Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2024 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Autism Res. 2023 Jan 7;16(3):502–523. doi: 10.1002/aur.2884

Genetic and epigenetic signatures associated with plasma oxytocin levels in children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorder

Stephen K Siecinski 1,^, Stephanie N Giamberardino 1,^, Marina Spanos 2, Annalise C Hauser 1, Jason R Gibson 1, Tara Chandrasekhar 2, M D Pilar Trelles 3, Carol M Rockhill 4, Michelle L Palumbo 5, Allyson Witters Cundiff 6, Alicia Montgomery 7, Paige Siper 3, Mendy Minjarez 4, Lisa A Nowinski 5, Sarah Marler 6, Lydia C Kwee 1, Lauren C Shuffrey 7, Cheryl Alderman 2,8, Jordana Weissman 3, Brooke Zappone 4, Jennifer E Mullett 5, Hope Crosson 7, Natalie Hong 7, Sheng Luo 8,9, Lilin She 8, Manjushri Bhapkar 8, Russell Dean 10, Abby Scheer 2, Jacqueline L Johnson 10, Bryan H King 4, Christopher J McDougle 5, Kevin B Sanders 6, Soo-Jeong Kim 4, Alexander Kolevzon 3, Jeremy Veenstra-VanderWeele 7, Elizabeth R Hauser 1,9, Linmarie Sikich 2,8, Simon G Gregory 1,11,*
PMCID: PMC10023458  NIHMSID: NIHMS1860749  PMID: 36609850

Abstract

Oxytocin (OT), the brain’s most abundant neuropeptide, plays an important role in social salience and motivation. Clinical trials of the efficacy of OT in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have reported mixed results due in part to ASD’s complex etiology. We investigated whether genetic and epigenetic variation contribute to variable endogenous OT levels that modulate sensitivity to OT therapy. To carry out this analysis, we integrated genome-wide profiles of DNA-methylation, transcriptional activity, and genetic variation with plasma OT levels in 290 participants with ASD enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of OT. Our analysis identified genetic variants with novel association with plasma OT, several of which reside in known ASD risk genes. We also show subtle but statistically significant association of plasma OT levels with peripheral transcriptional activity and DNA-methylation profiles across several annotated gene sets. These findings broaden our understanding of the effects of the peripheral oxytocin system and provide novel genetic candidates for future studies to decode the complex etiology of ASD and its interaction with OT signaling and OT-based interventions.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder, plasma oxytocin, multi’ome, genetic association

INTRODUCTION

Oxytocin (OT) is the most abundant neuropeptide in the human brain and functions as a neurotransmitter, neuromodulator, and hormone with actions throughout the body13. In the brain, oxytocin is thought to contribute to social attachment, affiliation, and sexual behavior at least partially through the modulation of mesolimbic dopaminergic neural circuits3. This is further supported by a recent brain-wide voxel-based transcriptional and fMRI meta-analysis that showed region-specific overlap of oxytocin activity with dopaminergic and cholinergic genes in brain regions associated with appetitive and aversive emotional states4.

There is also a growing body of research on the complex interplay between OT and other neurosignaling pathways. Estrogen stimulates oxytocin release in the brain and plays an important role in social behavior57 and potentially in ASD8. Similarly, serotonin has well-characterized roles in social behavior, interacts with OT to enable social memory and processing9, 10, and may play a part in the etiology of ASD11. Finally, glutamate and GABA are essential to maintaining excitatory and inhibitory (E/I) balance in the brain, which is dysregulated in some individuals with ASD12 and influenced by OT in a context-specific manner1315. Glutamate signaling has also been shown to stimulate the release of OT from hypothalamic nuclei16. Collectively, these interactions implicate OT signaling in a wide range of neuromodulatory roles.

Oxytocin exerts these neuromodulatory effects via somatodendritic release from magnocellular neurons of the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei (SON and PVN, respectively) of the hypothalamus and subsequent binding to its widely distributed receptor, OXTR15, 1724. Collectively, the broad neuromodulatory and prosocial effects of oxytocin make it an attractive candidate for therapeutic intervention targeting social difficulties, particularly in ASD25.

Clinical trials of oxytocin in humans aim to improve social deficits in a broad range of conditions including addiction, eating disorders, schizophrenia, and ASD. To date, 39 clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of intranasal oxytocin in the context of ASD alone, with over 240 trials across all diagnostic categories. Oxytocin trials in ASD have had mixed results, with some showing no improvement in core social deficits2628, including our own study29, while others have shown improvements in specific populations30, age groups31, and in individuals with co-occurring intellectual disability32. Important to assessing oxytocin treatment efficacy and mode of action in the context of behavioral phenotypes is an individual’s baseline levels of endogenously produced oxytocin. Recent studies have shown that baseline oxytocin levels may play an important role in the presentation of ASD33, 34 and social behaviors more broadly3541 and may be influenced by putative genetic factors42.

Genetic and epigenetic studies have previously evaluated components of the oxytocin system in relation to social behavior and autism. Candidate gene studies have reported associations between polymorphisms in oxytocin system genes and social phenotypes, including in ASD, although this has not been reported in genome-wide association studies (GWAS)4354. We previously reported that differential methylation of the CpG-island (CGI) of the OXTR promoter is associated with ASD55, while additional studies have identified this association with various other psychosocial phenotypes5660. This suggests that peripheral measurements of OXTR methylation could serve as a biomarker to identify OT pathway dysregulation and may correlate with baseline levels of the ligand, which has a short peripheral half-life. Few studies, and none in ASD, have previously performed genome-wide analyses in relation to plasma oxytocin levels61.

This study investigates the genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic variation associated with plasma levels of oxytocin in biospecimens from 175 participants from the Study of Oxytocin in Autism and Reciprocal Social Behaviors (SOARS-B) trial29, and provide the most comprehensive genetic and epigenetic analysis of the peripheral oxytocin system to date.

METHODS

Study Population and Sample Selection

A full description of the SOARS-B clinical trial and study population has been previously reported29, 62. Briefly, 355 children and adolescents were screened for study inclusion, with 290 individuals with ASD enrolled and randomized 1:1 to intranasal placebo or oxytocin spray in a multi-site clinical trial. Participants who passed screening and had available DNA or RNA samples were eligible for inclusion in the current study (Table 1). Participant samples were considered for inclusion for each modality independently (Figure 1) with blood drawn at baseline/screening and weeks 8, 24, 36, and 48. To maximize the sample size for the genome-wide association study (GWAS), DNA samples were genotyped from any available timepoint. Samples for other genomic modalities were restricted to those obtained at screening and/or baseline study visits, collectively referred to as “pre-treatment” samples. Notably, because gene expression profiling was designed to profile participants longitudinally, only participants with a viable RNA sample available from at least 2 different study visits were included in this dataset (defined as containing at least 0.05 μg). SOARS-B sample collection was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board at each site. Written parental consent and participant assent (when clinically appropriate) was obtained for all participants and the UNC Tracs Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reviewed the safety data throughout the study. Analyses of the samples were carried out under two Duke IRBs (Pro00063950, Pro00016404).

Table 1:

Population characteristics for participants with pre-treatment plasma oxytocin and at least one other dataset (after quality control).

Characteristic Analysis Population (n=175)
Mean age in years at baseline (SD) 10.74 (3.91)
Female sex (%) 25 ( 14.3)
Self-Report Racial Group (%)
 White 125 (71.4)
 Black/African America 15 (8.6)
 Asian 18 (10.3)
 More than one race 15 (8.6)
 Not reported 2 (1.1)
Hispanic/Latino (%) 16 (9.1)
Low Functioning Group (%) 91 (52.0)
Study Site (%)
 Duke (previously UNC) 50 (28.6)
 Mt. Sinai School of Medicine 20 (11.4)
 Massachusetts General Hospital 15 (8.6)
 Vanderbilt 51 (29.1)
 Seattle Children’s Research Institute 39 (22.3)
Post-QC Dataset Availability (%)
 Illumina Omni 2.5 genotypes 175 (100.0)
 Targeted genotypes 175 (100.0)
 CNVs 157 (89.7)
 Illumina HT-12 gene expression 149 (85.1)
 Illumina EPIC methylation 174 (99.4)
 OXTR targeted methylation 172 (98.3)

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Participant and sample inclusion for each modality tested within the study

Plasma Oxytocin

Plasma was extracted from 7 mL of blood, and plasma OT levels were quantified in 96-well batches using the Enzo Oxytocin ELISA kit (CAT: ADI-901–153A) with the standard protocol at the University of North Carolina, as previously described63. Each sample was quantified (pg/mL) on a standard curve, and mean plasma OT values were included if more than one pre-treatment measurement was available for a given sample. Sample measurements that could not be validated after quality control were excluded from downstream analyses (N=8 across all samples with measurements), as well as samples from the Columbia study site due to systematic differences in the OT measures (Supplementary Figure 1). For all subsequent analyses, natural log-transformed pre-treatment plasma OT values were used.

Genome-Wide Genotyping, Expression and Methylation Profiling

The hg19 (GRCh37) reference genome was used for all quality control and analytical operations described in the genotype, gene expression, and methylation profiling methods.

Genome-wide genotype profiling was performed using the Illumina Infinium Omni2.5 BeadChip array for 286 study participants and 6 Centre d’Etude du Polymorphism Humain (CEPH) samples from Coriell, including one parent-offspring quad. Data processing and quality control were performed within Illumina GenomeStudio and PLINK (v1.9)64. Briefly, variants were excluded if they were classified as insertions or deletions and for poor genotyping calling, coordinate mapping issues, discordance between identical samples, Mendelian errors, haploid heterozygosity, and excessive missingness or monomorphism within our dataset. Samples were excluded for genotypic-phenotypic sex-discrepancies (reflecting 1 unexpected sample swap and 2 participants with known sex chromosome aneuploidy), excessive homozygosity, or relatedness to another genotyped participant (pi-hat > 0.185). Due to high call rates, no individuals were excluded for excessive missingness, and variants were not excluded from analysis based on Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium since the population is derived from a case-only study. For additional information, see the complete GWAS quality control protocol in the Supplemental Methods. A total of 281 unique individuals and 2,049,113 variants passed all quality control procedures.

Gene expression profiling was performed using the Illumina Human HT-12 Expression BeadChip for 255 study participants and generated in 4 batches. Quality control was performed using the limma R package (v3.46)65. Samples with low signal-to-noise ratios or excessive proportions of undetected probes or systematically shifted expression levels (relative to other samples within the same batch) were excluded. All batches were background-corrected and quantile-normalized together using limma’s neqc function. Samples were excluded from analyses if they were flagged as a sample swap in analysis of each omics dataset or if they came from an individual that had an underlying genetic condition, as defined in the SOARS-B study29, 62. Probes were excluded if they displayed poor mapping quality or were not detected across all samples. Probes with a detection p-value ≥ 0.05 were set to missing for downstream analyses. For additional details, see the full protocol in the Supplemental Methods.

