., 2019). Metagenomic-sequencing has shown that prophages contribute to approximately 5% of the conserved function in the human gut microbiome (Qin et al., 2010) and are essential for the stability and maintenance of bacterial populations (Kim and Bae, 2018). These functions generally benefit the bacterial host by improving their competitive fitness in the GI environment by mechanisms that include their expansion of metabolic potential (Dragoš et al., 2021), improved survival (Brown et al., 2021), superinfection exclusion of phages (Bondy-Denomy et al., 2016), and environmental stress resistance (Wang et al., 2010). Some studies have suggested that phages are significant contributors to the spread of antibiotic resistance genes (Modi et al., 2013; Quirós et al., 2014), whereas others indicate that this is likely a rare occurrence in the human gut (Davies and Davies, 2010; Debroas and Siguret, 2019; Enault et al., 2017), especially when compared with conjugation (Džunková et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2019). Prophage induction, leading to progeny phage that can spread to new hosts, can be initiated by various stimuli including gut metabolites (e.g., bile salts or nitric oxide) (Hernández et al., 2012), exogenous inducers such as quinolone antibiotics (Zhang et al., 2000), non-antibiotic medication (Sutcliffe et al., 2021), or specific dietary compounds (Boling et al., 2020; Oh et al., 2019). Prophage induction can also impact co-colonizing species as demonstrated by the production of the composite phage φV1/7 from Enterococcous faecalis V583 that lyses other competitor E. faecalis strains (Duerkop et al., 2012), or facilitate the release of intracellular bacteriocins (Colicin lb) as found with Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium targeting a competing commensal Escherichia coli (Nedialkova et al., 2016). As a result, prophage induction can contribute to gastrointestinal diseases by diminishing the ratio of symbionts to pathobionts, enabling pathogens to occupy the niche vacated by recently lysed commensals (Cornuault et al., 2018; Mills et al., 2013). Phage predation has also been observed to induce a type VIIb secretion system in E. faecalis, killing bystander species not directly targeted by the phage VPE25 (Chatterjee et al., 2021).

Phage predation can lead to bacterial resistance and phage counter effects. In some cases, bacteria do not develop genetic changes that confer phage resistance, possibly owing to phenotypic variation (Bull et al., 2014). In other cases, bacteria can remain completely susceptible to the phage by colonizing regions largely occluded from the phage access such deep in the intestinal mucosa. Outgrowth into the lumen may allow for those cells to become phage accessible and thus sustain phage propagation (Lourenço et al., 2020). However, the culture of a phage with its bacterial host often leads to a coexistence with phage-susceptible and phage-resistant bacterial species. Bacteria can develop resistance by a number of mechanisms including the inhibition of adsorption (receptor mutation, altered expression, or occlusion), interference with DNA injection (exclusion mechanisms), degradation of injected DNA (restriction modification or CRISPR-Cas systems), or abortive infection that prevents the spread of a progeny phage, among others (Houte et al., 2016). Whereas phage resistance may be beneficial against viral infection, the challenges associated with colonization is multifaceted, i.e., resistance development can result in a loss of beneficial functions (Gurney et al., 2020). This principle can be leveraged therapeutically. In Pseudomonas aeruginosa, resistance to the virulent OMKO1 phage results in a functionally defective outer membrane porin M, a crucial component in multidrug resistance leading to phage resistance but antibiotic susceptibility, or antibiotic resistance but phage susceptibility (Chan et al., 2016). Thus, the selective pressure provided by phage predation can attenuate virulence, termed “phage steering,” and has the potential to guide pathogenic bacteria to more therapeutically amenable situations (Gurney et al., 2020).

In response to the evolution of phage resistance, some phages are able to overcome such mechanisms by switching to other surface receptors on the same host (Meyer et al., 2012) or adapting to target other hosts (De Sordi et al., 2017). Phages are also able to counter bacterial nucleases by altering their genetic material to defend against restriction enzymes (Bair and Black, 2007), mutating sites targeted by CRISPR, or expressing anti-CRISPR proteins (ARCs) to either evade or directly inhibit host CRISPR-Cas systems (Bondy-Denomy et al., 2013).

Phage interactions with the mammalian host

The mucosa of the human GI tract is essential for the maintenance of homeostasis, acting as an immunological and physiological barrier to infiltration by bacterial pathogens while harboring a rich population of commensal microorganisms (Allam-Ndoul et al., 2020; Vaga et al., 2020). Phages may have a significant role in this region as the T4 phage was shown to adhere to glycan residues in mucin via weak interactions with the immunoglobulin (Ig)-like domains of their capsid proteins, acting as a host-independent antimicrobial shield (Figure 1C) (Barr et al., 2013a, 2013b). This localization in the mucosa allows for sub-diffusive populations of phages to have an increased likelihood of host encounters (Barr et al., 2015). It is possible that this adherence strategy is utilized broadly as shown with Ig-like domains in the structural proteins of Caudovirales (Fraser et al., 2006) and Bacteroides-associated carbohydrate-binding (BACON) domains in crAssphages (De Jonge et al., 2019; Dutilh et al., 2014).

In addition to residing at the host-bacterial interface of the GI tract, phage particles are capable of directly interacting with the host (Bichet et al., 2021). Phages can be obtained from the GI tract through transcytosis (Nguyen et al., 2017) or permeation across a weakened intestinal barrier (Figure 1D) (Tetz and Tetz, 2016). Phages can also be carried across the epithelial barrier by dendritic cells when contained within bacteria (Figure 1E) (Duerkop and Hooper, 2013; Nguyen et al., 2017). Furthermore, epithelial and endothelial tissue may also act as a sink for exogenously administered phages (Bichet et al., 2021). Once accessed by the immune system, phages can act as immunomodulators, for example, by stimulating the production of anti-phage antibodies (Gogokhia et al., 2019; Kaźmierczak et al., 2021; Majewska et al., 2015, 2019), and possibly leading to a broader antiviral response (Duerkop and Hooper, 2013). In the case of Enterococcus hirae, a tape measure protein encoded by its prophage improved immunotherapy with cyclophosphamide through molecular mimicry of an oncogenic epitope, an effect that could be transferred to other commensal bacteria by heterologous expression (Fluckiger et al., 2020). Other studies by Gorski et al. suggested that phages can also exert an immunosuppressive protective role in the gut by acting with the immune system to control inflammatory and autoimmune reactions (Górski and Weber-Dabrowska, 2005). This was also shown with an Enterococcus gallinarum prophage ameliorating DSS-induced colitis in mouse models (Nishio et al., 2021). Contrarily, a study in a rodent model by Tetz and Tetz reported that the administration of a phage cocktail alters the composition of the intestinal microbiome and promotes loss of intestinal barrier integrity causing an increase in intestinal permeability (leaky gut) (Tetz and Tetz, 2016, 2018). Phages can also be pro-inflammatory as shown with the E. coli phage stimulating an inflammatory response in mice through the induction of interferon-gamma production by CD4+ T-cells in a Toll-like receptor dependent pathway, exacerbating colitis (Gogokhia et al., 2019; Gogokhia and Round, 2021). Another study reported that the internalization of the filamentous Pf phage virions, produced during chronic P. aeruginosa infection, may trigger a maladaptive antiviral response, leading to the suppression of bacterial clearance from infected wounds (Sweere Johanna et al., 2019).

