Abstract
Anxiety and depression are among the most common psychiatric conditions affecting children and adolescents, and physicians in primary care settings often represent the first point of contact for these patients. Therefore, it is critical to provide these clinicians with an overview of current, evidence-based approaches for treating these conditions in pediatric and adolescent patients. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is an appropriate and effective first-line intervention for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. For depressive disorders, treatment guidelines recommend either CBT or interpersonal therapy (IPT) as frontline treatment approaches. Pharmacologically, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) represent the most efficacious treatment for anxiety and depressive disorders in young persons. Combination therapies consisting of a psychotherapy plus an SSRI have produced greater therapeutic effects than either treatment alone. In particular, CBT plus sertraline is most effective in those with anxiety, whereas combining CBT or IPT with fluoxetine has been identified as the most effective treatment for depression in this population. Clinically, these combination therapies are especially useful in patients showing an insufficient response to treatment with only an SSRI or psychotherapy. A physician should also recommend lifestyle alterations to aid in the management of anxiety and depression, including diet, exercise, adequate sleep, limiting screen time, and spending time in nature. When used to complement standard treatment approaches, these interventions may provide the patient with additional symptom reduction while decreasing the return of symptoms in the long term.
Keywords: adjunctive interventions, nonpharmacologic treatment, pharmacologic treatment, pediatric anxiety, pediatric depression
Introduction and background
Anxiety and depression are two common mental health diagnoses made in pediatric patients. The median age of onset for anxiety disorder is six years old and typically persists throughout the lifetime of those diagnosed. Generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) is characterized by excessive worrying, insomnia, irritability, fatigue, and decreased concentration. Other anxiety disorders include social anxiety disorder and separation anxiety disorder. The median age of onset for social anxiety disorder is 12 years old and is characterized by fear of embarrassment or scrutiny from peers. Separation anxiety disorder has an earlier onset at the age of eight years old and is characterized by extreme worry or anxiety when separated from someone with whom they have a firm attachment. Depression is usually diagnosed later in childhood, with a median age of onset of 13 years old [1,2]. Major depressive disorder (MDD) is characterized by low self-esteem, guilt, hopelessness, impulsivity, and changes in sleep and appetite. Children between the ages of three and five years old can have suicidal thoughts, but suicidal ideation has a higher occurrence in children 13 years old and older [3]. It is important for physicians to recognize these symptoms early so that optimal management of GAD and MDD can be provided and decreases the risk of developing other mood disorders [2].
Review
Anxiety
Nonpharmacologic
Among the therapeutic approaches used in the treatment of this population, current evidence offers the most support to cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), which is recommended as a first-line intervention due to its well-established efficacy and limited side effects [2,4-6]. While CBT remains the evidence-based current standard, other psychotherapies have also been effective in treating these patients, including social effectiveness therapy (SET) and acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT).
CBT is a combination of therapeutic approaches that teach the patient to identify feelings of anxiety and confront irrational thoughts during anxiety-provoking situations. Treatment with CBT focuses on cultivating mechanisms of modifying these thoughts and beliefs so as to alter maladaptive behaviors in response to distressing conditions [5,7,8]. Traditionally, CBT programs adopt a generic treatment approach that uses the same set of techniques to treat separation, generalized, and social anxiety disorders in children and adolescents [5,7,9,10]. However, this non-specific CBT approach is found to be less effective for young patients with social anxiety compared to other anxiety disorders [9-11]. Consequently, psychotherapies specifically targeting social anxiety disorders have been developed by altering existing therapies to address social skills deficits in this population [5,7,9,12].
Among the first of these tailored therapies was cognitive behavioral group therapy for adolescents (CBGT-A), a treatment approach that incorporates social skills training (SST) into group-based CBT programs [12,13]. Standard CBT programs are more effective in treating youth anxiety when SST is added [11,12]. In contrast, social effectiveness therapy for children (SET-C) is a group-based behavioral therapy for patients with social anxiety that focuses on exposure therapy, SST, and peer generalization [2,7,9,11-13].
ACT is a contemporary method that seeks to treat patients by promoting long-term, goal-oriented behaviors rather than focusing on symptom reduction [14,15]. Treatment with ACT focuses on developing psychological flexibility or the ability to accept experiences and commit to value-based behaviors [10,14-16]. ACT intervention has been proven to be effective in treating anxiety and depression with positive treatment outcomes comparable to those achieved by traditional CBT, which is the current standard for the treatment of anxiety disorders [9,10,14-16]. See Table 1 for a comparison of these psychosocial therapies.
Table 1. Psychotherapy interventions for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents.
