Abstract
Severe SARS-CoV-2 infection1 has been associated with highly inflammatory immune activation since the earliest days of the COVID-19 pandemic2–5. More recently, these responses have been associated with the emergence of self-reactive antibodies with pathologic potential6–10, although their origins and resolution have remained unclear11. Previously, we and others have identified extrafollicular B cell activation, a pathway associated with the formation of new autoreactive antibodies in chronic autoimmunity12,13, as a dominant feature of severe and critical COVID-19 (refs. 14–18). Here, using single-cell B cell repertoire analysis of patients with mild and severe disease, we identify the expansion of a naive-derived, low-mutation IgG1 population of antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) reflecting features of low selective pressure. These features correlate with progressive, broad, clinically relevant autoreactivity, particularly directed against nuclear antigens and carbamylated proteins, emerging 10–15 days after the onset of symptoms. Detailed analysis of the low-selection compartment shows a high frequency of clonotypes specific for both SARS-CoV-2 and autoantigens, including pathogenic autoantibodies against the glomerular basement membrane. We further identify the contraction of this pathway on recovery, re-establishment of tolerance standards and concomitant loss of acute-derived ASCs irrespective of antigen specificity. However, serological autoreactivity persists in a subset of patients with postacute sequelae, raising important questions as to the contribution of emerging autoreactivity to continuing symptomology on recovery. In summary, this study demonstrates the origins, breadth and resolution of autoreactivity in severe COVID-19, with implications for early intervention and the treatment of patients with post-COVID sequelae.
Subject terms: Clonal selection, Antibodies, Peripheral tolerance, Viral infection, SARS-CoV-2
Single-cell B cell repertoire analysis identifies the expansion of a naive-derived population of antibody-secreting cells contributing to de novo autoreactivity in patients with severe COVID-19 and those with post-COVID symptoms.
Main
In 2019, the novel betacoronavirus SARS-CoV-2 emerged from Wuhan, China, resulting in the COVID-19 pandemic1. With reported mortality of around 2%, early characterizations of severe disease emphasized the proinflammatory cytokine IL-6 and invoked the possibility of cytokine storms2,3. These observations, alongside the observed efficacy of high-dose steroids in these patients, were highly suggestive of immune responses not only responsible for viral clearance but potentially contributing to disease pathology4,5. Profound alterations in the immune compartment were quickly identified as correlates of these inflammatory responses, with distinct patient immunotypes having increased frequencies of circulating plasmablasts yet lacking evidence of T follicular help (Tfh)19. This was bolstered by the identification of collapsed germinal centre environments in patients that had succumbed to COVID-19 (ref. 14).
Deep analysis of B cell activation pathways by our group and others has led to a strong emphasis on the extrafollicular (EF) pathway as a common feature of severe disease14,15,17. Characterized by the induction of T-bet-driven double-negative 2 (CD27−, IgD−, CD11c+, CD21− (DN2)) B cells, expansion of CD19+ antibody-secreting cells (ASCs) and depression of mutation frequencies in the ASC repertoire, these responses are highly similar to those we had identified previously in patients with active severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)13,20. In these patients, EF response activation results in the de novo generation of naive-derived autoreactivities despite the presence of chronic preformed autoimmune memory, correlated with disease severity12. At the time of publication of our study, evidence of autoreactivity was mounting in severe disease, with observations of autoantibody-linked blood clotting6, anti-interferon antibodies7, connective-tissue-disease-associated interstitial lung disease8 and generalized observations of clinical autoreactivity9, including our findings of expanded IGHV4-34 B cells15,21. These observations have been bolstered by the reporting of broad autoreactivity in these patients, frequently targeting critical immune components10, with serological kinetics strongly suggesting the onset of new autoreactivity11. However, the developmental origins of these autoreactivities, their connection with the underlying de novo antiviral response and their ultimate resolution have remained unknown.
Viral-specific ASCs in severe COVID-19
Previous work established robust expansion of the ASC compartment as a hallmark of severe COVID-19 (refs. 15,19). Retrospective analysis of previously collected data from 25 (nine healthy donors (HD), seven outpatients (OUT-C) and nine intensive care unit (ICU) patients (ICU-C)) individuals showed that such expansion also includes the more mature CD19-negative ASC fraction that we first reported to contain the long-lived plasma cells in the human bone marrow and that has not been previously measured in COVID-19 infection or other acute immune responses in humans22 (Extended Data Fig. 1a–c and Supplemental Tables 1 and 2). Consistent with previous findings, ASC expansion in the ICU-C cohort was directly correlated with expansion of DN2 B cells, an important intermediate in the naive-derived EF B cell response pathway (Extended Data Fig. 1a, d)13,15.
Although ASC expansion correlates with increased serological IgG response to the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein receptor-binding domain (RBD) in patients with severe disease15, the circulating ASC compartment's direct contribution to that response has not been assessed. Using a new in vitro method that optimizes overnight antibody secretion from peripheral blood mononuclear cell (PBMC)-purified ASCs into the culture supernatant (medium enriched in newly synthesized antibodies; MENSA23), we found that ICU-C patients had higher frequencies of blood ASCs secreting IgG RBD-specific antibodies, confirming the relevance of early circulating ASCs to the antiviral response as opposed to non-specific cellular expansion (Fig. 1a). Indeed, overall IgG-switched RBD-targeted MENSA titres were directly correlated with ASC expansion across the COVID-19+ cohorts (Fig. 1b).
Low selective pressure in expanded ASCs
In SLE, naive-derived EF ASC expansions result in new autoreactive clones12. With considerable literature pointing to the presence of autoreactivity as a feature of severe COVID-19 (refs. 6,7,10), it was important to understand the contribution of ASCs to both antiviral and autoantigen targeting. However, direct binding studies of these IgG+ cells are hampered by the propensity of the cells to downregulate surface B cell receptor (BCR), in contrast to their IgM+ counterparts (Fig. 1c). Thus, antigen-specific flow-based study of this population would incompletely assess the ASC contribution to the overall antigen-specific response, and broad analysis of this cellular compartment independent of BCR expression and antigen-specific probing is required.
To study the nature of the ASC compartment in these patients, six of ten recruited ICU patients without dexamethasone treatment, alongside four patients with mild disease and three demographically matched HD, were selected for single-cell VDJ repertoire analysis. More than 17,000 ASCs were sequenced at acute infection time points between 4 and 18 days after symptom onset, reflecting almost 9,000 independent ASC clonotypes across all individuals (Supplemental Table 3). Clonality of the library was consistent with previous descriptions of oligoclonal ASC expansion15, with up to 13% of clonotypes representing more than 3% of the total repertoire (Supplemental Table 3). Isotype analysis demonstrated a consistent expansion of IgG1 in the ICU-C cohort relative to the dominance of IgA found in steady-state HD in this study and previous publications24 (Fig. 1d and Extended Data Fig. 2a, b). Concomitant IgM+ expansions in some patients, alongside clonal connectivity between IgM and IgG1 ASCs in the ICU-C group, indicated that the IgG1 compartment might reflect the newly minted Ag-specific ASC pool (Extended Data Fig. 2a, c). An intermediate phenotype was observed in the OUT-C group with IgG1 increases that did not reach statistical significance (Extended Data Fig. 2b). Emphasis of IgG1 clonotypes was consistent with enrichment of total serological IgG1 in the ICU-C cohort, and with retrospective analysis of published single-cell transcriptomics data collected from bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) of ten intubated patients, which identified substantial IgG1 expression in the plasmablast population (Extended Data Fig. 3)25.