Precision modification of the gut microbiota

The potential role of commensal species in the gut as contributors to the development or exacerbation of human diseases has received considerable attention over the past decade. Duan et al. recently showed that the presence of cytolysin-producing E. faecalis correlates with the severity of liver disease and with mortality in patients with alcoholic hepatitis (Duan et al., 2019). Another study by Qi et al. reported an increase of Bacteroides vulgatus in the stool of individuals with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). This effect could be induced in PCOS-like mouse models by FMT from women with PCOS or colonization with B. vulgatus (Qi et al., 2019). The specific nature of phage–bacterial interactions makes the use of phages an attractive strategy for the selective modification of individual species among a bacterial consortium. Applications of virulent phages against pathogens in phage therapy exemplify this strategy. In contrast, using a phage to target commensal species linked to disease allows one to potentially modulate host physiology without broadly altering the gut microbiota in a way that might occur with antibiotics. This was recently demonstrated with alcohol-related liver disease (ALD) in which a cocktail of virulent phages targeting cytolysin-producing E. faecalis abolished ALD in mice through bacterial knockdown (Duan et al., 2019). This indicates that the reduction of a commensal bacterium by a phage, and not necessarily its eradication, may be sufficient for the treatment of certain diseases.

In some cases, the introduction of a virulent phage can lead to effects beyond the species targeted. Using gnotobiotic mice colonized with a defined set of 10 human commensal bacteria and phages, longitudinal tracking of each microbe revealed that the knockdown of specific bacteria by their virulent phages altered the concentrations of co-colonizing species (i.e., those not directly targeted by phages) as well as the gut metabolome (Hsu et al., 2019). Such effects are not unexpected owing to the extensive cooperative and competitive interactions present in the gut microbiome (Coyte and Rakoff-Nahoum, 2019). The indirect effects of a lytic phage on non-host communities through metabolic and evolutionary mechanisms have been also reported by Fazzino et al., which showed that lysis of E. coli by the T7 phage increased S. enterica concentrations in coculture, owing to the released cell debris and the increased carbon secretion from E. coli cells that evolved resistance to the T7 phage (Fazzino et al., 2020).

A genetically engineered phage can sensitize bacteria to antibiotics. With the coming challenges associated with antibiotic resistance, developing strategies that improve their potency are important. Using an M13mp18 filamentous phage that produces a progeny phage without killing the host (i.e., the chronic phage cycle), over-expression of the lexA3 repressor increased bacterial sensitivity to the antibiotics ofloxacin, gentamicin, and ampicillin (Lu and Collins, 2009). A temperate phage λ, encoding a multi-copy rpsL gene and “mock” rpsL gene containing silent mutations, re-sensitized a streptomycin-resistant E. coli to the antibiotic and decreased the minimum inhibitory concentration from 200 to 1.56 μg/mL (Figure 2A) (Edgar et al., 2012). To improve the efficacy of a virulent phage in combination with antibiotics, Yosef et al. engineered a λ phage to carry a CRISPR-Cas9 that targeted a plasmid-borne antibiotic resistance gene and T7 phage. Thus, lysogens would be re-sensitized to antibiotics but resistant to the T7 phage, whereas non-lysogens would remain susceptible to lysis by the T7 phage (Yosef et al., 2015). In a related approach, Citorik et al. used the M13 phage, engineered to express CRISPR-Cas9, to eliminate plasmid-borne resistance genes or to selectively kill antibiotic resistant bacteria within a mixed E. coli population (Figure 2B) (Citorik et al., 2014). Lam et al. used the M13 phage expressing CRISPR-Cas9 to target chromosomal fluorescent reporter genes in E. coli and found that escape mutants either lost phage-borne CRISPR-Cas9 components or mutated the targeted reporter gene (Lam et al., 2021). Using programmable nucleases to improve the potency or specificity of virulent phages as stand-alone antimicrobials is also an active area of research that has been well reviewed elsewhere (Lenneman et al., 2021).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Modulation of bacterial function by genetically engineered phage

(A) Over-expression of wildtype rpsL expressed from λ phage re-sensitizes the host bacterium to the antibiotic, streptomycin.

(B) CRISPR-Cas elements expressed from a λ prophage or an M13 phagemid can re-sensitize bacteria to β-lactam antibiotics through the cleavage of plasmids containing antibiotic resistance genes (e.g., β-lactamases).

(C) Expression of a transcriptional repressor for Shiga toxin (Stx) from a λ prophage can inhibit production of the toxin from bacteria colonizing the murine gut.

(D) Expression of a nuclease inactivated Cas9 element from a λ prophage can be programmed to repress the expression of specific genes, such as a fluorescent marker protein, Red Fluorescent Protein (RFP).

Bacterial gene expression can be modulated by the phage within the mammalian gut. Of the breadth of functions expressed by bacteria, it may be that only a small subset is directly associated with disease. Exemplar are virulence factors that are present in some strains of E. coli but are not components of the core genome and are not found in commensal strains (Leimbach et al., 2013). Using an engineered phage to intracellularly modulate the expression of virulence factors substantially expands the possible targets beyond extracellular moieties that are typically the target of anti-virulence drugs (Dickey et al., 2017). Using a λ phage engineered to repress the enterohemorrhagic E. coli 933W prophage, this phage was shown to inhibit the production of Shigatoxin in vitro and in vivo (Figure 2C) (Hsu et al., 2020b). To broaden the versatility of this strategy, λ phage was engineered to express dCas9 with programmable RNAs for targeted gene repression. This was demonstrated with the specific knockdown of the RFP expression in E. coli colonizing the murine gut without substantially changing the fecal bacterial concentration (Figure 2D) (Hsu et al., 2020a).