Therapy | Indication | Most efficacious components | Predictors of greater treatment response |
Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)* | Generalized, separation, and social anxiety disorders; ages ≥6 years old | Exposure therapy: the patient is repeatedly exposed to anxiety-provoking objects or situations, typically in a stepwise fashion of increasing intensity. Cognitive restructuring: challenging previously established thought patterns | Diagnoses of non-social anxiety disorders. Longer duration of overall treatment. Greater parental involvement when treating younger children. Positive expectations regarding the value of exposure-based CBT. The addition of social skills training |
Social effectiveness therapy for children (SET-C) | Social anxiety disorder; ages 7-17 | Exposure therapy: the patient is repeatedly exposed to anxiety-provoking objects or situations, typically in a stepwise fashion of increasing intensity. Social skills training: group-based learning of various social skills, including conversation, listening and telephone skills, and making and maintaining relationships | Decreases in child-reported loneliness throughout treatment |
Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) | Generalized, separation, and social anxiety disorders; ages ≥6 years old | Psychological flexibility: the ability to accept experiences and commit to value-based behaviors. Exposure therapy: the patient is repeatedly exposed to anxiety-provoking objects or situations, typically in a stepwise fashion of increasing intensity. Acceptance: choosing to tolerate negative thoughts and feelings rather than avoiding or attempting to change them. Cognitive defusion: observing own thought processes | Higher pretreatment psychological flexibility |
Pharmacologic
Compared to adults, the efficacy of psychopharmacotherapy has not been well studied in pediatrics. Currently, the only FDA-approved medication for the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder in children and adolescents is duloxetine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI) [1]. Though duloxetine is approved by the FDA, studies have shown that selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are more efficacious than SNRIs and are considered the first-line pharmacologic treatment of GAD in pediatrics [17]. SSRIs, such as fluoxetine and sertraline, significantly improve GAD in children and adolescents and are well tolerated [1].
Benzodiazepines are a class of anxiolytics that have not been well investigated in pediatric patients. Studies indicate no significant difference between the drug and placebo in relief of GAD symptoms. In addition, adverse reactions such as irritability, drowsiness, oppositional behavior, dry mouth, and treatment-emergent suicidality were experienced [1,2]. Furthermore, children treated with benzodiazepines have an increased risk of upper and lower extremity fractures. A clear causation has not been identified, but it has been hypothesized that because benzodiazepines can cause dizziness, there is an increased risk of falling, which can lead to fractures [18].
Other anxiolytics traditionally used in adults have not been indicated for use in children due to harmful side effects or inefficacy. For example, tricyclic antidepressants (TCA) are not indicated, as potentially dangerous side-effects such as increased QT intervals and arrhythmias in those treated with this class of drugs have been observed [2]. Furthermore, buspirone has been observed to be well tolerated in children but does not show significant improvements in GAD when compared to a placebo [1,2].
A notable side effect of antidepressants is activation, which is described as a conglomerate of symptoms including impulsivity, restlessness, and insomnia. Children and adolescents at risk of bipolar depressive disorder and those diagnosed with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) are more likely to experience activation when being treated for anxiety with an SSRI. It has been recommended that pediatric patients at risk of activation should be prescribed a lower starting dose of SSRIs and then titrated slowly [19].
The protocol for discontinuing treatment with antidepressants is dependent on the half-life of the medication. For example, due to fluoxetine’s long half-life, the drug may be stopped without tapering. A small amount of fluoxetine will remain in the system for up to nine days after the patient stops actively taking the drug. Other medications, paroxetine and venlafaxine, with shorter half-lives may require tapering in order to avoid discontinuation syndrome, which is characterized by flu-like symptoms and mood changes [20].
Research investigating new pharmacologic agents’ efficacy in treating pediatric GAD shows promising results. Vortioxetine, an SSRI, significantly reduces GAD especially in patients also experiencing symptoms of depression. Vortioxetine has been observed to be well tolerated, but adverse effects can include headache, nausea, dysmenorrhea, and vomiting [1]. Furthermore, atomoxetine, a medication traditionally used to treat ADHD, has significantly reduced GAD in the pediatric population. Overall, atomoxetine has been well tolerated, but some children treated did experience increased heart rate, increased blood pressure, drowsiness, and decreased appetite. The changes in heart rate and blood pressure may require monitoring after each increase in dosing [2]. Guanfacine, which is approved to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, has been noted to be effective in treating GAD in the pediatric population as well [21]. A sample list of medications indicated for the treatment of GAD in the pediatric population is summarized in Table 2.