The expanded IgG1+ ASC compartment of ICU-C patients was distinguished by reduced mutation frequency relative to OUT-C and HD controls (Fig. 1e, f). Notably, mutation reduction was largely concentrated on the IgG1 compartment, with 10–70% of all IgG1 ASCs expressing VH germline sequences and overall mutation frequencies significantly decreased in comparison with the rest of the class-switched ASC compartment (Fig. 1e–g). Consistent with these observations, an analysis of the selective pressure on the antibody complementarity-determining regions, as determined by Bayesian estimates of antigen-driven selection (BASELINe)26, demonstrated selective reduction of the IgG1 in the ICU-C cohort versus other class-switched compartments (Fig. 1h). In SLE, the increased incorporation of autoreactivity-prone IgHV4-34 clonotypes into the antigen-selected CD27+ B cell compartment is a bellwether of reduced selective pressure and is often a result of naive-derived EF B cell responses12. A similar phenomenon was reflected in the repertoire of the ICU-C cohort, with increased frequency of IGHV4-34+ cells emerging specifically in the IgG1+ ASC compartment (Fig. 1i), aligning with our previous observations of increased IGHV4-34 serology in these patients15.
Uncoupled ASC and memory compartments
To more deeply understand the origins and persistence of the low-mutation IgG1 ASC compartment, the contemporaneous CD27+ memory B cells were sorted and analysed in three surviving patients from the original ICU cohort (Supplementary Table 3). Consistent with the expected properties of established memory B cells, class-switched CD27+ cells were more polyclonal and had high levels of SHM12 (Supplemental Table 3). In contrast to their matched ASC counterparts, IgG1-expressing memory clonotypes showed increased selective pressures and decreased frequency of IgG1 clonotypes expressing unmutated BCRs (Extended Data Fig. 4a–c).
Formal connectivity analysis of the IgG1 ASC compartment and contemporaneous memory in the ICU-C cohort showed low levels of clonal sharing in two of three patients and no significant differences compared with steady-state HD, who in the absence of known immune perturbation are presumed to be devoid of continuing memory activation (Extended Data Fig. 4d). Moreover, in the two patients that showed active connections between memory and ASC compartments, the connections were dominated by higher-mutation clonotypes (>1%) (Extended Data Fig. 4e). Indeed, across the dataset, only four low-mutation clonotypes were identified as shared between the emerging ASC and memory compartments. Overall, our findings indicate uncoupling and separate selection pressures between the IgG1 ASC and memory B cell repertoires (Extended Data Fig. 4a–c) and are consistent with the emergence during acute severe infection of a memory-independent, newly generated ASC compartment with reduced selective pressure.
Clinical autoreactivity in COVID-19
The developing ASC response characteristics observed at both the cellular and repertoire levels were highly similar to previous observations in patients with active SLE12,15. To understand whether COVID-19 responses also correlated with autoreactivity, plasma collected from 27 ICU-C, 18 OUT-C, 20 SLE and 14 HD individuals was assessed through testing of more than 30 clinically relevant autoantigens by Exagen, Inc. and analysed for autoreactivity associated with connective tissue disorders. Broad tolerance breaks were identified across the ICU-C cohort against a variety of targets including rheumatoid factor (RF; 2/27), phospholipids (3/27), nuclear antigens (11/27) and glomerular basement membrane (GBM; 2/27) (Table 1). Most ICU patients had at least one positive test, with some patients testing positive for up to seven independent autoantigens (Fig. 2a). Higher ‘densities’ of autoreactivity were significantly increased in ICU-C individuals, with three or more autoreactivities being found exclusively in this cohort (Fig. 2a and Extended Data Fig. 5a).
Table 1.
Autoreactive | HD | OUT | ICU | ICU-PASC | ARDS | SLE |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target | (n = 14) | (n = 18) | (n = 27) | (n = 40) | (n = 29) | (n = 20) |
dsDNA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3%) | 18 (90%) | |
ANA titre | 2 (14%) | 1 (6%) | 11 (41%) | 16 (40%) | 18 (62%) | 20 (100%) |
Sm | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 (30%) |
Ro52 | 0 | 0 | 1 (4%) | 0 | 1 (3%) | 12 (60%) |
Ro60 | 1 (7%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 (65%) |
La | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (15%) |
Jo | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Ribonucleoprotein | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 (70%) |
Ribosomal protein | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3%) | 0 | 6 (30%) |
RNA Pol 3 IgG | 0 | 0 | 2 (7%) | 4 (10%) | 2 (7%) | 8 (40%) |
RF IgM | 0 | 1 (6%) | 2 (7%) | 2 (5%) | 4 (14%) | 8 (40%) |
RF IgA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (7%) | 4 (20%) |
Citulinated protein | 0 | 0 | 1 (4%) | 0 | 3 (10%) | 3 (15%) |
Prothrombin IgM | 0 | 2 (11%) | 4 (15%) | 1 (3%) | 0 | 4 (20%) |
Prothrombin IgG | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3%) | 0 | 7 (35%) |
Cardiolipin IgM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3%) | 0 |
Cardiolipin IgA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 (7%) | 1 (5%) |
Cardiolipin IgG | 0 | 2 (11%) | 2 (7%) | 1 (3%) | 2 (7%) | 1 (5%) |
B2GP1 IgM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
B2GP1 IgA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (5%) |
B2GP1 IgG | 0 | 1 (6%) | 1 (4%) | 2 (5%) | 1 (3%) | 3 (15%) |
MPO | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
PR3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3%) | 0 |
ANCA | 0 | 0 | 3 (11%) | 4 (10%) | 1 (3%) | 12 (60%) |
p70 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 (3%) | 9 (45%) |
Carbamylated protein | 0 | 0 | 11 (41%) | 10 (25%) | 11 (38%) | 14 (70%) |
GBM | 0 | 0 | 2 (7%) | 0 | 1 (3%) | 0 |
Autoreactivity screening identified significant emergence of two autoreactivities: antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) and anticarbamylated protein responses (CarP) (Fig. 2b, c). Although ANAs have been well characterized in clinical autoimmunity, they can also be present in up to 15% of healthy subjects at immunofluorescence titres less than 1:80 (ref. 27). By contrast, more than 40% of the ICU-C cohort showed ANA reactivities at titres greater than 1:160 (Table 1). Anti-CarP antibodies, which are associated with tissue damage in rheumatoid arthritis and SLE28,29, were specific to the ICU-C cohort and present in more than 40% of patients (Fig. 2c and Table 1). Titres of a-CarP were directly correlated with the overall number of tolerance breaks across the cohort (Fig. 2d and Extended Data Fig. 5b). Despite similarities in B cell activation profiles, other canonical reactivities associated with SLE, including Sm/RNP, Ro, La and even double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), were universally negative (Table 1).
To understand specificity to COVID-19, another 28 plasma samples from ICU patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) as a result of confirmed bacterial pneumonia were assessed (Table 1). Notably, the autoreactivity profiles of these patients were highly similar to those of patients with critical COVID-19, strongly suggesting that the autoimmune phenomena described in COVID-19 so far may be generalizable to other severe pulmonary infections (Fig. 2e and Table 1). Identification of similar self-targets, particularly anti-CarP and anti-GBM titres, indicates that clinical tests available at present could be used to identify these phenomena in real time across a host of human infectious diseases (Table 1).
