Skip to main content
Critical Care Explorations logoLink to Critical Care Explorations
. 2022 Dec 14;4(12):e0819. doi: 10.1097/CCE.0000000000000819

Expression Patterns of Airway Fluid Cytokines From Intubated Children With Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Michael J Ripple 1,2, Ahmad F Mohammad 1, Susan T Stephenson 1, Anne M Fitzpatrick 1,3, Jocelyn R Grunwell 1,2,✉
PMCID: PMC9760621  PMID: 36567781

OBJECTIVES:

Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is a heterogeneous illness affecting 6% of mechanically ventilated children and with an overall mortality of 17%. Studies in PARDS have mainly focused on plasma biomarkers which may not reflect airway biomarkers. We lack adequate understanding of the inflammatory mediators and underlying immune responses in the airways of PARDS patients. Our objective was to compare the levels of cytokines in the airway fluid of intubated children with severe versus nonsevere acute respiratory distress syndrome.

DESIGN:

Prospective observational cohort study.

SETTING:

Single 36-bed quaternary care academic safety-net hospital PICU.

PATIENTS:

Children intubated for acute respiratory failure between January 2018 and November 2021 stratified by Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference-1 criteria for PARDS.

INTERVENTIONS:

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:

We measured levels of 23 cytokines, chemokines, and protein biomarkers in the tracheal aspirate from 82 intubated children, between 14 days and 17 years old, at risk for or with PARDS. Levels of interleukin-4, -5, -7, -8, -12(p-70), -17a, -21, and fractalkine were higher in patients with severe versus nonsevere PARDS. There were no associations between airway and plasma cytokines.

CONCLUSIONS:

Proinflammatory cytokines are elevated in the airway fluid from intubated children with severe PARDS and reflect diverse patterns of airway inflammation.

Keywords: biomarker, cytokine, intubation, mechanical ventilation, pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome, tracheal aspirate


KEY POINTS

Question: What are the levels of cytokines in the airway fluid of intubated children with severe versus nonsevere acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)?

Findings: Levels of interleukin-4, -5, -7, -8, -12(p-70), -17a, -21, and fractalkine were higher in patients with severe versus nonsevere pediatric ARDS (PARDS). There were no associations between airway and plasma cytokines.

Meaning: Tracheal aspirate sampling in children is feasible and may permit better understanding of the airway immune response in severe PARDS.

Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome (PARDS) is a heterogeneous condition characterized by damage to alveolar epithelial and vascular endothelial cells lining the alveolar-capillary units of the lung. Breakdown of the alveolar epithelial/endothelial barriers results in proteinaceous fluid filling the alveolar airspace which leads to poor gas exchange and severe refractory hypoxemia (1). Six percent of mechanically ventilated children develop PARDS; approximately 25% of these children develop new functional deficits, and overall mortality is approximately 20% (2–4). To date, the inflammatory mechanisms associated with PARDS are not well understood.

Recent studies have used biomarkers, namely systemic ones, to examine PARDS heterogeneity (5–9). For example, elevated concentrations of plasma interleukin (IL)-6, IL-8, IL-18, macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)–1β, IL-10, and tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptors 1 and 2 are associated with PARDS severity, fewer ventilator-free days, nonpulmonary organ dysfunctions, and death (5, 10). However, these systemic biomarkers do not reflect the state of the airways (11). Given the paucity of data on airway cytokine concentrations in PARDS patients, the primary objective of this study was to measure a panel of common T-cell–expressed cytokines in tracheal aspirate samples from intubated children with PARDS. We hypothesized that children with severe PARDS would have higher concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines compared with children with nonsevere PARDS and that these concentrations would not be associated with plasma values.