Table 2. Pharmacologic treatment for children with generalized anxiety disorder.
Medication | Drug class | Formulation | Dosing | Minimum duration | Potential side effects | Special notes |
Fluoxetine* | SSRI | Capsule, tablet, or liquid | Starting dose: 10 mg/day; typical dose: 20-60 mg/day | 4-8 weeks | Treatment-induced suicidality, increased BMI, and mania | Contraindicated with the use of tricyclic antidepressants, antiarrhythmic drugs, and neuroleptics. A longer half-life causes this drug to have the smallest occurrence of withdrawal symptoms |
Sertraline* | SSRI | Capsule, tablet, or liquid | Starting dose: 25 mg/day; maximum dose: 200 mg/day | 4-8 weeks | Headache, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, diarrhea, dyspepsia, and insomnia | Bid dosing is recommended in adolescents due to its short half-life. Decreased absorption with food. Well tolerated in children ages 6-17 |
Duloxetine | SNRI | Capsule or tablet | Starting dose: 30 mg/day; maximum dose: 120 mg/day | 6-8 weeks | Weight loss, constipation, dry mouth, drowsiness, and increased heart rate | FDA approved |
Depression
Nonpharmacologic
For the treatment of mild depression in young patients, treatment guidelines recommend a period of watchful waiting before beginning active intervention. If symptoms continue, evidence-based psychotherapy is the first-line of intervention for low-severity cases and in patients unable to take medication due to apprehension or contraindication. In contrast, antidepressants are often used to complement psychotherapies in treating more severe cases or patients in which first-line psychotherapy alone was ineffective [27-29]. The two psychological therapies most often used to treat childhood and adolescent depression are CBT and interpersonal therapy (IPT) [30]. In addition to these more established interventions, ACT is another modality that has been shown to be effective [14,15].
Better treatment outcomes have been observed in CBT programs that include any combination of cognitive restructuring, the involvement of caregivers, behavioral activation, and the increased participation in pleasurable activities [27-29]. Relatively less studied, IPT focuses on developing interpersonal problem-solving skills, modifying communication patterns, and improving relationships. As such, rather than attempting to reduce depressive symptoms directly, IPT seeks to address them by improving interpersonal relationships [27,30]. This therapeutic approach has been suggested to be particularly beneficial when there is a well-established relational component to the underlying cause of the patient’s depressive symptoms [29].
Both CBT and IPT are regarded as well-established treatments for MDD in adolescent patients over 13 years of age, though limited evidence exists for treatment in younger patients [27-30]. While more research has been devoted to CBT, IPT has been found to produce comparable effects [3,27,29]. ACT, as previously described, has also been successful in treating childhood and adolescent depression. When compared to CBT, treatment with ACT has been found to produce similar outcomes in this population [14,15].
Pharmacologic
SSRIs are the recommended first-line pharmacologic treatment for children with MDD. Fluoxetine has been observed to be efficacious in treating pediatric MDD and is well tolerated in children. Though adverse reactions are rare, the FDA recommends a follow-up visit four weeks following the initial treatment to evaluate effectiveness and treatment-induced suicidality [22]. Escitalopram and sertraline have also been found to be highly efficacious when treating children with MDD. Though not as well studied as fluoxetine, escitalopram has been recommended by the FDA as another first-line treatment for children with MDD. The efficacy of all SSRIs prescribed to pediatric patients should be evaluated between four and six weeks. If no change in symptoms is observed, it is recommended to evaluate dosing and treatment duration. Pediatric patients are often underdosed due to low body weight and may require a higher dose than expected [20,27].
SNRIs may also be prescribed to treat MDD in pediatric patients. Specifically, duloxetine may be efficacious in decreasing symptoms of depression in children, though the FDA indicates duloxetine for the treatment of pediatric GAD. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that adverse side effects are more common with the treatment of SNRIs than with SSRIs [20,27].
Tricyclic antidepressants are efficacious in treating MDD in children, but adverse side effects render this class of drugs less favorable. Specifically, TCAs increase the risk of seizures in children and can cause QT prolongation and arrhythmias. If prescribed, children taking TCAs require periodic cardiac monitoring by electrocardiogram [20].