To validate the ICU cohort, a retrospective study of 52 independent critically ill patients who had received autoantibody testing as part of routine clinical care at the discretion of their treating physicians was undertaken. More than 50% of patients had at least one positive test, with ANAs as the most common autoreactive feature (a-CarP antibody testing was not performed) (Extended Data Fig. 6). Among ICU patients, disease severity was correlated with tolerance breaks—patients with the highest levels of C-reactive protein (CRP; a surrogate of disease severity in COVID-19 (ref. 30)) had both increased numbers and increased intensities of autoreactive tests (Fig. 2f–h). Although longitudinal testing for this cohort was limited, seven patients were tested 2 weeks after the initial draw, with three of seven testing positive for ANAs on initial assessment (Fig. 2i). In alignment with published work describing building serological autoreactivity in immune-targeted autoantibodies11, all three patients showed stable or increasing ANA titres despite decreased CRP, suggesting building autoreactivity profiles beyond the resolution of biomarkers of clinical illness. Combining the datasets and supplementing them with a further 50 ICU patient plasma samples, a cross-sectional analysis of ANA reactivity as a function of the day after COVID-19 symptom onset demonstrated a clear and significant emergence of autoreactivity that can be identified between days 10 and 15 following symptomatic severe infection (Fig. 2j, k).
Self-reactivity in antiviral response
In addition to autoimmune serologies and repertoire features of IgG1 ASC, the contribution of IgG1 to autoreactivity in ICU-C was supported by the identification of IgG1-specific ANA reactivity in that cohort that could not be identified in IgG2 (Extended Data Fig. 7a). To investigate this possibility, two patients (ICU-1 and ICU-2) were identified for individual clonotype assessment and monoclonal antibody (mAb) production and testing. These patients were representative of the overall cohort, with low ASC mutation frequencies and high incorporation of autoreactive-prone IGHV4-34 clonotypes (Extended Data Fig. 7b, c). In patient ICU-1, low-mutation ASCs had more connections to the CD27− B cell fraction than the memory compartment, and high levels of IgM ASC connectivity to IgG1 ASCs in both patients were suggestive of recent development (Extended Data Fig. 7d, e).
Clonotypes were selected from this ASC compartment (54 and 53 clonotypes from ICU-1 and ICU-2, respectively) on the basis of their inclusion of an IgG1 member, low mutation frequency (<1%), and presence in the ASC compartment, CD27− compartment or both. In addition to all expanded clonotypes (more than five members), all IGHV4-34-expressing members were included in the screening analysis.
mAbs were screened against several SARS-CoV-2 antigens including S1, RBD, amino-terminal domain (NTD), S2, ORF-3 and nucleocapsid (Fig. 3a)31, with more than 65% showing binding to one of the tested target antigens (Fig. 3a, b). Despite similar frequencies in antiviral targeting, responses against nucleocapsid and the spike NTD differed between patients ICU-1 and ICU-2, indicating potential differences in the response microenvironment. Despite their naive origin and low (or absent) levels of somatic hypermutation (SHM), many of the resulting antibodies had high affinity, with KD values in the low nanomolar range (Supplemental Table 4). The top binders to spike and nucleocapsid had affinities of KD = 2.82 × 10−9 and KD = 9.93 × 10−10, respectively, in the range of several published neutralizing antibodies32 (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 8). Of interest, IGHV4-34-expressing clones were generally viral targeted (Fig. 3a). Overall, these data confirm this compartment as enriched for antigen-specific ASCs contributing to the emerging antiviral response.
However, despite the dominance of SARS-CoV2-specific ASC, ~30% of the clones tested did not have clear specificity for the tested proteins, and many showed low binding (Fig. 3a). Given these findings, combined with the low selective pressures, it was important to understand whether these antibodies also contained autoreactive potential. To this end, mAbs were screened for ANA binding as an established method for broad human B cell autoreactivity assessment33. In accordance with patients’ ANA serum positivity, 16% of all 107 mAbs showed ANA reactivity, equally distributed between the two patients (Fig. 3c). Specific antigen targeting was heterogeneous, with individual reactivities identified against cytoplasmic, nuclear, membrane, cytoskeleton and Golgi antigens (Extended Data Fig. 9a). Further screening against the highly disease-specific GBM antigen resulted in several positive hits in the patient with anti-GBM serum reactivity (ICU-1; 4/54 or 8%) with three of four also showing antiviral affinity (Fig. 3d). Binding to human naive B cells, a feature of IGHV4-34 antibodies in SLE linked to reactivity against the naive B cell surface, was also tested34,35. Consistent with autoreactive potential against B cells and other lupus antigens, 10 of 30 VH4-34 antibodies demonstrated B cell binding, with four of them showing reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 antigens as confirmed through surface plasmon resonance (Fig. 3a and Extended Data Fig. 9b)34.
In total, 65% (15/23) of mAbs with identified autoreactivity had some affinity to a screened viral antigen, highly similar to the overall antiviral reactivity of the total antibody pool. Autoreactivity was independent of SHM, with more than half of identified self-targeted antibodies (14/23) having germline BCRs (Fig. 3a). Crossreactivity between self-antigens and the RBD (highly specific to SARS-CoV-2) further confirmed the naive origins of these autoreactive responses, and the heterogeneity of antiviral targets associated with self-reactivity strongly favours a model in which relaxed selective pressure in the ASC compartment, rather than dominant molecular mimicry driven by a specific viral protein, is likely to be responsible for the emergence of autoreactivity observed in this cohort.
Uneven autoreactive recovery in COVID-19
To understand the evolution of the low-mutation ASC compartment in acute disease resolution, patients ICU-1–3 were recruited for follow-up between 6 and 10 months after symptom onset (Supplemental Table 3). All three patients showed a contraction of the overall IgG1 ASC compartment from the acute phase of disease, with two showing reductions of more than 50% (Fig. 4a, b), down to frequencies comparable with those observed in steady-state HD (Fig. 1d). Of more than 900 independent IgG1 ASC clonotypes identified in the acute phase of disease, only two could be detected in the recovery phase in both memory and ASC compartments. None of the 107 characterized clones was persistent at recovery, irrespective of antiviral targeting. IgG1 ASC mutation frequencies were increased at recovery to HD steady-state levels (Fig. 4c), and the nature of these mutations reflected a normalization of selective pressures at levels similar to those of other contemporaneous class-switched ASC compartments (Fig. 4d). Renewed censoring of IGHV4-34 clonotypes in the ASC compartment across all three patients and reductions in IGHV4-34+ IgG antibodies in the plasma at recovery time points further confirmed the re-establishment of tolerance standards (Fig. 4e, f).
However, despite universal signs of a return to ‘normal’ tolerance environments in the ASC compartment, the resolution of clinical autoreactivities was more complex. Although two of three patients (ICU-1 and ICU-2) showed evidence of resolving autoreactivity in the blood across several target antigens (including high titres of anti-GBM antibodies), one of the two seemed to have increased reactivity against cardiolipin 7 months following disease onset (Extended Data Fig. 10a–c). Further, patient ICU-3 showed increased reactivity against both RF and CarP antigens at 10 months after symptom onset versus the acute phase of infection, indicating that in a subset of patients, clinical autoreactivity may persist well beyond the acute phase of infection (Extended Data Fig. 10c). To assess this possibility, plasma from 40 ICU-recovered patients with no history of autoimmune disorders was collected from postacute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) clinics and combined with that of existing cohorts of acute patients for cross-sectional longitudinal analysis. Consistent with individual patient reactivities, an early emergence of ANA reactivity was observed that persisted at significant albeit tapering levels over the following year (Fig. 4g). Of the 20 PASC patients available more than 100 days after symptom onset, seven (35%) showed ANA reactivity. Similarly, anti-CarP responses remained elevated, albeit at decreased levels, in a large fraction of patients (ICU-C 35%, PASC 25%) in the recovery phase of COVID-19 (Fig. 4h), further stressing the need for continued follow-up of these patients to understand the long-term implications of tolerance breaks on continuing symptomology and chronic autoimmune manifestations.