Methylation profiling was performed using the Illumina Infinium MethylationEPIC array for 277 study participants. Quality control and preprocessing were performed using a previously described methylation pipeline66. In parallel, the R package ewastools67 was used to examine sample-level Illumina quality control metrics and to confirm sample identity where possible. For additional information, see the complete EPIC array quality control protocol in the Supplemental Methods

Candidate Gene Selection and Testing

Candidate genes were selected from canonical signaling pathways that interact with oxytocin directly or show strong patterns of regional co-expression within the brain. Additionally, genes from the estrogen signaling pathway were included due estrogen’s ability to stimulate oxytocin release in the brain6, its recently documented roles in social behavior57 and its potential role in ASD8. Genes from the serotonin signaling pathway were included due to its role in regulating oxytocin-mediated social circuits9, 10, and its observed dysregulation in ASD11. The signaling pathways for GABA and glutamate were also included due to their role in maintaining excitatory/inhibitory balance in the brain, which is which is achieved in part through context-specific interactions with oxytocin1315, 68. Furthermore, glutamate has been shown to induce the release of oxytocin from the hypothalamic nuclei16 (Supplementary Methods, Targeted Genotyping). Using this approach, the following KEGG-annotated pathways were chosen: ”Oxytocin signaling pathway” (map0921); ”Dopaminergic synapse” (map04728)13, 69, 70; ”Serotonergic synapse” (map04726)9, 10; ”Cholinergic synapse” (map04725)4, 71, 72; ”GABAergic synapse” (map04727); “Glutamatergic synapse” (map04724)14; “Estrogen signaling pathway” (map04915). Genes from each KEGG pathway were extracted using the R package KEGGREST v 1.24.173.

Redundant genes between KEGG pathways were removed, creating a final list of 494 genes. The UCSC table browser was used to retrieve GENCODE “knowncanonical” hg19 coordinates for each gene with a +/− 5 kb buffer to include proximal regulatory regions. The expanded coordinates were intersected with the “InfiniumOmni2–5-8v1-3_A1” manifest using BEDtools v 2.29.274 to identify each probe within the candidate gene list. The resulting probe list was used in the targeted Omni 2.5 analysis.

TAQMAN genotyping candidates were identified using the UCSC table browser to extract the rsIDs of all common SNPs (build 138) that fell within the genomic coordinates (+/− 5 kb) of genes in the dopamine and oxytocin signaling pathways and retained if the rsID was not present in the Omni 2.5 manifest. Further filtering was performed by quantifying the number of published articles for each using the R package easyPubmed (v 2.13) with the following search terms: rsID AND (”plasma oxytocin” OR ”serum oxytocin” OR ”salivary oxytocin” OR ”central oxytocin” OR ”plasma OT ” OR ”serum OT” OR ”salivary OT” OR ”central OT ”) and choosing the most cited rsIDs from the results. A summary of these findings is provided in75.

Targeted Genotyping

Eleven TaqMan assays (Thermofisher, MA) (Supplementary Table 1) were selected based on the previously described literature review (Supplementary Table 2) in addition to a twelfth, which overlapped with the Omni 2.5 manifest on the X chromosome and was used for sample identity confirmation. Variant calling and quality assessments were performed using a ViiA 7 and the ViiA 7 software suite (ThermoFisher, MA), and sample-level quality controls were applied using PLINK (v1.9).

Targeted OXTR Methylation Profiling

Targeted pyrosequencing was used to profile three CpG sites within the MT2 region of OXTR (hg19 - chr3:8,810,774-8,810,807) that were previously associated with ASD55. Briefly, DNA from each participant was bisulfite converted, PCR amplified (in triplicate) and run on a Qiagen Q96 pyrosequencer to generate DNA methylation estimates for each CpG site. Samples were flagged and rerun if methylation values exhibited excessive variation (>5%) at one or more of the three CpG sites, or if they had fewer than two successful measurements for each CpG. Reported measurements are in units of mean percent methylation (across a minimum of 2 technical replicates for each CpG/sample). A detailed protocol including primer design, PCR programs, and analytical details is provided in the Supplemental Methods.

Copy number variant (CNV) analyses

CNVs were called for all samples genotyped on the Omni 2.5 array using PennCNV76. After CNV and sample-level quality control procedures (Supplemental Methods), 259 participants displayed at least one autosomal CNV (>= 20kb in length) for a total of 1,198 CNVs. Frequency filtering was then applied to generate a dataset consisting of rare (5% frequency) CNVs for downstream analysis.

Pathway Analyses

Pathway-level analyses were used to address our limited power to detect associations at the level of individual variants, probes, and CpGs in our molecular datasets. We profiled 5 pathway collections from the msigdb R package77 across all three modalities: Hallmark, Gene Ontology (GO) Biological Process, GO Cellular Component, GO Molecular Function, and KEGG (supplemented to also include pathways selected of particular relevance to oxytocin, as described above). For our genomic dataset, we generated gene-level association p-values for rare and common variation present in autosomal genes utilizing the SKAT-O algorithm within the SKAT R package78. We implemented an Over Representation Analysis using the 10% of genes with the lowest p-values (<= 0.053) from SKAT-O as ‘associations’ and tested against the background of all genes tested in SKAT-O (n = 24,501) present within each of the selected pathway collections. For the transcriptome and methylome datasets, we performed pathway-level analyses utilizing fast Gene Set Enrichment (fGSEA), as implemented in the fgsea R package79. As input for these analyses, we leveraged individual probe/CpG results from our linear model association testing in limma to select a single probe/CpG per gene, based on lowest p-value for association with oxytocin, and then ranked genes based on the corresponding fold change for the oxytocin model term. Additional details can be found in the pathway analysis sections of the Supplemental Methods.

Multi-Omic Analyses

Data from the DNA methylation, gene expression, and genotype arrays were used as inputs for the integrated analysis using the Multi-Factor Omics Analysis + (“MOFA+”) package in R80. Approximately 8,300–8,500 genes per dataset were integrated to create 20 factors, which were then tested for association with plasma oxytocin. Details of the analysis are provided in the multi-omic sections of the Supplemental Methods.

Array Based Analyses: QTL, Differential Expression, Differential Methylation

All analyses were performed on plasma OT measurements obtained at screen or baseline study visits (i.e., pre-treatment). OT was included as the variable of interest in the QTL analysis and, either as the dependent variable of interest in the genetic analyses or as the independent variable of interest in the genome-wide differential gene expression and DNA methylation analyses. QTL association testing for all SNP-level genotypic analyses with plasma OT was conducted using PLINK 1.9. Associations between plasma OT and differential gene expression and DNA methylation were conducted using the “eBays” method within limma. We adjusted for a consistent set of covariates across all modalities that included functional strata as defined in the SOARS-B study 29, 62, age at sample, sex, 3 principal components reflecting genetic ancestry, and oxytocin measurement batch (which was correlated with participants’ study site). Modality-specific covariates were adjusted for as necessary and included gene-expression assay batch, OXTR assay plate, and a series of covariates to adjust for cell-type proportions and assay position within the methylome dataset. Linear model residuals, after accounting for the covariates above, were used as input for the expression and methylation inputs for MOFA+, initially in univariate models and then in models controlling only for plasma OT measurement batch.

Association test results at the probe or CpG-level in our transcriptome and methylome datasets were only used for downstream pathway analyses because we were not adequately powered to detect signal from those datasets in this study. CNVs were tested through burden tests implemented in CONCUR81 and with generalized linear models in R, where burden was modeled as total number of CNVs and total length of CNVs in kilobases. All tests were performed within deletions and duplications combined, deletions-only, and duplications-only datasets.

RESULTS

After the completion of quality control analysis (see Methods) at least one modality of omics data was available for 175 participants with most participants possessing data for analysis in all three modalities (Figure 1). Of the overall cohort, participants were on average 10.7 years of age, 14 % were female, and 71% were white (Table 1). Among the individuals included in the analysis, the mean OT level was 2.3 ln pg/mL. The methods used in the analysis of each of the datasets, including quality control and preprocessing steps, are represented in Figure 2, a detailed description of each of these steps are included in the Methods and Supplemental Methods.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

A workflow schema of the computational tools used in each of the array and omics-based analyses. Grey nodes represent molecular data types and the experimental platforms used to generate the data. Blue nodes represent QC / pre-processing steps; green nodes represent analytical steps.

Genome-Wide Common Variant Analysis

A total of 1,276,908 common (minor allele frequency (MAF) >= 0.05) autosomal and X-chromosome variants passed quality control and were tested for association with plasma oxytocin, adjusting for sex, functional strata, age at time of sampling, ancestry principal components, and oxytocin measurement batch (Figure 3A). These genome-wide analyses yielded a lambda of 1.008, suggesting adequate control of population stratification in our population (Figure 3B).

Figure 3:

Figure 3:

Genome-wide Common variant analysis of the SOARS-B cohort for association with plasma oxytocin. A) Manhattan plot showing 14 SNPs associated with plasma oxytocin (1 × 10−5) and B) Q-Q plot of our data showing appropriate control of population stratification.

Although no SNPs reached genome-wide significance, fourteen SNPs were associated with plasma OT at a threshold of 1 × 10−5, of which seven were intronic, four intergenic, two downstream of genes, and one in an annotated regulatory region (Table 2).

Table 2:

Genome-wide suggestive SNP loci results from association with pre-treatment natural log-transformed plasma oxytocin.

SNP Chr (hg19) Position (hg19) Alleles Beta (95% CI) P-Value Freq Nearest Gene(s)
rs1780315 1 21863956 G/A −0.26 (−0.37 – −0.15) 7.9E-06 0.27 ALPL
rs12036829 1 45285664 A/G 0.56 (0.33 – 0.78) 2.2E-06 0.06 BTBD19, PTCH2, RNU5E-6P
rs62260734 3 104979397 A/G 0.36 (0.21 – 0.50) 2.8E-06 0.13 ALCAM
rs11785337 8 1169491 A/G 0.29 (0.17 – 0.42) 8.5E-06 0.22 DLGAP2
rs7017524 8 139593796 A/C 0.31 (0.18 – 0.45) 8.0E-06 0.16 COL22A1
rs75796442 10 13006376 G/A 0.43 (0.25 – 0.60) 3.0E-06 0.09 CCDC3
rs803565 12 108786534 G/C 0.28 (0.17 – 0.39) 3.0E-06 0.24 CMKLR1
rs2559883 12 108807177 G/A 0.31 (0.18 – 0.45) 6.5E-06 0.15 CMKLR1
rs56208353 12 109297829 A/G 0.54 (0.32 – 0.77) 6.5E-06 0.05 DAO
rs7331972 13 60115787 A/C −0.64 (−0.92 – −0.37) 8.6E-06 0.05 RNU7–88P
rs9940013 16 6113392 A/G −0.41 (−0.58 – −0.24) 3.2E-06 0.09 RBFOX1
rs6500746 16 6113709 A/G −0.33 (−0.45 – −0.21) 2.9E-07 0.16 RBFOX1
rs8052564 16 6115382 A/C −0.40 (−0.56 – −0.23) 4.5E-06 0.09 RBFOX1
rs11645768 16 6120149 G/A −0.40 (−0.57 – −0.24) 4.0E-06 0.09 RBFOX1

Alleles displayed as effect allele/reference allele

CI is confidence interval.

Beta, CI & P-Value report on the additive genetic model effects, adjusted for sex, functional strata, ancestry principal components, and oxytocin measurement batch.

Freq is the allele frequency of the effect allele in the analysis population.