Potential adverse reactions to antidepressants must be considered before prescribing treatment. Similar to anxiety, children being treated for MDD with SSRIs are at risk of activation symptoms. For each one-year increase in age, there is a 27% decrease in the risk of activation. Family history of bipolar depressive disorder should be taken into consideration when prescribing SSRIs as this may increase the likelihood that the patient experiences activation. Furthermore, serotonin syndrome is a life-threatening reaction that may occur with the treatment of SSRIs. An increase in postsynaptic serotonin may result in symptoms including tachycardia, arrhythmias, hypertension, and diarrhea. The risk of serotonin syndrome increases when a patient is treated with multiple medications that affect serotonin levels in the synaptic cleft. Though rare, interactions between multiple serotonin-affecting medications should be reviewed to reduce the risk of serotonin syndrome [19,20]. A list of medications indicated for treating MDD in children is summarized in Table 3.
Table 3. Pharmacologic treatments for children with major depressive disorder.
Medication | Drug class | Formulation | Dosing | Duration | Potential side effects | Special notes |
Fluoxetine* | SSRI | Capsule, tablet, or liquid | Starting dose: 10-20 mg/day; typical dose: 20-80 mg/day | Initial treatment: 4-6 weeks; minimum duration for one depressive episode: 1 year | Treatment-induced suicidality, increased BMI, and mania | May be up to three times as potent in pediatrics than in adults. Approved for the treatment of ≥8 years old. Contraindicated with the use of TCAs, antiarrhythmic drugs, and neuroleptics. FDA recommends a four-week follow-up. FDA approved |
Escitalopram* | SSRI | Capsule, tablet, or liquid | Starting dose: 5-10 mg/day; typical dose: 10-40 mg/day | Initial treatment: 4-6 weeks; minimum duration for one depressive episode: 1 year | Increased BMI and mania | Approved for the treatment of ≥12 years old. FDA approved |
Duloxetine | SNRI | Capsule or tablet | Starting dose: 30 mg/day; typical dose: 40-60 mg/day | Initial treatment: 6-8 weeks | Weight loss, changes in systolic blood pressure, and changes in heart rate | First-line SNRI |
The combination of pharmacology and psychotherapy interventions
Current treatment guidelines recommend CBT as the first-line treatment for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents experiencing mild symptoms. However, in more severe cases, the recommended treatment approach is CBT plus an SSRI, as numerous studies have indicated that this combination is the most effective intervention for anxiety in patients of ages 7-17 years old [6,7]. Specifically, CBT plus sertraline is more effective than interventions using only CBT or sertraline monotherapy. The advantage of this combined intervention was found in treating generalized, social, and separation anxiety disorders. Furthermore, the benefits of using this combination therapy were maintained at 24- and 36-week follow-up periods [2,7,9].
For the treatment of mild depression in young patients, treatment guidelines recommend a period of watchful waiting before beginning active intervention with either CBT or IPT. If symptoms persist, adding an SSRI to the patient’s treatment regimen may be required [27,29]. In moderate to severe cases of MDD, clinical practice guidelines recommend that the patient be treated with a combination of fluoxetine plus CBT or IPT [27,29,30]. Interventions that couple fluoxetine with psychotherapies have been found to produce the greatest therapeutic effects in young patients, with some evidence suggesting that the addition of CBT may help reduce the risk of treatment-induced suicidality [29,30].
Adjunctive interventions
In addition to psychotherapies and pharmacologic agents, several other interventions have been shown to improve symptoms of anxiety and depression in pediatric patients. These lifestyle interventions can benefit patients and are important to consider because depression and anxiety often persist throughout life after being diagnosed in children and adolescents. Diet and nutrition management, screen time and sleep recommendations, and nature-based interventions represent practical tools that a physician can aid patients in integrating into their daily lives.
Diet and Nutrition Interventions
Possibly the most easily integrated interventions that a primary care physician can advise in the management of anxiety and depression involve changes in dietary habits. Following dietary recommendations, avoiding certain products, and taking nutritional supplements all have the potential to improve patients’ symptoms. One study showed that patients consuming sufficient fruits, vegetables, grains, and milk products had significantly fewer visits to their primary care doctor to address mental health symptoms. Dietary recommendations for managing pediatric anxiety and depression are listed in Table 4. Compliance with each additional recommendation reduced the relative risk for mental health visits by 15% [33].
Table 4. Dietary recommendations for the management of pediatric anxiety and depression.
Food | Recommended amount |
Fruits and vegetables | ≥6 servings per day |
Grain products | ≥6 servings per day |
Milk and milk alternatives | ≥3 servings per day |
Meat and meat alternatives | ≥2 servings per day |
Saturated fats | <10% of daily caloric intake |
Added sugars | <10% of daily caloric intake |
Adolescent symptoms of anxiety and depression can also be improved by completely stopping the intake of caffeine and cannabis products. There is a significant correlation between caffeine ingestion and anxiety and depression in children [34]. The avoidance of all cannabis products is also recommended in pediatric patients with anxiety and depression. While studies are still being done to evaluate the clinical impacts of cannabis, sufficient evidence demonstrates higher rates of anxiety and depression with its use in children. Because it has been shown that on average, one out of three children admits to having tried cannabis products, it is worthwhile for physicians to address the avoidance of these products during a visit [35].
