Abstract
Extensive work have been done to harvest untapped water energy in formats of raindrops, flows, waves, and others. However, attaining stable and efficient electricity generation from these low-frequency water kinetic energies at both individual device and large-scale system level remains challenging, partially owing to the difficulty in designing a unit that possesses stable liquid and charge transfer properties, and also can be seamlessly integrated to achieve preferential collective performances without the introduction of tortuous wiring and redundant node connection with external circuit. Here, we report the design of water electricity generators featuring the combination of lubricant layer and transistor-like electrode architecture that endows enhanced electrical performances in different working environments. Such a design is scalable in manufacturing and suitable for facile integration, characterized by significant reduction in the numbers of wiring and nodes and elimination of complex interfacing problems, and represents a significant step toward large-scale, real-life applications.
Graphical abstract
Public summary
-
•
A lubricant-armored transistor-like electricity generator is proposed
-
•
The transistor-like electrode architecture causes high electrical output
-
•
The lubricant armor ensures stable performance in extreme environments
-
•
The design is scalable in manufacturing and suitable for facile integration
Introduction
Rapid industrialization over the past decades called for new techniques to facilitate the transition from carbon-intensive fossil fuel-based energy to green, low-carbon, and renewable energy for global carbon neutrality.1 Owing to abundance, diversity, and availability, water energy is one of the most promising green energy sources on Earth. Although the kinetic energy of water can be converted into electricity through efficient hydropower technology, a large amount of water energy in the form of raindrops, tides, and even moisture remains underused.2, 3, 4 Their intrinsic limitations, including low frequency, sparse distribution, and variable formats impose great challenges on the efficiency, scalability, and stability of water-energy harvesting technologies.
A wide variety of new strategies based on electrokinetic,5, 6, 7, 8 osmotic,9, 10, 11 triboelectric,12, 13, 14 electromagnetic,15, 16, 17 and piezoelectric effects18,19 have been developed to harvest untapped water energies. In these methods, a close interplay between water and underlying interfacial materials is favored to facilitate both the mass and charge transfer. Liquid wicking in the case of electrokinetic or osmotic devices and easy liquid detachment in the case of triboelectric or piezoelectric devices can be achieved by tailoring surface wettability.20,21 For example, droplet-based electricity generators (DE-Gs) decorated with hydrophobic or superhydrophobic surfaces demonstrate excellent dynamic water repellency and hold promise for stable and efficient energy harvesting from high-frequency water droplet effects.22, 23, 24, 25, 26
In spite of extensive efforts, the attainment of stable and efficient electricity generation at both individual device and large-scale systems levels is still difficult. First, from an individual device perspective, conventional water energy-harvesting devices are limited by low energy conversion efficiency and relatively poor durability of non-wetting surfaces in aqueous environments, especially in extreme environments (e.g., high humidity, freezing temperatures, marine environment).22,27, 28, 29, 30, 31 Moreover, non-wetting surfaces are deposited with a large amount of surface charge to facilitate electricity generation and thereby absorb the counterions in water due to electrostatic attraction. The adsorbed counterions exhibit an unfavorable screening effect on the surface charges, leading to the deteriorated electrical performance of water energy-harvesting devices.32, 33, 34 Although these challenges can be solved by the choice of lubricant layer to achieve durable interfacial materials (e.g., the slippery lubricant-infused porous surface [SLIPS]), it is limited by relatively weak electrical performance.35,36
Second, scaled-up integration of individual water energy-harvesting devices into systems exhibiting both excellent scalability and stability remains challenging, unlike solar energy harvesting, which can be achieved through designing integrated photovoltaic arrays. The difficulty in large-scale integration lies in designing a water energy-harvesting unit that possesses ideal liquid and charge transfer properties, and can be seamlessly integrated to achieve preferential collective performances without sacrificing the advantages inherent in individual devices. In particular, an individual device in conventional design is based on the use of separated electrode architecture characterized by the placement of two electrodes on the top and bottom of the dielectric material, which is greatly limited by the interfacing problem (convoluted wiring and redundant nodes).37, 38, 39 For example, for a system consisting of 5 × 5 units, a total of at least 50 wires and 50 nodes are required for unit interconnection.