The most significant polymorphism, rs6500746, falls within the first intron of the RNA binding Fox-1 Homolog 1 gene (RBFOX1), and had a negative association with plasma OT levels (β = −0.33, p-value 2.9 × 10−7) (Supplementary Figure 2). Three additional common RBFOX1 variants exhibited similar directions of effect at a suggestive significance threshold (rs9940013, rs8052564, and rs11645768) (Figure 4). These four variants fall within a 7 kb region of the large first intron of RBFOX1 and are included in three haplotypes commonly found in individuals with European ancestry as reported by LDlink82. Conversely, a SNP in the first intron of DLGAP2, a gene that has previously been associated with ASD83, displayed a positive association with plasma OT in our study population (rs11785337, β = 0.29, p-value 8.5 × 10−6).

Figure 4:

Figure 4:

Locus Zoom plot for RBFOX1, the most significantly associated region with plasma oxytocin levels using a common SNP approach.

Genotype Analyses within Pre-Defined Genes of Interest

Variants within genic regions defined by pathways of interest (Supplemental Methods) were filtered for those with at least three minor alleles observed in our analysis population and tested for association with plasma oxytocin. Interestingly, all the six variants with a suggestive association with plasma OT were carried by individuals whose ancestry was self-reported as African (n = 3), no self-reported ancestry (n = 1) or mixed (n = 1) ancestry (Table 3).

Table 3:

Genome-wide suggestive SNP loci (within genes of interest) results from association with pre-treatment natural log-transformed plasma oxytocin.

SNP Chr (hg19) Position (hg19) Alleles Beta (95% CI) P-Value Freq Gene
rs3842724 11 2185556 A/G 1.14 (0.66 – 1.61) 5.0E-06 0.011 TH
rs17124695 14 52339300 G/A 1.27 (0.74 – 1.80) 6.2E-06 0.009 GNG2
rs17124713 14 52349410 A/G 1.27 (0.74 – 1.80) 6.2E-06 0.009 GNG2
rs17092983 14 52357476 A/G 1.27 (0.74 – 1.80) 6.2E-06 0.009 GNG2
rs7342769 16 23845262 G/A 1.27 (0.74 – 1.80) 6.2E-06 0.009 PRKCB
rs7186490 16 24288512 G/A 1.05 (0.61 – 1.49) 5.9E-06 0.014 CACNG3

The most significant SNP from this analysis, rs3842724, falls within exon 14 of the Tyrosine Hydroxylase (TH) gene and is associated with a relatively larger increase in plasma OT levels (β = 1.14, p-value 4.98 × 10−6). The ‘A’ effect allele has an AFLA-estimated84 global MAF of ~0.008, with higher representation in African and African American genomes (0.07 – 0.09). Three additional suggestive variants, rs17124695, rs17124713, and rs17092983, fall within a 18,176 bp region of G Protein Sub-Unit Gamma 2 (GNG2). This apparent haplotype is present in ~5.8% of individuals with African ancestry as reported in LDLink82 and is associated with a β-value of 1.27 in the three heterozygous carriers of the G, A, A minor alleles, respectively.

Another significant SNP, rs7186490 (β = 1.05, p-value 5.9 × 10−6), falls in the first intron of the Voltage-Dependent Calcium Channel Gamma-3 subunit (CACNG3). Like the other top variants, the AFLA-estimated frequency of the minor A-allele of rs7186490 is virtually absent in European genomes (0%) and more common in African and African American genomes (~9%). Our cohort contained five heterozygous carriers of the A-allele with a study MAF of 0.014, making it one of our more common variants among the suggestive polymorphisms from the targeted analysis.

The variant rs7342769 is located ~2,000 bp upstream of Protein Kinase C Beta (PRKCB) and associated with increased levels of plasma OT (β = 1.27, p-value 6.2 × 10−6, study MAF = 0.009). ALFA estimates show a low global prevalence of the G allele (MAF = 0.0048), and it is extremely rare in European populations (MAF = 0.000384). However, it has a relatively higher prevalence in African / African American populations (MAF = 0.075 – 0.089), and all G-allele carriers in this study are of self-report African or African American ancestry.

Several associations were statistically less significant but exhibited much higher MAFs within our study population. These include variants in GABBR1 (rs926552, MAF = 0.12, β = 0.3151, p-value <10−3, Global MAF=0.10) and ADCY2 (rs326153, MAF = 0.055, β = 0.54, p-value <10−3, Global MAF=0.04), which exhibit relatively high population frequencies in both our study and in the general population.

The R package SKAT85 was used to examine the association of rare variants aggregated at the gene level with plasma OT by including rare variants (those with a minor allele count of 1 to those with a minor allele frequency of 1%) that passed quality control and were present within our genes of interest. Three genes (ESR1, GNG2, and PLCL1) passed a family-wise error threshold of 0.1 and had nominal p-values ranging from 1.1 × 10−4 to 3.0 × 10−4 (Table 4) akin to data from the GNG2 region (Supplementary Table 8).

Table 4:

Candidate gene SKAT results (FWER<0.1) from association with pre-treatment natural log-transformed plasma oxytocin.

Gene Name hg19 Coordinates (Ensembl) Num. SNPs P-Value
ESR1 chr6:151977826–152450754 63 1.1E-04
GNG2 chr14:52292913–52446060 42 1.4E-04
PLCL1 chr2:198669426–199437305 99 3.0E-04

Targeted Variant Analyses

None of the eleven targeted genotype assays were significantly associated with plasma OT levels, failing to replicate the findings of previous studies (Supplementary Table 3).

Association of Methylation at OXTR Locus

In analyses examining the relationship between pre-treatment plasma OT levels and methylation at the OXTR locus, 172 participants had complete data available after quality control. There was no significant association between plasma OT levels and the three CpGs individually (−901, p=0.74, −924, p = 0.11 & −934, p = 0.41), as well as the mean methylation of all three CpGs (p = 0.47) (Supplementary Table 4A) with a comparison to our previous data, including normal controls (Supplementary Table 4B); the design described in Supplementary Table 5.

CNV Burden Testing Analyses

Rare CNV burden was not significantly associated with plasma OT in any CONCUR or basic linear model analysis (Supplementary Tables 6 and 7). Furthermore, among the generalized linear model analyses, only rare deletion and duplication CNV burden, when modeled as total number of CNVs, had a nominal negative association with pre-treatment plasma OT (β = −0.0005, p-value 0.03).

Genomic, Transcriptome and Methylome Pathway Analyses

Significant associations (FDR-BH < 0.10) were detected across all the included gene sets (Gene Ontology terms: Biological Process, Cellular Component, Molecular Function; MSigDB – Hallmark, MSigDB – KEGG). The top five significant associations (when available) for each pathway are presented in (Table 5 and 6) and unfiltered results with the leading-edge genes are provided in (Supplementary Data 1). There was very little overlap between the leading edges of the significant transcriptomic and DNA-methylation gene sets (Supplementary Data 2) indicating that these signatures were unlikely to represent direct interactions between DNA methylation and transcriptional activity.

Table 5:

Differential DNA methylation: Top 5 Gene-Set Enrichment Results

Gene Ontology: Biological Process

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

GOBP_BIOLOGICAL_ADHESION 1.12367E-07 0.000840616 0.704975715 −0.219562561 −1.553156862 1436
GOBP_POSITIVE_REGULATION_OF_TRANSCRIPTION_BY_RNA_POLYMERASE_II 3.38547E-06 0.005776737 0.62725674 0.203939162 1.496668795 1157
GOBP_ENZYME_LINKED_RECEPTOR_PROTEIN_SIGNALING_PATHWAY 3.86094E-06 0.005776737 0.610526878 −0.219887211 −1.528302828 1044
GOBP_REGULATION_OF_INTRACELLULAR_SIGNAL_TRANSDUCTION 6.56586E-06 0.008110581 0.610526878 −0.198906861 −1.419968897 1711
GOBP_CELL_MIGRATION 7.5891E-06 0.008110581 0.610526878 −0.206398076 −1.465245551 1473

Gene Ontology: Cellular Component

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

GOCC_CHROMOSOME 4.49452E-07 0.000444957 0.67496286 0.194572882 1.461162041 1600
GOCC_GOLGI_APPARATUS 5.46809E-06 0.002706706 0.610526878 −0.203172284 −1.441837216 1510
GOCC_CELL_SUBSTRATE_JUNCTION 1.95579E-05 0.004840579 0.575610261 −0.26666842 −1.693822137 416
GOCC_ORGANELLE_SUBCOMPARTMENT 4.12881E-05 0.008175035 0.557332239 −0.194566332 −1.388581146 1660
GOCC_ENDOSOME 0.000114933 0.016630538 0.538434096 −0.214013128 −1.469702478 919

Gene Ontology: Molecular Function

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

GOMF_DNA_BINDING_TRANSCRIPTION_FACTOR_ACTIVITY 5.45438E-08 3.10536E-05 0.719512826 0.206697777 1.529734161 1384
GOMF_ENZYME_BINDING 8.45945E-06 0.002768905 0.593325476 −0.196680992 −1.416300136 1880
GOMF_DEMETHYLASE_ACTIVITY 9.72683E-06 0.002768905 0.593325476 −0.589662296 −2.375087322 35
GOMF_RIBONUCLEOTIDE_BINDING 1.39626E-05 0.003406877 0.593325476 −0.195099045 −1.399089233 1799
GOMF_T_CELL_RECEPTOR_BINDING 3.44433E-05 0.006960575 0.557332239 0.778807333 2.314727522 11

MSigDB: Hallmark

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

HALLMARK_APICAL_JUNCTION 0.000113861 0.005693038 0.538434096 −0.311598909 −1.787660398 193
HALLMARK_UV_RESPONSE_UP 0.002474518 0.061862952 0.431707696 −0.286876533 −1.582574506 154
HALLMARK_P53_PATHWAY 0.003919572 0.065326199 0.407017919 −0.271085488 −1.555232629 193

MSigDB: KEGG

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

KEGG_VIRAL_MYOCARDITIS 0.000927501 0.089503858 0.477270815 0.375260335 1.861713018 68

Table 6:

Differential Gene Expression: Top 5 Gene-Set Enrichment Results

Gene Ontology: Biological Process

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

GOBP_MRNA_METABOLIC_PROCESS 9.26351E-13 6.78459E-09 0.910119735 0.338938499 1.922851013 519
GOBP_RNA_CATABOLIC_PROCESS 2.81343E-10 1.03028E-06 0.814035838 0.392875545 2.082959607 255
GOBP_COTRANSLATIONAL_PROTEIN_TARGETING_TO_MEMBRANE 8.00142E-09 1.17205E-05 0.747739663 0.580372281 2.494997418 70
GOBP_CELLULAR_MACROMOLECULE_LOCALIZATION 1.45707E-08 1.52451E-05 0.747739663 0.251329207 1.496753872 1025
GOBP_PROTEIN_LOCALIZATION_TO_ORGANELLE 3.53532E-08 2.87696E-05 0.719512826 0.294298521 1.678544037 528

Gene Ontology: Cellular Component

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

GOCC_RIBONUCLEOPROTEIN_COMPLEX 1.10683E-12 1.06366E-09 0.910119735 0.359556877 2.009491699 428
GOCC_RIBOSOMAL_SUBUNIT 2.16899E-07 0.00010422 0.690132459 0.439186056 2.072398909 124
GOCC_MITOCHONDRIAL_PROTEIN_CONTAINING_COMPLEX 7.40086E-07 0.000237074 0.659444398 0.411009054 1.981108469 137
GOCC_MITOCHONDRION 4.35682E-06 0.000752714 0.610526878 0.243333456 1.435184235 790
GOCC_INNER_MITOCHONDRIAL_MEMBRANE_PROTEIN_COMPLEX 7.25062E-06 0.000922239 0.610526878 0.53667146 2.164560593 54