In managing anxiety and depression, dietary supplements that can be considered adjunctive therapies include omega-3 fatty acids, probiotics, vitamin D, and folate. Supplementation with polyunsaturated fatty acids, such as omega-3 fatty acids, can help to correct dysfunction in the transport of neurotransmitters within the neuron. Because this dysfunction is associated with depressive symptoms, some studies have shown that supplementation with docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EHA) helps to improve and prevent symptoms of depression [36,37]. DHA and EHA supplementation of 1,000-2,000 mg per day for 12-16 weeks is recommended as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of depression [38]. As studies continue to assess the impact of the gut microbiome on mental health, probiotics may also serve as a dietary supplement that is beneficial as an adjunctive therapy in the treatment of anxiety and depression in children. Studies have shown that a healthier gut microbiome is associated with decreased levels of inflammation and a healthier BMI. Because inflammation and a higher BMI are both associated with symptoms of depression, probiotics and a healthy gut microbiome can decrease symptoms of depression and improve the response to antidepressants [36]. Deficiency in vitamin D is also associated with depression, and treating this deficiency with supplementation has also been shown to improve symptoms [36]. Lastly, folate supplementation has been shown to improve depression symptoms in adolescents, specifically when there is a mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene [37].
Exercise Interventions
Exercise interventions are among the most studied adjunctive therapies and have proven very effective in reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression in pediatric populations. Furthermore, studies have shown a significantly higher adherence to exercise treatment interventions in adolescents as compared to psychological and drug therapies [39]. Yoga is particularly effective in the reduction of symptoms of anxiety [39,40]. For the most significant improvement, one study recommended participating in yoga sessions at least four times a week for at least six weeks [40]. Similarly, aerobic exercise has been repeatedly shown as an effective treatment to reduce depression and depressive symptoms [39,41-44]. Current guidelines recommend moderate to vigorous intensity exercise for 60 minutes or more per day for children and adolescents. Studies have shown that patients meeting or exceeding this guideline demonstrate the greatest reduction in depressive symptoms [43,45,46]. Participating in sports is one way to make this goal more feasible and has also been shown specifically to reduce symptoms of anxiety and depression as well [45].
Screen Time Limitation and Sleep Recommendations
Studies have shown a correlation between increased screen time and the increased severity of anxiety symptoms and the duration of depressive symptoms [47,48]. Specifically, for maximal benefit, it is recommended that, when possible, screen time is limited to less than two hours a day [47]. One study found that adhering to this screen time limit and getting between nine and 11 hours of sleep significantly reduced the number of doctor visits addressing mental health concerns [33].
Nature-Based Interventions
As a consequence of spending more time with technology, children are spending less time in natural environments, which may contribute to the increased prevalence of anxiety and depression in pediatric populations. Both anecdotal evidence and clinical studies have found exposure to nature to be significantly beneficial to overall mental health. It is estimated that protecting natural areas and outdoor environments saves an average of six trillion dollars globally on healthcare costs associated with poor mental health [49]. Additionally, studies have shown that the benefits of nature-based activities are significantly greater than the benefits of exercise alone [50]. This information has led to a movement of greater incorporation of a variety of different types of outdoor therapies and nature-based interventions. In general, any increase in accessibility, exposure, and engagement with natural outdoor spaces for kids significantly improves their mental health [51]. These positive impacts of nature-based interventions are even greater for kids that are of lower socioeconomic status and those that live in areas with a higher population density [52,53]. The specific intervention can vary based on a patient’s needs, ranging from visiting local parks with greater frequency to outdoor programs, camp experiences, and wilderness expeditions. For some patients, it may be beneficial to recommend a structured wilderness therapy program facilitated by a trained professional. These types of programs offer group treatment and are uniquely beneficial due to the incorporation of natural environments [51].
Osteopathic Manipulative Interventions
While there are currently no studies evaluating osteopathic manipulative treatments for anxiety and depression in children and adolescents, the following techniques are known to improve heart rate variability by downregulating the sympathetic nervous system and could prove beneficial in reducing symptoms of anxiety and depression: cervical soft tissue/long axis kneading, cervical high velocity/low amplitude, sacral decompression, suboccipital/occipitoatlantal (OA) decompression, doming the respiratory diaphragm, and the compression of the fourth ventricle [54].