Here, we propose the design of a lubricant-armored transistor-like electricity generator (LA-TEG) that imparts an enhanced electrical output in a wide spectrum of harsh environments, ranging from high salinity to caustic acid-base, from low humidity to high humidity, and from low temperature to room temperature. Moreover, leveraging the conventional printed circuit board (PCB) technology, such a design reduces the number of output interfacing nodes and eliminates the complicated wire bridging, which is favorable for large-scale integration. Just like the invention of electronic transistors revolutionizing modern society, the development of the LA-TEG and its integration may provide a generic solution to large-scale and stable water energy harvesting, especially in diverse harsh environments.
Results and discussion
Design of the LA-TEG
The LA-TEG is designed to consist of a SLIPS layer, top electrode, bottom electrode, and connection circuit (Figures 1A and 1B). As shown in Figure S1, the SLIPS layer is engineered by infusing a lubricant within a superhydrophobic polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) membrane to transform the solid membrane into a slippery and transparent film (Figure S2 and see experimental procedures in Supplemental information), which preserves both antiwetting and easy liquid detachment.40,41 We also delicately regulate the thickness and the viscosity of the SLIPS to achieve excellent electrical performance of LA-TEG (see Note S1 in Supplemental information). In spite of the presence of SLIPS that spatially separates the bottom electrode from the top electrode, a closed-loop circuit can be achieved for effective charge transfer and enhanced electrical output when impinging droplets bridge two electrodes.22,42 Analogous to the electronic transistors in which the current flows from the source terminal to the drain terminal by applying voltage on the gate terminal, the impacting droplet gates the effective charge transfer between the top electrode and bottom electrode. Thus, the bottom electrode/SLIPS, the top electrode, and the water can be treated as the source, drain, and gate and called the transistor-like electrode structure, although the working principles are different.43,44
We chose to construct the transistor-like electrode structure and connection circuit on a PCB substrate with the aim of achieving large-scale water energy harvesting. Briefly, both the top electrode and bottom electrode are designed at the top surface of the PCB, whereas the connection circuit is constructed on the bottom surface of the PCB. Holes across the PCB are also created to fill with wires to connect two electrodes with the connection circuit (Figures 1C and 1D). Notably, the utility of the built-in connection circuit on PCB effectively mitigates the wiring problem and facilitates the integration of multiple LA-TEG units for a large-scale water energy harvester featuring variable units, fewer nodes, and built-in wiring. For example, a 3 × 3 LA-TEG array demands 2 nodes and does not need additional complicated line connections among each unit (Figure 1E). In striking contrast, for a 3 × 3 array based on conventional electrode architecture, at least 18 nodes and 18 wires are required for parallel connection with each unit (Figure 1F). Further increases in the number of units will pose severe burdens in the arrangement of nodes and wires, leading to the serious cost issue and posing a great threat to the electrical isolation of the entire system, especially in long-term contact with water.
Boosted electrical performance of LA-TEG
We measured the electrical output from LA-TEG featuring a transistor-like architecture, under the impingement of tap water of 50 μL. Briefly, under a Weber number of 80, defined as the ratio of the droplet’s kinetic energy to its surface energy, a tap water droplet impinging on a single LA-TEG unit generates a peak voltage of 65 V, a current of 200 μA, and a transfer charge of 6 nC, respectively, all of which are several orders higher than those of the SLIPS-based triboelectric nanogenerator (SLIPS-TENG) (Figures 2A–2D and S3).35,36,45, 46, 47 Such a boost in electrical performance stems from the transistor-like structure that induces an effective charge transfer (see Note S2 on the detailed circuit model analysis in Supplemental information). Before the impinging droplet contacts the top electrode, the bottom electrode possesses the same amount of electrostatically induced countercharges as that on the upper surface of SLIPS, which naturally builds a higher potential on the bottom electrode relative to the upper surface of SLIPS. In this condition, the bottom electrode and the upper surface of SLIPS serve as the bottom plate and top plate of a capacitor, respectively, constituting a capacitor CS. When the spreading droplet connects the top electrode with SLIPS, the bottom plate (bottom electrode) and top plate (SLIPS) of the CS are connected into a closed circuit, leading to the flow of countercharges from the bottom electrode to the top electrode. Subsequently, the droplet slides downhill and detaches from the top electrode, the circuit becomes open, and the charges flow back to the bottom electrode, ready for the electricity generation from the next falling droplet (Figure S4).