METHODS

The Emory University School of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB00034236: Prevalence of oxidative stress in critically ill children and its relationship to immune function; a pilot study, Approved: February 14, 2018 and IRB00113035: Airway Immune Response in Critically ill Children: Precision Medicine in Children at Risk for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Approved: July 29, 2019) approved the study. Informed consent from a parent or legal guardian was performed by a trained study coordinator prior to enrollment. All study procedures were performed according to the relevant guidelines and regulations in the Declaration of Helsinki. Detailed methods are provided in the Online Supplement (http://links.lww.com/CCX/B106). Briefly, children between 14 days, with a corrected gestational age of 40 weeks, and 17 years were eligible if they were endotracheally intubated in a PICU within the preceding 72 hours. Immunosuppressed children were excluded. PARDS was assigned based on Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference (PALICC)-1 criteria including the unilateral infiltrate on chest radiograph. Children not meeting PALICC-1 criteria were assigned to the “at-risk” group. PARDS patients were further stratified by severity based on oxygenation index (OI) or oxygen saturation index (OSI), if an arterial catheter was not in place, on the day of sample collection according to the PALICC-1 definition (3). An OI of 16 or greater (OSI ≥ 12.3) was defined as severe PARDS. An OI of 4–16 (OSI 5–12.3) was defined as nonsevere PARDS.

Tracheal aspirates were obtained and processed (12–14), and airway fluid was analyzed for 21 T-cell–expressed cytokines (fractalkine; granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor [GM-CSF]; interferon gamma; IL-1b, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 10, 12 (p70), 13, 17, 21, 23; interferon-inducible T-cell alpha chemoattractant; MIP-1A, MIP-1B, MIP-3A; and TNF-α), soluble TNF receptor 1 (sTNFr1), and receptor for advanced glycation end products (RAGE). These assays were also performed on plasma samples from a subset of participants. Analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics software (IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0; Armonk, NY, IBM Corp) after logarithmic transformation of nonnormally distributed data. A p value of less than 0.5 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Eighty-two children were enrolled, including 47 children with PARDS (nonsevere, n = 34; severe, n = 13) (Table 1). Children with severe PARDS had higher Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction scores, longer hospital and PICU lengths of stays, longer duration of mechanical ventilation, and increased extracorporeal membrane oxygenation requirements.

TABLE 1.

Features of the Participants

Feature At-Risk for PARDS, N = 35 Nonsevere PARDS, N = 34 Severe PARDS, N = 13
Age, mo 10 (3–28) 11 (3–21) 23 (4–28)
Male 20 (57.1) 20 (58.8) 8 (61.5)
Ethnicity
 Hispanic/Latino 2 (5.7) 0 1 (7.7)
 Not Hispanic/Latino 32 (91.4) 34 (100) 12 (92.3)
 Unknown/not reported 1 (2.9) 0 0
Race
 White or White-Hispanic 13 (37.1) 10 (29.4) 4 (30.8)
 Black or Black-Hispanic 20 (57.1) 22 (64.7) 6 (46.2)
 Multiple races 0 2 (5.9) 3 (23.1)
 Other 1 (2.9) 0 0
 Unknown/not reported 1 (2.9) 0 0
Pediatric Risk of Mortality-III score 12 (8–17) 14 (9–17) 16 (12–20)
Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction score 5 (4–8) 6 (5–6) 9 (5–12)a,b
Viral respiratory culture
 Not performed 7 (20.0) 5 (14.7) 0
 No virus 3 (8.6) 4 (11.8) 3 (23.1)
 Positive virus 21 (60.0) 21 (61.8) 8 (61.5)
 Positive multiple virus 4 (11.4) 4 (11.8) 2 (15.4)
Bacterial respiratory culture
 Not performed 17 (48.6) 4 (11.8) 3 (23.1)
 No bacteria 1 (2.9) 2 (5.9) 0
 Positive bacteria or yeast 17 (48.6) 28 (82.4)a 10 (76.9)a
Hours to sample collection 17 (12–22) 21 (11–37) 23 (11–43)
Hospital days 10 (7–13) 16 (7–19) 21 (15–38)a,b
PICU days 7 (4–10) 8 (6–13) 15 (10–32)a,b
Ventilator days 4 (2–6) 5 (3–8)a 7 (6–20)a,b
28-d ventilator-free days 25 (22–26) 23 (19–24)a 19 (5–22)a,b
Extracorporeal membranous oxygenation 0 1 (2.9) 5 (38.5)a,b
Died 1 (2.9) 1 (2.9) 1 (7.7)