Summary and outlook

Phage rehab

Phage therapy has an interesting history in leveraging a virulent phage as an antimicrobial strategy, one that is intertwined with antibiotics to elicit sometimes strong and often mixed opinions (Summers, 2012). In the early stages of modern medicine, when a bacterial infection could not be reliably treated, eradicating any and all bacteria was a boon to human health. Since then, our understanding of the mechanisms by which individual bacteria or their communities can contribute to health and disease has substantially improved, muddying the classification of some species as solely pathogenic or non-pathogenic especially without ecological context. Whereas the use of phages as antimicrobials is well described by phage therapy, it presumes a goal of bacterial eradication that is incompatible with emergent uses of phages in which treatment may not depend on bacterial eradication but instead the modulation of bacterial concentration or function, i.e., a rehabilitation of the gut microbiota.

In contrast to phage therapy, we suggest the use of the term “phage rehab” that would encompass the use of phages for the reduction or enrichment of bacterial species, or the modulation of one or multiple aspects of their function. As a result, the judicious application of the wildtype or engineered phage could be used to make subtle but therapeutically relevant changes in the mammalian gut. This would be distinct from phage steering, in which the desired outcome is the elimination of a bacterial pathogen.

Specificity

In an environment saturated with substrates capable of redirecting phages by non-specific adsorption, their ability to find cognate bacteria and successfully propagate in vivo is a testament to their persistence and specificity. We have shown that the knockdown of specific bacteria can alter the concentration of species not-directly targeted within a defined consortium colonizing gnotobiotic mice (Hsu et al., 2019). Thus, well-designed cocktails of phages targeting extensively interacting species could have an amplified effect that is conducted to other co-colonizing species via inter-microbial interactions. Recent studies showed that a cocktail of coliphages, marketed as PreforPro, administered to healthy individuals altered the targeted gut E. coli as well as other bacterial species not directly targeted by the phage cocktail (Febvre et al., 2019; Grubb et al., 2020). The breadth and strength of this cascade effect will likely be dependent on the composition and density of co-colonizing microbes, as well as host type, health, and diet (Vujkovic-Cvijin et al., 2020). It will be especially crucial to have sufficient taxonomic resolution to track individual species, as alterations will be masked at a genus level or higher sequencing.

A graded knockdown of bacteria

Targeting individual species with causal relationships to disease, such as cytolysin producing E. faecalis in ALD (Duan et al., 2019), suggests that therapeutic effect may be achieved by bacterial knockdown instead of complete elimination. An important consideration, which may not be easy to answer, is how much is enough? Duan et al. showed that ∼1-log reduction of E. faecalis was therapeutically sufficient in mouse models, which is promising. However, the bacterial response to a phage may vary depending on the co-colonizing species. Simplified in vitro cultures of E. coli and its phage (e.g., T5 or T7 phage) in minimal media showed only slight reductions in species concentration (<1 log) owing to the emergence of phage resistance, but in the presence of a nutrient competitor, S. enterica, there was a substantial reduction (>3-logs) (Harcombe and Bull, 2005). The converse, adding E. coli to a culture of S. enterica and its phage, Sf6 phage, did not have a similar effect, indicating the importance of the underlying mechanisms of resistance development, nutrient conditions, and competition (Harcombe and Bull, 2005).

Intracellular access

Making genetic modifications to bacteria in the laboratory can be straightforward, provided the species is genetically tractable. However, once colonizing the gut, these bacteria become inaccessible by traditionally used techniques of genetic engineering. Injecting genetic material into their cognate bacteria is a process intrinsic to phage propagation and offers a potentially unique accessibility to bacteria in the mammalian gut. Using a temperate phage enables the durable modification with heterologous functions, targeting species colonizing the mammalian gut. In addition to phage-based mechanisms for microbial gene delivery, there are other interesting strategies based on conjugative plasmids (Neil et al., 2020; Ronda et al., 2019). Although these require direct contact with recipient cells and, in some cases, can have low efficiencies, they can be broadly disseminated across species, if desirable.

As we learn more about this microbial community colonizing the mammalian gut, an important next step is to develop strategies with commensurate sophistication that are capable of performing the desired modifications with precision and predictability. In a broad sense, these properties are natural aspects of phages, making them an attractive tool for use in rich and diverse ecosystems. Whether to provide mechanistic information through the specific probing of species or to make subtle compositional or function adjustments, the use of phages is an exciting and emergent area of research for the remodeling of the gut microbiome.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the Institute for Critical Technology and Applied Science, College of Science, and Department of Biological Sciences at Virginia Tech.

Author contributions

Writing – original draft, H.B., Z.R.B., H.C.F., and B.B.H.; Visualization, Z.R.B. and H.C.F.; writing – reviewing and editing, H.B. and B.B.H.; funding acquisition, B.B.H.

Declaration of interests

B.B.H. is a member of the scientific advisory board of Vulcan Biologics and has filed patents related to the use of genetically engineered phages. The other authors declare no competing interests.