To convince the working mechanism of the transistor-like electrode structure, we further investigated the thickness of the SLIPS layer on the electrical performance of a single LA-TEG. The thickness of the SLIPS layer is responsible for the capacitance of CS and thereby affects the output voltage of the LA-TEG according to the equation derived in our circuit model (see Note S2):
(Equation 1) |
where Qs, є, and S represent the stored charges, dielectric constant, and the surface area of the capacitor CS, respectively, and d is the thickness of SLIPS layer. We find that the output voltage increases from 65 to 100 V with the increased thickness from 26 to 46 μm (Figures 2E and S5A), which is consistent with Equation (1). However, the output voltage reduces with the further increase in the thickness to 66 μm due to the reduction of the Qs with the increased thickness of the SLIPS layer, suggesting an optimal thickness of 46 μm for the electrical performance of LA-TEG (Figure S5B).
In addition to the tap water, we substantiate that the performance improvement of LA-TEG is generic to water with various salt concentrations. Theoretically, a higher salt concentration leads to a lower electrical resistance of water and hence the internal resistance of the device.42,48 With the thickness of SLIPS layer at 46 μm, we find that the output current increases to 1.5 mA, while the output voltage decreases to 20 V, with the increase in salt concentration from 10−7 to 0.6 M (Figures 2F and S6A), suggesting the mutually exclusive effect of the internal resistance on the output current and voltage. As a result, an optimized instantaneous power density of 118 Wm−2 can be obtained using a moderate salt concentration of 0.1 M rather than a higher one (Figures 2G and S6B). Such a trend is also applicable to LA-TEG, with the SLIPS thickness of 26 μm indicating the decoupling of the influence of the salt concentration of water and thickness of the SLIPS layer on the electrical performance (Figures 2H, S6C, and S6D).
Understanding the effects of the salt concentrations of water and the thickness of SLIPS enables us to achieve an optimal electrical performance of LA-TEG, such as an output voltage of 100 V, an output current of 1.5 mA, the instantaneous power density of 118 Wm−2, an average power of 0.695 mW for 1 water droplet, and an energy conversion efficiency of 0.4%. Such performances are higher than those from the previous studies involving the use of SLIPS (Figures 2I and S7). Very excitingly, although our previous work has shown that the salt water would cause an unfavored decay in the output voltage of devices,22 we successfully demonstrated that the influence of the salt concentrations and the thickness of the SLIPS layer on performance can be decoupled and that carefully controlling the salt concentration and thickness can achieve higher electrical performance.
Enhanced performance stability of LA-TEG in extreme environments
The significant enhancement in the electricity generation of LA-TEG is also simultaneously achieved with enhanced stability, especially under extreme conditions, including low temperature, high humidity, and seawater. To simplify the fabrication process for the stability test, we chose LA-TEG consisting of the SLIPS layer, indium tin oxide (ITO) conductive glass, and the aluminum electrode since the electrical performance is not sensitive to the electrode materials used (Figures S8 and S9). At a freezing temperature, LA-TEG can sustain a stable output voltage beyond 50 V, 5 times higher than that of the control sample at −2°C (Figure 3A), due to the preferable anti-icing property of SLIPS than bare superhydrophobic PTFE membrane (Figure S10).49 At high relative humidity, LA-TEG can also maintain a stable electrical output because the presence of infused lubricant timely sheds the humidity-induced condensates and prevents the formation of water film on the surface (Figures 3B and S11).50,51 On the contrary, the control sample suffers from the rapid decay in electrical output due to the formation of a water film (Figure S12). For seawater with a high salt concentration (normal = 3.5 wt %), the voltage and current signals of LA-TEG are measured to be ∼65 V and 200 μA even after 30 days of immersion, which are close to the initial electrical performance of the device (Figures 3C and S13). This result demonstrates the enhanced electrical performance stability of LA-TEG in seawater as a result of the presence of the SLIPS protection layer (Figure S14).