Discussion
Although several studies have detailed the presence of autoantibodies in COVID-19, their mechanisms of generation, chronic pathogenic potential and eventual resolution remain to be understood. New recent information has clearly documented the appearance of de novo serological autoreactivity in patients hospitalized with severe infection; however, the precise cellular source of such autoreactivity remains unidentified. Indeed, both the naive and memory B cell compartments of healthy individuals contain large proportions of autoreactive or polyreactive cells that could be triggered to produce autoantibodies in the context of severe inflammation through a combination of antigen-specific and non-specific stimuli33,36–38. Here, we assign that phenomenon, at least in large part, to a transient naive-derived ASC compartment through mechanisms that by and large involve antigen-mediated triggering. These cells, enriched in autoreactive potential, emerge during the acute phase of severe COVID-19 and regress gradually during the recovery phase in most but not all patients. This compartment is characterized by a predominance of IgG1 ASCs expressing antibodies with low levels or absence of SHM distributed in a pattern consistent with low antigenic selection pressure. Emergence of this population is correlated with increased clinical autoreactivity against a variety of self-antigens, routinely including nuclear antigens and carbamylated proteins. Whereas the re-establishment of indicators of selective pressure in the ASC repertoire was consistent among all patients, the presence of autoantibodies in the serum persisted into the recovery phase in many patients experiencing continuing symptoms well into the recovery phase of disease, raising significant questions as to their contributions to postacute sequelae.
The origins of autoreactivity in COVID-19 have been an important area of debate owing to their prognostic potential. Early reporting of autoreactivity against type-I interferons in critically ill patients indicates that if these autoantibodies predate the infection, they may help to predict those at high risk7. Here, we demonstrate definitively that autoantibodies of substantial affinity can be generated, de novo, at the earliest phases of the humoral immune response. Indeed, the identification of RBD-specific clonotypes with germline BCR configurations and autoreactive targeting confirms that autoreactivity and antiviral targeting can be generated simultaneously in the robust EF responses identified in severe COVID-19. Thus, although preformed autoantibodies are likely to have an important role in specific aspects of infection severity, they are unlikely to account for the robust autoreactive phenotypes identified routinely in these patients. Instead, the current work establishes experimentally that the early emergence of isotype-switched autoreactivity is not a proxy for pre-existing autoreactive memory.
Although emphasized in COVID-19, autoreactivity following severe viral infection has been well documented in mice, with various potential mechanisms proposed. Early work by Roosnek and Lanzavecchia described efficient non-cognate antigen presentation by autoreactive B cells as a mechanism for autoreactivity induction39. That model was invoked a decade later to explain the significant fraction of autoreactive clonotypes emerging from lymphocytic choriomeningitis infection40. Molecular mimicry, an independent model of tolerance breakdown, has also been postulated as the source of autoreactivity in viral infection. Best described in rheumatic fever, in which antistreptococcal antibodies crossreact with cardiac myosin, different types of molecular mimicry have been invoked across a variety of infectious diseases41–45. In SLE, it has been suggested that peptide homology between Epstein–Barr virus and ribonucleoproteins could lead to B cell epitope spreading and disease development46. Our experimental data do indeed demonstrate a degree of crossreactivity between SARS-CoV2 antigens and a variety of self-antigens, an observation that would be likely to expand with more extensive testing against more comprehensive self-antigen arrays. However, specifically measuring the degree to which molecular mimicry accounts for such crossreactivity would require extensive molecular and structural studies of various antigens and antigen–mAb structures outside the scope of the current work. In a strict sense, whereas molecular mimicry would require the sharing of a linear or conformational epitope between different antigens, crossreactivity at large may be mediated by binding to separate antigens devoid of shared epitopes through separate parts of the antigen-binding site, a promiscuity that is enhanced by the large and heavily charged CDR3 frequently enriched in autoreactive B cells.
Although our experimental approach does not address these mechanisms directly, the identification of extensive ASC crossreactivity between viral and self-antigens indicates that the most robust manifestation of molecular mimicry—a specific pathogenic protein driving autoreactivity against a consensus self-antigen—may not be the primary driver of the autoreactivity emerging in COVID-19. This postulate is consistent with the lack of correlation between individual viral targets and specific self-antigens, as autoreactivity could be identified in clones targeting all tested components of SARS-CoV-2. Further, the same broad autoantigens (naive B cells, for example) could be targeted by antibodies with specificity to nucleocapsid or RBD, or could have no discernable affinity to the dominant viral antigens tested (Fig. 3a). Instead, the data presented here are most consistent with a model by which the highly inflammatory milieu created by severe COVID-19 would promote the unopposed expansion of a positively selected naive compartment endowed with substantial germline-encoded autoreactivity through the EF response pathway12,47. This scenario would result in the rapid conversion of autoreactive activated T-bet+ naive B cells and their intermediary DN2 effectors into functional autoantibody-producing ASCs, a mechanism strongly driven by Th1-like cytokines prominently including IFN gamma, which is highly correlated with COVID-19 severity15,48, as we and others have documented in acute SLE12,13,49.
This model, in which the initially expanded autoreactivity would be enriched for self-reactivities not subject to strong central tolerance and readily present in the naive compartment, might help explain the enduring tolerance against some antigens, such as dsDNA and MPO, which would be abundant in the local milieu of severe COVID-19 owing to strong neutrophil activation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation50. This was also true of individual ANA antigens including La, Sm and Ro, which are associated with SLE but remained negative throughout acute infection. This profile would be consistent with broad expansion of the autoreactivity previously documented in human naive B cells, which is enriched for ENA-negative ANA+ reactivity33 and normally censored in the germinal centre51. Accordingly, our studies highlight the immunological consequences of uncensored EF expansion of autoreactive naive B cells in severe COVID-19 infection and indicate that common, clinically testable autoreactivities including ANA and anti-CarP reactivity may be useful in identifying these phenomena in a variety of severe infectious diseases in real time14. The pathologic potential of individual reactivities that emerges in these patients remains to be established; however, the generation of autoantibodies associated with autoimmune diseases with antibody-mediated pathology, including anti-CarP and GBM, strongly suggests a pathogenic role.
A critical finding of this study is the restoration of normal features in the IgG1 ASC compartment after recovery, including size contraction and increased levels of somatic mutation and selection pressure on par with contemporaneous memory cells of the same subclass. These changes indicate a dynamic process of acute expansion of naive-derived IgG1 ASCs enriched in autoreactivity that dominates during severe infection and subsequently subsides. However, despite clear resolution at the cellular level, kinetic analysis of autoreactive serology presents a more subtle picture, with general declines in autoreactivity that nonetheless may persist at significant levels for several months. In some patients, such as ICU-3, autoreactivity may even increase postinfection; it will be important to know whether these features are associated with the future emergence of chronic autoimmunity.