Gene Ontology: Molecular Function

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

GOMF_STRUCTURAL_CONSTITUENT_OF_RIBOSOME 9.49255E-09 7.85509E-06 0.747739663 0.485914734 2.263711078 109
GOMF_RNA_BINDING 9.22281E-09 7.85509E-06 0.747739663 0.257416001 1.521953405 961
GOMF_RECEPTOR_REGULATOR_ACTIVITY 2.8698E-05 0.011949712 0.575610261 −0.436819672 −1.900958901 105
GOMF_ELECTRON_TRANSFER_ACTIVITY 4.38963E-05 0.012914201 0.557332239 0.482611113 1.995992607 58
GOMF_G_PROTEIN_COUPLED_RECEPTOR_ACTIVITY 4.68189E-05 0.012914201 0.557332239 −0.441050596 −1.916698929 103

MSigDB: Hallmark

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

HALLMARK_MYC_TARGETS_V1 5.74695E-05 0.002873475 0.557332239 0.366392807 1.777097663 142
HALLMARK_PANCREAS_BETA_CELLS 0.00169365 0.03386272 0.455059867 0.762546654 1.928485959 9
HALLMARK_APOPTOSIS 0.002278523 0.03386272 0.431707696 0.34059792 1.554611214 102
HALLMARK_MTORC1_SIGNALING 0.003050991 0.03386272 0.431707696 0.315377768 1.511938527 135
HALLMARK_KRAS_SIGNALING_DN 0.003386272 0.03386272 0.431707696 −0.47915741 −1.698994381 43

MSigDB: KEGG

pathway pval padj log2err ES NES size

KEGG_RIBOSOME 5.63025E-08 1.08664E-05 0.719512826 0.577292459 2.387472926 59
KEGG_PARKINSONS_DISEASE 5.81096E-06 0.000560758 0.610526878 0.521886761 2.125596999 55
KEGG_PROTEIN_EXPORT 5.40296E-05 0.002606928 0.557332239 0.748066781 2.160791581 14
KEGG_SPLICEOSOME 9.15509E-05 0.002944886 0.538434096 0.411937356 1.852261229 87
KEGG_NEUROACTIVE_LIGAND_RECEPTOR_INTERACTION 0.000867047 0.020917515 0.477270815 −0.487634644 −1.829077848 51

Multi-Omics Analyses

The integrated omic analysis did not reveal additional correlation among the individual omic platforms as the individual omics datasets retained their respective information and did not inform upon one another. The resulting MOFA+ factors were each dominated by one input dataset, with the gene expression dataset having the predominant variance explained over all factors and the genotype dataset having the lowest (<10%; data not shown). In univariate models, factors 6, 8, 12 & 17 met an FDR-adjusted p-value < 0.10, but after testing all factors in models adjusting for oxytocin measurement batch, factors 8 (β=0.30, p-value=0.009), 11 (β=0.06, p-value=0.026), and 16 (β=0.09, p-value=0.040) were nominally significant with positive associations at an unadjusted p-value of 0.05 but not after FDR adjustment (Supplementary Table 9). These nominally significant factors represented the individual inputs of methylation (factors 8 and 16) and gene expression (factor 11) datasets.

DISCUSSION

Our study represents the most comprehensive genetic, epigenetic, and transcriptomic analysis of endogenous plasma OT levels to date. Our findings provide important insights into the genetic underpinnings of oxytocin signaling and the peripheral correlates of circulating oxytocin with gene expression and DNA methylation. They help to address a paucity of currently available data about the molecular regulation of endogenous oxytocin in humans. Targeted genotype analyses identified several variants located in genes from the oxytocin signaling pathway and other closely related pathways, and additional candidates were identified at a suggestive threshold in the unbiased genome-wide analysis. Some of these variants overlap with annotated ASD risk genes and show functional enrichment in Ca2+ related activity in dopamine and oxytocin signaling pathways. The associations between these variants and plasma OT levels in humans, albeit suggestive, are novel and substantially broaden the number of candidate genes that are now associated with endogenous oxytocin levels. In contrast, gene expression and DNA methylation results did not identify any individual genes or methylation markers that were associated with plasma oxytocin. However, both datasets did show intriguing patterns of pathway enrichment that could indicate a role for plasma OT in modulating a wide array of biological processes in the periphery, particularly in the domains of cell adhesion, immune activity, and cell-to-cell signaling.

Genotype Results

Unlike the peripheral methylation and expression data, genotypes that are associated with plasma OT levels could indicate neurologically associated mechanisms. Prior to our study, only a small number of variants had been suggestively associated with plasma OT levels. Two previous studies identified a borderline association between rs2254298, which is in the third intron of OXTR, and plasma OT levels in individuals with ASD86, 87, but these were not significant after correction for multiple testing. A third study identified an association with rs12625893, which is located ~20 kb downstream of OXT, in a study cohort with obesity and impaired glucose tolerance 61. The failure to replicate the findings of these studies is likely due to several factors including heterogeneity in age88, sex89, and ancestry. In the case of the 2019 Weingarten et al. study49, our cohorts differed substantially. The Weingarten was older (mean age 47), had a much higher proportion of women (55%), a much larger non-ASD cohort (n = 721), and a different ancestral composition. Similarly, the subjects in the 2011 Feldman et al.77 study were balanced between male and female subjects (55% women), had a larger cohort (n = 352) of individuals with Israeli-Jewish ancestry, and were older (21 to 37 years). The 2017 Yang et al. study78 had a similarly sized cohort composed of 55 subjects with ASD and 110 typically developing (TD) subjects that served as the basis for their comparisons but was composed entirely of individuals with Han Chinese ancestry. Importantly, the authors note the large number of studies identifying rs2254298 as a risk locus for ASD, but also conflicting results for the risk alleles depending on the study cohort and its ancestral composition. Finally, while these studies used similar protocols for measuring OT levels to our own, there is a growing understanding that the commonly used ELISA-based oxytocin assays can produce inconsistent results and are very sensitive to protocol modifications90, which makes replication more challenging.

The SOARS-B study, from which our samples were derived29, allowed us to include non-Caucasian participants to identify suggestive genetic associations that might be unique to specific ancestries. The benefit of this approach is reflected in multiple suggestive associations that were only present in individuals of self-report African ancestry. The top hit in this category is for the A allele of rs3842724 in tyrosine hydroxylase (TH), which is associated with a large increase of plasma OT in A-allele carriers (β = 1.14). This is of particular interest because TH is responsible for catalyzing L-tyrosine into L-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine and is the rate-limiting enzyme in the biosynthesis of catecholamines, including dopamine91. In humans, approximately 40% of neuronal cells in the SON and PVN of the hypothalamus show positive immunostaining for TH, and there is substantial overlap between TH+ and OXT+ magnocellular neurons, which are the primary source for oxytocin release in the brain92. In rats, activation of dopamine receptors in the PVN stimulates the release of oxytocin and impacts the activity of mesolimbic dopaminergic neurons93. Changes in TH levels or functionality in these neurons may impact the autoregulatory positive feedback loop between dopamine and oxytocin release94 and contribute to the increased levels of plasma OT observed in the A-allele carriers in our study.

We also identified increased plasma OT in C-allele carriers of rs7186490, which is in the Calcium Voltage-Gated Channel Auxiliary Sub-Unit Gamma 3 (CACNG3) gene. CACNG3 is a component of one of the calcium channels that opens in response to OXTR activation. This leads to depolarization and the subsequent release of oxytocin and other neuropeptides from the activated neuron. This is an important mechanism for regulating activity in the hypothalamic-neurohypophysial system, which is heavily influenced by voltage-gated Ca2+ channel density95 and impacts the release of oxytocin96; however, there is very little published data on the role of CACNG3 in the brain. Two recent studies implicated CACNG3 in addiction97 and memory deficits98 in the hippocampus, both of which have also been associated with disruptions to oxytocin signaling. These findings point towards a potential role for CACNG3 in the activation of oxytocin-associated neurons, its broader overlap with glutamatergic signaling, and modulation of OT release via Ca2+ depolarization, which might contribute to the increased plasma OT levels observed in the five C-allele carriers of rs7186490.

There is less autism related literature for G Protein Subunit Gamma 2 (GNG2), which was associated with a similarly large increase (β = 1.27) in 3 heterozygous carriers of the “GAA” haplotype across variants rs17092983, rs17124695, and rs1712471399, 100. GNG2 is predicted to downregulate both Ca2+ channel activity and adenylate cyclase activity while upregulating phospholipase C activity, which is one of the first downstream targets of OXTR. Interestingly, the three carriers of the GNG2 GAA haplotype were also carriers of the G allele of rs7342769 in PRKCB, a direct downstream target of OXTR that modulates multiple secondary pathways including MAPK, Ras, and calcium ion signaling, with broad activity in the brain through the phosphorylation of target proteins101. These two genes are on separate chromosomes, so the overlap of these three individuals is not based on linkage disequilibrium but could be driven by genetic background. Notably, PRKCB is also a strong candidate for ASD, with several studies supporting its association102104.

While all suggestive associations in the targeted analyses were centered around a relatively small number of individuals of self-reported African or multiracial ancestry, there was a borderline candidate allele with a much higher frequency within our cohort. The A-allele of rs926552 in the Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Type B Receptor Subunit 1 gene (GABBR1) was represented in our cohort by one homozygous carrier and 40 heterozygous carriers (study MAF = 0.12 vs. ALFA estimated global MAF = 0.1) and associated with a moderate increase in plasma OT (β = 0.31, p = 1.58 × 10−4)104106. GABBR1 expression levels107, 108 and methylation levels109 are also significantly altered in the brains of individuals with ASD.

Among the results of the genome-wide analysis, the association between the A-allele carriers of rs6500746 in the RNA Binding Fox-1 Homolog 1 gene (RBFOX1) and reduced plasma OT (β = −0.33) is the most robust. Functionally, RBFOX1 encodes an RNA-binding protein that regulates tissue specific nuclear RNA splicing110112 and enhances cytoplasmic mRNA stability113, however it is also strongly associated with ASD114. Knockout of Rbfox1 in vitro and using in vivo mouse models results in abnormal brain development, with deficits in radial migration of cortical neurons, dendritic arborization, and electrophysiological characteristics115, 116. At the time of writing, there are no published connections between RBFOX1 and oxytocin signaling or plasma OT in the literature. However, a recent study shows that RBFOX1 regulates synaptic transmission and excitatory-inhibitory (E/I) balance117, which could have a direct impact on the release of oxytocin based on activity-dependent release.

Finally, we established that the A-allele of rs11785337 was associated with a moderate increase in plasma OT (β = 0.29, study MAF = 0.22). The SNP is located within the DLG Associated Protein 2 gene (DLGAP2) that has a suggestive link to ASD118, 119. The DLGAP2 encodes a membrane-associated protein that serves as a major a structural component (along with DLGAP1, 3 and 4) of the post-synaptic density, where it impacts glutamatergic signaling activity120. A CRISPR-based silencing of DLGAP2 in an in vitro model of iPSC-derived excitatory neurons revealed reduced spontaneous excitatory postsynaptic currents, which further implicates the gene in maintaining E/I balance121. Signatures of this disruption are also present in a mouse Dlgap2(−/−) model of ASD, in which double-knockout mice exhibit increased aggressive and dominance-related behavior, altered dendritic spine density, decreased peak amplitude in excitatory post-synaptic current, and reduced post-synaptic density122.

The gene level analyses of rare variants further supported the association of plasma OT with GNG2 and identified an association with Estrogen Receptor 1 (ESR1) and Phospholipase C-like 1 (PLCL1). ESR1 was previously shown to regulate OT signaling during gestation and parturition123, 124 and variation in ESR1 is associated with social interaction and emotional regulation in individuals with ASD125, but it has not been previously associated with circulating OT levels. Similarly, PLCL1 has been associated with ASD126 and plays an inhibitory role in uterine contraction through modulation of the OT signaling pathway127, but has not been reported in modulating plasma OT levels. These findings build upon a growing body of evidence for the roll of these genes in OT signaling and social behavior.

Gene Expression and DNA Methylation

Gene Expression

The gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of changes in peripheral gene expression associated with differences in plasma OT identified several immune-related pathways, including “immune response”, “immune activation”, “protein tracking”, and “catabolic processes/oxidative phosphorylation”. These findings corroborate a growing body of research that suggest an immunoregulatory role of oxytocin in both CNS and peripheral contexts128, and a functional and mechanistic coupling between the immune and neuroendocrine system more broadly129. Cytokines like IL-1, IL-2, IL-6, interferon-gamma, and transforming growth factor-beta are produced by hypothalamic cells130, which may play a role in mediating the production and release of neuropeptides131.

All but 1 of the 26 significant GO:BP associations(adjusted p value <0.1, see Supplementary Data 2) were positively associated with plasma OT levels. This overarching trend of increased transcriptional activity with plasma OT could indicate a relationship between neuronal oxytocin production and enhanced immune system activity that has been reported in ASD132134. This type of interaction has been observed more directly using in vitro models, such as uterine smooth muscle cells, which increase the expression of OXTR following exposure to IL-6135, or in cultured microglia, which increase OXTR expression in response to bacterial endotoxin and show reduced activation when pre-treated with endogenous oxytocin136.

G protein coupled receptor activity was also enriched in the GO and molecular function annotations and negatively associated with plasma oxytocin. These findings may also overlap at a functional level with the broader implication of immune system activity with plasma OT levels. Immune cells rely heavily on GPCR signaling to navigate137 and regulate context-specific inflammatory processes138. Terms related to secretion were positively enriched, including “secretory granule”, “vesicle”, and “vesicle lumen”, which have functional roles in releasing neuropeptides and hormones from the neuroendocrine system and effector molecules in the peripheral immune system.

Methylation Results

Genome-Wide Methylation

DNA methylation is generally considered to be a more stable molecular measure than gene expression139. Based upon prior reports, correlations between blood and brain methylation markers appear to be poor, with one study showing ~7% of CpGs significantly correlated between blood and brain tissue140. Even so, peripheral markers that are not directly correlated with brain methylation could still be useful if they are altered due to neurological phenotypes that can affect the periphery, such as variation in plasma OT levels. In the case of OXTR, positions −901, −924, and −934 were we previously reported to be hypermethylated in both peripheral blood mononuclear cells and post-mortem cortical samples of individuals with ASD, leading to the idea that early developmental insults could impact OXTR methylation prior to establishing the primordial germ layers55, and that those changes in methylation are maintained into adulthood.

As was the case in the gene expression analysis, we did not find any probe-level (CpG resolution) methylation associations with plasma OT after correcting for multiple testing, nor did we find any associations in the aggregated regional analysis. However, GSEA identified several enriched terms. Within the Hallmark gene set, genes involved in apical junctions were negatively enriched, which is consistent with the broader theme of cell adhesion terms that were present in the gene expression analysis. Of the 46 GO biological pathway results, there was positive enrichment of DNA methylation with plasma OT in 13 pathways that was largely associated with early embryonic / organ-level development and morphogenesis. Among the negatively enriched pathways, there are several terms that point to neuronally associated processes (i.e., axon development, receptor localization to synapse), which implies that, in aggregate, peripheral hypermethylation in these pathways may be associated with lower levels of plasma oxytocin. Interestingly, “demethylase activity” was the top negatively enriched gene set in the GO molecular function analysis and included several KDM-family genes. These genes are lysine-specific histone demethylases that broadly regulate gene expression and DNA repair. Deletions and splice variants of KDM5-family enzymes have recently been associated with intellectual disability and mild ASD141. Finally, GO cellular component results largely aligned with the significant pathways identified in the biological pathway and molecular function analyses. As was the case in the biological pathway results, we once again see negative enrichment in terms like “axon”, reflecting a potential connection to neuronally relevant mechanisms in the brain.

Targeted OXTR Methylation

The initial findings by our group55 generated significant interest around the three differentially methylated sites in the promoter region of OXTR (−901, −924, −934) and subsequent findings continue to suggest that this region has a role in regulating oxytocin signaling in the brain. Methylation levels between these sites are tightly correlated and have consistently been implicated in regulating OXTR expression142. Furthermore, a recent study suggested that hypermethylation in −934 and −924 moderated the way that early life stress affects brain activity when anticipating rewards143. Our findings are consistent with our 2009 study43, which indicated similar methylation levels at these three CpG sites in subjects with ASD, but significantly less in typically developing controls (Supplementary Table 4B). Associations between OXTR methylation and peripheral OT levels have also been inconsistent, though trends indicate that there is likely no association between the two at these sites133,134. Although our data support this lack of association, we still see evidence for differential methylation at these sites related to autism, but we must conclude that this association is not operating through baseline oxytocin levels.

This study had several limitations. The 290-person study cohort was insufficiently powered for genome-wide statistical analyses and further complicated by the diverse array of ages, ancestries, and the inclusion of both sexes. As a result, we may have missed small or moderate effect size associations with plasma OT levels, particularly for probe-level analyses, and our suggestive findings should be interpreted accordingly.

We also acknowledge the limitations of using peripheral blood samples to identify biomarkers for OT production, particularly in the gene expression and DNA methylation analyses. We chose this approach because it enabled the simultaneous collection of samples for the molecular and plasma OT analyses from a tissue with demonstrated responsiveness to exogenous OT. 135. Several studies in separate fields have shown peripheral expression and DNA methylation profiles can be informative of states in the brain145, 146, and that blood provides the largest number of significantly correlated methylation sites between the periphery and the brain (~20% of measured CpGs)147. These findings align with our prior work, which demonstrated hypermethylation of a subset of CpGs in the MT2 region of OXTR that was present in both peripheral blood and post-mortem brain samples from individuals with ASD43.

Similarly, there are conflicting reports on how well peripheral OT levels reflect those of the central nervous system. A meta-analysis of 17 studies and 516 participants showed no correlation between peripheral and central OT under baseline conditions but did show significant correlations in response to intranasal OT and experimentally induced stress139. A separate study showed that peripheral OT levels were significantly and positively correlated with those in the brain, but only in three of the four assays tested, and none of the methods correlated with each other148. These results demonstrate the need for ongoing methods development and adds to the growing body of concerns surrounding the quantification of peripheral OT and the social contexts that moderate it, particularly in the context of its use as an intranasal therapeutic149.

Finally, we acknowledge that peripheral OT has a half-life of less than an hour and may not be adequately represented by a single time point sample, compounded by the inherent variability in measuring endogenous OT using available assays75, 150, 151.

Conclusions

Our genetic analyses identified several novel associations between plasma OT and variation in RBFOX1, DLGAP2, TH, GNG2, ESR1, and PLCL1. Many of these genes have been previously associated with ASD, but their interactions with oxytocin signaling are not well characterized. They represent a cross-section of biological roles that include Ca2+ depolarization, G protein / neuropeptide signaling, RNA-metabolism, and phospholipid cleavage all of which can be connected to oxytocin signaling or its downstream mechanisms. However, additional studies will be required to validate these findings, to understand the mechanisms through which they impact circulating OT levels. Our gene expression analyses did not identify significant associations between plasma OT and gene expression at the level of individual probes or genes. However, GSEA identified associations with broader patterns of pathway-level changes including immune function, mRNA metabolism, cell adhesion, and G protein signaling, among others. Similarly, no significant associations were found between individual DNA-methylation sites and plasma OT, but GSEA identified several significant terms that broadly overlap with those identified in the expression data, though with little overlap in the genes driving these associations. Collectively, these novel associations between genetic variants and biological pathways with plasma OT levels provide exciting new candidates for future studies and add to the growing body of knowledge related to the complex etiology of ASD and its interactions with OT signaling.

Supplementary Material

tS3
tS1
tS2
tS6
tS5
tS7
tS8
tS4
tS9
Supinfo3
Supinfo2
Supinfo1
Supinfo4

Acknowledgements

First and foremost, we would like to thank the participants of the SOARS-B clinical trial and their caretakers who made this research possible. We would also like to thank the clinical sites from Duke University, the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, Vanderbilt University, Massachusetts General Hospital, the Mount Sinai School of Medicine, and Seattle Children’s Hospital Research Institute that performed the recruitment, behavioral evaluations, and sample collections for the SOARS-B participants. Sheryl Walker, Ph.D., generated the plasma OT measurements. We would also like to thank David Layfield and the staff at Duke Biofluids Shared Resource, Dr. Devos and the rest of the staff at Duke’s Sequencing and Genomics Technologies Core, and the staff at the Duke Molecular Genomics core, particularly Karen Abramson, Stephanie Arvai, and Emily Hocke for their excellent support throughout the course of this study.

Funding

The authors disclose receipt of the following sources of financial support for the research, analysis, authorship, and publication described in this manuscript: This work was supported by the NIH through two R01 awards to support the SOARS-B phase 2 clinical trial (RFA-HD 12-196) and the subsequent molecular analysis of the samples from SOARS-B participants (R01-HD-088007) and by the Autism Speaks Weatherstone Fellowship (Grant # 10136).

Abbreviations:

OT

Oxytocin

ASD

Autism spectrum disorder

SON and PVN

Supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei

GWAS

Genome-wide association studies

CGI

CpG-island

SOARS-B

Study of Oxytocin in Autism and Reciprocal Social Behaviors

CEPH

Centre d’Etude du Polymorphism Humain

CNV

Copy number variation

fGSEA

Fast Gene Set Enrichment

MOFA+

Multi-Factor Omics Analysis +

MAF

Minor allele frequency

Footnotes

Declarations:

Declaration of Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Written parental consent and participant assent (when clinically appropriate) was obtained for all participants and the UNC Tracs Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) reviewed the safety data throughout the study. Analyses of the samples were carried out under two Duke IRBs (Pro00063950, Pro00016404).