To illustrate the fundamental mechanisms responsible for the enhanced stability in environments of high salinity such as seawater, we examined the ion adsorption on the lubricant layer of LA-TEG. As shown in Figure S15, the lubricant layer, featuring intrinsic fluidity as well as chemical inertness, acts as a natural barrier to prevent the lodging of Na+ ions attracted by the negative surface charges on PTFE, thereby ensuring the stable electrical performance of LA-TEG.34 We further simulated ion absorption processes of LA-TEG in NaCl solution based on the molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to gain molecular-level understanding (Figure S16; Note S3 in Supplemental information). Figures 3D and 3E show the nanoscale water slab models containing Na+ and Cl− ions that simulate the immersion of LA-TEG and the control in NaCl solution. As for LA-TEG, it presents no obvious adsorption of ions on the model surface. In striking contrast, 25% of Na+ ions in water are adsorbed on the PTFE surface of the control sample during the simulation time of 50 ns, as shown in Figure 3F. The striking contrast of ion absorption between the LA-TEG and control surface can also be verified by comparing the numbers of salt crystals on dried surfaces. As shown in Figure S17, the lubricant-infused surface is free from salt crystal coverage, while the control sample is covered by multi-sized salt crystals ranging from a few hundred nanometers to 10 μm.
The effective anti-absorption of ions rendered by lubricant armor can be further substantiated by a series of solution-immersion experiments. Figure 3G shows the voltage change (ΔV/Vo) of LA-TEG immersed in solutions with different alkali ions. Vo and ΔV refer to the voltage output of the original sample before the immersion treatment and the variation of output voltage after the treatment, respectively. LA-TEG exhibits the enhanced stability of electrical performance after being soaked in solutions with Li+, Na+, or K+, respectively, as evidenced by the positive voltage change rate. However, without the lubricant infusion, the control samples demonstrate the largest voltage reduction rate of −0.33 in the solution of LiCl, indicating the massive absorption of Li+ ion on the PTFE surface, synchronous with surface charge screening. After being immersed in a solution of NaCl or KCl, the control samples show a descending voltage reduction rate of −0.24 and −0.23, suggesting the reduced absorption of Na+ and K+ on PTFE. We attribute these contrasting results to the lubricant armor, which can effectively prevent alkali ion absorption occurring at the PTFE surface; otherwise, PTFE tends to absorb the alkali metal ions with the smaller atom number.7,32,52 Similar results can be found by immersing samples in solutions with increased NaCl concentrations. As shown in Figure 3H, the voltage change of LA-TEG is always positive for each concentration, while the control samples show a voltage reduction from −0.14 to −0.24, with the increasing NaCl concentration from 10−7 M (deionized [DI] water) to 1 M, suggesting that lubricant armor can effectively inhibit the screening effect of high salinity on surface charges. Moreover, the lubricant-induced protection sustains even in acid and base. According to Figure 3I, LA-TEG maintains a stable voltage output in the solutions of different pH, whereas the control samples suffer from the large voltage reduction of −0.25 and −0.32 in acid and base.
Practical application
LA-TEG can further be assembled into multiscale water energy harvesters that can adapt to water energy harvesting in various scenarios (Figure 4A). For instance, a LA-TEG unit constructed on a flexible PCB can serve as a condensate energy harvester that scavenges energy from water droplets that are condensed on curved walls from vapor (Figure S18). A peak voltage of up to 22 V is produced when the little condensate droplets slide across the device surface with a height difference of less than 3 cm (Figure 4B). Furthermore, we can also collect energy from droplets by integrating horizontally arrayed LA-TEG units (Figure S19), from water flow by designing vertically arrayed LA-TEG units (Figure S20) or from water wave by the integration of horizontally and vertically arrayed LA-TEG units (Figure S21). For example, the wave energy harvester, made of 5 × 6 units, allows for electricity generation from periodical upsurges of continuous water wave and exhibits a notable peak voltage of 40 V, a current of 2 μA, and a transfer charge of 100 nC (Figures 4C and S22).