This mixed picture is consistent with established properties of the EF response, not only in the dominant generation of short-lived plasmablasts but also in their less-appreciated potential to generate long-lived plasma cells and to contribute to memory responses52. Although the absence of acute phase clonotypes from IgG1 memory at recovery argues against robust memory incorporation, this finding is tempered by the necessarily restricted depth of repertoire tracking afforded by single-cell analysis and the lack of direct examination of tissue-based memory and plasma cells. Hence, combinations of large correlative clinical studies and more extensive cellular studies will be required to understand whether acute relaxations of tolerance do indeed result in an increased susceptibility to chronic autoimmunity in a small subset of patients. These studies could help identify a therapeutic window wherein, as in autoimmunity, infectious disease treatment could be tailored to diminish the generation and survival of autoreactive B cells. Further, interfering with the maturation of autoreactive naive B cells using anti-BAFF or similar therapies53, depletion of emerging pathogenic autoantibodies using anti-ASC agents54 or strategies aimed at cycling the patient’s IgG fraction55 may improve recovery outcomes. This current study informs that important future work, characterizing the immunologic underpinning of emerging primary autoreactivity in COVID-19 and identifying potential avenues for monitoring those responses, in real time, in a clinical setting.
Methods
Human participants
All research was approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board (nos. IRB00058507, IRB00057983 and IRB00058271) and was performed in accordance with all relevant guidelines and regulations. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants or, if they were unable to provide informed consent, from designated healthcare surrogates. Healthy individuals (n = 20) were recruited using promotional materials approved by the Emory University Institutional Review Board. Individuals with COVID-19 (n = 19) were recruited from Emory University Hospital, Emory University Hospital Midtown and Emory St. Joseph’s Hospital (all Atlanta, USA). All nonhealthy individuals were diagnosed with COVID-19 by PCR amplification of SARS-CoV-2 viral RNA obtained from nasopharyngeal or oropharyngeal swabs. Individuals with COVID-19 were included in the study if they were between 18 and 80 years of age, were not immunocompromised and had not been given oral or intravenous corticosteroids during the preceding 14 days. Peripheral blood was collected in either heparin sodium tubes (for PBMCs) or serum tubes (for serum) (both BD Diagnostic Systems). Baseline individual demographics are included in Supplementary Table 1. Study data were collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at Emory University.
Banked frozen plasma from patients with ARDS (n = 28) was obtained as previously described56.
PBMC cell isolation and plasma collection
Peripheral blood samples were collected in heparin sodium tubes and processed within 6 h of collection. PBMCs were isolated by density gradient centrifugation at 1,000g for 10 min. Aliquots from the plasma layer were collected and stored at −80 °C until use. PBMCs were washed twice with RPMI at 500g for 5 min. Viability was assessed using trypan blue exclusion, and live cells were counted using an automated hemocytometer.
Flow cytometry
Isolated PBMCs (2 × 106) were centrifuged and resuspended in 75 μl FACS buffer (phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and 2% fetal bovine serum (FBS)) and 5 μl Fc receptor block (BioLegend, no. 422302) for 5 min at room temperature. For samples stained with anti-IgG, it was observed that Fc block inappropriately interfered with staining, so a preincubation step of the anti-IgG alone for 5 min at 22 °C was added before the addition of the block. Next, 25 μl of antibody cocktail (Supplementary Table 3) was added (100 μl staining reaction), and samples were incubated for 20 min at 4 °C. Cells were washed in PBS and resuspended in a PBS dilution of Zombie NIR fixable viability dye (BioLegend, no. 423106). Cells were washed and fixed in 0.8% paraformaldehyde for 10 min at 22 °C in the dark before a final wash and resuspension for analysis.
Cells were analysed on a Cytek Aurora flow cytometer using Cytek SpectroFlo software. Up to 3 × 106 cells were analysed using FlowJo v.10 (Treestar) software.
Analysis software
Computational analysis was carried out in R (v.3.6.2; release 12 Dec 2019). Heat maps were generated using the pheatmap library (v.1.0.12), with data prenormalized (log-transformed z scores calculated per feature) before plotting. Custom plotting, such as that for mutation frequency violin plots, was performed using the ggplot2 library for base analysis, followed by postprocessing in Adobe Illustrator. Alluvial plotting was performed using the ggalluvial package with postprocessing in Adobe Illustrator. Clonotype connectivity analysis was carried out using the R-based ‘vegan’ package and then visualized with ‘pheatmap’ before postprocessing in Adobe Illustrator. Statistical analyses were performed directly in R or in GraphPad Prism (v.8.2.1).
Analyses of the single-cell VDJ annotated sequences were performed using the Immcantation tool suite (http://www.immcantation.org) v.4.1.0 pipeline in Docker. This suite contains SHazaM for statistical analysis of SHM patterns as described in Gupta et al., 2015 and BASELINe for analysis of selection pressure as described in Yaari et al.26. Visualizations were generated in R using the SHazaM package (v.1.0.2) and then postprocessed in Adobe Illustrator.
Flow cytometry and sorting of B cell subsets for repertoire sequencing
Frozen cell suspensions were thawed at 37 °C in RPMI with 10% fetal calf serum and then washed and resuspended in FACS buffer (PBS with 2% fetal calf serum). The cells were incubated with a mix of fluorophore-conjugated antibodies for 30 min on ice. The cells were washed in PBS and then incubated with live/dead fixable aqua dead cell stain (Thermo Fisher) for 10 min at 22 °C. After a final wash in FACS buffer, the cells were resuspended in FACS buffer at 107 cells per ml for cell sorting on a three-laser BD FACS (BD Biosciences).
For single-cell analysis, total ASCs were gated as CD3−CD14−CD16−CD19+CD38+CD27+ single live cells, whereas naive B cells were gated as CD3−CD14−CD16−CD19+CD27−IgD+CD38+ single live cells.
For bulk sequencing preparations, B cells were enriched using StemCell’s Human Pan-B Cell Enrichment Kit (no. 19554; negative selection of CD2, CD3, CD14, CD16, CD36, CD42b, CD56, CD66b and CD123). CD138+ ASCs were enriched further using CD138+ selection beads according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Miltenyi Biotec, no. 130-051-301).
Single-cell V(D)J repertoire library preparation and sequencing
Cells were counted immediately using a hemocytometer and adjusted to 1,000 cells per microlitre to capture 10,000 single cells per sample loaded in the 10× Genomics Chromium device according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol (Chromium Next GEM Single Cell V(D)J Reagent Kits, v.1.1). The 10× Genomics v2 libraries were prepared using the 10x Genomics Chromium Single Cell 5′ Library Construction Kit per the manufacturer’s instructions. Libraries were sequenced on an Illumina NovaSeq (paired-end; 2 × 150 bp; read 1:26 cycles; i7 index: 8 cycles, i5 index: 0 cycles; read 2: 98 cycles) such that more than 70% saturation could be achieved with a sequence depth of 5,000 reads per cell.
Carbodiimide coupling of microspheres to SARS-CoV-2 antigens
Two SARS-CoV-2 proteins were coupled to MagPlex microspheres of different regions (Luminex). Nucleocapsid protein expressed from Escherichia coli (N-terminal His6) was obtained from Raybiotech (230-01104-100) and the RBD of spike protein expressed from HEK293 cells was obtained from the laboratory of J. Wrammert63 at Emory University. Coupling was carried out at 22 °C following standard carbodiimide coupling procedures. Concentrations of coupled microspheres were confirmed by Bio-Rad T20 Cell Counter.