PARDS = pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.

a

p < 0.05 vs at-risk.

b

p < 0.05 vs nonsevere.

Data are shown as the median (25–75th percentile) or the number of participants (n) (%).

Airway fluid cytokine assay performance characteristics and raw data values are shown in Table E1 (http://links.lww.com/CCX/B106). GM-CSF and IL-2 fell below the limit of detection in 54 children (66%) and 36 children (44%) and were excluded from further analyses. Discriminant analysis of the linear combination of all other raw cytokines revealed significant differences in children with severe PARDS (Fig. E1A, http://links.lww.com/CCX/B106). However, children with severe PARDS also had significantly lower airway total protein concentrations (median [25–75th percentile] for at-risk vs nonsevere vs severe PARDS: 1.42 [0.79–2.63] vs 1.74 [0.66–3.75] vs 0.30 mg/mL [0.12–2.63 mg/mL]; p = 0.011). Therefore, cytokines were normalized to total protein for further analyses. Discriminant analysis of the linear combination of protein-normalized cytokines also revealed significant differences in the cytokine expression pattern of children with severe PARDS Fig. E1B, http://links.lww.com/CCX/B106). Further inspection of individual cytokines demonstrated no differences between at-risk children and children with nonsevere PARDS, with the exception of fractalkine (Table 2). However, children with severe PARDS, compared with children with nonsevere PARDS, had significantly higher airway concentrations of IL-4 (p = 0.046), IL-5 (p = 0.035), IL-7 (p = 0.012), IL-8 (p = 0.019), IL-12p70 (p = 0.031), IL-13 (p = 0.013), IL-17A (p = 0.007), IL-21 (p = 0.019), and fractalkine (p < 0.001) (Table 2).

TABLE 2.

Protein-Normalized Cytokine Concentrations in the Airway Fluid

Cytokine (pg/mg Protein) At-Risk for PARDS, N = 35 Nonsevere PARDS, N = 34 Severe PARDS, N = 13
IL-1β 73.3 (9.6–433.8) 48.1 (7.6–146.2) 26.8 (3.7–107.1)a
IL-4 7.3 (4.6–13.7) 4.8 (3.3–12.4) 11.1 (4.5–23.7)b
IL-5 0.3 (0.1–0.5) 0.2 (0.1–0.4) 0.4 (0.3–2.5)a,b
IL-6 93.3 (37.7–158.5) 99.1 (34.2–146.0) 157.2 (45.3–304.8)
IL-7 3.8 (2.4–6.7) 2.9 (0.9–10.4) 6.8 (3.6–17.6)b
IL-8 752.8 (281.5–1433) 569.5 (283.2–973.6) 1,715 (372.9–4,192)b
IL-10 16.9 (7.1–49.6) 12.6 (7.3–41.6) 10.3 (3.6–34.2)
IL-12p70 0.4 (0.3–0.6) 0.3 (0.2–0.7) 0.5 (0.4–1.0)b
IL-13 0.3 (0.2–0.8) 0.3 (0.1–0.8) 0.7 (0.5–1.3)b
IL-17A 4.6 (2.8–6.9) 3.6 (1.5–8.1) 15.0 (3.3–20.9)b
IL-21 5.6 (3.2–10.3) 5.4 (1.3–8.8) 12.3 (5.3–17.8)b
IL-23 15.2 (8.5–29.5) 11.6 (7.9–20.1) 12.3 (9.3–28.7)
IFN-inducible T-cell alpha chemoattractant 20.7 (9.1–123.9) 17.7 (8.4–363.7) 65.5 (16.7–174.7)
Fractalkine 78.5 (39.0–132.2) 39.7 (12.3–100.3)a 186.9 (59.3–300.1)b
IFN gamma 4.7 (2.0–8.1) 4.3 (2.3–11.2) 5.9 (3.9–13.4)
MIP-1α 69.6 (22.8–195.5) 66.3 (20.5–109.0) 185.3 (13.8–273.0)
MIP-1β 62.0 (31.2–127.7) 59.6 (24.8–145.6) 109.9 (53.0–245.2)
MIP-3α 90.2 (22.2–183.9) 40.2 (14.5–209.9) 75.4 (26.9–544.4)
Tumor necrosis factor-α 56.8 (7.4–176.3) 17.2 (6.7–58.3) 24.9 (8.5–151.9)
Receptor for advanced glycation end product 20.9 (2.4–196.4) 47.3 (2.6–391.4) 25.8 (8.4–12,409)
soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor 1 517.4 (380.5–923.7) 647.8 (447.4–812.6) 511.4 (411.1–833.0)