References

  1. Aggarwala V., Liang G., Bushman F.D. Viral communities of the human gut: metagenomic analysis of composition and dynamics. Mob. DNA. 2017;8:12. doi: 10.1186/s13100-017-0095-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Allam-Ndoul B., Castonguay-Paradis S., Veilleux A. Gut microbiota and intestinal trans-epithelial permeability. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6402. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Bäckhed F., Ley R.E., Sonnenburg J.L., Peterson D.A., Gordon J.I. Host-bacterial mutualism in the human intestine. Science. 2005;307:1915–1920. doi: 10.1126/science.1104816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Bair C.L., Black L.W. A type iv modification dependent restriction nuclease that targets glucosylated hydroxymethyl cytosine modified DNAs. J. Mol. Biol. 2007;366:768–778. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.11.051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Barr J.J., Auro R., Furlan M., Whiteson K.L., Erb M.L., Pogliano J., Stotland A., Wolkowicz R., Cutting A.S., Doran K.S., et al. Bacteriophage adhering to mucus provide a non–host-derived immunity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2013;110:10771–10776. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1305923110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Barr J.J., Auro R., Sam-Soon N., Kassegne S., Peters G., Bonilla N., Hatay M., Mourtada S., Bailey B., Youle M., et al. Subdiffusive motion of bacteriophage in mucosal surfaces increases the frequency of bacterial encounters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2015;112:13675–13680. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1508355112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barr J.J., Youle M., Rohwer F. Innate and acquired bacteriophage-mediated immunity. Bacteriophage. 2013;3:e25857. doi: 10.4161/bact.25857. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Belkaid Y., Hand T.W. Role of the microbiota in immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157:121–141. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Benler S., Yutin N., Antipov D., Rayko M., Shmakov S., Gussow A.B., Pevzner P., Koonin E.V. Thousands of previously unknown phages discovered in whole-community human gut metagenomes. Microbiome. 2021;9:78. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01017-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bichet M.C., Chin W.H., Richards W., Lin Y.-W., Avellaneda-Franco L., Hernandez C.A., Oddo A., Chernyavskiy O., Hilsenstein V., Neild A., et al. Bacteriophage uptake by mammalian cell layers represents A potential sink that may impact phage therapy. iScience. 2021;24:102287. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2021.102287. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Boling L., Cuevas D.A., Grasis J.A., Kang H.S., Knowles B., Levi K., Maughan H., Mcnair K., Rojas M.I., Sanchez S.E., et al. Dietary prophage inducers and antimicrobials: toward landscaping the human gut microbiome. Gut Microb. 2020;11:721–734. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2019.1701353. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bondy-Denomy J., Pawluk A., Maxwell K.L., Davidson A.R. Bacteriophage genes that inactivate the crispr/cas bacterial immune system. Nature. 2013;493:429–432. doi: 10.1038/nature11723. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bondy-Denomy J., Qian J., Westra E.R., Buckling A., Guttman D.S., Davidson A.R., Maxwell K.L. Prophages mediate defense against phage infection through diverse mechanisms. ISME J. 2016;10:2854–2866. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.79. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Breitbart M., Bonnain C., Malki K., Sawaya N.A. Phage puppet masters of the marine microbial realm. Nat. Microbiol. 2018;3:754–766. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0166-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Broecker F., Klumpp J., Schuppler M., Russo G., Biedermann L., Hombach M., Rogler G., Moelling K. Long-term changes of bacterial and viral compositions in the intestine of a recovered Clostridium difficile patient After fecal microbiota transplantation. Cold Spring Harb. Mol. Case Stud. 2016;2:A000448. doi: 10.1101/mcs.a000448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown E.M., Arellano-Santoyo H., Temple E.R., Costliow Z.A., Pichaud M., Hall A.B., Liu K., Durney M.A., Gu X., Plichta D.R., et al. Gut microbiome adp-ribosyltransferases are widespread phage-encoded fitness factors. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:1351–1365.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.07.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brunse A., Deng L., Pan X., Hui Y., Castro-Mejía J.L., Kot W., Nguyen D.N., Secher J.B.-M., Nielsen D.S., Thymann T. Fecal filtrate transplantation protects against necrotizing enterocolitis. ISME J. 2022;16:686–694. doi: 10.1038/s41396-021-01107-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brüssow H., Hendrix R.W. Phage genomics: small is beautiful. Cell. 2002;108:13–16. doi: 10.1016/s0092-8674(01)00637-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bull J.J., Vegge C.S., Schmerer M., Chaudhry W.N., Levin B.R. Phenotypic resistance and the dynamics of bacterial escape from phage control. PLoS One. 2014;9:e94690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0094690. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Camarillo-Guerrero L.F., Almeida A., Rangel-Pineros G., Finn R.D., Lawley T.D. Massive expansion of human gut bacteriophage diversity. Cell. 2021;184:1098–1109.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.01.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Chan B.K., Sistrom M., Wertz J.E., Kortright K.E., Narayan D., Turner P.E. Phage selection restores antibiotic sensitivity in mdr Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:26717. doi: 10.1038/srep26717. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Chatterjee A., Willett J.L.E., Dunny G.M., Duerkop B.A. Phage infection and sub-lethal antibiotic exposure mediate Enterococcus faecalis type vii secretion system dependent inhibition of bystander bacteria. PLoS Genet. 2021;17:E1009204. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chehoud C., Dryga A., Hwang Y., Nagy-Szakal D., Hollister E.B., Luna R.A., Versalovic J., Kellermayer R., Bushman F.D., Fraser C.M., et al. Transfer of viral communities between human individuals during fecal microbiota transplantation. mBio. 2016;7:e00322–e00326. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00322-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Citorik R.J., Mimee M., Lu T.K. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered rna-guided nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014;32:1141–1145. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Clemente J.C., Manasson J., Scher J.U. The role of the gut microbiome in systemic inflammatory disease. BMJ. 2018;360:J5145. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j5145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Clooney A.G., Sutton T.D.S., Shkoporov A.N., Holohan R.K., Daly K.M., O'regan O., Ryan F.J., Draper L.A., Plevy S.E., Ross R.P., Hill C. Whole-virome analysis sheds light on viral dark matter in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:764–778.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.10.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Cornuault J.K., Petit M.-A., Mariadassou M., Benevides L., Moncaut E., Langella P., Sokol H., De Paepe M. Phages infecting Faecalibacterium prausnitzii belong to novel viral genera that help to decipher intestinal viromes. Microbiome. 2018;6:65. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0452-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Coyte K.Z., Rakoff-Nahoum S. Understanding competition and cooperation within the mammalian gut microbiome. Curr. Biol. 2019;29:R538–R544. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.04.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Cryan J.F., O'riordan K.J., Sandhu K., Peterson V., Dinan T.G. The gut microbiome in neurological disorders. Lancet Neurol. 2020;19:179–194. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30356-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Davar D., Dzutsev A.K., Mcculloch J.A., Rodrigues R.R., Chauvin J.M., Morrison R.M., Deblasio R.N., Menna C., Ding Q., Pagliano O., et al. Fecal microbiota transplant overcomes resistance to anti-Pd-1 therapy in melanoma patients. Science. 2021;371:595–602. doi: 10.1126/science.abf3363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Davies J., Davies D. Origins and evolution of antibiotic resistance. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2010;74:417–433. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00016-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. De Jonge P.A., Von Meijenfeldt F.A.B., Van Rooijen L.E., Brouns S.J.J., Dutilh B.E. Evolution of bacon domain tandem repeats in crassphage and novel gut bacteriophage lineages. Viruses. 2019;11:1085. doi: 10.3390/v11121085. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. De Sordi L., Khanna V., Debarbieux L. The gut microbiota facilitates drifts in the genetic diversity and infectivity of bacterial viruses. Cell Host Microbe. 2017;22:801–808.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2017.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Debroas D., Siguret C. Viruses as key reservoirs of antibiotic resistance genes in the environment. ISME J. 2019;13:2856–2867. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0478-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Den Besten G., Van Eunen K., Groen A.K., Venema K., Reijngoud D.J., Bakker B.M. The role of short-chain fatty acids in the interplay between diet, gut microbiota, and host energy metabolism. J. Lipid Res. 2013;54:2325–2340. doi: 10.1194/jlr.R036012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dickey S.W., Cheung G.Y.C., Otto M. Different drugs for bad bugs: antivirulence strategies in the age of antibiotic resistance. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2017;16:457–471. doi: 10.1038/nrd.2017.23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dragoš A., Andersen A.J.C., Lozano-Andrade C.N., Kempen P.J., Kovács Á.T., Strube M.L. Phages carry interbacterial weapons encoded by biosynthetic gene clusters. Curr. Biol. 2021;31:3479–3489.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.046. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Draper L.A., Ryan F.J., Dalmasso M., Casey P.G., Mccann A., Velayudhan V., Ross R.P., Hill C. Autochthonous faecal viral transfer (Fvt) impacts the murine microbiome after antibiotic perturbation. BMC Biol. 2020;18:173. doi: 10.1186/s12915-020-00906-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Duan Y., Llorente C., Lang S., Brandl K., Chu H., Jiang L., White R.C., Clarke T.H., Nguyen K., Torralba M., et al. Bacteriophage targeting of gut bacterium attenuates alcoholic liver disease. Nature. 2019;575:505–511. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1742-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Ducarmon Q.R., Zwittink R.D., Hornung B.V.H., Schaik W.V., Young V.B., Kuijper E.J. Gut microbiota and colonization resistance against bacterial enteric infection. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2019;83:E00007–E00019. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00007-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Duerkop B.A., Clements C.V., Rollins D., Rodrigues J.L.M., Hooper L.V. A composite bacteriophage alters colonization by an intestinal commensal bacterium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2012;109:17621–17626. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1206136109. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Duerkop B.A., Hooper L.V. Resident viruses and their interactions with the immune system. Nat. Immunol. 2013;14:654–659. doi: 10.1038/ni.2614. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Dutilh B.E., Cassman N., Mcnair K., Sanchez S.E., Silva G.G.Z., Boling L., Barr J.J., Speth D.R., Seguritan V., Aziz R.K., et al. A highly abundant bacteriophage discovered in the unknown sequences of human faecal metagenomes. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:4498. doi: 10.1038/ncomms5498. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Džunková M., Low S.J., Daly J.N., Deng L., Rinke C., Hugenholtz P. Defining the human gut host–phage network through single-cell viral tagging. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:2192–2203. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0526-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Edgar R., Friedman N., Molshanski-Mor S., Qimron U. Reversing bacterial resistance to antibiotics by phage-mediated delivery of dominant sensitive genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2012;78:744–751. doi: 10.1128/AEM.05741-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Edwards R.A., Vega A.A., Norman H.M., Ohaeri M., Levi K., Dinsdale E.A., Cinek O., Aziz R.K., Mcnair K., Barr J.J., et al. Global phylogeography and ancient evolution of the widespread human gut virus crassphage. Nat. Microbiol. 2019;4:1727–1736. doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0494-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Enault F., Briet A., Bouteille L., Roux S., Sullivan M.B., Petit M.-A. Phages rarely encode antibiotic resistance genes: a cautionary tale for virome analyses. ISME J. 2017;11:237–247. doi: 10.1038/ismej.2016.90. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Fan Y., Pedersen O. Gut microbiota in human metabolic health and disease. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2021;19:55–71. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-0433-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Fazzino L., Anisman J., Chacón J.M., Heineman R.H., Harcombe W.R. Lytic bacteriophage have diverse indirect effects in A synthetic cross-feeding community. ISME J. 2020;14:123–134. doi: 10.1038/s41396-019-0511-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Febvre H.P., Rao S., Gindin M., Goodwin N.D.M., Finer E., Vivanco J.S., Lu S., Manter D.K., Wallace T.C., Weir T.L. Phage study: effects of supplemental bacteriophage intake on inflammation and gut microbiota in healthy adults. Nutrients. 2019;11:666. doi: 10.3390/nu11030666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Fluckiger A., Daillère R., Sassi M., Sixt B.S., Liu P., Loos F., Richard C., Rabu C., Alou M.T., Goubet A.-G., et al. Cross-reactivity between tumor mhc class I-restricted antigens and an enterococcal bacteriophage. Science. 2020;369:936–942. doi: 10.1126/science.aax0701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Fraser J.S., Yu Z., Maxwell K.L., Davidson A.R. Ig-like domains on bacteriophages: a tale of promiscuity and deceit. J. Mol. Biol. 2006;359:496–507. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2006.03.043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Frazao N., Sousa A., Lassig M., Gordo I. Horizontal gene transfer overrides mutation in Escherichia coli colonizing the mammalian gut. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2019;116:17906–17915. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906958116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Fujimoto K., Kimura Y., Allegretti J.R., Yamamoto M., Zhang Y.Z., Katayama K., Tremmel G., Kawaguchi Y., Shimohigoshi M., Hayashi T., et al. Functional restoration of bacteriomes and viromes by fecal microbiota transplantation. Gastroenterology. 2021;160:2089–2102.e12. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2021.02.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gensollen T., Iyer S.S., Kasper D.L., Blumberg R.S. How colonization by microbiota in early life shapes the immune system. Science. 2016;352:539–544. doi: 10.1126/science.aad9378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Gogokhia L., Buhrke K., Bell R., Hoffman B., Brown D.G., Hanke-Gogokhia C., Ajami N.J., Wong M.C., Ghazaryan A., Valentine J.F., et al. Expansion of bacteriophages is linked to aggravated intestinal inflammation and colitis. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:285–299.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Gogokhia L., Round J.L. Immune-bacteriophage interactions in inflammatory bowel diseases. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2021;49:30–35. doi: 10.1016/j.coviro.2021.04.010. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Gordon H., Harbord M. A patient with severe crohn's colitis responds to faecal microbiota transplantation. J. Crohns Colitis. 