Luminex proteomic assays for measurement of anti-antigen antibody
Approximately 50 μl of coupled microsphere mix was added to each well of 96-well clear-bottom black polystyrene microplates (Greiner Bio-One) at a concentration of 1,000 microspheres per region per well. All wash steps and dilutions were accomplished using 1% BSA, 1× PBS assay buffer. Sera were assayed at 1:500 dilution and surveyed for antibodies against nucleocapsid protein or RBD. After a 1-h incubation in the dark on a plate shaker at 800 rpm, wells were washed five times in 100 μl of assay buffer using a BioTek 405 TS plate washer before applications of 3 μg ml−1 PE-conjugated goat antihuman IgA, IgG and/or IgM (Southern Biotech). After 30 min of incubation at 800 rpm in the dark, wells were washed three times in 100 μl assay buffer, resuspended in 100 μl assay buffer and analysed using a Luminex FLEXMAP 3D instrument running xPONENT 4.3 software. Mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) using combined or individual detection antibodies (anti-IgA, anti-IgG or anti-IgM) was measured using the Luminex xPONENT software. The background value of the assay buffer was subtracted from each serum sample result to obtain MFI minus background (net MFI).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was carried out using Prism (GraphPad). For each experiment, the type of statistical testing, summary statistics and levels of significance can be found in the figures and corresponding legends. All measurements shown were taken from distinct samples.
High-throughput surface plasmon resonance
High-throughput surface plasmon resonance (HT-SPR) data were collected through single-cycle kinetic analysis against either SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid or spike trimer (S2P). mAbs were prescreened for antigen binding through Luminex-based multiplex binding assessment (above), and select antibodies were analysed for binding affinity. All data were collected with 1:1 referencing collected in real time on a Nicoya Alto HT-SPR instrument with eight referenced channels running in parallel on carboxyl-coated sensors. Ligand binding and regeneration conditions for each antigen were as follows.
S2P
SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer was resuspended in Tris acetate buffer, pH 4.5, and immobilized on an EDC/NHS-activated carboxyl sensor for 5 min at 50 μg ml−1. Regeneration of the sensor was performed using glycine HCl, pH 2.5, for 1 min.
Nucleocapsid
SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein was resuspended in Tris acetate buffer, pH 6, and immobilized onto an EDC/NHS-activated carboxyl sensor for 5 min at 50 μg ml−1. Regeneration of the sensor was performed using glycine HCl, pH 3, for 1 min.
All single-curve kinetics were performed with five threefold analyte dilutions with final concentrations between 222 nM and 914 pM. Analytes were run in phosphate-buffered saline (0.05% Tween), with interactions collected at 25 °C.
B cell binding assay
Two to three million HD PBMCs were incubated with 5 μg of mAb at 40 °C for 30 min. The cells were washed with 30× volume FACS buffer (1× PBS, 2% FBS) and subsequently stained with antibodies against CD3, CD19, CD27, IgD and IgG, as well as with Zombie NIR. Staining was completed with 0.8% paraformaldehyde for fixation. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on a CytoFLEX (BD Biosciences). Dead cells and doublets were excluded. The mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of mAb (IgG) was determined on a naive B cell population.
mAb selection and production
mAb were selected for production from the single-cell repertoire data obtained from patient ICU-1. Individual cells were clustered into clonotypes and then assessed for clonotype size, nucleotide mutation frequency, isotype and connectivity between sorted populations. Through progressive filtering, clonotypes were selected that met the following criteria:
contained at least one IgG1 member;
had at least one member with a mutation frequency of <1%;
had at least one member in the ASC compartment or the CD27− compartment or contained members in both.
With those criteria met, all expanded clonotypes (>5 individual cells identified in the clonotype) and all IGHV4-34+ members were selected for mAb production and screening (55 clonotypes in all). The most frequently repeated BCR sequence from each clonotype was provided to Genscript for antibody production on a standard IgG1 backbone.
Clinical autoreactivity testing
For autoimmune biomarker analysis, frozen plasma was shipped on dry ice to Exagen, Inc., which has a clinical laboratory accredited by the College of American Pathologists and certified under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments. Thawed plasma was aliquoted and distributed for the following tests: antinuclear antibodies (ANA) were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) (QUANTA Lite; Inova Diagnostics) and indirect immunofluorescence (IFA) (NOVA Lite; Inova Diagnostics); anti-dsDNA antibodies were also measured by ELISA and were confirmed by IFA with Crithidia luciliae; extractable nuclear antigen autoantibodies (anti-Sm, anti-SS-B/La IgG, anti-Scl-70 IgG, anti-U1RNP IgG, anti-RNP70 IgG, anti-CENP IgG, anti-Jo-1 IgG and anti-CCP IgG) as well as RF IgA and IgM were measured using the EliA test on the Phadia 250 platform (ThermoFisher Scientific); IgG, IgM and IgA isotypes of anticardiolipin and anti-β2‐glycoprotein, as well as anti-Ro52, anti-Ro60, anti-GBM, anti-PR3 and anti-MPO, were measured using a chemiluminescence immunoassay (BIO-FLASH; Inova Diagnostics); anti-CarP, anti-RNA-pol-III, and the IgG and IgM isotypes of anti-PS/PT were measured by ELISA (QUANTA Lite; Inova Diagnostics), whereas C-ANCA and P-ANCA were measured by IFA (NOVA Lite; Inova Diagnostics). All assays were performed following the manufacturer’s instructions.
BALF plasma cell gene expression
To assess the constant region gene expression in BALF-derived ASCs, data were retrospectively analysed from the UCSC data browser available at https://www.nupulmonary.org/covid-19-ms1. In brief, these data are representative of ten ICU patients whose BALF was collected within 48 h of intubation, with total isolated cells sequenced using the 10× single-cell transcriptomics platform. Patient information and full methods are available in the associated manuscript25.
MENSA generation
Medium enriched for newly synthesized antibodies (MENSA) was generated by isolating, washing and culturing ASC-containing PBMC from blood using a modified procedure previously described (REF). PBMC were isolated by centrifugation (1,000g; 10 min) using Lymphocyte Separation Media (Corning) and Leucosep tubes (Greiner Bio-One). Five washes with RPMI-1640 (Corning) were performed to remove serum immunoglobulins (800g; 5 min), with erythrocyte lysis (3 ml; 3 min) after the second wash and cell counting after the fourth. Collected PBMCs were cultured at 106 cells ml−1 in R10 medium (RPMI-1640, 10% Sigma FBS, 1% Gibco antibiotic/antimycotic) on a 12-well sterile tissue-culture plate for 24 h at 37 °C and 5% CO2. After incubation, the cell suspension was centrifuged (800g; 5 min), and the supernatant (MENSA) was separated from the PBMC pellet, aliquoted and stored at −80 °C for testing.
COVID-19 multiplex immunoassay
SARS-CoV-2 antigens were coupled to MagPlex microspheres of spectrally distinct regions by carbodiimide coupling and tested against patient samples as previously described. Results were analysed on a Luminex FLEXMAP 3D instrument running xPONENT 4.3 software. MFI using combined or individual PE-conjugated detection antibodies (anti-IgA/anti-IgG/anti-IgM) was measured using the Luminex xPONENT software on enhanced PMT setting. The background value of assay buffer or R10 medium was subtracted from the serum and plasma or MENSA results, respectively, to obtain an MFI minus background (net MFI). Serum and plasma samples were tested at 1:500 dilution, and MENSA was tested undiluted.
Selection of antigens
MENSA and serum samples
Four recombinant SARS-CoV-2 antigens were used in this study. The nucleocapsid protein (catalogue no. Z03480; expressed in E. coli), the S1 domain (amino acids 16–685; catalogue no. Z03485; expressed in HEK293 cells) of the spike protein, and the S1-RBD (catalogue no. Z03483; expressed in HEK293 cells) were purchased from GenScript. The S1-NTD (amino acids 16–318) was custom synthesized by GenScript. Each protein was expressed with an N-terminal His6-tag to facilitate purification (>85% pure) and appeared as a predominant single band in sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis analysis.
mAb testing
RBD (catalogue no. Z03483; expressed in HEK293 cells) and nucleocapsid protein (catalogue no. Z03480; expressed in E. coli) were purchased from GenScript (same as the first version). S1 (catalogue no. S1N-C52H3; HEK293), S2 (catalogue no. S2N-C52H5; HEK293) and S1-NTD (catalogue no. S1D-C52H6; HEK293) were purchased from ACROBiosystems. The carboxyl terminus sequence of ORF3a (accession: QHD43417.1, amino acids 134–275 plus N-terminal His6-Tag) was sent to Genscript for custom protein expression in E. coli.
Reporting summary
Further information on research design is available in the Nature Research Reporting Summary linked to this article.
Online content
Any methods, additional references, Nature Research reporting summaries, source data, extended data, supplementary information, acknowledgements, peer review information; details of author contributions and competing interests; and statements of data and code availability are available at 10.1038/s41586-022-05273-0.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by National Institutes of Health grants UL TR000424 (Emory Library IT), U54-CA260563-01 Emory SeroNet (I.S., F.E.L.), U19-AI110483 Emory Autoimmunity Center of Excellence (I.S.), P01-AI125180-01 (I.S., F.E.L.), R37-AI049660 (I.S.), 1R01AI12125 (F.E.L.), 1U01AI141993 (F.E.L) and T32-HL116271-07 (R.P.R.) and by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-002351, F.E.L.). It was additionally supported by the Lupus Research Alliance (Distinguished Innovator Award, I.S.). Clinical autoreactivity testing was provided by Exagen, Inc. We thank S. Auld, W. Bender, L. Daniels, B. Staitieh, C. Swenson and A. Truong for their expertise and support of our research. We also thank the nurses, staff and providers in the 71 ICU in Emory University Hospital Midtown and the 2E ICU in Emory Saint Joseph’s Hospital. We thank S. Rey, S. Demers, M. Hammons, A. Sace and R. LaFon and the Sanz/Lee clinical coordination and sample processing teams for aid in sample identification, collection, preparation and serological screening. Finally, we acknowledge L. Morales-Nebreda for her guidance in the use of previously published datasets.
Extended data figures and tables
Source data
Author contributions
M.C.W., R.P.R., S.A.J., F.E.L. and I.S. conceived and directed this study. M.C.W. and R.B. performed flow cytometry, mAb and serum autoreactivity testing and mAb affinity testing used in the study. M.C.-M. and A.S.S. performed single-cell sorting and sequencing. R.P.R., N.S.H. and F.A.A. performed serum and mAb screening against viral antigens. M.C.W., J.H., E.C.C., M.P. and C.M.T. analysed and compiled the resulting data. R.P.R., M.C.R. and A.K. conducted chart review and identified patient samples for study inclusion, and T.A.W., A.D.T., A.N.D., J.E.H., I.A., V.J., K.S.C., D.C.N., S.K., G.S.M., C.L.M. and A.E. provided critical patient samples for the study. M.E.R. and M.P. oversaw critical collaborations for patient autoreactivity screening and mAb affinity testing, respectively. E.C.C. and G.G. provided critical feedback and support in data analysis and interpretation. M.C.W. and I.S. wrote the manuscript, with all authors providing editorial support.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature thanks Shiv Pillai and the other, anonymous reviewer(s) for their contribution to the peer review of this work. Peer reviewer reports are available.
Data availability
Source data for Figs. 1, 2 and 4 are provided with the paper. All flow cytometry(FCM) and sequencing data presented here are publicly available in alignment with current requirements for public disclosure before peer review. All FCM data presented and analysed in this manuscript (Fig. 1) are publicly available in the FlowRepository at http://flowrepository.org/id/FR-FCM-Z2XF/.
Competing interests
F.E.L. is the founder of MicroB-plex, Inc., and has research grants with Genentech. M.E.R. is employed by Exagen, Inc. M.P. is employed by Nicoya.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
These authors contributed equally: Matthew C. Woodruff and Richard P. Ramonell
Contributor Information
F. Eun-Hyung Lee, Email: F.E.Lee@emory.edu.
Ignacio Sanz, Email: Ignacio.sanz@emory.edu.
Extended data
is available for this paper at 10.1038/s41586-022-05273-0.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41586-022-05273-0.
References
- 1.Andersen KG, Rambaut A, Lipkin WI, Holmes EC, Garry RF. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 2020;26:450–452. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0820-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen X, et al. Detectable serum severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 viral load (RNAemia) is closely correlated with drastically elevated interleukin 6 level in critically ill patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:1937–1942. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa449. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Henderson LA, et al. On the alert for cytokine storm: immunopathology in COVID-19. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2020;72:1059–1063. doi: 10.1002/art.41285. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Group RC, et al. Dexamethasone in hospitalized patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2021;384:693–704. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2021436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cao X. COVID-19: immunopathology and its implications for therapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2020;20:269–270. doi: 10.1038/s41577-020-0308-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang Y, et al. Coagulopathy and antiphospholipid antibodies in patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;382:e38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2007575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Bastard P, et al. Autoantibodies against type I IFNs in patients with life-threatening COVID-19. Science. 2020;370:eabd4585. doi: 10.1126/science.abd4585. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gagiannis D, et al. Clinical, serological, and histopathological similarities between severe COVID-19 and acute exacerbation of connective tissue disease-associated interstitial lung disease (CTD-ILD) Front. Immunol. 2020;11:587517. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.587517. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bowles L, et al. Lupus anticoagulant and abnormal coagulation tests in patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:288–290. doi: 10.1056/NEJMc2013656. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Wang EY, et al. Diverse functional autoantibodies in patients with COVID-19. Nature. 2021 doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-03631-y. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Chang SE, et al. New-onset IgG autoantibodies in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:5417. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25509-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Tipton CM, et al. Diversity, cellular origin and autoreactivity of antibody-secreting cell population expansions in acute systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Immunol. 2015;16:755–765. doi: 10.1038/ni.3175. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Jenks SA, et al. Distinct effector B cells induced by unregulated Toll-like receptor 7 contribute to pathogenic responses in systemic lupus erythematosus. Immunity. 2018;49:725–739.e726. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.08.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Kaneko N, et al. Loss of Bcl-6-expressing T follicular helper cells and germinal centers in COVID-19. Cell. 2020;183:143–157.e113. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.08.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Woodruff MC, et al. Extrafollicular B cell responses correlate with neutralizing antibodies and morbidity in COVID-19. Nat. Immunol. 2020;21:1506–1516. doi: 10.1038/s41590-020-00814-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hoehn KB, et al. Cutting edge: distinct B cell repertoires characterize patients with mild and severe COVID-19. J. Immunol. 2021;206:2785–2790. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2100135. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Sosa-Hernandez VA, et al. B cell subsets as severity-associated signatures in COVID-19 patients. Front. Immunol. 2020;11:611004. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.611004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Nielsen SCA, et al. Human B cell clonal expansion and convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2. Cell Host Microbe. 2020;28:516–525.e515. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2020.09.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Mathew D, et al. Deep immune profiling of COVID-19 patients reveals distinct immunotypes with therapeutic implications. Science. 