IFN = Interferon, IL = interleukin, MIP = macrophage inflammatory protein, PARDS = pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome.

a

p < 0.05 vs at-risk.

b

p < 0.05 vs nonsevere.

Data are shown as the median (25–75th percentile) and were logarithmically transformed prior to analysis.

We then assessed associations between IL-4, IL-5, IL-7, IL-8, IL-12p70, IL-13, IL-17A, IL-21 and fractalkine in airway fluid and paired plasma. For this analysis, blood and airway samples were collected over a 21-day period in a subset of participants (paired samples, at-risk, n = 6; nonsevere, n = 13; severe, n = 9). There were no significant correlations between airway and plasma cytokines in this subset (Table E2, http://links.lww.com/CCX/B106).

DISCUSSION

Previous studies of children with PARDS have reported plasma cytokines due to the ease of collection compared with tracheal aspirate sampling. Herein we report airway cytokine levels in intubated children with PARDS to deepen our understanding of the factors that instigate and intensify alveolar inflammation. We found elevated concentrations of nine cytokines in children with severe versus nonsevere PARDS reflecting global inflammation that is not specific to a single T-cell subset. Instead, the cytokines that were elevated signify Type 1 inflammation (i.e., IL-12p70), eosinophilic Type 2 inflammation (i.e., IL-4, IL-5, IL-13), neutrophilic inflammation (i.e., IL-8), and also Type 17 inflammation (i.e., IL-17A). However, Type 17 inflammation was most pronounced and was reflected by more than five-fold elevated concentrations of IL-17A in children with severe versus nonsevere PARDS. Although we found several cytokines from our tracheal aspirate sampling that have also been shown to be elevated in plasma samples of PARDS patients, there were no significant associations between airway and plasma cytokines in the present study. This finding suggests that components described in the plasma may not represent ongoing pathophysiologic processes at the lung epithelial border. However, this study is small, and our findings warrant further investigation.

Our findings are consistent with a prior study of 16 children with pneumonia-triggered PARDS that reported elevated airway concentrations of IL-12 (p70) and IL-17A (15). IL-12 is a proinflammatory cytokine that promotes differentiation of T helper (Th) 1 cells and activation of cytotoxic CD8+ T cells (16). In adults with ARDS, elevated circulating and alveolar levels of IL-17A are associated with increased alveolar neutrophils, permeability, and organ dysfunction (17). A higher ratio of IL-17–secreting Th17 to regulatory T cells in the peripheral blood of adults with ARDS was associated with death (18). IL-21, which was also elevated in the severe PARDS patients in our cohort, is required for Th17 cell maintenance via a Signal transducer and activator of transcription3 signaling (19).