Conclusions
As the prevalence of anxiety and depression increases in the pediatric population, there are a variety of therapies and interventions that a primary care doctor may utilize in managing these conditions. For many patients, the use of pharmacologic agents, referral to a mental health professional for psychosocial therapy, adjunctive interventions, and coaching regarding lifestyle modifications collectively represent the most effective management. It is important for the treating physician to refer to mental health professionals for the administration of psychosocial therapies when needed. This type of referral may be necessary during the continual evaluation of the efficacy of managing a child’s anxiety or depression.
While there are a variety of therapies that are available to treat these conditions, there are still relatively few studies looking at pharmacotherapy in the pediatric population as compared to adults. In addition, the management of these conditions could be improved by studies evaluating the most effective components of CBT that offer the greatest therapeutic response. These types of studies could be helpful in minimizing the use of pharmacologic agents, thereby reducing the risk of adverse reactions.
The content published in Cureus is the result of clinical experience and/or research by independent individuals or organizations. Cureus is not responsible for the scientific accuracy or reliability of data or conclusions published herein. All content published within Cureus is intended only for educational, research and reference purposes. Additionally, articles published within Cureus should not be deemed a suitable substitute for the advice of a qualified health care professional. Do not disregard or avoid professional medical advice due to content published within Cureus.
Footnotes
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
References
- 1.Pharmacotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder in adult and pediatric patients: an evidence-based treatment review. Strawn JR, Geracioti L, Rajdev N, Clemenza K, Levine A. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2018;19:1057–1070. doi: 10.1080/14656566.2018.1491966. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Research review: pediatric anxiety disorders - what have we learnt in the last 10 years? Strawn JR, Lu L, Peris TS, Levine A, Walkup JT. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2021;62:114–139. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Major depressive disorder in children and adolescents. Mullen S. Ment Health Clin. 2018;8:275–283. doi: 10.9740/mhc.2018.11.275. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Exposure therapy for youth with anxiety: utilization rates and predictors of implementation in a sample of practicing clinicians from across the United States. Reid AM, Guzick AG, Fernandez AG, et al. J Anxiety Disord. 2018;58:8–17. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.06.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents. James AC, Reardon T, Soler A, James G, Creswell C. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11:0. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013162.pub2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Clinical practice guideline for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with anxiety disorders. Walter HJ, Bukstein OG, Abright AR, Keable H, Ramtekkar U, Ripperger-Suhler J, Rockhill C. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2020;59:1107–1124. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2020.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Assessment and treatment of anxiety among children and adolescents. Freidl EK, Stroeh OM, Elkins RM, Steinberg E, Albano AM, Rynn M. Focus (Am Psychiatr Publ) 2017;15:144–156. doi: 10.1176/appi.focus.20160047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.A meta-analysis to guide the enhancement of CBT for childhood anxiety: exposure over anxiety management. Whiteside SP, Sim LA, Morrow AS, Farah WH, Hilliker DR, Murad MH, Wang Z. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2020;23:102–121. doi: 10.1007/s10567-019-00303-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Practitioner review: anxiety disorders in children and young people - assessment and treatment. Creswell C, Waite P, Hudson J. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61:628–643. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Identifying the underlying mechanisms of change during acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): a systematic review of contemporary mediation studies. Stockton D, Kellett S, Berrios R, Sirois F, Wilkinson N, Miles G. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2019;47:332–362. doi: 10.1017/S1352465818000553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.CBT for childhood anxiety: reviewing the state of personalised intervention research. Bertie LA, Hudson JL. Front Psychol. 2021;12:722546. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.722546. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Beidel D, Le TA, Willis E. Pediatric anxiety disorders. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier; 2019. Social anxiety disorder: an update on diagnostics, epidemiology, etiology, assessment, treatment, unanswered questions, and future directions; pp. 201–223. [Google Scholar]
- 13.Understanding social anxiety disorder in adolescents and improving treatment outcomes: applying the cognitive model of Clark and Wells (1995) Leigh E, Clark DM. Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2018;21:388–414. doi: 10.1007/s10567-018-0258-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for children. Fang S, Ding D. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020;15:225–234. [Google Scholar]