2014;8:256–257. doi: 10.1016/j.crohns.2013.10.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Górski A., Weber-Dabrowska B. The potential role of endogenous bacteriophages in controlling invading pathogens. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 2005;62:511. doi: 10.1007/s00018-004-4403-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Gregory A.C., Zablocki O., Zayed A.A., Howell A., Bolduc B., Sullivan M.B. The gut virome database reveals age-dependent patterns of virome diversity in the human gut. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:724–740.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.08.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Grubb D.S., Wrigley S.D., Freedman K.E., Wei Y., Vazquez A.R., Trotter R.E., Wallace T.C., Johnson S.A., Weir T.L. Phage-2 study: supplemental bacteriophages extend bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis Bl04 benefits on gut health and microbiota in healthy adults. Nutrients. 2020;12:2474. doi: 10.3390/nu12082474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Guerin E., Shkoporov A.N., Stockdale S.R., Comas J.C., Khokhlova E.V., Clooney A.G., Daly K.M., Draper L.A., Stephens N., Scholz D., et al. Isolation and characterisation of Φcrass002, A crass-like phage from the human gut that infects Bacteroides xylanisolvens. Microbiome. 2021;9:89. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01036-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Gurney J., Brown S.P., Kaltz O., Hochberg M.E. Steering phages to combat bacterial pathogens. Trends Microbiol. 2020;28:85–94. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2019.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Harcombe W.R., Bull J.J. Impact of phages on two-species bacterial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005;71:5254–5259. doi: 10.1128/AEM.71.9.5254-5259.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Hernández S.B., Cota I., Ducret A., Aussel L., Casadesús J. Adaptation and preadaptation of Salmonella enterica to bile. PLoS Genet. 2012;8:E1002459. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Houte S.V., Buckling A., Westra E.R. Evolutionary ecology of prokaryotic immune mechanisms. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2016;80:745–763. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00011-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Hoyles L., Mccartney A.L., Neve H., Gibson G.R., Sanderson J.D., Heller K.J., Van Sinderen D. Characterization of virus-like particles associated with the human faecal and caecal microbiota. Res. Microbiol. 2014;165:803–812. doi: 10.1016/j.resmic.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Hryckowian A.J., Merrill B.D., Porter N.T., Van Treuren W., Nelson E.J., Garlena R.A., Russell D.A., Martens E.C., Sonnenburg J.L. Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron-infecting bacteriophage isolates inform sequence-based host range predictions. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:371–379.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Hsu B.B., Gibson T.E., Yeliseyev V., Liu Q., Lyon L., Bry L., Silver P.A., Gerber G.K. Dynamic modulation of the gut microbiota and metabolome by bacteriophages in A mouse model. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:803–814.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Hsu B.B., Plant I.N., Lyon L., Anastassacos F.M., Way J.C., Silver P.A. In situ reprogramming of gut bacteria by oral delivery. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:5030. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-18614-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Hsu B.B., Way J.C., Silver P.A. Stable neutralization of A virulence factor in bacteria using temperate phage in the mammalian gut. mSystems. 2020;5:e00013–e00020. doi: 10.1128/mSystems.00013-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Jacob V., Crawford C., Cohen-Mekelburg S., Viladomiu M., Putzel G.G., Schneider Y., Chabouni F., Oʼneil S., Bosworth B., Woo V., et al. Single delivery of high-diversity fecal microbiota preparation by colonoscopy is safe and effective in increasing microbial diversity in active ulcerative colitis. Inflamm. Bowel Dis. 2017;23:903–911. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000001132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Jiang X., Hall A.B., Xavier R.J., Alm E. Comprehensive analysis of mobile genetic elements in the gut microbiome reveals phylum-level niche-adaptive gene pools. PLoS One. 2019 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223680. 214213. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Kaźmierczak Z., Majewska J., Miernikiewicz P., Międzybrodzki R., Nowak S., Harhala M., Lecion D., Kęska W., Owczarek B., Ciekot J., et al. Immune response to therapeutic staphylococcal bacteriophages in mammals: kinetics of induction, immunogenic structural proteins, natural and induced antibodies. Front. Immunol. 2021;12:639570. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.639570. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Khan Mirzaei M., Khan M.A.A., Ghosh P., Taranu Z.E., Taguer M., Ru J., Chowdhury R., Kabir M., Deng L., Mondal D., Maurice C.F. Bacteriophages isolated from stunted children can regulate gut bacterial communities in an age-specific manner. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;27:199–212.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Kim M.-S., Bae J.-W. Lysogeny is prevalent and widely distributed in the murine gut microbiota. ISME J. 2018;12:1127–1141. doi: 10.1038/s41396-018-0061-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lam K.N., Spanogiannopoulos P., Soto-Perez P., Alexander M., Nalley M.J., Bisanz J.E., Nayak R.R., Weakley A.M., Yu F.B., Turnbaugh P.J. Phage-delivered crispr-cas9 for strain-specific depletion and genomic deletions in the gut microbiome. Cell Rep. 2021;37:109930. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109930. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Leimbach A., Hacker J., Dobrindt U. E. Coli as an all-rounder: the thin line between commensalism and pathogenicity. Curr. Top Microbiol. Immunol. 2013;358:3–32. doi: 10.1007/82_2012_303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Lenneman B.R., Fernbach J., Loessner M.J., Lu T.K., Kilcher S. Enhancing phage therapy through synthetic biology and genome engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2021;68:151–159. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2020.11.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Ley R.E., Hamady M., Lozupone C., Turnbaugh P.J., Ramey R.R., Bircher J.S., Schlegel M.L., Tucker T.A., Schrenzel M.D., Knight R. Evolution of mammals and their gut microbes. Science. 2008;320:1647–1651. doi: 10.1126/science.1155725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Lim E.S., Zhou Y., Zhao G., Bauer I.K., Droit L., Ndao I.M., Warner B.B., Tarr P.I., Wang D., Holtz L.R. Early life dynamics of the human gut virome and bacterial microbiome in infants. Nat. Med. 2015;21:1228–1234. doi: 10.1038/nm.3950. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Lourenço M., Chaffringeon L., Lamy-Besnier Q., Pédron T., Campagne P., Eberl C., Bérard M., Stecher B., Debarbieux L., De Sordi L. The spatial heterogeneity of the gut limits predation and fosters coexistence of bacteria and bacteriophages. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:390–401.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Lu T.K., Collins J.J. Engineered bacteriophage targeting gene networks as adjuvants for antibiotic therapy. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2009;106:4629–4634. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0800442106. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Ma Y., You X., Mai G., Tokuyasu T., Liu C. A human gut phage catalog correlates the gut phageome with type 2 diabetes. Microbiome. 2018;6:24. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0410-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Majewska J., Beta W., Lecion D., Hodyra-Stefaniak K., Kłopot A., Kaźmierczak Z., Miernikiewicz P., Piotrowicz A., Ciekot J., Owczarek B., et al. Oral application of T4 phage induces weak antibody production in the gut and in the blood. Viruses. 