Specifically, we constructed a homemade rain droplet energy-harvesting platform by assembling five horizontally arrayed droplet energy harvesters with three-dimensional (3D)-printed droplet dispensers, as shown in Figure S23. It is worth noting that we can easily integrate the diodes into the droplet energy harvesters leveraging on our design of the built-in connection circuits on PCB substrates, aiming to overcome the offset of output signals from different LA-TEG units. Such a water energy-harvesting platform can sustain a stable output voltage up to 40 V under continuous droplet impingement (Figure 4D). As shown in Figure 4E; Video S1, the water energy-harvesting platform can successfully power three parallel connected liquid-crystal displays (LCDs) in real time. Meanwhile, combined with a power management module (Figure S24), it can also be exploited as a power supply for the wireless temperature monitoring (Figure 4F; Video S2). As shown in Figure 4G, the wireless temperature sensor can transmit the ambient temperature value to a receiver every 100 s. In this regard, our design would be a promising supplement to power sources for Internet of Things (IoT) applications in the remote and off-grid regions.53,54
Conclusions
In summary, we report the design of a new water harvesting device that exhibits outstanding output performance and durability, in both individual and scaled-up devices. In particular, the design can be easily integrated into the commercial connection circuit, imparting both excellent electrical performance and feasible scalability, as exemplified by the significant reduction in the amount of wiring and nodes required for device integration. In addition, the introduction of lubricant armor endows the protection of the surface charges from unwanted screening effects induced by ion absorption at the water-solid interface and ensures the stable electrical performance of LA-TEG in different harsh conditions ranging from low temperature, high humidity, and high salinity. We envision that LA-TEG would hold promise in achieving large-scale and stable water energy harvesting in diverse scenarios for applications such as wireless temperature monitoring.
Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial support of the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong (nos. C1006-20WF and 11213320), the Tencent Foundation through the XPLORER PRIZE, the Innovation and Technology Council (no. 9440248), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant nos. 51975502 and 21621001), and the 111 Project (B17020). We also thank Mr. Pan Zhenghua for his contribution to the design and manufacture of the PCB substrate.
Author contributions
Z.W. conceived and supervised the research. Y.S. and W.X. designed the experiments. H.Z., M.C., and Y.Z. participated in the discussion of the experimental design. Y.S., B.Z., and L.W. prepared and characterized the samples. Y.S., W.X., and H.Z. constructed the experimental platform. X.Y., X.X., P.L., and Z.Y. conducted the construction of the wireless temperature monitoring. Y.S. assembled and characterized the samples and carried out the experiments. Y.S., W.X., and Y.L. discussed the models. Y.L. built the MD models. All of the authors analyzed the data. Z.W. wrote the manuscript, with the input of all of the other authors.
Declaration of interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Published Online: August 11, 2022
Footnotes
Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2022.100301.
Supplemental information
References
- 1.Chu S., Majumdar A. Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature. 2012;488:294–303. doi: 10.1038/nature11475. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lin Z.H., Cheng G., Lee S., et al. Harvesting water drop energy by a sequential contact-electrification and electrostatic-induction process. Adv. Mater. 2014;26:4690–4696. doi: 10.1002/adma.201400373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Scruggs J., Jacob P. Harvesting ocean wave energy. Science. 2009;323:1176–1178. doi: 10.1126/science.1168245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wang H., Sun Y., He T., et al. Bilayer of polyelectrolyte films for spontaneous power generation in air up to an integrated 1, 000 V output. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021;16:811–819. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00903-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang Z., Li X., Yin J., et al. Emerging hydrovoltaic technology. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2018;13:1109–1119. doi: 10.1038/s41565-018-0228-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Xue G., Xu Y., Ding T., et al. Water-evaporation-induced electricity with nanostructured carbon materials. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2017;12:317–321. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2016.300. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yin J., Li X., Yu J., et al. Generating electricity by moving a droplet of ionic liquid along graphene. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2014;9:378–383. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2014.56. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Yin J., Zhang Z., Li X., et al. Waving potential in graphene. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3582–3586. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Siria A., Poncharal P., Biance A.-L., et al. Giant osmotic energy conversion measured in a single transmembrane boron nitride nanotube. Nature. 2013;494:455–458. doi: 10.1038/nature11876. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Xin W., Zhang Z., Huang X., et al. High-performance silk-based hybrid membranes employed for osmotic energy conversion. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11792-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang Z., He L., Zhu C., et al. Improved osmotic energy conversion in heterogeneous membrane boosted by three-dimensional hydrogel interface. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:875–878. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14674-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Lin S., Chen X., Wang Z.L. Contact electrification at the liquid-solid interface. Chem. Rev. 2022;122:5209–5232. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00176. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang Y., Gao S., Xu W., Wang Z. Nanogenerators with superwetting surfaces for harvesting water/liquid energy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2020;30:1908252. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Xu W., Song Y., Xu R.X., Wang Z. Electrohydrodynamic and hydroelectric effects at the water-solid interface: from fundamentals to applications. Adv. Mater. Interfaces. 2021;8:2000670. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ma Z., Ai J., Shi Y., et al. A superhydrophobic droplet-based magnetoelectric hybrid system to generate electricity and collect water simultaneously. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:2006839. doi: 10.1002/adma.202006839. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Ma Z., Wang Q., Wu Z., et al. A superconducting-material-based maglev generator used for outer-space. Adv. Mater. 2022:e2203814. doi: 10.1002/adma.202203814. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Zhang X., Wang Q., Zou R., et al. 3D-printed superhydrophobic and magnetic device that can self-powered sense a tiny droplet impact. Engineering. 2022 [Google Scholar]
- 18.Vatansever D., Hadimani R.L., Shah T., Siores E. An investigation of energy harvesting from renewable sources with PVDF and PZT. Smart Mater. Struct. 2011;20:055019. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Xu X., Wang Y., Li P., et al. A leaf-mimic rain energy harvester by liquid-solid contact electrification and piezoelectricity. Nano Energy. 2021;90:106573. [Google Scholar]
- 20.Feng S., Zhu P., Zheng H., et al. Three-dimensional capillary ratchet-induced liquid directional steering. Science. 2021;373:1344–1348. doi: 10.1126/science.abg7552. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu Y., Moevius L., Xu X., et al. Pancake bouncing on superhydrophobic surfaces. Nat. Phys. 2014;10:515–519. doi: 10.1038/nphys2980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Xu W., Zheng H., Liu Y., et al. A droplet-based electricity generator with high instantaneous power density. Nature. 2020;578:392–396. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1985-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Wang L., Song Y., Xu W., et al. Harvesting energy from high-frequency impinging water droplets by a droplet-based electricity generator. EcoMat. 2021;3:e12116. [Google Scholar]
- 24.Wu H., Mendel N., van der Ham S., et al. Charge trapping-based electricity generator (CTEG): an ultrarobust and high efficiency nanogenerator for energy harvesting from water droplets. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:e2001699. doi: 10.1002/adma.202001699. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Helseth L.E. A water droplet-powered sensor based on charge transfer to a flow-through front surface electrode. Nano Energy. 2020;73:104809. [Google Scholar]
- 26.Wang X., Fang S., Tan J., et al. Dynamics for droplet-based electricity generators. Nano Energy. 2021;80:105558. [Google Scholar]
- 27.Liu L., Shi Q., Ho J.S., Lee C. Study of thin film blue energy harvester based on triboelectric nanogenerator and seashore IoT applications. Nano Energy. 2019;66:104167. [Google Scholar]
- 28.Tian X., Verho T., Ras R.H.A. Moving superhydrophobic surfaces toward real-world applications. Science. 2016;352:142–143. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2073. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Varanasi K.K., Deng T., Smith J.D., et al. Frost formation and ice adhesion on superhydrophobic surfaces. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2010;97:234102. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Amini S., Kolle S., Petrone L., et al. Preventing mussel adhesion using lubricant-infused materials. Science. 2017;357:668–673. doi: 10.1126/science.aai8977. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Sosa M.D., Martínez Ricci M.L., Missoni L.L., et al. Liquid–polymer triboelectricity: chemical mechanisms in the contact electrification process. Soft Matter. 2020;16:7040–7051. doi: 10.1039/d0sm00738b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Park J., Yang Y., Kwon S.-H., Kim Y.S. Influences of surface and ionic properties on electricity generation of an active transducer driven by water motion. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2015;6:745–749. doi: 10.1021/jz502613s. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Nie J., Ren Z., Xu L., et al. Probing contact-electrification-induced electron and ion transfers at a liquid–solid interface. Adv. Mater. 2020;32:1905696. doi: 10.1002/adma.201905696. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhan F., Wang A.C., Xu L., et al. Electron transfer as a liquid droplet contacting a polymer surface. ACS Nano. 2020;14:17565–17573. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.0c08332. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Xu W., Zhou X., Hao C., et al. SLIPS-TENG: robust triboelectric nanogenerator with optical and charge transparency using a slippery interface. Natl. Sci. Rev. 2019;6:540–550. doi: 10.1093/nsr/nwz025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Chung J., Cho H., Yong H., et al. Versatile surface for solid–solid/liquid–solid triboelectric nanogenerator based on fluorocarbon liquid infused surfaces. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 2020;21:139–146. doi: 10.1080/14686996.2020.1733920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Gu H., Zhang N., Zhou Z., et al. A bulk effect liquid-solid generator with 3D electrodes for wave energy harvesting. Nano Energy. 2021;87:106218. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Chen G., Liu X., Li S., et al. A droplet energy harvesting and actuation system for self-powered digital microfluidics. Lab Chip. 2018;18:1026–1034. doi: 10.1039/c7lc01259d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yu J., Ma E., Ma T. Exponential energy harvesting through repetitive reconfigurations of a system of capacitors. Commun. Phys. 2018;1:9–10. [Google Scholar]
- 40.Wong T.-S., Kang S.H., Tang S.K.Y., et al. Bioinspired self-repairing slippery surfaces with pressure-stable omniphobicity. Nature. 2011;477:443–447. doi: 10.1038/nature10447. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Tang X., Li W., Wang L. Furcated droplet motility on crystalline surfaces. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021;16:1106–1112. doi: 10.1038/s41565-021-00945-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Wu H., Mendel N., van den Ende D., et al. Energy harvesting from drops impacting onto charged surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2020;125:078301. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.078301. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Yang Z.W., Pang Y., Zhang L., et al. Tribotronic transistor array as an active tactile sensing system. ACS Nano. 2016;10:10912–10920. doi: 10.1021/acsnano.6b05507. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Wu H., Wang S., Wang Z., Zi Y. Achieving ultrahigh instantaneous power density of 10 MW/m2 by leveraging the opposite-charge-enhanced transistor-like triboelectric nanogenerator (OCT-TENG) Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5470–5478. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25753-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Nie J., Wang Z., Ren Z., et al. Power generation from the interaction of a liquid droplet and a liquid membrane. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:2264. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10232-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Wang P., Zhang S., Zhang L., et al. Non-contact and liquid–liquid interfacing triboelectric nanogenerator for self-powered water/liquid level sensing. Nano Energy. 2020;72:104703. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Wu J., Xi Y., Shi Y. Toward wear-resistive, highly durable and high performance triboelectric nanogenerator through interface liquid lubrication. Nano Energy. 2020;72:104659. [Google Scholar]
- 48.Li X., Ning X., Li L., et al. Performance and power management of droplets-based electricity generators. Nano Energy. 2022;92:106705. [Google Scholar]
- 49.Kim P., Wong T.-S., Alvarenga J., et al. Liquid-infused nanostructured surfaces with extreme anti-ice and anti-frost performance. ACS Nano. 2012;6:6569–6577. doi: 10.1021/nn302310q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Hao C., Li J., Liu Y., et al. Superhydrophobic-like tunable droplet bouncing on slippery liquid interfaces. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7986–7987. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Smith J.D., Dhiman R., Anand S., et al. Droplet mobility on lubricant-impregnated surfaces. Soft Matter. 2013;9:1772–1780. [Google Scholar]
- 52.Park J., Song S., Shin C., et al. Ion specificity on electric energy generated by flowing water droplets. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2018;57:2091–2095. doi: 10.1002/anie.201711505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Xi F., Pang Y., Liu G., et al. Self-powered intelligent buoy system by water wave energy for sustainable and autonomous wireless sensing and data transmission. Nano Energy. 2019;61:1–9. [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ahmed A., Saadatnia Z., Hassan I., et al. Self-powered wireless sensor node enabled by a duck-shaped triboelectric nanogenerator for harvesting water wave energy. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017;7:1601705. [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.