- 15.Acceptance and commitment therapy in group format for anxiety and depression. A systematic review. Coto-Lesmes R, Fernández-Rodríguez C, González-Fernández S. J Affect Disord. 2020;263:107–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.154. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive behavior therapy for children with anxiety: outcomes of a randomized controlled trial. Hancock KM, Swain J, Hainsworth CJ, Dixon AL, Koo S, Munro K. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2018;47:296–311. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2015.1110822. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.The impact of antidepressant dose and class on treatment response in pediatric anxiety disorders: a meta-analysis. Strawn JR, Mills JA, Sauley BA, Welge JA. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018;57:235–244. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.01.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Benzodiazepine treatment and fracture risk in young persons with anxiety disorders. Bushnell GA, Gerhard T, Crystal S, Olfson M. Pediatrics. 2020;146:0. doi: 10.1542/peds.2019-3478. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Antidepressant-induced activation in children and adolescents: risk, recognition and management. Luft MJ, Lamy M, DelBello MP, McNamara RK, Strawn JR. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2018;48:50–62. doi: 10.1016/j.cppeds.2017.12.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Antidepressants for pediatric patients. Dwyer JB, Bloch MH. https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpmc%2Farticles%2FPMC6738970%2F&data=05%7C01%7Crmpettitt%40liberty.edu%7C4961a4020d774139478208da7672a074%7Cbaf8218eb3024465a9934a39c97251b2%7C0%7C0%7C637952533469345884%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=7HlUS0AkVU%2FsEoVkNM7PwYG32%2Bv%2BCANjrgNXf6PMN1c%3D&reserved=0. Curr Psychiatr. 2019;18:26–42. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Extended release guanfacine in pediatric anxiety disorders: a pilot, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Strawn JR, Compton SN, Robertson B, Albano AM, Hamdani M, Rynn MA. J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2017;27:29–37. doi: 10.1089/cap.2016.0132. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Time-to-effect of fluoxetine in children with depression. Yan T, Goldman RD. https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2Fpmc%2Farticles%2FPMC6693597%2F&data=05%7C01%7Crmpettitt%40liberty.edu%7C4961a4020d774139478208da7672a074%7Cbaf8218eb3024465a9934a39c97251b2%7C0%7C0%7C637952533469345884%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=mhH1t8UYcX7Bs%2FsFhAnDqodKt4SPDR991IPzVt1MhEo%3D&reserved=0. Can Fam Physician. 2019;65:549–551. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pharmacological treatment of anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: a review for practitioners. Patel DR, Feucht C, Brown K, Ramsay J. Transl Pediatr. 2018;7:23–35. doi: 10.21037/tp.2017.08.05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Pharmacotherapy of anxiety disorders: current and emerging treatment options. Garakani A, Murrough JW, Freire RC, Thom RP, Larkin K, Buono FD, Iosifescu DV. Front Psychiatry. 2020;11:595584. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.595584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Guanfacine toxic ingestion with subsequent cardiogenic pulmonary edema. Bridwell RE, Larson NP, Rosenthal JB, Wray J, Baker Z, Cibrario A, Oliver JJ. Am J Emerg Med. 2021;39:256–258. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.06.080. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gastrointestinal side effects associated with antidepressant treatments in patients with major depressive disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oliva V, Lippi M, Paci R, et al. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2021;109:110266. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2021.110266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Guidelines for adolescent depression in primary care (GLAD-PC): part II. Treatment and ongoing management. Cheung AH, Zuckerbrot RA, Jensen PS, Laraque D, Stein RE. Pediatrics. 2018;141:0. doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-4082. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Effectiveness of CBT for children and adolescents with depression: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis. Oud M, de Winter L, Vermeulen-Smit E, et al. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;57:33–45. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2018.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Depression in adolescence: a review. Beirão D, Monte H, Amaral M, Longras A, Matos C, Villas-Boas F. Middle East Curr Psychiatry. 2020;27:50. [Google Scholar]
- 30.Treatment of major depressive disorder in pediatric populations. Neavin DR, Joyce J, Swintak C. Diseases. 2018;6:48. doi: 10.3390/diseases6020048. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Treatment of depression in children and adolescents. Barreto T. https://nam04.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.aafp.org%2Fpubs%2Fafp%2Fissues%2F2020%2F1101%2Fp558.html&data=05%7C01%7Crmpettitt%40liberty.edu%7C4961a4020d774139478208da7672a074%7Cbaf8218eb3024465a9934a39c97251b2%7C0%7C0%7C637952533469345884%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=84Oo1XNSX72EKmlUVEhgTEXxjqaCboe46e%2FPCliAVR0%3D&reserved=0. Am Fam Physician. 2020;102:558–561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Delineation of the intimate details of the backbone conformation of pyridine nucleotide coenzymes in aqueous solution. Bose KS, Sarma RH. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1975;66:1173–1179. doi: 10.1016/0006-291x(75)90482-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lifestyle behavior and mental health in early adolescence. Loewen OK, Maximova K, Ekwaru JP, Faught EL, Asbridge M, Ohinmaa A, Veugelers PJ. Pediatrics. 2019;143:0. doi: 10.1542/peds.2018-3307. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Review: Trends, safety, and recommendations for caffeine use in children and adolescents. Temple JL. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2019;58:36–45. doi: 10.1016/j.jaac.2018.06.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Medical cannabinoid products in children and adolescents. Miller KK, Klein JD. Pediatr Rev. 2020;41:262–264. doi: 10.1542/pir.2019-0083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Microbiome and mental health, specifically as it relates to adolescents. Simkin DR. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019;21:93. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1075-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Annual research review: defining and treating pediatric treatment-resistant depression. Dwyer JB, Stringaris A, Brent DA, Bloch MH. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2020;61:312–332. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.13202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nutritional neuroscience as mainstream of psychiatry: the evidence- based treatment guidelines for using omega-3 fatty acids as a new treatment for psychiatric disorders in children and adolescents. Chang JP, Su KP. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2020;18:469–483. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2020.18.4.469. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of exercise on depression in adolescents. Wang X, Cai ZD, Jiang WT, Fang YY, Sun WX, Wang X. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022;16:16. doi: 10.1186/s13034-022-00453-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Yoga as an intervention for the reduction of symptoms of anxiety and depression in children and adolescents: a systematic review. James-Palmer A, Anderson EZ, Zucker L, Kofman Y, Daneault JF. Front Pediatr. 2020;8:78. doi: 10.3389/fped.2020.00078. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Impact of physical exercise on depression and anxiety in adolescent inpatients: A randomized controlled trial. Philippot A, Dubois V, Lambrechts K, et al. J Affect Disord. 2022;301:145–153. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.01.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Physical activity and depression, anxiety, and self-esteem in children and youth: an umbrella systematic review. Dale LP, Vanderloo L, Moore S, Faulkner G. Ment Health Phys Act. 2019;16:66–79. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Combinations of physical activity, sedentary time, and sleep duration and their associations with depressive symptoms and other mental health problems in children and adolescents: a systematic review. Sampasa-Kanyinga H, Colman I, Goldfield GS, et al. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2020;17:72. doi: 10.1186/s12966-020-00976-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Exercise interventions for mental disorders in young people: a scoping review. Pascoe MC, Bailey AP, Craike M, Carter T, Patten R, Stepto NK, Parker AG. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2020;6:0. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2019-000678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Does organized sports participation in childhood and adolescence positively influence health? A review of reviews. Bjørnarå HB, Westergren T, Sejersted E, Torstveit MK, Hansen BH, Berntsen S, Bere E. Prev Med Rep. 2021;23:101425. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Change in device-measured physical activity assessed in childhood and adolescence in relation to depressive symptoms: a general population-based cohort study. Hamer M, Patalay P, Bell S, Batty GD. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2020;74:330–335. doi: 10.1136/jech-2019-213399. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Effects of screentime on the health and well-being of children and adolescents: a systematic review of reviews. Stiglic N, Viner RM. BMJ Open. 2019;9:0. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023191. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Less screen time and more frequent vigorous physical activity is associated with lower risk of reporting negative mental health symptoms among Icelandic adolescents. Hrafnkelsdottir SM, Brychta RJ, Rognvaldsdottir V, et al. PLoS One. 2018;13:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196286. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Economic value of protected areas via visitor mental health. Buckley R, Brough P, Hague L, et al. Nat Commun. 2019;10:5005. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12631-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Bringing outdoor therapies into mainstream mental health. Buckley RC, Brough P, Westaway D. Front Public Health. 2018;6:119. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Mental health benefits of interactions with nature in children and teenagers: a systematic review. Tillmann S, Tobin D, Avison W, Gilliland J. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2018;72:958–966. doi: 10.1136/jech-2018-210436. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.The relationship between surrounding greenness in childhood and adolescence and depressive symptoms in adolescence and early adulthood. Bezold CP, Banay RF, Coull BA, et al. Ann Epidemiol. 2018;28:213–219. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2018.01.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Psychological impacts of "screen time" and "green time" for children and adolescents: a systematic scoping review. Oswald TK, Rumbold AR, Kedzior SG, Moore VM. PLoS One. 2020;15:0. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237725. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Osteopathic approach to anxiety. [ Jul; 2022 ]. 2017. https://www.ofpjournal.com/index.php/ofp/article/view/512/431 https://www.ofpjournal.com/index.php/ofp/article/view/512/431