2020;369:eabc8511. doi: 10.1126/science.abc8511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jenks SA, Cashman KS, Woodruff MC, Lee FE, Sanz I. Extrafollicular responses in humans and SLE. Immunol. Rev. 2019;288:136–148. doi: 10.1111/imr.12741. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pugh-Bernard AE, et al. Regulation of inherently autoreactive VH4-34 B cells in the maintenance of human B cell tolerance. J. Clin. Invest. 2001;108:1061–1070. doi: 10.1172/JCI200112462. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Halliley JL, et al. Long-lived plasma cells are contained within the CD19−CD38hiCD138+ subset in human bone marrow. Immunity. 2015;43:132–145. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.06.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Haddad NS, et al. Novel immunoassay for diagnosis of ongoing Clostridioides difficile infections using serum and medium enriched for newly synthesized antibodies (MENSA) J. Immunol. Methods. 2021;492:112932. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2020.112932. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Mei HE, et al. Blood-borne human plasma cells in steady state are derived from mucosal immune responses. Blood. 2009;113:2461–2469. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-04-153544. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Grant RA, et al. Circuits between infected macrophages and T cells in SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Nature. 2021;590:635–641. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03148-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Yaari G, Uduman M, Kleinstein SH. Quantifying selection in high-throughput immunoglobulin sequencing data sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:e134. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks457. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Satoh M, et al. Prevalence and sociodemographic correlates of antinuclear antibodies in the United States. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64:2319–2327. doi: 10.1002/art.34380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Li Y, et al. Antibodies against carbamylated vimentin exist in systemic lupus erythematosus and correlate with disease activity. Lupus. 2020;29:239–247. doi: 10.1177/0961203319897127. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.O'Neil LJ, et al. Neutrophil-mediated carbamylation promotes articular damage in rheumatoid arthritis. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:eabd2688. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abd2688. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Luo X, et al. Prognostic value of C-reactive protein in patients with coronavirus 2019. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020;71:2174–2179. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Haddad NS, et al. One-stop serum assay identifies COVID-19 disease severity and vaccination responses. Immunohorizons. 2021;5:322–335. doi: 10.4049/immunohorizons.2100011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Cheng L, et al. Impact of the N501Y substitution of SARS-CoV-2 spike on neutralizing monoclonal antibodies targeting diverse epitopes. Virol. J. 2021;18:87. doi: 10.1186/s12985-021-01554-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Wardemann H, et al. Predominant autoantibody production by early human B cell precursors. Science. 2003;301:1374–1377. doi: 10.1126/science.1086907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Richardson C, et al. Molecular basis of 9G4 B cell autoreactivity in human systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Immunol. 2013;191:4926–4939. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1202263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cappione AJ, Pugh-Bernard AE, Anolik JH, Sanz I. Lupus IgG VH4.34 antibodies bind to a 220-kDa glycoform of CD45/B220 on the surface of human B lymphocytes. J. Immunol. 2004;172:4298–4307. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.172.7.4298. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Mietzner B, et al. Autoreactive IgG memory antibodies in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus arise from nonreactive and polyreactive precursors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2008;105:9727–9732. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0803644105. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Quách TD, et al. Anergic responses characterize a large fraction of human autoreactive naive B cells expressing low levels of surface IgM. J. Immunol. 2011;186:4640–4648. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1001946. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Scheid JF, et al. Differential regulation of self-reactivity discriminates between IgG+ human circulating memory B cells and bone marrow plasma cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:18044–18048. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1113395108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Roosnek E, Lanzavecchia A. Efficient and selective presentation of antigen-antibody complexes by rheumatoid factor B cells. J. Exp. Med. 1991;173:487–489. doi: 10.1084/jem.173.2.487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Hunziker L, et al. Hypergammaglobulinemia and autoantibody induction mechanisms in viral infections. Nat. Immunol. 2003;4:343–349. doi: 10.1038/ni911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zabriskie JB. Streptococcal cross-reactive antigens in relation to rheumatic fever. Zentralbl. Bakteriol. Orig. 1970;214:339–351. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fujinami RS, Oldstone MB. Amino acid homology between the encephalitogenic site of myelin basic protein and virus: mechanism for autoimmunity. Science. 1985;230:1043–1045. doi: 10.1126/science.2414848. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Kirvan CA, Swedo SE, Heuser JS, Cunningham MW. Mimicry and autoantibody-mediated neuronal cell signaling in Sydenham chorea. Nat. Med. 2003;9:914–920. doi: 10.1038/nm892. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Cunningham MW. Molecular mimicry, autoimmunity, and infection: the cross-reactive antigens of group A streptococci and their sequelae. Microbiol. Spectr. 2019 doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.GPP3-0045-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Lans T, et al. Clonally expanded B cells in multiple sclerosis bind EBV EBNA1 and GlialCAM. Nature. 2022;603:321–327. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04432-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Laurynenka V, et al. A high prevalence of anti-EBNA1 heteroantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) supports anti-EBNA1 as an origin for SLE autoantibodies. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:830993. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.830993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Duty J, et al. Functional anergy in a subpopulation of naive B cells from healthy humans that express autoreactive immunoglobulin receptors. J. Exp. Med. 2009;206:139–51. doi: 10.1084/jem.20080611. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lucas C, et al. Longitudinal analyses reveal immunological misfiring in severe COVID-19. Nature. 2020;584:463–469. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2588-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zumaquero E, et al. IFNγ induces epigenetic programming of human T-bethi B cells and promotes TLR7/8 and IL-21 induced differentiation. eLife. 2019;8:e41641. doi: 10.7554/eLife.41641. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Arcanjo A, et al. The emerging role of neutrophil extracellular traps in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (COVID-19) Sci. Rep. 2020;10:19630. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-76781-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Tiller T, et al. Autoreactivity in human IgG+ memory B cells. Immunity. 2007;26:205–213. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2007.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Elsner RA, Shlomchik MJ. Germinal center and extrafollicular B cell responses in vaccination, immunity, and autoimmunity. Immunity. 2020;53:1136–1150. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.11.006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Huang W, et al. Belimumab promotes negative selection of activated autoreactive B cells in systemic lupus erythematosus patients. JCI Insight. 2018;3:e122525. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.122525. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ostendorf L, et al. Targeting CD38 with daratumumab in refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020;383:1149–1155. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2023325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Blumberg LJ, et al. Blocking FcRn in humans reduces circulating IgG levels and inhibits IgG immune complex mediated immune responses. Sci. Adv. 2019;5:eaax9586. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax9586. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Nirappil FJ, et al. Characteristics and outcomes of HIV-1-infected patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. J. Crit. Care. 2015;30:60–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Source data for Figs. 1, 2 and 4 are provided with the paper. All flow cytometry(FCM) and sequencing data presented here are publicly available in alignment with current requirements for public disclosure before peer review. All FCM data presented and analysed in this manuscript (Fig. 1) are publicly available in the FlowRepository at http://flowrepository.org/id/FR-FCM-Z2XF/.