2015;7:4783–4799. doi: 10.3390/v7082845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Majewska J., Kaźmierczak Z., Lahutta K., Lecion D., Szymczak A., Miernikiewicz P., Drapała J., Harhala M., Marek-Bukowiec K., Jędruchniewicz N., et al. Induction of phage-specific antibodies by two therapeutic staphylococcal bacteriophages administered per Os. Front. Immunol. 2019;10:2607. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.02607. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Mangalea M.R., Paez-Espino D., Kieft K., Chatterjee A., Chriswell M.E., Seifert J.A., Feser M.L., Demoruelle M.K., Sakatos A., Anantharaman K., et al. Individuals at risk for rheumatoid arthritis harbor differential intestinal bacteriophage communities with distinct metabolic potential. Cell Host Microbe. 2021;29:726–739.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Manrique P., Bolduc B., Walk S.T., Van Der Oost J., De Vos W.M., Young M.J. Healthy human gut phageome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2016;113:10400–10405. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1601060113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Maslov S., Sneppen K. Population cycles and species diversity in dynamic kill-the-winner model of microbial ecosystems. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:39642. doi: 10.1038/srep39642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Meyer J.R., Dobias D.T., Weitz J.S., Barrick J.E., Quick R.T., Lenski R.E. Repeatability and contingency in the evolution of a key innovation in phage lambda. Science. 2012;335:428–432. doi: 10.1126/science.1214449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Mills S., Shanahan F., Stanton C., Hill C., Coffey A., Ross R.P. Movers and shakers: influence of bacteriophages in shaping the mammalian gut microbiota. Gut Microb. 2013;4:4–16. doi: 10.4161/gmic.22371. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Minot S., Sinha R., Chen J., Li H., Keilbaugh S.A., Wu G.D., Lewis J.D., Bushman F.D. The human gut virome: inter-individual variation and dynamic response to diet. Genome Res. 2011;21:1616–1625. doi: 10.1101/gr.122705.111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Modi S.R., Lee H.H., Spina C.S., Collins J.J. Antibiotic treatment expands the resistance reservoir and ecological network of the phage metagenome. Nature. 2013;499:219–222. doi: 10.1038/nature12212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Nedialkova L.P., Sidstedt M., Koeppel M.B., Spriewald S., Ring D., Gerlach R.G., Bossi L., Stecher B. Temperate phages promote colicin-dependent fitness of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;18:1591–1603. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.13077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Neil K., Allard N., Grenier F., Burrus V., Rodrigue S. Highly efficient gene transfer in the mouse gut microbiota is enabled by the Incl2 conjugative plasmid Tp114. Commun. Biol. 2020;3:523. doi: 10.1038/s42003-020-01253-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Nguyen S., Baker K., Padman B.S., Patwa R., Dunstan R.A., Weston T.A., Schlosser K., Bailey B., Lithgow T., Lazarou M., et al. Bacteriophage transcytosis provides a mechanism to cross epithelial cell layers. mBio. 2017;8:E01874–E01917. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01874-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Nishio J., Negishi H., Yasui-Kato M., Miki S., Miyanaga K., Aoki K., Mizusawa T., Ueno M., Ainai A., Muratani M., et al. Identification and characterization of a novel Enterococcus bacteriophage with potential to ameliorate murine colitis. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:20231. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99602-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Norman J.M., Handley S.A., Baldridge M.T., Droit L., Liu C.Y., Keller B.C., Kambal A., Monaco C.L., Zhao G., Fleshner P., et al. Disease-specific alterations in the enteric virome in inflammatory bowel disease. Cell. 2015;160:447–460. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Oh J.H., Alexander L.M., Pan M., Schueler K.L., Keller M.P., Attie A.D., Walter J., Van Pijkeren J.P. Dietary fructose and microbiota-derived short-chain fatty acids promote bacteriophage production in the gut symbiont lactobacillus reuteri. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:273–284.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2018.11.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Ott S.J., Waetzig G.H., Rehman A., Moltzau-Anderson J., Bharti R., Grasis J.A., Cassidy L., Tholey A., Fickenscher H., Seegert D. Efficacy of sterile fecal filtrate transfer for treating patients with Clostridium difficile infection. Gastroenterology. 2017;152:799–811.e7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2016.11.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Panchal P., Budree S., Scheeler A., Medina G., Seng M., Wong W.F., Eliott R., Mitchell T., Kassam Z., Allegretti J.R., Osman M. Scaling safe access to fecal microbiota transplantation: past, present, and future. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2018;20:14. doi: 10.1007/s11894-018-0619-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Qi X., Yun C., Sun L., Xia J., Wu Q., Wang Y., Wang L., Zhang Y., Liang X., Wang L., et al. Gut microbiota–bile acid–interleukin-22 Axis orchestrates polycystic ovary syndrome. Nat. Med. 2019;25:1225–1233. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0509-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Qin J., Li R., Raes J., Arumugam M., Burgdorf K.S., Manichanh C., Nielsen T., Pons N., Levenez F., Yamada T., et al. A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing. Nature. 2010;464:59–65. doi: 10.1038/nature08821. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Quirós P., Colomer-Lluch M., Martínez-Castillo A., Miró E., Argente M., Jofre J., Navarro F., Muniesa M. Antibiotic resistance genes in the bacteriophage dna fraction of human fecal samples. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2014;58:606–609. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01684-13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Rasmussen T.S., Mentzel C.M.J., Kot W., Castro-Mejía J.L., Zuffa S., Swann J.R., Hansen L.H., Vogensen F.K., Hansen A.K., Nielsen D.S. Faecal virome transplantation decreases symptoms of type 2 diabetes and obesity in a murine model. Gut. 2020;69:2122–2130. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-320005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Reyes A., Blanton L.V., Cao S., Zhao G., Manary M., Trehan I., Smith M.I., Wang D., Virgin H.W., Rohwer F., Gordon J.I. Gut dNA viromes of Malawian twins discordant for severe acute malnutrition. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2015;112:11941–11946. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1514285112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Ronda C., Chen S.P., Cabral V., Yaung S.J., Wang H.H. Metagenomic engineering of the mammalian gut microbiome in situ. Nat. Methods. 2019;16:167–170. doi: 10.1038/s41592-018-0301-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Roux S., Hallam S.J., Woyke T., Sullivan M.B. Viral dark matter and virus–host interactions resolved from publicly available microbial genomes. Elife. 2015;4:e08490. doi: 10.7554/eLife.08490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Sassone-Corsi M., Raffatellu M. No vacancy: how beneficial microbes cooperate with immunity to provide colonization resistance to pathogens. J. Immunol. 2015;194:4081–4087. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1403169. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Sausset R., Petit M.A., Gaboriau-Routhiau V., De Paepe M. New insights into intestinal phages. Mucosal Immunol. 2020;13:205–215. doi: 10.1038/s41385-019-0250-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Schmidt T.S.B., Raes J., Bork P. The human gut microbiome: from association to modulation. Cell. 2018;172:1198–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2018.02.044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Sender R., Fuchs S., Milo R. Revised estimates for the number of human and bacteria cells in the body. PLoS Biol. 2016;14:E1002533. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002533. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Shah S.A., Deng L., Thorsen J., Pedersen A.G., Dion M.B., Castro-Mejía J.L., Silins R., Romme F.O., Sausset R., Ndela E.O., et al. Hundreds of viral families in the healthy infant gut. Biorxiv. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41564-023-01345-7. Preprint at. 2021.07.02.450849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Shkoporov A.N., Clooney A.G., Sutton T.D.S., Ryan F.J., Daly K.M., Nolan J.A., Mcdonnell S.A., Khokhlova E.V., Draper L.A., Forde A., et al. The human gut virome is highly diverse, stable, and individual specific. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;26:527–541.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Shkoporov A.N., Hill C. Bacteriophages of the human gut: the “known unknown” of the microbiome. Cell Host Microbe. 2019;25:195–209. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2019.01.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Shkoporov A.N., Khokhlova E.V., Fitzgerald C.B., Stockdale S.R., Draper L.A., Ross R.P., Hill C. Φcrass001 represents the most abundant bacteriophage family in the human gut and infects Bacteroides intestinalis. Nat. Commun. 2018;9:4781. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07225-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Silveira C.B., Rohwer F.L. Piggyback-the-winner in host-associated microbial communities. NPJ Biofilms Microbiomes. 2016;2:16010. doi: 10.1038/npjbiofilms.2016.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Summers W.C. The strange history of phage therapy. Bacteriophage. 2012;2:130–133. doi: 10.4161/bact.20757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Sutcliffe S.G., Shamash M., Hynes A.P., Maurice C.F. Common oral medications lead to prophage induction in bacterial isolates from the human gut. Viruses. 2021;13:455. doi: 10.3390/v13030455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Suttle C.A. Viruses in the sea. Nature. 2005;437:356–361. doi: 10.1038/nature04160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Sweere Johanna M., Van Belleghem Jonas D., Ishak H., Bach Michelle S., Popescu M., Sunkari V., Kaber G., Manasherob R., Suh Gina A., Cao X., et al. Bacteriophage trigger antiviral immunity and prevent clearance of bacterial infection. Science. 2019;363:Eaat9691. doi: 10.1126/science.aat9691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Tetz G., Brown S.M., Hao Y., Tetz V. Parkinson’s disease and bacteriophages as its overlooked contributors. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-29173-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Tetz G., Brown S.M., Hao Y., Tetz V. Type 1 diabetes: an association between autoimmunity, the dynamics of gut amyloid-producing E. Coli and their phages. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:1–11. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46087-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Tetz G., Tetz V. Bacteriophage infections of microbiota can lead to leaky gut in an experimental rodent model. Gut Pathog. 2016;8:33. doi: 10.1186/s13099-016-0109-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Tetz G., Tetz V. Bacteriophages as new human viral pathogens. Microorganisms. 2018;6:54. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms6020054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Thingstad T.F. Elements of A theory for the mechanisms controlling abundance, diversity, and biogeochemical role of lytic bacterial viruses in aquatic systems. Limnol. Oceanogr. 2000;45:1320–1328. [Google Scholar]
  127. Thursby E., Juge N. Introduction to the human gut microbiota. Biochem. J. 2017;474:1823–1836. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160510. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Tian H., Ge X., Nie Y., Yang L., Ding C., Mcfarland L.V., Zhang X., Chen Q., Gong J., Li N. Fecal microbiota transplantation in patients with slow-transit constipation: a randomized, clinical trial. PLoS One. 2017;12:E0171308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Turnbaugh P.J., Ley R.E., Hamady M., Fraser-Liggett C.M., Knight R., Gordon J.I. The human microbiome project. Nature. 2007;449:804–810. doi: 10.1038/nature06244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Twort F.W. An investigation on the nature of the ultra-microscopic viruses. Lancet. 1915;186:1241–1243. [Google Scholar]
  131. Vaga S., Lee S., Ji B., Andreasson A., Talley N.J., Agréus L., Bidkhori G., Kovatcheva-Datchary P., Park J., Lee D. Compositional and functional differences of the mucosal microbiota along the intestine of healthy individuals. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-71939-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Van Lier Y.F., Davids M., Haverkate N.J.E., De Groot P.F., Donker M.L., Meijer E., Heubel-Moenen F., Nur E., Zeerleder S.S., Nieuwdorp M., et al. Donor fecal microbiota transplantation ameliorates intestinal graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. Sci. Transl. Med. 2020;12:eaaz8926. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aaz8926. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Van Nood E., Vrieze A., Nieuwdorp M., Fuentes S., Zoetendal E.G., De Vos W.M., Visser C.E., Kuijper E.J., Bartelsman J.F., Tijssen J.G., et al. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;368:407–415. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1205037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Vujkovic-Cvijin I., Sklar J., Jiang L., Natarajan L., Knight R., Belkaid Y. Host variables confound gut microbiota studies of human disease. Nature. 2020;587:448–454. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2881-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Wang H., Yang F., Zhang S., Xin R., Sun Y. Genetic and environmental factors in alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases and promising therapeutic intervention via fecal microbiota transplantation. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. 2021;7:70. doi: 10.1038/s41531-021-00213-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Wang X., Kim Y., Ma Q., Hong S.H., Pokusaeva K., Sturino J.M., Wood T.K. Cryptic prophages help bacteria cope with adverse environments. Nat. Commun. 2010;1:1–9. doi: 10.1038/ncomms1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  137. Weitz J.S. Princeton University Press; 2016. Quantitative Viral Ecology: Dynamics of Viruses and Their Microbial Hosts. [Google Scholar]
  138. Yosef I., Manor M., Kiro R., Qimron U. Temperate and lytic bacteriophages programmed to sensitize and kill antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A. 2015;112:7267–7272. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1500107112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  139. Zhang F., Zuo T., Yeoh Y.K., Cheng F.W.T., Liu Q., Tang W., Cheung K.C.Y., Yang K., Cheung C.P., Mo C.C., et al. Longitudinal dynamics of gut bacteriome, mycobiome and virome after fecal microbiota transplantation in graft-versus-host disease. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:65. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20240-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  140. Zhang T., Breitbart M., Lee W.H., Run J.Q., Wei C.L., Soh S.W., Hibberd M.L., Liu E.T., Rohwer F., Ruan Y. Rna viral community in human feces: prevalence of plant pathogenic viruses. PLoS Biol. 2006;4:E3. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  141. Zhang X., Mcdaniel A.D., Wolf L.E., Keusch G.T., Waldor M.K., Acheson D.W. Quinolone antibiotics induce Shiga toxin-encoding bacteriophages, toxin production, and death in mice. J. Infect. Dis. 2000;181:664–670. doi: 10.1086/315239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  142. Zuo T., Ng S.C. The gut microbiota in the pathogenesis and therapeutics of inflammatory bowel disease. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:2247. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.02247. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  143. Zuo T., Wong S.H., Lam K., Lui R., Cheung K., Tang W., Ching J.Y.L., Chan P.K.S., Chan M.C.W., Wu J.C.Y., et al. Bacteriophage transfer during faecal microbiota transplantation in Clostridium difficile infection is associated with treatment outcome. Gut. 2018;67:634–643. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-313952. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from iScience are provided here courtesy of Elsevier

RESOURCES