Consent for publication

All authors have consented to publication

Availability of data and materials

Genotype data (dbGAP), expression and methylation data (GEO) will be uploaded upon acceptance of the manuscript. Data will also be available upon request

REFERENCES

  • 1.Gimpl G, Fahrenholz F. The oxytocin receptor system: structure, function, and regulation. Physiol Rev 2001; 81(2): 629–683. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Veening JG, de Jong T, Barendregt HP. Oxytocin-messages via the cerebrospinal fluid: behavioral effects; a review. Physiol Behav 2010; 101(2): 193–210. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Baskerville TA, Douglas AJ. Dopamine and oxytocin interactions underlying behaviors: potential contributions to behavioral disorders. CNS Neurosci Ther 2010; 16(3): e92–123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Quintana DS, Rokicki J, van der Meer D, Alnaes D, Kaufmann T, Cordova-Palomera A et al. Oxytocin pathway gene networks in the human brain. Nat Commun 2019; 10(1): 668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.McCarthy MM. Estrogen modulation of oxytocin and its relation to behavior. Adv Exp Med Biol 1995; 395: 235–245. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Acevedo-Rodriguez A, Mani SK, Handa RJ. Oxytocin and Estrogen Receptor beta in the Brain: An Overview. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2015; 6: 160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Tsuda MC, Nagata K, Sagoshi S, Ogawa S. Estrogen and oxytocin involvement in social preference in male mice: a study using a novel long-term social preference paradigm with aromatase, estrogen receptor-alpha and estrogen receptor-beta, oxytocin, and oxytocin receptor knockout male mice. Integr Zool 2018; 13(6): 698–710. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Crider A, Thakkar R, Ahmed AO, Pillai A. Dysregulation of estrogen receptor beta (ERbeta), aromatase (CYP19A1), and ER co-activators in the middle frontal gyrus of autism spectrum disorder subjects. Mol Autism 2014; 5(1): 46. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Dolen G, Darvishzadeh A, Huang KW, Malenka RC. Social reward requires coordinated activity of nucleus accumbens oxytocin and serotonin. Nature 2013; 501(7466): 179–184. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Mottolese R, Redoute J, Costes N, Le Bars D, Sirigu A. Switching brain serotonin with oxytocin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111(23): 8637–8642. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Muller CL, Anacker AMJ, Veenstra-VanderWeele J. The serotonin system in autism spectrum disorder: From biomarker to animal models. Neuroscience 2016; 321: 24–41. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Uzunova G, Pallanti S, Hollander E. Excitatory/inhibitory imbalance in autism spectrum disorders: Implications for interventions and therapeutics. World J Biol Psychiatry 2016; 17(3): 174–186. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Peris J, MacFadyen K, Smith JA, de Kloet AD, Wang L, Krause EG. Oxytocin receptors are expressed on dopamine and glutamate neurons in the mouse ventral tegmental area that project to nucleus accumbens and other mesolimbic targets. J Comp Neurol 2017; 525(5): 1094–1108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Qi J, Han WY, Yang JY, Wang LH, Dong YX, Wang F et al. Oxytocin regulates changes of extracellular glutamate and GABA levels induced by methamphetamine in the mouse brain. Addict Biol 2012; 17(4): 758–769. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Lopatina OL, Komleva YK, Gorina YV, Olovyannikova RY, Trufanova LV, Hashimoto T et al. Oxytocin and excitation/inhibition balance in social recognition. Neuropeptides 2018; 72: 1–11. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Pampillo M, del Carmen Diaz M, Duvilanski BH, Rettori V, Seilicovich A, Lasaga M. Differential effects of glutamate agonists and D-aspartate on oxytocin release from hypothalamus and posterior pituitary of male rats. Endocrine 2001; 15(3): 309–315. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Moos F, Poulain DA, Rodriguez F, Guerne Y, Vincent JD, Richard P. Release of oxytocin within the supraoptic nucleus during the milk ejection reflex in rats. Exp Brain Res 1989; 76(3): 593–602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Morris JF, Ludwig M. Magnocellular dendrites: prototypic receiver/transmitters. J Neuroendocrinol 2004; 16(4): 403–408. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Tribollet E, Charpak S, Schmidt A, Dubois-Dauphin M, Dreifuss JJ. Appearance and transient expression of oxytocin receptors in fetal, infant, and peripubertal rat brain studied by autoradiography and electrophysiology. J Neurosci 1989; 9(5): 1764–1773. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Bales KL, Plotsky PM, Young LJ, Lim MM, Grotte N, Ferrer E et al. Neonatal oxytocin manipulations have long-lasting, sexually dimorphic effects on vasopressin receptors. Neuroscience 2007; 144(1): 38–45. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Mairesse J, Gatta E, Reynaert ML, Marrocco J, Morley-Fletcher S, Soichot M et al. Activation of presynaptic oxytocin receptors enhances glutamate release in the ventral hippocampus of prenatally restraint stressed rats. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2015; 62: 36–46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Breton JD, Veinante P, Uhl-Bronner S, Vergnano AM, Freund-Mercier MJ, Schlichter R et al. Oxytocin-induced antinociception in the spinal cord is mediated by a subpopulation of glutamatergic neurons in lamina I-II which amplify GABAergic inhibition. Mol Pain 2008; 4: 19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Kombian SB, Hirasawa M, Mouginot D, Pittman QJ. Modulation of synaptic transmission by oxytocin and vasopressin in the supraoptic nucleus. Prog Brain Res 2002; 139: 235–246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Bakos J, Srancikova A, Havranek T, Bacova Z. Molecular Mechanisms of Oxytocin Signaling at the Synaptic Connection. Neural Plasticity 2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, van IJMH. Sniffing around oxytocin: review and meta-analyses of trials in healthy and clinical groups with implications for pharmacotherapy. Transl Psychiatry 2013; 3(5): e258. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Bernaerts S, Boets B, Bosmans G, Steyaert J, Alaerts K. Behavioral effects of multiple-dose oxytocin treatment in autism: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial with long-term follow-up. Mol Autism 2020; 11(1): 6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Yamasue H, Okada T, Munesue T, Kuroda M, Fujioka T, Uno Y et al. Effect of intranasal oxytocin on the core social symptoms of autism spectrum disorder: a randomized clinical trial. Mol Psychiatry 2020; 25(8): 1849–1858. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Guastella AJ, Gray KM, Rinehart NJ, Alvares GA, Tonge BJ, Hickie IB et al. The effects of a course of intranasal oxytocin on social behaviors in youth diagnosed with autism spectrum disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2015; 56(4): 444–452. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Sikich L, Kolevzon A, King BH, McDougle CJ, Sanders KB, Kim SJ et al. Intranasal Oxytocin in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder. N Engl J Med 2021; 385(16): 1462–1473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Parker KJ, Oztan O, Libove RA, Sumiyoshi RD, Jackson LP, Karhson DS et al. Intranasal oxytocin treatment for social deficits and biomarkers of response in children with autism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114(30): 8119–8124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Guastella AJ, Boulton KA, Whitehouse AJO, Song YJ, Thapa R, Gregory SG et al. The effect of oxytocin nasal spray on social interaction in young children with autism: a randomized clinical trial. Mol Psychiatry 2022: 1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Higashida H, Munesue T, Kosaka H, Yamasue H, Yokoyama S, Kikuchi M. Social Interaction Improved by Oxytocin in the Subclass of Autism with Comorbid Intellectual Disabilities. Diseases 2019; 7(1). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Husarova VM, Lakatosova S, Pivovarciova A, Babinska K, Bakos J, Durdiakova J et al. Plasma Oxytocin in Children with Autism and Its Correlations with Behavioral Parameters in Children and Parents. Psychiatry Investig 2016; 13(2): 174–183. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Modahl C, Green L, Fein D, Morris M, Waterhouse L, Feinstein C et al. Plasma oxytocin levels in autistic children. Biol Psychiatry 1998; 43(4): 270–277. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Bertsch K, Schmidinger I, Neumann ID, Herpertz SC. Reduced plasma oxytocin levels in female patients with borderline personality disorder. Horm Behav 2013; 63(3): 424–429. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Jobst A, Padberg F, Mauer MC, Daltrozzo T, Bauriedl-Schmidt C, Sabass L et al. Lower Oxytocin Plasma Levels in Borderline Patients with Unresolved Attachment Representations. Front Hum Neurosci 2016; 10: 125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Taylor SE, Saphire-Bernstein S, Seeman TE. Are plasma oxytocin in women and plasma vasopressin in men biomarkers of distressed pair-bond relationships? Psychol Sci 2010; 21(1): 3–7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Goldman M, Marlow-O’Connor M, Torres I, Carter CS. Diminished plasma oxytocin in schizophrenic patients with neuroendocrine dysfunction and emotional deficits. Schizophr Res 2008; 98(1–3): 247–255. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Plasencia G, Luedicke JM, Nazarloo HP, Carter CS, Ebner NC. Plasma oxytocin and vasopressin levels in young and older men and women: Functional relationships with attachment and cognition. Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019; 110: 104419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Heinrichs M, von Dawans B, Domes G. Oxytocin, vasopressin, and human social behavior. Front Neuroendocrinol 2009; 30(4): 548–557. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Carter CS, Kenkel WM, MacLean EL, Wilson SR, Perkeybile AM, Yee JR et al. Is Oxytocin “Nature’s Medicine”? Pharmacol Rev 2020; 72(4): 829–861. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Akdemir N, Cinemre FB, Cinemre H, Sevinc L, Aydemir B, Coban B et al. Polymorphism of the Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) Gene Affects the Circulating Oxytocin Receptor Levels in Late-Term Pregnancy in a Turkish Population. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2020; 85(4): 343–351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.LoParo D, Waldman ID. The oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with autism spectrum disorder: a meta-analysis. Mol Psychiatry 2015; 20(5): 640–646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Lerer E, Levi S, Salomon S, Darvasi A, Yirmiya N, Ebstein RP. Association between the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene and autism: relationship to Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales and cognition. Mol Psychiatry 2008; 13(10): 980–988. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Campbell DB, Datta D, Jones ST, Batey Lee E, Sutcliffe JS, Hammock EA et al. Association of oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene variants with multiple phenotype domains of autism spectrum disorder. J Neurodev Disord 2011; 3(2): 101–112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Di Napoli A, Warrier V, Baron-Cohen S, Chakrabarti B. Genetic variation in the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene is associated with Asperger Syndrome. Mol Autism 2014; 5(1): 48. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Rodrigues SM, Saslow LR, Garcia N, John OP, Keltner D. Oxytocin receptor genetic variation relates to empathy and stress reactivity in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009; 106(50): 21437–21441. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tops M, van Ijzendoorn MH, Riem MM, Boksem MA, Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ. Oxytocin receptor gene associated with the efficiency of social auditory processing. Front Psychiatry 2011; 2: 60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chen FS, Kumsta R, von Dawans B, Monakhov M, Ebstein RP, Heinrichs M. Common oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphism and social support interact to reduce stress in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2011; 108(50): 19937–19942. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Skuse DH, Lori A, Cubells JF, Lee I, Conneely KN, Puura K et al. Common polymorphism in the oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) is associated with human social recognition skills. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111(5): 1987–1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Parker KJ, Garner JP, Libove RA, Hyde SA, Hornbeak KB, Carson DS et al. Plasma oxytocin concentrations and OXTR polymorphisms predict social impairments in children with and without autism spectrum disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111(33): 12258–12263. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Kawamura Y, Liu X, Akiyama T, Shimada T, Otowa T, Sakai Y et al. The association between oxytocin receptor gene (OXTR) polymorphisms and affective temperaments, as measured by TEMPS-A. J Affect Disord 2010; 127(1–3): 31–37. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Davis MC, Horan WP, Nurmi EL, Rizzo S, Li W, Sugar CA et al. Associations between oxytocin receptor genotypes and social cognitive performance in individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 2014; 159(2–3): 353–357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Slane MM, Lusk LG, Boomer KB, Hare AE, King MK, Evans DW. Social cognition, face processing, and oxytocin receptor single nucleotide polymorphisms in typically developing children. Dev Cogn Neurosci 2014; 9: 160–171. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Gregory SG, Connelly JJ, Towers AJ, Johnson J, Biscocho D, Markunas CA et al. Genomic and epigenetic evidence for oxytocin receptor deficiency in autism. BMC Med 2009; 7: 62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Dadds MR, Moul C, Cauchi A, Dobson-Stone C, Hawes DJ, Brennan J et al. Methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene and oxytocin blood levels in the development of psychopathy. Dev Psychopathol 2014; 26(1): 33–40. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Unternaehrer E, Luers P, Mill J, Dempster E, Meyer AH, Staehli S et al. Dynamic changes in DNA methylation of stress-associated genes (OXTR, BDNF ) after acute psychosocial stress. Transl Psychiatry 2012; 2: e150. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kim YR, Kim JH, Kim MJ, Treasure J. Differential methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene in patients with anorexia nervosa: a pilot study. PLOS ONE 2014; 9(2): e88673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Puglia MH, Lillard TS, Morris JP, Connelly JJ. Epigenetic modification of the oxytocin receptor gene influences the perception of anger and fear in the human brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2015; 112(11): 3308–3313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Ebstein RP, Israel S, Lerer E, Uzefovsky F, Shalev I, Gritsenko I et al. Arginine vasopressin and oxytocin modulate human social behavior. Values, empathy, and fairness across social barriers. New York Academy of Sciences: New York, NY, US, 2009, pp 87–102. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Weingarten MFJ, Scholz M, Wohland T, Horn K, Stumvoll M, Kovacs P et al. Circulating Oxytocin Is Genetically Determined and Associated With Obesity and Impaired Glucose Tolerance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 104(11): 5621–5632. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Spanos M, Chandrasekhar T, Kim SJ, Hamer RM, King BH, McDougle CJ et al. Rationale, design, and methods of the Autism Centers of Excellence (ACE) network Study of Oxytocin in Autism to improve Reciprocal Social Behaviors (SOARS-B). Contemp Clin Trials 2020; 98: 106103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Grewen KM, Davenport RE, Light KC. An investigation of plasma and salivary oxytocin responses in breast- and formula-feeding mothers of infants. Psychophysiology 2010; 47(4): 625–632. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MA, Bender D et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet 2007; 81(3): 559–575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Ritchie ME, Phipson B, Wu D, Hu Y, Law CW, Shi W et al. limma powers differential expression analyses for RNA-sequencing and microarray studies. Nucleic Acids Res 2015; 43(7): e47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Abdulrahim JW, Kwee LC, Grass E, Siegler IC, Williams R, Karra R et al. Epigenome-Wide Association Study for All-Cause Mortality in a Cardiovascular Cohort Identifies Differential Methylation in Castor Zinc Finger 1 (CASZ1). J Am Heart Assoc 2019; 8(21): e013228. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Heiss JA, Just AC. Identifying mislabeled and contaminated DNA methylation microarray data: an extended quality control toolset with examples from GEO. Clin Epigenetics 2018; 10: 73. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Xiao L, Priest MF, Nasenbeny J, Lu T, Kozorovitskiy Y. Biased Oxytocinergic Modulation of Midbrain Dopamine Systems. Neuron 2017; 95(2): 368–384 e365. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Love TM. Oxytocin, motivation and the role of dopamine. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2014; 119: 49–60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Pedersen CA, Caldwell JD, Walker C, Ayers G, Mason GA. Oxytocin activates the postpartum onset of rat maternal behavior in the ventral tegmental and medial preoptic areas. Behav Neurosci 1994; 108(6): 1163–1171. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Demeter E, Sarter M. Leveraging the cortical cholinergic system to enhance attention. Neuropharmacology 2013; 64: 294–304. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Grilli M, Patti L, Robino F, Zappettini S, Raiteri M, Marchi M. Release-enhancing pre-synaptic muscarinic and nicotinic receptors co-exist and interact on dopaminergic nerve endings of rat nucleus accumbens. J Neurochem 2008; 105(6): 2205–2213. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Dan T KEGGREST: Client-side REST access to the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG). 2020; 1.30.1. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics 2010; 26(6): 841–842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Javor A, Riedl R, Kindermann H, Brandstatter W, Ransmayr G, Gabriel M. Correlation of plasma and salivary oxytocin in healthy young men - experimental evidence. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 2014; 35(6): 470–473. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Wang K, Li M, Hadley D, Liu R, Glessner J, Grant SF et al. PennCNV: an integrated hidden Markov model designed for high-resolution copy number variation detection in whole-genome SNP genotyping data. Genome Res 2007; 17(11): 1665–1674. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Dolgalev I msigdbr: MSigDB Gene Sets for Multiple Organisms in a Tidy Data Format. 7.2.1 edn2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Lee S, Emond MJ, Bamshad MJ, Barnes KC, Rieder MJ, Nickerson DA et al. Optimal unified approach for rare-variant association testing with application to small-sample case-control whole-exome sequencing studies. Am J Hum Genet 2012; 91(2): 224–237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Korotkevich G, Sukhov V, Budin N, Shpak B, Artyomov MN, Sergushichev A. An algorithm for fast preranked gene set enrichment analysis using cumulative statistic calculation. bioRxiv 2021: 060012. [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Argelaguet R, Velten B, Arnol D, Dietrich S, Zenz T, Marioni JC et al. Multi-Omics Factor Analysis-a framework for unsupervised integration of multi-omics data sets. Mol Syst Biol 2018; 14(6): e8124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Brucker A, Lu W, Marceau West R, Yu QY, Hsiao CK, Hsiao TH et al. Association test using Copy Number Profile Curves (CONCUR) enhances power in rare copy number variant analysis. PLoS Comput Biol 2020; 16(5): e1007797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Machiela MJ, Chanock SJ. LDlink: a web-based application for exploring population-specific haplotype structure and linking correlated alleles of possible functional variants. Bioinformatics 2015; 31(21): 3555–3557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Marshall CR, Noor A, Vincent JB, Lionel AC, Feuk L, Skaug J et al. Structural variation of chromosomes in autism spectrum disorder. Am J Hum Genet 2008; 82(2): 477–488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Phan YJ L, Zhang H, Qiang W, Shekhtman E, Shao D, Revoe D, Villamarin R, Ivanchenko E, Kimura M, Wang ZY, Hao L, Sharopova N, Bihan M, Sturcke A, Lee M, Popova N, Wu W, Bastiani C, Ward M, Holmes JB, Lyoshin V, Kaur K, Moyer E, Feolo M, and Kattman BL. ALFA: Allele Frequency Aggregator. National Center for Biotechnology Information, US National Library of Medicine 2020. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Seunggeun Lee ZZLMMW. SKAT: SNP-Set (Sequence) Kernel Association Test. 2020.
  • 86.Feldman R, Zagoory-Sharon O, Weisman O, Schneiderman I, Gordon I, Maoz R et al. Sensitive parenting is associated with plasma oxytocin and polymorphisms in the OXTR and CD38 genes. Biol Psychiatry 2012; 72(3): 175–181. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Yang S, Dong X, Guo X, Han Y, Song H, Gao L et al. Serum Oxytocin Levels and an Oxytocin Receptor Gene Polymorphism (rs2254298) Indicate Social Deficits in Children and Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Front Neurosci 2017; 11: 221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Zak PJ, Curry B, Owen T, Barraza JA. Oxytocin Release Increases With Age and Is Associated With Life Satisfaction and Prosocial Behaviors. Front Behav Neurosci 2022; 16: 846234. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Marazziti D, Baroni S, Mucci F, Piccinni A, Moroni I, Giannaccini G et al. Sex-Related Differences in Plasma Oxytocin Levels in Humans. Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health 2019; 15: 58–63. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.MacLean EL, Wilson SR, Martin WL, Davis JM, Nazarloo HP, Carter CS. Challenges for measuring oxytocin: The blind men and the elephant? Psychoneuroendocrinology 2019; 107: 225–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Daubner SC, Le T, Wang S. Tyrosine hydroxylase and regulation of dopamine synthesis. Arch Biochem Biophys 2011; 508(1): 1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Li YW, Halliday GM, Joh TH, Geffen LB, Blessing WW. Tyrosine hydroxylase-containing neurons in the supraoptic and paraventricular nuclei of the adult human. Brain Res 1988; 461(1): 75–86. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Succu S, Sanna F, Melis T, Boi A, Argiolas A, Melis MR. Stimulation of dopamine receptors in the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus of male rats induces penile erection and increases extra-cellular dopamine in the nucleus accumbens: Involvement of central oxytocin. Neuropharmacology 2007; 52(3): 1034–1043. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Dayanithi G, Sabatier N, Widmer H. Intracellular calcium signalling in magnocellular neurones of the rat supraoptic nucleus: understanding the autoregulatory mechanisms. Exp Physiol 2000; 85 Spec No: 75S–84S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Lemos JR, Ortiz-Miranda SI, Cuadra AE, Velazquez-Marrero C, Custer EE, Dad T et al. Modulation/physiology of calcium channel sub-types in neurosecretory terminals. Cell Calcium 2012; 51(3–4): 284–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Engelmann M, Landgraf R, Wotjak CT. The hypothalamic-neurohypophysial system regulates the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis under stress: an old concept revisited. Front Neuroendocrinol 2004; 25(3–4): 132–149. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Choi MR, Jin YB, Bang SH, Im CN, Lee Y, Kim HN et al. Age-related Effects of Heroin on Gene Expression in the Hippocampus and Striatum of Cynomolgus Monkeys. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci 2020; 18(1): 93–108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Bolton JL, Schulmann A, Garcia-Curran MM, Regev L, Chen Y, Kamei N et al. Unexpected Transcriptional Programs Contribute to Hippocampal Memory Deficits and Neuronal Stunting after Early-Life Adversity. Cell Rep 2020; 33(11): 108511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Stelzer G, Rosen N, Plaschkes I, Zimmerman S, Twik M, Fishilevich S et al. The GeneCards Suite: From Gene Data Mining to Disease Genome Sequence Analyses. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics 2016; 54(1): 1 30 31–31 30 33. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Bonham LW, Evans DS, Liu Y, Cummings SR, Yaffe K, Yokoyama JS. Neurotransmitter Pathway Genes in Cognitive Decline During Aging: Evidence for GNG4 and KCNQ2 Genes. Am J Alzheimers Dis Other Demen 2018; 33(3): 153–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Riley GR, Jang W, Rubinstein WS, Church DM et al. ClinVar: public archive of relationships among sequence variation and human phenotype. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42(Database issue): D980–985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Lintas C, Sacco R, Garbett K, Mirnics K, Militerni R, Bravaccio C et al. Involvement of the PRKCB1 gene in autistic disorder: significant genetic association and reduced neocortical gene expression. Mol Psychiatry 2009; 14(7): 705–718. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Thal LB, Tomlinson ID, Quinlan MA, Kovtun O, Blakely RD, Rosenthal SJ. Single Quantum Dot Imaging Reveals PKCbeta-Dependent Alterations in Membrane Diffusion and Clustering of an Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder/Autism/Bipolar Disorder-Associated Dopamine Transporter Variant. ACS Chem Neurosci 2019; 10(1): 460–471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Philippi A, Roschmann E, Tores F, Lindenbaum P, Benajou A, Germain-Leclerc L et al. Haplotypes in the gene encoding protein kinase c-beta (PRKCB1) on chromosome 16 are associated with autism. Mol Psychiatry 2005; 10(10): 950–960. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Vangeel EB, Pishva E, Hompes T, van den Hove D, Lambrechts D, Allegaert K et al. Newborn genome-wide DNA methylation in association with pregnancy anxiety reveals a potential role for GABBR1. Clin Epigenetics 2017; 9: 107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Lee C, Mayfield RD, Harris RA. Intron 4 containing novel GABAB1 isoforms impair GABAB receptor function. PLOS ONE 2010; 5(11): e14044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Fatemi SH, Folsom TD, Reutiman TJ, Thuras PD. Expression of GABA(B) receptors is altered in brains of subjects with autism. Cerebellum 2009; 8(1): 64–69. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Fatemi SH, Reutiman TJ, Folsom TD, Rooney RJ, Patel DH, Thuras PD. mRNA and protein levels for GABAAalpha4, alpha5, beta1 and GABABR1 receptors are altered in brains from subjects with autism. J Autism Dev Disord 2010; 40(6): 743–750. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Nardone S, Sams DS, Zito A, Reuveni E, Elliott E. Dysregulation of Cortical Neuron DNA Methylation Profile in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Cereb Cortex 2017; 27(12): 5739–5754. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Wamsley B, Jaglin XH, Favuzzi E, Quattrocolo G, Nigro MJ, Yusuf N et al. Rbfox1 Mediates Cell-type-Specific Splicing in Cortical Interneurons. Neuron 2018; 100(4): 846–859 e847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Pedrotti S, Giudice J, Dagnino-Acosta A, Knoblauch M, Singh RK, Hanna A et al. The RNA-binding protein Rbfox1 regulates splicing required for skeletal muscle structure and function. Hum Mol Genet 2015; 24(8): 2360–2374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Lake BB, Ai R, Kaeser GE, Salathia NS, Yung YC, Liu R et al. Neuronal subtypes and diversity revealed by single-nucleus RNA sequencing of the human brain. Science 2016; 352(6293): 1586–1590. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Lee JA, Damianov A, Lin CH, Fontes M, Parikshak NN, Anderson ES et al. Cytoplasmic Rbfox1 Regulates the Expression of Synaptic and Autism-Related Genes. Neuron 2016; 89(1): 113–128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Abrahams BS, Arking DE, Campbell DB, Mefford HC, Morrow EM, Weiss LA et al. SFARI Gene 2.0: a community-driven knowledgebase for the autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Mol Autism 2013; 4(1): 36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Hamada N, Ito H, Nishijo T, Iwamoto I, Morishita R, Tabata H et al. Essential role of the nuclear isoform of RBFOX1, a candidate gene for autism spectrum disorders, in the brain development. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 30805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Hamada N, Ito H, Iwamoto I, Morishita R, Tabata H, Nagata K. Role of the cytoplasmic isoform of RBFOX1/A2BP1 in establishing the architecture of the developing cerebral cortex. Mol Autism 2015; 6: 56. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Vuong CK, Wei W, Lee JA, Lin CH, Damianov A, de la Torre-Ubieta L et al. Rbfox1 Regulates Synaptic Transmission through the Inhibitory Neuron-Specific vSNARE Vamp1. Neuron 2018; 98(1): 127–141 e127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Chien WH, Gau SS, Liao HM, Chiu YN, Wu YY, Huang YS et al. Deep exon resequencing of DLGAP2 as a candidate gene of autism spectrum disorders. Mol Autism 2013; 4(1): 26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Xing J, Kimura H, Wang C, Ishizuka K, Kushima I, Arioka Y et al. Resequencing and Association Analysis of Six PSD-95-Related Genes as Possible Susceptibility Genes for Schizophrenia and Autism Spectrum Disorders. Sci Rep 2016; 6: 27491. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Rasmussen AH, Rasmussen HB, Silahtaroglu A. The DLGAP family: neuronal expression, function and role in brain disorders. Mol Brain 2017; 10(1): 43. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Deneault E, White SH, Rodrigues DC, Ross PJ, Faheem M, Zaslavsky K et al. Complete Disruption of Autism-Susceptibility Genes by Gene Editing Predominantly Reduces Functional Connectivity of Isogenic Human Neurons. Stem Cell Reports 2018; 11(5): 1211–1225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Jiang-Xie LF, Liao HM, Chen CH, Chen YT, Ho SY, Lu DH et al. Autism-associated gene Dlgap2 mutant mice demonstrate exacerbated aggressive behaviors and orbitofrontal cortex deficits. Mol Autism 2014; 5: 32. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Kim SC, Lee JE, Kang SS, Yang HS, Kim SS, An BS. The regulation of oxytocin and oxytocin receptor in human placenta according to gestational age. J Mol Endocrinol 2017; 59(3): 235–243. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Fleming JG, Spencer TE, Safe SH, Bazer FW. Estrogen regulates transcription of the ovine oxytocin receptor gene through GC-rich SP1 promoter elements. Endocrinology 2006; 147(2): 899–911. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Doi H, Fujisawa TX, Iwanaga R, Matsuzaki J, Kawasaki C, Tochigi M et al. Association between single nucleotide polymorphisms in estrogen receptor 1/2 genes and symptomatic severity of autism spectrum disorder. Res Dev Disabil 2018; 82: 20–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Zheng F, Liu G, Dang T, Chen Q, An Y, Wu M et al. GABA Signaling Pathway-associated Gene PLCL1 Rare Variants May be Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Neurosci Bull 2021; 37(8): 1240–1245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Peavey MC, Wu SP, Li R, Liu J, Emery OM, Wang T et al. Progesterone receptor isoform B regulates the Oxtr-Plcl2-Trpc3 pathway to suppress uterine contractility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118(11). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Yang HP, Wang L, Han L, Wang SC. Nonsocial functions of hypothalamic oxytocin. ISRN Neurosci 2013; 2013: 179272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.Dantzer R Neuroimmune Interactions: From the Brain to the Immune System and Vice Versa. Physiol Rev 2018; 98(1): 477–504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Savino W, Arzt E, Dardenne M. Immunoneuroendocrine connectivity: the paradigm of the thymus-hypothalamus/pituitary axis. Neuroimmunomodulation 1999; 6(1–2): 126–136. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Jankord R, Zhang R, Flak JN, Solomon MB, Albertz J, Herman JP. Stress activation of IL-6 neurons in the hypothalamus. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2010; 299(1): R343–351. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Goines P, Van de Water J. The immune system’s role in the biology of autism. Curr Opin Neurol 2010; 23(2): 111–117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Meltzer A, Van de Water J. The Role of the Immune System in Autism Spectrum Disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology 2017; 42(1): 284–298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Mitchell RH, Goldstein BI. Inflammation in children and adolescents with neuropsychiatric disorders: a systematic review. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2014; 53(3): 274–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Rauk PN, Friebe-Hoffmann U, Winebrenner LD, Chiao JP. Interleukin-6 up-regulates the oxytocin receptor in cultured uterine smooth muscle cells. Am J Reprod Immunol 2001; 45(3): 148–153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Yuan L, Liu S, Bai X, Gao Y, Liu G, Wang X et al. Oxytocin inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in microglial cells and attenuates microglial activation in lipopolysaccharide-treated mice. J Neuroinflammation 2016; 13(1): 77. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Lammermann T, Kastenmuller W. Concepts of GPCR-controlled navigation in the immune system. Immunol Rev 2019; 289(1): 205–231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Sun L, Ye RD. Role of G protein-coupled receptors in inflammation. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2012; 33(3): 342–350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Paziewska A, Dabrowska M, Goryca K, Antoniewicz A, Dobruch J, Mikula M et al. DNA methylation status is more reliable than gene expression at detecting cancer in prostate biopsy. Br J Cancer 2014; 111(4): 781–789. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Walton E, Hass J, Liu J, Roffman JL, Bernardoni F, Roessner V et al. Correspondence of DNA Methylation Between Blood and Brain Tissue and Its Application to Schizophrenia Research. Schizophr Bull 2016; 42(2): 406–414. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Lebrun N, Mehler-Jacob C, Poirier K, Zordan C, Lacombe D, Carion N et al. Novel KDM5B splice variants identified in patients with developmental disorders: Functional consequences. Gene 2018; 679: 305–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Danoff JS, Wroblewski KL, Graves AJ, Quinn GC, Perkeybile AM, Kenkel WM et al. Genetic, epigenetic, and environmental factors controlling oxytocin receptor gene expression. Clin Epigenetics 2021; 13(1): 23. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Gonzalez MZ, Wroblewski KL, Allen JP, Coan JA, Connelly JJ. OXTR DNA methylation moderates the developmental calibration of neural reward sensitivity. Dev Psychobiol 2021; 63(1): 114–124. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Elagoz Yuksel M, Yuceturk B, Karatas OF, Ozen M, Dogangun B. The altered promoter methylation of oxytocin receptor gene in autism. J Neurogenet 2016; 30(3–4): 280–284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Kulakova OG, Kabilov MR, Danilova LV, Popova EV, Baturina OA, Tsareva EY et al. Whole-Genome DNA Methylation Analysis of Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells in Multiple Sclerosis Patients with Different Disease Courses. Acta Naturae 2016; 8(3): 103–110. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Lee T, Lee H. Prediction of Alzheimer’s disease using blood gene expression data. Sci Rep 2020; 10(1): 3485. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 147.Rubin LH, Connelly JJ, Reilly JL, Carter CS, Drogos LL, Pournajafi-Nazarloo H et al. Sex and diagnosis specific associations between DNA methylation of the oxytocin receptor gene with emotion processing and temporal-limbic and prefrontal brain volumes in psychotic disorders. Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging 2016; 1(2): 141–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 148.Lefevre A, Mottolese R, Dirheimer M, Mottolese C, Duhamel JR, Sirigu A. A comparison of methods to measure central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations in human and non-human primates. Sci Rep 2017; 7(1): 17222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 149.Leng G, Ludwig M. Intranasal Oxytocin: Myths and Delusions. Biol Psychiatry 2016; 79(3): 243–250. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 150.Martins D, Gabay AS, Mehta M, Paloyelis Y. Salivary and plasmatic oxytocin are not reliable trait markers of the physiology of the oxytocin system in humans. Elife 2020; 9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 151.Valstad M, Alvares GA, Egknud M, Matziorinis AM, Andreassen OA, Westlye LT et al. The correlation between central and peripheral oxytocin concentrations: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2017; 78: 117–124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

tS3
tS1
tS2
tS6
tS5
tS7
tS8
tS4
tS9
Supinfo3
Supinfo2
Supinfo1
Supinfo4

Data Availability Statement

Genotype data (dbGAP), expression and methylation data (GEO) will be uploaded upon acceptance of the manuscript. Data will also be available upon request

RESOURCES