IL-4, IL-8, and fractalkine play key roles in activation and recruitment of neutrophils, monocytes, and lymphocytes to sites of infection. Elevated levels of IL-4 in PARDS airways may promote repolarization of a proinflammatory (M1) alveolar macrophage toward an alternatively activated (M2) anti-inflammatory alveolar macrophage to aid in resolution of acute lung injury (ALI) (20). IL-8 is elevated in the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of children with ALI (21). In children critically ill with influenza, IL-8 was also higher in nonsurvivors and in those with Staphylococcus aureus secondary infections (22). Mice with knock-out in the fractalkine receptor (C-X3-C motif chemokine receptor 1) in a lipopolysaccharide model of acute pulmonary inflammation had elevated levels of fractalkine that led to the release of damage-associated molecular patterns that worsened lung inflammation (23).

Interestingly, we did not detect differences in tracheal aspirate concentrations of soluble RAGE (sRAGE) and sTNFr1 between severe and nonsevere PARDS. sRAGE in plasma has previously discriminated systemic organ injury and death among patients with indirect lung injury (24). However, the patients in our study have predominantly direct lung injury which may account for this discrepancy. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of ARDS/ALI biomarkers also showed that elevated serum and bronchoalveolar lavage levels of TNF-α were associated with ARDS/ALI; however, there was marked heterogeneity in measurements (25).

Other limitations include a relatively small convenience sample of intubated children with PARDS from a single center, which prohibited associations with clinical outcomes such as ventilator-free days due to limited power. We also focused on a single time point and cannot correlate clinical trajectory with changes in airway cytokines. Tracheal aspirate fluid may also not reflect the cytokine response from the alveolar air spaces, but bronchoalveolar is not routinely performed in PARDS. Finally, we chose to normalize cytokine levels to total protein measured in the tracheal aspirate fluid to account for dilution differences and variability in sampling. Normalization to total proteins in the airway fluid may introduce other variability related to the sample collection procedure. Nevertheless, we attempted consistency in the lavage procedure, report the raw cytokine values, and acknowledge that there are no better alternatives available in clinical practice. Future studies should ideally focus on longitudinal and simultaneous sampling of the systemic and lung compartments using clinically accessible and practical sampling of the airway environment.

CONCLUSIONS

Severe PARDS is associated with elevation of multiple airway proinflammatory cytokines. This study suggests that tracheal aspirate sampling in this population is feasible and may permit better understanding of the airway immune response in severe PARDS, to ultimately develop targeted therapies to improve functional morbidity and mortality in these children.

Supplementary Material

cc9-4-e0819-s001.pdf (241.4KB, pdf)

Footnotes

Supported, in part by, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (to Dr. Grunwell, K23 HL151897), National Institute of Nursing Research (to Dr. Fitzpatrick, K24 NR018866), and Emory + Children’s Pediatric Research Alliance, Warshaw Fellowship Research Award (to Dr. Ripple).

Supplemental digital content is available for this article. Direct URL citations appear in the printed text and are provided in the HTML and PDF versions of this article on the journal’s website (http://journals.lww.com/ccejournal).

The authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Matthay MA, Zemans RL, Zimmerman GA, et al. : Acute respiratory distress syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Primers 2019; 5:18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Khemani RG, Smith L, Lopez-Fernandez YM, et al. ; Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress syndrome Incidence and Epidemiology (PARDIE) Investigators: Paediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome incidence and epidemiology (PARDIE): An international, observational study. Lancet Respir Med 2019; 7:115–128 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Pediatric Acute Lung Injury Consensus Conference G: Pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome: Consensus recommendations from the pediatric acute lung injury consensus conference. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2015; 16:428–439 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Keim G, Watson RS, Thomas NJ, et al. : New morbidity and discharge disposition of pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome survivors. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:1731–1738 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dahmer MK, Yang G, Zhang M, et al. ; RESTORE and BALI Study Investigators: Identification of phenotypes in paediatric patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome: A latent class analysis. Lancet Respir Med 2022; 10:289–297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Zinter MS, Delucchi KL, Kong MY, et al. : Early plasma matrix metalloproteinase profiles. A novel pathway in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2019; 199:181–189 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Whitney JE, Feng R, Koterba N, et al. : Endothelial biomarkers are associated with indirect lung injury in sepsis-associated pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Explor 2020; 2:e0295. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Whitney JE, Zhang B, Koterba N, et al. : Systemic endothelial activation is associated with early acute respiratory distress syndrome in children with extrapulmonary sepsis. Crit Care Med 2020; 48:344–352 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Yehya N, Wong HR: Adaptation of a biomarker-based sepsis mortality risk stratification tool for pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2018; 46:e9–e16 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Zinter MS, Orwoll BE, Spicer AC, et al. : Incorporating inflammation into mortality risk in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2017; 45:858–866 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Fiore-Gartland A, Panoskaltsis-Mortari A, Agan AA, et al. ; PALISI PICFlu Investigators: Cytokine profiles of severe influenza virus-related complications in children. Front Immunol 2017; 8:1423. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Grunwell JR, Rad MG, Stephenson ST, et al. : Cluster analysis and profiling of airway fluid metabolites in pediatric acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Sci Rep 2021; 11:23019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Grunwell JR, Rad MG, Stephenson ST, et al. : Machine learning-based discovery of a gene expression signature in pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Explor 2021; 3:e0431. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Grunwell JR, Stephenson ST, Mohammad AF, et al. : Differential type I interferon response and primary airway neutrophil extracellular trap release in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sci Rep 2020; 10:19049. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Wong JJM, Tan HL, Zhou J, et al. : Large scale cytokine profiling uncovers elevated IL12-p70 and IL-17A in severe pediatric acute respiratory distress syndrome. Sci Rep 2021; 11:14158. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Trinchieri G: Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity. Nat Rev Immunol 2003; 3:133–146 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mikacenic C, Hansen EE, Radella F, et al. : Interleukin-17A is associated with alveolar inflammation and poor outcomes in acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2016; 44:496–502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Yu ZX, Ji MS, Yan J, et al. : The ratio of Th17/Treg cells as a risk indicator in early acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care 2015; 19:82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Wei L, Laurence A, Elias KM, et al. : IL-21 is produced by Th17 cells and drives IL-17 production in a STAT3-dependent manner. J Biol Chem 2007; 282:34605–34610 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Johnston LK, Rims CR, Gill SE, et al. : Pulmonary macrophage subpopulations in the induction and resolution of acute lung injury. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol 2012; 47:417–426 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Todd DA, Marsh MJ, George A, et al. : Surfactant phospholipids, surfactant proteins, and inflammatory markers during acute lung injury in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2010; 11:82–91 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Hall MW, Geyer SM, Guo CY, et al. ; Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators (PALISI) Network PICFlu Study Investigators: Innate immune function and mortality in critically ill children with influenza: A multicenter study. Crit Care Med 2013; 41:224–236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ngamsri KC, Gamper-Tsigaras J, Reutershan J, et al. : Fractalkine is linked to the necrosome pathway in acute pulmonary inflammation. Front Med (Lausanne) 2021; 8:591790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Lim MJ, Zinter MS, Chen L, et al. : Beyond the alveolar epithelium: Plasma soluble receptor for advanced glycation end products is associated with oxygenation impairment, mortality, and extrapulmonary organ failure in children with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care Med 2022; 50:837–847 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Liu Z, Liu D, Wang Z, et al. : Association between inflammatory biomarkers and acute respiratory distress syndrome or acute lung injury risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Wien Klin Wochenschr 2022; 134:24–38 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

cc9-4-e0819-s001.pdf (241.4KB, pdf)

Articles from Critical Care Explorations are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES